From owner-freebsd-net Sun Apr 7 1:40:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC81A37B405; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 01:40:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020407094017.IUUN21252.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 09:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA45224; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 01:35:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 01:35:19 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: "Crist J. Clark" Cc: Luigi Rizzo , Andreas Klemm , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: better DSL bandwidth usage by priorizing ACKs in outgoing packets over others In-Reply-To: <20020406184526.E70207@blossom.cjclark.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > ...I'm getting some severe deja vu with this topic. But I can't recall > what the exact subject was previously. I once described a flow manager that did similar.. queuing the return acks per session to ensure that some sessions didn't over-run others.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message