From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 1:53:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FAC37B793 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQ8P6GUKFQ0000JC@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:53:45 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 05 Jun 2000 10:53:44 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 10:53:40 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: New build instructions To: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75D5@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear FreeBSD Java people, I have revised the build instructions on my web site, integrating Timo's release building instructions into Greg's. It is one step closer to what would be called a "port" in the FreeBSD jargon. I hope you will find them useful. http://web.inter.nl.net/users/kjkoster/java/index.html Thank you all for your involvement. Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 9:31:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ADF37BE4A for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQ955S9D1M0000S3@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 18:31:20 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 05 Jun 2000 18:31:19 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 18:31:14 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: SIGSEV with FBSD 3.1 and linux-jdk-1.2 (pre-v2) To: 'Loic Mahe'' Cc: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75E6@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I am not sure if anyone has commented yet. > > I'm using FreeBSD 3.1 and I wanted to try JDK 1.2. > According to http://www.jmcm.org/tech/ports/linux_jdk.html, > I installed linux_base-5.2 and Blackdown 1.2pre-v2 JDK. > You will need to have linux_base 6.1 installed. I have had no reports that older linux emu's work. You can also find the blackdown port in /usr/ports/java/linux-jdk. You may have to update your ports tree for this. Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 15:40:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f232.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 257B637BE4E for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 15:40:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 94813 invoked by uid 0); 5 Jun 2000 22:40:26 -0000 Message-ID: <20000605224026.94812.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:40:26 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: FYI: Java Community Process (JCP) Revised Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 18:40:26 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: Sun has changed the community process for Java by allowing other vendors a greater say. Sun retains effective control (and "veto power" on Java specs). It is my understanding that the deadline for public review has past (was May 30th). Read more at: http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nsf/all/000602E4E2 Sun's Java Developer's site would probably also have more info, if you're interested. John ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 16:24:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f208.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.208]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95CAA37BE36 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:24:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 55758 invoked by uid 0); 5 Jun 2000 23:24:38 -0000 Message-ID: <20000605232438.55757.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Mon, 05 Jun 2000 16:24:38 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Apple, FreeBSD and the JCP Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 19:24:38 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: Below is Apple's comment concerning the new Java Community Process (JCP). Does this represent anything close to a Java port to FreeBSD? Is it in Apple's best interest to help the FreeBSD-Java team port JDK 1.2.2 and future JDK's? Does anyone think that Apple might voice FreeBSD, or FreeBSD-sympathetic, concerns/issues on the Java executive commitee? Apple has announced that they intend to track FreeBSD code as part of Darwin/OSX. While Apple is free to do whatever they like with FreeBSD code subject to the generous BSD license, just like anyone else, it would seem that one would *hope* that those who benefit most, would be supportive of the community. Apple's comment in Sun's JCP press release: "Apple's commitment to Java technology is strong - Mac OS X will ship with the Java 2 platform built-in, Java technology-based applications will be able to use the modern Aqua interface on Mac OS X, WebObjects 5 for Java will be built using 100 percent pure Java technology, and QuickTime for Java technology brings industry standard audio and video to Java technology-based applications," said Philip Schiller, Apple's vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "We are thrilled to be a part of the Java Community Process program's Executive Committee and plan to play a major role in shaping the future of Java technology through an open process." ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 16:34:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1305437B54C for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:34:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16054; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:34:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA05272; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:34:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006052334.QAA05272@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "John Daniels" Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apple, FreeBSD and the JCP In-Reply-To: <20000605232438.55757.qmail@hotmail.com> References: <20000605232438.55757.qmail@hotmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Below is Apple's comment concerning the new Java Community Process (JCP). > Does this represent anything close to a Java port to FreeBSD? Is it in > Apple's best interest to help the FreeBSD-Java team port JDK 1.2.2 and > future JDK's? Does anyone think that Apple might voice FreeBSD, or > FreeBSD-sympathetic, concerns/issues on the Java executive commitee? FWIW, there should be an announcement about Java/FreeBSD in the next couple of days coming out of JavaOne. It *just* came about, and I'm not allowed to say what exactly, but I think you'll be happily suprised. (And, if we're lucky, the promises in the annoucement may actually come true. :) :) :) However, that's not to say that we (the FreeBSD developmers) wouldn't also stand to gain something by partnering with Apple. Blackdown works with Sun, and IBM make their own JDK offering, so working with Apple might give us another Java option on FreeBSD. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 16:45: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA19037B84D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:44:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rooneg@rpi.edu) Received: from cortez.sss.rpi.edu (rooneg@cortez.sss.rpi.edu [128.113.113.33]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA150120 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 19:44:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (rooneg@localhost) by cortez.sss.rpi.edu (8.8.5/8.8.6) with SMTP id TAA22168 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 19:45:12 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: cortez.sss.rpi.edu: rooneg owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 19:45:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Rooney X-Sender: rooneg@cortez.sss.rpi.edu To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: linux jdk 1.3 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org so sun released their jdk1.3 for linux today, and as far as i can see it seems to be working fine under linux emulation (just need to change the java script to use /compat/linux/usr/bin/expr instead of /usr/bin/expr). all the programs i've tried have worked, but it's giving me a strange error message. whenever a thread exits (i think) it prints the following error message: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM warning: cannot uninstall alt signal stack does anyone have any idea what that means? anyway, it does seem to work though. assuming it passes a few more tests, it means i no longer have an excuse to keep linux on my laptop ;-) -garrett x----------------------------------------------------------------------x | rooneg@rpi.edu garrett rooney | | http://www.rpi.edu/~rooneg unix geek | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | unrequited love is neat because it lasts so much longer - w. t. c. | x----------------------------------------------------------------------x To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 17: 6:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBAB37BE57 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:06:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rooneg@rpi.edu) Received: from cortez.sss.rpi.edu (rooneg@cortez.sss.rpi.edu [128.113.113.33]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA240048 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:06:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (rooneg@localhost) by cortez.sss.rpi.edu (8.8.5/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA50308 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:06:42 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: cortez.sss.rpi.edu: rooneg owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:06:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Rooney X-Sender: rooneg@cortez.sss.rpi.edu To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux jdk 1.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote: > anyway, it does seem to work though. > > assuming it passes a few more tests, it means i no longer have an excuse > to keep linux on my laptop ;-) well, it works until i try and do anything with graphics ;-( then it gives this error message: Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x123)! in addition to the previous one, and nothing repaints. it may be something to do with the fact that i'm using XFree86 4.0, and i'm willing to bet the compiled with 3.6 -garrett x----------------------------------------------------------------------x | rooneg@rpi.edu garrett rooney | | http://www.rpi.edu/~rooneg unix geek | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | unrequited love is neat because it lasts so much longer - w. t. c. | x----------------------------------------------------------------------x To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 17:17:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155937BE32 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:17:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA311106; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:17:28 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20000605232438.55757.qmail@hotmail.com> References: <20000605232438.55757.qmail@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:17:57 -0400 To: "John Daniels" , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Apple, FreeBSD and the JCP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 7:24 PM -0400 6/5/00, John Daniels wrote: >Apple has announced that they intend to track FreeBSD code as part >of Darwin/OSX. While Apple is free to do whatever they like with >FreeBSD code subject to the generous BSD license, just like anyone >else, it would seem that one would *hope* that those who benefit >most, would be supportive of the community. Any decent support of Java would have to include GUI-related routines. What Apple needs to do for Java in MacOS 10 (which is to say, "Quartz/Aqua") is not going to be of any use when it comes to FreeBSD (which is to say, "X windowing system"). Now, Apple may want to support Java for Darwin, or maybe the Darwin community outside of Apple may want to make that happen. I am just noting that the Java-related work Apple does for MacOS 10 may not be of much help for Java on other BSD's. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 23:35:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from clefw.ra.rockwell.com (clefw.ra.rockwell.com [192.159.76.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9E037B61A for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkes@ra.rockwell.com) Received: from raclesmtp01.ra.rockwell.com (raclesmtp01.cle.ra.rockwell.com [130.151.192.220]) by clefw.ra.rockwell.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA27731 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 02:34:23 -0400 (EDT) From: mkes@ra.rockwell.com Subject: Forte for Java (aka NetBeans) is OpenSource To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 08:30:25 +0200 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on RACleSMTP01/Cleveland/RA/Rockwell(Release 5.0.2b (Intl)|16 December 1999) at 06/06/2000 02:23:02 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org FYI: I've got this from a friend who is working for Netbeans. Mira ----- Forwarded message from tboudreau@netbeans.com ----- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:37:01 +0200 From: tboudreau@netbeans.com Reply-To: eap-interest@developer.netbeans.com Subject: [NB-EAP] WWW.NETBEANS.ORG is live! To: eap-interest@developer.netbeans.com Hi, All, The NetBeans open source site, www.netbeans.org is now live. What's there: - The sources for Forte for Java CE Update Release 1 (CVS or tarball) - Sources and binaries for the "Jaga" 1.1 development branch - Mailing lists and discussion forums - Infrastructure for starting new projects/modules The sources are released under a variant of the Mozilla license - basically, Mozilla with the word "Netscape" changed to "Sun" and a few other changes. We're hoping a lot of you who've been involved in EAP will also get involved in the open source project. Thanks for your support, and hope to see you at JavaOne, Tim Boudreau NetBeans - Sun Microsystems ----------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://web.horde.org/imp/ -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please visit http://eap.netbeans.com/lists.html If you have any problems, please contact listmaster@developer.netbeans.com ----- End forwarded message ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Mon Jun 5 23:50: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from zeus.mipnet.org (zeus.mipnet.org [195.115.143.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E6637B61A for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 23:49:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from loic@twam.com) Received: from twamx.twam (sad-hermes-31.mipnet.org [195.115.76.46]) by zeus.mipnet.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04547; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:05:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from loic@localhost) by twamx.twam (8.9.2/8.9.2) id IAA56458; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 08:51:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from loic) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 08:51:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Loïc Mahé Message-Id: <200006060651.IAA56458@twamx.twam> To: K.J.Koster@kpn.com, mahe@twam.com Subject: RE: SIGSEV with FBSD 3.1 and linux-jdk-1.2 (pre-v2) Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75E6@l04.research.kpn.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Thanks for your answer. I'm on FreeBSD 3.1 and linux_base 6.1 doesn't work on this version. I'll have tu upgrade my system (damn !). OK, thanks anyway and goodbye. Loic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 0:14:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f275.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4316537C03B for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:14:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 87091 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2000 07:14:31 -0000 Message-ID: <20000606071431.87090.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:14:31 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: OpenJIT install Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 03:14:31 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: I got the following warning after I did the second gmake while installing OpenJIT for native JDK1.2.2 on a 4.0-STABLE machine: /work/build/freebsd/include-old -I/home/johnd/source-jdk1.2.2/work/build/freebsd/include-old/freebsd -I./CClassHeaders -DARCH=\"X86\" -DJDK_VERSION_STRING=\"1.2.2\" -c -o obj/rt-X86.o rt-X86.c rt-X86.c: In function `dispatchJVM': rt-X86.c:1027: warning: passing arg 7 of pointer to function from incompatible pointer type rt-X86.c: In function `OpenJIT_SignalHandler': rt-X86.c:2383: warning: unused variable `ebp' ld -G -o libOpenJIT.so obj/api.o obj/stubs.o obj/jdklink.o obj/rt-X86.o gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/johnd/OpenJIT-1.1.12' I followed the directions on kjkoster's website. Question: Is there a step missing? After the buildscript is run, the next paragraph is "Install and use" but there is no install command (like "gmake install"), only an "export PATH..." command. I would like to install PostgreSQL which, as described in an earlier post, installs one of two JDBC drivers, depending on the JDK installed. Has anyone done this (Edward Wolpert?) and/or how can I install the JDK1.2.2 like a port so that it will be detected (my guess: copy the release directory to /usr/local/jdk1.2.2; do something like a pkg_install). Should I have done this before I installed OpenJIT (since OpenJIT asks for the path to the JDK)? John John ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 3:59: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CF337B816 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 03:58:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from past@netmode.ece.ntua.gr) Received: from netmode.ece.ntua.gr (dolly.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.10]) by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01383; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:58:47 +0300 (EET DST) Received: by netmode.ece.ntua.gr (Postfix, from userid 410) id 09B5685C3; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:47:46 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:47:46 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas To: John Daniels Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenJIT install Message-ID: <20000606134746.A25825@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr References: <20000606071431.87090.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000606071431.87090.qmail@hotmail.com>; from jmd526@hotmail.com on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 03:14:31AM -0400 X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450 X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 03:14:31AM -0400, John Daniels wrote: > Hi: > > I got the following warning after I did the second gmake while installing > OpenJIT for native JDK1.2.2 on a 4.0-STABLE machine: > > /work/build/freebsd/include-old > -I/home/johnd/source-jdk1.2.2/work/build/freebsd/include-old/freebsd > -I./CClassHeaders -DARCH=\"X86\" -DJDK_VERSION_STRING=\"1.2.2\" -c -o > obj/rt-X86.o rt-X86.c > rt-X86.c: In function `dispatchJVM': > rt-X86.c:1027: warning: passing arg 7 of pointer to function from > incompatible pointer type > rt-X86.c: In function `OpenJIT_SignalHandler': > rt-X86.c:2383: warning: unused variable `ebp' > ld -G -o libOpenJIT.so obj/api.o obj/stubs.o obj/jdklink.o obj/rt-X86.o > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/johnd/OpenJIT-1.1.12' It is harmless (or it should be :-). > I followed the directions on kjkoster's website. > > Question: Is there a step missing? After the buildscript is run, the next > paragraph is "Install and use" but there is no install command (like "gmake > install"), only an "export PATH..." command. You should 'gmake install' after building. The page mentions this now that I looked. > I would like to install PostgreSQL which, as described in an earlier post, > installs one of two JDBC drivers, depending on the JDK installed. Has > anyone done this (Edward Wolpert?) and/or how can I install the JDK1.2.2 > like a port so that it will be detected (my guess: copy the release > directory to /usr/local/jdk1.2.2; do something like a pkg_install). Should > I have done this before I installed OpenJIT (since OpenJIT asks for the path > to the JDK)? That's right. If you do this before building OpenJIT and modify your PATH, OpenJIT should find you native 1.2.2 installation on its own. -past To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 5:42:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4448437B665 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 05:42:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQABGB8BXG0000U7@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:42:24 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 14:42:24 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 14:42:23 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: Re: linux jdk 1.3 To: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75F4@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for trying. I have included you findings on my web pages. http://web.inter.nl.net/users/kjkoster/java/index.html Scroll the blue bar to the bottom and click on "Blackdown Linux 1.3.0 Port". Let me know if you have any more information. Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. > -----Original Message----- > From: Garrett Rooney [mailto:rooneg@rpi.edu] > Sent: dinsdag 6 juni 2000 1:07 > To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: linux jdk 1.3 > > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote: > > > anyway, it does seem to work though. > > > > assuming it passes a few more tests, it means i no longer > have an excuse > > to keep linux on my laptop ;-) > > well, it works until i try and do anything with graphics ;-( > > then it gives this error message: > > Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x123)! > > in addition to the previous one, and nothing repaints. > > it may be something to do with the fact that i'm using > XFree86 4.0, and > i'm willing to bet the compiled with 3.6 > > -garrett > > x------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------x > | rooneg@rpi.edu > garrett rooney | > | http://www.rpi.edu/~rooneg > unix geek | > |------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------| > | unrequited love is neat because it lasts so much longer - > w. t. c. | > x------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------x > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 5:52:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C5937B665 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 05:52:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12zIqI-000LGI-0W for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:52:27 +0100 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id MAA17259 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:52:39 GMT Message-ID: <393CF476.1A0A98D8@olive.co.uk> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 13:54:14 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Query... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings fellow java/freebsd lovers :) My query is simple. How 'release-able' is the current 'port' of the JDK1.2.2? The reason for my question is that (triumph for FreeBSD) our Linux webserver box has been rooted and cannibalised. Usually I would take this kind of thing seriously, but (a) we have backups (b) it shows Linux for what it is and (c) my company may now take FreeBSD seriously, despite the fact that I administer our firewall (FreeBSD) and run it on my desktop with less problems than anyone else. We need to run our custom written Java software on it, and need to be able to run Servlets / JSP. Our systems are high end systems, and although it's probably not good to run them using a (what I guess you could call) beta JVM, but the software is already proven to be reliable in this case, and merely needs patching to fit our beloved operating system. If there are any dire issues that people are aware of aside from those fixed in the current patch set, please let me know so that I can be prepared when I have to write and chair a report for my employer. Many thanks, and WELL DONE the FreeBSD/Java porting team and contributers, your work is appreciated more than you know. Thanks again. -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 6:10:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7299F37B665 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 06:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQACGCPF8U000166@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:10:41 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:10:40 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:10:40 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: Query... To: 'Cliff Rowley' , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75F6@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Cliff, > > We need to run our custom written Java software on it, and need to be > able to run Servlets / JSP. Our systems are high end systems, and > although it's probably not good to run them using a (what I guess you > could call) beta JVM, but the software is already proven to > be reliable in this case, and merely needs patching to fit our beloved > operating system. > Ah, careful. It's not beta quality yet. It's alpha quality. > > If there are any dire issues that people are aware of aside from those > fixed in the current patch set, please let me know so that I can be > prepared when I have to write and chair a report for my employer. > As long as you are sticking with back-end stuff such as the Servlets/JSP you mention, I believe that the direst problems have been resolved. Patchset 9 will include some fixes for spawning processes from your JVM. I will switch to our native port for compilation/back-end with the release of patchset 9, although I will still use the Linux JDK to run my (Swing) front-end application. If your software is heavily threaded I would be scratching my head. I've seen some problems in Swing that seem to point to thread deadlock, but it's hard to put my finger on it. Some vague reports on the freebsd-java list seem to point in the same direction, but no hard evidence has been provided. On the other hand, it would be nice to be able write in your report: "even the alpha stuff that comes out of the FreeBSD community is better than Linux' production stuff". *duck* joke guys. No flames, please. :) Have you tried running your software with the port? Generally it's the problems that are reported that get fixed (hint, hint). All the problems that have been reported have been hard lockups or crashes. There don't seem to be any subtle, creeping bugs. If your stuff runs out of the box, you're probably going to be OK. > > Many thanks, and WELL DONE the FreeBSD/Java porting team and > contributers, your work is appreciated more than you know. > *blush* :-) Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 7: 9:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB6337BB7A for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 07:09:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12zK1e-000EuP-0X for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:08:14 +0100 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id OAA18015 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:08:26 GMT Message-ID: <393D0639.32364356@olive.co.uk> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:10:01 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Hint: compiling new JDK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Just a quick hint for those people who are only using the Blackdown JDK to bootstrap FreeBSD/JDK builds (and not for normal usage). If you've already compiled and installed the FreeBSD JDK port and compiled and installed a JIT, be sure to unset JAVA_COMPILER before making a new version. I just got bitten by that one, because the Blackdown JDK couldnt find OpenJIT. Took me a little while to discover it, when the build reported my Linux JDK was not a valid JDK to build with. The problem comes around because the sanity check looks at the first line outputted by '/usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -version' in order to check the version number. The correct output would usually be: java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2.2_RC4, green threads, nojit)# or similar. In my case, it was: Warning: JIT compiler "OpenJIT" not found. Will use interpreter. java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2.2_RC4, green threads, nojit) and the sanity check obviously found no version number in the first line. Just issuing an 'unset JAVA_COMPILER' before the build will do the trick. Just a quickie :) -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 7:43:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.246.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A737B6DC for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 07:43:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA46228; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:13:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) From: Greg Lewis Message-Id: <200006061443.AAA46228@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Hint: compiling new JDK In-Reply-To: <393D0639.32364356@olive.co.uk> from Cliff Rowley at "Jun 6, 2000 03:10:01 pm" To: Cliff Rowley Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:13:16 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL70 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Cliff Rowley wrote: > The problem comes around because the sanity check looks at the first > line outputted by '/usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -version' in order > to check the version number. The correct output would usually be: > > java version "1.2.2" > Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2.2_RC4, green threads, nojit)# > > or similar. > > In my case, it was: > > Warning: JIT compiler "OpenJIT" not found. Will use interpreter. > java version "1.2.2" > Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2.2_RC4, green threads, nojit) Yup, sanityck could potentially be a little smarter about parsing the output of java -version. > Just a quickie :) Thanks :). -- Greg Lewis glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au Computing Officer +61 8 8303 5083 Teletraffic Research Centre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 7:59:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.246.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831A737B6F5 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 07:59:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA46359; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:28:57 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) From: Greg Lewis Message-Id: <200006061458.AAA46359@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Query... In-Reply-To: <393CF476.1A0A98D8@olive.co.uk> from Cliff Rowley at "Jun 6, 2000 01:54:14 pm" To: Cliff Rowley Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:28:56 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL70 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Cliff Rowley wrote: > We need to run our custom written Java software on it, and need to be > able to run Servlets / JSP. Our systems are high end systems, and > although it's probably not good to run them using a (what I guess you > could call) beta JVM, but the software is already proven to be reliable > in this case, and merely needs patching to fit our beloved operating > system. I'm not personally running any sort of servlets, but the reports I've seen on the list of using patchset 8 for this are favourable. > If there are any dire issues that people are aware of aside from those > fixed in the current patch set, please let me know so that I can be > prepared when I have to write and chair a report for my employer. Hmmm, I can't think of any issues which are in the dire category, but there are certainly some open bugs. There are also some fixed bugs which aren't in the current patchset (external processes, deleting empty directories). From what it sounds like you're doing, you'll probably be fine. But as with all software in this stage of its life, give it a thorough test before committing yourself to it :). -- Greg Lewis glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au Computing Officer +61 8 8303 5083 Teletraffic Research Centre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 8:12:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f322.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3F5B37B6B3 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 29526 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2000 15:12:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20000606151232.29525.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 08:12:32 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: past@netmode.ntua.gr, K.J.Koster@kpn.com Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenJIT install Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 11:12:32 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: Thanks for your reply. I just want to clarify some points... >On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 03:14:31AM -0400, John Daniels wrote: > > Hi: > > I got the following warning after I did the second gmake while >installing > > OpenJIT for native JDK1.2.2 on a 4.0-STABLE machine: > > > > /work/build/freebsd/include-old > > -I/home/johnd/source-jdk1.2.2/work/build/freebsd/include-old/freebsd > > -I./CClassHeaders -DARCH=\"X86\" -DJDK_VERSION_STRING=\"1.2.2\" -c -o > > obj/rt-X86.o rt-X86.c > > rt-X86.c: In function `dispatchJVM': > > rt-X86.c:1027: warning: passing arg 7 of pointer to function from > > incompatible pointer type > > rt-X86.c: In function `OpenJIT_SignalHandler': > > rt-X86.c:2383: warning: unused variable `ebp' > > ld -G -o libOpenJIT.so obj/api.o obj/stubs.o obj/jdklink.o obj/rt-X86.o > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/johnd/OpenJIT-1.1.12' > >It is harmless (or it should be :-). Glad to hear it! > > I followed the directions on kjkoster's website. > > > > Question: Is there a step missing? After the buildscript is run, the >next > > paragraph is "Install and use" but there is no install command (like >"gmake > > install"), only an "export PATH..." command. > >You should 'gmake install' after building. The page mentions this now >that I looked. I do not see a 'gmake install' as part of the instructions on building the JDK. But there *is* a 'gmake install' as part of the instructions on building a JIT. (I followed the instructions for adding OpenJIT). Specifically, the section headings that K.J. Koster uses under "Howto's" are: 1. Build the Port Install required ports, Create Work Directories, Download JDK source, Download patches, Unpack and Apply Patches, Create Build Script, Build, Install and Use <----- NOTE 2. Install a JIT 3. Build for FreeBSD 2.2.8 NOTE: There is no install step under "Install and Use". There would appear to be three possibilities: 1. The 'gmake release-images' within the build script that is run before the "Install and Use" section also does an install, 2. the 'gmake install' under "Install a JIT" also installs the JDK, 3. the install step for the JDK is missing. > > I would like to install PostgreSQL which, as described in an > > earlier post, installs one of two JDBC drivers, depending on the > > JDK installed. Has anyone done this (Edward Wolpert?) and/or how > > can I install the JDK1.2.2 like a port so that it will be detected > > (my guess: copy the release directory to /usr/local/jdk1.2.2; do > > something like a pkg_install). Should I have done this before I > > installed OpenJIT (since OpenJIT asks for the path to the JDK)? > >That's right. If you do this before building OpenJIT and modify your >PATH, OpenJIT should find you native 1.2.2 installation on its own. Well I have already followed the directions on K.J. Koster's website so my release JDK is currently under my Home directory at: $HOME/source-jdk1.2.2/work/build/FreeBSD/jdk-image-i386, and I have already installed OpenJIT as per the directions. So, do I have to do any 'deinstall's before coping the directory to /usr/local/jdk1.2.2? Once I have copied the directory over, do I have to (re-)install the JDK? (what should I use: gmake install? pkg_install?) do I have to reinstall OpenJIT? etc. On an earlier post to the mailing list (two or three weeks ago, I believe) Greg Lewis responded to someone who was having trouble by saying that an IDE (I think it was Forte) might need to have the *_g files available. Is this true and would it mean that I should copy the ../FreeBSD/bin files (which includes the *_g files) to /usr/local/jdk1.2.2/bin? Thanks again. John ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 9:20: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4219B37B620 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:19:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from past@netmode.ece.ntua.gr) Received: from netmode.ece.ntua.gr (dolly.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.10]) by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07420; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:19:09 +0300 (EET DST) Received: by netmode.ece.ntua.gr (Postfix, from userid 410) id 8071085C3; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:08:11 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:08:11 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas To: John Daniels Cc: K.J.Koster@kpn.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenJIT install Message-ID: <20000606190811.B27343@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr References: <20000606151232.29525.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000606151232.29525.qmail@hotmail.com>; from jmd526@hotmail.com on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:12:32AM -0400 X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450 X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:12:32AM -0400, John Daniels wrote: > >You should 'gmake install' after building. The page mentions this now > >that I looked. > > I do not see a 'gmake install' as part of the instructions on building > the JDK. But there *is* a 'gmake install' as part of the instructions > on building a JIT. (I followed the instructions for adding OpenJIT). > > Specifically, the section headings that K.J. Koster uses under "Howto's" > are: > > 1. Build the Port > Install required ports, > Create Work Directories, > Download JDK source, > Download patches, > Unpack and Apply Patches, > Create Build Script, > Build, > Install and Use <----- NOTE > 2. Install a JIT > 3. Build for FreeBSD 2.2.8 > > NOTE: There is no install step under "Install and Use". There would > appear to be three possibilities: > 1. The 'gmake release-images' within the build script that is run before > the "Install and Use" section also does an install, > 2. the 'gmake install' under "Install a JIT" also installs the JDK, > 3. the install step for the JDK is missing. Sorry, I thought you were talking about installing OpenJIT. To "install" the jdk, follow the instructions in the BUILD-RELEASE file. In summary: do a "gmake release-images" and copy the appropriate directory (probably jdk-image-i386, unless you have specific needs) in /usr/local/jdk1.2.2. For OpenJIT you could just rebuild it to avoid any troubles. The point is to re-run configure, so that it finds the correct jdk directory, in /usr/local, and then install it in the correct place. -past To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 10:10:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl (c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ACC637B69B for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:10:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ernst@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl) Received: (qmail 62420 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jun 2000 17:10:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:10:09 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan To: Greg Lewis Cc: Cliff Rowley , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Query... Message-ID: <20000606191009.B62393@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> References: <393CF476.1A0A98D8@olive.co.uk> <200006061458.AAA46359@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200006061458.AAA46359@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au>; from glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au on Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 12:28:56AM +0930 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Cliff && all, > > If there are any dire issues that people are aware of aside from those > > fixed in the current patch set, please let me know so that I can be > > prepared when I have to write and chair a report for my employer. Hmm, I'm having trouble when running Orion (a J2EE application server). It seems to `hang' when deploying .ear files. I don't know in what category this problem would fall, but it keeps me from completely switching from the Blackdown 1.2.2 rc4 to the native FreeBSD JDK. A problem that should be solved in patchset 9 is that Ant can not delete directories. I find that AWT applications are sometimes very slow. The Forte 1.0 CE installer (InstallShield) is *very* slow. It takes ~ 10 seconds to draw the first window. So on one hand the native JDK is not very usable IMHO, but the Linux JDK is in my experience very stable on both 3.4-STABLE and on 4.0-STABLE. So I believe you can make the switch to the FreeBSD operating system, but I recommend you use the Linux JDK for now (in the ports tree). * Orion http://www.orionserver.com/ * Ant http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/ * Forte http://www.sun.com/forte/ Ernst It appears Greg Lewis wrote: > Cliff Rowley wrote: > > We need to run our custom written Java software on it, and need to be > > able to run Servlets / JSP. Our systems are high end systems, and > > although it's probably not good to run them using a (what I guess you > > could call) beta JVM, but the software is already proven to be reliable > > in this case, and merely needs patching to fit our beloved operating > > system. > > I'm not personally running any sort of servlets, but the reports I've seen > on the list of using patchset 8 for this are favourable. > > > If there are any dire issues that people are aware of aside from those > > fixed in the current patch set, please let me know so that I can be > > prepared when I have to write and chair a report for my employer. > > Hmmm, I can't think of any issues which are in the dire category, but there > are certainly some open bugs. There are also some fixed bugs which aren't > in the current patchset (external processes, deleting empty directories). > > >From what it sounds like you're doing, you'll probably be fine. But as > with all software in this stage of its life, give it a thorough test before > committing yourself to it :). > > -- > Greg Lewis glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au > Computing Officer +61 8 8303 5083 > Teletraffic Research Centre > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 12:20:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f106.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B872E37B911 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 17848 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2000 19:20:43 -0000 Message-ID: <20000606192043.17847.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 12:20:43 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Installing Java IDE Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:20:43 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: At the Forte for Java download site there are formats for Solaris, Linux, Windows, and class. The directions say that "other" unix's should use the Solaris download (to use the .sh files). I had thought that I would have to use the Linux format. Is it possible to run Forte (and JBuilder or VisualAge) by using the Solaris formats under FreeBSD? (what about using the .class files format?) I'd be happy to hear from anyone with an opinion about Java IDE's or instructions on how they got their IDE working, whether it was under Linux emulation or native. John ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 16:54:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop5.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop5.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68DAC37BAAF for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wolpert@methodsystems.com) Received: (qmail 14150 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2000 23:54:03 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG@fixme Received: (qmail 13273 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2000 23:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osti.methodsystems.com) (63.227.49.195) by dnvrpop5.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 6 Jun 2000 23:53:45 -0000 Content-Length: 1653 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20000606192043.17847.qmail@hotmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 17:53:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Edward Wolpert To: John Daniels Subject: RE: Installing Java IDE Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Use the class file for the install. You'll need to use the 1.2.2 patchset8 version of the native jdk. It does run under the linux emulated version, but very slowly. On 06-Jun-00 John Daniels wrote: > Hi: > > At the Forte for Java download site there are formats for Solaris, Linux, > Windows, and class. The directions say that "other" unix's should use the > Solaris download (to use the .sh files). > > I had thought that I would have to use the Linux format. Is it possible to > run Forte (and JBuilder or VisualAge) by using the Solaris formats under > FreeBSD? (what about using the .class files format?) > > I'd be happy to hear from anyone with an opinion about Java IDE's or > instructions on how they got their IDE working, whether it was under Linux > emulation or native. > > John > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message Virtually, | "I'm sorry, but Godot isn't Edward Wolpert | here right now. Perhaps if 4eb8 4e75 | you came back tomorrow..." ___________________________________________/ -SB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQB1AwUBOT2PCK2tQW/xJRRFAQFlPwMAtEF63Kbs0pdLUlNJaWsUuMzUE37oKkaZ NHNA+0a57cZa4hUmd4qp4koB6rfz6rMeQgxmpPovVBKdjhW9zRt/MFWJavck1yW2 TPVDxckRJl3F+dMu9RuLVP3gH8OEO8do =8RQC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 18: 0:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B29137B9AC for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:00:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wolpert@methodsystems.com) Received: (qmail 69573 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2000 01:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG@fixme Received: (qmail 69559 invoked by uid 0); 7 Jun 2000 01:00:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osti.methodsystems.com) (63.227.49.195) by dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 01:00:37 -0000 Content-Length: 17741 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:00:37 -0600 (MDT) From: Edward Wolpert To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Forte_ce core dump with JDK 1.2.2p8 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Folks- Inclosed is a (long) stack trace. I was using Forte-ce editor... browsing between files. Not sure how helpful this is, but I figure I'd send it out. (Using forte_ce with Java1.2.2p8 on FBSD4.0-stable) Let me know what other information you need. SIGSEGV 11 segmentation violation Full thread dump Classic VM (jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD:edward:2000/05/22-08:02, green thr eads): "OpenIDE Request Processor-1" (TID:0x291ad2c8, sys_thread_t:0x9975280, state :CW) prio=1 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "visdoc" (TID:0x29180b40, sys_thread_t:0x83af680, state:CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at ice.iblite.VisDocument.run(VisDocument) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "parser" (TID:0x29180f20, sys_thread_t:0x83af480, state:R) prio=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at ice.iblite.Parser.run(Parser) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Java Source Parsing" (TID:0x29301368, sys_thread_t:0x921f080, state:R) prio =10 at java.util.HashMap.clone(HashMap.java:452) at java.util.HashSet.clone(HashSet.java:193) at org.openide.util.Task.notifyFinished(Task.java:103) at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:133) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:559) "XMLDataObject::Info" (TID:0x29390a40, sys_thread_t:0x8fe6a80, state:CW) pri o=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "TimerQueue" (TID:0x2941ca08, sys_thread_t:0x8fce480, state:R) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at javax.swing.TimerQueue.postExpiredTimers(TimerQueue.java:219) at javax.swing.TimerQueue.run(TimerQueue.java:234) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Compilation" (TID:0x293712d8, sys_thread_t:0x8f97680, state:CW) prio=2 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at com.netbeans.developer.impl.compiler.CompilationEngineImpl$CompilerTh read.nextJobAndTask(CompilationEngineImpl.java:159) at com.netbeans.developer.impl.compiler.CompilationEngineImpl$CompilerTh read.run(CompilationEngineImpl.java:181) "OpenFile Server" (TID:0x293b6348, sys_thread_t:0x8df4280, state:CW) prio=5 at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.peek(Native Method) at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:354) at com.netbeans.developer.modules.openfile.Server.run(Server.java:100) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Thread-1" (TID:0x293c77d0, sys_thread_t:0x8dc6e80, state:R) prio=5 at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:406) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:240) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:224) at com.sun.web.server.Endpoint.run(Endpoint.java:45) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Thread-0" (TID:0x293cd978, sys_thread_t:0x8dc6280, state:CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) at com.sun.web.core.Reaper.run(Reaper.java:59) "Folder recognizer" (TID:0x294881d0, sys_thread_t:0x8c2e480, state:CW) prio= 6 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "OpenIDE Request Processor-0" (TID:0x294aaa08, sys_thread_t:0x8696680, state :R) prio=1 at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:533) "Screen Updater" (TID:0x294c3550, sys_thread_t:0x858be80, state:CW) prio=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at sun.awt.ScreenUpdater.nextEntry(ScreenUpdater.java:79) at sun.awt.ScreenUpdater.run(ScreenUpdater.java:99) "AWT-Motif" (TID:0x294eef90, sys_thread_t:0x8422880, state:R) prio=5 at sun.awt.motif.MToolkit.run(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "SunToolkit.PostEventQueue-0" (TID:0x294eeb70, sys_thread_t:0x83e2a80, state :CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at sun.awt.PostEventQueue.run(SunToolkit.java:413) "AWT-EventQueue-0" (TID:0x294eedb0, sys_thread_t:0x83e2880, state:R) prio=6 at java.awt.EventQueue.getNextEvent(EventQueue.java:208) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEvent(EventDispatchThread.java:10 0) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:92) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:83) "Finalizer" (TID:0x294c8320, sys_thread_t:0x8087c80, state:CW) prio=8 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:112) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:127) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:174) "Reference Handler" (TID:0x294c83b0, sys_thread_t:0x8087480, state:CW) prio= 10 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:114) "Signal dispatcher" (TID:0x294c83e0, sys_thread_t:0x8051c80, state:CW) prio= 5 "Thread-3" (TID:0x293a76e8, sys_thread_t:0x8051080, state:CW) prio=5 Monitor Cache Dump: javax.swing.TimerQueue@2941CA00/29AEA770: owner "TimerQueue" (0x8fce480) 2 e ntries java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock@294C8338/294FDD00: Waiting to be notified: "Finalizer" (0x8087c80) java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock@294C83C0/294FD830: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Waiting to be notified: "Reference Handler" (0x8087480) ice.iblite.VisDocument@29180B20/2A3F0128: Waiting to be notified: "visdoc" (0x83af680) java.lang.Object@29181310/2A3EEF78: owner "parser" (0x83af480) 1 entry org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Task@29076190/2B4A0C28: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry java.util.TreeSet@294ADC18/29724198: Waiting to be notified: "Folder recognizer" (0x8c2e480) java.util.LinkedList@2936F460/29A57AA8: Waiting to be notified: "Compilation" (0x8f97680) java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl@29469400/299534D0: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df4280) 1 entry java.util.TreeSet@294F6288/29674720: Waiting to be notified: "XMLDataObject::Info" (0x8fe6a80) sun.awt.PostEventQueue@294EEB70/295C1FB0: Waiting to be notified: "SunToolkit.PostEventQueue-0" (0x83e2a80) java.util.TreeSet@292F1678/2A34E478: Waiting to be notified: "OpenIDE Request Processor-1" (0x9975280) sun.awt.ScreenUpdater@294C3550/29644F70: Waiting to be notified: "Screen Updater" (0x858be80) java.net.PlainSocketImpl@293C7C48/2998DCF8: owner "Thread-1" (0x8dc6e80) 1 e ntry java.net.DatagramPacket@29413D10/29958850: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df428 0) 1 entry java.net.DatagramSocket@29469290/299532D8: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df428 0) 1 entry Registered Monitor Dump: utf8 hash table: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry JNI pinning lock: JNI global reference lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry BinClass lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Class linking lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry System class loader lock: Code rewrite lock: Heap lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Monitor cache lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 2 entries Dynamic loading lock: Monitor IO lock: User signal monitor: Waiting to be notified: "Signal dispatcher" (0x8051c80) Child death monitor: I/O monitor: owner "AWT-Motif" (0x8422880) 1 entry Alarm monitor: Waiting to be notified: (0x8051280) Thread queue lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 2 entries Waiting to be notified: "Thread-3" (0x8051080) Monitor registry: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry SIGABRT 6 abort() Full thread dump Classic VM (jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD:edward:2000/05/22-08:02, green thr eads): "OpenIDE Request Processor-1" (TID:0x291ad2c8, sys_thread_t:0x9975280, state :CW) prio=1 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "visdoc" (TID:0x29180b40, sys_thread_t:0x83af680, state:CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at ice.iblite.VisDocument.run(VisDocument) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "parser" (TID:0x29180f20, sys_thread_t:0x83af480, state:R) prio=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at ice.iblite.Parser.run(Parser) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Java Source Parsing" (TID:0x29301368, sys_thread_t:0x921f080, state:R) prio =10 at java.util.HashMap.clone(HashMap.java:452) at java.util.HashSet.clone(HashSet.java:193) at org.openide.util.Task.notifyFinished(Task.java:103) at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:133) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:559) "XMLDataObject::Info" (TID:0x29390a40, sys_thread_t:0x8fe6a80, state:CW) pri o=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "TimerQueue" (TID:0x2941ca08, sys_thread_t:0x8fce480, state:R) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at javax.swing.TimerQueue.postExpiredTimers(TimerQueue.java:219) at javax.swing.TimerQueue.run(TimerQueue.java:234) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Compilation" (TID:0x293712d8, sys_thread_t:0x8f97680, state:CW) prio=2 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at com.netbeans.developer.impl.compiler.CompilationEngineImpl$CompilerTh read.nextJobAndTask(CompilationEngineImpl.java:159) at com.netbeans.developer.impl.compiler.CompilationEngineImpl$CompilerTh read.run(CompilationEngineImpl.java:181) "OpenFile Server" (TID:0x293b6348, sys_thread_t:0x8df4280, state:CW) prio=5 at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.peek(Native Method) at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:354) at com.netbeans.developer.modules.openfile.Server.run(Server.java:100) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Thread-1" (TID:0x293c77d0, sys_thread_t:0x8dc6e80, state:R) prio=5 at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:406) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:240) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:224) at com.sun.web.server.Endpoint.run(Endpoint.java:45) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "Thread-0" (TID:0x293cd978, sys_thread_t:0x8dc6280, state:CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) at com.sun.web.core.Reaper.run(Reaper.java:59) "Folder recognizer" (TID:0x294881d0, sys_thread_t:0x8c2e480, state:CW) prio= 6 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:520) "OpenIDE Request Processor-0" (TID:0x294aaa08, sys_thread_t:0x8696680, state :R) prio=1 at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$ProcessorThread.run(RequestProcesso r.java:533) "Screen Updater" (TID:0x294c3550, sys_thread_t:0x858be80, state:CW) prio=4 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at sun.awt.ScreenUpdater.nextEntry(ScreenUpdater.java:79) at sun.awt.ScreenUpdater.run(ScreenUpdater.java:99) "AWT-Motif" (TID:0x294eef90, sys_thread_t:0x8422880, state:R) prio=5 at sun.awt.motif.MToolkit.run(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) "SunToolkit.PostEventQueue-0" (TID:0x294eeb70, sys_thread_t:0x83e2a80, state :CW) prio=5 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at sun.awt.PostEventQueue.run(SunToolkit.java:413) "AWT-EventQueue-0" (TID:0x294eedb0, sys_thread_t:0x83e2880, state:R) prio=6 at java.awt.EventQueue.getNextEvent(EventQueue.java:208) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEvent(EventDispatchThread.java:10 0) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:92) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:83) "Finalizer" (TID:0x294c8320, sys_thread_t:0x8087c80, state:CW) prio=8 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:112) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:127) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:174) "Reference Handler" (TID:0x294c83b0, sys_thread_t:0x8087480, state:CW) prio= 10 at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:424) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:114) "Signal dispatcher" (TID:0x294c83e0, sys_thread_t:0x8051c80, state:CW) prio= 5 "Thread-3" (TID:0x293a76e8, sys_thread_t:0x8051080, state:CW) prio=5 Monitor Cache Dump: javax.swing.TimerQueue@2941CA00/29AEA770: owner "TimerQueue" (0x8fce480) 2 e ntries java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock@294C8338/294FDD00: Waiting to be notified: "Finalizer" (0x8087c80) java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock@294C83C0/294FD830: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Waiting to be notified: "Reference Handler" (0x8087480) ice.iblite.VisDocument@29180B20/2A3F0128: Waiting to be notified: "visdoc" (0x83af680) java.lang.Object@29181310/2A3EEF78: owner "parser" (0x83af480) 1 entry org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Task@29076190/2B4A0C28: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry java.util.TreeSet@294ADC18/29724198: Waiting to be notified: "Folder recognizer" (0x8c2e480) java.util.LinkedList@2936F460/29A57AA8: Waiting to be notified: "Compilation" (0x8f97680) java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl@29469400/299534D0: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df4280) 1 entry java.util.TreeSet@294F6288/29674720: Waiting to be notified: "XMLDataObject::Info" (0x8fe6a80) sun.awt.PostEventQueue@294EEB70/295C1FB0: Waiting to be notified: "SunToolkit.PostEventQueue-0" (0x83e2a80) java.util.TreeSet@292F1678/2A34E478: Waiting to be notified: "OpenIDE Request Processor-1" (0x9975280) sun.awt.ScreenUpdater@294C3550/29644F70: Waiting to be notified: "Screen Updater" (0x858be80) java.net.PlainSocketImpl@293C7C48/2998DCF8: owner "Thread-1" (0x8dc6e80) 1 e ntry java.net.DatagramPacket@29413D10/29958850: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df428 0) 1 entry java.net.DatagramSocket@29469290/299532D8: owner "OpenFile Server" (0x8df428 0) 1 entry Registered Monitor Dump: utf8 hash table: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry JNI pinning lock: JNI global reference lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry BinClass lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Class linking lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry System class loader lock: Code rewrite lock: Heap lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Monitor cache lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 2 entries Dynamic loading lock: Monitor IO lock: User signal monitor: Waiting to be notified: "Signal dispatcher" (0x8051c80) Child death monitor: I/O monitor: owner "AWT-Motif" (0x8422880) 1 entry Alarm monitor: Waiting to be notified: (0x8051280) Thread queue lock: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 2 entries Waiting to be notified: "Thread-3" (0x8051080) Monitor registry: owner "Java Source Parsing" (0x921f080) 1 entry Abort trap - core dumped Virtually, | "I'm sorry, but Godot isn't Edward Wolpert | here right now. Perhaps if 4eb8 4e75 | you came back tomorrow..." ___________________________________________/ -SB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQB1AwUBOT2eta2tQW/xJRRFAQFLhAL+L82PTCDRb0c+kaH3eoSGTJ27MUEBHBt6 Oo5XHbQFUHDGw+ik07Oign+wo6NNVez14uQz1tsB8CgHAxW7SAH+4I/qENku4aMb SEMcsTD5TPSSrsBg7icaH+4nv+X9iAA9 =uJwb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 22: 2:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from vargas.rz.uni-frankfurt.de (vargas.rz.uni-frankfurt.de [141.2.21.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ECF37BC67 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 22:02:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from buchmann@stud.uni-frankfurt.de) Received: from smirnoff.rz.uni-frankfurt.de ([141.2.164.25]) by vargas.rz.uni-frankfurt.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12zXz5-0006AP-00 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 07:02:31 +0200 Received: from hendrix.localnet.org (actually NAFp2-079.rz.uni-frankfurt.de) by smirnoff.rz.uni-frankfurt.de with Local SMTP (PP); Wed, 7 Jun 2000 07:02:19 +0200 Received: (from buchmann@localhost) by hendrix.localnet.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id GAA02479 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 06:57:46 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 06:57:46 +0200 From: Jan Buchmann To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: [nelson@monkey.org: JavaOne report - Linux support!] Message-ID: <20000607065746.A1976@hendrix.localnet.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, maybe this of some interest for us freebsdlers (especially the last line in "some technical tidbits" :-)). Bye Jan ----- Forwarded message from Nelson Minar ----- Delivery-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 03:50:07 +0200 Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:02:17 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:02:02 -0700 (PDT) From: nelson@monkey.org (Nelson Minar) To: java-linux@java.blackdown.org Subject: JavaOne report - Linux support! Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: java-linux@java.blackdown.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3815 X-Loop: java-linux@java.blackdown.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org Just got back from the first day of JavaOne. I'm happy to say that Sun sounds like they're fairly serious about Linux support. Lots of Linux visibility at the conference, several talks and BOFs. The biggest news I heard is that Java 1.4 ("Merlin") should be released simultaneously on Windows, Solaris, and Linux. Yay! Pretty much all the standard J2SE and J2EE stuff should be coming out for Linux, including Hotspot (client & server), Java plug-in, etc. The session name was BUS-1698, you may be able to find notes on the JavaOne site at http://java.sun.com/javaone, or at http://jsp.java.sun.com/javaone/javaone2000/event.jsp?eventId=1698&trackId=1&eventType=BUS&ts=960339101588 Blake Connell, Calvin Austin, and Eileen Yang all spoke for awhile. Blake is a product line manager, Calvin is the lead Linux port engineer, and Eileen works on performance. (Hong Zhang was also on the panel, he does Hotspot work). Some technical tidbits: J2EE 1.2.1 is also available for Linux October 2000 should be the final J2SE 1.3 release. Fourth quarter 2001 should be J2SE 1.4 release (simultaneous). Linux 1.3 should include everything that's in the Solaris version. Hotspot both server & client, I believe native threads too. Sound API is currently OSS, they may move to ALSA. 1.4 should be better at Java2D, SMP, and Hotspot. They're interested in better Linux desktop support. Motif gives them trouble with non-Motif window managers. They test KDE + KWM mostly, but want to support everything. Dual monitor support is forthcoming There's a AWT on GTK port on the SCSL site, but they don't intend to do anything with it. Java 3D API is forthcoming from Blackdown. Performance is getting better, 1000% IO improvement in 1.3! Faster Swing, too. No specific plans for embedded Linux support. No plans to do SVGA or framebuffer versions of AWT. x86 releases only for now. A FreeBSD port is in the works! Not official yet. Political tidbits: Caldera is a Java source licensee and is doing their own ports. Mandrake will distributed Java with next release. Sun is working with LinuxCare for support on portability, optimization. They have no plans to compromise on SCSL to be more GPL friendly. Plenty of props and respect paid to Blackdown. An explicit apology about the gaffe on Sun's first Java 1.2 release with Inprise. They also indicated a continuing relationship with Blackdown, particularly for porting optional packages. I asked "why did it take so long to support Linux?", the answer I got was "limited resources". They are listening to people's feedback and bug reports, would like to hear more. nelson@monkey.org . . . . . . . . http://www.media.mit.edu/~nelson/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to java-linux-request@java.blackdown.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact karl@blackdown.org ----- End forwarded message ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 6 23:38:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B4E37B6EE for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 23:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from runge@rostock.zgdv.de) Received: from rostock.zgdv.de (penguin.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.145]) by kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAAE6F for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:38:18 +0200 Message-ID: <393DEE92.79B591C4@rostock.zgdv.de> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:41:22 +0200 From: Thomas Runge X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: jdk build Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So, I tried to build jdk 1.2.2 like described in Kees' Webpage. The problem I have is, that Linux' java don't wants relative pathnames for the classpath. So the build fails right here: /usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -classpath . InvokerGen < ../../../../src/share/javavm/include/invokers.txt > invokers.c Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: InvokerGen linux-jdk-1.2.2 installed via ports (which is actually a jdk-1.2.2-RC4), FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Looks like a wrong .java_wrapper, any ideas? -- Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 0:36: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from imsp211.netvigator.com (imsp211.netvigator.com [205.252.144.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966637B556 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:36:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ) Received: from webmail (wtsam024167.netvigator.com [168.70.103.167]) by imsp211.netvigator.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA00446; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 15:31:44 +0800 (HKT) To: bizbuysell@hotmail.com From: bizinfo@imsp211.netvigator.com Subject: Re: Marketplace for importer, exporter, manufacturers ! Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 15:31:58 +0800 Message-Id: <36684.647200925926400.508638@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear sir, http://www.sinoleads.com Do you want to reach 20,000,000 worldwide manufacturers and traders ?! Do you want to find your product a buyer within hours ?! Do you want to explore foreign market ?! http://www.sinoleads.com Visit us to explore your market ! _____________________________________________________________ You receive this email because you are indicated by our trade site BBS afflicates that you are interested in Trade relate information. To be remove from the list, please email: tradeleads@hongkong.com?Subject=Remove ______________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 2: 9:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912A537B896 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 02:09:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQBIC070Y80001K0@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:09:47 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:09:45 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:09:44 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: Hanging Orion (was: Query...) To: 'Ernst de Haan' Cc: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75F9@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hoi Ernst, > > It seems to `hang' when deploying .ear files. > Have your tried the patch for executing external programs? Perhaps Orion runs a shell script of some sort. Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 2:25:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBC237B5BB for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 02:25:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQBIVKW6BI0001K0@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:25:33 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:25:32 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:25:32 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: jdk build To: 'Thomas Runge' , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75FB@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > So, I tried to build jdk 1.2.2 like described in Kees' > Webpage. The problem I have is, that Linux' java don't wants > relative pathnames for the classpath. > > So the build fails right here: > > /usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -classpath . InvokerGen < > ../../../../src/share/javavm/include/invokers.txt > invokers.c > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: InvokerGen I've seen this too on my home box: http://web.inter.nl.net/users/kjkoster/java/content/known.html#hd13 > > linux-jdk-1.2.2 installed via ports (which is actually a > jdk-1.2.2-RC4), FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE > > Looks like a wrong .java_wrapper, any ideas? > I thought it may be because I have a symlink in the path or something. I have been hacking at it for a but, but only half heartedly, becasue you can simply copy work/build/freebsd/java/jvm/*.class and work/src/share/javavm/include/invokers.txt to /tmp, then invoke the InvokerGen command line there, and finally move the generated .c file back into the right position. The JDK build fine after that. If you do a -verbose, you can see that InvokerGen.class does actually get loaded. Anyone knows what's wrong? Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 3:20: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D6D37B89A for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 03:19:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12zcwF-000PvY-0A for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:19:55 +0000 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id KAA26482 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:20:06 GMT Message-ID: <393E2236.4DB2BBFD@olive.co.uk> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:21:42 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank you everyone for your replies yesterday. We're getting a new test machine in the next few days or so, and I'll be heavily stress testing our software, and possibly patching the JDK, so I might be posting a few here and there. That should clean out a few cobwebs if they exist :) Couple of quickies; What patchset are we at now? i.e. on Kees' site Do we have official word from Sun yet? Thank ye :) -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 3:39: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CDA37B57C for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 03:38:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQBLFLQ6PC0001KR@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:38:57 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:38:57 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:38:56 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: To: 'Cliff Rowley' Cc: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7603@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > What patchset are we at now? i.e. on Kees' site > We're oficially at patchset 8. There are two fixes that are floating around, one for deleting directories, and the other for exec-ing stuff. You may want to add those when you build the JDK for your tests. My site is still in patchset 7 mode. :-( That's where the cobwebs are. I have no time this week to work on it, so I was going to wait until patchset 9 comes out. Notably, the socket related issues (Resource Unavailable thingy) have been resolved. > > Do we have official word from Sun yet? > Not yet, I guess. Anyone been at JavaOne? Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 5:40:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E079637B52B for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 05:40:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12zf80-00088a-0U for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:40:12 +0100 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id MAA27813 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:40:24 GMT Message-ID: <393E4316.F08A087C@olive.co.uk> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 13:41:58 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Exec patch? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've found the delete patch in the mailing list archives, but I cant find the external execution patch anywhere - a few references to problems with executing external programs, but not much else... Is there one floating around? -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 5:46:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989A837BCDC for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 05:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQBPVAC42K00016M@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 14:46:09 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 14:46:07 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 14:46:06 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: Exec patch? To: 'Cliff Rowley' Cc: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7609@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFD086.BACC5894" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFD086.BACC5894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" This one? Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFD086.BACC5894 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="wait.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="wait.diff" Index: src/freebsd/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/java/JDK2/javasrc/src/freebsd/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- src/freebsd/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c 1999/10/11 18:46:30 1.2 +++ src/freebsd/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c 2000/05/31 15:46:04 1.3 @@ -166,8 +166,9 @@ JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_java_lang_UNIXProcess_run(JNIEnv *env, jobject process) { -#ifdef __FreeBSD__ /*** XXX ***/ - char info[256]; +#ifdef __FreeBSD__ + pid_t pid; + int status; #else siginfo_t info; #endif @@ -188,14 +189,14 @@ /* block this reaper thread until the child process exits */ #ifdef __FreeBSD__ -/* waitpid() is a wrapper, that does the "right thing" already */ - if (waitid(P_ALL, 0, &info, WEXITED) != 0) { - continue; - } + /* waitpid() is a wrapper, that does the "right thing" already */ + pid = waitid(P_ALL, 0, &status, WEXITED); #else if (waitid(P_ALL, 0, &info, WEXITED) != 0 || info.si_pid == 0) { continue; } + pid = info.si_pid; + status = info.si_status; #endif (*env)->MonitorEnter(env, fork_wait_mon); @@ -205,13 +206,8 @@ "java/lang/UNIXProcess", "deadChild", "(II)V", -#ifdef __FreeBSD__ /*** XXX ***/ - 0, - 0 -#else - info.si_pid, - info.si_status -#endif + pid, + status ); if ((*env)->ExceptionOccurred(env)) { return; Index: src/freebsd/hpi/green_threads/src/synch.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/java/JDK2/javasrc/src/freebsd/hpi/green_threads/src/synch.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- src/freebsd/hpi/green_threads/src/synch.c 1999/11/03 03:54:58 1.4 +++ src/freebsd/hpi/green_threads/src/synch.c 2000/05/31 15:41:06 1.5 @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ #ifdef __FreeBSD__ pid_t fork1(void); -int waitid(int, int, void *, int); +pid_t waitid(int, int, int *, int); #endif /* For java.lang.Process */ @@ -179,17 +179,16 @@ extern int _waitid(idtype_t idtype, id_t id, siginfo_t *infop, int options); int waitid(idtype_t idtype, id_t id, siginfo_t *infop, int options) #else -int waitid(int idtype, int id, void *infop, int options) +pid_t waitid(int idtype, int id, int *status, int options) #endif { sys_mon_t *mon = asyncMon(SYS_ASYNC_MON_CHILD); #ifdef __FreeBSD__ - int status; pid_t pid; sysMonitorEnter(sysThreadSelf(), mon); do { - pid = waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG); + pid = waitpid(-1, status, WNOHANG); if ((int)pid > 0 && !WIFSTOPPED(status)) break; sysMonitorWait(sysThreadSelf(), mon, SYS_TIMEOUT_INFINITY); @@ -202,7 +201,11 @@ } #endif sysMonitorExit(sysThreadSelf(), mon); +#ifdef __FreeBSD__ + return pid; +#else return 0; +#endif } #ifndef __FreeBSD__ ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFD086.BACC5894-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 7:31:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9024D37B5BA for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 07:31:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12zgrr-000ESB-0V for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 15:31:39 +0100 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id OAA28813 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 14:31:48 GMT Message-ID: <393E5D33.57F3C8E8@olive.co.uk> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 15:33:23 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: JServ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, all I can say at this point is: Example Apache JServ Servlet Congratulations, ApacheJServ 1.1 is working! No modifications required so far, the latest patchset (still minus the delete and exec patches) seem to be working fine. -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 9:34:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CB537B9F8 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04457; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:34:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA17385; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006071634.JAA17385@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Koster, K.J." Cc: "'Cliff Rowley'" , "'FreeBSD Java mailing list'" Subject: RE: In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7603@l04.research.kpn.com> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7603@l04.research.kpn.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Do we have official word from Sun yet? > > Not yet, I guess. Anyone been at JavaOne? Nothing official, although I spent the evening with Sun and met the Blackdown folks last night for cocktails as I broke free to spend one afternoon at JavaOne. More as official news is released.... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 11:44:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xnet.com (quake.xnet.com [198.147.221.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C430537B9CC for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amacker@xnet.com) Received: from hurricane.xnet.com (typhoon.xnet.com [198.147.221.66]) by mail.xnet.com (8.9.3+Sun/XNet-3.0R) with ESMTP id NAA07072 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:44:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hurricane.xnet.com (Postfix, from userid 4111) id ADE1C38650; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:44:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hurricane.xnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A389935D76 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:44:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:44:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Richard Amacker To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: BSDi Announces Java 2 for BSD Platforms Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org More info can be found here: http://bsdi.com/news/press/20000607/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 7 21:33:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from portal.west.saic.com (portal.west.saic.com [198.151.12.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACF4537B9DD for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:33:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from GARY.R.SHAFFER@saic.com) Received: from cpmx.saic.com by portal.west.saic.com via smtpd (for hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18]) with SMTP; 8 Jun 2000 04:33:35 UT Received: from [139.121.95.12] by cpmx.mail.saic.com; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:33:22 -0700 Received: from cp-its-exbh01.mail.saic.com ([139.121.95.34]) by 139.121.95.12 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 04:33:21 0000 (GMT) Received: by cp-its-exbh01.mail.saic.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:33:22 -0700 Message-Id: <9C4E165721F7D311AC3D00805FBBB118312EB8@US-SD-PLTC.mail.saic.com> From: "Shaffer, Gary R" To: "'nate@yogotech.com'" , "Koster, K.J." Cc: 'Cliff Rowley' , 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Subject: RE: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:30:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I met with the BSDi folks in the pavillion the last night and they were pretty tight lip'd about any/all announcements wrt java2 and BSD....would'nt even accept cash!!! -----Original Message----- From: Nate Williams [mailto:nate@yogotech.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:34 AM To: Koster, K.J. Cc: 'Cliff Rowley'; 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Subject: RE: > > Do we have official word from Sun yet? > > Not yet, I guess. Anyone been at JavaOne? Nothing official, although I spent the evening with Sun and met the Blackdown folks last night for cocktails as I broke free to spend one afternoon at JavaOne. More as official news is released.... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 3:20:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E728237BB39 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 03:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cliff@olive.co.uk) Received: from grimwade.demon.co.uk ([194.222.1.157] helo=olive.co.uk) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 12zzPt-000Jgb-0K for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:20:01 +0000 Received: from olive.co.uk (merlin.osl.co.uk [192.168.1.19]) by olive.co.uk (SMI-8.6/v3.2) with ESMTP id KAA06423; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:20:12 GMT Message-ID: <393F73D2.3A6DD2C1@olive.co.uk> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 11:22:10 +0100 From: Cliff Rowley Organization: Olive Systems LTD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'FreeBSD Java mailing list'" Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: References: <9C4E165721F7D311AC3D00805FBBB118312EB8@US-SD-PLTC.mail.saic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org *sigh* and who do us brits ever get to meet? Not that I'm envious or anything *stab* *poke* *smack* "Shaffer, Gary R" wrote: > > I met with the BSDi folks in the pavillion the last night and they were > pretty tight lip'd about any/all announcements wrt java2 and BSD....would'nt > even accept cash!!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Williams [mailto:nate@yogotech.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:34 AM > To: Koster, K.J. > Cc: 'Cliff Rowley'; 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' > Subject: RE: > > > > Do we have official word from Sun yet? > > > > Not yet, I guess. Anyone been at JavaOne? > > Nothing official, although I spent the evening with Sun and met the > Blackdown folks last night for cocktails as I broke free to spend one > afternoon at JavaOne. > > More as official news is released.... > > Nate > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message -- Cliff Rowley Software Engineer Olive Systems LTD http://www.olive.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 4:10:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01FA37BF35 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 04:10:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQD0U10AYK000154@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 13:10:34 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:10:19 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:10:18 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: To: 'Cliff Rowley' Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D762D@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > *sigh* and who do us brits ever get to meet? Not that I'm > envious or anything *stab* *poke* *smack* > Brits? What about the rest of Europe? Err... Never mind. :) Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 4:53:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f121.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6267D37B97D for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 04:53:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 10083 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jun 2000 11:53:05 -0000 Message-ID: <20000608115305.10082.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 04:53:05 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 07:53:05 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The BSDi press release is (purposely?) vague. It doesn't seem like the kind of news they want to shout about. BTW, how far from alpha is "controlled beta"? Looking forward to the news hinted at below.. Gary Shaffer wrote: >I met with the BSDi folks in the pavillion the last night and they >were pretty tight lip'd about any/all announcements wrt java2 and >BSD....would'nt even accept cash!!! > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Nate Williams [mailto:nate@yogotech.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:34 AM >>To: Koster, K.J. >>Cc: 'Cliff Rowley'; 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' >>Subject: RE: >> >> >>>Do we have official word from Sun yet? >> >>Not yet, I guess. Anyone been at JavaOne? >> >>Nothing official, although I spent the evening with Sun and met the >>Blackdown folks last night for cocktails as I broke free to spend >>one afternoon at JavaOne. >> >>More as official news is released.... >> >> >> >>Nate ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 5: 2:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED83637BF60 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQD2N9F2JU00019I@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:02:18 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:02:17 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:02:15 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: To: 'John Daniels' , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D762E@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > The BSDi press release is (purposely?) vague. It doesn't > seem like the kind of news they want to shout about. > Hmm. Dunno. It seems like to me like shoutable news. > > BTW, how far from alpha is "controlled beta"? > Well, I don't know how far BSDi has advanced, but *our* port is alpha quality until Greg says otherwise. Maybe BSDi has a different port altogether? :-) Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 5: 7: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl (c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0523C37BF4E for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 05:07:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ernst@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl) Received: (qmail 77691 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Jun 2000 12:07:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:07:04 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan To: "Koster, K.J." Cc: 'Cliff Rowley' , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20000608140704.A77671@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D762D@l04.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D762D@l04.research.kpn.com>; from K.J.Koster@kpn.com on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 01:10:18PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org FYI: There is an article on /. too: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/01/1635220 Ernst It appears Koster, K.J. wrote: > > > > *sigh* and who do us brits ever get to meet? Not that I'm > > envious or anything *stab* *poke* *smack* > > > Brits? What about the rest of Europe? Err... Never mind. :) > > Kees Jan > > ============================================== > Everyone is responsible for his own actions, > and (people tend to forget this) the effect > they have on others. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 5:45:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f296.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27C7837BA51 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 05:45:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 20088 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jun 2000 12:45:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20000608124527.20087.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 05:45:27 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: K.J.Koster@kpn.com Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 08:45:27 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi: I was (in part) commenting on the fact, noted earlier, that BSDi folks were mum on any Java-BSD news the day before the announcement. My impression, judging from their silence and the details (or lack thereof) in the press release is that they haven't advanced much beyond where the FreeBSD-java porting team is today. Naturally, I'm happy that any vendor supports Java on *BSD, and as you point out their port *may* be totally different, but that would seem to defy common sense. Why didn't they just call it patchset 9 for consistency? ;) John K.J.Koster wrote: > > The BSDi press release is (purposely?) vague. It doesn't > > seem like the kind of news they want to shout about. > > >Hmm. Dunno. It seems like to me like shoutable news. > > > > > BTW, how far from alpha is "controlled beta"? > > >Well, I don't know how far BSDi has advanced, but *our* port is alpha >quality until Greg says otherwise. Maybe BSDi has a different port >altogether? :-) > > Kees Jan > >============================================== > Everyone is responsible for his own actions, > and (people tend to forget this) the effect > they have on others. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 7:13: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.246.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F87637B884 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:12:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA21743; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:42:39 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) From: Greg Lewis Message-Id: <200006081412.XAA21743@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: In-Reply-To: <393F73D2.3A6DD2C1@olive.co.uk> from Cliff Rowley at "Jun 8, 2000 11:22:10 am" To: Cliff Rowley Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:42:38 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL70 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Cliff Rowley wrote: > *sigh* and who do us brits ever get to meet? Not that I'm envious or > anything *stab* *poke* *smack* And then theres the warm beer and the regular thrashings at cricket and rugby by us colonials ;). > > More as official news is released.... > > > > Nate I don't think there is much point in us speculating on the list about exactly what the support from BSDi means. Lets just let the dust settle and see what it is we've gotten. I'm sure Nate will update as he is able :). -- Greg Lewis glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au Computing Officer +61 8 8303 5083 Teletraffic Research Centre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 7:37:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6754F37BB34 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from runge@rostock.zgdv.de) Received: from rostock.zgdv.de (penguin.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.145]) by kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA7306 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:37:41 +0200 Message-ID: <393FB070.CC78B26C@rostock.zgdv.de> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 16:40:48 +0200 From: Thomas Runge X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk build References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D75FB@l04.research.kpn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Koster, K.J." wrote: > > So the build fails right here: > > > > /usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -classpath . InvokerGen < > > ../../../../src/share/javavm/include/invokers.txt > invokers.c > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: InvokerGen > > I've seen this too on my home box: > http://web.inter.nl.net/users/kjkoster/java/content/known.html#hd13 > Anyone knows what's wrong? Well, that trick helped, but not much. The build failed just some seconds later. Now I moved that directory some levels up and everything builds fine. Strange. (from /usr/home/runge to /usr/java, which are on different disks/mounts, I guess, thats the problem.) -- Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 7:48: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C874837B8C9 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:48:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQD8FPTNBY0001QQ@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:48:01 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 16:48:00 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 16:47:59 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: jdk build To: 'Thomas Runge' Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7634@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Well, that trick helped, but not much. The build failed just > some seconds later. Now I moved that directory some levels up > and everything builds fine. Strange. > > (from /usr/home/runge to /usr/java, which are on different > disks/mounts, I guess, thats the problem.) > Begins to sound like the Linux JDK has a maximum path length somewhere that's tripped by deep directory trees. Hope that our port won't have this problem. Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 8:43:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0435D37C05D for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:43:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15259; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 09:42:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA24845; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006081542.IAA24845@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Shaffer, Gary R" Cc: "'nate@yogotech.com'" , "Koster, K.J." , "'Cliff Rowley'" , "'FreeBSD Java mailing list'" Subject: RE: In-Reply-To: <9C4E165721F7D311AC3D00805FBBB118312EB8@US-SD-PLTC.mail.saic.com> References: <9C4E165721F7D311AC3D00805FBBB118312EB8@US-SD-PLTC.mail.saic.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I met with the BSDi folks in the pavillion the last night and they were > pretty tight lip'd about any/all announcements wrt java2 and BSD....would'nt > even accept cash!!! Really? That's suprising, since the announcement was made. However, as I understand things, the techie's and management haven't had time to get their stories straight yet, since things have been happening fast and furious. What details can I state that would help out? So far, there is a lot of 'concern' and 'interest' in making a *BSD port happen from Sun, and BSDi has stepped up to be the 'point of contact' for this to happen (actually, Sun needed a legal entity to sign the license and such, and it was easier to 'legally' work with BSDi than a bunch of volunteers, or so I've been told). So, the balls is basically in BSDi's court at this point, and I don't expect to hear anything back until *after* JavaOne, when the folks at BSDi can get together again. However, I've got calls in all over the place. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 10:47:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f299.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B65837BA18 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 60998 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jun 2000 17:47:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20000608174751.60997.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 209.220.228.2 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:47:51 PDT X-Originating-IP: [209.220.228.2] From: "John Daniels" To: nate@yogotech.com Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:47:51 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for the update, it makes what's going on much more intelligible. Nate Williams wrote: >What details can I state that would help out? So far, there is a >lot of 'concern' and 'interest' in making a *BSD port happen from >Sun, and BSDi has stepped up to be the 'point of contact' for this >to happen... This sounds like potentially the same licensing/business model that was used with Inprise for the Linux port. If I recall correctly, at that time Sun also spoke of a need for a legal entity. Thankfully, BSDi's press release is only 1/2 the story: it is augmented by discussions for an "official" port, and that is certainly good news :) Apparently there is not yet any contractual arrangement between Sun and BSDi, :( which explains some of the vagueness of the BSDi press release. Looking forward to more info ... ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 11:25:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FBB37BC18 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16541; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 12:25:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA25602; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006081825.LAA25602@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "John Daniels" Cc: nate@yogotech.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: In-Reply-To: <20000608174751.60997.qmail@hotmail.com> References: <20000608174751.60997.qmail@hotmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >What details can I state that would help out? So far, there is a > >lot of 'concern' and 'interest' in making a *BSD port happen from > >Sun, and BSDi has stepped up to be the 'point of contact' for this > >to happen... > > This sounds like potentially the same licensing/business model that was used > with Inprise for the Linux port. If I recall correctly, at that time Sun > also spoke of a need for a legal entity. Exactly. > Thankfully, BSDi's press release is only 1/2 the story: it is > augmented by discussions for an "official" port, and that is certainly > good news :) *grin* > Apparently there is not yet any contractual arrangement between Sun and > BSDi, :( which explains some of the vagueness of the BSDi press release. That may be. As I understand things, the arrangement might be in place, or it may still be in the works. However, it should be more clear next week, or so the story goes. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 13:46: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from brs.com.br (brs.com.br [192.41.24.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2092E37C09B for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from email@carlos.eti.br) Received: from fraga.carlos.eti.br ([200.241.0.6]) by brs.com.br (8.8.5) id SAA12941; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 18:46:07 -0200 (GMT+2) X-Authentication-Warning: brs.com.br: Host [200.241.0.6] claimed to be fraga.carlos.eti.br Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000608174731.00b2c7b0@carlos.eti.br> X-Sender: email@carlos.eti.br X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 17:47:36 -0300 To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG From: Carlos Fraga Subject: Re: It's worth ! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org A site that pays you to receive some e-mails. No more than that. Nothing to buy, just to receive the e-mail and click on the link to visit the site. Don't you believe it exists ? Yes, it exists. And I have already received a US$ 50,00 check. Will you say that you don't want some money ? It's up to you to subscribe and start receiving e-mails and money ! Follow the link: http://www.sendmoreinfo.com/id/871883 See you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 14:20: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from nwcst282.netaddress.usa.net (nwcst282.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.23.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42BE537C2C5 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from math.programming@usa.net) Received: (qmail 18755 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jun 2000 21:19:54 -0000 Message-ID: <20000608211954.18754.qmail@nwcst282.netaddress.usa.net> Received: from 204.68.23.27 by nwcst282 for [206.172.22.7] via web-mailer(34FM1.4.02C) on Thu Jun 8 21:19:54 GMT 2000 Date: 8 Jun 00 17:19:54 EDT From: Dmitry Golovashkin To: Carlos Fraga , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Re: It's worth !] X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM1.4.02C) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org is there any way to pay $50 (or whatever it is) and stop receiving such stuff? thanks a lot Dmitry Carlos Fraga wrote: A site that pays you to receive some e-mails. No more than that. Nothing = to = buy, just to receive the e-mail and click on the link to visit the site. Don't you believe it exists ? Yes, it exists. And I have already received= a = US$ 50,00 check. Will you say that you don't want some money ? It's up to you to subscribe= = and start receiving e-mails and money ! Follow the link: http://www.sendmoreinfo.com/id/871883 See you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message ---------_________---------> ---------_________---------> ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Fri Jun 9 1:33:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544237B66B; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 01:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQE9MZQHKW0001N5@research.kpn.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:33:42 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 09 Jun 2000 10:33:41 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 10:33:33 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: To: 'FreeBSD Java mailing list' Cc: "'jkh@FreeBSD.org'" Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7636@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello people, I've cc'd this to Jordan, because I believe he's closest to BSDi. First off, I'm really happy that we've gotten this far with Sun. I'm happy that BSDi is lending a hand. Someone on the freebsd-alpha list expressed concern about the position of the "other BSDs" (for want of a better word). I'm a little curious how they fit in. The way I see it, once we've got Sun's backing it will be easier for them to get it too. Sun will have gone through the motions several times by then, and may even have found that it's not all that painful. Also, they will have a BSD specific patchset to work from, instead of a Solaris/Linux one. On the other hand, perhaps we are in the position now to save them a lot of frustration. There's interest in Java on the other BSDs too, of course. Personally, I think it would be good for the quality of the patches if we have a more homogenous OS group that they work on. Perhaps we could negotiate a more open BSD license for the JDK, allowing other BSDs in too, maybe based on the fact that we share a common ancestry. This will save Sun quite some time in the future, because they don't have to do the dance for each BSD individually. Another pro is that there would be a single entity controlling the BSD ports, and possibly a single code base too. This could reduce fragmentation over the BSDs, and it would improve the quality of each individual port. Kees Jan PS. "really happy" does not quite cover it. ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Fri Jun 9 4: 3:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D85F37B706 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 04:03:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from runge@rostock.zgdv.de) Received: from rostock.zgdv.de (penguin.egd.igd.fhg.de [192.102.170.145]) by kiew.egd.igd.fhg.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA2024 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:02:59 +0200 Message-ID: <3940CFA1.3372CED0@rostock.zgdv.de> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 13:06:09 +0200 From: Thomas Runge X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: native 1.2.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Finally I succeeded compiling "my own" jdk 1.2.2 and I have to say, that I'm really surprised! I just checked some applications I made for my recent project, which make quite a lot stuff with Swing, threads and CORBA and everythin worked. There are only some problems with fonts (Font specified in font.properties not found [-*-*-medium-r-normal-*-*-%d-*-*-p-*-adobe-fontspecific]) and thus the layout looks a little bit different. I even checked suns new Java Webstart, which seems to work quite fine. But one thing makes me thoughtfully. It seems, that our native port without JIT is faster then the linux port with JIT, at least within Swing based applications. How can that be? penguin ~> /usr/local/linux-jdk1.2.2/bin/java -version java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2.2_RC4, green threads, sunwjit) penguin ~> /usr/local/jdk1.2.2/bin/java -version java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD:runge:2000/06/08-15:45, green threads, nojit) -- Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Fri Jun 9 8:10:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.mail.yahoo.com (smtp.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.68.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DF5F37C3DA for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 08:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pranje@yahoo.com) Received: from unknown (HELO yahoo.com) (203.197.172.76) by smtp.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2000 08:09:57 -0700 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3941096D.A8AF35CA@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 20:42:45 +0530 From: Pran Joseph Reply-To: pranje@yahoo.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Subject: Segmentation violation when invoking JNI call to C from Java with Pthreads Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I am using FreeBsd 3.4 with jdk 1.1.8 green threads on i386 . I am getting Segmentation violation from JNI call as reported in PR 12286. Program is crashing when I try to create a new Java object using JNI NewObject function. Problem report still says that bug is open. The PR is included in the end of this mail. Any one of you know the solution for this problem or have a patch for this problem. -Pran Joseph ----------------------Start PR---------------------------------- Problem Report i386/12286 Segmentation violation when invoking JNI call to C from Java with PTHREADS Confidential : no Severity : critical Priority : high Responsible : freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org State :open Class : sw-bug Submitter-Id current-users Arrival-Date Fri Jun 18 16:40:01 PDT 1999 Last-Modified Thu Jun 24 17:10:00 PDT 1999 Originator Steve Heller Release FreeBSD 3.1 RELEASE Organization PaymentNet, Inc. Environment FreeBSD yoda.paymentnet.com 3.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 15 11:08:08 GMT 1999 jkh@usw3.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 % gcc --version 2.7.2.1 Description When I link a static library which calls pthread routines into a shared object file with gcc -shared -pthread, and then run the java compiled program which calls it through JNI with JDK 1.1.8 (green threads), (I had to add -lc_r to the link flags in order to get pthread_mutex_lock() to be found when linking the .so file), I get the following Segmentation violation: (cd jni; java pntransjava test.paymentnet.com 443 "TRXTYPE=S&TENDER=C&PWD=g0edel 1685&USER=pnprodtest&ACCT=5105105105105100&EXPDATE=1299&AMT=27.33" 30; cd ..) SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation Full thread dump: "Finalizer thread" (TID:0x28454210, sys_thread_t:0x29258f00, state:R) prio=1 "Async Garbage Collector" (TID:0x28454258, sys_thread_t:0x29237f00, state:R) prio=1 "Idle thread" (TID:0x284542a0, sys_thread_t:0x29216f00, state:R) prio=0 "Clock" (TID:0x28454088, sys_thread_t:0x291f5f00, state:CW) prio=12 "main" (TID:0x284540b0, sys_thread_t:0x8067700, state:R) prio=5 *current thr ead* pntransjava.main(pntransjava.java:59) Monitor Cache Dump: Registered Monitor Dump: Thread queue lock: Name and type hash table lock: String intern lock: JNI pinning lock: JNI global reference lock: BinClass lock: Class loading lock: Java stack lock: ----------------------end PR---------------------------------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Sat Jun 10 14:59:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD937B817 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08551; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:59:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03379; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006102159.OAA03379@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Runge Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: native 1.2.2 In-Reply-To: <3940CFA1.3372CED0@rostock.zgdv.de> References: <3940CFA1.3372CED0@rostock.zgdv.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > But one thing makes me thoughtfully. It seems, that our native > port without JIT is faster then the linux port with JIT, at > least within Swing based applications. > How can that be? That is actually normal. We've found that the JIT tends to be heavy GUI applications slower than w/out a JIT, due to the increase in size for the JIT'd code and larger runtime issues, which blow the cache. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-java Sat Jun 10 15: 1:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E4C37C825 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08576; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 16:01:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA03393; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:01:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006102201.PAA03393@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: pranje@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Subject: Segmentation violation when invoking JNI call to C from Java with Pthreads In-Reply-To: <3941096D.A8AF35CA@yahoo.com> References: <3941096D.A8AF35CA@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I am using FreeBsd 3.4 with jdk 1.1.8 green threads on i386 . I > am getting Segmentation violation from JNI call as reported in PR > 12286. This is probably due to cockpit error. > When I link a static library which calls pthread routines into a > shared object file with gcc -shared -pthread, and then run the > java compiled program which calls it through JNI with JDK 1.1.8 > (green threads), (I had to add -lc_r to the link flags in order > to get pthread_mutex_lock() to be found when linking the .so file), If you've done this, then the program won't work. pthread_mutex_lock and friends aren't compatible with the threading using the JDK1.1 VM. The bug is almost certainly in your JNI code that is doing something 'wrong', although it's not necessarily your fault, since doing JNI isn't documented, and is (as expected) different for each platform, FreeBSD being no exception. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message