From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 15 0:13:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FA837B400 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB81343E6A for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:13:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from mailhost.feral.com (mjacob@mailhost.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g8F7CXv86196; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@beppo Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: Kris Kennaway , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS lock failure (was Re: FreeBSD 5.0 as a desktop 'failure' report) In-Reply-To: <20020914215026.A91907-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Huh- that's a good question. I have all of that stuff around and should try it. Last I tried either connectathon or spec, FreeBSD panicd. On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > ... When the machine > > rebooted (with a newer kernel, hmm) it is now completing the locking > > tests (note the warnings, though). My locking problems with the linux > > server continue though. > > Cool! I'm glad that FreeBSD -current passes the new Connectathon 2002 > locking suites (especially when run by somebody other than me :-) ). > > Your linux problems are not surprising. The linux NFS server did not > support partial file locking last time I checked. It also did not support > certain combinations of rpc binding(portmapper/rpcbind), NFS version, and > NFS lock manager verion. However, NFS on linux is Somebody Else's > Problem(tm). > > The lack of partial file locking was the reason that I rewrote a whole lot > of rpc.lockd on -current. Even after this rewrite, rpc.lockd still has > some quirks on -current which will require some significant kernel > digging to rectify. However, some of this should get easier given the > significant efforts which have gone into the filesystem code in -current. > > -a > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message