From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Mar 14 19:36:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D2537B8C9 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:36:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA03768 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 04:38:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id EAA12584 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 04:36:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB3E37C076 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:34:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA94942 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:34:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:34:03 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Time for an /etc/ipv6 directory? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, We're starting to get a lot of new files in /etc related to the IPV6 changes (which I think are a fabulous thing, don't get me wrong). Would it be worthwhile to follow the precedent of /etc/ssh and /etc/mail to lump these files together in their own directory? My personal feeling is that anything which needs 3 files or more should get a directory, and we just crossed that point with IPV6. Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message