From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Aug 26 2: 0: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D279837B40B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7Q902l40085; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108260900.f7Q902l40085@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: "Peter Avalos" Subject: RE: docs/29740: [PATCH] Setting WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj is a bad idea, but not commented Reply-To: "Peter Avalos" Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/29740; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Peter Avalos" To: "'Dima Dorfman'" Cc: Subject: RE: docs/29740: [PATCH] Setting WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj is a bad idea, but not commented Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 03:53:04 -0500 > It sounds like this is a bug in make(1) that should be fixed > (when I first read the PR, I thought this was a documented > `feature' of some sorts). Perhaps you (or whoever was having > this problem) could file a PR against that with some > analysis, and/or at least the simplest test case? Upon searching more about this problem, I stumbled across this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24711 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message