From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Apr 29 0:58: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8438E37B422; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:58:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3T7vjU35285; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:57:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: scanner@jurai.net Cc: Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jailNG In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:49:59 EDT." Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <35283.988531065@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , scanner @jurai.net writes: > >It is my understanding from the OpenRoot project that jail currently does >not allow ICMP to work inside a jail? If this is so, this seriously >damages services that need Path MTU-D such as SMTP and HTTP. Surely this >is not the case? Can someone enlighten me on this. ICMP works just as usual, but programs which use RAW-IP sockets, such as the ping(8) program does not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message