From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Feb 24 0:39: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from gate.soum.co.jp (gate.soum.co.jp [202.221.40.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63B637B405 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:38:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from force.soum.co.jp (force.soum.co.jp [IPv6:3ffe:501:80a:1:a00:20ff:fef0:4c9c]) by gate.soum.co.jp (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g1O8crO0032917; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:38:53 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from fujita@soum.co.jp) Received: from vanilla.soum.co.jp (vanilla.soum.co.jp [3ffe:501:80a:1:202:b3ff:fe98:8115]) by force.soum.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-2001122804) with ESMTP id g1O8cpS10749; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:38:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by vanilla.soum.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663563F4B; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:38:51 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:38:51 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20020224.173851.41690938.fujita@soum.co.jp> To: skibo@pacbell.net Cc: mitchy@er.ams.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net Subject: Re: Linksys WMP11 support From: FUJITA Kazutoshi In-Reply-To: <3C78661D.88619743@pacbell.net> References: <20020206095856D.mitchy@er.ams.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp> <20020224.084619.74696422.fujita@soum.co.jp> <3C78661D.88619743@pacbell.net> X-PGP-PublicKey: http://www.soum.co.jp/~fujita/fujita-GnuPG-publickey.txt X-PGP-FingerPrint: 9956 2ECE 7E7D B425 EC2D D49E FEBB 3C5F 2C34 1ECA Organization: SOUM Corporation, JAPAN X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjgtTFobKEIp?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Thomas Skibo Subject: Re: Linksys WMP11 support Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:03:41 -0800 Message-ID: <3C78661D.88619743@pacbell.net> > One comment: If you're trying to determine if a device is a Prism 2.5, "sc->wi_bus_type == WI_BUS_PCI_NATIVE" isn't a good check. I believe > the latest WPC11 PCMCIA card is a Prism 2.5 but it's bus type would > be WI_BUS_PCCARD. I know my hacks is very very 'ad-hoc', and I don't know why the modification is required as in my previous mail. In my previous mail, I did not describe my test environment, and describe below. In my company, we are using Melco(BUFFALO) WLI-PCM-L11G PCMCIA card with 104bit WEP encryption, BSS mode. The card is indicated, } Tuple #5, code = 0x20 (Manufacturer ID), length = 4 } 000: 56 01 02 00 } PCMCIA ID = 0x156, OEM ID = 0x2 as result of command 'pccardc dumpcis'. It works fine. There is no problem. Without my hacks, my new notebook 'IBM ThinkPad X23', that have Prism2.5(PCI vendor=0x1260, dev=0x3873) on board, can't communicate with others. After applying my hacks, I checked it can communicate in following condition. [1] BSS mode with 104bit WEP encryption. The other side of communication is all Melco's PCMCIA card in my company. [2] ad-hoc mode without WEP encryption. The other side of communication is my another notebook using Melco's PCMCIA card. [3] ad-hoc mode with 40bit WEP encryption. The other side of communication is my another notebook using Melco's PCMCIA card. [4] ad-hoc mode with 104bit WEP encryption. The other side of communication is my another notebook using Melco's PCMCIA card. (*)The only case I checked in BSS mode, is using 104bit WEP encryption. Because I can't change the settings of station. (It is not technical reason) That's all. TIA. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message