From owner-freebsd-audit Sun Nov 11 4:50:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA9437B416 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 04:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 162u4o-0004D0-00; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 14:51:06 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Akinori MUSHA" Cc: audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make test(1) a sh(1) builtin command In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 10 Nov 2001 05:39:18 +0900." <86n11vel1l.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 14:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <16181.1005483066@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 05:39:18 +0900, "Akinori MUSHA" wrote: > I think it would be a great trade to pay just 0.6% size increase for a > test(1) builtin command. What do you guys think? I think if you drop the builtin printf to make way for the builtin test, you've got a good deal. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message