From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jun 11 0:15:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D473A37B9D2 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:15:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA10119; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:16:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200006110716.JAA10119@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: LAN detection? In-Reply-To: <39433796.86535D51@fil.net> from Love Bug at "Jun 11, 2000 02:54:14 pm" To: Love Bug Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, troy@picus.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > We could parse the detail file for bytes delivered. Questions come to mind > about information originating with our site, or from our proxy... Is it > really fair to charge the same for this "cheap" bandwidth as well as for the > "expensive" bandwidth? well, your proxy is also getting things from the outside... certtainly you could differentiate charges based on source, but -glob- accounting is gonna become a nightmare! cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message