From owner-freebsd-atm Tue Feb 22 8:30:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw.ust.hk (mailgw.ust.hk [143.89.14.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF29537B715 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 97Efcw@alumni.ee.ust.hk) Received: from imaila.ust.hk (imaila.ust.hk [143.89.14.173]) by mailgw.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA01230; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:23:16 +0800 (HKT) Received: from alumni.ee.ust.hk (sy5kts9-p46.ust.hk [143.89.227.146]) by imaila.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25213; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:27:51 +0800 (HKT) Message-ID: <38B2B9F8.53F07753@alumni.ee.ust.hk> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:31:52 +0800 From: Chris <97Efcw@alumni.ee.ust.hk> Organization: HahaCity X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Krukow , freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speedstream 3010 driver and PPPoATM References: <38872C2D.33FD6243@alumni.ee.ust.hk> <002001bf65a1$233f3c30$fbf8d7c3@alpha> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, Seems my ISP (CWHKT) is busy for her merging and I hope I will be given a connection in coming weeks. Meanwhile I am still looking for ways to use 3010 in my freebsd box. I find a 3010 driver for linux here: http://www.sfgoth.com/~mitch/linux/atm/lanai/ and instructions to setup PPPoATM in linux here (using the above driver): http://home4u.hongkong.com/_H4U/technology/internet/ultraline/pppoalinux1.html 1. Are there anybody working on porting the driver to freebsd? 2. If no, maybe I will have a try. However, where can I find information of porting a driver from linux to freebsd? 3. Also it seems that netgraph supports have to be added for PPPoATM. Where can I find more info on netgraph? (like API stuff) I hope I don't need to use linux finally. Thanks. Chris P.S. I haven't written any driver before. Karl Krukow wrote: > > I asked a guy who was developing a driver for the Speedstream3010, here is > the mails: - Remember please send me an e-mail if you get a connection to > your ISP working. > > This is what I asked him: > ------------------------ > Hi. > I saw that you're developing a driver for the Efficient Speedstreem 3010 > for FreeBSD. What is the status on this driver? Does it work? > Is there still people working on it? > > I'm very interested in this as my ISP offers an ADSL-service and I'm using > this card. I think it runs as PPP over ATM - do you know if this is > supported in FreeBSD at this time? > > Sincerely > - Karl Krukow > > kkrukow@post8.tele.dk > > -------------- > REPLY: > -------------- > No it does not currently work. During newbus integration some interfaces > have changed and driver is not up to date anymore. > > However, as i personally don't have 3010 (I have 3020 with DMT physical > part, but no documentation for admsp910), i havent been never able to > throughtfully test and complete it. > > In principle after som review and adding netgrahp support, it should > be quite easy to run PPP over ATM. > > best regards, > taavi > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Taavi Talvik | Internet: taavi@uninet.ee > Unineti Andmeside AS | phone: +372 6405150 > Ravala pst. 10 | fax: +372 6405151 > Tallinn 10143, Estonia | > > ________________________________________________________ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Chris <97Efcw@alumni.ee.ust.hk> > Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.atm,mpc.lists.freebsd.atm > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 4:38 PM > Subject: Speedstream 3010 driver and PPPoATM > > > Dear all, > > > > My ISP will provide me a 3010 for internet access and it will run > > PPPoATM. > > > > I get the driver from here: > > ftp://ftp.uninet.ee/pub/ATM/ > > > > I wanna ask if I have to use it on -current? Can I use it on -stable? > > > > Also, it is said that "the kernel synchronous PPP package has 90% of > > what is needed to do PPP over ATM". Where is the remaining 10%? Does > > it really work? or what is supported/not supported? > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Chris > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Wed Feb 23 3:27:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E5F37B845 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 03:27:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.100]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/21/00) with ESMTP id TAA16472 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:49:54 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/18/00) with ESMTP id TAA01518 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:49:49 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from CF-S21 (meseipc-abepad.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.17.139]) by imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id TAA11696 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:49:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Sender: ha006@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:55:55 +0900 To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org From: Hirofumi ABE Subject: Traffic shaping on HARP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Now, I use 3 PVCs among 4 sites, and use en drivers on FreeBSD2.2.8R. To cap the bandwidth of PVC, I use pvctxctl in ALTQ. But it is a problem that en drivers don't supports RFC1483 encapsulation. HARP supports RFC1483, but I think it doesn't have a way to cap the bandwidth of a PVC. Are there any good way to realize both RFC1483 encapsulation and traffic shaping for a PVC? How about the Linux? Thanks. Hirofumi ABE from Japan. 阿部裕文 < abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp > Tel:0422-59-3289 情報流通プラットフォーム研究所 Fax:0422-60-7815 メガメディアプロジェクト メガメディアサービス制御グループ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Wed Feb 23 5:29:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (inetfw.SonyCSL.Co.Jp [203.137.129.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E53637B880 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:29:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7Ws3/inetfw/2000012200/smtpfeed 1.01) with ESMTP id WAA39481; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:29:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7Ws3/hotaka/99101212) with ESMTP id WAA08083; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:29:47 +0900 (JST) To: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.5 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:29:47 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133) Lines: 17 Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hirofumi ABE wrote: > Now, I use 3 PVCs among 4 sites, and use en drivers on FreeBSD2.2.8R. > To cap the bandwidth of PVC, I use pvctxctl in ALTQ. > But it is a problem that en drivers don't supports RFC1483 encapsulation. If you are using en0, you have to set a flag to use LLC/SNAP encapsulation. # route add -iface 128.252.200.2 -link en0:3.0.0.c9 ^ 3 means AAL5/LLCSNAP If you are using pvc0, LLC/SNAP is added by default. Or, are you talking about a different thing by RFC1483? -Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Feb 24 0:40:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2235237BAED for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:40:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.100]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/21/00) with ESMTP id RAA26124; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/18/00) with ESMTP id RAA26191; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from CF-S21 (meseipc-abepad.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.17.139]) by imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id RAA08892; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:54 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Sender: ha006@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:46:59 +0900 To: Kenjiro Cho , freebsd-atm@freebsd.org From: Hirofumi ABE Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP Cc: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp In-Reply-To: <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 22:29 00/02/23 +0900, Kenjiro Cho wrote: >Hirofumi ABE wrote: > > Now, I use 3 PVCs among 4 sites, and use en drivers on FreeBSD2.2.8R. > > To cap the bandwidth of PVC, I use pvctxctl in ALTQ. > > But it is a problem that en drivers don't supports RFC1483 encapsulation. > >If you are using en0, you have to set a flag to use LLC/SNAP >encapsulation. > > # route add -iface 128.252.200.2 -link en0:3.0.0.c9 > ^ 3 means AAL5/LLCSNAP > >If you are using pvc0, LLC/SNAP is added by default. > >Or, are you talking about a different thing by RFC1483? Thanks! This is what I want. I confirmed BSD box using en drivers can be connected through cisco4000. This works very well when we use ping, telnet and http, but only ftp-data doesn't. The cisco seems to discard the data. Why only ftp-data cause? - hirofumi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Feb 24 3:51:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (inetfw.SonyCSL.Co.Jp [203.137.129.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805C037BA3C for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:51:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7Ws3/inetfw/2000012200/smtpfeed 1.01) with ESMTP id UAA88452; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:51:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7Ws3/hotaka/99101212) with ESMTP id UAA15505; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:51:54 +0900 (JST) To: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.5 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000224205153B.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:51:53 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133) Lines: 11 Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hirofumi ABE wrote: > I confirmed BSD box using en drivers can be connected through cisco4000. > This works very well when we use ping, telnet and http, but only ftp-data > doesn't. > The cisco seems to discard the data. > Why only ftp-data cause? Path MTU discovery? -Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Feb 24 19:50:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC55837BD51 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:50:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.100]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/21/00) with ESMTP id MAA23462; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:41 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/18/00) with ESMTP id MAA08666; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from CF-S21 (meseipc-abepad.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.17.139]) by imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id MAA26805; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000225124047.031acb10@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Sender: ha006@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:56:46 +0900 To: Kenjiro Cho , freebsd-atm@freebsd.org From: Hirofumi ABE Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP Cc: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp In-Reply-To: <20000224205153B.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 20:51 00/02/24 +0900, Kenjiro Cho wrote: >Hirofumi ABE wrote: > > I confirmed BSD box using en drivers can be connected through cisco4000. > > This works very well when we use ping, telnet and http, but only ftp-data > > doesn't. > > The cisco seems to discard the data. > > Why only ftp-data cause? > >Path MTU discovery? Thanks, I avoided the problem. I can't decide which box is wrong BSD or cisco, but the MTU size of 9180 seems to have some problems. Current configuration is following.. [Sender BSD] ifconfig en0 inet 192.168.10.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500 up route add -iface cisco64 -link en0:3.0.0.40 pvctxctl en0 64 -p 6975 route add -net 192.168.65.0 -gateway cisco64 [Cisco] enable conf t interface atm 0.5 point-to-point ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 64 0 64 aal5snap 3000 3000 3000 inarp exit interface atm 0.6 point-to-point ip address 192.168.65.1 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 64 0 64 aal5snap 3000 3000 3000 inarp exit disable [Receiver BSD] ifconfig en0 inet 192.168.65.72 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500 up route add -iface cisco65 -link en0:3.0.0.41 pvctxctl en0 65 -p 6975 route add -net 192.168.10.0 -gateway cisco65 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message