From owner-freebsd-emulation  Sun Jan  9  6:18:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de (merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.1.23])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6BE15009
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Jan 2000 06:18:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rk@merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de)
Received: (from rk@localhost) 
	by merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3)
	id PAA02849 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org;
	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:18:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Ronald Kuehn <kuehn@rz.tu-clausthal.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:18:28 +0100
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: rt_sigsuspend (linux) needed for staroffice5 on -stable
Message-ID: <20000109151828.A2821@merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

I'm not sure this is the right list for this. I noted
that the staroffice5 port (tested with ports/german/staroffice5)
doesn't work under -stable (as of today). During installation
it tries to run setup.bin which dies with SIGSYS (12).
It turns out that it wants to call rt_sigsuspend.
This is not present in -stable as of now. Would it be
possible to MFC it? Yes, I read the mail from Marcel Moolenaar
from (1999-12-30) about it:

"rt_sigsuspend should not be implemented on -stable, because it breaks
 more than it fixes. setresuid is not implemented in -current (yet)."

So is there no chance at all to get staroffice 5.1a running on -stable?

Bye,
  Ronald


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message