From owner-freebsd-net Sun Sep 1 17:29: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E637B400 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.synvision.com.tw (mail.synvision.com.tw [210.242.39.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3047443E4A for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ericlin@ericlin.cabin.idv.tw) Received: from spd6 (ip1-250.synvision.com.tw [192.168.1.250]) by mail.synvision.com.tw (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g820SZl7047260 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:28:35 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from ericlin@ericlin.cabin.idv.tw) Message-ID: <002b01c25217$a6842a00$fa01a8c0@synvision.com.tw> From: "Jui-Nan Eric Lin" To: References: <001101c24f3f$e39f5840$fa01a8c0@synvision.com.tw> <20020830090012.A53982@iguana.icir.org> Subject: Re: Question about bridge(4): loop without physical loop Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:28:24 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, I have searched with keyword "aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa" and get the same result. It said that those might be collisions on the net. So I tried to reduce collisions, but the message still appears. (not frequently) If you have made a patch, please let me know. Thanks. Sincerely, Jui-Nan Eric Lin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luigi Rizzo" To: "Jui-Nan Eric Lin" Cc: Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 12:00 AM Subject: Re: Question about bridge(4): loop without physical loop > hi, > these might be runt packets deriving e.g. from junk on the link. > It is the first time that i see such reports so haven't > worried too much about it. > a possible fix could be to avoid bridging of packets that are > too short for the ethernet specs or have crc errors. > > if the problem shows up frequently and you are willing to try some > patches let me know, i could try to send you some code to > fix this. > > cheers > luigi > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:38:19PM +0800, Jui-Nan Eric Lin wrote: > > Hi, all: > > > > I have installed bridge on my freebsd box, but the message showed on the > > screen frequently and the network halted (packet missing): > > > > /kernel: -- loop (0) 55.55.55.55.55.55 to fxp1 from fxp0 (active) > > /kernel: -- loop (0) 55.55.55.55.55.55 to fxp0 from fxp1 (active) > > > > It' weird because I didn't have a NIC which has mac address > > 55.55.55.55.55.55. > > I have searched with Google, and found the message below: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=180949+0+archive/2002/freebsd-n > > et/20020707.freebsd-net > > > > It seems that bridge supports only NICs with "SIMPLEX" flag. > > Therefore, I checked result of "ifconfig -a", but my two Intel 82550 (fxp0, > > fxp1) has "SIMPLEX" flag: > > > > fxp0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > > fxp1: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > > > > Any suggestion? > > > > P.S. #1 sysctl -a | grep bridge > > > > #sysctl -a | grep bridge > > net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0,fxp1 > > net.link.ether.bridge: 1 > > net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 1 > > net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0 > > net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_drop: 0 > > net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_collisions: 749 > > > > P.S.#2 Sorry for my poor English :) > > > > Sincerely, > > Jui-Nan Eric Lin > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message