From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 21 11:28:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FEF37B698 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 11:28:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0LJRU901079; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:27:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200101211927.f0LJRU901079@harmony.village.org> To: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: Request For Review: libc/libc_r changes to allow -lc_r Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:26:26 EST." References: Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:27:30 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Daniel Eischen writes: : > By the way, should it be __thread_sys_foo and __foo? Two underscores? : > ISTR some rule about using a single leading underscore for file scope : > (e.g. macros) and two for global scope. : : I don't recall that, but anything for file scope that isn't a macro : can be static and not use the underscores. Macros are usually upper : case anyways. ANSI C reserves _[A-Z]* and __[a-zA-Z] to the implementation space. That leaves _[a-z] to the user name space, so Jacques is right about that. I can quote chapter and verse if you really want me to. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message