From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 0: 4:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BDB37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 00:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9124H218607 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 02:04:17 GMT (envelope-from bsd-stable@boneyard.lawrence.ks.us) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 02:04:17 +0000 (GMT) From: "Stephen D. Spencer" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: <95295.970251478@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This system is a PII-300, 128M RAM, an IDE boot drive with an array of 8 seagate baracuda UW drives connected to an Adaptec U2W card. This system has been around as a test box. It is running a recent 4.1.1 kernel from the middle of last week for vinum testing. I have been experiencing this panic when rsync'ing a large nfs volume to the RAID5 vinum volume. It usually takes several hours for this to occur. Originally, I was running on a generic kernel, but after I started having difficulties, I compiled a minimal kernel (I had been using soft updates on the vinum volume) I forgot to set dumpdev this time around, but this problem seems easily reproducable. Thanks to all for their fantastic work. Regards, Stephen Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0138c63 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc8c31cc8 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc8c31d30 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = trace trap, interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 4 (bufdaemon) interrupt mask = bio kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at ahc_action+0x1ef: movl 0x14(%esi),%eax db> db> trace ahc_action(c0d29980,c0d75c00,1,c0d7e730,6c4000) at ahc_action+0x1ef xpt_run_dev_sendq(c0d29940) at xpt_run_dev_sendq+0x1cb xpt_action(c0d75c00,684000) at xpt_action+0x23f dastart(c0d6e880,c0d75c00,c0d75c00,c0d7e730,1,684000,c0d6f830,1) at dastart+0x1cc xpt_run_dev_allocq(c0d29940,c0d6e880,c0d85800,c0edc988,684000) at xpt_run_dev_allocq+0x80 xpt_schedule(c0d6e880,1,684000,c0d85800,c0edc988) at xpt_schedule+0xbf dastrategy(c0edc988,c0edc988,2,c8c31e74,c0dab6ea) at dastrategy+0x88 diskstrategy(c0edc988,c0e67980,c0d99000,c369cb28,c0ee0540) at diskstrategy+0x95 launch_requests(c0ee0540,0,c369cb28,c8c1ef40,684000) at launch_requests+0x2ee vinumstart(c369cb28,0,c369cb28,c8c31ec4,c0187bb0) at vinumstart+0x1ce vinumstrategy(c369cb28,c0d8a080,c369cb28,1,c8c31ed0) at vinumstrategy+0x96 spec_strategy(c8c31ef8,c8c31edc,c01f7eb9,c8c31ef8,c8c31f04) at spec_strategy+0x8c spec_vnoperate(c8c31ef8,c8c31f04,c01750ea,c8c31ef8,2000) at spec_vnoperate+0x15 ufs_vnoperatespec(c8c31ef8) at ufs_vnoperatespec+0x15 bwrite(c369cb28,c8c31f1c,c017a449,c8c31f68,c8c31f28) at bwrite+0x1de vop_stdbwrite(c8c31f68,c8c31f28,c0187685,c8c31f68,c8c31f34) at vop_stdbwrite+0xe vop_defaultop(c8c31f68,c8c31f34,c01f7eb9,c8c31f68,c8c31f74) at vop_defaultop+0x15 spec_vnoperate(c8c31f68,c8c31f74,c0175f8e,c8c31f68,c369cb28) at spec_vnoperate+0x15 ufs_vnoperatespec(c8c31f68,c369cb28,c027c198,c015dfb5,c0154d09) at ufs_vnoperatespec+0x15 vfs_bio_awrite(c369cb28,39,c01764c4,c015dfb5,0) at vfs_bio_awrite+0x23e flushbufqueues(0,8000,c02280ec,0,b0246) at flushbufqueues+0x116 buf_daemon(0) at buf_daemon+0x8f fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 Stephen Spencer | | "Mutton yesterday, mutton today, and blimey, | if it don't look like mutton again tomarrer" | -Bert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 0: 7:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D385D37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 00:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A08FF1F85; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 03:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 03:07:16 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001001030716.A384@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <92759.970208180@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <92759.970208180@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:16:20PM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan and list, > If you could get a kernel crash dump, especially with a kernel with > debugging symbols, that would help enormously! Thanks. For better or worse, my box just obliged with a crash only 3h41m28s after booting my "DEBUG" kernel. I have found at least one interesting factor in the crashes. Searching my logs for timestatms associated with the crashes, I see... hal9000:/root# awk '/The FreeBSD Project/{print $1" "$2"\t"$3}' /var/log/messages{.1,.0,} Sep 9 23:34:24 Sep 10 16:33:17 Sep 10 16:51:09 Sep 11 02:47:41 Sep 20 20:12:51 Sep 20 20:17:06 Sep 21 02:02:07 Sep 22 02:02:16 Sep 22 19:51:15 Sep 23 02:11:15 Sep 24 02:11:53 Sep 24 02:19:24 Sep 25 02:10:45 Sep 26 02:10:56 Sep 26 18:52:44 Sep 27 02:11:00 Sep 27 23:45:23 Sep 28 02:10:37 Sep 29 02:10:33 Sep 30 02:10:32 Sep 30 22:26:08 Oct 1 02:10:50 You'll notice the remarkable number of crashes at or around 02:10. The only thing which runs regularly around then is "periodic daily", which starts at 01:59. I was sitting here while the disks rumbled away and after a while the system dived. While I would usually, think this is a hardware issue - heating from the overactive disks upsetting the memory or whatever, this system builds world at least weekly and has never crashing during that time. The build uses all three disks and, of course, hits them pretty hard. Sometimes I build a few ports at the same time and there has never been a complaint. Here's what I got from the core. Script started on Sun Oct 1 02:16:48 2000 hal9000:/root# cd /usr/obj/home/src/sys/DEBUG hal9000:DEBUG# gdb -k kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... IdlePTD 3149824 initial pcb at 28b860 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x6c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0175772 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7676db4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7676dd4 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 973 (tee) interrupt mask = none trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 182 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 giving up on 5 buffers Uptime: 3h41m28s dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 327680 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 --- #0 boot (howto=256) at /home/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:302 302 dumppcb.pcb_cr3 = rcr3(); (kgdb) symbol-file kernel.debug Load new symbol table from "kernel.debug"? (y or n) y Reading symbols from kernel.debug...done. (kgdb) exec-file /var/crash/kernel.0 (kgdb) core-file /var/crash/vmcore.0 IdlePTD 3149824 initial pcb at 28b860 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x6c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0175772 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7676db4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7676dd4 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 973 (tee) interrupt mask = none trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 182 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 giving up on 5 buffers Uptime: 3h41m28s dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 327680 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 --- #0 boot (howto=256) at /home/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:302 302 dumppcb.pcb_cr3 = rcr3(); (kgdb) bt #0 boot (howto=256) at /home/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:302 #1 0xc01419ec in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc02410cf, howto=-949627008) at /home/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:552 #2 0xc020aef2 in trap_fatal (frame=0xc7676d74, eva=108) at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:951 #3 0xc020abb9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc7676d74, usermode=0, eva=108) at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:844 #4 0xc020a78f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -949288944, tf_es = -949551088, tf_ds = -949551088, tf_edi = -949522828, tf_esi = -949522944, tf_ebp = -949522988, tf_isp = -949523040, tf_ebx = -950285472, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 27, tf_eax = -949523008, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072212110, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66199, tf_esp = -949523008, tf_ss = 0}) at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:443 #5 0xc0175772 in fdesc_setattr (ap=0xc7676e00) at vnode_if.h:305 #6 0xc0173d08 in vn_open (ndp=0xc7676ed0, fmode=1026, cmode=416) at vnode_if.h:305 #7 0xc016fc1b in open (p=0xc765d780, uap=0xc7676f80) at /home/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:989 #8 0xc020b10e in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = 2, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1077936848, tf_isp = -949522476, tf_ebx = -1077936760, tf_edx = 521, tf_ecx = 4, tf_eax = 5, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671963196, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 598, tf_esp = -1077936908, tf_ss = 47}) ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1150 #9 0xc01ffe25 in Xint0x80_syscall () #10 0x804860f in ?? () (kgdb) quit hal9000:DEBUG# exit Script done on Sun Oct 1 02:19:15 2000 Any insighti, suggestions or requests for more info are welcome. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 0:30:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A4F37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2BB31F44; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 03:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 03:30:20 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001001033020.B384@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable References: <92759.970208180@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <92759.970208180@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:16:20PM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Additional: I'm running 4.1.1-STABLE cvsup'ed on September 28th at 04:13. The box is a Gateway G6-266M with ? mobo, PII-266, 96MB, Quantum Fireball ST6.4A (ata0-master), Iomega ZIP (ata1-master), Mitsumi(?) ATA FX240S CD-ROM (ata1-slave), two Seagate/Compaq ST32171Ws off a Tekram DC-390F, STB Velocity 128 (NVidia/SGS-Thomson Riva128) AGP, Netgear XA410 TXC (dc0 - LC82C115 PNIC II 10/100BaseTX), Ensoniq ES1370. More info on request. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 3:41:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCA637B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 03:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kernighan.demon.co.uk ([194.222.151.76] helo=homebrew.kernighan.demon.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 13fgYM-000KSf-0V; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:41:07 +0100 Received: from localhost (njh@localhost) by homebrew.kernighan.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA00936; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:40:34 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njh@kernighan.demon.co.uk) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:40:32 +0100 (BST) From: Neil Hoggarth To: Nick Sayer Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UP kernel on SMP machine? In-Reply-To: <39D34CB4.98D76F8D@quack.kfu.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Nick Sayer wrote: > It does indeed have a Qlogic SCSI chip. I've been talking with the > maintainer of the isp driver, and he doesn't know about anything like > this... Yeah - I've been meaning to file a PR, but I wanted to do a bit more digging and come up with a decent description of the problem. I have been seriously short of round tuits recently. Now that the Oxford Beer Festival is out of the way I'll (a) collapse for a few days and then (b) try and get some hacking done. :-) Regards, Neil. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 5:22:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F5E37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 05:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veager.siteplus.net (1Cust186.tnt9.chattanooga.tn.da.uu.net [63.39.120.186]) by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28558; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 05:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 08:22:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: Ken Bolingbroke , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? In-Reply-To: <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know for a fact this works. I have done binary upgrades straight from 2.2.6 to 4.0-STABLE snapshots. One note, the next time you SVSUP and build you should rebuild /usr/src/release/sysinstall since it doesnt automatically build during makeworld. -- Jim Weeks On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Crist J . Clark wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:59:43PM -0700, Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 03:13:23PM -0700, Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm in the middle of updating a machine from 2.2.5 to 4.1.1, hopefully. > > > > I've got it to 2.2.8-S, successfully, then when the initial attempt to go > > > > from 2.2.8 to 3.5-S failed, I dropped down to 3.2-R which was successful. > > > > > > You did a binary upgrade to 3.2-R? Why not just do the binary upgrade > > > to 4.1.1? > > > > I didn't do a binary upgrade, I cvsup'd RELENG_3_2_0. The machine in > > question doesn't have either a CD or floppy drive, and it also only has > > 8 meg of RAM, all of which make binary upgrading a bit difficult. > > Otherwise, I'd have wiped the machine and installed 4.1.1 fresh. > > Holy, @#$%! And you do buildworlds on this machine!? Sounds like a > source upgrade would be even tougher. How long does it take to do one? > > Can you not do sysinstall on 8 MB anymore? If you can, I'd recommend > doing the minimal install of 4.1.1 over FTP. I can't imagine that that > would take longer than two or three buildworlds unless you are running > over a 1200 baud connection. > > If sysinstall does not work on 8 MB anymore, do you have another > machine that you can use to help? That opens up a lot more options. > -- > Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:13:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rrlhcmal1001.lhc.redrivernet.com (rrlhcmal1001.lhc.redrivernet.com [206.162.75.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3BB37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.173.151.57] by rrlhcmal1001.redrivernet.com (NTMail 5.06.0016/NU7672.00.74189ec7) with ESMTP id ackabbaa for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:13:50 -0700 Message-ID: <39D77ED0.CCA8A49D@techie.com> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:13:36 -0700 From: Janet Sullivan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BSD Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Did this box come with a USB keyboard? My Athlon crashed randomly while using either the USB keyboard that came with the system or a PS/2 style keyboard until I disabled atkbd0 in the kernel, enabled USB support and the USB Keyboard in the kernel, and used the USB keyboard that came with the system...its now solid as a rock, netscape excluded. Janet BSD wrote: > > My Athlon box again, here's the crash dump. I saved all the bins so that > I can go back into gdb if anyone needs me to look something else up. > Order of info: gdb, dmesg, kernel config. > [...] > machine i386 > ident MARVINUP > maxusers 1024 > makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin #Don't allow use of memcmp, etc. > options MAXDSIZ="(768*1024*1024)" > options DFLDSIZ="(768*1024*1024)" > options BLKDEV_IOSIZE=8192 > options PQ_LARGECACHE # color for 512k/16k cache > options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel > cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > options NO_F00F_HACK > options COMPAT_43 > options SYSVSHM > options SYSVSEM > options SYSVMSG > options KTRACE #kernel tracing > options INET #Internet communications protocols > pseudo-device ether 5 #Generic Ethernet > pseudo-device loop 5 #Network loopback device > pseudo-device bpf 5 #Berkeley packet filter > options IPFIREWALL #firewall > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by default > options IPDIVERT #divert sockets > options IPFILTER #ipfilter support > options IPFILTER_LOG #ipfilter logging > options IPSTEALTH #support for stealth forwarding > options TCPDEBUG > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > options TCP_RESTRICT_RST > options ICMP_BANDLIM > options DUMMYNET > options FFS #Fast filesystem > options PROCFS #Process filesystem > options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device > options SOFTUPDATES > options NSWAPDEV=20 > options QUOTA #enable disk quotas > options P1003_1B > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L > pseudo-device pty 256 #Pseudo ttys > pseudo-device snp 5 #Snoop device - to look at pty/vty/etc.. > options MSGBUF_SIZE=4096 > device isa > options AUTO_EOI_1 > options NTIMECOUNTER=100 > device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD > device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 > device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 > device vga0 at isa? > device sc0 at isa? > options MAXCONS=16 # number of virtual consoles > options SC_ALT_MOUSE_IMAGE # simplified mouse cursor in text mode > options SC_DFLT_FONT # compile font in > makeoptions SC_DFLT_FONT=cp850 > options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=8192 # number of history buffer lines > options SC_MOUSE_CHAR=0x3 # char code for text mode mouse cursor > options SC_PIXEL_MODE # add support for the raster text mode > options SC_TWOBUTTON_MOUSE > device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX flags 0x0 irq 13 > device ata > device atadisk # ATA disk drives > options ATA_STATIC_ID > options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA > options IDE_DELAY=10000 # Be optimistic about Joe IDE device > device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 > device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 > device fd1 at fdc0 drive 1 > device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 > device pci > device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) > options PANIC_REBOOT_WAIT_TIME=15 > > I'm now going to re-synch sources with cvsup, and re-build the > kernel. We'll see if it keeps on crashing. > > --Bart > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:27:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91IQu609774; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:26:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:26:56 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: Janet Sullivan Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) In-Reply-To: <39D77ED0.CCA8A49D@techie.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Janet Sullivan wrote: > Did this box come with a USB keyboard? My Athlon crashed randomly while > using either the USB keyboard that came with the system or a PS/2 style > keyboard until I disabled atkbd0 in the kernel, enabled USB support and > the USB Keyboard in the kernel, and used the USB keyboard that came with > the system...its now solid as a rock, netscape excluded. The system runs a PS/2 keyboard...it didn't come with anything, I made it. Interesting problem you report though. Perhaps you should gather some crash dumps so that people can see what causes your reboots. --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:33:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BAF37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91IXZU09060; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Andrew J Caines Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew J Caines of "Sun, 01 Oct 2000 03:07:16 EDT." <20001001030716.A384@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:33:35 -0700 Message-ID: <9056.970425215@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > For better or worse, my box just obliged with a crash only 3h41m28s after > booting my "DEBUG" kernel. Well, that's paradoxically something of a hopeful sign. :) > #3 0xc020abb9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc7676d74, usermode=0, eva=108) > at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:844 > #4 0xc020a78f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -949288944, tf_es = -949551088, > tf_ds = -949551088, tf_edi = -949522828, tf_esi = -949522944, > tf_ebp = -949522988, tf_isp = -949523040, tf_ebx = -950285472, > tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 27, tf_eax = -949523008, tf_trapno = 12, > tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072212110, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66199, > tf_esp = -949523008, tf_ss = 0}) at /home/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:443 > #5 0xc0175772 in fdesc_setattr (ap=0xc7676e00) at vnode_if.h:305 > #6 0xc0173d08 in vn_open (ndp=0xc7676ed0, fmode=1026, cmode=416) > at vnode_if.h:305 This, however, is quite interesting. Can you tell us a little bit about what you're running on this system and if you're using any special devices? If this panic occurs twice in a row at the same location, we're definitely starting to narrow it down. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:35:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1302C37B670; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91IahT35842; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:36:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:36:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Fortran 90/HPF on FreeBSD 4.x Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear Sirs. I need help! I'm looking for a Fortran 90 compiler with SMP/parallel capabilities, running under FreeBSD 4.1. I looked around for some compilers and I found these: FreeBSD nativ: - NAG Fortran F90 (www.nag.co.uk) - g77 Fotran 77 (GNU Fortran) Linux nativ: - PGI Compiler Suite (includes F77/F90/HPF/C/C++), MP capable over OpenMP (www.pgroup.com) - Lahey/Fujitsu F95 for Linux Express V5.5 (www.lahey.com) -VAST/F90 (www.psrv.com). NAG offers also compilers for Linux and you can get a free download of theire compiler suits, but for FreeBSD, I would have to obtain a 20 British Pound fee, Linux is completely free. So, first I tried to install Lahey's F95. I ran into trouble because of Lahey's glibc-detection routine, it showed me that my FBSD-Linux emulation uses glibc, not glibc2.1 so the compiler was installed with the wrong libraries and this happened while their were some updates in the FBSD code on which I accused the compiler malfunctions. Well, to come alongside the problem, I tried now to compile some software and Lahey/Fujitsu works well on F77 code (but I only have one testprogram at the moment). Another project compiled well, but the nativ f95 code has some syntax errors, which are NOT shown by the PC edition (division by zero, WinNT version does not stop there :-)). Well, because one of our new oncoming scientists is highly involved by meterological, environmental research, radiation-research, he uses a lot of code which has been developed on PGI's compiler suite and he told me, that a lot of the stuff needs to run on PGI compilers. Well, for that, I got a copy of their Linux distribution on September, 30th and installed it. Version 3.1-1 compiled well and our scatter function test suite (F77) was compiled well and I got an executable binary. The other software with the obscure division by zero error (mentioned above) was compiled well also, but the executable drops a core after starting. Yesterday evening and today I visited Portland again and got a copy of their new compiler R 3.2-2. I made the same installation, took some modifications in linux86rc file to make it compiling - and it compiles. But the result is always dumping a core, also the F77-compatible source which has been success= fuly compiled with the prior version. I tried to downgrade again, but Portland Group cleaned up their downloads and I can only obtain R 3.1-2 and -3 of the compiler suite. NAG compiler, Linux version, shows a lot of error messages on the f77 standard code and I'm not the professional to clean it up or apply the right tricky compilation option. Some collegues tried it, too, with no success. i do not want me wasting money on a "free" copy of their FreeBSD nativ compiler because it seems not realitic that their suite is to be used here at our department. So I have a focus on Lahey/Fujitsu F95 and especially PGI's compiler suite, especially last one is prefereable because of the MP capabilities. Unfortunately the newest version is not willing to run under FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE. So far on my experiences. Waht I need, really need, are some little performance hungry f90 native applications, coded as nativ f90 applications without any tricks or special library needs (vendor specific) to test and stress Lahey or PGI compilers and to proof, whether they produce real code or a heap of bit-trash (sorry for that). --> Is there anybody who's testing Portland Group's compiler on FreeBSD's Linux emulation? --> Who knows some places where I can download some testsuits of simple f90/hpf/f95 code to stress the compiler? Please not any kind special applications with special needs of applied libraries ... --> For the lucky case, Portland Group's compiler is willing to work under some circumstances under FreeBSD, where to find some parallelizing applications for testing purposes? Another, maybe crucial question is: how reliable, fast and scalable is Linux in high performance computing using OpenMP or PVM (clustering) in comparison to FreeBSD? FreeBSD seems not to be very wide spread in numerical application's research using Fortran, I guess (unlike the ancestors using BSD 4.2 or similar, like Ultrix machine or SunOS). If anybody has any hint, tip or trick in solving my problems to get the PGI running under FreeBSd, please email me. And: I need essential help in saving my FreeBSD infrastructure, it should not be replaced by Linux only due the lack of suitable high performance Fotran compilers. And, last but not least: Are there any benchmark comparisons between Linux and FreeBSD? I need some recent tests, especially how fast is Linux in doing SMP and FreeBSD/SMP. Last week I had a discussion with some scientists of our computing center and they told me something about Solaris vs. Linux regarding SMP. I was told that Linux was faster if the number of CPUs is not higher than 4 pieces, means: Linux must be really fast because Solaris is said to be a very fast and well scaling SMP OS?! And FreeBSD? I have no datasheets, so I can not decide anyway ... - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz BRD/Germany Tel: +496131/3924662 FAX: +496131/3923235 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:43:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C7937B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91IhoV19166 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:43:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:43:50 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Constant panics: some thoughts on the situation Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Let me start off by saying I'm no kernel hacker. So whatever I say here may be totally wrong and I would appreciate being corrected. Anyways, I've noticed some things about this whole situation. So here's a list of observations. 1) It seems to be affecting computers that have a relatively high network traffic load. I, for one, get hit with every attack imaginable. I'm sure Andrew J.Caines of altavista.net gets tons of funky packets too. 2) When in tcp_timer.c, tcp_timer_persist() function, it gets passed 0xdfd10720 as its void *xtp argument. It then sets struct tcpcb *tp = xtp. At no point in the function do I see tp being changed (and it's never passed with &tp)...other than that hack which calls a goto out;. But from the crash dump, the trap is on line 340, which is before the out label. When printing tp, the value shows as 0x620000. How did this change? 3) And why did this change to THAT #. Michael Allman's crash dump shows his trap coming in at route.c:135/rtalloc1(). When he prints the value of rnh, he gets 0x62000000. 2 extra 0s. Is this a mere coincidence? Is there something special about this # in the BSD kernel? --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:52:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.fpsn.net (mail.fpsn.net [63.224.69.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2611E37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sharky (adsl-151-202-94-89.bellatlantic.net [151.202.94.89]) by mail.fpsn.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA23485 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:48:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Message-Id: <200010011848.MAA23485@mail.fpsn.net> From: "Simon" To: "stable@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 14:55:39 -0400 Reply-To: "Simon" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Constant panics: some thoughts on the situation Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What's going on? have we entered a panic season? everyone is having panics... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 11:54:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40D337B66D for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA10344; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:54:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-104.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.104) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma010338; Sun Oct 1 13:53:55 2000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 13:49:44 -0500 To: BSD , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:39 PM 9/30/00 -0500, BSD wrote: >My Athlon box again, here's the crash dump. I saved all the bins so that >I can go back into gdb if anyone needs me to look something else up. >Order of info: gdb, dmesg, kernel config. This looks very similar to some crashing I had months back. An older drive didn't seem to like it at all and stopped using it for that drive. Panics continued and removing the drive physically didn't help. Turning off softupdates for all drives did eliminate the panic and later commits at some point fixed the problem and it could be turned back on, even on the drive it didn't like. No need to recompile, just 'tunefs -n disable' worked. >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) >options NO_F00F_HACK The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. >options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=8192 # number of history buffer lines Rather large and why one would need to go back so many lines. Neither are a problem, but you might want to scour your config and remove any additions since the panics started, if any. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12: 6:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA8E37B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91J6jE40399; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:06:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:06:45 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > This looks very similar to some crashing I had months back. An older drive > didn't seem to like it at all and stopped using it for that drive. Panics > continued and removing the drive physically didn't help. Turning off > softupdates for all drives did eliminate the panic and later commits at > some point fixed the problem and it could be turned back on, even on the > drive it didn't like. No need to recompile, just 'tunefs -n disable' worked. So...given these later commits, I should be fine with softupdates now, no? > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK option :) > >options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=8192 # number of history buffer lines > Rather large and why one would need to go back so many lines. Good point here though. I haven't had the best of luck with the syscons driver, it seems very touchy about its options. There, deleted all syscons options. Defaults are wonderful. :) 2 reboots from now we'll see if these changes failed to do anthing vs the rebooting problem. --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:15:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098B237B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 95D211F44; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:15:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:15:19 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001001151519.C384@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: Jordan Hubbard , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <9056.970425215@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <9056.970425215@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:33:35AM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan, > This, however, is quite interesting. Can you tell us a little bit > about what you're running on this system and if you're using any > special devices? At the time of the last boot, I was had a bash login shell on ttyv1 in which I was running mutt. I wasn't even using X at that point. Wile I can't tell you which job, from the sound of the disks, periodic daily was still running. Other than that, my usual servers were running: system daemons - ntpd, inetd, cron, sshd, moused; apps - postfix, thttpd and dnetc (Distributed net client to keep my load permanently above 1). There was hardly any mail or web activity. As for special devices, I only have the hardware which I mentioned. > If this panic occurs twice in a row at the same > location, we're definitely starting to narrow it down. I agree. The explanation also has to account the fact that it doesn't always happen at approximately the same time. Another listmember asked about what filesystems I was using. At the time of the last crash I had 6 ufs with four softupdates, 2 mfs, a procfs and a fdesc. I have iso9660 and MSDOSFS in the kernel, but almost never use them. The fdesc addition postdates the crashes. Is there anything I can usefully run to gather more info before the crash, such as a ps dump? -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:24:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDFA37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e91JOGU53269; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:24:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Andrew J Caines Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew J Caines of "Sun, 01 Oct 2000 15:15:19 EDT." <20001001151519.C384@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 12:24:16 -0700 Message-ID: <53266.970428256@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Another listmember asked about what filesystems I was using. At the time > of the last crash I had 6 ufs with four softupdates, 2 mfs, a procfs and a > fdesc. I have iso9660 and MSDOSFS in the kernel, but almost never use > them. fdesc... If it's not too much to ask, could you remove this one from the mix? I know you say it postdates your crashes, but eliminating it would at least make the debugging environment that much simpler. Same for the MFS mounts, actually, unless you're really using them a lot. Thanks! - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:25:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pathlink.net (linda.i1.pathlink.com [209.155.56.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689A437B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from data (c48797-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.0.77.106]) by pathlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA45944 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:25:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Message-Id: <200010011925.MAA45944@pathlink.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) From: kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 12:25:37 -0700 X-Mailer: WinVN 0.99.8 (x86 32bit) In-Reply-To: References: <95295.970251478@winston.osd.bsdi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , you say... > > >This system is a PII-300, 128M RAM, an IDE boot drive with an array of >8 seagate baracuda UW drives connected to an Adaptec U2W card. > >This system has been around as a test box. It is running a recent 4.1.1 >kernel from the middle of last week for vinum testing. I have been >experiencing this panic when rsync'ing a large nfs volume to the RAID5 >vinum volume. It usually takes several hours for this to occur. > >Originally, I was running on a generic kernel, but after I started having >difficulties, I compiled a minimal kernel (I had been using soft updates >on the vinum volume) > >I forgot to set dumpdev this time around, but this problem seems easily >reproducable. Thanks to all for their fantastic work. > >Regards, >Stephen > >Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >fault virtual address = 0x14 >fault code = supervisor read, page not present >instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0138c63 >stack pointer = 0x10:0xc8c31cc8 >frame pointer = 0x10:0xc8c31d30 >code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >processor eflags = trace trap, interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >current process = 4 (bufdaemon) >interrupt mask = bio >kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 >Stopped at ahc_action+0x1ef: movl 0x14(%esi),%eax >db> > [snip] I upgraded one of our news servers from 4.0-S to 4.1.1 Release. It panic'ed 3 times in 2 days at exactly the same location. Since it was one of productions system, I had to downgrade it back to 4.0-S. It was an ASUS P2B/DS Dual 800 PIII 512M Ram on board ahc plus 2 2940W. This was the panic info... Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0134bb3 stack pointer = 0x10:0xd6de3748 frame pointer = 0x10:0xd6de37b0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 141 (nfsd) interrupt mask = bio <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 boot() called on cpu#0 nm -n kernel ... c0133b9c T read_seeprom c01341ac T verify_cksum c01341e8 t ahc_create_path c0134220 T ahc_attach c0134608 t ahc_freebsd_intr c01346f4 T ahc_done c01349c4 t ahc_action <----------------------------- c0135308 t ahc_get_tran_settings c01353f8 t ahc_async c01354a4 t ahc_execute_scb c01359e4 t ahc_poll c0135ad0 t ahc_setup_data c0135c9c t ahc_set_recoveryscb c0135d1c T ahc_timeout ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:41:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4063737B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C7D441C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:41:31 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: BSD Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from bsd@shell-server.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:06:45PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:06:45PM -0500, BSD wrote: > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > option :) That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction with I586_CPU. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:51: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8743E37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA10694; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:51:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-104.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.104) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma010692; Sun Oct 1 14:50:43 2000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20001001143213.00c89180@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 14:46:32 -0500 To: BSD From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:06 PM 10/1/00 -0500, BSD wrote: > So...given these later commits, I should be fine with softupdates >now, no? Maybe. Others may have made an appearance or the VIA chipset may be an issue. Regardless, the suggestion was to narrow down things and if it still panics, I'll bet the trace is shorter. That would help those better suited to diagnose things. > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK >option :) Arrgh! The NO_ part just bit my NOse. > Good point here though. I haven't had the best of luck with the >syscons driver, it seems very touchy about its options. There, deleted >all syscons options. Defaults are wonderful. :) 2 reboots from now we'll >see if these changes failed to do anthing vs the rebooting problem. Mine is set for 200 lines and allows enough to go back. Would suggest a different network card, if you suspect that. Missed out on the hardware combinations with the Intel card that troubled others and your's doesn't look to be one of them. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:51:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.inwind.it (relay1.inwind.it [212.141.53.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871F537B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (62.98.154.71) by relay1.inwind.it (5.1.046) id 39AFDC990047619B; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:50:54 +0200 From: Salvo Bartolotta Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:51:40 GMT Message-ID: <20001001.20514000@bartequi.ottodomain.org> Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: BSD , "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 10/1/00, 8:41:31 PM, Bill Fumerola wrote regarding Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report): > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:06:45PM -0500, BSD wrote: > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > > option :) > That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > with I586_CPU. > -- > Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. > billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Dear Bill Fumerola, LINT (cvsup'ed yesterday) states:
# NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run # on a Pentium.
Either the statement in LINT is not correct, or your statement is not correct. Tertium non datur :-) Seriously: if NO_F00F_HACK is only used in conjunction with pentiums (I586_CPU), then LINT should be modified accordingly. Best regards, Salvo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 12:58:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C41B37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C787C1C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:58:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:58:07 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Salvo Bartolotta Cc: BSD , "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001155807.Z38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> <20001001.20514000@bartequi.ottodomain.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20001001.20514000@bartequi.ottodomain.org>; from bartequi@inwind.it on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:51:40PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:51:40PM +0000, Salvo Bartolotta wrote: > LINT (cvsup'ed yesterday) states: > >
> > # NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY > # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is > # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run > # on a Pentium. > >
> > Either the statement in LINT is not correct, or your statement is not > correct. Tertium non datur :-) > > Seriously: if NO_F00F_HACK is only used in conjunction with pentiums > (I586_CPU), then LINT should be modified accordingly. ./i386/identcpu.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/identcpu.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/machdep.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/machdep.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/machdep.c:#endif /* defined(I586_CPU) && !NO_F00F_HACK */ ./i386/mp_machdep.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/trap.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/trap.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/trap.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) ./i386/trap.c:#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(NO_F00F_HACK) So, because the microphone evidently wasn't on the first time: If you don't define I586_CPU, NO_F00F_HACK does nothing. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 13: 1:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDEB37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA10792; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:01:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-104.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.104) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma010768; Sun Oct 1 15:00:33 2000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20001001144825.00e164a0@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 14:56:22 -0500 To: Bill Fumerola , BSD From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:41 PM 10/1/00 -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: >That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any >scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction >with I586_CPU. Perhaps then the following should be revised. LINT: # NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run # on a Pentium. to: # NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run # on a Pentium and have the "cpu I586_CPU" option. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 14:36:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wallace.webmatic.de (wallace.webmatic.de [212.78.99.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0459837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ncc-qae0k3bnoas.chef-ingenieur.de (guru.chef-ingenieur.de [212.78.97.166]) by wallace.webmatic.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E6E7C21 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001001233344.02a45320@wallace.webmatic.de> X-Sender: guru-fbsd@wallace.webmatic.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 23:37:07 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Thomas Krause, CI" Subject: RELENG_3_5_1_RELEASE tag ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, how to update my sources to 3.5.1-REL? It seems that there is no RELENG_3_5_1_RELEASE-tag. (Or other questions: where is a list with all available tags?) Kind regards, Thomas. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 14:37:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9866A37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA31395; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:36:13 +0200 To: BSD Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <970436173.39d7ae4d3a4de@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 23:36:13 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting BSD : > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > > This looks very similar to some crashing I had months back. An older > drive > > didn't seem to like it at all and stopped using it for that drive. > Panics > > continued and removing the drive physically didn't help. Turning off > > softupdates for all drives did eliminate the panic and later commits > at > > some point fixed the problem and it could be turned back on, even on > the > > drive it didn't like. No need to recompile, just 'tunefs -n disable' > worked. > > So...given these later commits, I should be fine with softupdates > now, no? > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > option :) I686_CPU implies NO_F00F_HACK. In the code F00F_HACK is enabled only if I586_CPU is enabled. Thus, this option is usefull on AMD and alike processors which are "586" class. I wonder if your crashes has something to do with recently MFCed uipc_socket stuff. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 14:38:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C309E37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1E281C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:38:52 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: "Thomas Krause, CI" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_3_5_1_RELEASE tag ? Message-ID: <20001001173852.B38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20001001233344.02a45320@wallace.webmatic.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20001001233344.02a45320@wallace.webmatic.de>; from freebsd@chef-ingenieur.de on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:37:07PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:37:07PM +0200, Thomas Krause, CI wrote: > how to update my sources to 3.5.1-REL? Just use RELENG_3, its close enough. > It seems that there is no RELENG_3_5_1_RELEASE-tag. Our fearless leaders determined the cost of a tag on our repository didn't justify tagging it. > (Or other questions: where is a list with all available tags?) 'cvs log' -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 14:45:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A211837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.238.54.101] (helo=freebie.demon.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #4) id 13fqvL-000Gd7-00; Sun, 01 Oct 2000 21:45:31 +0000 Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.demon.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e91LlKD14491; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:47:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:47:20 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: Bill Fumerola , BSD , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001234720.A14383@freebie.demon.nl> References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> <4.3.2.20001001144825.00e164a0@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20001001144825.00e164a0@207.227.119.2>; from jeff-ml@mountin.net on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:56:22PM -0500 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:56:22PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > At 03:41 PM 10/1/00 -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > >That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > >scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > >with I586_CPU. > > Perhaps then the following should be revised. > > LINT: > > # NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY > # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is > # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run > # on a Pentium. > > to: > > # NO_F00F_HACK disables the hack that prevents Pentiums (and ONLY > # Pentiums) from locking up when a LOCK CMPXCHG8B instruction is > # executed. This should be included for ALL kernels that won't run > # on a Pentium and have the "cpu I586_CPU" option. Is there any reason *not* to have the F00F fix/hack in the kernel automatically when it detects a true (and buggy) Pentium? In other words, does it make sense to have this as an option? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 15:18: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9210D37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA31403 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:17:11 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Pthreads saga continues.. Message-ID: <970438631.39d7b7e76d963@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:17:11 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-MOQ9704386317946fe126fe4be24aaf7570972c0367b" User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. ---MOQ9704386317946fe126fe4be24aaf7570972c0367b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Good day, Isn't the main thread should break out of accept when it receives signal from the other thread? Am I missing something? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] ---MOQ9704386317946fe126fe4be24aaf7570972c0367b Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="pthreadtest2.c"; name="pthreadtest2.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="pthreadtest2.c" I2luY2x1ZGUgPHB0aHJlYWQuaD4KI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy90eXBlcy5oPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lz L3NvY2tldC5oPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8bmV0aW5ldC9pbi5oPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8c2lnbmFsLmg+CiNp bmNsdWRlIDxlcnJuby5oPgoKaW50IHNvY2s7CmludCBjbWQ9MDsKcHRocmVhZF90IG1haW5fdGlk OwoKdm9pZCogcm91dGluZSh2b2lkICphcmcpCnsKICBwdGhyZWFkX3QgbXlfdGlkOwogLyogd2hp bGUoMSk7ICovCiAgc2xlZXAoNSk7CiAgbXlfdGlkPXB0aHJlYWRfc2VsZigpOyAKICBwcmludGYo IiVsZDogU2VuZGluZyAlbGQgc2lnbmFsXG4iLCBteV90aWQsIG1haW5fdGlkKTsKICBwdGhyZWFk X2tpbGwobWFpbl90aWQsIFNJR1VTUjEpOwogIHByaW50ZigiJWxkOiBTZW50ICVsZCBzaWduYWxc biIsIG15X3RpZCwgbWFpbl90aWQpOwp9Cgp2b2lkIHVzcjFoYW5kbGVyKGludCBzaWcpCnsKICBp bnQgcmM9LTI7CiAgcHJpbnRmKCJDbG9zaW5nIHNvY2tldDogJWRcbiIsIHNvY2spOwogIHJjPWNs b3NlKHNvY2spOwogIHByaW50ZigiQ2xvc2VkIHNvY2tldCwgcmM6ICVkXG4iLCByYyk7Cn0KCmlu dCBtYWluKHZvaWQpCnsKICBwdGhyZWFkX3QgdGlkOwogIGludCBuZXdmZCwgc2luX3NpemUsIG9u PTE7CiAgc3RydWN0IHNvY2thZGRyX2luIG15YWRkciwgaGlzYWRkcjsKICAvKnNpZ25hbChTSUdV U1IxLCB1c3IxaGFuZGxlcik7Ki8KCiAgcHRocmVhZF9jcmVhdGUoJnRpZCwgTlVMTCwgcm91dGlu ZSwgTlVMTCk7CiAgbWFpbl90aWQ9cHRocmVhZF9zZWxmKCk7CgogIGlmICggKHNvY2s9c29ja2V0 KFBGX0lORVQsIFNPQ0tfU1RSRUFNLCA2KSk9PS0xKSB7CiAgICBwZXJyb3Ioc29ja2V0KTsKICAg IHB0aHJlYWRfa2lsbCh0aWQsIFNJR1RFUk0pOwogICAgZXhpdCgtMSk7CiAgfQogIHNldHNvY2tv cHQoc29jaywgU09MX1NPQ0tFVCwgU09fUkVVU0VBRERSLCAmb24sIHNpemVvZihvbikpOwoKICBt eWFkZHIuc2luX2ZhbWlseT1QRl9JTkVUOwogIG15YWRkci5zaW5fcG9ydD1odG9ucygxMTExKTsK ICBteWFkZHIuc2luX2FkZHIuc19hZGRyPUlOQUREUl9BTlk7CiAgYnplcm8oJihteWFkZHIuc2lu X3plcm8pLCA4KTsKCiAgaWYgKChiaW5kKHNvY2ssIChzdHJ1Y3Qgc29ja2FkZHIqKSZteWFkZHIs IHNpemVvZihzdHJ1Y3Qgc29ja2FkZHIpKSk9PS0xKSB7CiAgICBwZXJyb3IoYmluZCk7CiAgICBw dGhyZWFkX2tpbGwodGlkLCBTSUdURVJNKTsKICAgIGV4aXQoLTEpOwogIH0KCiAgaWYgKGxpc3Rl bihzb2NrLCAyKSA9PSAtMSApIHsKICAgIHBlcnJvcigibGlzdGVuIik7CiAgICBwdGhyZWFkX2tp bGwodGlkLCBTSUdURVJNKTsKICAgIGV4aXQoLTEpOwogIH0KICB3aGlsZSgxKSB7CiAgICBpZiAo KCBuZXdmZD1hY2NlcHQoc29jaywgKHN0cnVjdCBzb2NrYWRkciAqKSZoaXNhZGRyLCAmc2luX3Np emUpKT09LTEpewogICAgICBpZiAoIGVycm5vPT1FSU5UUiApIHsKICAgICAgICBwcmludGYoIkdv dCBhIHNpZ25hbFxuIik7CiAgICAgICAgaWYgKCBjbWQgKSB7CiAgICAgICAgICBwcmludGYoIkl0 IHdhcyBhIHNpZ24hXG4iKTsKICAgICAgICAgIGJyZWFrOwogICAgICAgIH0KICAgICAgfQogICAg ICBwZXJyb3IoImFjY2VwdCIpOwogICAgICBleGl0KC0xKTsKICAgIH0KICAgIHByaW50ZigiY29u bmVjdGlvbiBhY2NlcHRlZFxuIik7CiAgICBjbG9zZShuZXdmZCk7CiAgfQogIHB0aHJlYWRfa2ls bCh0aWQsIFNJR1RFUk0pOwogIHJldHVybiAwOwp9Cg== ---MOQ9704386317946fe126fe4be24aaf7570972c0367b-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 15:35:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8983337B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01771; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:35:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA02911; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:35:38 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010012235.QAA02911@harmony.village.org> To: Ken Bolingbroke Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:13:23 PDT." References: Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 16:35:38 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Ken Bolingbroke writes: : I'd love to read /usr/src/UPDATING to see what I'm missing here, but when : I cvsup RELENG_3, UPDATING is empty except for the revision banner. I've : verified this on machines at home and work, and they're all the same. Is : this an error, or is there just nothing of interest for UPDATING on : RELENG_3? Sadly, UPDATING on RELENG_3 is useless. I suck for making it useless. For a source upgrade from 3.2R -> 3.5-stable shouldn't have a problem. Maybe you can remove /usr/obj and try again? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 15:37:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496A937B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01790; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:37:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA02945; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:37:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010012237.QAA02945@harmony.village.org> To: Ken Bolingbroke Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 19:59:43 PDT." References: Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 16:37:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Ken Bolingbroke writes: : I didn't do a binary upgrade, I cvsup'd RELENG_3_2_0. The machine in : question doesn't have either a CD or floppy drive, and it also only has : 8 meg of RAM, all of which make binary upgrading a bit difficult. : Otherwise, I'd have wiped the machine and installed 4.1.1 fresh. Ah. You might have a problem with not enough swap. I've had excellent luck building on a "fast" machine and doing multiple installs on remote machines. make installworld -k is what I normally do. Why -k? Because sometimes the *@(#%@!#$^$ libncurses wants to regenerate symbolic links in /usr/obj :-(. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 15:38:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FC937B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01806; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:38:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA02972; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:38:42 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010012238.QAA02972@harmony.village.org> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Cc: Ken Bolingbroke , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 22:40:49 PDT." <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> References: <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20000930183600.F25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 16:38:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> "Crist J . Clark" writes: : Can you not do sysinstall on 8 MB anymore? No. You need at least 12M from my experiences with 4.0 and 4.1. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 16:19:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from oracle.clara.net (oracle.clara.net [195.8.69.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4DE37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.126.143.46] (helo=viewport.clara.co.uk) by oracle.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 13fsON-0004Fm-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:19:36 +0100 Content-Length: 6124 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-No-Archive: yes Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:19:28 +0100 (BST) Organization: David_Marsh@home: see signature for organisation From: David Marsh To: FreeBSD-Stable LIST Subject: Order of 'make's in updating from 3.2 -> RELENG_4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Apologies if this is a repeated post. I think my computer may have goofed when I tried to send this initially..] I am currently running FreeBSD 3.2, which I installed from the distribution CDs. I would like to update to 4.x (mainly to see if I can get my soundcard (SoundBlaster 16 PCI) to work, and because I notice that my system can't make some of the newer ports, and, also, "it's about time.." ;-) After weeks of dithering through fear, I finally took the plunge to try cvsup, and I was *very* impressed at how easily it worked :-) Here's the background, and now I'm unsure how to proceed next.. I apologise if these are stupid questions, but having heeded the warnings on this list about the risks about doing what one thought was right (and discovering that it wasn't, with (very) nasty things happening instead), I'd like to be very clear whether I am Doing The Right Thing at all times! I'm now at the stage where, over the past few days, I have cvsup'ped my sources to RELENG_4: because I'm sharing the phone line with others, I've been cvsup'ping in "chunks", for about an hour each night (and stopping cvsup from the GUI before I hang up, each time), until my system is up to date. (I assume that everything is now up to date, because if I try to cvsup again, it seems happy that it has everything it needs..? My cvsup file fetches 'src-all' with the following settings: *default host=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix However, I'm unsure about the following: ## Export-restricted collections. # # Only people in the USA and Canada may fetch these collections. If # you are not in the USA or Canada, please use the collections in the # "secure-supfile" instead. #src-crypto #src-eBones #src-secure If I understand correctly, it's no longer prohibited for persons outwith the USA (with the exception of a certain few countries) to retrieve these files. Are these files now fetched as part of src-all, or must I still fetch them separately somehow before I can upgrade? I have also read the Handbook section on "make world" and /usr/src/UPDATING. /usr/src/UPDATING mentions various occasions when changes (after 3.2 was released) to the sources have required remakes of either the kernel or the world, eg: 19990929 sigset_t change 199912xx change from wd to ad 20000117 texinfo updated (mildly curious why this requires such a 'big fix'?) [..and various other things ominously recommending remaking..] This induces a sense of fear that my planned upgrade may be tricker (impossible?) than thought. Or, is it the case that these entries *only* affect "people upgrading from earlier [than 3.x?] versions of -stable/-current" as the file says, and that I don't need to worry about these? How does the change from wd to ad affect me? (Is wd still present, so I can worry about changing to ad 'later'?) If I can do an upgrade, when I compare the Handbook and "UPDATING", I'm unsure which I should follow with regard to the following conflict (I know the Handbook does say that UPDATING normally takes precedence): The Handbook says: ------------------ [check /etc/make.conf (I don't have /etc/defaults/make.conf) and /etc/groups [done, seem OK]] cd /usr/src make buildworld make installworld *then* make a new kernel (How? UPDATING also appears to suggest that making the kernel has also been split into two build/install parts, or do I use the 'old' way?) UPDATING says: -------------- (Under the section "To update from 3.x to 4.x stable") cd /usr/src make buildworld [Does this mean I should _actually_ build/install a kernel at this point (before installworld), as described a couple of paragraphs earlier in UPDATING?] cd /usr/src/sbin/mknod make install [Could somebody tell me exactly how to convert the pseudocode ("list of disk/slices") into what I should type in? I'm always a bit fuzzy about how exactly I should refer to disks/slices.. My system is currently setup as follows: /dev/wd2s2b none swap /dev/wd2s2a / ufs /dev/wd2s2f /usr ufs /dev/wd2s2e /var ufs /dev/wcd0c /cdrom cd9660 # /dev/wd0s2a /mnt/bkp ufs /dev/wd0s1 /mnt/mfsc msdos /dev/wd2s1 /mnt/mfsd msdos proc /proc procfs (Yes, the disk that FreeBSD is installed on is attached to the primary thingie [1] on the second IDE controller. I have "root_disk_unit=2" in /boot/loader.conf to enable my boot sequence to work properly. I realise that this is a slightly unusual setup, is it likely to cause any problems here? [1] My vocabulary has failed me at this time of night: I mean, channel, connector, port, whatever-you-call-it..] reboot [Does this mean to do a complete and total reboot? (ie, shutdown -r, right down to the BIOS starting up again?)] cd /usr/src cd gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/install-info make install cd ../../../.. ldconfig -R /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc make installworld [5] [There is no Footnote 5!? :-( ] mergemaster [4] reboot The order of installworld, mergemaster, updating /dev, and remaking the kernel, are different in the two descriptions. Should I follow UPDATING as it says? Is it right to make a new kernel before doing installworld and all the rest? Once again, I apologise if these are extraordinarily daft questions. Many thanks for any help/advice! David. -- David Marsh,drmarsh@bigfoot.com | http://www.viewport.co.uk/ | Glasgow, Scotland. | If urgent, phone: +44 77-121-848-90 | >Trim quotes b4 replying; Quote 1st, reply 2nd; Ask b4 attaching files< To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 16:25:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bsdhome.dyndns.org (unknown [24.25.2.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC6B37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vger.bsdhome.com (vger [192.168.220.2]) by bsdhome.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e91NP6e02836 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:25:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsd@bsdhome.com) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by vger.bsdhome.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e91NP4R22041 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:25:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsd@vger.bsdhome.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:25:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Dean To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Was there a recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change that I may have missed the announcement for? I seem to have to specify that now in order for ftp to work on my system (updated this weekend): FreeBSD vger.bsdhome.com 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Sat Sep 30 13:15:45 EDT 2000 bsd@vger.bsdhome.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VGER i386 Is this only controlled through the environment variable or is there another system default setting that could be interfering? Thanks, -Brian -- Brian Dean bsd@FreeBSD.org bsd@bsdhome.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 16:53:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA5B37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e91NrBn93983; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:53:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39D7CE65.2521143D@thehousleys.net> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 19:53:09 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Dean Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Dean wrote: > > Hi, > > Was there a recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change that I may have missed the > announcement for? I seem to have to specify that now in order for ftp > to work on my system (updated this weekend): > > FreeBSD vger.bsdhome.com 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Sat Sep 30 13:15:45 EDT 2000 bsd@vger.bsdhome.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VGER i386 > > Is this only controlled through the environment variable or is there > another system default setting that could be interfering? > Yes. /etc/login.conf specifies FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES Jim -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 17:12:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8E237B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA46485; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:11:56 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03636; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:11:56 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200010020011.LAA03636@lightning.itga.com.au> From: Gregory Bond To: Warner Losh Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:27:48 -0600. Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:11:55 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 10 on isa0 > ed0: address 00:00:c0:79:2a:f0, type SMC8416T (16 bit) > > ed1 is at 0x300 irq 5 and is a real NE-2000. > > Is plug and play enabled on these cards? I have no clue if that is > supported by them or not, but I thought I'd ask. On the SMC8416T (or at least all the ones I've tried!), the PnP implementation is broken (it always returns 0x0 as the memory address) so these cards cannot be used in PnP mode. (Or perhaps it is more correct that they can't be used in PnP mode except in programmed-IO mode!) Greg. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 17:28:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4D337B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6 (k6.grasslake.net [192.168.2.1]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA00842 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:45:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <001f01c02c08$83e5f460$0102a8c0@k6> From: "Shawn Barnhart" To: Subject: HP Kayak XA series vs FreeBSD Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:34:24 -0500 Organization: Grasslake.Net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been migrating an existing FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE system to an HP Kayak XA system -- basically moving the hard disks and NICs from one box to another and I'm now having a devil of a time booting. When I get the initial boot menu I have a choice of F1 for DOS, F2 for FreeBSD and F5 for Disk 2. I cannot choose F2 -- all I get is a beep, it will not timeout to that choice either. F1 works, F5 brings me to the second disk which has a non-booting FreeBSD filesystem on it. I can only boot the system by choosing the non-booting filesystem on disk2, getting an error, and entering: 0:ad(0,a)/kernel at the boot: prompt. The system will boot normally at that point. I've moved these same disks between hardware platforms without a problem more than once. If I move the disks back to the original box they boot just fine. What am I missing and can anything be done to fix it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 17:45:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bsdhome.dyndns.org (unknown [24.25.2.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CFC37B66D for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vger.bsdhome.com (vger [192.168.220.2]) by bsdhome.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e920ive02954; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:44:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsd@bsdhome.com) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by vger.bsdhome.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e920is700423; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:44:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsd@vger.bsdhome.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:44:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Dean To: James Housley Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change? In-Reply-To: <39D7CE65.2521143D@thehousleys.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, James Housley wrote: > Yes. /etc/login.conf specifies FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES > Hmmm ... that hasn't changed since June, but your tip got me thinking about what I'm doing differently and I think I figured out why I'm having trouble. I just switched over to using 'xdm' instead of running 'xinit' at login, and now the defaults in /etc/login.conf do not appear to be working. Is this normal? Thanks, -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 17:48:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29537B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6 (k6.grasslake.net [192.168.2.1]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA01038; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:04:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <003401c02c0b$398c1cc0$0102a8c0@k6> From: "Shawn Barnhart" To: "Gregory Bond" Cc: References: <200010020038.LAA04965@lightning.itga.com.au> Subject: Re: HP Kayak XA series vs FreeBSD Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:53:48 -0500 Organization: Grasslake.Net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Bond" | >When I get the initial boot menu I have a choice of F1 for DOS, F2 for | >FreeBSD and F5 for Disk 2. I cannot choose F2 -- all I get is a beep, | >it will not timeout to that choice either. | | We had the same problem. It seems there is some sort of problem with the new | 1024-byte boot0 on the HP XA boxes. John Baldwin was going to send me some | debugging boot0s but he's obviously been busy. | | Our workaround was to install the 512-byte boot0 from the 4.0 CD. We did this | by booting the 4.1 CD, using the 4.1 Fixit floppies (because the 4.1 Fixit CD | didn't work!), then copying the boot0 from a 4.0 CD into /boot, then using | boot0cfg to install it. No 4.0 CD here, just 3.4. Would you email it to me? What BIOS version do your XAs have? I did a quick run-through of the release notes for 11.10 and there was no mention of any boot snafus, which only means there's no Windows problems :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 17:56:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BC737B66E for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vigrid.com (pm3-pt79.pcnet.net [206.105.29.153]) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) with ESMTP id UAA01860; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:55:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <39D7DCE6.C907B257@vigrid.com> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:55:02 -0400 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pthreads saga continues.. References: <970438631.39d7b7e76d963@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Good day, > Isn't the main thread should break out of accept when it receives signal from > the other thread? > Am I missing something? Please don't attach such short programs as anything other than text. It works for me under -current (you should try compiling it with -Wall): bash-2.02$ pthreadtest2 134530048: Sending 134529024 signal 134530048: Sent 134529024 signal Got a signal accept: Interrupted system call -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18: 3:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E4037B66F for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e920aNJ00778; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:36:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200010020036.e920aNJ00778@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Shawn Barnhart" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HP Kayak XA series vs FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 01 Oct 2000 19:34:24 CDT." <001f01c02c08$83e5f460$0102a8c0@k6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 17:36:23 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You have a geometry mismatch. If these are SCSI disks, try dinking with BIOS options in the SCSI controller BIOS (eg. the "1GB translation" option in the Adaptec BIOS setup). If they're IDE disks, try working your way through the BIOS geometry options there... > I've been migrating an existing FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE system to an HP Kayak > XA system -- basically moving the hard disks and NICs from one box to > another and I'm now having a devil of a time booting. > > When I get the initial boot menu I have a choice of F1 for DOS, F2 for > FreeBSD and F5 for Disk 2. I cannot choose F2 -- all I get is a beep, > it will not timeout to that choice either. F1 works, F5 brings me to > the second disk which has a non-booting FreeBSD filesystem on it. I can > only boot the system by choosing the non-booting filesystem on disk2, > getting an error, and entering: > > 0:ad(0,a)/kernel at the boot: prompt. The system will boot normally at > that point. > > I've moved these same disks between hardware platforms without a problem > more than once. If I move the disks back to the original box they boot > just fine. What am I missing and can anything be done to fix it? > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:11:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4697F37B502; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA46587; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:39:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04965; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:38:59 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200010020038.LAA04965@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: "Shawn Barnhart" Cc: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HP Kayak XA series vs FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 01 Oct 2000 19:34:24 -0500. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:38:59 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >When I get the initial boot menu I have a choice of F1 for DOS, F2 for >FreeBSD and F5 for Disk 2. I cannot choose F2 -- all I get is a beep, >it will not timeout to that choice either. We had the same problem. It seems there is some sort of problem with the new 1024-byte boot0 on the HP XA boxes. John Baldwin was going to send me some debugging boot0s but he's obviously been busy. Our workaround was to install the 512-byte boot0 from the 4.0 CD. We did this by booting the 4.1 CD, using the 4.1 Fixit floppies (because the 4.1 Fixit CD didn't work!), then copying the boot0 from a 4.0 CD into /boot, then using boot0cfg to install it. Greg. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:11:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D237B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13836 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e921BT301611 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:11:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org> Subject: HP500 deskjet and 4.X To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Organization: <> thought.org: pvblic service Unix since 1986... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unless there are other causes -- like bizarre side-effects from interrupts -- or something even further out, I'm guessing that the reason my deskjet has stopped working recently (in FreeBSD-4.1) is a driver or configuration problem. There were a few postings on -stable not too many weeks back, but I can't find them in the archives. Here is the related dmesg output: ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 I have changed nothing in my KERNEL file from the GENERIC setup; can anybody tell me what needs doing to get my old DeskJet-500 back to working? thanks much, gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:25:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203D237B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13959 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e921PBK01718 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <200010020125.e921PBK01718@thought.org> Subject: Stray?? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Organization: <> thought.org: pvblic service Unix since 1986... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is bizarre: by itself, % dmesg gives me this--note the ``stray irq 7'' line at the end? I was editing /var/run/dmesg.boot last week; don't see how this could have affected the output of dmesg, tho. Any thoughts here, folks? Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Sun Oct 1 11:21:07 PDT 2000 kline@tao.thought.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TAO Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium/P55C (200.46-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8001bf real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 126287872 (123328K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0450000. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 8.0 irq 10 ahc0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 12 at device 9.0 on pci0 ahc0: aic7870 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ed0: port 0x6800-0x681f irq 5 at device 10.0 on pci0 ed0: address 00:20:78:14:25:03, type NE2000 (16 bit) fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 8) da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 8.064MB/s transfers (8.064MHz, offset 8) da0: 1042MB (2134305 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 132C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 695MB (1423360 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 695C) cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 3.300MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [327575 x 2048 byte records] da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) stray irq 7 ^^^^^^^^^^^ -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:57: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973BB37B66F; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA25448; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:57:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:57:07 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Gregory Bond Cc: Shawn Barnhart , John Baldwin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HP Kayak XA series vs FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <200010020038.LAA04965@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Gregory Bond wrote: >>When I get the initial boot menu I have a choice of F1 for DOS, F2 for >>FreeBSD and F5 for Disk 2. I cannot choose F2 -- all I get is a beep, >>it will not timeout to that choice either. > >We had the same problem. It seems there is some sort of problem with the new >1024-byte boot0 on the HP XA boxes. John Baldwin was going to send me some >debugging boot0s but he's obviously been busy. > >Our workaround was to install the 512-byte boot0 from the 4.0 CD. We did this >by booting the 4.1 CD, using the 4.1 Fixit floppies (because the 4.1 Fixit CD >didn't work!), then copying the boot0 from a 4.0 CD into /boot, then using >boot0cfg to install it. FWIW, the new boot0 caused problems for me when installing 4.1 on a dual booting Intel DK440LX motherboard w/ onboard AIC7895. The system would never even get to loading boot0, the BIOS didn't like it. I just installed OSBS 1.35 on it and the system has been running happily since. Brandon D. Valentine -- bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at structbio.vanderbilt.edu "Truth suffers from too much analysis." -- Ancient Fremen Saying To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 18:59:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284C37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e921xDh70447; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: Bill Fumerola Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) In-Reply-To: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > > option :) > That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > with I586_CPU. But...the CPU is i686. --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19: 0:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.flashcom.net (3ff83059.dsl.flashcom.net [63.248.48.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B3237B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgaff@localhost) by mail.flashcom.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9220Ys73828 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:00:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cgaff) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:00:29 -0500 From: "Corey G." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001001210029.A73784@flashcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No matter what, while compiling on my AMD K62-450 I get some type of signal 4 error. 4.1.1 compiled fine on a PIII. Any ideas? Three weeks ago 4.1 STABLE compiled fine too. Is my CPU going bad or is this a CPU incompatibility problem? cc -pg -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/include -DPTHREAD_KERNEL -D_THREAD_SAFE -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../../include -D_LOCK_DEBUG -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/regex/regexec.c -o regexec.po cc: {standard input}: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4 Assembler messages: {standard input}:2122: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc_r. -- Best Regards, Corey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19: 2:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B5D37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3C3FD1C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:02:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:02:04 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: BSD Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001220204.E38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from bsd@shell-server.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:59:13PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:59:13PM -0500, BSD wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > > > option :) > > That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > > scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > > with I586_CPU. > > But...the CPU is i686. Go reread this thread a few more times and then realize that's my point. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19: 3: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47B837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e92232R27819; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:03:02 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Corey G." Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001001190302.J27736@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001001210029.A73784@flashcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20001001210029.A73784@flashcom.net>; from cgaff@flashcom.net on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:00:29PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Corey G. [001001 19:01] wrote: > No matter what, while compiling on my AMD K62-450 I get some type of > signal 4 error. 4.1.1 compiled fine on a PIII. Any ideas? Three weeks > ago 4.1 STABLE compiled fine too. Is my CPU going bad or is this a CPU > incompatibility problem? Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. sorry, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19:19: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BA237B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA73863; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:18:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200010020218.TAA73863@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: <20001001190302.J27736@fw.wintelcom.net> from Alfred Perlstein at "Oct 1, 2000 07:03:02 pm" To: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Cc: cgaff@flashcom.net (Corey G.), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > * Corey G. [001001 19:01] wrote: > > No matter what, while compiling on my AMD K62-450 I get some type of > > signal 4 error. 4.1.1 compiled fine on a PIII. Any ideas? Three weeks > > ago 4.1 STABLE compiled fine too. Is my CPU going bad or is this a CPU > > incompatibility problem? > > Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. I would change that to check, in order, cooling, cpu voltage setting, memory and memory timing, power supply, and finally cabling. If you have one of the rare 2.4V 450MHz K6-2-450 they are extreamly picky about Vcore ripple, and often run very very hot and need a very large heatsink and fan to run reliably. (Check the chip, the voltage setting is ingraved in the top of it, oh, and if you don't have heat sink grease on it, GET SOME!! FYI heat sink compound should be applied in a very thin layer (You should almost be able to see through it), too much is just as bad as none.) -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19:36: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A570237B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e922ZtK89194 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:35:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:35:55 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Crash dump timing issue Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've noticed that my athlon which is famous for those constant panics, has stopped taking crash dumps. I think this is because I changed the auto-reboot-after-panic time to 15 seconds, from 24 hours. I timed a write, and it takes 27 seconds to write the RAM out to the HD. Has the error reporting gone away because the system reboots before it saves a dump? If so, this little point should probably be mentioned in the handbook for people who have lots of RAM to save. Default is 16 seconds, right? --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 20:12: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193B737B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:12:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15010 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9234SM00909; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:04:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <200010020304.e9234SM00909@thought.org> Subject: Re: Stray?? To: kline@thought.org (Gary Kline) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010020125.e921PBK01718@thought.org> from "Gary Kline" at Oct 01, 2000 06:25:11 PM Organization: <> thought.org: pvblic service Unix since 1986... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Gary Kline: > > > > This is bizarre: by itself, % dmesg gives me this--note the > ``stray irq 7'' line at the end? > > I was editing /var/run/dmesg.boot last week; don't see how > this could have affected the output of dmesg, tho. > > > [[ ... ]] > stray irq 7 > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > Problem was resolved by rebuilding my kernel. Somehow when I was experimenting with the dmesg.boot file, the ``stray irq 7'' got wrapped into my earlier build. ...Stranger things have happened. gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 20:26:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47AE37B66D for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e923QDf72239; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:26:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14808.85.608.911665@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:26:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Sergei Vyshenski Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: typo in etrn.pl of sendmail kit In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000929120332.00aa8970@vivaldi> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000929120332.00aa8970@vivaldi> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta35) "Nike" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG svysh> FreeBSD-4.1.1 distribution has a useful script meant for svysh> enforced fetch of mail from secondary mx-servers: svysh> /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/contrib/etrn.pl svysh> It begins with a line "#!/usr/local/bin/perl", svysh> while default location of perl here seems to be /usr/bin/perl. svysh> Without correcting it, script just says: "Cannot find file", svysh> which may be not a transparent guideline for what to do. That file (in the src/contrib) area is a direct import of the sendmail sources. It's not meant to be a binary directory for users to run things out of. As has been mentioned by others, the best solution is to make a symlink in /usr/local/bin. I've found that many scripts assume that path for perl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 21: 7:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 757.org (users.757.org [209.96.173.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E737B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jeff@localhost) by 757.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02885 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:18:02 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: users.757.org: jeff owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:18:02 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Duffy X-Sender: jeff@users.757.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >* Corey G. [001001 19:01] wrote: >> No matter what, while compiling on my AMD K62-450 I get some type of >> signal 4 error. 4.1.1 compiled fine on a PIII. Any ideas? Three >> weeks >> ago 4.1 STABLE compiled fine too. Is my CPU going bad or is this a CPU >> incompatibility problem? > >Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. I have had the same problem. To wit: 1. Installed 4.1-RELEASE on a K6-III 400 2. CVSUPed from cvsup6 3. Ran buildworld. Failed with the following error: cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/l ocale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/net/res_debug.c -o res_debug.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:0: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4 *** Error code 1 4. rm'ed /usr/src, CVSUPed again four hours later. Ran buildworld. Failed with same error (same place). 5. rm'ed /usr/src, CVSUPed again the next day (today), this time from cvsup.freebsd.org. Ran buildworld. Failed with same error (same place). 6. Read Signal 11 FAQ, ran tests as recommended, all passed. Ran memtest in single user mode with no extraneous processes running on all available memory (~128MB). All test passed. 7. Saw this post, and began to get suspicious... :) Any ideas where I can start looking? 4.1-STABLE built on this box fine a few weeks ago (new install due to new disks). Jeff Duffy jeff@alanne.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 21:38:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F5837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B967A8AC; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:38:28 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E56754B7; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:38:28 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:38:27 +1000 (EST) From: andrew@ugh.net.au To: Brian Dean Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Brian Dean wrote: > having trouble. I just switched over to using 'xdm' instead of > running 'xinit' at login, and now the defaults in /etc/login.conf do > not appear to be working. Is this normal? I reported this as a bug to the XFree people but they said I would have to fix it myself and that there were security implications for doing xdm the way it is and I got the impression I wouldn't get far if I produced patches anyway. That was quite a while ago, they may be more receptive now but I don't have any time. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 21:48:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (adsl-216-102-90-210.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.90.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB237B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (fremont.bolingbroke.com [216.102.90.210]) by fremont.bolingbroke.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA15722; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:48:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Bolingbroke To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? In-Reply-To: <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > I didn't do a binary upgrade, I cvsup'd RELENG_3_2_0. The machine in > > question doesn't have either a CD or floppy drive, and it also only has > > 8 meg of RAM, all of which make binary upgrading a bit difficult. > > Otherwise, I'd have wiped the machine and installed 4.1.1 fresh. > > Holy, @#$%! And you do buildworlds on this machine!? Sounds like a > source upgrade would be even tougher. How long does it take to do one? Pentium-133. Doing a buildworld for 2.2.8 took 11 hours. :-) > Can you not do sysinstall on 8 MB anymore? Last time I tried it, no, and I seem to remember finding articles saying the minimum RAM requirement is 12 MB these days. That was for 3.x. > If sysinstall does not work on 8 MB anymore, do you have another > machine that you can use to help? That opens up a lot more options. But mostly, this is just a fun exercise. Just seeing if I _could_ do it all the way. :-) If it fails, I'll bite the bullet and get a RAM upgrade then do a fresh install. But it would be more fun if it works. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 21:58:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (adsl-216-102-90-210.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.90.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B5637B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (fremont.bolingbroke.com [216.102.90.210]) by fremont.bolingbroke.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA15767 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Bolingbroke To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FYI: 2.2.5 --> 4.1.1 success! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I had a Pentium-133 running 2.2.5 that I've finally gotten around to upgrading. I would have just installed fresh to 4.1.1, but this machine has no floppy drive and only 8meg RAM, so that would mean I'd have to upgrade and/or borrow the parts to do a fresh install. Also, this machine was previously an offsite server that got physically damaged. So several successive buildworlds seemed like a good way to stress-test the machine and make sure everything is still working right. So, I try the upgrade route. First, I cvsup 2.2.8-STABLE and buildworld (note: buildworld took 6 hours, 52 minutes), then installworld. All goes well, except that I get bitten by the network card driver changing from vx0 to xl0. No biggie, probably covered in the docs, but I didn't read those... :-) Next, I cvsup to 3.5-STABLE and go buildworld again. Part way through this, it stops with a nasty error, so I hit dejanews and find that I need to read UPDATING. Unfortunately, cvsup has given me an empty UPDATING file. There isn't anything in it, besides the version banner. Another dejanews message points me at: http://andrsn.stanford.edu/FreeBSD/transit.html Which explains that I need to do a 'make aout-to-elf-build' and install, among other helpful tidbits. Right, I forgot about the aout-->elf migration back then. But it still doesn't work, it dies out at another place. Back to Dejanews, and I find that it's suggested to upgrade to 3.2-RELEASE before going to the 3.x-STABLE. And on another website, it's recommended to do a 'make upgrade' instead of 'make aout-to-elf-build'. So I do this, and it starts compiling straight for over 11 hours, then errors out, apparently due to a conflict in my kernel configuration. I should have used GENERIC after all... With the GENERIC kernel, the buildworld succeeds and I get to 3.2-RELEASE. After several missteps with the 3.5-STABLE buildworld, mostly due to trying to run it over a network connection that got interrupted, then restarting with a 'make -DNOCLEAN buildworld', which left gunk that kept breaking the build, I finally got a fresh start at the console and finished it. (Only took 12 hours, 20 minutes for 3.5-S buildworld) Then I get to 4.1.1, there's an UPDATING, I follow the instructions, and it all goes nearly perfect. Yep, my old machine is finally running 4.1.1-STABLE, after being upgraded all the way from 2.2.5 in stages. My thanks to the FreeBSD team for making this possible! :-) Ken Bolingbroke To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 22:26: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.flashcom.net (3ff83059.dsl.flashcom.net [63.248.48.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830BC37B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgaff@localhost) by mail.flashcom.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e925PXS74337 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:25:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cgaff) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:24:08 -0500 From: "Corey G." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001002002408.A74254@flashcom.net> References: <20001001210029.A73784@flashcom.net> <20001001190302.J27736@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001001190302.J27736@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 07:03:02PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans. It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted into STABLE that was never fully tested to compile on an AMD CPU. We now have another user who has posted a similar if not identical problem while compiling 4.1.1 using an AMD processor. This is starting to look like a coding problem. Thanks, Corey On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 07:03:02PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Corey G. [001001 19:01] wrote: > > No matter what, while compiling on my AMD K62-450 I get some type of > > signal 4 error. 4.1.1 compiled fine on a PIII. Any ideas? Three weeks > > ago 4.1 STABLE compiled fine too. Is my CPU going bad or is this a CPU > > incompatibility problem? > > Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. > > sorry, > -Alfred > ---end quoted text--- -- Best Regards, Corey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 22:30:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E209237B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e925WYJ01541; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:32:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200010020532.e925WYJ01541@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Corey G." Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:24:08 CDT." <20001002002408.A74254@flashcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 22:32:34 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other > programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the > motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans. > > It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted > into STABLE that was never fully tested to compile on an AMD CPU. > > We now have another user who has posted a similar if not identical > problem while compiling 4.1.1 using an AMD processor. This is starting > to look like a coding problem. To paraphrase Babbage: "I an not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a conclusion." -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 23: 4: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1CD37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9263tL30610; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:03:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Simon Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Constant panics: some thoughts on the situation In-Reply-To: <200010011848.MAA23485@mail.fpsn.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Simon wrote: > > What's going on? have we entered a panic season? everyone is having panics... It is kinda warm outside still ... ;-) Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 23:15:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 757.org (users.757.org [209.96.173.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B8137B66C for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jeff@localhost) by 757.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA02779 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 02:26:03 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: users.757.org: jeff owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 02:26:03 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Duffy X-Sender: jeff@users.757.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Mike Smith wrote: >> I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other >> programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the >> motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans. In response, I have checked as well. All three of my case fans and my huge-block-o-heatsink CPU fan are operating properly. Just to check, I compiled Apache, Postgres, and a fair number of GTK apps. Flawlessly. >> It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted >> into STABLE that was never fully tested to compile on an AMD CPU. Hmmm. I'm not here to point fingers, I just want a BSD UNIX to use. One I can compile, anyway. >> We now have another user who has posted a similar if not identical >> problem while compiling 4.1.1 using an AMD processor. This is starting >> to look like a coding problem. >To paraphrase Babbage: > > "I an not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that > could provoke such a conclusion." This sounds to me like "nope, you have malfunctioning hardware". I'm not saying that's impossible, but I think it unlikely given that I can reproduce the problem fairly well, and I've certainly tried to take all the steps necessary to rule that out. Are there any committers running -stable on AMD K6 boxes? If so, has someone been able to buildworld for 4.1.1 successfully? Do I have any alternatives left other than procuring new hardware or living with the fact that I will not be able to run FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE? Jeff Duffy jeff@alanne.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 23:24:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B46137B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDA091F46; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 02:24:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 02:24:27 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001002022427.A371@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: Jordan Hubbard , FreeBSD Stable References: <53266.970428256@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <53266.970428256@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:24:16PM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan and list, Right on time tonight - 02:06 while running "periodic daily". The panic was exactly the same as before, so I won't repeat it. The command being run at the time was "tee" again. Just before the panic I had shut down all X and was running a "ps -axww ; top | head -24" snapshot every ten seconds. Here it is: ---------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 0 ?? DLs 0:00.26 (swapper) 1 ?? ILs 0:00.27 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:15.34 (pagedaemon) 3 ?? DL 0:03.26 (vmdaemon) 4 ?? DL 0:04.60 (bufdaemon) 5 ?? DL 0:31.55 (syncer) 34 ?? ILs 0:00.38 mfs -o noatime -s 16384 /dev/ad0s1b /tmp (mount_mfs) 36 ?? ILs 0:00.06 mfs -o noatime -s 2048 /dev/ad0s1b /var/run (mount_mfs) 114 ?? Ss 0:00.64 /sbin/dhclient dc0 141 ?? Ss 0:00.91 syslogd -s -vv -a localhost:* 148 ?? S 141 root 2 0 944K 320K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% syslogd 252 postfix 2 0 1072K 524K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% qmgr 114 root 2 0 536K 120K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% dhclient 171 root 10 0 984K 240K nanslp 0:01 0.00% 0.00% cron 198 root 2 0 2144K 88K select 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sshd 34 root 10 0 8712K 40K mfsidl 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mount_mfs 301 www 2 0 1256K 544K poll 0:00 0.00% 0.00% thttpd 169 root 2 0 1060K 140K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% inetd 60320 root 30 0 1460K 1044K RUN 0:00 0.00% 0.00% top 317 root 3 0 1052K 616K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% bash 59982 root 10 0 668K 264K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sh 36 root 10 0 1532K 68K mfsidl 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mount_mfs ---------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- As you can see I still had the mfs and fdesc mounts active. Now, after the reboot, I'm all disk. We'll see what happens after 02:00 tomorow. Note that this is definitely not just a disk activity and heat related hardware issue. I was badly abusing all my disks earlier today as the temperature in my study went up to almost 30 degrees Celcius (86 olde degrees Farenheit), but now it is much cooler. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 23:24:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kirk.giovannelli.it (kirk.giovannelli.it [194.184.65.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8591837B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from suzy.masternet.it (modem56.masternet.it [194.184.65.116]) by kirk.giovannelli.it (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e926JSs28853 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:19:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gmarco@giovannelli.it) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> X-Sender: gmarco@194.184.65.4 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 08:27:08 +0200 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: username with - Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify the user of virtual domains), like : ac-info But rmuser refuse to delete them : gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? P.s. Obviusly users can be delete manually :-) Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco http://www2.masternet.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 23:52:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12A237B66D for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21596; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:52:18 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:52:18 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon To: "Daniel M. Eischen" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pthreads saga continues.. In-Reply-To: <39D7DCE6.C907B257@vigrid.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Daniel M. Eischen wrote: > Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > > > Good day, > > Isn't the main thread should break out of accept when it receives signal from > > the other thread? > > Am I missing something? > > Please don't attach such short programs as anything other than > text. I'm using a tricky mailer most of the time (not now), so I don't really have control over it. > It works for me under -current (you should try compiling it > with -Wall): It probably warns with -Wall :)) The point is it DOESN'T work under -stable. > bash-2.02$ pthreadtest2 > 134530048: Sending 134529024 signal > 134530048: Sent 134529024 signal > Got a signal > accept: Interrupted system call Yes, I wish that it was the same under -stable .. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 0: 0:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5862D37B66E for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21824; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:00:24 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:00:24 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: <200010020218.TAA73863@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory. > > I would change that to check, in order, cooling, cpu voltage setting, > memory and memory timing, power supply, and finally cabling. > > If you have one of the rare 2.4V 450MHz K6-2-450 they are extreamly I have this one. It worked fine with Vcore 2.2V for couple of months, then started giving strange signal in buildworld. I was going nuts since the temperature was normal and was almost sure it's RAM that went bad. Decreasing Vcore to 2.1 made it panic soon after boot but increasing to 2.4 made it work ok. It's getting warmer though, so like the people say - be sure about heat sink and heat sink grease. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 0:10:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www-student.eit.ihk.dk (www-student.eit.ihk.dk [194.182.124.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD83737B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from xride@localhost) by www-student.eit.ihk.dk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e927A7P38601; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:10:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:10:07 +0200 From: Me To: Gianmarco Giovannelli Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: username with - Message-ID: <20001002091007.A38551@www-student.eit.ihk.dk> Reply-To: x@x12.dk References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4>; from gmarco@giovannelli.it on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:27:08AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Have u looked at pw it's a nice script able program to add/rm/modify users with. Best regard S›ren On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:27:08AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > Hi, > Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify > the user of virtual domains), like : > ac-info > > But rmuser refuse to delete them : > gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info > Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. > > So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? > > P.s. > Obviusly users can be delete manually :-) > > > Best Regards, > Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" > http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco > http://www2.masternet.it > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 0:12:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (ZSEA.zp.ua [212.8.40.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAB837B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:12:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from laa@localhost) by mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e927Bk862999 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:11:46 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from laa@laa.zp.ua) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:11:45 +0300 From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: periodic daily don't put ``Subject:'' field in the mail headers Message-ID: <20001002101145.A61818@laa.zp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi. I have 2 boxes with FreeBSD-4.1.1-STABLE, and both don't put ``Subject:'' field in the mail headers. -- Laa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 0:25:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80B637B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22187; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:12:00 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:11:59 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon To: Gary Kline Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stray?? In-Reply-To: <200010020125.e921PBK01718@thought.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Gary Kline wrote: > This is bizarre: by itself, % dmesg gives me this--note the > ``stray irq 7'' line at the end? > > I was editing /var/run/dmesg.boot last week; don't see how > this could have affected the output of dmesg, tho. > > Any thoughts here, folks? > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > stray irq 7 stray irq 7 is weird since it belongs to ppc0. It really doesn't belong here. If it's still not working you may try: options PPC_PROBE_CHIPSET Also, check your port settings in bios. read ppbus(4) an ppc(4) It talks about different modes. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 1: 4: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pluton.ispras.ru (pluton.ispras.ru [194.186.94.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7EC37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 01:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.ispras.ru (gate [194.67.37.200]) by pluton.ispras.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e927tWl11164; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:55:33 +0400 (MSK) Received: from ispgate (ispgate [194.67.37.200]) by gate.ispras.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id e9281MM24737; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:01:30 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:01:21 +0400 (MSK) From: Grigory Kljuchnikov To: David Gilbert Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Freebsd vs. UPS In-Reply-To: <14801.62266.831581.816270@trooper.velocet.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Gilbert wrote: > I've got a few of the Powerware... both RackMount and regular. I've > found them to be dependable and cost effective. They come with > software for Linux that I havn't been able to get running. > I've got a Powerware 5105 and have tried to install software from CDROM that come with UPS for Solaris SPARC. This soft isn't work properly. But I've got upgrage soft from www.powerware.com for LanSafe III v.4.15 for Linix, Solaris SPARC and Solaris x86. I've tried to use it on all these systems and I was very wonderfull, this soft was work fine. Now I use this soft on Solaris x86 and Solaris SPARC systems. Best regards, Grigory Klyuchnikov ------------------------------------------------------------ Institute for System Programming Russian Academy of Sciences, 109004, Moscow, Russia, B.Kommunistitcheskay, 25, phone(work): +7-095-9125659 fax: +7-095-9121524 e-mail: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 4:59:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E6F237B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 04:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ginger.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:58:58 +0100 Message-ID: <39D87881.19EB8AEC@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:58:57 +0100 From: Theo PAGTZIS Organization: UCL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am using Fbsd 3.4 stable and I have setup NIS, however when I log in trying whoami gives me a number rather than the proper UID while and on a ls ~ it gives me that I am an unknown user Does anyone have suggestions as to what may be wrong and I do not get the proper UID ? Thanks Theo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 5:16:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC07F37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 05:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id OAA24879; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:17:03 +0200 (MEST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13g4WC-00028n-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:16:28 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:16:28 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: David Marsh Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Order of 'make's in updating from 3.2 -> RELENG_4 Message-ID: <20001002141628.A5850@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: David Marsh , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from drmarsh@bigfoot.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:19:28AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Although I no longer run -STABLE, I will try to help, because I saw no one to jump up and do it... On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:19:28AM +0100, David Marsh wrote: > I am currently running FreeBSD 3.2, which I installed from the > distribution CDs. > > I would like to update to 4.x (mainly to see if I can get my soundcard > (SoundBlaster 16 PCI) to work, and because I notice that my system > can't make some of the newer ports, and, also, "it's about time.." ;-) OK. So, I will tell you something which may not be much joy to you but I want you to complete this transition safely. First you should upgrade to 3.5.1-STABLE (the latest from the RELENG_3 branch) and do an upgrade from there. It may work directly, but it is not certain. 3.2-RELEASE is relatively old. > I'm now at the stage where, over the past few days, I have cvsup'ped my > sources to RELENG_4: because I'm sharing the phone line with others, > I've been cvsup'ping in "chunks", for about an hour each night (and > stopping cvsup from the GUI before I hang up, each time), until my > system is up to date. (I assume that everything is now up to date, > because if I try to cvsup again, it seems happy that it has > everything it needs..? Well... if it fetches nothing more and finishes successfully, then yes. > My cvsup file fetches 'src-all' with the following settings: > > *default host=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup > *default prefix=/usr > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 > *default delete use-rel-suffix Seems OK. Apart from the fact that I am not sure, if rebuilding the world is well supported from non-standard locations (I have never tried it.) > However, I'm unsure about the following: > > ## Export-restricted collections. > # > # Only people in the USA and Canada may fetch these collections. If > # you are not in the USA or Canada, please use the collections in the > # "secure-supfile" instead. > #src-crypto > #src-eBones > #src-secure These no longer even exist. Yes, these are now part of src-all. No need to worry about them:-) > I have also read the Handbook section on "make world" and > /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > /usr/src/UPDATING mentions various occasions when changes (after 3.2 > was released) to the sources have required remakes of either the > kernel or the world, eg: > > 19990929 sigset_t change > 199912xx change from wd to ad > 20000117 texinfo updated > (mildly curious why this requires such a 'big fix'?) because texinfo is one of the tools that is used to build the rest of the world and the new version was not fully compatible with the previous one. 'Make world' is rather complex and saves people a lot of work when they do source upgrades. I am not aware of any other OS (free or otherwise) which would allow you this ease of upgrading. As we have just read on this list, there was this guy who successfully upgraded his 2.2.5 box to -STABLE just now and it worked! All others, put that into your binary upgrade packages and smoke it. FreeBSD rocks! If you are curious about what happens and how, just "tape" your make buildworld/installworld session with script(1) and you can see the exact commands as they were executed. It is also helpful for finding causes of problems if there were any during the build. (That is why the Handbook recommends it, too.) You can also look at the Makefiles but it is rather complex... On the other hand, you do not need to worry about these items in UPDATING, because this is more of a changelog than anything else. If you get the latest source and make world as described there, you will have all previous changes applied, too. The only things you should look out for are configuration changes. If UPDATING says that you need add a new option to your kernel or that you should change one of your config files or similar, than you should do that (unless later invalidated by another entry. Many of the entries were temporary. Order is new itmes first, oldest ones at the bottom. IIRC.) > This induces a sense of fear that my planned upgrade may be tricker > (impossible?) than thought. Or, is it the case that these entries *only* > affect "people upgrading from earlier [than 3.x?] versions of > -stable/-current" as the file says, and that I don't need to worry > about these? As I said, all upgrades are all-inclusive. You get the latest fixes plus all previous ones. No need to worry. But this is the reason why upgardes across branch changes (when the first digit of the RELEASE number changes, too) are only sure to succeed if you first grab the latest of the branch you are on (in your case, RELENG_3) and upgrade to the new branch. > How does the change from wd to ad affect me? > (Is wd still present, so I can worry about changing to ad 'later'?) IIRC wd is still there, but changing to ad(4) is not difficult. All you do is make the appropriate devices in /dev with MAKEDEV as described in UPDATING and then edit the /etc/fstab file and at the next reboot things will work already the new way. Problems will only arise if you are one of those unlucky people, who have the mobo+hdd combos ad(4) does not like, because then full performance will not be available to you. (AFAIR VIA chipsets were among the main culprits.) (I have an LX440 mobo and two Quantum HDDs and they work fine.) > If I can do an upgrade, when I compare the Handbook and "UPDATING", > I'm unsure which I should follow with regard to the following conflict > (I know the Handbook does say that UPDATING normally takes precedence): The items in UPDATING take precedence over the Handbook because the latter is a general-purpose document while the former only covers upgrade in this particular situation. So when the two are not the same, follow the UPDATING file and you will be safe. > The Handbook says: > ------------------ > > [check /etc/make.conf (I don't have /etc/defaults/make.conf) and > /etc/groups [done, seem OK]] > > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > > make installworld > Yes. Careful use of mergemaster(8) will bring all you need. > > > > *then* make a new kernel > > (How? UPDATING also appears to suggest that making the kernel has also > been split into two build/install parts, or do I use the 'old' way?) During the upgrade, do as UPDATING says. Later, I think you can choose. (I run -CURRENT and I still use the 'old' way.) > UPDATING says: > -------------- > > (Under the section "To update from 3.x to 4.x stable") > > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > > > > [Does this mean I should _actually_ build/install a kernel at this point > (before installworld), as described a couple of paragraphs earlier in > UPDATING?] Yes. > cd /usr/src/sbin/mknod > make install > > > > > [Could somebody tell me exactly how to convert the pseudocode > ("list of disk/slices") into what I should type in? I'm always a bit > fuzzy about how exactly I should refer to disks/slices.. cd /dev sh ./MAKEDEV all ad0 ad2 sh ./MAKEDEV ad0s1a ad2s1a ad2s2a Then change all wd* to ad* and all wcd* to acd* in /etc/fstab and there you go. > My system is currently setup as follows: > /dev/wd2s2b none swap > /dev/wd2s2a / ufs > /dev/wd2s2f /usr ufs > /dev/wd2s2e /var ufs > /dev/wcd0c /cdrom cd9660 > # > /dev/wd0s2a /mnt/bkp ufs > /dev/wd0s1 /mnt/mfsc msdos > /dev/wd2s1 /mnt/mfsd msdos > proc /proc procfs > (Yes, the disk that FreeBSD is installed on is attached to the primary > thingie [1] on the second IDE controller. I have "root_disk_unit=2" in > /boot/loader.conf to enable my boot sequence to work properly. I > realise that this is a slightly unusual setup, is it likely to cause > any problems here? I do not think so. > [1] My vocabulary has failed me at this time of night: I mean, channel, > connector, port, whatever-you-call-it..] So you mean secondary master? Ah, no problem:-) > reboot > > [Does this mean to do a complete and total reboot? > (ie, shutdown -r, right down to the BIOS starting up again?)] Yes. When you build a new kernel, you always need a complete reboot. > > cd /usr/src > cd gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/install-info > make install > cd ../../../.. > ldconfig -R /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc > > make installworld [5] > > [There is no Footnote 5!? :-( ] :-) Sorry, I cannot say, what Mr. Losh had in mind/was smoking at this point:-) > mergemaster [4] > reboot > > > > > The order of installworld, mergemaster, updating /dev, and remaking the > kernel, are different in the two descriptions. > > Should I follow UPDATING as it says? Yes. > Is it right to make a new kernel before doing installworld and all the > rest? In this situation it is required but if you follow the instructions, there will be no problem. Otherwise, well I make my kernel last but some people say that it can cause problems if the new kernel fails and I have a new world with wich the old kernel cannot work properly. (Normally not an issue for me because I upgrade every two days or so:-) Again, there is a suggested way in UPDATING for tracking -STABLE further down the road, I think you can stick to that. > Once again, I apologise if these are extraordinarily daft questions. No probs. As you have done more of this make world stuff, you will get more confident and be able to help others, too:-) It is not hard, just unusual at first sight. But you can see OS development at work(tm) as it really goes, not just the end product in form of next version/new binary packages/rpms/debs what have you.:-) Welcome to this new world! > Many thanks for any help/advice! Your welcome... I hope this was at least in part helpful. > David. -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 6:15:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5965037B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 06:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92DF3423491 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:15:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA37211 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id JAA25791 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:15:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm having problems upgrading a 3.4 system to 4.1. I thought I might be able to provide more information: On 3.4, it was able to use the ethernet pccard (an ed0 clone card made by Archtek). This is the pccard.conf entry it had: # SmartLink (Archtek Fast Ethernet Adaptor) card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" config auto "ed0" any 0x30000 insert logger -s SmartLink inserted insert /etc/pccard_ether $device remove logger -s SmartLink removed remove /etc/pccard_ether_remove $device But, on 4.1 - I don't seem to be able to get it to work... pccardd will find the card... with the messages: pccardd[43]: Card "PCMCIA"("FastEthernet") [V] [1.0] matched "PCMCIA" ("FastEhternet") [(null)][(null)] ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 3 slot 1 on pccard1 ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) Oct 2 09:14:27 canteens pccardd[43]: ed1: SmartLink inserted. Oct 2 09:14:27 canteens pccarddd[43]: pccardd started Oct 2 09:14:29 canteens /kernel: ed1: device timeout The entry I have in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf is: # SmartLink (Archtek Fast Ethernet Adaptor) card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" config auto "ed" ? 0x30000 logstr "SmartLink" insert /etc/pccard_ether $device remove /sbin/ifconfig $device delete I've tried changing the pccard_flags to use various IRQs, only IRQ #3 and IRQ #5 seem to get this far (all others fail..) The machine is a Sony VAIO PCG-F480. Again, just moments ago (before the upgrade) this hardware worked just fine with FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE and the PAO kernel. Any assistance/pointers, etc... would be appreciated. - Thanks! - - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 6:52:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [205.252.34.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF2C37B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [205.252.34.3]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC272E443 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:52:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92Dqq750775; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:52:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from khera) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14808.37684.484892.784439@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:52:52 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recent FTP_PASSIVE_MODE change? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "a" == andrew writes: a> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Brian Dean wrote: >> having trouble. I just switched over to using 'xdm' instead of >> running 'xinit' at login, and now the defaults in /etc/login.conf do >> not appear to be working. Is this normal? a> I reported this as a bug to the XFree people but they said I would have to a> fix it myself and that there were security implications for doing xdm the a> way it is and I got the impression I wouldn't get far if I produced Curious... I use kdm to log into my workstation, and the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable does get set on my local shells. The only place this is set is in login.conf, so it would seem that at least kdm honors it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:24:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.matrix.com.br (smtp.matrix.com.br [200.202.17.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E21837B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from speed.matrix.com.br (speed.matrix.com.br [200.196.0.241]) by smtp.matrix.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD8D60E23; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:24:19 -0300 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:24:21 -0300 (EST) From: Rodrigo Campos X-Sender: speed@speed.matrix.com.br Reply-To: Rodrigo Campos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.1.1 wont boot with IBM KATANA hard disk Message-ID: Organization: Matrix Network - but not speaking for X-URL: http://www.br-unix.org/users/campos/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Several days ago I posted a note on the freebsd-questions mailling list about problems with 4.1.1-* and the Adaptec AIC 7899 SCSI Controller. After some tests I discovered that the problem is not related to the SCSI controller, but with the hard disk. I'll try to describe the whole scenario so it may be easier to understand the problem. I installed the system from the FreeBSD 4.0 CD (March 2000) and it works just great, after a cvsup/make world/kernel building, the kernel hangs up during SCSI devices recognition, the message follows: (probe1:ahc0:0:0:1): parity error detected in DT Data-in phase. SEQADDR(0X173) SCSIRATE (0X93) Unexpected DT Data Phase Any ideas ? All I can say is that 4.0 works with the same hardware configuration, and 4.1.1 doesn't. Best Regards, -- Rodrigo Albani de Campos Matrix Internet - NOC http://www.br-unix.org/users/campos/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:43:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C325037B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13g6oo-000DfH-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:43:50 +0100 Received: (from rasputin@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA98464 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:43:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rasputin) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:43:50 +0100 From: Rasputin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1.1 breakage: GUS, spash screen, CD writing Message-ID: <20001002154350.B98364@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20000929130048.A62987@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from behanna@zbzoom.net on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:32:20AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:32:20AM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Rasputin wrote: > > > Was tracking stable until the ata0 bus (pr20924) knocked out my CDROM drive. > > But my supfile is hardcoded to not update past the 21st of August > > because of the ata bug. > > If you're referring to the inability to mount a CD and the > subsequent inability to eject it, that was fixed quite some time ago. > No, I'm referring to PR 20924 , which is the inability of freeBSD-stable to detect ata0-slave on some intel kits. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20924 still shows it as open... Should I resubmit this PR, as my hardware is very different to the one listed? Maybe sos@frebsd.org thinkd it's only affecting 1 person? -- Rasputin Jack of All Trades :: Master of Nuns To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:44:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [205.252.34.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409B937B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [205.252.34.3]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C6C2E446 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92Eiak63822; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from khera) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14808.40788.16853.106698@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: bt0 kernel log messages X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got these log messages on my nightly report: > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc7828880 - timed out > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc7828880 - timed out > bt0: No longer in timeout > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc78293c0 - timed out > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc78293c0 - timed out > bt0: No longer in timeout What does this indicate? I'm preparing to put this box into service soon, so I'd like to know if it is something to address now while it is in testing mode. This is FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE from last monday. Here's the dmesg.boot output: Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Mon Sep 25 17:42:31 EDT 2000 khera@yertle.kciLink.com:/u/yertle2/usr.obj/amd/onceler/u/onceler1/usr/src/sys/LORAX Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 199216145 Hz CPU: Pentium/P54C (199.22-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x52c Stepping = 12 Features=0x1bf real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 128008192 (125008K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02b2000. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at 7.1 de0: port 0x6000-0x607f mem 0xe0800000-0xe080007f irq 9 at device 17.0 on pci0 de0: DEC DE500-XA 21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.2 de0: address 00:00:f8:03:1e:19 pci0: at 18.0 irq 10 bt0: port 0x6100-0x6103 mem 0xe0801000-0xe0801fff irq 11 at device 19.0 on pci0 bt0: BT-948 FW Rev. 5.05R Ultra Narrow SCSI Host Adapter, SCSI ID 7, 192 CCBs fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3b0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x100> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle de0: enabling 10baseT port Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a da0 at bt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 1010MB (2069860 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 1010C) da1 at bt0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 2047MB (4194058 512 byte sectors: 128H 32S/T 1023C) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:53: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [63.67.141.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1341837B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA55802; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:52:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:52:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Gregory Bond Cc: Warner Losh , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010020011.LAA03636@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Gregory Bond wrote: > On the SMC8416T (or at least all the ones I've tried!), the PnP > implementation is broken (it always returns 0x0 as the memory address) > so these cards cannot be used in PnP mode. (Or perhaps it is more > correct that they can't be used in PnP mode except in programmed-IO > mode!) ...which the 'ed' driver doesn't support anyway. (SMC cards in PIO mode.) -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:55:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CEC37B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veager.siteplus.net (user-38lc8vb.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.35.235]) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA24672; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:54:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: Thomas David Rivers Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It looks like you need to change the line device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 in your kernel config to just device ed After you recompile the kernel this will cause the device to be recognized as ed0, the first device rather than ed1 that is being recognized now. Hope this helps, -- Jim Weeks On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > I'm having problems upgrading a 3.4 system to 4.1. > I thought I might be able to provide more information: > > On 3.4, it was able to use the ethernet pccard (an ed0 > clone card made by Archtek). This is the pccard.conf > entry it had: > > # SmartLink (Archtek Fast Ethernet Adaptor) > card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" > config auto "ed0" any 0x30000 > insert logger -s SmartLink inserted > insert /etc/pccard_ether $device > remove logger -s SmartLink removed > remove /etc/pccard_ether_remove $device > > > But, on 4.1 - I don't seem to be able to get it to > work... pccardd will find the card... with the > messages: > > pccardd[43]: Card "PCMCIA"("FastEthernet") [V] [1.0] matched "PCMCIA" ("FastEhternet") [(null)][(null)] > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > Oct 2 09:14:27 canteens pccardd[43]: ed1: SmartLink inserted. > Oct 2 09:14:27 canteens pccarddd[43]: pccardd started > Oct 2 09:14:29 canteens /kernel: ed1: device timeout > > The entry I have in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf is: > > # SmartLink (Archtek Fast Ethernet Adaptor) > card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" > config auto "ed" ? 0x30000 > logstr "SmartLink" > insert /etc/pccard_ether $device > remove /sbin/ifconfig $device delete > > > I've tried changing the pccard_flags to use various IRQs, > only IRQ #3 and IRQ #5 seem to get this far (all others > fail..) > > The machine is a Sony VAIO PCG-F480. > > Again, just moments ago (before the upgrade) this hardware > worked just fine with FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE and the PAO kernel. > > Any assistance/pointers, etc... would be appreciated. > > - Thanks! - > - Dave Rivers - > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 7:56: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD2537B670 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92Etsr16507; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010021455.e92Etsr16507@ptavv.es.net> To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 02:26:03 CDT." Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 07:55:54 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG These sound like exactly what I was posting a couple of months ago. My fans were fine. MOBO temp was fine. Memory was totally swapped out. Only occurred on my K6/450 after 4.0 was installed. Other things like the Gimp built fine. It HAD to be a problem in the OS. But it was not. It was CPU temperature. A small amount of heat sink grease applied to the chip and heat sink and the signal 4 errors vanished! Please make sure that your heat sink is doing it's job before blaming FreeBSD. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:15:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD2037B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92FFMr11178; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010021515.e92FFMr11178@ptavv.es.net> To: Lee Ann Goldstein Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 13:06:40 PDT." <200009302006.NAA11982@leeann.snedmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 08:15:22 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for the scripts, but Mark's seems to work a bit better than yours, although yours looks nicer. You script seems to miss several IRQs including my Ethernet and my sound card. Mark's output: atapci0: irq 0 atkbd0: irq 1 sio1 irq 3 sio0 irq 4 fdc0: irq 6 ppc0: irq 7 pcm0: irq 9 xl0: irq 10 pci1: irq 11 psm0: irq 12 ata0: irq 14 ata1: irq 15 Your output: atkbd0 irq 1 sio1 irq 3 sio0 irq 4 fdc0 irq 6 ppc0 irq 7 psm0 irq 12 I can understand "atapci0: irq 0" being missing, but pcm0: irq 9 xl0: irq 10 pci1: irq 11 ata0: irq 14 ata1: irq 15 all are legit. I'm not a sed person and, while Mark's sed script was pretty clear, yours is just a bit beyond me. Could this be related to the fact that I am running 4.1-Stable? R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 13:06:40 -0700 > From: Lee Ann Goldstein > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > I decided I wanted to see the pci assignments as well, and thought I'd > make the output a little prettier while I was at it, so I "sliced et > diced" a little further... > > find_irq.sh > ----------- > #!/bin/sh > dmesg | \ > sed -n -f find_irq.sed | \ > sed -e 's/ [0-9]$/ &/' -e 's/://' | \ > sort -n +2 -3 > > find_irq.sed > ------------ > /irq [0-9][0-9]* on pci/ s/\(^[a-z0-9]*[: ]\).*\(irq [0-9][0-9]*\).*\(pci[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)/\1 \2 \3/p > /pci/b > s/\(^[a-z0-9]*[: ]\).*\(irq [0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1 \2/p > > (those are tabs after the "\1"s, and that first substitution command > wraps to the next line. I couldn't figure out a way to split it for > readability that wouldn't risk introducing worse errors than letting > it wrap might) > > For my system (still at 3.4-R), this produces: > > atkbd0 irq 1 > sio1 irq 3 > sio0 irq 4 > pcm1 irq 5 > fdc0 irq 6 > ppc0 irq 7 > adv0 irq 10 pci0.10.0 > fxp0 irq 10 pci0.9.0 > uhci0 irq 10 pci0.7.2 > vga0 irq 11 pci1.0.0 > psm0 irq 12 > wdc0 irq 14 > wdc1 irq 15 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:17: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6962B37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12587; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:16:46 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:16:46 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon To: Vivek Khera Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bt0 kernel log messages In-Reply-To: <14808.40788.16853.106698@onceler.kciLink.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > I got these log messages on my nightly report: > > > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc7828880 - timed out > > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc7828880 - timed out > > bt0: No longer in timeout > > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc78293c0 - timed out > > (da0:bt0:0:0:0): CCB 0xc78293c0 - timed out > > bt0: No longer in timeout > > What does this indicate? I'm preparing to put this box into service > soon, so I'd like to know if it is something to address now while it > is in testing mode. > bt0: port 0x6100-0x6103 mem 0xe0801000-0xe0801fff irq 11 at device 19.0 on pci0 > bt0: BT-948 FW Rev. 5.05R Ultra Narrow SCSI Host Adapter, SCSI ID 7, 192 CCBs ... > da0 at bt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled > da0: 1010MB (2069860 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 1010C) > da1 at bt0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled > da1: 2047MB (4194058 512 byte sectors: 128H 32S/T 1023C) I would check the da0 cabling and termination. Target 0 is da0 after all (it even explicitly says so). --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:24:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from us66.grant.org (us66.grant.org [213.39.2.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88BC37B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grant.org (splat [213.39.2.179]) by us66.grant.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA11662 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:24:03 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <39D8A891.256CF7B6@grant.org> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 17:24:01 +0200 From: Michael Grant X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: strange messages when booting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've just upgraded my 3.4-stable to 3.5-stable (RELENG_3). Now, when I boot, I see two strange messages: Bad SMBIOS table checksum! ... ahc0: rev 0x01 int a irq 5 on pci0.10.0 ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc1: rev 0x04 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0 ahc1: Illegal cable configuration!!. Only two connectors on the adapter may be used at a time! ahc1: aic7895 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc2: rev 0x04 int b irq 11 on pci0.12.1 ahc2: Using left over BIOS settings ahc2: aic7895 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs I searched the archives. Several people reported the bad checksum but nobody ever replied with an answer. The second illegal cable config also showed up in the archives only once but again without an answer. Anyone made any progress on fixing these? The machine boots and all seems ok, so at least they're not fatal. -Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:29: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AEC37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92FSwI02342; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:28:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA11349; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:28:57 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021528.JAA11349@harmony.village.org> To: Gregory Bond Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:11:55 +1100." <200010020011.LAA03636@lightning.itga.com.au> References: <200010020011.LAA03636@lightning.itga.com.au> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:28:57 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010020011.LAA03636@lightning.itga.com.au> Gregory Bond writes: : On the SMC8416T (or at least all the ones I've tried!), the PnP : implementation is broken (it always returns 0x0 as the memory address) : so these cards cannot be used in PnP mode. (Or perhaps it is more correct : that they can't be used in PnP mode except in programmed-IO mode!) I got my system up last night. It is good to have a current -STABLE system as my gateway again. Here's the probe lines: ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 10 on isa0 ed0: address 00:00:c0:79:2a:f0, type SMC8416T (16 bit) ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xd0000 irq 5 on isa0 ed1: address 00:00:1b:1e:23:dc, type NE2000 (16 bit) Note that neither card is in plug and play mode. The NE2000 is a real, honest to god NE2000 and doesn't support plug and pray, while I've been using the SMC8416T since before PnP support in FreeBSD worked. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:33:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FCD37B66F for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92FXGI02380; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:33:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA11398; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:33:14 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021533.JAA11398@harmony.village.org> To: Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: Re: username with - Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 08:27:08 +0200." <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:33:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> Gianmarco Giovannelli writes: : Hi, : Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify : the user of virtual domains), like : : ac-info : : But rmuser refuse to delete them : : gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info : Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. : : So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? Adduser is right. Dashes are allowed in user names. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:34:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from carmel.diva.nl (carmel.diva.nl [195.86.140.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7C937B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (boland@localhost) by carmel.diva.nl (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92FYMA06739 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:34:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:34:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Michiel Boland To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: <200010021455.e92Etsr16507@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Kevin Oberman wrote: > These sound like exactly what I was posting a couple of months ago. My > fans were fine. MOBO temp was fine. Memory was totally swapped > out. Only occurred on my K6/450 after 4.0 was installed. Other things > like the Gimp built fine. It HAD to be a problem in the OS. > > But it was not. It was CPU temperature. I have a machine that sig11s/reboots for no apparent reason during buildworlds. It has a pIII 600 socket370 cpu on an asus P3V4X board. Our hardware supplier thought it could be related to a buggy slot-1 converter. Apparently you can only use the asus converter on asus boards. Why they did not supply the asus converter along with the board is a mystery to me but that's another story.:) Anyway, the morale here is that another thing to look out for if you're getting sig4/11/reboots is crappy slot1 converters. Cheers Michiel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:36:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4294637B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92FZkI02410; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:35:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA11428; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:35:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021535.JAA11428@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:15:02 EDT." <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:35:45 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : Oct 2 09:14:29 canteens /kernel: ed1: device timeout Are you sure you have no other hardware on IRQ 3 and 5? Both of these on my vaio are used. The timeout that you are seeing is almost always an interrupt problem. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:37:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F285B37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92FbQI02426; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:37:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA11448; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:37:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021537.JAA11448@harmony.village.org> To: Jim Weeks Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:54:14 EDT." References: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:37:25 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Jim Weeks writes: : After you recompile the kernel this will cause the device to be recognized : as ed0, the first device rather than ed1 that is being recognized now. This isn't a ed0 vs ed1 problem. He's got the device recognized, but it is failing to generate interrupts (vmstat -i is your friend here, btw). That's caused almost always by an attempt to use an interrupt that another hunk of hardware, possibly w/o a driver, is using. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 8:41:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F537B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13g7im-000FqU-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:41:40 +0100 Received: (from rasputin@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA99027 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:41:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rasputin) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:41:40 +0100 From: Rasputin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata0-slave doesn't show up! Message-ID: <20001002164140.A98941@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <86d7hm839k.fsf@xa12.heimat.gr.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <86d7hm839k.fsf@xa12.heimat.gr.jp>; from nakaji@heimat.gr.jp on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:37:11PM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:37:11PM +0900, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote: > >>>>> Andre Yelistratov wrote: > > AY> I have a similar problem: > > Me too. > > AY> PS stable version - 20000907. > > I can't upgrade from 20000822 to 20000930. > > AY> > >> Has anybody found a solution to this yet? My workaround was to go back > AY> > >> to the wdc device rather than the ata device, but it might be better > AY> > >> for me to back down from 4.1-STABLE to 4.1-RELEASE and use the newer > AY> > >> device. My CD-ROM is at ata0-slave and also wasn't being detected at > AY> > >> bootup. Exactly the same symptoms as below. If you roll back to 21st of August, the bug vanishes. installworld is a bit shaky then , though :( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20924 -- Rasputin Jack of All Trades :: Master of Nuns To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:39: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA9937B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92Gd2O19933; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:39:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA37529; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:39:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id MAA38314; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:38:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021638.MAA38314@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, rivers@dignus.com In-Reply-To: <200010021537.JAA11448@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message Jim Weeks writes: > : After you recompile the kernel this will cause the device to be recognized > : as ed0, the first device rather than ed1 that is being recognized now. > > This isn't a ed0 vs ed1 problem. He's got the device recognized, but > it is failing to generate interrupts (vmstat -i is your friend here, > btw). That's caused almost always by an attempt to use an interrupt > that another hunk of hardware, possibly w/o a driver, is using. > > Warner > I agree - this is most likely an interrupt problem. I don't _think_ anything is on 3 or 5... and I can't use 10 or 11. And, remember FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE with PAO was able to handle this hardware just fine - just earlier this morning. I'm building a kernel with USB disabled - perhaps that contributes to the problem (i.e. stealing an interrupt.) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:44:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3320437B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92GioI02852; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:44:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA12130; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:44:49 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021644.KAA12130@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: jim@siteplus.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:38:59 EDT." <200010021638.MAA38314@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010021638.MAA38314@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:44:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010021638.MAA38314@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : I agree - this is most likely an interrupt problem. : : I don't _think_ anything is on 3 or 5... and I can't use 10 or 11. : : And, remember FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE with PAO was able to handle : this hardware just fine - just earlier this morning. : : I'm building a kernel with USB disabled - perhaps that contributes : to the problem (i.e. stealing an interrupt.) Hmmm. There have been a couple of commits to -stable/-current to the ed driver since 4.1-RELEASE. There's a small chance that this card needed additional support to get its interrupts working properly. I'd double check the BIOS just to make sure there isn't a PnP device that wasn't enabled in 3.4 but that is now enabled. OK, so it's a longshot. Oh, the unknown driver now doesn't report anything but failures unless you've done a boot verbose. Maybe that might be a clue on how to proceed. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:48:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C8F37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92Gm4116808; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:48:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA37557; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:48:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id MAA38436; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:48:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:48:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021648.MAA38436@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-Reply-To: <200010021644.KAA12130@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > In message <200010021638.MAA38314@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : I agree - this is most likely an interrupt problem. > : > : I don't _think_ anything is on 3 or 5... and I can't use 10 or 11. > : > : And, remember FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE with PAO was able to handle > : this hardware just fine - just earlier this morning. > : > : I'm building a kernel with USB disabled - perhaps that contributes > : to the problem (i.e. stealing an interrupt.) > > Hmmm. There have been a couple of commits to -stable/-current to the > ed driver since 4.1-RELEASE. There's a small chance that this card > needed additional support to get its interrupts working properly. > > I'd double check the BIOS just to make sure there isn't a PnP device > that wasn't enabled in 3.4 but that is now enabled. OK, so it's a > longshot. Well - nothing has changed since this morning when it was running 3.4-RELEASE (almost nothing, I've turned off/on PNP-OS with no discernable difference.) > Oh, the unknown driver now doesn't report anything but > failures unless you've done a boot verbose. Maybe that might be a > clue on how to proceed. Hmm... It would be nice to be able to enable a boot -v; but I seem to be in the throws of the new boot manager. I can't enable/disable things from the "ok" prompt (I can do an ls on the file system, which is nice) - perhaps this is the GENERIC kernel that got installed? - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:49:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5CE37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e92GmBU58085; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:48:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: Message from Jeff Duffy of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:18:02 CDT." Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:48:11 -0700 Message-ID: <58081.970505291@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have had the same problem. To wit: > > 1. Installed 4.1-RELEASE on a K6-III 400 > > 2. CVSUPed from cvsup6 > > 3. Ran buildworld. Failed with the following error: If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything from Celerons to Athlons. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:51:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375AB37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92GpLI02935; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:51:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA12261; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:51:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021651.KAA12261@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:48:02 EDT." <200010021648.MAA38436@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010021648.MAA38436@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:51:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010021648.MAA38436@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : Well - nothing has changed since this morning when it was running 3.4-RELEASE : (almost nothing, I've turned off/on PNP-OS with no discernable difference.) Hmmm. OK. I'd expect all PnP devices to be turned on if PnP-os was no. : > Oh, the unknown driver now doesn't report anything but : > failures unless you've done a boot verbose. Maybe that might be a : > clue on how to proceed. : : It would be nice to be able to enable a boot -v; but I seem to be : in the throws of the new boot manager. boot -v turns on the verbose code. : I can't enable/disable things from the "ok" prompt (I can do an : ls on the file system, which is nice) - perhaps this is the GENERIC : kernel that got installed? boot -c will kick you into the CLI device editor. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:53:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4137B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92GrNg23616; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:53:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA37578; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:53:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id MAA38517; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:53:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:53:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021653.MAA38517@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-Reply-To: <200010021651.KAA12261@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > In message <200010021648.MAA38436@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : Well - nothing has changed since this morning when it was running 3.4-RELEASE > : (almost nothing, I've turned off/on PNP-OS with no discernable difference.) > > Hmmm. OK. I'd expect all PnP devices to be turned on if PnP-os was no. This is a dual-boot machine (Win98 & FreeBSD) - so I've had PnP-os to "YES" in the past - seemed to work fine. [Of course, with 4.1-RELEASE, the USB drivers complain; but that's OK by me.] > > boot -v turns on the verbose code. > > boot -c will kick you into the CLI device editor. > Duh... Thanks! - Dave R. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 9:57:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD8A37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e92GupU58193; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:56:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Andrew J Caines Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew J Caines of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 02:24:27 EDT." <20001002022427.A371@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:56:51 -0700 Message-ID: <58189.970505811@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > As you can see I still had the mfs and fdesc mounts active. Now, after the > reboot, I'm all disk. We'll see what happens after 02:00 tomorow. And that's the panic I'm interested in, of course... :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 10:16:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 757.org (users.757.org [209.96.173.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC49037B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jeff@localhost) by 757.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA11729 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:27:11 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: users.757.org: jeff owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:27:11 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Duffy X-Sender: jeff@users.757.org To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just >a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine >on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything >from Celerons to Athlons. I agree. I was just waiting for someone who had a successful buildworld of 4.1.1-STABLE on a K6-II or K6-III to speak up (since these were the two CPUs in question). I assume (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jordan is saying that he has done just that. Given, I'm sure he knows the issues better than I. While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I helped start :) If the 4.1.1-STABLE build fails in the same place however, can I assume that that would be interesting data? Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 10:17:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D84437B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92HH0G00255; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA37616; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id NAA38653; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:16:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021716.NAA38653@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-Reply-To: <200010021644.KAA12130@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > > Hmmm. There have been a couple of commits to -stable/-current to the > ed driver since 4.1-RELEASE. There's a small chance that this card > needed additional support to get its interrupts working properly. Is is possible to just `plop' these changes on to a 4.1-RELEASE tree (i.e. are they isolated enough where that's something reasonable to test.) I don't have the best network connectivity (again) and can't download 4.1.1-RELEASE... so, I was hoping that perhaps I could just patch up a file or two to try this out... - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 10:24:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3424137B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veager.siteplus.net (user-38lc8vb.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.35.235]) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17394; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:23:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: Warner Losh Cc: Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <200010021537.JAA11448@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I see that now. I original had the timeouts caused by ed0/ed1, but that must have been because I had ed0 specified in pccard.conf. It would appear that changing the line to "config auto "ed" any 0x30000" would have cured my problem without recompiling the kernel. Yet another reason we keep Warner around ;-) -- Jim Weeks On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Jim Weeks writes: > : After you recompile the kernel this will cause the device to be recognized > : as ed0, the first device rather than ed1 that is being recognized now. > > This isn't a ed0 vs ed1 problem. He's got the device recognized, but > it is failing to generate interrupts (vmstat -i is your friend here, > btw). That's caused almost always by an attempt to use an interrupt > that another hunk of hardware, possibly w/o a driver, is using. > > Warner > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 10:41:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6652A37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e92HeuU59136; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:40:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: Message from Jeff Duffy of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 13:27:11 CDT." Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:40:56 -0700 Message-ID: <59131.970508456@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a > 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I > have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile > cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I > helped start :) Another thing you might try is totally blowing away your source tree and getting another copy via an authoritative source. In cases where I'm genuinely not sure myself, I also blow away the host environment (do a fresh install) and try that. If I still get a compilation error, I then figure that's a clear smoking gun. This may seem like a rather onerous set of steps to go through, but the set of inter-dependencies between the host compilation environment and the target source tree is so huge that literally anything can happen if the littlest thing is unsynched. It also helps to have a test box one can completely blow away, of course.. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 10:49: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9656337B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parish ([62.253.88.161]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20001002184746.JBY23965.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@parish>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:47:46 +0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92Hmka01957; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:48:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:48:45 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: Gary Kline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X Message-ID: <20001002184845.F252@parish> References: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org>; from kline@thought.org on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:11:28PM -0700 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > Unless there are other causes -- like bizarre side-effects from > interrupts -- or something even further out, I'm guessing that > the reason my deskjet has stopped working recently (in FreeBSD-4.1) > is a driver or configuration problem. > > There were a few postings on -stable not too many weeks back, but > I can't find them in the archives. > > Here is the related dmesg output: > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > I have changed nothing in my KERNEL file from the GENERIC setup; > can anybody tell me what needs doing to get my old DeskJet-500 > back to working? > Are you sure? I don't see ppbus. Here's mine. IIRC the only time I _don't_ see ppbus is if the printer is switched off when I boot (although I can't be 100% sure; it may report ppbus but, obviously, not the printer's ID string). ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 plip0: on ppbus0 > thanks much, > > gary > > > > > -- > Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- 4.4 - The number of the Beastie ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 11: 2:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2178F37B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92I2Br21643; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010021802.e92I2Br21643@ptavv.es.net> To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 13:27:11 CDT." Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:02:11 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeff, If I was not completely clear, I am running 4.1.1-Stable, CVSuped yesterday afternoon on a K6-III running 450 MHz. Built and installed fine. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 11:15: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC637B66F; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA00925; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92IEZp12804; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:14:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:14:34 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Mark Ovens Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X Message-ID: <20001002111434.A12622@tao.thought.org> References: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org> <20001002184845.F252@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001002184845.F252@parish>; from marko@freebsd.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:48:45PM +0100 X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:48:45PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > Unless there are other causes -- like bizarre side-effects from > > interrupts -- or something even further out, I'm guessing that > > the reason my deskjet has stopped working recently (in FreeBSD-4.1) > > is a driver or configuration problem. > > > > There were a few postings on -stable not too many weeks back, but > > I can't find them in the archives. > > > > Here is the related dmesg output: > > > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > > > I have changed nothing in my KERNEL file from the GENERIC setup; > > can anybody tell me what needs doing to get my old DeskJet-500 > > back to working? > > > > Are you sure? I don't see ppbus. Here's mine. IIRC the only time I _don't_ > see ppbus is if the printer is switched off when I boot (although I can't > be 100% sure; it may report ppbus but, obviously, not the printer's ID > string). > > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP > Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: > ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > I'm not 100% sure of many things, but here is what is in my KERNEL file related to the printer port: # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip # TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da The ppbus code probably can't tell much about an old DeskJet--that's my hand-waving SWAG;). For now, since I believe the DJ works--it works with a simple ASCII file, I haven't tried anything fancy-- I'm happy. gary > -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 11:22:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (mta06-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9DC37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parish ([62.253.85.160]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20001002182220.EMQT19246.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@parish>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:22:20 +0100 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92IMBf02198; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:22:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:22:06 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: Gary Kline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X Message-ID: <20001002192206.H252@parish> References: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org> <20001002184845.F252@parish> <20001002111434.A12622@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001002111434.A12622@tao.thought.org>; from kline@thought.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 11:14:34AM -0700 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 11:14:34AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:48:45PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > > Unless there are other causes -- like bizarre side-effects from > > > interrupts -- or something even further out, I'm guessing that > > > the reason my deskjet has stopped working recently (in FreeBSD-4.1) > > > is a driver or configuration problem. > > > > > > There were a few postings on -stable not too many weeks back, but > > > I can't find them in the archives. > > > > > > Here is the related dmesg output: > > > > > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > > > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > > > > > I have changed nothing in my KERNEL file from the GENERIC setup; > > > can anybody tell me what needs doing to get my old DeskJet-500 > > > back to working? > > > > > > > Are you sure? I don't see ppbus. Here's mine. IIRC the only time I _don't_ > > see ppbus is if the printer is switched off when I boot (although I can't > > be 100% sure; it may report ppbus but, obviously, not the printer's ID > > string). > > > > > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > > ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP > > Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: > > ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > > > I'm not 100% sure of many things, but here is what > is in my KERNEL file related to the printer port: > > # Parallel port > device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 > device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) > device lpt # Printer > device plip # TCP/IP over parallel > device ppi # Parallel port interface device > #device vpo # Requires scbus and da > > > The ppbus code probably can't tell much about > an old DeskJet--that's my hand-waving SWAG;). > For now, since I believe the DJ works--it works Huh? I thought you said it *doesn't'* work? > with a simple ASCII file, I haven't tried anything > fancy-- I'm happy. > Well, if you ever want to try something fancy (like printing PS) there's some info on setting up WP8 and SO5.1 (using ghostscript) at http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/printer.html (links at the bottom of the page). HTH > > gary > > > > > > > -- > Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- 4.4 - The number of the Beastie ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 11:26:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9263237B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92IRPr26490 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:27:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:27:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X In-Reply-To: <20001002111434.A12622@tao.thought.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Gary Kline wrote: > [...DeskJet 500 not probed...] > > I'm not 100% sure of many things, but here is what > is in my KERNEL file related to the printer port: > > # Parallel port > device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 > device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) > device lpt # Printer > device plip # TCP/IP over parallel > device ppi # Parallel port interface device > #device vpo # Requires scbus and da > > > The ppbus code probably can't tell much about > an old DeskJet--that's my hand-waving SWAG;). > For now, since I believe the DJ works--it works > with a simple ASCII file, I haven't tried anything > fancy-- I'm happy. My even-more-ancient OfficeJet 350 gets probed (as an OfficeJet 300); therefore, I'd be surprised if your DeskJet does not. apsfilter is your friend. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 11:34:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.34.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14DE37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste@localhost) by leeann.snedmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA15467; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:34:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com) Message-Id: <200010021834.LAA15467@leeann.snedmail.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 02 Oct 2000 08:15:22 PDT. <200010021515.e92FFMr11178@ptavv.es.net> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:34:10 -0700 From: Lee Ann Goldstein Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Your message was: (from "Kevin Oberman") > Thanks for the scripts, but Mark's seems to work a bit better than > yours, although yours looks nicer. > > You script seems to miss several IRQs including my Ethernet and my > sound card. [snip] > I can understand "atapci0: irq 0" being missing, but > pcm0: irq 9 > xl0: irq 10 > pci1: irq 11 > ata0: irq 14 > ata1: irq 15 > all are legit. I'm not a sed person and, while Mark's sed script was > pretty clear, yours is just a bit beyond me. > > Could this be related to the fact that I am running 4.1-Stable? Could be, since I've not yet seen 4.1 dmesg output. But I can also see where some assumptions I made based on my own dmesg output bit me. Bleh. Anyone who's sufficiently interested is welcome to send me (not the list!) the output of "dmesg | grep -i irq", and I'll beat the blasted thing into submission. Lee Ann -- Lee Ann Goldstein Caffeine is *not* a substitute for sleep. lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com lgoldste@lafn.org leeann@rand.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:10:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from frolkin.demon.co.uk (frolkin.demon.co.uk [194.222.100.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCC837B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sasha by frolkin.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13gB2C-0000TB-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:13:56 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:13:56 +0100 From: Alexander Frolkin To: Ken Bolingbroke Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Message-ID: <20001002201356.A1228@gamma> Reply-To: Alexander Frolkin References: <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd@bolingbroke.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:48:00PM -0700 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.17 X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 6C84 3EB2 550E E581 62FA BB0C D510 B042 FD5C E7A7 X-Editor: Vi Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:48:00PM -0700, Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > > > I didn't do a binary upgrade, I cvsup'd RELENG_3_2_0. The machine in > > > question doesn't have either a CD or floppy drive, and it also only has > > > 8 meg of RAM, all of which make binary upgrading a bit difficult. > > > Otherwise, I'd have wiped the machine and installed 4.1.1 fresh. > > > > Holy, @#$%! And you do buildworlds on this machine!? Sounds like a > > source upgrade would be even tougher. How long does it take to do one? > > Pentium-133. Doing a buildworld for 2.2.8 took 11 hours. :-) That's nothing - it took me 3 _days_ to buildworld for 3.4 on a Pentium 75 with 8MB RAM over a network... Alexander To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:22: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7C637B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA63062; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:21:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:21:46 -0400 From: Michael Lucas To: Alexander Frolkin Cc: Ken Bolingbroke , cjclark@alum.mit.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Message-ID: <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001002201356.A1228@gamma> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20001002201356.A1228@gamma>; from alexander@frolkin.demon.co.uk on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:13:56PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 08:13:56PM +0100, Alexander Frolkin wrote: > > Pentium-133. Doing a buildworld for 2.2.8 took 11 hours. :-) > > That's nothing - it took me 3 _days_ to buildworld for 3.4 on a Pentium 75 > with 8MB RAM over a network... Gee, you have it soft! My home firewall is a 25-mhz 486, 8 meg RAM. It takes well over a week, and that's with NO_DARNNEAREVERYTHING* in /etc/make.conf to cut out sendmail, named, etc. ==ml *You know, this was meant as a joke, but it might be a good idea. A single flag to say, "Don't build optional system parts." Then we'd have accusations of bloat, however, and far more bandwidth would be wasted discussing the merits of the idea than would be caused by implementing it. Never mind, forget I said anything at all. -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:32: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.svr.pol.co.uk (mail2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0A537B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modem-208.bicolor-angel.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.229.208] helo=freeloader.freeserve.co.uk) by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 13gBJY-00035K-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <39D8E29F.5EB755CE@freeloader.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:31:43 +0100 From: ian j hart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Duffy Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeff Duffy wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > >If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just > >a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine > >on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything > >from Celerons to Athlons. > > I agree. I was just waiting for someone who had a successful buildworld > of 4.1.1-STABLE on a K6-II or K6-III to speak up (since these were the > two CPUs in question). I assume (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jordan > is saying that he has done just that. Given, I'm sure he knows the issues > better than I. > > While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a > 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I > have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile > cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I > helped start :) > > If the 4.1.1-STABLE build fails in the same place however, can I assume > that that would be interesting data? > > Jeff > Builds okay on my K6II-500 system. The build looks good, I've done an NFS install using it. I do have an humungous CPU fan fitted tho' :) The only thing that bit me was mountd failing when kernel and world were out of sync. Boot kernel.old and installworld fixed that. (4.1RC to 4.1.1). alpha# uname -a FreeBSD alpha.my.domain 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Sat Sep 30 17:21:20 BST 2000 ianjhart@alpha.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALPHA i386 -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:35:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA2A37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92JZMI00908; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200010021935.e92JZMI00908@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: Gary Kline , Marcel Moolenaar , Warner Losh , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: perl and installworld (was Re: Why is gcc version so old?) In-Reply-To: <39AC6C87.C87B1E11@urx.com> References: <39AC1866.6DA9F5EC@urx.com> <39AB5A46.9FB75350@urx.com> <200008291838.MAA10618@harmony.village.org> <200008292012.OAA11124@harmony.village.org> <39AC1A43.7FD07745@urx.com> <39AC2097.4592B952@cup.hp.com> <39AC2324.6EC53F85@urx.com> <20000829171824.B47623@tao.thought.org> <39AC6C87.C87B1E11@urx.com> Comments: In-reply-to Kent Stewart message dated "Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:08:07 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_730491568P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:35:22 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_730491568P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Kent Stewart wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > > > > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl > > > > > > > > > > cd sdbm && make all > > > > > rm -rf libsdbm.a > > > > > ar cr libsdbm.a sdbm.o pair.o hash.o && : libsdbm.a > > > > > chmod 755 libsdbm.a > > > > > chmod:No such file or directory > > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Should we have a chmod here in the first place? > > > > > > > > It seems to me that a mod of 755 is wrong for archives. > > > > > > That may be true but, for right now, the Makefile for perl is using > > > chmod and the lack of its presence is killing the 4-stable > > > installworld. [snip] > I wouldn't worry about it. I have tried it on two machines. You cvsup > stable and then edit /usr/src/Makefile.inc1. You only have to look for > the installworld section (line 313) and add chmod in front of chown. > It works like a charm at that point. Dumb question: Did this ever get fixed in the repository? Reason I'm asking is that I just finished a cvsup to update my local respository, did a cvs update of my RELENG_4 sources from that repository, then a buildworld, buildkernel, reboot, installworld, and ran into this same problem (can't install libsdbm.a because it relies on chmod). Since this thread came up over a month ago, I'd be perfectly happy to find out it has indeed been fixed, and that I somehow bungled the cvs operations. I can't find any history for src/Makefile.inc1 that would imply adoption of the workaround patch, and I don't understand the perl build process enough to know where to look in there. In this case, a whack of the clue-stick would be much appreciated. (The workaround still works, however.) Thanks! Bruce. --==_Exmh_730491568P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: oo1roNcYRtO4AzX8aE/eWT6gyZs5SZjU iQA/AwUBOdjjetjKMXFboFLDEQJlLgCdECzsc2Rlc+HRBGM/b5uqN8llAb0AnjBp Errs/Nr/NSG1D/k7SQPaZEbz =dWYU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_730491568P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:54:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4DD37B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92JsG413818; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:54:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA38186; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:54:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA45176; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:54:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:54:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-Reply-To: <200010021651.KAA12261@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, some news. I tried booting the kernel found on the 4.1.1-RELEASE kern.flp... and, guess what... I don't get the ed1 timeouts anymore; and a `ping' to an IP address on that line almost works... Note the *almost*... It seems packets go out the interface (as is evidenced by the flashing lights on the dongle - but pings, etc... don't work. Could this be due to kernel <-> user-land mismatch? (Also - interestingly enough - routes begin showing up in the laptop's routing table to other machines on the network, and they include the correct ARP address, etc... so, the low-level hardware seems to be "working".) If I could determine just which source diff to apply to the 4.1-RELEASE tree that made this work, I should be able to build a fixed up 4.1-RELEASE kernel (which would then match my user-land code) and be all done... Any pointers would be appreciated! - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 12:58:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3137B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92JweI04022; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:58:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA14254; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:58:40 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010021958.NAA14254@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:54:13 EDT." <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 13:58:40 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : If I could determine just which source diff to apply to the 4.1-RELEASE : tree that made this work, I should be able to build a fixed up 4.1-RELEASE : kernel (which would then match my user-land code) and be all done... : Any pointers would be appreciated! Just drop the 4.1.1 if_ed sources (in sys/dev/ed) into the 4.1 tree and go from there. You may also need to set the flags on the config line of pccard.conf. I'd snag the entry from the 4.1.1 (or -current) src/etc/defaults/pccard.conf. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13: 5:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1369E37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92K58I04061; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA14316; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010022005.OAA14316@harmony.village.org> To: behanna@zbzoom.net Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X Cc: FreeBSD-Stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:27:25 EDT." References: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:05:08 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Chris BeHanna writes: : My even-more-ancient OfficeJet 350 gets probed (as an OfficeJet : 300); therefore, I'd be surprised if your DeskJet does not. ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML plip0: on ppbus0 My deskjet 670C probes just fine. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13: 5:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74C837B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92K5sI04081; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA14341; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010022005.OAA14341@harmony.village.org> To: Michael Lucas Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Cc: Alexander Frolkin , Ken Bolingbroke , cjclark@alum.mit.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:21:46 EDT." <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001002201356.A1228@gamma> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:05:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> Michael Lucas writes: : Then we'd have accusations of bloat, however, and far more bandwidth : would be wasted discussing the merits of the idea than would be caused : by implementing it. Never mind, forget I said anything at all. And said discussion wuold likely be cut sure by a working implementation :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13:27:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4A437B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e92KR5423606; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:27:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA38243; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id QAA45403; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:27:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010021958.NAA14254@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok... _almost_ there... I grab /sys/dev/ed from the cvwweb (a file at a time, but not a problem; very few files) and `plop'd the 4.1.1-RELEASE files onto a 4.1 tree. This built find, and it seems to be setting the interrupt (i.e. I get not timeouts.) But, I also don't seem to get connected... like I mentioned before, a `ping' to another host on the local net will generate traffic on the line - but it doesn't `get through' (i.e. all packets lost.) This is a 10/100 card on a 10-megabit network - is there, possibly, some special magic to convincing it to use 10-megabits? Also, Sean had mentioned something called `fa_select' - 4.1 doesn't seem to `know' about that... what is it? - Thanks - - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13:37: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9E437B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA09150; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:36:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA14823; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:36:52 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id QAA24970; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:36:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14808.61924.930437.91060@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:36:52 -0700 (MST) To: Warner Losh , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010021625.KAA11862@harmony.village.org> References: <14808.45618.368338.347768@hip186.ch.intel.com> <14804.65209.8908.316746@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200009292130.PAA03763@harmony.village.org> <200010021625.KAA11862@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Monday, October 2, Warner Losh wrote: ] > In message <14808.45618.368338.347768@hip186.ch.intel.com> John Reynolds~ writes: > Yes. It works. I have one the follwoing in my dmesg output: > > ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 10 on isa0 > ed0: address 00:00:c0:79:2a:f0, type SMC8416T (16 bit) > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xd0000 irq 5 on isa0 > ed1: address 00:00:1b:1e:23:dc, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > So I'm not sure what's going on.. > Well, I'm still seeing breakage with my two Ether16 ed cards. I CVSup'ed from this morning's sources and built world and built a kernel. I installed only the kernel and booted. Nada. Only ed1 is seen, not ed0 and ed1. I booted back to my 4.1-RELEASE kernel (and world) and everything is totally fine. Then I booted "-v" the 4.1.1-S kernel. Here's what I see: ... ... lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ed0 failed to probe at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 bpf: ed1 attached ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices SMP: enabled INTs: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, apic_imen: 0x00fa2d25 ... ... When booting "-v" on the 4.1-R system I see: ... ... lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port plip0: on ppbus0 bpf: lp0 attached ed0 at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 bpf: ed0 attached ed0: address 00:40:05:6e:67:c0, type NE2000 (16 bit) ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 bpf: ed1 attached ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices SMP: enabled INTs: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, apic_imen: 0x00fe2d25 ... ... The relevent portion of my kernel config is: device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 I'm "pretty darned sure" that this is not a hardware problem as I can reliably go back to a 4.1-R kernel and everything works fine. My next task is to CVSup from a previous date (before 4.1.1) and see what happens (the only problem with that is there is a lot of space between 4.1-R and 4.1.1-S to check). Anybody have any other clues? Are there other kernel config options that I can use that will make things even more verbose than "boot -v" gives? I'm also going to try swapping the two cards' configurations and see if that makes any difference (i.e. if ed1 goes away instead of ed0). -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13:39:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from prydn.tacni.net (207-55-167-221.dhc.net [207.55.167.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2D9137B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 89163 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Oct 2000 20:38:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:38:36 -0500 From: Erich Zigler To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RSA and FreeBSD 3.4 Message-ID: <20001002153836.B89036@superhero.org> Mail-Followup-To: Erich Zigler , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy. X-Shane: Hi Shane! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am trying to compile a certain application on FreeBSD 3.4 I get the following error though.. /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so: undefined reference to `ERR_load_RSAREF_strings' /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so: undefined reference to `RSA_PKCS1_RSAref' There used to be a simple addition to the Makefile to make this error go away, but I have since forgotten it. If someone could please clue me I would be much obliged. Thank you. -- Erich Zigler Chief Technical Officer Our stock might crash but our systems don't! A fault-tolerant computer company can recover from my opinions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13:54:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ABA37B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07981; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92KsKq14322; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:54:19 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Mark Ovens Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP500 deskjet and 4.X Message-ID: <20001002135419.A13926@tao.thought.org> References: <200010020111.e921BT301611@thought.org> <20001002184845.F252@parish> <20001002111434.A12622@tao.thought.org> <20001002192206.H252@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001002192206.H252@parish>; from marko@freebsd.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:22:06PM +0100 X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:22:06PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 11:14:34AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:48:45PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:11:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > > > > Unless there are other causes -- like bizarre side-effects from > > > > interrupts -- or something even further out, I'm guessing that > > > > the reason my deskjet has stopped working recently (in FreeBSD-4.1) > > > > is a driver or configuration problem. > > > > [[ ... ]] > Huh? I thought you said it *doesn't'* work? > > > with a simple ASCII file, I haven't tried anything > > fancy-- I'm happy. You must've missed my follow-ip mumbled with "stray irq" in the Subject line. Because this seemed excruciatingly like an IRQ problem, I checked my dmesg output and found 'stray irq 7' on the last line of `dmesg | grep "irq "'... . Long-story-short, (at least in my case), the err was (prob'ly) due to a bad printer cable connection. I rebuilt the kernel, re-connected the cabling, and everything is happy. > > > > Well, if you ever want to try something fancy (like printing PS) there's > some info on setting up WP8 and SO5.1 (using ghostscript) at WP8 and ghostscript is set up, tho not retested. Thanks for the SO reference... that has been on my to-do list for awhile. It'll be interesting to see if StarOffice has its own printcap entry. --The more we can do to make this setup easier, the better. gary > > http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/printer.html > > (links at the bottom of the page). > > -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 14:10:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96537B66F for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08918; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92LASh14507; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:10:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:10:27 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stray?? Message-ID: <20001002141027.C13926@tao.thought.org> References: <200010020125.e921PBK01718@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:11:59AM +0300 X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:11:59AM +0300, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Gary Kline wrote: > > > This is bizarre: by itself, % dmesg gives me this--note the > > ``stray irq 7'' line at the end? > > > > I was editing /var/run/dmesg.boot last week; don't see how > > this could have affected the output of dmesg, tho. > > > > Any thoughts here, folks? > > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > > plip0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: on ppbus0 > > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > stray irq 7 > > stray irq 7 is weird since it belongs to ppc0. It really doesn't belong > here. > If it's still not working you may try: > options PPC_PROBE_CHIPSET > > Also, check your port settings in bios. > read ppbus(4) an ppc(4) > It talks about different modes. > The "stray irq %d" comes from /sys/i386/isa/intr_machdep.c, around like 318. There are interesting comments that most of us should at least be aware of. Esp'ly those of us with prehistoric hardware. I've got a pointer to this in one of my ~/.notes files... in case this bites me again! gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 14:37: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8059D37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA06774; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:36:05 +0200 To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <970522565.39d8ffc58d52e@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:36:05 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> <200010021535.JAA11428@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: <200010021535.JAA11428@harmony.village.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Warner Losh : > In message <200010021315.JAA25791@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers > writes: > : Oct 2 09:14:29 canteens /kernel: ed1: device timeout > > Are you sure you have no other hardware on IRQ 3 and 5? Both of these > on my vaio are used. The timeout that you are seeing is almost always > an interrupt problem. > > Warner > It's in the FAQ. ed sometimes gives it at boot. I've RealTek 8029 which gives it to me when the system boots. It should work otherwise. What happends when you try to ifconfig it? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 14:38:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from oracle.clara.net (oracle.clara.net [195.8.69.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DD937B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.126.143.212] (helo=viewport.clara.co.uk) by oracle.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 13gDHl-0007nl-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:38:19 +0100 Content-Length: 609 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-No-Archive: yes Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 22:37:41 +0100 (BST) Organization: David_Marsh@home: see signature for organisation From: David Marsh To: FreeBSD-Stable LIST Subject: RE: Order of 'make's in updating from 3.2 -> RELENG_4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to Jim Weeks, Michael Grant, and Szilveszter Adam for their advice. It seems that, because I'm running a relatively old system version, it would be better/safer to upgrade to the latest RELENG_3 first of all, and then attempt the upgrade to 4.x from there, so that's what I'm going to do. If all goes well, I should be back tomorrow ready to make the big leap :-) David. -- David Marsh,drmarsh@bigfoot.com | http://www.viewport.co.uk/ | Glasgow, Scotland. | If urgent, phone: +44 77-121-848-90 | >Trim quotes b4 replying; Quote 1st, reply 2nd; Ask b4 attaching files< To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 14:55:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1837237B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA06778; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:55:02 +0200 To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <970523702.39d904368d52c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:55:02 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Thomas David Rivers : > Ok... _almost_ there... > > I grab /sys/dev/ed from the cvwweb (a file at a time, but not a problem; > very few files) and `plop'd the 4.1.1-RELEASE files onto a 4.1 tree. > > This built find, and it seems to be setting the interrupt (i.e. I get > not timeouts.) > > But, I also don't seem to get connected... like I mentioned before, > a `ping' to another host on the local net will generate traffic > on the line - but it doesn't `get through' (i.e. all packets lost.) > > This is a 10/100 card on a 10-megabit network - is there, possibly, > some special magic to convincing it to use 10-megabits? > > Also, Sean had mentioned something called `fa_select' - 4.1 doesn't > seem to `know' about that... what is it? Maybe you have ipfilter/ipfw which blocks the pings so they never return? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:15:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hindenburg.eboai.org (hindenburg.eboai.org [206.183.134.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7100A37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hindenburg.eboai.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66CDC3D9E; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:15:18 -0400 From: Chip Marshall To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Signal 8 and pcm Message-ID: <20001002181518.A86677@setzer.chocobo.cx> Reply-To: chip@chocobo.cx Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i X-URL: http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a kindof annoying problem that seems to pop up from time to time now. I'm on a FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE system (Sep 28 14:40) running Xfree86 3.3.6, and every once and a while a bunch of my aterm's will die off of signal 8. This seems to correspond to a bunch of pcm0 errors. Here's the console messages: pcm0: hwptr went backwards 6164 -> 6152 pcm0: hwptr went backwards 2064 -> 1880 Oct 2 18:07:35 magus /kernel: pid 37817 (aterm), uid 1001: exited on signal 8 pcm0: hwptr went backwards 2064 -> 116 Oct 2 18:07:35 magus /kernel: pid 37840 (aterm), uid 1001: exited on signal 8 pcm0: hwptr went backwards 6164 -> 5632 pcm0: hwptr went backwards 4116 -> 3720 Once I had licq die at the same time as well, but that may have been unrelated. Any idea what's causing this? What's a signal 8 normally mean? -- Chip Marshall http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ Finger for PGP GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a18>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N+@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS PE Y? PGP++ t+@ 5 X R>+ tv+() b++>+++ DI++++ D(-) G++ e>++ h!>++ r-- y- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:18: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.flashcom.net (3ff83059.dsl.flashcom.net [63.248.48.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EBC37B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgaff@localhost) by mail.flashcom.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92MHOp01024 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:17:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cgaff) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:17:24 -0500 From: "Corey G." To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001002171724.A987@flashcom.net> References: <59131.970508456@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <59131.970508456@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:40:56AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I tried this method yesterday and still received a signal 4. I am anxiously waiting for Jeff Duffy's attempt on a 3rd AMD machine. Thanks, Corey On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:40:56AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a > > 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I > > have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile > > cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I > > helped start :) > > Another thing you might try is totally blowing away your source tree > and getting another copy via an authoritative source. In cases where > I'm genuinely not sure myself, I also blow away the host environment > (do a fresh install) and try that. If I still get a compilation > error, I then figure that's a clear smoking gun. This may seem like a > rather onerous set of steps to go through, but the set of > inter-dependencies between the host compilation environment and the > target source tree is so huge that literally anything can happen if > the littlest thing is unsynched. It also helps to have a test box > one can completely blow away, of course.. > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end quoted text--- -- Best Regards, Corey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:21:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DABA37B66C; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01140; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:21:24 -0700 Message-ID: <39D90A64.F93ABAB8@urx.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:21:24 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Gary Kline , Marcel Moolenaar , Warner Losh , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: perl and installworld (was Re: Why is gcc version so old?) References: <39AC1866.6DA9F5EC@urx.com> <39AB5A46.9FB75350@urx.com> <200008291838.MAA10618@harmony.village.org> <200008292012.OAA11124@harmony.village.org> <39AC1A43.7FD07745@urx.com> <39AC2097.4592B952@cup.hp.com> <39AC2324.6EC53F85@urx.com> <20000829171824.B47623@tao.thought.org> <39AC6C87.C87B1E11@urx.com> <200010021935.e92JZMI00908@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > > If memory serves me right, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl > > > > > > > > > > > > cd sdbm && make all > > > > > > rm -rf libsdbm.a > > > > > > ar cr libsdbm.a sdbm.o pair.o hash.o && : libsdbm.a > > > > > > chmod 755 libsdbm.a > > > > > > chmod:No such file or directory > > > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > > > Should we have a chmod here in the first place? > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that a mod of 755 is wrong for archives. > > > > > > > > That may be true but, for right now, the Makefile for perl is using > > > > chmod and the lack of its presence is killing the 4-stable > > > > installworld. > > [snip] > > > I wouldn't worry about it. I have tried it on two machines. You cvsup > > stable and then edit /usr/src/Makefile.inc1. You only have to look for > > the installworld section (line 313) and add chmod in front of chown. > > It works like a charm at that point. > > Dumb question: Did this ever get fixed in the repository? Short answer is no. I think people didn't like chmod being involved with an install. > > Reason I'm asking is that I just finished a cvsup to update my local > respository, did a cvs update of my RELENG_4 sources from that > repository, then a buildworld, buildkernel, reboot, installworld, and > ran into this same problem (can't install libsdbm.a because it relies > on chmod). > > Since this thread came up over a month ago, I'd be perfectly happy to > find out it has indeed been fixed, and that I somehow bungled the cvs > operations. I can't find any history for src/Makefile.inc1 that would > imply adoption of the workaround patch, and I don't understand the perl > build process enough to know where to look in there. In this case, a > whack of the clue-stick would be much appreciated. Something else causes it. I know I was misinterpreting the message. I thought libsdbm.a didn't exist and it was chmod that was missing from the make modules. You add the chmod and you may not have to do it again. I had a patch that added it and I was patching Makefile.inc1 after every cvsup. That isn't necessary. Warner (imp) suggested the fix to me and it worked. The next time I built a system, I captured the buildworld and the chmod was done there and properly. Why it wasn't done on the one that failed is beyond me. I didn't capture it of course :). I had been doing builds every few days and I didn't see anything new introduced. > > (The workaround still works, however.) I think that is what the archive is really for. Kent > > Thanks! > > Bruce. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:27:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.flashcom.net (3ff83059.dsl.flashcom.net [63.248.48.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F43E37B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgaff@localhost) by mail.flashcom.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92MR6Z01064 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:27:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cgaff) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:27:06 -0500 From: "Corey G." To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001002172706.A1006@flashcom.net> References: <200010021455.e92Etsr16507@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010021455.e92Etsr16507@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:55:54AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Point well taken, although I am not trying to blame anyting in peticular I just want to find the problem. On that note, I am going to purchase a bigger fan and some CPU grease. I will report back on my results. Thanks for the suggestion. Corey On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:55:54AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > These sound like exactly what I was posting a couple of months ago. My > fans were fine. MOBO temp was fine. Memory was totally swapped > out. Only occurred on my K6/450 after 4.0 was installed. Other things > like the Gimp built fine. It HAD to be a problem in the OS. > > But it was not. It was CPU temperature. A small amount of heat sink > grease applied to the chip and heat sink and the signal 4 errors > vanished! Please make sure that your heat sink is doing it's job > before blaming FreeBSD. > > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end quoted text--- -- Best Regards, Corey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:31:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hellasnet.gr (mail.hellasnet.gr [212.54.192.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF17E37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hades.hell.gr (ppp4.patr.hellasnet.gr [212.54.197.19]) by mail.hellasnet.gr (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA23785; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:31:49 -0200 (GMT) Received: (from charon@localhost) by hades.hell.gr (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92BVjG00681; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:31:45 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:31:44 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pthreads bug? Message-ID: <20001002143144.A562@hades.hell.gr> References: <970215688.39d451088fbef@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <970215688.39d451088fbef@webmail.harmonic.co.il>; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 10:21:28AM +0200 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3A 75 52 EB F1 58 56 0D - C5 B8 21 B6 1B 5E 4A C2 X-URL: http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~keramida/index.html Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 10:21:28AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > btw, linux doesn't dump core on threaded application, how one's supposed to > debug it? Some of the linux distributions are in the annoying habbit of setting a user-limit for core file size to zero (0), thus disabling core dumps. I'm sure that if asked they can come up with a good excuse for doing so, but you should ignore them and set up your own user limits :-) -- Giorgos Keramidas, < keramida @ ceid . upatras . gr > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 15:33:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6CD37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92MXgI04816; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA15371; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:42 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010022233.QAA15371@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:27:03 EDT." <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:33:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010022027.QAA45403@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : This built find, and it seems to be setting the interrupt (i.e. I get : not timeouts.) OK. : But, I also don't seem to get connected... like I mentioned before, : a `ping' to another host on the local net will generate traffic : on the line - but it doesn't `get through' (i.e. all packets lost.) : : This is a 10/100 card on a 10-megabit network - is there, possibly, : some special magic to convincing it to use 10-megabits? : : Also, Sean had mentioned something called `fa_select' - 4.1 doesn't : seem to `know' about that... what is it? fa_select is for the NetGear FA410-FX card only. Is that the card you have? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 16:31: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wysoft.tzo.com (c481444-a.bremtn1.wa.home.com [24.12.235.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F6F37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wysoft@localhost) by wysoft.tzo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10663; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Wyman To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out already... I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of time, and built that. 4.1.1-R is built and has been running very stable for a week now. I can also agree with others that a good heatsink/fan combo and either conducting grease or pads are a MUST with this chip. With a good amount of grease on mine, it runs fine even without the fan, but I didn't like the idea of this just to save a little bit more of my ear drums. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Duffy wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > >If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just > >a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine > >on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything > >from Celerons to Athlons. > > I agree. I was just waiting for someone who had a successful buildworld > of 4.1.1-STABLE on a K6-II or K6-III to speak up (since these were the > two CPUs in question). I assume (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jordan > is saying that he has done just that. Given, I'm sure he knows the issues > better than I. > > While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a > 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I > have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile > cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I > helped start :) > > If the 4.1.1-STABLE build fails in the same place however, can I assume > that that would be interesting data? > > Jeff > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 16:33:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.va.home.com (ha1.rdc1.va.home.com [24.2.32.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE9237B680 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx ([24.6.244.187]) by mail.rdc1.va.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001002233308.IJOS26082.mail.rdc1.va.home.com@laptop.baldwin.cx>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:08 -0700 Content-Length: 1643 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200009300341.e8U3ffP48330@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:33:09 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Subject: RE: Strange GCC Error Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 30-Sep-00 Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > I've been working on a PGP 6.5.8 port, however I get the following: > > gcc -O -pipe -DPGP_UNIX=1 -DPGP_COMPILER_GCC=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -DPGP_DEBUG=1 -DUNFINISHED_CODE_ALLOWED=1 -DUSE_PGP_LEAKS=1 > -I../../.././unix -I../../.././pub/include -I../../.././priv/include > -I../../.././priv/include/opaque -I../../.././priv/external/unix/bsafe/i > nclude/unknown -I../../.././../pfl/common -I../../.././../pfl/common/pre > fs -I../../.././../pfl/common/file -I../../.././../pfl/common/util > -I../../.././../pfl/common/lthread -I../../.././../pfl/common/sorting > -I../../.././../pfl/unix -I. -c -o pgpRandomPool.o pgpRandomPool.c > pgpRandomPool.c: In function `pgpGlobalRandomPoolEntropyWasAdded': > pgpRandomPool.c:470: Invalid `asm' statement: > pgpRandomPool.c:470: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for > class AREG. > pgpRandomPool.c: In function `sRandAddKeyEntropy': > pgpRandomPool.c:870: Invalid `asm' statement: > pgpRandomPool.c:870: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for > class AREG. > gmake[4]: *** [pgpRandomPool.o] Error 1 > > It appears that the following statement is the culprit: > >#define UMULH_32(r,a,b) __asm__("mull %2" : "=d"(r) : "%a"(a), "mr"(b) >: "ax") Take out the final ': "ax"'. The %ax (or rather, since it is a mull, %eax) register is already used due to the constraint on the 'a' parameter. > Anyone seen this before? -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 16:33:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.va.home.com (ha1.rdc1.va.home.com [24.2.32.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BF937B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx ([24.6.244.187]) by mail.rdc1.va.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001002233312.IJPI26082.mail.rdc1.va.home.com@laptop.baldwin.cx>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:33:12 -0700 Content-Length: 488 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20001002101145.A61818@laa.zp.ua> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:33:13 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Alexandr A. Listopad" Subject: RE: periodic daily don't put ``Subject:'' field in the mail head Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 02-Oct-00 Alexandr A. Listopad wrote: > hi. > > I have 2 boxes with FreeBSD-4.1.1-STABLE, and both don't put ``Subject:'' > field in the mail headers. This is due to a recent change to /usr/src/etc/crontab to "clean up" the periodic entries. It broke all my mail filters as well. :-( > -- > Laa -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 16:37:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wysoft.tzo.com (c481444-a.bremtn1.wa.home.com [24.12.235.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FFB37B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wysoft@localhost) by wysoft.tzo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10694; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:30:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Wyman To: Jeff Duffy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Small note, as I wasn't thinking this far back when I wrote this.. I tracked stable since 3.3-RELEASE on a K6-2 333 (300@4.5x75), and never had such problems. Same good cooling - big fan/heatsink and conducting grease. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Wyman wrote: > Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out > already... > > I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It > runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about > every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of time, > and built that. 4.1.1-R is built and has been running very stable for a > week now. > > I can also agree with others that a good heatsink/fan combo and either > conducting grease or pads are a MUST with this chip. With a good amount of > grease on mine, it runs fine even without the fan, but I didn't like the > idea of this just to save a little bit more of my ear drums. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 17:15:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0A237B66C; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA27365; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:15:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma027289; Mon, 2 Oct 00 19:14:41 -0500 Message-ID: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:14:09 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All, Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB swap, running a generic kernel. Anyone know how long this is gonna take? Thanks in advance, -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 17:18: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from radius.wavefire.com (radius.wavefire.com [139.142.95.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEFCA37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5409 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2000 00:17:55 -0000 Received: from ccliii.caniserv.com (HELO dbitech) (darcyb@139.142.95.253) by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2000 00:17:55 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> X-Sender: darcyb@mail.ok-connect.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 17:21:40 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Darcy Buskermolen Subject: agp_if.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ===> agp @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/i386/include make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules *** Error code 1 This is with a 4.x cvsup of 2 minutes ago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 17:56: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E0837B66C; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 39B5818FD; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:55:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:55:59 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Laurence Berland Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Laurence Berland , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net>; from stuyman@confusion.net on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:14:09PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:14:09PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is You mean KDE 1.94? > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc mcopidl.cc is a huge file. If you run low on swap, it may take forever or close to that. I recommend at least 200MB of memory minimum to compile the entire suite (including physical and swap). > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > swap, running a generic kernel. Yeah, that's the bottleneck. For your system I suggest using packages. Unfortunately, mcopidl.cc obviously needs to be broken up, but hasn't. For reference, I have a dual PIII-500 w/ 512MB of memory, and the new box I'm building will have a dual PIII-600E w/ 640MB. The former takes approximately 5 hours to build the entire suite. -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 18: 1:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9651937B66E; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9313Oh04055; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:03:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200010030103.e9313Oh04055@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:55:59 CDT." <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 18:03:24 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > For reference, I have a dual PIII-500 w/ 512MB of memory, and the new > box I'm building will have a dual PIII-600E w/ 640MB. The former takes > approximately 5 hours to build the entire suite. Have you ever tried going beyond that and actually run it? Is it meant to work? Specifically, startup is kinda flaky, kwrited starts and can't be (easily) killed, and konsole never starts a shell and dies after a few seconds. Aside from that, it's nice candy. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 18: 2:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357FC37B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA14888; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:02:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma014791; Mon, 2 Oct 00 20:02:04 -0500 Message-ID: <39D92FED.C129C748@confusion.net> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:01:33 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:14:09PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > You mean KDE 1.94? Yes, silly me...I need more sleep > > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > mcopidl.cc is a huge file. If you run low on swap, it may take forever > or close to that. I recommend at least 200MB of memory minimum to > compile the entire suite (including physical and swap). Unfortunately I can't get any more memory or swap right now, but I am perfectly content to wait long periods of time. I'm just glad I don't need the box just yet. > > > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > > swap, running a generic kernel. > > Yeah, that's the bottleneck. For your system I suggest using packages. > Unfortunately, mcopidl.cc obviously needs to be broken up, but hasn't. I like ports...so I'll wait the days this may take. FWIW I don't see all of the swap being used, so it's not a serious issue, it'll just take a long long time I guess. THis was more to sanity check than anything else. Assuming it eventually finishes, which I guess it will, I guess I'm set. I'm just too used to the boxes at work, where huge amounts of memory and processing is standard. Oh, the joys of college computing... > > For reference, I have a dual PIII-500 w/ 512MB of memory, and the new > box I'm building will have a dual PIII-600E w/ 640MB. The former takes > approximately 5 hours to build the entire suite. Yeah, I guess I can probably expect it to take 2 or 3 days, not that I mind waiting... Thanks for your help, Laurence > > -- > Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench > The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." > -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:16:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAE837B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e932GAc02049; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:16:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA38832; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:16:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id WAA46514; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:16:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:16:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010022233.QAA15371@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > : Also, Sean had mentioned something called `fa_select' - 4.1 doesn't > : seem to `know' about that... what is it? > > fa_select is for the NetGear FA410-FX card only. Is that the card > you have? > > Warner > Nope - I have a "SmartLink" NE2000 clone card; that does to 10/100 mbits/second... This is actually a re-labeled Archtek card. Again, this works great with 3.4-RELEASE... so, perhaps something else isn't quite right? Anyone particularly interested in debugging if_ed.c & friends? - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:19:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB0337B66C; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8AE9D18FD; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:19:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:19:42 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Mike Smith Cc: Will Andrews , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001002211942.K613@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Mike Smith , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> <200010030103.e9313Oh04055@mass.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010030103.e9313Oh04055@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:03:24PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:03:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > Have you ever tried going beyond that and actually run it? Is it meant > to work? Specifically, startup is kinda flaky, kwrited starts and can't > be (easily) killed, and konsole never starts a shell and dies after a few > seconds. Yes. I've tested it to some extent. Kwrited has problems, that's for sure... I don't use konsole though (kvt seems to be its usual self). Because of its current state, I've delayed deployment on heavy-traffic user workstations at Physics. I'm hoping they will fix the issues by the release time. > Aside from that, it's nice candy. 8) It certainly is. :) -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:24:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE7437B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e932Q4h04320; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:26:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200010030226.e932Q4h04320@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 21:19:42 CDT." <20001002211942.K613@puck.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 19:26:04 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:03:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > Have you ever tried going beyond that and actually run it? Is it meant > > to work? Specifically, startup is kinda flaky, kwrited starts and can't > > be (easily) killed, and konsole never starts a shell and dies after a few > > seconds. > > Yes. I've tested it to some extent. Kwrited has problems, that's for > sure... I don't use konsole though (kvt seems to be its usual self). It does? It's not part of KDE2 to the best of my ability to tell. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:31:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A0937B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e932VqM05857; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:31:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA17060; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:31:52 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010030231.UAA17060@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 22:16:03 EDT." <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 20:31:52 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : Nope - I have a "SmartLink" NE2000 clone card; that does to : 10/100 mbits/second... This is actually a re-labeled Archtek card. Ah. The light goes on. Does your config file look something like: card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" config auto "ed" ? 0x30000 : Again, this works great with 3.4-RELEASE... so, perhaps something else : isn't quite right? Anyone particularly interested in debugging : if_ed.c & friends? Only if I have the card in hand... :-( And not until BSDcon. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:33: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49937B503; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A074018FD; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:32:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:32:59 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Mike Smith Cc: Will Andrews , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001002213259.A41798@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Mike Smith , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001002211942.K613@puck.firepipe.net> <200010030226.e932Q4h04320@mass.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010030226.e932Q4h04320@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:26:04PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:26:04PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > It does? It's not part of KDE2 to the best of my ability to tell. 8) Dang... they're on to me. ;-) -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 19:35:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flux.ptc.spbu.ru (flux.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA09237B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snark.ptc.spbu.ru (snark.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.131]) by flux.ptc.spbu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf-1.0.rbl) with ESMTP id GAA15776 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:35:42 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from uwe@localhost) by snark.ptc.spbu.ru (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id GAA23223 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:35:41 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:35:41 +0400 From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001003063541.A23168@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> <200010030103.e9313Oh04055@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <20001002211942.K613@puck.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.3i In-Reply-To: <20001002211942.K613@puck.firepipe.net>; from "Will Andrews" on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 21:19:42 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 21:19:42 -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 06:03:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > > Have you ever tried going beyond that and actually run it? Is it > > meant to work? Specifically, startup is kinda flaky, kwrited > > starts and can't be (easily) killed, and konsole never starts a > > shell and dies after a few seconds. > > Yes. I've tested it to some extent. Kwrited has problems, that's for > sure... I don't use konsole though (kvt seems to be its usual self). Make sure the bloody thing has a control terminal and that terminal has -tostop. I was playing with it (just to get an idea what the whole buzz is about) so I added exec startkde as my last line in .xinitrc and kwrited was dying on me and all sort of weirdness happened. After few experiments I figured I have to comment out I/O redirection I do in .xinitrc and set the tty that I ran startx on to -tostop mode (or KDE is blocked by TTOUT). After that it worked. Hope this helps. > > Aside from that, it's nice candy. 8) > > It certainly is. :) I'd rather not share my opinion ;-) Though, yes - it's an eyecandy ;-). SY, Uwe -- uwe@ptc.spbu.ru | Zu Grunde kommen http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 21:13:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D9837B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e934DHM07190; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:13:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA22544; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:13:16 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010030413.WAA22544@harmony.village.org> To: Darcy Buskermolen Subject: Re: agp_if.c Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 17:21:40 PDT." <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> References: <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 22:13:16 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> Darcy Buskermolen writes: : ===> agp : @ -> /usr/src/sys : machine -> /usr/src/i386/include : make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop : *** Error code 2 : : Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules : *** Error code 1 : : : This is with a 4.x cvsup of 2 minutes ago On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier with make buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 21:21:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.shell-server.com (marvin.shell-server.com [216.206.242.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459AA37B66D for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by marvin.shell-server.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e934LTf84856 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:21:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd@shell-server.com) X-Authentication-Warning: marvin.shell-server.com: bsd owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:21:29 -0500 (CDT) From: BSD To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Constant panics solved? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just thought I'd inform everyone that this morning, a bug was fixed in the tcp_timer.c code that was plauging me. It's made it through to cvsup, and I guess y'all should synch, re-build, and see if it fixed all our problems. --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 21:34:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from eris.intertech-canada.com (eris.intertech-canada.com [216.191.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C79737B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1621 invoked by uid 98); 3 Oct 2000 04:23:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20001003042314.1620.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> From: "Flattie McGee" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 4.1.1 Perl problem in Makeworld? Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:23:14 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey.. I installed 4.1.1 (directly from ISO) on a fresh system. I Cvsuped the latest ports, and src directories. I did a make world, and lo and behold it crapped out. Any help, suggestions, recommendations are appreciated. # perl -v This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-freebsd **** Make world info building shared library libperl.so.3 ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/miniperlmain.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -lperl -lm -lcrypt ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl sh config_h.sh Extracting config.h (with variable substitutions) sh writemain lib/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a > perlmain.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../../../../contrib/perl5 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c perlmain.c miniperl /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../../../../contrib/perl5/configpm Config.pm Porting/Glossary myconfig config.sh miniperl -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib -e 'use AutoSplit; autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*.pm lib/*/*.pm AutoSplitting lib/Getopt/Long.pm (lib/auto/Getopt/Long) touch autosplit sh cflags.sh Extracting cflags (with variable substitutions) Writing Makefile for DynaLoader Warning: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm may be out of date with /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.sh cd /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl && make lib/Config.pm `lib/Config.pm' is up to date. Warning: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h out of date with /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.sh Makefile out-of-date with respect to /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile... *** Error code 1 (ignored) make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1 || /bin/sh -c true perl "-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" "-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" Makefile.PL "INSTALLDIRS=perl" "PERL_SRC=/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl" "INSTALLMAN3DIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/perl/man3" "PERL=perl" "FULLPERL=perl" "DEFINE=-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include" "LINKTYPE=static" "LIBS=-lperl -lm" Writing Makefile for DynaLoader ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <== ==> Please rerun the make command. <== false *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/ext/DynaLoader. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 22:15: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dayspring.firedrake.org (dayspring.firedrake.org [195.82.105.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32C037B503 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from float by dayspring.firedrake.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13gKPn-0006UD-00; Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:14:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:14:55 +0100 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: bt driver badness Message-ID: <20001003061455.A22420@firedrake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: void Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I cvsupped to -STABLE today, and when I booted my new kernel, the bt driver printed some unusual stuff and then the root partition failed to mount. bt0: bt_cmd: timeout waiting for adapter ready, status = 0x0 bt0: port 0xfff4 - 0xfff7 mem 0xffbef000 - 0xffbeffff irq 9 at device 15.0 on PCI device_probe_and_attach: bt0 attach returned 6 If I can provide any more useful information, let me know, as I'm currently booting off an old kernel, and all my libkvm-based commands are useless until I get this resolved, so I'm quite eager to get this fixed. It doesn't seem as though anything has changed in sys/dev/buslogic recently, so this must have been caused by a change somewhere else. Perhaps in src/sys/boot/i386, or src/sys/cam? Looking through my cvsup output, I see that there have been changes in both these directory. Anyway, any help would be *greatly* appreciated. Please CC replies to this address. -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 22:31:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2650D37B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA09806; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:31:39 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Warner Losh Cc: Gianmarco Giovannelli , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: username with - Message-ID: <20001002223139.A7328@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> <200010021533.JAA11398@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010021533.JAA11398@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 09:33:14AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 09:33:14AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> Gianmarco Giovannelli writes: > : Hi, > : Our adduser let me add username with a dash inside (I use them to identify > : the user of virtual domains), like : > : ac-info > : > : But rmuser refuse to delete them : > : gmarco:/home/gmarco# rmuser ac-info > : Sorry, login name must contain alphanumeric characters only. > : > : So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? > > Adduser is right. Dashes are allowed in user names. But not at the start of the user name..login(1) special cases it, I think. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 22:33:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE7337B502; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA10884; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:33:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:33:47 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Erich Zigler Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RSA and FreeBSD 3.4 Message-ID: <20001002223347.B7328@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20001002153836.B89036@superhero.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001002153836.B89036@superhero.org>; from erichz@superhero.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:38:36PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:38:36PM -0500, Erich Zigler wrote: > I am trying to compile a certain application on FreeBSD 3.4 I get > the following error though.. > > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so: undefined reference to > `ERR_load_RSAREF_strings' > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so: undefined reference to `RSA_PKCS1_RSAref' Are you forgetting to link against librsaglue? Alternatively, recompile your OpenSSL without rsaref support, since it is no longer needed. > There used to be a simple addition to the Makefile to make this > error go away, but I have since forgotten it. If someone could > please clue me I would be much obliged. Not on FreeBSD 3.x (nor on FreeBSD 4.x/5.x now that rsaref has gone away). Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 23:13:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from admin.cgocable.net (admin.cgocable.net [24.226.1.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8244437B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 210041a (d150-26-29.home.cgocable.net [24.150.26.29]) by admin.cgocable.net (8.10.0/8.9.3) with SMTP id e936F2H10268 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20001003021515.01138b00@tristo.netinc.ca> X-Sender: mike@tristo.netinc.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 02:15:15 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Michael DeMutis Subject: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG How is the Dell PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE? I have a server being delivered in a week and it's running a 2 disk array. Is this going to be a nightmare to setup? I'll be installing 4.x from scratch, and I'd like full LVL 5 RAID support. The machine has to boot from the RAID device. Is there a process I should follow for installation? Help is always appreciated. Thanks! Michael DeMutis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael DeMutis System's Administrator || 2Gen.Inc. 143 James Street South, Suite 300, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8P 3A1 email: mike@2gen.net website: http://www.2gen.net/ Phone: 905-308-9155 Fax: 905-308-9519 ICQ UIN: 1257176 "Merging Media & Idea To Bring Internet Exposure to Innovative Businesses" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 23:17:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C945337B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A86131F55; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:17:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:17:22 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001003021722.A19069@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable References: <58189.970505811@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <58189.970505811@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 09:56:51AM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan and list, > > As you can see I still had the mfs and fdesc mounts active. Now, after the > > reboot, I'm all disk. We'll see what happens after 02:00 tomorow. > > And that's the panic I'm interested in, of course... :-) It's 02:12 and periodic daily has come and gone and there was no crash. While I don't want to leap to conclusions, this is the first day there has been no crash just after 02:00 since September 21st. I'll leave the system as it is with no fdesc or mfs for another day, then add the mfs back and see what happens, unless I hear a better suggestion. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 23:19:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE5737B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e936KVh05030; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:20:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200010030620.e936KVh05030@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Michael DeMutis Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 02:15:15 EDT." <3.0.3.32.20001003021515.01138b00@tristo.netinc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:20:31 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There are two entirely different RAID controller families that are relabelled as "PERC 2". See http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#ami and http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#adaptec for more details. > How is the Dell PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE? > > I have a server being delivered in a week and it's running a 2 disk array. > > Is this going to be a nightmare to setup? > > I'll be installing 4.x from scratch, and I'd like full LVL 5 RAID support. > The machine has to boot from the RAID device. Is there a process I should > follow for installation? > > Help is always appreciated. > > Thanks! > Michael DeMutis > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Michael DeMutis > System's Administrator || 2Gen.Inc. > 143 James Street South, Suite 300, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8P 3A1 > email: mike@2gen.net website: http://www.2gen.net/ > Phone: 905-308-9155 Fax: 905-308-9519 ICQ UIN: 1257176 > "Merging Media & Idea To Bring Internet Exposure to Innovative Businesses" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 23:50:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.34.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD0537B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste@localhost) by leeann.snedmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16701; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:50:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com) Message-Id: <200010030650.XAA16701@leeann.snedmail.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:34:10 PDT. <200010021834.LAA15467@leeann.snedmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:50:32 -0700 From: Lee Ann Goldstein Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Your message was: (from Lee Ann Goldstein) > > --Your message was: (from "Kevin Oberman") > > You script seems to miss several IRQs including my Ethernet and my > > sound card. > > [snip] > > > Could this be related to the fact that I am running 4.1-Stable? > > Could be, since I've not yet seen 4.1 dmesg output. But I can also > see where some assumptions I made based on my own dmesg output bit > me. Bleh. Thanks to folks sending me dmesg output for 3.x, 4.x, and 5.x I now have an awk script that should do the right thing up until someone changes the dmesg output format again ;) There's some sample output at the very end of this message. find_irq.sh ----------- #!/bin/sh dmesg | \ ./find_irq.awk | \ sort -n +2 -3 -----end sh script----- find_irq.awk ------------ #!/usr/bin/awk -f ! /irq\>/ {next} /at device/ && /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+).*(pci[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\4.\\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*(pci[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /^pci[0-9]+/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(<[[:print:]]+>).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+) (irq [0-9]+$)/,"\\1 \\4 \\1.\\3 \\2", 1) gsub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*/, "\\1 \\2", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9]$/, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } -----end awk script----- There is a tab after the initial "\\1" in the substitution strings. I noticed quite a number of PCI devices that refer only to pci0 or pci1, so for them I also included the manufacturer's description returned by the probe. A question about the line IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Should I be filtering it out or transmogrifying it? > Anyone who's sufficiently interested is welcome to send me (not the > list!) the output of "dmesg | grep -i irq", and I'll beat the blasted > thing into submission. Thank you to the following people for providing test input: James E. Housley Gary Kline Kevin Oberman Sean O'Connell Mark Ovens Igor Timkin Here is some sample input and output: 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 2 21:53:06 MSD 2000 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ahc0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xfa000000-0xfa000fff irq 19 at device 9.0 on pci0 ahc1: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xf9800000-0xf9800fff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci0 fxp0: port 0xd400-0xd41f mem 0xf9000000-0xf90fffff,0xfb000000-0xfb000fff irq 17 at device 11.0 on pci0 ahc2: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xf8800000-0xf8800fff irq 16 at device 12.0 on pci0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff irq 5 on isa0 produces: IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 atkbd0 irq 1 sio1 irq 3 sio0 irq 4 ed0 irq 5 fdc0 irq 6 ata0 irq 14 ahc2 irq 16 pci0.2.0 fxp0 irq 17 pci0.1.0 ahc1 irq 18 pci0.0.0 ahc0 irq 19 pci0.9.0 ----- 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Oct 2 15:26:43 MSD 2000 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 7.2 irq 9 pci0: at 8.0 irq 9 pcm0: port 0xf4c0-0xf4ff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x1011, dev=0x0009) at 14.0 irq 11 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 produces: atkbd0 irq 1 sio1 irq 3 sio0 irq 4 fdc0 irq 6 ppc0 irq 7 pci0 irq 9 pci0.7.2 pci0 irq 9 pci0.8.0 pcm0 irq 10 pci0.3.0 pci0 irq 11 pci0.4.0 ata0 irq 14 ata1 irq 15 Lee Ann -- Lee Ann Goldstein Caffeine is *not* a substitute for sleep. lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com lgoldste@lafn.org leeann@rand.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 23:59:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (ZSEA.zp.ua [212.8.40.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BF137B66D; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 23:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from laa@localhost) by mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e936wpt10509; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:58:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from laa@laa.zp.ua) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:58:51 +0300 From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" To: John Baldwin Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: periodic daily don't put ``Subject:'' field in the mail head Message-ID: <20001003095851.A10377@laa.zp.ua> References: <20001002101145.A61818@laa.zp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:33:13PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:33:13PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 02-Oct-00 Alexandr A. Listopad wrote: > > hi. > > > > I have 2 boxes with FreeBSD-4.1.1-STABLE, and both don't put ``Subject:'' > > field in the mail headers. > > This is due to a recent change to /usr/src/etc/crontab to "clean up" the > periodic entries. It broke all my mail filters as well. :-( Ah, thanks... I run mergemaster, but not change /etc/crontab... I will merge old on current crontab now. -- Laa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 0:21: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EAE37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA07338; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:20:10 +0200 To: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: pthreads bug? Message-ID: <970557610.39d988aa29383@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:20:10 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Roman Shterenzon , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <970215688.39d451088fbef@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <20001002143144.A562@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20001002143144.A562@hades.hell.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Giorgos Keramidas : > On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 10:21:28AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > btw, linux doesn't dump core on threaded application, how one's > supposed to > > debug it? > > Some of the linux distributions are in the annoying habbit of setting a > user-limit for core file size to zero (0), thus disabling core dumps. > I'm sure that if asked they can come up with a good excuse for doing so, > but you should ignore them and set up your own user limits :-) As I said; Linux doesn't dump core on pthreaded applications. All regular apps dump core without problem. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 0:24:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.techometer.net (techometer.net [216.240.169.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB2337B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from emechler@localhost) by lucifer.techometer.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e937OOl02575 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:24:24 -0700 From: Erick Mechler To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: USA_RESIDENT is back? Message-ID: <20001003002424.B2497@lucifer.techometer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just built/installed world and I noticed that in /etc/defaults/make.conf, the USA_RESIDENT option seems to be back, while the MAKE_RSAINTL option has disappeared. Was this change made recently? According to www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/defaults/make.conf I have the most recent version of the file: src/etc/defaults/make.conf,v 1.97.2.21 2000/09/19 23:37:08 gshapiro Regards, Erick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 0:26:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBEC37B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA07353; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:25:32 +0200 To: Laurence Berland Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <970557932.39d989ec5eece@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:25:32 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> In-Reply-To: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Laurence Berland : > All, > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 > hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights > are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it > does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > swap, running a generic kernel. > > Anyone know how long this is gonna take? I had this couple of times back on 3.3-STABLE I think. With some other app. Pressing ^D made it proceed. IMHO it has to deal with "-pipe" flag to cc. Try to omit the "-pipe" flag in /etc/make.conf and recompile. I don't like it though; it should work ok with the "-pipe" flag. I'm reading my mail sequentally, so it's possible that other people already answered it. Sorry for additional traffic I might have caused :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 0:31:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dns.comrax.com (dns.comrax.com [194.90.246.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7337B6A7 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NOOR (unknown [156.27.243.27]) by dns.comrax.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 44C4E1C984 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:31:00 +0200 (IST) From: "Noor Dawod" To: "FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List" Subject: Apache on newly FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:27:24 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello all, I've made the world last night on my FreeBSD to version 4.1.1-RELEASE. After rebooting, I re-compiled and re-installed everything that the system had. Then, I compiled Apache with mod_ssl and PHP. I also re-installed MySQL version 3.23.25. PHP makes use of MySQL. Let's call this machine . I have another system, with the same configuration, and was upgraded at the same time to 4.1.1-STABLE. Let's call this machine . I start mysqld and then Apache on wonderfully. Same is for . The problem is: when I issue a restart command to Apache on , it doesn't restart and the log file shows nothing. But, this works on , and the restart action gets carried out smoothly. As far as I've checked, both systems look and act alike, except for the slight difference in versions (which, in time of compilation, were the same code). Could anyone help out in this problem, maybe a series of debugging actions to do in order to find the cause of this problem? If you need specific information, I will gladly supply it. Thank you in advance. Noor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 0:50:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DF237B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e937o8x09628; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:50:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:50:08 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Darcy Buskermolen Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001003105008.A8383@sunbay.com> Mail-Followup-To: Darcy Buskermolen , stable@FreeBSD.org References: <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> <200010030413.WAA22544@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010030413.WAA22544@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:13:16PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:13:16PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> Darcy Buskermolen writes: > : ===> agp > : @ -> /usr/src/sys > : machine -> /usr/src/i386/include > : make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop > : *** Error code 2 > : > : Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules > : *** Error code 1 > : > : > : This is with a 4.x cvsup of 2 minutes ago > > On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier with make > buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. > I seem to recall this error was caused by not-up-to-date /usr/share/mk. -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 1: 2:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.34.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380E737B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste@localhost) by leeann.snedmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA16969; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:02:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com) Message-Id: <200010030802.BAA16969@leeann.snedmail.com> To: Stijn Hoop Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:41:26 +0200. <20001003094126.B91234@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 01:02:09 -0700 From: Lee Ann Goldstein Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Your message was: (from Stijn Hoop) > Hi, > > I've tried out your script on my > > FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 27 13:37:31 CEST 2000 > > system, and I like it! I noticed one small error however: my integrated > graphics adapter isn't printed in the same way as your examples. > This is my dmesg: [snipped] > And this is the output of ./find_irq.sh: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > pci1 at 0.0 irq 9 > atkbd0 irq 1 > pcm0 irq 5 > fdc0 irq 6 > uhci0 irq 11 pci0.7.2 > xl0 irq 11 pci0.7.0 > psm0 irq 12 > ata0 irq 14 > ata1 irq 15 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hrrm. I get: lgoldste@leeann 479% cat irqpci.txt | ./find_irq.awk | sort -n +2 -3 atkbd0 irq 1 pcm0 irq 5 fdc0 irq 6 pci1 irq 9 pci1.0.0 uhci0 irq 11 pci0.7.2 xl0 irq 11 pci0.7.0 psm0 irq 12 ata0 irq 14 ata1 irq 15 Might be a typo somewhere (which is why I cc:ed this to the list), so here's the awk script again: (because of the tabs, linewraps, etc., I recommend saving this whole message to a file and then editing all but the awk script away :) find_irq.awk ------------ #!/usr/bin/awk -f ! /irq\>/ {next} /at device/ && /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+).*(pci[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\4.\\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*(pci[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /^pci[0-9]+/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(<[[:print:]]+>).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+) (irq [0-9]+$)/,"\\1 \\4 \\1.\\3 \\2", 1) gsub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*/, "\\1 \\2", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9]$/, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } -----end awk script----- > Thanks for the script! You're welcome :) Lee Ann -- Lee Ann Goldstein Caffeine is *not* a substitute for sleep. lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com lgoldste@lafn.org leeann@rand.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 1:13:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DA837B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8005713418; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:13:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:13:24 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Lee Ann Goldstein Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? Message-ID: <20001003101324.A92210@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20001003094126.B91234@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <200010030802.BAA16969@leeann.snedmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010030802.BAA16969@leeann.snedmail.com>; from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:02:09AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:02:09AM -0700, Lee Ann Goldstein wrote: > > Hrrm. I get: > > lgoldste@leeann 479% cat irqpci.txt | ./find_irq.awk | sort -n +2 -3 > atkbd0 irq 1 > pcm0 irq 5 > fdc0 irq 6 > pci1 irq 9 pci1.0.0 > uhci0 irq 11 pci0.7.2 > xl0 irq 11 pci0.7.0 > psm0 irq 12 > ata0 irq 14 > ata1 irq 15 Strange.... > Might be a typo somewhere (which is why I cc:ed this to the list), > so here's the awk script again: > > (because of the tabs, linewraps, etc., I recommend saving this whole > message to a file and then editing all but the awk script away :) [find_irq.awk snipped] That was what I did before. I tried the same with this version, with the same results as before... awk --version gives me GNU Awk 3.0.4 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991-1999 Free Software Foundation. Maybe this is different from yours? --Stijn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 1:41:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.34.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905CD37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste@localhost) by leeann.snedmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA17038; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:41:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com) Message-Id: <200010030841.BAA17038@leeann.snedmail.com> To: Stijn Hoop Cc: Lee Ann Goldstein , stable@freebsd.org, lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:13:24 +0200. <20001003101324.A92210@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 01:41:52 -0700 From: Lee Ann Goldstein Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Your message was: (from Stijn Hoop) > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:02:09AM -0700, Lee Ann Goldstein wrote: > > > > Hrrm. I get: > > > > lgoldste@leeann 479% cat irqpci.txt | ./find_irq.awk | sort -n +2 -3 > > atkbd0 irq 1 > > pcm0 irq 5 > > fdc0 irq 6 > > pci1 irq 9 pci1.0.0 > > uhci0 irq 11 pci0.7.2 > > xl0 irq 11 pci0.7.0 > > psm0 irq 12 > > ata0 irq 14 > > ata1 irq 15 > > Strange.... > > > Might be a typo somewhere (which is why I cc:ed this to the list), > > so here's the awk script again: > > > > (because of the tabs, linewraps, etc., I recommend saving this whole > > message to a file and then editing all but the awk script away :) > > [find_irq.awk snipped] > > That was what I did before. I tried the same with this version, with the same > results as before... > > awk --version gives me > > GNU Awk 3.0.4 > Copyright (C) 1989, 1991-1999 Free Software Foundation. > > Maybe this is different from yours? Nope, same version: lgoldste@leeann 485% awk --version GNU Awk 3.0.4 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991-1999 Free Software Foundation. The line pci1: at 0.0 irq 9 will be processed by the clause /^pci[0-9]+/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(<[[:print:]]+>).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+) (irq [0-9]+$)/,"\\1 \\4 \\1.\\3 \\2", 1) gsub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } So the problem, whatever it is, is somewhere within the regex used in the gensub call. All on one line, that regex looks like this (I've marked the 3 blanks in the pattern): /(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(<[[:print:]]+>).*([0-9]+\.[0-9]+) (irq [0-9]+$)/ ^ ^ ^ This should pick out, as individual tokens, "pci1:", "", "0.0", and "irq 9". But the way this is written, if any of those blanks were really a tab, the pattern wouldn't match, and you'd get the output you're seeing. Try replacing the 2nd blank with [[:blank:]], which will also match a tab, and let me know if that works. Lee Ann -- Lee Ann Goldstein Caffeine is *not* a substitute for sleep. lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com lgoldste@lafn.org leeann@rand.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 2: 3:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B7C37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9393Ba85102; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:03:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:03:11 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Theo PAGTZIS Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Question Message-ID: <20001003110311.B84649@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <39D87881.19EB8AEC@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39D87881.19EB8AEC@cs.ucl.ac.uk>; from t.pagtzis@cs.ucl.ac.uk on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:58:57PM +0100 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001002 14:00], Theo PAGTZIS (t.pagtzis@cs.ucl.ac.uk) wrote: >I am using Fbsd 3.4 stable and I have setup NIS, however when I log in >trying whoami gives me a number rather than the proper UID while and on >a ls ~ it gives me that I am an unknown user > >Does anyone have suggestions as to what may be wrong and I do not get >the proper UID ? What does ypmatch passwd say? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 3:34:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com [155.208.254.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B3937B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 03:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (hpcpbla.bri.hp.com [15.144.112.65]) by bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC83D19F96; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:33:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.0) with ESMTP id LAA06306; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:33:25 +0100 (BST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA04107; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:36:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:36:41 +0100 From: Steve Roome To: Thomas David Rivers Cc: imp@village.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001003113641.I1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Roome , Thomas David Rivers , imp@village.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net References: <200010021651.KAA12261@harmony.village.org> <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010021954.PAA45176@lakes.dignus.com>; from rivers@dignus.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > Well, some news. > > I tried booting the kernel found on the 4.1.1-RELEASE kern.flp... > and, guess what... > > > > I don't get the ed1 timeouts anymore; and a `ping' to an > IP address on that line almost works... > > Note the *almost*... > > It seems packets go out the interface (as is evidenced by > the flashing lights on the dongle - but pings, etc... don't work. I had the same problem with a generic ne2000 compatible. For me it turned out that no matter what i did FreeBSD couldn't find the MAC address of the card properly. I did have it working properly with 3.x for a while, and on installing 4.x (-stable) it stopped working. After checking with DOS (as I'd no idea what the MAC address had been under 3.x) it was just that simple, the new config for some reason couldn't figure it out. Even after dumping the entire card memory I couldn't find it anywhere in there. Dunno why, I probably missed something really obvious but opted for the quick ugly fix. It might not be your problem, but it was easily/grottily solved with a few lines like in /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c such as : ether_addr[0] = 0; ether_addr[1] = 0xe0; .. etc.. ether_addr[5] = 0x26; Nasty hack and all, not the right way etc. etc. but in a results oriented world and all! =) Obviously I wouldn't advocate this sort of kludgery, it's a pain for things like cvsup. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 3:48:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E6337B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 03:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93AnEt13498; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:49:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20001003064505.03578258@mail.sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@mail.sentex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:48:37 -0400 To: Michael DeMutis , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20001003021515.01138b00@tristo.netinc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:15 AM 10/3/2000 -0400, Michael DeMutis wrote: >How is the Dell PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE? > >I have a server being delivered in a week and it's running a 2 disk array. > >Is this going to be a nightmare to setup? > >I'll be installing 4.x from scratch, and I'd like full LVL 5 RAID support. >The machine has to boot from the RAID device. Is there a process I should >follow for installation? If its the MegaRAID based card (see man amr) nothing special. I imagine the new machine will have a fairly recent firmware for the card which matters in my experience. RAID 5 on the card is OK, but if you want speed, I found mirrored RAID 0 is a fair bit faster. Also, note the defaults used when making the stripe set. Depending on your situation, its not necessarily what you want. There was a time when the card would give grief under high disk load, but this appears to have been fixed now. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 3:51: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ABB37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 03:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth.causticlabs.com (oca-pm3-1-36.hitter.net [207.192.76.36]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060E19B05; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by earth.causticlabs.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C41DC7C7F; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:50:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:50:55 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Flattie McGee Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.1.1 Perl problem in Makeworld? Message-ID: <20001003065055.A72880@earth.causticlabs.com> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Flattie McGee , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20001003042314.1620.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001003042314.1620.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com>; from flattie@globelinks.org on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 04:23:14AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 04:23:14AM +0000, Flattie McGee wrote: > > Hey.. I installed 4.1.1 (directly from ISO) on a fresh system. I > Cvsuped the latest ports, and src directories. I did a make world, and > lo and behold it crapped out. Any help, suggestions, recommendations > are appreciated. > *snip* > ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <== > ==> Please rerun the make command. <== > false > *** Error code 1 > Is your system's clock skewed (like, way off)? -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 4: 4:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD537B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 04:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e93B4cE22216; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:04:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA39625; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:04:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id HAA47540; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:04:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:04:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010031104.HAA47540@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010030231.UAA17060@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > In message <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : Nope - I have a "SmartLink" NE2000 clone card; that does to > : 10/100 mbits/second... This is actually a re-labeled Archtek card. > > Ah. The light goes on. Does your config file look something like: > card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" > config auto "ed" ? 0x30000 Yes - it looks exactly like that.... > > : Again, this works great with 3.4-RELEASE... so, perhaps something else > : isn't quite right? Anyone particularly interested in debugging > : if_ed.c & friends? > > Only if I have the card in hand... :-( And not until BSDcon. There's a dealer here with a whole slew of them - if you can commit to working on it, I'll dash out and buy you one and send it along. - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 5:50:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E38037B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 05:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB50C18098; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:50:33 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20001003021515.01138b00@tristo.netinc.ca> References: <3.0.3.32.20001003021515.01138b00@tristo.netinc.ca> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:22:44 +0200 To: Michael DeMutis , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:15 AM -0400 2000/10/3, Michael DeMutis wrote: > How is the Dell PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE? > > I have a server being delivered in a week and it's running a 2 disk array. > > Is this going to be a nightmare to setup? > > I'll be installing 4.x from scratch, and I'd like full LVL 5 RAID support. > The machine has to boot from the RAID device. Is there a process I should > follow for installation? My understanding of the RAID-5 algorithm is that it requires a minimum of three drives to operate (two for data, the third for parity). Otherwise, you might as well just use RAID-1, a.k.a. mirroring (one data, one parity). I don't know how the PERC2 card functions in this situation, but I'd be willing to guess that they do the same. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 6:55:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2190737B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id GAA06489; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:54:16 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda06487; Tue Oct 3 06:54:09 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e93Ds8e00855; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdaEQ853; Tue Oct 3 06:53:42 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e93Drfc11151; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010031353.e93Drfc11151@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdj11147; Tue Oct 3 06:53:31 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: Andrew J Caines Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 02:17:22 EDT." <20001003021722.A19069@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:53:31 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001003021722.A19069@hal9000.bsdonline.org>, Andrew J Caines write s: > Jordan and list, > > > > As you can see I still had the mfs and fdesc mounts active. Now, after th > e > > > reboot, I'm all disk. We'll see what happens after 02:00 tomorow. > > > > And that's the panic I'm interested in, of course... :-) > > It's 02:12 and periodic daily has come and gone and there was no crash. > > While I don't want to leap to conclusions, this is the first day there has > been no crash just after 02:00 since September 21st. > > I'll leave the system as it is with no fdesc or mfs for another day, then > add the mfs back and see what happens, unless I hear a better suggestion. MFS will not cause you problems. It's safe to leave it in. FDESC has had problems in the past with panics. I had a patch for 2.x & 3.x that added support for pipes which fixed the panics. 4.x now has support for pipes so the exploit to panic an unpatched FreeBSD no longer works, though there might be something else in FDESC that might cause the panic. IIRC, find /mnt | xargs ls -l would cause a panic of FDESC. Under 4.0 the following output is produced: [snip] ?--------- 0 root wheel 0 Oct 3 06:50 0 [snip] Adding the following to DTYPE_PIPE handling in fdesc_vnops.c might fix this too: if (fp->f_type == DTYPE_SOCKET) vap->va_type = VSOCK; /* XXX pipe? */ else vap->va_type = VFIFO; Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 7: 6:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic.adaptec.com [208.236.45.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADD237B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kingdom.adaptec.com (kingdom.adaptec.com [162.62.50.10]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA00170; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [162.62.64.10]) by kingdom.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA06554; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com (btcexc01 [162.62.147.10]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA14635; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:03:18 -0600 (MDT) Received: by btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:03:23 -0600 Message-ID: <605F7B3EA58DD411BB550000D11ABE921CEBFC@btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com> From: "Long, Scott" To: "'Michael DeMutis'" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:03:20 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As has been stated my Mike, there are two distictly different PERC2 flavors. If you have the PERC2/Si or PERC2/QC, then you are using the Adaptec flavor and will need the aac driver. This driver hasn't made it's way back to -stable yet, though Mike has some patches for it at http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/adaptec/aac-20000912.tar.gz (Mike, should I commit this sometime?). To answer about the RAID question, with the aac cards you can start with a two disk array in either a RAID 0 or 1 configuration, then add a third drive at a later date and the card will morph it to a RAID 5. Of course, RAID 0 provides no data protection, so I would stick with a RAID 1 for now unless speed is more important. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael DeMutis [mailto:mike@2gen.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 12:15 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE > > > How is the Dell PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE? > > I have a server being delivered in a week and it's running a > 2 disk array. > > Is this going to be a nightmare to setup? > > I'll be installing 4.x from scratch, and I'd like full LVL 5 > RAID support. > The machine has to boot from the RAID device. Is there a > process I should > follow for installation? > > Help is always appreciated. > > Thanks! > Michael DeMutis > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > Michael DeMutis > System's Administrator || 2Gen.Inc. > 143 James Street South, Suite 300, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8P 3A1 > email: mike@2gen.net website: http://www.2gen.net/ > Phone: 905-308-9155 Fax: 905-308-9519 ICQ UIN: 1257176 > "Merging Media & Idea To Bring Internet Exposure to > Innovative Businesses" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8: 2:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AAB37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11697; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:01:50 +0300 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:01:50 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon To: Lee Ann Goldstein Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-Reply-To: <200010030650.XAA16701@leeann.snedmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Lee Ann Goldstein wrote: > find_irq.sh > ----------- > #!/bin/sh > > dmesg | \ > ./find_irq.awk | \ > sort -n +2 -3 > -----end sh script----- > > find_irq.awk > ------------ > #!/usr/bin/awk -f 1) Better use /var/run/dmesg.boot since message buffer may get filled with other stuff. 2) Since perl is a part of a system now, perhaps it'll be prettier to use perl for that task. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8: 7:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B82637B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93F1cr29846; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: Steve Roome Cc: Thomas David Rivers , imp@village.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <20001003113641.I1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Steve Roome wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > Well, some news. > > > > I tried booting the kernel found on the 4.1.1-RELEASE kern.flp... > > and, guess what... > > > > > > > > I don't get the ed1 timeouts anymore; and a `ping' to an > > IP address on that line almost works... > > > > Note the *almost*... > > > > It seems packets go out the interface (as is evidenced by > > the flashing lights on the dongle - but pings, etc... don't work. > > [...FreeBSD couldn't get source info for the card...] > > It might not be your problem, but it was easily/grottily solved with a > few lines like in /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c such as : > > ether_addr[0] = 0; > ether_addr[1] = 0xe0; > .. etc.. > ether_addr[5] = 0x26; > > Nasty hack and all, not the right way etc. etc. but in a results > oriented world and all! =) Obviously I wouldn't advocate this sort of > kludgery, it's a pain for things like cvsup. If you find you have to do this a lot, you can do one of two things: 1) Use anonymous CVS to merge new changes into your source tree. Your changes will be preserved, and CVS will inform you of any conflicting changes; or 2) Keep your patched copies in a mirror source tree, say /usr/patches, and then diff them when you cvsup, and then overlay them as necessary. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8:12:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.isi.com (hermes.isi.com [192.73.222.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3702337B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windriver.com (nala [128.224.195.172]) by hermes.isi.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3/Hermes 991202 TroyC) with ESMTP id IAA23428; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39D9F87D.B4DFA73E@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:17:17 -0400 From: Tadayuki Okada X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75C-ja [ja_JP.EUC] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: ja, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.5-STABLE broken? References: <39D9EE7A.150F30FC@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cputypes.h has inconsistent definition for P4. from sys/i386/include/cputypes.h #define CPU_PIII 15 /* Intel Pentium III */ #define CPU_4 16 /* Intel Pentium 4 */ Tadayuki Okada wrote: > > Did P4 ident MFC break 3.5-STABLE? > > I got this kernel build error yesterday. > cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK > -include opt_global.h -elf ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c: In function `printcpuinfo': > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: `CPU_P4' undeclared (first use this function) > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: for each function it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > Tadayuki Okada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8:21:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rhall.sc.scruznet.com (rhall.sc.scruznet.com [165.227.39.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704B537B66D for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by rhall.sc.scruznet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e93FKZs80124; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:20:35 -0700 From: Mailing List Owner To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Darcy Buskermolen , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001003082035.A75193@rhall.sc.scruznet.com> References: <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> <200010030413.WAA22544@harmony.village.org> <20001003105008.A8383@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001003105008.A8383@sunbay.com>; from ru@sunbay.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:50:08AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I ran into this, because I did not know about the new kernel compilation instructinos. Read /usr/src/UPDATAING. You must compile your kernel from /usr/src, an upgrade looks like this.. cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel KERNEL= reboot cd /usr/src make installworld mergemaster Replace "" with the name of your kernel. I usually do the upgrade with GENERIC and after everything is done, I go back and build my custom kernel. That way I always have a version of GENERIC handy that matches my current build. Roland Hall rhall@rhall.sc.scruznet.com On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:50:08AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:13:16PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> Darcy Buskermolen writes: > > : ===> agp > > : @ -> /usr/src/sys > > : machine -> /usr/src/i386/include > > : make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop > > : *** Error code 2 > > : > > : Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules > > : *** Error code 1 > > : > > : > > : This is with a 4.x cvsup of 2 minutes ago > > > > On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier with make > > buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. > > > I seem to recall this error was caused by not-up-to-date /usr/share/mk. > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8:22:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pi.yip.org (yip.org [199.45.111.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E337B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (melange@localhost) by pi.yip.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26668; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:22:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from melange@yip.org) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:22:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob K X-Sender: melange@localhost To: Noor Dawod Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Apache on newly FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's generally a good idea to wrap your lines at 70 or 72 characters. On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Noor Dawod wrote: [snip] > I start mysqld and then Apache on wonderfully. Same is > for . The problem is: when I issue a restart command to Apache on > , it doesn't restart and the log file shows nothing. But, > this works on , and the restart action gets carried out smoothly. > > As far as I've checked, both systems look and act alike, except for > the slight difference in versions (which, in time of compilation, were > the same code). > > Could anyone help out in this problem, maybe a series of debugging > actions to do in order to find the cause of this problem? > > If you need specific information, I will gladly supply it. [snip] What version was Apache originally running on before the upgrades? I ran into a similar problem when I upgraded from 1.3.4 to 1.3.12 - not only did the name of the log files change, but also the name of the configuration file and pid file (from httpd.pid to apache.pid). A bug is that apachectl doesn't check [what used to be httpd.conf but is now apache.conf] for the name of the pid file; the new version just assumes /var/run/apache.pid, apparently. Going through and carefully merging the old httpd.conf into apache.conf with special attention to file locations, killing the old httpd, and *then* apachectl start'ing worked for me... -- Bob "I'm Canadian, and I can't photocopy my ass without the RCMP coming after me." - bigkahuna@scowling.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 8:28:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559B137B66C for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93FSAM09802; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:28:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA26440; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:28:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> To: behanna@zbzoom.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: Steve Roome , Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:01:38 EDT." References: Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:28:09 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Chris BeHanna writes: : > It might not be your problem, but it was easily/grottily solved with a : > few lines like in /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c such as : : > : > ether_addr[0] = 0; : > ether_addr[1] = 0xe0; : > .. etc.. : > ether_addr[5] = 0x26; : > : > Nasty hack and all, not the right way etc. etc. but in a results : > oriented world and all! =) Obviously I wouldn't advocate this sort of : > kludgery, it's a pain for things like cvsup. : : If you find you have to do this a lot, you can do one of two : things: Isn't that what the ether keyword is for. ether 0x12 or whatever. Pccardd also tries to figure it out itself, but sometimes needs help. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 9: 3: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3748337B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93G4Ds04135; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:04:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:04:13 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: HELP! Mouse Problem on FBSD 4.1.1 and XFree86-4.0.1_1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was running XFree86 4.0.1 now for about 5 months without any problems and our FreeBSD box is on FBSD 4.1.1-STABLE. Today, I saw that the ports collection has been updated to XFree86-4.0.1_1 and for that, I got it and I compiled it like I compiled it all the time before without problems. Nothing seems to has changed, sources are the same, so I restarted the server and - my mouse moves immediately after touching into the upper lefthand corner! I use a Logitech 3 button Pilot Mouse and it worked well all the years before with 3.3.6 and now for months with 4.0.1 and FBSD 4.1.1. But today it makes strange things and I guess it has to do with some changes in FBSD 4.1 to 4.1.1 how to handle the mouse device (mouse is on /dev/psm0). Mouese protocol is PS/2, I tried MouseMan and Microsoft without any changes. Can you help? Thanks. - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz BRD/Germany Tel: +496131/3924662 FAX: +496131/3923235 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 9:16:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7FC37B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.privatelabs.com [198.143.31.6]) by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA06217; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:35:45 -0400 Received: from virtual-estates.net (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by misha.privatelabs.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93GG0v09601; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:16:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@virtual-estates.net) Message-Id: <200010031616.e93GG0v09601@misha.privatelabs.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:15:59 -0400 (EDT) From: mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: KDE2 experiences (Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible w ay) To: Mike Smith Cc: Will Andrews , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, david@mandrakesoft.com In-Reply-To: <200010030103.e9313Oh04055@mass.osd.bsdi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2 Oct, Mike Smith wrote: = > For reference, I have a dual PIII-500 w/ 512MB of memory, and the = > new box I'm building will have a dual PIII-600E w/ 640MB. The former = > takes approximately 5 hours to build the entire suite. = = Have you ever tried going beyond that and actually run it? Is it meant = to work? Specifically, startup is kinda flaky, kwrited starts and = can't be (easily) killed, and konsole never starts a shell and dies = after a few seconds. kcminit was seg-faulting for me on startup until I moved my ~/.kde (from 1.1.2) away and restarted. It does come up and looks cute. Konqueror (the Internet browser -- my major reason to upgrade) seems to work but crashes on the the kde.org's list of bugs (http://bugs.kde.org/db/ix/full.html) -- a HUGE page -- very ironic. I filed the bug report, but the response was that they can not reproduce it and would need to recompile with --enable-debug... Sometimes, popup menus have double entries for everything. Perhaps a Qt thing... For some reason, the support for the Ukrainian charset koi8-u is ifdef-ed out of the Qt2, although it is just a superset of the Russian koi8-r (which is supported) adding a few more characters. It was not obvious, that one needs to download the particular language translation and install it manually to have the languages other than English (US) and "Default C". This is different from the previous version, but makes sense, now that I know about it. Running Linux version of Netscape becomes difficult, because KDE seems to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH by default (the previous beta was also setting LD_PRELOAD!!!). My biggest complaint was the Run entry of the right mouse popup menu. Trying to be smarter than I am, it would refuse to try ``exec xterm'' -- only ``xterm'' would work. Since it uses the user's shell to process the command, this means I will have a tcsh process running in background eating up VM space until I exit the xterm (/bin/tcsh -c xterm). Our /bin/sh has the same issue, but the bash (default on Linux) does not -- it appears to be smart enough to bypass fork(2) and go straight to exec(2) on the last command of a script. From talking to the developer, it seems they just wanted to be able to tell an application failure from the shell's failure to execute the command, and so KDE will look through the PATH for the command before invoking the shell. This breaks ALL shell's builtin commands -- most importantly, the exec and the aliases. And it relies on the uniform support of the -c option by all possible shells. I hope, this will be addresses before the 2.0 release, I guess a workaround would be to touch /bin/exec and chmod +x /bin/exec :) = Aside from that, it's nice candy. 8) Indeed :) -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 9:50:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0C37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mira1.cisco.com (mira1.cisco.com [171.71.208.193]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA10089; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cisco.com (sjck-dial-gw5-103.cisco.com [10.19.238.104]) by mira1.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ABI03243; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39DA0C81.800D8F3D@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:42:41 -0700 From: W Gerald Hicks Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Flattie McGee Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.1.1 Perl problem in Makeworld? References: <20001003042314.1620.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Check your clock. Flattie McGee wrote: > > Hey.. I installed 4.1.1 (directly from ISO) on a fresh system. I > Cvsuped the latest ports, and src directories. I did a make world, and > lo and behold it crapped out. Any help, suggestions, recommendations > are appreciated. > > # perl -v > This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-freebsd > > **** Make world info > > building shared library libperl.so.3 > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > cc -O -pipe > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/miniperlmain.c > > cc -O -pipe > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o > -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -lperl -lm > -lcrypt > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl > sh config_h.sh > Extracting config.h (with variable substitutions) > sh writemain lib/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a > perlmain.c > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../../../../contrib/perl5 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c perlmain.c > miniperl > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../../../../contrib/perl5/configpm > Config.pm Porting/Glossary myconfig config.sh > miniperl -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib -e 'use > AutoSplit; autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*.pm lib/*/*.pm > AutoSplitting lib/Getopt/Long.pm (lib/auto/Getopt/Long) > touch autosplit > sh cflags.sh > Extracting cflags (with variable substitutions) > Writing Makefile for DynaLoader > Warning: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm may be out > of date with /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.sh > cd /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl && make lib/Config.pm > `lib/Config.pm' is up to date. > Warning: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h out of date > with /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.sh > Makefile out-of-date with respect to > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h > Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile... > *** Error code 1 (ignored) > make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1 || /bin/sh -c true > perl "-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" > "-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" Makefile.PL > "INSTALLDIRS=perl" "PERL_SRC=/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl" > "INSTALLMAN3DIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/perl/man3" "PERL=perl" > "FULLPERL=perl" "DEFINE=-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include" > "LINKTYPE=static" "LIBS=-lperl -lm" > Writing Makefile for DynaLoader > ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <== > ==> Please rerun the make command. <== > false > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/ext/DynaLoader. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:25:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 200-227-201-50-as.acessonet.com.br (200-227-201-50-as.acessonet.com.br [200.227.201.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9E437B66D for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5252 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Oct 2000 17:22:42 -0000 From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:22:20 -0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: newsyslog.conf error on latest stable? Message-ID: <20001003152220.B3826@Fedaykin.here> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 05:00:00PM -0000, Cron Daemon wrote: > newsyslog: malformed at: > /var/log/monthly.log 640 12 * $M1D0 Z I've been getting this lately. I think this is pretty unusual since this file is identical (a copy actually) to the one in the -STABLE repository. And, yes, I am running a compatible -STABLE built as of Sep 27. I did my normal single user % make KERNEL=LIOUX world buildkernel installkernel % mergemaster I am running: FreeBSD Here.here 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #13: Sat Sep 30 2 0:08:23 BRT 2000 lioux@Here.here:/usr/src/sys/compile/LIOUX i386 The worst thing is that I do not see anything wrong with that line. At least according the examples on newsyslog(8). Odd. ps: I hope this is not a dumb mistake on my part. -- Mario S. F. Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br ) flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:26:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB1B37B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ophelia.nectar.com (ophelia.nectar.com [10.5.5.2]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA651925D; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:26:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by ophelia.nectar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA00932; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:27:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:27:49 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Warner Losh , Gianmarco Giovannelli , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: username with - Message-ID: <20001003122749.B890@ophelia.nectar.com> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> <200010021533.JAA11398@harmony.village.org> <20001002223139.A7328@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001002223139.A7328@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:31:39PM -0700 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > : So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? > > > > Adduser is right. Dashes are allowed in user names. > > But not at the start of the user name..login(1) special cases it, I > think. rmuser is broken if it won't allow you to remove users with any character in the username besides ':' and newline. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:27:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com [155.208.254.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67E437B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (hpcpbla.bri.hp.com [15.144.112.65]) by bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0648150BF; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:27:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.0) with ESMTP id SAA15589; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:26:55 +0100 (BST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA05216; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:29:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:29:26 +0100 From: Steve Roome To: Warner Losh Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Roome , Warner Losh , behanna@zbzoom.net, Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net References: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:28:09AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:28:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Chris BeHanna writes: > : > It might not be your problem, but it was easily/grottily solved with a > : > few lines like in /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c such as : > : > > : > ether_addr[0] = 0; > : > ether_addr[1] = 0xe0; > : > .. etc.. > : > ether_addr[5] = 0x26; > : > > : > Nasty hack and all, not the right way etc. etc. but in a results > : > oriented world and all! =) Obviously I wouldn't advocate this sort of > : > kludgery, it's a pain for things like cvsup. > : > : If you find you have to do this a lot, you can do one of two > : things: > > Isn't that what the ether keyword is for. > ether 0x12 > or whatever. Pccardd also tries to figure it out itself, but > sometimes needs help. I know what the MAC address is supposed to be! I've been through all of the cards attribute memory but can't find it. It was about a month back now, but the only MAC address that works was not anywhere within the cards memory that I could see. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, as surely it has to either be in there somewhere or perhaps (unlikely?) coded somehow, but I certainly couldn't find it at all. Which is why I opted for the nasty hack. I know it looks really stupid, but honestly I didn't step lightly into hardcoding my MAC address before really trying very hard to use the ether offset option! I'll give anything else a go to find it properly as I'd rather have a less ugly hack... Although... the net card itself had a dodgy cable converter (the thing that goes from RJ45 <-> PCcard-whatever it is 15 pin connector) so I've soldered a RJ45 female connector directly onto the pccard pcb. I wasn't expecting this to work as I've not got the most precise soldering iron! Stop laughing! It's been on 24/7 for a month since with no problems other than a dieing LCD screen. It makes a great router/mail server at home. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:28:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B9F37B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93HSNM10396; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:28:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA27574; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:28:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010031728.LAA27574@harmony.village.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Subject: Re: username with - Cc: Kris Kennaway , Gianmarco Giovannelli , stable@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:27:49 CDT." <20001003122749.B890@ophelia.nectar.com> References: <20001003122749.B890@ophelia.nectar.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20001002082345.0256ceb0@194.184.65.4> <200010021533.JAA11398@harmony.village.org> <20001002223139.A7328@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:28:23 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001003122749.B890@ophelia.nectar.com> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: : > > : So, who is right ? adduser or rmuser ? : > > : > > Adduser is right. Dashes are allowed in user names. : > : > But not at the start of the user name..login(1) special cases it, I : > think. : : rmuser is broken if it won't allow you to remove users with any : character in the username besides ':' and newline. Agreed. It doesn't matter how the user was created, just that he/she/it was created and now must leave. - at the start of a name might be a particular problem due to getopt(3). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:35:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3C337B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93HZdM10456; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:35:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA27686; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:35:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010031735.LAA27686@harmony.village.org> To: Steve Roome Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:29:26 BST." <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> References: <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:35:39 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Steve Roome writes: : I know what the MAC address is supposed to be! I've been through all : of the cards attribute memory but can't find it. It was about a month : back now, but the only MAC address that works was not anywhere within : the cards memory that I could see. I recall seeing a syntax for this in pccardd. Hmmm, hold I while I check... OK. Looks like normal FreeBSD's ether statement doesn't allow one to directly set the NIC address. : That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, as surely it has to either be : in there somewhere or perhaps (unlikely?) coded somehow, but I : certainly couldn't find it at all. Which is why I opted for the nasty : hack. For the Ed cards (ne-2000 and clones), the NIC address is usually in a ROM that the NIC chip reads and presents to the driver writer in a number of I/O ports (yes, I'm being vague, because the details vary somewhat). : I know it looks really stupid, but honestly I didn't step lightly into : hardcoding my MAC address before really trying very hard to use the : ether offset option! I understand that. I'm just trying to understand the type of card that you have. : I'll give anything else a go to find it properly as I'd rather have a : less ugly hack... Although... the net card itself had a dodgy cable : converter (the thing that goes from RJ45 <-> PCcard-whatever it is 15 : pin connector) so I've soldered a RJ45 female connector directly onto : the pccard pcb. I wasn't expecting this to work as I've not got the : most precise soldering iron! Hmmm, well, I wouldn't laugh at that. You should see one of my 3C589D's that does exactly the same thing. It even works, so long as I don't move it too much. : Stop laughing! It's been on 24/7 for a month since with no problems : other than a dieing LCD screen. It makes a great router/mail server at : home. I've often thought about doing this myself. The trouble is that I don't have a spare laptop to dedicate to this. I just moved my router world over to a tiny 486DX2 (amd) from a large 486DX2-66 (intel). The tiny system takes up less space than most laptops, except maybe a libretto 50CT! Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 10:58:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.34.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A297937B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leeann.snedmail.com (lgoldste@localhost) by leeann.snedmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18121; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com) Message-Id: <200010031758.KAA18121@leeann.snedmail.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Roman Shterenzon , lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:01:50 +0300. Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:58:31 -0700 From: Lee Ann Goldstein Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Your message was: (from Roman Shterenzon) > > 1) Better use /var/run/dmesg.boot since message buffer may get filled with > other stuff. Unless something's changed in 4.1.1-S or 5.0-C, that's not really a problem. dmesg does not take its input from /var/log/messages. This is not necessarily true about dmesg in other *NIXes. > 2) Since perl is a part of a system now, perhaps it'll be prettier to use > perl for that task. *shrug* I speak awk better than I speak perl. Like any other even mildly interesting problem, there are at least half a dozen ways to solve this. I've been working with Stijn Hoop , who identified a locale problem with awk/gawk. This is reproduceable- with LANG set to en_US.ISO_8859-1, awk will not match the expression (<[[:print:]]+>), so a line like pci1: at 0.0 irq 9 does not get turned into pci1 irq 9 pci1.0.0 When LANG is not set, the expression matches as expected. I have no idea if this is a problem with gawk in general, or with the FreeBSD build of it. I note that I can successfully grep for both "<" and ">" regardless of how LANG is set, though this may be a red herring. I'm giving up on the regex problem, and will just unset LANG in my wrapper script. (bleh. nasty hack) I also found and fixed another regex problem, so here's my final form of both scripts. Lee Ann find_irq.sh ----------- #!/bin/sh LANG=;export LANG dmesg | \ ./find_irq.awk | \ sort -n +2 -3 -----end sh script----- find_irq.awk ------------ #!/usr/bin/awk -f ! /irq\>/ {next} /at device/ && /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*\<([0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\> on (pci[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\4.\\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /on pci/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*(pci[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)/, "\\1 \\2 \\3", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } /^pci[0-9]+/ {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(<[[:print:]]+>).*\<([0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\> (irq [0-9]+)/,"\\1 \\4 \\1.\\3 \\2", 1) gsub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9] /, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } {irqinfo = gensub(/(^[a-z0-9]+[: ]).*(irq [0-9]+).*/, "\\1 \\2", 1) sub(/:/, "", irqinfo) sub(/ [0-9]$/, " &", irqinfo) print irqinfo next } -----end awk script----- -- Lee Ann Goldstein Caffeine is *not* a substitute for sleep. lgoldste@leeann.snedmail.com lgoldste@lafn.org leeann@rand.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 11:19:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mxbh4.isus.emc.com (mxbh4.isus.emc.com [168.159.208.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B3F37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mxbh4.isus.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:19:38 -0400 Message-ID: <0BEC2FAE2A21D411965C00E0291E7C3340BED4@corpmx17.isus.emc.com> From: Neff_Glen@emc.com To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: v3.x-stable problem Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:19:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I CVSUP'ed and went to compile a new kernel this morning and found a problem caused by what appears to be a typo. In the file: include/cputypes.h The line which reads: #define CPU_4 16 /* Intel Pentium 4 */ Should read: #define CPU_P4 16 /* Intel Pentium 4 */ At least according to what's called in the file: i386/identcpu.c Thanks, -G PS: Can you tell I don't really know any C? /* Glen R. J. Neff neff_glen@emc.com 919-248-6145 Dirty deeds done for a meager 20% markup. . . */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 11:26:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com [155.208.254.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDF537B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (hpcpbla.bri.hp.com [15.144.112.65]) by bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BA71A2B0; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:26:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.0) with ESMTP id TAA16324; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:24:32 +0100 (BST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA05414; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:27:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:27:10 +0100 From: Steve Roome To: Warner Losh Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001003192710.R1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Roome , Warner Losh , behanna@zbzoom.net, Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net References: <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> <200010031735.LAA27686@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010031735.LAA27686@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:35:39AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:35:39AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20001003182926.M1786@moose.bri.hp.com> Steve Roome writes: > : I know what the MAC address is supposed to be! I've been through all > : of the cards attribute memory but can't find it. It was about a month > : back now, but the only MAC address that works was not anywhere within > : the cards memory that I could see. > > I recall seeing a syntax for this in pccardd. Hmmm, hold I while I > check... > > OK. Looks like normal FreeBSD's ether statement doesn't allow one to > directly set the NIC address. Yeah, I thought the PAO one did this, but I didn't investigate it because although I expect it's great I preferred to go with a more vanilla install. > : That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, as surely it has to either be > : in there somewhere or perhaps (unlikely?) coded somehow, but I > : certainly couldn't find it at all. Which is why I opted for the nasty > : hack. > > For the Ed cards (ne-2000 and clones), the NIC address is usually in a > ROM that the NIC chip reads and presents to the driver writer in a > number of I/O ports (yes, I'm being vague, because the details vary > somewhat). I could read some specs and try to fix it I suppose, but in the end, it works right now, I don't understand enough kernel code, and I'm slightly uneasy to mess with it as it's for my most important customer - the girlfriend! =) > : I know it looks really stupid, but honestly I didn't step lightly into > : hardcoding my MAC address before really trying very hard to use the > : ether offset option! > > I understand that. I'm just trying to understand the type of card > that you have. It's a "trust 10/100MB" card. I disposed of the packaging a bit quickly perhaps, obviously with the current wiring situation finding the chips on it shouldn't be a problem. Anyway, I don't think my solution will necessarily solve Thomas' original problem with his card, but might be worth a shot. > : I'll give anything else a go to find it properly as I'd rather have a > : less ugly hack... Although... the net card itself had a dodgy cable > : converter (the thing that goes from RJ45 <-> PCcard-whatever it is 15 > : pin connector) so I've soldered a RJ45 female connector directly onto > : the pccard pcb. I wasn't expecting this to work as I've not got the > : most precise soldering iron! > > Hmmm, well, I wouldn't laugh at that. You should see one of my > 3C589D's that does exactly the same thing. It even works, so long as > I don't move it too much. Well, it's slightly rigged and I laughed when it first worked. =) > : Stop laughing! It's been on 24/7 for a month since with no problems > : other than a dieing LCD screen. It makes a great router/mail server at > : home. > > I've often thought about doing this myself. The trouble is that I > don't have a spare laptop to dedicate to this. I just moved my router > world over to a tiny 486DX2 (amd) from a large 486DX2-66 (intel). The > tiny system takes up less space than most laptops, except maybe a > libretto 50CT! This laptop is some sort of mish mash of parts someone donated to the other half. The screen doesn't work anymore which is why it's only really ever going to be a router. It's nice to use a laptop though as it's what I consider to be the right sort of size for the task. It's a P133 anyway, so no use for Windows/MS Office work, and I can't see myself actually needing a FreeBSD laptop, no matter how trendy some people may think it is, I don't really see the need to carry something like that around. I already have a Palm V that I don't really use, (except as a serial console for the laptop!) I don't think I should invest in more stuff to (not) carry about! Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 11:37:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from likes.radiohead.net (likes.radiohead.net [64.63.20.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C83DB37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18598 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Oct 2000 18:41:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:41:08 -0700 From: Dan Peterson To: Erick Mechler Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USA_RESIDENT is back? Message-ID: <20001003114108.A17119@danp.net> References: <20001003002424.B2497@lucifer.techometer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001003002424.B2497@lucifer.techometer.net>; from emechler@techometer.net on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 12:24:24AM -0700 X-PGP-Key: http://danp.net/pubkey.asc Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Erick Mechler wrote: * I just built/installed world and I noticed that in * /etc/defaults/make.conf, the USA_RESIDENT option seems to be back, * while the MAKE_RSAINTL option has disappeared. Was this change made * recently? Apparently, USA_RESIDENT is still used for some ports for export-related issues (not sure if this really applies anymore). MAKE_RSAINTL went away because the system now uses OpenSSL's RSA implementation instead of using RSAref if USA_RESIDENT is YES. -- Dan Peterson / danp@danp.net / 415.505.4855 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 11:49:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.XtremeDev.com (odsl228.dnvr.uswest.net [209.181.79.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599A037B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.XtremeDev.com (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 43D585BAD; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:49:45 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.XtremeDev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7151C990; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:49:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:49:44 -0700 (MST) From: FreeBSD To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! Mouse Problem on FBSD 4.1.1 and XFree86-4.0.1_1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got the same error. After a few recompiles of XFree86 4.0.1_1 and still no mouse, (something about ioctl and inappropriate device in /var/log/XFree86.0.log), I only got it to work after setting the mouse protocol to auto instead of ps/2. /etc/X11/XF86Config: Option "Protocol" "auto" I think it has to do with the recent commits with patch-k to fix a switching between virtual term and X11 problem. I can't verify right now due to time constraints. My hardware is a Logitech Marble PS/2 running FreeBSD 4.1.1 and XFree84 4.0.1_1 with /dev/psm0. Hopefully what I suggested will fix your problem as well, since your symptoms matches mine exactly. On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, O. Hartmann wrote: > Today, I saw that the ports collection has been updated to > XFree86-4.0.1_1 and for that, I got it and I compiled it > like I compiled it all the time before without problems. > > Nothing seems to has changed, sources are the same, so I restarted > the server and - my mouse moves immediately after touching into > the upper lefthand corner! > I use a Logitech 3 button Pilot Mouse and it worked well all the years > before with 3.3.6 and now for months with 4.0.1 and FBSD 4.1.1. But > today it makes strange things and I guess it has to do with some changes > in FBSD 4.1 to 4.1.1 how to handle the mouse device (mouse is on > /dev/psm0). Mouese protocol is PS/2, I tried MouseMan and Microsoft > without any changes. > > Can you help? > > Thanks. > > - > MfG > O. Hartmann > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de > > Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA > IT Netz- und Systembetreuung > Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz > Becherweg 21 > D-55099 Mainz > BRD/Germany > > Tel: +496131/3924662 > FAX: +496131/3923235 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 12: 1:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED6337B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e93J1Ev23614; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA40654; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA81054; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:01:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:01:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010031901.PAA81054@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010031104.HAA47540@lakes.dignus.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <200010030216.WAA46514@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : Nope - I have a "SmartLink" NE2000 clone card; that does to > : 10/100 mbits/second... This is actually a re-labeled Archtek card. > > Ah. The light goes on. Does your config file look something like: > card "PCMCIA" "FastEthernet" > config auto "ed" ? 0x30000 Warner, You asked that as if you had some info about this issue? [mine looks exactly like that.] Anything I can do here to get closer to working? - Thanks - - Dave R. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 12:24:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD93737B66C; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93JPds06621; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:25:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:25:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP! Mouse Problem on FBSD 4.1.1 and XFree86-4.0.1_1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, FreeBSD wrote: The problem wents away when changing Protocol from "PS/2" to "Auto". Don't know as what the Logitech is now recohnized, but it works. :>ng between virtual term and X11 problem. I can't verify right now :>due to time constraints. :> :>My hardware is a Logitech Marble PS/2 running FreeBSD 4.1.1 and XFree84 :>4.0.1_1 with /dev/psm0. Hopefully what I suggested will fix your problem :>as well, since your symptoms matches mine exactly. :> :> :>On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, O. Hartmann wrote: :> :>> Today, I saw that the ports collection has been updated to :>> XFree86-4.0.1_1 and for that, I got it and I compiled it :>> like I compiled it all the time before without problems. :>> :>> Nothing seems to has changed, sources are the same, so I restarted :>> the server and - my mouse moves immediately after touching into :>> the upper lefthand corner! :>> I use a Logitech 3 button Pilot Mouse and it worked well all the years :>> before with 3.3.6 and now for months with 4.0.1 and FBSD 4.1.1. But :>> today it makes strange things and I guess it has to do with some changes :>> in FBSD 4.1 to 4.1.1 how to handle the mouse device (mouse is on :>> /dev/psm0). Mouese protocol is PS/2, I tried MouseMan and Microsoft :>> without any changes. :>> :>> Can you help? :>> :>> Thanks. :>> :>> - :>> MfG :>> O. Hartmann :>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- :>> ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de :>> :>> Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA :>> IT Netz- und Systembetreuung :>> Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz :>> Becherweg 21 :>> D-55099 Mainz :>> BRD/Germany :>> :>> Tel: +496131/3924662 :>> FAX: +496131/3923235 :>> :>> :>> :>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message :>> :> :> :> - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz BRD/Germany Tel: +496131/3924662 FAX: +496131/3923235 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 13: 0:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C864337B66D; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id NAA07974; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:00:47 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda07972; Tue Oct 3 13:00:40 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e93K0dI10137; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdo10123; Tue Oct 3 13:00:01 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e93K01c12859; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010032000.e93K01c12859@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdA12850; Tue Oct 3 12:59:52 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: John Baldwin Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Strange GCC Error In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:33:09 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:59:52 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , John Baldwin writes: > > On 30-Sep-00 Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > I've been working on a PGP 6.5.8 port, however I get the following: > > > > gcc -O -pipe -DPGP_UNIX=1 -DPGP_COMPILER_GCC=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > > -DPGP_DEBUG=1 -DUNFINISHED_CODE_ALLOWED=1 -DUSE_PGP_LEAKS=1 > > -I../../.././unix -I../../.././pub/include -I../../.././priv/include > > -I../../.././priv/include/opaque -I../../.././priv/external/unix/bsafe/i > > nclude/unknown -I../../.././../pfl/common -I../../.././../pfl/common/pre > > fs -I../../.././../pfl/common/file -I../../.././../pfl/common/util > > -I../../.././../pfl/common/lthread -I../../.././../pfl/common/sorting > > -I../../.././../pfl/unix -I. -c -o pgpRandomPool.o pgpRandomPool.c > > pgpRandomPool.c: In function `pgpGlobalRandomPoolEntropyWasAdded': > > pgpRandomPool.c:470: Invalid `asm' statement: > > pgpRandomPool.c:470: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for > > class AREG. > > pgpRandomPool.c: In function `sRandAddKeyEntropy': > > pgpRandomPool.c:870: Invalid `asm' statement: > > pgpRandomPool.c:870: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for > > class AREG. > > gmake[4]: *** [pgpRandomPool.o] Error 1 > > > > It appears that the following statement is the culprit: > > > >#define UMULH_32(r,a,b) __asm__("mull %2" : "=d"(r) : "%a"(a), "mr"(b) > >: "ax") > > Take out the final ': "ax"'. The %ax (or rather, since it is a mull, %eax) > register is already used due to the constraint on the 'a' parameter. Thanks. That did the trick. I'll update my update to the PGP6 port accordingly, after appropriate testing of course. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 13:28:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F69F37B66C for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93KQhX82950; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:26:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Andrew J Caines , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: Message from Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:53:31 PDT." <200010031353.e93Drfc11151@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:26:43 -0700 Message-ID: <82946.970604803@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > MFS will not cause you problems. It's safe to leave it in. I think it might be a little premature to reach that conclusion right now; I've had panics with MFS in the past and also took note of the fact when Andrew said his usage of fdesc post-dated the crashes. But for that, it would be my prime suspect as well (unless Andrew simply got his timeline wrong :-). - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 14: 4:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtprelay2.adelphia.net (smtprelay2.adelphia.net [64.8.25.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947F737B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adelphia.net ([24.50.186.158]) by smtprelay2.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id G1VH4D00.DT7 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:02:37 -0400 Message-ID: <39DAF33F.935B00B7@adelphia.net> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 05:07:11 -0400 From: Nader Turki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I wanna download the FreeBSD iso file and i see FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE and FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE. I think I bet get the 4.1.1-STABLE, but my question is if i wanna get the latest 4.x-STABLE. Will it show 4.1-STABLE or 4.1.1-STABLE? Thanks, -Nader To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 14: 7:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB1B37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1800C1F55; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:07:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:07:05 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001003170705.D20080@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable References: <82946.970604803@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <82946.970604803@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:26:43PM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan, Cy and co., I'll admit my concept of time was taken from me during lectures on special relativity, but for all observers on the list, I added fdesc after the crashes began. I didn't see any problem with trying it. I'll add the mfs mounts back later and poke the system by running "periodic daily", since I think that the evidence is strong enough that there is something in there which is tickling the cause of the crashes. More details later. Thanks for your continued interest and assistance. BTW, I'm intentionally not updating my world, in case a change masks (as opposed to fixes) the problem. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 14:44:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1560337B66C; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newluxor (151.33.118.110) by smtp2.libero.it; 3 Oct 2000 23:43:48 +0200 Received: from localhost (flag@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by NewLuxor (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93Jet800184; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:40:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from flag@libero.it) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:40:55 +0200 (CEST) From: flag X-Sender: flag@NewLuxor To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Random net errors: any guru out there? In-Reply-To: <20000927091815.T9141@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I remeber coming across this problem with FreeBSD several years ago, > someone told me to turn on or off the rfc extentions, try this: The TCP Extensions are turned off yet. Any other idea? Paolo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:14:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1308F37B66E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e93MEMJ22730; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:14:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA41085; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:14:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id SAA82730; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:14:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:14:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> To: behanna@zbzoom.net, imp@village.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, rivers@dignus.com, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-Reply-To: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just to add to this thread a little. I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. In 3.4 PAO I get: Card inserted, slot 0 card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x30000 ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) I 4.1(.1) I get: ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) it seems the MAC address on 4.1(.1) isn't working... (perhaps I will be hard-coding the MAC address after all.) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:18:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from radius.wavefire.com (radius.wavefire.com [139.142.95.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2484537B6E0 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5370 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2000 22:17:45 -0000 Received: from ccliii.caniserv.com (HELO dbitech) (darcyb@139.142.95.253) by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2000 22:17:45 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.32.20001003152129.032787a0@mail.ok-connect.com> X-Sender: darcyb@mail.ok-connect.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:21:30 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Darcy Buskermolen Subject: Re: agp_if.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dual 400MHz PII @128MB ram on a Asus P2B-D I was hopeing only to have to build a kernel on this machine since that is all I needed.. At 10:13 PM 10/2/00 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >In message <3.0.32.20001002172140.0166da00@mail.ok-connect.com> Darcy Buskermolen writes: >: ===> agp >: @ -> /usr/src/sys >: machine -> /usr/src/i386/include >: make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop >: *** Error code 2 >: >: Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules >: *** Error code 1 >: >: >: This is with a 4.x cvsup of 2 minutes ago > >On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier with make >buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. > >Warner > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:25: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F63937B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA13500; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:24:34 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA08521; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:21:12 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id SAA17981; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:21:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:21:11 -0700 (MST) To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Tuesday, October 3, Thomas David Rivers wrote: ] > Just to add to this thread a little. > > I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to > acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. > > In 3.4 PAO I get: > > Card inserted, slot 0 > card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x30000 > ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > I 4.1(.1) I get: > > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > When you do this in 4.1.1, do you already have an 'ed0' device in your machine? The PAO example shows 'ed0' as the device while 4.1.1 shows ed1. I'm currently having problems with any 4.1.1 kernel probing my two ed cards incorrectly (I get ed1 but not ed0), I just haven't had time to debug it. Hopefully tonight I can back out the if_ed.c file to the last RELENG_4 commit and see if that fixes my problem. Just wondering if there was another card in your machine which would make this PCcard NE2000 become ed1 rather than ed0. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:32: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [209.192.237.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF84D37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 13gabI-0004s4-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:31:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:31:51 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001003183151.D17374@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com>; from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:21:11PM -0700 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Reynolds~ probably said: > When you do this in 4.1.1, do you already have an 'ed0' device in > your machine? The PAO example shows 'ed0' as the device while 4.1.1 > shows ed1. I'm currently having problems with any 4.1.1 kernel > probing my two ed cards incorrectly (I get ed1 but not ed0), I just > haven't had time to debug it. Hopefully tonight I can back out the > if_ed.c file to the last RELENG_4 commit and see if that fixes my > problem. One of my standard procedures for 4.* laptops is to change any ethernet lines from, say; device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 to device ed Then all the device names seem to be right and start at 0. P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:40:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7229D37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e93Mcet04893; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:39:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA41131; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:38:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id SAA82910; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:38:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:38:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010032238.SAA82910@lakes.dignus.com> To: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > [ On Tuesday, October 3, Thomas David Rivers wrote: ] > > Just to add to this thread a little. > > > > I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to > > acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. > > > > In 3.4 PAO I get: > > > > Card inserted, slot 0 > > card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x30000 > > ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > I 4.1(.1) I get: > > > > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > When you do this in 4.1.1, do you already have an 'ed0' device in your > machine? The PAO example shows 'ed0' as the device while 4.1.1 shows ed1. I'm > currently having problems with any 4.1.1 kernel probing my two ed cards > incorrectly (I get ed1 but not ed0), I just haven't had time to debug > it. Hopefully tonight I can back out the if_ed.c file to the last RELENG_4 > commit and see if that fixes my problem. > > Just wondering if there was another card in your machine which would make this > PCcard NE2000 become ed1 rather than ed0. > > -Jr > Nope - there actually wasn't - but the kernel is configured for one (which is why, I believe, the pccard code chose #1 instead of #0.) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:41: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B636937B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA18692 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:40:58 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA12108 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:37:36 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-To: X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id SAA19174; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:37:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14810.24495.934291.596690@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:37:35 -0700 (MST) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <20001003183151.D17374@pir.net> References: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> <20001003183151.D17374@pir.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Tuesday, October 3, Peter Radcliffe wrote: ] > > One of my standard procedures for 4.* laptops is to change any ethernet > lines from, say; > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 > to > device ed > I've not tried this. But the two cards I've got are on bizzare IRQs, so I've just left the more verbose lines in the kernel config. there were some substantial commits of this driver between 4.1-R and 4.1.1-R and I hadn't CVSup'ed this box in 6 weeks (due to a new baby leaving me with zero time to be a nerd). I think something in the last two commits has gone skee-wompus. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:43:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [209.192.237.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFF437B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 13gamB-0004xi-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:43:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:43:06 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001003184306.E17374@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200010031528.JAA26440@harmony.village.org> <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> <20001003183151.D17374@pir.net> <14810.24495.934291.596690@hip186.ch.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <14810.24495.934291.596690@hip186.ch.intel.com>; from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:37:35PM -0700 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Reynolds~ probably said: > [ On Tuesday, October 3, Peter Radcliffe wrote: ] > > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 > > to > > device ed > > I've not tried this. But the two cards I've got are on bizzare IRQs, so I've > just left the more verbose lines in the kernel config. The more verbose lines are useless for pcmcia, the settings come from pccardd, not the kernel ... P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 15:56: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (mta06-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CF737B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parish ([62.253.84.191]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20001003225555.MUBI19246.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@parish> for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:55:55 +0100 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e93MtuK01246 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:55:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:55:55 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Question about 'boot -c' Message-ID: <20001003235555.A255@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am seeking a definitive answer to this so that I can document it in the "The FreeBSD Booting Process" section of the handbook. A question fairly often asked is about booting with ``-c'' and the settings not being saved. ISTR that in 2.2.x any changes made in the boot config editor were saved (to /kernel.config in 2.2.x) but this does not appear to happen in 4.x. According to /sys/boot/README you need to do: # kget > /boot/kernel.conf I have tried here on my machine (-STABLE) and cannot get the settings saved (although using kget(8) as above does work). I have these lines in /boot/loader.conf: userconfig_script_load="YES" userconfig_script_name="/boot/kernel.conf" userconfig_script_type="userconfig_script" If this is behaving as intended then perhaps the wording of the question asked when exiting the visual boot config editor should be changed. It asks if you wish to save the settings, and if this is not happening then it will confuse new users. I have not been able to find the source code for the config editor; where is it? TIA. -- 4.4 - The number of the Beastie ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 16:20:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cybercable.fr (r122m108.cybercable.tm.fr [195.132.122.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7B537B66C for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mux@localhost) by cybercable.fr (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e93NMFp00954 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:22:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mux) From: Maxime Henrion Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:22:15 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: questions and suggestions about default sendmail configuration Message-ID: <20001004012215.A806@nebula.cybercable.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, While playing with sendmail on FreeBSD, I noticed several settings that are not optimum, in my opinion. So I post to know your feelings about it. First, I realized that sendmail is running by default on port 25 (nothing weird here ...) but on port 587 too because of this line in the sendmail.cf : O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E It is probably known and wanted because I remember a thread about it a while ago. However, if someone could explain me the use of this, that'd be kind ! :-) Then, the genericstable feature is not enabled by default. I think it's a very useful feature (not well known though) and it's particularly useful on machines from which you send e-mails but that can't receive them directly on their own sendmail (like personal computers that dont have a static DNS). This kind of problems is generally solved by properly configuring the MUA, but it's in my opinion more logical and more convenient to do it at the MTA level so that users can send e-mails with any MUA (that uses sendmail to send its mails) without configuring it. To enable genericstable, these lines must be added to the freebsd.mc file : FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable')dnl GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains')dnl Finally, the PrivacyOptions set by default allow both the usage of the EXPN and VRFY command, wich aren't a real security threat but can anyway allow someone to get some informations since it's an easy way to know wether a login exists on a system or not. Thus, it would perhaps be a good idea to add noexpn and novrfy to the PrivacyOptions (or even goaway, but it might be a bit hard by default ;). I'm waiting for your comments and I'm ready to send any patch if needed. Regards, Maxime Henrion To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 16:25:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C434C37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93NMoa69671; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:22:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93NLcs35076; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:21:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010032321.e93NLcs35076@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Userland ppp In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:04:15 +0200." <970049055.39d1c61fc7e60@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:21:38 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmm, I haven't heard any other reports like this. Try adding the following line to your config set log physical dns tcp/ip This should show all IP traffic, outbound DNS requests and what ppp is actually writing to the link. The only thing we can really do here is ensure that all the data is being written to the modem in the same way. Given that there's nothing wrong there, I'd suggest seeing how far traceroute gets.... perhaps something upstream is dropping data. > Hello, > I'm noticing a strange behavior in userland ppp - when I download something > from ftp (or other extensive network use), other programs cannot get any chunk > of bandwidth, it just takes all the bandwidth and doesn't leave other programs > any. Even small packets like dns queries fail > I've tried to play with "set urgent" in ppp.conf and via the pppctl, but it > doesn't seem to help. (Which reminds me - how can I check the "urgent" list?) > I don't remember when I first noticed this behavior, but it wasn't this way > once. > The same computer in linux 2.2.x with their kernel ppp works as expected: > when something is using the network extensively, it's slow, but works for other > apps. > In freebsd, however, every program I tried fails after a timeout. > Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 16:43: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5A637B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA28050; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:42:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma027950; Tue, 3 Oct 00 18:42:33 -0500 Message-ID: <39DA2932.4C4B1D9B@confusion.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:45:06 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <970557932.39d989ec5eece@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why would -pipe require me to press ctrl-D to continue compilation? So far nothing else has had this issue, and i have everything using -pipe since it's in make.conf Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Quoting Laurence Berland : > > > All, > > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > > > It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 > > hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights > > are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it > > does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 > > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > > swap, running a generic kernel. > > > > Anyone know how long this is gonna take? > I had this couple of times back on 3.3-STABLE I think. > With some other app. > Pressing ^D made it proceed. IMHO it has to deal with "-pipe" flag to cc. > Try to omit the "-pipe" flag in /etc/make.conf and recompile. > I don't like it though; it should work ok with the "-pipe" flag. > I'm reading my mail sequentally, so it's possible that other people already > answered it. Sorry for additional traffic I might have caused :) > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 16:49:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C896B37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e93NkjM12371; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:46:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA31311; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:46:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010032346.RAA31311@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:14:19 EDT." <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 17:46:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : I 4.1(.1) I get: : : ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 : ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) : This is a big clue that something bad is wrong. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 16:54:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.inwind.it (relay1.inwind.it [212.141.53.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E17637B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (62.98.152.45) by relay1.inwind.it (5.1.046) id 39AFDC99004B4C56; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:54:08 +0200 From: Salvo Bartolotta Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:54:56 GMT Message-ID: <20001004.545600@bartequi.ottodomain.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE To: Nader Turki , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <39DAF33F.935B00B7@adelphia.net> X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 10/4/00, 10:07:11 AM, Nader Turki wrote regarding FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE: > Hi there, > I wanna download the FreeBSD iso file and i see FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE and > FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE. I think I bet get the 4.1.1-STABLE, but my > question is if i wanna get the latest 4.x-STABLE. Will it show > 4.1-STABLE or 4.1.1-STABLE? > Thanks, > -Nader FreeBSD-4-STABLE ---|-----------|---------------> time elapsing; | | fewer bugs; | | functionalities MFC. | | 4.1-Release 4.1.1-Release Strictly speaking, there is one 4-STABLE branch. However, the development subsequent to 4.1.1-Release will show up (uname -a) as 4.1.1-STABLE. MFC=3Dmerge[d] from -CURRENT. Please have a look at the handbook for more info. Best regards, Salvo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 17:10:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB8C37B66C; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9409Aa72704; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:09:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9407ls35825; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:07:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010040007.e9407ls35825@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:17:27 +0200." <970269447.39d52307e0502@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:07:47 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, > I've tried to connect my palm to 4.1.1-STABLE (built couple of days before) > and it dumped core. > I've already connected my palm to other 4.1-STABLE system back in mid-august. > The only options I'd were: > palm: > set device /dev/cuaa1 > set speed 57600 > set ifaddr 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3 > accept dns > enable proxy > > then I write term in ppp and click on connect in palm. > I can't remember what was the setup on the laptop I used back in august, > but I think that it was the same or, really similar. > I can get more information from ppp(8) if you need, I built it with -g today. > I wonder what the bundle.66 is, it's missing debugging symbols. > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] Can ``set log +physical +hdlc +phase +debug'' and send the resulting log ? That stack trace doesn't look too sane, but if ppp is mishandling the incoming data, I may be able to figure out what it's doing wrong if you can send me a log of what it's received.... Also, it'd be worth doing disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp to see if that makes any difference. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 17:25:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B8137B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e940Ola73703; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:24:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e940NFs36018; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:23:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010040023.e940NFs36018@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: John Baldwin Cc: "Alexandr A. Listopad" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: periodic daily don't put ``Subject:'' field in the mail head In-Reply-To: Message from John Baldwin of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:33:13 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:23:15 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > On 02-Oct-00 Alexandr A. Listopad wrote: > > hi. > > > > I have 2 boxes with FreeBSD-4.1.1-STABLE, and both don't put ``Subject:'' > > field in the mail headers. > > This is due to a recent change to /usr/src/etc/crontab to "clean up" the > periodic entries. It broke all my mail filters as well. :-( It should be the same as it previously was. It sounds like you're missing the latest version of /usr/sbin/periodic... > > -- > > Laa > > -- > > John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 17:40:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4518837B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA06844; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:38:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200010040038.RAA06844@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? In-Reply-To: <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com> from John Reynolds~ at "Oct 3, 0 03:21:11 pm" To: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com (John Reynolds~) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:38:50 -0700 (MST) Cc: rivers@dignus.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, John Reynolds~ wrote: > > [ On Tuesday, October 3, Thomas David Rivers wrote: ] > > Just to add to this thread a little. > > > > I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to > > acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. > > > > In 3.4 PAO I get: > > > > Card inserted, slot 0 > > card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x30000 > > ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > I 4.1(.1) I get: > > > > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) In case it helps identify your parts, the IEEE Organization Unique Identifier (OUI) for 00:10:60 is: BILLIONTON SYSTEMS, INC. 3F-1, NO. 8, LANE 99 PU-DING RD. HSIN-CHU TAIWAN, R.O.C. and 01:02:00 has no entry in the database. I'd guess the MAC address your 4.1.1 system gets is bogus. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 17:41: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9360A37B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA19692; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:40:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma019420; Tue, 3 Oct 00 19:40:17 -0500 Message-ID: <39DA7C52.2047455E@confusion.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 19:39:46 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <20001002195559.J613@puck.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A brief update for all. A check indicates that mcopidl.cc is about 75K. The file has been compiling (still on that line) for close to 37 hours now. Does that still seem remotely reasonable? Will Andrews wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 07:14:09PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > You mean KDE 1.94? > > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > mcopidl.cc is a huge file. If you run low on swap, it may take forever > or close to that. I recommend at least 200MB of memory minimum to > compile the entire suite (including physical and swap). > > > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > > swap, running a generic kernel. > > Yeah, that's the bottleneck. For your system I suggest using packages. > Unfortunately, mcopidl.cc obviously needs to be broken up, but hasn't. > > For reference, I have a dual PIII-500 w/ 512MB of memory, and the new > box I'm building will have a dual PIII-600E w/ 640MB. The former takes > approximately 5 hours to build the entire suite. > > -- > Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench > The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." > -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 17:55:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A05E37B66C for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e940pEa75471; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:51:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e940nOs36506; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:49:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010040049.e940nOs36506@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf error on latest stable? In-Reply-To: Message from "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:22:20 -0200." <20001003152220.B3826@Fedaykin.here> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:49:24 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 05:00:00PM -0000, Cron Daemon wrote: > > newsyslog: malformed at: > > /var/log/monthly.log 640 12 * $M1D0 Z > > I've been getting this lately. This really sounds like you haven't got version 1.25.2.1 of newsyslog.c installed.... This was when the above format was added and was committed to -stable on May 19. Having said that, I would have thought you should be seeing a ``malformed interval'' message if you had an old newsyslog, so the only other thing I can think of is that you've got something dodgy in your newsyslog.conf.... what do you see if you ``cat -vet newsyslog.conf'' ? > -- > Mario S. F. Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." > lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br ) > flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 18:50:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 200-227-201-133-as.acessonet.com.br (200-227-201-133-as.acessonet.com.br [200.227.201.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A7837B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1505 invoked by uid 1001); 4 Oct 2000 01:50:18 -0000 From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:49:56 -0200 To: Brian Somers Cc: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf error on latest stable? Message-ID: <20001003234956.A1366@Fedaykin.here> References: <200010040049.e940nOs36506@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010040049.e940nOs36506@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:49:02AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:49:02AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > This really sounds like you haven't got version 1.25.2.1 of > newsyslog.c installed.... This was when the above format was added > and was committed to -stable on May 19. I am positive that I using the latest versions, but... MD5 (newsyslog.c) = c2f8b0b7543a1312bd178957fe7fd00c MD5 (pathnames.h) = 741be923233db85fec663603752189ab I was worried about a typo inside newsyslog.conf but everthing seems to check with what newsyslog(8) expects. Besides, I am using a -STABLE shipped newsyslog.conf file to be sure this is not a typo. At least, not mine. :) > Having said that, I would have thought you should be seeing a > ``malformed interval'' message if you had an old newsyslog, so the > only other thing I can think of is that you've got something dodgy in > your newsyslog.conf.... what do you see if you ``cat -vet > newsyslog.conf'' ? I get the following. I was assuming this as correct since the md5 for /usr/src/etc/newsyslog.conf and /etc/newsyslog.conf are identical. MD5 (/etc/newsyslog.conf) = 716810f8e00a9175e7886e27b7facad8 MD5 (/usr/etc/etc/newsyslog.conf) = 716810f8e00a9175e7886e27b7facad8 The `cat -vet` output is: # configuration file for newsyslog$ # $FreeBSD: src/etc/newsyslog.conf,v 1.25.2.2 2000/09/20 02:43:46 jkh Exp $$ #$ # logfilename [owner:group] mode count size when [ZB] [/pid_file] [sig_num]$ /var/log/cron^I^I^I^I600 3^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/amd.log^I^I^I644 7^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/kerberos.log^I^I^I644 7^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/lpd-errs^I^I^I644 7^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/maillog^I^I^I644 7 * @T00 Z$ /var/log/sendmail.st^I^I^I644 10 * 168 B$ /var/log/messages^I^I^I644 5^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/all.log^I^I^I600 7 * @T00 Z$ /var/log/slip.log^I^I^I600 3^I 100 * Z$ /var/log/ppp.log^I^I^I600 3^I 100^I* Z$ /var/log/security^I^I^I600 10 100 * Z$ /var/log/wtmp^I^I^I^I644 3^I *^I@01T05 B$ /var/log/daily.log^I^I^I640 7 * @T00 Z$ /var/log/weekly.log^I^I^I640 5 1 $W6D0 Z$ /var/log/monthly.log^I^I^I640 12 * $M1D0 Z$ I can't seem to identify the problem. I've just erased both /usr/src/etc/newsyslog.conf and /usr/src/usr.sbin/newsyslog. Let's see what cvsup brings me tonight. Odd. -- Mario S. F. Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br ) flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 19: 2:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from po3.glue.umd.edu (po3.glue.umd.edu [128.8.10.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C648837B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from glue.umd.edu (poseidon.student.umd.edu [129.2.144.21]) by po3.glue.umd.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9422ON20472; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:02:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <39DA8FB0.845F1A7@glue.umd.edu> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 22:02:24 -0400 From: Brandon Fosdick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darcy Buskermolen Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c References: <3.0.32.20001003152129.032787a0@mail.ok-connect.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > >On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier with make > >buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. Are there any plans for returning to a system where we don't need to do a buildworld just to make a new kernel? This is really really really getting annoying. And I hate it to. :) -Brandon PS. Did I mention I don't like it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 19:21:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blight.micron.net (blight.micron.net [204.229.122.191]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C5337B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 10.224.0.191 ([10.224.0.191]) by blight.micron.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.1) with SMTP id G1VVWJ00.777 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:21:55 -0600 Received: from micron.net (1Cust48.tnt1.bellingham2.wa.da.uu.net [63.29.24.48]) by with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Tue, 03 Oct 2000 20:21:54 -0600 Message-ID: <39DA956B.E1045440@micron.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 19:26:51 -0700 From: Anthony X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15CLE i586) X-Accept-Language: en, zh-TW MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SMTP-HELO: micron.net X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: theskunk@micron.net X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: 1Cust48.tnt1.bellingham2.wa.da.uu.net [63.29.24.48] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 20: 4: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3B337B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79D151953; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:04:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:04:12 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Laurence Berland Cc: Roman Shterenzon , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001003220412.W41798@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Laurence Berland , Roman Shterenzon , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <970557932.39d989ec5eece@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <39DA2932.4C4B1D9B@confusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39DA2932.4C4B1D9B@confusion.net>; from stuyman@confusion.net on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:45:06PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:45:06PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > Why would -pipe require me to press ctrl-D to continue compilation? So > far nothing else has had this issue, and i have everything using -pipe > since it's in make.conf Roman may be on the point here, try his suggestion and let me know. -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 21:10:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21ED37B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA25437; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:10:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma025368; Tue, 3 Oct 00 23:09:34 -0500 Message-ID: <39DAAD5F.184E6E6@confusion.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 23:09:03 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: Roman Shterenzon , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <970557932.39d989ec5eece@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <39DA2932.4C4B1D9B@confusion.net> <20001003220412.W41798@puck.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Despite my having no clue why that would work, I tried this suggestion. I really did want it to make things better. It did not change anything, and the process is bubbling along...grrrr...this just doesn't seem right. Will Andrews wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:45:06PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > > Why would -pipe require me to press ctrl-D to continue compilation? So > > far nothing else has had this issue, and i have everything using -pipe > > since it's in make.conf > > Roman may be on the point here, try his suggestion and let me know. > > -- > Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench > The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." > -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 21:49:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0ED37B503; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA08528; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:49:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma008450; Tue, 3 Oct 00 23:48:48 -0500 Message-ID: <39DAB690.3686A882@confusion.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 23:48:17 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews , Roman Shterenzon , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <970557932.39d989ec5eece@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <39DA2932.4C4B1D9B@confusion.net> <20001003220412.W41798@puck.firepipe.net> <39DAAD5F.184E6E6@confusion.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've retried compiling this without -pipe by hand, and that has no effect. I've tried fiddling with the nice of the process, going all the way to -20, which has no effect. According to top, the process ends up almost always being in state swread with a pri of -22. I take this to mean we're waiting to read from something, but I don't know. Sincerely yours, Exasperated in Evanston Laurence Berland wrote: > > Despite my having no clue why that would work, I tried this suggestion. > I really did want it to make things better. It did not change anything, > and the process is bubbling along...grrrr...this just doesn't seem > right. > > Will Andrews wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:45:06PM -0500, Laurence Berland wrote: > > > Why would -pipe require me to press ctrl-D to continue compilation? So > > > far nothing else has had this issue, and i have everything using -pipe > > > since it's in make.conf > > > > Roman may be on the point here, try his suggestion and let me know. > > > > -- > > Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench > > The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." > > -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > -- > Laurence Berland > Intern, Flooz.com > Northwestern '04 > stuyman@confusion.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 22:10:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtprelay2.adelphia.net (smtprelay2.adelphia.net [64.8.25.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744D437B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adelphia.net ([24.50.186.158]) by smtprelay2.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id G1W3LK00.BOA for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:08:08 -0400 Message-ID: <39DB6512.395BA221@adelphia.net> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:12:50 -0400 From: Nader Turki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 2 HD's Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I know that this is not the right list for such a question. But i'm a newbie and sure thee are many sys admins on this list who can answer my question :) I have 2 HD's 1. 9GB SCSI Ultra2 7200RPM 2. 36GB SCSI Ultra2 10,000RPM You see they both used to be 7200RPM, then i had bad sectors and IBM replaced the HD to a faster/better one. So, is it better to use just the 36GB 10,000RPM Or, I can use both and there will be no difference between the 7200 and 10000RPM? I mean I usually have /, /var, /tmp, /usr on the 9GB and /home on the 36GB But now I have a faster 36GB so i dunno if it's gonna be the same or it's stupid to use the old one (7200RPM) with the new one. I'll appreciate it if someone could help me. Thanks, -Nader To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 22:47:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C6F37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e945l6f96839; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:47:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:47:06 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Neff_Glen@emc.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: v3.x-stable problem Message-ID: <20001004074706.A96772@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <0BEC2FAE2A21D411965C00E0291E7C3340BED4@corpmx17.isus.emc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <0BEC2FAE2A21D411965C00E0291E7C3340BED4@corpmx17.isus.emc.com>; from Neff_Glen@emc.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 02:19:38PM -0400 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001003 20:20], Neff_Glen@emc.com (Neff_Glen@emc.com) wrote: >In the file: include/cputypes.h > >The line which reads: > > #define CPU_4 16 /* Intel Pentium 4 */ > >Should read: > > #define CPU_P4 16 /* Intel Pentium 4 */ > >At least according to what's called in the file: i386/identcpu.c Feck, I had that correct before I commit it, must've hit an x in vim while going over the changes once more. Should be fixed now. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 22:47:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FBE37B503 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 593741F55; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:47:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:47:28 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001004014728.A399@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable References: <82946.970604803@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <20001003170705.D20080@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001003170705.D20080@hal9000.bsdonline.org>; from A.J.Caines@altavista.net on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 05:07:05PM -0400 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan, Cy and co., Here are my tests and the results. Have the whitecoats on standby. In each case I ran a tight ps/top loop in the background, ie. # while true; do (ps -auxww ; top 50 | head -55 ) > $snapshot ; done & I then ran the "periodic daily" with command echo, ie. # sh -x /usr/sbin/periodic daily | tee $ouputfile 1. No mfs, no fdesc Completed with no errors. 2. Both mfs mounts (/tmp and /var/run), no fdesc Completed with no errors. 3. Both mfs mounts and fdesc Crash. I didn't check the space left in my /var, so I couldn't get the dump this time. Since this appears reproducable and I need sleep, I will collect one tomorow along with the rest of the information. I'm still sure it crashed before I added fdesc. Ok, I'll come quietly. BTW, renaming /var/run while working on the console was interesting. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 23:18:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1958C37B66E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.com ([24.177.36.45]) by femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001004061758.PMTC6495.femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com> for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:17:58 -0700 Message-ID: <39DACC4B.C8A627A9@home.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 23:20:59 -0700 From: loconet Organization: loconet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: World.sh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am makeing a script for newbies to help them upgrade there system it isnt really pretty it mostly just a script that i made in a cuple of hours but does the job and i was wundering if anyone could give it a try and then email me bug/info/ etc.. or if you whant to help me then email me saying so.. to dl goto : world-sh.sourceforge.net or www.sourceforge.net/projects/world-sh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 3 23:19:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570A637B66C for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e946IqX86613; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Andrew J Caines Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew J Caines of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:47:28 EDT." <20001004014728.A399@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 23:18:52 -0700 Message-ID: <86610.970640332@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Here are my tests and the results. Have the whitecoats on standby. This is what I expected. :) Still, you've proven there's a clear bad interaction here. Thanks! - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 0: 2:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from srcso.globis.ru (globis.ru [212.248.80.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE5537B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raduga.sochi.net (raduga.sochi.net [212.248.82.76]) by srcso.globis.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03859 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:20:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@raduga.sochi.net) Received: (from igor@localhost) by raduga.sochi.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e94726C05466 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:02:06 +0400 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:02:06 +0400 From: Igor Roboul To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: passwd problem after builworld/installworld Message-ID: <20001004110206.A5407@linux.rainbow> Reply-To: igorr@crosswinds.net Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have done buildworld/installworld of one-week old cvsupped source. So now I have 4.1.1-STABLE. All works Ok, except demon# passwd pgsql Changing local password for pgsql. New password: Retype new password: passwd: cannot set password cipher: Undefined error: 0 passwd: /etc/master.passwd: unchanged I have removed USA_RESIDENT=NO from /etc/make.conf before build. My present shell accounts work well, I have just forgot passwd for pgsql, so I need change it :-) demon# ldd /usr/bin/passwd /usr/bin/passwd: libcrypt.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x2806b000) librpcsvc.so.2 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.2 (0x28081000) libutil.so.3 => /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28089000) libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28093000) demon# ls /usr/lib/lib*crypt* /usr/lib/libcrypt.a /usr/lib/libdescrypt.a /usr/lib/libcrypt.so /usr/lib/libdescrypt.so /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2 /usr/lib/libdescrypt.so.2 /usr/lib/libcrypt_p.a /usr/lib/libdescrypt_p.a /usr/lib/libcrypto.a /usr/lib/libscrypt.a /usr/lib/libcrypto.so /usr/lib/libscrypt.so /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1 /usr/lib/libscrypt.so.2 /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a /usr/lib/libscrypt_p.a -- Igor Roboul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", Sochi, Russia http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 3: 6:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB1E37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 03:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.203.90]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13glRG-000Nv0-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:06:14 +0100 Received: (from ip@localhost) by karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e94A6CE56504 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:06:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ip) From: Ian Pallfreeman Message-Id: <200010041006.e94A6CE56504@karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:06:11 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <200010011925.MAA45944@pathlink.net> from "Kachun Lee" at Oct 01, 2000 12:25:37 PM Reply-To: ip@mcc.ac.uk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) wrote: > I upgraded one of our news servers from 4.0-S to 4.1.1 Release. > [...] > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 > fault virtual address = 0x14 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0134bb3 > [...] > c01349c4 t ahc_action <----------------------------- Same here; upgraded two news boxes from 4.1-STABLE to 4.1.1-RELEASE and they were both crashing regularly. Here's three panics from the worst culprit: *** #1 *** Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ea18 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ea80 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 5 (syncer) interrupt mask = trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... panic: lockmgr: locking against myself *** #2 *** Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ccc8 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6cd30 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 4 (bufdaemon) interrupt mask = bio trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 giving up on 345 buffers *** #3 *** Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present^ instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6cc94 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ccfc code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 4 (bufdaemon) interrupt mask = bio trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... Spot the pattern: utserv% grep ^instr nakaleen instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f6a3 The last one is running a debug kernel, but I didn't manage to either get a dump or get into the debugger. :-( nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6a3 nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6a nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6 nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f c012f4b4 t ahc_action I've reverted to 4.1-STABLE from around 7th August, which is fine, except for the kvm change between the two. Bah. Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #0: Tue Oct 3 12:54:30 BST 2000 ip@karma:/usr/src/sys/compile/NAKALEEN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 400911107 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (400.91-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x651 Stepping = 1 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127995904 (124996K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02b5000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 7.2 chip1: port 0x5000-0x500f at device 7.3 on pci0 fxp0: port 0x6800-0x683f mem 0xe4000000-0xe40fffff,0xe4100000-0xe4100fff irq 12 at device 11.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:09:07:3f ahc0: port 0x6c00-0x6cff mem 0xe4101000-0xe4101fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs ahc1: port 0x7000-0x70ff mem 0xe4102000-0xe4102fff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ad0: 124MB [1001/15/17] at ata0-master using PIO0 ad1: 325MB [768/14/62] at ata0-slave using PIO0 ad2: 405MB [989/15/56] at ata1-master using PIO3 Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da0: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da2: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da4 at ahc1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da4: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da4: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da3 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da3: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da3: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da6 at ahc1 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da6: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da6: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da6: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da1: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da7 at ahc1 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 da7: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da7: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da7: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) da5 at ahc1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da5: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da5: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted vinum: loaded vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da7s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da4s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da3s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da5s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da6s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da2s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1e vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da0s1e FWIW, Ian. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 4:21:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from xkis.kis.ru (xkis.kis.ru [195.98.32.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E16037B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 04:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dv@localhost) by xkis.kis.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA29137 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:21:45 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:21:45 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Valdov X-Sender: dv@xkis.kis.ru To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 3.x kernel compile problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include opt_global.h -elf ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c: In function `printcpuinfo': ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: `CPU_P4' undeclared (first use this function) ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 4:44:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED3237B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e94Bij413508; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA42295; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id HAA84948; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:44:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:44:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-Reply-To: <200010032346.RAA31311@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > In message <200010032214.SAA82730@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : I 4.1(.1) I get: > : > : ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > : ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > : > > This is a big clue that something bad is wrong. > > Warner > Warner is right... Just to verify things further - I hardcoded the mac address in if_ed.c:ed_get_Linksys() (wrapping an #if 0 around the code that gets it before and simply setting the bytes in sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[].) This worked beautifully - and my laptop is no `on the net.' The code for this in the 3.4 PAO is: /* * 0x14-0x19 : Physical Address Register 0-5 (PAR0-PAR5) * 0x1A : Card ID Register (CIR) * 0x1B : Check Sum Register (SR) */ for (sum = 0, i = 0x4; i < 0xc; i++) sum += inb(sc->asic_addr + i); if (sum != 0xff) return 0; /* invalid DL10019C */ for (i = 0; i < ETHER_ADDR_LEN; i++) { sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i] = inb(sc->asic_addr + 0x4 + i); /* printf("%02x.", sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i]); */ } return 2; while the code for this in 4.1.1 is: /* * Linksys registers(offset from ASIC base) * * 0x04-0x09 : Physical Address Register 0-5 (PAR0-PAR5) * 0x0A : Card ID Register (CIR) * 0x0B : Check Sum Register (SR) */ for (sum = 0, i = 0x04; i < 0x0c; i++) sum += ed_asic_inb(sc, i); if (sum != 0xff) return (0); /* invalid DL10019C */ for (i = 0; i < ETHER_ADDR_LEN; i++) { sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[i] = ed_asic_inb(sc, 0x04 + i); } it turns out that `sum' was not 0xff (but 0x51) as it should have been... but, everything looks just fine to me... (of course, I'm not "up" on the busifying of everything - so I'm not sure if ed_asic_inb() actually expands to the same things as the basic inb() was in 3.4.) But - this seems to be the place for the difficulties... - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 5:10: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from front3m.grolier.fr (front3m.grolier.fr [195.36.216.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AD837B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 05:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sniper.domtek.fr (nas4-31.vzy.club-internet.fr [195.36.175.31]) by front3m.grolier.fr (8.9.3/No_Relay+No_Spam_MGC990224) with ESMTP id OAA15166; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:10:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by sniper.domtek.fr (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D0FEA614AD; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:07:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:07:21 +0200 From: Matthieu Pasini To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: marc@kleurbeeld.be, eapeland@c2i.net Subject: Re: Setting up sppp Message-ID: <20001004140721.E876@sniper> References: <200009301844.UAA01218@golf.dax.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from marc@kleurbeeld.be on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:00:00PM +0200 X-Disclaimer: "Not use too much your computer ..." Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From the keybord of Marc Veldman on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:00:00PM +0200 > As far as I know, there is no HOW-TO about this. > Maybe, if we get this all figured out, we could > write one. > > I'd really like to get this into some sort of > HOW-TO/FAQ. All comments/experiences are welcome ! > > (Excueses for the late response, but the > Real World had kept me away...) > > Marc Veldman. A nice thing to do would be to make a step-by-step explained HOW-TO in order to make the hard exercice of building a gateway more easy . the xDSL and Cable are getting out with lower price, and i think that a lot of persons are interrested on making a gateway for their home network (i have experienced that ...) so why not on freebsd ? I'll be to help if it's needed . Regards -- Matthieu Pasini "Je pense, donc je suis" -- René Descartes Translation : "I think, so i am" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 6:50:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wysoft.tzo.com (c481444-a.bremtn1.wa.home.com [24.12.235.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D8337B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wysoft@localhost) by wysoft.tzo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA13863; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Wyman To: Dmitry Valdov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.x kernel compile problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Run cvsup again, this was just fixed. On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Dmitry Valdov wrote: > Hi! > > > cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include > -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include opt_global.h -elf ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c: In function `printcpuinfo': > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: `CPU_P4' undeclared (first use this function) > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > ../../i386/i386/identcpu.c:223: for each function it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 7: 1:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtpproxy1.mitre.org (mb-20-100.mitre.org [129.83.20.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582F037B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avsrv1.mitre.org (avsrv1.mitre.org [129.83.20.58]) by smtpproxy1.mitre.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23914 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:01:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailsrv2.mitre.org (mailsrv2.mitre.org [129.83.221.17]) by smtpsrv1.mitre.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA25890 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mitre.org ([128.29.145.140]) by mailsrv2.mitre.org (Netscape Messaging Server 4.1) with ESMTP id G1WSAD00.RO6; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:01:25 -0400 Message-ID: <39DB3830.9126DB8E@mitre.org> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 10:01:20 -0400 From: "Andresen,Jason R." Organization: The MITRE Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en]C-20000818M (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nader Turki Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2 HD's References: <39DB6512.395BA221@adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nader Turki wrote: > > Hi there, > I know that this is not the right list for such a question. But i'm a > newbie and sure thee are many sys admins on this list who can answer my > question :) > > I have 2 HD's > 1. 9GB SCSI Ultra2 7200RPM > 2. 36GB SCSI Ultra2 10,000RPM > > You see they both used to be 7200RPM, then i had bad sectors and IBM > replaced the HD to a faster/better one. > > So, is it better to use just the 36GB 10,000RPM > Or, I can use both and there will be no difference between the 7200 and > 10000RPM? > > I mean I usually have /, /var, /tmp, /usr on the 9GB and /home on the > 36GB > But now I have a faster 36GB so i dunno if it's gonna be the same or > it's stupid to use the old one (7200RPM) with the new one. > > I'll appreciate it if someone could help me. > Well, the 7200 will be slower than the 10,000, but that is not a reason to dump it entirely. Unless you are striping between the two drives, you can use the 10,000 at nearly its full speed (minus any bus contention issues that shouldn't be a problem with only two drives on the SCSI bus) and just leave the 7200 as a slower data drive or something. BTW, if the 36GB drive is the IBM DDYS-T36950N, be sure you have adequate cooling on the drive. I got one of those and it runs hotter than fire if you don't have a fan blowing across it. One final issue: if your new drive is a SCSI-3 Ultra/160 and your old one is a SCSI-2 Ultra or something, the bus will be forced to the lower speed, slowing down the bigger drive (independant of the RPM rating), however if your controller is only SCSI-2 Ultra (2940UW for instance) it won't be able to use the Ultra/160 even if you take the slower drive off of the bus. -- _ _ _ ___ ____ ___ ______________________________________ / \/ \ | ||_ _|| _ \|___| | Jason Andresen -- jandrese@mitre.org / /\/\ \ | | | | | |/ /|_|_ | Views expressed may not reflect those /_/ \_\|_| |_| |_|\_\|___| | of the Mitre Corporation. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 8:13:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719A337B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 08:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e94FFDs32098 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:15:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:15:12 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: X11 Console Problems FBSD 4.1.1 and XFree86 4.0.1_1 since new compilation Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since I compiled XFree86 4.0.1_1 from the sources offered in the ports-collection, I have a very severe problem: Prior to this "update" I could change from graphical display to console by Ctrl-Alt-F9 (I use vt as console driver because many clients have to much problems in coming along with the pc console). Now this do not work anymore! I changed nothing to my configuration except I changed the mouese protocol which caused errors and left mouse in unusable state when using "PS/2" as protocol. When now the Ctrl-Alt-F9 keys are hit, I get a funny coloured screen - but I do not get a console! How can I fix that? What happened to the code? What are the changes in compilation? - MfG O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver-Abteilung des IPA IT Netz- und Systembetreuung Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 D-55099 Mainz BRD/Germany Tel: +496131/3924662 FAX: +496131/3923235 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 9:19:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from modemcable101.200-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca (modemcable140.61-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.61.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF27E37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 50751 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 16:19:16 -0000 Received: from patrak.local.mindstep.com (HELO PATRAK) (192.168.10.4) by jacuzzi.local.mindstep.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 16:19:16 -0000 Message-ID: <010b01c02e1e$ed22a0a0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> From: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" To: References: <20001004110206.A5407@linux.rainbow> Subject: Re: passwd problem after builworld/installworld Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:19:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Roboul" > I have done buildworld/installworld of one-week old cvsupped source. > So now I have 4.1.1-STABLE. All works Ok, except > > demon# passwd pgsql > Changing local password for pgsql. > New password: > Retype new password: > passwd: cannot set password cipher: Undefined error: 0 > passwd: /etc/master.passwd: unchanged I have the exact same problem if I set "passwd_format=des" in my login.conf file. If I leave it undefined or set to "passwd_format=md5" then the password updating works well. bash-2.03$ uname -a FreeBSD nitro 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #1: Tue Oct 3 17:53:09 EDT 2000 patrick@nitro:/music/usr_obj/music/usr_src/sys/NITRO i386 bash-2.03$ ls -l libcrypt* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.a -> libscrypt.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so -> libscrypt.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so.2 -> libscrypt.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 15 Jan 3 2000 libcrypt_p.a -> libdescrypt_p.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1276404 Oct 3 16:29 libcrypto.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Oct 3 16:29 libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 781588 Oct 3 16:29 libcrypto.so.1 bash-2.03$ ls -l libscrypt* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9378 Oct 3 12:06 libscrypt.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Oct 3 16:22 libscrypt.so -> libscrypt.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6224 Oct 3 12:06 libscrypt.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 26862 Jan 3 2000 libscrypt_p.a bash-2.03$ ls -l libdescrypt* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 16246 Oct 3 12:06 libdescrypt.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Oct 3 16:22 libdescrypt.so -> libdescrypt.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11412 Oct 3 12:06 libdescrypt.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 34894 Jan 3 2000 libdescrypt_p.a In my /etc/make.conf file I have the following option: NODESCRYPTLINKS=true # do not replace libcrypt -> libscrypt links Any clue ? Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 10: 2:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7BC37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02516; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:00:44 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:00:44 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Patrick Bihan-Faou Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: passwd problem after builworld/installworld In-Reply-To: <010b01c02e1e$ed22a0a0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > > demon# passwd pgsql > > Changing local password for pgsql. > > New password: > > Retype new password: > > passwd: cannot set password cipher: Undefined error: 0 > > passwd: /etc/master.passwd: unchanged > > I have the exact same problem if I set "passwd_format=des" in my login.conf > file. If I leave it undefined or set to "passwd_format=md5" then the > password updating works well. > > bash-2.03$ ls -l libcrypt* > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.a -> libscrypt.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so -> libscrypt.so > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so.2 -> > libscrypt.so.2 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 15 Jan 3 2000 libcrypt_p.a -> > libdescrypt_p.a you do not have des in your libcrypt (libscrypt) what we need is one single libcrypt with all cipher algorithms in it (libcrypt == libdescrypt) /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11: 0:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from eris.intertech-canada.com (eris.intertech-canada.com [216.191.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 805D837B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 401 invoked by uid 98); 4 Oct 2000 17:55:58 -0000 Message-ID: <20001004175558.400.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> From: "Flattie McGee" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Kernel Compile error on 4.1.1 (with info) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 17:55:58 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Its me again ;) So I managed to make it through the ordeal of the make world processes (I forgot to set the BIOS time/date, thanks to the people who helped me, you know who you are). Now I'm faced with another problem. Odly enough, I've commented out the USB support lines in the kernel, and removed the #'s to uncomment them. I've tried removing the ata drivers..too. I've provided my Kernel config info, dmesg info as well as the error msg. --- machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident GENERIC maxusers 32 #makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options MATH_EMULATE #Support for x87 emulation options INET #InterNETworking options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options MFS #Memory Filesystem options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device options NFS #Network Filesystem options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as root device, NFS required options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660 required options PROCFS #Process filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options SCSI_DELAY=15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering #options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA #Enable DMA on ATAPI devices SCSI Controllers device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required) device da # Direct Access (disks) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device ppi # Parallel port interface device # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. device miibus # MII bus support device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device pty 16 # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device md # Memory "disks" # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! pseudo-device bpf 5 # Berkeley packet filter pseudo-device snp 5 # Snoop --- Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #0: Tue Sep 26 00:46:59 GMT 2000 jkh@narf.osd.bsdi.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (601.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 100597760 (98240K bytes) avail memory = 93712384 (91516K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0416000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 4.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 11 at device 4.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: port 0x5000-0x500f at device 4.3 on pci0 pci0: at 9.0 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe800-0xe87f mem 0xd5810000-0xd581007f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:da:84:83:88 miibus0: on xl0 xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto ahc0: port 0xec00-0xecff mem 0xd5811000-0xd5811fff irq 5 at device 13.0 on pci0 aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave using PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 20.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da0: 2061MB (4222640 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 262C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 20.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da1: 8715MB (17850000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1111C) xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 180 bytes xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 240 bytes --- ===> aue cc -O -pipe -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:110: `USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:110: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:110: (near initialization for `aue_devs[3].aue_did') /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c: In function `aue_miibus_statchg': /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:494: `USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:494: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:494: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c: In function `aue_reset': /usr/src/sys/modules/aue/../../dev/usb/if_aue.c:589: `USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:14: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dynamictrade.com (node-d8e93fd2.powerinter.net [216.233.63.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A6EF37B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31677 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 18:13:47 -0000 Received: from tyr.internal.3.168.192.in-addr.arpa (HELO dynamictrade.com) (192.168.3.213) by mailhost.internal with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 18:13:47 -0000 Message-ID: <39DB73D9.A4C96755@dynamictrade.com> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:15:53 -0500 From: john b p melesky X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Flattie McGee Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Compile error on 4.1.1 (with info) References: <20001004175558.400.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Now I'm faced with another problem. Odly enough, I've commented out the USB > support lines in the kernel, and removed the #'s to uncomment them. I've > tried removing the ata drivers..too. ... > `USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650' undeclared here (not in a function) I ran into the same problem this morning. It's being compiled as a kernel module, which is why commenting it out of your kernel config file doesn't help. I ended up going into /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs.h and adding the following line: #define USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650 0x4001 /* no clue -- jmelesky */ I don't know if that line is accurate or not, but i didn't have that device on my machine, so it worked fine just getting everything to compile. Kernel compiled and ran without a problem. Anyone working with USB know if that's the way to get around this error? -johnnnnnnnn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:20: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from isds.duke.edu (davinci.isds.duke.edu [152.3.22.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1696137B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from feta.isds.duke.edu (feta.isds.duke.edu [152.3.22.76]) by isds.duke.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26512; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:20:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from sto@localhost) by feta.isds.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e94IK1J32845; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:20:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sto) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:20:01 -0400 From: "Sean O'Connell" To: Flattie McGee Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel Compile error on 4.1.1 (with info) Message-ID: <20001004142001.I32095@stat.Duke.EDU> Reply-To: "Sean O'Connell" Mail-Followup-To: Sean O'Connell , Flattie McGee , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001004175558.400.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001004175558.400.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com>; from flattie@globelinks.org on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:55:58PM +0000 X-Organization: Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Flattie McGee stated: : : Its me again ;) : : So I managed to make it through the ordeal of the make world processes (I : forgot to set the BIOS time/date, thanks to the people who helped me, you : know who you are). : : Now I'm faced with another problem. Odly enough, I've commented out the USB : support lines in the kernel, and removed the #'s to uncomment them. I've : tried removing the ata drivers..too. I think you must have cvsup'd in between wpaul 2000/10/03 11:52:55 PDT Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sys/dev/usb if_aue.c Log: MFC: sync with -current. Add support for D-Link NIC with different device ID, allow homePNA transceivers to work. Revision Changes Path 1.19.2.5 +11 -4 src/sys/dev/usb/if_aue.c AND wpaul 2000/10/03 14:01:00 PDT Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sys/dev/usb usbdevs Log: Rrrrr. Add the device ID for the D-Link DSB650 NIC. Revision Changes Path 1.11.2.7 +2 -1 src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs I think you can simply grab the lates releng4 versions usbdevs.h usbdevs_data.h from cvsweb (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/usb) HTH, S To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:21:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beta.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E5A237B66E for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17530 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 18:21:12 -0000 Received: from client75-185.hispeed.ch (HELO WORK) (62.2.75.185) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 18:21:12 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:24:31 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.46c) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: make installworld over NFS: supported? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I've been wondering if installworld over NFS is supported or not. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't (which is the case at the moment). I'd really like this feature to have my servers upgraded easily as soon as an important update gets released without needing to do cvsup/make buildworld on each of the machines (what needs more CPU time/bandwith than really needed for the task)... Any other approaches to solve this problem are welcome as well, for sure. Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:27:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D362737B670 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e94IRUq05724; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:27:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39DB7690.73B0C12F@thehousleys.net> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 14:27:28 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld over NFS: supported? References: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > > Hello, > I've been wondering if installworld over NFS is supported or not. Sometimes > it works, sometimes it doesn't (which is the case at the moment). I'd > really like this feature to have my servers upgraded easily as soon as an > important update gets released without needing to do cvsup/make > buildworld on each of the machines (what needs more CPU time/bandwith than > really needed for the task)... Any other approaches to solve this > problem are welcome as well, for sure. > I haven't had problems since the 2.2.x days with this. I currently have 4 active machines, 3 of them do installworld via nfs. cat: server make -j16 buildworld make installworld baby: workstation mount cat:/usr/src /usr/src mount cat:/usr/obj /usr/obj cd /usr/src ; make installworld egg: workstation mount cat:/usr/src /usr/src mount cat:/usr/obj /usr/obj cd /usr/src ; make installworld etc..... Jim -- Progress (n) : What led from smart users in front of dumb terminals to dumb users in front of smart terminals. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:29:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57CD37B66D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e94DSl227884; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:28:47 GMT (envelope-from bsd-stable@boneyard.lawrence.ks.us) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:28:47 +0000 (GMT) From: "Stephen D. Spencer" To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld over NFS: supported? In-Reply-To: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > I've been wondering if installworld over NFS is supported or not. Sometimes > it works, sometimes it doesn't (which is the case at the moment). [...] Hrm. Perhaps I have good timing as to when I attempt this, but I can't say I've ever had a problem with NFS installworlds. Just make sure that both ./src and ./obj are mounted on the remote system. Make sure you're in single user mode. Stephen Spencer | | "Mutton yesterday, mutton today, and blimey, | if it don't look like mutton again tomarrer" | -Bert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:34:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.infolibria.com (mail.infolibria.com [199.103.137.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420437B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from infolibria.com (border [199.103.137.193]) by mail.infolibria.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04952DDB8B; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:34:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <39DB780D.B5F17A68@infolibria.com> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 14:33:49 -0400 From: John LoVerso Organization: InfoLibria, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: rivers@dignus.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? References: <200010040038.RAA06844@freeway.dcfinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > and 01:02:00 has no entry in the database. Because it is a multicast address, not a unicast address. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:39:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.infolibria.com (mail.infolibria.com [199.103.137.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620A537B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h201.infolibria.com (unknown [199.103.137.201]) by mail.infolibria.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C6ADDB8B for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h201.infolibria.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA39982; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:28:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from loverso@loverso.southborough.ma.us) Message-Id: <200010041828.OAA39982@h201.infolibria.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Brandon Fosdick Subject: buildkernel without buildworld (Re: agp_if.c) X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://surf.to/loverso Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 14:28:35 -0400 From: "John R. LoVerso" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are there any plans for returning to a system where we don't need to do a > buildworld just to make a new kernel? This is really really really getting I'm sure I'll be told of the errors of my ways, but here are two changes I use on a 4-STABLE source base. The sys/conf/Makefile.i386 change was originally there to catch when I'd done a "make buildkernel" without the "make buildworld", as it preventing the make from continuing after genassym crapped out and left a useless assym.s. This would be useful to have in the tree. The change to Makefile.inc1 simply arranges for "make buildkernel" to fall back to the installed toolchain when a "make buildworld" hasn't been done. Thus, the latter is no longer a requirement for the former. For someone not wanting to buildworld, this is good; however, this would be a disaster if someone required a successful build of the toolchain before building anything else. John *** Makefile.inc1.orig Wed Oct 4 10:44:52 2000 --- Makefile.inc1 Tue Oct 3 13:27:39 2000 *************** *** 169,171 **** LIBRARY_PATH=${WORLDTMP}${SHLIBDIR}:${WORLDTMP}/usr/lib \ ! OBJFORMAT_PATH=${WORLDTMP}/usr/libexec \ PERL5LIB=${WORLDTMP}/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 --- 169,171 ---- LIBRARY_PATH=${WORLDTMP}${SHLIBDIR}:${WORLDTMP}/usr/lib \ ! OBJFORMAT_PATH=${WORLDTMP}/usr/libexec:/usr/libexec \ PERL5LIB=${WORLDTMP}/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 *** sys/conf/Makefile.i386.orig Thu Jul 6 20:29:27 2000 --- sys/conf/Makefile.i386 Tue Oct 3 13:31:03 2000 *************** *** 172,173 **** --- 172,174 ---- sh $S/kern/genassym.sh genassym.o > ${.TARGET} + if test -f assym.s -a ! -s assym.s ; then rm -f assym.s ; exit 1; fi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:40:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD937B66D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e94Idvd09880; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <14811.31101.675079.926@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Maxime Henrion Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: questions and suggestions about default sendmail configuration In-Reply-To: <20001004012215.A806@nebula.cybercable.fr> References: <20001004012215.A806@nebula.cybercable.fr> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta36) "Notus" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mux> First, I realized that sendmail is running by default on port 25 mux> (nothing weird here ...) but on port 587 too because of this line in= mux> the sendmail.cf : mux> O DaemonPortOptions=3DPort=3D587, Name=3DMSA, M=3DE mux> It is probably known and wanted because I remember a thread about it= a mux> while ago. However, if someone could explain me the use of this, mux> that'd be kind ! :-) =46rom the RELEASE_NOTES: sendmail implements RFC 2476 (Message Submission), e.g., it can now listen on several different ports. Use: O DaemonPortOptions=3DName=3DMSA, Port=3D587, M=3DE to run a Message Submission Agent (MSA); this is turned on by default in m4-generated .cf files; it can be turned off with FEATURE(`no_default_msa'). mux> Then, the genericstable feature is not enabled by default. mux> To enable genericstable, these lines must be added to the freebsd.mc= mux> file : mux> FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable')dnl mux> GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains')dnl I more inclined to push for users configuring features they need rather than pushing them in the default configuration. Additionally, in practic= e, I actually don't see a lot of sites using genericstable. mux> Finally, the PrivacyOptions set by default allow both the usage of t= he mux> EXPN and VRFY command, wich aren't a real security threat but can mux> anyway allow someone to get some informations since it's an easy way= mux> to know wether a login exists on a system or not. Thus, it would mux> perhaps be a good idea to add noexpn and novrfy to the PrivacyOption= s mux> (or even goaway, but it might be a bit hard by default ;). I do agree with this one however. I'll add it to my list of things to do= =2E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 11:58:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beta.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78D4B37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18414 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 18:58:20 -0000 Received: from client75-185.hispeed.ch (HELO WORK) (62.2.75.185) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 18:58:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:01:39 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.46c) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <18418097592.20001004210139@buz.ch> To: James Housley Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: make installworld over NFS: supported? In-reply-To: <39DB7690.73B0C12F@thehousleys.net> References: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> <39DB7690.73B0C12F@thehousleys.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello James, Wednesday, October 04, 2000, 8:27:28 PM, you wrote: > cat: server > make -j16 buildworld > make installworld > baby: workstation > mount cat:/usr/src /usr/src > mount cat:/usr/obj /usr/obj > cd /usr/src ; make installworld > egg: workstation > mount cat:/usr/src /usr/src > mount cat:/usr/obj /usr/obj > cd /usr/src ; make installworld Well, alpha has got a completely built world/kernel on /usr/src and /usr/obj which is a symlink to /backup/obj. I mounted the two directories as /usr/src and /usr/obj on gamma but I always end up with an error stating that install couldn't find bin/rmail which is strange as the log of a normal make installworld on alpha doesn't even show up bin/rmail: alpha# grep rmail installworld_log ===> usr.sbin/ctm/ctm_rmail install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ctm_rmail /usr/sbin install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 ctm_rmail.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_smail.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_rmail.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_dequeue.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_rmail.1.gz gamma# grep rmail installworld_log ===> bin/rmail install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rmail /bin Stop in /usr/src/bin/rmail. Now what about this (4.1.1 STABLE, CVSupped at about 14:30 GMT today)? Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 12: 2:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761A537B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e94J2Nq05968; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:02:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39DB7EBB.D747EDA6@thehousleys.net> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 15:02:19 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld over NFS: supported? References: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> <39DB7690.73B0C12F@thehousleys.net> <18418097592.20001004210139@buz.ch> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms1C219F4250192CC50D2268F9" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms1C219F4250192CC50D2268F9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > > alpha# grep rmail installworld_log > ===> usr.sbin/ctm/ctm_rmail > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ctm_rmail /usr/sbin > install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 ctm_rmail.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 > /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_smail.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_rmail.1.gz > /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_dequeue.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/ctm_rmail.1.gz > > gamma# grep rmail installworld_log > ===> bin/rmail > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rmail /bin > Stop in /usr/src/bin/rmail. > > Now what about this (4.1.1 STABLE, CVSupped at about 14:30 GMT today)? > Is /etc/make.conf different on these machines? They have to be identical, well almost. The build (alpha) machine can't say NO_SENDMAIL=true and the install machine (gamma) be missing that line (for example). Check for differences in these files. Jim -- Progress (n) : What led from smart users in front of dumb terminals to dumb users in front of smart terminals. --------------ms1C219F4250192CC50D2268F9 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIIBwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIH+DCCB/QCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BdgwggK8MIICJaADAgECAgMDTCIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgZQxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxFDASBgNVBAcTC0R1cmJhbnZpbGxlMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZU aGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9QZXJzb25h bCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMTk5OS45LjE2MB4XDTAwMDkyMTE1NDAyOVoXDTAxMDkyMTE1NDAy OVowXjEQMA4GA1UEBBMHSG91c2xleTEOMAwGA1UEKhMFSmFtZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDUphbWVz IEhvdXNsZXkxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE2ppbUB0aGVob3VzbGV5cy5uZXQwgZ8wDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMvwiLzwK732uOEUqWh2yKZpO/Vz5Yfq1xn0uOxi7CZbxZRH RoNbMOOpjOKR8k8jsK9q92SERm/BQ7bpc9Hc6+n0/TpYMKBJWnpt95cm2yyHnycgHd3LJ9QP vUzvI8umjXhBMKDa32OPPEIcrqTpnf3cQTyyIjNtDJOda+cgmo4NAgMBAAGjUTBPMB4GA1Ud EQQXMBWBE2ppbUB0aGVob3VzbGV5cy5uZXQwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSI q/Fgg2ZV9ORYx0YdwGG9I9fDjDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBVuNZlfOrMlcz0XsGClvQu M/EusYBvbiVqwXu5HC0Gt/6JMxnK8jeYlXYTB0TO9KFreF4GvtlvOWic9gFzSUpUVssVrvZq scrmY0f9LsFq34RAftDQhqVVnCEpyLdLRRwLuisQUUtm/H/Ux89ur8m1ocwalf9CI4rlup3B owRvGTCCAxQwggJ9oAMCAQICAQswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNp b24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05OTA5MTYxNDAxNDBaFw0wMTA5 MTUxNDAxNDBaMIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRQwEgYD VQQHEwtEdXJiYW52aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNjCB nzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAs2lal9TQFgt6tcVd6SGcI3LNEkxL937Px/vK ciT0QlKsV5Xje2F6F4Tn/XI5OJS06u1lp5IGXr3gZfYZu5R5dkw+uWhwdYQc9BF0ALwFLE8J AxcxzPRB1HLGpl3iiESwiy7ETfHw1oU+bPOVlHiRfkDpnNGNFVeOwnPlMN5G9U8CAwEAAaM3 MDUwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBRyScJzNMZV9At2coF+d/SH58ay DjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBrxlnpMfrptuyxA9jfcnL+kWBI6sZV3XvwZ47GYXDnbcKl N9idtxcoVgWL3Vx1b8aRkMZsZnET0BB8a5FvhuAhNi3B1+qyCa3PLW3Gg1Kb+7v+nIed/Lfp dJLkXJeu/H6syg1vcnpnLGtz9Yb5nfUAbvQdB86dnoJjKe+TCX5V3jGCAfcwggHzAgEBMIGc MIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtEdXJi YW52aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNl czEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNgIDA0wiMAkGBSsO AwIaBQCggbEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDAx MDA0MTkwMjIzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU81LfNugN7p5VOMKrS9+nNJdAZJUwUgYJKoZI hvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAMHydAbefXIk6OEz41 BPV48+tm9oa1+eDYz4hoUWGeZ22elooakGUrWocfzd675bH7CrhxdVZk30P3OAlSPjop8H3A R5uPTAFpkXlc6yb9yIENY85+Ir9EGrc6uP0SYaeUrNtfscdO3RsIl/5YJdONxsMtF4zSFTYz pdxhWYmtzQ== --------------ms1C219F4250192CC50D2268F9-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 12:10:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beta.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 552DB37B66D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18721 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 19:10:35 -0000 Received: from client75-185.hispeed.ch (HELO WORK) (62.2.75.185) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 19:10:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:13:54 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.46c) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <10718832860.20001004211354@buz.ch> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[3]: make installworld over NFS: supported? In-reply-To: <18418097592.20001004210139@buz.ch> References: <9715869168.20001004202431@buz.ch> <39DB7690.73B0C12F@thehousleys.net> <18418097592.20001004210139@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mea culpa, mea culpa: I forgot to use the changed make.conf (I don't build sendmail ;-) on the clients as well. Solved so far... Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 12:16: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D52737B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14183 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 2000 19:15:57 -0000 Received: from p3ee20aa2.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO speedy.gsinet) (62.226.10.162) by mail.gmx.net with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 19:15:57 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by speedy.gsinet (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA06399 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:01:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:01:14 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001004210114.G31338@speedy.gsinet> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3.0.32.20001003152129.032787a0@mail.ok-connect.com> <39DA8FB0.845F1A7@glue.umd.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <39DA8FB0.845F1A7@glue.umd.edu>; from bfoz@glue.umd.edu on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:02:24PM -0400 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 22:02 -0400, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > >On what sort of machine? I think that you might be happier > > >with make buildworld followed by a make buildkernel. > > Are there any plans for returning to a system where we don't > need to do a buildworld just to make a new kernel? This is > really really really getting annoying. And I hate it to. :) Doesn't the old "config; cd; make dep all install" sequence work? It's just that you are meant to be silent and try the official way when things don't work this way. It they do -- enjoy! I thought buildworld is only needed before buildkernel. But to make sure (and to get the philosophy as well as all the advantages and downsides) make sure to check the archive -- the threads were quite numerous and long. > PS. Did I mention I don't like it? Then don't update your sources. :) Nobody told you to take all the hassle if you only want to comple your kernel after adjusting GENERIC's copy to your needs. virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 12:18:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B429A37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tdtemp30 (veldy.net [64.1.117.28]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C7E138C36; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:19:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <007001c02e37$ee7492b0$ea6810ac@psinetcs.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "Gerhard Sittig" , References: <3.0.32.20001003152129.032787a0@mail.ok-connect.com> <39DA8FB0.845F1A7@glue.umd.edu> <20001004210114.G31338@speedy.gsinet> Subject: Re: agp_if.c Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:18:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Doesn't the old "config; cd; make dep all install" sequence work? > It's just that you are meant to be silent and try the official > way when things don't work this way. It they do -- enjoy! > This is the way I do it and always have - never bothered to switch. Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 12:28: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from eris.intertech-canada.com (eris.intertech-canada.com [216.191.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BBAB37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 496 invoked by uid 98); 4 Oct 2000 19:23:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20001004192324.495.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> References: <20001004175558.400.qmail@eris.intertech-canada.com> <39DB73D9.A4C96755@dynamictrade.com> In-Reply-To: <39DB73D9.A4C96755@dynamictrade.com> From: "Flattie McGee" To: john b p melesky Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Compile error on 4.1.1 (with info) (SOLVED) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 19:23:24 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG john b p melesky writes: > > Now I'm faced with another problem. Odly enough, I've commented out the USB > > support lines in the kernel, and removed the #'s to uncomment them. I've > > tried removing the ata drivers..too. > ... > > `USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650' undeclared here (not in a function) > > I ran into the same problem this morning. It's being compiled as a > kernel module, which is why commenting it out of your kernel config file > doesn't help. I ended up going into /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs.h and > adding the following line: > > #define USB_PRODUCT_DLINK_DSB650 0x4001 /* no clue -- > jmelesky */ > > I don't know if that line is accurate or not, but i didn't have that > device on my machine, so it worked fine just getting everything to > compile. Kernel compiled and ran without a problem. I didn't have that card either, which is why found it odd than such an error would occur, but your solution fixed it.. Brilliant! Thanks :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 13:18:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from modemcable101.200-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca (modemcable140.61-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.61.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FE237B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 59430 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2000 20:18:51 -0000 Received: from patrak.local.mindstep.com (HELO PATRAK) (192.168.10.4) by jacuzzi.local.mindstep.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 20:18:51 -0000 Message-ID: <001401c02e40$6608c7d0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> From: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" To: "Max Khon" Cc: References: Subject: Re: passwd problem after builworld/installworld Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:19:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Khon" > > bash-2.03$ ls -l libcrypt* > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.a -> libscrypt.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so -> libscrypt.so > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Oct 3 16:22 libcrypt.so.2 -> > > libscrypt.so.2 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 15 Jan 3 2000 libcrypt_p.a -> > > libdescrypt_p.a > > you do not have des in your libcrypt (libscrypt) > what we need is one single libcrypt with all cipher algorithms in it > (libcrypt == libdescrypt) This is very well, I am just confused as to what is present in which library. Should I install libscrypt or libdescrypt ? If I do not link libcrypt to libscrypt can I still use md5 passwords ? I thought that the new login.conf capability would be taking care this problem. But I guess I missed something. Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 13:21:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3612E37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e94KIGM17286; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:18:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA39582; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:18:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010042018.OAA39582@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:44:42 EDT." <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 14:18:15 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : Just to verify things further - I hardcoded the mac address in : if_ed.c:ed_get_Linksys() (wrapping an #if 0 around the code : that gets it before and simply setting the bytes in : sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr[].) OK. I'll have to try my linksys card after the great ed reorg. Maybe the asic_addr isn't getting setup properly for the card. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 13:29:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E7337B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id UAA14879; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:33:20 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA18623; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:29:20 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id QAA27719; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:29:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14811.37665.447008.535024@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:29:21 -0700 (MST) To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010021625.KAA11862@harmony.village.org> References: <14808.45618.368338.347768@hip186.ch.intel.com> <14804.65209.8908.316746@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200009292130.PAA03763@harmony.village.org> <200010021625.KAA11862@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Monday, October 2, Warner Losh wrote: ] > > Yes. It works. I have one the follwoing in my dmesg output: > > ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 10 on isa0 > ed0: address 00:00:c0:79:2a:f0, type SMC8416T (16 bit) > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xd0000 irq 5 on isa0 > ed1: address 00:00:1b:1e:23:dc, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > So I'm not sure what's going on.. > OK. I've finally had a chance to start figuring out why 4.1.1 kernels don't see both of my ed devices. Here's what I've done thus far: 1) I took the 4.1.1-RELEASE branded files (all of them) in sys/dev/ed and moved those into my 4.1-RELEASE sys/dev/ed directory. Thereby replacing the 4.1-RELEASE code with 4.1.1-RELEASE code. 2) I compiled a kernel and installed it. 3) Booted the kernel manually (as I installed it under a different name). Now, the ed0 and ed1 devices probe and attach correctly! So, in my layman's mind that seems to rule out the rather substantial MFC of the ed driver from 4.1-RELEASE to 4.1.1-RELEASE as the culprit--seeing as how I had a 4.1-RELEASE kernel with just the bits from the 4.1.1-RELEASE ed driver in there. If that theory is true, then something else has gone south in the kernel from 4.1 to 4.1.1 which is causing my problem. The problem is, I don't know where to look from here. What could be causing the ed0 device to not probe? I'm certainly willing to incrementally add changes to a 4.1-R kernel until the problem shows up (so that we can then figure out what it is and nail it) but I need some suggestions about which areas to look at. My normal dmesg output for these devices is: ed0 at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 ed0: address 00:40:05:6e:67:c0, type NE2000 (16 bit) ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) and the kernel config for them is: device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 The cards are two Linksys Ether16 ISA cards in a BX based ABit BP6 motherboard. Warner seems to not have the problem but he's got different cards for ed0 and ed1. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 13:41: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2537B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA08901; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 03:38:58 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 03:38:58 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Patrick Bihan-Faou Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: passwd problem after builworld/installworld In-Reply-To: <001401c02e40$6608c7d0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > > you do not have des in your libcrypt (libscrypt) > > what we need is one single libcrypt with all cipher algorithms in it > > (libcrypt == libdescrypt) > > This is very well, I am just confused as to what is present in which > library. Should I install libscrypt or libdescrypt ? the latter > If I do not link libcrypt to libscrypt can I still use md5 passwords ? yes /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 13:59:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8548537B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e94KxAM17487; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:59:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA39955; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:59:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010042059.OAA39955@harmony.village.org> To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:29:21 PDT." <14811.37665.447008.535024@hip186.ch.intel.com> References: <14811.37665.447008.535024@hip186.ch.intel.com> <14808.45618.368338.347768@hip186.ch.intel.com> <14804.65209.8908.316746@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200009292130.PAA03763@harmony.village.org> <200010021625.KAA11862@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 14:59:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <14811.37665.447008.535024@hip186.ch.intel.com> John Reynolds~ writes: : OK. I've finally had a chance to start figuring out why 4.1.1 kernels don't : see both of my ed devices. Here's what I've done thus far: .. : If that theory is true, then something else has gone south in the kernel from : 4.1 to 4.1.1 which is causing my problem. ... Do you have any other drivers in your kernel that might be looking at iospace 0x2c0-0x2df. Also, did you know that both of these cards have the same memory address. I don't think that matters for the ne2000 since they don't do memory mapped I/O. Areas that would cause this: New drivers changed drivers changed configure code (kern/subr_bus.c) whacked out space aliens messing with your mind Resource allocation plug and play Now, one of the above list is almost certainly not right, but as for the rest... You might try updating the filesystems and vm to 4.1.1 from 4.1. I'd expect 0 effect by doing that. Beyond that, I'm not quite sure what to suggest. This is weird, eh? Let's see. Looking at the logs, I'd say that July 26th to September 25th is the target range. I'd do a binary serach over that time frame for the kernel as a whole. Two months shouldn't take more than 6 or 7 kernels to track the problem down with to a given day and maybe 2 or 3 more to find the change that broke things. I'd also be tempted to try Sept 9th first, since that's the day before the MFC of the ed driver and something tells me that it is a good place to start. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 16:20:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pathlink.net (linda.i1.pathlink.com [209.155.56.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B837B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dvl-1 (dvl-1.pathlink.com [209.155.56.211]) by pathlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA27753 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:20:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Message-Id: <200010042320.QAA27753@pathlink.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) From: kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 16:20:29 -0700 X-Mailer: WinVN 0.99.8 (x86 32bit) In-Reply-To: <200010041006.e94A6CE56504@karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <200010011925.MAA45944@pathlink.net> <200010041006.e94A6CE56504@karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have set up a test server, P2B/DS PII 400Mhz and couple SCSI drives, and it has been running buildworld for over a day without a panic. With the 3 inn's crashed in this thread, I think we can rule out the type of ahc (W, U2 and U160), CPU (PII/III/speed) or SMP. However, all 3 have an ata/ahc combination and more than one ahc. I will try to dig up another ahc and see if I can duplicate the problem with the test server. Of course, the other thing missing is network traffic. In article <200010041006.e94A6CE56504@karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, you say... > >kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) wrote: > >> I upgraded one of our news servers from 4.0-S to 4.1.1 Release. >> [...] >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 >> fault virtual address = 0x14 >> fault code = supervisor read, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0134bb3 >> [...] >> c01349c4 t ahc_action <----------------------------- > >Same here; upgraded two news boxes from 4.1-STABLE to 4.1.1-RELEASE and they >were both crashing regularly. Here's three panics from the worst culprit: > > *** #1 *** > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x14 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ea18 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ea80 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 5 (syncer) > interrupt mask = > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... panic: lockmgr: locking against myself > > *** #2 *** > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x14 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ccc8 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6cd30 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 4 (bufdaemon) > interrupt mask = bio > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 > giving up on 345 buffers > > *** #3 *** > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x14 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present^ > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6cc94 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7d6ccfc > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 4 (bufdaemon) > interrupt mask = bio > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... > >Spot the pattern: > > utserv% grep ^instr nakaleen > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f69f > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc012f6a3 > >The last one is running a debug kernel, but I didn't manage to either get a >dump or get into the debugger. :-( > > nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6a3 > nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6a > nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f6 > nakaleen% nm /kernel.debug | grep ^c012f > c012f4b4 t ahc_action > >I've reverted to 4.1-STABLE from around 7th August, which is fine, except for >the kvm change between the two. Bah. > >Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #0: Tue Oct 3 12:54:30 BST 2000 > ip@karma:/usr/src/sys/compile/NAKALEEN >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >Timecounter "TSC" frequency 400911107 Hz >CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (400.91-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x651 Stepping = 1 > Features=0x183f9ff >real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) >avail memory = 127995904 (124996K bytes) >Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02b5000. >Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >npx0: on motherboard >npx0: INT 16 interface >pcib0: on motherboard >pci0: on pcib0 >pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 >pci1: on pcib1 >isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >isa0: on isab0 >atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 >ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >pci0: at 7.2 >chip1: port 0x5000-0x500f at device 7.3 on pci0 >fxp0: port 0x6800-0x683f mem 0xe4000000-0xe40fffff,0xe4100000-0xe4100fff irq 12 at device 11.0 on pci0 >fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:09:07:3f >ahc0: port 0x6c00-0x6cff mem 0xe4101000-0xe4101fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 >aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs >ahc1: port 0x7000-0x70ff mem 0xe4102000-0xe4102fff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 >aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs >fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 >fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >kbd0 at atkbd0 >vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >sc0: on isa0 >sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> >sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >sio0: type 16550A, console >sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 >sio1: type 16550A >ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 >ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode >lpt0: on ppbus0 >lpt0: Interrupt-driven port >ad0: 124MB [1001/15/17] at ata0-master using PIO0 >ad1: 325MB [768/14/62] at ata0-slave using PIO0 >ad2: 405MB [989/15/56] at ata1-master using PIO3 >Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle >da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da0: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 >da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da2: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da4 at ahc1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da4: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da4: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da3 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 >da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da3: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da3: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da6 at ahc1 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 >da6: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da6: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da6: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 >da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da1: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da7 at ahc1 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 >da7: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da7: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da7: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >da5 at ahc1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 >da5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da5: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) >da5: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >WARNING: / was not properly dismounted >vinum: loaded >vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da7s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da4s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da3s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da5s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da6s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da2s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1e >vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da0s1e > >FWIW, > >Ian. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 16:51:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52BBE37B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115228>; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:51:27 +1000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:51:34 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: "no t_stop, using nottystop" messages To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-followup-to: stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <00Oct5.105127est.115228@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a box running 4-STABLE from mid-August. Last time I rebooted it, it spat out a string of 'no t_stop, using nottystop' messages immediately after starting syslogd. The messages entries are: Oct 5 10:18:10 aalp02 /kernel: Warning:ttyp0: no t_stop, using nottystop Oct 5 10:18:10 aalp02 /kernel: Warning:ttyp1: no t_stop, using nottystop Oct 5 10:18:10 aalp02 /kernel: Warning:ttyp2: no t_stop, using nottystop Oct 5 10:18:10 aalp02 /kernel: Warning:ttyp3: no t_stop, using nottystop Oct 5 10:18:10 aalp02 /kernel: Warning:ttyp4: no t_stop, using nottystop I've never seen these before. Looking at the source, they come from /sys/miscfs/specfs/spec_vnops.c: spec_open(), when t_stop is not initialised for a TTY. Any ideas what would be causing them? Why just on the first 5 PTYs? Why is syslogd(?) opening ptys? Why don't they occur for other PTYs (I've tried logging in 10 times to use later PTYs without any errors). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 18:29:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CC637B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA62812; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:29:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25324; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:29:47 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au> From: Gregory Bond To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, gnb@itga.com.au Subject: Re: agp_if.c In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 04 Oct 2000 21:01:14 +0200. Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 12:29:46 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Doesn't the old "config; cd; make dep all install" sequence work? Traps for young players: No this (sometimes) doesn't work. You need to do "make depend && make all", so that the second invocation of make picks up the new dependencies calculated by "make depend". Doing them as one command (i.e. "make depend all") will sometimes result in odd behaviour as the make will use the old dependencies for the whole make run. This is one area where gmake differs from BSD make - gmake will reread any makefiles that are changed during the make run, so the "make depend all" trick would work for projects built with gmake. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 19:27: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from uffdaonline.net (host37.uffdaonline.net [207.109.235.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4689337B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uffdaonline.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B36362044; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 02:26:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:26:46 -0500 From: "Zach N. Heilig" To: ip@mcc.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001004212646.A1423@murkwood.znh.org> References: <200010011925.MAA45944@pathlink.net> <27C4A7507DCCDF6930C712BD@mail.uffdaonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <27C4A7507DCCDF6930C712BD@mail.uffdaonline.net>; from ip@karma.freebsd-uk.eu.org on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:06:11AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:06:11AM +0100, Ian Pallfreeman wrote: > kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) wrote: > > > I upgraded one of our news servers from 4.0-S to 4.1.1 Release. > > [...] > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 > > fault virtual address = 0x14 > > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0134bb3 > > [...] > > c01349c4 t ahc_action <----------------------------- Something that seems to have started sometime between Sept. 20 and Sept. 26: during the first boot after initial power-up: panic: ahc0: brkadrint, Scratch or SCB Memory Parity Error at seqaddr=0x0 but all boots after that panic, until power-off again succeed. I'm not 100% positive it isn't hardware, as I haven't had a chance to check an older kernel. I'll probably find time later tonight... I wouldn't have noticed, but we had a power failure and my UPS battery was dead (the computer hasn't been powered off for past couple upgrades). -- Zach Heilig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 21:36:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836B137B66D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09F1AA842; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:36:10 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A945457; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:36:10 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:36:09 +1000 (EST) From: andrew@ugh.net.au To: Francisco Reyes Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Kernel problem building from 3.4 stable to 4.X stable In-Reply-To: <200006270333.XAA27934@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmm...well this mail took 4 months to arrive and according to the mail headers tooks the weirdest routing...something dodgy went on. On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Now I get > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > when I try to run config Well I don't really remeber what the original problem was but see if you have a /usr/lib/lib.so.4. If not grab one from another box or try symlink the closest libc you have. You may be having problems with ldconfig...If you do have a libc.so.4 run ldconfig -m /dir/with/lib.so.4 and try again. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 21:54: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sanson.reyes.somos.net (freyes.static.inch.com [216.223.199.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B01737B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomasa (tomasa.reyes.somos.net [10.0.0.11]) by sanson.reyes.somos.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA16862; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:45:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Message-Id: <200010050445.AAA16862@sanson.reyes.somos.net> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "andrew@ugh.net.au" Cc: "FreeBSD Stable List" Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:50:51 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Not a problem anymore (was Re: Kernel problem building from 3.4 stable to 4.X stable) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:36:09 +1000 (EST), andrew@ugh.net.au wrote: >Hmm...well this mail took 4 months to arrive and according to the mail >headers tooks the weirdest routing...something dodgy went on. That must be some kind of record. >You may be having problems with ldconfig...If you do have a libc.so.4 run >ldconfig -m /dir/with/lib.so.4 and try again. I have already migrated all my boxes to 4.1 so the problem no longer applies. Where does ldconfig usually gets run from for programs which use libraries? Thanks for the reply.. francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 22: 2:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from srcso.globis.ru (globis.ru [212.248.80.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAD937B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 22:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raduga.sochi.net (raduga.sochi.net [212.248.82.76]) by srcso.globis.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06520 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:20:31 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@raduga.sochi.net) Received: (from igor@localhost) by raduga.sochi.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e9551n116438 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:01:49 +0400 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:01:49 +0400 From: Igor Roboul To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: passwd problem after builworld/installworld Message-ID: <20001005090149.A16398@linux.rainbow> Reply-To: igorr@crosswinds.net Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001004110206.A5407@linux.rainbow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: <20001004110206.A5407@linux.rainbow>; from igor@raduga.sochi.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:02:06AM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, again Still does not work :-( I have changed symlinks even. If I remove symlinks loader complains that it can't find libcrypt.so. If I change symlinks, I get same error (passwd: cannot set password cipher: Undefined error: 0) :-((( -- Igor Roboul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", Sochi, Russia http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 22:11: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFCC37B502 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 22:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B54BA842; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:11:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2931B5457; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:11:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:11:02 +1000 (EST) From: andrew@ugh.net.au To: Francisco Reyes Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Not a problem anymore (was Re: Kernel problem building from 3.4 stable to 4.X stable) In-Reply-To: <200010050445.AAA16862@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Where does ldconfig usually gets run from for programs which use > libraries? Its run at boot from /etc/rc. You need to run it again whenever you add another shared library (most ports that require it do it for you). It updates its cache in /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 1:23:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8291137B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@[193.193.218.95]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08282; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:22:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e958N2604463; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:23:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <39DC3A5B.671E4BDD@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:22:51 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurence Berland Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Laurence Berland wrote: > All, > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 > hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights > are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it > does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > swap, running a generic kernel. Try GNOME - it's now almost at par with KDE in usability/eye candiness (even beats it in the later category IMO), while uses old plain C and not so heavily CORBA-minded, so it is definitely the only choice for low-end machines. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 1:28:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from skynet.comm2000.it (skynet.comm2000.it [212.97.35.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A41B37B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13615 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 08:28:16 -0000 Received: from loopback.comm2000.it (HELO comm2000.it) (127.0.0.1) by loopback.comm2000.it with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 08:28:16 -0000 Message-ID: <39DC3B9F.FB943CE2@comm2000.it> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:28:15 +0200 From: Rudy Lamarca X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: it, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IOMEGA DITTO Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------F413130011112163DB1AB1FF" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------F413130011112163DB1AB1FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! how can i use a Iomega Ditto 2Gb internal tape drive under FreeBSD ? ThX Rudy --------------F413130011112163DB1AB1FF Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="rudy.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Rudy Lamarca Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rudy.vcf" begin:vcard n:Lamarca;Rudy x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Comm2000 S.p.A. adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:rudy@comm2000.it x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Rudy Lamarca end:vcard --------------F413130011112163DB1AB1FF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 1:54:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647EE37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desire ([63.202.70.107]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0G1Y005VV8P1HJ@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 01:51:18 -0700 From: Andrew Houghton Subject: Missing RAND_add (repeat of bug #20142) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <00f401c02ea9$6dac4110$6b46ca3f@desire> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 4.1-STABLE cvs-supped back in late August. I'm getting a duplicate of bug #20142, which was closed on August 12. I was trying to compile a program and the linker failed on RAND_add and RAND_status. This bug was closed saying "All of my machines have the RAND_* symbols, and they're needed for regular operation." Does this mean things would necessarily fail without them? For reference: ns1# sysctl kern.version kern.version: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Aug 16 15:02:39 PDT 2000 ns1# cd /usr/lib ns1# nm -a lib*.a | grep RAND_add ns1# pwd /usr/lib ns1# cd /usr/include/openssl ns1# grep RAND_add * ns1# grep RAND_status * ns1# pwd /usr/include/openssl - Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 2:12:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sphinx.mythic-beasts.com (sphinx.mythic-beasts.com [195.82.107.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2AE37B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 02:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xelah (helo=localhost) by sphinx.mythic-beasts.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #8) id 13h74Q-0006Aj-00; Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:12:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:12:06 +0100 (BST) From: Alex Hayward X-Sender: xelah@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way In-Reply-To: <39DC3A5B.671E4BDD@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Laurence Berland wrote: > > > All, > > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > > > It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 > > hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights > > are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it > > does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 > > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > > swap, running a generic kernel. > > Try GNOME - it's now almost at par with KDE in usability/eye candiness (even > beats it in the later category IMO), while uses old plain C and not so heavily > CORBA-minded, so it is definitely the only choice for low-end machines. KDE doesn't use CORBA. There have also been a number of reports on the KDE lists that recent sources have got a lot better performance wise, including on low end machines. Just in case the blindingly obvious has been missed, have any of the people with compile problems tried removing the '-O'? It's what works for me, though I haven't tried it with a recent cvsup of KDE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:18:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from malkav.snowmoon.com (ip-208-20-126-237.cdcsd.k12.ny.us [208.20.126.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E8EB37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26463 invoked by uid 1003); 5 Oct 2000 14:18:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 14:18:39 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:18:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marius M. Rex" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am using: $ uname -a FreeBSD utterlux.communityconnect.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Oct 4 10:39:24 EDT 2000 root@utterlux.communityconnect.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UTTERLUX i386 Though I cvsup'ed a while back, I just got to 'make installworld' yesterday. (work has been busy) Anyway, I rebooted this morning and found that it is basically ignoring my /etc/rc.conf file. It ignores the firewall type I setup, my default route, the fact that I have a mouse. etc. (It does this consistantly on each reboot) This same thing happened to me before the last time I cvsup'ed to 4.x-stable. I thought it was just that I did something wrong. So I was expecting doing it again, now that I have updated a number of other machines sucessfully, that it would work again. 'make buildworld' 'make installworld' and mergemaster (Done completely by hand) went through without a hitch. I don't quite understand what is wrong. But it will do this to me every time I reboot. (Which, admittedly, is infrequently.) Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. Here is my /etc/rc.conf file if it matters: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf # please make all changes to this file. # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" # -- marius additions -- # firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="CLIENT" tcp_drop_synfin="YES" tcp_restrict_rst="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" named_enable="YES" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # lpd_enable="YES" ipv6_enable="NO" usbd_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 216.89.86.152 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="216.89.86.128" hostname="utterlux.communityconnect.com" check_quotas="NO" ntpdate_flags="bitsy.mit.edu" ntpdate_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marius M. Rex "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." -- The Mahabharata To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:19: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A0C37B670 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA03175; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:16:41 +0200 To: Lee Ann Goldstein Subject: Re: A new file for the base system? Message-ID: <970755401.39dc8d4942605@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:16:41 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010031758.KAA18121@leeann.snedmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200010031758.KAA18121@leeann.snedmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Lee Ann Goldstein : > > --Your message was: (from Roman Shterenzon) > > > > 1) Better use /var/run/dmesg.boot since message buffer may get filled > with > > other stuff. > > Unless something's changed in 4.1.1-S or 5.0-C, that's not really a > problem. dmesg does not take its input from /var/log/messages. This > is not necessarily true about dmesg in other *NIXes. For my best knowledge, in FreeBSD and alike unixes dmesg is kernel message buffer. It may get filled with, say, log_in_vain or other kernel messages. Better use /var/run/dmesg.boot which will not get overwritten after boot. Solaris 2.7 has very weird dmesg which seems to work with log files ... > > 2) Since perl is a part of a system now, perhaps it'll be prettier to > use > > perl for that task. > > *shrug* I speak awk better than I speak perl. Like any other even > mildly interesting problem, there are at least half a dozen ways > to solve this. I could write such a beast if you sent me the dmesgs you've got in hand. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:22:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hq1.tyfon.net (hq1.tyfon.net [213.212.29.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C6E37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A771C5C6; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:22:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Dan Larsson To: "Marius M. Rex" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Tyfon Svenska AB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Marius M. Rex wrote: | Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. run mergemaster. | Regards +------ Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21 Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02 GPG and PGP keys | finger dl@hq1.tyfon.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:30: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dfn.com (dfn.com [206.245.243.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E052137B677 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:28:37 -0600 Message-Id: <200010050828.AA166985936@dfn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Brad Biggers" Reply-To: To: Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf X-Mailer: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am by no means an expert...but dont you have to rebuild the kernel after you run mergemaster? Brad Biggers ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Marius M. Rex" Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:18:39 -0400 (EDT) >Hi, > >I am using: > >$ uname -a >FreeBSD utterlux.communityconnect.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE >#0: Wed Oct 4 10:39:24 EDT 2000 >root@utterlux.communityconnect.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UTTERLUX i386 > > >Though I cvsup'ed a while back, I just got to 'make installworld' >yesterday. (work has been busy) Anyway, I rebooted this morning and found >that it is basically ignoring my /etc/rc.conf file. It ignores the >firewall type I setup, my default route, the fact that I have a >mouse. etc. (It does this consistantly on each reboot) > >This same thing happened to me before the last time I cvsup'ed to >4.x-stable. I thought it was just that I did something wrong. So I was >expecting doing it again, now that I have updated a number of >other machines sucessfully, that it would work again. > >'make buildworld' 'make installworld' and mergemaster (Done completely by >hand) went through without a hitch. I don't quite understand what is >wrong. But it will do this to me every time I reboot. (Which, >admittedly, is infrequently.) > >Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. > >Here is my /etc/rc.conf file if it matters: >----------------------------------------------------------------------- ># This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf ># please make all changes to this file. > ># -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # >linux_enable="YES" >moused_enable="YES" ># -- marius additions -- # >firewall_enable="YES" >firewall_type="CLIENT" >tcp_drop_synfin="YES" >tcp_restrict_rst="YES" >sendmail_enable="NO" >named_enable="YES" > ># -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # >lpd_enable="YES" >ipv6_enable="NO" >usbd_enable="YES" >sshd_enable="YES" >ifconfig_fxp0="inet 216.89.86.152 netmask 255.255.255.0" >defaultrouter="216.89.86.128" >hostname="utterlux.communityconnect.com" >check_quotas="NO" >ntpdate_flags="bitsy.mit.edu" >ntpdate_enable="YES" >moused_enable="YES" >------------------------------------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Marius M. Rex >"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is >no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five >hundred." > -- The Mahabharata > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:35:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from malkav.snowmoon.com (ip-208-20-126-237.cdcsd.k12.ny.us [208.20.126.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDB0737B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26498 invoked by uid 1003); 5 Oct 2000 14:35:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 14:35:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:35:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marius M. Rex" To: Dan Larsson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I did run mergemaster, by hand. It went fine. The only files I didn't completely replace were my site specific files like resolv.conf, hosts, password, group, inetd.conf and my rc.firewall. On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Dan Larsson wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Marius M. Rex wrote: > > | Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. > > run mergemaster. > > | > > Regards > +------ > Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21 > Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02 > GPG and PGP keys | finger dl@hq1.tyfon.net > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:39:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dns.comrax.com (dns.comrax.com [194.90.246.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B7537B66F for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NOOR (unknown [156.27.243.27]) by dns.comrax.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A40E21C982; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:39:04 +0200 (IST) From: "Noor Dawod" To: "Marius M. Rex" , Subject: RE: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:35:40 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Marius, I once had a similar problem. The solution was that one of the many /etc/rc.* (a hunch: check /etc/rc.firewall) is not properly reading /etc/defaults/rc.donf correctly, and this is causing mis-understanding in your box. The /etc/rc.firewall should have at the begining of it the following lines: if [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ]; then . /etc/defaults/rc.conf source_rc_confs elif [ -r /etc/rc.conf ]; then . /etc/rc.conf fi Make sure this is inserted correctly. Noor -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Marius M. Rex Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 4:19 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf Hi, I am using: $ uname -a FreeBSD utterlux.communityconnect.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Oct 4 10:39:24 EDT 2000 root@utterlux.communityconnect.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UTTERLUX i386 Though I cvsup'ed a while back, I just got to 'make installworld' yesterday. (work has been busy) Anyway, I rebooted this morning and found that it is basically ignoring my /etc/rc.conf file. It ignores the firewall type I setup, my default route, the fact that I have a mouse. etc. (It does this consistantly on each reboot) This same thing happened to me before the last time I cvsup'ed to 4.x-stable. I thought it was just that I did something wrong. So I was expecting doing it again, now that I have updated a number of other machines sucessfully, that it would work again. 'make buildworld' 'make installworld' and mergemaster (Done completely by hand) went through without a hitch. I don't quite understand what is wrong. But it will do this to me every time I reboot. (Which, admittedly, is infrequently.) Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. Here is my /etc/rc.conf file if it matters: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf # please make all changes to this file. # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" # -- marius additions -- # firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="CLIENT" tcp_drop_synfin="YES" tcp_restrict_rst="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" named_enable="YES" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # lpd_enable="YES" ipv6_enable="NO" usbd_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 216.89.86.152 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="216.89.86.128" hostname="utterlux.communityconnect.com" check_quotas="NO" ntpdate_flags="bitsy.mit.edu" ntpdate_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Marius M. Rex "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." -- The Mahabharata To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 7:44:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5035B37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e95Ei6q13576; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:44:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39DC93B4.BF20E059@thehousleys.net> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:44:04 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marius M. Rex" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Marius M. Rex" wrote: > > I did run mergemaster, by hand. It went fine. The only files I didn't > completely replace were my site specific files like resolv.conf, hosts, > password, group, inetd.conf and my rc.firewall. > Try running "mergemaster -s" to do a more complete comparison. Jim -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! Reboot now? [OK] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 8: 5:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from malkav.snowmoon.com (ip-208-20-126-237.cdcsd.k12.ny.us [208.20.126.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E39D37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26573 invoked by uid 1003); 5 Oct 2000 15:05:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 15:05:53 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:05:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marius M. Rex" To: Noor Dawod Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I was missing the 'source' line in my rc.firewall file. But that doesn't change the fact that I have no mouse support, named doesn't come up. No default route... -Nothing- specified in the /etc/rc.conf file occurs at boot. I just ran mergemaster -s that didn't change things either. I appreciate the suggestions, but it is a pretty fundamental problem. I can start most things easily by hand, but it is annoying to do. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marius M. Rex "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." -- The Mahabharata On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Noor Dawod wrote: > Hi Marius, > > I once had a similar problem. The solution was that one of the many > /etc/rc.* (a hunch: check /etc/rc.firewall) is not properly reading > /etc/defaults/rc.donf correctly, and this is causing mis-understanding > in your box. > > The /etc/rc.firewall should have at the begining of it the following > lines: > > if [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ]; then > . /etc/defaults/rc.conf > source_rc_confs > elif [ -r /etc/rc.conf ]; then > . /etc/rc.conf > fi > > Make sure this is inserted correctly. > > Noor > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Marius M. Rex > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 4:19 PM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf > > > Hi, > > I am using: > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD utterlux.communityconnect.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE > #0: Wed Oct 4 10:39:24 EDT 2000 > root@utterlux.communityconnect.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UTTERLUX i386 > > > Though I cvsup'ed a while back, I just got to 'make installworld' > yesterday. (work has been busy) Anyway, I rebooted this morning and > found > that it is basically ignoring my /etc/rc.conf file. It ignores the > firewall type I setup, my default route, the fact that I have a > mouse. etc. (It does this consistantly on each reboot) > > This same thing happened to me before the last time I cvsup'ed to > 4.x-stable. I thought it was just that I did something wrong. So I was > expecting doing it again, now that I have updated a number of > other machines sucessfully, that it would work again. > > 'make buildworld' 'make installworld' and mergemaster (Done completely > by > hand) went through without a hitch. I don't quite understand what is > wrong. But it will do this to me every time I reboot. (Which, > admittedly, is infrequently.) > > Anyone else had this problem? I havn't sen it mentioned on the list. > > Here is my /etc/rc.conf file if it matters: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf > # please make all changes to this file. > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # > linux_enable="YES" > moused_enable="YES" > # -- marius additions -- # > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="CLIENT" > tcp_drop_synfin="YES" > tcp_restrict_rst="YES" > sendmail_enable="NO" > named_enable="YES" > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # > lpd_enable="YES" > ipv6_enable="NO" > usbd_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 216.89.86.152 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="216.89.86.128" > hostname="utterlux.communityconnect.com" > check_quotas="NO" > ntpdate_flags="bitsy.mit.edu" > ntpdate_enable="YES" > moused_enable="YES" > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > Marius M. Rex > "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is > no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five > hundred." > -- The Mahabharata > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 8:18:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC9A37B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e95FGrq13749; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:16:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39DC9B65.D16C6858@thehousleys.net> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:16:53 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marius M. Rex" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms497A4E17F2FE2FA65878FBB6" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms497A4E17F2FE2FA65878FBB6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Marius M. Rex" wrote: > > I appreciate the suggestions, but it is a pretty fundamental > problem. I can start most things easily by hand, but it is annoying to > do. > Okay. This is all started during boot by init(). You should be able to restart and log the result by doing: "cd /etc ; script rc.out sh -x rc" That will put rc in verbose mode. You might have to edit some of the rc.* scripts and add "set -x" as the second line to see inside of them. But this will give you more detail then you want, but it will show exactly what is happening. Jim -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! Reboot now? [OK] --------------ms497A4E17F2FE2FA65878FBB6 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIIBwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIH+DCCB/QCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BdgwggK8MIICJaADAgECAgMDTCIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgZQxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxFDASBgNVBAcTC0R1cmJhbnZpbGxlMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZU aGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9QZXJzb25h bCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMTk5OS45LjE2MB4XDTAwMDkyMTE1NDAyOVoXDTAxMDkyMTE1NDAy OVowXjEQMA4GA1UEBBMHSG91c2xleTEOMAwGA1UEKhMFSmFtZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDUphbWVz IEhvdXNsZXkxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE2ppbUB0aGVob3VzbGV5cy5uZXQwgZ8wDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMvwiLzwK732uOEUqWh2yKZpO/Vz5Yfq1xn0uOxi7CZbxZRH RoNbMOOpjOKR8k8jsK9q92SERm/BQ7bpc9Hc6+n0/TpYMKBJWnpt95cm2yyHnycgHd3LJ9QP vUzvI8umjXhBMKDa32OPPEIcrqTpnf3cQTyyIjNtDJOda+cgmo4NAgMBAAGjUTBPMB4GA1Ud EQQXMBWBE2ppbUB0aGVob3VzbGV5cy5uZXQwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSI q/Fgg2ZV9ORYx0YdwGG9I9fDjDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBVuNZlfOrMlcz0XsGClvQu M/EusYBvbiVqwXu5HC0Gt/6JMxnK8jeYlXYTB0TO9KFreF4GvtlvOWic9gFzSUpUVssVrvZq scrmY0f9LsFq34RAftDQhqVVnCEpyLdLRRwLuisQUUtm/H/Ux89ur8m1ocwalf9CI4rlup3B owRvGTCCAxQwggJ9oAMCAQICAQswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNp b24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05OTA5MTYxNDAxNDBaFw0wMTA5 MTUxNDAxNDBaMIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRQwEgYD VQQHEwtEdXJiYW52aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNjCB nzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAs2lal9TQFgt6tcVd6SGcI3LNEkxL937Px/vK ciT0QlKsV5Xje2F6F4Tn/XI5OJS06u1lp5IGXr3gZfYZu5R5dkw+uWhwdYQc9BF0ALwFLE8J AxcxzPRB1HLGpl3iiESwiy7ETfHw1oU+bPOVlHiRfkDpnNGNFVeOwnPlMN5G9U8CAwEAAaM3 MDUwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBRyScJzNMZV9At2coF+d/SH58ay DjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBrxlnpMfrptuyxA9jfcnL+kWBI6sZV3XvwZ47GYXDnbcKl N9idtxcoVgWL3Vx1b8aRkMZsZnET0BB8a5FvhuAhNi3B1+qyCa3PLW3Gg1Kb+7v+nIed/Lfp dJLkXJeu/H6syg1vcnpnLGtz9Yb5nfUAbvQdB86dnoJjKe+TCX5V3jGCAfcwggHzAgEBMIGc MIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtEdXJi YW52aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNl czEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNgIDA0wiMAkGBSsO AwIaBQCggbEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDAx MDA1MTUxNjUzWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQURYv8VmgtgY1wxHaxuXVwOFU3k50wUgYJKoZI hvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAO3QUVXCgUKQNiD6Od bJNnq+rEogLlorFwFX1chGr6cGYN4TWY0n8qcnN9Os0P11V8Tz0lHMSgdSG7sfDu2TcAmknO 0why8oXJlp4hRbvIoK4CGj1rt9r8KYrVu9BJMlHTNHeJZI4s7md722yADZ9P6SE/zKwNqEyZ HXk1W/NUEw== --------------ms497A4E17F2FE2FA65878FBB6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 8:26:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from itc1.itchannel.net (mail.itchannel.net [194.154.172.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615AA37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ITC1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:25:12 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jon Paterson To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:25:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If these seem like trivial questions please do not flame me, I have never attempted to do this before and do not want to damage a working system! As far as I have researched I need to perform the following actions: 1 get the up to date source (using one of the cvs tools) 2. make buildworld 3. make installworld 4. run mergemaster. 5. rebuild kernel ??????? 6. reboot (and pray!) is this correct or have I missed something out? I assume that the src from the updates are for the system only, and not any changes to any of the ports. Do I / can I keep the ports up to date also? or is this a bad idea? do I need to "clean" after the install to clear all the temporary files? thankyou for any advice you can offer. regards, Jon Paterson. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 9:11:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta01.chello.no (mta01.chello.no [212.186.255.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFF537B66E for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c76-s10-r13h3.upc.chello.no ([212.186.234.76]) by mta01.chello.no (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license 77df2db80a2bdce4d335ff4839618d42) with ESMTP id <20001005161159.OOQF3527.mta01@c76-s10-r13h3.upc.chello.no>; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:11:59 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:16:47 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Skundberg?= X-Sender: eskimo@igloo.chello.no To: Jon Paterson Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jon Paterson wrote: > If these seem like trivial questions please do not flame me, I have never > attempted to do this before and do not want to damage a working system! >=20 > As far as I have researched I need to perform the following actions: >=20 >=20 > 1 get the up to date source (using one of the cvs tools) >=20 > 2. make buildworld >=20 > 3. make installworld >=20 > 4. run mergemaster. >=20 > 5. rebuild kernel ??????? Yes, you should always build a new kernel with the same sources with which you built world. Use the make installkernel/buildkernel method. >=20 > 6. reboot (and pray!) By all means, but it's usually not necessary :) >=20 > is this correct or have I missed something out? I assume that the src fr= om > the updates are for the system only, and not any changes to any of the > ports. Do I / can I keep the ports up to date also? or is this a bad ide= a? Not at all. You need this=20 *default release=3Dcvs tag=3D. in your ports-supfile. =20 > do I need to "clean" after the install to clear all the temporary files? I use to rm -rf /usr/obj/* before a new buildworld.=20 =D8S. --=20 Thank you. I feel so much better now. =09=09=09=09http://www.determinism.com yskundbe@chello.no=09*=09http://home.chello.no/~yskundbe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 9:37:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBC137B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e95GbM002025; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:37:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA51557; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:37:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> To: Jon Paterson Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:25:06 BST." References: Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:37:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Jon Paterson writes: : If these seem like trivial questions please do not flame me, I have never : attempted to do this before and do not want to damage a working system! From src/UPDATING: To update from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current 4.x-STABLE ---------- make buildworld make buildkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE make installkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE reboot (in single user) [1] make installworld mergemaster reboot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 9:38:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405BF37B66D for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e95GZI002017; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:35:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA51533; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:35:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010051635.KAA51533@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:44:42 EDT." <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 10:35:07 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : it turns out that `sum' was not 0xff (but 0x51) as it should have : been... but, everything looks just fine to me... (of course, I'm This is odd. My -current box works great for my linksys card, modulo the removal of interrupts on eject issues that have come up in the SMPng stuff. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 9:42:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3029337B66D for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03147; Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:41:59 -0700 Message-ID: <39DCAF57.48D6C918@urx.com> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:41:59 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Paterson Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jon Paterson wrote: > > If these seem like trivial questions please do not flame me, I have never > attempted to do this before and do not want to damage a working system! > > As far as I have researched I need to perform the following actions: > > 1 get the up to date source (using one of the cvs tools) > > 2. make buildworld > > 3. make installworld > > 4. run mergemaster. > > 5. rebuild kernel ??????? > > 6. reboot (and pray!) You need to read /usr/src/UPDATING. It will let you run an installworld before you do a buildkernel but the section on updating 4.x to 4.x-stable suggests the sequence make buildkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL make installkernel KERNEL=YOUR_KERNEL in between the buildworld and the installworld. YOUR_KERNEL is your kernel config file. I don't have to boot to single user mode before I run my installworld. That isn't always the case. Kent > > is this correct or have I missed something out? I assume that the src from > the updates are for the system only, and not any changes to any of the > ports. Do I / can I keep the ports up to date also? or is this a bad idea? > > do I need to "clean" after the install to clear all the temporary files? > > thankyou for any advice you can offer. > > regards, > > Jon Paterson. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 10:22:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ldc.ro (ldc-gw.pub.ro [192.129.3.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE5A137B66E for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10633 invoked by uid 666); 5 Oct 2000 17:22:13 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:22:13 +0300 From: Alex Popa To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: moh_php4 not compiling, failing at config Message-ID: <20001005202213.A9631@ldc.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am trying to compile php4 on a FreeBSD -stable, cvsupped last night, and compiled today, with ports collection cvsupped some one hour ago. Also, since I think it should compile (-kthread appears in cc's manpage), I cc'd this to -stable as well as -ports. Here is the output (after make patch, I just logged the "make") =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for mod_php-4.0.2 creating cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g whe= el checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal... found checking for working autoconf... found checking for working automake... found checking for working autoheader... found checking for working makeinfo... found Updated php_version.h checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking host system type... i386--freebsd4.1.1 checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... no checking for awk... awk checking for bison... no checking for byacc... byacc configure: warning: You will need bison if you want to regenerate the PHP p= arsers. checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for AIX... no checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking for ranlib... ranlib checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for flex... flex checking for flex... (cached) flex checking for yywrap in -lfl... yes checking lex output file root... lex.yy checking whether yytext is a pointer... yes checking for working const... yes checking for pthreads_cflags... -pthread checking for pthreads_lib...=20 =1B[1mConfiguring SAPI modules=1B[m checking for AOLserver support... no checking for Apache module support via DSO through APXS...=20 Usage: apxs -g [-S =3D] -n apxs -q [-S =3D] ... apxs -c [-S =3D] [-o ] [-D [=3D]] [-I ] [-L ] [-l ] [-Wc,] [-Wl,] ... apxs -i [-S =3D] [-a] [-A] [-n ] ... apxs -e [-S =3D] [-a] [-A] [-n ] ... configure: error: Sorry, I cannot run apxs. Either you need to install Perl= or you need to pass the absolute path of apxs by using --with-apxs=3D/abso= lute/path/to/apxs =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed: here are the contents of "config.log" This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. configure:1273: checking for a BSD compatible install configure:1326: checking whether build environment is sane configure:1383: checking whether make sets ${MAKE} configure:1429: checking for working aclocal configure:1442: checking for working autoconf configure:1455: checking for working automake configure:1468: checking for working autoheader configure:1481: checking for working makeinfo configure:1511: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of = Makefiles configure:1540: checking host system type configure:1568: checking for gawk configure:1568: checking for mawk configure:1568: checking for nawk configure:1568: checking for awk configure:1602: checking for bison configure:1602: checking for byacc configure:1649: checking for gcc configure:1762: checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works configure:1778: cc -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5 configure:1804: checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-c= ompiler configure:1809: checking whether we are using GNU C configure:1818: cc -E conftest.c configure:1837: checking whether cc accepts -g configure:1869: checking how to run the C preprocessor configure:1890: cc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out configure:1949: checking for AIX configure:1986: checking for cc option to accept ANSI C configure:2039: cc -c -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5 configure:2066: checking for ranlib configure:2098: checking whether cc understands -c and -o together configure:2110: cc -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5 configure:2111: cc -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5 configure:2146: checking whether ln -s works configure:2173: checking for flex configure:2206: checking for flex configure:2240: checking for yywrap in -lfl configure:2259: cc -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.c -lfl 1>&5 configure:2282: checking lex output file root configure:2303: checking whether yytext is a pointer configure:2322: cc -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.c -lfl 1>&5 configure:2345: checking for working const configure:2399: cc -c -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5 configure:2516: cc -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5 /tmp/ccy10558.o: In function `main': /tmp/ccy10558.o(.text+0x1d): undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_init' /tmp/ccy10558.o(.text+0x31): undefined reference to `pthread_create' configure: failed program was: #line 2498 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include void *thread_routine(void *data) { return data; } int main() { pthread_t thd; pthread_mutexattr_t mattr; int data =3D 1; pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr); return pthread_create(&thd, NULL, thread_routine, &data); }=20 configure:2536: checking for pthreads_cflags configure:2569: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -kthread conftest.c 1>&5 /tmp/ccx10573.o: In function `main': /tmp/ccx10573.o(.text+0x1d): undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_init' /tmp/ccx10573.o(.text+0x31): undefined reference to `pthread_create' configure: failed program was: #line 2551 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include void *thread_routine(void *data) { return data; } int main() { pthread_t thd; pthread_mutexattr_t mattr; int data =3D 1; pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr); return pthread_create(&thd, NULL, thread_routine, &data); }=20 configure:2569: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -pthread conftest.c 1>&5 configure:2598: checking for pthreads_lib configure:2703: checking for AOLserver support configure:2777: checking for Apache module support via DSO through APXS (end of "config.log") *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. ------------+------------------------------------------ Alex Popa, | "Artificial Intelligence is razor@ldc.ro| no match for Natural Stupidity" ------------+------------------------------------------ "It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 10:41:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEA837B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parish ([62.255.96.90]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20001005184008.XBLO23965.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@parish>; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:40:08 +0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by parish (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e95HfEp01560; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:41:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:41:07 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Skundberg?= Cc: Jon Paterson , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. Message-ID: <20001005184107.A258@parish> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from yskundbe@chello.no on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 06:16:47PM +0200 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Øystein Skundberg wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jon Paterson wrote: > > > 6. reboot (and pray!) > > By all means, but it's usually not necessary :) > I hope you are referring to praying. A reboot is always necessary ;) -- 4.4 - The number of the Beastie ________________________________________________________________ 51.44°N FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org 2.057°W My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark mailto:marko@freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 12:15:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEE9337B66F for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3228 invoked by uid 0); 5 Oct 2000 19:15:41 -0000 Received: from p3ee20a94.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO speedy.gsinet) (62.226.10.148) by mail.gmx.net with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 19:15:41 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by speedy.gsinet (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA08564 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:12:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:12:31 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001005191231.J31338@speedy.gsinet> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au>; from gnb@itga.com.au on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 12:29:46PM +1100 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 12:29 +1100, Gregory Bond wrote: > > Doesn't the old "config; cd; make dep all install" sequence > > work? > > Traps for young players: No this (sometimes) doesn't work. > You need to do "make depend && make all", so that the second > invocation of make picks up the new dependencies calculated by > "make depend". [ ... ] This is one area where gmake differs > from BSD make - gmake will reread any makefiles that are > changed during the make run, so the "make depend all" trick > would work for projects built with gmake. The above sequence was meant more as a sketch than as an instruction. :) Otherwise the config(8) misses its argument as well as cd(1)ing $HOME won't suffice ... I'm sure there are plenty of instructions in UPDATING as in the mail lists archives (these threads come up *very* regularly, I've seen several dozens of them in the short time following -stable). virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 12:18:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB2537B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26146; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e95JIil08697; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:44 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Noor Dawod Cc: "Marius M. Rex" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf Message-ID: <20001005121843.B8408@tao.thought.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from noor@comrax.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 05:35:40PM +0200 X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Noor Dawod wrote: > Hi Marius, > > I once had a similar problem. The solution was that one of the many > /etc/rc.* (a hunch: check /etc/rc.firewall) is not properly reading > /etc/defaults/rc.donf correctly, and this is causing mis-understanding > in your box. > > The /etc/rc.firewall should have at the begining of it the following > lines: > > if [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ]; then > . /etc/defaults/rc.conf > source_rc_confs > elif [ -r /etc/rc.conf ]; then > . /etc/rc.conf > fi > > Make sure this is inserted correctly. > I had a very similar experience after my 3.x to 4.x upgrade. Only things in the default rc.conf were seen; my /etc/rc.conf.local file was ignored. I knew it was a scripting problem but wasn't sure where to begin looking. Long story short, things began working after I mv'd the rc.conf.local file to /etc/rc.conf; also adding echo's within the file. The idea of having a large unchanging /etc/defaults/rc.conf seems like a major win--a stroke of genius. Couldn't we add some minor debug features to this configuration that printed to stdout that "No local rc configuration file found!" if that were the case? Just a thought; something to make sysadmin a bit easier. Anyone using *BSD is a heavy-hitter by default; still, paving any rough roads would help. gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 12:56:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33E637B66D for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e95Ju6x29178; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:56:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA45251; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:56:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA00532; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:56:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net, steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com In-Reply-To: <200010051635.KAA51533@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200010041144.HAA84948@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : it turns out that `sum' was not 0xff (but 0x51) as it should have > : been... but, everything looks just fine to me... (of course, I'm > > This is odd. My -current box works great for my linksys card, modulo > the removal of interrupts on eject issues that have come up in the > SMPng stuff. > > Warner > Well - the only reason I thought it might be the LinkSys card is that it claims to be a FastEthernet 10/100... The trade-mark is SmartLink , which appears to be the Archtek America Corporation. The floppy has drivers for Linux - when a do a strings on the objects, etc... the only semi-meaningful thing to come out is lnax100 pcnet_reset_8390 8390.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donal Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov) The bar-code on the box says 100BTX-16, the `official' name from the www.archtek.com web page appears to be: SmartLink EP100-BTX-16(C) 10/100Mbps 16 bit Auto-Sensing PCMCIA Ethernet Card. I couldn't find anything in the manual, on the box or on the web page that indicated what the chipset was... The Windows/2000 drivers did have: %*LNA100N.DeviceDesc%=LNA100N.ndi,PCMCIA\PCMCIA-FastEthernet-7898 Do any of these cryptic strings mean anything to anyone? - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 13:26:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.wedgev.com (cm57-70.liwest.at [212.33.57.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38BC37B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wedge by smtp.wedgev.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (FreeBSD)) id 13hHb5-0000DM-00 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2000 22:26:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:26:31 +0200 From: Bernhard Valenti To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: sblive broken Message-ID: <20001005222631.A794@cipher.home.at> Reply-To: Bernhard Valenti Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, i just made world on my box and after rebooting the sblive isnt working quite right anymore. mpg123 bla.mp3 aborts and prints: SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT: Invalid argument (several times, trying to use different playback rates) xmms seems to have another problem cause it creates massive noise. if you listen very hard you can hear the song in the background. * $FreeBSD: /c/ncvs/src/sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c,v 1.6.2.3 2000/10/05 05:12:31 cg Exp $ i'll try to get the older version of this file ( has been updated 15 hours ago ) and see if that fixes it. regards, bernhard valenti To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 14:18: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84437B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA05796; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:15:55 +0200 To: Alex Hayward Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <970780555.39dcef8b31450@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:15:55 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Alex Hayward : > KDE doesn't use CORBA. There have also been a number of reports on the > KDE > lists that recent sources have got a lot better performance wise, > including on low end machines. It's really not the right list, and I must admit that I dislike both of them, but it *seems* that KDE runs faster than GNOME. I mean the old KDE. This is strange due to the fact that KDE is C++ and GNOME is C and one would expect the C one to be faster. This hold true for both FreeBSD and Linux I've seen GNOME and KDE on. P.S. Lets not discuss it any further though :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 14:26:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297C537B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA05849; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:24:35 +0200 To: Brian Somers Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) Message-ID: <970781075.39dcf193a406c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:24:35 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200010040007.e9407ls35825@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <200010040007.e9407ls35825@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Brian Somers : > > Hi, > > I've tried to connect my palm to 4.1.1-STABLE (built couple of days > before) > > and it dumped core. > > I've already connected my palm to other 4.1-STABLE system back in > mid-august. > > The only options I'd were: > > palm: > > set device /dev/cuaa1 > > set speed 57600 > > set ifaddr 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3 > > accept dns > > enable proxy > > > > then I write term in ppp and click on connect in palm. > > I can't remember what was the setup on the laptop I used back in > august, > > but I think that it was the same or, really similar. > > I can get more information from ppp(8) if you need, I built it with -g > today. > > I wonder what the bundle.66 is, it's missing debugging symbols. > > > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > > Can ``set log +physical +hdlc +phase +debug'' and send the resulting > log ? That stack trace doesn't look too sane, but if ppp is > mishandling the incoming data, I may be able to figure out what it's > doing wrong if you can send me a log of what it's received.... > > Also, it'd be worth doing > > disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > to see if that makes any difference. After adding what you've proposed it doesn't dump core and it connects fine. I know that I didn't upgrade my palm, so I'll try to look at ppp cvs and find what was changed since mid-august. Do you have an idea? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 14:36:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E77937B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA28075; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:36:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma027956; Thu, 5 Oct 00 16:36:28 -0500 Message-ID: <39DCF43C.FD9A3253@confusion.net> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:35:56 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: <39D924D1.DA491E02@confusion.net> <39DC3A5B.671E4BDD@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While I have seriously considered trying GNOME out, that wouldn't really satisfy my desire to figure out what is going on with this file. Top shows the compilation sitting at swread, truss is not telling me anything of interest, and it seems like the system is sitting idle even during all this. Hmm... Laurence Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Laurence Berland wrote: > > > All, > > Trying to compile KDE 4.1 on a somewhat recent 4.1-STABLE yields some > > strange results. All appears to be going well, until it begins > > compiling the file mcopidl.cc. The precise line is > > > > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I,,.,,.dcop -I../../kdecore > > -I../../kdeui -I../../kssl -I/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 -I/usr/X11R6/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I./../mcop -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -frtti -c mcopidl.cc > > > > It doesn't fail per se, but it's been working on this for at least 7 > > hours, with no sign of anything happening, though the activity lights > > are flashing. Top shows some activity involving this process, and it > > does seem to be using a large and oft-varied amount of memory (~50-70 > > MB). Just for reference the machine is a PPro 200 with 32 MB ram, 128MB > > swap, running a generic kernel. > > Try GNOME - it's now almost at par with KDE in usability/eye candiness (even > beats it in the later category IMO), while uses old plain C and not so heavily > CORBA-minded, so it is definitely the only choice for low-end machines. > > -Maxim > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 15: 9:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from corinth.bossig.com (corinth.bossig.com [208.26.239.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2001037B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topaz (unverified [208.26.241.83]) by corinth.bossig.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.2.4) with SMTP id ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:11:01 -0700 Message-ID: <002d01c02f18$ecac2880$0600a8c0@kbs.com> From: "Kent Stewart" To: "Francisco Reyes" , "John Polstra" Cc: References: <200006270228.WAA27777@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Subject: Re: cleanup after softupdate move Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:08:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "John Polstra" ; "Kent Stewart" Cc: Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 7:25 PM Subject: Re: cleanup after softupdate move > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:14:50 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > >The only problem is that people will not typically see cvsup having > >problems checking out the two files. I just happened to see the > >messages flash by on the screen. > > > And this is why it is best to always send the output of cvsup to > a file. > I like the graphic interface, but until it has loging > capabilities (did I miss them somewhere?) it really doesn't make > much sense to use it. The floppy symbol on the bottom right. Kent > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 15:38:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from irv1-mail2.intelenet.net (irv1-mail2.intelenet.net [204.182.160.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD0837B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimba.intelenet.net (nimba.intelenet.net [207.38.65.93]) by irv1-mail2.intelenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08695 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimba.intelenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1294) id 851CF83C72; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:38:05 -0700 From: matthew zeier To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: recommended patch list? Message-ID: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does freebsd have a sort of recommended patch list? I got an email from SANS today while installed 4.1.1 and saw mention of a fingerd patch that got me thinking. Thanks. - mz -- matthew zeier - "There ain't no rules around here. We're trying to accomplish something." - Thomas Edison To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 15:45:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DE537B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e95MjN709538; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:45:23 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: matthew zeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommended patch list? Message-ID: <20001005154523.O27736@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net>; from matthew@intelenet.net on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:38:05PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * matthew zeier [001005 15:39] wrote: > > Does freebsd have a sort of recommended patch list? I got an email from > SANS today while installed 4.1.1 and saw mention of a fingerd patch that > got me thinking. See: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cutting-edge.html you want to look at the "-stable" stuff. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 15:56:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE78037B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca42-27.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.27]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10757; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:56:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e95MtOa52663; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010052255.e95MtOa52663@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: HEADS UP: ports layout restructuring happening this weekend From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello world, As those of you who have been following the ports list may know, we are changing the ports skeletons' layout in an effort to reduce the number of small directories and significantly speed up operation on the ports tree. This should especially help operations such as "CVS update", and will also reduce the number of i-nodes required to keep the whole tree around. The conversion will be done this weekend. It will only take a day or two. There should be no functional changes that you can see after the conversion (minus the bugs I may introduce, of course). However, during the conversion, the tree will be in an inconsistent state and attempts to use the tree will fail in most weird ways, so it is recommended that you cvsup the tree on or before Friday and do not cvsup again until I post an "all clear" message. Thanks, -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 16:22:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gloria.cord.edu (gloria.cord.edu [138.129.254.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D7537B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (twschulz@localhost) by gloria.cord.edu (8.9.0/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA06870; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:21:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:21:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Trenton Schulz To: Laurence Berland Cc: Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way In-Reply-To: <39DCF43C.FD9A3253@confusion.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Laurence Berland wrote: > While I have seriously considered trying GNOME out, that wouldn't really > satisfy my desire to figure out what is going on with this file. Top > shows the compilation sitting at swread, truss is not telling me > anything of interest, and it seems like the system is sitting idle even > during all this. Hmm... While I know that not building a port is not nearly as "fun" KDE does offer pre-built packages over at: ftp://ftp.de.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/distribution/2.0Beta5/tar/FreeBSD/ download them and pkg_add away :) -- Trenton Schulz twschulz@cord.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 17:57: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAC637B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e960tHB07212; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:55:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e960t0B57187; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:55:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010060055.e960t0B57187@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:24:35 +0200." <970781075.39dcf193a406c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 01:54:59 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, The last core-dump problem with ppp was quite a few months ago (way before August) where it had problems with /etc/resolv.conf being unreadable or not existing. > Quoting Brian Somers : > > > > Hi, > > > I've tried to connect my palm to 4.1.1-STABLE (built couple of days > > before) > > > and it dumped core. > > > I've already connected my palm to other 4.1-STABLE system back in > > mid-august. > > > The only options I'd were: > > > palm: > > > set device /dev/cuaa1 > > > set speed 57600 > > > set ifaddr 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3 > > > accept dns > > > enable proxy > > > > > > then I write term in ppp and click on connect in palm. > > > I can't remember what was the setup on the laptop I used back in > > august, > > > but I think that it was the same or, really similar. > > > I can get more information from ppp(8) if you need, I built it with -g > > today. > > > I wonder what the bundle.66 is, it's missing debugging symbols. > > > > > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > > > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > > > > Can ``set log +physical +hdlc +phase +debug'' and send the resulting > > log ? That stack trace doesn't look too sane, but if ppp is > > mishandling the incoming data, I may be able to figure out what it's > > doing wrong if you can send me a log of what it's received.... > > > > Also, it'd be worth doing > > > > disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > > to see if that makes any difference. > After adding what you've proposed it doesn't dump core and it connects fine. > I know that I didn't upgrade my palm, so I'll try to look at ppp cvs and find > what was changed since mid-august. > Do you have an idea? > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 18:41:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0338A37B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [192.168.0.1]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E8998C2B for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:42:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <001301c02e6d$2d0e51c0$0100a8c0@veldy.net> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Subject: PS/2 mouse problem and X-Windows? Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:40:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am suddenly having a problem with X-Windows (4.0.1_2) and the PS/2 mouse. I have tried both the PS/2 protocol and the Intellimouse protocol. Everytime I start X everything appears to start OK, but when I move the mouse, it jumps all over the place - highlighting text and what have you. In a split second it becomes stuck at the top of the screen. Here is the kicker. I have an Athlon 600 system from compaq (it was ...). The mainboard in it stinks. Well, this mouse problem suddenly crops up after a fresh build world. I was sick of the quirks of the old board, so I went and bought an ABIT KA7-100. I put a new mouse on it and bought new Micron memory (PC133). Everything is well, except this mouse problem has popped up again. I have no reason to believe that it is anything except for FreeBSD or a new patch in X at this point. I have never had this problem before, either with the old or new hardware configuration. I have not been able to find any reference to this problem anywhere else on this list. Does anybody have an idea what is going on here? Have there been any changes made to the psm driver? Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 19:15:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A489137B66E; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 568B61928; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:16:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:16:25 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Trenton Schulz Cc: Laurence Berland , Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way Message-ID: <20001005211625.F70754@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Trenton Schulz , Laurence Berland , Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39DCF43C.FD9A3253@confusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from twschulz@gloria.cord.edu on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 06:21:56PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 06:21:56PM -0500, Trenton Schulz wrote: > While I know that not building a port is not nearly as "fun" KDE does offer > pre-built packages over at: > ftp://ftp.de.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/distribution/2.0Beta5/tar/FreeBSD/ I built these packages. They are not as good as the ones that bento.FreeBSD.org (package cluster) built. You can get these at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.1.1-release/All/, and more recently, you can get 4.1.1-STABLE && 3.5-STABLE && 5.0-CURRENT packages by substituting `4.1.1-release` with `4-stable`, `3-stable` and `5-current`, respectively. So I suggest you get the ones off the FreeBSD.org FTP mirrors (please don't use ftp.freebsd.org if you can avoid it). -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 19:40:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDD437B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA21551; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:40:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from confusion.net (dhcp089155.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.89.155]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma021487; Thu, 5 Oct 00 21:39:36 -0500 Message-ID: <39DD3B48.C866FB11@confusion.net> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 21:39:04 -0500 From: Laurence Berland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trenton Schulz Cc: Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE2 fails to compile in strangest possible way References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Regardless, problem solved, -O does some strange stuff... Trenton Schulz wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Laurence Berland wrote: > > > While I have seriously considered trying GNOME out, that wouldn't really > > satisfy my desire to figure out what is going on with this file. Top > > shows the compilation sitting at swread, truss is not telling me > > anything of interest, and it seems like the system is sitting idle even > > during all this. Hmm... > > While I know that not building a port is not nearly as "fun" KDE does offer > pre-built packages over at: > ftp://ftp.de.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/distribution/2.0Beta5/tar/FreeBSD/ > > download them and pkg_add away :) > > -- > Trenton Schulz > twschulz@cord.edu -- Laurence Berland Intern, Flooz.com Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 19:45:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au [203.2.75.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D195E37B66C for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from echidna.stu.cowan.edu.au (perax4-066.dialup.optusnet.com.au [198.142.81.66]) by mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27232; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:40:37 +1100 Message-ID: <39DD3C59.F35DB061@echidna.stu.cowan.edu.au> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:43:37 +0800 From: Trent Nelson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PS/2 mouse problem and X-Windows? References: <001301c02e6d$2d0e51c0$0100a8c0@veldy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: > Does anybody have an idea what is going on here? Have there been any > changes made to the psm driver? If you've got 'Protocol' in your XF86Config file set to "PS/2", change it to "auto". If you've got it set to "auto", change it to "MouseSystems" (this worked for me on X 4.01 built early September). This has been the solution for just about everyones' mouse & X 4.01 related problems. > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@veldy.net Regards, Trent. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 20:35:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC8237B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA89718; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:36:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: matthew zeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommended patch list? Message-ID: <20001005203630.B89659@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net>; from matthew@intelenet.net on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:38:05PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:38:05PM -0700, matthew zeier wrote: > > Does freebsd have a sort of recommended patch list? I got an email from > SANS today while installed 4.1.1 and saw mention of a fingerd patch that > got me thinking. See the security advisories - http://www.freebsd.org/security.html Not all of them have patches (only those which relate to the base system, not ports). Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 21:12:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E5337B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e964CJH00438; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:12:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA05217; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:12:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010060412.WAA05217@harmony.village.org> To: Thomas David Rivers Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:56:03 EDT." <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 22:12:18 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: : The trade-mark is SmartLink , which appears to be the Archtek America : Corporation. OK. I couldn't find the chipset on their website. Physical examination might be required to find out. : The floppy has drivers for Linux - when a do a strings on the : objects, etc... the only semi-meaningful thing to come out is : lnax100 : pcnet_reset_8390 : 8390.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donal Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov) Does it say anything about ax88190? If not, then you don't want the flags 0x30000 that I think you said you had in your pccard.conf. Where did you get this card? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 22:55:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from area51.slashnet.org (area51.slashnet.org [208.222.214.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3935437B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by area51.slashnet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6874114D409 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 054689905; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:55:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:55:42 -0500 From: Sean Kelly To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: dd and acd Message-ID: <20001006005542.A22289@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've recently not been able to make images of any of the CDs I have here. I can burn a cd using burncd, but I am unable to read it back: (60) root@edgemaster:~$ dd if=/dev/acd0c of=iso dd: /dev/acd0c: Bad address 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.002280 secs (0 bytes/sec) I can't image a self-burned, and I can't dd/cp any of the commercial CDs I have here either. This used to work! I even tried it both in my CD-RW and DVD-ROM with the same error. ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 acd0: CD-RW at ata0-slave using UDMA33 acd1: DVD-ROM at ata1-slave using WDMA2 FreeBSD edgemaster.zombie.org 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 2 2 1:39:58 CDT 2000 smkelly@edgemaster.zombie.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDGEMAST ER i386 Any feedback on how I can get this to work would be welcomed. -- Sean Kelly or PGP KeyID: 4AC781C7 http://www.sean-kelly.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 23:39:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC5237B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA80831; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:38:12 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:38:12 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: matthew zeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommended patch list? In-Reply-To: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, matthew zeier wrote: > Does freebsd have a sort of recommended patch list? I got an email from > SANS today while installed 4.1.1 and saw mention of a fingerd patch that > got me thinking. I think fingerd hole should be mentioned in ERRATA /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 0:54:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBB837B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from workhorse.my.domain ([206.170.3.43]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0G2000JN30E5K4@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeus.usa.net (zeus [10.0.0.3]) by workhorse.my.domain (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9684e400223 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 01:04:41 -0700 (PDT envelope-from leonardc9@usa.net) Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 00:53:10 -0700 From: "Leonard C." Subject: CDROM support brokenness X-Sender: (Unverified) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently upgraded from 4.0 RELEASE to 4.1.1-STABLE on a box with some pretty old hardware. After the upgrade, my CDROM drive (slave on 2nd channel) is no longer detected. Doing a quick search of the mailing list archive, this seems to be a pretty common problem that other people have run into, but I couldn't find any solutions to the problem. Does anybody know the status of this bug? Are there any workarounds? Thanks, Leonard > uname -a FreeBSD workhorse 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Thu Oct 5 23:45:51 PDT 2000 leonard@workhorse:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKHORSE_KERN i386 > dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Thu Oct 5 23:45:51 PDT 2000 leonard@workhorse:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKHORSE_KERN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Overdrive Pentium/P54T Overdrive (83.23-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x1532 Stepping = 2 Features=0x13f real memory = 30932992 (30208K bytes) config> di pcic0 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di psm0 No such device: psm0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di sn0 No such device: sn0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di lnc0 No such device: lnc0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di le0 No such device: le0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di ie0 No such device: ie0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di fe0 No such device: fe0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di cs0 No such device: cs0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di bt0 No such device: bt0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di aic0 No such device: aic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di aha0 No such device: aha0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di adv0 No such device: adv0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> en ed0 config> po ed0 0x300 config> ir ed0 12 config> iom ed0 0xd8000 config> f ed0 0 config> q avail memory = 26968064 (26336K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc034a000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc034a09c. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface isa0: on motherboard fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold ppi0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port plip0: on ppbus0 ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xd8000 irq 12 drq 0 on isa0 ed0: address 00:00:b4:3f:a9:30, type NE2000 (16 bit) sbc0: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b irq 5 drq 1,5 on isa0 pcm0: on sbc0 ata1-slave: identify retries exceeded ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ad0: 1549MB [3148/16/63] at ata0-master using BIOSPIO ad1: 696MB [1416/16/63] at ata0-slave using BIOSPIO ad2: 233MB [978/14/35] at ata1-master using BIOSPIO Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a -- Support the Blue Ribbon Campaign for free speech online http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html "Those who will not reason perish in the act. Those who will not act, perish for that reason." - W. H. Auden To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 1:13:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from stjohn.stjohn.ac.th (stjohn.stjohn.ac.th [202.21.144.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93C437B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from granite ([203.151.134.100]) by stjohn.stjohn.ac.th (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA25881; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:07:57 +0700 (GMT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> X-Sender: mcrogerm@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 15:14:06 +0700 To: "Leonard C." From: Roger Merritt Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:53 AM 10/6/00 -0700, you wrote: >I recently upgraded from 4.0 RELEASE to 4.1.1-STABLE on a box with some >pretty old hardware. After the upgrade, my CDROM drive (slave on 2nd >channel) is no longer detected. > >Doing a quick search of the mailing list archive, this seems to be a pretty >common problem that other people have run into, but I couldn't find any >solutions to the problem. > >Does anybody know the status of this bug? Are there any workarounds? > >Thanks, > >Leonard > The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. -- Roger An egotist is an annoying person who is more interested in himself than in me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 1:22:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bajor.softcomca.com (bajor.softcomca.com [168.144.1.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020E537B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bajor.softcomca.com [168.144.1.158] by bajor.softcomca.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.00) id AB4A94300D8; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 04:20:26 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 158.36.119.206 X-URL: http://www.mail2web.com/ Subject: Strange permission problem after upgrade to 4.1.1-S From: "yskundbe@mail.chello.no" Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 04:20:26 -0400 To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Reply-To: yskundbe@chello.no X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: JMail 3.7.0 by Dimac (www.dimac.net) Message-Id: <200010060420402.SM00229@bajor.softcomca.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After going from 4.1-S to 4.1.1-S, and presumably making a wrong turn somewhere in mergemaster, I get this error when ope= ning my Pine INBOX: Unable to create scratch file: Permission denied. Pine reports the number of new messages, but they show up without headers and with zero bytes content. When I start x11am= p , i get this: Bind: permission denied Where should I start looking? I would happily chmod and chown away, if I knew what files these two programs were trying t= o access. As mentioned, I suspect some of the files mergemaster upgrades. x11amp is really no problem, since xmms works a= nyway, but the Pine/mail thing worries me. I haven't tried another client (this is sent from a webmail service, which is = no fun at all) but I don't believe the actual problem is Pine. Any input appreciated. =D8ystein Skundberg ------------------------------------------------------------------- This message has been posted from Mail2Web http://www.mail2web.com/ Web Hosting for $9.95 per month! Visit: http://www.yourhosting.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 1:56:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7F237B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from workhorse.my.domain ([206.170.3.43]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0G20002D82X73B@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeus.berkeley.edu (zeus [10.0.0.3]) by workhorse.my.domain (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e968xC400437; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 01:59:16 -0700 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 01:47:48 -0700 From: Leonard Chung Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> X-Sender: leonard@yikes.com To: Roger Merritt , "Leonard C." Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006014551.028bc028@yikes.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:14 AM 10/6/2000, Roger Merritt wrote: >The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from >postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose >you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the >problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, >but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. >Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. >-- >Roger > >An egotist is an annoying person who is more interested >in himself than in me. Thanks for the help, The sources are current as of yesterday, so it looks like the problem is still there. Does anybody know for sure whether this problem actually got fixed? Leonard -- Leonard Chung - SETI@home - The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence @ home http://www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 2:48:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.a1.org.uk (ns.a1.org.uk [194.105.64.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A007D37B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.a1.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA64845; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:38:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bap) From: Bap Message-Id: <200010060938.KAA64845@ns.a1.org.uk> Subject: stable on multiple machines To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:38:30 +0100 (BST) Cc: lists@a1.org.uk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can anyone tell me the best way of doing the following: I have 3 machines - 2 faily decent, and a 486DX2 66, 16M, 230M HDD ( just got a 500M to add to it! ) The 486 has been sitting as a dialup gw for a couple of years running 2.2.6-RELEASE ( have never had any problems ) I am going to get a permenant connection to the net using a 56k modem so thought it was about time I upgraded to track STABLE on the router. I know I can cvsup and build sources on my best machine, then NFS mount and install on the other decent machine. What is the best way of doing this for the 486, as it will obviously need the absolute minimum install to fit comfortably? Thanks for any ideas, Bap. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 3:17:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7834A37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 03:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA11096; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:15:25 +0200 To: Bap Subject: Re: stable on multiple machines Message-ID: <970827325.39dda63d55e63@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 12:15:25 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010060938.KAA64845@ns.a1.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200010060938.KAA64845@ns.a1.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Bap : > Can anyone tell me the best way of doing the following: > > I have 3 machines - 2 faily decent, and a 486DX2 66, 16M, 230M HDD ( > just got a 500M to add to it! ) > > The 486 has been sitting as a dialup gw for a couple of years running > 2.2.6-RELEASE ( have never had any problems ) > I am going to get a permenant connection to the net using a 56k modem so > thought it was about time I upgraded to track STABLE on the router. > > I know I can cvsup and build sources on my best machine, then NFS mount > and install on the other decent machine. > > What is the best way of doing this for the 486, as it will obviously > need the absolute minimum install to fit comfortably? > > Thanks for any ideas, > Bap. I don't see point in upgrading a perfectly working machine. Anyway, 4.x seems to be more memory hungry, so 3.5.1 might be a better option for you. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 3:36:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.a1.org.uk (ns.a1.org.uk [194.105.64.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D5437B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 03:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.a1.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA64916 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:26:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bap) From: Bap Message-Id: <200010061026.LAA64916@ns.a1.org.uk> Subject: Re: stable on multiple machines In-Reply-To: <970827325.39dda63d55e63@webmail.harmonic.co.il> from Roman Shterenzon at "Oct 6, 2000 12:15:25 pm" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:26:49 +0100 (BST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > Quoting Bap : > > > Can anyone tell me the best way of doing the following: > > > > I have 3 machines - 2 faily decent, and a 486DX2 66, 16M, 230M HDD ( > > just got a 500M to add to it! ) > > > > The 486 has been sitting as a dialup gw for a couple of years running > > 2.2.6-RELEASE ( have never had any problems ) > > I am going to get a permenant connection to the net using a 56k modem so > > thought it was about time I upgraded to track STABLE on the router. > > > > I know I can cvsup and build sources on my best machine, then NFS mount > > and install on the other decent machine. > > > > What is the best way of doing this for the 486, as it will obviously > > need the absolute minimum install to fit comfortably? > > > > Thanks for any ideas, > > Bap. > I don't see point in upgrading a perfectly working machine. > Anyway, 4.x seems to be more memory hungry, so 3.5.1 might be a better option > for you. I would like to ensure that the firewall and PPP is kept up to date and bug free as the machines will be on net 100% of time. This 486 will only be running PPP, gateway and firewall, so I'm hoping memory wont be too much of a problem. If I did install 3.5.1, I would still like to track 3, which due to drive space/proc power/memory, would be extremely tedious/impossible on the machine itself! Also, it's nice to work on machine at exactly the same revision so configs, etc, are in the same places and take the same args. Thx, Bap. > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 3:41:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A7637B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 03:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96Af8q20717; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:41:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39DDAC43.65D560AF@thehousleys.net> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 06:41:07 -0400 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bap Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, lists@a1.org.uk Subject: Re: stable on multiple machines References: <200010060938.KAA64845@ns.a1.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bap wrote: > > What is the best way of doing this for the 486, as it will obviously need the absolute minimum install to fit comfortably? > I don't think you can do source upgrade from 2.2.6 to 3.5.1 or 4.1.1. You have major issues including 1) new boot blocks. 2) aout to elf kernels. 3) Drastically different /etc/rc*. 4) I am sure there are more. If you really need to upgrade this your best bet would be a "fresh" binary install, after saving vital configuration information. I am not trying to discourage you, but this won't be an easy path. I believe the recommened path will be 2.2.6->2.2.8-STABLE (there actually was a commit 2 days ago). 2.2.8-STABLE->3.2-RELEASE and change boot blocks and kernel to elf. 3.2-RELEASE to 3.5.1-STABLE. Now you can remove all the old libs and programs that have moved locations. And all this on a 486??? Jim -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! Reboot now? [OK] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 3:42:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AD937B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 03:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e96Agem22137; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA46596; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:42:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id GAA52635; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:42:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200010061042.GAA52635@lakes.dignus.com> To: imp@village.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010060412.WAA05217@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > In message <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> Thomas David Rivers writes: > : The trade-mark is SmartLink , which appears to be the Archtek America > : Corporation. > > OK. I couldn't find the chipset on their website. Physical > examination might be required to find out. > > : The floppy has drivers for Linux - when a do a strings on the > : objects, etc... the only semi-meaningful thing to come out is > : lnax100 > : pcnet_reset_8390 > : 8390.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donal Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov) > > Does it say anything about ax88190? If not, then you don't want the > flags 0x30000 that I think you said you had in your pccard.conf. It needed the 0x30000 to work with 3.4-RELEASE. You think, perhaps, that's not needed for 4.1? > > Where did you get this card? > > Warner > At a small store here in the area calld PC Warehouse. It's part of a small chain. - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 6:12:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B50337B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.238.54.101] (helo=freebie.demon.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #4) id 13hXIs-0009qU-00; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 13:12:46 +0000 Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.demon.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e966Tfe73244; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:29:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:29:41 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PS/2 mouse problem and X-Windows? Message-ID: <20001006082940.A73201@freebie.demon.nl> References: <001301c02e6d$2d0e51c0$0100a8c0@veldy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <001301c02e6d$2d0e51c0$0100a8c0@veldy.net>; from veldy@veldy.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:40:00PM -0500 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:40:00PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I am suddenly having a problem with X-Windows (4.0.1_2) and the PS/2 mouse. > I have tried both the PS/2 protocol and the Intellimouse protocol. > Everytime I start X everything appears to start OK, but when I move the > mouse, it jumps all over the place - highlighting text and what have you. > In a split second it becomes stuck at the top of the screen. > > Here is the kicker. > > I have an Athlon 600 system from compaq (it was ...). The mainboard in it > stinks. Well, this mouse problem suddenly crops up after a fresh build > world. I was sick of the quirks of the old board, so I went and bought an > ABIT KA7-100. I put a new mouse on it and bought new Micron memory (PC133). FWIW: I have never seen this on my KA7. So I am pretty sure this is software/setup related. Plain Logitech PS/2 mouse here, listed in X86config as Option "Protocol" "PS/2" (XFree 4.x BTW) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 6:47: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from proton.hexanet.fr (proton.hexanet.fr [194.98.140.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2DD37B502; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proton.hexanet.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proton.hexanet.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04284; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:46:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nighty@proton.hexanet.fr) Message-Id: <200010061346.PAA04284@proton.hexanet.fr> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: chris@hexanet.fr From: "Christophe Prevotaux" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problem building kernel on 4-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 15:46:44 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just updated my source tree and when I try to compile my kernel I get = these errors , does anyone knows why ? = @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include perl @/kern/makedevops.pl -h @/kern/device_if.m perl @/kern/makedevops.pl -h @/kern/bus_if.m rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ = -I@/../include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include = /usr/src/sys/modules/wi/../../i386/isa/if_wi.c cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STORM; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj = COMPILER_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/u= sr/bin = LIBRARY_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/li= b = OBJFORMAT_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec PERL5LIB=3D/usr/obj/u= sr/src/i38 6/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 DESTDIR=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 INSTALL=3D"s= h = /usr/src/tools/install.sh" PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/ob= j/usr/sr c/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/= bin = MACHINE=3Di386 make KERNEL=3Dkernel all cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls = -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arit= h = -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. = -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h= -elf = -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/locore.s /tmp/ccoU4373.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1745: Error: .space specifies non-absolute value /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2471: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation setting = PTmap /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2471: Error: undefined symbol PDRSHIFT in operation setti= ng = PTmap /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1713: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1713: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1714: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1714: Error: undefined symbol PDESIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2471: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation setting = APTmap /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2471: Error: undefined symbol PDRSHIFT in operation setti= ng = APTmap /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1722: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1722: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1723: Error: undefined symbol L0=01 in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1723: Error: undefined symbol PDESIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1929: Error: undefined symbol UPAGES in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1929: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2332: Error: undefined symbol BI_ESYMTAB in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2337: Error: undefined symbol BI_SYMTAB in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2338: Error: undefined symbol BI_ESYMTAB in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2342: Error: undefined symbol BI_KERNEND in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2354: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2354: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2358: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2358: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: undefined symbol UPAGES in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: undefined symbol UPAGES in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2367: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2367: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2370: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2370: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SIZE in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2427: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SHIFT in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2443: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SHIFT in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2444: Error: undefined symbol PAGE_SHIFT in operation /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1855: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".tmpstk" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 28= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1878: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "end" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 38. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1879: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "edata" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 43. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1891: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_feature" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addres= s 61. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:1907: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 81= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2116: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "kernelname" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 375. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2144: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "bootinfo" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 4= 15. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2161: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "nfs_diskless" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addre= ss = 447. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2166: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "nfs_diskless_valid" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file= = address 460. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2179: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "boothowto" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address = 474. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2181: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "bootdev" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 48= 2. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2219: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 534. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2224: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 550. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2225: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 560. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2226: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 570. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2227: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 580. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2228: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 590. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2247: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 631. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2274: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 666. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2275: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 676. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2276: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 686. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2282: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_high" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 7= 01. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2283: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 707. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2284: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 713. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2285: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 719. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2286: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_vendor" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 725. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2290: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_id" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 738= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2291: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_feature" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addres= s 744. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2298: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 761. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2304: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 778. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2308: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 790. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2321: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_feature" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addres= s 801. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2329: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "end" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 823. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2332: Error: Negative of non-absolute symbol KERNBASE /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2337: Error: Negative of non-absolute symbol KERNBASE /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2338: Error: Negative of non-absolute symbol KERNBASE /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2342: Error: Negative of non-absolute symbol KERNBASE /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2350: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 882.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2351: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 888.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2354: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 894.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2354: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 906.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2355: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 924.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2358: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 930.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2358: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 942.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2359: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 96= 0. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 966.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2362: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 978.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2363: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 996.= /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2365: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "proc0paddr" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address= 1008. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2367: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1014= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2367: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1026= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2368: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1044= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2370: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1050= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2370: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1062= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2371: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "vm86pa" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 108= 0. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2373: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "vm86paddr" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address = 1092. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2388: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_feature" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addres= s = 1102. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2393: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "etext" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1119= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2396: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1142= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2399: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "etext" {*UND* section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1164= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2405: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "cpu_feature" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file addres= s = 1185. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2410: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1203= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2413: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1222= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2416: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 12= 44. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2418: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1263= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2421: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1286= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2423: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1305= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2428: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1347= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2431: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1370= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2433: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1389= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2439: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "vm86pa" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 143= 1. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2445: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "vm86pa" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 147= 3. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2451: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1496= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2454: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 15= 12. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2457: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = ".data" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 1535= =2E /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2460: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 15= 54. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2463: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 15= 77. /tmp/ccoU4373.s:2466: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sect= ions = "IdlePTD" {.data section} - "KERNBASE" {*UND* section} at file address 15= 96. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STORM. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- = -- =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Christophe Prevotaux Email: chris@hexanet.fr HEXANET SARL URL: http://www.hexanet.fr/ Z.A Farman Sud Tel: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 05 = 9 rue Roland Coffignot Direct: +33 (0)3 26 79 08 02 = BP415 Fax: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 06 51689 Reims Cedex 2 = FRANCE = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 6:56:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB6237B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tdtemp30 (veldy.net [64.1.117.28]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 387288C2C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:57:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <00cf01c02f9d$341e3620$ea6810ac@psinetcs.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: References: <001301c02e6d$2d0e51c0$0100a8c0@veldy.net> <20001006082940.A73201@freebie.demon.nl> Subject: Re: PS/2 mouse problem and X-Windows? Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:56:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The only parts in common between the old configuration and the new configuration is the Video card (Diamond Viper 770 TNT2 Ultra), the sound card (SB PCI512) and the CPU the Athlon 600. I have no reason to suspect any problems with any of the hardware, other than this mouse problem. Any ideas? Like I said, it worked just fine for me until about a week ago. Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilko Bulte" To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 1:29 AM Subject: Re: PS/2 mouse problem and X-Windows? > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:40:00PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > I am suddenly having a problem with X-Windows (4.0.1_2) and the PS/2 mouse. > > I have tried both the PS/2 protocol and the Intellimouse protocol. > > Everytime I start X everything appears to start OK, but when I move the > > mouse, it jumps all over the place - highlighting text and what have you. > > In a split second it becomes stuck at the top of the screen. > > > > Here is the kicker. > > > > I have an Athlon 600 system from compaq (it was ...). The mainboard in it > > stinks. Well, this mouse problem suddenly crops up after a fresh build > > world. I was sick of the quirks of the old board, so I went and bought an > > ABIT KA7-100. I put a new mouse on it and bought new Micron memory (PC133). > > FWIW: I have never seen this on my KA7. So I am pretty sure this is > software/setup related. Plain Logitech PS/2 mouse here, listed in X86config > as Option "Protocol" "PS/2" (XFree 4.x BTW) > > -- > Wilko Bulte > wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 6:56:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ivin.nl (ivin.nl [161.58.235.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DF237B671; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roberts4.roberts.nl ([213.73.149.39]) by ivin.nl (8.8.8) id PAA94294; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20001006155321.00a36090@pop.roberts.nl> X-Sender: lar@pop.roberts.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 15:55:27 +0200 To: chris@hexanet.fr, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Luke Roberts Subject: Re: Problem building kernel on 4-STABLE In-Reply-To: <200010061346.PAA04284@proton.hexanet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 15:46 06/10/2000 +0200, Christophe Prevotaux wrote: >I just updated my source tree and when I try to compile my kernel I get >these errors , does anyone knows why ? Could be because of the order in which you do things. Below cookbook I wrote lately worked for me and my brother's FreeBSD box. Cheers, Luke 1. Install CVSUP ---------------------- cd /usr/src/ports/net/cvsup-bin make make install 2. Fetch the latest FreeBSD stable source for /usr/src from the FreeBSD repository ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ cd /usr/local/bin/cvsup -h cvsup.nl.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile (this will now download loads of stuff, could take an hour) 3. Compile stuff ----------------- cd /usr/src make buildworld (this will take a long time ~1 hour) 4. Go to single user mode and Install Stuff --------------------------------------------- shutdown now (the computer will shutdown and go into a single user prompt) cd /usr/src make installworld 5. Recompile and Install Kernel -------------------------------- cd /src/i386/conf config -r YOURKERNEL (YOURKERNEL = name of yopur kernel) cd ../../compile/YOURKERNEL make clean make depend make install 6. Shutdown and Reboot ------------------------ shutdown -r now That should be it. In a prompt try: uname -srm You should get: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 7:40:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from malkav.snowmoon.com (ip-208-20-126-237.cdcsd.k12.ny.us [208.20.126.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEA5437B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 07:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28134 invoked by uid 1003); 6 Oct 2000 14:40:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2000 14:40:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:40:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marius M. Rex" To: James Housley Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD ignoring /etc/rc.conf In-Reply-To: <39DC9B65.D16C6858@thehousleys.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Very interesting. According the the script rc.out my /etc/rc.conf file is sourced. Once in the very begining. script rc.out sh -x rc: >Script started on Fri Oct 6 10:25:42 2000 >+ stty status ^T >+ trap : 2 >+ trap : 3 >+ HOME=/ >+ PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin >+ export HOME PATH >+ [ -r /etc/rc.diskless1 ] >+ /sbin/sysctl -n vfs.nfs.diskless_valid >+ dlv= >+ [ 0 != 0 ] >+ [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ] ***snip*** >+ update_motd=YES >+ start_vinum= >+ [ -z ] >+ source_rc_confs_defined=yes >+ source_rc_confs >+ local i sourced_files >+ sourced_files=:/etc/rc.conf: >+ [ -r /etc/rc.conf ] >+ . /etc/rc.conf ***snip***B And when my rc.firewall is called up. Hmm..This definately helped. Though I am not quite sure what is happening yet. I will have to study this a bit more. But thank you, now I have something to work with. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marius M. Rex "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." -- The Mahabharata On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, James Housley wrote: > "Marius M. Rex" wrote: > > > > I appreciate the suggestions, but it is a pretty fundamental > > problem. I can start most things easily by hand, but it is annoying to > > do. > > > Okay. This is all started during boot by init(). You should be able to > restart and log the result by doing: "cd /etc ; script rc.out sh -x rc" > > That will put rc in verbose mode. You might have to edit some of the > rc.* scripts and add "set -x" as the second line to see inside of them. > But this will give you more detail then you want, but it will show > exactly what is happening. > > Jim > -- > Your mouse has moved. > Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! > > Reboot now? [OK] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 7:47:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hole.etrust.ru (sweet.etrust.ru [194.84.67.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEED337B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from osa@localhost) by hole.etrust.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA64395 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:47:16 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from osa) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:47:16 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: buildworld (upgrade from 3.4-S to RELENG_4) failed... Message-ID: <20001006184716.A64352@freebsd.org.ru> Reply-To: osa@freebsd.org.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! I tried to upgrade my 3.4-S version to RELENG_4, but buildworld failed: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o opmini.o /usr/obj/usr/src /gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a -lm -lcrypt -lutil /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a(pp_hot.o): In function `Perl_pp_aassign': pp_hot.o(.text+0x16a1): undefined reference to `setresuid' pp_hot.o(.text+0x16d4): undefined reference to `setresgid' *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Any idea? -- Rgdz, /"\ Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN osa@freebsd.org.ru X AGAINST HTML MAIL http://freebsd.org.ru/~osa/ / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 7:50: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8074937B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id C843A9B1F; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:49:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:49:59 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: "Sergey A. Osokin" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: buildworld (upgrade from 3.4-S to RELENG_4) failed... Message-ID: <20001006104958.A82507@pawn.primelocation.net> References: <20001006184716.A64352@freebsd.org.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001006184716.A64352@freebsd.org.ru>; from osa@freebsd.org.ru on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > Hello! > I tried to upgrade my 3.4-S version to RELENG_4, but buildworld > failed: > > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o opmini.o /usr/obj/usr/src > /gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a -lm -lcrypt -lutil > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a(pp_hot.o): In function `Perl_pp_aassign': > pp_hot.o(.text+0x16a1): undefined reference to `setresuid' > pp_hot.o(.text+0x16d4): undefined reference to `setresgid' > *** Error code 1 > You are following the instructions in /usr/src/UPDATING for bringing a system from 3.x to 4.x, aren't you? -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 7:51:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.a1.org.uk (ns.a1.org.uk [194.105.64.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523537B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 07:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.a1.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA65170 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:42:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bap) From: Bap Message-Id: <200010061442.PAA65170@ns.a1.org.uk> Subject: Re: stable on multiple machines In-Reply-To: <39DDAC43.65D560AF@thehousleys.net> from James Housley at "Oct 6, 2000 06:41:07 am" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:42:11 +0100 (BST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Bap wrote: > > > > What is the best way of doing this for the 486, as it will obviously need the absolute minimum install to fit comfortably? > > > I don't think you can do source upgrade from 2.2.6 to 3.5.1 or 4.1.1. > You have major issues including 1) new boot blocks. 2) aout to elf > kernels. 3) Drastically different /etc/rc*. 4) I am sure there are > more. If you really need to upgrade this your best bet would be a > "fresh" binary install, after saving vital configuration information. > > I am not trying to discourage you, but this won't be an easy path. I > believe the recommened path will be 2.2.6->2.2.8-STABLE (there actually > was a commit 2 days ago). 2.2.8-STABLE->3.2-RELEASE and change boot > blocks and kernel to elf. 3.2-RELEASE to 3.5.1-STABLE. Now you can > remove all the old libs and programs that have moved locations. And all > this on a 486??? It would be a challenge! I was going to install 4.1.1 from ftp, with CDROM in one of my other machines and go from there. Bap. > > Jim > -- > Your mouse has moved. > Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! > > Reboot now? [OK] > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 8:15:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C591037B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA39741; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:15:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:15:28 +0100 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Roger Merritt , y@chuggalug.clues.com Cc: "Leonard C." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness Message-ID: <20001006161528.K37433@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th>; from Roger Merritt on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > > The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from > postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose > you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the > problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, > but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. > Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. > -- > Roger > I had assumed the problem was broader than this I have had two boxes upgraded from 3.x stable to 4.0 stable (ie pre 4.1) and both were unable to detect their IDE CDs (actually DVDs) post upgrade. THe only workaround I have seen suggest was to drop back to the old IDE driver. For the record both were slaves to ATA/66 capable disks. -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 8:15:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC83737B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA39745; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:15:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:15:42 +0100 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Roger Merritt , y@chuggalug.clues.com Cc: "Leonard C." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness Message-ID: <20001006161528.K37433@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th>; from Roger Merritt on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > > The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from > postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose > you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the > problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, > but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. > Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. > -- > Roger > I had assumed the problem was broader than this I have had two boxes upgraded from 3.x stable to 4.0 stable (ie pre 4.1) and both were unable to detect their IDE CDs (actually DVDs) post upgrade. THe only workaround I have seen suggest was to drop back to the old IDE driver. For the record both were slaves to ATA/66 capable disks. -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 8:16:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83B237B66D for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA39755; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:16:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:16:05 +0100 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Roger Merritt Cc: "Leonard C." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness Message-ID: <20001006161528.K37433@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th>; from Roger Merritt on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > > The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from > postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose > you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the > problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, > but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. > Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. > -- > Roger > I had assumed the problem was broader than this I have had two boxes upgraded from 3.x stable to 4.0 stable (ie pre 4.1) and both were unable to detect their IDE CDs (actually DVDs) post upgrade. THe only workaround I have seen suggest was to drop back to the old IDE driver. For the record both were slaves to ATA/66 capable disks. -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 8:51:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D3937B66D for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA15654; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:55:15 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id IAA22147; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:51:17 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id LAA21368; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:51:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14813.62711.149661.506143@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:51:19 -0700 (MST) To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Thursday, October 5, Warner Losh wrote: ] > > Wish I knew what to tell you... > Yeah ... me too :) Actually, I sacrificed sleep last night and did binary searches until I narrowed the kernel problem down to a 6 hour period of commits. What is the culprit you ask? It HAS to be some ATA commits because those are the only commits in this "window". If I CVSup along RELENG_4 and use the date 2000.8.22.06.00.00, rebuild a kernel, everything works fine. I get ed0 and ed1. But, from there if I change the CVSup date to 2000.8.22.12.00.00 (i.e. go from 6am sources to noon), rebuild a kernel, ed0 doesn't show up. These are the only commits to anything during that time frame on RELENG_4. Parsing supfile "supfile" Connecting to cvsup6.FreeBSD.org Connected to cvsup6.FreeBSD.org Server software version: REL_16_1 Negotiating file attribute support Exchanging collection information Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection Running Updating collection src-sys/cvs Edit src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c Add delta 1.50.2.6 2000.08.22.08.41.28 sos Edit src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.h Add delta 1.26.2.2 2000.08.22.08.41.29 sos Edit src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c Add delta 1.60.2.6 2000.08.22.08.41.29 sos Edit src/sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c Add delta 1.35.2.4 2000.08.22.08.41.29 sos Edit src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c Add delta 1.48.2.4 2000.08.22.08.41.29 sos Edit src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.h Add delta 1.15.2.3 2000.08.22.08.41.29 sos Shutting down connection to server Finished successfully How could ATA commits screw up the probing of ed0? I wish I had a logical answer and was hoping to narrow down the "commit window" so that it would show me something obvious--like in the ed driver itself or in some of the dev/isa files or something. If I back these commits out, again the kernel probes and attaches ed0. I see in the commit logs for these files, there is the comment: "New improved probe." Is it possible that this probe is stomping on something on my ed0 card (being intrusive) and thus the "real" probe for the NIC then doesn't find it? I looked through LINT and didn't see any "copious debug" option for ATA that I could enable in the kernel for more "boot -v" messages. Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues? Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA NICs. Kernel config for them is: device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 Thanks, -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 8:55:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D697637B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id IAA27637 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:55:05 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id IAA22597 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:55:03 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-To: X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id LAA21651; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:55:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14813.62936.633906.484788@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:55:04 -0700 (MST) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Roger Merritt wrote: ] > > The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from > postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose > you could update to any version prior to that. I've also read that the > problem was fixed of 25 August and also that it was fixed on 2 September, > but I cvsupped to 4-STABLE on 14 Sep and it still didn't work for me. > Apparently it still hasn't been corrected. August 22nd you say. That's terribly coincidental to the "window" of commits I narrowed down my NIC probing problem. If I back out to 4.1-STABLE before 8/22 at 8:00am in the morning (before the ATA commits) both of my network cards probe fine. After the ATA commits, I no longer get ed0. Seems as if definitely something is still awry (don't ask me how this is stomping on an ISA NIC, but it appears to be ...). -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:10:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net [216.139.128.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2BD37B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (efutch@bsd1.nyct.net [216.139.128.3]) by mail.nyct.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA60337 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:09:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from efutch@nyct.net) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:09:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eric D. Futch" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: isp weirdness on alpha Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-998137023-970848239=:54340" Content-ID: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-998137023-970848239=:54340 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: I'm having some problems with isp in STABLE. Kernel and world are from sources checked out yesterday. I'm not sure what's going on here. When I boot from my old kernel, I also see the same thing. FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Thu Oct 5 18:24:05 EDT 2000 efutch@alpha.nyct.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/ALPHA alpha kernel config and dmesg output is attached. Anyone have any ideas? -- Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd. efutch@nyct.net Technical Support Staff http://www.nyct.net (212) 293-2620 "Bringing New York The Internet Access It Deserves" KNYC: 06-Oct-00 10:51 EDT: 68.0 F (20.0 C), overcast, humidity 89% --0-998137023-970848239=:54340 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=ALPHA Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ALPHA bWFjaGluZQkJYWxwaGENCiNjcHUJCUVWNA0KY3B1CQlFVjUNCmlkZW50CQlB TFBIQQ0KbWF4dXNlcnMJMTI4DQoNCiNtYWtlb3B0aW9ucwlERUJVRz0tZwkJ I0J1aWxkIGtlcm5lbCB3aXRoIGdkYigxKSBkZWJ1ZyBzeW1ib2xzDQoNCiMg UGxhdGZvcm1zIHN1cHBvcnRlZA0KI29wdGlvbnMgCURFQ19BWFBQQ0lfMzMJ CSMgVURCLCBNdWx0aWEsIEFYUHBjaTMzLCBOb25hbWUNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlE RUNfRUIxNjQJCSMgRUIxNjQsIFBDMTY0LCBQQzE2NExYLCBQQzE2NFNYDQoj b3B0aW9ucyAJREVDX0VCNjRQTFVTCQkjIEVCNjQrLCBBc3BlbiBBbHBpbmUs IGV0Yw0KI29wdGlvbnMgCURFQ18yMTAwX0E1MAkJIyBBbHBoYVN0YXRpb24g MjAwLCAyNTAsIDI1NSwgNDAwDQojb3B0aW9ucyAJREVDX0tOMjBBQQkJIyBB bHBoYVN0YXRpb24gNTAwLCA2MDANCm9wdGlvbnMgCURFQ19TVDU1MAkJIyBQ ZXJzb25hbCBXb3Jrc3RhdGlvbiA0MzMsIDUwMCwgNjAwDQojb3B0aW9ucyAJ REVDX1NUNjYwMAkJIyB4cDEwMDAsIGRwMjY0LCBkczIwLCBkczEwLCBmYW1p bHkNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlERUNfMzAwMF8zMDAJCSMgREVDMzAwMC8zMDAqIFBl bGljKiBmYW1pbHkNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlERUNfMzAwMF81MDAJCSMgREVDMzAw MC9bNC05XTAwIEZsYW1pbmdvL1NhbmRwaXBlciBmYW1pbHkNCiNvcHRpb25z IAlERUNfMTAwMEEJCSMgQWxwaGFTZXJ2ZXIgMTAwMCwgMTAwMEEsIDgwMA0K I29wdGlvbnMgCURFQ19LTjhBRQkJIyBBbHBoYSA4MjAwLzg0MDAgKFR1cmJv bGFzZXIpDQoNCm9wdGlvbnMgCUlORVQJCQkjSW50ZXJORVR3b3JraW5nDQoj b3B0aW9ucyAJSU5FVDYJCQkjSVB2NiBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyBwcm90b2Nv bHMNCm9wdGlvbnMgCUZGUwkJCSNCZXJrZWxleSBGYXN0IEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0N Cm9wdGlvbnMgCUZGU19ST09UCQkjRkZTIHVzYWJsZSBhcyByb290IGRldmlj ZSBba2VlcCB0aGlzIV0NCm9wdGlvbnMgCU1GUwkJCSNNZW1vcnkgRmlsZXN5 c3RlbQ0KI29wdGlvbnMgCU1EX1JPT1QJCQkjTUQgaXMgYSBwb3RlbnRpYWwg cm9vdCBkZXZpY2UNCm9wdGlvbnMgCU5GUwkJCSNOZXR3b3JrIEZpbGVzeXN0 ZW0NCiNvcHRpb25zIAlORlNfUk9PVAkJI05GUyB1c2FibGUgYXMgcm9vdCBk ZXZpY2UNCm9wdGlvbnMgCU1TRE9TRlMJCQkjTVNET1MgRmlsZXN5c3RlbQ0K b3B0aW9ucyAJQ0Q5NjYwCQkJI0lTTyA5NjYwIEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0NCiNvcHRp b25zIAlDRDk2NjBfUk9PVAkJI0NELVJPTSB1c2FibGUgYXMgcm9vdCBkZXZp Y2UNCm9wdGlvbnMgCVBST0NGUwkJCSNQcm9jZXNzIGZpbGVzeXN0ZW0NCm9w dGlvbnMgCUNPTVBBVF80MwkJI0NvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBCU0QgNC4zIFtL RUVQIFRISVMhXQ0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJU0NTSV9ERUxBWT01MDAwCQkjRGVsYXkg KGluIG1zKSBiZWZvcmUgcHJvYmluZyBTQ1NJIA0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJVUNPTlNP TEUJCSNBbGxvdyB1c2VycyB0byBncmFiIHRoZSBjb25zb2xlDQpvcHRpb25z IAlLVFJBQ0UJCQkja3RyYWNlKDEpIHN5c2NhbGwgdHJhY2Ugc3VwcG9ydA0K b3B0aW9ucyAJU1lTVlNITQkJCSNTWVNWLXN0eWxlIHNoYXJlZCBtZW1vcnkN Cm9wdGlvbnMgCVNZU1ZNU0cJCQkjU1lTVi1zdHlsZSBtZXNzYWdlIHF1ZXVl cw0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJU1lTVlNFTQkJCSNTWVNWLXN0eWxlIHNlbWFwaG9yZXMN Cm9wdGlvbnMJCVAxMDAzXzFCCQkjUG9zaXggUDEwMDNfMUIgcmVhbC10aW1l IGV4dGVudGlvbnMNCm9wdGlvbnMgCV9LUE9TSVhfUFJJT1JJVFlfU0NIRURV TElORw0Kb3B0aW9ucwkJSUNNUF9CQU5ETElNCQkjUmF0ZSBsaW1pdCBiYWQg cmVwbGllcw0KDQojIFN0YW5kYXJkIGJ1c3Nlcw0KZGV2aWNlCQlpc2ENCmRl dmljZQkJcGNpDQoNCiMgRmxvcHB5IGRyaXZlcw0KZGV2aWNlCQlmZGMwCWF0 IGlzYT8gcG9ydCBJT19GRDEgaXJxIDYgZHJxIDINCmRldmljZQkJZmQwCWF0 IGZkYzAgZHJpdmUgMA0KDQojIEFUQSBhbmQgQVRBUEkgZGV2aWNlcw0KI2Rl dmljZQkJYXRhDQojZGV2aWNlCQlhdGFkaXNrCQkjIEFUQSBkaXNrIGRyaXZl cw0KI2RldmljZQkJYXRhcGljZAkJIyBBVEFQSSBDRFJPTSBkcml2ZXMNCiNk ZXZpY2UJCWF0YXBpZmQJCSMgQVRBUEkgZmxvcHB5IGRyaXZlcw0KI2Rldmlj ZQkJYXRhcGlzdAkJIyBBVEFQSSB0YXBlIGRyaXZlcw0KDQojIFNDU0kgQ29u dHJvbGxlcnMNCiNkZXZpY2UJCWFoYwkJIyBBSEEyOTQwIGFuZCBvbmJvYXJk IEFJQzd4eHggZGV2aWNlcw0KI2RldmljZQkJZXNwCQkjIDUzQzk0ICYgZnJp ZW5kcywgbm90IENBTS1pZmllZA0KZGV2aWNlCQlpc3AJCSMgUWxvZ2ljIGZh bWlseQ0KI2RldmljZQkJbmNyCQkjIE5DUi9TeW1iaW9zIExvZ2ljDQojZGV2 aWNlCQlzeW0JCSMgTkNSL1N5bWJpb3MgTG9naWMgKG5ld2VyIGNoaXBzZXRz KQ0KDQojIFNDU0kgcGVyaXBoZXJhbHMNCmRldmljZQkJc2NidXMJCSMgU0NT SSBidXMgKHJlcXVpcmVkKQ0KZGV2aWNlCQlkYQkJIyBEaXJlY3QgQWNjZXNz IChkaXNrcykNCmRldmljZQkJc2EJCSMgU2VxdWVudGlhbCBBY2Nlc3MgKHRh cGUgZXRjKQ0KZGV2aWNlCQljZAkJIyBDRA0KZGV2aWNlCQlwYXNzCQkjIFBh c3N0aHJvdWdoIGRldmljZSAoZGlyZWN0IFNDU0kgYWNjZXNzKQ0KDQojIGF0 a2JkYzAgY29udHJvbHMgYm90aCB0aGUga2V5Ym9hcmQgYW5kIHRoZSBQUy8y IG1vdXNlDQpkZXZpY2UJCWF0a2JkYzAJYXQgaXNhPyBwb3J0IElPX0tCRA0K ZGV2aWNlCQlhdGtiZDAJYXQgYXRrYmRjPyBpcnEgMQ0KZGV2aWNlCQlwc20w CWF0IGF0a2JkYz8gaXJxIDEyDQpkZXZpY2UJCXZnYTAJYXQgaXNhPw0KDQoj IHNwbGFzaCBzY3JlZW4vc2NyZWVuIHNhdmVyDQpwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNlCXNw bGFzaA0KIyBzeXNjb25zIGlzIHRoZSBkZWZhdWx0IGNvbnNvbGUgZHJpdmVy LCByZXNlbWJsaW5nIGFuIFNDTyBjb25zb2xlDQpkZXZpY2UJCXNjMAlhdCBp c2E/DQoNCiMgcmVhbCB0aW1lIGNsb2NrDQpkZXZpY2UJCW1jY2xvY2swIGF0 IGlzYT8gcG9ydCAweDcwDQoNCiMgU2VyaWFsIChDT00pIHBvcnRzDQpkZXZp Y2UJCXNpbzAJYXQgaXNhPyBwb3J0IElPX0NPTTEgaXJxIDQNCmRldmljZQkJ c2lvMQlhdCBpc2E/IHBvcnQgSU9fQ09NMiBpcnEgMyBmbGFncyAweDUwDQoN CiMgUENJIEV0aGVybmV0IE5JQ3MuDQojZGV2aWNlCQlkZQkJIyBERUMvSW50 ZWwgREMyMXg0eCAoYGBUdWxpcCcnKQ0KI2RldmljZQkJZnhwCQkjIEludGVs IEV0aGVyRXhwcmVzcyBQUk8vMTAwQiAoODI1NTcsIDgyNTU4KQ0KI2Rldmlj ZQkJbGUJCSMgTGFuY2UNCiNkZXZpY2UJCXd4CQkjIEludGVsIEdpZ2FiaXQg RXRoZXJuZXQgQ2FyZCAoYGBXaXNlbWFuJycpDQoNCiMgUENJIEV0aGVybmV0 IE5JQ3MgdGhhdCB1c2UgdGhlIGNvbW1vbiBNSUkgYnVzIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIg Y29kZS4NCmRldmljZQkJbWlpYnVzCQkjIE1JSSBidXMgc3VwcG9ydA0KZGV2 aWNlCQlkYwkJIyBERUMvSW50ZWwgMjExNDMgYW5kIHdvcmthbGlrZXMNCiNk ZXZpY2UJCXJsCQkjIFJlYWxUZWsgODEyOS84MTM5DQojZGV2aWNlCQlzZgkJ IyBBZGFwdGVjIEFJQy02OTE1IChgYFN0YXJmaXJlJycpDQojZGV2aWNlCQlz aXMJCSMgU2lsaWNvbiBJbnRlZ3JhdGVkIFN5c3RlbXMgU2lTIDkwMC9TaVMg NzAxNg0KI2RldmljZQkJc3RlCQkjIFN1bmRhbmNlIFNUMjAxIChELUxpbmsg REZFLTU1MFRYKQ0KI2RldmljZQkJdGwJCSMgVGV4YXMgSW5zdHJ1bWVudHMg VGh1bmRlckxBTg0KI2RldmljZQkJdnIJCSMgVklBIFJoaW5lLCBSaGluZSBJ SQ0KI2RldmljZQkJd2IJCSMgV2luYm9uZCBXODlDODQwRg0KI2RldmljZQkJ eGwJCSMgM0NvbSAzYzkweCAoYGBCb29tZXJhbmcnJywgYGBDeWNsb25lJycp DQoNCiMgUHNldWRvIGRldmljZXMgLSB0aGUgbnVtYmVyIGluZGljYXRlcyBo b3cgbWFueSB1bml0cyB0byBhbGxvY2F0ZWQuDQpwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNlCWxv b3AJCSMgTmV0d29yayBsb29wYmFjaw0KcHNldWRvLWRldmljZQlldGhlcgkJ IyBFdGhlcm5ldCBzdXBwb3J0DQpwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNlCXNsCTEJIyBLZXJu ZWwgU0xJUA0KcHNldWRvLWRldmljZQlwcHAJMQkjIEtlcm5lbCBQUFANCnBz ZXVkby1kZXZpY2UJdHVuCQkjIFBhY2tldCB0dW5uZWwuDQpwc2V1ZG8tZGV2 aWNlCXB0eQkJIyBQc2V1ZG8tdHR5cyAodGVsbmV0IGV0YykNCnBzZXVkby1k ZXZpY2UJbWQJCSMgTWVtb3J5ICJkaXNrcyINCiNwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNlCWdp Zgk0CSMgSVB2NiBhbmQgSVB2NCB0dW5uZWxpbmcNCiNwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNl CWZhaXRoCTEJIyBJUHY2LXRvLUlQdjQgcmVsYXlpbmcvKHRyYW5zbGF0aW9u KQ0KDQojIFRoZSBgYnBmJyBwc2V1ZG8tZGV2aWNlIGVuYWJsZXMgdGhlIEJl cmtlbGV5IFBhY2tldCBGaWx0ZXIuDQojIEJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIHRoZSBhZG1p bmlzdHJhdGl2ZSBjb25zZXF1ZW5jZXMgb2YgZW5hYmxpbmcgdGhpcyENCg0K cHNldWRvLWRldmljZQlicGYJCSNCZXJrZWxleSBwYWNrZXQgZmlsdGVyDQoN CiMgVVNCIHN1cHBvcnQNCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVoY2kJCSMgVUhDSSBQQ0ktPlVT QiBpbnRlcmZhY2UNCiNkZXZpY2UJCW9oY2kJCSMgT0hDSSBQQ0ktPlVTQiBp bnRlcmZhY2UNCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVzYgkJIyBVU0IgQnVzIChyZXF1aXJlZCkN CiNkZXZpY2UJCXVnZW4JCSMgR2VuZXJpYw0KI2RldmljZQkJdWhpZAkJIyAi SHVtYW4gSW50ZXJmYWNlIERldmljZXMiDQojZGV2aWNlCQl1a2JkCQkjIEtl eWJvYXJkDQojZGV2aWNlCQl1bHB0CQkjIFByaW50ZXINCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVt YXNzCQkjIERpc2tzL01hc3Mgc3RvcmFnZSAtIFJlcXVpcmVzIHNjYnVzIGFu ZCBkYTANCiNkZXZpY2UJCXVtcwkJIyBNb3VzZQ0KIyBVU0IgRXRoZXJuZXQN CiNkZXZpY2UJCWF1ZQkJIyBBRE10ZWsgVVNCIGV0aGVybmV0DQojZGV2aWNl CQljdWUJCSMgQ0FUQyBVU0IgZXRoZXJuZXQNCiNkZXZpY2UJCWt1ZQkJIyBL YXdhc2FraSBMU0kgVVNCIGV0aGVybmV0DQoNCiNCZWdpbiBsb2NhbCBjb25m aWd1cmF0aW9uIGhlcmUuLi4NCiANCiMgU291bmQgc3VwcG9ydA0KZGV2aWNl CQlwY20NCmRldmljZQkJc2JjDQoNCiMgU29mdCB1cGRhdGVzIGlzIHRlY2hu aXF1ZSBmb3IgaW1wcm92aW5nIGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIHNwZWVkIGFuZA0KIyBt YWtpbmcgYWJydXB0IHNodXRkb3duIGxlc3Mgcmlza3kuDQojDQpvcHRpb25z CQlTT0ZUVVBEQVRFUw0KDQojIElQRklSRVdBTEwgZW5hYmxlcyBzdXBwb3J0 IGZvciBJUCBmaXJld2FsbCBjb25zdHJ1Y3Rpb24sIGluDQojIGNvbmp1bmN0 aW9uIHdpdGggdGhlIGBpcGZ3JyBwcm9ncmFtLiAgSVBGSVJFV0FMTF9WRVJC T1NFIHNlbmRzDQojIGxvZ2dlZCBwYWNrZXRzIHRvIHRoZSBzeXN0ZW0gbG9n Z2VyLiAgSVBGSVJFV0FMTF9WRVJCT1NFX0xJTUlUDQojIGxpbWl0cyB0aGUg bnVtYmVyIG9mIHRpbWVzIGEgbWF0Y2hpbmcgZW50cnkgY2FuIGJlIGxvZ2dl ZC4NCiMNCm9wdGlvbnMJCUlQRklSRVdBTEwJCSNmaXJld2FsbA0Kb3B0aW9u cwkJSVBGSVJFV0FMTF9WRVJCT1NFCSNwcmludCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhYm91 dCBkcm9wcGVkIHBhY2tldHMNCm9wdGlvbnMJCUlQRklSRVdBTExfRk9SV0FS RAkjZW5hYmxlIHRyYW5zcGFyZW50IHByb3h5IHN1cHBvcnQNCg0KIyBUaGlz IGFsbG93cyB5b3UgdG8gYWN0dWFsbHkgc3RvcmUgdGhpcyBjb25maWd1cmF0 aW9uIGZpbGUgaW50bw0KIyB0aGUga2VybmVsIGJpbmFyeSBpdHNlbGYsIHdo ZXJlIGl0IG1heSBiZSBsYXRlciByZWFkIGJ5IHNheWluZzoNCiMgICAgc3Ry aW5ncyAtYW91dCAtbiAzIC9rZXJuZWwgfCBncmVwIF5fX18gfCBzZWQgLWUg J3MvXl9fXy8vJyA+IE1ZS0VSTkVMDQojDQpvcHRpb25zCQlJTkNMVURFX0NP TkZJR19GSUxFCSMgSW5jbHVkZSB0aGlzIGZpbGUgaW4ga2VybmVsDQoNCiMg VW5kb2N1bWVudGVkIC0gYnVtcCB0aGUgbWF4IG51bWJlciBvZiBtYnVmIGNs dXN0ZXJzDQojb3B0aW9ucwlOTUJDTFVTVEVSUz01MTIwDQoNCnBzZXVkby1k ZXZpY2UJc25wCTQJIyBTbm9vcCBkZXZpY2UgLSB0byBsb29rIGF0IHB0eS92 dHkvZXRjLi4gICANCnBzZXVkby1kZXZpY2UJdm4JNAkjIFZub2RlIGRyaXZl ciAodHVybnMgYSBmaWxlIGludG8gYSBkZXZpY2UpDQoNCiMgV2UnbGwgY2Fs bCB0aGUga2VybmVsIC92bXVuaXggOikNCm1ha2VvcHRpb25zCUtFUk5FTD12 bXVuaXgJCSNCdWlsZCBrZXJuZWwgImZvbyIgYW5kIGluc3RhbGwgIi9mb28i DQoNCg0K --0-998137023-970848239=:54340 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="dmesg.out" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.out" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMDAgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4N CkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk3OSwgMTk4MCwgMTk4MywgMTk4NiwgMTk4OCwg MTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MiwgMTk5MywgMTk5NA0KCVRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9m IHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVz ZXJ2ZWQuDQpGcmVlQlNEIDQuMS4xLVNUQUJMRSAjMDogVGh1IE9jdCAgNSAx ODoyNDowNSBFRFQgMjAwMA0KICAgIGVmdXRjaEBhbHBoYS5ueWN0Lm5ldDov dXNyL3NyYy9zeXMvY29tcGlsZS9BTFBIQQ0KRGlnaXRhbCBQZXJzb25hbCBX b3Jrc3RhdGlvbiAoTWlhdGEpDQpEaWdpdGFsIFBlcnNvbmFsIFdvcmtTdGF0 aW9uIDUwMGF1LCA1MDBNSHoNCjgxOTIgYnl0ZSBwYWdlIHNpemUsIDEgcHJv Y2Vzc29yLg0KQ1BVOiBFVjU2ICgyMTE2NEEpIG1ham9yPTcgbWlub3I9MCBl eHRlbnNpb25zPTB4MTxCV1g+DQpPU0YgUEFMIHJldjogMHgxMDAwMDAwMDIw MTE2DQpyZWFsIG1lbW9yeSAgPSAxMzIyNzYyMjQgKDEyOTE3NksgYnl0ZXMp DQphdmFpbCBtZW1vcnkgPSAxMjMwODQ4MDAgKDEyMDIwMEsgYnl0ZXMpDQpQ cmVsb2FkZWQgZWxmIGtlcm5lbCAidm11bml4IiBhdCAweGZmZmZmYzAwMDA2 NjQwMDAuDQptZDA6IE1hbGxvYyBkaXNrDQpjaWEwOiBQeXhpcywgcGFzcyAx DQpjaWEwOiBleHRlbmRlZCBjYXBhYmlsaXRpZXM6IDE8QldFTj4NCmNpYTA6 IFdBUk5JTkc6IFB5eGlzIHBhc3MgMSBETUEgYnVnOyBubyBiZXRzLi4uDQpw Y2liMDogPDIxMTd4IFBDSSBob3N0IGJ1cyBhZGFwdGVyPiBvbiBjaWEwDQpw Y2kwOiA8UENJIGJ1cz4gb24gcGNpYjANCmRjMDogPEludGVsIDIxMTQzIDEw LzEwMEJhc2VUWD4gcG9ydCAweDkwMDAtMHg5MDdmIG1lbSAweDgxMTQwMDAw LTB4ODExNDAwN2YgaXJxIDAgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDMuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQpkYzA6 IGludGVycnVwdGluZyBhdCBDSUEgaXJxIDANCmRjMDogRXRoZXJuZXQgYWRk cmVzczogMDA6MDA6Zjg6NzU6ZTE6MjkNCm1paWJ1czA6IDxNSUkgYnVzPiBv biBkYzANCm5zcGh5MDogPERQODM4NDAgMTAvMTAwIG1lZGlhIGludGVyZmFj ZT4gb24gbWlpYnVzMA0KbnNwaHkwOiAgMTBiYXNlVCwgMTBiYXNlVC1GRFgs IDEwMGJhc2VUWCwgMTAwYmFzZVRYLUZEWCwgYXV0bw0KcGNpMDogPENNRCA2 NDYgQVRBIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IGF0IDQuMCBpcnEgMQ0KaXNhYjA6IDxJbnRl bCA4MjM3OElCIFBDSSB0byBJU0EgYnJpZGdlPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgNy4wIG9u IHBjaTANCmlzYTA6IDxJU0EgYnVzPiBvbiBpc2FiMA0KcGNpYjE6IDxERUMg MjExNTIgUENJLVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSAyMC4wIG9uIHBjaTAN CnBjaTE6IDxQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMQ0KaXNwMDogPFFsb2dpYyBJU1Ag MTAyMC8xMDQwIFBDSSBTQ1NJIEFkYXB0ZXI+IHBvcnQgMHg4MDAwLTB4ODBm ZiBtZW0gMHg4MTA0MDAwMC0weDgxMDQwZmZmIGlycSAxNiBhdCBkZXZpY2Ug OS4wIG9uIHBjaTENCmlzcDA6IGludGVycnVwdGluZyBhdCBDSUEgaXJxIDE2 DQpwY2kxOiA8VkdBLWNvbXBhdGlibGUgZGlzcGxheSBkZXZpY2U+IGF0IDEw LjAgaXJxIDIwDQpmZGMwOiA8TkVDIDcyMDY1QiBvciBjbG9uZT4gYXQgcG9y dCAweDNmMC0weDNmNSwweDNmNyBpcnEgNiBkcnEgMiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmZGMw OiBpbnRlcnJ1cHRpbmcgYXQgSVNBIGlycSA2DQpmZGMwOiBGSUZPIGVuYWJs ZWQsIDggYnl0ZXMgdGhyZXNob2xkDQpmZDA6IDwxNDQwLUtCIDMuNSIgZHJp dmU+IG9uIGZkYzAgZHJpdmUgMA0KYXRrYmRjMDogPEtleWJvYXJkIGNvbnRy b2xsZXIgKGk4MDQyKT4gYXQgcG9ydCAweDYwLDB4NjQgb24gaXNhMA0KYXRr YmQwOiA8QVQgS2V5Ym9hcmQ+IGlycSAxIG9uIGF0a2JkYzANCmF0a2JkMDog aW50ZXJydXB0aW5nIGF0IElTQSBpcnEgMQ0KcHNtMDogPFBTLzIgTW91c2U+ IGlycSAxMiBvbiBhdGtiZGMwDQpwc20wOiBpbnRlcnJ1cHRpbmcgYXQgSVNB IGlycSAxMg0KcHNtMDogbW9kZWwgR2VuZXJpYyBQUy8yIG1vdXNlLCBkZXZp Y2UgSUQgMA0KdmdhMDogPEdlbmVyaWMgSVNBIFZHQT4gYXQgcG9ydCAweDNj MC0weDNkZiBpb21lbSAweGEwMDAwLTB4YmZmZmYgb24gaXNhMA0Kc2MwOiA8 U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IG9uIGlzYTANCnNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFs IGNvbnNvbGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDIwMD4NCm1jY2xvY2swOiA8TUMxNDY4MThB IHJlYWwgdGltZSBjbG9jaz4gYXQgcG9ydCAweDcwLTB4NzEgb24gaXNhMA0K c2lvMCBhdCBwb3J0IDB4M2Y4LTB4M2ZmIGlycSA0IG9uIGlzYTANCnNpbzA6 IHR5cGUgMTY1NTBBDQpzaW8wOiBpbnRlcnJ1cHRpbmcgYXQgSVNBIGlycSA0 DQpzaW8xOiByZXNlcnZlZCBmb3IgbG93LWxldmVsIGkvbw0Kc2JjMDogPEVT UyBFUzE4ODg+IGF0IHBvcnQgMHgyMjAtMHgyMmYgaXJxIDUgZHJxIDEgb24g aXNhMA0Kc2JjMDogaW50ZXJydXB0aW5nIGF0IElTQSBpcnEgNQ0KcGNtMDog PEVTUyAxOHh4IERTUD4gb24gc2JjMA0KVGltZWNvdW50ZXIgImFscGhhIiAg ZnJlcXVlbmN5IDQ5OTg2OTA1NiBIeg0KSVAgcGFja2V0IGZpbHRlcmluZyBp bml0aWFsaXplZCwgZGl2ZXJ0IGRpc2FibGVkLCBydWxlLWJhc2VkIGZvcndh cmRpbmcgZW5hYmxlZCwgZGVmYXVsdCB0byBkZW55LCB1bmxpbWl0ZWQgbG9n Z2luZw0KV2FpdGluZyA1IHNlY29uZHMgZm9yIFNDU0kgZGV2aWNlcyB0byBz ZXR0bGUNCmlzcDA6IDAuMSBnZXQgdXNlciBwZXJpb2QgMHhjIG9mZnNldCAw eDggZmxhZ3MgMHhmZDAwDQppc3AwOiAwLjEgZ2V0IGN1cnJlbnQgcGVyaW9k IDB4MTkgb2Zmc2V0IDB4MCBmbGFncyAweGM1MDANCmlzcDA6IDAuMSBzZXQg Y3VycmVudCBwZXJpb2QgMHhjIG9mZnNldCAweDggZmxhZ3MgMHhmZDAwDQpp c3AwOiAwLjAgZ2V0IHVzZXIgcGVyaW9kIDB4YyBvZmZzZXQgMHg4IGZsYWdz IDB4ZmQwMA0KaXNwMDogMC4wIGdldCBjdXJyZW50IHBlcmlvZCAweDE5IG9m ZnNldCAweDAgZmxhZ3MgMHhjNTAwDQppc3AwOiAwLjAgc2V0IGN1cnJlbnQg cGVyaW9kIDB4YyBvZmZzZXQgMHg4IGZsYWdzIDB4ZmQwMA0KaXNwMDogMC40 IGdldCB1c2VyIHBlcmlvZCAweGMgb2Zmc2V0IDB4OCBmbGFncyAweGQ1MDAN CmlzcDA6IDAuNCBnZXQgY3VycmVudCBwZXJpb2QgMHgxOSBvZmZzZXQgMHgw IGZsYWdzIDB4YzUwMA0KaXNwMDogMC40IHNldCBjdXJyZW50IHBlcmlvZCAw eGMgb2Zmc2V0IDB4OCBmbGFncyAweGQ1MDANCk1vdW50aW5nIHJvb3QgZnJv bSB1ZnM6L2Rldi9kYTBhDQpkYTEgYXQgaXNwMCBidXMgMCB0YXJnZXQgMSBs dW4gMA0KZGExOiA8U0VBR0FURSBTVDM0NTIwVyAxNDg3PiBGaXhlZCBEaXJl Y3QgQWNjZXNzIFNDU0ktMiBkZXZpY2UgDQppc3AwOiAwLjEgZ2V0IGN1cnJl bnQgcGVyaW9kIDB4YyBvZmZzZXQgMHg4IGZsYWdzIDB4ZmQwMA0KZGExOiA0 MC4wMDBNQi9zIHRyYW5zZmVycyAoMjAuMDAwTUh6LCBvZmZzZXQgOCwgMTZi aXQpLCBUYWdnZWQgUXVldWVpbmcgRW5hYmxlZA0KZGExOiA0MzQwTUIgKDg4 ODg5MjQgNTEyIGJ5dGUgc2VjdG9yczogMjU1SCA2M1MvVCA1NTNDKQ0KZGEw IGF0IGlzcDAgYnVzIDAgdGFyZ2V0IDAgbHVuIDANCmRhMDogPFNFQUdBVEUg U1QzOTEwMkxDIDAwMDQ+IEZpeGVkIERpcmVjdCBBY2Nlc3MgU0NTSS0yIGRl dmljZSANCmlzcDA6IDAuMCBnZXQgY3VycmVudCBwZXJpb2QgMHhjIG9mZnNl dCAweDggZmxhZ3MgMHhmZDAwDQpkYTA6IDQwLjAwME1CL3MgdHJhbnNmZXJz ICgyMC4wMDBNSHosIG9mZnNldCA4LCAxNmJpdCksIFRhZ2dlZCBRdWV1ZWlu ZyBFbmFibGVkDQpkYTA6IDg2ODNNQiAoMTc3ODMyNDAgNTEyIGJ5dGUgc2Vj dG9yczogMjU1SCA2M1MvVCAxMTA2QykNCihjZDA6aXNwMDowOjQ6MCk6IGdv dCBDQU0gc3RhdHVzIDB4NTANCihjZDA6aXNwMDowOjQ6MCk6IGZhdGFsIGVy cm9yLCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gYXR0YWNoIHRvIGRldmljZQ0KKGNkMDppc3AwOjA6 NDowKTogbG9zdCBkZXZpY2UNCihjZDA6aXNwMDowOjQ6MCk6IHJlbW92aW5n IGRldmljZSBlbnRyeQ0KcGlkIDE2IChzd2Fwb24pLCB1aWQgMDogZXhpdGVk IG9uIHNpZ25hbCAxMQ0KcGlkIDE3IChmc2NrKSwgdWlkIDA6IGV4aXRlZCBv biBzaWduYWwgMTENCldhaXRpbmcgKG1heCA2MCBzZWNvbmRzKSBmb3Igc3lz dGVtIHByb2Nlc3MgYGJ1ZmRhZW1vbicgdG8gc3RvcC4uLnN0b3BwZWQNCldh aXRpbmcgKG1heCA2MCBzZWNvbmRzKSBmb3Igc3lzdGVtIHByb2Nlc3MgYHN5 bmNlcicgdG8gc3RvcC4uLnN0b3BwZWQNCg0Kc3luY2luZyBkaXNrcy4uLiAN CmRvbmUNClVwdGltZTogMjRzDQpSZWJvb3RpbmcuLi4NCg== --0-998137023-970848239=:54340-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:22:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A0537B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA07034; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:18:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:18:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 11:58:26 2000 >From: John Reynolds~ >Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:51:19 -0700 (MST) >To: Warner Losh >Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices >Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Please pardon my "jumping in" and/or ignorance... >How could ATA commits screw up the probing of ed0? >[...] ed0 living on an IRQ that is "reserved" (somehow) for one of the ATA "channels?" (ie. 14 and/or 15?) >Is it possible that this probe is stomping on something on >my ed0 card (being intrusive) and thus the "real" probe for >the NIC then doesn't find it? >[...] Hmmm... I might "question" an ATA-probe "there..." (?) >Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues? >Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA >NICs. Kernel config for them is: > > device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? > device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) (Brain-cobweb-digging) I also notice that that the "iomem" is the same; shouldn't those be different segments? >Thanks, > >-Jr Hope I was at least slightly helpful... -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:33: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com [155.208.254.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D748537B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (hpcpbla.bri.hp.com [15.144.112.65]) by bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448DF1A0F4; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:32:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.0) with ESMTP id RAA13379; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:32:18 +0100 (BST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA27419; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:35:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:35:35 +0100 From: Steve Roome To: Thomas David Rivers Cc: imp@village.org, behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <20001006173535.A26762@moose.bri.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Roome , Thomas David Rivers , imp@village.org, behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net References: <200010051635.KAA51533@harmony.village.org> <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com>; from rivers@dignus.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:56:03PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:56:03PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > The trade-mark is SmartLink , which appears to be the Archtek America > Corporation. > > %*LNA100N.DeviceDesc%=LNA100N.ndi,PCMCIA\PCMCIA-FastEthernet-7898 > > > Do any of these cryptic strings mean anything to anyone? Sounds familiar, my previous card was brandless, the actual PCB says : Billionton Systems Inc. LNA-100 Ver:1.1 Windows 95 driver line looked very familiar to the one you've got. (But I don't have a Windows laptop to test this with anymore =( or =) depending on how you look at it! ) Notable chips on it : a) SD49784 sumida - not a clue what that is. (simple rom to keep ID details ? Can't find any info on SUMIDA as a company, could just be where it's made of course!) b) AX88190 P ASIX F99060291 EDI http://www.asix.com.tw/ 10/100 (MII) Fast ethernet controller There's a lot of documentation here... The datasheet : http://www.asix.com.tw/Ax190-16.PDF Sod, I've just read the first few pages and I think I can see where to find the MAC address on the card, I guess that's probably what my problem was with my first card! Oops. c) LUCENT LU6612 9914S 37214404 get the spec from here, might have more helpful information on similar chips as well: http://www.lucent.com/micro/netcom/products/enterprise_lan.html d) 2 * W24257AQ 28531420-511 9120CX0 (ram?) not a clue! I think that http://www.asix.com.tw/190lu3a.PDF is interesting. it's a reference design for a similar card. Sadly, http://www.asix.com.tw/190lu1a.PDF would be the link I want. a reference design, with drivers! for the AX88190 + lucent 6612, which looks like it should be there... but the link is messed up/broken, so the reference design for what is probably identical to my netcard is probably there, with drivers. Excuse me, minor rant time : But due to some idiot web designer/html markup monkey (no offence to web monkeys!) I can't see the reference design for my LAN card, but they do have the above for the lucent 3x31 design instead. grrr! They have datasheets and drivers for all of them anyway. Might help ? > The bar-code on the box says 100BTX-16, the `official' name from > the www.archtek.com web page appears to be: > > SmartLink EP100-BTX-16(C) 10/100Mbps 16 bit Auto-Sensing PCMCIA > Ethernet Card. > > > I couldn't find anything in the manual, on the box or on the > web page that indicated what the chipset was... Did you try prizing the case open ? It's not too hard! > The floppy has drivers for Linux - when a do a strings on the > objects, etc... the only semi-meaningful thing to come out is > lnax100 > pcnet_reset_8390 > 8390.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donal Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov) I'd take a peek at the drivers on asix page, they might shed some new light on it for you ? Depends how far you want to go, I just bought a different card and stayed at work an extra few hours! =) I guess to someone who wrote the ed drivers this is all fairly common knowledge though, I wish they'd shared it with me when I was trying to figure the damn things out! Hope that helped, or was at least amusing. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:36: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08B237B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id QAA17584; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:39:49 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA02074; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:51 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id MAA24463; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:35:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14813.65383.903678.216540@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:51 -0700 (MST) To: Kenneth W Cochran Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] > > Please pardon my "jumping in" and/or ignorance... > > ed0 living on an IRQ that is "reserved" (somehow) for one > of the ATA "channels?" (ie. 14 and/or 15?) Hmmmm. Yeah, I've got ed0 living on IRQ15. However, this h/w combo has been running since 3.3 (including 4.0->4.1-RELEASE). > Hmmm... I might "question" an ATA-probe "there..." (?) > > Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ > disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? No, it's hardwired in the card. I read on the archives when I bought it to disable the PnP stuff on the card because it wouldn't work without it. So, I assigned it IRQs manually through their stupid little DOG program. 15 and 9 were the only ones their setup program could find that weren't "conflicts" with something else. I can certainly try to move ed0 onto a different IRQ. > I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" > one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) > > (Brain-cobweb-digging) I also notice that that the "iomem" > is the same; shouldn't those be different segments? Probably so. Any suggestions for the second segment's starting position? LINT says nothing about it. > Hope I was at least slightly helpful... yeah, it was at least enlightening to see that IRQ14/IRQ15 are "meant" for ATA. That certainly does look like a smoking gun. However, I bring up the canonical fact that "it worked before this commit" .... Hopefully I'll have time over the weekend to futz with the IRQs on these cards. Maybe I'll just ditch the damn things and go get two PCI NICs ... who knows ... Thanks, -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:41:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BCF37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96Gf0H03493; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:41:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA09284; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:40:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010061640.KAA09284@harmony.village.org> To: Steve Roome Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Cc: Thomas David Rivers , behanna@zbzoom.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@siteplus.net In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 17:35:35 BST." <20001006173535.A26762@moose.bri.hp.com> References: <20001006173535.A26762@moose.bri.hp.com> <200010051635.KAA51533@harmony.village.org> <200010051956.PAA00532@lakes.dignus.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:40:46 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Try the following patch. It is relative to -current, but should apply. I think that the NIC address is getting hozed on the linksys probe. Warner Index: if_ed_pccard.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/imp/FreeBSD/CVS/src/sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 if_ed_pccard.c --- if_ed_pccard.c 2000/09/25 06:01:42 1.18 +++ if_ed_pccard.c 2000/10/06 16:39:07 @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ ax88190_geteprom(sc); ed_release_resources(dev); + goto end2; } error = ed_probe_Novell(dev, 0, flags); To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:50:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cg.nu (e106195.upc-e.chello.nl [213.93.106.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9133F37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cg.nu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BFC4C13118; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:50:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cg.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0F8D58D for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:50:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:50:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Henk Wevers To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Bug report /contrib/gcc/function.c Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, When i try to make my machine stable i get the following errors. /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/function.c: In function `assign_stack_local': /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/function.c:772: syntax error before ``' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. *** Error code 1 This is with FreeBSD 4.1.1 on a PIII 733 with 512 MB RAM CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (736.46-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 real memory = 536788992 (524208K bytes) And two hd's ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA66 ad1: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-slave using UDMA66 Henk Wevers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:52:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763D37B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96GqoH03560; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:52:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA09417; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:52:49 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010061652.KAA09417@harmony.village.org> To: Roger Merritt Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness Cc: "Leonard C." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 15:14:06 +0700." <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> References: <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:52:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> Roger Merritt writes: : The workaround I found was to drop back to 4.1-RELEASE. I understand from : postings to the list that the problem started around 22 August so I suppose There's also an interaction with ed cards with this same change... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:55: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE60B37B502; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96GsuH03576; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:54:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA09454; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:54:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010061654.KAA09454@harmony.village.org> To: chris@hexanet.fr Subject: Re: Problem building kernel on 4-STABLE Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 15:46:44 +0200." <200010061346.PAA04284@proton.hexanet.fr> References: <200010061346.PAA04284@proton.hexanet.fr> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:54:56 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010061346.PAA04284@proton.hexanet.fr> "Christophe Prevotaux" writes: : I just updated my source tree and when I try to compile my kernel I get : these errors , does anyone knows why ? Read UPDATING. Follow the instructions there for buildkernel. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10: 0:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34A937B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96H03H03608; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:00:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA09492; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:59:57 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010061659.KAA09492@harmony.village.org> To: Kenneth W Cochran Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: John Reynolds~ , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 12:18:28 EDT." <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:59:57 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> Kenneth W Cochran writes: : >How could ATA commits screw up the probing of ed0? : >[...] : : ed0 living on an IRQ that is "reserved" (somehow) for one : of the ATA "channels?" (ie. 14 and/or 15?) They aren't reserved. : >Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues? : >Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA : >NICs. Kernel config for them is: : > : > device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 : : Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ : disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? Maybe that's where we should look. Does the ata probe for the slave somehow fail to release irq 15? The hardware config is fine (I've been over it in private email sevearl times). : > device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 : : I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" : one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) IRQ 9 is fine. Nothing wrong with it. It isn't shared at all. It used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:19:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7CA37B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA17228; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200010061715.NAA17228@world.std.com> To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 13:04:01 2000 >To: Kenneth W Cochran >Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices >Cc: John Reynolds~ , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:59:57 -0600 >From: Warner Losh > >: >Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues? >: >Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA >: >NICs. Kernel config for them is: >: > >: > device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000 >: >: Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ >: disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? > >Maybe that's where we should look. Does the ata probe for >the slave somehow fail to release irq 15? > >The hardware config is fine (I've been over it in private >email sevearl times). Ah, ok... :) >: > device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 >: >: I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" >: one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) > >IRQ 9 is fine. Nothing wrong with it. It isn't shared at >all. It used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining. ^^^^^^^^ That's the word I was looking for... :) >Warner Thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:19:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804AB37B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96HKIg00828 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:20:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:20:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Machine Wedges Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ever since upgrading to 4.1.1-STABLE, I've been having problems in which the machine wedges every 2 or 3 days. It looks like something in the xl driver code, from what I saw in /var/log/messages (I've included a portion of this file below). As the system begins to slow down, netstat -gin starts showing me Ierr errors on xl0 and lo0. # uname -a FreeBSD topperwein.dyndns.org 4.1.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #0: Fri Sep 29 11:02:55 EDT 2000 behanna@topperwein.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TOPPERWEIN i386 The system is a PII-350 running on an Abit BX-6 (rev. 1) motherboard, 256MB RAM, WD 8.4 GB and 45GB drives. I have an SB16 and a Zoom modem in the ISA slots (the latter is useless under 4.x so far, but that's a different problem and not critical at the moment), an ATI Xpert 98 in the AGP slot, and the following PCI cards: Promise 66, Adaptec 3950U2B, and 3Com 3C905B # grep irq /var/log/dmesg.today ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 5 at device 7.2 on pci0 ahc0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem 0xea022000-0xea022fff irq 5 at device 9.0 on pci0 ahc1: port 0xa800-0xa8ff mem 0xea020000-0xea020fff irq 5 at device 9.1 on pci0 atapci1: port 0xbc00-0xbc3f,0xb800-0xb803,0xb400-0xb407,0xb000-0xb003,0xac00-0xac07 mem 0xea000000-0xea01ffff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xc000-0xc07f mem 0xea021000-0xea02107f irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 0 on isa0 sbc1: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x300-0x301,0x388-0x38b irq 9 drq 1,5 on isa0 sbc1: setting card to irq 9, drq 1, 5 Finally, here are the logged errors: Oct 6 09:00:00 topperwein newsyslog[53134]: logfile turned over Oct 6 09:00:00 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:00:31 topperwein last message repeated 63 times Oct 6 09:00:45 topperwein last message repeated 30 times Oct 6 09:00:46 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:00:46 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:00:51 topperwein last message repeated 9 times Oct 6 09:00:51 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:00:52 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:00:56 topperwein last message repeated 8 times Oct 6 09:00:57 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:00:58 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:01:09 topperwein last message repeated 32 times Oct 6 09:01:09 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:01:09 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:01:20 topperwein last message repeated 26 times Oct 6 09:01:20 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:01:20 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:01:27 topperwein last message repeated 15 times Oct 6 09:01:27 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:01:27 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:01:38 topperwein last message repeated 16 times Oct 6 09:01:39 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:01:40 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:02:11 topperwein last message repeated 53 times Oct 6 09:04:12 topperwein last message repeated 194 times Oct 6 09:06:46 topperwein last message repeated 258 times Oct 6 09:06:47 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:06:47 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:06:51 topperwein last message repeated 6 times Oct 6 09:06:51 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:06:53 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:07:01 topperwein last message repeated 11 times Oct 6 09:07:02 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:07:02 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:07:15 topperwein last message repeated 30 times Oct 6 09:07:15 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:07:17 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:07:28 topperwein last message repeated 19 times Oct 6 09:07:28 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:07:29 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:07:39 topperwein last message repeated 12 times Oct 6 09:07:41 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:07:41 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Oct 6 09:08:12 topperwein last message repeated 66 times Oct 6 09:10:13 topperwein last message repeated 224 times Oct 6 09:12:49 topperwein last message repeated 270 times Oct 6 09:12:49 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available Oct 6 09:12:50 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! (and on and on ad nauseam) Does anyone have any ideas? If you need more information, let me know. Thanks, -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:20: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09E537B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA01804; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:56 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA12675; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:55 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id NAA27244; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:19:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14814.2491.812486.29815@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:19:55 -0700 (MST) To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices - ATA stepping on it! In-Reply-To: <200010061659.KAA09492@harmony.village.org> References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061659.KAA09492@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Warner Losh wrote: ] > > They aren't reserved. OK. > Maybe that's where we should look. Does the ata probe for the slave > somehow fail to release irq 15? Hmmmmm. I've got verbose output from a 4.1.1 kernel lying around ... let me login to my machine at home ... Aha ... I didn't see this before, but wasn't looking: ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 then later on: ed0 failed to probe at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 DUH. Makes sense if the IRQ is already snagged by something. I have 1 ATA device in this machine. A single disk sitting on ad0: ad0: 9765MB [19841/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33 and it's using the IDE channels from the BX chipset (the HighPoint controller on this board just gave me way too many problems when I tried to use it). Here's more of the boot message: ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: devices = 0x1 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xf008 ata1: mask=03 status0=2c status1=2c ata1: mask=03 status0=1c status1=1c ata1: devices = 0x0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 I assume blindly that "devices = 0x1" on ata0 means it found 1 thing connected on the first channel. This is correct. By the same token I assume "devices = 0x0" on the ata1 line means it found nothing on my second channel. And that's also correct! I have nothing on the second channel! I don't even have anything on the slave of ata0. So yes Warner, it appears you are correct. The ATA code appears to be setting up ata1 for my second IDE channel when I'm not even using it! I do not have "boot -v" output sitting around for my working 4.1-RELEASE kernel but my 'normal' dmesg output says absolutely nothing about 'ata1'. > IRQ 9 is fine. Nothing wrong with it. It isn't shared at all. It > used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining. Oh goodie. I was hoping somebody would say that. I'm glad somebody knows this crap :) Now .... I just have to figure out how to get the ATA code to relinquish IRQ15 and not attach ata1 since I'm not using it. Ideas? Theories? Places to go look in the code? I'd like to have a general idea of how to fix it before sending in a PR (since PRs with patches generally get fixed before "it's broken" gripes do). Thanks to all that have helped track this down so far! Thanks Warner! -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:25: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464F237B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03200; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:24:34 -0700 Message-ID: <39DE0AD2.A006F85A@urx.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:24:34 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henk Wevers Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug report /contrib/gcc/function.c References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Henk Wevers wrote: > > Hi, > > When i try to make my machine stable i get the following errors. > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/function.c: In > function `assign_stack_local': > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/function.c:772: syntax > error before ``' > *** Error code 1 How did you do to set this up? You are only showing us the last line of a multi-line output. I just cvsup'ed RELENG_4 and did a buildworld. My buildworld had no problem compiling function.c. Kent > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. > *** Error code 1 > > This is with FreeBSD 4.1.1 on a PIII 733 with 512 MB RAM > CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (736.46-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 > real memory = 536788992 (524208K bytes) > > And two hd's > ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA66 > ad1: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-slave using UDMA66 > > Henk Wevers > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:25:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C80137B503; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA03893; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:25:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA13704; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:25:29 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id NAA27619; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:25:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14814.2825.338858.508213@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:25:29 -0700 (MST) To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: sos@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CDROM support brokenness In-Reply-To: <20001006131133.K50639@stat.Duke.EDU> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001006004836.028b9e58@yikes.com> <3.0.6.32.20001006151406.007d73c0@stjohn.stjohn.ac.th> <14813.62936.633906.484788@hip186.ch.intel.com> <20001006131133.K50639@stat.Duke.EDU> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Sean O'Connell wrote: ] > > John- > > Have you included Soren Schmidt (sos@freebsd.org) on this thread? He No, I haven't explicitly. I was hoping to go sleuthing around the code a bit and have a general idea of where he should look before I bugged him directly. > is the maintainer/developer of the ATA stuff. Also, what ata stuff > do you have in your kernel? Do you do the full-blown, > > device ata0 at blah > device ata1 at blah > > or do you use the > > device ata > > and let the chips fall? I copied this kernel config from GENERIC and then edited appropriately. So, yes, I do have the "blah" as above, but you'll notice that "device ata1" is definitely commented out (and has been "forever") since I don't have anything there. # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering #options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA #Enable DMA on ATAPI devices -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:27: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9042D37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA13450; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:22:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200010061722.NAA13450@world.std.com> To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Oct 6 12:39:56 2000 >From: John Reynolds~ >Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:51 -0700 (MST) >To: Kenneth W Cochran >Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices > >[ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] >> Please pardon my "jumping in" and/or ignorance... >> >> ed0 living on an IRQ that is "reserved" (somehow) for one >> of the ATA "channels?" (ie. 14 and/or 15?) > >Hmmmm. Yeah, I've got ed0 living on IRQ15. However, this h/w >combo has been running since 3.3 (including 4.0->4.1-RELEASE). I wonder if its "previous" running/probing might have been a "glitch" (not as severe as a "bug" :) with prior drivers and that now, this "glitch" is being "exposed" by the "new" stuff(?) >> Hmmm... I might "question" an ATA-probe "there..." (?) >> >> Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ >> disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? > >No, it's hardwired in the card. I read on the archives when >I bought it to disable the PnP stuff on the card because it >wouldn't work without it. So, I assigned it IRQs manually >through their stupid little DOG program. 15 and 9 were the >only ones their setup program could find that weren't >"conflicts" with something else. > >I can certainly try to move ed0 onto a different IRQ. Maybe remove something & change the IRQ just for testing? Is IRQ 15 BIOS-disabled (therefore making it available for things like ISA cards). Might be useful datapoints... >> I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" >> one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) >> >> (Brain-cobweb-digging) I also notice that that the "iomem" >> is the same; shouldn't those be different segments? > >Probably so. Any suggestions for the second segment's >starting position? LINT says nothing about it. Hmmm... These cards appear to be "shared-memory" cards. 1. IIRC (deep cobwebs now :), shared memory should not (cannot?) be cached, thus the possible need to "enable" the "memory hole" at 15M (in BIOS setup). IIRC (again :) this makes a 1mb non-cacheable "region" starting at 15M. 2. We would need to know the "shared memory segment size" of the cards & how to set their (starting) addresses (any card -doc?); (conceivably) these would be values for "iomem" in your kernel-config. I couldn't find anything about "iomem" either, but that would be my guess. Hopefully Someone Who Knows will answer here (& maybe document that parameter? :) (I see Warner replying... ;) >> Hope I was at least slightly helpful... > >yeah, it was at least enlightening to see that IRQ14/IRQ15 >are "meant" for ATA. That certainly does look like a >smoking gun. However, I bring up the canonical fact that >"it worked before this commit" .... As I mentioned above, its "working before" miiiiight have been a "glitch" (or maybe a "boo-boo" :). But I'd think that would be "cleared" if you "turn off" IRQ 15 in your BIOS. Fwiw, I run 4.1.1-s on a box so configured, & IRQ 15 gets used "elsewhere" (the (PCI) NIC at this time). >Hopefully I'll have time over the weekend to futz with the >IRQs on these cards. Maybe I'll just ditch the damn things >and go get two PCI NICs ... who knows ... I believe PCI NICs would be The Cure... My experience with (especially PnP) ISA cards on modern PCI systems leads me to conclude that (ISA/PnP) cards are Truly Evil(tm)... >Thanks, >-Jr I'm curious as to how it turns out... -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:28:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB8F37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03220; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:27:41 -0700 Message-ID: <39DE0B8C.85569D58@urx.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:27:40 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Reynolds~ Cc: Warner Losh , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices - ATA stepping on it! References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061659.KAA09492@harmony.village.org> <14814.2491.812486.29815@hip186.ch.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Reynolds~ wrote: > > [ On Friday, October 6, Warner Losh wrote: ] > > > > They aren't reserved. > > OK. > > > Maybe that's where we should look. Does the ata probe for the slave > > somehow fail to release irq 15? > > Hmmmmm. I've got verbose output from a 4.1.1 kernel lying around ... let me > login to my machine at home ... > > Aha ... I didn't see this before, but wasn't looking: > > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > > then later on: > > ed0 failed to probe at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 > > DUH. Makes sense if the IRQ is already snagged by something. I have 1 ATA > device in this machine. A single disk sitting on ad0: > > ad0: 9765MB [19841/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33 > > and it's using the IDE channels from the BX chipset (the HighPoint controller > on this board just gave me way too many problems when I tried to use it). > > Here's more of the boot message: > > ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: devices = 0x1 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xf008 > ata1: mask=03 status0=2c status1=2c > ata1: mask=03 status0=1c status1=1c > ata1: devices = 0x0 > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > > I assume blindly that "devices = 0x1" on ata0 means it found 1 thing connected > on the first channel. This is correct. By the same token I assume "devices = > 0x0" on the ata1 line means it found nothing on my second channel. And that's > also correct! I have nothing on the second channel! I don't even have anything > on the slave of ata0. > > So yes Warner, it appears you are correct. The ATA code appears to be setting > up ata1 for my second IDE channel when I'm not even using it! > > I do not have "boot -v" output sitting around for my working 4.1-RELEASE > kernel but my 'normal' dmesg output says absolutely nothing about 'ata1'. > > > IRQ 9 is fine. Nothing wrong with it. It isn't shared at all. It > > used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining. > > Oh goodie. I was hoping somebody would say that. I'm glad somebody knows this > crap :) > > Now .... I just have to figure out how to get the ATA code to relinquish IRQ15 > and not attach ata1 since I'm not using it. Ideas? Theories? Places to go look > in the code? I'd like to have a general idea of how to fix it before sending > in a PR (since PRs with patches generally get fixed before "it's broken" > gripes do). Do you have the secondary channel disabled in your bios? Kent > > Thanks to all that have helped track this down so far! Thanks Warner! > > -Jr > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | > | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | > | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 10:33:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C1237B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA07225; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:33:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id KAA16187; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:33:23 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id NAA28130; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:33:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14814.3299.737912.379926@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:33:23 -0700 (MST) To: kstewart@urx.com Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices - ATA stepping on it! In-Reply-To: <39DE0B8C.85569D58@urx.com> References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061659.KAA09492@harmony.village.org> <14814.2491.812486.29815@hip186.ch.intel.com> <39DE0B8C.85569D58@urx.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Kent Stewart wrote: ] > > Do you have the secondary channel disabled in your bios? > > Kent > That I do not know for sure. I haven't been in the BIOS on this machine for months and months and months; but, somebody else brought that up too. At lunch I will most certainly try it. Thanks! -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 11:50: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D406F37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96IoUg01224 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:50:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:50:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Machine Wedges In-Reply-To: <20001006134245.O50639@stat.Duke.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Sean O'Connell wrote: > Chris BeHanna stated: > : Ever since upgrading to 4.1.1-STABLE, I've been having problems in > : which the machine wedges every 2 or 3 days. It looks like something > : in the xl driver code, from what I saw in /var/log/messages (I've > : included a portion of this file below). As the system begins to slow > : down, netstat -gin starts showing me Ierr errors on xl0 and lo0. > : > : [...snip...] > : > : Oct 6 09:07:41 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! > : Oct 6 09:08:12 topperwein last message repeated 66 times > : Oct 6 09:10:13 topperwein last message repeated 224 times > : Oct 6 09:12:49 topperwein last message repeated 270 times > : Oct 6 09:12:49 topperwein dhclient: send_packet: No buffer space available > : Oct 6 09:12:50 topperwein /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! > : > : (and on and on ad nauseam) > : > : Does anyone have any ideas? If you need more information, let me > : know. > > Chris- > > This looks like an mbuf starvation issue. 'netstat -m' ought > to let you know if you are running into problems. This is tied > to NMBCLUSTERS value and to a lesser extent maxusers. > > >From LINT: > > options NMBCLUSTERS=1024 OK, but why would this have become a problem in 4.1.1, when it worked fine in 4.1? -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 12:14:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.eastlink.ca (syd.eastlink.ca [24.222.47.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E1937B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Craig (u56n134.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.56.134]) by mail.eastlink.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07642 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:14:08 -0300 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001006160901.009eb5d0@pop.syd.eastlink.ca> X-Sender: dest@pop.syd.eastlink.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:14:38 -0300 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org From: Craig Hawco Subject: Bad IDE Drive Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have recently fled from FreeBSD back into (ugh) windows because of a minor drive problem. It seems that my drive has a few bad blocks, and I know what they are. FreeBSD seems to try to write to the same bad sectors every time, and keeps printing errors that it can't write to the block, etc etc. The thing is it's the same few (about a dozen) sectors, about 8/10ths the way through the drive. I could use only up to that amount, but that doesn't seem like an elegant solution leaving a few hundred megs of empty space. Is there a way to have FreeBSD map the sectors and try to neither read nor write to them? It wouldn't be a problem (I can turn off syslog and get rid of the nasty messages ;) if it didn't cause the filesystem to become corrupted (fsck tries to read/fix the data on the bad spots and dies). Hope someone out there can help. --Craig P.S. - I know this might not be the BEST place to ask, but I've been on this list and only this list for a couple months, so I'd prefer to ask here. ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 12:19:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073C837B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dkelly@localhost) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e96JJLR20684; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:19:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:19:21 -0500 (CDT) From: David Kelly Message-Id: <200010061919.e96JJLR20684@mail.hiwaay.net> To: dest@syd.eastlink.ca, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad IDE Drive Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Craig Hawco writes: > > I have recently fled from FreeBSD back into (ugh) windows because of a > minor drive problem. It seems that my drive has a few bad blocks, and I > know what they are. FreeBSD seems to try to write to the same bad sectors > every time, and keeps printing errors that it can't write to the block, etc > etc. The thing is it's the same few (about a dozen) sectors, about 8/10ths > the way through the drive. I could use only up to that amount, but that > doesn't seem like an elegant solution leaving a few hundred megs of empty > space. Is there a way to have FreeBSD map the sectors and try to neither > read nor write to them? It wouldn't be a problem (I can turn off syslog and > get rid of the nasty messages ;) if it didn't cause the filesystem to > become corrupted (fsck tries to read/fix the data on the bad spots and > dies). Hope someone out there can help. man badsect: BADSECT(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual BADSECT(8) NAME badsect - create files to contain bad sectors SYNOPSIS badsect bbdir sector ... DESCRIPTION Badsect makes a file to contain a bad sector.... [...] A better solution would be to contact the manufacturer of the IDE drive for a utility to internally remap the bad blocks. This kind of thing is standardized on SCSI disks but apparently not on IDE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 12:22:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6DF37B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id 79B019B05; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:22:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:22:47 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Craig Hawco Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bad IDE Drive Message-ID: <20001006152247.B82507@pawn.primelocation.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Craig Hawco , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001006160901.009eb5d0@pop.syd.eastlink.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001006160901.009eb5d0@pop.syd.eastlink.ca>; from dest@syd.eastlink.ca on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:14:38PM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:14:38PM -0300, Craig Hawco wrote: > Hello, > > I have recently fled from FreeBSD back into (ugh) windows because of a > minor drive problem. It seems that my drive has a few bad blocks, and I > know what they are. FreeBSD seems to try to write to the same bad sectors > every time, and keeps printing errors that it can't write to the block, etc > etc. The thing is it's the same few (about a dozen) sectors, about 8/10ths > the way through the drive. I could use only up to that amount, but that > doesn't seem like an elegant solution leaving a few hundred megs of empty > space. Is there a way to have FreeBSD map the sectors and try to neither > read nor write to them? It wouldn't be a problem (I can turn off syslog and > get rid of the nasty messages ;) if it didn't cause the filesystem to > become corrupted (fsck tries to read/fix the data on the bad spots and > dies). Hope someone out there can help. > Most modern IDE drives automatically remap bad sectors. If the drive can no longer remap bad sectors itself, it is probably time to replace it. -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 12:22:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exchange.the-force.net (exchange.the-force.net [216.244.94.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35AA37B66D for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.the-force.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:27:30 -0700 Message-ID: <359A18BE6FEDD311938C00104B100AE50D9309@exchange.the-force.net> From: Mike Shannon To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: unsubscribe Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:27:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 12:34:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.eastlink.ca (syd.eastlink.ca [24.222.47.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1AF37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Craig (u56n134.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.56.134]) by mail.eastlink.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08655 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:34:47 -0300 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001006163108.009e9070@pop.syd.eastlink.ca> X-Sender: dest@pop.syd.eastlink.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:35:17 -0300 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org From: Craig Hawco Subject: Re: Bad IDE Drive In-Reply-To: <20001006152247.B82507@pawn.primelocation.net> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001006160901.009eb5d0@pop.syd.eastlink.ca> <5.0.0.25.0.20001006160901.009eb5d0@pop.syd.eastlink.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ah, very true, but I can't afford to replace it. It's a 1.7gig Fujitsu M1623TAU.. 3 years old. I have a 4-5year old 1gig Seagate that's still in perfect condition.. guess that tells you how good Fujitsu drives are. >Most modern IDE drives automatically remap bad sectors. If the drive can >no longer remap bad sectors itself, it is probably time to replace it. > >-- >Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org >-------------------------------------------------------- >FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 13:13:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1868537B502; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA03970; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:34 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id NAA26769; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:33 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id QAA08929; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:13:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14814.12910.409342.160241@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:34 -0700 (MST) To: Kenneth W Cochran Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010061947.PAA17583@world.std.com> References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <200010061722.NAA13450@world.std.com> <200010061947.PAA17583@world.std.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org, imp@village.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] > > >I've thought of that too ... but I think Warner stumbled > >upon the correct answer. To me, there's not much of a reason for the > >ATA code to probe and attach (and hog IRQ15) for ata1 when I > > > > a) don't have it configured in my kernel > > b) don't have anything sitting on that channel > > > And I'm Very Inclined To Agree With Warner. :) > (Although I am curious to know what happens(ed) if IRQ15 > (2nd ATA port) is BIOS-disabled...) > Well, curiosity killed the cat. It also killed my machine (not quite). On many people's advice I went home at lunch and disabled the second IDE channel in my BIOS altogether. Now when I boot a 4.1.1-S kernel (verbose) I get: ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: devices = 0x1 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xf008 ata1: mask=00 status0=ff status1=ff ata1: probe allocation failed And, not only that, but now I see that ed0 attaches! ed0 at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 bpf: ed0 attached ed0: address 00:40:05:6e:67:c0, type NE2000 (16 bit) ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 bpf: ed1 attached ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) BUT ... it didn't quite solve the problem. After the filesystems were mounted and the machine fired up DHCP to configure ed0 with its address, I kept getting these error messages until I hit ^C: ed0: device timeout ed0: device timeout ed0: device timeout ed0: device timeout ed0: device timeout The rest of the machine booted of course, but ed0 was "dead." This means the device isn't getting any interrupts, correct? This is still with device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 in my kernel and not just "device ata". It also happens when I boot my working 4.1-RELEASE kernel (the ed0: device timeout messages). When I go back into the BIOS and re-enable the second IDE channel then and only then can I even use my 4.1-R kernel "like before." Aside from changing the bloody IRQ on my first NIC, what else can be tried? -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 13:25:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exchange.the-force.net (exchange.the-force.net [216.244.94.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33D837B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange.the-force.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:30:32 -0700 Message-ID: <359A18BE6FEDD311938C00104B100AE50DE6CA@exchange.the-force.net> From: spam To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: unsubscribe Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:30:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 13:48: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9612D37B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA06742; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:41:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:41:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200010062041.QAA06742@world.std.com> To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <200010061722.NAA13450@world.std.com> <200010061947.PAA17583@world.std.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 16:16:59 2000 >From: John Reynolds~ >Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:34 -0700 (MST) >To: Kenneth W Cochran >Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices >Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, imp@village.org > >[ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] >> >I've thought of that too ... but I think Warner stumbled >> >upon the correct answer. To me, there's not much of a reason for the >> >ATA code to probe and attach (and hog IRQ15) for ata1 when I >> > >> > a) don't have it configured in my kernel >> > b) don't have anything sitting on that channel >> > >> And I'm Very Inclined To Agree With Warner. :) >> (Although I am curious to know what happens(ed) if IRQ15 >> (2nd ATA port) is BIOS-disabled...) > >Well, curiosity killed the cat. It also killed my machine >(not quite). On many people's advice I went home at lunch >and disabled the second IDE channel in my BIOS altogether. >Now when I boot a 4.1.1-S kernel (verbose) I get: > > ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: devices = 0x1 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xf008 > ata1: mask=00 status0=ff status1=ff > ata1: probe allocation failed I'm not an "ATA/IDE jock" at all, but this appears to be ok (so far)... (?) >And, not only that, but now I see that ed0 attaches! > > ed0 at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 > bpf: ed0 attached > ed0: address 00:40:05:6e:67:c0, type NE2000 (16 bit) > ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 > bpf: ed1 attached > ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) Ummm-hmmm... So far, so not-too-bad... >BUT ... it didn't quite solve the problem. After the >filesystems were mounted and the machine fired up DHCP to >configure ed0 with its address, I kept getting these error >messages until I hit ^C: > > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > >The rest of the machine booted of course, but ed0 was >"dead." This means the device isn't getting any interrupts, >correct? This is still with > > device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > >in my kernel and not just "device ata". It also happens >when I boot my working 4.1-RELEASE kernel (the ed0: device >timeout messages). When I go back into the BIOS and >re-enable the second IDE channel then and only then can I >even use my 4.1-R kernel "like before." > >Aside from changing the bloody IRQ on my first NIC, what >else can be tried? > >-Jr I bet (& am becoming more convinced) it's the memory-segment thing... Card-doc will Tell The Tale (& some info on "iomem"... :). -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 13:54:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6370237B503; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96KsTH04569; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:54:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA11161; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:54:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010062054.OAA11161@harmony.village.org> To: John Reynolds~ Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Cc: Kenneth W Cochran , stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 13:13:34 PDT." <14814.12910.409342.160241@hip186.ch.intel.com> References: <14814.12910.409342.160241@hip186.ch.intel.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <200010061722.NAA13450@world.std.com> <200010061947.PAA17583@world.std.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:54:28 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <14814.12910.409342.160241@hip186.ch.intel.com> John Reynolds~ writes: : in my kernel and not just "device ata". It also happens when I boot my : working 4.1-RELEASE kernel (the ed0: device timeout messages). When I go back : into the BIOS and re-enable the second IDE channel then and only then can I : even use my 4.1-R kernel "like before." : : Aside from changing the bloody IRQ on my first NIC, what else can be tried? You could hack/kludge ata to not probe ata1 :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 13:59:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [205.252.34.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD4237B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [205.252.34.3]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D782E443 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:59:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e96Kx8s04406; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:59:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from khera) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14814.15644.780542.774320@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:59:08 -0400 (EDT) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: curious interaction between kdm and snmpd on startup X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I run kdm from my /etc/rc.local script to get nice graphical login to KDE. Recently I added ucd-snmp to this system. Today I did a reboot after testing the vmware "vmnet" module which happened to lock up my kernel. Upon reboot, the keyboard within X under the kdm session was non-responsive to most keystrokes. The CTRL-ALT-Fn sequence beeped at me execpt for F2, which didn't do anything. CAPS LOCK worked, as did NUMLOCK. The regular keys did nothing. All I could do was CTRL-ALT-DEL to get out of it. Disabling kdm from the boot and running it manually after the rest of the system came up worked fine. Finally, I noticed that during a boot-up, right after snmpd was started, the screen mode switched to X. Not until after I hit the C-A-D reboot sequence did the remainder of the text from the boot appear. If I disable snmpd from the boot sequence, I briefly see a flash of a login prompt before the X screen switch, and everything works fine. Is there some interaction going on with the startup scripts and snmpd and kdm? Any ideas on how to work around this other than manually running snmpd after I boot up? Thanks. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-545-6996 GPG & MIME spoken here http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 15: 9:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from admin.astroboy.org (admin.astroboy.org [203.37.46.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7508B37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from psycho ([192.168.1.3]) by admin.astroboy.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA07379 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 09:00:22 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from alias@admin.astroboy.org) Message-ID: <001d01c02fea$0c392be0$0301a8c0@psycho> From: "alias" To: Subject: Remote upgrade Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 09:06:21 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C0303D.DC2192E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C0303D.DC2192E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hiya,=20 I was wondering if its possible to upgrade from 3.x to 4.x stable = without going into single user mode. If I can, what kind of things = should I be wary of?=20 Thanks =20 Mark ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C0303D.DC2192E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hiya,
 
I was wondering if its possible to = upgrade from=20 3.x to 4.x stable without going into single user mode. If I can, = what kind=20 of things should I be wary of?
 
Thanks
 
Mark
 
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C0303D.DC2192E0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 15:12: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7667137B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00560; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:11:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Max Khon Cc: matthew zeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommended patch list? Message-ID: <20001006151143.B471@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <20001005153805.A810@intelenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:38:12PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:38:12PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > hi, there! > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, matthew zeier wrote: > > > Does freebsd have a sort of recommended patch list? I got an email from > > SANS today while installed 4.1.1 and saw mention of a fingerd patch that > > got me thinking. > > I think fingerd hole should be mentioned in ERRATA I think we should stop trying to pretend anyone ever updates the errata for security issues, and point them at the master advisory list :). Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 15:24: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CB037B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.143]) by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20414 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA17685 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17681 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:23:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: rac3.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:23:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: wierd interupt percentage problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Recently with -STABLE (cvsupped as of 1:30 AM eastern time, OCT 6) I have noticed a problem with the statistics reported for "interrupt" in to To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 15:24:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB7537B66C for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.143]) by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20441 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA17844 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17840 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:24:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: rac3.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:24:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: disreguard last messege. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Please disreguard the last messege I sent, I figured out the problem. DOH! Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 16:19:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A8B37B503; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e96NJif01392; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:19:44 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: security@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 2.2.x FreeBSD-SA-00:52 patch adjusted Message-ID: <20001006161944.C272@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Because of serious breakage in the arc4random code in FreeBSD-current (3 months and counting) my initial patch to 2.2.x was flawed because the arc4random code would never re-seed itself properly. This problem could possibly lead to more easy to predict sequences. I've just added another patch that should allievate the problem, just for reference make sure src/sys/libkern/arc4random.c is has this ID tag: $FreeBSD: /c/ncvs/src/sys/libkern/arc4random.c,v 1.6.4.2 2000/10/06 22:49:54 alfred Exp $ That would be arc4random.c MFC'd from -stable (FreeBSD 4) where it should be working properly. Thanks to Kris Kennaway (kris@freebsd.org) for pointing out this error and suggesting the fix. My apologies to those who already cvsup'd and rebooted thier 2.2.x boxes. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 17:11:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0086737B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9708HB13960; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:08:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9707Js49806; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:07:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010070007.e9707Js49806@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 23:24:35 +0200." <970781075.39dcf193a406c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:07:19 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Also, it'd be worth doing > > > > disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > > to see if that makes any difference. > After adding what you've proposed it doesn't dump core and it connects fine. And if you comment these lines out again... does it dump core ? > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 17:18:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail11.svr.pol.co.uk (mail11.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB24537B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modem-121.cesium.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.46.121] helo=freeloader.freeserve.co.uk) by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 13hhgu-00077f-00; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:18:17 +0100 Message-ID: <39DE6BC7.DDCAD907@freeloader.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:18:15 +0100 From: ian j hart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Reynolds~ Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <200010061722.NAA13450@world.std.com> <200010061947.PAA17583@world.std.com> <14814.12910.409342.160241@hip186.ch.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Reynolds~ wrote: > > [ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] > > > > >I've thought of that too ... but I think Warner stumbled > > >upon the correct answer. To me, there's not much of a reason for the > > >ATA code to probe and attach (and hog IRQ15) for ata1 when I > > > > > > a) don't have it configured in my kernel > > > b) don't have anything sitting on that channel > > > > > And I'm Very Inclined To Agree With Warner. :) > > (Although I am curious to know what happens(ed) if IRQ15 > > (2nd ATA port) is BIOS-disabled...) > > > > Well, curiosity killed the cat. It also killed my machine (not quite). On many > people's advice I went home at lunch and disabled the second IDE channel in my > BIOS altogether. Now when I boot a 4.1.1-S kernel (verbose) I get: > > ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 > ata0: devices = 0x1 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xf008 > ata1: mask=00 status0=ff status1=ff > ata1: probe allocation failed > > And, not only that, but now I see that ed0 attaches! > > ed0 at port 0x2c0-0x2df iomem 0xd8000 irq 15 on isa0 > bpf: ed0 attached > ed0: address 00:40:05:6e:67:c0, type NE2000 (16 bit) > ed1 at port 0x340-0x35f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 on isa0 > bpf: ed1 attached > ed1: address 00:40:05:6e:67:9c, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > BUT ... it didn't quite solve the problem. After the filesystems were mounted > and the machine fired up DHCP to configure ed0 with its address, I kept > getting these error messages until I hit ^C: > > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > ed0: device timeout > > The rest of the machine booted of course, but ed0 was "dead." This means the > device isn't getting any interrupts, correct? This is still with > > device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > > in my kernel and not just "device ata". It also happens when I boot my > working 4.1-RELEASE kernel (the ed0: device timeout messages). When I go back > into the BIOS and re-enable the second IDE channel then and only then can I > even use my 4.1-R kernel "like before." > > Aside from changing the bloody IRQ on my first NIC, what else can be tried? > > -Jr This may not be relevant, but here are a few points of reference (0.2 euro worth). case 1: PCI NE2000 clone (asix, rtk8039 I think) on ed driver This card wouldn't probe at all without setting user config (GENERIC 4.1 kernel) as follows. Delete all other NIC drivers. Set i/o to 0xEF80. I got the i/o address from the DOS setup program (useful). Deleting the other drivers has been mentioned in the list I think. case 2: PCI Ovislink RTK8139, SB128PCI?, AZZA VIA Apollo MVP3 M/B The two cards would clash unless the BIOS was set to PNP resources controlled by AUTO. This prevents setting IRQ 15 to legacy of cource. This is a BIOS issue. The cards are hosed before you even boot. Don't overlook the obvious. If you moved the box then Murphy's Law states that * Six years worth of dirt fell into the connector. * The Network cable failed. * The new hub doesn't duplex, but the driver thinks it does. These all give the symptom that the card probes okay, but DHCP fails. Equally I've had M/B's where disabling the PS2 mouse disabled interrupts on IRQ 12. You could have the same thing with IRQ 15. If you don't need the second serial port, turn it off. That gets you a very useful IRQ to play with. I would avoid IRQ 15 like the plague (and 12 for that matter). What happens if you swap the IRQ's of the cards, or swap the order of the cards in rc.conf? Are both cards using DHCP? I've never gotten two cards to work like this. The second one fails - this could be me tho' ;) HTH/Prods the brain cells/Doesn't confuse the issue to much. -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 17:25:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4C137B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA16361; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:23:44 +0200 To: Brian Somers Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) Message-ID: <970878224.39de6d10dc2d1@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 02:23:44 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200010070007.e9707Js49806@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <200010070007.e9707Js49806@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Brian Somers : > > > Also, it'd be worth doing > > > > > > disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > > > > to see if that makes any difference. > > After adding what you've proposed it doesn't dump core and it connects > fine. > > And if you comment these lines out again... does it dump core ? Yes it does. I didn't have those lines in mid-august, and it worked. It was on ThinkPad though. I can provide you with a core dump or send any traces if you wish. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 17:41:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD937B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e970eGB14120; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:40:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e970d3s63810; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:39:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200010070039.e970d3s63810@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Coredump in ppp(8) In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 02:23:44 +0200." <970878224.39de6d10dc2d1@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:39:02 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If you could get a stack trace it'd point me in the right directection... Cheers. > Quoting Brian Somers : > > > > > Also, it'd be worth doing > > > > > > > > disable vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > > deny vj pred1 deflate protocomp acfcomp > > > > > > > > to see if that makes any difference. > > > After adding what you've proposed it doesn't dump core and it connects > > fine. > > > > And if you comment these lines out again... does it dump core ? > Yes it does. > I didn't have those lines in mid-august, and it worked. > It was on ThinkPad though. > I can provide you with a core dump or send any traces if you wish. > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 18:10:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from d1o93.telia.com (d1o93.telia.com [194.17.166.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E9537B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaticide (h5fls4o93flexi.telia.com [62.20.226.5]) by d1o93.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA07180 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:39:16 +0200 (CEST) From: "Johan Huldtgren" To: Subject: pw error Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:08:23 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20001006173535.A26762@moose.bri.hp.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I use pw to add large amounts of users at once, after todays cvsup, build/install[world | kernel] I get the following error: su-2.03> echo password | pw adduser newuser -s /usr/local/noshell -g users -h 0 -k /home/template -m /home/newuser pw: setting crypt(3) format: No such file or directory pw: setting crypt(3) format: No such file or directory su-2.03> I can still add users manually by running adduser, but this is quite a pain. Any ideas? - Johan --------------------- Info: su-2.03# uname -a FreeBSD home.rixtele.com 4.1.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 6 09:24:59 CEST 2000 satan@home.rixtele.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EVIL_II i386 su-2.03# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 6 09:24:59 CEST 2000 satan@home.rixtele.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EVIL_II Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (696.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x387fbff real memory = 536805376 (524224K bytes) avail memory = 519311360 (507140K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc035c000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 15.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib3 ahc0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xf4100000-0xf4100fff irq 19 at device 12.0 on pci0 aic7896/97: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs ahc1: port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xf4101000-0xf4101fff irq 19 at device 12.1 on pci0 aic7896/97: Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs fxp0: port 0x2800-0x283f mem 0xf4000000-0xf40fffff,0xf4102000-0xf4102fff irq 21 at device 14.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:89:85:80 isab0: at device 18.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x2860-0x286f at device 18.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 18.2 irq 21 Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz chip1: port 0x1040-0x104f at device 18.3 on pci0 pci0: at 20.0 pcib1: on motherboard pci3: on pcib1 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 plip0: on ppbus0 APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! ad0: 26063MB [52953/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using PIO4 Waiting 2 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted su-2.03# To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 18:53: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp [133.30.50.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5A337B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp (skai0713.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [202.248.10.221]) by shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA55607; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 10:51:14 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp) Received: from shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.9.1/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id JAA07069; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 09:43:25 +0900 (JST) From: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp Message-Id: <200010070043.JAA07069@libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> To: dest@syd.eastlink.ca, dkelly@mail.hiwaay.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bad IDE Drive In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:19:21 EST." <200010061919.e96JJLR20684@mail.hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 09:43:24 +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010061919.e96JJLR20684@mail.hiwaay.net>, David Kelly wrote: >man badsect: > >BADSECT(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual BADSECT(8) > >NAME > badsect - create files to contain bad sectors > >SYNOPSIS > badsect bbdir sector ... > >DESCRIPTION > Badsect makes a file to contain a bad sector.... >[...] > >A better solution would be to contact the manufacturer of the IDE drive >for a utility to internally remap the bad blocks. This kind of thing >is standardized on SCSI disks but apparently not on IDE. This tool is broken after block device is disappeared from FreeBSD. I corrected it,but I don't have code for now.(It is at my desktop computer, 50km far from here.) To use this tool, # dd if=/dev/${DEV} of=/dev/null (${DEV} is the device where the bad sector exiist) and if bad secter exist, it stops at the block count of the bad sector. ${AAAA}+0 records in ${AAAA}+0 records out ${BBBB} bytes transferred in ${XX} secs (${YY} bytes/sec) then use # badsect /${FS}/BAD ${AAAA} in singule user mode with the ${FS} mounted. Then unmount the ${FS} and use fsck. Takanori Watanabe Public Key Key fingerprint = 2C 51 E2 78 2C E1 C5 2D 0F F1 20 A3 11 3A 62 2A To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 19: 2:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from process.dhs.org (u56n134.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.56.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEDD37B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dest@localhost) by process.dhs.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97230L00440 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:03:00 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from dest@process.dhs.org) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:02:54 -0300 (ADT) From: Dest To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problems with badsect Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Let's see if someone here can't help me Here's the error: ad0: UDMA ICRC READ ERROR blk# 2608830 status=59 error=80 ad0: UDMA ICRC READ ERROR blk# 2608830 status=59 error=80 (* a bunch of sectors) badsect reports: process# badsect bad 2608830 Cannot find dev 01502645 corresponding to bad process# bad is a subdirectory of /usr and the command is issued from /usr. any help would be appreciated. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 20: 5:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f34.hotmail.com [216.32.181.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B81837B66D for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:05:16 -0700 Received: from 198.211.214.81 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 03:05:16 GMT X-Originating-IP: [198.211.214.81] From: "Kenneth Mays" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: WU-FTPD Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 23:05:16 EDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2000 03:05:16.0971 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B5267B0:01C0300B] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wanted to ask if there were any improvements to this code. Some reviews state that it is very CPU-intensive during high loads. Is there any better FTP server for FreeBSD 4.x or improvements to the default ftp server?!? Ken _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 23:14:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC9437B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B81291F59; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:14:45 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: More panics (different hardware) Message-ID: <20001007021445.B10082@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable References: <86610.970640332@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <86610.970640332@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:18:52PM -0700 Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan and List, > Still, you've proven there's a clear bad interaction here. Thanks! You're welcome, I think. Before I go crashing my box, collecting debugging output and core dumps, I wanted to make sure this will be helpful. Please let me know. This is something which I find a bit confusing. FDESC is in LINT with all the "safe" filesytems, unlike DEVFS which has has something of a warning above it. I know that UNION has warning and that the fdesc filesystem uses a union mount but... I don't have UNION in my kernel! To clarify, fdesc(5) mentions that it requires a union mount, however LINT does not specify any UNION dependency and clearly mounting fdesc "mostly works" without even having UNION in the kernel. Just to add to the confusion, mount_std(8) considers fdesc ``standard'', defining ``standard'' to include union mounts. This is, of course, a semantic issue, not a technical one. I can't tell whether I'm missing a piece of the puzzle or if there really is a discrepancy. If it's a documentation issue, I'd be happy to offer a diff for LINT - if I understand what's going on, that is. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@altavista.net | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 23:54: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (adsl-216-102-90-210.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.90.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCDB37B503 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (fremont.bolingbroke.com [216.102.90.210]) by fremont.bolingbroke.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA84797 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:54:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Bolingbroke To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: `time make buildworld' In-Reply-To: <20001007021445.B10082@hal9000.bsdonline.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I previously mentioned my adventures upgrading a Pentium 133 from 2.2.5 to 4.1.1, but I'm noting some odd behavior with the length of time it takes to buildworld: -Running 2.2.5, buildworld to 2.2.8-S, ~11 hours -Running 2.2.8-S, buildworld to 3.2-S, ~12 hours -Running 3.2-S, buildworld to 3.5-S, ~12 hours -Cheated, ran buildworld on a PII-350 for 4.1.1-S, 1 hour, 54 minutes, then ran installworld over NFS -Running 4.1.1-S, buildworld 4.1.1-S, 74 hours, 53 minutes. Now, I couldn't see that buildworld for 3.5-S would take 12 hours, then on the same machine, buildworld for 4.1.1-S would take nearly 75 hours. Besides the upgrade from 3.5 to 4.1.1, the only change was that I mounted all non-root partitions with softupdates enabled. So, I disable softupdates on all partitions and try again. Now it only takes 44 hours and 30 minutes to buildworld. Only, ha. So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? Not a matter of life and death--the system seems to be running happily, buildworld completes, etc, but just curious as to why it's taking so much longer for 4.1.1 buildworlds... Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 0: 8:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5EE37B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA01370; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:08:48 -0700 Message-ID: <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:08:48 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Bolingbroke Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > I previously mentioned my adventures upgrading a Pentium 133 from 2.2.5 to > 4.1.1, but I'm noting some odd behavior with the length of time it takes > to buildworld: > > -Running 2.2.5, buildworld to 2.2.8-S, ~11 hours > > -Running 2.2.8-S, buildworld to 3.2-S, ~12 hours > > -Running 3.2-S, buildworld to 3.5-S, ~12 hours > > -Cheated, ran buildworld on a PII-350 for 4.1.1-S, 1 hour, 54 minutes, > then ran installworld over NFS > > -Running 4.1.1-S, buildworld 4.1.1-S, 74 hours, 53 minutes. > > Now, I couldn't see that buildworld for 3.5-S would take 12 hours, then on > the same machine, buildworld for 4.1.1-S would take nearly 75 hours. > Besides the upgrade from 3.5 to 4.1.1, the only change was that I mounted > all non-root partitions with softupdates enabled. > > So, I disable softupdates on all partitions and try again. Now it only > takes 44 hours and 30 minutes to buildworld. Only, ha. > > So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does > buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot > longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? I'm assuming weird up front. I find a 4.1.1 BW takes 36xxu and 1:23 of clock time on my P-II 400 with 256MB of memory and UDMA33 HD's. You p133 should be about 6x or more slower as a guess. I think your differences, based on really minimal information, are probably due to the kind of HD's you have and how much memory. Kent > > Not a matter of life and death--the system seems to be running happily, > buildworld completes, etc, but just curious as to why it's taking so much > longer for 4.1.1 buildworlds... > > Ken > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 0:15:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (adsl-216-102-90-210.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.90.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B20637B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fremont.bolingbroke.com (fremont.bolingbroke.com [216.102.90.210]) by fremont.bolingbroke.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA84888 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:14:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Bolingbroke To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-Reply-To: <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Kent Stewart wrote: > Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > > I previously mentioned my adventures upgrading a Pentium 133 from 2.2.5 to > > 4.1.1, but I'm noting some odd behavior with the length of time it takes > > to buildworld: > >... > > -Running 3.2-S, buildworld to 3.5-S, ~12 hours > >... > > -Running 4.1.1-S, buildworld 4.1.1-S, 74 hours, 53 minutes. > >... > > So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does > > buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot > > longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? > > I'm assuming weird up front. I find a 4.1.1 BW takes 36xxu and 1:23 of > clock time on my P-II 400 with 256MB of memory and UDMA33 HD's. You > p133 should be about 6x or more slower as a guess. I think your > differences, based on really minimal information, are probably due to > the kind of HD's you have and how much memory. Someone else just made me think--perhaps 4.1.1 is more sensitive to low RAM? This machine only has 8meg RAM, with 200 megs of swap evenly split across two IDE disks. There were no hardware changes between the various builds. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 0:21:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B14737B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lunabase.org ([63.200.244.106]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0G21005EETO61D@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from praxis.lunabase.org (praxis.lunabase.org [63.200.244.110]) by lunabase.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e977JaN09794; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:19:39 -0700 (PDT envelope-from faber@lunabase.org) Received: from praxis.lunabase.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by praxis.lunabase.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e977KjZ00940; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:20:45 -0700 X-URL: http://www.lunabase.org/~faber Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:20:45 -0700 From: Ted Faber Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-reply-to: "Your message of Sat, 07 Oct 2000 00:08:48 PDT." <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: Ken Bolingbroke , FreeBSD Stable Message-id: <200010070720.e977KjZ00940@praxis.lunabase.org> Organization: My Secret Broadcast Base on the Moon X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kent Stewart wrote: >> Now, I couldn't see that buildworld for 3.5-S would take 12 hours, then on >> the same machine, buildworld for 4.1.1-S would take nearly 75 hours. >> Besides the upgrade from 3.5 to 4.1.1, the only change was that I mounted >> all non-root partitions with softupdates enabled. >> >> So, I disable softupdates on all partitions and try again. Now it only >> takes 44 hours and 30 minutes to buildworld. Only, ha. >> >> So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does >> buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot >> longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? > >I'm assuming weird up front. I find a 4.1.1 BW takes 36xxu and 1:23 of >clock time on my P-II 400 with 256MB of memory and UDMA33 HD's. You >p133 should be about 6x or more slower as a guess. I think your >differences, based on really minimal information, are probably due to >the kind of HD's you have and how much memory. FYI, I just built 4.1.1-STABLE on my P133 running 4.1-STABLE, 32MB memory, 256MB swap, and it took about 6 hours (359 mins, as I recall). I can confirm that number if you think it would be helpful. Softupdates are off. Separate disks for source and object (an articact, not an intentional performance enhancement). dmesg and other info on request. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 iD8DBQE53s7MaUz3f+Zf+XsRAjpRAKCzqlgESANxS20IhRJD4T5T6KEIHQCeN691 51qVGFUIwncCPpeainXFGQw= =2xnD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 0:58:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC9937B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 00:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boostworks.com (root@oldrn.luxdev.boostworks.com [192.168.1.99]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA39707; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 09:57:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200010070757.JAA39707@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 09:58:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Remy Nonnenmacher Reply-To: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: Bad IDE Drive To: jedgar@fxp.org Cc: dest@syd.eastlink.ca, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001006152247.B82507@pawn.primelocation.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 Oct, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:14:38PM -0300, Craig Hawco wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have recently fled from FreeBSD back into (ugh) windows because of a >> minor drive problem. It seems that my drive has a few bad blocks, and I >> know what they are. FreeBSD seems to try to write to the same bad sectors >> every time, and keeps printing errors that it can't write to the block, etc >> etc. The thing is it's the same few (about a dozen) sectors, about 8/10ths >> the way through the drive. I could use only up to that amount, but that >> doesn't seem like an elegant solution leaving a few hundred megs of empty >> space. Is there a way to have FreeBSD map the sectors and try to neither >> read nor write to them? It wouldn't be a problem (I can turn off syslog and >> get rid of the nasty messages ;) if it didn't cause the filesystem to >> become corrupted (fsck tries to read/fix the data on the bad spots and >> dies). Hope someone out there can help. >> > > Most modern IDE drives automatically remap bad sectors. If the drive can > no longer remap bad sectors itself, it is probably time to replace it. > Remapping works for IDE and SCSI but most of them remap only on a write operation, not on a read (Even is told to do so by ARRE for SCSI disks). This is intended to let you know that something is wrong, instead of silently reallocating a new zeroed sector and let you then, later, guess why your data are corrupted. Unfortunetly, this require you to overwrite the sector (and more generally the 8K block covering the sector(s), else the system will try to read in the block in buffers before writting and will fail the write). To get things worst, some disks succeed in rewritting and do not really relocate the sector, making a Damocles' sword of the problem. Thanks to camcontrol (or scsi(1)), you can force rellocation on SCSI disks pretty easily. RN. IeM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 1:14:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131BE37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.mindspring.com (user-33qtcav.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.177.95]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA07386 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 04:14:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from david@localhost) by freebsd.mindspring.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e978EGH01404 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:14:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:14:16 -0500 From: "David J. Kanter" To: FreeBSD stable Subject: Security problem with "script"? Message-ID: <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD stable Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't know if this is an issue or not, but using the script program with sudo seems to switch the sudoer's id to root. Here's an example: david@/usr/src % whoami david david@/usr/src % sudo script /usr/tmp/buildworld Script started, output file is /usr/tmp/buildworld root@/usr/src % whoami root root@/usr/src % Is this a security problem? -- David Kanter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 1:38: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5668037B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.238.54.101] (helo=freebie.demon.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #2) id 13hpUT-0005Md-00; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 08:37:57 +0000 Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.demon.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e978HWf91509; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 10:17:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 10:17:32 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Ken Bolingbroke Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' Message-ID: <20001007101732.A91198@freebie.demon.nl> References: <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd@bolingbroke.com on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:14:48AM -0700 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:14:48AM -0700, Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > > > > I previously mentioned my adventures upgrading a Pentium 133 from 2.2.5 to > > > 4.1.1, but I'm noting some odd behavior with the length of time it takes > > > to buildworld: > > >... > > > -Running 3.2-S, buildworld to 3.5-S, ~12 hours > > >... > > > -Running 4.1.1-S, buildworld 4.1.1-S, 74 hours, 53 minutes. > > >... > > > So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does > > > buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot > > > longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? > > > > I'm assuming weird up front. I find a 4.1.1 BW takes 36xxu and 1:23 of > > clock time on my P-II 400 with 256MB of memory and UDMA33 HD's. You > > p133 should be about 6x or more slower as a guess. I think your > > differences, based on really minimal information, are probably due to > > the kind of HD's you have and how much memory. > > Someone else just made me think--perhaps 4.1.1 is more sensitive to low > RAM? This machine only has 8meg RAM, with 200 megs of swap evenly split > across two IDE disks. There were no hardware changes between the various > builds. Ah. In 8 meg it thrashes like h*ll, so all bets are off as far as a reasonable build time. FWIW: on an Alpha I ran the experiment to build a GENERIC kernel on 16Mb RAM. After 26 hours I gave up.. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 1:43:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from org.chem.msu.su (org.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B780A37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from org.chem.msu.su (org.chem.msu.su [158.250.48.161]) by org.chem.msu.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA79237; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:42:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:42:28 +0400 (MSD) From: kostik To: Gregory Bond Cc: Gerhard Sittig , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: agp_if.c In-Reply-To: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Gregory Bond wrote: > > Doesn't the old "config; cd; make dep all install" sequence work? > Traps for young players: No this (sometimes) doesn't work. You need > to do "make depend && make all", so that the second invocation of make > picks up the new dependencies calculated by "make depend". Doing them > as one command (i.e. "make depend all") will sometimes result in odd > behaviour as the make will use the old dependencies for the whole make > run. > > This is one area where gmake differs from BSD make - gmake will reread > any makefiles that are changed during the make run, so the "make depend > all" trick would work for projects built with gmake. i have an old question - why freebsd project can't switch to gmake? i'm holding to (!) different makes on my system now (make & gmake). WBR, Konstantin Yu. Pasichnichenko E-mail : kostik@org.chem.msu.su FIDO : 2:5020/118.82@fidonet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 2:14:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from static.unixfreak.org (static.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED91737B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by static.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B3621F19; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? In-Reply-To: <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> "from David J. Kanter at Oct 7, 2000 03:14:16 am" To: "David J. Kanter" Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 02:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Cc: FreeBSD stable From: Dima Dorfman Reply-To: dima@unixfreak.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20001007091443.9B3621F19@static.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I don't know if this is an issue or not, but using the script program with > sudo seems to switch the sudoer's id to root. > > Here's an example: > > david@/usr/src % whoami > david > david@/usr/src % sudo script /usr/tmp/buildworld > Script started, output file is /usr/tmp/buildworld > root@/usr/src % whoami > root > root@/usr/src % > > Is this a security problem? Maybe it's the lack of caffeine or sleep, but I fail to see the problem here. Sudo is supposed to run the command you give it as a different user. If you don't specify one with the -u flag, it assumes you want to run it as root. It looks like it did exactly what you asked of it. Hope this helps -- Dima Dorfman Finger dima@unixfreak.org for my public PGP key. Drive defensively; buy a tank. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 3: 3:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from oracle.clara.net (oracle.clara.net [195.8.69.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAFD37B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.126.142.199] (helo=viewport.clara.co.uk) by oracle.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #5) id 13hqpC-000Gt9-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 11:03:27 +0100 Content-Length: 3993 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-No-Archive: yes Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 11:03:25 +0100 (BST) Organization: David_Marsh@home: see signature for organisation From: David Marsh To: FreeBSD-Stable LIST Subject: make buildworld errors when upgrading 3.2R -> RELENG_3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Following advice given a few days ago, I changed from trying to upgrade from 3.2R to RELENG_4 in one fell swoop, and and now first trying to upgrade to RELENG_3 before making the leap to RELENG_4. I have now cvsup'ed the RELENG_3 sources, and am now attempting to make buildworld. I first tried last night, leaving the computer running before I went to bed. The make buildworld stopped at some point overnight with error/signal (can't remember the exact wording) 11 (definitely number 11, though). Fine, I thought, I delete /usr/obj and just start again, in case it was a one-off glitch.. I have tried to buildworld again this morning and this time make buildworld stopped with the following: [last few lines of typescript included] :::::: cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/gen/timezone.c -o timezone.o cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/gen/ttyname.c -o ttyname.o cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/gen/ttyslot.c -o ttyslot.o cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/gen/ualarm.c -o ualarm.o cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. :::::: From previous posts on this list, it appears that these kind of errors usually suggest some kind of hardware problem? I'll be the first to admit that my machine is not the best. I was on a strict budget at the time, and the machine is a Pentium-MMX 233MHz, with a cheapie no-name TX PRO-II motherboard, home-built from components (new). The machine has been slightly upgraded since then, and now has 64MB RAM (4x 16MB SIMMs (all 'no-name')) and a larger hard disk. In everyday use the machine does crash occasionally (it's not left on permanently, and crashes maybe on one occasion every few weeks), but I'm never sure whether this is a result of shonky hardware or whether it's just Netscape sucking up all of the resources.. I'm reluctant to buy a new motherboard or memory (SIMMs are seemingly almost impossible to get hold of now, although the motherboard can also take DIMMs) on the off-chance that this may fix things as I can't really afford or justify it. I will try a further make buildworld, but if it looks like I'm continually running up errors (I appreciate that a buildworld puts a not inconsiderable strain on the components), I was wondering if there was an easy way to do a 'binary' upgrade of my system. Ordering the latest release CDs from the USA would obviously take a few weeks (oh, such impatience), I was wondering if there was a way to download and install a "binary" release (which I wouldn't need to compile) from the net in such a way that could be cleanly managed over consecutive one-hour download sessions (bear in mind that in the UK we have to pay for phone calls, and my flatmates do also need to use the phone, so it's not really possible for me to stay online for 50 hours at a time, although I could download 50-hours' worth of files progressively.. ) David. -- David Marsh,drmarsh@bigfoot.com | http://www.viewport.co.uk/ | Glasgow, Scotland. | If urgent, phone: +44 77-121-848-90 | >Trim quotes b4 replying; Quote 1st, reply 2nd; Ask b4 attaching files< To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 5:56:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A1537B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 05:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (st5xqt@localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by green.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97CuC575128 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 08:56:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200010071256.e97CuC575128@green.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: any errors with passwd(8) etc? From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 08:56:10 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Could anyone who is having strange errors such as passwd: cannot set password cipher: Undefined error: 0 please e-mail me some extended info? I need to see: ldd /usr/bin/passwd grep passwd_format /etc/login.conf grep passwd_format ~/.login_conf ls -l /usr/bin/passwd /usr/lib/lib*crypt.* nm --dynamic /usr/lib/lib{util,crypt}.so.? | grep crypt_set_format at least. Thanks! -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 6: 6:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from admin.astroboy.org (admin.astroboy.org [203.37.46.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4C537B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 06:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from psycho ([192.168.1.3]) by admin.astroboy.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA08311 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:57:31 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from alias@admin.astroboy.org) Message-ID: <003e01c03067$4da1fbc0$0301a8c0@psycho> From: "alias" To: Subject: Buildworld for 3.xR to 4.x stable Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 00:02:59 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hiya, Im having a similiar problem to another person who posted here a few days ago, but i didnt see a response. I checked the archives and I couldn't find a response to the error. So hopefully someone on here can help with it. make buildworld fails with the following error cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 - I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o opmini.o /usr/obj/usr/src /gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a -lm -lcrypt -lutil /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl/libperl.a(pp_hot.o): In function `Perl_pp_aassign': pp_hot.o(.text+0x16a1): undefined reference to `setresuid' pp_hot.o(.text+0x16d4): undefined reference to `setresgid' *** Error code 1 Stop. Is there any way to work around this, or a way to fix it so buildworld works properly? thanks :) Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 7:34: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cmh-dial.columbus.rr.com (cmh-dial.columbus.rr.com [204.210.252.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AE737B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from columbus.rr.com (dhcp16466029.columbus.rr.com [24.164.66.29]) by cmh-dial.columbus.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15147 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 10:33:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <39DF3587.3C2BA373@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 10:39:03 -0400 From: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' References: <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> <20001007101732.A91198@freebie.demon.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does > > > > buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot > > > > longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? > Ah. In 8 meg it thrashes like h*ll, so all bets are off as far as a > reasonable build time. Just to add to this, I've done some very limited experiments with softupdates and my conclusion is that running softupdates on systems with low RAM is a very bad idea (tm) as it hurts performance badly. On systems with a more reasonable amount of RAM it's an improvement. I say limited tests because I haven't run the same machine with low/sufficient RAM to verify that it's the RAM that causes the slowdown, but it makes sense. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 11: 7:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0CD37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97I7dd00965; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:07:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA01420; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:07:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010071807.MAA01420@harmony.village.org> To: "David J. Kanter" Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? Cc: FreeBSD stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 03:14:16 CDT." <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> References: <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:07:39 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> "David J. Kanter" writes: : I don't know if this is an issue or not, but using the script program with : sudo seems to switch the sudoer's id to root. : : Here's an example: : : david@/usr/src % whoami : david : david@/usr/src % sudo script /usr/tmp/buildworld : Script started, output file is /usr/tmp/buildworld : root@/usr/src % whoami : root : root@/usr/src % : : Is this a security problem? No. script forks a shell. sudo tells you to do that as root. It is merely complying. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 11:10:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E8537B66D for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97IAjd00984; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:10:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA01453; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:10:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010071810.MAA01453@harmony.village.org> To: Bill Moran Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 10:39:03 EDT." <39DF3587.3C2BA373@columbus.rr.com> References: <39DF3587.3C2BA373@columbus.rr.com> <39DECC00.71E81EF1@urx.com> <20001007101732.A91198@freebie.demon.nl> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:10:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <39DF3587.3C2BA373@columbus.rr.com> Bill Moran writes: : Just to add to this, I've done some very limited experiments with : softupdates and my conclusion is that running softupdates on systems : with low RAM is a very bad idea (tm) as it hurts performance badly. On : systems with a more reasonable amount of RAM it's an improvement. : I say limited tests because I haven't run the same machine with : low/sufficient RAM to verify that it's the RAM that causes the : slowdown, but it makes sense. I know that softupdates on my 16MB OpenBSD/arc system trippled the make build time from 26 hours to 76. When I put 16MB more into that machine, for a total of 32MB, the build world time with stoft updates and without droped to 21 and 19 respectively. When I put another 32MB into the machine (to max it out), the build world time dropped another hour or so (17.5 with soft updates, 20.5 without). On a 8MB system, I'd recommend against softupdates. They need a lot of RAM to be useful. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 11:42:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27AC37B503; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-112.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.112]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA10604; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 14:42:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e97IgYi77657; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:42:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) To: current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail References: <200010071839.LAA35413@freefall.freebsd.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 07 Oct 2000 11:42:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: Satoshi Asami's message of "Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'll post another message when I'm done. -PW --- From: Satoshi Asami Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT) X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Sender: owner-cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org asami 2000/10/07 11:39:58 PDT Modified files: . avail Log: The ports tree is now locked for the layout change. Revision Changes Path 1.127 +2 -2 CVSROOT/avail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 11:53:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F8137B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: ust@cert.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97IrWI06176 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:53:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97IrWP14597 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:53:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from alaska.cert.siemens.de (reims.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.202.134]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.11.1/8.11.1/Siemens CERT [ $Revision: 1.8 ]) with ESMTP id e97IrWs18287 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ust@localhost) by alaska.cert.siemens.de (8.11.1/8.11.1/alaska [ $Revision: 1.4 ]) id e97IrWF00510 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:53:31 +0200 From: Udo Schweigert To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ahc driver sort of broken Message-ID: <20001007205311.A467@alaska.cert.siemens.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, after cvsuping today and a "make world" my kernel did a panic: ..... da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17429MB (35694860 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2221C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17429MB (35694860 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2221C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present vinum: loaded da4 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da4: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da4: 3.300MB/s transfers da4: 96MB (196608 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 96C) (da5:ahc1:0:5:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x5 sg[0] - Addr 0xfcc5420 : Length -2147483640 (da5:ahc1:0:5:0): Queuing a BDR SCB ahc1: WARNING no command for scb 2 (cmdcmplt) QOUTPOS = 23 (da5:ahc1:0:5:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x5 sg[0] - Addr 0xfcc5420 : Length -2147483640 (da5:ahc1:0:5:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0137558 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0290a08 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0290a18 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = Idle interrupt mask = cam trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... done Uptime: 18s Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort The next boot with the same kernel is OK because the JAZ-drive (da5) responds immediately to the INQUIRY command (The jaz needs some time to spinup the disc inside the drive). Before the MFC of the new ahc driver this did not happen. Regards. -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170 ZT IK 3, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166 D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : ust@cert.siemens.de PGP-2/5 fingerprint | D8 A5 DF 34 EC 87 E8 C6 E2 26 C4 D0 EE 80 36 B2 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:10: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.hexanet.fr (speedfreak.hexanet.fr [194.98.140.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777D837B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.hexanet.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e97KBfG14658 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:11:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nighty@zippy.hexanet.fr) Message-Id: <200010072011.e97KBfG14658@zippy.hexanet.fr> Reply-To: chris@hexanet.fr From: "Christophe Prevotaux" X-Mailer: NMH 1.0.4 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: AHC driver BROKEN in 4.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14655.970949500.1@zippy> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 22:11:41 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG AHC driver does not work in 4.1.1 and 4.1 with a 29160N It works fine under Debian Linux with absolutely no problem whatsoever. in the same machine with the same components etc... could the person responsible for the driver fix this please I hate using Linux , be in this case it looks like I will have to if nothing is done to make the driver work properly as mentioned in the docs , 29160N adaptec SCSI controller IS supposed to be supported. -- =================================================================== Christophe Prevotaux Email: chris@hexanet.fr HEXANET SARL URL: http://www.hexanet.fr/ Z.A Farman Sud Tel: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 05 9 rue Roland Coffignot Direct: +33 (0)3 26 79 08 02 BP415 Fax: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 06 51689 Reims Cedex 2 FRANCE =================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:16:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7142637B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca ([204.244.186.218]) by mail2.uniserve.com with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13i0Ol-0005PG-00; Sat, 07 Oct 2000 13:16:47 -0700 Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:16:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Christophe Prevotaux Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AHC driver BROKEN in 4.1.1 In-Reply-To: <200010072011.e97KBfG14658@zippy.hexanet.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Christophe Prevotaux wrote: > AHC driver does not work in 4.1.1 and 4.1 > with a 29160N ... > could the person responsible for the driver fix this please "does not work" does not even come close to describing what is happening, nor is it enough to figure how it might be fixed, if it needs fixing. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:17:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABBE37B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97KI7g07546 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:18:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:18:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Ken Bolingbroke wrote: > > > > > > I previously mentioned my adventures upgrading a Pentium 133 from 2.2.5 to > > > 4.1.1, but I'm noting some odd behavior with the length of time it takes > > > to buildworld: > > >... > > > -Running 3.2-S, buildworld to 3.5-S, ~12 hours > > >... > > > -Running 4.1.1-S, buildworld 4.1.1-S, 74 hours, 53 minutes. > > >... > > > So what's happening here? Softupdates slow down buildworld? 4.1.1 does > > > buildworld slower than 3.5 and earlier? Or 4.1.1 buildworld takes a lot > > > longer than earlier versions? Or my system is just weird? > > > > I'm assuming weird up front. I find a 4.1.1 BW takes 36xxu and 1:23 of > > clock time on my P-II 400 with 256MB of memory and UDMA33 HD's. You > > p133 should be about 6x or more slower as a guess. I think your > > differences, based on really minimal information, are probably due to > > the kind of HD's you have and how much memory. > > Someone else just made me think--perhaps 4.1.1 is more sensitive to low > RAM? This machine only has 8meg RAM, with 200 megs of swap evenly split > across two IDE disks. There were no hardware changes between the various > builds. That's probably it. Your machine was constantly thrashing. If you look around, you can still find 72-pin SIMMs (on an auction site, for example). You might think really hard about picking some up. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:18: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA00037B66D for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beastie.localdomain ([24.19.158.41]) by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001007201649.FDXM4031.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@beastie.localdomain>; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:16:49 -0700 Received: (from brian@localhost) by beastie.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) id NAA02255; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:19:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:19:40 -0700 From: "Brian O'Shea" To: Christophe Prevotaux Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AHC driver BROKEN in 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001007131940.L622@beastie.localdomain> Reply-To: boshea@ricochet.net Mail-Followup-To: Christophe Prevotaux , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010072011.e97KBfG14658@zippy.hexanet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <200010072011.e97KBfG14658@zippy.hexanet.fr>; from Christophe Prevotaux on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 10:11:41PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 10:11:41PM +0200, Christophe Prevotaux wrote: > AHC driver does not work in 4.1.1 and 4.1 > with a 29160N > > > It works fine under Debian Linux with absolutely no problem > whatsoever. in the same machine with the same components etc... > > could the person responsible for the driver fix this please > > I hate using Linux , be in this case it looks like I will have to > if nothing is done to make the driver work properly > > as mentioned in the docs , 29160N adaptec SCSI controller IS supposed > to be supported. Could you maybe provide some more information about your system? Your kernel config file and the output from the dmesg command would be useful. Thanks, -brian -- Brian O'Shea boshea@ricochet.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:40:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-99.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F5C37B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97KfDg07623 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:41:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:41:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? In-Reply-To: <200010071807.MAA01420@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20001007031416.A1389@freebsd.mindspring.com> "David J. Kanter" writes: > : I don't know if this is an issue or not, but using the script program with > : sudo seems to switch the sudoer's id to root. > : > : Here's an example: > : > : david@/usr/src % whoami > : david > : david@/usr/src % sudo script /usr/tmp/buildworld > : Script started, output file is /usr/tmp/buildworld > : root@/usr/src % whoami > : root > : root@/usr/src % > : > : Is this a security problem? > > No. script forks a shell. sudo tells you to do that as root. It is > merely complying. Er, wouldn't that give a user root access to do anything he or she wanted? -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (at yourfit.com) behanna@zbzoom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:41:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7D037B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt6-216-180-4-8.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.8]) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97Kfg700352; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:41:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e97KeLa82084; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:40:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <200010072040.e97KeLa82084@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Warner Losh Cc: FreeBSD Stable From: David Kelly Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-reply-to: Message from Warner Losh of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:10:44 MDT." <200010071810.MAA01453@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 15:40:15 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > On a 8MB system, I'd recommend against softupdates. They need a lot > of RAM to be useful. I have a 4MB 386SX16 with 2.something on it. Should I upgrade? :-) OS I mean, not the hardware. Keep that old think laying around for laughs, its bigger than a laptop but in similar package. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:51:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5117C37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DA0B11C6A; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:51:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:51:01 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? Message-ID: <20001007165101.Q38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200010071807.MAA01420@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from behanna@zbzoom.net on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:41:13PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:41:13PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: > > : david@/usr/src % whoami > > : david > > : david@/usr/src % sudo script /usr/tmp/buildworld > > : Script started, output file is /usr/tmp/buildworld > > : root@/usr/src % whoami > > : root > > : root@/usr/src % > > : > > : Is this a security problem? > > > > No. script forks a shell. sudo tells you to do that as root. It is > > merely complying. > > Er, wouldn't that give a user root access to do anything he or she > wanted? Isn't that the point of sudo? I can't believe this thread even exists... -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 13:51:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E81D37B66D for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31388 invoked by uid 1003); 7 Oct 2000 20:51:32 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:51:32 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable , "David J. Kanter" Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? Message-ID: <20001007225132.A29035@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <200010071807.MAA01420@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from behanna@zbzoom.net on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:41:13PM -0400 Organization: Sunesi Clinical Systems X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat 2000-10-07 (16:41), Chris BeHanna wrote: > > No. script forks a shell. sudo tells you to do that as root. It is > > merely complying. > > Er, wouldn't that give a user root access to do anything he or she > wanted? If you set up 'sudo' to let someone run 'script' as root, yes. It has nothing to do with 'script', it's the fact 'sudo' runs it as root. For it to do that, you need to set it up to do that. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 15:59:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6137B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA16836; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:59:56 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kenneth Mays Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WU-FTPD Message-ID: <20001007155956.A16778@citusc17.usc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from kmays2000@hotmail.com on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:05:16PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:05:16PM -0400, Kenneth Mays wrote: > I wanted to ask if there were any improvements to this code. > Some reviews state that it is very CPU-intensive during high loads. > Is there any better FTP server for FreeBSD 4.x or improvements to the > default ftp server?!? Do you need something the default ftpd server cannot do? We ship a very good one already :) Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 16: 0:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2090F37B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA16848; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:01:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: kostik Cc: Gregory Bond , Gerhard Sittig , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001007160117.B16778@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from kostik@org.chem.msu.su on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:42:28PM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:42:28PM +0400, kostik wrote: > i have an old question - why freebsd project can't switch to gmake? > i'm holding to (!) different makes on my system now (make & gmake). It is GPL'ed software. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 16: 9: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC0437B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e97N7Rt13231; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:07:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20001007190050.0968aeb0@mail.sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@mail.sentex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 19:06:07 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: WU-FTPD Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001007155956.A16778@citusc17.usc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:59 PM 10/7/2000 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:05:16PM -0400, Kenneth Mays wrote: > > I wanted to ask if there were any improvements to this code. > > Some reviews state that it is very CPU-intensive during high loads. > > Is there any better FTP server for FreeBSD 4.x or improvements to the > > default ftp server?!? > >Do you need something the default ftpd server cannot do? We ship a >very good one already :) Perhaps I missed the change, but the ability to have uploaded files automatically saved with pre defined permissions and ownership on virtual hosts is the big one I find missing. Otherwise, you quickly become a warez drop box. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 16:50:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E53337B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e97No9Y00423; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:50:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA00780; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:50:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010072350.RAA00780@harmony.village.org> To: behanna@zbzoom.net Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? Cc: FreeBSD-Stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 16:41:13 EDT." References: Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 17:50:08 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Chris BeHanna writes: : Er, wouldn't that give a user root access to do anything he or she : wanted? Yes. That's the logical conclusion if you give someone shell access, or access to any program that can fork a shell. "TOYOTA: You asked for it, you got it." Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 16:51:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3527337B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D6D1A1C69; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:51:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:51:20 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Kris Kennaway Cc: kostik , Gregory Bond , Gerhard Sittig , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: agp_if.c Message-ID: <20001007195120.V38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200010050129.MAA25324@lightning.itga.com.au> <20001007160117.B16778@citusc17.usc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20001007160117.B16778@citusc17.usc.edu>; from kris@citusc.usc.edu on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:01:17PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:01:17PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:42:28PM +0400, kostik wrote: > > > i have an old question - why freebsd project can't switch to gmake? > > i'm holding to (!) different makes on my system now (make & gmake). > > It is GPL'ed software. It's also crappy software and incompatabile with our current build system. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 16:54:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F083637B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e97NrwX95025; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:53:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: David Kelly Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-Reply-To: Message from David Kelly of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 15:40:15 CDT." <200010072040.e97KeLa82084@nospam.hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 16:53:58 -0700 Message-ID: <95021.970962838@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think you should keep it around as a data point for the worldstone benchmark. We could have your machine's value as the low-end reference point. :) - Jordan > Warner Losh writes: > > On a 8MB system, I'd recommend against softupdates. They need a lot > > of RAM to be useful. > > I have a 4MB 386SX16 with 2.something on it. Should I upgrade? :-) > OS I mean, not the hardware. Keep that old think laying around for > laughs, its bigger than a laptop but in similar package. > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net > ===================================================================== > The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its > capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 17: 4:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FB237B679 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt6-216-180-4-58.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.58]) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e98046727059; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:04:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9802ma83795; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:02:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <200010080002.e9802ma83795@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD Stable From: David Kelly Subject: Re: `time make buildworld' In-reply-to: Message from Jordan Hubbard of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 16:53:58 PDT." <95021.970962838@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 19:02:48 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan Hubbard writes: > I think you should keep it around as a data point for the worldstone benchmark. > We could have your machine's value as the low-end reference point. :) I let it run for at least 10 days trying (I gave up, it was still crunching) to buildworld via NFS once. Or was that 40 days? Its been a long time. Guess I should fire it up connected to a UPS and find out. And one day we may also find the definitive answer as to "How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie-Pop(tm)?" > > Warner Losh writes: > > > On a 8MB system, I'd recommend against softupdates. They need a lot > > > of RAM to be useful. > > > > I have a 4MB 386SX16 with 2.something on it. Should I upgrade? :-) > > OS I mean, not the hardware. Keep that old think laying around for > > laughs, its bigger than a laptop but in similar package. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 17:15:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flux.ptc.spbu.ru (flux.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1A737B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snark.ptc.spbu.ru (snark.ptc.spbu.ru [195.19.225.131]) by flux.ptc.spbu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf-1.0.rbl) with ESMTP id EAA92632 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:15:39 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from uwe@localhost) by snark.ptc.spbu.ru (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id EAA00996 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:15:39 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:15:38 +0400 From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dd and acd Message-ID: <20001008041538.A954@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20001006005542.A22289@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.3i In-Reply-To: <20001006005542.A22289@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from "Sean Kelly" on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 00:55:42 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 00:55:42 -0500, Sean Kelly wrote: > (60) root@edgemaster:~$ dd if=/dev/acd0c of=iso > dd: /dev/acd0c: Bad address Add bs=2048 or any other block size that is multiple of 2K. SY, Uwe -- uwe@ptc.spbu.ru | Zu Grunde kommen http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 17:18:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE47237B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.org (tao.sea.tera.com [207.108.223.55]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01104 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e980IUY02824 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:18:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) From: Gary Kline Message-Id: <200010080018.e980IUY02824@thought.org> Subject: the ``stray irq 7'' is back To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Organization: <> thought.org: pvblic service Unix since 1986... <> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is what my /etc/checkIRQ.sh script shows about 5 seconds into printing a file:: atkbd0 irq 1 sio1 irq 3 sio0 irq 4 ed0 irq 5 pci0.10.0 fdc0 irq 6 ppc0 irq 7 stray irq 7 pci0 irq 10 pci0.8.0 ahc0 irq 12 pci0.9.0 ata0 irq 14 ata1 irq 15 Any guesses as to the cause of this? Printer problems cropped up again a couple evenings ago and we cleaned the connections this morning. After a reboot, the IRQ script showed no strays. Could I need a new cable? Re-re-reseat the cabling (again:)? Has anyone noticed this kind of problem since moving from 3.x to 4.x? gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 17:59:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (placeholder-dcat-1076843290.broadbandoffice.net [64.47.83.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F2537B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e980xRZ62667; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:59:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:59:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200010080059.e980xRZ62667@earth.backplane.com> To: "Kenneth Mays" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WU-FTPD References: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :I wanted to ask if there were any improvements to this code. :Some reviews state that it is very CPU-intensive during high loads. :Is there any better FTP server for FreeBSD 4.x or improvements to the :default ftp server?!? : :Ken I would either use the ftpd supplied with FreeBSD, or not use ftpd at all... especially not wu-ftpd, which has a terrible history of root compromises. This is one case where all those cool features in wu-ftpd are just not worth the potential for yet another root hack being discovered. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 18: 9:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.qc.ca (epsilon.lucida.qc.ca [216.95.146.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F320637B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 98843 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Oct 2000 01:09:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2000 01:09:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 21:09:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman X-Sender: matt@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca To: Matt Dillon Cc: Kenneth Mays , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WU-FTPD In-Reply-To: <200010080059.e980xRZ62667@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 However, if you need the features that wu-ftpd provide, and want an FTPD with a good track record, you can check out ProFTPD, which is a lot easier to use and far more flexible than wu-ftpd. Apache style configureation is quite nice to use. It's in the ports. :) On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Matt Dillon wrote: : I would either use the ftpd supplied with FreeBSD, or not : use ftpd at all... especially not wu-ftpd, which has a : terrible history of root compromises. This is one case where : all those cool features in wu-ftpd are just not worth the : potential for yet another root hack being discovered. : : -Matt * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE538k3dMMtMcA1U5ARAsq+AJ96ROh/AjanDbFDeG7t90r/brrAAgCcCgyu TolP3WOf9Xm64sReUZCl5hQ= =4IxC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 18:33:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A2237B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beastie.localdomain ([24.19.158.41]) by femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001008013317.FXIW27630.femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com@beastie.localdomain>; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:33:17 -0700 Received: (from brian@localhost) by beastie.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) id SAA02965; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:31:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:31:56 -0700 From: "Brian O'Shea" To: spam Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: unsubscribe Message-ID: <20001007183156.N622@beastie.localdomain> Reply-To: boshea@ricochet.net Mail-Followup-To: spam , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" References: <359A18BE6FEDD311938C00104B100AE50DE6CA@exchange.the-force.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <359A18BE6FEDD311938C00104B100AE50DE6CA@exchange.the-force.net>; from spam on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:30:30PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry for adding to the signal-to-noise ratio problem, but I couldn't help but noticing that this message is pure irony: On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:30:30PM -0700, spam wrote: > unsubscribe freebsd-stable > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Brian O'Shea boshea@ricochet.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 20:21:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D6337B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA20344 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:21:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-73.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.73) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma020342; Sat Oct 7 22:21:04 2000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20001007221151.00ad2f00@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 22:20:24 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: installkernel targets Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmm... One thing I miss by using the "new" method is the install.debug target. "make installkernel.debug" is a big long, but would only take 3 lines in Makefile.inc1 plus documentation. Just a minor suggestion. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 20:44:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.uni-bielefeld.de (mail2.uni-bielefeld.de [129.70.4.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ACE37B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frolic.no-support.loc (ppp36-153.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de [129.70.36.153]) by mail.uni-bielefeld.de (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.05.17.04.13.p6) with ESMTP id <0G230068EEDQUY@mail.uni-bielefeld.de> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 05:44:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from bjoern@localhost) by frolic.no-support.loc (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e983gO416198; Sun, 08 Oct 2000 05:42:24 +0200 (CEST envelope-from bjoern) Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 05:42:24 +0200 From: Bjoern Fischer Subject: problem w/ new pcm feeder + emu10k1 in 4.1.1-stable To: Cameron Grant Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <20001008054224.A16164@frolic.no-support.loc> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Cameron, I was curious about your new pcm feeder, so I cvsuped to 4.1.1-STABLE (Sun Oct 8 00:22:45 CEST 2000) and made world and new kernel. The SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT ioctl *always* returns EINVAL :-( Hardware: SB Live! 1024 / EMU10K1 I turned on some debug switches and got this while trying to start esd (esound). I have chosen esound because esd tries many different formats for SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT before giving up: installing feeder: 8to16le installing feeder: 16leto8 installing feeder: monotostereo8 installing feeder: monotostereo16 installing feeder: stereotomono8 installing feeder: stereotomono16 installing feeder: endian installing feeder: sign8 installing feeder: sign16le installing feeder: ulawtou8 installing feeder: u8toulaw open snd0 subdev 0 flags 0x00000003 mode 0x00002000 close snd0 subdev 0 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 0, want speed 8000, try speed 48000, got speed 48000, not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 r = 22 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 16 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 16 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 16 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 FIOASYNC SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 0x01000008 SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT 256 frags, 256 sz want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 close snd0 subdev 3 chn_flush c->flags 0x00003000 open snd0 subdev 3 flags 0x00000006 mode 0x00002000 want format 8 not mapped, flags 8, find feeder type 3, got 0 ... Any idea what's causing this? Bjoern -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UB++++OSI++++$ P+++(-) L---(++) !E W- N+ o>+ K- !w !O !M !V PS++ PE- PGP++ t+++ !5 X++ tv- b+++ D++ G e+ h-- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 20:56:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from intcon.net (linux.intcon.net [206.230.48.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B198537B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from portal.megahack.com (portal.megahack.com [206.230.54.106]) by intcon.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12661; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:56:22 -0500 Received: (from steve@localhost) by portal.megahack.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e983uLo00346; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:56:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from steve) From: Steven Farmer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14815.61540.655647.106686@catbert.megahack.com> Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:56:20 -0500 (CDT) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: ahc driver problem X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My 4.1.1-STABLE box died in the ahc driver today while running dump. After some poking around, I discovered that I can kill it reliably by running "ls -lR /". The kernel was built after cvsuping today. A kernel a week older does not have the problem. My hand transcription of the first half of the console messages are shown below (sorry, I got writers cramp - if more is needed I'll try again), along with my dmesg and kernel config file. ahc0:A:1 ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid during seqint 0x71 scb(70) ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 70 (cmdcmplt) QOUTPOS = 64 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc013a730 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7dd6cfc frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7dd6d0c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 5 (syncer) interrupt mask = bio cam kernel i type 12 trap, code = 0 Stopped at ahc_match_scb+0x18: movl 0(%esi),%eax db> trace ahc_match_scb(c0a28800,0,1,41,0,ff,0) at ahc_match_scb+0x18 ahc_search_quinfifo(c0a28800,1,41,0,ff) at ahc_search_quinfifo+0xf7 ahc_freeze_devq(c0a28800,c0a2e5e4) at ahc_freeze_devq+0x5d ahc_handle_seqint(c0a28800,71) at ahc_handle_seqint+0x135 ahc_freebsd_intr(c0a28800,6c0400,c0313b80,ce008000,c7dd6e5c) at ahc_freebsd_intr+0x97 Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #1: Thu Oct 5 17:45:53 CDT 2000 steve@catbert.megahack.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/CATBERT Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium Pro (199.43-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x619 Stepping = 9 Features=0xf9ff real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127238144 (124256K bytes) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at 7.1 pci0: at 11.0 irq 11 ahc0: port 0xf800-0xf8ff mem 0xffbe9000-0xffbe9fff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs sym0: <810a> port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xffbebc00-0xffbebcff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking isa0: too many dependant configs (8) isa0: unexpected small tag 14 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio3 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 3 on isa0 sio3: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 5 on isa0 ed0: address 00:00:c0:25:72:e2, type SMC8416C/SMC8416BT (16 bit) sbc0: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x300-0x301,0x388-0x38b irq 9 drq 0,5 on isa0 sbc0: setting card to irq 9, drq 0, 5 pcm0: on sbc0 joy0: at port 0x200-0x207 on isa0 IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 15) sa1 at sym0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa1: 4.032MB/s transfers (4.032MHz, offset 8) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da1: 8709MB (17836668 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1110C) Mounting root from ufs:da1s1a cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present WARNING: / was not properly dismounted da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da0: 2047MB (4194057 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 261C) cd1 at sym0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8) cd1: cd present [4294911071 x 2048 byte records] machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident CATBERT maxusers 32 makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols makeoptions KERNEL=kernel options DDB #Enable kernel debugger #options MATH_EMULATE #Support for x87 emulation options INET #InterNETworking options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options MFS #Memory Filesystem options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device options NFS #Network Filesystem options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as root device, NFS required options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660 required options PROCFS #Process filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extentions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies options SOFTUPDATES # device isa device eisa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # ATA and ATAPI devices #device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 #device ata #device atadisk # ATA disk drives #device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering ##options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA #Enable DMA on ATAPI devices # SCSI Controllers device ahc0 # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices device sym0 # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets) # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required) device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) # My actual SCSI devices device scbus0 at ahc0 device da0 at scbus0 target 0 device da1 at scbus0 target 1 device sa0 at scbus0 target 4 device cd0 at scbus0 target 5 device scbus1 at sym0 device sa1 at scbus1 target 5 device cd1 at scbus1 target 6 # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 # SOUND device pcm device sbc device joy # VGA controller device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Advanced Power Management #device apm0 at nexus? # disable flags 0x20 # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? disable port IO_COM2 irq 3 device sio2 at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 device sio3 at isa? port IO_COM4 irq 3 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer # ISA Ethernet NICs. device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device ppp 1 # Kernel PPP pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel. pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device md # Memory "disks" pseudo-device gif 4 # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling pseudo-device faith 1 # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter # Firewall stuff... options IPFIREWALL # firewall options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE # print information about # dropped packets options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD # enable transparent proxy support options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity options IPDIVERT # divert sockets options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN # drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN options TCP_RESTRICT_RST # restrict emission of TCP RST To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 20:58:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E8B37B66D for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e983vmK32710; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:57:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:57:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Steven Farmer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc driver problem In-Reply-To: <14815.61540.655647.106686@catbert.megahack.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Justin just applied a patch to -current that I believe is meant to fix this *exact* problem ... I've hit it here too, but under -current ... if it works there, I imagine it will get MFC'd down ... On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Steven Farmer wrote: > My 4.1.1-STABLE box died in the ahc driver today while running dump. > After some poking around, I discovered that I can kill it reliably by > running "ls -lR /". The kernel was built after cvsuping today. A > kernel a week older does not have the problem. My hand transcription > of the first half of the console messages are shown below (sorry, I > got writers cramp - if more is needed I'll try again), along with my > dmesg and kernel config file. > > ahc0:A:1 ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid during seqint 0x71 scb(70) > ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 70 (cmdcmplt) > QOUTPOS = 64 > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc013a730 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc7dd6cfc > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc7dd6d0c > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 5 (syncer) > interrupt mask = bio cam > kernel i type 12 trap, code = 0 > Stopped at ahc_match_scb+0x18: movl 0(%esi),%eax > db> trace > ahc_match_scb(c0a28800,0,1,41,0,ff,0) at ahc_match_scb+0x18 > ahc_search_quinfifo(c0a28800,1,41,0,ff) at ahc_search_quinfifo+0xf7 > ahc_freeze_devq(c0a28800,c0a2e5e4) at ahc_freeze_devq+0x5d > ahc_handle_seqint(c0a28800,71) at ahc_handle_seqint+0x135 > ahc_freebsd_intr(c0a28800,6c0400,c0313b80,ce008000,c7dd6e5c) at ahc_freebsd_intr+0x97 > > Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE #1: Thu Oct 5 17:45:53 CDT 2000 > steve@catbert.megahack.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/CATBERT > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Pentium Pro (199.43-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x619 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xf9ff > real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) > avail memory = 127238144 (124256K bytes) > Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled > md0: Malloc disk > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > pcib0: on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > pci0: at 7.1 > pci0: at 11.0 irq 11 > ahc0: port 0xf800-0xf8ff mem 0xffbe9000-0xffbe9fff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 > aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs > sym0: <810a> port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xffbebc00-0xffbebcff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking > isa0: too many dependant configs (8) > isa0: unexpected small tag 14 > fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 > fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > sc0: on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio3 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 3 on isa0 > sio3: type 16550A > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f iomem 0xd8000-0xd9fff irq 5 on isa0 > ed0: address 00:00:c0:25:72:e2, type SMC8416C/SMC8416BT (16 bit) > sbc0: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x300-0x301,0x388-0x38b irq 9 drq 0,5 on isa0 > sbc0: setting card to irq 9, drq 0, 5 > pcm0: on sbc0 > joy0: at port 0x200-0x207 on isa0 > IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default > Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 > sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device > sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 15) > sa1 at sym0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 > sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device > sa1: 4.032MB/s transfers (4.032MHz, offset 8) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) > da1: 8709MB (17836668 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1110C) > Mounting root from ufs:da1s1a > cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) > da0: 2047MB (4194057 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 261C) > cd1 at sym0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > cd1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8) > cd1: cd present [4294911071 x 2048 byte records] > > machine i386 > cpu I686_CPU > ident CATBERT > maxusers 32 > > makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols > makeoptions KERNEL=kernel > options DDB #Enable kernel debugger > > #options MATH_EMULATE #Support for x87 emulation > options INET #InterNETworking > options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols > options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem > options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] > options MFS #Memory Filesystem > options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device > options NFS #Network Filesystem > options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as root device, NFS required > options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem > options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem > options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660 required > options PROCFS #Process filesystem > options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] > options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI > options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console > options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor > options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor > options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support > options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory > options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues > options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores > options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extentions > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies > options SOFTUPDATES # > > device isa > device eisa > device pci > > # Floppy drives > device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 > device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 > > # ATA and ATAPI devices > #device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 > #device ata > #device atadisk # ATA disk drives > #device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives > #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives > #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives > #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering > ##options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA #Enable DMA on ATAPI devices > > # SCSI Controllers > device ahc0 # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices > device sym0 # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets) > > # SCSI peripherals > device scbus # SCSI bus (required) > device da # Direct Access (disks) > device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) > device cd # CD > device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) > > # My actual SCSI devices > device scbus0 at ahc0 > device da0 at scbus0 target 0 > device da1 at scbus0 target 1 > device sa0 at scbus0 target 4 > device cd0 at scbus0 target 5 > > device scbus1 at sym0 > device sa1 at scbus1 target 5 > device cd1 at scbus1 target 6 > > # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse > device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD > device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 > device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 > > # SOUND > device pcm > device sbc > device joy > > # VGA controller > device vga0 at isa? > > # splash screen/screen saver > pseudo-device splash > > # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console > device sc0 at isa? > > # Floating point support - do not disable. > device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 > > # Advanced Power Management > #device apm0 at nexus? # disable flags 0x20 > > # Serial (COM) ports > device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 > device sio1 at isa? disable port IO_COM2 irq 3 > device sio2 at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 > device sio3 at isa? port IO_COM4 irq 3 > > # Parallel port > device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 > device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) > device lpt # Printer > > # ISA Ethernet NICs. > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000 > > # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. > pseudo-device loop # Network loopback > pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support > pseudo-device ppp 1 # Kernel PPP > pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel. > pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) > pseudo-device md # Memory "disks" > pseudo-device gif 4 # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling > pseudo-device faith 1 # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) > > # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. > # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! > pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter > > # Firewall stuff... > options IPFIREWALL # firewall > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE # print information about > # dropped packets > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD # enable transparent proxy support > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity > options IPDIVERT # divert sockets > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN # drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN > options TCP_RESTRICT_RST # restrict emission of TCP RST > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > Marc G. Fournier scrappy@hub.org Systems Administrator @ hub.org scrappy@{postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 20:59:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.teliauk.com (mailhub.teliauk.com [195.12.225.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7846837B503 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d1o314.teliauk.com (root@d1o314.teliauk.com [195.12.237.81]) by mailhub.teliauk.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9840SA13629; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 05:00:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from vilnya.demon.co.uk (t1o316p192.teliauk.com [195.12.246.192]) by d1o314.teliauk.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA24653; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:59:00 +0100 (GMT/BST) Received: from haveblue (haveblue.rings [10.2.4.5]) by vilnya.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 32042D9A8; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:58:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <000901c030dc$0fdcc980$0504020a@haveblue> From: "Cameron Grant" To: "Bjoern Fischer" Cc: References: <20001008054224.A16164@frolic.no-support.loc> Subject: Re: problem w/ new pcm feeder + emu10k1 in 4.1.1-stable Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 04:58:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT ioctl *always* returns EINVAL :-( i fat-fingered the mfc. sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c revision: 1.6.2.4 should fix it. -cg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 21: 5:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 115FB37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 21:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17482 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Oct 2000 04:05:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2000 04:05:21 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:05:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Frank Tobin X-Sender: ftobin@localhost To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? In-Reply-To: <200010072350.RAA00780@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh, at 17:50 -0600 on Sat, 7 Oct 2000, wrote: > Yes. That's the logical conclusion if you give someone shell access, > or access to any program that can fork a shell. "TOYOTA: You asked > for it, you got it." Along the same lines, don't give a user sudo access to just run "xemacs", unless you want them playing Tetris as root. Oh, wait...that's not the worst thing they can do :) -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 22:15:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F4237B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e985FUY01418; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:15:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA02691; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:15:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010080515.XAA02691@harmony.village.org> To: Matt Heckaman Subject: Re: WU-FTPD Cc: Matt Dillon , Kenneth Mays , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 21:09:10 EDT." References: Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:15:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Matt Heckaman writes: : However, if you need the features that wu-ftpd provide, and want an FTPD : with a good track record, you can check out ProFTPD, which is a lot easier : to use and far more flexible than wu-ftpd. Apache style configureation is : quite nice to use. It's in the ports. :) I wouldn't chose it because of its track record. It has had as many or more security problems that wu-ftpd has had... There's nothing known there now, and it is generally believed to be as secure as wu-ftpd. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 22:17:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739D37B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e985HqY01427; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:17:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA02711; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:17:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010080517.XAA02711@harmony.village.org> To: Frank Tobin Subject: Re: Security problem with "script"? Cc: FreeBSD-Stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:05:21 CDT." References: Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:17:51 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Frank Tobin writes: : Along the same lines, don't give a user sudo access to just run "xemacs", : unless you want them playing Tetris as root. Oh, wait...that's not the : worst thing they can do :) Yea. They could cheat and edit the Tetris high scores file :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message