From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Aug 20 5:14:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E698C37B43E for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parish.my.domain ([62.253.90.158]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20000820121447.HFKX26680.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@parish.my.domain> for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 13:14:47 +0100 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA01245 for doc@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 13:14:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 13:14:44 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: tag in the docs Message-ID: <20000820131444.C254@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In the Programmers Tools tutorial there are several uses of the tag but it appears not to work: MS-DOS appears in the doc as: MS-DOS&trade Looking through the handbook and FAQ there is no special treatment of trademarks so the fix would appear to be simply removing the tags, but before I do can someone confirm whether or not this is a bug (I assume the tag should produce the "(TM)" symbol). Also, shouldn't we really acknowledge trademarks, either by using the "(TM)" symbol with each instance, or a global "All trademarks are the property of their respective owners" type statement in the header of each doc? -- 4.4 - The number of the Beastie ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message