From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 0:10: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A033237B402 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0K8A1p74535; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-232-222-90.client.attbi.com [12.232.222.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D34137B416 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dschultz@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g0K84wp01924; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:04:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz) Message-Id: <200201200804.g0K84wp01924@HAL9000.wox.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:04:58 -0800 (PST) From: dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: bin/34076: [PATCH] Add -n flag to renice; update docs Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Number: 34076 >Category: bin >Synopsis: [PATCH] Add -n flag to renice; update docs >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Jan 20 00:10:01 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: David Schultz >Release: FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386 >Organization: cluttered >Environment: System: FreeBSD HAL9000.wox.org 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #6: Sun Jan 13 02:46:53 PST 2002 dschultz@HAL9000.wox.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAL9000 i386 >Description: Add the -n flag to renice, which allows priorities to be specified as an offset of a process' current priority. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- renice.c.orig Sat Jan 19 22:37:21 2002 +++ renice.c Sat Jan 19 22:51:56 2002 @@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ #include #include -int donice __P((int, int, int)); +#define CHANGE_ABS 1 +#define CHANGE_REL 2 + +int donice __P((int, int, int, int)); static void usage __P((void)); /* @@ -70,17 +73,19 @@ char **argv; { int which = PRIO_PROCESS; - int who = 0, prio, errs = 0; + int who = 0, prio, errs = 0, change = CHANGE_ABS; argc--, argv++; if (argc < 2) usage(); + if (strcmp(*argv, "-n") == 0) { + change = CHANGE_REL; + argc--, argv++; + if (argc < 2) + usage(); + } prio = atoi(*argv); argc--, argv++; - if (prio > PRIO_MAX) - prio = PRIO_MAX; - if (prio < PRIO_MIN) - prio = PRIO_MIN; for (; argc > 0; argc--, argv++) { if (strcmp(*argv, "-g") == 0) { which = PRIO_PGRP; @@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ continue; } } - errs += donice(which, who, prio); + errs += donice(which, who, prio, change); } exit(errs != 0); } @@ -118,13 +123,13 @@ usage() { fprintf(stderr, -"usage: renice priority [ [ -p ] pids ] [ [ -g ] pgrps ] [ [ -u ] users ]\n"); +"usage: renice [ -n ] priority [ [ -p ] pids ] [ [ -g ] pgrps ] [ [ -u ] users ]\n"); exit(1); } int -donice(which, who, prio) - int which, who, prio; +donice(which, who, prio, change) + int which, who, prio, change; { int oldprio; @@ -133,6 +138,12 @@ warn("%d: getpriority", who); return (1); } + if (change == CHANGE_REL) + prio += oldprio; + if (prio > PRIO_MAX) + prio = PRIO_MAX; + if (prio < PRIO_MIN) + prio = PRIO_MIN; if (setpriority(which, who, prio) < 0) { warn("%d: setpriority", who); return (1); --- renice.8.orig Sat Jan 19 22:37:29 2002 +++ renice.8 Sat Jan 19 23:30:39 2002 @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ .Nd alter priority of running processes .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm +.Op Fl n .Ar priority .Oo .Op Fl p @@ -73,6 +74,10 @@ Options supported by .Nm : .Bl -tag -width Ds +.It Fl n +Interpret the +.Ar priority +parameter as an offset from the process' current priority. .It Fl g Force .Ar who @@ -87,14 +92,6 @@ interpretation to be (the default) process ID's. .El .Pp -For example, -.Bd -literal -offset -renice +1 987 -u daemon root -p 32 -.Ed -.Pp -would change the priority of process ID's 987 and 32, and -all processes owned by users daemon and root. -.Pp Users other than the super-user may only alter the priority of processes they own, and can only monotonically increase their ``nice value'' @@ -114,6 +111,21 @@ in the system wants to), 0 (the ``base'' scheduling priority), anything negative (to make things go very fast). +.Sh EXAMPLES +.Pp +.Bd -literal -offset indent +renice +1 987 -u daemon root -p 32 +.Ed +.Pp +Change the priority of process ID's 987 and 32, and +all processes owned by users daemon and root. +.Pp +.Bd -literal -offset indent +renice -n -5 654 +.Ed +.Pp +Decrease the ``nice value'' of process ID 654 by 5, +assuming you are a super-user. .Sh FILES .Bl -tag -width /etc/passwd -compact .It Pa /etc/passwd >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 5:51: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3976437B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 05:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dwmalone@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KDfhi32786; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 05:41:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 05:41:43 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201341.g0KDfhi32786@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/8498: Race condition between unp_gc() and accept(). Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Race condition between unp_gc() and accept(). Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->dwmalone Responsible-Changed-By: dwmalone Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 05:39:51 PST 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll try to look at this as I have a few discriptor passing PRs to my name at the moment. If anyone else wants to look at this (Matt might, as he has worked with Al Viro on file discriptor problems before) please be my guest. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8498 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 7:54:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97D37B41C; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 07:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com ([68.55.188.27]) by femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20020120155456.HLG4306.femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 07:54:56 -0800 Received: (from sjr@localhost) by cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KFstN22209; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:54:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sjr) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:54:55 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" Message-Id: <200201201554.g0KFstN22209@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, sjr@home.net Subject: Re: misc/6612: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s In-Reply-To: <200201192205.g0JM5KK73221@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > From iedowse@FreeBSD.org Sat Jan 19 17:22:07 2002 > Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:05:20 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: misc/6612: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s > > Synopsis: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: iedowse > State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 19 14:05:02 PST 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > > Does this problem still exist? > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6612 Yes, this problem still exists under 4.5-PRERELEASE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 8:50: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D748737B404 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KGo2498613; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201201650.g0KGo2498613@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: misc/6612: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/6612; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: misc/6612: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:45:38 +0000 Adding to the audit trail: In message <200201201554.g0KFstN22209@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com>, "Stephen J . Roznowski" writes: >> From iedowse@FreeBSD.org Sat Jan 19 17:22:07 2002 >> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:05:20 -0800 (PST) >> Subject: Re: misc/6612: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s >> >> Synopsis: bsd.man.mk can't handle man pages with ":"s >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback >> State-Changed-By: iedowse >> State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 19 14:05:02 PST 2002 >> State-Changed-Why: >> >> Does this problem still exist? >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6612 > >Yes, this problem still exists under 4.5-PRERELEASE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 8:51: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951BE37B416; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KGojt98766; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:50:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:50:45 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201650.g0KGojt98766@freefall.freebsd.org> To: crossd@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10283: Race condition in rc.network Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Race condition in rc.network State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 08:50:14 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this bug still present in recent releases? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10283 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 8:51: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250F037B402; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KGneX98573; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:49:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:49:40 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201649.g0KGneX98573@freefall.freebsd.org> To: steve@home.pl, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10172: [panics] Kernel (esp kern/sys_pipe.c) dies on low kvm Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: [panics] Kernel (esp kern/sys_pipe.c) dies on low kvm State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 08:47:02 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist in recent releases? There were a number of related changes to sys_pipe.c last year, so maybe this is fixed. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10172 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:11: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C9037B417; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KH9L804690; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:09:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:09:21 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201709.g0KH9L804690@freefall.freebsd.org> To: adrian2ubergeeks.com@gosub.cstone.net, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10601: Ownership of symlinks copied by adduser are not set correctly. Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Ownership of symlinks copied by adduser are not set correctly. State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:05:21 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->iedowse Responsible-Changed-By: iedowse Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:05:21 PST 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: MFC reminder. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10601 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:21: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D65837B400; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHJUF05964; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:19:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:19:30 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201719.g0KHJUF05964@freefall.freebsd.org> To: haug@hawaii.conterra.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10609: adjtime bug (tv_sec > 2147) and enhancement (nil first arg) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: adjtime bug (tv_sec > 2147) and enhancement (nil first arg) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:16:42 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: What was the conclusion here? Would a modification that range-checks or caps the delta be acceptable? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10609 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:31: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCCE37B400; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHOZj06606; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:24:35 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201724.g0KHOZj06606@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ume@mahoroba.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10755: de driver says `invalid EESPROM checksum' Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: de driver says `invalid EESPROM checksum' State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:24:12 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10755 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:41: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D24D37B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHWs307650; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:32:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:32:54 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201732.g0KHWs307650@freefall.freebsd.org> To: howardjp@wam.umd.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10924: Extensions to biff(1) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Extensions to biff(1) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:28:12 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Patches against our existing biff rather than a reimplementation of it would be much preferred! You can change the status of another tty using our current biff if you redirect stderr to that tty, but it is a bit odd that it uses stderr and not stdin. Do you still wish to see support for a tty argument? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10924 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:51: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7882C37B41D; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHlUh09508; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:47:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:47:30 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201747.g0KHlUh09508@freefall.freebsd.org> To: schweikh@noc.dfn.de, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/11114: make(1) does not work as documented with .POSIX: target Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: make(1) does not work as documented with .POSIX: target State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:47:12 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11114 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:51: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF4B37B41A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHmPR09638; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:48:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:48:25 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201748.g0KHmPR09638@freefall.freebsd.org> To: csgphysics.purdue.edu@physics.purdue.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/11126: vt100 termcap entry appears broken Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: vt100 termcap entry appears broken State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:48:06 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11126 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10: 1: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF06537B41C; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHwce11186; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:58:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:58:38 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201758.g0KHwce11186@freefall.freebsd.org> To: crawdad+fbsd@gungnir.fnal.gov, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/11979: Vaio 505DX touchpad not detected as GlidePoint Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Vaio 505DX touchpad not detected as GlidePoint State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:58:21 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11979 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10: 1:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D6B37B417; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHu2010709; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201756.g0KHu2010709@freefall.freebsd.org> To: aron@cs.rice.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/11966: TCP copies send and receive socket buffer sizes from routing information even when user applications set them Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: TCP copies send and receive socket buffer sizes from routing information even when user applications set them State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:55:44 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11966 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10: 1: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC6037B416; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHvY810967; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:57:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:57:34 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201757.g0KHvY810967@freefall.freebsd.org> To: aron@cs.rice.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/11968: kldload should call module entry point before initializing kernel data structures Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: kldload should call module entry point before initializing kernel data structures State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:57:14 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this problem still present? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11968 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4ED37B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KIAvo16341; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:10:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:10:57 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201810.g0KIAvo16341@freefall.freebsd.org> To: howardjp@wam.umd.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10924: Extensions to biff(1) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Extensions to biff(1) State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:10:23 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Submitter says that this can be closed. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10924 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F231B37B416; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KIA5616178; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:10:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201810.g0KIA5616178@freefall.freebsd.org> To: csgphysics.purdue.edu@physics.purdue.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/11126: vt100 termcap entry appears broken Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: vt100 termcap entry appears broken State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:09:48 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Mail to submitter bounces. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11126 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BCE37B417; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KI7p715921; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:07:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:07:51 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201807.g0KI7p715921@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ggm@dstc.edu.au, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/12383: make release warns about /dev entries making bin/bin tarball Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: make release warns about /dev entries making bin/bin tarball State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:07:35 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can this be closed? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12383 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C601537B41A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KI6ni15774; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:06:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:06:49 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201806.g0KI6ni15774@freefall.freebsd.org> To: moore@bricoworks.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/12281: active-filter option in pppd doesn't stop reset of idle timer Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: active-filter option in pppd doesn't stop reset of idle timer State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:06:17 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this problem still present? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12281 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9588E37B41C; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KI4kV12071; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:04:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:04:46 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201804.g0KI4kV12071@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/12280: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:04:04 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: What was the conclusion here - can this PR be closed? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12280 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:11:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB55137B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KI2FO11711; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:02:15 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201802.g0KI2FO11711@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jose@we.lc.ehu.es, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/12244: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:01:13 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this problem still present in more recent releases? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12244 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:21: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5322A37B404; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KIGIh17036; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:16:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:16:18 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201816.g0KIGIh17036@freefall.freebsd.org> To: isupov@moonhe.jinr.ru, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/12545: kldload(8) should be more sensitive to errors in *_module_handler(..., MOD_LOAD, ...) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: kldload(8) should be more sensitive to errors in *_module_handler(..., MOD_LOAD, ...) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:15:50 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this problem still present? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12545 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:31: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7811437B41A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:31:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KIQJR18355; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:26:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:26:19 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201826.g0KIQJR18355@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd@spatula.net, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/13309: Fixes to nos-tun Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Fixes to nos-tun State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:23:56 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Is this problem still present? If so, do you have an update patch as per the comments in the audit trail? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13309 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 10:31: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39D737B41B; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:31:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KIMma17880; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:22:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:22:48 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201822.g0KIMma17880@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mrami@gbtb.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/13266: Removal of #defines and addition of constness for C++ in ncurses.h and nterm.h headers Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Removal of #defines and addition of constness for C++ in ncurses.h and nterm.h headers State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:22:15 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist in more recent releases? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13266 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 11:21: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CC437B416; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:21:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KJHNU28689; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201917.g0KJHNU28689@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mrami@gbtb.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/13266: Removal of #defines and addition of constness for C++ in ncurses.h and nterm.h headers Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Removal of #defines and addition of constness for C++ in ncurses.h and nterm.h headers State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 11:16:54 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Mail to submitter bounces. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13266 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 11:30:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376A537B41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KJU1831227; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82337B400 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:20:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KJKmw29132; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:20:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200201201920.g0KJKmw29132@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:20:48 -0800 (PST) From: Anselm Garbe To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0 Subject: i386/34092: reboot hangs the system (IBM PC Server 315) at message "Rebooting..." Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Number: 34092 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: reboot hangs the system (IBM PC Server 315) at message "Rebooting..." >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Jan 20 11:30:01 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Anselm Garbe >Release: FreeBSD-4.3, FreeBSD-4.4, FreeBSD-4.5-RC >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD donar 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Sun Jan 20 19:21:40 CET 2002 root@donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/DONAR i386 >Description: On my IBM PC Server 315 (PPro 200, 3x4,3GB SCSI, AHA2940) a simple 'reboot' results in hanging the system after the message "Rebooting..." appears. A cold start is needed to reboot the whole server. The keyboard controller is ok, I tried the BROKEN_KEYBOARD_RESET-option with no effect to solve the problem. Here's what dmesg says: Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Sun Jan 20 19:21:40 CET 2002 root@donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/DONAR Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 199309996 Hz CPU: Pentium Pro (199.31-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x619 Stepping = 9 Features=0xfbff real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127102976 (124124K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc038e000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 Correcting Natoma config for non-SMP isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at 1.1 uhci0: port 0x5000-0x501f irq 15 at devic e 1.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ahc0: port 0x6800-0x68ff mem 0x50000000-0x5000 0fff irq 14 at device 1.0 on pci1 aic7880: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs rl0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0x50001100-0x500011ff ir q 11 at device 2.0 on pci1 rl0: Ethernet address: 00:30:84:0d:11:4d miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl1: port 0x6000-0x60ff mem 0x50001000-0x500010ff ir q 10 at device 4.0 on pci1 rl1: Ethernet address: 00:50:fc:3b:58:24 miibus1: on rl1 rlphy1: on miibus1 rlphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: at 15.0 orm0:
 

TrafficWoW Daily Newsletter January 21, 2002

Disclaimer: ----------- This email is NEVER sent unsolicited. THIS IS NOT SPAM. You are receiving this because you have either answered classified ad, posted to our FFA pages, are on the same opt-in list or have sent me something in the past. If you'd like to be removed, see instructions at the bottom of this message.

=========================== IN THIS ISSUE ===========================

1. Traffic for your website

2. Bulk E-mail

3. FFA Submission

4. Our traffic secrets revealed to show you how we do it

5. Popquiz

======================================================================
The New Way To Make Your Website Buzz for Less Than 1-Cent Per Targeted User. ======================================================================

TrafficWOW will deliver 1000's of users to your site within 3 days!!! Or Your Money Back "Guaranteed".

How do we do it?

With our vast marketing network set within search engine pages, newsletters and content positioning, YOUR website will get the traffic it deserves. NO SPAM! Just good quality traffic. Read some more at http://www.trafficwow.net\faq_wow.htm

What areas can we target?

Adult, Arts, Business, Computers, Casino, Entertainment, Financial, Games, Webmasters, Marketing, Shopping, Sports, Automotive, Career, Education, Family, Food, Health, Real Estate, Software, Travel. More categories will be introduced.

Why are we different?

Trafficwow will give you a full refund if we do not deliver every single user you have paid for. All you need to do, is to ensure your site is ready for the world of e-commerce. Don't buy traffic if your website is poor. (Be Honest with yourself!)

For further info on the above traffic package or any of the others incredible packages we offer, take a good look: http://www.trafficwow.net PS - All new customers in January will receive a FREE website health check at http://www.trafficwow.net

How good are our prices?

We have traffic packages starting at $99 per 10,000 unique users or just about the very best price for "real" traffic for your website. Over and above it, many other traffic solutions are available and will be tailormade at your request.

Please note TrafficWoW offers a 100% money back guarantee. If we do not deliver all of the traffic you purchased, a full rebate will be given.

Visit our website today and let us know how good  our prices really are. Try us, we will pleasantly surprise you.

======================================================================
BULK E-MAIL WORKS !!!
======================================================================

TrafficWOW can send your message to 1 Million people for only $999. Interested? We are!

Contact me directly at sales@trafficwow.net

======================================================================
LIGHT UP YOUR SITE WITH THIS POWERFUL SYSTEM. FREE !!!! ======================================================================

Everyone on the web will tell you how he or she makes money but how many really do? You can register your heart out. But with out people linking to your site you are in for a long wait.

Click below and find out how it's really done! FREE! http://pages.ffanet.com/links/trafficwow.htm

======================================================================
Our traffic secrets revealed to show you how we do it ======================================================================

TrafficWoW want to send you the best traffic available. Our product ensures that your web site gets the best opportunity to succeed. There are several different ways that you can make your website better.

Click here to find out how? We recommend this strongly as a bad web site will never succeed! http://www.trafficwow.net/faq_wow.htm

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P O P Q U I Z

Bob Bly, author of "Complete Idiots Guide to Direct Marketing" calls it: "The hands-down best way to get traffic to your site ever created. Period."

What is it? Click here to find out: http://www.exitblaze.com/cgi-bin/intro_track.pl?b=28051&c=xbad1

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

======================================================================

Further Transmission to you by the sender of this e-mail may be stopped at no cost to you by clicking here http://www.trafficwow.net/removeusers.asp?Emails=freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG

If your click fails, then copy and paste the link below:
http://www.trafficwow.net/removeusers.asp?Emails=freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
and paste it into your browser.

Do not reply to this email for the removal process. The only way to be removed from our mailing lists is to click on the removal link above, else your remove request will fail. DO NOT reply to this email as it is an automated email address.

======================================================================

Part of the v3exchange.com network!

© 2001 TrafficWoW.net

------000000000000000000000-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13: 1:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515F937B425; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from billf@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LKtkv21752; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:55:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:55:46 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212055.g0LKtkv21752@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd@spatula.net, billf@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, billf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/13309: Fixes to nos-tun Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Fixes to nos-tun State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: billf State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 12:54:27 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: these patches are still relevent Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->billf Responsible-Changed-By: billf Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 12:54:27 PST 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: i will work with the submitter (as i know him) to generate updated patches and test them. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13309 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:10:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4B037B405 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLA2E27670; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201212110.g0LLA2E27670@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: bin/12244: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/12244; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/12244: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:06:59 +0000 Adding to the audit trail: In message <20020121021534.A853@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es>, "Jose M. Alcaide" writes: >On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:02:15AM -0800, iedowse@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Synopsis: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback >> State-Changed-By: iedowse >> State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:01:13 PST 2002 >> State-Changed-Why: >> >> Is this problem still present in more recent releases? >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12244 > >Yes, it is. Realpath(3) continues using open()/fchdir() for >saving/restoring the current directory. I think that the getwd()/chdir() >method should be used as fallback. > >-- >****** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org ****** >** "Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers" -- Leonard Brandwein ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:10:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E0737B41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLA4X27681; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201212110.g0LLA4X27681@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: bin/7287: Incorrect domain name for MAP_UPDATE in multidomain NIS environment Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/7287; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/7287: Incorrect domain name for MAP_UPDATE in multidomain NIS environment Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:09:47 +0000 Adding to the audit trail: In message , Andy Farkas writes: >On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 iedowse@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Does this problem still occur in more recent releases? >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=7287 >> > >I dont use NIS anymore. Although the code has been touched since, and the >spelling mistake corrected, my other changes have not been implemented and >so I would guess that it still does not function correctly. > >-- > > :{ andyf@speednet.com.au > > Andy Farkas > System Administrator > Speednet Communications > http://www.speednet.com.au/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:10:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5209E37B419 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLA3D27675; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201212110.g0LLA3D27675@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: kern/12281: active-filter option in pppd doesn't stop reset of idle timer Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/12281; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/12281: active-filter option in pppd doesn't stop reset of idle timer Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:08:54 +0000 Adding to the audit trial: In message , Tim Moore writes: >I don't use pppd anymore and don't have a current copy of the sources >checked out, so unfortunately I can't comment. > >Tim > >On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 iedowse@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Synopsis: active-filter option in pppd doesn't stop reset of idle timer >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback >> State-Changed-By: iedowse >> State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:06:17 PST 2002 >> State-Changed-Why: >> >> Is this problem still present? >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12281 >> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:11:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3033437B485; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:11:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LL2Pe22852; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:02:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:02:25 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212102.g0LL2Pe22852@freefall.freebsd.org> To: danderse@cs.utah.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/13401: tftp will ack duplicate packets with large delays Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: tftp will ack duplicate packets with large delays State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 12:46:34 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: The included patch isn't quite right. It doesn't reliably detect duplicates, and it causes protocol hangs if a packet gets lost. I think to fix this properly would require dynamically adjusting the timeout according to the observed round-trip time. Do you wish to try updating the patch, or shall I just close the problem report? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13401 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:20: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD0E37B400 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLK1430249; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201212120.g0LLK1430249@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: bin/12280: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/12280; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/12280: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:11:43 +0000 Adding to the audit trail: In message <200201210315.g0L3FcQ07050@aldan.algebra.com>, Mikhail Teterin write s: >On 20 Jan, iedowse@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Synopsis: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries > >Well, that's still the case. It would seem to me, it should stay open, >until someone implements the missing feature -- it is useful sometimes >and is already documented :-) > > -mi > >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback >> State-Changed-By: iedowse >> State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 10:04:04 PST 2002 >> State-Changed-Why: >> >> What was the conclusion here - can this PR be closed? >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12280 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:21:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAE837B404; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLGfa29560; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:16:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212116.g0LLGfa29560@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jin@iss-p5.lbl.gov, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/13427: gdb reports wrong info Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: gdb reports wrong info State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:16:05 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist in more recent FreeBSD releases? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13427 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:21:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74F737B417; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLJr430162; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:19:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:19:53 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212119.g0LLJr430162@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Jan@online.be, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/13709: panic: sched_sync: fsync failed Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: panic: sched_sync: fsync failed State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:19:01 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Do these panics still occur on more recent releases? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13709 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:21:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD97937B416; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLD5728570; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:13:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:13:05 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212113.g0LLD5728570@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jose@we.lc.ehu.es, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/12244: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: realpath() fails when there is no permission to read the WD State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:12:44 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: This is still a problem. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12244 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:21:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4F37B419; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLHQK29770; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:17:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:17:26 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212117.g0LLHQK29770@freefall.freebsd.org> To: bostic@sleepycat.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/13525: gcc fails load against library with both C++ and C modules Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: gcc fails load against library with both C++ and C modules State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:17:03 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13525 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:31:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D508E37B405; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLRf231414; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:27:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:27:41 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212127.g0LLRf231414@freefall.freebsd.org> To: kondo@ysyslab.co.jp, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/14511: chapss Y2K problem Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: chapss Y2K problem State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:26:52 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can this be closed, now that it has become a Y3K problem? :-) http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14511 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:31:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824137B416; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLLcD30493; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:21:38 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212121.g0LLLcD30493@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/12280: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: LD_IGNORE_MISSING_OBJECTS not honored for ELF binaries State-Changed-From-To: feedback->suspended State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:21:05 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting implementation. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12280 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:31:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F2237B417; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLQDI31167; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:26:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:26:13 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212126.g0LLQDI31167@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/14448: ftp-client may not recognize failure, report erroneous stats Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: ftp-client may not recognize failure, report erroneous stats State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:25:27 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14448 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:31:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6444D37B41A; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLUQD32007; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:30:26 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212130.g0LLUQD32007@freefall.freebsd.org> To: iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, sound@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/14574: ISA based ESS1688 support(partially) for VoxWare sound driver Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: ISA based ESS1688 support(partially) for VoxWare sound driver Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->sound Responsible-Changed-By: iedowse Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:28:48 PST 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Old sound-related PR; is this still relevant? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14574 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:40:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from abyssinian.sleepycat.com (abyssinian.sleepycat.com [199.103.242.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A0C37B400; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:40:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bostic@localhost) by abyssinian.sleepycat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLWwH11686; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:32:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:32:58 -0500 (EST) From: Keith Bostic Message-Id: <200201212132.g0LLWwH11686@abyssinian.sleepycat.com> To: iedowse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/13525: gcc fails load against library with both C++ and C modules Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Synopsis: gcc fails load against library with both C++ and C modules > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: iedowse > State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:17:03 PST 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > > Does this problem still exist? > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13525 Sorry, but I haven't the slightest idea -- it's been 2 1/2 years. There's a test case in the PR, so you should be able to find out. Regards, --keith =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Keith Bostic Sleepycat Software Inc. bostic@sleepycat.com 118 Tower Rd. +1-781-259-3139 Lincoln, MA 01773 http://www.sleepycat.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:51:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2697937B421; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLlt835104; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:47:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:47:55 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212147.g0LLlt835104@freefall.freebsd.org> To: cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/15418: tput(1) doesn't work with new libncurses.so.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: tput(1) doesn't work with new libncurses.so.5 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:47:39 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Does this problem still exist? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15418 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:51:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823C737B419; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLnNs35394; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:49:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:49:23 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212149.g0LLnNs35394@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jin@iss-p5.lbl.gov, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/13427: gdb reports wrong info Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: gdb reports wrong info State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:49:07 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Mail to submitter bounces. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13427 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:51:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B57337B402; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLiNt34267; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:44:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:44:23 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212144.g0LLiNt34267@freefall.freebsd.org> To: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/14891: New smbus driver lmsmb Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: New smbus driver lmsmb State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:43:14 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: It's been a while since this was submitted. Is the driver still needed and/or relevant? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14891 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:51:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227CD37B405; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:51:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLgPf33909; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:42:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:42:25 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212142.g0LLgPf33909@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mb@imp.ch, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/14829: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:36:52 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: What was the conclusion here - can this be closed? As far as I know, any shutdown mechanism that signals init(8) will invoke rc.shutdown. The halt and reboot programs are supposed to do a quick shutdown and work even if init is stuck, so it seems reasonable that they skip the rc.shutdown step. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14829 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 13:55:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C17137B405; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from levais.imp.ch (levais.imp.ch [157.161.4.66]) by mail.imp.ch (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0LLt2E51631; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:55:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:01:27 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Cc: Subject: Re: bin/14829: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. In-Reply-To: <200201212142.g0LLgPf33909@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20020121225928.L42193-100000@levais.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Ian, You can close this bug, as reboot(8) really should do a fast reboot. Martin Martin Blapp, ------------------------------------------------------------------ Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------ On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 iedowse@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: iedowse > State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:36:52 PST 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > > What was the conclusion here - can this be closed? As far as I know, > any shutdown mechanism that signals init(8) will invoke rc.shutdown. > The halt and reboot programs are supposed to do a quick shutdown > and work even if init is stuck, so it seems reasonable that they > skip the rc.shutdown step. > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14829 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 14: 0:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DFE37B48E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LM02w37184; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D3437B402 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLw8B36851; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:58:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200201212158.g0LLw8B36851@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:58:08 -0800 (PST) From: Herve Boulouis To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0 Subject: i386/34135: 4.5-RC2 : sysinstall : signal 11 in the disklabel editor Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Number: 34135 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: 4.5-RC2 : sysinstall : signal 11 in the disklabel editor >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 21 14:00:01 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Herve Boulouis >Release: 4.5-RC2 >Organization: EFREI >Environment: FreeBSD 4.5-RC2 i386 install kernel on a HP LH3000 2*pII-600, all drives on a MegaRAID controler >Description: When reinstalling 4.5-RC2 (from the iso) for the second time, I went to the disklabel editor to configure the existing slices on my raid second volume (amrd1s1). These were created by the same disklabel editor during the first install. I selected the first slice (amrd1s1e) and directly pressed T to toggle newfs, forgetting to set the mount point. Then a popup showed roughly saying 'I got signal 11. Saving as much as possible and shuting down'. Then I had to reset the box. >How-To-Repeat: Simply boot the 4.5-RC2 iso, go to the disklabel editor (on a disk where slices already exists), press T on the first slice whithout specifying a mount point. Not tested on another box than the one specified above. >Fix: I dunno but I would bet on a string handling issue or something similar since this does not happen when the mount point is correctly set. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 14: 1:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CE137B417; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LLv7c36686; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:57:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:57:07 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201212157.g0LLv7c36686@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mb@imp.ch, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/14829: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: rc.shutdown is handled unconsistently by reboot(8), shutdown -r now etc. State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 21 13:56:45 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Submitter says this can be closed. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14829 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 21 14:10:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5FF37B400 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LMA1142062; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:10:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201212210.g0LMA1142062@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: David Hanney Subject: Re: kern/31659: USB controller driver will die after some hours/heavy load. Reply-To: David Hanney Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/31659; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Hanney To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, sehh@altered.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/31659: USB controller driver will die after some hours/heavy load. Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:02:49 +0000 I can duplicate this and on a much more recent version ... uname: FreeBSD pizza.house 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Wed Jan 16 21:22:20 GMT 2002 dave@pizza.house:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 cvsuped: from RELENG_4 on 2002.01.14.00.00.00 dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Wed Jan 16 21:22:20 GMT 2002 dave@pizza.house:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (697.88-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x387f9ff real memory = 267124736 (260864K bytes) avail memory = 255029248 (249052K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0491000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00f3230 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at 1.0 irq 11 pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 fxp0: port 0xde80-0xdebf mem 0xff700000-0xff7f ffff,0xff8fe000-0xff8fefff irq 9 at device 1.0 on pci1 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:b5:ef:4d inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci1: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 7.0 irq 10 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 9 at device 3 1.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ugen0: ALCATEL Speed Touch USB , rev 1.10/0.00, addr 2 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2413) at 31.3 irq 0 orm0: