From owner-freebsd-ipfw  Mon Mar  6  7:40:29 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from lk.tempest.sk (lk.tempest.sk [195.28.100.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F349937BDAA
	for <ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  6 Mar 2000 07:40:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from lk@tempest.sk)
Received: (from koren@localhost)
	by lk.tempest.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA32568;
	Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:38:56 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from koren)
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:38:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <200003061538.QAA32568@lk.tempest.sk>
From: Ludo Koren <lk@tempest.sk>
To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org
Cc: luigi@info.iet.unipi.it, ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000303185412.70377A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	(message from Robert Watson on Fri, 3 Mar 2000 19:00:38 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: ipdivert and ethernet bridging
Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


      > I have a 3.4-STABLE box which I have enabled ethernet
      > bridging, bridging and ipfw, and also ipdivert, as I would
      > like to transform/process some packets as they pass through
      > the bridge using a userland process.  However, the results so
      > far seem not to be good--while the packet due indeed disappear
      > from processing at the divert rule, they never reappear
      > following it, or reach the userland process :-(.  Packets
      > originating locally on the bridge box seem to be processed
      > fine.

      > I was wondering if you had any thoughts on whether this should
      > be something that works, or how I could get it to work?  I'm
      > not averse to using -current instead, if necessary.


I have a patch for bridge. I am using forwarding to redirect packets
for squid. So far it is working well. If you are interested I can send
you the patch.

ludo


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message