From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 1:53:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from su.ualberta.ca (mail.su.ualberta.ca [129.128.133.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156BB37B421 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 01:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [142.59.20.91] (HELO [192.168.1.22]) by su.ualberta.ca (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.1) with ESMTP id 600567 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 02:50:42 -0700 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 02:53:20 -0700 Subject: Crontab mailings... From: Colin Harford To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 X-address: Suite 2-900, SUB, University of Alberta, 8900-114 St, Edmonton: Alberta, T6G 2J7 X-disclaimer: Opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have checked the sendmail docs for info on this, and I seem to be blind a= s I can not find the answer. Basically, what I would like to do, is for all the daily mail output from the crontab scripts (daily, weekly, monthly) to be mailed to a valid email account. Of course, I would prefer to not to have to keep sendmail or another mail server process running all the time.... Colin Harford =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Systems and Network Administrator =A0=A0=A0=A0 Apple Product Professional =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =A0=A0=A0=A0 Computer and Network Support =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 University of Alberta Students' Union =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Phone: (780) 492-4241 =A0=A0Fax: =A0(780) 492-4643 http://www.su.ualberta.ca "I sense much NT in you, NT leads to Blue Screen. Blue Screen leads to downtime, downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside." - Unknown Unix Jedi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 3: 4:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from support.euronet.nl (support.euronet.nl [194.134.32.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3240737B41E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 03:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (franst@localhost) by support.euronet.nl (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g01B3kK82989; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:03:47 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: support.euronet.nl: franst owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:03:46 +0100 (CET) From: Frans ter Borg X-Sender: franst@support.euronet.nl To: Colin Harford Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Crontab mailings... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Colin Harford wrote: > I have checked the sendmail docs for info on this, and I seem to be > blind as I can not find the answer. > > Basically, what I would like to do, is for all the daily mail output > from the crontab scripts (daily, weekly, monthly) to be mailed to a > valid email account. > > Of course, I would prefer to not to have to keep sendmail or another > mail server process running all the time.... Since most periodic scripts are run from a root crontab, their output will be mailed to root on that box. Normally you should be able to change where root's mail goes by changing it in /etc/aliases and running 'newaliases' or the equivalent on your system. (do 'man 5 crontab' instead of man sendmail) You shouldn't need to have a mailserver process running all the time, since cron will inject the mails into the commandline mail tools, though these should be properly configured... If cron cannot find your sendmail or /bin/mail try and change the locations in /usr/src/usr.sbin/cron/cron/config.h and recompile. good luck. Frans -- Quanza Engineering B.V. www.quanza.net Frans ter Borg, Haarlemmerstraat 49-3, 1013 EK Amsterdam T:+31 6 20 444 979, F:+31 84 8704241, E:frans@quanza.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 3: 4:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.worldgatein.com (ns2.worldgatein.com [203.109.64.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4A937B41E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 03:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rivendell.worldgatein.net (interoffice.worldgatein.net [203.109.64.31]) by ns2.worldgatein.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4D9BDF3; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:20:44 +0530 (IST) Received: by rivendell.worldgatein.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 732F132609; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:10:43 +0530 (IST) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:10:43 +0530 From: Devdas Bhagat To: Colin Harford Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crontab mailings... Message-ID: <20020101171043.B31393@rivendell.worldgatein.net> Reply-To: Devdas Bhagat References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from colin.harford@mail.su.ualberta.ca on Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:53:20AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 01/01/02 02:53 -0700, Colin Harford wrote: > Basically, what I would like to do, is for all the daily mail output from > the crontab scripts (daily, weekly, monthly) to be mailed to a valid email > account. Use the MAILTO variable. > Of course, I would prefer to not to have to keep sendmail or another mail > server process running all the time.... Sendmail does not need to need to run as a daemon to deliver mail. If it isn't running as a daemon, it will make only one attempt to deliver that mail unless the queue is manually flushed. Devdas Bhagat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 15:52:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from inet03.citec.qld.gov.au (inet03.citec.qld.gov.au [203.5.10.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ED037B423 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:52:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au; id JAA07525; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:52:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from citecub.citec.qld.gov.au( 131.242.4.98) by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma007278; Wed, 2 Jan 02 09:51:58 +1000 Received: from guru.citec.qld.gov.au by citecub.citec.qld.gov.au (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA06193; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:51:58 +1000 Received: from localhost (sgcccdc@localhost) by guru.citec.qld.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA89720; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:51:57 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: guru.citec.qld.gov.au: sgcccdc owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:51:56 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell To: Peter Brezny Cc: Subject: Re: access restriction by MAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Peter Brezny wrote: > I'm looking for a way to restrict connectivity by mac address. > > Any suggestions on this? Your users are on the same segment as your "firewall" aren't they? If there are any routers between your users and the "firewall" you won't see their MAC address. All you'll see is the router's MAC address. Colin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 18: 8:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi (bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi [193.166.133.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AD737B41E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (eyurtese@localhost) by bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id EAA83774 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 04:08:30 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 04:08:29 +0200 (WET) From: Evren Yurtesen To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: amd question (mount inside mount?) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello I would like to replicate the whole filesystem structure of 1 machine in another so I can take backup easily. I have found out that there is little problems with that. I have /backup directory in the backup machine and the mounts should appear as /backup/{machine_name}... so it should look like /backup/{machine_name}/ /backup/{machine_name}/var /backup/{machine_name}/usr but when I set amd to mount / filesystem it doesnt create links for var and usr filesystems. how can I entirely mimic the filesystem structure of a machine in another with nfs? any other suggestions? =) Evren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 1 19:13:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from inet03.citec.qld.gov.au (inet03.citec.qld.gov.au [203.5.10.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C0F37B423 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:13:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au; id NAA11097; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:13:45 +1000 (EST) Received: from citecub.citec.qld.gov.au( 131.242.4.98) by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma010975; Wed, 2 Jan 02 13:13:41 +1000 Received: from guru.citec.qld.gov.au by citecub.citec.qld.gov.au (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA28233; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:13:40 +1000 Received: from localhost (sgcccdc@localhost) by guru.citec.qld.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA90372; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:13:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: guru.citec.qld.gov.au: sgcccdc owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:13:38 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell To: Evren Yurtesen Cc: Subject: Re: amd question (mount inside mount?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Hello > I would like to replicate the whole filesystem structure of 1 machine in > another so I can take backup easily. > I have found out that there is little problems with that. > I have /backup directory in the backup machine and the mounts should > appear as /backup/{machine_name}... > so it should look like > /backup/{machine_name}/ > /backup/{machine_name}/var > /backup/{machine_name}/usr > but when I set amd to mount / filesystem it doesnt create links for var > and usr filesystems. > how can I entirely mimic the filesystem structure of a machine in another > with nfs? You need to mount (or configure amd to mount) host:/ on /backup/host/ host:/var on /backup/host/var host:/usr on /backup/host/usr Colin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 1:51:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from [194.182.205.3] (expers.aabc.dk [194.182.205.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3355B37B617 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 01:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.130.1.4] by [194.182.205.3] via smtpd (for hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 09:46:57 UT Received: by expers.aabc.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:56:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: pzw@aabc.dk To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Problems with Bind 8.2.3 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:56:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've solved the problem. If any of you are working with a Cisco 677/678 ADSL Router, upgrade the CBOS to atleast 2.4.3 and setup your nameserver to answer on a port larger than 1024, eg. 3000. Then forward port 53 TCP/UDP from the external interface to port 3000 (Or what you've configured your nameserver to) on the internal interface. Somehow it translates addresses if the port you forward to internally, are bellow 1024. Best Regards, Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 3:41:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31F8C37B420 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from 213.156.65.77.softtronik.com (HELO there) (213.156.65.77) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 11:41:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" From: Yaroslav Buga To: Angelo , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:43:37 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I think that's the problem with mailbox locking. I'm not sure but it seems to me that there exists some lockfile which doesn't allow sendmail to open mailbox. Look carefully: Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; Check for lockfiles . They shouldn't be present. Slava. > Hi, > > Yesterday, I updated my sendmail to version 8.11.6 ( before it was 8.11.1 ) > > After doing this, all messages sent to local users there, fails.. I got > this log: > > Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; error > code 75 > Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw sendmail[1500]: fBTGxFo01420: > to=, delay=00:16:30, xdelay=00:00:31, mailer=local, > pri=300014, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer > (/usr/libexec/mail.local) exited with EX_TEMPFAIL > [3:16pm] newfw[/var/mail> > > This is my local users ( this server is being tested ) > > [3:47pm] newfw[/var/mail> ls -l > total 52 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 cruel > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 maint > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 mrdida > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 52445 Dec 28 22:32 root > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 testemail > [3:56pm] newfw[/var/mail> > > I've checked if it was a wrong permission, but mail.local doesnt work. It > logs a error about lock mailbox, and give up. > > 1391 ?? Ss 0:00.55 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > 1498 ?? Ss 0:00.03 send-mail -i mrdida (sendmail) > 1499 ?? Ss 0:00.10 mail -d mrdida (mail.local) -> this guy doest > work > > - Before upgrading it, the problem with mail.local didnt happening > I'm worried about it, I dont known how to solve this. > > Please see my maillog, so as to have an ideia > > [3:03pm] newfw[/etc/mail> tail /var/log/maillog > > Dec 29 15:00:18 newfw sendmail[1443]: fBTH0Ep01443: Losing > ./qffBTH0Ep01443: savemail panic > Dec 29 15:00:18 newfw sendmail[1443]: fBTH0Ep01443: SYSERR(root): savemail: > cannot save rejected email anywhere > Dec 29 15:01:52 newfw sendmail[1453]: fBTH1do01453: from=, > size=59801, class=0, nrcpts=1, > msgid=<5.0.0.25.2.20011229160457.0346e498@pop.openlink.com.br>, > proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=opt-0-16.br.inter.net [200.185.56.16] (may > be forged) > Dec 29 15:02:22 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; error > code 75 > Dec 29 15:02:22 newfw sendmail[1456]: fBTH1do01453: > to=, delay=00:00:42, xdelay=00:00:30, mailer=local, > pri=89219, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer (/usr/libexec/mail.local) > exited with EX_TEMPFAIL > [3:03pm] newfw[/etc/mail> > > [3:03pm] newfw[/etc/mail> tail /var/log/maillog > Dec 29 15:00:18 newfw sendmail[1443]: fBTH0Ep01443: Losing > ./qffBTH0Ep01443: savemail panic > Dec 29 15:00:18 newfw sendmail[1443]: fBTH0Ep01443: SYSERR(root): savemail: > cannot save rejected email anywhere > Dec 29 15:01:52 newfw sendmail[1453]: fBTH1do01453: from=, > size=59801, class=0, nrcpts=1, > msgid=<5.0.0.25.2.20011229160457.0346e498@pop.openlink.com.br>, > proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=opt-0-16.br.inter.net [200.185.56.16] (may > be forged) > Dec 29 15:02:22 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; error > code 75 > Dec 29 15:02:22 newfw sendmail[1456]: fBTH1do01453: > to=, delay=00:00:42, xdelay=00:00:30, mailer=local, > pri=89219, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer (/usr/libexec/mail.local) > exited with EX_TEMPFAIL > [3:03pm] newfw[/etc/mail> > > > 1391 ?? Ss 0:00.55 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > 1498 ?? Ss 0:00.03 send-mail -i mrdida (sendmail) > 1499 ?? Ss 0:00.10 mail -d mrdida (mail.local) -->( this guy > after upgrade wont work anymore, it fail, log and give up ) > > Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; error > code 75 > Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw sendmail[1500]: fBTGxFo01420: > to=, delay=00:16:30, xdelay=00:00:31, mailer=local, > pri=300014, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer > (/usr/libexec/mail.local) exited with EX_TEMPFAIL > [3:16pm] newfw[/var/mail> > > > Do you have any idea that could helps me? > > Obrigado pela atencao, > > Angelo > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 4: 6:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi (bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi [193.166.133.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0125937B405 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 04:06:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (eyurtese@localhost) by bessel.tekniikka.turkuamk.fi (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA82152; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:06:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:06:39 +0200 (WET) From: Evren Yurtesen To: Colin Campbell Cc: Evren Yurtesen , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amd question (mount inside mount?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org yes it just wasnt working but I discovered it is possible with nfsx filesystem in amd (yes nfsx) On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Colin Campbell wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > > Hello > > I would like to replicate the whole filesystem structure of 1 machine in > > another so I can take backup easily. > > I have found out that there is little problems with that. > > I have /backup directory in the backup machine and the mounts should > > appear as /backup/{machine_name}... > > so it should look like > > /backup/{machine_name}/ > > /backup/{machine_name}/var > > /backup/{machine_name}/usr > > but when I set amd to mount / filesystem it doesnt create links for var > > and usr filesystems. > > how can I entirely mimic the filesystem structure of a machine in another > > with nfs? > > You need to mount (or configure amd to mount) > > host:/ on /backup/host/ > host:/var on /backup/host/var > host:/usr on /backup/host/usr > > Colin > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 8:10: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from relay.office.bezpeka.net (gw.office.bezpeka.net [193.108.112.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697D337B41F for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:08:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.office.bezpeka.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g02G5sAQ024088; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:05:54 +0200 (EET) Received: (from admin@localhost) by vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g02G5sBl024087; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:05:54 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:05:54 +0200 From: "Alexey V. Vatchenko" To: Yaroslav Buga Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 Message-ID: <20020102180153.A505@unixbox.office.annaltd.com> References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org>; from slava_buga@yahoo.com on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 01:43:37PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Check your sendmail .mc file. Be sure FEATURE(local_lmtp) is there. -- e-mail: apache@ukr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 11:57:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A563637B503 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with BSMTP id g02K54I17095 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:05:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 20:55:11 +0100 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.77 References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.93] X-Accept-Language: de,en X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-No-Archive: yes X-ZC-VIA: 20020102000000W+1@dinoex.sub.org Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > me that there exists some lockfile which doesn't allow sendmail to open > mailbox. Look carefully: > Dec 29 15:15:46 newfw mail.local: lockmailbox /var/mail/maint failed; > Check for lockfiles . They shouldn't be present. There is a permissions problem here: > > This is my local users ( this server is being tested ) > > > > [3:47pm] newfw[/var/mail> ls -l > > total 52 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 cruel > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 maint > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 mrdida > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 52445 Dec 28 22:32 root > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 testemail > > [3:56pm] newfw[/var/mail> It should look: -rw-r--r-- 1 cruel mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 cruel -rw-r--r-- 1 maint mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 maint -rw-r--r-- 1 mrdida mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 mrdida -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 52445 Dec 28 22:32 root -rw-r--r-- 1 testemail mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 testemail fix: $ cd /var/mail && rm -f cruel maint mrdida testemail kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 16:15:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from nlaredo.globalpc.net (nld2.globalpc.net [207.193.206.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7F637B405 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ds9 (ds9.globalpc.net [207.193.204.57]) by nlaredo.globalpc.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA07924 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:19:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adrianbsd@globalpc.net) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20020102181635.0100da70@globalpc.net> X-Sender: adrianbsd@globalpc.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 18:16:35 -0600 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Adrian Gonzalez Subject: VoIP and PPP question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello I've been doing tests with a couple of Multitech MVP200 V/IP gateways (http://www.multitech.com/PRODUCTS/MultiVOIP/). Basically it's a gateway with 2 fxs/fxo/e&m ports and an ethernet port. The idea is to get v/ip going between two offices, with the following setup on both: Multitech V/IP Gateway connected via ethernet to a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE box. Each FBSD box is running user ppp to connect to us (ISP) via a 3com ISDN modem. We receive them on our pm3's. Everything works great, but the real issue is QoS. A simple ftp download is enough to disrupt voice quality. I've toyed around with the "set urgent" option in user ppp, which is either being ignored or is not enough to fix the problem. I tried lowering the MTU on the link but that seems to break things for them. I'm considering trying dummynet for queuing, but I wonder if the problem has more to do with the packet size. I imagine it has to do with the big 1500ish byte packets clogging the 128k isdn connection for more than 100ms at a time, but I'm not sure why lowering the MTU from 1500 to 500 causes problems. When I lowered the MTU they started complaining about Ftp's suddenly hanging, and link slowdown in general. Anyone out there tried a similar setup? Any help greatly appreciated -Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 2 21:26: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F02E37B41D for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 16Lzn1-00034S-00; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:47:39 -0800 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:47:37 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Adrian Gonzalez Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VoIP and PPP question In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20020102181635.0100da70@globalpc.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Adrian Gonzalez wrote: > Hello > > I've been doing tests with a couple of Multitech MVP200 V/IP gateways > (http://www.multitech.com/PRODUCTS/MultiVOIP/). Basically it's a gateway > with 2 fxs/fxo/e&m ports and an ethernet port. > > The idea is to get v/ip going between two offices, with the following setup > on both: > > Multitech V/IP Gateway connected via ethernet to a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE box. > Each FBSD box is running user ppp to connect to us (ISP) via a 3com ISDN > modem. We receive them on our pm3's. > > Everything works great, but the real issue is QoS. A simple ftp download > is enough to disrupt voice quality. > > I've toyed around with the "set urgent" option in user ppp, which is either > being ignored or is not enough to fix the problem. I tried lowering the > MTU on the link but that seems to break things for them. It probably isn't effective because the ISDN TA is probably buffering. You are probably running the TA at 230.4Kbps async, and the line is 128Kbps sync. FreeBSD can't reorder packets if there are never (or rarly) more than one in its send buffer. The TA can probably buffer most of a TCP send window. > I'm considering trying dummynet for queuing, but I wonder if the problem > has more to do with the packet size. I imagine it has to do with the big > 1500ish byte packets clogging the 128k isdn connection for more than 100ms > at a time, but I'm not sure why lowering the MTU from 1500 to 500 causes > problems. When I lowered the MTU they started complaining about Ftp's > suddenly hanging, and link slowdown in general. The most common problem with MTU breaking file transfers is that ICMP is incorrectly filtered somewhere between the client and server and path MTU detection is being used (default on most TCP/IP stacks). The gateways that are transitioning from MTU 1500 to MTU 500 don't fragment traffic when Path MTU detection is on. They throw it away, and send a ICMP "could not fragment" message back to the sender of the packet. That ICMP is not getting through. dummynet would likely help. You can put all the non-VoIP traffic into a pipe that is can't use more than 50% of the ISDN link, leaving 50% of the bandwidth for VoIP. Not the most efficient use of the bandwidth, but should resolve the issue. > Anyone out there tried a similar setup? Any help greatly appreciated > > -Adrian Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 3 0: 5: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.dev.itouchnet.net (devco.net [196.15.188.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAEF37B405 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:05:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with scanned_ok (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16M2tj-000EGo-00 for isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:06:47 +0200 Received: from shell.devco.net ([196.15.188.7]) by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16M2th-000EGT-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:06:45 +0200 Received: from bvi by shell.devco.net with local (Exim 3.33 #4) id 16M2x4-000Csv-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:10:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:10:14 +0200 From: Barry Irwin To: Peter Brezny Cc: TD790@aol.com, isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: access restriction by MAC Message-ID: <20020103101014.G30577@itouchlabs.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from peter@skyrunner.net on Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 06:27:00PM -0500 X-Checked: This message has been scanned for any virusses and unauthorized attachments. X-iScan-ID: 54854-1010045206-64567@mx1.dev.itouchnet.net version $Name: REL_2_0_2 $ Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org have a look at the ethfw package, this will allow you to add firewall rules based on mac address. If you are concerned about tying IP's to specific mac addresses you can look at using static arp entries on your gateway, although this can get rather cumbersome as soon as you have more than a handful of addresses. Barry On Mon 2001-12-31 (18:27), Peter Brezny wrote: > This looks like a great package. however I was hoping someone might have > some pointers to put something like this together by hand using ipfw. > > Anyone? > > Peter Brezny > Skyrunner.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: TD790@aol.com [mailto:TD790@aol.com] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 5:21 PM > To: peter@skyrunner.net > Cc: isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: access restriction by MAC > > > In a message dated 12/31/2001 9:01:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, > peter@skyrunner.net writes: > > > 'm looking for a way to restrict connectivity by mac address. > > > > Any suggestions on this? > > > > Ideally, a package that integrated usage based billing would be superb, > but > > I'd settle just for something that would only allow access to specific > mac > > addresses. > > > > Our commercial add-on bandwidth manager software package can do both for you > (include enforce MAC/IP pairs if necessary). You can also match src/dst MACs > (if you wanted to allow access to local hosts but not the gateway, for > example). > > www.etinc.com for more info. > > Dennis > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 3 0:14: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from relay.office.bezpeka.net (gw.office.bezpeka.net [193.108.112.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF87A37B422 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.office.bezpeka.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g038C4eN000672 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:12:04 +0200 (EET) Received: (from admin@localhost) by vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g038C4Ch000671 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:12:04 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:12:04 +0200 From: apache@ukr.net To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 Message-ID: <20020103101204.A418@unixbox.office.annaltd.com> References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:55:11PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org My sendmail 8.12.X just renames "someone's" mailbox owned by root into BOGUN.someone.N and creates new "someone" mailbox owned by "someone". -- e-mail: apache@ukr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 3 0:17:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from 217-126-145-95.uc.nombres.ttd.es (217-126-145-95.uc.nombres.ttd.es [217.126.145.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935BF37B41B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by unicorn.ea4els.ampr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8D0B931D8; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:17:43 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> <20020103101204.A418@unixbox.office.annaltd.com> From: Simon J Mudd Date: 03 Jan 2002 09:17:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020103101204.A418@unixbox.office.annaltd.com> Message-ID: <86ell7hmqg.fsf@unicorn.ea4els.ampr.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org apache@ukr.net writes: > My sendmail 8.12.X just renames "someone's" mailbox owned by root > into BOGUN.someone.N and creates new "someone" mailbox owned by "someone". That's because "someone's" mailbox should be owned by "someone". I think the behaviour is quite normal, because in any case sendmail wouldn't/shouldn't be able to write to the mailbox if it is owned by root: "someone" won't have the appropriate permissions. I think it would be worth investigating why someone's mailbox is not owned by himself. Simon -- Simon J Mudd, Tel: +34-91-408 4878, Mobile: +34-605-085 219 Madrid, Spain. email: sjmudd@pobox.com, Postfix RPM Packager To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 3 0:35:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from relay.office.bezpeka.net (gw.office.bezpeka.net [193.108.112.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E4437B405 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.office.bezpeka.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g038XueN000756 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:33:56 +0200 (EET) Received: (from admin@localhost) by vatchenko.office.annaltd.com (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id g038XuPE000755 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:33:56 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:33:56 +0200 From: apache@ukr.net To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail 8.11.6 Message-ID: <20020103103356.B418@unixbox.office.annaltd.com> References: <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <5.0.0.25.2.20011229160759.04b58e60@pop.openlink.com.br> <20020102114130.31F8C37B420@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:55:11PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > It should look: > -rw-r--r-- 1 cruel mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 cruel > -rw-r--r-- 1 maint mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 maint > -rw-r--r-- 1 mrdida mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 mrdida > -rw-r--r-- 1 root mail 52445 Dec 28 22:32 root > -rw-r--r-- 1 testemail mail 0 Dec 29 12:40 testemail > > fix: > $ cd /var/mail && rm -f cruel maint mrdida testemail > My sendmail 8.11.3 with that case tells my DSN: Service unavailable. I cannot check 8.11.6 but i guess it's problem with mail.local too. I've had such problem when there is no FEATURE local_lmtp or local_procmail in .mc file. In .cf file Mlocal (local mailer) contains mail $u instead of mail.local -l. -- e-mail: apache@ukr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jan 3 1: 9:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from griffin.Pikapp.net (pkf60.eastnet.gatech.edu [128.61.105.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F3A37B41D; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.eudoramail.com ([67.203.104.212]) by griffin.Pikapp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779); Thu, 3 Jan 2002 04:05:47 -0500 Message-ID: <000008cb56a4$00000516$00000050@mx1.eudoramail.com> To: From: SHCCpress@eudoramail.com Subject: SHCC: Tonight's Investment Special BKK Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 03:06:19 -1800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: SHCCnews6@eudoramail.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2002 09:05:48.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[D597FDD0:01C19435] Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org = Investors
 <= /caption>
=

Investm= ent Special
Toni= ght's Feature Company

ShareCom, Inc.
(OTC= BB: SHCC)

Current Price: $0.0154

52 Week High: $2.49
52 Week Low: $0.009

      Why SHCC?
  • SHCC has established bus= iness relationships with FEMA, the American Red Cross, AAA, NOAA, and more=

  • SHCC is cu= rrently booking revenues of $45,000 per month and projects revenues = of $13 million for 2002.
  • Partnerships and= market advantage fuel exponential growth for SHCC.

    • The Time is NOW a= t Sharecom

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)= , the National Weather Service (NWS), the Red Cross and = AAA are a but a few of the agencies and organizations with whom = ShareCom Inc. has forged alliances to ensure clear competitive a= dvantage for its product lines. The past 10 years have seen a dram= atic increase in severe weather conditions=FFFFFF85and with continued glob= al warming these patterns will exacerbate. Prompted by FEMA and NWS aggres= sive programs, demand for the Company=FFFFFF92s NOAA Weather Radio will= soar. Today 7% of American homes possess a NOAA radio=FFFFFF85 = the national goal is 100%. 

    ShareCom=FFFFFF92s ww= w.WeatherRadios.com is the site for consumers to purchase the Company=FF= FFFF92s superior product at a significant discount. SHCC's revenue flow ra= te is at $45,000/month and rapidly growing. The Company will realiz= e a profit this year and plans to triple it next.. SHCC's market dominance= in this growing "bread and butter", niche business makes it an = interesting acquisition candidate and a compelling investment.

    This Just Out: SHCC NEWS

    =
     

    ShareCom, Inc. Ships the First NOAA = Weather Radio Featuring Instant Localized Setup

    PALATINE, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 11, 2001--ShareCom, In= c.(TM), the market leader in designing and manufacturing NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration) Weather Radi= o and Disaster Readiness electronics products, today announced availabilit= y of its WRP-500 Broadcaster(TM) NOAA Weather Radio, with an SRP of= $149.99, available for purchase via its ecommerce web site and through se= lect retailers around the country. Like all ShareCom products, the WRP-500= features a streamlined and fashionable design, coupled with strong price = performance.

    ShareCom manufactures products which are expressly d= esigned to support the in-place NOAA Weather Network - an always on (24/7)= broadcast network that covers 95% of the US. This ``early warning'= ' network provides general-purpose weather information and alerts for haza= rdous weather or disaster warnings for people throughout the US.

    = The Federal Government, The Americ= an Red Cross and numerous state and local government agencies a= re now emphasizing the need for the NOAA Weather Radio network, especially= since the September 11th tragedy. A NOAA Weather Radio is now consi= dered as important as having a smoke detector in a home, school or busines= s.

    ``Our market research in= dicated a strong need in the marketplace for a NOAA Weather Radio that loo= ks good in someone's home or office, but that has real ease of use built i= nto the overall design,'' said Brad Nordling the CEO of ShareCom, Inc. ``O= ne of the most requested feature enhancements from our consumers has been = to provide functionality that enables them to setup a radio right out of t= he box, with no cumbersome interface to deal with. The WRP-500 Broadcaster= addresses this need by incorporating our Graphical Alert Technology(TM) s= pecialty software - our customers now have the ability to easily config= ure their radios in a matter of seconds using a functional scroll down men= u.''

    Stay tun= ed for more announcements to come

More Reasons to Consider Buyin= g SHCC

1.= WeatherRadios.com has been awar= ded a National Partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (F= EMA) to increase the use of Weather Radios country wide through a = program called Project Impact. There are 2,600 Project Impact communities = in the U.S. The FEMA web site lists WeatherRadios.com as a national partne= r providing a banner and link to the WeatherRadios.com site. The FEMA site= receives over 100,000 visitors per day. 

2. The Nat= ional Oceanic and Aerospace Administration (NOAA) has WeatherRadio= s.com listed first on their web site, telling people were to purchase a NO= AA Weather Radio. 

3. The National Weather Serv= ice (NWS) has offered to promote corporate sponsorships to the Wea= therRadios.com site through recognition and media support.  &nbs= p;

4. Local American Red Cross Chapters will promo= te NOAA Weather Radios through WeatherRadios.com in an exchange fo= r a $5.00 donation per radio sold. 

5. The Chicago= Area AAA will feature SHCC's 2WayTalk.com on its web site offering exclusive discounts on Weather Radios,= and FRS Family Radios. 2WayTalk.com will also be listed in the AAA magazi= ne called "Home and Away". 

6. The Federation of Manufactured Home Owners of Florid= a (FMO) has entered into a one year agreement that will increase t= he sale of Weather Radios from the WeatherRadios.com site. Mailings and we= b site links will offer a group discount to members and also pay a rebate = to the organization for every radio sold. 

7. The Owner - Operat= or Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) has begun to promote th= e discount that is offered through the WeatherRadios.com site. Magazine ar= ticles, mailings, and web site links will offer a group discount to member= s and also pay a rebate to the organization for every radio sold. This agr= eement will run for one year. 

     NOAA Weather Radios automatically alert people of impending severe weather conditions &= quot;24/7". This is especially critical for families while sleeping. = These devices are fast becoming recognized as essential and pote= ntially life saving for use in homes, businesses, and critical care fa= cilities.

The National Weather Service (NWS)<= /font> has stated that t= here has been an increase in severe weather in the last 10 years and this = trend is expected to continue. NWS has a published goal for NOAA Weathe= r Radios to be in every home within the next 10 years. Currentl= y, approximately just 7% of homes have this device. This being said= , we can expect a tremendous increase in the presence and sale of weath= er radios over the coming years. The NWS, NOAA, the Federal Emergency = Management Agency (FEMA) and other government agencies have an aggressive = education and funding effort to reach the 100% goal.

New technology called Specific Area Mess= age Encoding (SAME) was introduced in the mid 90s. It allows users to set = an alarm only for their specific geographic area. This feature is expected= to make this tool commonplace in homes alerting families of weathe= r conditions that pose an immediate danger.

Additionally, 2Wa= yTalk.com will continue to focus on Internet users who are outdoor enthusi= asts. The market continues to be strong and growing. FRS Family Radios are= now becoming a popular family item on vacations, ski trips, camping, and = biking events. They are used for a wide variety of purposes, from staying = in touch with children playing in the neighborhood, to coordinating soccer= tournaments and antique auctions. 

A Final Word About SHCC

SHCC is currently= booking $45,000/ month and is conservatively projecting earnings next yea= r of $1.3 million on revenues of $13 million. Unlike most e-commerc= e ventures, ShareCom's marketing "burn rate" is very modest. The= Company forecasts revenues of $32.5 million the following year, in= creasing profitability to earn $4.6 million. Given its impressive relation= ships and the rapidly growing market for its product, SHCC's share pric= e of just 1.6 cents makes it a compelling play for the astute investor. 
DISCLAIMER: 
Inform= ation within this email contains "forward looking statements" wi= thin the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section = 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or= involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, p= lans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or perf= ormance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward loo= king statements."

Forward looking statements are based on ex= pectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made = that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause ac= tual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipat= ed. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through th= e use of words such as "projects", "foresee", =FFFFFF9= 3expects=FFFFFF92=FFFFFF94, =FFFFFF93will,=FFFFFF94  =FFFFFF93anticip= ates,=FFFFFF94 =FFFFFF93estimates,=FFFFFF94 =FFFFFF93believes,=FFFFFF94 &q= uot;understands" or that by statements indicating certain actions =FF= FFFF93may,=FFFFFF94 =FFFFFF93could,=FFFFFF94 or =FFFFFF93might=FFFFFF94 oc= cur.  All information provided within this email pertaining to invest= ing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not= investment advice. Investment News Alert advises all readers and subscrib= ers to seek advice from a registered professional securities represen= tative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. = ; None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind o= f investment advice.

In compliance with the Securities Act of 193= 3, Section17(b), Investment Special discloses the receipt of $30,000 cash = from a third party for the publication of this report and additional  services related to SHCC. Be awa= re of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such compensation.&n= bsp; All factual information in this report was gathered from public = sources, including but not limited to SEC filings, Company Press Releases,= and Market Guide.  Investme= nt Special  believes this information to be reliable but can make no = guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Use of the material within t= his email constitutes your acceptance of these terms.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 2:36:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.voljatel.si (mail.voljatel.si [217.72.64.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F362537B417 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 02:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pxna.hide.voljatel.si (unknown [217.72.64.8]) by mail.voljatel.si (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F37453503 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:36:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:37:21 +0100 From: Damir Horvat To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: jail in production Message-Id: <20020104113721.701419dd.damir@voljatel.si> Organization: Voljatel telekomunikacije d.d. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! My situation is web hosting server. I would like restrict users scripts (php,perl) to only run in their "home" enviroment. I've heard, jail is THE thing to use if one wants to separate customers on one server. Any comments, ideas, hints ... Thanks, Damir Horvat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 5:16: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.edgehosting.com (c870302-c.roalok1.mi.home.com [24.22.74.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B89837B41C for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 05:16:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from Beta (omega [10.10.128.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.edgehosting.com (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g04DMe8C055343 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:22:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <009201c19521$f3cfb620$0a800a0a@edgehosting.com> From: "Joe White" To: References: <20020104113721.701419dd.damir@voljatel.si> Subject: Re: jail in production Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:15:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I currently use Jail on my webserver to do apache+frontpage extensions (ICK). It's a wonderful tool, and very powerful, however i think a base jail will take up little over 200MB. Starts adding up when adding more servers/users obviously. The only real problem i have, is that sendmail on the main server (mail server) likes to bind itself to ALL ip addresses, and for some reason, sendmail within my jail gets socket errors, and won't allow me to send anymail. A minor problem i'm working on. Regards, Joe White www.edgehosting.com 248.561.2827 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damir Horvat" To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:37 AM Subject: jail in production > Hello! > > My situation is web hosting server. I would like restrict users scripts > (php,perl) to only run in their "home" enviroment. > > I've heard, jail is THE thing to use if one wants to separate customers on > one server. > > Any comments, ideas, hints ... > > > Thanks, > Damir Horvat > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 5:36:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from axis.tdd.lt (axis.tdd.lt [213.197.128.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D89137B405 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 05:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (midom@localhost) by axis.tdd.lt (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g04Da8p34195; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:36:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from midom@delfi.lt) X-Authentication-Warning: axis.tdd.lt: midom owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:36:08 +0200 (EET) From: Domas Mituzas X-X-Sender: To: Joe White Cc: Subject: Re: jail in production In-Reply-To: <009201c19521$f3cfb620$0a800a0a@edgehosting.com> Message-ID: <20020104153533.E32948-100000@axis.tdd.lt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there, # SMTP daemon options O DaemonPortOptions=Name=MTA O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E O DaemonPortOptions=Address=1.2.3.4 # SMTP client options O ClientPortOptions=Address=1.2.3.4 -- Cheers, Domas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 13: 1:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from squid.tznet.com (squid.tznet.com [66.170.64.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F68937B405 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (tech@localhost) by squid.tznet.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g04L1NG20826 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:01:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:01:23 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Pilz To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Virus and Spam Filtering Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We currently use Postini to filter spam and viruses, however Postini is raising prices shortly and we are looking for an alternative. We run FreeBSD 4.0 with QPopper as the POP3 server, Sendmail as the SMTP server and Procmail as the delivery agent. I'm looking for possibilities that we should consider as an ISP (with several thousand mail accounts) to replace our current service with Postini. Furthermore, the following information will be very helpful: - What do most large mail servers run? - Are the programs that do the filtering harsh on the CPU/Memory? - How GOOD do the programs work: - Virus defs. updated often? - Spam filtering works well? - When a message is "filtered", is there a way to GET it? Or does the program simply delete it? Any information on what you run on your own server, or any external program (we used to be with MAPS, then I guess they went down hill, is ORBS any good or do they still suck as well?) will be VERY helpful! Thanks in advance! Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 13:25:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A1937B435 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:25:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id C56E416B22 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:25:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from LenConrad.Go2France.com [66.64.14.18] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A1871CE6030E; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 22:41:27 +0100 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020104150753.0370de18@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 15:25:14 -0600 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: Virus and Spam Filtering In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >We currently use Postini to filter spam and viruses, however >Postini is raising prices shortly and we are looking for an alternative. :)) >We run FreeBSD 4.0 with QPopper as the POP3 server, Sendmail as the SMTP >server and Procmail as the delivery agent. > > I'm looking for possibilities that we should consider as an ISP >(with several thousand mail accounts) to replace our current service with >Postini. a couple of hundred ISP's have taken the IMGate approach, see my sig, with universal success, even with enthusiasm. most were were pure GUI jockeys before, and came to FreeBSD only for IMGate. > Furthermore, the following information will be very helpful: > > - What do most large mail servers run? > - Are the programs that do the filtering harsh on the CPU/Memory? unanchored regex's on megabytes of message bodies is expensive. > - How GOOD do the programs work: > - Virus defs. updated often? every day. I use avcheck chroot wrapper for Kaspersky FreeBSD Server Daemon. One ISP I set up with IMgateAV is scanning 300k msgs/day, removing about 1000 infections. the machine is loafing, but the disk can get behind a times, up to a 20 minute delay, but WTF do you want with a cheapo ATA disk? :)) so he's upping to dual 128-mb-caching SCSI controllers and dual disks (separating logging from mailqueuing). > - Spam filtering works well? yes, using RBL databases, DNS validations, SMTP protocol enforcements, regex filtering on headers and bodies will catch 90+%, for free. certainly get it to liveable level. additional approaches like tmda, spamassassin, vipul+s razor will just about slam the door on the last bits of junk. > - When a message is "filtered", is there a way to GET it? Or does >the program simply delete it? best is to just reject at the edge, so the sending mail server notifies the sender. keeps the crap out of your system. nothing's deleted. but AV is different, notices are sent to sender, recipient, and/or admin. most infections are not valid messages, but worm crap so deleting them hurts no one. if someone sends a Really Valuable File (while keeping their own copy) that's infected and deleted, well TS. >any information on what you run on your own server, or any >external program (we used to be with MAPS, then I guess they went down >hill, is ORBS any good orbs is dead, I run: maps_rbl_domains = relays.ordb.org, inputs.orbz.org, dialups.relays.osirusoft.com, spews.relays.osirusoft.com, or.orbl.org >or do they still suck as well?) will be VERY >helpful! IMGate config files are free for the asking. Len http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 17: 7:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C1F37B6BC; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id C05AF16B1C; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:06:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from LenConrad.Go2France.com [66.64.14.18] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A55C67A02C4; Sat, 05 Jan 2002 02:22:36 +0100 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020104190317.03abc758@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 19:06:24 -0600 To: Freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: iptraf is only for Linux? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org 4.4Rel + iptraf 2.5.0 I found a few references to this famous GNU getopt.h stuff in the google/bsd and freebsd archives but not real solution, and no useful ref's to iptraf. # make gcc -Wall -O2 -c iptraf.c iptraf.c:28: getopt.h: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/src/iptraf-2.5.0/src. thanks Len http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 4 18: 0:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2232337C792; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from k7.mavetju.org (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231F92B6D9; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:46:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by k7.mavetju.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 88A877DB; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:45:56 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:45:56 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Len Conrad Cc: Freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iptraf is only for Linux? Message-ID: <20020105124556.F823@k7.mavetju.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Len Conrad , Freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020104190317.03abc758@mail.Go2France.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020104190317.03abc758@mail.Go2France.com>; from LConrad@Go2France.com on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:06:24PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:06:24PM -0600, Len Conrad wrote: > 4.4Rel + iptraf 2.5.0 > > I found a few references to this famous GNU getopt.h stuff in the > google/bsd and freebsd archives but not real solution, and no useful ref's > to iptraf. > > # make > gcc -Wall -O2 -c iptraf.c > iptraf.c:28: getopt.h: No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/local/src/iptraf-2.5.0/src. If you install devel/libgnugetopt you have getopt.h in /usr/local/include Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jan 5 23:42:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from netian.com (s210-117-109-162.thrunet.ne.kr [210.117.109.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C71637B41B for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 23:42:09 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: kpyh1224@netian.com From: 특판사업부 To: Subject: 과속감시카메라 위치를 음성으로 안내[광고물] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:49:32 +0900 X-User: 2.11-dgegcjgt-coehdi-Bbgff Message-Id: <20020106074209.9C71637B41B@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [광고메일]

전국도로를 실사하여 구축된 DB를 이용하여 전국토의 70%가 산악지대인 우리나라 도로 여건에서 사고 위험지역과 과속 위험지역 전방 500m 지점에서 사전 음성안내를 해줍니다.

문의전화 080-439-5004, 담당 특판사업부 / 수호천사 소비자가격 280,000원

 수신거부의사가 있으시면 여기를 클릭하여 주시면 감사하겠습니다. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message