From owner-freebsd-java Sun Aug 26 5:19: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from matsulab.is.titech.ac.jp (matsulab.is.titech.ac.jp [131.112.35.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1B637B407 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 05:18:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp) Received: from tripper.private by matsulab.is.titech.ac.jp (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W) id VAA05379; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:18:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:21:06 +0900 Message-ID: <55itfb107h.wl@tripper.private> From: Fuyuhiko Maruyama To: Greg Lewis Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1 awt exception, plugin, OpenJIT In-Reply-To: <20010826113923.A8065@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20010825120422.A18841@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20010825130721.A20869@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <55wv3sqxtc.wl@tripper.private> <20010826040557.A87652@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <55u1yvrij8.wl@tripper.private> <20010826113923.A8065@misty.eyesbeyond.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) on XEmacs/21.5.1 (anise) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:39:23 +0930, Greg Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 05:28:27AM +0900, Fuyuhiko Maruyama wrote: > > At Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:05:57 +0930, > > Greg Lewis wrote: > > > > > > > > Making symbolic link > > > > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/bsd > > > > and > > > > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/bsd > > > > may also fix the problem. > > > > > > Will it be easier if the build installs these include files in freebsd > > > rather than bsd? I think maybe that is more correct, what are your > > > thoughts? > > I think installing those files in freebsd is not so good because our > > J2SDK tree isn't only for FreeBSD but also for NetBSD and OpenBSD even > > if currently it runs only on FreeBSD. From OpenJIT's point of view, > > porting OpenJIT for NetBSD or OpenBSD may be easy as it already > > supports Linux and FreeBSD by almost same codes, so placing those > > include files in `bsd' is not so bad -- it simplifies our configure > > scripts. The problem caused by the directory name can be solved by > > modifing OpenJIT's configure scripts and it is quite easy and already > > finished. > > Well, what I actually meant was what if we install the includes in > freebsd on FreeBSD, netbsd on NetBSD, etc. I.e. we use the `actual' > platform rather than the meta bsd platform name as the directory > name. That strikes me as maybe being the scheme that some code > assumes. How does it affect to the mainteinanciblity of J2SDK tree for FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD? I think this should be the most elemental basis of the decision. -- Fuyuhiko MARUYAMA Matsuoka laboratory, Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message