From owner-freebsd-security Sun Dec 2 0:51:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E4937B416 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB28npY52436; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 09:49:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: freebsd-security@rikrose.net Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: philosophical question... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Dec 2001 01:08:49 GMT." Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 09:49:51 +0100 Message-ID: <52434.1007282991@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message , freebsd-security@ rikrose.net writes: >On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Colin Percival wrote: >> >Seems like an OpenBSD feature :P > >> Still, I have to agree that this sounds pretty OpenBSDish... looking at >> the BSDs as a whole I'd say it would make sense for this to be added into >> OpenBSD first and ported to FreeBSD once it has proved itself. > >Anyone mind if I start a discussion about encrypted swap? I know I had the >option under OpenBSD (and yes, it was on), but I still don't understand >the implications. Encrypted swap is coming to FreeBSD as part of the DARPA contract NAI has won. Stay tuned. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message