From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Oct 15 8: 8:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FA237B66D for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 08:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id RAA21767; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 17:08:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13kooh-0006sX-00; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 16:31:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 16:31:11 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine update Message-ID: <20001015163111.A24077@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20001013144702.A15082@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:43:33PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:43:33PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > Oh. I am sad to hear that. (20001002 did not work for me either, it > > could not load its kernel after starting up. But as I mentioned it has > > since disappeared, maybe because it was a too problematic snapshot > > Strange. On my 4.1-RELEASE box I just downloaded 20001002 (with `make`) > and it compiles and runs fine after some updates to the port. OK, I downloaded it again, just to be sure. > > Hmmm. It is good that the problem got resolved, but I take both 4.1 and > > -CURRENT use the same gcc version... (2.95.2) Or am I missing something? > > AFAIK, -CURRENT uses a snapshot of GCC 2.96 which may have some bugs. It reports itself as 2.95.2. > >> ...and will send this to you, so that you can double check it. > > Yes, certainly! > > I built, installed and deinstalled, and ran Notepad, Calc, Solitaire and > Forte Agent on FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE with my current patch set for 20001002 > so I went ahead and submitted it as PR ports/21961. ;-) OK, I saw it and they have already been committed, but I was too busy yesterday migrating my whole system to a new (big) disk so I could only test now. > If you can give these patches a try on -CURRENT, I'd certainly appreciate > that! I tested the 20001002 snapshot both with and without your proposed patch-ge. (the other patches were applied in either case) Results: Without: The old "cannot load module kernel32.dll" error on startup. Wine unusable. (Maybe related to the GCC problem you discovered. The GCC on -CURRENT *is* affected by your PR on this topic according my test.) With: It starts up but dies with an X error BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes). (I am using XFree86-3.3.6) For reference, Wine-20000909 still works... I am sorry to tell you this. Maybe I will have the time to do some more debugging, but right now I must say that the 20001002 snapshot does not work on -CURRENT. Of course, it is more important to have a working implementation on -STABLE, so it was a good idea to update the port. Until then I will stick with 20000909... I hope to be able to get back to you on this soon. -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Oct 16 1:50:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.dante.org.uk (alpha.dante.org.uk [193.63.211.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDA737B66C; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 01:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from theta.dante.org.uk ([193.63.211.7]) by alpha.dante.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #4) id 13l5xc-0003M0-00; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:49:32 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dante.org.uk) by theta.dante.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #4) id 13l5xb-0006nn-00; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <39EAC11A.F6FBAFC8@dante.org.uk> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:49:30 +0100 From: Konstantin Chuguev Organization: Delivery of Advanced Networking Service to Europe Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Which GCC in CURRENT? [Was: Re: Wine update] References: <20001013144702.A15082@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> <20001015163111.A24077@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > > Hmmm. It is good that the problem got resolved, but I take both 4.1 and > > > -CURRENT use the same gcc version... (2.95.2) Or am I missing something? > > > > AFAIK, -CURRENT uses a snapshot of GCC 2.96 which may have some bugs. > > It reports itself as 2.95.2. > There are two directories in CURRENT's src/contrib: gcc and gcc.295 (the former is fresher). In src/gnu/{usr.bin|lib} appropriate Makefile.inc files set .PATH to .../.../gcc.295. There seems to be no way to switch to another GCC by editing just one line somewhere. Does anybody knows why there are two GCC in CURRENT? Regards, Konstantin. -- * * Konstantin Chuguev - Application Engineer * * Francis House, 112 Hills Road * Cambridge CB2 1PQ, United Kingdom D A N T E WWW: http://www.dante.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Oct 16 2:59:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF6137B66C; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 02:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id LAA17572; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:59:18 +0200 (MEST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13l72Y-0002Jq-00; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:58:42 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:58:42 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: Konstantin Chuguev Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which GCC in CURRENT? [Was: Re: Wine update] Message-ID: <20001016115842.F4302@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: Konstantin Chuguev , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20001013144702.A15082@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> <20001015163111.A24077@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> <39EAC11A.F6FBAFC8@dante.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <39EAC11A.F6FBAFC8@dante.org.uk>; from Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:49:30AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:49:30AM +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote: > > There are two directories in CURRENT's src/contrib: gcc and gcc.295 (the former is > fresher). In src/gnu/{usr.bin|lib} appropriate Makefile.inc files set .PATH to > .../.../gcc.295. > There seems to be no way to switch to another GCC by editing just one line > somewhere. > Does anybody knows why there are two GCC in CURRENT? Because there is a planned upgrade of the gcc to 2.96 sometime in the future. But the new gcc snapshot contained in that directory (which is also refreshed sometimes) is not yet ready for prime time. A gcc upgrade is a very delicate matter and must be planned carefully. Also, since 2.96 has not even been released yet, I assume the maintainer (bruce, AFAIK) just makes sure that it builds and compiles stuff OK and so by the time 5.0 will be released and hopefully 2.96 too, we just have to push the button and it will be there. If you look closely enough, you can also see two parallel gdb trees and at one time (before the upgrade to the latest release version) there also used to be two binutils dirs. I think this very careful approach on the part of the maintainer(s) makes sure that gcc (and binutils and libc) upgrades are so painless on FreeBSD, while they can be a significant PITA on Linux because of possible incompatibilities. -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Oct 16 4:21:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E437B66E; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 04:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.130.111.77] (taygeta [128.130.111.77]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00401; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:32 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: Konstantin Chuguev , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which GCC in CURRENT? [Was: Re: Wine update] In-Reply-To: <20001016115842.F4302@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Also, since 2.96 has not even been released yet, I assume the > maintainer (bruce, AFAIK) just makes sure that it builds and compiles > stuff OK and so by the time 5.0 will be released and hopefully 2.96 > too, we just have to push the button and it will be there. I can assert, with utmost authority ;-), that GCC 2.96 will never be released by the GCC team. See . > I think this very careful approach on the part of the maintainer(s) > makes sure that gcc (and binutils and libc) upgrades are so painless > on FreeBSD, while they can be a significant PITA on Linux because of > possible incompatibilities. Upgrades are not painless at all on FreeBSD, because of some additional hacks you/we are using. See the following two PRs for examples that cost me quite some time each (and are still open): http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20966 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21983 If the first PR is not resolved in time for the GCC 3.0 release process (which is not that far ahead), FreeBSD might even be dropped from the list of secondary evaluation platforms for GCC 3.0. :-( In any case, the bug does prevent regular GCC developers and testers from using FreeBSD -- not a good thing, either! :-( On the other hand, lately David O'Brien has submitted several patches for the FreeBSD ports to GCC, most (all?) of which have been reviewed and integrated quickly, so there is a good chance that the difference between the FreeBSD version of GCC and FSF GCC will be further reduced. :-) Should any of you have some time to spend, those two PRs I mentioned above are really critical. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Oct 18 7:59:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from hk.egroups.com (hk.egroups.com [208.50.99.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 171BC37B4D7 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-eGroups-Return: Princerhys@yahoo.com Received: from [10.1.10.114] by hk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2000 14:59:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:59:29 -0000 From: "Prince Rhys" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Wanted: Message-ID: <8skdsh+dhvv@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 320 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 209.184.251.110 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Here is a list of Roms I need Tenchi Muyo (english translated(SNES) Pokemon Gold (Fully Translated) Final Fantasy II. III (SNES) Secret of Mana (SNES) Sailor Moon (Genesis(Fully Translated) Any Hentai Video Game for SNES, Gameboy, Genesis, Linx, or NES If you could please answer my plea I would be much Greatful ^_^ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Oct 18 9:13:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from vbook.express.ru (vbook.express.ru [212.24.37.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013CD37B4CF for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vova@localhost) by vbook.express.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA12056; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:13:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from vova) From: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14829.52292.64898.425444@vbook.express.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:13:56 +0400 (MSD) To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problems with rtc port X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org /usr/ports/emulators/rtc# make install clean ... skip ... ===> Installing for rtc-2000.09.22 /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/modules /bin/mkdir -p /dev install -c -o root -g wheel -m 555 rtc.ko /usr/local/modules ===> Generating temporary packing list ** Missing package files for rtc-2000.09.22. *** Error code 1 Stop in /ext/ports/emulators/rtc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /ext/ports/emulators/rtc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /ext/ports/emulators/rtc. /usr/ports/emulators/rtc# -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Oct 18 15:16:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AC837B4D7; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA71889; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:15:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Szilveszter Adam , Konstantin Chuguev , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which GCC in CURRENT? [Was: Re: Wine update] Message-ID: <20001018151552.C71459@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20001016115842.F4302@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:21:33PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > Also, since 2.96 has not even been released yet, I assume the > > maintainer (bruce, AFAIK) just makes sure that it builds and compiles > > stuff OK and so by the time 5.0 will be released and hopefully 2.96 > > too, we just have to push the button and it will be there. > > I can assert, with utmost authority ;-), that GCC 2.96 will never be > released by the GCC team. Correct, and FreeBSD 5.0 will ship with 5.0+ release. The import and use of GCC 2.96(7) in FreeBSD-CURRENT is to support development of the IA-64, x86-64, and PPC ports. Since FreeBSD-CURRENT is not a release and is a tool to use in getting to 5.0, we didn't mind importing a non-released version of GCC. Note that FreeBSD's warning of don't expect stability in -CURRENT will also be very true of the this compiler. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Oct 20 6:43:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from susla.urania.ee (susla.urania.ee [195.222.24.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429A937B479 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urania.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by susla.urania.ee (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9KDhAG00394 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:43:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from tanel@urania.ee) Message-ID: <39F04BEE.8DD93034@urania.ee> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:43:10 +0200 From: Tanel Kuusk Organization: Urania Com =?iso-8859-1?Q?O=DC?= (http://www.urania.ee) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: et, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: vmware crashes 4.1.1-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I have been using vmware 2.0.1 happily on my 4.1-RELEASE box for a while now. Now i upgraded to -STABLE from around October 17th (using cvsup and make world) and vmware crashes the box just after power on (before showing the virtual BIOS copyright). I tried to upgrade and recompile vmware port also (now vmware 2.0.2, port 0.98, vmmon 0.21), but with no help. I also tried with and without rtc port, IPV6, if_tap.ko, still no luck. Finally i connected a serial console to my machine and managed to get the following output there: kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at vm_page_unqueue+0x40: decl 0(%eax) db> trace vm_page_unququ(c04d0ac0) at vm_page_unqueue+0x40 vm_page_wire(c04d0ac0,c62aabfc,c09961a2,36e5,c0938000) at vm_page_wire+0x22 host_lock_ppn(36e5,c0938000,c0938000,2918e000,c62aac18) at host_lock_ppn+0x23 HostIF_LockPage(c0938000,2918e000,c62aadbc,c0938000,18b4020) at HostIF_LockPage+0x92 Vmx86_LockPage(c0938000,2918e000,1,c62aadbc,c097f080) at Vmx86_LockPage+0x39 FreeBSD_Driver_Ioctl(c097f080,200056cf,c62aae80,3,c6229a80) at FreeBSD_Driver_Ioctl+0xf1 spec_ioctl(c62aadbc,c62aada4,c01ec741,c62aadbc,c62aae4c) at spec_ioctl+0x26 spec_vnoperate(c62aadbc,c62aae4c,c01768b8,c62aadbc,c0940100) at spec_vnoperate+0x15 ufs_vnoperatespec(c62aadbc,c0940100,cf,0,c0278360) at ufs_vnoperatespec+0x15 vn_ioctl(c0940100,200056cf,c62aae90,c6229a80,c0935800) at vn_ioctl+0x110 ioctl(c6229a80,c62aaf80,c62aaf2c,c0960be0,c6229a80) at ioctl+0x206 linux_ioctl_vmmon(c6229a80,c62aaf80,c6229a80,3,8306a18) at linux_ioctl_vmmon+0x1f2 linux_ioctl(c6229a80,c62aaf80,a,0,8306a18) at linux_ioctl+0x54 syscall2(2f,2f,2f,8306a18,0) at syscall2+0x205 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x25 db> panic Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x1e0600 fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01f66bc stack pointer = 0x10:0xc62aabbc frame pointer = 0x10:0xc62aabc4 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 protsessor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 3 current process = 365 (vmware) interrupt mask = net bio cam kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at vm_page_unqueue+0x40: decl 0(%eax) db> Hope this helps, since I am by far not a debugging expert. Any ideas what has changed since 4.1R that may cause it? Thanks, Tanel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Oct 20 18:37:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from spaceview.net (spaceview.net [216.122.88.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE6C37B479 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo (pm3-p04-wny-023.modempools.net [64.30.128.182]) by spaceview.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA13893 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 20:34:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000b01c03aff$374341c0$0201010a@apollo> Reply-To: "Nicholas D. Polcz" From: "Nicholas D. Polcz" To: Subject: BSDI's doscmd Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:35:33 -0400 Organization: SpaceView.Net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C03ADD.AD93C560" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C03ADD.AD93C560 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0008_01C03ADD.AD93C560" ------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C03ADD.AD93C560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would like to help in any way possable on the prject for running dos = app's under FreeBSD... Nicholas D. Polcz MIS / Project Manager SpaceView.Net ------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C03ADD.AD93C560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would like to help in any way possable on the prject for running = dos=20 app's under FreeBSD...
 
Nicholas D. Polcz
MIS / Project Manager
SpaceView.Net
------=_NextPart_001_0008_01C03ADD.AD93C560-- ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C03ADD.AD93C560 Content-Type: image/gif; name="grid.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <000601c03aff$349c3da0$0201010a@apollo> R0lGODlhKAAoAJH/AP///xgYGAAAAAAAACwAAAAAKAAoAAAChIyPqcspD2GIdFJ5cRY29/tVGzeG kal55bqhj0u2rCrX9A3Oub3jIv/znRrEIlEX7CmTzBPSCYQKU0tpldrEWrOvp/bbjYJj03CZfDWD jOw27O1Vc9FzuFi+zY/tZ36aroe3Fwc4eFcomIi46NZ4dOhXRxgZyDh5CYnZp/lHabiZGXpWAAA7 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C03ADD.AD93C560-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message