From owner-freebsd-fs Sun Apr 9 0:57: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from cs.columbia.edu (cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A684737B700; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 00:57:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ezk@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu) Received: from shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.15]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA01574; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 03:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ezk@localhost) by shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA29145; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 03:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 03:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200004090756.DAA29145@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> From: Erez Zadok To: Kris Kennaway Cc: John Estess , adrian@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd@unix-consult.org Subject: Re: UNIONFS In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 08 Apr 2000 14:08:57 PDT." Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message , Kris Kennaway writes: > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, John Estess wrote: > > > I've perused the mailing lists for the union fs and read the scant info > > in the D&I book, but I want to make sure there isn't a RFC or something > > for this fs. Is there some guidance besides the source code for this > > thing or is this a "let your conscience be your guide" scenario? > > There's no RFC, since it's not an internet service :-) What would be > useful in understanding what's going on are the papers by John Heidemann > on stacking layers: > > http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/WORK/index.html I've collected all relevant papers on stacking, which you can find on my FiST home page: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/research/fist/ and also in the URL ftp://shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/ezk/stacking.tar.gz Erez. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message