From owner-freebsd-qa Sun Jul 14 5:34:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9254037B401 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (zola.noos.net [212.198.2.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B36843E65 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 42663534 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jul 2002 12:34:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.76 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jul 2002 12:34:34 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (213ogvn71n5nql99@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6ECYYdT062563; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:34:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6ECYXnD062562; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:34:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:34:33 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Mark Valentine Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Message-ID: <20020714123433.GH35142@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > From: Cyrille Lefevre > > Date: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 > > Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for > > > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? > > > > > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? > > > > how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just > > define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ? > > I suggested docproj and docproj-nojadetex on the doc mailing list back > in March. I don't particularly care which way around it is, but my preference > would be to have jadetex by default. > > Is this what's needed to fix the missing package? yes, having docproj-whatever as a package would be great :) > Nik, is this a problem for the FreeBSD Services release too? I guess there is not enough room on the first CD. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message