From owner-freebsd-security Sun Apr 7 0: 9:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from caligula.anu.edu.au (caligula.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A6737B419 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 00:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by caligula.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA06353; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:09:49 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200204070809.SAA06353@caligula.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: pf OR ipf ? To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:09:48 +1000 (Australia/ACT) Cc: scott@lampert.org (Scott Lampert), security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020406214253.H70207@blossom.cjclark.org> from "Crist J. Clark" at Apr 06, 2002 09:42:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Crist J. Clark, sie said: > > It's in 5.0-CURRENT so it may make 5.0-RELEASE. ;) I do not plan to > merge the code into 4.x-STABLE in its current form. I really am not > happy with how it works in -CURRENT either, but to get it to work more > cleanly and in a way darrenr suggested, I'd need to modify IPFilter > code, which I have tried to avoid. So the -CURRENT code is > experimental, but that's OK for -CURRENT. It's not OK for -STABLE. Ack. what was it that I suggested (that needed ipfilter code changed) ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message