From owner-freebsd-net  Sun May 28  0: 6:33 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from juice.shallow.net (node16229.a2000.nl [24.132.98.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD3237B8B9
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 May 2000 00:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from joshua@roughtrade.net)
Received: from localhost (joshua@localhost)
	by juice.shallow.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04399;
	Sun, 28 May 2000 09:05:50 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from joshua@roughtrade.net)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 09:05:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net>
To: Steve Shah <sshah@clickarray.com>
Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>,
	Olaf Hoyer <ohoyer@fbwi.fh-wilhelmshaven.de>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BPF vs. promiscuous mode
In-Reply-To: <20000524072320.C14568@clickarray.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005280902410.4330-100000@juice.shallow.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> <BOFH>
> What would have been entertaining is to try and put ever student
> on their own subnet. This would keep the script kiddies from 
> doing broadcast based attacks since all the other hosts would just
> ignore the packets within the first few checks in their IP stack.
> There are certainly enough networks to support a few thousand 
> 30 bit netmasks.... <grin>
> </BOFH>

The RIR's should beat you into the ground with a cluestick if you try
that.

- J



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message