From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 9 11:10:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BB01525C for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:10:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24837 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 20:10:37 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id UAA54288 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 20:10:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C557D15105; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:10:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id EAA17888; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 04:10:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id EAA15227; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 04:10:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.55]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id EAA27481; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 04:10:17 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 7th patch] In-Reply-To: <20000103011347M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> References: <19991223014928J.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <19991228033918X.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000103011347M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000110041028T.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 04:10:28 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 5 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Patces to tcp seems to be working as I see the reports from testers. so I'll commit them. If there are problems, I'll backout the changes. Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 2: 3:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BA414FB8 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:03:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05936 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:03:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA77947 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:03:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF571509E; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id TAA00791; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:03:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id TAA08677; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:03:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.145]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id TAA29568; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:03:03 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: [Solicite review for KAME 9th patch] X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:03:32 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 19 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry for delay, but apps for tcp IPv6 is near to come, but before that, I would like to announce small patches related to libc rcmd support for people who wish to try such as openssh build with IPv6 support. http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/rcmd.20000113 The routes to above host seems to be unstable recently, so I also placed the diffs below. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~shin/rcmd.20000113 In the above patch, I added bindresvport2(), a general version of bindresvoprt(), because bindresvoprt() is IPv4 specific. Any comments are welcome. Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 6:58:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8938415587 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:57:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16324 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id PAA79049 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:57:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D8A152E0; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:56:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id XAA05112; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:56:02 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id XAA21246; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:56:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.202]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id XAA13099; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:56:00 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 9th patch] In-Reply-To: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> References: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:56:33 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Sorry for delay, but apps for tcp IPv6 is near to come, > but before that, I would like to announce small patches > related to libc rcmd support for people who wish to try such > as openssh build with IPv6 support. > > http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/rcmd.20000113 This seems to be necessary for openssh port committer, sumikawa, so I'll commit this soon. This is confirmed to work by him, and also in my local environment both for IPv4 and IPv6. Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 7: 6:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8961572D for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16487 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA79100 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:06:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4914155D9; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA18831; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:25 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 9th patch] Message-ID: <20000113160325.H16498@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>; from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp on Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 11:56:33PM +0900 Organisation: bART Internet Services B.V. Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000113 16:00], Yoshinobu Inoue (shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) wrote: >> Sorry for delay, but apps for tcp IPv6 is near to come, >> but before that, I would like to announce small patches >> related to libc rcmd support for people who wish to try such >> as openssh build with IPv6 support. >> >> http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/rcmd.20000113 > >This seems to be necessary for openssh port committer, sumikawa, >so I'll commit this soon. It looked alright based on my hasty reading of it, except one function actually has the same name as another function but with a 2 appended to it. Not one of the best solutions IMHO. Then again, I am no network code expert and this may be perfectly acceptable to others. =) -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 7:18:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68F1152E1 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:18:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16675 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:18:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA79144 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:18:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D336014E8E; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id AAA06259; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:17:30 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id AAA06441; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:17:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.70]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id AAA14066; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:17:28 +0900 (JST) To: asmodai@bart.nl Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 9th patch] In-Reply-To: <20000113160325.H16498@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113160325.H16498@lucifer.bart.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114001736Z.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:17:36 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 25 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >This seems to be necessary for openssh port committer, sumikawa, > >so I'll commit this soon. Sorry, I commited it and then I found your message. > It looked alright based on my hasty reading of it, except one function > actually has the same name as another function but with a 2 appended to > it. Not one of the best solutions IMHO. Is your concern about the naming issue? Then, something like following name is more permissible? bindresvport_sa(int sd, struct sockaddr *sa, int addrlen) Cheers, Yoshinobu Inoue > Then again, I am no network code expert and this may be perfectly > acceptable to others. =) > > -- > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator > bART Internet Services / > Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 11:48:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692814F0C for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:48:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20019 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:48:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id UAA80085 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:48:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97FF14FEA; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:47:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id EAA19590; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:47:54 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id EAA01477; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:47:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.54]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id EAA20424; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:47:52 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:48:25 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 46 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Apps for tcp IPv6 are still not all finished, but I decided to send patches for apps I have already confirmed to work, before review time disappear. (And sorry for last very short review time patches, and thanks for Asmodai for giving me a comment in such a short time.) Patches are placed below. http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/tcp-apps.20000114 http://www.FreeBSD.org/~shin/tcp-apps.20000114 They includes, -inetd -libutil -rlogin -rlogind -rshd -telnetd As far as I checked, those apps seems to be working over both IPv4 and IPv6. Ftp is still under testing. By the way, feature freeze 15th means -can put some feature until 14th midnight? or -can put some feature until 15th midnight? And I did it again, I added a new function realhostname2() which is protocol independent version of realhostname(), in libutil. If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. e.g. bindresvport_sa() realhostname_sa() Thanks, Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 11:55:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF1D14CC0 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:55:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20110 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:55:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id UAA80108 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:55:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8315039; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:54:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA20866; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:54:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:54:38 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Message-ID: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>; from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp on Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 04:48:25AM +0900 Organisation: bART Internet Services B.V. Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000113 20:50], Yoshinobu Inoue (shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) wrote: > > -can put some feature until 14th midnight? >or > -can put some feature until 15th midnight? The 15th 00:00 Freefall time? >And I did it again, >I added a new function realhostname2() which is protocol >independent version of realhostname(), in libutil. > >If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think >it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. >e.g. > bindresvport_sa() > realhostname_sa() I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous from the 2 appended versions. I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that we'll make a IPv6 API standard? Thanks for doing this shin. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 12:13:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B555B14E21 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:13:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20285 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA80191 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:13:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F3114D19; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:12:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA45463; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:12:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA24069; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:13:07 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001132013.NAA24069@harmony.village.org> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Cc: Yoshinobu Inoue , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:54:38 +0100." <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:13:07 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : The 15th 00:00 Freefall time? Traditionally it has been 18:00:01pm Jan 15th Pacific local time, which usually translates to 0:00:01 GMT Jan 16th, but since we're not cutting a release right at that time, I suspect that new features could be added for a couple hours either side of that and you could ask Jordan if you were in doubt. He's the traditional gatekeeper for things like this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 12:23:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4D314E42 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:23:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20434 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:23:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA80229 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:23:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA8514CA9; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:23:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA66695; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:48:25 +0900." <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:23:28 -0800 Message-ID: <66692.947795008@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > By the way, feature freeze 15th means > -can put some feature until 14th midnight? > or > -can put some feature until 15th midnight? Feature freeze means that no new feature work should be started. Work already in progress, like IPv6, can proceed right up to the code freeze date. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 12:28:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAF314E42 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:28:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20485 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:28:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA80254 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:28:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D025C15585; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:26:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id FAA20813; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:25:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id FAA13166; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:25:54 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.12]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id FAA20976; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:25:53 +0900 (JST) To: asmodai@bart.nl Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-Reply-To: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114052621L.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:26:21 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 19 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > bindresvport_sa() > > realhostname_sa() > > I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous > from the 2 appended versions. I prefer self describing names too. If there is no strong opinion, I'll just apply *_sa(). > I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere > already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that > we'll make a IPv6 API standard? > > Thanks for doing this shin. Thanks for commenting it Asmodai. (:-) Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 12:29:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3803015182 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20500 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:29:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA80268 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:29:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724AB15636; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:28:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id FAA08125; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:28:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id FAA24590; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:28:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.12]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id FAA20998; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:28:04 +0900 (JST) To: imp@village.org Cc: asmodai@bart.nl, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-Reply-To: <200001132013.NAA24069@harmony.village.org> References: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <200001132013.NAA24069@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114052837U.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:28:37 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Traditionally it has been 18:00:01pm Jan 15th Pacific local time, > which usually translates to 0:00:01 GMT Jan 16th, but since we're not > cutting a release right at that time, I suspect that new features > could be added for a couple hours either side of that and you could > ask Jordan if you were in doubt. He's the traditional gatekeeper for > things like this. > > Warner All rights, thanks for the info, (:-) Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 12:46:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EFC14BDC for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20663 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:45:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA80309 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:45:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7859915213; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:43:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA66827; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:42:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Warner Losh Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Yoshinobu Inoue , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:13:07 MST." <200001132013.NAA24069@harmony.village.org> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:42:56 -0800 Message-ID: <66824.947796176@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since I'm not laying down a tag for feature freeze, people can consider the freeze in effect when my message stating so hits their mailboxes. This should give everyone at least an extra 24-48 hours grace period to claim they haven't seen it yet. :-) - Jordan > In message <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Wer ven writes: > : The 15th 00:00 Freefall time? > > Traditionally it has been 18:00:01pm Jan 15th Pacific local time, > which usually translates to 0:00:01 GMT Jan 16th, but since we're not > cutting a release right at that time, I suspect that new features > could be added for a couple hours either side of that and you could > ask Jordan if you were in doubt. He's the traditional gatekeeper for > things like this. > > Warner > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 16:19:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44515271 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:19:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA22722 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 01:19:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id BAA81176 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 01:17:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5776015271; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:17:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9912-Fujitsu Gateway) id JAA06646; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:17:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from chisato.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id JAA13800; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:17:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dhcp7194.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp [10.18.7.194]) by chisato.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp (8.8.5+2.7Wbeta5/3.3W8chisato-970826) with ESMTP id JAA20785; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:17:22 +0900 (JST) To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-Reply-To: <66692.947795008@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <66692.947795008@zippy.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114091758R.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:17:58 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 18 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > By the way, feature freeze 15th means > > -can put some feature until 14th midnight? > > or > > -can put some feature until 15th midnight? > > Feature freeze means that no new feature work should be started. Work > already in progress, like IPv6, can proceed right up to the code > freeze date. > > - Jordan Oh, really? That is very good news! Then I'll be able to also merge v6 multicast routing. (:-) Thanks, Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 18:50:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B18F14DB7 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA25531 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 03:50:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id DAA81513 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 03:50:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from ind.alcatel.com (postal.xylan.com [208.8.0.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E37B1505E; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:49:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from mailhub.xylan.com (mailhub [198.206.181.70]) by ind.alcatel.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1 (ind.alcatel.com 3.0 [OUT])) with SMTP id SAA29143; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:48:32 -0800 (PST) X-Origination-Site: Received: from omni.xylan.com by mailhub.xylan.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (mailhub 2.1 [HUB])) id SAA14020; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:48:29 -0800 Received: from softweyr.com (dyn1.utah.xylan.com [198.206.184.237]) by omni.xylan.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1 (Xylan engr [SPOOL])) with ESMTP id SAA24558; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:47:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <387E8F5C.31958DE1@softweyr.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:52:12 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Cc: Yoshinobu Inoue , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > > -On [20000113 20:50], Yoshinobu Inoue (shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) wrote: > > > > -can put some feature until 14th midnight? > >or > > -can put some feature until 15th midnight? > > The 15th 00:00 Freefall time? I think the typical use in the past has been that "the 15th" means "whenever Jordan arrives to lay down the tag on the morning of the 16th". Pushing it too hard would still not be a good idea... > >If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think > >it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. > >e.g. > > bindresvport_sa() > > realhostname_sa() > > I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous > from the 2 appended versions. The _sa version hints at the reason why there are more arguments, rather than just implying there are more arguments. It's certain better than appending a "2" to the name. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 19:18:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D2714DE3 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:18:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA25672 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:18:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id EAA81578 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:18:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24F714CCB; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:16:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA68149; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:15:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Wes Peters Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Yoshinobu Inoue , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:52:12 MST." <387E8F5C.31958DE1@softweyr.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:15:52 -0800 Message-ID: <68146.947819752@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think the typical use in the past has been that "the 15th" means > "whenever Jordan arrives to lay down the tag on the morning of the > 16th". Pushing it too hard would still not be a good idea... Just to clarify this, as I previously stated there will be no tag. This is a feature freeze, not a code freeze. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jan 14 11:14: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25A115763 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:09:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11124 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:09:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id UAA84095 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:07:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from alsatian.cslab.vt.edu (alsatian.cslab.vt.edu [198.82.184.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D680615A28; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:52:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from john.baldwin.cx (pineapple.cslab.vt.edu [198.82.184.58]) by alsatian.cslab.vt.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14374; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:52:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200001141852.NAA14374@alsatian.cslab.vt.edu> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:52:30 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Yoshinobu Inoue Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 13-Jan-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: >>And I did it again, >>I added a new function realhostname2() which is protocol >>independent version of realhostname(), in libutil. >> >>If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think >>it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. >>e.g. >> bindresvport_sa() >> realhostname_sa() > > I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous > from the 2 appended versions. I also prefer the *_sa names to the *2 names. > I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere > already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that > we'll make a IPv6 API standard? I also second this, i.e. if there is a standard API we should be following that, but I suppose that it there was a standard you would already be following it. :) -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message