From owner-freebsd-security Sun Oct 8 0:28:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B6137B66D; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 00:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newsguy.com (p43-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.108]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id QAA02446; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 16:28:07 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <39E021C5.1F5DEE48@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 16:27:01 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: Robert Watson , "Matthew D. Fuller" , Jordan Hubbard , John Baldwin , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Stable branch References: <4.3.2.20001007161924.00b72460@207.227.119.2> <4.3.2.20001007214506.00bb7c10@207.227.119.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote: > > One other idea that cropped up would be if we want to set this up for the > more troublesome releases like 3.2 to force them to upgrade to a later > version. Think that only 3.4+ should be considered due to a large enough > install base to consider. Err... we would consider only for 4.2+. This is not something we can go back and do for previous versions without going insane. New model, new versions. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@linux.bsdconspiracy.net the ants all left because mtn. dew is sold out again To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message