From owner-freebsd-ppc  Tue Jun 20 13:27: 2 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Received: from lor.watermarkgroup.com (lor.watermarkgroup.com [207.202.73.33])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A4F37C14A
	for <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from luoqi@watermarkgroup.com)
Received: (from luoqi@localhost)
	by lor.watermarkgroup.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e5KKQpX05096
	for freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com>
Message-Id: <200006202026.e5KKQpX05096@lor.watermarkgroup.com>
To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject: standized name: ppc or powerpc?
Sender: owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I want to raise a practical issue, what do we use for the standized name of
powerpc architure? For purposes like, creating subdirectories, setting the
MACHINE_ARCH/TARGET_ARCH variables. My personal preference `powerpc', which
is used by gcc and friends, but it doesn't really matter which one we use
as long as it's consistent in all places.

-lq


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ppc" in the body of the message