From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Oct 29  0: 2:12 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from io.yi.org (h24-69-199-88.gv.shawcable.net [24.69.199.88])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E79337B479
	for <smp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from io.yi.org (localhost.gvcl1.bc.wave.home.com [127.0.0.1])
	by io.yi.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B96BBA6D; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: KSE project announcement 
In-Reply-To: Message from Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> 
   of "Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:18 PDT." <20001027162818.I48771@canonware.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:02:11 -0700
From: Jake Burkholder <jburkhol@home.com>
Message-Id: <20001029070211.3B96BBA6D@io.yi.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I have a question: is the idea that kse_init always "return"s
on the same stack?  and if so how does the kernel know when an
upcall is finished, off the upcall context, and its safe to let
another kse return to userland on that same stack?

Thanks,
Jake



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message