From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 5:50: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cutter.wantabe.com (cutter.wantabe.com [209.16.8.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D5F15074 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:49:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeffrl@wantabe.com) Received: from cutter.wantabe.com (cutter.wantabe.com [209.16.8.8]) by cutter.wantabe.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA08352 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 07:49:58 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 07:49:58 -0600 (CST) From: "Jeffrey J. Libman" To: stable@freeBSD.org Subject: re: rpc.statd won't fire on friday's build Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG no idea what i've done here. friday's cvsup and build...new kernel...installed on 2 systems. on one of the systems, rpc.statd will not run, gets: rpc.statd: unable to register (SM_PROG, SM_VERS, udp) this particular system has about 50 ip's assigned to lo0...and that has worked fine as is for months, inspite of all the verbage here about netmasks and such. loopback IS configured. any help? i need this working or i cannot server up nfs mounts from this machine. cheers, jeff -- | |\ +------------------------------+ Jeffrey J. Libman, ops. mgr. | \ | Wantabe Internet Services | Wantabe, Inc. |__\ +------------------------------+ jeffrl@wantabe.com <-----|------> | access web cgi ftp news mail | (281) 493-0718 __,.-=\'`^`'~=-../__,.-= +------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 10:54:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.uunet.ca (mail5.uunet.ca [142.77.1.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C31114F75 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:54:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from w01.arpa-canada.net ([216.95.146.6]) by mail5.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <233564-9847>; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 13:55:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 13:54:17 -0500 From: matt X-Sender: matt@w01.arpa-canada.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: bind related freebsd-stable question. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm running bind 8.2.2-p5 on a machine that has a large amount of IPs bound to it. Instead of having bind listen on all interfaces, I set it to listen to one ip via listen-to option. When I did this, certain braindead things like IRCd stopped working, even though I had /etc/resolv.conf set to the IP I was making bind listen on, it seems that trying to do something like, dig @0.0.0.0 does not work unless bind is listening on all interfaces. This is a problem I need to get worked out. The machine is 3.4-STABLE, with about 200 IPs bound to it. Any ideas? Also, I realize this post is somewhat off-topic, but I couldn't think of anyone else to ask, allow me to apologize ahead of time for the somewhat off-topic post. Thank you. Matt Heckaman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 12:22:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9B315035 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:22:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA11546; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:45:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:45:21 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: matt Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind related freebsd-stable question. Message-ID: <20000116124521.D508@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET on Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 01:54:17PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * matt [000116 11:18] wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm running bind 8.2.2-p5 on a machine that has a large amount of IPs > bound to it. Instead of having bind listen on all interfaces, I set it > to listen to one ip via listen-to option. > > When I did this, certain braindead things like IRCd stopped working, even > though I had /etc/resolv.conf set to the IP I was making bind listen on, > it seems that trying to do something like, dig @0.0.0.0 does not work > unless bind is listening on all interfaces. This is a problem I need to > get worked out. The machine is 3.4-STABLE, with about 200 IPs bound to it. > > Any ideas? Also, I realize this post is somewhat off-topic, but I couldn't > think of anyone else to ask, allow me to apologize ahead of time for the > somewhat off-topic post. Thank you. Try adding 127.0.0.1 as one of bind's listen-to options? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 12:30: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.uunet.ca (mail5.uunet.ca [142.77.1.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058611526E for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:30:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from w01.arpa-canada.net ([216.95.146.6]) by mail5.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <233416-17315>; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:30:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:29:55 -0500 From: matt X-Sender: matt@w01.arpa-canada.net To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind related freebsd-stable question. In-Reply-To: <20000116124521.D508@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: [...] : Try adding 127.0.0.1 as one of bind's listen-to options? : : -Alfred I thought of that as well, however, it did not help even though it showed in netstat as listening on 127.0.0.1.53.. I find the whole thing kind of odd, if I may say so. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 12:36:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sand2.sentex.ca (sand2.sentex.ca [209.167.248.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908014DBF for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:36:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from p10 (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by sand2.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA68537; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:36:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.1.20000116153403.04f2ea90@granite.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtancsa@granite.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:35:08 -0500 To: matt From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: bind related freebsd-stable question. Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <20000116124521.D508@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:29 PM 1/16/00 , matt wrote: > >On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >[...] >: Try adding 127.0.0.1 as one of bind's listen-to options? >: >: -Alfred > >I thought of that as well, however, it did not help even though it showed >in netstat as listening on 127.0.0.1.53.. I find the whole thing kind of >odd, if I may say so. Is the daemon bound to a particular IP, or all of them ? Perhaps try net.inet.udp.log_in_vain=1 to see what IP it is trying to query from. ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 519 651 3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 14:43:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6AE153FA; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:43:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA53631; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:43:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12170; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:43:21 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200001162243.JAA12170@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: Donald Burr Cc: FreeBSD Questions , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Any chance at supporting writing to ATAPI CD-R/RW at >2X? In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:05:11 -0800. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:43:21 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I noticed while browsing through the wormcontrol(8) man page that the > 'prepdisk' command takes arguments 'single' or 'double', meaning that you > can only write disks in 1x and 2x speeds. I think the document is misleading. The arg 'double' seems to be to write in the fastest speed that the drive will support. I know I write a full CD in around 15 minutes on my (4x) HP 8100i drive after specifying "prepdisk double". (I run 3.x here; 4.x has a whole new ATA driver which may change this.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 21:49:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lafontaine.cybercable.fr (lafontaine.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 650BF14CCB for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from herbelot@cybercable.fr) Received: (qmail 2157435 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 05:49:10 -0000 Received: from d016.paris-30.cybercable.fr (HELO cybercable.fr) ([212.198.30.16]) (envelope-sender ) by lafontaine.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Jan 2000 05:49:10 -0000 Message-ID: <3882AD9C.E8750C92@cybercable.fr> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 06:50:20 +0100 From: Thierry Herbelot X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: recent 3.4 and netscape ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I've installed on the second disk of this machine the latest 3.4 snpashot, then installed cvsup and updated the sources to -Stable, then rebuilt the world and a new kernel, and finally compiled and installed the latest Xfree86 (3.3.6) Thus, I should have a very recent -Stable. But I can't install and run netscape : (there follows an install attempt) ---------------------------------------------------------------- tfh# make install ===> Extracting for netscape-communicator-4.7 >> Checksum OK for communicator-v47-export.x86-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz. ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found You can make Netscape use 128-bit encryption by defining USE_128BIT ===> Patching for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> Ignoring empty patch directory ===> Perhaps you forgot the -P flag to cvs co or update? ===> Configuring for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> Installing for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found Couldn't open /usr/libexec/ld.so. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. tfh# tfh# uname -a FreeBSD tfh.herbelot.nom 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 16 23:53:58 C ET 2000 thierry.herbelot@tfh.herbelot.nom:/usr/src/sys/compile/TFH_34 i386 tfh# tfh# pkg_info Mesa-3.0 A graphics library similar to SGI's OpenGL XFree86-3.3.6 X11R6.3/XFree86 core distribution bzip2-0.9.5d A block-sorting file compressor cvsup-16.1 A general network file distribution system optimized for CVS gettext-0.10.35 GNU gettext package giflib-4.1.0 Tools and library routines for working with GIF images gmake-3.78.1 GNU version of 'make' utility jpeg-6b IJG's jpeg compression utilities kdelibs-1.1.2 Support libraries for the KDE integrated X11 desktop libtool-1.3.3 Generic shared library support script modula-3-3.6 Modula-3 compiler and libraries from DEC Systems Research Ce modula-3-lib-3.6 The shared libraries needed for executing Modula-3 programs png-1.0.5 Library for manipulating PNG images qt-1.42 A C++ X GUI toolkit tiff-3.5.4 Tools and library routines for working with TIFF images xpm-3.4k The X Pixmap library tfh# ---------------------------------------------------------------- I know netscape is still aout, so I may have forgotten to recompile the aout support tools in the new world I've built - but I'd like to know for sure. Thanks in advance for any help TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 22:20:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from neptune.innovativeinternet.net (neptune.innovativeinternet.net [208.244.165.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BB1C1508B for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:20:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com) Received: (qmail 3508 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 06:20:23 -0000 Received: from harlan.fred.net (HELO pcpsj.pfcs.com) (@208.238.64.78) by neptune.innovativeinternet.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 06:20:23 -0000 Received: from mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11] (HELO mumps.pfcs.com) by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) via ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:18:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from brown.pfcs.com [192.52.69.44] (HELO brown.pfcs.com) by mumps.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.pfcs.com [127.0.0.1] (HELO brown.pfcs.com) by brown.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:15:46 -0500 (EST) To: Thierry Herbelot Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recent 3.4 and netscape ? In-Reply-To: Thierry Herbelot's (herbelot@cybercable.fr) message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2000 06:50:20. <3882AD9C.E8750C92@cybercable.fr> X-Face: "csXK}xnnsH\h_ce`T#|pM]tG,6Xu.{3Rb\]&XJgVyTS'w{E+|-(}n:c(Cc* $cbtusxDP6T)Hr'k&zrwq0.3&~bAI~YJco[r.mE+K|(q]F=ZNXug:s6tyOk{VTqARy0#axm6BWti9C d User-Agent: EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.7 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Y?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=1B=2ED=8E=FEzaki?=) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) (i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.3 - "Komaiko") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:15:46 -0500 Message-ID: <28424.948089746@brown.pfcs.com> From: Harlan Stenn Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your environment, get rid of it. H To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 16 22:40:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lafontaine.cybercable.fr (lafontaine.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D82715082 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:40:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from herbelot@cybercable.fr) Received: (qmail 2186288 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 06:40:08 -0000 Received: from d016.paris-30.cybercable.fr (HELO cybercable.fr) ([212.198.30.16]) (envelope-sender ) by lafontaine.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Jan 2000 06:40:08 -0000 Message-ID: <3882B98D.4F246933@cybercable.fr> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:41:17 +0100 From: Thierry Herbelot X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Zerkle , Stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recent 3.4 and netscape ? References: <3882AD9C.E8750C92@cybercable.fr> <3882B8A9.4D00A346@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dan Zerkle wrote: > > Look at the error message. You should have told us if > /usr/libexec/ld.so is there. > > Just a guess.... > > Make sure that you have all of the compatibility libraries compiled and > installed. You just uncomment the COMPAT stuff in the make.conf file. > I have a feeling that this will solve your problem. I seem to remember > this issue from a very old installation of Netscape.... indeed, I've just checked and the COMPAT lines are commented out. > > Yes, and make sure that you have a.out support installed. Do I need to make the world with -DWANTAOUT ? If so, this begins not to be a vanilla config and I'm puzzled if there must be so much work just to get Netscrap running. TfH > > -Dan [Snippage] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 0:20:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from firebat.Bushong.NET (c128625-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.5.196.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43E014F7B for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dbushong@firebat.Bushong.NET) Received: (from dbushong@localhost) by firebat.Bushong.NET (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA52062 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:20:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dbushong) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:20:17 -0800 From: David Bushong To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: DynaLoader in latest stable Message-ID: <20000117002017.A51998@Bushong.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i X-Floating-Sheep-Port: 0xbaa Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is, at first glance, more of a Perl or Apache question, but I thought I'd give it a whack here anyway. I run Apache with mod_perl (latest versions of both), and have had it working fine without a hitch for quite a while. This evening, I made buildworld and installed, going from 3.3-stable to yesterday afternoon's 3.4-stable. After rebooting, I noted many of my mod_perl based pages had stopped working. Doing some investigation, I noted that these same perl scripts worked fine run by hand, but died when run through mod_perl. The unifying factor seems to be use of modules which require extra .so's to be linked in, as I get the following errors: [Mon Jan 17 00:12:55 2000] [error] Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/auto/DBI/DBI.so' for module DBI: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/auto/DBI/DBI.so: Undefined symbol "PL_dowarn" at /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/DynaLoader.pm line 169. or [Mon Jan 17 00:07:06 2000] [error] Can't load '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so' for module Image::Magick: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so: Undefined symbol "PL_sv_undef" at /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/DynaLoader.pm line 169. Thinking maybe my mod_perl was out of sync with the latest perl (a newer 5.00503?), I rebuilt both mod_perl and Apache, and all of the modules in question, and still got the exact same error. Does anyone know of anything which changed recently in the FreeBSD standard Perl distribution which might cause the DynaLoader to explode? BTW, the referenced line of death in question is: my $libref = dl_load_file($file, $module->dl_load_flags) or croak("Can't load '$file' for module $module: ".dl_error()."\n"); (where it actually loads the file) Thanks, --David Bushong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 2:34:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.kurgan.ru (phoenix.kurgan.ru [195.54.28.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BACD14E0E for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:34:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Martin@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru) Received: from mcflysr.kurgan.ru (mcflysr.kurgan.ru [195.54.7.11]) by phoenix.kurgan.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA54516 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:34:27 +0500 (YEKT) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:34:25 +0500 From: Martin McFlySr Reply-To: Martin McFlySr Organization: Back To The Future X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <0648.000117@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ppp-2.3.8+ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, anybody can make and install ppp-2.3.8+ in freebsd 3.4s? in configure - 3.[0-1] only :(( thank you, -- Monday, January 17, 2000, 15:33 Best regards from future, Martin McFlySr, HillDale. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 7:17:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5893E14A28 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:17:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id HAA23262; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:13:12 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda23260; Mon Jan 17 07:13:06 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA03781; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdAi3777; Mon Jan 17 07:12:10 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA07420; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:12:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001171512.HAA07420@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdEI7416; Mon Jan 17 07:11:47 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Mark Ovens Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:05:01 GMT." <20000115130501.A336@marder-1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:11:46 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000115130501.A336@marder-1>, Mark Ovens writes: > Hmm, just noticed this (note the dates): > > marder-1# ls -ld /drvc /ntfs > drwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 1 1980 /drvc It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. stat /dos File: "/dos" Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 7:42:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from techpower.net (techpower.net [205.133.231.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF0D14E4C for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net) Received: from localhost (hometeam@localhost) by techpower.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03397; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:45:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:45:19 -0500 (EST) From: hometeam To: Martin McFlySr Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppp-2.3.8+ In-Reply-To: <0648.000117@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just change the config to in configure - 3.[0-4] < On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Martin McFlySr wrote: > Hello freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, > > anybody can make and install ppp-2.3.8+ in freebsd 3.4s? > > in configure - 3.[0-1] only :(( > > thank you, > > -- > Monday, January 17, 2000, > 15:33 > > Best regards from future, > Martin McFlySr, HillDale. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 8:19: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C68E14E94 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs10.alcatel.fr (mailhub2.alcatel.fr [155.132.188.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA08499; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:10:19 +0100 From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Received: from frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr (frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.32]) by aifhs10.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with SMTP id RAA14723; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:12:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id C1256869.00596DC0 ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:16:48 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALCATEL To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Mark Ovens , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:16:32 +0100 Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Same here : pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (261) ->ls -ld /dos_c drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17408 Jan 1 1980 /dos_c pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (262) ->uname -a FreeBSD pc-mcs1.telspace.alcatel.fr 2.2.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE #0: Mon6 pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (263) -> pc-bsd53% ls -ld /dos_c drwxr-xr-x 1 herbelot users 16384 Jan 1 1980 /dos_c pc-bsd53% uname -a FreeBSD pc-bsd53.val9900.telspace.alcatel.fr 3.3-19990905-RC FreeBSD 3.3-1999096 pc-bsd53% TfH Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group on 17/01/2000 16:11:46 Please respond to Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group To: Mark Ovens cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG(bcc: Thierry HERBELOT/FR/ALCATEL) Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In message <20000115130501.A336@marder-1>, Mark Ovens writes: > Hmm, just noticed this (note the dates): > > marder-1# ls -ld /drvc /ntfs > drwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 1 1980 /drvc It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. stat /dos File: "/dos" Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 8:30:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E90615134 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA23415; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:26:14 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda23413; Mon Jan 17 08:26:07 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA04075; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:26:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdjU4073; Mon Jan 17 08:25:10 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA07653; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:25:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001171625.IAA07653@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdYj7645; Mon Jan 17 08:24:52 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Mark Ovens , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:11:46 PST." <200001171512.HAA07420@cwsys.cwsent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:24:52 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It should read: "It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs or the directory itself". Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" In message <200001171512.HAA07420@cwsys.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Sy stems Group writes: > In message <20000115130501.A336@marder-1>, Mark Ovens writes: > > Hmm, just noticed this (note the dates): > > > > marder-1# ls -ld /drvc /ntfs > > drwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 1 1980 /drvc > > It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed > below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on > this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe > just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that > until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. > > stat /dos > File: "/dos" > Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory > Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) > Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 > Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > ITSD > Province of BC > "e**(i*pi)+1=0" > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 8:57:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtppzh.pzh.nl (webshield.pzh.nl [194.178.168.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3471A14C91 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:56:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MULHUIJZEN@PZH.NL) Received: FROM smtp.pzh.nl BY smtppzh.pzh.nl ; Mon Jan 17 17:55:57 2000 0000 Received: from PZH40-1-Message_Server by smtp.pzh.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:56:01 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:55:24 +0100 From: "ROGIER MULHUIJZEN" To: Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can confirm for 3.4-RELEASE [ root@venus:/ ] # ls -ld /win98 drwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 1 1980 /win98 [ root@venus:/ ] # umount /win98 [ root@venus:/ ] # ls -ld /win98 drwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 512 Jan 19 1999 /win98 ntfs has some problems too: [ root@venus:/ ] # ls -ld /winnt drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Apr 22 2009 /winnt [ root@venus:/ ] # umount /winnt [ root@venus:/ ] # ls -ld /winnt drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 512 Aug 23 11:51 /winnt It does not seem to affect datestamps on files within the filesystems though. Just the mountpoints. DocWilco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 8:58:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from localhost.cproject.com (premium129.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.132.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9775D14C27 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:58:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhanna@cproject.com) Received: (qmail 434 invoked by uid 83); 17 Jan 2000 16:56:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dv2000.omfus.org) (10.1.1.43) by larryboy with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 16:56:21 -0000 Message-ID: <010001bf610b$eeb902a0$2b01010a@omfus.org> From: "John Hanna" To: Subject: kernel + MROUTING -> netstat: no namelist Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:51:38 -0700 Organization: Caleb Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I built the stable kernel with option MROUTING and routing died. netstat -nr reported "no namelist" -- any suggestions? John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 10:16:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com [24.6.21.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CE414EFC for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:16:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA68389 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:16:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:16:20 -0600 (CST) Organization: @Home Network From: Conrad Sabatier To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been trying to get a new kernel to work on a friend's machine, but every time I install a new kernel and reboot, we get this: changing root device to wd0s2a wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 0) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 wd0: Last time I say: interrupt timeout. Probably a portable PC. (status 50 error 1) wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 His system worked just fine with a previous custom kernel with exactly the same config as this one. I'm at a loss as to what to do. I've already tried disabling all flags on the wdc* devices; didn't do any good. Here are the relevant config entries: options "AUTO_EOI_1" options "AUTO_EOI_2" controller fdc0 at isa? port "IO_FD1" bio irq 6 drq 2 disk fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 #disk fd1 at fdc0 drive 1 options "CMD640" # work around CMD640 chip deficiency controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 disk wd0 at wdc0 drive 0 #disk wd1 at wdc0 drive 1 controller wdc1 at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 disk wd2 at wdc1 drive 0 #disk wd3 at wdc1 drive 1 options ATAPI #Enable ATAPI support for IDE bus options ATAPI_STATIC #Don't do it as an LKM device acd0 #IDE CD-ROM Suggestions, anyone? -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 10:21:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2BE14F1D for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:21:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA40132; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:21:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000117131900.025a2710@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:19:00 -0500 To: Conrad Sabatier , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:16 PM 1/17/00 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >I've been trying to get a new kernel to work on a friend's >machine, but every time I install a new kernel and reboot, >we get this: > >changing root device to wd0s2a >wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 0) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 >wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 >wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 >wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 >wd0: interrupt timeout (status 50 error 1) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 >wd0: Last time I say: interrupt timeout. Probably a portable PC. >(status 50 error 1) >wd0: wdtimeout() DMA status 4 > >His system worked just fine with a previous custom kernel with >exactly the same config as this one. I'm at a loss as to what >to do. On first glance, it would seem you have come across a bad sector on your hard drive. ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 10:46:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com [24.6.21.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD9E14F5E for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:46:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA68746; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:46:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000117131900.025a2710@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:46:21 -0600 (CST) Organization: @Home Network From: Conrad Sabatier To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: > > On first glance, it would seem you have come across a bad sector on > your hard drive. So why then wouldn't booting into kernel.old detect the same problem? -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 10:48:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2118614EEC for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:48:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA44114; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:48:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000117134613.025a4150@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:46:13 -0500 To: Conrad Sabatier From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20000117131900.025a2710@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:46 PM 1/17/00 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > >On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: >> >> On first glance, it would seem you have come across a bad sector on >> your hard drive. > >So why then wouldn't booting into kernel.old detect the same problem? Perhaps because something is trying to read from a bad sector. ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 10:51: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com [24.6.21.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD5B14FA4 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA68755; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:50:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000117134613.025a4150@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:50:55 -0600 (CST) Organization: @Home Network From: Conrad Sabatier To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 12:46 PM 1/17/00 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> >>On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> >>> On first glance, it would seem you have come across a bad sector >>> on >>> your hard drive. >> >>So why then wouldn't booting into kernel.old detect the same >>problem? > > Perhaps because something is trying to read from a bad sector. So, what would be the fix for this? fsck? -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 12:30: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AFD14EEE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id MAA24411; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:30:00 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda24405; Mon Jan 17 12:29:49 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA02267; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:29:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001172029.MAA02267@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdTB2259; Mon Jan 17 12:29:22 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: Ron Rosson Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/16147: New Awhois Port In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:28:26 PST." <20000117112826.C15691@lunatic.oneinsane.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:29:22 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You can lookup network handles using whois -a. Maintaining the awhois script script to track a moving target would be easier than whois, a C program, unless whois.c could be modified to be table driven via an external file rather than hard coded. A table driven whois is definitely the better way to go as opposed to the awhois script. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" In message <20000117112826.C15691@lunatic.oneinsane.net>, "Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson" writes: > Unless the base whois has the scalability of keeping up with the > mindless people who keep wanting to change the way the whois databases > modify their output I see need for the awhois. Currently the whois in > the base does not have the function to look up NIC handles. > > Please add the port. > > TIA > On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Cy Schubert was heard blurting out: > > > The following reply was made to PR ports/16147; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > > From: Cy Schubert > > To: Josef Karthauser > > Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: ports/16147: New Awhois Port > > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:04:25 -0800 > > > > You are correct. Awhois, however, automatically checks the ARIN > > database when it sees a dotted decimal IP address. Whois requires a -a > > flag. Not a big issue, though. > > > > Please do not implement the port. Please close. > > > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > > Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > > ITSD > > Province of BC > > "e**(i*pi)+1=0" > > > > In message <20000116192349.B76584@florence.pavilion.net>, Josef > > Karthauser writ > > es: > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca w > rote: > > > > > > > > description: > > > > Awhois tries to figure out what you're looking for and to invoke whois > > > > with the appropriate arguments. It knows how to deal with the new > > > > Registry WHOIS service, it falls back to checking the whois server > > > > specified in the DNS at whois-servers.net, and its interface is just > > > > like the original whois. > > > > > > > > > > Our own whois already does this from 3.4-RELEASE onwards. > > > > > > Joe > > > -- > > > Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just how > > > Technical Manager deep the rabbit hole goes. (http://www.uk.freeb > sd.org) > > > Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@freebsd.org, joe@tao.org. > uk] > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user said ... > The InSaNe One rm -rf * > insane@oneinsane.net and all was /dev/null and *void() > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > "On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first > strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and > Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony." And Windows98 Crashed! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 12:38:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cliff.i-plus.net (cliff.i-plus.net [209.100.20.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059B614CF1 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from st@i-plus.net) Received: from ARCADIA (arcadia.i-plus.net [209.100.20.198]) by cliff.i-plus.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA78400 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:38:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Troy Settle" To: Subject: 1/16/2000 make world success Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:38:55 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG With the recent threads about crap failing... I cvsup'ed the evening of 1/16/2000, and built the world and installed it, and didn't have a single problem. Actually, I can't remember the last time I had a failure that an immediate cvsup didn't fix. And even that has been at least a couple years. Hope the hackers keep up the good work. -Troy PS: Sysinstall on the 3.4 CD is not just broken on the custom menu, it's also broken in the express menu when trying to select which distributions to install. Sysinstall is also broken from the configure menu when trying to add additional distributions. Don't take this as a complaint though... I know about the ERATTA, and know I could have downloaded the floppy images, but the box I was on didn't have a floppy drive, and I'm too lazy to install one. I fussed around with it, and got a successful installation anyways :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 12:39: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5054F14E37 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:39:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id MAA24461; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:39:00 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda24459; Mon Jan 17 12:38:56 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA02417; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:38:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001172038.MAA02417@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdoK2412; Mon Jan 17 12:38:22 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: Josef Karthauser Cc: "Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson" , Cy Schubert , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/16147: New Awhois Port In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:26:38 GMT." <20000117202638.D65852@florence.pavilion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:38:22 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000117202638.D65852@florence.pavilion.net>, Josef Karthauser writ es: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 11:28:26AM -0800, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote: > > Unless the base whois has the scalability of keeping up with the > > mindless people who keep wanting to change the way the whois databases > > modify their output I see need for the awhois. Currently the whois in > > the base does not have the function to look up NIC handles. > > > > Please add the port. > > > > TIA > > Whois in the base _should_ have the ability to lookup NIC handles. It > used to have. If it doesn't work anymore then I must have broken it! > > Have I broken it? No you haven't. It just needs the -a flag. An approach to keeping up with the ever-changing whois server list might be to make whois.c table driven through an external file. The advantage that the awhois script has over whois.c is ease of modification. An external whois reference table would make server lists easier to maintain. It could look for the file in /usr/share/whois and /usr/share/whois/default. The latter containing the FreeBSD distributed file while the former contains a locally maintained file, should changes be required between releases. Before anyone asks for patches, I could start working on this on Jan 23 or 30. If you want it sooner either produce patches yourself or wait 'till the end of the month. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 12:45:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from florence.pavilion.net (florence.pavilion.net [212.74.0.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F97E14D1B for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:45:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@florence.pavilion.net) Received: (from joe@localhost) by florence.pavilion.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) id UAA54174; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:45:31 GMT (envelope-from joe) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:45:30 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: "Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson" , Cy Schubert , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/16147: New Awhois Port Message-ID: <20000117204530.E65852@florence.pavilion.net> References: <20000117202638.D65852@florence.pavilion.net> <200001172038.MAA02417@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <200001172038.MAA02417@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> X-NCC-RegID: uk.pavilion Organisation: Pavilion Internet plc, Lees House, 21-23 Dyke Road, Brighton, England Phone: +44-845-333-5000 Fax: +44-845-333-5001 Mobile: +44-403-596893 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 12:38:22PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > > An approach to keeping up with the ever-changing whois server list > might be to make whois.c table driven through an external file. The > advantage that the awhois script has over whois.c is ease of > modification. An external whois reference table would make server > lists easier to maintain. It could look for the file in > /usr/share/whois and /usr/share/whois/default. The latter containing > the FreeBSD distributed file while the former contains a locally > maintained file, should changes be required between releases. I agree, although I've not got time to look at it at the moment due to an important database roll-out that's eating into my beauty sleep. > Before anyone asks for patches, I could start working on this on Jan 23 > or 30. If you want it sooner either produce patches yourself or wait > 'till the end of the month. Excellent. Let's work together on it. I've got a few outstanding things to implement in whois which I was intending to look at soon anyway. Is the config format that awhois uses any good? Can we improve on it? Joe -- Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just how Technical Manager deep the rabbit hole goes. (http://www.uk.freebsd.org) Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 12:48:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F7514EDB; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:47:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA63457; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:47:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000117154538.0206c360@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:45:38 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Multiport Serial card under stable Cc: stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am reconfiguring a customers multi-port serial card on a stable box. The pervious kernel config seems to agree with what the current documentation shows, options "COM_MULTIPORT" #Boca Multi-Port support #options "EXTRA_SIO=17" #number of extra sio ports to allocate (tried with and without) device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" tty irq 4 vector siointr device sio1 at isa? port 0x100 tty flags 0x1005 device sio2 at isa? port 0x108 tty flags 0x1005 device sio3 at isa? port 0x110 tty flags 0x1005 device sio4 at isa? port 0x118 tty flags 0x1005 device sio5 at isa? port 0x120 tty flags 0x1005 device sio6 at isa? port 0x128 tty flags 0x1005 device sio7 at isa? port 0x130 tty flags 0x1005 device sio8 at isa? port 0x138 tty flags 0x1005 device sio9 at isa? port 0x140 tty flags 0x1005 device sio10 at isa? port 0x148 tty flags 0x1005 device sio11 at isa? port 0x150 tty flags 0x1005 device sio12 at isa? port 0x158 tty flags 0x1005 device sio13 at isa? port 0x160 tty flags 0x1005 device sio14 at isa? port 0x168 tty flags 0x1005 device sio15 at isa? port 0x170 tty flags 0x1005 device sio16 at isa? port 0x178 tty flags 0x1005 irq 5 vector siointr But at bootup time, sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 not found at 0x100 sio2: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio2 not found at 0x108 sio3: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio3 not found at 0x110 sio4: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio4 not found at 0x118 sio5: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio5 not found at 0x120 sio6: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio6 not found at 0x128 sio7: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio7 not found at 0x130 sio8: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio8 not found at 0x138 sio9: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio9 not found at 0x140 sio10: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio10 not found at 0x148 sio11: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio11 not found at 0x150 sio12: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio12 not found at 0x158 sio13: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio13 not found at 0x160 sio14: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio14 not found at 0x168 sio15: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio15 not found at 0x170 sio16: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio16 not found at 0x178 From the previous 2.2.x machine, Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio0: type 16550A Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio1 at 0x100-0x107 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio1: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio2 at 0x108-0x10f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio2: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio3 at 0x110-0x117 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio3: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio4 at 0x118-0x11f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio4: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:57 mail /kernel: sio5 at 0x120-0x127 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio5: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio6 at 0x128-0x12f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio6: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio7 at 0x130-0x137 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio7: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio8 at 0x138-0x13f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio8: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio9 at 0x140-0x147 flag Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: s 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio9: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio10 at 0x148-0x14f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio10: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio11 at 0x150-0x157 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio11: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio12 at 0x158-0x15f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio12: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio13 at 0x160-0x167 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio13: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio14 at 0x168-0x16f flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio14: type 16550A (multiport) Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio15: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio15 not found at 0x170 Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio16 at 0x178-0x17f irq 5 flags 0x1005 on isa Jan 14 15:10:58 mail /kernel: sio16: type 16550A (multiport master) Any thoughts as to what am I missing ? ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 13:19:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9017514FAD for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:19:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21489; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:18:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200001172118.OAA21489@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-Reply-To: <200001171625.IAA07653@cwsys.cwsent.com> from Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group at "Jan 17, 0 08:24:52 am" To: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:18:18 -0700 (MST) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed > below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on > this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe > just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that > until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. > > stat /dos > File: "/dos" > Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory > Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) > Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 > Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > ITSD > Province of BC Filesystem date/times seem to work for me, under 2.2.8-STABLE: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Script started on Mon Jan 17 14:13:14 2000 % ls -l /dos/MSDOS.SYS -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jun 16 1998 /dos/MSDOS.SYS % touch /dos/touched % ls -l /dos/touched -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jan 17 14:13 /dos/touched % exit -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 13:24:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rumfish.corp.gulf.net (rumfish.corp.gulf.net [206.105.61.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF09B14F6A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:24:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phill@rumfish.corp.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (phill@localhost) by rumfish.corp.gulf.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09163 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:24:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from phill@rumfish.corp.gulf.net) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:24:35 -0600 (CST) From: Phillip Salzman To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Odd idle times Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone ever seen this before? ------------------------------------------------------------------- pompano:~ > w 3:18PM up 9 days, 19:03, 4 users, load averages: 0.06, 0.10, 0.11 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT user1 p0 bleh1.corp.gul 2:08PM 28 telnet user2 p1 bleh2.corp.gul 11:57AM 3:04 -su (csh) user3 p2 bleh3.corp.gul 3:11PM - cp phill p3 myws.corp.gulf 3:16PM - w pompano:~ > w 3:19PM up 9 days, 19:04, 6 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.15, 0.13 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT user1 p0 bleh1.corp.gul 2:08PM 29 telnet user2 p1 bleh2.corp.gul 11:57AM 3:05 -su (csh) user3 p2 bleh3.corp.gul 3:11PM - cat t phill p3 myws.corp.gul 3:16PM - w user3 p4 bleh3.corp.gul 3:18PM 26 -csh (csh) user3 p5 bleh3.corp.gul 3:18PM 2days -csh (csh) ------------------------------------------------------------------ The idle times should not be like that if user3 just logged in. Or, if user3 was already there -- why did s/he just appear in the second w(1)? -- Phillip Salzman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 13:39:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.jeah.net (shell2.jeah.net [216.132.235.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC2C14C4A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:39:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@jeah.net) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by shell.jeah.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA56044; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:39:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris@jeah.net) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:39:29 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Byrnes To: Phillip Salzman Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Odd idle times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > pompano:~ > w > 3:19PM up 9 days, 19:04, 6 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.15, 0.13 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > user1 p0 bleh1.corp.gul 2:08PM 29 telnet > user2 p1 bleh2.corp.gul 11:57AM 3:05 -su (csh) > user3 p2 bleh3.corp.gul 3:11PM - cat t > phill p3 myws.corp.gul 3:16PM - w > user3 p4 bleh3.corp.gul 3:18PM 26 -csh (csh) > user3 p5 bleh3.corp.gul 3:18PM 2days -csh (csh) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The idle times should not be like that if user3 just logged in. Or, > if user3 was already there -- why did s/he just appear in the second > w(1)? It could be that he has a screened session re-attached. - Chris Byrnes, chris@jeah.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 14:48:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3801015029 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:48:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id OAA24804; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:48:24 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda24802; Mon Jan 17 14:48:11 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA03375; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:48:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001172248.OAA03375@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdKw3371; Mon Jan 17 14:48:08 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:18:18 MST." <200001172118.OAA21489@freeway.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:48:08 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200001172118.OAA21489@freeway.dcfinc.com>, "Chad R. Larson" writes: > As I recall, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed > > below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on > > this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe > > just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that > > until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. > > > > stat /dos > > File: "/dos" > > Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory > > Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) > > Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 > > Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > Filesystem date/times seem to work for me, under 2.2.8-STABLE: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Script started on Mon Jan 17 14:13:14 2000 > % ls -l /dos/MSDOS.SYS > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jun 16 1998 /dos/MSDOS.SYS > % touch /dos/touched > % ls -l /dos/touched > -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jan 17 14:13 /dos/touched > % exit > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Based on a couple of private emails I received, I'm beginning to suspect Windows. Though I won't be able to test it under that environment until Saturday or Sunday. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 15:17:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98001503A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:17:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id PAA24873; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:17:24 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda24871; Mon Jan 17 15:17:13 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA03583; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdpD3580; Mon Jan 17 15:16:18 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA09368; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:16:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001172316.PAA09368@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdBH9361; Mon Jan 17 15:15:46 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Conrad Sabatier Cc: Mike Tancsa , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with 3.4-STABLE custom kernel In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:50:55 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:15:46 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Conrad Sabatier writes: > > On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 12:46 PM 1/17/00 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > >> > >>On 17-Jan-00 Mike Tancsa wrote: > >>> > >>> On first glance, it would seem you have come across a bad sector > >>> on > >>> your hard drive. > >> > >>So why then wouldn't booting into kernel.old detect the same > >>problem? > > > > Perhaps because something is trying to read from a bad sector. > > So, what would be the fix for this? fsck? Some drives (mostly SCSI) will remap the bad sectors automatically. Some drive manufacturers provide a utility that can be run from DOS that will remap bad sectors. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "e**(i*pi)+1=0" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 19:24:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from anarcat.dyndns.org (phobos.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.20.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35C71509F for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:24:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spidey@anarcat.dyndns.org) Received: by anarcat.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DCCF1BEB; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:16:35 -0500 (EST) From: Spidey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14467.56082.953656.416222@anarcat.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:16:34 -0500 (EST) To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? References: <200001171625.IAA07653@cwsys.cwsent.com> <200001172118.OAA21489@freeway.dcfinc.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: beaupran@iro.umontreal.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't think this is really the problem. It's more the mount point that is badly marked. Not the files in the filesystem. I will try to test this (*sigh*, gotta reboot again.. :)) I guess a good procedure would be: reboot BIOS(setdate(1999.12.31.11.58)) boot windows 'touch' c: look date reboot fbsd look date no? see ya --- Big Brother told Chad R. Larson to write, at 14:18 of January 17: > As I recall, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed > > below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on > > this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe > > just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that > > until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. > > > > stat /dos > > File: "/dos" > > Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory > > Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) > > Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 > > Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > > > > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > > Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > > ITSD > > Province of BC > > Filesystem date/times seem to work for me, under 2.2.8-STABLE: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Script started on Mon Jan 17 14:13:14 2000 > % ls -l /dos/MSDOS.SYS > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jun 16 1998 /dos/MSDOS.SYS > % touch /dos/touched > % ls -l /dos/touched > -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 0 Jan 17 14:13 /dos/touched > % exit > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > -crl > -- > Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? > chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net > DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Si l'image donne l'illusion de savoir C'est que l'adage pretend que pour croire, L'important ne serait que de voir Lofofora To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 19:24:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from anarcat.dyndns.org (phobos.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.20.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F91F150A6 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:24:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spidey@anarcat.dyndns.org) Received: by anarcat.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE3E71BE9; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:11:43 -0500 (EST) From: Spidey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14467.55790.965968.808394@anarcat.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:11:42 -0500 (EST) To: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Mark Ovens , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? References: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: beaupran@iro.umontreal.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Confirmed on 3.4-STABLE 1999.12.28 $ ls -dl /dos drwxrwx--- 1 root dos 4096 Jan 1 1980 /dos/ $ uname -a FreeBSD anarcat.dyndns.org 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #1: Wed Dec 29 14:37:01 EST 1999 spidey@anarcat.dyndns.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/HALL i386 Funny. But as long as it's in dos.. I don't really give a darn.. :)) --- Big Brother told Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr to write, at 17:16 of January 17: > > > Same here : > > pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (261) ->ls -ld /dos_c > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17408 Jan 1 1980 /dos_c > pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (262) ->uname -a > FreeBSD pc-mcs1.telspace.alcatel.fr 2.2.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE #0: Mon6 > pc-mcs1:/usr/home/herbelot (263) -> > > pc-bsd53% ls -ld /dos_c > drwxr-xr-x 1 herbelot users 16384 Jan 1 1980 /dos_c > pc-bsd53% uname -a > FreeBSD pc-bsd53.val9900.telspace.alcatel.fr 3.3-19990905-RC FreeBSD 3.3-1999096 > pc-bsd53% > > TfH > > > > > > Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group on 17/01/2000 16:11:46 > > Please respond to Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group > > > > To: Mark Ovens > > cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG(bcc: Thierry > HERBELOT/FR/ALCATEL) > > > > Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? > > > > > > > In message <20000115130501.A336@marder-1>, Mark Ovens writes: > > Hmm, just noticed this (note the dates): > > > > marder-1# ls -ld /drvc /ntfs > > drwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 1 1980 /drvc > > It appears there is a Y2K problem with either msdosfs, as witnessed > below from one of my machines. I don't have any plans to boot W95 on > this system until Saturday, so I won't know how W95 lists it as. Maybe > just touching the directory may fix it, though I'm unwilling to do that > until I've had a chance to look at it under W95. > > stat /dos > File: "/dos" > Size: 16384 Allocated Blocks: 32 Filetype: Directory > Mode: (0775/drwxrwxr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/wheel) > Device: 0,196610 Inode: 1 Links: 1 > Access: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Modify: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > Change: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1980 > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > ITSD > Province of BC > "e**(i*pi)+1=0" > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Si l'image donne l'illusion de savoir C'est que l'adage pretend que pour croire, L'important ne serait que de voir Lofofora To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 19:50:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from anarcat.dyndns.org (phobos.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.20.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E09B15083 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:50:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spidey@anarcat.dyndns.org) Received: by anarcat.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EDAA1B61; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:49:57 -0500 (EST) From: Spidey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14467.58084.338784.771795@anarcat.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:49:56 -0500 (EST) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? References: <200001172118.OAA21489@freeway.dcfinc.com> <200001172248.OAA03375@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: beaupran@iro.umontreal.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (-stable 1999.12.28 + Win98 (FAT32) here.) After verification, surprisingly, I cannot state the change date on my C in windows. I am quite surprise of that. Even a 'dir C:' doesn't give me a '.' entry. Strange. This may be related. (??) How can one state the change date on a drive? chkdsk gives me only the creation date. Is there a change date _at all_ for disks in DOS??? Also, I would like to point out, even if it may be obvious to some people, that unmounting the filesystem (/dos) gives back a more sensible date for the directory. Also, mounting the dos partition on another directory doesn't solve the problem. Small example: anarcat$ mount /dos anarcat$ ls -dl /dos drwxrwx--- 1 root dos 4096 Jan 1 1980 /dos anarcat$ umount /dos anarcat$ ls -dl /dos drwxrwx--- 2 root dos 512 Feb 24 1999 /dos anarcat$ mount -t msdos /dev/wd0s1 /mnt ls anarcat$ ls -ld /mnt drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4096 Jan 1 1980 /mnt anarcat$ umount /mnt anarcat$ And obviously, a change in the directory does not update the date... -- Si l'image donne l'illusion de savoir C'est que l'adage pretend que pour croire, L'important ne serait que de voir Lofofora -- Si l'image donne l'illusion de savoir C'est que l'adage pretend que pour croire, L'important ne serait que de voir Lofofora To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 21:26: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.greatbasin.net (mail.greatbasin.net [207.228.35.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7EE14C0A for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@jgl.reno.nv.us) Received: from jgl.reno.nv.us (rno-max2-50.gbis.net [207.228.60.178]) by mail.greatbasin.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA10542; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from danco (danco.home [10.0.0.2]) by jgl.reno.nv.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA46701; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:25:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@jgl.reno.nv.us) Message-ID: <01e101bf6174$7d584260$0200000a@danco.home> From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "Troy Settle" , Subject: Re: 1/16/2000 make world success Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:57:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >With the recent threads about crap failing... > >I cvsup'ed the evening of 1/16/2000, and built the world and installed it, >and didn't have a single problem. > >Actually, I can't remember the last time I had a failure that an immediate >cvsup didn't fix. And even that has been at least a couple years. Troubleshooting rules-of-thumb: 1. If you have a problem in Windows, reboot... 2. If 'make world', kernel rebuilds, or ports break in FreeBSD, wait a couple of hours and re-cvsup... These two steps solve 99% of all computing problems in the known universe. :-) --Dan ** The thing I like most about Windows 98 is... ** You can download FreeBSD with it! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 23:45:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lesbains.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (lesbains.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8251504E for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:45:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (brabantio [134.2.12.25]) by lesbains.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB1643D for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:45:14 +0100 (NFT) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA24526; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:45:14 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: parallel printer & nlpt0 References: <14462.17367.949655.971736@onceler.kcilink.com> <20000114133954.A96965@lpthe.jussieu.fr> From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: 18 Jan 2000 08:45:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: Michel TALON's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:39:54 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) XEmacs/21.2 (Millenium) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "Michel" == Michel TALON writes: Michel> On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 10:50:41PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: >> >> > >>>>> "RK" == Ronald Klop writes: >> > >> > RK> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: >> > >> > >> A comment in GENERIC would also suffice, I think. >> > >> > RK> Hello, >> > >> > RK> Maybe it's good to make an update of the man pages also. >> > RK> Man lpt gives the info about the old lpt device (before ppbus was >> > RK> introduced). Man nlpt gives info about the current (3.x-STABLE) lpt >> > RK> device. Everything discussed in this thread is explained in that page. >> > >> > Actually, I was looking at the man page for ppc and it says nothing >> > about using "net" instead of "tty", so that probably could use an >> > update as well. The synopsis actually only lists the "tty" variant. >> > >> >> But looking at 'man plip' wil show you the net option. But I agree, net >> is an option to ppc, so it should also be mentioned in that man page. Michel> And moreover the significance of the flags tty and net is explained in Michel> man splnet. A reference to that page would be nice in man ppbus. I've read that, but how does this difference account for the printer problems people are having? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 17 23:55: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.uunet.ca (mail1.uunet.ca [209.167.141.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97A14E18 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:54:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from w01.arpa-canada.net ([216.95.146.6]) by mail1.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <217980-9236>; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 02:54:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 02:54:52 -0500 From: matt X-Sender: matt@w01.arpa-canada.net To: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: -Stable on a Toshiba. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, This is a bit off the normal discussion here, but I've been laptop shopping, and have my mind rather liking the Toshiba 2610DVD, I've been wondering what my odds are on getting fbsd -stable to run on the thing. Has anyone had any exp. with this particular laptop? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 1: 1: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtppzh.pzh.nl (webshield.pzh.nl [194.178.168.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A09EB14E2F for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:01:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MULHUIJZEN@PZH.NL) Received: FROM smtp.pzh.nl BY smtppzh.pzh.nl ; Tue Jan 18 10:00:08 2000 0000 Received: from PZH40-1-Message_Server by smtp.pzh.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:00:12 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:59:26 +0100 From: "ROGIER MULHUIJZEN" To: , Subject: Re: -Stable on a Toshiba. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Myself I have a Toshiba Tecra 8000, and the only trouble I had was with the soundcard. I had to go out and buy OSS to get it to work properly (but hey, OSS is pretty good IMHO). And since this sound chipset I have (Yamaha OPL-SAx3) and it's close relatives, have been in Toshiba notebooks for years, I'd say the 2610 will probably have it too. And don't believe what they say about SoundBlaster Pro compatible, cuz it ain't. ANY soundblaster pro driver will only do 8 bit sound. It probably has the NeoMagic MagicMedia 256AV as graphics chipset too, and well, it runs X fine for me. Toshiba usually sticks to a certain piece of technology once they start using it, so I'd say you'll have a pretty good chance of making a kickass little workstation out of it. But why don't you ask if you can tinker with it for an hour or so in the store. Just bring a 3.4-RELEASE CD and go to town on it. If it works, you're happy, and they'll have sold a notebook. If not, you're happy you didn't spend all that money, and they.... well erm.... COULD have sold a notebook. Just make sure you don't get cardbus PCMCIA cards for now. DocWilco >>> matt 01/18 8:54 AM >>> Hi, This is a bit off the normal discussion here, but I've been laptop shopping, and have my mind rather liking the Toshiba 2610DVD, I've been wondering what my odds are on getting fbsd -stable to run on the thing. Has anyone had any exp. with this particular laptop? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 1:31:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sapphire.looksharp.net (mcdouga9.user.msu.edu [35.10.148.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B691526E for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:31:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by sapphire.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA94973; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:30:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) X-Authentication-Warning: sapphire.looksharp.net: bsdx owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:30:54 -0500 (EST) From: Adam To: "Dan O'Connor" Cc: Troy Settle , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1/16/2000 make world success In-Reply-To: <01e101bf6174$7d584260$0200000a@danco.home> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Dan O'Connor wrote: > >With the recent threads about crap failing... > > > >I cvsup'ed the evening of 1/16/2000, and built the world and installed it, > >and didn't have a single problem. > > > >Actually, I can't remember the last time I had a failure that an immediate > >cvsup didn't fix. And even that has been at least a couple years. > > > Troubleshooting rules-of-thumb: > > 1. If you have a problem in Windows, reboot... > > 2. If 'make world', kernel rebuilds, or ports break in FreeBSD, wait a > couple of hours and re-cvsup... > > These two steps solve 99% of all computing problems in the known universe. > :-) > > --Dan I thought it was this: Having trouble in Windows? ReBoot. Having trouble in Unix? BeRoot. (paraphrased from Gldm) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 1:32: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tricord.system.pl (tricord.system.pl [195.205.185.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7697A14E2F for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:32:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from saper@system.pl) Received: from localhost (saper@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tricord.system.pl (SYSTEM Internet) with ESMTP id JAA18368 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:01:08 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:01:05 +0100 (MET) From: Marcin Cieslak To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-Reply-To: <14467.58084.338784.771795@anarcat.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The problem is, that no one remembers how things used to be before Y2K. I suppose that 1 Jan 1980 date (or DOS epoch) was normal. FAT root directory is different than others, for example it does not have a true "parent" entry with attrs, times etc. It cannot also grow easily. Even it's cluster number is a special case (0) or MSDOSFS_ROOT. Anyone wants to see my "/dos" entry on otherwise-compliant Solaris 2.5/Intel? # ls -ld /dos drwxrwxrwx 1 root other 16384 Jan 1 1970 /dos It's even UNIX epoch! :) -- << Marcin Cieslak // saper@system.pl >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- SYSTEM Internet Provider http://www.system.pl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 2:17:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from martens.math.ntnu.no (martens.math.ntnu.no [129.241.15.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F216714DA9 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 02:17:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perhov@math.ntnu.no) Received: (qmail 19456 invoked by uid 29119); 18 Jan 2000 10:17:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:17:47 +0100 (MET) From: Per Kristian Hove X-Sender: perhov@martens.math.ntnu.no To: Marcin Cieslak Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Marcin Cieslak] | The problem is, that no one remembers how things used to be | before Y2K. I suppose that 1 Jan 1980 date (or DOS epoch) | was normal. Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to show that it's always been this way. $ tar tvzf svele-c.tar.gz |head -3 drwx------ perhov/perhov 0 Jan 1 01:00 1970 ./ -r-x------ perhov/perhov 40566 Sep 30 06:20 1993 io.sys -r-x------ perhov/perhov 38138 Sep 30 06:20 1993 msdos.sys [*] It might even have been NetBSD or Solaris, I can't recall. That may explain the UNIX epoch above. Nonetheless, it's not Y2K related. -- Per Kristian Hove Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, NTNU N-7491 Trondheim, Norway To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 4: 0: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay01.chello.nl (smtp.chello.nl [212.83.68.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9905150D7 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl ([212.187.104.187]) by relay01.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license a4501b83b68dc3e36f6046e1d8586abe) with ESMTP id <20000118120738.CSQR512.relay01@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:07:38 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:00:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Ernst de Haan X-Sender: ernst@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl To: Adam Cc: Dan O'Connor , Troy Settle , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1/16/2000 make world success In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Adam wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Dan O'Connor wrote: ----------8<------------ > > 1. If you have a problem in Windows, reboot... Nah, try a reinstall. That _usually_ does the trick (B-P > > These two steps solve 99% of all computing problems in the known universe. > > :-) ;'/ > I thought it was this: > > Having trouble in Windows? ReBoot. > Having trouble in Unix? BeRoot. > > (paraphrased from Gldm) Ernst To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 4:51:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cutter.wantabe.com (cutter.wantabe.com [209.16.8.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8F214E4C for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:51:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeffrl@wantabe.com) Received: from cutter.wantabe.com (cutter.wantabe.com [209.16.8.8]) by cutter.wantabe.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA08403 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 06:51:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 06:51:02 -0600 (CST) From: "Jeffrey J. Libman" To: stable@freeBSD.org Subject: panic: dirty bufs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG one of my machines with 3.4-stable (build of Friday Jan 14 cvsup'd the same day) just locked up with malloc errors ...couldn't even log onto the console. on cntrl-alt-delete, i got: panic: vimvalbufs: dirty bufs can you tell me what this means? cheers, jeff -- | |\ +------------------------------+ Jeffrey J. Libman, ops. mgr. | \ | Wantabe Internet Services | Wantabe, Inc. |__\ +------------------------------+ jeffrl@wantabe.com <-----|------> | access web cgi ftp news mail | (281) 493-0718 __,.-=\'`^`'~=-../__,.-= +------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 4:56:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920A814CA6 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:56:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA09257; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 05:19:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 05:19:51 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Jeffrey J. Libman" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: dirty bufs Message-ID: <20000118051951.B8736@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from jeffrl@wantabe.com on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 06:51:02AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jeffrey J. Libman [000118 05:15] wrote: > one of my machines with 3.4-stable (build of Friday Jan 14 cvsup'd the > same day) just locked up with malloc errors ...couldn't even log onto the > console. > > on cntrl-alt-delete, i got: > > panic: vimvalbufs: dirty bufs > > can you tell me what this means? it means that for some reason when the kernel tried to flush a file to the underlying storage (NFS, disk, whatever) it failed, without a backtrace or your kernel config and a general idea of 'what you were doing' before the panic, it's pretty hard to pin this down on anything. please see: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 6: 7:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from main.mednet.com (main.mednet.com [194.186.40.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2F914C31 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 06:06:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lenya@fonds.phtula.mednet.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by main.mednet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id RAA03025 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:06:52 +0300 (MSK) Received: from starlight (starlight.tula.ffoms.ru [10.20.25.200]) by tula.tula.ffoms.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA04499 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:59:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from lenya@fonds.phtula.mednet.com) Message-ID: <004e01bf61bd$14de7620$c819140a@tula.ffoms.ru> From: "çÁÒÁÇÁÔÙÊ áÌÅËÓÅÊ âÏÒÉÓÏ×ÉÞ" To: Subject: Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:05:31 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004B_01BF61D6.39E0E980" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2417.2000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01BF61D6.39E0E980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01BF61D6.39E0E980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01BF61D6.39E0E980-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 9:14:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616D51517E for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:13:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steveroo@mothra.bri.hp.com) Received: from mothra.bri.hp.com (mothra.bri.hp.com [15.144.1.185]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E505921 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (steveroo@localhost) by mothra.bri.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id RAA14331 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:13:00 GMT Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:13:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -Stable on a Toshiba. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, ROGIER MULHUIJZEN wrote: > Myself I have a Toshiba Tecra 8000, and the only trouble I had was with > the soundcard. I had to go out and buy OSS to get it to work properly > (but hey, OSS is pretty good IMHO). And since this sound chipset I have > (Yamaha OPL-SAx3) and it's close relatives, have been in Toshiba > notebooks for years, I'd say the 2610 will probably have it too. And > don't believe what they say about SoundBlaster Pro compatible, cuz it > ain't. ANY soundblaster pro driver will only do 8 bit sound. This soundcard has worked with pcm0 since before 3.2-RELEASE, although I must admit that mine is not in a laptop. Also I do have to use the synth volume controls to change the CD volume. I've not actually tried this with -stable yet, but it was never a big problem - although midi might be nice if OSS does that. [btw, I got about half way into trying to get the driver to understand the mixer better a while back, but Yamaha never did send me the chipset specs they promised so I spent my time at work instead =( ] Steve Roome Hopefully that was of some use.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 12:15:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313AF1517A for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:15:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-stable@boneyard.lawrence.ks.us) Received: from mail (mail [24.124.26.25]) by madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24102 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:15:09 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:15:09 -0600 (CST) From: SDS To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -Stable on a Toshiba. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Stephen Roome wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, ROGIER MULHUIJZEN wrote: > > Myself I have a Toshiba Tecra 8000, and the only trouble I had was with > > the soundcard. I had to go out and buy OSS to get it to work properly > > [...] > This soundcard has worked with pcm0 since before 3.2-RELEASE, although I must > admit that mine is not in a laptop. [...] I am using a Tecra8000. A loose order of operations is to disable sound w/in BIOS, configure everything else. See what system resources are left and utilize them in the configuration of pcm and the sound device. Also, this is not a PnP device so I found it expeditious to remove the pnp option from my kernel config. "Will there be another race to come along and take over for us? Maybe Martians could do better than we've done. We'll make great pets..." [Perry Farrell] Stephen D. Spencer - Lawrence, KS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 13:42:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rumfish.corp.gulf.net (rumfish.corp.gulf.net [206.105.61.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07AE1517E for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:42:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phill@rumfish.corp.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (phill@localhost) by rumfish.corp.gulf.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03546 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:42:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from phill@rumfish.corp.gulf.net) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:42:12 -0600 (CST) From: Phillip Salzman To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Stray IRQs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A mission-critical production machine of ours seems to be having issues with stray irqs. This is in the dmesg: ----------------------------- stray irq 15 stray irq 15 stray irq 15 stray irq 15 stray irq 15 too many stray irq 15's; not logging any more ---------------------------- It seems as if the ethernet traffic stops for about a minute when it posts that message. I've searched back in the mailing lists to find that this may be caused by the BIOS grabbing the IRQ -- and was just wondering if anyone else has seen this problem lately? Thanks --- Phillip Salzman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 14:46:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beholder.ods.org (ppp-047.m2-1.sub.ican.net [142.51.225.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72C7150DA for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:46:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from beholder@beholder.ods.org) Received: from beholder.ods.org (laptop [192.168.0.21]) by beholder.ods.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05925; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:45:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from beholder@beholder.ods.org) Message-ID: <3884ED90.25FAA604@beholder.ods.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:47:44 -0500 From: Pat Wendorf X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phillip Salzman Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stray IRQs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Phillip Salzman wrote: > > A mission-critical production machine of ours seems to be > having issues with stray irqs. > > This is in the dmesg: > ----------------------------- > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > too many stray irq 15's; not logging any more > ---------------------------- > > It seems as if the ethernet traffic stops for about a minute > when it posts that message. > > I've searched back in the mailing lists to find that this > may be caused by the BIOS grabbing the IRQ -- and was just > wondering if anyone else has seen this problem lately? > I had that same problem, but it happened when I shutdown a Printer port (in my bios setup) for a very buggy motherboard. It happened because, even though I had shut it down, the IRQ was still firing (which confused the hell out of freebsd I guess). Sounds like you've got a flakey NIC on that machine, and you should probably get it replaced. -- ---------------------- Pat Wendorf beholder@unios.dhs.org ICQ: 1503733 --------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 14:52:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beholder.ods.org (ppp-047.m2-1.sub.ican.net [142.51.225.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DC71525E for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:52:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from beholder@beholder.ods.org) Received: from beholder.ods.org (laptop [192.168.0.21]) by beholder.ods.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05940; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:51:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from beholder@beholder.ods.org) Message-ID: <3884EEF4.A7F3466B@beholder.ods.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:53:40 -0500 From: Pat Wendorf X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SDS Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -Stable on a Toshiba. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG SDS wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Stephen Roome wrote: > > I am using a Tecra8000. A loose order of operations is to disable sound w/in > BIOS, configure everything else. See what system resources are left and > utilize them in the configuration of pcm and the sound device. Also, this > is not a PnP device so I found it expeditious to remove the pnp option from > my kernel config. I have a Digital Highnote VP 575, which uses an ESS1688 sound card (chip?). I'm not sure if you have this problem, but when I use the pcm0 driver, I get 16 bit sound, but the playback is very very choppy and sounds horrible. Now I'm stuck with the snd0+sb0 device drivers, which only give me 8-bit mono sound. The nice thing about the pcm0 driver is it properly detects the sound card as an ESS1688, while the SB driver complains about the wrong sound card type, but it functions nonetheless. Any insights from a fellow laptop users would be appreciated. -- ---------------------- Pat Wendorf beholder@unios.dhs.org ICQ: 1503733 --------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 18 15: 1:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4464214CF1 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:01:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03097; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:07:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <200001182307.PAA03097@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Phillip Salzman Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stray IRQs In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:42:12 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:07:08 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > A mission-critical production machine of ours seems to be > having issues with stray irqs. > > This is in the dmesg: > ----------------------------- > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > stray irq 15 > too many stray irq 15's; not logging any more > ---------------------------- > > It seems as if the ethernet traffic stops for about a minute > when it posts that message. > > I've searched back in the mailing lists to find that this > may be caused by the BIOS grabbing the IRQ -- and was just > wondering if anyone else has seen this problem lately? No; this is typically caused by having hardware in the system that's generating interrupts but isn't handled by a driver. It may be symptomatic of faulty hardware or a system misconfiguration. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 0:28:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bse.bse.bg (bse.bse.bg [195.138.140.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A12814A2E for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:28:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Hristo@BSE.BG) Received: from BSE.BG (nitrous.bse.bg [195.138.140.28]) by bse.bse.bg (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA21291 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:28:44 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <388575BD.58CCDF59@BSE.BG> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:28:45 +0200 From: Hristo Grigorov Organization: BSE AD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: bg, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: strange process info Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9AFC79E80F9516CB77625B7B" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9AFC79E80F9516CB77625B7B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings! I am not sure, but the following 'ps' output looks strange to me: .... 61890 ?? S -2341043:-43.88 /usr/local/sbin/ncftpd -q /usr/local/etc/ncftpd/general.cf /usr/local/etc/ncftpd/domain.cf ... Any comments ? --------------9AFC79E80F9516CB77625B7B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Hristo.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Hristo Grigorov Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Hristo.vcf" begin:vcard n:Grigorov;Hristo tel;fax:+359 56 29635 tel;work:+359 56 800430 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:BSE;Internet adr:;;k-s "B.Miladinovi" 42A;Bourgas;;8000;BULGARIA version:2.1 email;internet:Hristo@BSE.BG title:Internet Services Manager x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Hristo Grigorov end:vcard --------------9AFC79E80F9516CB77625B7B-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 1: 1:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A62E14A2E; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:01:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hiwaay.net) Received: from tnt6-216-180-4-117.dialup.HiWAAY.net (tnt6-216-180-4-117.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.117]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA13536; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 03:01:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 03:01:09 -0600 (CST) From: Kris Kirby To: Gregory Bond Cc: Donald Burr , FreeBSD Questions , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Any chance at supporting writing to ATAPI CD-R/RW at >2X? In-Reply-To: <200001162243.JAA12170@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think the document is misleading. The arg 'double' seems to be to write in > the fastest speed that the drive will support. I know I write a full CD in > around 15 minutes on my (4x) HP 8100i drive after specifying "prepdisk double". This is *great*. Now I don't have to reboot to burn a CD! (I also own a 8110) -- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "God gave them the ability to reproduce... ... Science gave us the hope they won't." -KBK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 2:46:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from carlton.innotts.co.uk (carlton.innotts.co.uk [212.56.32.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D763D1519D for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 02:46:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robmel@innotts.co.uk) Received: from muffin.highwire.local (pool-1-p34.innotts.co.uk [212.56.33.34]) by carlton.innotts.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08531; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:46:29 GMT Received: from [172.16.17.20] (robsmac.highwire.local [172.16.17.20]) by muffin.highwire.local (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00439; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:45:33 GMT (envelope-from robmel@innotts.co.uk) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: robmel@wrcmail (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200001182307.PAA03097@mass.cdrom.com> References: <200001182307.PAA03097@mass.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:45:38 +0000 To: Phillip Salzman From: Robin Melville Subject: Re: Stray IRQs Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > A mission-critical production machine of ours seems to be > > having issues with stray irqs. > > > > This is in the dmesg: > > ----------------------------- > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > too many stray irq 15's; not logging any more > > ---------------------------- >No; this is typically caused by having hardware in the system that's >generating interrupts but isn't handled by a driver. It may be >symptomatic of faulty hardware or a system misconfiguration. I agree, I saw this when I removed an lpt driver from the kernel. Make sure all your hardware devices are config-ed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Robin Melville, Addiction Information Service Nottingham Alcohol & Drug Team Tel: +44 (0)115 952 9478 Fax: +44 (0)115 952 9421 work: robmel@nadt.org.uk Pages: http://www.nadt.org.uk/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 3:59:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD6B14EF5 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 03:59:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steveroo@mothra.bri.hp.com) Received: from mothra.bri.hp.com (mothra.bri.hp.com [15.144.1.185]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231121161; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 06:59:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (steveroo@localhost) by mothra.bri.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id LAA26045; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:58:42 GMT Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:58:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: Pat Wendorf Cc: SDS , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -Stable on a Toshiba. In-Reply-To: <3884EEF4.A7F3466B@beholder.ods.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Pat Wendorf wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Stephen Roome wrote: > > > > I am using a Tecra8000. A loose order of operations is to disable sound w/in > > BIOS, configure everything else. See what system resources are left and > > utilize them in the configuration of pcm and the sound device. Also, this > > is not a PnP device so I found it expeditious to remove the pnp option from > > my kernel config. > Yikes! I didn't write that and I don't have laptop running FreeBSD. All I was saying is that the Yamaha OPL-SAx3 should work fine. Although I sometimes see these : "How strange... mss_intr with no reason!" Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 7:35:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from WEBSI.com (websi.com [216.156.137.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C16C14C49 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:35:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shashi@WEBSI.com) Received: (from shashi@localhost) by WEBSI.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA77755; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:34:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shashi) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:34:34 -0500 From: ShashiKant Joshi To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Makeworld of 3.4 (on a 3.2 box) fails in 'rebuilding bootstrap libraries' Message-ID: <20000119103434.A77321@Shift-F1.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I looked in the archives, but no one seems to have had problem in buildworld. Lucky people are able to reach the install stage !! I have 3.2-stable on production and test box. Both had 3.2-stable installed from CD, and cvsuped to get latest changes back in Jul 99. From Jan 06-18 I have been trying to do a make world for 3.4 Here is what I did. mv /usr/src /usr/SRC cvsup 3.4 cd /usr/src make buildworld On prod box, it compiled okay. I have not done a installworld yet on prod. On test box, I got errors in bootsrap libraries. So I tared /usr/src of prod, ftp to test , untared it and did a make world again. I again get error in make buildworld. about .section in /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c I cvsuped this on Jan 06, 2000. I don't want to installworld on prod unless it succeeds on test. Any reason why it would buildworld on prod and not on test? Here is the error: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding bootstrap libraries -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin BISON_SIMPLE=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/share/misc/bison.simple COMPILER_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib NOEXTRADEPEND=t OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/libexec /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -f Makefile.inc1 bootstrap-libraries cd /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED all; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -B install cleandir obj rm -f .depend /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GPATH /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GRTAGS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GSYMS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GTAGS cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c -o crt1.o cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c -o crtbegin.o [ ... stderr went to terminal :-^%$#%$% It gives error about .section not being valid option/ not being allowed??? complains about .section ] *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. -- Shashi Joshi _____________________________________________________________________ __o o__ o__ o__ o__ There's one _ \<._ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ in every (_)/ (_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) crowd... _____________________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 8:18:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5900152B8; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:18:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:RAcuuhKoSZq9IL9wY+MuOSAZZUH87okD@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7Wpl2) with ESMTP id BAA00329; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:18:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id BAA01247; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:23:55 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200001191623.BAA01247@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: "Jeffrey J. Libman" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: rpc.statd won't fire on friday's build In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2000 07:49:58 CST." References: Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:23:54 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am experiencing the same problem on the 4.0-CURRENT system built from the source around Saturday. Another -CURRENT box, for which 'make world' was done from the source about a week ago, appears to have no problem. I suspect `portmap' is somewhat broken. In addition to `rpc.statd', `nfsd' and `mountd' are also unable to register ports. nfsd:[88]: can't register with udp portmap mountd[86]: can't register mount Kazu >no idea what i've done here. > >friday's cvsup and build...new kernel...installed on 2 systems. on one of >the systems, rpc.statd will not run, gets: > >rpc.statd: unable to register (SM_PROG, SM_VERS, udp) > >this particular system has about 50 ip's assigned to lo0...and that has >worked fine as is for months, inspite of all the verbage here about >netmasks and such. loopback IS configured. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 8:34: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from amalthea.salford.ac.uk (amalthea.salford.ac.uk [146.87.255.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 212FE15284 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:34:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk) Received: (qmail 14712 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2000 16:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14706 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2000 16:34:00 -0000 Received: from plato.salford.ac.uk (146.87.255.76) by amalthea.salford.ac.uk with SMTP; 19 Jan 2000 16:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7202 invoked by uid 141); 19 Jan 2000 16:34:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:34:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Powell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: VM problems with recent 3.4-S and DPT controllers Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have 3 machines which are to become SMTP servers. All three are identical config except two have DPT controllers and one has an Adaptec 2940U2W. I've been keeping up with 3.4-S, with latest cvsup this morning. Exactly the same kernel is used on all three machines, so the dpt and the ahc driver are in there. The dpt machines will start producing vm_fault error messages after a while of running. A long running command such as "tar cfl /all.tar /" usually does the trick. This has been occuring since last week. I thought cvsupping might get it to a stage where the problem was fixed, but no. Sample errors: Jan 19 15:44:00 rhea syslogd: /var/log/all: Input/output error Jan 19 15:44:00 rhea /kernel: spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=5) Jan 19 15:44:00 rhea /kernel: size: 20480, resid: 20480, a_count: 20480, valid: 0x0 Jan 19 15:44:00 rhea /kernel: nread: 0, reqpage: 4, pindex: 15, pcount: 5 Jan 19 15:44:00 rhea /kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 61311 (tar) Once they've hit this state any command will usually produce a segmentation fault. Sometimes reboot works sometimes not: rhea:/ # reboot Jan 19 15:52:38 rhea /kernel: spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=5) Jan 19 15:52:38 rhea /kernel: size: 65536, resid: 65536, a_count: 65536, valid: 0x0 Jan 19 15:52:38 rhea /kernel: nread: 0, reqpage: 0, pindex: 0, pcount: 16 bash: /sbin/reboot: Input/output error rhea:/ # Going back to the 3.4-R GENERIC kernel cures the problem. So it's either something that's changed since 3.4-R or maybe my config file is screwy. I cvsupped one machine back to 3.4-R and used the same kernel config file. The problem was cured. If I use the GENERIC config file with the latest 3.4-S source I get the same problems. The Adaptec machine has no problems at all. Looks like something has changed which is screwing these DPT machines. All three machines have: Asus P3B-F 512MB RAM Intel EtherExpress Pro 100+ 2 x 9GB 10K rpm IBM drives (I have two other web cache machines with the exact same config except 6 drives and 1GB RAM. They have DPT controllers and run 3.3-R no problem). All three have the following config file (I also tried taking the smb stuff out, but with no improvement): ------------------ machine "i386" cpu "I586_CPU" cpu "I686_CPU" ident SMTP maxusers 128 options "NMBCLUSTERS=8192" #options MSIZE="256" #options "MAXDSIZ=(1024*1024*1024)" #options "DFLDSIZ=(1024*1024*1024)" options INET options FFS options FFS_ROOT options "SOFTUPDATES" options "AUTO_EOI_1" options "COMPAT_43" options SCSI_REPORT_GEOMETRY options SCSI_DELAY=0 options VESA options "VM86" options UCONSOLE options FAILSAFE options "INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE" #options DDB #options DDB_UNATTENDED config kernel root on da0 controller isa0 controller pci0 controller dpt0 options DPT_ALLOW_MEMIO controller fdc0 at isa? port "IO_FD1" bio irq 6 drq 2 disk fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # Enable PnP support in the kernel. This allows you to automaticly # attach to PnP cards for drivers that support it and allows you to # configure cards from USERCONFIG. See pnp(4) for more info. controller pnp0 # Luigi's snd code (use INSTEAD of snd0 and all VOXWARE drivers!). # You may also wish to enable the pnp controller with this, for pnp # sound cards. # #device pcm0 at isa? port ? tty irq 10 drq 1 flags 0x0 #controller ncr0 controller ahc0 controller scbus0 device da0 device sa0 device pass0 device cd0 device npx0 at isa? port IO_NPX irq 13 device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" flags 0x10 tty irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port "IO_COM2" tty irq 3 device sio2 at isa? disable port "IO_COM3" tty irq 5 device sio3 at isa? disable port "IO_COM4" tty irq 9 controller atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD tty device atkbd0 at isa? tty irq 1 device vga0 at isa? port ? conflicts device sc0 at isa? tty pseudo-device splash device fxp0 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 controller ppbus0 device nlpt0 at ppbus? device plip0 at ppbus? device ppi0 at ppbus? #controller vpo0 at ppbus? pseudo-device loop pseudo-device ether pseudo-device pty 16 #pseudo-device ppp 1 pseudo-device speaker pseudo-device vn 1 pseudo-device snp 2 options KTRACE pseudo-device bpfilter 2 options SYSVSHM options SYSVSEM options SYSVMSG options "MD5" options "ICMP_BANDLIM" controller smbus0 controller iicbus0 controller iicbb0 controller intpm0 device smb0 at smbus? -------------- The dmesg output for the DPT machines is: -------------- Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 19 09:23:21 GMT 2000 root@rhea.salford.ac.uk:/usr/src/sys/compile/SMTP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 451024898 Hz CPU: Pentium III (451.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff> real memory = 536870912 (524288K bytes) avail memory = 519884800 (507700K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0281000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x03 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x03 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x02 on pci0.4.0 intpm0: rev 0x02 on pci0.4.3 intpm0: I/O mapped e800 ALLOCED IRQ 0 intr IRQ 9 enabled revision 0 intsmb0: smbus0: on intsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 intpm0: PM I/O mapped e400 fxp0: rev 0x08 int a irq 10 on pci0.9.0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:0b:1b:5f dpt0: rev 0x02 int a irq 11 on pci0.11.0 dpt0: DPT PM3334UW FW Rev. 07M0, 2 channels, 64 CCBs Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: vga0: rev 0x7a on pci1.0.0 Probing for PnP devices: Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 on isa ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppi0: on ppbus 0 plip0: on ppbus 0 npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa changing root device to da0s1a da0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 8747MB (17915728 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1115C) WARNING: / was not properly dismounted --------------- The Adaptec machines dmesg: --------------- Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 19 09:23:21 GMT 2000 root@rhea.salford.ac.uk:/usr/src/sys/compile/SMTP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 451024877 Hz CPU: Pentium III (451.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff> real memory = 536870912 (524288K bytes) avail memory = 519888896 (507704K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0281000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x03 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x03 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x02 on pci0.4.0 intpm0: rev 0x02 on pci0.4.3 intpm0: I/O mapped e800 ALLOCED IRQ 0 intr IRQ 9 enabled revision 0 intsmb0: smbus0: on intsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 intpm0: PM I/O mapped e400 fxp0: rev 0x08 int a irq 10 on pci0.10.0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:0b:26:ba ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0 ahc0: aic7890/91 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: vga0: rev 0x7a on pci1.0.0 Probing for PnP devices: Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 on isa ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppi0: on ppbus 0 plip0: on ppbus 0 npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa changing root device to da0s1a da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8748MB (17916240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1115C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8748MB (17916240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1115C) ---------------- Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - Clifford Whitworth Building A.I.S., University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key M.S.Powell@ais.salfrd.ac.uk (spell salford correctly to reply to me) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9: 3:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat200.60.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.200.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E21E15020; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA35186; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:03:42 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:03:42 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Morning all... I just upgraded my XFree86 out of ports, and now can't start it up anymore, with the following messages...I've checked the archives for -stable, and say one mention about 'options UCONSOLE', which I didnt' have, but do now, with no change...I've tried as both user root and non-root user, to no avail... I've updated my OS to the latest -STABLE, and there is no module 'xserver' that I seem able to find ... can anyone point me in the right direction on this? Thanks... Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > startx Authentication failed - cannot start X server. Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > exit exit Script done on Wed Jan 19 12:57:19 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9: 8:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pouet.noc.fr.clara.net (zion.noc.fr.clara.net [212.43.195.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8389115020; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:08:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sameh@fr.clara.net) Received: by pouet.noc.fr.clara.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C5C7568; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:07:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:07:25 +0100 From: Sameh Ghane To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? Message-ID: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from scrappy@hub.org on Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker écrivit: > > Morning all... > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > startx > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: xserver auth required pam_permit.so As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. -- Sameh Ghane To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9:11:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kci.kciLink.com (kci.kciLink.com [204.117.82.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A781500C; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:11:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kcilink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [204.117.82.2]) by kci.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F001E8A4; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:11:35 -0500 (EST) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kcilink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA02050; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:11:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from khera@kci.kcilink.com) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14469.61511.68656.181886@onceler.kcilink.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:11:35 -0500 (EST) To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "THH" == The Hermit Hacker writes: THH> Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service THH> Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service Might this have something to do with PAM support? Just a wild guess. I'm building XFree86 right now, and I'm now a bit afraid to install it... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9:15:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat200.60.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.200.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA191530C; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:15:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA35325; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:15:22 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:15:22 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Sameh Ghane Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-Reply-To: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG D'oh...first time I've been burnt on that :( When it said 'no modules', I automatically thought /modules :( thanks, working great now ... On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Sameh Ghane wrote: > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker écrivit: > > > > Morning all... > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > startx > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > -- > Sameh Ghane > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9:30:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A65A15308; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:30:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA04123; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:29:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) Message-Id: <200001191729.MAA04123@misha.cisco.com> Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-Reply-To: from The Hermit Hacker at "Jan 19, 2000 01:15:22 pm" To: The Hermit Hacker Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:29:13 -0500 (EST) Cc: Sameh Ghane , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com From: Mikhail Teterin X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The Hermit Hacker once wrote: > D'oh...first time I've been burnt on that :( When it said 'no > modules', I automatically thought /modules :( > > thanks, working great now ... This would seem to me as an error-reporting bug in Xwrapper/whatever... Mentioning `pam' somewhere there would immeditely point one to the right direction. -mi > On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Sameh Ghane wrote: > > > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker _crivit: > > > > > > Morning all... > > > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > > startx > > > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > > > -- > > Sameh Ghane > > > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 9:50: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from WEBSI.com (websi.com [216.156.137.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849E015254 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:49:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shashi@WEBSI.com) Received: (from shashi@localhost) by WEBSI.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA79238; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:48:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shashi) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:48:51 -0500 From: ShashiKant Joshi To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Makeworld of 3.4 (on a 3.2 box) fails in 'rebuilding bootstrap libraries' Message-ID: <20000119124851.A79223@Shift-F1.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I looked in the archives, but no one seems to have had problem in buildworld. Lucky people are able to reach the install stage !! I have 3.2-stable on production and test box. Both had 3.2-stable installed from CD, and cvsuped to get latest changes back in Jul 99. Between Jan 06-18 I have been trying to do a make world for 3.4 Here is what I did. mv /usr/src /usr/SRC cvsup 3.4 cd /usr/src make buildworld On prod box, it compiled okay. I have not done a installworld yet on prod. On test box, I got errors in bootsrap libraries. So I tared /usr/src of prod, ftp to test , untared it and did a make world again. I again get error in make buildworld. about .section in /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c I cvsuped this on Jan 06, 2000. I don't want to installworld on prod unless it succeeds on test. Any reason why it would buildworld on prod and not on test? Here is the error: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding bootstrap libraries -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin BISON_SIMPLE=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/share/misc/bison.simple COMPILER_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib NOEXTRADEPEND=t OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/libexec /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -f Makefile.inc1 bootstrap-libraries cd /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED all; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -B install cleandir obj rm -f .depend /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GPATH /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GRTAGS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GSYMS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GTAGS cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c -o crt1.o cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c -o crtbegin.o [ ... stderr went to terminal :-^%$#%$% It gives error about .section not being valid option/ not being allowed??? complains about .section ] *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. -- Shashi Joshi _____________________________________________________________________ __o o__ o__ o__ o__ There's one _ \<._ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ _.>/ _ in every (_)/ (_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) (_) \(_) crowd... _____________________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 13:25:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cxi.cx (CXI.CX [208.138.115.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C0E1532A for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:25:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwsedlak@cxi.cx) Received: (from nwsedlak@localhost) by cxi.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA20620 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:25:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nwsedlak) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:25:25 -0500 From: Neil Sedlak To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: cannot buildworld updated 2.2.7 Message-ID: <20000119162525.A20564@matrix.cxi.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a 2.2.7 release verion installed off CD that I'm trying to update to 3.x stable. I've cvsup'ed the source fine, but I'm getting a compile error which is listed below. I checked as of 30 minutes ago (3:30 EST local time) and I have the latest source. Anyone have any ideas? I've updated systems before, but not from a 2.2.7 to a 3.x. Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding bootstrap libraries -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin BISON_SIMPLE=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/share/misc/bison.simple COMPILER_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib NOEXTRADEPEND=t OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/libexec /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -f Makefile.inc1 bootstrap-libraries cd /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED all; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -B install cleandir obj rm -f .depend /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GPATH /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GRTAGS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GSYMS /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/GTAGS cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c -o crt1.o cc -O -pipe -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c -o crtbegin.o /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c:32: section attributes are not supported for this target /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtbegin.c:33: section attributes are not supported for this target {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:68: Error: Unknown pseudo-op: `.section' *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. # exit Script done on Wed Jan 19 15:21:28 2000 -- Neil Sedlak nwsedlak@cxi.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 13:32:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5901518F for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:32:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.18 2000/01/07 21:56:55 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id OAA20619; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:32:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.8 1999/04/16 15:25:49 steved Exp steved $) with ESMTP id OAA04664; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:32:29 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id QAA15464; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:32:29 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14470.11628.903014.938395@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:32:28 -0700 (MST) To: Neil Sedlak Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot buildworld updated 2.2.7 In-Reply-To: <20000119162525.A20564@matrix.cxi.cx> References: <20000119162525.A20564@matrix.cxi.cx> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.3.11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Wednesday, January 19, Neil Sedlak wrote: ] > I have a 2.2.7 release verion installed off CD that I'm trying to update to > 3.x stable. I've cvsup'ed the source fine, but I'm getting a compile error > which is listed below. I checked as of 30 minutes ago (3:30 EST local time) > and I have the latest source. Anyone have any ideas? I've updated systems > before, but not from a 2.2.7 to a 3.x. Thanks > Well, updating a 2.2.x machine to 3.x from sources is not unheard of, but I've alwasy seen people on this list say that you must CVSup the 2.2.x machine to 2.2.8-STABLE before you even attempt to begin. See: http://home.san.rr.com/freebsd/make-upgrade.html it is a bit outdated as this was to 2.2.8->3.2, but still gives you a basic idea what what you have have to do. End the end, if you have the means to backup your personal data, an install from a 3.x CD is probably easier (if you can get your hands on one easily). Good luck. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 15: 6:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cxi.cx (CXI.CX [208.138.115.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CC814F02 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:06:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwsedlak@cxi.cx) Received: (from nwsedlak@localhost) by cxi.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA21426 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:06:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nwsedlak) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:06:23 -0500 From: Neil Sedlak To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot buildworld updated 2.2.7 Message-ID: <20000119180623.A21379@matrix.cxi.cx> References: <20000119162525.A20564@matrix.cxi.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 05:57:28PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Neil Sedlak writes: > > I have a 2.2.7 release verion installed off CD that I'm trying to update to > > 3.x stable. I've cvsup'ed the source fine, but I'm getting a compile error > > which is listed below. I checked as of 30 minutes ago (3:30 EST local time) > > and I have the latest source. Anyone have any ideas? I've updated systems > > before, but not from a 2.2.7 to a 3.x. Thanks I've resolved the issue by just starting over with newer boot floppies from the ftp site. I wasn't aware there was such a huge gap from 2.2.7 to 3.x. Thanks for the help. -- Neil Sedlak nwsedlak@cxi.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 15:26: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1961535F; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:25:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from [212.238.110.140] (helo=jollem.com) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12B4U2-000BY5-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:25:50 +0000 Message-ID: <38864803.13EE909@jollem.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:25:55 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Jollem X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sameh Ghane Cc: The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@freebsd.org, Sebastiaan van Erk Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? References: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sameh et all. I'm experiencing the same problem, with one difference: The solution does not apply to my system >:-( I added the suggested line in my pam.conf, with no effect. I then copied /usr/src/etc/pam.conf to /etc/pam.conf, and as a result I now get even more errors. This is the message I get: bash-2.03$ startx Authentication failed - cannot start X server. Perhaps you do not have console ownership? I am facing this problem since I installed the x11/xfree86 port that included the 335 xfree sources. I installed and make'd the 336 port last week, with no effect. I'm getting pretty desparate and considering re-installing from my genuine FreeBSD 3.2 CD :-( Sounds like Winblows, eh? :( I'll post my startx-output, truss-startx-output, x config file and kernel config file tomorrow. Ernst Sameh Ghane wrote: > > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker crivit: > > > > Morning all... > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > startx > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. -- Ernst de Haan Freelance Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="ernst.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Ernst de Haan Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ernst.vcf" begin:vcard n:de Haan;Ernst tel;fax:+31 (0)26 3645634 tel;work:+31 (0)26 3623895 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.znerd.demon.nl/ org:Jollem adr:;;Rozendaalselaan 35;Velp;GLD;6881 KZ;Netherlands version:2.1 email;internet:ernst@jollem.com title:Java Architect fn:Ernst de Haan end:vcard --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 16:38: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pluto.senet.com.au (pluto.senet.com.au [203.11.90.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3D715233 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:37:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Greg@FatCanary.com.au) Received: from the-toaster.gwork.org.au (c21-p63.senet.com.au [203.152.254.192]) by pluto.senet.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22119; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:07:51 +1030 Received: from qman (the-fridge.gwork.org.au [192.168.252.2]) by the-toaster.gwork.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA00525; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:14:31 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from Greg@FatCanary.com.au) Message-ID: <006b01bf62de$899a0f20$02fca8c0@qman> From: "Greg Work" To: "Ernst de Haan" , "Sameh Ghane" Cc: References: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> <38864803.13EE909@jollem.com> Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:07:31 +1030 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey ya - thought this may help - i had the same problem with Xfree 3.3.5 When you started the build in the ports, it asks you COMPILE PAM SUPPORT [YES] (or something like that - i can't remember exactly as it was a few weeks ago ) as one of the compilation options - this was at the same time as selecting what servers, etc. to compile This you can say 'NO' to with no ill effects - mine seems to crank over ok now Feel free to flame me if this is no good :) G. Greg Work Email : Greg@FatCanary.com.au ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernst de Haan" To: "Sameh Ghane" Cc: "The Hermit Hacker" ; ; ; ; "Sebastiaan van Erk" Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 9:55 AM Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? > Hi Sameh et all. > > > I'm experiencing the same problem, with one difference: The solution does > not apply to my system >:-( I added the suggested line in my pam.conf, > with no effect. I then copied /usr/src/etc/pam.conf to /etc/pam.conf, and > as a result I now get even more errors. > > This is the message I get: > > bash-2.03$ startx > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > Perhaps you do not have console ownership? > > I am facing this problem since I installed the x11/xfree86 port that > included the 335 xfree sources. I installed and make'd the 336 port last > week, with no effect. I'm getting pretty desparate and considering > re-installing from my genuine FreeBSD 3.2 CD :-( Sounds like Winblows, eh? > :( > > I'll post my startx-output, truss-startx-output, x config file and kernel > config file tomorrow. > > Ernst > > Sameh Ghane wrote: > > > > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker crivit: > > > > > > Morning all... > > > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > > startx > > > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > -- > Ernst de Haan > Freelance Java Architect > > "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, > and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 16:56:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blackbird.lonetree.com (blackbird.lonetree.com [207.141.55.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3B15341; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:56:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolfman@csocs.com) Received: from csocs.com [209.64.46.23] by blackbird.lonetree.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.00) id AD0D555C014A; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: <38865E7C.119E57CD@csocs.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:01:48 -0700 From: "J.C. Frazier" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a problem with PAM. Recompile the port without PAM support and you will lose those errors. J.C. Frazier The Hermit Hacker wrote: > Morning all... > > I just upgraded my XFree86 out of ports, and now can't start it up > anymore, with the following messages...I've checked the archives for > -stable, and say one mention about 'options UCONSOLE', which I didnt' > have, but do now, with no change...I've tried as both user root and > non-root user, to no avail... > > I've updated my OS to the latest -STABLE, and there is no module > 'xserver' that I seem able to find ... can anyone point me in the right > direction on this? > > Thanks... > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > startx > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > exit > exit > > Script done on Wed Jan 19 12:57:19 2000 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:25:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sparenix.metronet.com (sparenix.metronet.com [207.170.106.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD7F914CE6 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:25:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmanley@metronet.com) Received: (qmail 30183 invoked by uid 7770); 20 Jan 2000 03:45:49 -0000 Received: from fcn105-2.tmi.net (HELO win) (207.170.105.2) by sparenix.metronet.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 03:45:49 -0000 Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: jmanley/mail.metronet.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:15:26 -0600 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Jim Manley Subject: Multiple IP addresses Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I seem to recall there is a way to allow one NIC to support multiple IP addresses but can't remember how to set it up. If I'm thinking of the right OS, can someone point me in the right direction? Regards, Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:31: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net [204.141.86.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E958314D1F for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:31:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (efutch@bsd1.nyct.net [204.141.86.3]) by mail.nyct.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA08450; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:30:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:30:54 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric D. Futch" To: Jim Manley Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This Works for me... /sbin/ifconfig netmask 0xffffffff alias -- Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 "Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: I seem to recall there is a way to allow one NIC to support multiple IP addresses but can't remember how to set it up. If I'm thinking of the right OS, can someone point me in the right direction? Regards, Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:36:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sparenix.metronet.com (sparenix.metronet.com [207.170.106.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B69AB15341 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmanley@metronet.com) Received: (qmail 30307 invoked by uid 7770); 20 Jan 2000 03:57:37 -0000 Received: from fcn105-2.tmi.net (HELO win) (207.170.105.2) by sparenix.metronet.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 03:57:37 -0000 Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: jmanley/mail.metronet.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:34:13 -0600 To: "Eric D. Futch" From: Jim Manley Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tried that: darkstar# ifconfig -a ep0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:20:af:1e:8d:8d tun0: flags=8050 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 darkstar# ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 255.255.255.0 0xffffffff alias ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists At 09:30 PM 1/19/00 -0500, Eric D. Futch wrote: >This Works for me... > >/sbin/ifconfig netmask 0xffffffff alias > >-- >Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. >efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff >http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 >"Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" > > >On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: > >I seem to recall there is a way to allow one NIC to support multiple >IP addresses but can't remember how to set it up. If I'm thinking >of the right OS, can someone point me in the right direction? > >Regards, > >Jim > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:41:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net [204.141.86.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54CF14CAD for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:41:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (efutch@bsd1.nyct.net [204.141.86.3]) by mail.nyct.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA09901; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:41:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:41:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric D. Futch" To: Jim Manley Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: >Tried that: > >darkstar# ifconfig -a >ep0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > ether 00:20:af:1e:8d:8d >tun0: flags=8050 mtu 1500 >sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 >ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 >lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >darkstar# ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 255.255.255.0 0xffffffff alias ^^^ You won't need this... The 0xffffffff is the netmask which is the same as 255.255.255.255 >ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:41:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.15.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA6114CE6 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: from rtfm.newton (mi@rtfm.newton [10.10.0.1]) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA80814; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:41:21 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin X-Relay-IP: 10.10.0.1 Received: (from mi@localhost) by rtfm.newton (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA22983; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:41:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Message-Id: <200001200241.VAA22983@rtfm.newton> Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> from Jim Manley at "Jan 19, 2000 08:34:13 pm" To: Jim Manley Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:41:21 -0500 (EST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"-parentheses -- it's a keyword. In your case, the line should be ``ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 netmask 0xffffffff alias'' Also, please, direct this sort of questions to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. The stable mailing list is for FreeBSD-STABLE issues only. -mi =darkstar# ifconfig -a =ep0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 = inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 = ether 00:20:af:1e:8d:8d =tun0: flags=8050 mtu 1500 =sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 =ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 =lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 = inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 =darkstar# ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 255.255.255.0 0xffffffff alias =ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists = =At 09:30 PM 1/19/00 -0500, Eric D. Futch wrote: =>This Works for me... => =>/sbin/ifconfig netmask 0xffffffff alias To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:42:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pi.yip.org (yip.org [199.45.111.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23907151AB for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:42:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from melange@yip.org) Received: from localhost (melange@localhost) by pi.yip.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA65590; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:42:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from melange@yip.org) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:42:26 -0500 (EST) From: Bob K X-Sender: melange@localhost To: Jim Manley Cc: "Eric D. Futch" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: [snip] > darkstar# ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 255.255.255.0 0xffffffff alias > ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists Try: ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 0xffffffff alias and then add the route manually to the interface. > At 09:30 PM 1/19/00 -0500, Eric D. Futch wrote: > >This Works for me... > > > >/sbin/ifconfig netmask 0xffffffff alias > > > >-- > >Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. > >efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff > >http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 > >"Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" > > > > > >On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: > > > >I seem to recall there is a way to allow one NIC to support multiple > >IP addresses but can't remember how to set it up. If I'm thinking > >of the right OS, can someone point me in the right direction? > > > >Regards, > > > >Jim > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > Bob "I love signing autographs. I'll sign anything but veal cutlets. My ballpoint pen slips on veal cutlets." - Casey Stengel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 18:43: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sparenix.metronet.com (sparenix.metronet.com [207.170.106.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7026514F9C for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:42:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmanley@metronet.com) Received: (qmail 30388 invoked by uid 7770); 20 Jan 2000 04:03:57 -0000 Received: from fcn105-2.tmi.net (HELO win) (207.170.105.2) by sparenix.metronet.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 04:03:57 -0000 Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000119203927.00a7b8e0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: jmanley/mail.metronet.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:40:33 -0600 To: "Eric D. Futch" From: Jim Manley Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> References: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Found it. Syntax problem. ifconfig alias 192.168.0.10 netmask 0xffffffff At 08:34 PM 1/19/00 -0600, Jim Manley wrote: >Tried that: > >darkstar# ifconfig -a >ep0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > ether 00:20:af:1e:8d:8d >tun0: flags=8050 mtu 1500 >sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 >ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 >lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >darkstar# ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.10 255.255.255.0 0xffffffff alias >ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > >At 09:30 PM 1/19/00 -0500, Eric D. Futch wrote: >>This Works for me... >> >>/sbin/ifconfig netmask 0xffffffff alias >> >>-- >>Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. >>efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff >>http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 >>"Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" >> >> >>On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jim Manley wrote: >> >>I seem to recall there is a way to allow one NIC to support multiple >>IP addresses but can't remember how to set it up. If I'm thinking >>of the right OS, can someone point me in the right direction? >> >>Regards, >> >>Jim >> >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 21:27:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F441152CE; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:27:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:6+KtLN6WXcLBePX2JltYUcdJFhjJmmes@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7Wpl2) with ESMTP id OAA02213; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:27:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id OAA16660; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:32:38 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200001200532.OAA16660@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: "Jeffrey J. Libman" , stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Cc: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: rpc.statd won't fire on friday's build Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:32:36 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Oops, my loopback (lo0) was down. It's a pilot error. Sorry for the false alarm. `portmap' is OK in -CURRENT. Jeffrey, your problem may be the same as mine. You had better check `network_interfaces' in /etc/rc.conf. It should have `lo0' together with all other network interfaces. Or, it should have just one word, "auto". Kazu >I am experiencing the same problem on the 4.0-CURRENT system >built from the source around Saturday. Another -CURRENT box, >for which 'make world' was done from the source about a week ago, >appears to have no problem. > >I suspect `portmap' is somewhat broken. In addition to `rpc.statd', >`nfsd' and `mountd' are also unable to register ports. > >nfsd:[88]: can't register with udp portmap >mountd[86]: can't register mount > >Kazu > >>no idea what i've done here. >> >>friday's cvsup and build...new kernel...installed on 2 systems. on one of >>the systems, rpc.statd will not run, gets: >> >>rpc.statd: unable to register (SM_PROG, SM_VERS, udp) >> >>this particular system has about 50 ip's assigned to lo0...and that has >>worked fine as is for months, inspite of all the verbage here about >>netmasks and such. loopback IS configured. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 22:10:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from evil.2y.net (port-3-192.adsl.one.net [216.2.0.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BC115377; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:10:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cokane@evil.2y.net) Received: (from cokane@localhost) by evil.2y.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA71242; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:55:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cokane) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:55:00 -0500 From: Coleman Kane To: Mike Smith Cc: Phillip Salzman , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stray IRQs Message-ID: <20000118205500.A71226@evil.2y.net> References: <200001182307.PAA03097@mass.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200001182307.PAA03097@mass.cdrom.com>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 06:04:37PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG IRQ 15 is typically an interrupt for the second IDE controller. You may be using SCSI and have disabled the wdc on a mobo that doesn't like that too much. The network traffic blockage could be attributed to the PIC not being reset before the requests were handled. IRQs 8-15 are handled by IRQ 2, mid you, so they are higher priority if your netcard is on PIC1. --cokane Mike Smith had the audacity to say: > > A mission-critical production machine of ours seems to be > > having issues with stray irqs. > > > > This is in the dmesg: > > ----------------------------- > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > stray irq 15 > > too many stray irq 15's; not logging any more > > ---------------------------- > > > > It seems as if the ethernet traffic stops for about a minute > > when it posts that message. > > > > I've searched back in the mailing lists to find that this > > may be caused by the BIOS grabbing the IRQ -- and was just > > wondering if anyone else has seen this problem lately? > > No; this is typically caused by having hardware in the system that's > generating interrupts but isn't handled by a driver. It may be > symptomatic of faulty hardware or a system misconfiguration. > > -- > \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith > \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 19 23:28:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from abc.123.org (123.org [195.244.241.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED9153A5 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from k@abc.123.org) Received: (from k@localhost) by abc.123.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA88014; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:27:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from k) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:27:33 +0100 From: Kai Voigt To: Jim Manley Cc: "Eric D. Futch" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses Message-ID: <20000120082732.V78143@abc.123.org> References: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> <4.2.2.20000119203927.00a7b8e0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000119203927.00a7b8e0@127.0.0.1> Organization: 123.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jim Manley wrote: > Found it. Syntax problem. > > ifconfig alias 192.168.0.10 netmask 0xffffffff And to get all this done automatically at boot time, add this to your /etc/rc.conf network_interfaces="de0 lo0" # List of network interfaces (lo0 is loopback). ifconfig_de0="inet 195.244.241.123 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_de0_alias0="inet 195.244.241.124 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_de0_alias1="inet 195.244.241.125 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_de0_alias2="inet 195.244.241.126 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_de0_alias3="inet 195.244.241.127 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_de0_alias4="inet 195.244.241.128 netmask 255.255.255.255" Kai PS: People, please learn to quote, thank you. -- kai voigt hamburger chaussee 36 24113 kiel 04 31 - 22 19 98 69 http://k.123.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 0:23:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net [204.141.86.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1A1153A3 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:23:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (efutch@bsd1.nyct.net [204.141.86.3]) by mail.nyct.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA22153; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 03:23:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 03:23:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric D. Futch" To: Kai Voigt Cc: Jim Manley , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-Reply-To: <20000120082732.V78143@abc.123.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Kai Voigt wrote: >And to get all this done automatically at boot time, add this >to your /etc/rc.conf > >network_interfaces="de0 lo0" # List of network interfaces (lo0 is loopback). >ifconfig_de0="inet 195.244.241.123 netmask 255.255.255.0" >ifconfig_de0_alias0="inet 195.244.241.124 netmask 255.255.255.255" >ifconfig_de0_alias1="inet 195.244.241.125 netmask 255.255.255.255" >ifconfig_de0_alias2="inet 195.244.241.126 netmask 255.255.255.255" >ifconfig_de0_alias3="inet 195.244.241.127 netmask 255.255.255.255" >ifconfig_de0_alias4="inet 195.244.241.128 netmask 255.255.255.255" > Or you could take advantage of that neat little thing in rc.network that runs /etc/start_if. for you. This is what I do on all my boxes. I stuff all my aliases into /etc/start_if.fxp0 so I don't have to overload rc.conf (it's overloaded enough already :)). Relevant lines from /etc/rc.network (starts line #57 rc.network version 1.39.2.14): ... for ifn in ${network_interfaces}; do showstat=false if [ -e /etc/start_if.${ifn} ]; then . /etc/start_if.${ifn} showstat=true fi ... Just something to consider. >Kai Eric >PS: People, please learn to quote, thank you. Ok. >-- >kai voigt hamburger chaussee 36 > 24113 kiel > 04 31 - 22 19 98 69 > http://k.123.org/ -- Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 "Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 0:31:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay01.chello.nl (smtp.chello.nl [212.83.68.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0614FB1; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:31:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl ([212.187.104.187]) by relay01.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license a4501b83b68dc3e36f6046e1d8586abe) with ESMTP id <20000120083916.MKTW463.relay01@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:39:16 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:31:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Ernst de Haan X-Sender: ernst@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl To: Sameh Ghane Cc: The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-Reply-To: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, In an attempt to disable both PAM and XDM-AUTORIZATION-1, I deinstalled and then reinstalled the xfree86-336 port, with no effect. The questions I had to answer previously are not posed again :-( Does any1 know how I can make the make process ask me those questions again? :) Ernst -- Ernst de Haan, Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Sameh Ghane wrote: > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker crivit: > > > > Morning all... > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > startx > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > -- > Sameh Ghane > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 0:42:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.aktrad.ru (ns1.aktrad.ru [195.218.140.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9A4153B7 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:42:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hook@aktrad.ru) Received: from sloth (sloth.aktrad.ru [195.218.140.13]) by ns1.aktrad.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA29161 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:42:11 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <04de01bf6322$417d45b0$0d8cdac3@aktrad.ru> From: "Gene Sokolov" To: Subject: possible invalid use of Zeller Conguence in libc/stdtime/localtime.c Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:42:00 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got an impression that the parsing of daylight savings rules from TZ environment variable is off by one day. The manual on tzset() states that the M notation for rules assumes 0 for Sunday. The actual transtime() in localtime.c I believe assumes 0 for Saturday. Can someone please verify that. I checked 2.2.8 and 3.3 sources. The reason why this was not noticed before, I believe, is because most installations do not use TZ variable and those which do, have this bug manifest itself just twice per year on weekends. Gene Sokolov. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 1:34:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay01.chello.nl (smtp.chello.nl [212.83.68.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE0E153CC; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:34:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl ([212.187.104.187]) by relay01.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license a4501b83b68dc3e36f6046e1d8586abe) with ESMTP id <20000120094151.MQHO463.relay01@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:41:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:34:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Ernst de Haan X-Sender: ernst@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl To: Sameh Ghane , jmz@freebsd.org, Sebastiaan van Erk Cc: The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok, got the thing back on-line! X is working now, I've done something like: bash-2.03# pwd /usr/ports/x11/XFree86 bash-2.03# rm -Rf work ...busy... bash# make install And then I answered no to the Secure RPC, the PAM and the XDM-AUTHORIZATION questions. Thanx all! Ernst -- Ernst de Haan, Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Well, In an attempt to disable both PAM and XDM-AUTORIZATION-1, I > deinstalled and then reinstalled the xfree86-336 port, with no effect. The > questions I had to answer previously are not posed again :-( > > Does any1 know how I can make the make process ask me those questions > again? :) > > Ernst > > -- > Ernst de Haan, Java Architect > > "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, > and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Sameh Ghane wrote: > > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker crivit: > > > > > > Morning all... > > > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > > startx > > > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > > > -- > > Sameh Ghane > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 1:37:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pouet.noc.fr.clara.net (zion.noc.fr.clara.net [212.43.195.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18B314C0E; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:37:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sameh@fr.clara.net) Received: by pouet.noc.fr.clara.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D086554; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:37:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:37:12 +0100 From: Sameh Ghane To: Ernst de Haan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? Message-ID: <20000120103711.D13677@noc.fr.clara.net> References: <20000119180725.H10127@noc.fr.clara.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from ernst@jollem.com on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 09:31:45AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 09:31:45AM +0000, Ernst de Haan écrivit: > Well, In an attempt to disable both PAM and XDM-AUTORIZATION-1, I > deinstalled and then reinstalled the xfree86-336 port, with no effect. The > questions I had to answer previously are not posed again :-( Did you make clean your xfree port before ? I think not. You have to rebuild the port to be asked those questions again. Verify that Xwrapper is suid root also. -- Sameh Ghane To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 5:43:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from prserv.net (out1.prserv.net [165.87.194.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAB414D7B for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 05:43:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from placej@ibm.net) Received: from ibm.net. ([166.72.224.72]) by prserv.net (out1) with ESMTP id <2000012013423925204b94q6e>; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:42:41 +0000 Received: (from placej@localhost) by ibm.net. (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA00523; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:43:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from placej) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:43:15 -0500 From: "John C. Place" To: Hristo Grigorov Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange process info Message-ID: <20000120084315.C365@attglobal.net> Reply-To: "John C. Place" Mail-Followup-To: Hristo Grigorov , stable@freebsd.org References: <388575BD.58CCDF59@BSE.BG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <388575BD.58CCDF59@BSE.BG>; from Hristo@BSE.BG on Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:28:45AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:28:45AM +0200, Hristo Grigorov wrote: > I am not sure, but the following 'ps' output looks strange to me: > It looks like kernel and userland ps are out of sync. Have you been tracking the kernel sources and not keeping ps up? John John C. Place Systems Specialist CTC Distribution Direct - York, PA placej@ctcdist.com FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just howdeep the rabbit hole goes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 6:19: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bse.bse.bg (bse.bse.bg [195.138.140.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA5014C48 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:18:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Hristo@BSE.BG) Received: from BSE.BG (nitrous.bse.bg [195.138.140.28]) by bse.bse.bg (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA37533; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:18:26 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <38871937.AA0EACAE@BSE.BG> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:18:31 +0200 From: Hristo Grigorov Organization: BSE AD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: bg, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John C. Place" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange process info References: <388575BD.58CCDF59@BSE.BG> <20000120084315.C365@attglobal.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------8373E9E792CD553579336B97" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------8373E9E792CD553579336B97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "John C. Place" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:28:45AM +0200, Hristo Grigorov wrote: > > I am not sure, but the following 'ps' output looks strange to me: > > > It looks like kernel and userland ps are out of sync. Have you been > tracking the kernel sources and not keeping ps up? No, I installed from STABLE snapshot and not played with kernel and userland tools anymore. Btw, 'ps' output looks good today. ?! > > John > > John C. Place > Systems Specialist > CTC Distribution Direct - York, PA > placej@ctcdist.com > > FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just howdeep the rabbit hole goes. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message --------------8373E9E792CD553579336B97 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Hristo.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Hristo Grigorov Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Hristo.vcf" begin:vcard n:Grigorov;Hristo tel;fax:+359 56 29635 tel;work:+359 56 800430 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:BSE;Internet adr:;;k-s "B.Miladinovi" 42A;Bourgas;;8000;BULGARIA version:2.1 email;internet:Hristo@BSE.BG title:Internet Services Manager x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Hristo Grigorov end:vcard --------------8373E9E792CD553579336B97-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 6:33: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D840114CEC; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:32:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id GAA02952; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:31:44 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda02950; Thu Jan 20 06:31:39 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA42898; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:31:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdY42896; Thu Jan 20 06:31:16 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA03076; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:31:13 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001201431.GAA03076@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdzi3070; Thu Jan 20 06:30:17 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Ernst de Haan Cc: Sameh Ghane , The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, Sebastiaan van Erk Subject: Re: no modules loaded for 'xserver' service? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:25:55 +0100." <38864803.13EE909@jollem.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:30:17 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Try this at the end of your pam.conf. This fixed it for me. # If we don't match anything else, default to using getpwnam(). other auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass other account required pam_unix.so try_first_pass other session required pam_permit.so try_first_pass Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." In message <38864803.13EE909@jollem.com>, Ernst de Haan writes: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hi Sameh et all. > > > I'm experiencing the same problem, with one difference: The solution does > not apply to my system >:-( I added the suggested line in my pam.conf, > with no effect. I then copied /usr/src/etc/pam.conf to /etc/pam.conf, and > as a result I now get even more errors. > > This is the message I get: > > bash-2.03$ startx > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > Perhaps you do not have console ownership? > > I am facing this problem since I installed the x11/xfree86 port that > included the 335 xfree sources. I installed and make'd the 336 port last > week, with no effect. I'm getting pretty desparate and considering > re-installing from my genuine FreeBSD 3.2 CD :-( Sounds like Winblows, eh? > :( > > I'll post my startx-output, truss-startx-output, x config file and kernel > config file tomorrow. > > Ernst > > Sameh Ghane wrote: > > > > Le Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:03:42PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker crivit: > > > > > > Morning all... > > > > > > Jan 18 15:58:27 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:25 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 18 15:59:38 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:06 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:55:29 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Jan 19 12:57:00 atelier Xwrapper: no modules loaded for `xserver' service > > > Script started on Wed Jan 19 12:57:13 2000 > > > > startx > > > > > > Authentication failed - cannot start X server. > > > Perhaps you do not have console ownership?^Cxinit: unexpected signal 2 > > > > try adding this line in your /etc/pam.conf: > > > > xserver auth required pam_permit.so > > > > As a general rule, try to merge, or at least to see the diffs > > between your /etc and /usr/src/etc when upgrading. > > -- > Ernst de Haan > Freelance Java Architect > > "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, > and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ > --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A > Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; > name="ernst.vcf" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Description: Card for Ernst de Haan > Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename="ernst.vcf" > > begin:vcard > n:de Haan;Ernst > tel;fax:+31 (0)26 3645634 > tel;work:+31 (0)26 3623895 > x-mozilla-html:FALSE > url:http://www.znerd.demon.nl/ > org:Jollem > adr:;;Rozendaalselaan 35;Velp;GLD;6881 KZ;Netherlands > version:2.1 > email;internet:ernst@jollem.com > title:Java Architect > fn:Ernst de Haan > end:vcard > > --------------0AC503CA7234F5B06915D71A-- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 9: 2:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.ct.home.com (ha1.rdc1.ct.home.com [24.2.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9F214F4D for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:02:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from structure@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.2.138.118]) by mail.rdc1.ct.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP id <20000120170213.UPLP9446.mail.rdc1.ct.home.com@home.com> for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:02:13 -0800 Message-ID: <3886F94F.43BE7635@home.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:02:23 +0000 From: AJ Siegel Organization: @Home Network X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-AtHome0407 (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: I just did an CVSup today Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can't do a make world... Keep getting ann error that it "can't make crypt-md5.c HELP!!! What do I do? -Aj To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 10:25:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from imc.macro.ru (imc.macro.ru [194.220.38.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EFC152C6 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:25:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lev@imc.macro.ru) Received: (from lev@localhost) by imc.macro.ru (8.8.5/8.7.3) id VAA11049 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:24:51 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:24:51 +0300 (MSK) From: Lev Serebryakov oD Message-Id: <200001201824.VAA11049@imc.macro.ru> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ppp see carrier everytime! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, All! I have very strange problem with user-level ppp. ppp always see carrier on my modem. All other software works perfectly (mgetty, FIDO mailer qico). Here are details: Motherboard is SiS496, CPU i486DX4-100, 16Mb of RAM. Sportster 33600 internal ISA is installed as COM2 (motherboard's COM2 is switched off). I have next lines in my kernel config: device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" tty flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port "IO_COM2" tty flags 0x10 irq 3 Kernel found devices: sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on isa sio1: type 16550A mgetty works perfectly: 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.21-Ju 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 check for lockfiles 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 locking the line 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 lowering DTR to reset Modem 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 send: AT&F1M0L0[0d] 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 waiting for ``OK'' ** found ** 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 mdm_send: 'ATI' 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 USR Courier/Sportster V.34(+) detected 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'ATI3' 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 additional info: 'Sportster 33600/Fax V2.0' 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2.0' -> OK 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FAA=1;+FCR=1' -> OK 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FBO=1' -> OK 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FNR=1,1,1,0' -> OK 01/20 20:58:16 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FLI="7 812 1072343"' -> OK 01/20 20:58:16 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FCC=1,5,0,2,0,0,0,0' -> OK But user-level ppp could not use port /dev/cuaa1! It always see carrier on it: ppp ON freebsd> set log local +chat +phase +connect Phase: bundle: Establish Phase: deflink: closed -> opening Phase: deflink: Connected! Phase: deflink: opening -> dial Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier ppp ON freebsd> Phase: deflink: /dev/cuaa1 doesn't support CD Phase: deflink: carrier -> login Chat: Send: Chat: Expect(15): login: I could say more: if I setup ppp to use /dev/cuaa0 (which is empty), ppp will find Carrier too: ppp ON freebsd> set device dev/cuua0 Phase: bundle: Establish Phase: deflink: closed -> opening Phase: deflink: Connected! Phase: deflink: opening -> dial Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier ppp ON freebsd> Phase: deflink: /dev/cuaa0 doesn't support CD Phase: deflink: carrier -> login Chat: Send: Chat: Expect(15): login: Simple program, which call ``ioctl(d,TIOCMGET,&flags)'' could not find any carrier. Lev Serebryakov, 2:5030/661.0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 11:19:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112E414EC6; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96441E01E; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:18:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA17503; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:18:48 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id LAA16321; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:18:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001201918.LAA16321@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200001111107.MAA09106@114046.kema.nl> <20000111040500.A46259@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:18:47 -0800 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2g/makemail 2.9a Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nothing like resurrecting a week-dead thread, huh? I thought that I had picked up somewhere that Berkeley's agreement with USL didn't allow major releases without renegotiating the license, but patches were considered to be OK, so the 4.x releases were all deemed to be "patches" to 4BSD. Perhaps this is a BSD urban legend? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12: 6:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707EC14DA0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:06:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.18 2000/01/07 21:56:55 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA21656; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:06:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.8 1999/04/16 15:25:49 steved Exp steved $) with ESMTP id NAA25667; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:06:44 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id PAA13667; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:06:43 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14471.27347.111589.91576@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:06:43 -0700 (MST) To: AJ Siegel Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: I just did an CVSup today In-Reply-To: <3886F94F.43BE7635@home.com> References: <3886F94F.43BE7635@home.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.3.11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Thursday, January 20, AJ Siegel wrote: ] > I can't do a make world... Keep getting ann error that it "can't make > crypt-md5.c HELP!!! What do I do? > > -Aj > You need to provide us with a bit more information. First off, include relevant parts of your CVSup file. Did you use one straight from /usr/share/examples/cvsup for 'stable'? Also, you need to cut-n-paste actual error messages from the make procedure and also the exact command you used in order to "make world". Send in those items and we can help. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:10: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFE714D60 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:09:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40324>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:01:49 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses In-reply-to: <20000120082732.V78143@abc.123.org>; from k@123.org on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 06:20:42PM +1100 To: Kai Voigt Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Jan21.070149est.40324@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <4.2.2.20000119201356.00a8fad0@127.0.0.1> <4.2.2.20000119203316.00a8e2a0@127.0.0.1> <4.2.2.20000119203927.00a7b8e0@127.0.0.1> <20000120082732.V78143@abc.123.org> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:01:49 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2000-Jan-20 18:20:42 +1100, Kai Voigt wrote: >And to get all this done automatically at boot time, add this >to your /etc/rc.conf > >network_interfaces="de0 lo0" # List of network interfaces (lo0 is loopback). Note that changing this to network_interfaces="auto" will make the system configure all the interfaces it finds (via ifconfig -l) where there are ifconfig_[_aliasN] entries. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:31: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEB314DA0; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:30:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA30394; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:30:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:28:18 -0500 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? ---Mike >The only log that he could provide was this one: > >---snip--- > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > >---snip--- > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the >impression it was freebsd specific." > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:34:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4029115355; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:34:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca ([204.244.186.218]) by mail2.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #4) id 12BOI4-0006ns-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:34:48 -0800 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:34:45 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? > > ---Mike > > >The only log that he could provide was this one: > > > >---snip--- > > > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > > > >---snip--- > > > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, > >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the > >impression it was freebsd specific." > > > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for > >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. Uhh.. there isn't enough information here to determine anything. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net > Sentex Communications www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada Tom Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:36: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sivka.rdy.com (sivka.rdy.com [207.33.166.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BB314DA0; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:35:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima@rdy.com) Received: (from dima@localhost) by sivka.rdy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA54949; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:35:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima) Message-Id: <200001202035.MAA54949@sivka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> from Mike Tancsa at "Jan 20, 2000 03:28:18 pm" To: Mike Tancsa Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:35:18 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@rdy.com From: dima@rdy.com (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Tancsa writes: > > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? I personaly haven't seen the code in question, but I've heard that this problem is not FreeBSD specific (Linux,Solaris,OpenBSD,etc etc etc are all affected). And due to the nature of the problem it won't be easy to fix it. > ---Mike > > >The only log that he could provide was this one: > > > >---snip--- > > > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > > > >---snip--- > > > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, > >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the > >impression it was freebsd specific." > > > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for > >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net > Sentex Communications www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:38:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F74C1522C; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:38:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 20 Jan 2000 20:38:41 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:38:40 +0000 From: David Malone To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Message-ID: <20000120203840.A49511@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca>; from mike@sentex.net on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 03:28:18PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 03:28:18PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? It was mentioned on freebsd-net a few days ago. Jordan said someone was working on a fix. The kernel message mentioned seems to only occur in an old sound driver: % find . -type f -print | xargs fgrep -i "list empty" ./i386/isa/sound/gustest/Attic/midithru.c,v: if (!nlen) {fprintf(stderr, "Free list empty but no notes playing\n");return;} /* No notes playing */ Which seems unlikely to be involved with the attack. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:40: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F13152D3; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:39:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA32223; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:39:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000120153724.0206a850@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:37:24 -0500 To: Tom From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:34 PM 1/20/00 -0800, Tom wrote: > Uhh.. there isn't enough information here to determine anything. That was only a snippet. The poster claims to have contacted the freebsd team and that they were working on it... I just wanted to know if this were the case. Another snippet of the post below. I didnt want to blurt the whole bugtraq posting, as I suspect most people are already subscribed to it. >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the >impression it was freebsd specific." > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. > > ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:41:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2BC15444; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA79777; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:40:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA04465; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:40:23 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001202040.NAA04465@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:28:18 EST." <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> References: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:40:23 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In message <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mike Tancsa writes: : Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on : a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? All versions of every os on the planet is affected, at least that's the very preliminary indications that I've been getting from people reporting to me on the bug. There is no easy fix and attacks a flaw in the TCP/IP protocol. If this turns out not to be the case, then I'll update people. Warner -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBOIdys9xynu/2qPVhAQEm5gP+KIbAeBdVgA0u7Itza314xTZ1CA1o7UJ2 GwRYMpIlmT+xz8AiBtJghdCZT18CSyR839FyjUTXGGWpj6sTL8AEQ40QD3PrMUzD Q30kxO3swZmXJapJjjhLhEe5+8HKAjAjByDXXwBOcrX9W3a36LhWPmhzs7z1Jo+r po3+GNcKWmU= =qBqL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 12:53:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA68515071 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:53:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@d60-025.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.25]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA86642; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:53:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA18316; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:53:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:53:09 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Bill Fenner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) Message-ID: <20000120125309.A10077@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <200001111107.MAA09106@114046.kema.nl> <20000111040500.A46259@dragon.nuxi.com> <200001201918.LAA16321@windsor.research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200001201918.LAA16321@windsor.research.att.com>; from fenner@research.att.com on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:18:47AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:18:47AM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote: > I thought that I had picked up somewhere that Berkeley's agreement with > USL didn't allow major releases without renegotiating the license, but > patches were considered to be OK, so the 4.x releases were all deemed > to be "patches" to 4BSD. Perhaps this is a BSD urban legend? Yes an legend. McKusick [I thought I posted his reply] dispelled it. -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 13: 0: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060715392; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:59:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sean@innu.org) Received: from innu.org (bsg-ma1a-66.ix.netcom.com [209.110.248.66]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA18845; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:59:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3887BD39.2FE8E40A@innu.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:58:18 -0500 From: Sean Trifero X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? References: <200001202035.MAA54949@sivka.rdy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is on a Linux 2.2.14 system. /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c: panic("Free list empty"); Sean Trifero Dima Ruban wrote: > Mike Tancsa writes: > > > > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? > > I personaly haven't seen the code in question, but I've heard that > this problem is not FreeBSD specific (Linux,Solaris,OpenBSD,etc etc etc > are all affected). And due to the nature of the problem it won't be easy to > fix it. > > > ---Mike > > > > >The only log that he could provide was this one: > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, > > >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the > > >impression it was freebsd specific." > > > > > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for > > >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net > > Sentex Communications www.sentex.net > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada > > > > -- dima > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 13: 9:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from x.arpa.com (x.arpa.com [199.245.173.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AD814F1C; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:09:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@arpa.com) Received: from jamie by x.arpa.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12BOpt-0006oz-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:09:45 -0800 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:09:45 -0800 From: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard To: Tom Cc: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Message-ID: <20000120130945.B24082@x.arpa.com> References: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from tom@uniserve.com on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 12:34:45PM -0800 X-Face: d=) RFC_Violation: You saw it here first! X-PGP-Fingerprint: <921C135D> C4 48 1B 26 18 7B 1F D9 BA C4 9C 7A B1 07 07 E8 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a copy of this, which I am not giving out. I will probably fire one off to jkh for sanity, but this looks like a really tough one to handle. The program basically fires off *loads* of pkts/sec of ACK at the victim host.. random source, blah blah. The problem is, the kernel already (from my understanding) drops bad ACKs pretty quickly. The thing is, tho, that it's kernel bound.. which means CPU.. so unless you have tons of extra CPU to spare, this attack will take your system to a "pause" until the attacker ceases. The only way to trace this attack is same as a SYN or smurf attack: to reverse flow "trace", which requires experienced backbone engineers and cooperation of sometimes multiple providers. I duno. We'll see. -jamie On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 12:34:45PM -0800, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? > > > > ---Mike > > > > >The only log that he could provide was this one: > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, > > >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the > > >impression it was freebsd specific." > > > > > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for > > >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. > > > Uhh.. there isn't enough information here to determine anything. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net > > Sentex Communications www.sentex.net > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada > > > Tom > Uniserve > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message -- i am jamie at arpa dot com this is a no plur zone. "silly raver, k is for cats!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 13:11: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3AD1546D; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:10:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA79922; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:10:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA04699; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:10:42 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001202110.OAA04699@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: Tom , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:37:24 EST." <3.0.5.32.20000120153724.0206a850@staff.sentex.ca> References: <3.0.5.32.20000120153724.0206a850@staff.sentex.ca> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:10:42 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3.0.5.32.20000120153724.0206a850@staff.sentex.ca> Mike Tancsa writes: : That was only a snippet. The poster claims to have contacted the freebsd : team and that they were working on it... I just wanted to know if this were : the case. We have the code and it isn't FreeBSD specific. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 13:13:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from x.arpa.com (x.arpa.com [199.245.173.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC43F15386; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:13:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@arpa.com) Received: from jamie by x.arpa.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12BOtF-0006qN-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:13:13 -0800 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:13:13 -0800 From: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard To: Sean Trifero Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Message-ID: <20000120131313.D24082@x.arpa.com> References: <200001202035.MAA54949@sivka.rdy.com> <3887BD39.2FE8E40A@innu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3887BD39.2FE8E40A@innu.org>; from sean@innu.org on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 08:58:18PM -0500 X-Face: d=) RFC_Violation: You saw it here first! X-PGP-Fingerprint: <921C135D> C4 48 1B 26 18 7B 1F D9 BA C4 9C 7A B1 07 07 E8 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The poster got his info from me. That was my box (x.arpa.com) that he pasted syslog from that I pasted to him. I have no sound hardware :) It's not a FBSD system.. It's Linux 2.x Tho I do have and run FBSD boxen and see the same result. Regards -jamie On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 08:58:18PM -0500, Sean Trifero wrote: > > This is on a Linux 2.2.14 system. > > /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c: panic("Free list empty"); > > > Sean Trifero > > Dima Ruban wrote: > > > Mike Tancsa writes: > > > > > > Can anyone confirm the bugtraq posting ? Are the freebsd folks working on > > > a fix ? If so, what versions are effected ? > > > > I personaly haven't seen the code in question, but I've heard that > > this problem is not FreeBSD specific (Linux,Solaris,OpenBSD,etc etc etc > > are all affected). And due to the nature of the problem it won't be easy to > > fix it. > > > > > ---Mike > > > > > > >The only log that he could provide was this one: > > > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > > > >syslog:Jan 18 12:30:36 x kernel: Kernel panic: Free list empty > > > > > > > >---snip--- > > > > > > > >One thing of note: he also stated this happened on non-freebsd systems, > > > >which is contrary to what the other person said, who was "under the > > > >impression it was freebsd specific." > > > > > > > >I have the source, which I'm not going to post for 2-3 days (give time for > > > >fbsd to work on the fix). If it isn't out before the 21st, I'll post it up. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > > Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net > > > Sentex Communications www.sentex.net > > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada > > > > > > > -- dima > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message -- i am jamie at arpa dot com this is a no plur zone. "silly raver, k is for cats!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:32:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8847D14C9E; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11281; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:04 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:03 -0700 To: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000120130945.B24082@x.arpa.com> References: <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:09 PM 1/20/2000 , jamiE rishaw - master e*tard wrote: >I have a copy of this, which I am not giving out. I will probably >fire one off to jkh for sanity, I've been a good boy, so I hope that, er, Sanity doesn't come down the chimney of any of the systems I administer before there's a patch! ;-) >but this looks like a really tough one >to handle. > >The program basically fires off *loads* of pkts/sec of ACK at the victim >host.. random source, blah blah. > >The problem is, the kernel already (from my understanding) drops bad ACKs >pretty quickly. The thing is, tho, that it's kernel bound.. which means >CPU.. so unless you have tons of extra CPU to spare, this attack will >take your system to a "pause" until the attacker ceases. The name "stream.c" makes it sound like a local, not remote, DoS. Does it have to be done from inside the system to be effective? I would think that, if it came from the outside, it'd be harder to saturate the victim. I can think of ways to filter this by adding some stuff to IPFW. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:34:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965AF154E5; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:34:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA80992; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:34:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA06762; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:34:26 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:03 MST." <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> References: <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:34:26 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> Brett Glass writes: : The name "stream.c" makes it sound like a local, not remote, DoS. Does : it have to be done from inside the system to be effective? I would think : that, if it came from the outside, it'd be harder to saturate the : victim. It is a remote exploit. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:38:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23818153FA; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:38:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11362; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:38:15 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120173540.01a26100@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:38:13 -0700 To: Warner Losh From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> References: <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmm. I haven't started at the stack to see if this is feasible, but can't the code that implements IPFW's "established" keyword be used to discard the ACK if it isn't associated with an active session? --Brett At 05:34 PM 1/20/2000 , Warner Losh wrote: >It is a remote exploit. > >Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:40:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469B415472; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:40:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11402; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:40:13 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120173905.01882570@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:40:11 -0700 To: Warner Losh From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That means that the code path that validates the ACK in the kernel must be long. Long enough so that you can hose the CPU over, say, a T1. How does one short-circuit this? --Brett At 05:34 PM 1/20/2000 , Warner Losh wrote: >It is a remote exploit. > >Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:40:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1411D15513; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:40:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA14428; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:40:01 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210040.LAA14428@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:40:01 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jan 20, 2000 05:34:26 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What versions of FreeBSD are known to be vulnerable to it ? There appears to be some confusion about whether or not it is a wide spread problem. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:45: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sivka.rdy.com (sivka.rdy.com [207.33.166.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1215415; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:44:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima@rdy.com) Received: (from dima@localhost) by sivka.rdy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA57553; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:43:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima) Message-Id: <200001210043.QAA57553@sivka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> from Brett Glass at "Jan 20, 2000 05:32:03 pm" To: Brett Glass Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:43:13 -0800 (PST) Cc: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@rdy.com From: dima@rdy.com (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brett Glass writes: > At 02:09 PM 1/20/2000 , jamiE rishaw - master e*tard wrote: > > >I have a copy of this, which I am not giving out. I will probably > >fire one off to jkh for sanity, Terriffic! > >The problem is, the kernel already (from my understanding) drops bad ACKs > >pretty quickly. The thing is, tho, that it's kernel bound.. which means > >CPU.. so unless you have tons of extra CPU to spare, this attack will > >take your system to a "pause" until the attacker ceases. > > The name "stream.c" makes it sound like a local, not remote, DoS. Does No, it's remote. > it have to be done from inside the system to be effective? I would think Not necessarily. > that, if it came from the outside, it'd be harder to saturate the > victim. > > I can think of ways to filter this by adding some stuff to IPFW. I don't believe you can filter it. > > --Brett > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 16:51:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADBB154DE; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11524; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:51:21 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120174826.01882ad0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:51:19 -0700 To: Darren Reed , imp@village.org (Warner Losh) From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210040.LAA14428@cairo.anu.edu.au> References: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Darren: Glad to see you are in on this discussion. The code you use for the "keep state" option in IPFilters might be able to recognize that the ACK does not belong to an existing connection. Could a fast check be implemented as a rule under IPFilters? (If it could, it's probably a one-liner, but I'd need to figure out how to write it since I do not deal with IPFilters on a regular basis.) If not, it seems as if the framework might mostly be in place in your code. --Brett At 05:40 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: >What versions of FreeBSD are known to be vulnerable to it ? > >There appears to be some confusion about whether or not it is a wide >spread problem. > >Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17: 1:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6871540A; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11640; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:00:35 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120175659.0167ce60@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:00:33 -0700 To: Warner Losh From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120173540.01a26100@localhost> References: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Oops.... I've answered my own question. IPFW's "established" keyword only checks the RST or ACK bits; it can't tell if a session is REALLY established or not. Only a firewall that can save state (such as IPFilters), or the kernel itself, can do this. It'd be neat if we could use IPFilters to do a temporary fix for this, because it'd nuke the problem on several OSes at once -- including all of the BSDs. (They all just happen to come with IPFilters out of the box now.) This way, when the skript kiddies reading Bugtraq start trying this, there will be an immediate defense. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17: 1:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C94915147; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:01:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA81201; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:01:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA07092; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:01:42 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001210101.SAA07092@harmony.village.org> To: Darren Reed Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:40:01 +1100." <200001210040.LAA14428@cairo.anu.edu.au> References: <200001210040.LAA14428@cairo.anu.edu.au> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:01:42 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200001210040.LAA14428@cairo.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes: : What versions of FreeBSD are known to be vulnerable to it ? : : There appears to be some confusion about whether or not it is a wide : spread problem. All versions of {Free,Open,Net}BSD, Solaris, Linux, etc are vulnerable to some degree to this attack, or similar attacks. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17: 4: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810CD15291; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:03:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA20844; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:03:35 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210103.MAA20844@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:03:35 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120174826.01882ad0@localhost> from "Brett Glass" at Jan 20, 2000 05:51:19 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Brett Glass, sie said: > > Darren: > > Glad to see you are in on this discussion. > > The code you use for the "keep state" option in IPFilters might be > able to recognize that the ACK does not belong to an existing > connection. Could a fast check be implemented as a rule under > IPFilters? (If it could, it's probably a one-liner, but I'd need > to figure out how to write it since I do not deal with IPFilters > on a regular basis.) If not, it seems as if the framework might > mostly be in place in your code. If you're using "flags S keep state" or "flags S/SA keep state", then as far as I'm aware, having read the code, you are safe. I'm intrigued to know what the bug is. Reading the code, it is hard to see how you could make a box fall over using it, unless there were some serious problems in how random TCP ACK's were handled. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17:13:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E26115291; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:13:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11856; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:12:37 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120180821.0188d5c0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:12:37 -0700 To: Darren Reed From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210103.MAA20844@cairo.anu.edu.au> References: <4.2.2.20000120174826.01882ad0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:03 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: >If you're using "flags S keep state" or "flags S/SA keep state", >then as far as I'm aware, having read the code, you are safe. This might be a workaround. What rule(s) would have to follow it to block the ACK? >I'm intrigued to know what the bug is. Reading the code, it is >hard to see how you could make a box fall over using it, unless >there were some serious problems in how random TCP ACK's were >handled. My guess is that there's a long code path, or other inefficiency, in the way the ACK is handled. Perhaps a linear search for the right socket instead of one that's more clevery implemented (e.g. search by port, then address, etc.). --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17:41:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D6F14E57; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:41:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA28168; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:40:50 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210140.MAA28168@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:40:49 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120180821.0188d5c0@localhost> from "Brett Glass" at Jan 20, 2000 06:12:37 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Brett Glass, sie said: > > At 06:03 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: > > >If you're using "flags S keep state" or "flags S/SA keep state", > >then as far as I'm aware, having read the code, you are safe. > > This might be a workaround. What rule(s) would have to follow it > to block the ACK? None. > >I'm intrigued to know what the bug is. Reading the code, it is > >hard to see how you could make a box fall over using it, unless > >there were some serious problems in how random TCP ACK's were > >handled. > > My guess is that there's a long code path, or other inefficiency, > in the way the ACK is handled. Perhaps a linear search for the > right socket instead of one that's more clevery implemented > (e.g. search by port, then address, etc.). Well, it does bring Solaris7 to a point where it runs _very_ slowly: # ping -s 10.100.1.2 PING 10.100.1.2: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=0. time=2. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=3. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=4. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=5. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=6. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=7. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=8. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=9. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=10. time=0. ms -- start 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=11. time=11. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=12. time=16. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=13. time=16. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=14. time=18. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=15. time=21. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=17. time=23. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=19. time=25. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=22. time=29. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=28. time=21. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=36. time=0. ms -- end 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=37. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=38. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=39. time=0. ms ^C ----10.100.1.2 PING Statistics---- 40 packets transmitted, 24 packets received, 40% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/7/29 # FWIW, the box sending the ping's and solaris7 are 100BaseT but the attacker is only 10BaseT. Besides the issue of time to process TCP packets, there is also basic network flooding happening here too. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 17:49:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5943514D72; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:48:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA29656; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:48:41 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210148.MAA29656@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:48:41 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass), avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210103.MAA20844@cairo.anu.edu.au> from "Darren Reed" at Jan 21, 2000 12:03:35 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If you are using ipnat and have ipfilter installed, the work around is as follows: pass in all block in proto tcp all head 100 pass in proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 this (1) continues to let all packets in (2) blocks (silent drop) all TCP packets except for (3) SYN only packets which cause a state entry to be made. I'm of no doubt that this attack will cause some %CPU to be used in checking the IP Filter state tables, but it will not result in TCP RST's being generated in reply. I've tested this again against the same solaris7 box and results are: # ping -s 10.100.1.2 PING 10.100.1.2: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=0. time=2. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=2. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=3. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=4. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=5. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=6. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=7. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=8. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=9. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=10. time=0. ms -- start 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=11. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=12. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=13. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=14. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=15. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=16. time=1. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=17. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=18. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=19. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=20. time=0. ms -- end 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=21. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=22. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=23. time=0. ms 64 bytes from solaris7 (10.100.1.2): icmp_seq=24. time=0. ms ^C ----10.100.1.2 PING Statistics---- 25 packets transmitted, 25 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/2 # ipfstat -hio empty list for ipfilter(out) 123021 pass in from any to any 122994 block in proto tcp from any to any head 100 0 pass in proto tcp from any to any flags S/FSRPAU keep state group 100 Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 19: 7:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4993714CCE; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:07:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13131; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:01:55 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120194320.019e0220@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:51:17 -0700 To: Darren Reed , avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed) From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210148.MAA29656@cairo.anu.edu.au> References: <200001210103.MAA20844@cairo.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:48 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: >If you are using ipnat and have ipfilter installed, the work around is >as follows: > >pass in all >block in proto tcp all head 100 >pass in proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 Fantastic! Forwarded to Bugtraq. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 19:15:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from notrecords.com (228-121.ppp.ripco.net [209.100.228.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32C914D72 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:15:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aphor@ripco.com) Received: from ripco.com (nell.notrecords.com [192.168.1.123]) by notrecords.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA47135 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:17:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aphor@ripco.com) Message-ID: <3887CF9F.F0D234EB@ripco.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:16:47 -0600 From: Jeremy McMillan Reply-To: aphor@ripco.com Organization: Loose.. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? References: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org> <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> <4.2.2.20000120175659.0167ce60@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I really don't have enough experience with the source yet, but netstat is setgid kmem, meaning there is a structure in kernelspace that lists open connections. I started poking around there, and the includes led me right to the /usr/src/sys/netinet directory where I did grep for TCP and STATE. Is it referenced by &ips_table[hv] I found this in /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_state.c ---cut--- /* * Check if a packet has a registered state. */ int fr_checkstate(ip, fin) ---cut--- And right to the chase.... ---cut--- case IPPROTO_TCP : { register u_short dport = tcp->th_dport, sport = tcp->th_sport; hv += dport; hv += sport; hv %= IPSTATE_SIZE; MUTEX_ENTER(&ipf_state); for (isp = &ips_table[hv]; (is = *isp); isp = &is->is_next) if ((is->is_p == pr) && fr_matchsrcdst(is, src, dst, fin, tcp, sport, dport)) { if (fr_tcpstate(is, fin, ip, tcp)) { pass = is->is_pass; #ifdef _KERNEL MUTEX_EXIT(&ipf_state); #else if (tcp->th_flags & TCP_CLOSE) { *isp = is->is_next; isp = &ips_table[hv]; KFREE(is); } #endif return pass; } } MUTEX_EXIT(&ipf_state); break; } ---cut--- If this is it, and it isn't fast enough, then maybe we should pass all incoming ACKs to a separate thread with his own buffer space? Alternative, maintain a separate hash for TCP states to shorten the search? fr_matchsrcdest(is, src, dst, fin, tcp, sp, dp) seems to be matching by port number first. Someone either start explaining or send me the exploit so I can figure this out? Brett Glass wrote: > > Oops.... I've answered my own question. IPFW's "established" keyword > only checks the RST or ACK bits; it can't tell if a session is > REALLY established or not. Only a firewall that can save state > (such as IPFilters), or the kernel itself, can do this. > > It'd be neat if we could use IPFilters to do a temporary fix for > this, because it'd nuke the problem on several OSes at once -- > including all of the BSDs. (They all just happen to come with IPFilters > out of the box now.) This way, when the skript kiddies reading Bugtraq > start trying this, there will be an immediate defense. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:19:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195C415295; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:19:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA25285; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:35 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:35 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120211801.01a4a4c0@localhost> from "Brett Glass" at Jan 20, 2000 09:18:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Brett Glass, sie said: > > At 06:48 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: > > >If you are using ipnat and have ipfilter installed, the work around is > >as follows: > > I'm not very experienced with IPFilter, so this may be an "newbie" question, > but why is ipnat necessary? It isn't. I said that for people who are using ipnat but not ipfilter. btw, I think the better way to write the 3 rules is: block in quick proto tcp from any to any head 100 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 pass in all Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:38:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E62615450; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA04706; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:34:26 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001210534.QAA04706@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net (Mikhail Teterin) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:34:26 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210531.AAA26807@rtfm.newton> from "Mikhail Teterin" at Jan 21, 2000 12:31:10 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Mikhail Teterin, sie said: > > Darren Reed once stated: > > =It isn't. I said that for people who are using ipnat but not ipfilter. > = > =btw, I think the better way to write the 3 rules is: > = > =block in quick proto tcp from any to any head 100 > =pass in quick proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 > =pass in all > > Can a similar rule be created for ipfw? Thanks! Unless ipfw has stateful packet filtering, no. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:40:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CDB1547B; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:40:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA14277; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:18:51 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120211801.01a4a4c0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:18:51 -0700 To: Darren Reed , avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed) From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jamiE@arpa.com (jamiE rishaw - master e*tard), tom@uniserve.com (Tom), mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210148.MAA29656@cairo.anu.edu.au> References: <200001210103.MAA20844@cairo.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:48 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: >If you are using ipnat and have ipfilter installed, the work around is >as follows: I'm not very experienced with IPFilter, so this may be an "newbie" question, but why is ipnat necessary? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:40:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36FB15442 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:40:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13936; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:52:23 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000120205108.019a6e50@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:52:24 -0700 To: Gene Harris From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.2.20000120194320.019e0220@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 08:52 PM 1/20/2000 , Gene Harris wrote: > > > > > >pass in all > > >block in proto tcp all head 100 > > >pass in proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 > > > > Fantastic! Forwarded to Bugtraq. > > > > --Brett > > > >I guess this is good. But the thoughts of translating 350 >plus rules from ipfw to ipfilter are not too appealing. The problem is that ipfw doesn't have "keep state." I understand that the IPFilter page at http://cheops.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ has a link to a "rule compiler" that lets you recompile rules for different firewalls. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:40:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.15.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F2F1547D; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: from rtfm.newton (mi@rtfm.newton [10.10.0.1]) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA87473; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:31:11 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin X-Relay-IP: 10.10.0.1 Received: (from mi@localhost) by rtfm.newton (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA26807; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:31:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Message-Id: <200001210531.AAA26807@rtfm.newton> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> from Darren Reed at "Jan 21, 2000 03:21:35 pm" To: Darren Reed Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:31:10 -0500 (EST) Cc: Brett Glass , Warner Losh , jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:43:57 -0700 To: Mikhail Teterin , Darren Reed From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: Warner Losh , jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200001210531.AAA26807@rtfm.newton> References: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unfortunately, no. IPFW is stateless (at least from packet to packet). This makes it compact and fast but unable to detect or handle some situations by itself. You could write a daemon that hung off of a divert(4) socket (as natd does) to do this, but serious juju would be required. --Brett At 10:31 PM 1/20/2000 , Mikhail Teterin wrote: >Can a similar rule be created for ipfw? Thanks! > > -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 21:48:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (ftp.tetronsoftware.com [208.236.46.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B94515218 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:48:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zeus@tetronsoftware.com) Received: from tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (tetron02.tetronsoftware.com [208.236.46.106]) by tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07877; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:52:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from zeus@tetronsoftware.com) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:52:40 -0600 (CST) From: Gene Harris To: Brett Glass Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000120194320.019e0220@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > >pass in all > >block in proto tcp all head 100 > >pass in proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 > > Fantastic! Forwarded to Bugtraq. > > --Brett > I guess this is good. But the thoughts of translating 350 plus rules from ipfw to ipfilter are not too appealing. Unless, it is possible to use both. Most of SOHO users I know are using natd and ipfw. I fail to see how this will be a quick fix for them. Gene Harris http://www.tetronsoftware.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 22: 3:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.uunet.ca (mail5.uunet.ca [142.77.1.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7A1151C0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:03:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from w01.arpa-canada.net ([216.95.146.6]) by mail5.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <232083-10708>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:03:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:03:41 -0500 From: matt X-Sender: matt@w01.arpa-canada.net To: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG curious.. on 3.4-stable, cvsupped Dec. 29 1999, defaults/rc.conf has; TCP_DROP_SYNFIN and TCP_RESTRICT_RST, which point to: sysctl net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin and net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst, However: root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst=1 sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst' root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin' Is this not functional yet? Or does it require something that I'm missing here? As I said, the machine is 3.4-STABLE as of Dec. 29 1999. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 22:28:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCBD151CD; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:28:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.39] (helo=softweyr.com ident=wes) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #3) id 12BXYV-0005WF-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:28:23 -0700 Message-ID: <3887FD8A.379E9B91@softweyr.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:32:42 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass Cc: Darren Reed , Warner Losh , jamiE rishaw - master e*tard , Tom , Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? References: <4.2.2.20000120174826.01882ad0@localhost> <4.2.2.20000120180821.0188d5c0@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brett Glass wrote: > > At 06:03 PM 1/20/2000 , Darren Reed wrote: > > >If you're using "flags S keep state" or "flags S/SA keep state", > >then as far as I'm aware, having read the code, you are safe. > > This might be a workaround. What rule(s) would have to follow it > to block the ACK? > > >I'm intrigued to know what the bug is. Reading the code, it is > >hard to see how you could make a box fall over using it, unless > >there were some serious problems in how random TCP ACK's were > >handled. > > My guess is that there's a long code path, or other inefficiency, > in the way the ACK is handled. Perhaps a linear search for the > right socket instead of one that's more clevery implemented > (e.g. search by port, then address, etc.). I don't think so. The handling for bare TCP ACKs isn't all that bad, so I'm not seeing the bug. Maybe tomorrow, after I've slept a bit. Tonight it's just escaping me. From the report, it's obviously a resource usage problem, where the ACKs are being queued up or something, but I can't see it tonight. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 22:29:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 8825314E3C; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E62B1CD5E0; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:29:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:29:13 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <200001210531.AAA26807@rtfm.newton> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Can a similar rule be created for ipfw? Thanks! No, because ipfw doesn't keep connection state :( This is one of the big advantages of ipfilter over ipfw. People had talked about adding the ability, but nothing has come of it yet. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 22:36:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (ftp.tetronsoftware.com [208.236.46.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBE015156 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:36:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zeus@tetronsoftware.com) Received: from tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (tetron02.tetronsoftware.com [208.236.46.106]) by tetron02.tetronsoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00841; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:39:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from zeus@tetronsoftware.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:39:44 -0600 (CST) From: Gene Harris To: matt Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, matt wrote: > > curious.. on 3.4-stable, cvsupped Dec. 29 1999, defaults/rc.conf has; > > TCP_DROP_SYNFIN and TCP_RESTRICT_RST, which point to: > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin and net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst, However: > > root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst=1 > sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst' > root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 > sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin' > I think you forgot to compile the options into your kernel. options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN options TCP_RESTRICT_RST Adding this should do the trick. Gene To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 23:10:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.jeah.net (shell2.jeah.net [216.132.235.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5124151E3 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:10:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@shell.jeah.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by shell.jeah.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA12352 for stable@freeBSD.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:10:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:10:11 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Byrnes Message-Id: <200001210710.BAA12352@shell.jeah.net> To: stable@freeBSD.org Subject: Installing FP Extensions. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does anybody know, or can somebody point me in the direction of a help file, the correct way to install FrontPage extensions on a FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE box? I know this might possibly be the incorrect list, but I'm tearing my hair out, because I can't figure it out. Thanks in advance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 23:14:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id B00A515224; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59791CD5E2; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:14:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:14:09 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: AJ Siegel Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: I just did an CVSup today In-Reply-To: <3886F94F.43BE7635@home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, AJ Siegel wrote: > I can't do a make world... Keep getting ann error that it "can't make > crypt-md5.c HELP!!! What do I do? You probably cvsupped something other than RELENG_3 when you cvsupped the crypto sources. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 20 23:18:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id E1A20153EF; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81C41CD5E2; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:18:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:18:53 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Byrnes Cc: stable@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing FP Extensions. In-Reply-To: <200001210710.BAA12352@shell.jeah.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Chris Byrnes wrote: > Does anybody know, or can somebody point me in the direction of a help > file, the correct way to install FrontPage extensions on a FreeBSD > 3.4-STABLE box? Look at the apache13-fp port. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 1:54:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.di.uminho.pt (mail.di.uminho.pt [193.136.20.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E3CD15455 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:54:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@di.uminho.pt) Received: (qmail 19487 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2000 10:10:12 -0000 Received: from bogalhinho.di.uminho.pt (HELO di.uminho.pt) (jose@193.136.20.38) by mail.di.uminho.pt with SMTP; 21 Jan 2000 10:10:12 -0000 Message-ID: <38883B69.C31B969E@di.uminho.pt> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:56:41 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9=20Lu=EDs?= Faria Organization: Universidade do Minho-Departamento de =?iso-8859-1?Q?Inform=E1tica?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Diffserv over FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello all, I need a server with FreeBSD but working with Diffserv. Can you help me ? Thanks! -- :) cumprimentos -------------------------------- Jose Luis Faria Administrador de Sistemas Universidade do Minho - Departamento de Informática Campus de Gualtar 4710-057 Braga Portugal tel.: +351 253604440 Fax:+351 253604471 http://admin.di.uminho.pt/~jose To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 4: 2:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD738152B7 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 04:02:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steveroo@mothra.bri.hp.com) Received: from mothra.bri.hp.com (mothra.bri.hp.com [15.144.1.185]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B756D10B7; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:02:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (steveroo@localhost) by mothra.bri.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id MAA27223; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:01:23 GMT Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:01:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: Gene Harris Cc: matt , FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Gene Harris wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:39:44 -0600 (CST) > From: Gene Harris > To: matt > Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE > Subject: Re: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, matt wrote: > > > > > curious.. on 3.4-stable, cvsupped Dec. 29 1999, defaults/rc.conf has; > > > > TCP_DROP_SYNFIN and TCP_RESTRICT_RST, which point to: > > > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin and net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst, However: > > > > root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst=1 > > sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.restrict_rst' > > root[w01]:~# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 > > sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin' > > > > I think you forgot to compile the options into your kernel. > > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > options TCP_RESTRICT_RST Maybe it's a stupid question, but should sysctl even report these variables if they are not available to be set ? Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 4:28:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dd-mail-smtp.dk.damgaard.com (client.dk.damgaard.com [193.88.253.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0633B15226 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 04:28:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bbl@dk.damgaard.com) Received: from 193.88.253.3 by dd-mail-smtp.dk.damgaard.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:28:16 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) Received: by mail.damgaard.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:28:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5ED89301AE60D311AAD500508B0EF55F50DF1A@dd-mail.intern.dd.dk> From: Bjarne Blichfeldt To: "Freebsd-Stable (E-mail)" Subject: Trouble with de0, hubs and ISDN Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:27:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At home I have installed an Alpha Personal workstation 500au, which connects to a HUB which again connects to an 3com officeconnect to ISDN. de0 jumps up and down all the time, saying somthing like: de0 down, check cable. When the same machine is installed at work, there seems to be no problems. When checking the code in if_de.c, it seems the the driver uses the traffic on the interface to determine wether the interface is up or down. Since the machine at times is the only machine on the net,(the ISDN closes between traffic), the netcard jumps up and down. That makes it very difficult to work over isdn lines. When I want to initiate a connection, it takes a loooooong time to establish. When I have something running on the remote systems, and are waiting for output, the interface just decides that the cable is gone, and stops listening. Are there any way , other than changing the driver, to change that behaviour ? Regards, Bjarne Blichfeldt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 7: 1:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB601540A for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6614A19B9; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Per Kristian Hove Cc: Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? Message-ID: <20000118193532.J457@argon.blackdawn.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from perhov+abuse@math.ntnu.no on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Per Kristian Hove wrote: > Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so > I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to > show that it's always been this way. DOS epoch == UNIX epoch. At least, in my tests of my code that uses time_t, they both start on January 1, 1970 at 00:00 UTC. I used CodeWarrior Pro 2 + GCC 2.95.2. YMMV. (Not like this really matters anyhow.. ;-) --Will To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 7:27: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7392714D63; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrs@enteract.com) Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (jrs@shell-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.41]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA70432; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:26:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jrs@enteract.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:26:48 -0600 (CST) From: John Sconiers To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I work for a network security company and have been trying to get a copy of stream.c. Will someone please contact me off list so I can recieve a copy of the exploit. If you wish to verify my employer or any other information before sending please contact me at 847-952-5059. Thanks JRS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 7:38:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sstar.com (sstar.com [209.102.160.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688AA15238 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:38:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from king@sstar.com) Received: from JKING ([134.132.75.164]) by sstar.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52) id 6351400; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:38:05 -0600 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000121093608.00a8b130@mail.sstar.com> X-Sender: king@mail.sstar.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:38:06 -0600 To: Will Andrews , Per Kristian Hove From: Jim King Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? Cc: Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000118193532.J457@argon.blackdawn.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 07:35 PM 1/18/2000 -0500, Will Andrews wrote: >On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Per Kristian Hove wrote: > > Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so > > I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to > > show that it's always been this way. > >DOS epoch == UNIX epoch. At least, in my tests of my code that uses >time_t, they both start on January 1, 1970 at 00:00 UTC. > >I used CodeWarrior Pro 2 + GCC 2.95.2. YMMV. > >(Not like this really matters anyhow.. ;-) DOS epoch == UNIX epoch from the point of view of a C program using the C RTL, but DOS's "native" epoch is 1/1/1980, and that's how you have to interpret dates in msdosfs directory entries. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 8: 3:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from martens.math.ntnu.no (martens.math.ntnu.no [129.241.15.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D18414D14 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:03:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perhov@math.ntnu.no) Received: (qmail 25941 invoked by uid 29119); 21 Jan 2000 16:03:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:03:25 +0100 (MET) From: Per Kristian Hove X-Sender: perhov@martens.math.ntnu.no To: Jim King Cc: Will Andrews , Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20000121093608.00a8b130@mail.sstar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Jim King] | DOS epoch == UNIX epoch from the point of view of a C program using the C | RTL, but DOS's "native" epoch is 1/1/1980, and that's how you have to | interpret dates in msdosfs directory entries. Which directory entry? :-) The root directory entry for a msdosfs does not have a ".", so when stat()ing a msdosfs, the result is faked by the kernel. See msdosfs_lookup() in sys/msdosfs/msdosfs_lookup.c. Sorry, this doesn't belong in freebsd-stable. I'll shut up now. -- Per Kristian Hove Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, NTNU N-7491 Trondheim, Norway To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 8:31:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from correo.tamnet.com.mx (correo.tamnet.com.mx [200.34.205.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37551154B5 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:30:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adepoo@tamnet.com.mx) Received: from correo.tamnet.com.mx (correo.tamnet.com.mx [200.34.205.20]) by correo.tamnet.com.mx (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id KAA20885; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:30:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:30:09 -0600 (CST) From: To: Chris Byrnes Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing FP Extensions. In-Reply-To: <200001210710.BAA12352@shell.jeah.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Chris Byrnes wrote: > Does anybody know, or can somebody point me in the direction of a help file, the correct way > to install FrontPage extensions on a FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE box? > > I know this might possibly be the incorrect list, but I'm tearing my hair out, because I can't > figure it out. > > Thanks in advance. > You can take a look at http://www.freebsddiary.org/freebsd there are some articles about FrontPage 2000 on FreeBSD with some security advice also. Saludos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 8:55:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jason04.u.washington.edu (jason04.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECE11555C; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:55:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kraemer@u.washington.edu) Received: from mead2.u.washington.edu (kraemer@mead2.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.164]) by jason04.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA17764; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:55:32 -0800 Received: from localhost (kraemer@localhost) by mead2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA118496; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:55:32 -0800 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:55:32 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Kraemer To: Darren Reed Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? In-Reply-To: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Darren Reed wrote: > btw, I think the better way to write the 3 rules is: > > block in quick proto tcp from any to any head 100 > pass in quick proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 > pass in all If I'm not mistaken, this ruleset (and no other rules) will also effectively block any outgoing TCP sessions initiated from this machine. The machine will send a SYN, and then get blocked because the input rules never saw an incoming SYN to start keeping state. I assume a rule that keeps state on the outgoing would fix this? -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 9: 8:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jason04.u.washington.edu (jason04.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C8D15198 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:08:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kraemer@u.washington.edu) Received: from mead2.u.washington.edu (kraemer@mead2.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.164]) by jason04.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA35054 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:08:40 -0800 Received: from localhost (kraemer@localhost) by mead2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA73022 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:08:39 -0800 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:08:39 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Kraemer To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ipf and logging In-Reply-To: <200001210421.PAA25285@cairo.anu.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm using ipf (the version that builds with 3.4-STABLE) on a 3.4-STABLE machine and I cannot get it to log anything no matter what I do. I have added the keyword "log" to all my rules, and have tried using every option to the -l command line switch with no success. I have both IPFILTER and IPFILTER_LOG in my kernel config and have syslog.conf set up correctly. Running 'ipfstat -hio' shows that the counters on my rules are indeed climbing, so I should be getting log messages. What am I missing? -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 9:17:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dozer.skynet.be (dozer.skynet.be [195.238.2.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A03A15500; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:17:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by dozer.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with ESMTP id SAA10968; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:17:04 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:04:56 +0100 To: Brian Kraemer , Darren Reed From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 8:55 AM -0800 2000/1/21, Brian Kraemer wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, this ruleset (and no other rules) will also > effectively block any outgoing TCP sessions initiated from this machine. > The machine will send a SYN, and then get blocked because the input rules > never saw an incoming SYN to start keeping state. In fact, that is precisely what happens. I speak from experience. Maybe sometime Monday I can get a chance to look at this yet once again and figure out what the right rules should be. I sure as hell ain't gonna be tryin' to make any more changes tonight.... -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 9:27:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9197F154E0 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:27:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id JAA12352; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:27:15 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda12350; Fri Jan 21 09:27:08 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA10852; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdX10850; Fri Jan 21 09:26:54 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA02364; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:26:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001211726.JAA02364@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdbe2342; Fri Jan 21 09:25:55 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Brian Kraemer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipf and logging In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:08:39 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:25:55 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Brian Kraemer writes: > I'm using ipf (the version that builds with 3.4-STABLE) on a 3.4-STABLE > machine and I cannot get it to log anything no matter what I do. I have > added the keyword "log" to all my rules, and have tried using every option > to the -l command line switch with no success. I have both IPFILTER and > IPFILTER_LOG in my kernel config and have syslog.conf set up correctly. > Running 'ipfstat -hio' shows that the counters on my rules are indeed > climbing, so I should be getting log messages. > > What am I missing? You need to run ipmon(8). This question should have been posted to freebsd-questions. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Sun/DEC Team, UNIX Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 10:27:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-01.cdsnet.net (mail-01.cdsnet.net [206.107.16.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D58514FA1 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:27:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mrcpu@internetcds.com) Received: (qmail 17745 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2000 18:27:17 -0000 Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (204.118.244.32) by mail.cdsnet.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2000 18:27:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:25:27 -0800 (PST) From: Jaye Mathisen X-Sender: mrcpu@schizo.cdsnet.net To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Tweaking to enhance file-caching... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a box running that as much as possible, I would like the VM system to favor caching writes and metadata over program run space... Meaning, say on a 64MB box, if a program needed 100MB's of memory, that program would be forced to page/swap, while 32MB's of RAM (or whatever), is still caching filesystem writes. Essentially, the memory priority needs to be on caching... Is this possible with 3.4? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 10:43:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306FF15503; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:43:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23348; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA11593; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:43:39 -0800 (PST) Organization: Polstra & Co., Inc. From: John Polstra To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, named (duh) cvsup[1-8].FreeBSD.org. The newest, cvsup8, is a very high-capacity and well-connected site, yet hardly anybody is using it. Please give it a try! You can find the full list of mirrors worldwide at: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/mirrors-cvsup.html Remember, the mirrors are equivalent in the sense that they get their updates from the master server at the same intervals (hourly). There is nothing "better" about the lower-numbered mirrors, and they don't get their updates any sooner or more reliably. In fact, the higher-numbered mirrors often have faster hardware simply because they're newer. Also, in particular, there's nothing special about cvsup.FreeBSD.org -- it's simply an alias for cvsup1 and it gets its updates the same way at the same intervals from the same master server as all the other mirrors. To choose a mirror site, try pinging the mirrors in your country. Pick one with a low packet loss rate. The round trip time doesn't matter very much as long as it doesn't undergo wild variations. Second, pick a site that's not too heavily loaded. If your update _ever_ fails because the server is too busy, then you should try a different mirror -- because there are many mirrors that aren't even close to their full loads even at the busiest of times. Thanks for your cooperation. John --- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 11: 0:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431315156 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:00:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A0DA1C4A; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:38:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:38:14 -0500 From: Bill Fumerola To: Stephen Roome Cc: Gene Harris , matt , FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) Message-ID: <20000121133814.C48683@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from steveroo@mothra.bri.hp.com on Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 12:01:23PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 12:01:23PM +0000, Stephen Roome wrote: > > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > > options TCP_RESTRICT_RST > > Maybe it's a stupid question, but should sysctl even report these variables > if they are not available to be set ? Possibly, but the sysctl's haven't been "registered" unless those options are set. #ifdef TCP_DROP_SYNFIN static int drop_synfin = 0; SYSCTL_INT(_net_inet_tcp, OID_AUTO, drop_synfin, CTLFLAG_RW, &drop_synfin, 0, "Drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN set"); #endif from netinet/tcp_input.c -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 11:11:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AEC154F9; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23524; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA11686; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001211911.LAA11686@vashon.polstra.com> To: jdp@polstra.com Subject: Re: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , I wrote: > To choose a mirror site, try pinging the mirrors in your country. I have been reminded that a few mirrors (cvsup8 in particular) filter pings. Don't take ping failures as a certain indication that the server is down. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 11:52:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (dynamic-33.max4-du-ws.dialnetwork.pavilion.co.uk [212.74.9.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFB715021 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA14106; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 19:50:59 GMT (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00439; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:40:36 GMT (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200001210840.IAA00439@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.0 09/18/1999 To: Lev Serebryakov oD Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: ppp see carrier everytime! In-Reply-To: Message from Lev Serebryakov oD of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:24:51 +0300." <200001201824.VAA11049@imc.macro.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:40:36 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, All! > > I have very strange problem with user-level ppp. ppp always see carrier on > my modem. All other software works perfectly (mgetty, FIDO mailer > qico). > Here are details: > Motherboard is SiS496, CPU i486DX4-100, 16Mb of RAM. > Sportster 33600 internal ISA is installed as COM2 (motherboard's > COM2 is switched off). I have next lines in my kernel config: > > device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" tty flags 0x10 irq 4 > device sio1 at isa? port "IO_COM2" tty flags 0x10 irq 3 > > Kernel found devices: > > sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa > sio0: type 16550A > sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on isa > sio1: type 16550A > > mgetty works perfectly: > > 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.21-Ju > 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 check for lockfiles > 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 locking the line > 01/20 20:58:13 aa1 lowering DTR to reset Modem > 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 send: AT&F1M0L0[0d] > 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 waiting for ``OK'' ** found ** > 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 mdm_send: 'ATI' > 01/20 20:58:14 aa1 USR Courier/Sportster V.34(+) detected > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'ATI3' > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 additional info: 'Sportster 33600/Fax V2.0' > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2.0' -> OK > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FAA=1;+FCR=1' -> OK > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FBO=1' -> OK > 01/20 20:58:15 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FNR=1,1,1,0' -> OK > 01/20 20:58:16 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FLI="7 812 1072343"' -> OK > 01/20 20:58:16 aa1 mdm_send: 'AT+FCC=1,5,0,2,0,0,0,0' -> OK > > But user-level ppp could not use port /dev/cuaa1! > It always see carrier on it: > > ppp ON freebsd> set log local +chat +phase +connect > Phase: bundle: Establish > Phase: deflink: closed -> opening > Phase: deflink: Connected! > Phase: deflink: opening -> dial > Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 > Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier > ppp ON freebsd> Phase: deflink: /dev/cuaa1 doesn't support CD > Phase: deflink: carrier -> login > Chat: Send: > Chat: Expect(15): login: > > I could say more: if I setup ppp to use /dev/cuaa0 (which is empty), > ppp will find Carrier too: > > ppp ON freebsd> set device dev/cuua0 > Phase: bundle: Establish > Phase: deflink: closed -> opening > Phase: deflink: Connected! > Phase: deflink: opening -> dial > Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 > Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier > ppp ON freebsd> Phase: deflink: /dev/cuaa0 doesn't support CD > Phase: deflink: carrier -> login > Chat: Send: > Chat: Expect(15): login: > > Simple program, which call ``ioctl(d,TIOCMGET,&flags)'' could not > find any carrier. > > Lev Serebryakov, 2:5030/661.0 What you mean is ppp *doesn't* see carrier. Have you tried modifying the carrier detect timeout: set cd 3 I suspect you modem is just a bit slow at asserting carrier. WRT the simple program that does a TIOCMGET, this will never see carrier (unless your modem is misconfigured) as only one process is normally able to open the cua device at a time, and carrier is only raised when the modem's connected to another modem. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 12:37:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mindcrime.bit0.com (mindcrime.bit0.com [207.246.72.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6914153C7 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:37:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Received: from localhost (mandrews@localhost) by mindcrime.bit0.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA36033 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:37:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:37:08 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Andrews To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: natd pptpalias question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a customer who has a FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE box doing NAT for his internal LAN. He's trying to make outgoing PPTP connections from PC's inside this internal LAN headed for servers across the Internet. Right now I've got a -pptpalias flag on natd to allow this for just one of his internal PC's, but can't find a way to let all of his PC's make connections to various outside VPN servers. Is this doable at all without, say, a Cisco 2514? Sorry if this soudns like a dumb question, but I'm not very familiar with VPN setups yet (getting there though)... Mike Andrews (MA12) * mandrews@dcr.net * http://www.bit0.com/ VP, sysadmin, & network guy, Digital Crescent Inc, Frankfort KY Internet services for Frankfort, Lawrenceburg, Owenton, Shelbyville "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 15:58:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2641582C; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:58:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA15748; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:58:28 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200001212358.KAA15748@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? To: kraemer@u.washington.edu (Brian Kraemer) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:58:28 +1100 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Brian Kraemer" at Jan 21, 2000 08:55:32 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some mail from Brian Kraemer, sie said: > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Darren Reed wrote: > > > btw, I think the better way to write the 3 rules is: > > > > block in quick proto tcp from any to any head 100 > > pass in quick proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state group 100 > > pass in all > > If I'm not mistaken, this ruleset (and no other rules) will also > effectively block any outgoing TCP sessions initiated from this machine. > The machine will send a SYN, and then get blocked because the input rules > never saw an incoming SYN to start keeping state. > > I assume a rule that keeps state on the outgoing would fix this? Yes. I forgot about that :-) pass out proto tcp from any to any flags S keep state would be required also. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 21 21:30:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail6.uunet.ca (mail6.uunet.ca [142.77.1.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070EE14F0A for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:30:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: from w01.arpa-canada.net ([216.95.146.6]) by mail6.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <232885-27449>; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:24:21 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:24:20 -0500 From: matt X-Sender: matt@w01.arpa-canada.net To: Gene Harris Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Restricting RST & Dropping SYN/FIN (was; stream.c) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yeah, You're right. This teaches me to read through LINT more often, oh the joys of always using the same kernel config. *goes back to having more coffee* Thanks. -Matt On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Gene Harris wrote: [...] : I think you forgot to compile the options into your kernel. : : options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN : options TCP_RESTRICT_RST : : Adding this should do the trick. : : Gene : : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 8:17:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (paprika.michvhf.com [209.57.60.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB0BF14D46 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 08:17:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 16995 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jan 2000 16:17:27 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200001050716.XAA00673@mass.cdrom.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:17:27 -0500 (EST) X-Face: *0^4Iw) To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: booting 3.x from CD? Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 05-Jan-00 Mike Smith wrote: > Ack. At this point in time, we're stumped. It looks like you're > trying to install 3.1 here, but the code sequence that you're running > doesn't actually exist in the 3.1-RELEASE loader. If you boot this > particular CDROM, does it always die at _exactly_ the same place? > > The avenues for code corruption are: > > - bad CDROM (will always be the same error) > - bad memory (may vary locations, etc.) > - bad CD drive/cabling/controller (may vary locations) Problem found and fixed. It was a bad CDROM drive. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 128K ISDN: $24.95/mo or less - 56K Dialup: $17.95/mo or less at Pop4 Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 8:45:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F6814E1D for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 08:45:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p18-dnz02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.163.200.115]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) with ESMTP id BAA09459; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 01:45:22 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3889DE7E.EE288D15@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 01:44:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaye Mathisen Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tweaking to enhance file-caching... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > I have a box running that as much as possible, I would like the VM > system to favor caching writes and metadata over program run space... > > Meaning, say on a 64MB box, if a program needed 100MB's of memory, that > program would be forced to page/swap, while 32MB's of RAM (or whatever), > is still caching filesystem writes. > > Essentially, the memory priority needs to be on caching... > > Is this possible with 3.4? Why do you need that? FreeBSD doesn't really make any distinction between program and disk cache. It's the same thing, as far as we are concerned. Whatever gets most use stays in memory. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "2 b or not to b" meaning varies depending on whether one uses the 79 or the 83 standard. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 9:20:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4CC156CA for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:20:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00967; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA16383; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001221720.JAA16383@vashon.polstra.com> To: mandrews@bit0.com Subject: Re: natd pptpalias question In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Mike Andrews wrote: > I've got a customer who has a FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE box doing NAT for > his internal LAN. He's trying to make outgoing PPTP connections > from PC's inside this internal LAN headed for servers across the > Internet. Right now I've got a -pptpalias flag on natd to allow > this for just one of his internal PC's, but can't find a way to let > all of his PC's make connections to various outside VPN servers. Even ignoring the -pptpalias question, you'll probably have a hard time getting this to work. PPTP clients behind NAT are problematic in general. Here's why. A PPTP connection consists of two channels, a TCP connection (called the "control connection") and a GRE tunnel. The specification allows only one control connection (and one tunnel) between a given client and a given server. Since your clients are behind NAT, their outgoing connections will all appear to come from the same IP address, that of the NAT box's external interface. So if two clients try to connect to the same server, there will be two control connections between the same pairs of IP addresses, violating the standard. I have heard that "some servers" allow multiple control connections from the same IP address, but I don't know whether that's true or which servers it applies to. Depending on the flexibility of your NAT software, and if you have a whole block of public IP addresses, you may be able to set it up so that each outbound connection appears to come from a distinct IP address. But then you are still faced with the -pptpalias problem. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 12: 7:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from netcom.com (netcom16.netcom.com [199.183.9.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509FA14C10 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@netcom.com) Received: (from stanb@localhost) by netcom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA29191 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:07:40 -0800 (PST) From: Stan Brown Message-Id: <200001222007.MAA29191@netcom.com> Subject: How to make a floppy to boot a kernel on the hard disk? To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Stable List) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:07:40 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry to trouble this list again. It seems that my posts to questions must be connected to /dev/null. I brought home a machine over the weekend to set up for work on Monday, unfortunately the hard disk (or the disk controller in it) is bad. To try to determine which I tried installing a disk I had at home. Problem i the machine is an old 486, and the disk I am trying to use is a 20G. I can boot off the install disks, and get FreeBSD installed, but it won't boot, because the BIOS is too confused to pass any useful information. Is there a way to build a floppy loader, or some sort of boot disk that will boot the kernel on the hard disk, and mount the root partition on the hard disk as / I n=know I can do this in Linux using LILO, so surely we have a way to do this? I am running out of time here, and got no response whatsoever from the questions list over that past 2 days. and have been unable to find anything applicable to this in the FreeBSD book. Could some kind soul please give me a pointer here? Thanks, and again I apologize for posting this to this list. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 404-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- Look, look, see Windows 95. Buy, lemmings, buy! Pay no attention to that cliff ahead... Henry Spencer (c) 1998 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 13:22:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from radio.bicnet.net (radio.bicnet.net [199.190.243.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E407F14CBA for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:22:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@loverso.southborough.ma.us) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (nas-77-111.boston.navinet.net [216.67.77.111]) by radio.bicnet.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA09582; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 16:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loverso.southborough.ma.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08111; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 16:22:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from loverso@loverso.southborough.ma.us) Message-Id: <200001222122.QAA08111@loverso.southborough.ma.us> To: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable List) Subject: Re: How to make a floppy to boot a kernel on the hard disk? In-reply-to: Message from Stan Brown <200001222007.MAA29191@netcom.com> . X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://surf.to/loverso Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 16:22:11 -0500 From: John Robert LoVerso Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've done this in the past (such as for 3.3-RELEASE) by taking the fixit floppy image, mounting it, and adding a /boot.config file that has the single line: da(0,a)/boot/loader I then just leave that floppy in the drive. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 14:27: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (castles528.castles.com [208.214.165.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A3F14F80; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:27:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04820; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:35:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <200001222235.OAA04820@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: Mike Smith , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: booting 3.x from CD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:17:27 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:35:21 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > On 05-Jan-00 Mike Smith wrote: > > Ack. At this point in time, we're stumped. It looks like you're > > trying to install 3.1 here, but the code sequence that you're running > > doesn't actually exist in the 3.1-RELEASE loader. If you boot this > > particular CDROM, does it always die at _exactly_ the same place? > > > > The avenues for code corruption are: > > > > - bad CDROM (will always be the same error) > > - bad memory (may vary locations, etc.) > > - bad CD drive/cabling/controller (may vary locations) > > Problem found and fixed. It was a bad CDROM drive. Thanks _very_ much for the followup. One less ulcer for me! -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 14:40:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (castles528.castles.com [208.214.165.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB9E14F70 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:40:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04891; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:48:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <200001222248.OAA04891@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Stable List) Subject: Re: How to make a floppy to boot a kernel on the hard disk? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:07:40 EST." <200001222007.MAA29191@netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:48:37 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Problem i the machine is an old 486, and the disk I am trying to use is > a 20G. > > I can boot off the install disks, and get FreeBSD installed, but it > won't boot, because the BIOS is too confused to pass any useful > information. What do you mean particularly by this? Pass to whom? > Is there a way to build a floppy loader, or some sort of boot disk that > will boot the kernel on the hard disk, and mount the root partition on > the hard disk as / Yes, it should. Make a UFS floppy and install the bootblocks on it with disklabel -B. Put a kernel in /, create a /boot containing the loader and a loader.rc file that looks like this: load /kernel set currdev=disk1s1a: autoboot 10 Note that 'disk1s1a' assumes that the second BIOS disk is your harddisk, and you've installed FreeBSD in the first slice of that disk. If your BIOS is incredibly stupid, this may still not work, but it's worth a try. Let me know how you go; there are more tricks that can be played if this doesn't work. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 15:41: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.15.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54D614C16 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:40:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: from rtfm.newton (mi@rtfm.newton [10.10.0.1]) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA99779 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:40:57 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin X-Relay-IP: 10.10.0.1 Received: (from mi@localhost) by rtfm.newton (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA87892 for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:40:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Message-Id: <200001222340.SAA87892@rtfm.newton> Subject: Re: Tweaking to enhance file-caching... In-Reply-To: <3889DE7E.EE288D15@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Jan 23, 2000 01:44:46 am" To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:40:57 -0500 (EST) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" X-Relay-IP: 10.10.0.1 Received: (from mi@localhost) by rtfm.newton (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA87919; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Message-Id: <200001222344.SAA87919@rtfm.newton> Subject: Re: kern/13644 In-Reply-To: From "(env:" "mi)" at "Dec 28, 1999 09:55:47 am" To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:12 -0500 (EST) Cc: Bruce Evans , Mikhail Teterin , jasone@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" from = Bruce Evans at "Dec 28, 1999 05:03:47 pm" =To: Bruce Evans =Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:55:47 -0500 (EST) =CC: Mikhail Teterin , jasone@FreeBSD.ORG, = freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, = lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG =X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] =FreeBSD: ==> => If timeout is a non-nil pointer, it specifies a maximum ==> => interval to wait for the selection to complete. = =Solaris: ==> If timeout is not a NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum ==> interval to wait for the selection to complete. = =Linux: ==> timeout is an upper bound on the amount of time elapsed ==> before select returns. = =Irix (http://reality.sgi.com/cgi-bin/getman/?select): = If timeout is a non-zero pointer, it specifies a maximum = interval to wait for the selection to complete. = =BSDI (http://www.bsdi.com/bsdi-man?proto=1.1&apropos=0&msection=2&query=select): = If timeout is a non-NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum = interval to wait for the selection to complete. = =Perl 5.004 (http://man.cs.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/man?OS=alpha&command=select): = TIMEOUT is the maximum amount of time to wait before = returning an empty list. = =It seems, all of the documentation (including the FreeBSD's) agrees. The =FreeBSD's implementation disagrees... = = -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 22 20:56:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F83814DDA for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:56:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:56:21 -0800 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Mikhail Teterin" , Subject: RE: kern/13644 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:56:21 -0800 Message-ID: <000a01bf655e$314bb6c0$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <200001222344.SAA87919@rtfm.newton> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > =FreeBSD: > ==> => If timeout is a non-nil pointer, it specifies a maximum > ==> => interval to wait for the selection to complete. While the pthreads case is clearly a bug, in the other cases, FreeBSD's behavior seems correct. The timeout is bounding the time we wait for the selection to complete. However, the time to get back to the task includes more than just the time spent waiting for the selection to complete. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message