From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Mar 25 2: 1:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from nebula.cybercable.fr (d217.dhcp212-126.cybercable.fr [212.198.126.217]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9089437B71B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:01:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mux@qualys.com) Received: (from mux@localhost) by nebula.cybercable.fr (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2PA0k413461 for arch@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:00:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mux) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:00:46 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Building only a specified list of kernel modules Message-ID: <20010325120046.F777@nebula.cybercable.fr> References: <20010324211140.C4304@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010324205005.D777@nebula.cybercable.fr> <20010325101657.A36335@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010325101657.A36335@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:16:57AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Pentchev wrote: > Yeah, blame it all on newfangled means of communication :P > > With all due respect, I think my patch would work better in the case > when one wants to disable all modules except for a select few; yours > would include a whole lot of NO_KMOD_*, which, given the sheer number > of buildable modules (which is a good thing), would sum up to more than > half of /etc/make.conf ;) > > G'luck, > Peter My point is that more often we want to disable some modules and not specify a list of modules which would be scary for beginners and would lead to errors. Maxime -- Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations ; BSD is the One True Code Key fingerprint = F9B6 1D5A 4963 331C 88FC CA6A AB50 1EF2 8CBE 99D6 Public Key : http://www.epita.fr/~henrio_m/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message