From owner-freebsd-qa Fri Jul 12 15:43:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C20A37B447 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuvia.demon.co.uk (thuvia.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A4F446B2 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:30:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (dotar.thuvia.org [10.0.0.4]) by phaidor.thuvia.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CLTsb36962 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:29:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CLTsKC017941 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:29:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@dotar.thuvia.org) Received: (from mark@localhost) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CLTrmi017940 for qa@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:29:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:29:53 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine Message-Id: <200207122129.g6CLTrmi017940@dotar.thuvia.org> X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98) To: qa@freebsd.org Subject: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-qa Fri Jul 12 18:49:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F1E37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (aragon.noos.net [212.198.2.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB343E64 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:49:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 5602664 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jul 2002 01:49:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.75 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jul 2002 01:49:52 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (cl6bzlulfromnv0s@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D1nodT003729; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:49:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6D1nohW003728; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:49:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:49:50 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Mark Valentine Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Message-ID: <20020713014950.GD2527@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200207122129.g6CLTrmi017940@dotar.thuvia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207122129.g6CLTrmi017940@dotar.thuvia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ? Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-qa Sat Jul 13 15:20:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A137B400; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuvia.demon.co.uk (thuvia.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F66B43E31; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:20:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (dotar.thuvia.org [10.0.0.4]) by phaidor.thuvia.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6DMK6b41425; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6DMK6KC050407; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@dotar.thuvia.org) Received: (from mark@localhost) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6DMK6uM050406; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine Message-Id: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre's message of Jul 13, 3:49am X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98) To: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: Cyrille Lefevre > Date: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 > Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for > > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? > > > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? > > how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just > define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ? I suggested docproj and docproj-nojadetex on the doc mailing list back in March. I don't particularly care which way around it is, but my preference would be to have jadetex by default. Is this what's needed to fix the missing package? Nik, is this a problem for the FreeBSD Services release too? Is fixing this within the scope of the 4.6.1 release? It's painful installing the docproj packages without it (I build the package with jadetex locally here and stash it on my install server for things to work - it would be nice just to use the DVD instead of my install server.) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message