From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 0:38:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6057C37B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clink.schulte.org (clink.schulte.org [209.134.156.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A043743E52; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:38:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clink.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63192243CF; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 02:34:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tandist.nospam.schulte.org (void.schulte.org [209.134.156.217]) by clink.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B98243BE; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 02:34:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20020707022035.04105d30@pop3s.schulte.org> X-Sender: X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 02:34:05 -0500 To: Ruslan Ermilov From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: source upgrade from 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 to 4.6-stable Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020706144914.GA54094@sunbay.com> References: <5.1.1.6.2.20020706093642.03b3a020@pop3s.schulte.org> <5.1.1.6.2.20020706093642.03b3a020@pop3s.schulte.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre6 on clink.schulte.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 05:49 PM 7/6/2002 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Will a 4.0-RELEASE update directly to RELENG_4_6 work, or did your magic > > happen after 4.6-RELEASE and only avail in -STABLE? If that's the case > > I'll probably update to RELENG_4 and revert back to RELENG_4_6. > > >Before 4.6 went out, I've checked explicitly that it can be source upgraded >to from 4.0-RELEASE onwards (modulo the things I mentioned). So yes, this >should be possible, and you have a safe way to test this: > >1. make buildworld >2. make buildkernel >3. make installkernel >4. reboot >5. make installworld >6. mergemaster or equivalent >7. reboot FYI - source update [world/kernel] from 4.0-RELEASE to RELENG_4_6 was successful. For some reason sysctl:net.link.ether.bridge_cfg was not automatically populated. I don't know exactly where the problem originated, so I just set a manual sysctl.conf entry and moved on. Several more minor issues arose, but the point is that the source update works as advertised. Excellent work. >Cheers, >-- >Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, >ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, >ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, >+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > >http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve >http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age -- Christopher Schulte http://www.schulte.org/ Do not un-munge my @nospam.schulte.org email address. This address is valid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 0:53: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7C737B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (mippet.ci.com.au [192.65.182.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4A943E09; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:52:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rpp@ci.com.au) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (rpp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/CE020620/c+m+l) with ESMTP id g677qgIS006908; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:52:43 +1000 (EST) Received: (from rpp@localhost) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g677qgce006907; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:52:42 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:52:42 +1000 From: Richard Perini To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: pcmcia flash card problems after 4.6-S Message-ID: <20020707075242.GA6660@mippet.ci.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since upgrading from 4.4-STABLE (around Oct 2001) to 4.6-STABLE (30th June 2002), I can no longer get my Kodak Flash Card to work. Its a 64Mb ATA compatible card, and worked perfectly in 4.4. Pccardd now gives a "driver allocation failed: Device not configured" Below is output from "dmesg -a" with the pccardd output at the end. (I enabled "debuglevel 9" in /etc/pccard.conf). I also tried adding an entry in pccard.conf for the card that exactly matched the card's identification output - the entry in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf didn't seem to be matched. It made no difference in either case. The hardware is a Toshiba Portege 3440CT. Any pointers, things to try, etc, would be greatly appreciated. -- Richard Perini Internet: rpp@ci.com.au Corinthian Engineering Pty Ltd PHONE: +61 2 9906 7866 Sydney, Australia FAX: +61 2 9906 2464 Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #1: Sun Jun 30 14:19:46 EST 2002 rpp@meson.ci.com.au:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (500.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 134086656 (130944K bytes) avail memory = 126799872 (123828K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc03b0000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 9 entries at 0xc00f0190 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcm0: port 0xfcc0-0xfcff,0xfd00-0xfdff irq 11 at device 0.1 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x0000, dev=0x0000) at 0.2 pci0: (vendor=0x11c1, dev=0x0441) at 2.0 irq 11 pci0: at 4.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf870-0xf87f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xf840-0xf85f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: port 0xfe70-0xfe7f at device 7.3 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x1179, dev=0x0d01) at 9.0 irq 11 pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (60) to hard-routed irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:11 INTA routed to irq 11 pcic0: irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 pcic0: PCI Memory allocated: 0x44000000 pccard0: on pcic0 pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (61) to hard-routed irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:11 INTB routed to irq 11 pcic1: irq 11 at device 11.1 on pci0 pcic1: PCI Memory allocated: 0x44001000 pccard1: on pcic1 orm0:
Hi,
 
RELENG_4=20

The line of development for FreeBSD-4.X, also known as = FreeBSD-STABLE.

RELENG_4_6=20

The release branch for FreeBSD-4.6, used only for security advisories = and=20 other seriously critical fixes

Does the RELENG_4 branch have the security "updates" of the = RELENG_4_6 branch=20 as well ?

I can't understand.

 

Thanx very much !


-----------
Unix, Y2K compilant = since=20 1970
FreeBSD - opening computers from closed=20 Windows
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C225DA.7F1228F0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 8:22:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FB637B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sumter.awod.com (sumter.awod.com [208.140.99.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A4343E58 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.67]) by sumter.awod.com (8.8.7/8.12.2) with ESMTP id LAA92889 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:22:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sumter.awod.com: User sandib [pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net] popped 13 seconds ago Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RDxd-0005zM-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:28:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:28:29 -0400 From: stan To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Gnome/Sawfish problems after portupgrade Message-ID: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.17 X-Uptime: 11:25:21 up 18 days, 16:44, 1 user, load average: 0.27, 0.22, 0.19 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After last weekends cvsup & portupgrade I am unable to run Sawfish as the window manager fro Gnome on both machnes I track STABLE on Basicly Gnome starts up (after a _very long_ time) and there is no window manager runing. If I try to start Sawfish from an xterm within the Gnome session, I get the following error: error--> (file-error "No such file or directory" "rep/lang/interpreter") Can anyone give me any idea what's going on? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 8:37:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80DE37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CED743E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:37:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davep.NOSPAM@meduseld.net) Received: from baloo.meduseld.net ([66.30.120.53]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020707153709.UJKW15755.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@baloo.meduseld.net>; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:37:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baloo.meduseld.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g67FbBP62314; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:37:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from davep.NOSPAM@meduseld.net) Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:37:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20020707.113711.607973336.davep@meduseld.net> To: stanb@awod.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome/Sawfish problems after portupgrade From: "David A. Panariti" In-Reply-To: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> References: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> X-Attribution: davep X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.8 (Honest Recruiter) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I run into this every time I update librep. What I've found works is to rebuild sawfish. I always start from scratch, including rerunning the configure script. This may not be the minimal way to do this, but it works. davep To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 9:21:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA11C37B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF1643E42; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [209.224.20.87] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17REnC-0007Gh-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:21:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:23:48 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: murray@FreeBSD.ORG, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-Id: <20020707112348.394ef8c2.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 01:55:20 -0700 Murray Stokely wrote: > The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! > > - Murray > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > Murry, Although I was not one of the people clamoring for this, the effort and time spent doing this is truly appreciated. The tools the FreeBSD project has available to keep a system up to date and secure are great (cvsup, portupgrade, make release, buildworld) and for a seasoned UNIX admin this is more than enough, but to expend this effort to assist the newer users to FreeBSD is a "good thing". Thanks to all who are working on this point release, hopefully this will reduce the number of insecure "out of the box" installs, and further enhance the image of FreeBSD as IMHO "The Best True UNIX" for both the experienced hackers and the people who have just started on this path. Sincerely, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 9:25:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A1C37B405 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.black.pl (mailhub.black.pl [217.172.244.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F4F43E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erph@black.pl) Received: from rapid.black.pl (rapid.black.pl [217.172.244.9]) by mailhub.black.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59653A6F6 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:28:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by rapid.black.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B52C63276A; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:28:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:28:23 +0200 From: Artur Meski To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: OpenSSH 3.4p1 problem (sshd). Message-ID: <20020707182823.A50954@rapid.black.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When I'm logging to my box I get the following messages: Jul 7 18:20:51 encumbered sshd[50946]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for erph from 192.168.0.11 port 1143 ssh2 Jul 7 18:20:51 encumbered sshd[50948]: getting vmemoryuse resource limit: Invalid argument Tested with default configuration. How can I fix it? -- Artur Meski -> [erph@freebsd.net.pl] [http://erph.black.pl/] [ftp://black.pl/users/erph] [info,pgp: finger erph@black.pl] [PGP fingerprint: F97C3F0549483C59C8593FE78B60401576D0756A] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 9:56:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F8437B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.wuppy.net.ru (ns.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432A243E3B for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:56:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romanp@unshadow.net) Received: from room101.wuppy.net.ru (room101.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.131]) by ns.wuppy.net.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10E01E03; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:56:38 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:56:38 +0400 (MSD) From: "Roman V. Palagin" To: John Polstra Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS errors at high hz values with TCP mounts In-Reply-To: <200207062254.g66MsJPj000565@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: <20020707205408.Y416-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Jul 6, at 3:54pm -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > > Here's what happens when I try to copy a 512 kbyte file from the > > > hz=10000 client to a server that is NFS-mounted: > > > > > > thin$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo count=1000 > > > dd: /mnt/foo: Resource temporarily unavailable > > > 61+0 records in > > > 60+0 records out > > > 30720 bytes transferred in 0.000996 secs (30843571 bytes/sec) > > > > I forget to mention that this message appears in the dmesg output on > > the client machine: > > > > nfs send error 35 for server strings:/usr/home/jdp > > > > It comes from sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c line 499. > > Sorry for the extended conversation with myself. :-) I think I > found the bug. In nfs_connect() at line 300 of sys/nfs/nfs_socket.c > we have this code: > > so->so_rcv.sb_timeo = (5 * hz); > so->so_snd.sb_timeo = (5 * hz); > > But sb_timeo has type "short", which overflows when hz is 10000. > > This is in struct sockbuf. I don't think it would break binary > compatibility with existing 3rd party modules to change it to type > "long". Are there any contrary opinions? I see this problem with HZ=1000, overflow doesn't occured in this situation... May be problem lies somewhere else? - Roman --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 10:12:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF2A37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BF143E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:12:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g67HCJ817906; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:12:20 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:12:19 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Dave Uhring Cc: Jason Porter , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? In-Reply-To: <200207071143.20880.duhring@charter.net> Message-ID: <20020707210226.P98680-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Dave Uhring wrote: DU> > DU> If you are using an ATI Rage Pro video adapter you would be well DU> > advised DU> to completely avoid the newest version of XFree86. DU> > DU> > Could you please provide some links describing this? Also, any chance DU> > to fix this sad situation (ATI Rage Pro is the adapter in my own DU> > workstation, which is now the only machine I'd not upgraded yet ;-) DU> DU> I apologize for the long line, but that is the URL: DU> DU> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=uhagt2dhohfia6%40corp.supernews.com&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dxfree86-4.2.0%2Bati%2Brage%2Bpro%2Bgroup:comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26scoring%3Dr DU> %26as_drrb%3Db%26as_mind%3D12%26as_minm%3D5%26as_miny%3D2002%26as_maxd%3D7%26as_maxm%3D7%26as_maxy%3D2002%26selm%3Duhagt2dhohfia6%2540corp.supernews.com%26rnum%3D2 Hmm... Reading through, I did not find any very specific "it does not work" cases. However, I see that many people found ATI cards as a PITA. ... the problem is that I have no spare hardware to test it thoroughly, and my workstation works also as central monitoring point for our network ;-) Maybe I'll try "ati*.o from 4.1" way... Stangely enough, there is no info about ATI<->XFree86 4.2 at http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/Status6.html Anyway, thank you for the info. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 10:18:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B8D37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0D143E54 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g67H1ltl017315 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:01:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:01:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? In-Reply-To: <200207070009.06225.duhring@charter.net> Message-ID: <20020707125944.Y17224-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Dave Uhring wrote: > On Sunday 07 July 2002 12:00 am, Jason Porter wrote: > > I'm running XFree86 version 3.3.6 I think (or whatever the 3 version > > is that 4.5 came with). Would it be better to make version 4.2.0 > > without X running? I also know I'll need to change XF86Config file, > > but that's not too much of a problem. Thanks for the help. > > If you are using an ATI Rage Pro video adapter you would be well advised > to completely avoid the newest version of XFree86. Works great with the (three-year-old) ATI Rage Mobility in my HP 4150B. YMMV. I tar'd up all of /usr/X11R6 and all of /etc/X11 when I jumped from 3.3.6 to 4.0. You're advised to do the same. -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 10:26:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7701E37B401 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7C943E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g67HPI48080075; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g67HPIDb092108; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@realtime.exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g67HPBKA092095; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <200207071725.g67HPBKA092095@realtime.exit.com> Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? In-Reply-To: <20020707210226.P98680-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Dave Uhring , Jason Porter , freebsd-stable Reply-To: frank@exit.com X-Copyright0: Copyright 2002 Frank Mayhar. All Rights Reserved. X-Copyright1: Permission granted for electronic reproduction as Usenet News or email only. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hmm... Reading through, I did not find any very specific "it does not > work" cases. However, I see that many people found ATI cards as a PITA. > > ... the problem is that I have no spare hardware to test it thoroughly, > and my workstation works also as central monitoring point for our network > ;-) > > Maybe I'll try "ati*.o from 4.1" way... > > Stangely enough, there is no info about ATI<->XFree86 4.2 at > http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/Status6.html I'm using a Radeon 8500 128MB card. I had problems with 4.2.0 (it worked but a few things were a tad flaky, especially Xvideo), but I've been updating from the XFree86 CVS tree and it is working better and better. Just one data point. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 10:39:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5701337B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from theshell.com (arsenic.theshell.com [63.236.138.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D11CD43E64 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pavalos@theshell.com) Received: (qmail 31722 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2002 17:39:48 -0000 Received: from oxygen.theshell.com (pavalos@63.236.138.8) by arsenic.theshell.com with SMTP; 7 Jul 2002 17:39:48 -0000 Received: (from pavalos@localhost) by oxygen.theshell.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g67Hdlt8007789; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:39:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pavalos) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:39:47 -0700 From: Peter Avalos To: Brossin Pierrick Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tags Question Message-ID: <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> Mail-Followup-To: Brossin Pierrick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 05:19:48PM +0200, Brossin Pierrick wrote: >=20 > Does the RELENG_4 branch have the security "updates" of the RELENG_4_6 > branch as well ? >=20 Yes. Changes to the RELENG_4_6 branch are merged from RELENG_4. -- Peter Avalos --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9KHzjKjaxugguz8URApxiAJ9GYlBAL0kWxrC8WbMu3BTIRI70dQCeNY5u G+gpgNRWMCihZ16+8h0WTTg= =c1WG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 11:10:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A189937B405 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAC043E4A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.200] (vpn-client.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.200]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g67I9Tp4054213; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:09:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: Gnome/Sawfish problems after portupgrade From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: "David A. Panariti" Cc: stanb@awod.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020707.113711.607973336.davep@meduseld.net> References: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> <20020707.113711.607973336.davep@meduseld.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 07 Jul 2002 14:10:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1026065403.342.5.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 11:37, David A. Panariti wrote: > I run into this every time I update librep. > > What I've found works is to rebuild sawfish. I always start from > scratch, including rerunning the configure script. This may not be > the minimal way to do this, but it works. Correct. After the latest update to librep, a good idea is to do: portupgrade -fr librep To make sure all librep's dependents are up to speed. Joe > > davep > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 11:44:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B598137B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au (lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au [129.78.64.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2F643E3B for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:44:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from devnull@mail.usyd.edu.au) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA22154 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:44:33 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:44:33 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200207071844.EAA22154@lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au> From: An address that is never read by anyone To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Accepts the above commands on the command line. Reply-To: devnull@mail.usyd.edu.au In-Reply-To: <0GYW00HOL6Q2IZ@mail02.axelero.hu> from "freebsd-stable" at Sun, 07 Jul 2002 20:44:26 +0200 (MEST) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear freebsd-stable, This is a message about mail from you which was routed to the address dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU You have sent mail to an address ending in "physics.su.oz.au". This domain is no longer in use. Your message has not been delivered. If you were trying to mail someone@physics.su.oz.au or someone@suphys.physics.su.oz.au please try instead someone@physics.usyd.edu.au To find up to date contact details for University of Sydney staff, please consult the University's Electronic Phone Book at http://www.usyd.edu.au/is/phlookup If you need further help, please email postmaster@physics.usyd.edu.au Yours sincerely Postmaster@physics.su.oz.au (For your convenience your original mail item follows...) >Received: from addu.axelero.hu (mail02.axelero.hu [195.228.240.77]) > by lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA22094 > for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:44:31 +1000 (EST) >Received: from Ygglt (line-189-36.dial.matav.net [145.236.189.36]) > by mail02.axelero.hu > (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.6 (built Apr 26 2002)) > with SMTP id <0GYW00HOJ6Q1IZ@mail02.axelero.hu> for dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU; > Sun, 07 Jul 2002 20:44:28 +0200 (MEST) >Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 20:44:26 +0200 (MEST) >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by mail02.axelero.hu >From: freebsd-stable >Subject: Accepts the above commands on the command line. >To: dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU >Message-id: <0GYW00HOL6Q2IZ@mail02.axelero.hu> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw)" > > >--Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw) >Content-type: text/html >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > > > > > >--Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw) >Content-id: >Content-type: audio/x-midi; name=handbook91.bat >Content-transfer-encoding: base64 >Content-disposition: attachment; filename=handbook91.bat > > >--Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw) >Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > > >--Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw) >Content-id: >Content-type: application/octet-stream; name=handbook91.html >Content-transfer-encoding: base64 >Content-disposition: attachment; filename=handbook91.html > >PCFET0NUWVBFIGh0bWwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDMuMiBGaW5hbC8vRU4i >Pgo8SFRNTD4KPEhFQUQ+CjxNRVRBIEhUVFAtRVFVSVY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgQ09OVEVO >VD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWlzby04ODU5LTEiPgo8VElUTEU+QWRtaW5pc3RyYXRp >bmcgUHJpbnRlcnM8L1RJVExFPgo8L0hFQUQ+CjxCT0RZIHRleHQ9IiMwMDAwMDAiIGJnY29s >b3I9IiNmZmZmZmYiPgoKPEEgSFJFRj0iaGFuZGJvb2suaHRtbCI+PEVNPkZyZWVCU0QgSGFu >ZGJvb2s8L0VNPjwvQT4KIDxiPjo8L2I+IDxBIEhSRUY9ImhhbmRib29rNzkuaHRtbCI+PEVN >PlByaW50aW5nPC9FTT48L0E+CiA8Yj46PC9iPiA8QSBIUkVGPSJoYW5kYm9vazg2Lmh0bWwi >PjxFTT5Vc2luZyBQcmludGVyczwvRU0+PC9BPgogPGI+OjwvYj4gPEVNPkFkbWluaXN0cmF0 >aW5nIFByaW50ZXJzPC9FTT48QlI+CjxiPlByZXZpb3VzOjwvYj4gPEEgSFJFRj0iaGFuZGJv >b2s5MC5odG1sIj48RU0+QmV5b25kIFBsYWluIFRleHQ6IFByaW50aW5nIE9wdGlvbnM8L0VN >PjwvQT48QlI+CjxiPk5leHQ6PC9iPiA8QSBIUkVGPSJoYW5kYm9vazkyLmh0bWwiPjxFTT5B >ZHZhbmNlZCBQcmludGVyIFNldHVwPC9FTT48L0E+CgoKPEhSIE5PU0hBREU+CiAgPEgyPjxB >IE5BTUU9IjEyMCI+PC9BPjcuNS41LiBBZG1pbmlzdHJhdGluZyBQcmludGVyczxBIE5BTUU9 >InByaW50aW5nOmxwYyI+PC9BPjwvSDI+CjxwPiBBcyBhbiBhZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yIGZvciB5 >b3VyIHByaW50ZXJzLCB5b3UgaGF2ZSBoYWQgdG8KaW5zdGFsbCwgc2V0IHVwLCBhbmQgdGVz >dCB0aGVtLiAgVXNpbmcgdGhlIAo8QSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL2Nn >aS9tYW4uY2dpP2xwYyI+bHBjPC9BPiBjb21tYW5kLAp5b3UgY2FuIGludGVyYWN0IHdpdGgg >eW91ciBwcmludGVycyBpbiB5ZXQgbW9yZSB3YXlzLiAgV2l0aDwvcD4KPHA+PEEgaHJlZj0i >aHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9jZ2kvbWFuLmNnaT9scGMiPmxwYzwvQT4sIHlvdSBj >YW48L3A+CjxwPgo8dWw+CjxsaT5TdGFydCBhbmQgc3RvcCB0aGUgcHJpbnRlcnMKPC9saT4K >PGxpPkVuYWJsZSBhbmQgZGlzYWJsZSB0aGVpciBxdWV1ZXMKPC9saT4KPGxpPlJlYXJyYW5n >ZSB0aGUgb3JkZXIgb2YgdGhlIGpvYnMgaW4gZWFjaCBxdWV1ZS48L2xpPgo8L3VsPgo8L3A+ >CjxwPkZpcnN0LCBhIG5vdGUgYWJvdXQgdGVybWlub2xvZ3k6IGlmIGEgcHJpbnRlciBpcwo8 >ZW0+c3RvcHBlZDwvZW0+LCBpdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBwcmludCBhbnl0aGluZyBpbiBpdHMgcXVl >dWUuICBVc2VycwpjYW4gc3RpbGwgc3VibWl0IGpvYnMsIHdoaWNoIHdpbGwgd2FpdCBpbiB0 >aGUgcXVldWUgdW50aWwKdGhlIHByaW50ZXIgaXMgPGVtPnN0YXJ0ZWQ8L2VtPiBvciB0aGUg >cXVldWUgaXMgY2xlYXJlZC48L3A+CjxwPklmIGEgcXVldWUgaXMgPGVtPmRpc2FibGVkPC9l >bT4sIG5vIHVzZXIgKGV4Y2VwdCByb290KSBjYW4Kc3VibWl0IGpvYnMgZm9yIHRoZSBwcmlu >dGVyLiAgQW4gPGVtPmVuYWJsZWQ8L2VtPiBxdWV1ZSBhbGxvd3MKam9icyB0byBiZSBzdWJt >aXR0ZWQuICBBIHByaW50ZXIgY2FuIGJlIDxlbT5zdGFydGVkPC9lbT4gZm9yIGEKZGlzYWJs >ZWQgcXVldWUsIGluIHdoaWNoIGNhc2UgaXQgd2lsbCBjb250aW51ZSB0byBwcmludCBqb2Jz >CmluIHRoZSBxdWV1ZSB1bnRpbCB0aGUgcXVldWUgaXMgZW1wdHkuPC9wPgo8cD5JbiBnZW5l >cmFsLCB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0byBoYXZlIHJvb3QgcHJpdmlsZWdlcyB0byB1c2UgdGhlPC9wPgo8 >cD48QSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL2NnaS9tYW4uY2dpP2xwYyI+bHBj >PC9BPiBjb21tYW5kLiAgT3JkaW5hcnkgdXNlcnMgY2FuIHVzZSB0aGUgCjxBIGhyZWY9Imh0 >dHA6Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvY2dpL21hbi5jZ2k/bHBjIj5scGM8L0E+CmNvbW1hbmQg >dG8gZ2V0IHByaW50ZXIgc3RhdHVzIGFuZCB0byByZXN0YXJ0IGEgaHVuZyBwcmludGVyCm9u >bHkuPC9wPgo8cD5IZXJlIGlzIGEgc3VtbWFyeSBvZiB0aGUgCjxBIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly93 >d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvY2dpL21hbi5jZ2k/bHBjIj5scGM8L0E+IGNvbW1hbmRzLiAgTW9z >dCBvZiB0aGUKY29tbWFuZHMgdGFrZXMgYSA8aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+IGFyZ3VtZW50 >IHRvIHRlbGwgb24gd2hpY2gKcHJpbnRlciB0byBvcGVyYXRlLiAgWW91IGNhbiB1c2UgPGNv >ZGU+YWxsPC9jb2RlPiBmb3IgdGhlCjxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT4gdG8gbWVhbiBhbGwg >cHJpbnRlcnMgbGlzdGVkIGluCjxjb2RlPi9ldGMvcHJpbnRjYXA8L2NvZGU+LjwvcD4KPHA+ >CjxkbD4KPGR0PjxiPjxjb2RlPmFib3J0IDxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT48L2NvZGU+PC9i >PjxkZD48cD5DYW5jZWwgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgam9iIGFuZCBzdG9wIHRoZSBwcmludGVyLiAg >VXNlcnMgY2FuCnN0aWxsIHN1Ym1pdCBqb2JzIGlmIHRoZSBxdWV1ZSdzIGVuYWJsZWQuPC9w >PgoKPGR0PjxiPjxjb2RlPmNsZWFuIDxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT48L2NvZGU+PC9iPjxk >ZD48cD5SZW1vdmUgb2xkIGZpbGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHByaW50ZXIncyBzcG9vbGluZyBkaXJl >Y3RvcnkuCk9jY2FzaW9uYWxseSwgdGhlIGZpbGVzIHRoYXQgbWFrZSB1cCBhIGpvYiBhcmUg >bm90CnByb3Blcmx5IHJlbW92ZWQgYnkgTFBELCBwYXJ0aWN1bGFybHkgaWYgdGhlcmUgaGF2 >ZSBiZWVuCmVycm9ycyBkdXJpbmcgcHJpbnRpbmcgb3IgYSBsb3Qgb2YgYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRp >dmUKYWN0aXZpdHkuICBUaGlzIGNvbW1hbmQgZmluZHMgZmlsZXMgdGhhdCBkbyBub3QgYmVs >b25nIGluCnRoZSBzcG9vbGluZyBkaXJlY3RvcnkgYW5kIHJlbW92ZXMgdGhlbS48L3A+Cgo8 >ZHQ+PGI+PGNvZGU+ZGlzYWJsZSA8aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+PC9jb2RlPjwvYj48ZGQ+ >PHA+RGlzYWJsZSBxdWV1aW5nIG9mIG5ldyBqb2JzLiAgSWYgdGhlIHByaW50ZXIncyBzdGFy >dGVkLAppdCB3aWxsIGNvbnRpbnVlIHRvIHByaW50IGFueSBqb2JzIHJlbWFpbmluZyBpbiB0 >aGUKcXVldWUuICBUaGUgc3VwZXJ1c2VyIChyb290KSBjYW4gYWx3YXlzIHN1Ym1pdCBqb2Jz >LApldmVuIHRvIGEgZGlzYWJsZWQgcXVldWUuPC9wPgo8cD5UaGlzIGNvbW1hbmQgaXMgdXNl >ZnVsIHdoaWxlIHlvdSBhcmUgdGVzdGluZyBhIG5ldwpwcmludGVyIG9yIGZpbHRlciBpbnN0 >YWxsYXRpb246IGRpc2FibGUgdGhlIHF1ZXVlIGFuZApzdWJtaXQgam9icyBhcyByb290LiAg >T3RoZXIgdXNlcnMgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWJsZSB0bwpzdWJtaXQgam9icyB1bnRpbCB5b3Ug >Y29tcGxldGUgeW91ciB0ZXN0aW5nIGFuZCByZS1lbmFibGUKdGhlIHF1ZXVlIHdpdGggdGhl >IDxjb2RlPmVuYWJsZTwvY29kZT4gY29tbWFuZC48L3A+Cgo8ZHQ+PGI+PGNvZGU+ZG93biA8 >aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+IDxpPm1lc3NhZ2UuLi48L2k+PC9jb2RlPjwvYj48ZGQ+PHA+ >VGFrZSBhIHByaW50ZXIgZG93bi4gIEVxdWl2YWxlbnQgdG8gPGNvZGU+ZGlzYWJsZTwvY29k >ZT4KZm9sbG93ZWQgYnkgPGNvZGU+c3RvcDwvY29kZT4uICBUaGUgPGk+bWVzc2FnZTwvaT4g >YXBwZWFycyBhcyB0aGUKcHJpbnRlcidzIHN0YXR1cyB3aGVuZXZlciBhIHVzZXIgY2hlY2tz >IHRoZSBwcmludGVyJ3MKcXVldWUgd2l0aCAKPEEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcmVlYnNk >Lm9yZy9jZ2kvbWFuLmNnaT9scHEiPmxwcTwvQT4gb3Igc3RhdHVzIHdpdGggPGNvZGU+bHBj >IHN0YXR1czwvY29kZT4uPC9wPgoKPGR0PjxiPjxjb2RlPmVuYWJsZSA8aT5wcmludGVyLW5h >bWU8L2k+PC9jb2RlPjwvYj48ZGQ+PHA+RW5hYmxlIHRoZSBxdWV1ZSBmb3IgYSBwcmludGVy >LiAgVXNlcnMgY2FuIHN1Ym1pdCBqb2JzCmJ1dCB0aGUgcHJpbnRlciB3aWxsIG5vdCBwcmlu >dCBhbnl0aGluZyB1bnRpbCBpdCBpcyBzdGFydGVkLjwvcD4KCjxkdD48Yj48Y29kZT5oZWxw >IDxpPmNvbW1hbmQtbmFtZTwvaT48L2NvZGU+PC9iPjxkZD48cD5QcmludCBoZWxwIG9uIHRo >ZSBjb21tYW5kIDxpPmNvbW1hbmQtbmFtZTwvaT4uICBXaXRoIG5vCjxpPmNvbW1hbmQtbmFt >ZTwvaT4sIHByaW50IGEgc3VtbWFyeSBvZiB0aGUgY29tbWFuZHMKYXZhaWxhYmxlLjwvcD4K >CjxkdD48Yj48Y29kZT5yZXN0YXJ0IDxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT48L2NvZGU+PC9iPjxk >ZD48cD5TdGFydCB0aGUgcHJpbnRlci4gIE9yZGluYXJ5IHVzZXJzIGNhbiB1c2UgdGhpcyBj >b21tYW5kCmlmIHNvbWUgZXh0cmFvcmRpbmFyeSBjaXJjdW1zdGFuY2UgaGFuZ3MgTFBELCBi >dXQgdGhleQpjYW5ub3Qgc3RhcnQgYSBwcmludGVyIHN0b3BwZWQgd2l0aCBlaXRoZXIgdGhl >IDxjb2RlPnN0b3A8L2NvZGU+Cm9yIDxjb2RlPmRvd248L2NvZGU+IGNvbW1hbmRzLiAgVGhl >IDxjb2RlPnJlc3RhcnQ8L2NvZGU+IGNvbW1hbmQgaXMKZXF1aXZhbGVudCB0byA8Y29kZT5h >Ym9ydDwvY29kZT4gZm9sbG93ZWQgYnkgPGNvZGU+c3RhcnQ8L2NvZGU+LjwvcD4KCjxkdD48 >Yj48Y29kZT5zdGFydCA8aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+PC9jb2RlPjwvYj48ZGQ+PHA+U3Rh >cnQgdGhlIHByaW50ZXIuICBUaGUgcHJpbnRlciB3aWxsIHByaW50IGpvYnMgaW4gaXRzCnF1 >ZXVlLjwvcD4KCjxkdD48Yj48Y29kZT5zdG9wIDxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT48L2NvZGU+ >PC9iPjxkZD48cD5TdG9wIHRoZSBwcmludGVyLiAgVGhlIHByaW50ZXIgd2lsbCBmaW5pc2gg >dGhlIGN1cnJlbnQKam9iIGFuZCB3aWxsIG5vdCBwcmludCBhbnl0aGluZyBlbHNlIGluIGl0 >cyBxdWV1ZS4gIEV2ZW4KdGhvdWdoIHRoZSBwcmludGVyIGlzIHN0b3BwZWQsIHVzZXJzIGNh >biBzdGlsbCBzdWJtaXQKam9icyB0byBhbiBlbmFibGVkIHF1ZXVlLjwvcD4KCjxkdD48Yj48 >Y29kZT50b3BxIDxpPnByaW50ZXItbmFtZTwvaT4gPGk+am9iLW9yLXVzZXJuYW1lLi4uPC9p >PjwvY29kZT48L2I+PGRkPjxwPlJlYXJyYW5nZSB0aGUgcXVldWUgZm9yIDxpPnByaW50ZXIt >bmFtZTwvaT4gYnkgcGxhY2luZyB0aGUKam9icyB3aXRoIHRoZSBsaXN0ZWQgPGk+am9iPC9p >PiBudW1iZXJzIG9yIHRoZSBqb2JzCmJlbG9uZ2luZyB0byA8aT51c2VybmFtZTwvaT4gYXQg >dGhlIHRvcCBvZiB0aGUgcXVldWUuICBGb3IKdGhpcyBjb21tYW5kLCB5b3UgY2Fubm90IHVz >ZSA8Y29kZT5hbGw8L2NvZGU+IGFzIHRoZQo8aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+LjwvcD4KCjxk >dD48Yj48Y29kZT51cCA8aT5wcmludGVyLW5hbWU8L2k+PC9jb2RlPjwvYj48ZGQ+PHA+QnJp >bmcgYSBwcmludGVyIHVwOyB0aGUgb3Bwb3NpdGUgb2YgdGhlIDxjb2RlPmRvd248L2NvZGU+ >CmNvbW1hbmQuICBFcXVpdmFsZW50IHRvIDxjb2RlPnN0YXJ0PC9jb2RlPiBmb2xsb3dlZCBi >eQo8Y29kZT5lbmFibGU8L2NvZGU+LjwvcD4KCjwvZGw+CjwvcD4KCjxwPjxBIGhyZWY9Imh0 >dHA6Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvY2dpL21hbi5jZ2k/bHBjIj5scGM8L0E+IGFjY2VwdHMg >dGhlIGFib3ZlIGNvbW1hbmRzIG9uIHRoZSBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUuICBJZgp5b3UgZG8gbm90 >IGVudGVyIGFueSBjb21tYW5kcywgCjxBIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcv >Y2dpL21hbi5jZ2k/bHBjIj5scGM8L0E+IGVudGVycyBhbiBpbnRlcmFjdGl2ZQptb2RlLCB3 >aGVyZSB5b3UgY2FuIGVudGVyIGNvbW1hbmRzIHVudGlsIHlvdSB0eXBlIDxjb2RlPmV4aXQ8 >L2NvZGU+LAo8Y29kZT5xdWl0PC9jb2RlPiwgb3IgZW5kLW9mLWZpbGUuPC9wPgoKIDxIUiBO >T1NIQURFPgo8QSBIUkVGPSJoYW5kYm9vay5odG1sIj48RU0+RnJlZUJTRCBIYW5kYm9vazwv >RU0+PC9BPgogPGI+OjwvYj4gPEEgSFJFRj0iaGFuZGJvb2s3OS5odG1sIj48RU0+UHJpbnRp >bmc8L0VNPjwvQT4KIDxiPjo8L2I+IDxBIEhSRUY9ImhhbmRib29rODYuaHRtbCI+PEVNPlVz >aW5nIFByaW50ZXJzPC9FTT48L0E+CiA8Yj46PC9iPiA8RU0+QWRtaW5pc3RyYXRpbmcgUHJp >bnRlcnM8L0VNPjxCUj4KPGI+UHJldmlvdXM6PC9iPiA8QSBIUkVGPSJoYW5kYm9vazkwLmh0 >bWwiPjxFTT5CZXlvbmQgUGxhaW4gVGV4dDogUHJpbnRpbmcgT3B0aW9uczwvRU0+PC9BPjxC >Uj4KPGI+TmV4dDo8L2I+IDxBIEhSRUY9ImhhbmRib29rOTIuaHRtbCI+PEVNPkFkdmFuY2Vk >IFByaW50ZXIgU2V0dXA8L0VNPjwvQT4KCgoKPC9CT0RZPgo8L0hUTUw+Cj== > >--Boundary_(ID_jcy7fN9xpVax+OmZF/mmtw)-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 11:49: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B15A37B401 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hscmgw.ttuhsc.edu (hscmgw.ttuhsc.edu [168.49.126.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B17443E54 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Antigen_csnt008@TTUHSC.EDU) Received: from hscmgw.ttuhsc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hscmgw.ttuhsc.edu (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id g67In4H18200 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:49:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from csnt011.lubb.ttuhsc.edu (csnt011.lubb.ttuhsc.edu [168.49.126.17]) by hscmgw.ttuhsc.edu (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id g67Imwf18190 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:48:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by csnt011.lubb.ttuhsc.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:46:57 -0500 Message-ID: <83BFACF24412D511929D00D0B7B0CF17028DEAD3@csnt008.lubb.ttuhsc.edu> From: ANTIGEN_CSNT008 To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= HTML.MimeExploit (CA(Ve t)) virus Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:46:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= HTML.MimeExploit (CA(Vet)) virus. The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: Accepts the above commands on the command line.", was sent from An address that is never read by anyone and was discovered in Realtime Scan Job\Hays, Kelly\Vendors\FreeBSD\freebsd-stable located at TTU/TTMC/CSNT008. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 12: 3: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2208137B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F4643E52 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B478B5CC; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D289066.F5FBB2D7@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:03:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geraint A Edwards Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall hard links References: <20020707134417.GA18082@cymru.serf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Geraint A Edwards wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm fairly new to the world of upgrading, but (I think) I have > noticed something odd (though, I'm not sure if it's significant). > > On a handful of occasions, I've followed the handbook to upgrade > to STABLE, even to the later point (after 'make installworld' > and 'mergemaster') of > cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall > make all install > but have noticed that the contents of /stand is not what I > expected: all files hard linked to the same binary: Ok, this is going to sound harsh, but I don't intend it that way. A) This question is for -questions, not -stable. B) This topic is covered at great length in the mail archives. Please learn how to use them, and try them first before posting a question to the list. C) Hint: What you're describing is by design, and /stand is not updated as part of the make {build|install}world process. Good luck, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 12:13: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C737F37B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B5243E52; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:13:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44B98B5BA; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D2892BC.C3859361@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:13:00 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helge Oldach Cc: nunotex@pt-quorum.com, maxim@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/newsyslog newsyslog.c References: <200207071122.NAA19022@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Helge Oldach wrote: > Err, no, please cross-check with the source. I did take a quick look at it actually, but my memory may have been clouded by earlier experience. Thanks for the update. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 12:31:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2202B37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop3.psconsult.nl (ps226.psconsult.nl [193.67.147.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5C743E4A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:31:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@pop3.psconsult.nl) Received: (from paul@localhost) by pop3.psconsult.nl (8.9.2/8.9.2) id VAA56954 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:31:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from paul) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:31:33 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: IPsec and IPfilter interaction Message-ID: <20020707213133.A56630@psconsult.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All, (Not sure if this is the right list to discuss this, point me to a better list please if I'm wrong.) I'm trying to set up a small VPN between two Internet connected LANs. See below for the details. Now I try to configure IPfilter. I'd like to filter all VPN traffic as soon as it comes out of the tunnel but the traffic never passes the gif0 interface as explained in http://asherah.dyndns.org/~josh/ipsec-howto.txt (got there from the FreeBSD handbook, chapter 10.9, through the link to http://www.daemonnews.org/200101/ipsec-howto.html): The configuration of the SPD for tunnel mode is very similar to that of transport mode. The major change that is done is the use of the gif(4) device to get the routing correct. Note that traffic is *not* transported through the gif(4) tunnel! Instead the IPsec code in the kernel grabs the packets according to the specified policy and wraps them with the correct IP addresses for the IPsec tunnel. Tunnel traffic coming in on the external interface (fxp1) all looks like "proto ah" to IPfilter. It looks like I cannot access the TCP, UDP or ICP payload at this point, which makes sense to me. Does this mean that I can only filter TCP, UDP, ICMP traffic coming out of the tunnel when it leaves the firewall thru the internal interface (fxp0)? So all listening sockets inside the firewall are completely open to traffice coming from the tunnel? Or am I wrong here and is there a way to completely screen all tunnel traffic after the IPsec encapsulation is peeled off? Regards, Paul Schenkeveld ........................................................................ The configuration is as follows: 10.0.1.0/24 internal LAN ------+---------------------------------- | +-----------+ | fxp0 | | firewall1 | | fxp1 | +-----------+ | a.b.c.d +------> Internet <------+ | e.f.g.h +-----------+ | fxp1 | | firewall2 | | fxp0 | +-----------+ | -------------------------------+--------- 10.0.2.0/24 internal LAN I've set up IPsec as follows: On firewall1: # rc.conf ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp1="inet a.b.c.d netmask x.x.x.x" ifconfig_gif0="inet 10.0.1.1 10.0.2.1" gifconfig_gif0="a.b.c.d e.f.g.h" static_routes="10_0_2" route_10_0_2="-net 10.0.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.1" # ipsec.conf spdadd 10.0.1.0/24 10.0.2.0/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-e.f.g.h/require ah/transport/a.b.c.d-e.f.g.h/require; spdadd 10.0.2.0/24 10.0.1.0/24 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/e.f.g.h-a.b.c.d/require ah/transport/e.f.g.h-a.b.c.d/require; add a.b.c.d e.f.g.h esp 0x10001 -E blowfish-cbc ... -A keyed-md5 ...; add e.f.g.h a.b.c.d esp 0x10002 -E blowfish-cbc ... -A keyed-md5 ...; add a.b.c.d e.f.g.h ah 0x10003 -A keyed-md5 ...; add e.f.g.h a.b.c.d ah 0x10004 -A keyed-md5 ...; On firewall2: # rc.conf ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.0.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp1="inet e.f.g.h netmask x.x.x.x" ifconfig_gif0="inet 10.0.2.1 10.0.1.1" gifconfig_gif0="e.f.g.h a.b.c.d" static_routes="10_0_1" route_10_0_1="-net 10.0.1.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.1" # ipsec.conf spdadd 10.0.2.0/24 10.0.1.0/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/e.f.g.h-a.b.c.d/require ah/transport/e.f.g.h-a.b.c.d/require; spdadd 10.0.1.0/24 10.0.2.0/24 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-e.f.g.h/require ah/transport/a.b.c.d-e.f.g.h/require; add a.b.c.d e.f.g.h esp 0x10001 -E blowfish-cbc ... -A keyed-md5 ...; add e.f.g.h a.b.c.d esp 0x10002 -E blowfish-cbc ... -A keyed-md5 ...; add a.b.c.d e.f.g.h ah 0x10003 -A keyed-md5 ...; add e.f.g.h a.b.c.d ah 0x10004 -A keyed-md5 ...; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13: 0: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3E37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE2643E54 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F938B5BC; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D289DBD.857F5FD9@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:59:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schenkeveld Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: IPsec and IPfilter interaction References: <20020707213133.A56630@psconsult.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > > Hi All, > > (Not sure if this is the right list to discuss this, point me to a > better list please if I'm wrong.) Since your question has nothing to do with -stable, freebsd-questions is a more likely candidate. Good luck, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:10:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968A037B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wxp.homeip.net (adsl-212-101-21-176.solnet.ch [212.101.21.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D3D643E91 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pbrossin@wxp.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 11454 invoked by uid 8); 7 Jul 2002 20:00:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP id smtpd7A98XF; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:00:24 EDT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:00:07 +0200 From: "Brossin Pierrick" Message-ID: <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from nitrox (pierrick.wxp.homeip.net [10.0.0.50]) by server.wxp.homeip.net (AvMailGate-6.13.0.1) id 11442-4BD42850; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 22:00:10 +0200 References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> Reply-To: "Brossin Pierrick" Subject: FreeBSD Server and Gateway To: X-AntiVirus: OK! AvMailGate Version 6.13.0.26 at wxp.homeip.net has not found any known virus in this email. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I don't know if you guys know SME (www.e-smith.org). If not, it's a RedHat/Linux distro that does server and gateway (with firewall mail http .....) I'd like to the same with FreeBSD for my local network. I read those two howtos: http://www.schlacter.net:8500/public/FreeBSD-STABLE_and_IPFILTER.html http://www.muine.org/~hoang/freenat.html I'm a little bit confused now.. :/ I'd like/need (for the beginning) at least (I think) a firewall, adsl connection (pppoe) and NAT.. I read the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html But it's telling : Add the following to your /etc/rc.conf file: ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="YES" # if you want to enable nat for your local network, otherwise NO ppp_profile="name_of_service_provider" So why are the two other howtos treating (as I understand) ip masquerading with IPFilter. As you may see, I'm really confused with IPFilter NAT IP Masquerading .... Can someone take the time to explain or give the url of a page please.. I can't find any ? Regards, Pierrick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:12:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A27137B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (ca-sqy-4-107.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.57.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B421243E52 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dak@nitrogen.wanadoo.fr) Received: from nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (nitrogen [127.0.0.1]) by nitrogen (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g67IiGv8035331 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:44:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dak@nitrogen.wanadoo.fr) Received: (from dak@localhost) by nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g67IiGZo035330 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:44:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:44:15 +0200 From: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Nephtali To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: XFree 4.2.0 mouse problems Message-ID: <20020707184415.GA24427@nitrogen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have a laptop (Compaq Presario serie 1200) with a touchpad integrated and a Logitch PS/2 mouse pluged in. My problem is that my mouse doesn't work under X. After starting X, if i move slightly the pointer, it goes in a corner and doesn't want to move elsewhere. I have tried all protocols :/ What can i do ? -- Aurélien To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:16:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C922837B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C26D43E58 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (firewall-user@dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68]) by mizar.origin-it.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo27jun02) with ESMTP id g67KGLlg068320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:16:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/hmo06may02) with ESMTP id g67KGKNr013650; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:16:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo01jul02) id WAA20544; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:16:19 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200207072016.WAA20544@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: IPsec and IPfilter interaction In-Reply-To: <20020707213133.A56630@psconsult.nl> from Paul Schenkeveld at "Jul 7, 2002 9:31:33 pm" To: fb-stable@psconsult.nl (Paul Schenkeveld) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:16:19 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Schenkeveld: >(Not sure if this is the right list to discuss this, point me to a >better list please if I'm wrong.) -questions? > The configuration of the SPD for tunnel mode is very similar to that > of transport mode. The major change that is done is the use of the > gif(4) device to get the routing correct. Note that traffic is *not* > transported through the gif(4) tunnel! Instead the IPsec code in the > kernel grabs the packets according to the specified policy and wraps > them with the correct IP addresses for the IPsec tunnel. Oops. I think I wrote this. :-) >Tunnel traffic coming in on the external interface (fxp1) all looks >like "proto ah" to IPfilter. It looks like I cannot access the TCP, >UDP or ICP payload at this point, which makes sense to me. > >Does this mean that I can only filter TCP, UDP, ICMP traffic coming out of >the tunnel when it leaves the firewall thru the internal interface (fxp0)? > >So all listening sockets inside the firewall are completely open to >traffice coming from the tunnel? Actually you can (and want to!) filter for AH (or, if you're using tunnel mode, ESP) protocols and drop any TCP, UDP and ICMP traffic. Dropping ICMP completely is probably not wise - at least you want to allow ICMP from the peers you are talking AH (or ESP) to. Further, allowing a tcp/telnet resp. tcp/ssh to and from the remote site would probably be reasonable. >Or am I wrong here and is there a way to completely screen all tunnel >traffic after the IPsec encapsulation is peeled off? AFAIK not. I'd say this wouldn't be very sensible anyway. By setting up a security association with the peer you are basically trusting him. You can still do filtering on the inside interface of course. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:16:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946EF37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omen.e-lated.org (omen.e-lated.org [63.231.29.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081BA43E54 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danger@e-lated.org) Received: from localhost (danger@localhost) by omen.e-lated.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g67KFV352225; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:15:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danger@e-lated.org) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:15:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Seeman To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Nephtali Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree 4.2.0 mouse problems In-Reply-To: <20020707184415.GA24427@nitrogen> Message-ID: <20020707131505.M52193-100000@omen.e-lated.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG try "Auto" for the protocol On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, [unknown-8bit] Aur=E9lien Nephtali wrote: > Hi, > > I have a laptop (Compaq Presario serie 1200) with a touchpad integrated a= nd a > Logitch PS/2 mouse pluged in. My problem is that my mouse doesn't work un= der X. > > After starting X, if i move slightly the pointer, it goes in a corner and= doesn't > want to move elsewhere. I have tried all protocols :/ > > What can i do ? > > -- Aur=E9lien > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:28:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B977A37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop3.psconsult.nl (ps226.psconsult.nl [193.67.147.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305D543E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:28:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@pop3.psconsult.nl) Received: (from paul@localhost) by pop3.psconsult.nl (8.9.2/8.9.2) id WAA57647; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:28:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from paul) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:28:03 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld To: Helge Oldach Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec and IPfilter interaction Message-ID: <20020707222803.A57511@psconsult.nl> References: <20020707213133.A56630@psconsult.nl> <200207072016.WAA20544@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200207072016.WAA20544@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>; from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com on Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:16:19PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:16:19PM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote: > Paul Schenkeveld: > >(Not sure if this is the right list to discuss this, point me to a > >better list please if I'm wrong.) > > -questions? > > > The configuration of the SPD for tunnel mode is very similar to that > > of transport mode. The major change that is done is the use of the > > gif(4) device to get the routing correct. Note that traffic is *not* > > transported through the gif(4) tunnel! Instead the IPsec code in the > > kernel grabs the packets according to the specified policy and wraps > > them with the correct IP addresses for the IPsec tunnel. > > Oops. I think I wrote this. :-) > > >Tunnel traffic coming in on the external interface (fxp1) all looks > >like "proto ah" to IPfilter. It looks like I cannot access the TCP, > >UDP or ICP payload at this point, which makes sense to me. > > > >Does this mean that I can only filter TCP, UDP, ICMP traffic coming out of > >the tunnel when it leaves the firewall thru the internal interface (fxp0)? > > > >So all listening sockets inside the firewall are completely open to > >traffice coming from the tunnel? > > Actually you can (and want to!) filter for AH (or, if you're using > tunnel mode, ESP) protocols and drop any TCP, UDP and ICMP traffic. > Dropping ICMP completely is probably not wise - at least you want to > allow ICMP from the peers you are talking AH (or ESP) to. Further, > allowing a tcp/telnet resp. tcp/ssh to and from the remote site would > probably be reasonable. I know that I can filter on AH or ESP protocols but my issue is that every daemon on the firewall (by default, sometimes tunable) listens on every available interface, including the gif0 interface. So from the inside LAN at one location (behind firewall1) one can connect to e.g. sendmail running on firewall2 at the other location. How can I (on firewall2) block incoming connections coming in thru the tunnel to a particular TCP or UDP port of firewall2? > >Or am I wrong here and is there a way to completely screen all tunnel > >traffic after the IPsec encapsulation is peeled off? > > AFAIK not. I'd say this wouldn't be very sensible anyway. By setting up > a security association with the peer you are basically trusting him. So you mean that if one site gets compromised it's acceptable that the other sites get compromised as well? > You can still do filtering on the inside interface of course. Except for traffic terminating at the firewall. Regards, Paul Schenkeveld To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:44:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C7137B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE8E43E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:44:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g67KiHT85130; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:44:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@vashon.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g67KiBn5001861; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:44:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200207072044.g67KiBn5001861@vashon.polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: romanp@unshadow.net Subject: Re: NFS errors at high hz values with TCP mounts In-Reply-To: <20020707205408.Y416-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> References: <20020707205408.Y416-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <20020707205408.Y416-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru>, Roman V. Palagin wrote: > On Jul 6, at 3:54pm -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > so->so_rcv.sb_timeo = (5 * hz); > > so->so_snd.sb_timeo = (5 * hz); > > > > But sb_timeo has type "short", which overflows when hz is 10000. > > > > This is in struct sockbuf. I don't think it would break binary > > compatibility with existing 3rd party modules to change it to type > > "long". Are there any contrary opinions? > > I see this problem with HZ=1000, overflow doesn't occured in this > situation... May be problem lies somewhere else? Are you sure? I changed the type of sb_timeo to int and the problem disappeared on my system. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 13:57:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71CA37B400; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6080043E09; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:57:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g67KvYY63549; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:57:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g67KvWG93124; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:57:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 14:56:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020707.145637.73336666.imp@village.org> To: rpp@ci.com.au Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pcmcia flash card problems after 4.6-S From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020707075242.GA6660@mippet.ci.com.au> References: <20020707075242.GA6660@mippet.ci.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Maybe the ata driver has changed. Maybe you should try to upgrade to 4.5 and try that and 4.6-release as well. This will help us track down when things went bad. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 14:17:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F0D37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D559E43E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rip.psg.com.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17RJPn-000KNc-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 14:17:55 -0700 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Klaus Steden Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 14:17:55 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> yesterday's -stable and ports tree, rebuilt twice. >> % pgpk -l randy >> Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use >> sec+ 1024 0xB1331439 1994-04-04 ---------- RSA Sign & Encrypt >> uid Randy Bush >> 1 matching key found >> Received signal 8. >> anyone else see this or have a clue? > Yup. I tried PGP6, too, and found the same problem. Did some digging around > in the source, and at least with PGP6, I discovered it's a bug in > pgpRndUnix.c. Specifically, when loading a timer for use in an entropy > function (I think), there's a call to clock_getres() - using the > CLOCK_REALTIME clock, filling in a structure that gets returned to the caller > as 0, which triggers the FPE. > > I tried using CLOCK_VIRTUAL, which stopped the FPE, but returned an error and > thus didn't generate any randomness. > > Hopefully I've got my terms right - I'm no crypto expert by any stretch, but > that's what I found to be a problem in PGP6. I suspect something similar may > be at play in PGP5. ok, interesting news. if i move the working binary from the old system to the new system, i get the sig with it. i.e. it is in the system, not the build of pgp5. so i am moving this conversation to stable. randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 15:11: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C30937B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from milan.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (milan.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E9443E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@milan.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de) Received: by milan.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2EE3AAB9F; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:11:01 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ata-related panic on 4.6-STABLE Message-ID: <20020707221101.GE86838@unixpages.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I´m having some problems with a box that panics at startup. Had to install from a 4.4-RELEASE medium because an attempt from a 4.6-RELEASE one resulted in panics before sysinstall came up. Here's the panic with a trace, after the update from 4.4 to 4.6-STABLE. ata1-slave: ATAPI identify retries exceeded Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer: = 0x8:0xc0282ba6 stack pointer: = 0x10:0xc0379f08 frame pointer: = 0x10:0xc0379f74 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0xb1 = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = bio kernel: type 18 trap, code=0 Stopped at __qdivrem+0x2a: divi %ecx,%eax db> tr __qdivrem(0,0,0,0,0) at __qdivrem+0x2a __udivdi3(0,0,0,0) at __udivdi3+0x1a ad_attach(c11b762c) at ad_attach+0x403 ata_boot_attach(0) at ata_boot_attach+0x118 run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks(0,376c00,37e000,0,c0120380) at run_interrupt_d riven_config_hooks+0x1a mi_startup(0,0,0,0,0) at mi_startup+0x68 begin() at begin+0x47 db> Regards, Christian -- http://www.unixpages.org chris@unixpages.org GPG Pub-Key : www.unixpages.org/cbrueffer.asc GPG Fingerprint: 0DB5 8563 2473 C72A A8D1 56EA DAD2 B05D 5F3C 3185 GPG Key ID : DAD2B05D5F3C3185 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 15:13: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B3937B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (mippet.ci.com.au [192.65.182.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DD343E42 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:12:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rpp@ci.com.au) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (rpp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/CE020620/c+m+l) with ESMTP id g67MCoIS080219; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:12:51 +1000 (EST) Received: (from rpp@localhost) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g67MCooh080218; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:12:50 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:12:50 +1000 From: Richard Perini To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcmcia flash card problems after 4.6-S Message-ID: <20020707221250.GA78541@mippet.ci.com.au> References: <20020707075242.GA6660@mippet.ci.com.au> <20020707.145637.73336666.imp@village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020707.145637.73336666.imp@village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 02:56:37PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Maybe the ata driver has changed. Maybe you should try to upgrade to > 4.5 and try that and 4.6-release as well. This will help us track > down when things went bad. David Burren suggested changing the index config parameter from "default" to "0x1" worked for a similar card for him. I tried that, and it worked for me. So my /etc/pccard.conf file now looks like: # KODAK Picture Card card "KODAK Picture Card " "KODAK " # config default "ata" ? config 0x1 "ata" ? Everything now works fine. I'm happy to investigate further if it would help the cause. Thanks, -- Richard Perini Internet: rpp@ci.com.au Corinthian Engineering Pty Ltd PHONE: +61 2 9906 7866 Sydney, Australia FAX: +61 2 9906 2464 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 15:14:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FD337B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls1.std.com [199.172.62.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FDF43E3B for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:14:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (blair@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA28383; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:14:34 -0400 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA4562252; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:14:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200207072214.SAA4562252@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Out of swap, -stable, apache2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello -stable: Is anyone else here having an out-of-swap condition, apparently caused by apache2? This has only been happening since about the end of June. It seems to start about 24 hours after the system has been rebooted after a cvsup/{build,install}world. OS is -stable, as of 2002/07/05; this started happening (I think) after some port-updating (apache2) on 28 June. Webserver is apache2, from -ports, along with mod_php4. Apache/2.0.39 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/4.2.1 While this event is underway, top shows httpd at the top (eating quite a lot of CPU) & with a status of "PFAULT" (or something like that). After the event "finishes" httpd & the system appear to be running again, just fine. Looking around in the logs, I find the following: From /var/log/messages: Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: swap_pager: out of swap space Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: pid 33475 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space . . Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost last message repeated 46 times Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost /kernel: pid 33478 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space . . Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost last message repeated 64 times Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost /kernel: pid 46115 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space From /var/log/httpd-error.log: (ip-addresses clobbered to hopefully not embarrass the guilty... :) [Sat Jul 06 19:40:32 2002] [error] [client 999.999.99.999] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / . . [Sat Jul 06 22:35:19 2002] [error] [client 888.888.888.88] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / . . [Sun Jul 07 11:24:16 2002] [error] [client 777.77.777.777] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / Anything else in the logs is several minutes "outside" these (perhaps related?) entries. DNS is cache-only: named 8.3.2-T1B Fri Jul 5 19:08:16 CDT 2002 root@localhost.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named Any ideas as to what might be going on here? The above is, to me, admittedly rather sketchy; any suggestions as to how I might trigger this myself & capture any more helpful logging/debugging data/info? Is this even a FreeBSD issue? i.e. Should I take this up with the Apache Group? Or is this some kind of pilot-error on my part? Many thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 16:50:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2BF37B408 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45B443E64 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g67NocHd082265; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:50:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g67NocXW082263; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:50:38 -0700 From: faSty To: Kenneth W Cochran Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Out of swap, -stable, apache2 Message-ID: <20020707235038.GA82250@i-sphere.com> References: <200207072214.SAA4562252@shell.TheWorld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207072214.SAA4562252@shell.TheWorld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I have apache 2.0.39_3 + MySQL + PHP/4.2.1 no problem. -fasty On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:14:34PM -0400, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > Hello -stable: > > Is anyone else here having an out-of-swap condition, apparently > caused by apache2? > > This has only been happening since about the end of June. > It seems to start about 24 hours after the system has been > rebooted after a cvsup/{build,install}world. > > OS is -stable, as of 2002/07/05; this started happening (I > think) after some port-updating (apache2) on 28 June. > Webserver is apache2, from -ports, along with mod_php4. > Apache/2.0.39 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/4.2.1 > > While this event is underway, top shows httpd at the top > (eating quite a lot of CPU) & with a status of "PFAULT" > (or something like that). After the event "finishes" httpd & > the system appear to be running again, just fine. > > Looking around in the logs, I find the following: > > >From /var/log/messages: > > Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: swap_pager: out of swap space > Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed > Jul 6 19:42:09 localhost /kernel: pid 33475 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space > . > . > Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed > Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost last message repeated 46 times > Jul 6 22:36:39 localhost /kernel: pid 33478 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space > . > . > Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed > Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost last message repeated 64 times > Jul 7 11:25:41 localhost /kernel: pid 46115 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space > > >From /var/log/httpd-error.log: (ip-addresses clobbered to > hopefully not embarrass the guilty... :) > > [Sat Jul 06 19:40:32 2002] [error] [client 999.999.99.999] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / > . > . > [Sat Jul 06 22:35:19 2002] [error] [client 888.888.888.88] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / > . > . > [Sun Jul 07 11:24:16 2002] [error] [client 777.77.777.777] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23): / > > Anything else in the logs is several minutes "outside" these > (perhaps related?) entries. > > DNS is cache-only: > named 8.3.2-T1B Fri Jul 5 19:08:16 CDT 2002 > root@localhost.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named > > Any ideas as to what might be going on here? > > The above is, to me, admittedly rather sketchy; any suggestions > as to how I might trigger this myself & capture any more helpful > logging/debugging data/info? > > Is this even a FreeBSD issue? i.e. Should I take this up with > the Apache Group? Or is this some kind of pilot-error on my part? > > Many thanks, > > -kc > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 17: 2: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF6937B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from norton.palomine.net (dsl254-102-179.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.102.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1DE143E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:02:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjohnson@palomine.net) Received: (qmail 64839 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Jul 2002 00:02:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:02:00 -0400 From: Chris Johnson To: Kenneth W Cochran Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Out of swap, -stable, apache2 Message-ID: <20020708000200.GA64777@palomine.net> References: <200207072214.SAA4562252@shell.TheWorld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207072214.SAA4562252@shell.TheWorld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:14:34PM -0400, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > Is anyone else here having an out-of-swap condition, apparently > caused by apache2? >=20 > This has only been happening since about the end of June. > It seems to start about 24 hours after the system has been > rebooted after a cvsup/{build,install}world. >=20 > OS is -stable, as of 2002/07/05; this started happening (I > think) after some port-updating (apache2) on 28 June. > Webserver is apache2, from -ports, along with mod_php4. > Apache/2.0.39 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/4.2.1 >=20 > While this event is underway, top shows httpd at the top > (eating quite a lot of CPU) & with a status of "PFAULT" > (or something like that). After the event "finishes" httpd & > the system appear to be running again, just fine. >=20 > Looking around in the logs, I find the following: I had the identical thing happen on one of my boxes with plain apache-2.0.39 (no PHP). All of the leg entries were identical. Chris Johnson --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9KNZ3PC78Lz4X/PARAm0MAJ401yhLCUy+4PMmDRWQriLdt5I/DQCfXKNQ +4k+6iDEfmPXRRDs4VS1F98= =RXa8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 17:52:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385837B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smurf.jnielsen.net (12-254-136-47.client.attbi.com [12.254.136.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A9343E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:52:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stable@jnielsen.net) Received: from max (max.local [192.168.0.9]) by smurf.jnielsen.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g680q3YY000997; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:52:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from stable@jnielsen.net) Message-ID: <025401c22619$b4181430$0900a8c0@max> From: "John Nielsen" To: "Brossin Pierrick" , References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:52:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=WEIRD_PORT version=2.20 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This belongs on -questions, not -stable. Anyway, read on. Brossin Pierrick wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if you guys know SME (www.e-smith.org). > If not, it's a RedHat/Linux distro that does server and gateway (with > firewall mail http .....) > I'd like to the same with FreeBSD for my local network. No problem there. > I read those two howtos: > > http://www.schlacter.net:8500/public/FreeBSD-STABLE_and_IPFILTER.html > http://www.muine.org/~hoang/freenat.html > > I'm a little bit confused now.. :/ Neither of those howtos deal with using ppp (which you will need to use if your DSL modem doesn't do PPPoE for you). Follow the handbook (and read some man pages) to get your basic connection working, and then worry about a firewall and NAT. Since those howtos don't deal with ppp, they also won't tell you that FreeBSD's ppp software has NAT functionality built-in. Depending on what you need/want, you may just want to use that. Or you can disable it and use ipnat/ipfilter (or natd and ipfw). See also: man 8 ppp (long, but worth the read) man 4 ng_pppoe (for background--ppp should do most of the netgraph stuff automagically) chapter 16 of the handbook (you've looked at 16.4, but there's some basic stuff about ppp in there as well) For firewalling and other NAT options: man 8 natd man 8 ipfw sections 10.7 and 17.11 of the handbook man 1 ipnat man 8 ipf You probably only need/want one of either ipfw/natd or ipfilter/ipnat. They are basically two different implementations of the same functionality. You may like one better than the other. There are some good howto's out there, but (as you've discovered) they may be dated or incomplete for some setups. Use the freebsd-questions mailing list for further questions (or the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc newsgroup is a good resource as well). Also use google groups to search both of those archives. > I'd like/need (for the beginning) at least (I think) a firewall, adsl > connection (pppoe) and NAT.. > I read the handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html > But it's telling : > > Add the following to your /etc/rc.conf file: > > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_nat="YES" # if you want to enable nat for your local network, > otherwise NO > ppp_profile="name_of_service_provider" > > So why are the two other howtos treating (as I understand) ip masquerading > with IPFilter. > > As you may see, I'm really confused with IPFilter NAT IP Masquerading .... > Can someone take the time to explain or give the url of a page please.. I > can't find any ? HTH, JN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 17:56:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8286E37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com (angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com [216.223.196.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5D643E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:56:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@fasttrackmonkey.com) Received: (qmail 92734 invoked by uid 85); 8 Jul 2002 00:56:11 -0000 Received: from freebsd@fasttrackmonkey.com by angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com by uid 1001 with qmail-scanner-1.10 (sophie: 2.9/3.56. . Clear:0. Processed in 0.065001 secs); 08 Jul 2002 00:56:11 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: freebsd@fasttrackmonkey.com via angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.10 (Clear:0. Processed in 0.065001 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com) (64.47.30.2) by 0 with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 00:56:11 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:56:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: kern/40003: Panic on boot w/4.6 and 4.6-stable (ATA problems) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I filed a PR on this, but I've been having trouble scrounging up parts to build a null-modem cable so I can do a remote GDB trace on it. Since it appears there'll be a 4.6.1, and whatever's broken in ata is still kind of broken, here's what I can get from DDB (panic is before root is mounted): ad0: READ command timeout tag-0 serv-0 - restting ata0: restting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done ad0: 1916MB [3893/16/63] at ata0-master BIOSDMA Fatal trap 12: page fualt while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x6 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc013e865 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0363fbc code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = bio trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... done Uptime: 15s Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press akey on the console to abort Debugger("manual escape to debugger") Stopped at Debugger+0x34: movb $0,in_Debugger.429 db> tr Debugger(c029aa49) at Debugger+0x34 scgetc(c02e0fc0,3,c02d9b60,1,84) at scgetc+0x37e sccngetch(2,c0363e80,c01825e1,c02c9380,c036e90) at sccngetch+0xf3 sccncheckc(c02c9380,c0363e90,c0169790,1186a0,c044ae60) at sccncheckc+0xa cncheckc(186a0) at cncchecckc+0x29 shutdown_panic(0,100) at shutdown_panic+0x34 boot(100,10,c0363f64,c0363ef8,c026239f) at boot+0x314 panic(c029ff8c,c029fa6f,c02e1a00,c02c8de0,0) at panic+0x79 trap_fatal(c0363f,6,c02e1a00,c,0) at trap_fatal+0x32b trap_pfault(c0363f64,0,6,68c040,0) at trap_pfault+0x101 trap(10,c0440010,10,c075b850,0) at trap+0x34f calltrap() at calltrap+0x11 --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xc013e865, esp = 0xc0363fa4, ebp = 0xc0363fbc --- ad_attach(c075b850) at ad_attach+0x5d ata_boot_attach(0) at ata_boot_attach+0x12a run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks(0,360c00,368000,0,c0120fc0) at run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks+ox1a mi_startup(0,0,0,0,0) at mi_startup+0x68 begin() at begin+0x47 db> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 18:54: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F67737B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kobold.compt.com (TBextgw.compt.com [209.115.146.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6FB43E4A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:53:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from klaus@kobold.compt.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:53:54 -0400 From: Klaus Steden To: Randy Bush Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 Message-ID: <20020707215354.E95654@cthulu.compt.com> References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from randy@psg.com on Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 02:17:55PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> yesterday's -stable and ports tree, rebuilt twice. > >> % pgpk -l randy > >> Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use > >> sec+ 1024 0xB1331439 1994-04-04 ---------- RSA Sign & Encrypt > >> uid Randy Bush > >> 1 matching key found > >> Received signal 8. > >> anyone else see this or have a clue? > > > Yup. I tried PGP6, too, and found the same problem. Did some digging around > > in the source, and at least with PGP6, I discovered it's a bug in > > pgpRndUnix.c. Specifically, when loading a timer for use in an entropy > > function (I think), there's a call to clock_getres() - using the > > CLOCK_REALTIME clock, filling in a structure that gets returned to the caller > > as 0, which triggers the FPE. > > > > I tried using CLOCK_VIRTUAL, which stopped the FPE, but returned an error and > > thus didn't generate any randomness. > > > > Hopefully I've got my terms right - I'm no crypto expert by any stretch, but > > that's what I found to be a problem in PGP6. I suspect something similar may > > be at play in PGP5. > > ok, interesting news. > > if i move the working binary from the old system to the new system, i get > the sig with it. i.e. it is in the system, not the build of pgp5. so i am > moving this conversation to stable. > Just out of curiosity, what kind of CPUs are you running this on? I'm doing some testing with other PCs I've got access to (FreeBSD and OpenBSD), and the machines running Intel are fine - my workstation, with AMDs, returns 0 to clock_getres(). Klaus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 19:25:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A5B37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from the.oneinsane.net (the.oneinsane.net [66.42.61.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A58C43E3B for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:25:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blovett@moria.bsdguru.com) Received: from moria.bsdguru.com (gandalf.bsdguru.com [216.231.55.200]) by the.oneinsane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4B415503 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by moria.bsdguru.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A1047EB; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:24:57 -0700 From: Ben Lovett To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? Message-ID: <20020708022457.GA15944@bsdguru.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Lovett , stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Moon: The Moon is Waning Crescent (7% of Full) X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdguru.com/~blovett/blovett.pgp X-GPG-Fingerprint: 22E2 6A6D BD5A E63A 1D2D 86AC 1066 FBE9 B120 B402 X-GPG-KeyID: 0xB120B402 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD moria 4.6-STABLE X-Uptime: 7:20PM up 7:53, 5 users, load averages: 0.03, 0.06, 0.04 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone else noticed mmap() problems in recent -stable builds? On systems built recently (between July 4th and July 7th), the port audio/mad fails with the following: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilibmad -I./libid3tag -Iintl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -Wall -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -c madtime.c madtime.c:29: #error "madtime currently requires mmap() support" *** Error code 1 I tried to build this port on another system running -stable from late April of this year, and succeeded. Thanks, Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 20:40:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE3D37B401 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1642943E42 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g683ehLY001051 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:40:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:40:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? In-Reply-To: <20020708022457.GA15944@bsdguru.com> Message-ID: <20020707233851.U1021-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Ben Lovett wrote: > Has anyone else noticed mmap() problems in recent -stable builds? On > systems built recently (between July 4th and July 7th), the port > audio/mad fails with the following: > > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilibmad -I./libid3tag -Iintl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -Wall -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -c madtime.c > madtime.c:29: #error "madtime currently requires mmap() support" > *** Error code 1 > > I tried to build this port on another system running -stable from late > April of this year, and succeeded. This is a bug in the mad port. For reasons unrelated to mmap(), the configure-time mmap test fails; therefore, HAVE_MMAP doesn't get defined. I was going to run this down the other night, but it was too late and my bed was calling. Have a look at config.log in the work directory. You'll see what I mean. -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 21:36:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E01137B405 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DA743E97 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:34:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g684X0Vl002758; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:33:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g684WxtT002757; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:32:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:32:59 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: Dave Uhring , Jason Porter , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? Message-ID: <20020708043259.GA2640@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Morozovsky , Dave Uhring , Jason Porter , freebsd-stable References: <200207070009.06225.duhring@charter.net> <20020707124436.O96072-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020707124436.O96072-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Dmitry Morozovsky : > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Dave Uhring wrote: > > [snip] > > DU> If you are using an ATI Rage Pro video adapter you would be well advised > DU> to completely avoid the newest version of XFree86. > > Could you please provide some links describing this? Also, any chance to > fix this sad situation (ATI Rage Pro is the adapter in my own workstation, > which is now the only machine I'd not upgraded yet ;-) The XFree86 folks seem to think Rage Pro *is* supported: http://www.xfree.org/current/Status6.html However, a number of old cards that were supported in 3.3.6 no longer work in 4.X, since nobody has bothered to rewrite the drivers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 21:43: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0F637B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B2B43E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:43:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g684gfVl002808; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:42:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g684gUBJ002807; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:42:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:42:29 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Frank Mayhar Cc: Dmitry Morozovsky , Dave Uhring , Jason Porter , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? Message-ID: <20020708044229.GB2640@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Mayhar , Dmitry Morozovsky , Dave Uhring , Jason Porter , freebsd-stable References: <20020707210226.P98680-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> <200207071725.g67HPBKA092095@realtime.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207071725.g67HPBKA092095@realtime.exit.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Frank Mayhar : > I'm using a Radeon 8500 128MB card. I had problems with 4.2.0 (it worked > but a few things were a tad flaky, especially Xvideo), but I've been updating > from the XFree86 CVS tree and it is working better and better. Yes, but this issue is orthogonal to the earlier comment. Dave complained about old cards no longer being supported in recent versions of XFree86. You're complaining about new cards for which the drivers still have bugs. The distinction is important because Rage Pro owners can always go back to 3.3.6, whereas Radeon 8500 owners are unlikely to find better support in older versions of X. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 21:58:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBD837B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.kornet.net (relay3.kornet.net [211.48.62.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DC443E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:58:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leaders06@kornet.net) Received: from ursxsearj57rfwb (61.73.152.26) by relay3.kornet.net; 8 Jul 2002 10:11:44 +0900 Message-ID: <3d28e6d63d548cff@relay3.kornet.net> (added by relay3.kornet.net) From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?x9Gw5riuxKG//sDMxay3tA==?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?W7GksO1dIGZyZWVic2Qtc3RhYmxltNQgvsiz58fPvcq0z7HuPyDG8rv9tb++yCy0573FwLsgv9XAuLfOILjwvcq0z7TZIQ==?= Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 10:11:51 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0107_01C0F11A.93A51C00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C0F11A.93A51C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 x9GxubDmwaYguK7Eob/+wMwgxay3tCAgIA0KDQogICAgIA0KDQogICAgIA0KDQogICAgIA0K DQogICAgIA0KDQogICAgICANCg0KICAgICANCg0KICAgICANCg0KICAgICANCg0KICAgICAN Cg0KICAgICANCg0KICANCrHNx8/AxyC9wrb0vvjAzCDIq7q4vLogwPzA2iC/7MbtwLsguriz u7DUILXIIMGhIMGkwd/I9yC757D6ILXluLO0z7TZLg0KIMGkurjF673FuMHAzL/rw8vB+Ln9 ILHUwaTAuyDB2Lz2x8+/qSCxpLDtuN7Az8DTwLsgIMelvcPHz7+0wLi45ywgvPa9xbDFus4g wOXEobimILi2t8PHz7DtIMDWvcC0z7TZLg0KCQkJCQmxzcfPwMcgwPzA2iC/7MbtIMHWvNK0 wiDAzsXNs90gu/PAxyCw+LCztcggwOW80r+hvK0gvcC15sfPv7TAuLjnLCAgwPrI8bTCILHN x8/AxyDA/MDav+zG7SDB1rzSIL/cDQogvu62sMfRILCzwM7BpLq4tbUgsKHB9rDtIMDWwfYg vsrAuLnHt84gvsi9ycfPvcOx4iC52bb4tM+02S4NCgkJCQkJvPa9xcC7IL/4xKEgIL7KwLi9 w7jpILz2vcWwxbrOuKYgxay4r8fYICDB1r3KvcO/5C4NCiANCiAgIA== ------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C0F11A.93A51C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCEtLSBzYXZlZCBmcm9tIHVybD0oMDAyMilodHRwOi8vaW50ZXJuZXQuZS1tYWlsIC0tPg0K PCEtLSBzYXZlZCBmcm9tIHVybD0oMDAyMilodHRwOi8vaW50ZXJuZXQuZS1tYWlsIC0tPg0K PGh0bWw+DQoNCjxoZWFkPg0KPHRpdGxlPsfRsbmw5sGmILiuxKG//sDMIMWst7Q8L3RpdGxl Pg0KPG1ldGEgbmFtZT0iZ2VuZXJhdG9yIiBjb250ZW50PSJOYW1vIFdlYkVkaXRvciB2NC4w Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCg0KPGJvZHkgYmdjb2xvcj0id2hpdGUiIHRleHQ9ImJsYWNrIiBsaW5r PSJibHVlIiB2bGluaz0icHVycGxlIiBhbGluaz0icmVkIj4NCjx0YWJsZSBhbGlnbj0iY2Vu dGVyIiBib3JkZXI9IjAiIGNlbGxwYWRkaW5nPSIwIiBjZWxsc3BhY2luZz0iMCIgd2lkdGg9 IjY1OCI+DQogICAgPHRyPg0KICAgICAgICA8dGQ+DQogICAgICAgICAgICA8cD48aW1nIHNy Yz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYWlscGFydG5lci5jby5rci9lbWFpbC8wNDIyL2ltYWdlL2ltZ18w MS5naWYiIHdpZHRoPSI2NTgiIGhlaWdodD0iMTAyIiBib3JkZXI9IjAiPjwvcD4NCiAgICAg ICAgPC90ZD4NCiAgICA8L3RyPg0KICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgICAgPHRkPg0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWFpbHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3IvZW1haWwvMDQy Mi9pbWFnZS9pbWdfMDIuZ2lmIiB3aWR0aD0iNjU4IiBoZWlnaHQ9IjE4NiIgYm9yZGVyPSIw Ij48L3A+DQogICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+DQogICAgPC90cj4NCiAgICA8dHI+DQogICAgICAgIDx0 ZD4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgIDxwPjxpbWcgc3JjPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWxwYXJ0bmVyLmNv LmtyL2VtYWlsLzA0MjIvaW1hZ2UvaW1nXzAzLmdpZiIgd2lkdGg9IjY1OCIgaGVpZ2h0PSI1 NSIgYm9yZGVyPSIwIiB1c2VtYXA9IiNJbWFnZU1hcDEiPjwvcD4NCiAgICAgICAgPC90ZD4N CiAgICA8L3RyPg0KICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgICAgPHRkPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgPHA+PGlt ZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWFpbHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3IvZW1haWwvMDQyMi9pbWFnZS9p bWdfMDQuZ2lmIiB3aWR0aD0iNjU4IiBoZWlnaHQ9IjEzOCIgYm9yZGVyPSIwIj48L3A+DQog ICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+DQogICAgPC90cj4NCiAgICA8dHI+DQogICAgICAgIDx0ZD4NCiAgICAg ICAgICAgIDxwPjxpbWcgc3JjPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWxwYXJ0bmVyLmNvLmtyL2VtYWls LzA0MjIvaW1hZ2UvaW1nXzA1LmdpZiIgd2lkdGg9IjY1OCIgaGVpZ2h0PSI0NiIgYm9yZGVy PSIwIj48L3A+DQogICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+DQogICAgPC90cj4NCiAgICA8dHI+DQogICAgICAg IDx0ZD4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgIA0KICAgICAgPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWFp bHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3IvZW1haWwvMDQyMi9pbWFnZS9pbWdfMDYuZ2lmIiB3aWR0aD0iNjU4 IiBoZWlnaHQ9IjE4MyIgYm9yZGVyPSIwIiB1c2VtYXA9IiNNYXAiPjwvcD4NCiAgICAgICAg PC90ZD4NCiAgICA8L3RyPg0KICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgICAgPHRkPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAg PHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWFpbHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3IvZW1haWwvMDQyMi9p bWFnZS9pbWdfMDcuZ2lmIiB3aWR0aD0iNjU4IiBoZWlnaHQ9IjEwOSIgYm9yZGVyPSIwIj48 L3A+DQogICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+DQogICAgPC90cj4NCiAgICA8dHI+DQogICAgICAgIDx0ZD4N CiAgICAgICAgICAgIDxwPjxpbWcgc3JjPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWxwYXJ0bmVyLmNvLmty L2VtYWlsLzA0MjIvaW1hZ2UvaW1nXzA4LmdpZiIgd2lkdGg9IjY1OCIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxMTQi IGJvcmRlcj0iMCI+PC9wPg0KICAgICAgICA8L3RkPg0KICAgIDwvdHI+DQogICAgPHRyPg0K ICAgICAgICA8dGQ+DQogICAgICAgICAgICA8cD48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYWls cGFydG5lci5jby5rci9lbWFpbC8wNDIyL2ltYWdlL2ltZ18wOS5naWYiIHdpZHRoPSI2NTgi IGhlaWdodD0iMTM2IiBib3JkZXI9IjAiPjwvcD4NCiAgICAgICAgPC90ZD4NCiAgICA8L3Ry Pg0KICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgICAgPHRkPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0 dHA6Ly93d3cubWFpbHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3IvZW1haWwvMDQyMi9pbWFnZS9pbWdfMTAuZ2lm IiB3aWR0aD0iNjU4IiBoZWlnaHQ9IjU0IiBib3JkZXI9IjAiIHVzZW1hcD0iI0ltYWdlTWFw MiI+PC9wPg0KICAgICAgICA8L3RkPg0KICAgIDwvdHI+DQogICAgPHRyPg0KICAgICAgICA8 dGQ+DQogICAgICAgICAgICA8cD48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYWlscGFydG5lci5j by5rci9lbWFpbC8wNDIyL2ltYWdlL2ltZ18xMS5naWYiIHdpZHRoPSI2NTgiIGhlaWdodD0i MzgiIGJvcmRlcj0iMCI+PC9wPg0KICAgICAgICA8L3RkPg0KICAgIDwvdHI+DQo8L3RhYmxl Pg0KPHRhYmxlIHdpZHRoPSI2NTgiIGJvcmRlcj0iMCIgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciI+DQo8dHI+ PHRkIGJnY29sb3I9IiNlNmU2ZTYiIGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6OXB0OyI+PGJyPrHNx8/AxyC9wrb0vvjAzCDIq7q4vLogwPzA2iC/7MbtwLsguriz u7DUILXIIMGhIMGkwd/I9yC757D6ILXluLO0z7TZLjxicj4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgwaS6uMXrvcW4wcDMv+vDy8H4uf0gsdTBpMC7IMHYvPbHz7+pIDxiPjxmb250IGNvbG9y PSIjRkYwMDAwIj6xpLDtuN7AzzwvZm9udD48L2I+wNPAuyANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgx6W9w8fPv7TAuLjnLCC89r3FsMW6ziDA5cShuKYguLa3w8fPsO0gwNa9wLTPtNkuPGJy Pg0KCQkJCQmxzcfPwMcgwPzA2iC/7MbtIMHWvNK0wiDAzsXNs90gu/PAxyCw+LCztcggwOW8 0r+hvK0gvcC15sfPv7TAuLjnLCANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgwPrI8bTCILHNx8/A xyDA/MDav+zG7SDB1rzSIL/cPGJyPiC+7rawx9EgsLPAzsGkuri1tSCwocH2sO0gwNbB9iC+ ysC4uce3ziC+yL3Jx8+9w7HiILnZtvi0z7TZLjxicj4NCgkJCQkJvPa9xcC7IL/4xKEgDQog ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIL7KwLi9w7jpIDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpoeXVuMTAzMTBA a29ybmV0Lm5ldCI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9ImJsdWUiPrz2vcWwxbrOPC9mb250PjwvYT64piDF rLivx9ggDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIMHWvcq9w7/kLjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+Jm5ic3A7 PC90ZD48L3RyPjwvdGFibGU+DQo8YnI+DQo8bWFwIG5hbWU9IkltYWdlTWFwMSI+DQo8YXJl YSBzaGFwZT0icmVjdCIgY29vcmRzPSIxMCwgNywgMTU4LCA1MyIgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3 dy5tYWlscGFydG5lci5jby5rci9lbWFpbC8wNDIyL2lucHV0LmFzcCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxh bmsiPg0KPC9tYXA+PG1hcCBuYW1lPSJJbWFnZU1hcDIiPg0KPGFyZWEgc2hhcGU9InJlY3Qi IGNvb3Jkcz0iNTAyLCAzLCA2NTMsIDQ5IiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWxwYXJ0bmVy LmNvLmtyL2VtYWlsLzA0MjIvaW5wdXQuYXNwIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+DQo8L21hcD4N CjxtYXAgbmFtZT0iTWFwIj4NCiAgPGFyZWEgc2hhcGU9InJlY3QiIGNvb3Jkcz0iNDUsMywy MjEsMTgwIiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWxwYXJ0bmVyLmNvLmtyL2VtYWlsLzA0MjIv aW5wdXQuYXNwIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+DQogIDxhcmVhIHNoYXBlPSJyZWN0IiBjb29y ZHM9IjI0MCwzLDQxNSwxODAiIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWFpbHBhcnRuZXIuY28ua3Iv ZW1haWwvMDQyMi9pbnB1dC5hc3AiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4NCiAgPGFyZWEgc2hhcGU9 InJlY3QiIGNvb3Jkcz0iNDM0LDMsNjEwLDE4MSIgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYWlscGFy dG5lci5jby5rci9lbWFpbC8wNDIyL2lucHV0LmFzcCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPg0KPC9t YXA+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQoNCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== ------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C0F11A.93A51C00-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 22:22: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF137B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E3443E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:21:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rip.psg.com.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17RQyE-0007d3-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 22:21:58 -0700 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Klaus Steden Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020707215354.E95654@cthulu.compt.com> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 22:21:58 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>> yesterday's -stable and ports tree, rebuilt twice. >>>> % pgpk -l randy >>>> Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use >>>> sec+ 1024 0xB1331439 1994-04-04 ---------- RSA Sign & Encrypt >>>> uid Randy Bush >>>> 1 matching key found >>>> Received signal 8. > Just out of curiosity, what kind of CPUs are you running this on? works pent 3 0.8ghz fails pent 4 1.7ghz randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 22:33:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D5537B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kobold.compt.com (TBextgw.compt.com [209.115.146.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1C843E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from klaus@kobold.compt.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 01:33:24 -0400 From: Klaus Steden To: Randy Bush Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 Message-ID: <20020708013324.A13139@cthulu.compt.com> References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020707215354.E95654@cthulu.compt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from randy@psg.com on Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:21:58PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >>>> yesterday's -stable and ports tree, rebuilt twice. > >>>> % pgpk -l randy > >>>> Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use > >>>> sec+ 1024 0xB1331439 1994-04-04 ---------- RSA Sign & Encrypt > >>>> uid Randy Bush > >>>> 1 matching key found > >>>> Received signal 8. > > Just out of curiosity, what kind of CPUs are you running this on? > > works pent 3 0.8ghz > fails pent 4 1.7ghz > I'm running 1.0 GHz AMD Durons. The other machines I ran tests on were PIIs and PIIIs. Hmmm ... Klaus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 22:34:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8828937B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252EC43E09 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:34:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oistrakh@earthlink.net) Received: from user-1121008.dsl.mindspring.com ([66.32.128.8] helo=pirastro.oistrakh.org) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17RRA8-0007mL-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 01:34:16 -0400 Received: from pirastro.oistrakh.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pirastro.oistrakh.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g685YJUo097362; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:34:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oistrakh@earthlink.net) Received: (from oistrakh@localhost) by pirastro.oistrakh.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g685Y8Zr096359; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:34:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: pirastro.oistrakh.org: oistrakh set sender to oistrakh@earthlink.net using -f Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:34:08 -0700 From: Christian Chen To: Brossin Pierrick Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway Message-ID: <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Trying to do firewall/NAT/gateway via PPPoE under FreeBSD is a bit tricky. Most HOWTO's that I've found only deal with this via a less lame internet connection. But basically, you need to get PPPoE up and running first. There are several HOWTOs for setting that up. Assuming that you have that running, you will then have an internet connection via tun0. What will happen once you have everything set up is that any packets from other machines on your internal network are going to come in via your ethernet connection (let's say xl0), get routed to tun0 by NAT, and then go out through tun0 to the internet. The process will be reversed when the packets come back in. So, theoretically what you need to do is: 1. Set up NAT to route between your ethernet card and tun0 2. Set up a set of firewall rules using ipf that will block certain traffic trying to come in from tun0 and go to NAT. Problem is, I could never actually get step 2 to work properly. I'm certainly not a networking guru, so I'm sure it's my own incompetence that prevented me from getting it to work. But what I've found works equally well (at least, I *think* it's working equally well!) is to use the firewall features of PPP to block incoming packets on tun0. "man ppp.conf" will tell you how to set this up, and there are also examples in /usr/share/examples/ppp. So, what I'm actually doing is: 1. Set up NAT to route between my ethernet card and tun0 2. Set up the firewall rules via PPP I'm not running ipf at all. This appears to work properly from all the testing I've been able to do. Whether it works as efficiently as ipf would, or is flexible enough for your needs, I don't know. Christian Chen On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Brossin Pierrick wrote: > As you may see, I'm really confused with IPFilter NAT IP Masquerading .... > Can someone take the time to explain or give the url of a page please.. I > can't find any ? > > Regards, > > Pierrick > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 22:37:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B433837B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8839243E58 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:37:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g685bLZL079318; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:07:28 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Christian Chen Cc: Brossin Pierrick , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 08 Jul 2002 15:07:21 +0930 Message-Id: <1026106653.1697.22.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:04, Christian Chen wrote: > 1. Set up NAT to route between your ethernet card and tun0 > 2. Set up a set of firewall rules using ipf that will block certain traffic > trying to come in from tun0 and go to NAT. > > Problem is, I could never actually get step 2 to work properly. I'm > certainly not a networking guru, so I'm sure it's my own incompetence that > prevented me from getting it to work. But what > I've found works equally well (at least, I *think* it's working equally > well!) is to use the firewall features of PPP to block incoming packets > on tun0. "man ppp.conf" will tell you how to set this up, and there are > also examples in /usr/share/examples/ppp. I have IPFW controlling access via tun0 on my system.. I have a PPPoE DSL connection. You can have a copy of my rules if you like. I am using ppp's aliasing features, not IPF's - I haven't ever used IPF so I am not sure how it's NAT interacts with it's firewalling. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 23: 3:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D7237B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EBF43E4A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:03:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (firewall-user@dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68]) by mizar.origin-it.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo27jun02) with ESMTP id g68636lg013674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:03:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/hmo06may02) with ESMTP id g68635Nr037821; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:03:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo01jul02) id IAA22096; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:03:04 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200207080603.IAA22096@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: IPsec and IPfilter interaction In-Reply-To: <20020707222803.A57511@psconsult.nl> from Paul Schenkeveld at "Jul 7, 2002 10:28: 3 pm" To: fb-stable@psconsult.nl (Paul Schenkeveld) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:03:04 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Schenkeveld: >On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:16:19PM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote: >> Paul Schenkeveld: >> >(Not sure if this is the right list to discuss this, point me to a >> >better list please if I'm wrong.) >> >> -questions? >> >> > The configuration of the SPD for tunnel mode is very similar to that >> > of transport mode. The major change that is done is the use of the >> > gif(4) device to get the routing correct. Note that traffic is *not* >> > transported through the gif(4) tunnel! Instead the IPsec code in the >> > kernel grabs the packets according to the specified policy and wraps >> > them with the correct IP addresses for the IPsec tunnel. >> >> Oops. I think I wrote this. :-) >> >> >Tunnel traffic coming in on the external interface (fxp1) all looks >> >like "proto ah" to IPfilter. It looks like I cannot access the TCP, >> >UDP or ICP payload at this point, which makes sense to me. >> > >> >Does this mean that I can only filter TCP, UDP, ICMP traffic coming out of >> >the tunnel when it leaves the firewall thru the internal interface (fxp0)? >> > >> >So all listening sockets inside the firewall are completely open to >> >traffice coming from the tunnel? >> >> Actually you can (and want to!) filter for AH (or, if you're using >> tunnel mode, ESP) protocols and drop any TCP, UDP and ICMP traffic. >> Dropping ICMP completely is probably not wise - at least you want to >> allow ICMP from the peers you are talking AH (or ESP) to. Further, >> allowing a tcp/telnet resp. tcp/ssh to and from the remote site would >> probably be reasonable. > >I know that I can filter on AH or ESP protocols but my issue is that >every daemon on the firewall (by default, sometimes tunable) listens >on every available interface, including the gif0 interface. > >So from the inside LAN at one location (behind firewall1) one can connect >to e.g. sendmail running on firewall2 at the other location. How can I >(on firewall2) block incoming connections coming in thru the tunnel to a >particular TCP or UDP port of firewall2? For sendmail (and actually most other daemons, which is very important if you run jails on your machine) you can specify which interface to bind to. Secondly you have the option to play with the IP addresses of the gif interfaces at either side. As I wrote, the interface is not actually used, it's more a placeholder to get routing straight. Hence the remote address of the interface (not the local address!) is irrelevant, as long as you have a route at either side pointing to the remote side via this remote route. By using an address that is not reachable from the other side you can effectively disable access to gif from remote. BTW, you can achieve the same effect without gif: You need to set up a static arp entry using the MAC address of your default gateway with some arbirary address. Then set up a route to the remote side via this address, and again all packets matching the policy will be taken by IPsec. >> >Or am I wrong here and is there a way to completely screen all tunnel >> >traffic after the IPsec encapsulation is peeled off? >> >> AFAIK not. I'd say this wouldn't be very sensible anyway. By setting up >> a security association with the peer you are basically trusting him. > >So you mean that if one site gets compromised it's acceptable that the >other sites get compromised as well? IPsec's paradigm is that you either trust the remote side (according to the specified policy) or you don't. There is conceptually no such thing as a "maybe trust". >> You can still do filtering on the inside interface of course. > >Except for traffic terminating at the firewall. Correct, but this is a problem of ipfilter. Commercial IPsec gateways (say Cisco routers running IPsec) will do fine. In fact they can even filter traffic before encryption and after decryption on the external interface. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 23: 7:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A7A37B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [192.35.17.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEBE43E31 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:07:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ust@cert.siemens.de) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6866sv11396; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6866re02402; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:53 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alaska.cert.siemens.de (alaska.cert.siemens.de [139.23.202.134]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Siemens CERT [ $Revision: 1.25 ]) with ESMTP id g6866rug058143; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust@alaska.cert.siemens.de) Received: from alaska.cert.siemens.de (alaska.cert.siemens.de [127.0.0.1]) by alaska.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/alaska [ $Revision: 1.12 ]) with ESMTP id g6866rqx098779; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust@alaska.cert.siemens.de) Received: (from ust@localhost) by alaska.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/alaska [ $Revision: 1.3 ]) id g6866rHJ098778; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:06:53 +0200 From: Udo Schweigert To: Klaus Steden Cc: Randy Bush , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 Message-ID: <20020708060653.GA98569@alaska.cert.siemens.de> Mail-Followup-To: Klaus Steden , Randy Bush , FreeBSD Stable References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020707215354.E95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020708013324.A13139@cthulu.compt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708013324.A13139@cthulu.compt.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:33:24 -0400, Klaus Steden wrote: > >>>>> yesterday's -stable and ports tree, rebuilt twice. > >>>>> % pgpk -l randy > >>>>> Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use > >>>>> sec+ 1024 0xB1331439 1994-04-04 ---------- RSA Sign & Encrypt > >>>>> uid Randy Bush > >>>>> 1 matching key found > >>>>> Received signal 8. > >> Just out of curiosity, what kind of CPUs are you running this on? >> >> works pent 3 0.8ghz >> fails pent 4 1.7ghz >> > I'm running 1.0 GHz AMD Durons. The other machines I ran tests on were PIIs and > PIIIs. > Hi all, I also came across that problem and found the following patch (to be included as files/patch-ah into the pgp5 port) as a solution. (I also have the problem only on P4-systems). --- lib/pgp/random/pgpRndUnix.c.orig Sat Aug 9 23:45:14 1997 +++ lib/pgp/random/pgpRndUnix.c Mon Jul 8 07:59:30 2002 @@ -307,7 +307,11 @@ if (!ticksize) ticksize = ranTickSize(); - delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt) / ticksize); + if (ticksize) { + delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt) / ticksize); + } else { + delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt)); + } prevt = t; return delta; Best regards -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170 CT IC CERT, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166 D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : udo.schweigert@siemens.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 7 23:26:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B031737B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABF843E52 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:26:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rip.psg.com.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17RRsO-000Aou-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 23:20:01 -0700 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Udo Schweigert Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: signal 8 (fp execption) in pgp 5 References: <20020707145020.D95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020707215354.E95654@cthulu.compt.com> <20020708013324.A13139@cthulu.compt.com> <20020708060653.GA98569@alaska.cert.siemens.de> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 23:20:01 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > --- lib/pgp/random/pgpRndUnix.c.orig Sat Aug 9 23:45:14 1997 > +++ lib/pgp/random/pgpRndUnix.c Mon Jul 8 07:59:30 2002 > @@ -307,7 +307,11 @@ > > if (!ticksize) > ticksize = ranTickSize(); > - delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt) / ticksize); > + if (ticksize) { > + delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt) / ticksize); > + } else { > + delta = (word32)(tickdiff(t, prevt)); > + } > prevt = t; > > return delta; bingo! besten dank, randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 0:15:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555CC37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wxp.homeip.net (adsl-212-101-19-141.solnet.ch [212.101.19.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E6AC43E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:15:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pbrossin@wxp.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 20544 invoked by uid 100); 8 Jul 2002 07:15:29 -0000 Received: from 195.49.31.34 ( [195.49.31.34]) as user nitrox@localhost by wxp.homeip.net with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:15:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1026112528.3d293c10b4d91@wxp.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:15:28 +0200 From: Brossin Pierrick To: Christian Chen Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 X-Originating-IP: 195.49.31.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, For the moment I followed this howto: http://logicsquad.net/freebsd/PPPoE-how-to.html In ppp.conf the guy says to put: #Network Address Translation (NAT) nat enable yes nat log yes nat same_ports yes nat unregistered_only yes enable dns NAT Should be working for my local network then.. Nope ? I haven't tried yet.. I didn't have the time and I'm not at home.. For the moment PPPoE is working for my server.. ---------- Unix, Y2k compliant since 1970 ! FreeBSD - opening computers from closed Windows To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 0:20:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA39537B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ds.express.ru (ds.express.ru [212.24.32.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADABA43E5E for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from madmax@express.ru) Received: from localhost.express.ru ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ds.express.ru with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #8) id 17RSoY-000GDI-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:20:06 +0400 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:20:06 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Kozin To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Out of swap, -stable, apache2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's may be "/tmp/.a" worm, side effect on 2.0.39. Try 2.0.40 b.r. Kozin Maxim ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 8 Jul 2002 07:03:56 -0000 From: bugzilla@apache.org To: madmax@express.ru Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10146] - 2.0.39 DoS DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10146 2.0.39 DoS jerenkrantz@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From jerenkrantz@apache.org 2002-07-08 07:03 ------- Fixed in CVS. Will be included in next release (2.0.40). Thanks for using Apache httpd! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 0:40:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from backup.af.speednet.com.au (afgate.speednet.com.au [203.57.65.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638543E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:40:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Received: from backup.af.speednet.com.au (andyf@backup.af.speednet.com.au [172.22.2.4]) by backup.af.speednet.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g687dx770490; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:40:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:39:58 +1000 (EST) From: Andy Farkas X-X-Sender: To: Helge Oldach Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/newsyslog newsyslog.c In-Reply-To: <200207071122.NAA19022@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Helge Oldach wrote: > There is a problem with multiple logfiles created by daemons, cf. the > example in the original mail: > > /var/log/apache/httpd-error.log 640 3 3000 * B /var/run/httpd.pid 30 > /var/log/apache/httpd-access.log 640 7 100000 * B /var/run/httpd.pid 30 > > This will cause newsyslog to send the signal *twice* to Apache, and > Apache will restart *both* logfiles twice. Won't harm in most cases, but > with a multitude of logfiles (e.g. one logfile per virtual host) this is > obsolete overhead. See the patch in bin/20570 for a fix. > > Helge > You mean bin/25070. -- :{ andyf@speednet.com.au Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 1:52:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB3B37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 01:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wxp.homeip.net (adsl-212-101-19-141.solnet.ch [212.101.19.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CA6A43E70 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 01:52:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pbrossin@wxp.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 21690 invoked by uid 100); 8 Jul 2002 08:52:07 -0000 Received: from 195.49.31.34 ( [195.49.31.34]) as user nitrox@localhost by wxp.homeip.net with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:52:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1026118327.3d2952b732dee@wxp.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:52:07 +0200 From: Brossin Pierrick To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 X-Originating-IP: 195.49.31.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Hi saw 2 howtos talking about pppoe and nat. One saying to put "ppp_nat=YES" in rc.conf and the other one saying to put "nat enable yes" in ppp.conf What's the best or (maybe) most secure way to do it ? If I use one of these, my local network will be able to access the net as soon as they get an ip address that is on the same range that my second server's NIC right ? Thanks ---------- Unix, Y2k compliant since 1970 ! FreeBSD - opening computers from closed Windows To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 2:19:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6937B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 02:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6882C43E42; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 02:19:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g689In25009960; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:19:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g689InGp009959; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:18:49 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:18:49 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Murray Stokely Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Murray Stokely! On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:55:20AM -0700, you wrote: > The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for Will this list include resolv patch? > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 2:30:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184FF37B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 02:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.org.ru (sweet.etrust.ru [194.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D919C43E3B; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F6773E; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:30:08 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:30:08 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Alexandr Kovalenko Cc: Murray Stokely , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:18:49PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:55:20AM -0700, you wrote: > > > The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are > > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > > > Will this list include resolv patch? I think 4.6.1 _must_ include all dangerous/security fixes still 4.6. BTW what about of new tag in CVS, like RELENG_4_6_1 or something else? -- Rgdz, /"\ Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN osa@freebsd.org.ru X AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 4:18: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2691A37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Www.HCRC.edu.tw (www.HCRC.edu.tw [163.28.64.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54C243E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:18:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ijliao@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw) Received: from Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (root@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw [140.113.192.99]) by Www.HCRC.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68BHs3a082086 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:17:55 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from ijliao@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw) Received: from Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (ijliao@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68BI0Ud020500 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:18:00 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from ijliao@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw) Received: (from ijliao@localhost) by Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68BI0f5020499 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:18:00 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:18:00 +0800 From: Ying-Chieh Liao To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make buildkernel fails Message-ID: <20020708111800.GA20463@terry.dragon2.net> References: <1025817347.65620.0.camel@blue.mcneil.com> <20020705130910.GA891@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705145359.GA3161@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705172942.GA8309@terry.dragon2.net> <20020707125040.GA63922@terry.dragon2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020707125040.GA63922@terry.dragon2.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 X-PGP-Key-Location: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x11C02382 X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 4E98 55CC 2866 7A90 EFD7 9DA5 ACC6 0165 11C0 2382 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I dont know what happened to GCC but after I add -O2 to CFLAGS, everything is OK ! --=20 Allocate four digits for the year part of a date : a new millennium is comi= ng. --- David Huber --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9KXTorMYBZRHAI4IRAq2QAJ4iZqYQ3WsvsBJd6aOHY0MZ9hjfHQCeO6Sh 4NIERpjzzLiaoqj+wx3IKMg= =B4Gi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 4:32:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8947237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mgw1-in.NCTU.edu.tw (Mgw1-in.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.54.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CD643E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:32:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ijliao@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw) Received: from Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw [140.113.192.99]) by Mgw1-in.NCTU.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68BWYUw037573 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:32:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (ijliao@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68BWeUd020743 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:32:40 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from ijliao@Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw) Received: (from ijliao@localhost) by Terry.Dorm11.NCTU.edu.tw (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68BWUHk020742 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:32:30 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:32:30 +0800 From: Ying-Chieh Liao To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make buildkernel fails Message-ID: <20020708113230.GA20705@terry.dragon2.net> References: <1025817347.65620.0.camel@blue.mcneil.com> <20020705130910.GA891@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705145359.GA3161@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705172942.GA8309@terry.dragon2.net> <20020707125040.GA63922@terry.dragon2.net> <20020708111800.GA20463@terry.dragon2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708111800.GA20463@terry.dragon2.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 X-PGP-Key-Location: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x11C02382 X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 4E98 55CC 2866 7A90 EFD7 9DA5 ACC6 0165 11C0 2382 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 19:18:00 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > I dont know what happened to GCC > but after I add -O2 to CFLAGS, everything is OK ! I've re-produced this bug on another machine build kernel without any -O failed, -O or -O2 is ok anybody else could you please test this ? --=20 Allocate four digits for the year part of a date : a new millennium is comi= ng. --- David Huber --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9KXhOrMYBZRHAI4IRAgaDAKCsL9YKlXvfEOLfBOkhGU1ykxQhEQCeN2Ct 5vktHRkBN0sYYFkaFzbncQw= =4Ugj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 4:47:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFC737B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A067143E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:47:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ust@cert.siemens.de) Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g68BlPb29861; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g68BlPV11511; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:25 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alaska.cert.siemens.de (alaska.cert.siemens.de [139.23.202.134]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Siemens CERT [ $Revision: 1.25 ]) with ESMTP id g68BlPug071935; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust@alaska.cert.siemens.de) Received: from alaska.cert.siemens.de (alaska.cert.siemens.de [127.0.0.1]) by alaska.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/alaska [ $Revision: 1.12 ]) with ESMTP id g68BlPoF067780; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust@alaska.cert.siemens.de) Received: (from ust@localhost) by alaska.cert.siemens.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/alaska [ $Revision: 1.3 ]) id g68BlLT1067779; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:47:20 +0200 From: Udo Schweigert To: Ying-Chieh Liao Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make buildkernel fails Message-ID: <20020708114720.GA67696@alaska.cert.siemens.de> References: <1025817347.65620.0.camel@blue.mcneil.com> <20020705130910.GA891@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705145359.GA3161@terry.dragon2.net> <20020705172942.GA8309@terry.dragon2.net> <20020707125040.GA63922@terry.dragon2.net> <20020708111800.GA20463@terry.dragon2.net> <20020708113230.GA20705@terry.dragon2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708113230.GA20705@terry.dragon2.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 19:32:30 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 19:18:00 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: >> I dont know what happened to GCC >> but after I add -O2 to CFLAGS, everything is OK ! > > I've re-produced this bug on another machine > build kernel without any -O failed, -O or -O2 is ok > > anybody else could you please test this ? Yes, for me it fails here: cc -c -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fomit-frame-pointer ../../i386/i386/atomic.c In file included from ../../i386/i386/atomic.c:47: machine/atomic.h: In function `atomic_set_char': machine/atomic.h:106: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' machine/atomic.h: In function `atomic_clear_char': machine/atomic.h:107: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' machine/atomic.h: In function `atomic_add_char': machine/atomic.h:108: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' machine/atomic.h: In function `atomic_subtract_char': .............. With "-O -pipe" it's OK. Best regards -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170 CT IC CERT, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166 D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : udo.schweigert@siemens.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 5:18:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C9937B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (sbk-gw.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9FA43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:18:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (localhost.sibnet.ru [127.0.0.1]) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g68CI0Vr039543; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:18:01 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from localhost (stranger@localhost) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g68CHYVI039434; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:17:50 +0700 (NOVST) X-Authentication-Warning: sbk-gw.sibnet.ru: stranger owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:17:33 +0700 (NOVST) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" X-X-Sender: stranger@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru To: Barry Irwin Cc: Marcus Larsson , Subject: Re: DiskOnKey (mini keyring USB HDD) In-Reply-To: <20020706103808.E66426@itouchlabs.com> Message-ID: <20020708191656.W8357-100000@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Perhaps /dev/da0s4 (same as Zip 100 drive)? Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Barry Irwin wrote: >On Sat 2002-07-06 (10:19), Marcus Larsson wrote: >> >> So when i try for example: mount_msdos -o rdonly /dev/da0 >> >> mount: /dev/da0a: Input/output error >> >> dmesg output again: >> >> da0: reading primary partition table: error reading fsbn 0 >> (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x4, scsi status == 0x0 >> >> I read in the DOK-Linux-HOWTO that you should mount "the whole disk" that's why I wrote da0. > >try /dev/da0c, same as you mount a cdrom 'whole disk' as 'c' slice > >Barry > > >-- >Barry Irwin bvi@itouchlabs.com +27214875177 >Systems Administrator: Networks And Security >iTouch TAS http://www.itouchlabs.com South Africa > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 5:18:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567AC37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571A043E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:18:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68CIFRC089496 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:18:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g68CID8o089444 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:18:15 +0300 (EEST) X-Authentication-Warning: atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua: dmitry owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:18:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com.lucky.freebsd.vendors> Message-ID: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! 1. Please include /bin/sh memory leek fix (bin/40177) after MFC'ing it. 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drivers are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and 4.6-RELEASE-p1. Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 5:33:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5A637B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dignus.com (sdsl-64-32-254-102.dsl.iad.megapath.net [64.32.254.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765F43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 05:33:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g68CQxK22155 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:27:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g68CWgd46576 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:32:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rivers) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <200207081232.g68CWgd46576@lakes.dignus.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just wondering.. Will anyone be making CDs - or iso images available. My 4.6 CDs just arrived :-) - Dave Rivers - -- rivers@dignus.com Work: (919) 676-0847 Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 6:44:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095B837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 06:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sumter.awod.com (sumter.awod.com [208.140.99.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398CB43E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 06:44:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.67]) by sumter.awod.com (8.8.7/8.12.2) with ESMTP id JAA86427 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:44:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sumter.awod.com: User stanb [pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net] popped 14 seconds ago Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RYuD-0006CV-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:50:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:50:20 -0400 From: stan To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.17 X-Uptime: 09:44:00 up 19 days, 15:02, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.20, 0.18 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a laptop that I move from work to home. I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could previously. I get "permission refused" What did I do worng? Did the laptops keys get updated such that I need to copy them over to the other machines? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 6:46:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37ABB37B40A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 06:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate21.fw.porsche.de (gate23.fw.porsche.de [193.174.9.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC6BB43E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perisa@porsche.de) Received: (qmail 19879 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2002 13:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wuxin011.ibd.porsche.de) (141.36.65.1) by 193.197.149.150 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 13:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 18046 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2002 13:46:12 -0000 Received: from wuxws007.ibd.porsche.de (HELO porsche.de) (141.36.2.178) by smtp4cli.ibd.porsche.de with SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 13:46:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3D299810.8020400@porsche.de> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:48:00 +0200 From: Marc Perisa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en, de-de, es-es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Murray Stokely Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Murray Stokely wrote: > The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are >currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the >RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point >release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the >reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, >BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for >July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point >release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! > > - Murray > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your effort. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 7: 3:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B3837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E18643E52 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:03:05 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17RZ5d-0005k8-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:02:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:02:09 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? In-Reply-To: <20020707233851.U1021-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Chris BeHanna wrote: > This is a bug in the mad port. For reasons unrelated to mmap(), > the configure-time mmap test fails; therefore, HAVE_MMAP doesn't get > defined. I was going to run this down the other night, but it was too > late and my bed was calling. > > Have a look at config.log in the work directory. You'll see what > I mean. There was a very similar problem recently with the openssh port's configure; could be that there's stock configure code knocking around that doesn't include before -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk printf 'cat\nhello world' | `sh -c 'read c; echo $c'` To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 7:37:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981EA37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sumter.awod.com (sumter.awod.com [208.140.99.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E5343E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:37:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.67]) by sumter.awod.com (8.8.7/8.12.2) with ESMTP id KAA11233 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:37:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sumter.awod.com: User stanb [pcp01010372pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net] popped 141 seconds ago Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RZjY-0006Xf-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 10:43:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:43:24 -0400 From: stan To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Message-ID: <20020708144324.GA24911@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.17 X-Uptime: 10:35:31 up 19 days, 15:54, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.18 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I thought I would repost this with more information. I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my 4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get to before. The first clue was that I got a message about not being able to authenticate each and every machien that I try to ssh to. So, I have been acepting the new keys.=20 Some machines will let me in, but only if I enter the password (where I did not have to before). Others just refuse to let me in at all! Here's a log of one of the ones that won't let me in: Script started on Mon Jul 8 10:27:44 2002 =1B]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stan=07stan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/st= an $ ssh -v phse7 OpenSSH_3.4p1 FreeBSD-20020702, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090601f debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be truste= d. debug1: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to phse7 [170.85.106.132] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/identity type 0 debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_2.5.1= p1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.5.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.5.0p1*,OpenSSH_2.5.1p1* Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.4p1 FreeBSD-20020702 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST_OLD sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 210/384 debug1: bits set: 1024/2049 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'phse7' is known and matches the DSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/stan/.ssh/known_hosts:33 debug1: bits set: 1017/2049 debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: kex_derive_keys debug1: newkeys: mode 1 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: waiting for SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: newkeys: mode 0 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: done: ssh_kex2. debug1: send SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST debug1: service_accept: ssh-userauth debug1: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT debug1: authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: next auth method to try is publickey debug1: try privkey: /home/stan/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: try privkey: /home/stan/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: next auth method to try is keyboard-interactive debug1: authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: no more auth methods to try Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). debug1: Calling cleanup 0x804bef8(0x0) =1B]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stan=07stan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/st= an $=20 Script done on Mon Jul 8 10:27:58 2002 Can some kind soul tell me what I need to do to corect this problem? --=20 "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 7:44:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECAC37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F8143E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicolas@dauerreden.de) Received: from fwd08.sul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17RZkO-00067F-0K; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:44:16 +0200 Received: from pc5.abc (520067998749-0001@[217.233.104.190]) by fmrl08.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17RZkJ-0dFrsWC; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:11 +0200 Received: from pc5.abc (localhost.abc [127.0.0.1]) by pc5.abc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68EiAXP027664 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nicolas@pc5.abc) Received: (from nicolas@localhost) by pc5.abc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68EiANc027663 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:10 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020708144410.GE27215@narr.dauerreden.de> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List References: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: C11ABC0E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 19DB 8392 8FE0 814A 7362 EEBD A53B 526A C11A BC0E X-PGP-Key: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/nicolas_rachinsky.asc X-Sender: 520067998749-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * stan [2002-07-08 09:50 -0400]: > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > previously. I get "permission refused" > > What did I do worng? Did the laptops keys get updated such that I need to > copy them over to the other machines? Are you using passwords or keys? If you're using keys, try adding "-1" to your ssh commandline. Nicolas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 7:53:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CB837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (mx1.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6735843E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sams [134.2.12.50]) by mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489484AA for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:53 +0200 (MST) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68Erqeh014009 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sperber@sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68ErqdO014006; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:52 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:53:52 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.5 (bok choi, i386-unknown-freebsd4.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The 4.6 systems I've installed don't have a default root crontab anymore, even though I'm using the exact same procedure to install them as with 4.5. Is it me or is it FreeBSD? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 7:59:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A3137B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690A743E09; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 2E5E22E883; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:02 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: "Sergey A. Osokin" Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko , Murray Stokely , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020708075902.G20410@freebsdmall.com> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru>; from osa@freebsd.org.ru on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:30:08PM +0400 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:30:08PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > I think 4.6.1 _must_ include all dangerous/security fixes still 4.6. > BTW what about of new tag in CVS, like RELENG_4_6_1 or something else? We will follow the existing tag nomenclature. A RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE tag will be created on the RELENG_4_6 branch. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 8:15: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A36537B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF4443E09; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:15:04 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: 'Murray Stokely' , stable@FreeBSD.org Cc: vendors@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Upcoming 4.6.1 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:15:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Murray Stokely wrote: > > The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! I would suggest that Jonathan Lemon's patch to kern_sig.c be included. Its trivial to panic a system from user space without it. (Revision 1.72.2.16). The patch is also very simple (a missing splhigh()/splx()). --don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 8:53:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A8237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pump3.york.ac.uk (pump3.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAB443E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:53:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by pump3.york.ac.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g68FrEx15264; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68FrDAd086026; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g68FrC8E086023; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:13 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:53:12 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drivers > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. From memory, /usr/share/examples/cvsup was also empty, though I can't check at the moment. Gavin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9: 5:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB3237B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boredom.ennui.org (boredom.ennui.org [216.101.146.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6F243E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:05:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rone@ennui.org) Received: by boredom.ennui.org (Postfix, from userid 5150) id 496C026E27; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? In-Reply-To: <20020708022457.GA15944@bsdguru.com> To: Ben Lovett Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-URL: http://ennui.org/rone/ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20020708160531.496C026E27@boredom.ennui.org> From: rone@ennui.org (figmentality) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ben Lovett writes: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilibmad -I./libid3tag -Iintl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -Wall -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -c madtime.c madtime.c:29: #error "madtime currently requires mmap() support" *** Error code 1 Please see for a patch. I tried it and it solved the problem. rone -- Constancy of the speed of light is a conclusion, yes it is a conclusion based on nonconvincing, irrational assumptions. WHAT IS LIGHT?! Whose light? From what sourse? Please do not mention electronagnetics - the same applies to them. - Alexander Abian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:11:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF3B37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from search.sparks.net (d-207-5-180-136.gwi.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C63243E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmiller@sparks.net) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id CEFC0D988; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6369D987 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:11:26 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller X-Sender: dmiller@search.sparks.net To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/bin/w -n changes? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all; Is /usr/bin/w -n not supposed to show IP addresses anymore? Thanks, --- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:33:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78A737B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from the.oneinsane.net (the.oneinsane.net [66.42.61.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F9E43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blovett@moria.bsdguru.com) Received: from moria.bsdguru.com (unknown [65.123.250.26]) by the.oneinsane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E9215505 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by moria.bsdguru.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 901B87FC; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:33:18 -0700 From: Ben Lovett To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? Message-ID: <20020708163318.GA11288@bsdguru.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Lovett , stable@freebsd.org References: <20020708022457.GA15944@bsdguru.com> <20020708160531.496C026E27@boredom.ennui.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708160531.496C026E27@boredom.ennui.org> X-Moon: The Moon is Waning Crescent (4% of Full) X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdguru.com/~blovett/blovett.pgp X-GPG-Fingerprint: 22E2 6A6D BD5A E63A 1D2D 86AC 1066 FBE9 B120 B402 X-GPG-KeyID: 0xB120B402 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD moria 4.6-STABLE X-Uptime: 9:32AM up 12 mins, 3 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.10, 0.04 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I believe figmentality (rone@ennui.org) scribbled this: > Ben Lovett writes: > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilibmad -I./libid3tag -Iintl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -Wall -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -c madtime.c > madtime.c:29: #error "madtime currently requires mmap() support" > *** Error code 1 > > Please see for a patch. I tried it and it solved the problem. > > rone That worked. Thanks :) -ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:42:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4DD37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A3843E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:42:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 74DF8217B6; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem Newsgroups: ml.freebsd.stable References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> X-Trace: lorax.kciLink.com 1026143338 63984 216.194.193.105 (8 Jul 2002 15:48:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: daemon@kciLink.com X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020517 (@kci) X-Razor-id: f3456008c52ca98cae7455653b060b4e51bbd14e Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "DWC" == David W Chapman, writes: DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the >> install. Anyone else have this problem? DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. Personally, I just went with linux_base6-6.1 and it works flawlessly. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:49: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F3E37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0AB43E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:49:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68Gma56000441; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68GmUOL000440; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:48:29 -0700 From: David Schultz To: stan Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Message-ID: <20020708164829.GA337@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List References: <20020708144324.GA24911@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708144324.GA24911@teddy.fas.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake stan : > Some machines will let me in, but only if I enter the password (where I did > not have to before). Others just refuse to let me in at all! I have had the former problem for quite some time. All of the machines in question were running some version of SSH Secure Shell and were (as far as I know) correctly configured to use public key authentication. Reverting to ``Protocol 1,2'' in ssh_config solved the problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:52:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5E837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD8943E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:52:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from emerger.yogotech.com (emerger.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23429; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:52:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by emerger.yogotech.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) id g68Gq90L005530; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:52:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15657.49977.348140.590112@emerger.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:52:09 -0600 To: Vivek Khera Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem Newsgroups: ml.freebsd.stable In-Reply-To: References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the > >> install. Anyone else have this problem? > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from > DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux > > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. I'll agree with the former, but disagree with the latter. Acroread4 is working fine on my new box using linux_base-7.1, no core dumps. (I ignored the strip error, since it's really not a necessary step for full functionality.) I never tried acroread5, since the port couldn't find a copy of the binaries anywhere when I tried it. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:57:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48E537B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411CC43E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:57:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6585C3198DF; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:57:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:57:21 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Nate Williams Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem Message-ID: <20020708165721.GA42531@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Nate Williams , Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> <15657.49977.348140.590112@emerger.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15657.49977.348140.590112@emerger.yogotech.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:52:09AM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the > > >> install. Anyone else have this problem? > > > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from > > DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux > > > > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. > > I'll agree with the former, but disagree with the latter. Acroread4 is > working fine on my new box using linux_base-7.1, no core dumps. > > (I ignored the strip error, since it's really not a necessary step for > full functionality.) > > I never tried acroread5, since the port couldn't find a copy of the > binaries anywhere when I tried it. I wonder if we can use our strip since linux_base-7 doesn't include one? -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 9:59:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE74337B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1B343E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from emerger.yogotech.com (emerger.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23498; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:59:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by emerger.yogotech.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) id g68Gxpbk005746; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:59:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15657.50439.208282.915784@emerger.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:59:51 -0600 To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Nate Williams , Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem In-Reply-To: <20020708165721.GA42531@leviathan.inethouston.net> References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> <15657.49977.348140.590112@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020708165721.GA42531@leviathan.inethouston.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > > > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the > > > >> install. Anyone else have this problem? > > > > > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from > > > DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux > > > > > > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > > > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > > > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. > > > > I'll agree with the former, but disagree with the latter. Acroread4 is > > working fine on my new box using linux_base-7.1, no core dumps. > > > > (I ignored the strip error, since it's really not a necessary step for > > full functionality.) > > > > I never tried acroread5, since the port couldn't find a copy of the > > binaries anywhere when I tried it. > > I wonder if we can use our strip since linux_base-7 doesn't include > one? If you *really* are worried, grab the strip from linux_base-6. Otherwise, create something like: #!/bin/sh exit 0; Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 10: 5:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9982937B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BF843E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:05:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (dwcjr [192.168.0.248]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61D13198DF; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:05:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <02c201c226a1$a9957650$f800a8c0@dwcjr> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Nate Williams" Cc: "Nate Williams" , "Vivek Khera" , References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com><20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net><15657.49977.348140.590112@emerger.yogotech.com><20020708165721.GA42531@leviathan.inethouston.net> <15657.50439.208282.915784@emerger.yogotech.com> Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:05:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I wonder if we can use our strip since linux_base-7 doesn't include=20 > > one? >=20 > If you *really* are worried, grab the strip from linux_base-6. > Otherwise, create something like: I'm not that worried as I stopped using linux_base for a while. We do = need to pull some libc stuff from linux_base-6 to complete the = transition so that all ports will work with linux_base-7, so we might as = well pull strip as well. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 10:24:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D0F37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B4E43E3B; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:24:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g68HOYp05455; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:24:34 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Jason Porter , Doug Barton , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: BitchX in X? Message-ID: <20020708102434.A4644@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Jason Porter , Doug Barton , freebsd-stable References: <3D269EE8.8010001@xmission.com> <3D26A637.5E505900@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3D26A637.5E505900@FreeBSD.org>; from DougB@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:11:35AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I'm using WindowMaker, how would I go about getting bitchx to run in gtk > > mode? > > This question isn't appropriate for -stable. It's probably not > appropriate for freebsd lists in general, but I'm not sure of a bitchx > list to send you to. Yeah, probably better on -questions. Based on looking at /usr/ports/irc/bitchx/Makefile, it looks like you'll want to "cd /usr/ports/irc/bitchx && make WITH_GNOME=yes install clean". Best Regards, -jj -- Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew flowcharts; look how much good it did them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 10:45:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C2537B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A51E43E54 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from xdsl-195-14-220-102.netcologne.de (xdsl-195-14-206-105.netcologne.de [195.14.206.105]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g68Hj4Wf024636 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:45:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 1322 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Jul 2002 17:39:07 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:39:07 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Server and Gateway Message-ID: <20020708173907.GA581@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <000801c225c9$bba4d030$3200000a@nitrox> <20020707173947.GA250@theshell.com> <000301c225f0$e43dcf70$3200000a@nitrox> <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708053408.GA28499@earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Christian Chen (oistrakh@earthlink.net): > So, what I'm actually doing is: > > 1. Set up NAT to route between my ethernet card and tun0 > 2. Set up the firewall rules via PPP Ugh. Simply let ppp(8) take care of NAT, do the firewalling with ipfw(8) and you're done. Close to trivial. -- Thomas Seck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 10:50:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A0337B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bamse.ktv.se (bamse.ktv.se [195.17.241.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EF843E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leo@ktv.se) Received: from there (ftpmartin.ktv.se [194.52.13.252] (may be forged)) by bamse.ktv.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g68HoMO1015845; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:50:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leo@ktv.se) Message-Id: <200207081750.g68HoMO1015845@bamse.ktv.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Leo De Geer Organization: Kristianstad Teknikverkstad To: Ben Lovett , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mmap() problems in recent -stable ? Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:50:18 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020708022457.GA15944@bsdguru.com> <20020708160531.496C026E27@boredom.ennui.org> <20020708163318.GA11288@bsdguru.com> In-Reply-To: <20020708163318.GA11288@bsdguru.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mondayen den 8 July 2002 18.33, Ben Lovett wrote: > I believe figmentality (rone@ennui.org) scribbled this: > > Ben Lovett writes: > > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Ilibmad -I./libid3tag -Iintl > > -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -I/usr/local/include -Wall > > -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -c madtime.c madtime.c:29: #error "madtime > > currently requires mmap() support" *** Error code 1 > > > > Please see > > >TU.edu.tw> for a patch. I tried it and it solved the problem. > > > > rone > > That worked. Thanks :) > > -ben > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message did you yast use the patch because i get error in the makefile Need an operand on line 46 thats the last line in the patch regards leo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 11:33:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1773537B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hindenburg.eboai.org (hindenburg.eboai.org [206.183.134.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FEF43E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chip@chocobo.cx) Received: by hindenburg.eboai.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A56315E2D9; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:33:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:33:42 -0400 From: Chip Marshall To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020708183342.GA51240@chocobo.cx> Reply-To: chip@chocobo.cx Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-URL: http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ X-OS: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 up 9 days, 15 mins Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On July 08, 2002, Gavin Atkinson sent me the following: > > Hello! > > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/dri= vers > > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. >=20 > From memory, /usr/share/examples/cvsup was also empty, though I can't > check at the moment. Yeah, it was. I thought I was insane the first time I noticed it, but it appeared again on another 4.6 install. --=20 Chip Marshall http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r++ y? --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9KdsG8vyTVl6qbdQRAn2VAJ9ZiG8BDAvgoouFz0wxTrvJlYau2ACdEIBN leXcp/9lkPmCsrqCejzMqS4= =IWk/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 11:52:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE93A37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7D543E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:52:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g68Iq1o10481; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:52:01 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Linux Java 1.4 was: linux_base-7.1 problem Message-ID: <20020708115201.C4644@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from khera@kcilink.com on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:42:47AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >>>>> "DWC" == David W Chapman, writes: > > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the > >> install. Anyone else have this problem? > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from > DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux > > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. > > Personally, I just went with linux_base6-6.1 and it works flawlessly. I noticed that linux_base-7 makes linux-sun-jdk14 crash, whereas linux_base-6 doesn't. This was from a completely clean /compat. Should I submit a PR, or is this known behavior. What was really surprising is that linux-sun-jdk14 will try to install linux_base-7 if linux_base-6 isn't installed, but this default results in a broken configuration. Best Regards, -jj -- Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew flowcharts; look how much good it did them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 11:55:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AB837B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B481943E31; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 861752E883; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:55:24 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Murray Stokely Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c Message-ID: <20020708115524.H38007@freebsdmall.com> References: <200207081843.g68Ihmlq073169@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207081843.g68Ihmlq073169@freefall.freebsd.org>; from murray@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:43:48AM -0700 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm going to wait for a few other changes in the pipeline to hit RELENG_4_6 before bumping the patch level. - Murray On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:43:48AM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > murray 2002/07/08 11:43:48 PDT > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_6) > sys/dev/ata ata-all.c > Log: > MFS: Fix a misplaced splx(). > > Approved by: sos,so,re > > Revision Changes Path > 1.50.2.36.2.1 +1 -1 src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 12:41:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0213137B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr4.xmission.com (mgr4.xmission.com [198.60.22.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C7643E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:41:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from mail by mgr4.xmission.com with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17ReO5-0000HX-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:41:33 -0600 Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr4.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17ReO5-0000HU-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:41:33 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17ReO4-0001Lp-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:41:33 -0600 Message-ID: <3D29EAEA.4010203@xmission.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:41:30 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020702 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable Subject: Wine with -STABLE? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=8.0 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm thinking of downloading and installing wine, but I wanted to check the list and see if anyone had problems with it before I try. Thanks. -Jason Porter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 12:52:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAEE37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.altadena.net (ns.altadena.net [206.126.144.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3283343E42; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete@ns.altadena.net) Received: from ns.altadena.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.altadena.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68JqC48059731; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete@ns.altadena.net) Received: (from pete@localhost) by ns.altadena.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68JqB55059730; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete) From: Pete Carah Message-Id: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> Subject: Hang problem with spamass-milter... To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have spamass-milter compiled and running in a fresh 4.6-stable box (built last week). If two mail messages arrive "close enough" in time, spamc hangs hard (needs kill -9 to stop it) in pipe-read state with spamass-milter in pipe-read also. I have a suspicion about read acting non-blocking in the pipe case; looking through the pthread_read.c source, as long as EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN work right things shouldn't act like this. Do these work right on pipes in thread context? I guess I could set up a test program... Note that spamc is not compiled thread-safe (not required here since it is started for each message). spamass-milter's configure does not make the right choices for freebsd; I presume the port fixes this (I did so myself, adding _THREAD_SAFE and -pthread). The C++ library may or may not be thread-safe? I saw a query about this same thing dated last Feb (looking at the code fragment, I suspect it was in the same program); it is still around. The hint at a fix then was "are you sure you are writing anything". Given that the identical code works fine in debian, I suspect a system problem. To me it appears to be the behavior of EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN with pipes in thread context. -- Pete To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 12:54:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D6A37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from citron.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1440543E4A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fogalt@chasma.net) Received: (qmail 14292 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jul 2002 19:47:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fogalt.corp.chasma.net) (10.0.0.177) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 19:47:40 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:48:45 -0400 (EDT) From: tom fogal Reply-To: To: Subject: subscribe freebsd-stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 13: 7:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25FA37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADCC43E31; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:07:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g68K7l81014553; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:07:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:07:47 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Pete Carah Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Message-ID: <20020708200747.GA82041@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jul 08), Pete Carah said: > I have spamass-milter compiled and running in a fresh 4.6-stable box > (built last week). If two mail messages arrive "close enough" in > time, spamc hangs hard (needs kill -9 to stop it) in pipe-read state > with spamass-milter in pipe-read also. I have a suspicion about read > acting non-blocking in the pipe case; looking through the > pthread_read.c source, as long as EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN work right > things shouldn't act like this. You sure this is the trigger, and not an email over 250k? An unpatched spamass-milter will definitely hang on any email that spamc decides is too big to process (250k default). There are patches at http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ that fix this problem and add some more functionality ( see patches 349, 351, 354, 381, 385 ). Most of the patches require a CVS checkout, though, which is probably why the port doesn't include them. > spamass-milter's configure does not make the right choices for freebsd; > I presume the port fixes this (I did so myself, adding _THREAD_SAFE and > -pthread). The C++ library may or may not be thread-safe? patch 349 fixes this -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 13:17:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E919F37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smurf.jnielsen.net (12-254-136-47.client.attbi.com [12.254.136.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5242C43E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:17:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stable@jnielsen.net) Received: from max (max.local [192.168.0.9]) by smurf.jnielsen.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g68KHFCc001306; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:17:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from stable@jnielsen.net) Message-ID: <00fb01c226bc$7b049440$0900a8c0@max> From: "John Nielsen" To: "Pete Carah" , Cc: References: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:17:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL version=2.20 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Pete Carah wrote: > I have spamass-milter compiled and running in a fresh 4.6-stable > box (built last week). If two mail messages arrive "close enough" in > time, spamc hangs hard (needs kill -9 to stop it) in pipe-read state > with spamass-milter in pipe-read also. I have a suspicion about > read acting non-blocking in the pipe case; looking through the > pthread_read.c source, as long as EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN work right > things shouldn't act like this. > > Do these work right on pipes in thread context? I guess I could set > up a test program... > > Note that spamc is not compiled thread-safe (not required here since > it is started for each message). > > spamass-milter's configure does not make the right choices for freebsd; > I presume the port fixes this (I did so myself, adding _THREAD_SAFE and > -pthread). The C++ library may or may not be thread-safe? > > I saw a query about this same thing dated last Feb (looking at the > code fragment, I suspect it was in the same program); it is > still around. > > The hint at a fix then was "are you sure you are writing anything". > Given that the identical code works fine in debian, I suspect a system > problem. To me it appears to be the behavior of EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN with > pipes in thread context. I don't have any answers, but I can confirm the problem. I installed spamass-milter from the port, and it hangs every morning at 3:00 (when daily run output comes in from my other machines). I'd love to see a fix... :) JN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 13:48:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E807537B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1443E58 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:48:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from radwaste.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-230-92.inet.co.th [203.151.230.92]) by access.inet.co.th (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA02321; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:48:50 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (firak.thai-aec.org. [192.168.1.55]) by radwaste.thai-aec.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g68KnDQh001056; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:49:14 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68Kmmlo000890; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:48:48 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g68KmkVD000889; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:48:46 +0700 (ICT) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:48:46 +0700 From: pirat To: stan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020708204846.GC750@thai-aec.org> References: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:50:20AM -0400, stan wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:50:20 -0400 > From: stan > To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List > Subject: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( > > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > previously. I get "permission refused" > i even can not telnet from win me to my fav. freebsd box which formerly used to be alright. with best regards, psr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 14: 2:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6966A37B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from copper.eng.cstone.net (copper.eng.cstone.net [209.145.66.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596ED43E75; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:02:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from josepht@copper.eng.cstone.net) Received: from copper.eng.cstone.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by copper.eng.cstone.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68L2blj065687; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:02:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from josepht@copper.eng.cstone.net) Received: (from josepht@localhost) by copper.eng.cstone.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g68L2aTU065686; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:02:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:02:36 -0400 From: Joe Talbott To: Dan Nelson Cc: Pete Carah , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Message-ID: <20020708210236.GA65659@copper.eng.cstone.net> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Nelson , Pete Carah , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> <20020708200747.GA82041@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708200747.GA82041@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,X_NOT_PRESENT,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO version=2.30 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:07:47PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > You sure this is the trigger, and not an email over 250k? An unpatched > spamass-milter will definitely hang on any email that spamc decides is > too big to process (250k default). There are patches at > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ that fix this problem > and add some more functionality ( see patches 349, 351, 354, 381, 385 ). > Most of the patches require a CVS checkout, though, which is probably > why the port doesn't include them. I applied patch 349 to the port and reinstalled. I'm still having issues with multiple mails coming in at approximately the same time hanging spamass-milter/spamc. To repeat: for i in `jot 10 1`; do echo "test $i" | mail -s "test $i" email@dom.com done I also applied patch 372 which didn't solve the problem. Joe -- Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired. Jules Renard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 14:51:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CD337B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A9343E52; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g68Loxp9055311; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:50:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020708174501.04b030a8@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 17:49:29 -0400 To: Pete Carah From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have had this problem from the start. Just blast a few dozen messages to the machine at the same time and it hangs. Whether its 250K or less doesnt seem to matter. e.g. see http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=100680&group_id=1083 ---Mike At 12:52 PM 7/8/2002 -0700, Pete Carah wrote: >I have spamass-milter compiled and running in a fresh 4.6-stable >box (built last week). If two mail messages arrive "close enough" in >time, spamc hangs hard (needs kill -9 to stop it) in pipe-read state >with spamass-milter in pipe-read also. I have a suspicion about >read acting non-blocking in the pipe case; looking through the >pthread_read.c source, as long as EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN work right >things shouldn't act like this. > >Do these work right on pipes in thread context? I guess I could set >up a test program... > >Note that spamc is not compiled thread-safe (not required here since >it is started for each message). > >spamass-milter's configure does not make the right choices for freebsd; >I presume the port fixes this (I did so myself, adding _THREAD_SAFE and >-pthread). The C++ library may or may not be thread-safe? > >I saw a query about this same thing dated last Feb (looking at the >code fragment, I suspect it was in the same program); it is >still around. > >The hint at a fix then was "are you sure you are writing anything". >Given that the identical code works fine in debian, I suspect a system >problem. To me it appears to be the behavior of EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN with >pipes in thread context. > >-- Pete > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15: 5:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F12A37B401; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls1.std.com [199.172.62.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2912E43E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:05:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (licuanan@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA05244; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:05:49 -0400 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA4526172; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200207082205.SAA4526172@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/doc build failure in -stable (vinum) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi... Any reason -doc building in -stable is getting hung with vinum? Things build just fine, but when it hits vinum, jade seems to be hanging, eating the cpu & never completing. Ideas? Fix? Workaround? Thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:15:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7039037B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from samwise.jobeus.net (samwise.jobeus.net [209.91.102.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155543E52 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:15:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@jobeus.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by samwise.jobeus.net (8.12.5/8.12.3) id g68MEqRA092583; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:14:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@jobeus.net) Received: from localhost (freebsd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by samwise.jobeus.net (8.12.5/8.12.3av) with ESMTP id g68MEoSe092575; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:14:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@jobeus.net) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:14:50 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Carmichael To: David Miller Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020708161424.I92572-100000@samwise.jobeus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It does on mine (4.6-stable). What's your's outputting? On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Miller wrote: > Hi all; > > Is /usr/bin/w -n not supposed to show IP addresses anymore? > > Thanks, > > --- David > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:16:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BC237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (ca-sqy-2-238.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.55.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFCF43E4A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:16:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dak@nitrogen.wanadoo.fr) Received: from nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (nitrogen [127.0.0.1]) by nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g68MEQjg006210 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dak@nitrogen.wanadoo.fr) Received: (from dak@localhost) by nitrogen.wanadoo.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g68MEQYB006209 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:25 +0200 From: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Nephtali To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Time to update handbook (backup-programs.html) Message-ID: <20020708221425.GA6189@nitrogen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I think the 'creating a boot floppy' procedure explained in this page is outdated, the kernel file proposed doesn't even pass the config state and even if I compile the minimal kernel its size is 800k (after the script copies all files, df says there's only 444k free) -- Aurélien Sorry for bad english. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:20:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E013B37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113043E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g68MK4Pf010981; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:20:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:20:04 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Joe Talbott Cc: Pete Carah , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Message-ID: <20020708222004.GB13884@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> <20020708200747.GA82041@dan.emsphone.com> <20020708210236.GA65659@copper.eng.cstone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708210236.GA65659@copper.eng.cstone.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jul 08), Joe Talbott said: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:07:47PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > You sure this is the trigger, and not an email over 250k? An unpatched > > spamass-milter will definitely hang on any email that spamc decides is > > too big to process (250k default). There are patches at > > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ that fix this problem > > and add some more functionality ( see patches 349, 351, 354, 381, 385 ). > > Most of the patches require a CVS checkout, though, which is probably > > why the port doesn't include them. > > I applied patch 349 to the port and reinstalled. I'm still having issues > with multiple mails coming in at approximately the same time hanging > spamass-milter/spamc. > > To repeat: > > for i in `jot 10 1`; do > echo "test $i" | mail -s "test $i" email@dom.com > done Works for me. I changed `jot 10 1` to `jot 100 1` and after some chugging, got all 100 messages. With patch 349 applied, the milter uses a select() loop in the part of the code where it needs to both read and write from spamc, so I can't see where it would deadlock. I have some changes to patch 349 that adds a '-d' flag to log a debugging message to every function in the program; I'll CC you when I update the copy on savannah. It's possible you're seeing some sort of threading bug on -stable; I have only tested on -current. > I also applied patch 372 which didn't solve the problem. 372 just sets all the sockets to non-blocking, which will cause buzz-loops, and adds some other bugs that make it not 8-bit clean for incoming messages. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:28: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF35837B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E5143E72; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g68MRaA77380; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g68MRa44084731; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: stan Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <20020708144324.GA24911@teddy.fas.com> Message-ID: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > I thought I would repost this with more information. > > I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my > 4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get > to before. This is because the default in ssh seems to have changed from "Protocol 1,2" to "Protocol 2,1". The following in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or ~/.ssh/config should do the trick for you: Host * Protocol 1,2 DES, Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this topic. Doug -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:29: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A61A37B401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D4843E6A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:28:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g68MSdR26043; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g68MScu1084734; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:28:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: "Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > The 4.6 systems I've installed don't have a default root crontab There is no default root crontab. You create one if you want it by using 'crontab -e'. However, for system functions you're better off using /etc/crontab, since that's more visible, and easier to back up, etc. HTH, Doug -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:38:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7143A37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (thule.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.117.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD143E42 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:38:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dvastine@vastine.net) Received: from Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (thule@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g68McvFE022374 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:38:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dvastine@vastine.net) Received: from localhost (dvastine@localhost) by Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g68Mcv1q022371 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:38:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com: dvastine owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:38:57 -0400 (EDT) From: David Vastine X-X-Sender: dvastine@thule.ne.client2.attbi.com To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? In-Reply-To: <20020708161424.I92572-100000@samwise.jobeus.net> Message-ID: <20020708183103.V22309-100000@thule.ne.client2.attbi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I seem to have a couple 4.6-STABLE systems where 'w -n' will still resolve into host names and not just show the IP. My most recent -STABLE machine was built on July 2. David V. On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Scott Carmichael wrote: > It does on mine (4.6-stable). What's your's outputting? > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Miller wrote: > > > Hi all; > > > > Is /usr/bin/w -n not supposed to show IP addresses anymore? > > > > Thanks, > > > > --- David > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 15:43:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9195337B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD9E43E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:43:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g68MhBR30636; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g68MhB28085114; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:43:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: stan Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( In-Reply-To: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> Message-ID: <20020708154230.J84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > previously. I get "permission refused" You probably got bit by the protocol change bug. Try putting this in either /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or ~/.ssh/config: Host * Protocol 1,2 -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 16:35: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35F537B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246A943E54; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:34:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from Yggdrasil (adsl-68-20-19-121.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.19.121]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g68NYv35024032; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:34:57 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David Syphers Reply-To: dsyphers@uchicago.edu To: Doug Barton , stan Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:35:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List References: <20020708154230.J84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020708154230.J84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207081835.02452.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 08 July 2002 05:43 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > > > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > > previously. I get "permission refused" > > You probably got bit by the protocol change bug. I know you disagree with the change, but it's not a bug. It was intentional, and it's mentioned in UPDATING. Feel free to call it a bad idea... -David -- Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand... Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 17:10:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C37937B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modusponens.dnsalias.org (pool-151-203-188-249.wma.east.verizon.net [151.203.188.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994DF43E4A; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jay@eziba.com) Received: from eziba.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by modusponens.dnsalias.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g690CGju000306; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:12:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jay@eziba.com) Message-ID: <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:16 -0400 From: Jay Sachs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton Cc: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > > >>I thought I would repost this with more information. >> >>I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my >>4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get >>to before. > > > This is because the default in ssh seems to have changed from "Protocol > 1,2" to "Protocol 2,1". The following in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or > ~/.ssh/config should do the trick for you: > > Host * > Protocol 1,2 > > DES, > > Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA > thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this > topic. There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, and a move forward. It seems excessive to wait for the switch to 5.0-RELEASE for this change, and somewhere between any two 4.X releases seems just about right. IMO, if (at the *bare minumum*) you don't read and understand UPDATING after cvsupping, don't track -STABLE. (It's always struck me as a bit oxymoronic to apply POLA criteria to -STABLE). jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 17:26:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB3D37B400; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail7.nc.rr.com (fe7.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C17943E09; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:26:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from i8k.babbleon.org ([66.57.86.84]) by mail7.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:25:38 -0400 Received: by i8k.babbleon.org (Postfix, from userid 111) id 47EA2BB2C; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Brian T.Schellenberger To: Jay Sachs , Doug Barton Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:25:35 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> In-Reply-To: <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020709002535.47EA2BB2C@i8k.babbleon.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 08 July 2002 08:12 pm, Jay Sachs wrote: | Doug Barton wrote: | > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: | >>I thought I would repost this with more information. | >> | >>I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my | >>4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get | >>to before. | > | > This is because the default in ssh seems to have changed from "Protocol | > 1,2" to "Protocol 2,1". The following in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or | > ~/.ssh/config should do the trick for you: | > | > Host * | > Protocol 1,2 | > | > DES, | > | > Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA | > thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this | > topic. | | There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, | and a move forward. It seems excessive to wait for the switch to | 5.0-RELEASE for this change, and somewhere between any two | 4.X releases seems just about right. | | IMO, if (at the *bare minumum*) you don't read and understand UPDATING | after cvsupping, don't track -STABLE. (It's always struck me as a bit | oxymoronic to apply POLA criteria to -STABLE). Surely this is an exageration. It is surely that true that "zero-tolerance" "PONA" principle would overdo it, but surely you'd agree that surprises should be avoided unless there's a good reason for them? That said, changing *back* in stable is a truly extreme POLA violation. Argue about whether this was a terribly good idea, but it's done. Move on. | | jay | | | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org | with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . . bts@babbleon.org (personal) http://www.babbleon.org http://www.eff.org http://www.programming-freedom.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 19:35:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3414237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from search.sparks.net (d-207-5-180-136.gwi.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14C643E52 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:35:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmiller@sparks.net) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id C81CCD984; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:35:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FDDD983; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:35:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:35:47 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller To: Scott Carmichael Cc: David Miller , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? In-Reply-To: <20020708161424.I92572-100000@samwise.jobeus.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Scott Carmichael wrote: > It does on mine (4.6-stable). What's your's outputting? renegade:scan$ w -n 10:30PM up 14 days, 8:09, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.02 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT dmiller p0 dsta-aa664.pivot 2:36PM - w -n > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Miller wrote: > > > Hi all; > > > > Is /usr/bin/w -n not supposed to show IP addresses anymore? > > > > Thanks, > > > > --- David > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 19:48: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C119237B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop1.syd-office.yahoo.com (pop1.syd-office.yahoo.com [202.3.15.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87CB43E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:47:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kiels@au.yahoo-inc.com) Received: from rashaadj (rashaadj.syd-office.yahoo.com [172.24.32.64]) by pop1.syd-office.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/pop-au) with SMTP id g692lub86837 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:47:56 +1000 (EST) From: "Kiel R Stirling" To: Subject: ELF binary types not known after make world Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:50:19 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, After cvsup'n to 4.6 stable and make buildworld and make installworld I get the following errors when trying to install and run linux binaries. when running linux-realplay: ELF binary type "0" not known Abort trap when trying to install netscape7 ELF binary type "3" not known execution of lbjpeg-6b-9 script failed, exit status 0 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphices/linux-jpeg Is there a compat xx I should now install?? Regards, Kiel R. Stirling. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 19:51: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757BB37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr1.xmission.com (mgr1.xmission.com [198.60.22.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C1643E54 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:51:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from mail by mgr1.xmission.com with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17Rl5i-00000i-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:51:02 -0600 Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17Rl5i-00000f-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:51:02 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17Rl5i-0006Vs-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:51:02 -0600 Message-ID: <3D2A4F93.1060500@xmission.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:50:59 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020702 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiel R Stirling Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: ELF binary types not known after make world References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kiel R Stirling wrote: >Hi, > >After cvsup'n to 4.6 stable and make buildworld and make installworld I get >the following >errors when trying to install and run linux binaries. > >when running linux-realplay: > ELF binary type "0" not known > Abort trap > >when trying to install netscape7 > ELF binary type "3" not known > execution of lbjpeg-6b-9 script failed, exit status 0 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/graphices/linux-jpeg > >Is there a compat xx I should now install?? > >Regards, > >Kiel R. Stirling. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > Silly question, but did you brandelf -l Linux the files? -Jason Porter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 19:53:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FEB37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns4.sony.co.jp (NS4.Sony.CO.JP [146.215.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36A043E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:53:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mistral@imasy.or.jp) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (mail2.sony.co.jp [43.0.1.202]) by ns4.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g692rKh71041 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g692rKx23732 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:20 +0900 (JST) Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp ([43.2.7.195]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g692rJl23723 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.5/8.12.5/mistral) with ESMTP id g692rIev000734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from mistral@imasy.or.jp) Received: (from sarumaru@localhost) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g692rI3k000733; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sarumaru) From: mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko SARUMARU) To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: pam_ssh is broken? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22PL5] 2001-02/07(Wed) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:18 +0900 Message-ID: <020709115318.M0100426@mistral.imasy.or.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, After OpenSSH and PAM updates, I was locked out from the system by pam_ssh. login and xdm will dump core when I enter user name and pass phrase. /kernel: pid 287 (xdm), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) /kernel: pid 277 (login), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) I haven't found what is wrong yet. Maybe one of OpenSSH, libpam, pam_ssh or something else. Is there anyone who could found what is wrong? My pam.conf is: xdm auth required pam_unix.so +xdm auth sufficient pam_ssh.so try_first_path #xdm auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_first_pass #xdm auth sufficient pam_krb5.so try_first_pass xdm account required pam_unix.so try_first_pass xdm session required pam_deny.so +xdm session optional pam_ssh.so xdm password required pam_deny.so +login auth sufficient pam_ssh.so try_first_pass login auth sufficient pam_skey.so login auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake_prompts #login auth required pam_opieaccess.so login auth requisite pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so #login auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_first_pass #login auth sufficient pam_krb5.so try_first_pass login auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass login account required pam_unix.so login password required pam_permit.so login session required pam_permit.so +login session optional pam_ssh.so Thanks in advance, -- Yoshihiko SARUMARU mail: mistral@imasy.or.jp web: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~mistral/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 20:50:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E191E37B40A for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snickers.hotpop.com (snickers.hotpop.com [204.57.55.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C7943E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kosta_k@phreaker.net) Received: from phreaker.net (kubrick.hotpop.com [204.57.55.16]) by snickers.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 904D176534 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from windows (c17014.eburwd3.vic.optusnet.com.au [210.49.194.127]) by smtp-1.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F9B32F8108 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <001e01c226fb$b7366f80$2900a8c0@windows> From: "Kosta K" To: References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> Subject: Re: linux_base-7.1 problem Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:04 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-HotPOP: ----------------------------------------------- Sent By HotPOP.com FREE Email Get your FREE POP email at www.HotPOP.com ----------------------------------------------- Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. > > Personally, I just went with linux_base6-6.1 and it works flawlessly. i did a dodgy on installing acroread5, it works smoothly and fine now with linux base 7 (after being installed by base 6).. no core dumps To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 21: 0:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1074E37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9EA43E52 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:00:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:00:24 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: lmmon, xeon, e7500 chipset, supermicro, doesn't seem to work Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:00:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a motherboard with a dual XEON using the Intel e7500 chipset (a supermicro SUPER P4DPR-6GM+ motherboard). The smb driver is installed, and seems to work (I can enumerate the bus, some devices respond reliably). However, lmmon (and consolehm) don't seem to work in smb mode. lmmon uses slave address 0x5a. I don't have one of those. The devices I have are: 18 found. 1a found. 30 found. 48 found. 50 found. 98 found. 9a found. b0 found. c8 found. d0 found. Can anyone suggest what I might need to do here? Its not as simple as making lmmon use one of those numbers above. I'm guessing there is a different chip here, @ a different address. ichsmb0: is the device in question which acts as the bridge. I think this is probably working ok. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 21:43: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9685337B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f108.hotmail.com [216.32.181.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E2043E3B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:43:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmays2000@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:43:06 -0700 Received: from 24.196.232.182 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 04:43:05 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.196.232.182] From: "Kenneth Mays" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.6-Stable-070402 & 4.6R-p1: First Look... Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:43:05 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2002 04:43:06.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E24AB60:01C22703] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Thanks for fixing 5.0-070702-current to run a little more stable than the 5.0-062402 (?) version on a IBM Thinkpad 600E. I can actually test a few demos on the newer build. Also, both 4.6R-p1 and 4.6-070402 run great on IBM Thinkpad 600E laptops. Pretty stable after a few days of burn in and demo testing. Keep up the good work and I'll send hot toasted marshmellows your way. -Ken P.S. OpenLDAP 2.1.2 or 2.0.25 package...anyone?!? _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 22: 4:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024AB37B405 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.infowest.com (ns1.infowest.com [204.17.177.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EAD43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:04:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rickb@csi.com) Received: from THINMAN (gberger-208-186-106-149-vciXX.dsl.infowest.net [208.186.106.149]) by ns1.infowest.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D95F22B77 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:00:30 -0600 (MDT) From: "rickb" To: Subject: ata flash card question - Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:59:26 -0600 Message-ID: <003401c22705$66a786d0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can anyone point me to relevent docs re: ata flash card support? I haven't been able to find anything on my own. The situation: -------------- 4.6 installed on Libretto - works fine. Insert a flash card (SanDisk 512MB) in a pcmcia adapter and the adapter into the machine, and this is what I get: pccard: card inserted, slot 1 Jul 8 19:0:26 sysyphus pccard[52]: Card "SunDisk"("SDP") [5/3 0.6] [(null)] matched "SunDisk" ("/.*/") [(null)] [(null)] ata2 at port 0x240-0x247,0x24e irq 3 slot 1 on pccard1 ad4: 488MB [993/16/63] at ata2-master BIOSPIO Jul 8 19:03:31 sysyphus pccardd[52]: ata2: SunDisk (/.*/) inserted Basically, looks like it recognized it and assigned a device and driver to it. The problem is the ad4, of which I have no entries in /dev. Have a single disk, ad0. ad1-ad3 are present and unused, not sure why it took ad4. So, I don't have anything in /dev to mount. Can I explicitly assign it to ad{1,3}, somehow? Trying mknod or MAKEDEV after inserting the card doesn't get me anything, (but I'm not real conversant with those utilities, so may not have been using them correctly.) Any doc pointers/thoughts appreciated. rickb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 22:30:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DD837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0693843E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:30:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from grimoire.chen.org.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chen.org.nz (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g695U41M003036; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:30:04 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from jonc@grimoire.chen.org.nz) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by grimoire.chen.org.nz (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g695U3Ii003035; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:30:03 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:30:03 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: pirat Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020709053003.GC2936@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> <20020708204846.GC750@thai-aec.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708204846.GC750@thai-aec.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:48:46AM +0700, pirat wrote: [...] > i even can not telnet from win me to my fav. freebsd box which formerly used to be alright. > Did you check your telnet line in /etc/inetd.conf? -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Opportunity does not knock, it presents itself when you beat down the door" - W.E. Channing To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 22:36:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A28A37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2290A43E09 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:36:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g695a1ZL002537; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:06:03 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: ata flash card question - From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: rickb Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <003401c22705$66a786d0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> References: <003401c22705$66a786d0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 09 Jul 2002 15:06:00 +0930 Message-Id: <1026192963.4254.21.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 14:29, rickb wrote: > Trying mknod or MAKEDEV after inserting the card doesn't get me anything, > (but I'm not real conversant with those utilities, so may not have been > using them > correctly.) Do this.. cd /dev sh MAKEDEV ad4s1 mkdir /cfcard Then add the following to /etc/fstab /dev/ad4s1 /cfcard msdos rw,noauto 0 0 Then when you insert the card do 'mount /cfcard' and you should be set. Don't forget to 'umount /cfcard' before removing it :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 22:56:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C64F37B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lambertfam.org (www.lambertfam.org [216.223.196.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888B543E58 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lambert@lambertfam.org) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.inch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01FD350D5 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:54:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from laptop.lambertfam.org (unknown [10.1.0.2]) by mail.lambertfam.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB75350A2 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:54:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by laptop.lambertfam.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63AAA28B09; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:56:00 -0400 From: Scott Lambert To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? Message-ID: <20020709055600.GA1611@laptop.lambertfam.org> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20020708161424.I92572-100000@samwise.jobeus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:35:47PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Scott Carmichael wrote: > > > It does on mine (4.6-stable). What's your's outputting? > > renegade:scan$ w -n > 10:30PM up 14 days, 8:09, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.02 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > dmiller p0 dsta-aa664.pivot 2:36PM - w -n At least it's consistent. :-) 01:48:35 Tue Jul 9 $ w -n 1:48AM up 45 days, 1:07, 18 users, load averages: 0.03, 0.04, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT scott p0 adsl-167-217-223 1:48AM - w -n 01:48:36 Tue Jul 9 $ uname -a FreeBSD box.example.com 2.2.7-19980825-SNAP FreeBSD 2.2.7-19980825-SNAP #0: Thu Aug 30 19:57:58 EDT 2001 root@box.example.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/BOX i386 and: 01:52:58 Tue Jul 9 $ w -n 1:53AM up 9 days, 1:19, 7 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT scott p3 adsl-167-217-223 1:52AM - w -n 01:53:05 Tue Jul 9 $ uname -a FreeBSD box2.example.com 4.6-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE-p1 #10: Sat Jun 29 22:19:35 EDT 2002 root@box2.example.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 23: 2: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF837B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC3B43E31 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:01:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Received: from karl (adsl.ooe.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.78]) (authenticated bits=0) by sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6961Lax063237 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:01:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Message-ID: <008401c2270e$0d160ed0$0a05a8c0@ooe.kmjeuro.com> From: "Karl M. Joch" To: Subject: 4.6.1 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:01:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-MailScanner: Mail Server protected by CTS Austria www.ctseuro.com Message found to be clean Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hello, is the patch mentined earlier on stable@feebsd.og to correct this problem included in 4.6.1? > ahc0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x7 > ACCUM = 0x7, SINDEX = 0x64, DINDEX = 0x65, ARG_2 = 0x1 > HCNT = 0x0 SCBPTR = 0xf > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x0 > DFCNTRL = 0x0, DFSTATUS = 0x2d > LASTPHASE = 0x1, SCSISIGI = 0x0, SXFRCTL0 = 0x80 > SSTAT0 = 0x5, SSTAT1 = 0xa > STACK == 0x3, 0x16c, 0x13c, 0xc7 > SCB count = 130 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 37 > Card NEXTQSCB = 37 > QINFIFO entries: > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 15:7 11:15 8:13 12:23 0:11 2:24 3:18 7:20 14:10 9:38 5:28 13:19 1:25 10:21 6:27 4:33 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: > Sequencer SCB Info: 0(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0xb) 1(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x19) 2(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x18) 3(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x12) 4(c 0x66, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x21) 5(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x1c) 6(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x1b) 7(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x14) 8(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0xd) 9(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x26) 10(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x15) 11(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0xf) 12(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x17) 13(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x13) 14(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0xa) 15(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0, t 0x7) > Pending list: 7(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 6(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 36(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 26(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 17(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 129(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 16(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 2(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 12(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 35(c 0x64, s 0x7, l 0), 15(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 13(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 23(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 11(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 24(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 18(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 20(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 10(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 38(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 28(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 19(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 25(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 21(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 27(c 0x60, s 0x7, l 0), 33(c 0x62, s 0x7, l 0) > Kernel Free SCB list: 14 8 1 0 5 34 32 9 4 29 22 39 3 31 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 30 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 > sg[0] - Addr 0x2b78000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x99000 : Length 1024 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Queuing a BDR SCB > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b > ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:0. 25 SCBs aborted -- -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch tionen einfach mieten http://www.freebsd.at - Power Operating System To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 8 23:36:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DC137B400 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA0943E6E for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:36:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g696aaRC036456 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:36:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g696aYJF036452 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:36:36 +0300 (EEST) X-Authentication-Warning: atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua: dmitry owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:36:34 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: <20020709092718.Q32952-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! > > 1. Please include /bin/sh memory leek fix (bin/40177) after MFC'ing it. > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drivers > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. 3. Oh, and maybe some critical fixes to UFS code in /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs (if this code is mature enough). They're looking _really_ significant to the vast majority of FreeBSD users IMHO: [TXT] ufs_inode.c 1.25.2.3 3 days dillon MFC 1.44 - fix for quota related panic. Suggested by: Andre Albsmeier ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C79243E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:12:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA04080 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:12:11 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:12:11 -0600 (MDT) From: Brett Glass Message-Id: <200207090712.BAA04080@lariat.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Apache 2 subject to DoS from worms; downgrade to 1.3.26 recommended Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After the recent Apache security notices, I upgraded a few FreeBSD Web servers to Apache 2.0.39, thinking that this avoid exploitation of those servers. Alas, This turned out to be a mistake. For some reason, a FreeBSD server running Apache 2, when hit by the apache-scalp.c exploit or the worm that was built from it, seems to spawn the maximum number of httpd child processes and then stop handling incoming requests. While the exploit doesn't root the machine, the child processes (which are about 50% bigger than the ones spawned by Apache 1.3.x!) seem to get "wedged;" they never become available to handle more requests. So, more and more children are spawned until the "MaxClients" limit is reached or swap is exhausted. In either case, the server stops handling requests. Apache 1.3.26 doesn't seem susceptible to this problem... especially if one installs mod_blowchunks, which kills the session as soon as an attempt to exploit the server via chunked encoding is detected. I'd like to move to Apache 2.x as soon as possible. But since one of the main benefits of 2.x is its ability to use threading (not advisable under FreeBSD), and since the child processes are fatter and subject to denials of service, I'm sticking with 1.3.x for the moment. Have others experienced the same problems? (Note: I'm not subscribed to -STABLE right now, so please copy me as well as the list on responses.) --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 0:18:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBCF37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DBB43E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:18:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from radwaste.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-230-65.inet.co.th [203.151.230.65]) by access.inet.co.th (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA04717; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:18:41 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (firak.thai-aec.org. [192.168.1.55]) by radwaste.thai-aec.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g696bXQh001583; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:37:35 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g696b6lo001720; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:37:06 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g696b3hE001719; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:37:03 +0700 (ICT) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:37:03 +0700 From: pirat To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020709063703.GA1023@thai-aec.org> References: <20020708135020.GA23622@teddy.fas.com> <20020708204846.GC750@thai-aec.org> <20020709053003.GC2936@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709053003.GC2936@grimoire.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:30:03PM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:30:03 +1200 > From: Jonathan Chen > To: pirat > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:48:46AM +0700, pirat wrote: > > [...] > > > i even can not telnet from win me to my fav. freebsd box which formerly used to be alright. > > > > Did you check your telnet line in /etc/inetd.conf? yes they, ipv4 and ipv6, are enabled. just to allow myself doing some works from win me box. with best regards, psr --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=uname-a FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #1: Sun Jun 30 12:59:43 ICT 2002 root@firak.thai-aec.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Firak i386 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 1:10: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992A637B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCAF43E54; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:09:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (firewall-user@dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68]) by mizar.origin-it.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo27jun02) with ESMTP id g6989Nlg048354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo28jun02) with ESMTP id g6989MS7060642; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo01jul02) id KAA26773; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:20 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200207090809.KAA26773@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> from Jay Sachs at "Jul 8, 2002 8:12:16 pm" To: jay@eziba.com (Jay Sachs) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:20 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: DougB@FreeBSD.ORG, stanb@awod.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, des@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jay Sachs: >Doug Barton wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: >> >> >>>I thought I would repost this with more information. >>> >>>I cvsup'd, rebuilt everythign, and ran mergemester this weekend on my >>>4STABLE laptop. Now I'm having trouble ssh'ing to machines that could get >>>to before. >> >> >> This is because the default in ssh seems to have changed from "Protocol >> 1,2" to "Protocol 2,1". The following in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and/or >> ~/.ssh/config should do the trick for you: >> >> Host * >> Protocol 1,2 >> >> DES, >> >> Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA >> thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this >> topic. > >There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, >and a move forward. It seems excessive to wait for the switch to >5.0-RELEASE for this change, and somewhere between any two >4.X releases seems just about right. Agree. I would rather prefer several small changes like this one in -STABLE than making a huge jump with numerous incompatibilities when 5.0 arrives. After all, what's the purpose of UPDATING when no changes at all may be applied to STABLE. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 1:35:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB63137B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8C943E64; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:35:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g698ZVZL007222; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:05:32 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Sound driver and via82c686 From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 09 Jul 2002 18:05:30 +0930 Message-Id: <1026203731.4254.40.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am trying to get the sound built into my motherboard working but no luck.. I tried an 'instaMFC' and got the same result - a diff shows pretty minor differences so I suspect stable and current are already in sync :) My starting point was 4.5-RELEASE and I then put the -STABLE code in - all with the same results. I get this -> pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff irq 5 at device 17.5 on pci0 Then when I attempt to play any audio I get pcm0:play:0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead after about 2 seconds. I have another system which uses the same driver (via82c686) which used to work but I haven't tested it with the latest PCM code. Any patches/suggestions/etc ? :) Please CC me on reply, thanks. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 1:48:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5121A37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9730343E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:48:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g698mNZL007461; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:18:23 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: Sound driver and via82c686 From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Mr Daniel James O'Connor" Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1026203731.4254.40.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> References: <1026203731.4254.40.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 09 Jul 2002 18:18:22 +0930 Message-Id: <1026204502.4254.44.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 18:05, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Then when I attempt to play any audio I get > pcm0:play:0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead > after about 2 seconds. I checked with vmstat -i - no IRQ's happen at any time (when the module is loaded or playback is attempted) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 2:19:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CDF37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33D643E58 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g699JB183200; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:19:11 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: HEADS UP (not really, but you never know...) Message-ID: <20020709021911.A82719@iguana.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, i just made a commit to a number of files in net/ and netinet/ . From the commit log: ... The purpose of this commit is to bring the net/ and netinet/ sources more in sync with what is in -current, so that mainteinance and bugfix of the two trees is not a nightmare. THERE IS NO FUNCTIONAL OR EXTERNAL API CHANGE IN THIS COMMIT You should not need to recompile any userland code. ... As the commit log says, i basically haven't changed anything but glue. The relevant code has been in -current for 2-3 weeks now, and i have been using it the -stable version of it on our (moderately busy) departmental gateway for a while now, so you should not see any problem. But just in case, you may want to keep an eye open... cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 2:32:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E798937B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372E143E31; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g699W4R83312; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:04 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: ipfw2 patches for -stable available Message-ID: <20020709023203.A83270@iguana.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Bcc to -stable as relevant there] As the subject says, the latest patches to run ipfw2 on -stable are at http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ipfw2.stable.020709.diffs They rely on the code that I have just committed to -stable. Once you have patched your source tree, you need to add options IPFW2 to your kernel config file to have the new functionality available, otherwise you will still use the old ipfw code. You also need to recompile /sbin/ipfw. Note that this patch *does not* handle libalias. (For the curious, ipfw2 is a nickname for the new firewall code which is in -current. It is much faster and more flexible than the old one, and implements the old ipfw syntax as a subset, so your existing configuration files should work unmodified -- and if they don't, please report the rule(s) where it chokes so i can fix that). cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 4:44:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B91C37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 04:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B043E42 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 04:44:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69BidOx026232 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:44:39 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g69BidMG026231 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:44:39 +0800 (KRAST) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:44:39 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny Message-ID: <20020709194439.A26123@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That's what you get now after completing mergemaster: *** Comparison complete Do you wish to delete what is left of /var/tmp/temproot? [no] yes rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty rm: /var/tmp/temproot: Directory not empty *** /var/tmp/temproot has been deleted Obviously, last sentence isn't true :-) Eugene To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 5:16:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE51337B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47B843E4A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by mailf.telia.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g69CF6822710 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:15:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h53n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.53]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA07188 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:15:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 14176 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jul 2002 12:15:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:15:00 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny Message-ID: <20020709121500.GA13059@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Eugene Grosbein , stable@freebsd.org References: <20020709194439.A26123@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709194439.A26123@svzserv.kemerovo.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:44:39PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > That's what you get now after completing mergemaster: > > *** Comparison complete > > Do you wish to delete what is left of /var/tmp/temproot? [no] yes > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty > rm: /var/tmp/temproot: Directory not empty > *** /var/tmp/temproot has been deleted > > > Obviously, last sentence isn't true :-) Obviously?? It is actually true: /var/tmp/temproot actually is deleted afterwards (at least for a recent -stable). What mergemaster does when deleting is the following: rm -rf chflags -R rm -rf The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 5:47:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988037B4DE; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5946E43E09; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:47:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g69ClK180532; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:47:21 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:47:20 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Erik Trulsson , Cc: Eugene Grosbein , Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny In-Reply-To: <20020709121500.GA13059@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20020709164425.J77578-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Erik Trulsson wrote: ET> > Do you wish to delete what is left of /var/tmp/temproot? [no] yes ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot: Directory not empty ET> > *** /var/tmp/temproot has been deleted ET> > ET> > ET> > Obviously, last sentence isn't true :-) ET> ET> Obviously?? It is actually true: /var/tmp/temproot actually is deleted ET> afterwards (at least for a recent -stable). ET> ET> What mergemaster does when deleting is the following: ET> ET> rm -rf ET> chflags -R ET> rm -rf ET> ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. Well maybe then first rm -rf should be redirected to /dev/null? Index: mergemaster.sh =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh,v retrieving revision 1.6.2.14 diff -u -r1.6.2.14 mergemaster.sh --- mergemaster.sh 30 Jun 2002 19:01:35 -0000 1.6.2.14 +++ mergemaster.sh 9 Jul 2002 12:45:39 -0000 @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ CVS_ID_TAG=FreeBSD delete_temproot () { - rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" + rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" >/dev/null 2>&1 chflags -R 0 "${TEMPROOT}" rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" } Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 6:30:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4364437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44AB43E42 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7A9EF1A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys2 [10.1.2.1]) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69DU3OX041033 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsent.com) Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69DU3fP080346 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsys.cwsent.com) Message-Id: <200207091330.g69DU3fP080346@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: Message from Dmitry Pryanishnikov of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:36:34 +0300." <20020709092718.Q32952-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 06:30:03 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020709092718.Q32952-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>, Dmitry Pryan ishnikov writes: > > Hello! > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > > > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > > > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! > > > > 1. Please include /bin/sh memory leek fix (bin/40177) after MFC'ing it. > > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drivers > > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. > > 3. Oh, and maybe some critical fixes to UFS code in /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs > (if this code is mature enough). They're looking _really_ significant to > the vast majority of FreeBSD users IMHO: > > [TXT] ufs_inode.c 1.25.2.3 3 days dillon MFC 1.44 - fix for > quota related panic. Suggested by: Andre Albsmeier > [TXT] ufs_readwrite.c 1.65.2.11 2 weeks dillon MFC 1.90. Fix a > major performance issue that was introduced in late 2000. Sett... People, I'm seeing a lot of suggestions for good patch candidates to go into 4.6.1, however my gut feel is that we're beginning to see some creep of scope here. This is not a government project. :) 4.6.1 is a security release. Let's stay focused. -- Cheers, Phone: 250-387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: 250-387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, CITS Ministry of Management Services Province of BC FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 6:46: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5D437B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpproxy2.mitre.org (smtpproxy2.mitre.org [192.80.55.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6EC43E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:46:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jandrese@mitre.org) Received: from avsrv2.mitre.org (avsrv2.mitre.org [128.29.154.4]) by smtpproxy2.mitre.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g69Djwl08187; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:45:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAILHUB2 (mailhub2.mitre.org [129.83.221.18]) by smtpsrv1.mitre.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g69DjtD02251; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:45:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vsw070.mitre.org (128.29.156.70) by mailhub2.mitre.org with SMTP id 10775469; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:45:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:45:52 -0400 From: Jason Andresen Organization: The MITRE Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-20020130M (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton Cc: "Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > > > > The 4.6 systems I've installed don't have a default root crontab > > There is no default root crontab. You create one if you want it by using > 'crontab -e'. However, for system functions you're better off using > /etc/crontab, since that's more visible, and easier to back up, etc. ??? More visible? New people to the system can never find that file. Heck, I'm always forgetting where it is. It wouldn't be so bad if it just weren't so inconsistent. Who doesn't backup /var? Is it harder than backing up / somehow? -- \ |_ _|__ __|_ \ __| Jason Andresen jandrese@mitre.org |\/ | | | / _| Network and Distributed Systems Engineer _| _|___| _| _|_\___| Office: 703-883-7755 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 6:52: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDE937B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DBA43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3C09EF18; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys2 [10.1.2.1]) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69Dq1OX041291; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsent.com) Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69Dq0fP014792; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsys.cwsent.com) Message-Id: <200207091352.g69Dq0fP014792@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brett Glass Subject: cvs commit: ports/www/apache2 Makefile ports/www/apache2/files patch-modules:ht (fwd) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 06:52:00 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brett, this is probably what you've been looking for . -- Cheers, Phone: 250-387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: 250-387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, CITS Ministry of Management Services Province of BC FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org ------- Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 04:22:19 -0700 From: Hye-Shik Chang To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/www/apache2 Makefile ports/www/apache2/files patch-m odules:http:http_request.c perky 2002/07/09 04:22:19 PDT Modified files: www/apache2 Makefile Added files: www/apache2/files patch-modules:http:http_request.c Log: - Add a patch for a bug on infinite loop in HTTP_IN filter that allows DoS attack. - Bump PORTREVISION - Change maintainer address Obtained from: Apache Group CVS (rev 1.150-1.151) Revision Changes Path 1.125 +2 -2 ports/www/apache2/Makefile 1.1 +10 -0 ports/www/apache2/files/patch-modules:http:http_r equest. c (new) ------- End of Forwarded Message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 7:14:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A525437B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nas.dgap.mipt.ru (nas.dgap.mipt.ru [194.85.81.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04B43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:14:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@nas.dgap.mipt.ru) Received: from nas.dgap.mipt.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nas.dgap.mipt.ru (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69EEJSY063914 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:14:19 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from andrew@nas.dgap.mipt.ru) Received: (from andrew@localhost) by nas.dgap.mipt.ru (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g69EEJBQ063913 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:14:19 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:14:18 +0400 From: "Andrew L. Neporada" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: buildworld is broken on the system without 'crypto' distribution Message-ID: <20020709141418.GA63576@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems that libcrypto.so.2 is requied to complete buildworld. I got following errors on 4.6-RELEASE system with only 'bin' distribution installed while trying to build recent -stable (it builds ok on another box with 'crypto' installed): ===> secure/usr.bin/scp cc -O -pipe -I/data/FreeBSD/src/secure/usr.bin/scp/../../../crypto/openssh -DNO_IDEA -c /data/FreeBSD/src/secure/usr.bin/scp/../../../crypto/openssh/scp.c gzip -cn /data/FreeBSD/src/secure/usr.bin/scp/../../../crypto/openssh/scp.1 > scp.1.gz cc -O -pipe -I/data/FreeBSD/src/secure/usr.bin/scp/../../../crypto/openssh -DNO_IDEA -o scp scp.o -lssh /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.2, needed by /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_DigestInit' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_enc_null' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_rand' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_generate_key' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `PEM_read_PrivateKey' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_DigestFinal' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_bin2bn' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_CTX_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_value_one' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_bn2bin' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_do_sign' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_sub' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `OBJ_nid2sn' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `PEM_write_DSAPrivateKey' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `HMAC_Final' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_md5' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_rc4' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_generate_key' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_sign' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DH_generate_key' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DH_size' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_hex2bn' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_num_bits' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DH_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `SSLeay' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DH_compute_key' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_sha1' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_private_decrypt' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_CipherInit' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `CRYPTO_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_bn2dec' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_ripemd160' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_do_verify' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_PKEY_get1_DSA' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `MD5_Init' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RAND_status' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_dec2bn' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_public_encrypt' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `ERR_error_string' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `MD5_Final' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_mod' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_is_bit_set' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_DigestUpdate' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `PEM_write_RSAPrivateKey' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_CTX_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_cast5_cbc' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_des_cbc' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DH_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_SIG_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_SIG_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `ERR_get_error' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_copy' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `DSA_generate_parameters' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_verify' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_dup' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `HMAC_cleanup' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_des_ede3_cbc' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_PKEY_get1_RSA' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_clear_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `HMAC_Init' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `RSA_size' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_new' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_PKEY_free' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `MD5_Update' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `BN_cmp' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `HMAC_Update' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_bf_cbc' /usr/obj/data/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/lib/libssh.so: undefined reference to `EVP_get_digestbyname' *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 7:49:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3484E37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.ixpres.com (artemis.ixpres.com [216.240.160.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA9B43E54; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:49:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vizion@ixpres.com) Received: from vizion (66-81-74-194-modem.o1.com [66.81.74.194]) by smtp2.ixpres.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with SMTP id g69EnGd05746; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:49:17 -0700 Message-ID: <005701c22757$ae8d77a0$5cab3a40@vizion2000.net> From: "vizion communication" To: Cc: Subject: Plain text posting Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:48:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I have noticed an increased tendency of a few people to post to plain text lists using attachments. Quite apart from minor irritations such as increased bandwidth and the necessity to open attachments some people seem to have the mistaken impression that the practise of sending messages via a PGP signed attachments somehow adds to general recipient security rather than diminish it by encouraging careless attachment usage. It may be important to remember the general principle that the customary opening of attachments is inherently more risky than a plain text message for the recipent even when PGP signed. The less secure the operating system of the immediate recipent the more risky the practice. Viruses, which may not be able to infect a primary recipient often reach their targets by being forwared from a primary to a secondary recipent on a more vulnerable platform. PGP only tells us that the message has not changed in transit. A malformed/abusive/virus laden attachment is still malformed/abusive/virus laden even if PGP signed. Can we please stick to plain text UNLESS the material cannot reasonably be transmitted without being in attachment form. There is no benefit to be gained from attachments otherwise. Thanks David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9: 2:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB1037B405; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from copper.eng.cstone.net (copper.eng.cstone.net [209.145.66.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC55D43E58; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from josepht@copper.eng.cstone.net) Received: from copper.eng.cstone.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by copper.eng.cstone.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69G2Xlj020331; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:02:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from josepht@copper.eng.cstone.net) Received: (from josepht@localhost) by copper.eng.cstone.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g69G2W9S020330; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:02:32 -0400 From: Joe Talbott To: Dan Nelson Cc: Pete Carah , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hang problem with spamass-milter... Message-ID: <20020709160232.GB18270@copper.eng.cstone.net> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Nelson , Pete Carah , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200207081952.g68JqB55059730@ns.altadena.net> <20020708200747.GA82041@dan.emsphone.com> <20020708210236.GA65659@copper.eng.cstone.net> <20020708222004.GB13884@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708222004.GB13884@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,X_NOT_PRESENT,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO version=2.30 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:20:04PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 08), Joe Talbott said: > > > > To repeat: > > > > for i in `jot 10 1`; do > > echo "test $i" | mail -s "test $i" email@dom.com > > done > > Works for me. I changed `jot 10 1` to `jot 100 1` and after some > chugging, got all 100 messages. With patch 349 applied, the milter > uses a select() loop in the part of the code where it needs to both > read and write from spamc, so I can't see where it would deadlock. After applying the updated 349 to a fresh CVS update I received all 10 of my test messages. I have always gotten the messages. Before my latest build the headers were not being added. After the update all 10 messages were correctly processed. However I have 4 spamc processes hanging around and 4 spamd processes hanging around. I sent you this in a private email along with -d2 level logs. > It's possible you're seeing some sort of threading bug on -stable; I > have only tested on -current. That's possible. I haven't had much time to dig into this. > > > I also applied patch 372 which didn't solve the problem. > > 372 just sets all the sockets to non-blocking, which will cause > buzz-loops, and adds some other bugs that make it not 8-bit clean for > incoming messages. So you're saying I maybe should remove this patch from my builds? Thanks for your help, Joe -- Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired. Jules Renard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9:17:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609DA37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su [213.184.66.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE10F43E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g69GH0Un002199 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:17:00 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g69DoIhV001781 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:50:18 +0800 (KRAST) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:50:18 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny Message-ID: <20020709215018.A771@grosbein.pp.ru> References: <20020709194439.A26123@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20020709121500.GA13059@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020709121500.GA13059@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>; from ertr1013@student.uu.se on Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:15:00PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > Do you wish to delete what is left of /var/tmp/temproot? [no] yes > > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted > > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty > > rm: /var/tmp/temproot: Directory not empty > > *** /var/tmp/temproot has been deleted > > Obviously, last sentence isn't true :-) > Obviously?? It is actually true: /var/tmp/temproot actually is deleted > afterwards (at least for a recent -stable). Hmm, you are right. Now using fresh -STABLE I see that it cleans all right. Eugene To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9:22:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217C37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [156.153.255.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3DF43E31; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:22:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kgunders@hpb50341.boi.hp.com) Received: from hpbs5002.boi.hp.com (smtp.boi.hp.com [15.2.216.28]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDE8C00877; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kasilof.boi.hp.com (hpb50341.boi.hp.com [15.56.24.166]) by hpbs5002.boi.hp.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id KAA04495; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:22:06 -0600 (MDT) Received: by kasilof.boi.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5934FBA09; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:21:53 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:21:53 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Message-ID: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greets All: during the 4.6rc era i recall there were issues with intel ether pro and fxp drivers, particularly with smp boxes. Searching pr's i note there are numerous open issues as well. in the past the fbsd nic mantra has always been "intel ether express". Is such still the case with the 82559 based nics (e.g. pila 8460), or should I be looking elsewhere? Note that one of my boxes is a dual pii 450 on a bx board. Please cc, as I am no longer subscribed to the list (thanks to the phb's) -- Regards, Ken Gunderson (non-HP) HP-UX Systems Administrator HP NAOD Front-line System Management Boise Server Support Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9:29:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2359437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE9C43E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:29:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-195-14-204-168.netcologne.de [195.14.204.168]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g69GTgGL009847 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:29:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 1013 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jul 2002 16:17:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:17:46 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jason Andresen (jandrese@mitre.org): [/etc/crontab vs. crontab -u root] > ??? More visible? New people to the system can never find that file. > Heck, I'm always forgetting where it is. It wouldn't be so bad if > it just weren't so inconsistent. See cron(8), second paragraph. -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list - and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9:51:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236FF37B4A3 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15A43E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g69Gp3LA052680; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g69Gp3Lg052679; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> To: Thomas Seck Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :* Jason Andresen (jandrese@mitre.org): : :[/etc/crontab vs. crontab -u root] : :> ??? More visible? New people to the system can never find that file. :> Heck, I'm always forgetting where it is. It wouldn't be so bad if :> it just weren't so inconsistent. : :See cron(8), second paragraph. : :-- :Thomas Seck : /etc/crontab should probably not be touched, nor should /etc/periodic, or upgrading the system will be nightmware. If you want to use the periodic mechanisms you can create your own periodic directory hierarchy ala /usr/local/etc/periodic, and if you just want to mess with your own root crontab you should use 'crontab -e' as root. If you want to override the system default /etc/periodic you can create your own /etc/periodic.conf (else the system uses the default /etc/defaults/periodic.conf). It's simple. See man periodic.conf. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 9:57: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6844C37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64E343E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:57:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:55:35 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23FF5D03; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Thomas Seck , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:51:03 PDT." <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:57:02 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020709165702.B23FF5D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) > From: Matthew Dillon > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > > :* Jason Andresen (jandrese@mitre.org): > : > :[/etc/crontab vs. crontab -u root] > : > :> ??? More visible? New people to the system can never find that file. > :> Heck, I'm always forgetting where it is. It wouldn't be so bad if > :> it just weren't so inconsistent. > : > :See cron(8), second paragraph. > : > :-- > :Thomas Seck > : > > /etc/crontab should probably not be touched, nor should /etc/periodic, > or upgrading the system will be nightmware. If you want to use the > periodic mechanisms you can create your own periodic directory > hierarchy ala /usr/local/etc/periodic, and if you just want to mess > with your own root crontab you should use 'crontab -e' as root. If > you want to override the system default /etc/periodic you can create > your own /etc/periodic.conf (else the system uses the default > /etc/defaults/periodic.conf). > > It's simple. See man periodic.conf. Also, as far as I know, the use of local periodic(8) scripts via periodic.conf(5) entries in 999.local is supported. mergemaster(8) should catch changes in periodic.conf(5). R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10: 8:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE70937B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EB943E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:08:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Robin.Melville@nadt.org.uk) Received: from modem-3921.wolf.dialup.pol.co.uk ([81.76.143.81] helo=jade.highwire.local) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17RyTO-0007Ap-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:08:23 +0100 Received: from [10.0.1.175] (robslap.highwire.local [10.0.1.175]) by jade.highwire.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B791B18C8F; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:08:13 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: robmel@mailhost (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <005701c22757$ae8d77a0$5cab3a40@vizion2000.net> References: <005701c22757$ae8d77a0$5cab3a40@vizion2000.net> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:08:29 +0100 To: From: Robin.Melville@nadt.org.uk Subject: Re: Plain text posting Cc: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 7:48 am -0700 9/7/02, vizion communication wrote: >Hi >[...snip...] >Can we please stick to plain text UNLESS the material cannot >reasonably be transmitted without being in attachment form. >There is no benefit to be gained from attachments otherwise. I heartily concur. An additional problem is in message digests where the relationship between the attachment and the original message is lost. One finds onself scrolling through reams of base64. Robin. -- Robin Melville, Information manager Addiction & Forensic Information Service Nottingham Healthcare NHS Tust Tel: +44 (0)115 952 9478 Fax: +44 (0)115 952 9421 email: robmel@nadt.org.uk Pages: http://www.nadt.org.uk/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10: 9:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACAA37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2A943E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69H9TBu019975; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:09:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3D2B18C9.B266193A@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:09:29 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Sachs Cc: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jay Sachs wrote: > There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you think it's a good idea or not, it's already catching people by surprise, and locking them out of their systems. The change should be reverted. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:13: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E189637B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from columbus.cris.net (columbus.cris.net [212.110.128.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AC743E42 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:13:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ml@phantom.cris.net) Received: from phantom.cris.net (root@phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by columbus.cris.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA86812; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:12:55 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from ml@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g69HHd4p025120; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:17:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ml) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:17:39 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin To: Shannon -jj Behrens Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux Java 1.4 was: linux_base-7.1 problem Message-ID: <20020709201739.A24889@phantom.cris.net> References: <3D2335ED.8050201@xmission.com> <20020703175548.GJ42456@leviathan.inethouston.net> <20020708115201.C4644@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020708115201.C4644@alicia.nttmcl.com>; from jj@nttmcl.com on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:52:01AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the > > >> install. Anyone else have this problem? > > > > DWC> This happens sometimes when there are leftovers in /compat/linux from > > DWC> linux_base-6, if you can rm -fr /compat/linux/* and reinstall linux > > > > My experience is that linux_base-7.1 fails miserably with the > > acroread4 and acroread5 ports (fails to install them for lack of > > "strip" program), and then core dumps when you run acroread. > > > > Personally, I just went with linux_base6-6.1 and it works flawlessly. > > I noticed that linux_base-7 makes linux-sun-jdk14 crash, whereas linux_base-6 > doesn't. This was from a completely clean /compat. Should I submit a PR, or > is this known behavior. What was really surprising is that linux-sun-jdk14 > will try to install linux_base-7 if linux_base-6 isn't installed, but this > default results in a broken configuration. I hit to this problem also. I think root of problem is that official Linux release supported by jdk1.4 is RH 6.1 (as jdk building docs declare). And there're some fatal binary incompatibilities between RH 6.1 and 7.1 :-( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:21:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDD337B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E412C43E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:21:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:20:26 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E175D03; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:21:54 -0700 (PDT) To: Doug Barton Cc: Jay Sachs , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:09:29 PDT." <3D2B18C9.B266193A@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:21:54 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020709172154.58E175D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:09:29 -0700 > From: Doug Barton > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > Jay Sachs wrote: > > > There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, > > So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you > think it's a good idea or not, it's already catching people by surprise, > and locking them out of their systems. The change should be reverted. Doug, This was discussed on stable (admittedly a bit late in the game) and every comment I saw favored making the change in Stable. An entry was made in UPDATING to warn people of the change. From a security standpoint alone the change is justified as protocol V1.5 has long required kludges to work around its problems while V2 was much more carefully crafted from the ground up and has no known problems. I am only talking about the protocol and no particular implementation. People should really be using V2 protocols in all cases except where remote systems still don't support it. (And, do you REALLY want to connect to those systems?) I will admit that I had pretty much converted everything of mine to use V2 long before this came up, so this really didn't have an impact on me. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:39:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC0337B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BBC43E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:39:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09298; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:39:14 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook is dangerous and makes your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020709113649.033263a0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:39:09 -0600 To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache2 Makefile ports/www/apache2/files patch-modules:ht (fwd) In-Reply-To: <200207091352.g69Dq0fP014792@cwsys.cwsent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thank you for pointing this out! It may indeed be what's wedging Apache 2.x. I may still downgrade to 1.3.26, though. The process size is smaller, and the only truly major difference between 1.3.x and 2.x is the new threading model, which FreeBSD can't use because pthreads are still a kludge. --Brett At 07:52 AM 7/9/2002, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote: >Brett, this is probably what you've been looking for . > > >-- >Cheers, Phone: 250-387-8437 >Cy Schubert Fax: 250-387-5766 >Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca >Open Systems Group, CITS >Ministry of Management Services >Province of BC > FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org > > >------- Forwarded Message > >Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 04:22:19 -0700 >From: Hye-Shik Chang >To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org >Subject: cvs commit: ports/www/apache2 Makefile ports/www/apache2/files >patch-m > odules:http:http_request.c > >perky 2002/07/09 04:22:19 PDT > > Modified files: > www/apache2 Makefile > Added files: > www/apache2/files patch-modules:http:http_request.c > Log: > - Add a patch for a bug on infinite loop in HTTP_IN > filter that allows DoS attack. > - Bump PORTREVISION > - Change maintainer address > > Obtained from: Apache Group CVS (rev 1.150-1.151) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.125 +2 -2 ports/www/apache2/Makefile > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/www/apache2/files/patch-modules:http:http_r >equest. >c (new) > >------- End of Forwarded Message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:40:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F90437B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D7B43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g69HdumW018164; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:39:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 13:43:45 -0400 To: Ken Gunderson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stick with the fxp. I suspect its a popular card in FreeBSD land so by that very nature you are going to see more "problem" reports even if those reports have nothing to do with the fxp and more to do with other issues (e.g. hardware interaction between the card and the MB, PE, etc). Think of it this way: Lets say for arguments sake 1% of all FreeBSD problem reports are a result of pilot error and erroneously blame the NIC and or the NIC driver. And again for arguments sake lets say 100,000 FreeBSD users out there. If 30% use the Intel, and the next most popular card is lets say the realtek at 5% FreeBSD market share, the realtek will "seem" like a more reliable card since there are less problem reports. Using the sample numbers above, we would see 300 erroneous reports for the Intel vs. 50 reports on the realtek. Long story short, be careful about looking at the raw numbers of problem reports as an indicator of how reliable the NIC is. ---Mike At 10:21 AM 09/07/2002 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: >Greets All: > >during the 4.6rc era i recall there were issues with intel ether >pro and fxp drivers, particularly with smp boxes. Searching >pr's i note there are numerous open issues as well. in the past >the fbsd nic mantra has always been "intel ether express". Is >such still the case with the 82559 based nics (e.g. pila 8460), >or should I be looking elsewhere? Note that one of my boxes is a >dual pii 450 on a bx board. > > >Please cc, as I am no longer subscribed to the list (thanks to >the phb's) > > >-- > >Regards, > >Ken Gunderson (non-HP) >HP-UX Systems Administrator >HP NAOD Front-line System Management >Boise Server Support Team > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:48:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB0437B401; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.trigger.net (ns.trigger.net [204.50.18.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD4143E54; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikej@trigger.net) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [204.50.18.204]) by mail.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A0F9F30912; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:47:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Ken Gunderson" , Cc: Subject: RE: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:47:55 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If you are looking for stability, compatibility and speed all in one, I would go with a 3com card. My personal favorite is the 3c905c. I have never had any problems with this card. However, I have gone thought a number of fxp cards and motherboards with onboard chipsets. Some would cause problems, some would work ok, you wont know for sure until your try. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Ken Gunderson > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:22 PM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org > Subject: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? > > > Greets All: > > during the 4.6rc era i recall there were issues with intel ether > pro and fxp drivers, particularly with smp boxes. Searching > pr's i note there are numerous open issues as well. in the past > the fbsd nic mantra has always been "intel ether express". Is > such still the case with the 82559 based nics (e.g. pila 8460), > or should I be looking elsewhere? Note that one of my boxes is a > dual pii 450 on a bx board. > > > Please cc, as I am no longer subscribed to the list (thanks to > the phb's) > > > -- > > Regards, > > Ken Gunderson (non-HP) > HP-UX Systems Administrator > HP NAOD Front-line System Management > Boise Server Support Team > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 10:50:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA3137B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.infowest.com (ns1.infowest.com [204.17.177.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23E643E42 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rickb@csi.com) Received: from THINMAN (gberger-208-186-106-149-vciXX.dsl.infowest.net [208.186.106.149]) by ns1.infowest.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBBF521DCF for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:50:28 -0600 (MDT) From: "rickb" To: Subject: RE: ata flash card question - it works. thanx Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:49:17 -0600 Message-ID: <001601c22770$f28702f0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1026192963.4254.21.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just didn't know how to use MAKEDEV. Thanks to both who responded. rickb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 11: 2: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDFC37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.inode.at (goliath.inode.at [195.58.161.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B00F43E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:02:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbretter@inode.at) Received: from line-c-106.adsl-dynamic.inode.at ([62.99.151.106] helo=inode.at) by smtp.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17RzJG-0006qj-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:01:59 +0200 Message-ID: <3D2B24A1.7090907@inode.at> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:00:01 +0200 From: Michael Bretterklieber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de-at, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Sony FX601 freezing (with pcm compiled in) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm running FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE on a Sony VAIO FX601 Notebook. This notebook has a VIA KT133 Chipset, the soundchip is also a via82c686 one. Every time I compile the pcm-driver into the kernel, the kernel hangs on startup after the parallel-port-probing and before the ata-device-attachement. If I remove the pcm-driver from the kernel everything works ok. I also tried to load the sound-driver as klm, but the module then doesen't find the soundcard, but the kernel finds the sound-card if the pcm-driver is staticaly compiled in. I will try to debug this, but I don't know how can I debug this, because the kernel doesen't panic, it simply hangs. I compled DDB into the kernel and I can also go into the debugger at boot time by hidding CTRL-ALT-ESC, but I don't know how I should start to debug, bye, -- -- -------------------------------------- E-mail: Michael.Bretterklieber@jawa.at ---------------------------- JAWA Management Software GmbH Liebenauer Hauptstr. 200 A-8041 GRAZ Tel: ++43-(0)316-403274-12 Fax: ++43-(0)316-403274-10 GSM: ++43-(0)676-93 96 698 homepage: http://www.jawa.at --------- privat ----------- E-mail: mbretter@inode.at homepage: http://www.inode.at/mbretter -------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 11:10:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4AD37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pe4.eziba.com (mail.eziba.com [64.80.31.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BBD43E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jay@eziba.com) Received: from eziba.com (thelonius.eziba.com [192.168.0.31]) by pe4.eziba.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g69IAJ012764; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2B270B.2050201@eziba.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 14:10:19 -0400 From: Jay Sachs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton Cc: stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> <3D2B18C9.B266193A@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > Jay Sachs wrote: >>There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, > So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you > think it's a good idea or not, it's already catching people by surprise, > and locking them out of their systems. The change should be reverted. It just seems that changes are being made in response to vocal users who read neither UPDATING nor the headsup to the -stable list. Unfortunately, when changes feel "right" to people, it's typical to remain silent; hence I voiced my preference, being a -stable tracker but non-committer. But your response begs the question: when would such a change NOT catch people by surprise? jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 11:54:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA9437B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (h-66-166-142-198.SNDACAGL.covad.net [66.166.142.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7152D43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:54:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsder@mail.allcaps.org) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4BE94153B7; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEDF15277; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Helge Oldach Cc: Jay Sachs , , , , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <200207090809.KAA26773@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Message-ID: <20020709113139.N68413-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA > >> thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this > >> topic. Please don't change this back. Please file bug reports against OpenSSH to get the behavior to fall back to the other protocol rather than just dump out. I filed against the *inverse* behavior (Protocol 1,2) which astonished me (default for OpenSSH is Protocol 2,1). See bug report: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/38643 Anyhow, you don't need to reset your sshd_config. Use "ssh -1 " to get protocol 1 as a user or "ssh -2 " to get protocol 2. Aliases can be very useful. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 12:54:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76C237B405 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFAA43E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69JtMHd046027; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:55:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g69JtLdc046024; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:55:21 -0700 From: faSty To: rickb Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata flash card question - it works. thanx Message-ID: <20020709195521.GA45991@i-sphere.com> References: <1026192963.4254.21.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> <001601c22770$f28702f0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001601c22770$f28702f0$0efca8c0@THINMAN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG type cd /dev then sh MAKEDEV all -fasty On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:49:17AM -0600, rickb wrote: > Just didn't know how to use MAKEDEV. > > Thanks to both who responded. > > rickb > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 12:56:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC637B406 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smart.eusc.inter.net (smart.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E818743E4A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:56:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from tc07-n66-096.de.inter.net ([213.73.66.96] helo=there) by smart.eusc.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17S15c-0006Kn-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:56:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthias Schuendehuette Reply-To: msch@snafu.de Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: Cy Schubert Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:55:59 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cy Schubert wrote: > ... This is not a government project. :) 4.6.1 is a > security release. Let's stay focused. As far as I 'read the news' ;-) 4.6.1 is primarily an ATA-Bug-Fix-Release - Important enough IMHO. Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as well, but why not Matt's most recent bug fixes? -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) Powered by FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:11:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C8637B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977E643E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE2CEA94 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:44:44 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.6 kernel build failure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All, Decided I could do with a bridge so activated that option. Only to be greeted with: cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -c linux_sysent.c In file included from linux_sysent.c:14: linux_proto.h:57: syntax error before `linux_time_t' linux_proto.h:57: `linux_time_t' undeclared here (not in a function) linux_proto.h:57: syntax error before `)' linux_proto.h:57: `linux_time_t' undeclared here (not in a function) linux_proto.h:57: syntax error before `)' linux_proto.h:156: syntax error before `linux_handler_t' linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) linux_proto.h:184: syntax error before `linux_dev_t' ... Did a search on `In file included from linux_sysent.c' but alas. It's not a big deal in that the system is still operational, but I would like to have this resolved. BTW: frl:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# grep -i linux NISSER frl:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# so what's it doing compiling Linux code? Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:14:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBA137B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78F243E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:14:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id 222F3136AB; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:14:32 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Roelof Osinga Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure Message-ID: <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > Decided I could do with a bridge so activated that option. Only to be > greeted with: >=20 =2E.. > linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) > linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) > linux_proto.h:184: syntax error before `linux_dev_t' > ... >=20 See the 20011110 /usr/src/UPDATING entry > BTW: >=20 > frl:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# grep -i linux NISSER > frl:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# >=20 > so what's it doing compiling Linux code? >=20 building the module. --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iD8DBQE9K0QoObaG4P6BelARAm0nAJ4vynDyocKn4BoKRfIqbjelzGr8HwCZAS6s jKbck6Ag9X5oYPW2o+cnjew= =rR5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:45:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547AE37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [156.153.255.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7470643E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kgunders@hpb50341.boi.hp.com) Received: from hpbs5002.boi.hp.com (hpbs5002.boi.hp.com [15.2.216.28]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B343C00314; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kasilof.boi.hp.com (hpb50341.boi.hp.com [15.56.24.166]) by hpbs5002.boi.hp.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id OAA08908; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:44:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: by kasilof.boi.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58DEEBA84; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:44:36 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:44:36 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Message-ID: <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> References: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca>; from mike@sentex.net on Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:43:45PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:43:45PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Stick with the fxp. I suspect its a popular card in FreeBSD land so by that > very nature you are going to see more "problem" reports even if those > reports have nothing to do with the fxp and more to do with other issues > (e.g. hardware interaction between the card and the MB, PE, etc). > > Think of it this way: Lets say for arguments sake 1% of all FreeBSD problem > reports are a result of pilot error and erroneously blame the NIC and or > the NIC driver. And again for arguments sake lets say 100,000 FreeBSD > users out there. If 30% use the Intel, and the next most popular card is > lets say the realtek at 5% FreeBSD market share, the realtek will "seem" > like a more reliable card since there are less problem reports. Using the > sample numbers above, we would see 300 erroneous reports for the Intel vs. > 50 reports on the realtek. Long story short, be careful about looking at > the raw numbers of problem reports as an indicator of how reliable the NIC is. > > ---Mike > > > > At 10:21 AM 09/07/2002 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > >Greets All: > > > >during the 4.6rc era i recall there were issues with intel ether > >pro and fxp drivers, particularly with smp boxes. Searching > >pr's i note there are numerous open issues as well. in the past > >the fbsd nic mantra has always been "intel ether express". Is > >such still the case with the 82559 based nics (e.g. pila 8460), > >or should I be looking elsewhere? Note that one of my boxes is a > >dual pii 450 on a bx board. > > > > > >Please cc, as I am no longer subscribed to the list (thanks to > >the phb's) > > > > > >-- > > > >Regards, > > > >Ken Gunderson (non-HP) > >HP-UX Systems Administrator > >HP NAOD Front-line System Management > >Boise Server Support Team > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message thanks for the reply. i need about 5 additional cards for a personal project and i didin't want to order the intels and end up having to replace them. interestingly enough, a co-worker informs me these cards are causing a lot fo grief under load in quite a number of linux boxes deployed in hp datacenters. apparently the cards just become overwhelmed about once or twice per month and just hang until reset. chip in these cards is the 82557. there were numerous issues with fxp around 4.6rc time, and some rather long and involved threads discussing the issueses. i am just unsure as to the final outcome, however, and i am curiosu whether this ended up being a driver or chipset issue. if fxp driver then i know fbsd developers are on teh job, but if chipset, did the 82559 resolve the problem?? any clues?? -- Regards, Ken Gunderson (non-HP) HP-UX Systems Administrator HP NAOD Front-line System Management Boise Server Support Team 208-396-7926 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:49:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBEF37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E8443E09; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:49:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g69KnCA39767; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g69KnBJD024735; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: Helge Oldach , Jay Sachs , , , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <20020709113139.N68413-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Message-ID: <20020709134511.I24728-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > >> Can we get this changed back for -stable? In addition to the POLA > > >> thread in -security, this is just one of many user complaints on this > > >> topic. > > Please don't change this back. Please file bug reports against OpenSSH to > get the behavior to fall back to the other protocol The fact that it falls back does not mean that users can get into the box without intervention. Besides, you're missing the whole point here. Users should not have to deal with this AT ALL in -stable. YOU can have exactly what you want with a simple run-time config option. I am totally disinterested in what happens to the very small percentage of our users who follow -stable and RELENG_4 religiously. I'm very interested in what will happen when 4.6.1 is released, and throngs of people upgrade to it thinking it will "fix" their ssh problems, when in reality it's creating a whole bunch of new ones. Not to mention, it isn't going to be you people who think that the change is "better," who are going to be answering all the support mail on this. At least, it hasn't been so far. What this boils down to is that it really doesn't matter what you think the world OUGHT to be. The world as it is says that changing this option late in the life of the RELENG_4 branch is a Very Bad Thing.(TM) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:51: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C687C37B401; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913F43E09; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g69KoOR00191; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g69KoOkF024738; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Jay Sachs , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <20020709172154.58E175D03@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: <20020709134923.O24728-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: > This was discussed on stable (admittedly a bit late in the game) and > every comment I saw favored making the change in Stable. An entry was > made in UPDATING to warn people of the change. Once again, it doesn't matter what the very small percentage of our user base who reads -stable thinks. What matters is the hundreds of thousands of people who expect the next RELENG_4 release to work pretty much like the last one did. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 13:51: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5286B37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0888043E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g69KomR00567; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g69KojGq024741; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: Erik Trulsson , Eugene Grosbein , Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny In-Reply-To: <20020709164425.J77578-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20020709135037.G24728-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'll take a look at this, thanks. Doug On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > ET> > Do you wish to delete what is left of /var/tmp/temproot? [no] yes > ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted > ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty > ET> > rm: /var/tmp/temproot: Directory not empty > ET> > *** /var/tmp/temproot has been deleted > ET> > > ET> > > ET> > Obviously, last sentence isn't true :-) > ET> > ET> Obviously?? It is actually true: /var/tmp/temproot actually is deleted > ET> afterwards (at least for a recent -stable). > ET> > ET> What mergemaster does when deleting is the following: > ET> > ET> rm -rf > ET> chflags -R > ET> rm -rf > ET> > ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit > ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. > > Well maybe then first rm -rf should be redirected to /dev/null? > > Index: mergemaster.sh > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh,v > retrieving revision 1.6.2.14 > diff -u -r1.6.2.14 mergemaster.sh > --- mergemaster.sh 30 Jun 2002 19:01:35 -0000 1.6.2.14 > +++ mergemaster.sh 9 Jul 2002 12:45:39 -0000 > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ > CVS_ID_TAG=FreeBSD > > delete_temproot () { > - rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" > + rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" >/dev/null 2>&1 > chflags -R 0 "${TEMPROOT}" > rm -rf "${TEMPROOT}" > } > > > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 14: 4:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE8037B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4737943E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:04:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk) Received: from sliderule.demon.co.uk ([194.222.44.251]) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17S29q-00082l-0U for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:04:27 +0100 Message-ID: <3D2B4FD3.6BF2F5A3@sliderule.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:04:19 +0100 From: Steve Burton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stable Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? References: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ken Gunderson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:43:45PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > Stick with the fxp. I suspect its a popular card in FreeBSD land so by that > > very nature you are going to see more "problem" reports even if those > > reports have nothing to do with the fxp and more to do with other issues > > (e.g. hardware interaction between the card and the MB, PE, etc). > > > > Think of it this way: Lets say for arguments sake 1% of all FreeBSD problem > > reports are a result of pilot error and erroneously blame the NIC and or > > the NIC driver. And again for arguments sake lets say 100,000 FreeBSD > > users out there. If 30% use the Intel, and the next most popular card is > > lets say the realtek at 5% FreeBSD market share, the realtek will "seem" > > like a more reliable card since there are less problem reports. Using the > > sample numbers above, we would see 300 erroneous reports for the Intel vs. > > 50 reports on the realtek. Long story short, be careful about looking at > > the raw numbers of problem reports as an indicator of how reliable the NIC is. > > > > ---Mike > > > > > > > > At 10:21 AM 09/07/2002 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > >Greets All: > > > > > >during the 4.6rc era i recall there were issues with intel ether > > >pro and fxp drivers, particularly with smp boxes. Searching > > >pr's i note there are numerous open issues as well. in the past > > >the fbsd nic mantra has always been "intel ether express". Is > > >such still the case with the 82559 based nics (e.g. pila 8460), > > >or should I be looking elsewhere? Note that one of my boxes is a > > >dual pii 450 on a bx board. > > > > > > > > >Please cc, as I am no longer subscribed to the list (thanks to > > >the phb's) > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > >Ken Gunderson (non-HP) > > >HP-UX Systems Administrator > > >HP NAOD Front-line System Management > > >Boise Server Support Team > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > thanks for the reply. i need about 5 additional cards for a > personal project and i didin't want to order the intels and end > up having to replace them. interestingly enough, a co-worker > informs me these cards are causing a lot fo grief under load in > quite a number of linux boxes deployed in hp datacenters. > apparently the cards just become overwhelmed about once or twice > per month and just hang until reset. chip in these cards is the > 82557. there were numerous issues with fxp around 4.6rc time, > and some rather long and involved threads discussing the > issueses. i am just unsure as to the final outcome, however, > and i am curiosu whether this ended up being a driver or chipset > issue. if fxp driver then i know fbsd developers are on teh > job, but if chipset, did the 82559 resolve the problem?? > any clues?? > > -- > > Regards, > > Ken Gunderson (non-HP) > HP-UX Systems Administrator > HP NAOD Front-line System Management > Boise Server Support Team > 208-396-7926 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message I recently bought an intel express S (desktop model) and had real problems with 4.6 rc1. Connected to a Cisco 2916 I had to force 10Mbit/half duplex to get any throughput. I traced the problem to a bad cable (split pair) and thought that was the end of it until I put it under heavy load. Using htdig to spider a local (LAN) intranet server took 9 hours. I replaced the card with an older model (b or +) and the spidering went down to about ten minutes. Still sticking with Intel at the moment though. Steve. -- Steve Burton Webmaster & Sub-optimal Coder To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 14: 7: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D4B37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.com (nexus.root.com [209.102.106.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BCD43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@root.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by root.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g69KpxZ76959; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:51:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:51:59 -0700 From: David Greenman-Lawrence To: Ken Gunderson Cc: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Message-ID: <20020709135159.M28874@nexus.root.com> References: <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com>; from kgunders@hpb50341.boi.hp.com on Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:44:36PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >thanks for the reply. i need about 5 additional cards for a >personal project and i didin't want to order the intels and end >up having to replace them. interestingly enough, a co-worker >informs me these cards are causing a lot fo grief under load in >quite a number of linux boxes deployed in hp datacenters. >apparently the cards just become overwhelmed about once or twice >per month and just hang until reset. chip in these cards is the >82557. there were numerous issues with fxp around 4.6rc time, >and some rather long and involved threads discussing the >issueses. i am just unsure as to the final outcome, however, >and i am curiosu whether this ended up being a driver or chipset >issue. if fxp driver then i know fbsd developers are on teh >job, but if chipset, did the 82559 resolve the problem?? >any clues?? The 82557 has a receive side bug that can cause it to stop receiving, but this isn't caused by it being 'overwhelmed". The problem is supposed to only occur when using them in 10Mbps mode, although it can happen if the link changes state as well. The FreeBSD driver has a work-around for this problem and it the bug shouldn't exist in newer Intel chips in any case. -DG D.G.Lawrence Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (503) 288 9544 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 14:18: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE93D37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B9243E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:18:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-213-168-110-105.netcologne.de [213.168.110.105]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g69LHwGN024531 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:17:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 928 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jul 2002 21:15:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:15:26 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20020709211526.GB778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> <20020709165702.B23FF5D03@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709165702.B23FF5D03@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Kevin Oberman (oberman@es.net): > Also, as far as I know, the use of local periodic(8) scripts via > periodic.conf(5) entries in 999.local is supported. Yes it is. I assume that BSD traditionally used /etc/{daily,weekly,monthly}(.local) where FreeBSD uses periodic(8). I do not know it for sure because I started using BSD just two years ago when FreeBSD 4.0 came out so feel free to correct me if you know better. Thus I guess the hook in periodic.conf for local scripts in /etc is for backwards compatibility and to not violate POLA. NetBSD uses /etc/{daily,weekly,monthly} - and NetBSD does not use /etc/crontab in a default install, although their cron(8) would read it if it were there, at least this is what the manpage states. > mergemaster(8) should catch changes in periodic.conf(5). No it does not - /etc/periodic.conf does not exist in a default install. You have to check the assignments you make in /etc/{rc,periodic}.conf against their counterparts in /etc/defaults/ after an update. mergemaster at least does a sanity check for rc.conf via the new option "-C" (it was introduced because of the changes in the sendmail infrastructure). -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list - and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 14:18:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EC037B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766B343E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:18:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-213-168-110-105.netcologne.de [213.168.110.105]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g69LHwGL024531 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:17:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 854 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jul 2002 20:44:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:44:17 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20020709204417.GA778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Matthew Dillon (dillon@apollo.backplane.com): > :* Jason Andresen (jandrese@mitre.org): > : > :[/etc/crontab vs. crontab -u root] > : > :> ??? More visible? New people to the system can never find that file. > :> Heck, I'm always forgetting where it is. It wouldn't be so bad if > :> it just weren't so inconsistent. > : > :See cron(8), second paragraph. > /etc/crontab should probably not be touched, nor should /etc/periodic, > or upgrading the system will be nightmware. Did I state any claims on how I use roots crontab? Yes, I confess: I do maintain modified versions of /etc/crontab, simply because I can put them easily under version control. The same applies for almost every configuration file in /etc. I do this since 4.0 and found mergemaster a pretty fine tool for dealing with /etc/ during updates. But this is completely irrelevant here. The author of the message I replied to claimed that the existence of /etc/crontab was a secret unveiled only to true wizards of OS. This is wrong. See cron(8), second paragraph: "[...] Cron also searches /etc/crontab...". The original poster obviously did not bother to read this document. Failing to read documentation and posting false claims on a public mailing list is a behaviour that drives me up the wall. > If you want to use the > periodic mechanisms you can create your own periodic directory > hierarchy ala /usr/local/etc/periodic, and if you just want to mess > with your own root crontab you should use 'crontab -e' as root. If > you want to override the system default /etc/periodic you can create > your own /etc/periodic.conf (else the system uses the default > /etc/defaults/periodic.conf). Matthew, please do not try to over interpret my message. I am in fact a great fan of the periodic(8) framework and use it for local maintenance scripts. But this thread is not about periodic(8). > It's simple. See man periodic.conf. I know how to read man pages, thank you. -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list - and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 15: 1:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C37637B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9009443E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC26EA94; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:01:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:01:46 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Faulhaber Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chris Faulhaber wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > > ... >>linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) >>linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) >>linux_proto.h:184: syntax error before `linux_dev_t' >> ... > > See the 20011110 /usr/src/UPDATING entry Alas, no dice. Even when I give: donar:/usr/src/sys/modules/linux# make cleandir donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make modules-clean donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# grep BRIDGE NISSER #options BRIDGE donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# /usr/sbin/config NISSER Don't forget to do a ``make depend'' Kernel build directory is ../../compile/NISSER donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# cd ../../compile/NISSER/ donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make depend donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/linux. Ellipses withheld. And it's funny, because donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# uname -a FreeBSD donar.nisser.com 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 5 22:05:19 CEST 2002 toor@donar.nisser.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NISSER i386 It's been there, done that. So why this act now? >>so what's it doing compiling Linux code? > > building the module. I wish. Same thing on two boxes. Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 15: 5:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEDB37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28CF43E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:05:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9929EF18; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys2 [10.1.2.1]) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69M5HOX045516; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:05:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsent.com) Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69M5GfP029799; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cwsys.cwsent.com) Message-Id: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com To: msch@snafu.de Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: Message from Matthias Schuendehuette of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:55:59 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 15:05:16 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Matthias Schuendehuette wr ites: > Cy Schubert wrote: > > ... This is not a government project. :) 4.6.1 is a > > security release. Let's stay focused. > > As far as I 'read the news' ;-) 4.6.1 is primarily an > ATA-Bug-Fix-Release - Important enough IMHO. AFAIAC, the ATA bug fix is one of the issues. The others are OpenSSH, Apache, and the resolver bug. IMO, if we had just one issue to resolve, a patch release would be unwarranted. > > Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as well, but why > not Matt's most recent bug fixes? Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO, 4.6.1 s/b a point patch release. -- Cheers, Phone: 250-387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: 250-387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, CITS Ministry of Management Services Province of BC FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 15:18: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9686C37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F78943E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:17:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g69MIrHd048372; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g69MIrHS048371; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:18:53 -0700 From: faSty To: Roelof Osinga Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure Message-ID: <20020709221853.GA48316@i-sphere.com> References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG no no you need clean up in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NISSER (type make clean) then cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf and config NISSER then cd ../../compile/NISSER lastly make depend -fasty On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:01:46AM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > Chris Faulhaber wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > > > >... > >>linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) > >>linux_proto.h:156: `linux_handler_t' undeclared here (not in a function) > >>linux_proto.h:184: syntax error before `linux_dev_t' > >> ... > > > >See the 20011110 /usr/src/UPDATING entry > > Alas, no dice. Even when I give: > > donar:/usr/src/sys/modules/linux# make cleandir > donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make modules-clean > donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# grep BRIDGE NISSER > #options BRIDGE > donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# /usr/sbin/config NISSER > Don't forget to do a ``make depend'' > Kernel build directory is ../../compile/NISSER > donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# cd ../../compile/NISSER/ > donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make depend > donar:/usr/src/sys/compile/NISSER# make > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/linux. > > Ellipses withheld. And it's funny, because > > donar:/usr/src/sys/i386/conf# uname -a > FreeBSD donar.nisser.com 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 5 > 22:05:19 CEST 2002 toor@donar.nisser.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NISSER i386 > > It's been there, done that. So why this act now? > > >>so what's it doing compiling Linux code? > > > >building the module. > > I wish. Same thing on two boxes. > > Roelof > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > eBOAŽ est. 1982 > http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 > mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 15:39: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F15D37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC8F43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:38:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 15:38:51 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311985D03; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT) To: Doug Barton Cc: Jay Sachs , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2002 13:50:24 PDT." <20020709134923.O24728-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 15:38:54 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020709223854.311985D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) > From: Doug Barton > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > Once again, it doesn't matter what the very small percentage of our user > base who reads -stable thinks. What matters is the hundreds of thousands > of people who expect the next RELENG_4 release to work pretty much like > the last one did. If that's what you want, ask for it. I think it would be reasonable to have 4.6.1 retain the 4.6 behavior as it is supposed to be a bug-fix only release and people will NOT be expecting this or any functional change. But leave -stable as it is. The number of SIGNIFICANT changes in the live of RELENG_4 that required operational changes from users is quite large. RELENG_4 started out without SSH and than had V1 only. I'm almost sure that the default disabling of EVERYTHING in the standard inetd.conf was in the life of RELENG_4. Changes for PCcards and the like are very significant. This is noise by comparison to those changes. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 16:56:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8135137B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C92D243E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:56:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 43179 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 23:56:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO satan.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.4) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 23:56:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:56:49 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-Id: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi guys :) I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). And I noticed few hours ago, a little difference with the ata drivers. I know they have changed but there is something which "disturbs" me. Here a piece of log I have when "ATA failled". I don't know why. Disks seems to be ok, maybe the heat ;) so... Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done Jul 4 09:00:50 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy last message repeated 2 times Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ata0-master: timeout waiting for command=ef s=00 e=00 Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode Jul 4 09:01:20 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting After this, the system was still up, even if I was unable to access ad0 and ad2, processes "simply became dead". (system an 'sensible data' are on SCSI disks) Without happiness, I deal with this ;) This was before I upgrade ;) I thought (bad ?) that upgrading to newer version of ata driver, allows me to reset ata buses, and repair this "on the fly". I was wrong ! Now my FreeBSD system freezes. The last console info is (like): ad2: read command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata-1 resetting *FREEZE* and then hard reboot Nothing in syslog :) And now the question :o) Before considering what that happened (four times in 8hours today), I would like to know how I can trace this (kernel options, soft, daemon). Or maybe I've done a bad things ;) here's my uname -a : FreeBSD goofy.cultdeadsheep.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 4 10:05:12 CEST 2002 root@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOOFY i386 here's my ata (standard) kernel conf : device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering Thanks a lot in advanced, and I hope this "report" could be useful ;) clem PS: like other french people, sorry for my english ;) and sorry to post if I've done something bad ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 17:26:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799FB37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AAC43E4A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:26:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6A0QiLA055497; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:26:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6A0Qihk055496; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:26:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:26:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207100026.g6A0Qihk055496@apollo.backplane.com> To: Clement Laforet Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE References: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There still appear to be serious issues with ATA, mostly with CDROM drives. Soren is currently on vacation for 2 weeks (this from an email he sent to the list on 22 June), so we all need to have a little patience. He should be getting back pretty soon now. -Matt Matthew Dillon :Hi guys :) : :I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). :And I noticed few hours ago, a little difference with the ata drivers. :I know they have changed but there is something which "disturbs" me. :Here a piece of log I have when "ATA failled". I don't know why. Disks seems to be ok, maybe the heat ;) :so... : :Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done :Jul 4 09:00:50 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy last message repeated 2 times :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ata0-master: timeout waiting for command=ef s=00 e=00 :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode :Jul 4 09:01:20 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting : :After this, the system was still up, even if I was unable to access ad0 and ad2, processes "simply became dead". :(system an 'sensible data' are on SCSI disks) :Without happiness, I deal with this ;) :This was before I upgrade ;) : :I thought (bad ?) that upgrading to newer version of ata driver, allows me to reset ata buses, and repair this "on the fly". :I was wrong ! :Now my FreeBSD system freezes. :The last console info is (like): :ad2: read command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :ata-1 resetting :*FREEZE* :and then hard reboot :Nothing in syslog :) : :And now the question :o) :Before considering what that happened (four times in 8hours today), I would like to know how I can trace this (kernel options, soft, daemon). :Or maybe I've done a bad things ;) : :here's my uname -a : :FreeBSD goofy.cultdeadsheep.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 4 10:05:12 CEST 2002 root@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOOFY i386 : :here's my ata (standard) kernel conf : : :device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 :device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 :device ata :device atadisk # ATA disk drives :device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives :#device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives :#device atapist # ATAPI tape drives :options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering : : :Thanks a lot in advanced, and I hope this "report" could be useful ;) : :clem : :PS: like other french people, sorry for my english ;) and sorry to post if I've done something bad ;) : : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:21: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A09937B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc-mx03.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx03.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3BB43E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:20:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glennpj@charter.net) Received: from [24.158.214.244] (HELO charter.net) by dc-mx03.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 41927600 for FreeBSD-Stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:20:27 -0400 Received: from gforce.johnson.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by charter.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6A1Km98001358 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:20:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn@gforce.johnson.home) Received: (from glenn@localhost) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6A1KlVS001357 for FreeBSD-Stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:20:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn) From: Glenn Johnson Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:20:47 -0500 To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: change linux_to_bsd_flock for linux_base-7.1 Message-ID: <20020710012047.GA1172@gforce.johnson.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Back in December of 2001 there was a thread on the emulation list about the Flex license manager not working with linux_base-7. The fix was to zero out the l_len and l_pid fields in linux_to_bsd_flock. I have been using this fix (patch attached) and FlexLM works fine and the applications are able to negotiate the license and run fine also. I have not experienced any problems with my other Linux applications either. I do not know if this fix does anything bad with regard to systems with linux_base-6. Since linux_base-7 is now the default linux_base, and the one everyone is supposed to use, should this fix be committed now? Thank you. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="linux_to_bsd_flock.patch" --- sys/compat/linux/linux_file.c.orig Mon Nov 5 13:08:22 2001 +++ sys/compat/linux/linux_file.c Tue Jul 9 14:54:03 2002 @@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ } bsd_flock->l_whence = linux_flock->l_whence; bsd_flock->l_start = (off_t)linux_flock->l_start; - bsd_flock->l_len = (off_t)linux_flock->l_len; - bsd_flock->l_pid = (pid_t)linux_flock->l_pid; + bsd_flock->l_len = 0; + bsd_flock->l_pid = 0; } static void @@ -818,8 +818,8 @@ } bsd_flock->l_whence = linux_flock->l_whence; bsd_flock->l_start = (off_t)linux_flock->l_start; - bsd_flock->l_len = (off_t)linux_flock->l_len; - bsd_flock->l_pid = (pid_t)linux_flock->l_pid; + bsd_flock->l_len = 0; + bsd_flock->l_pid = 0; } static void --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:21:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA8737B406 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f29.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.32.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3143E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:21:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unixguy09@msn.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:21:21 -0700 Received: from 66.27.234.189 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:21:21 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.27.234.189] From: "Rob Vella" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Ifconfig Aliasing Problem - 4.6 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:21:21 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2002 01:21:21.0960 (UTC) FILETIME=[19C0FA80:01C227B0] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm having trouble adding an alias to my Intel Etherexpress Pro (fxp0). Here is the exact output: root$ /sbin/ifconfig fxp0 inet 204.212.36.170 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 204.212.36.255 alias ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists root$ I've had the same problem on my FreeBSD NAT Router (4.6 as well).. I'm hoping this is just a release problem. If anyone can help me get that aliased and working I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Rob Vella _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:43: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D8D37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.quantified.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9439143E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:42:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from mail.quantified.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.quantified.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6A1gtlf003606; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:42:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from localhost (dsilver@localhost) by mail.quantified.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) with ESMTP id g6A1gtxJ003603; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.quantified.com: dsilver owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Silver X-X-Sender: dsilver@mail.quantified.com To: Rob Vella Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ifconfig Aliasing Problem - 4.6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020709184146.Y3580-100000@mail.quantified.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.quantified.com) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rob - I believe the netmask must be 255.255.255.255. Could be wrong, though that's what I'm using on my 4.6 box. HTH -doug On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Rob Vella wrote: > I'm having trouble adding an alias to my Intel Etherexpress Pro (fxp0). H= ere > is the exact output: > > root$ /sbin/ifconfig fxp0 inet 204.212.36.170 netmask 255.255.255.0 > broadcast 204.212.36.255 alias > ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > root$ > > I've had the same problem on my FreeBSD NAT Router (4.6 as well).. I'm > hoping this is just a release problem. > > If anyone can help me get that aliased and working I would greatly > appreciate it. > > Thanks, > Rob Vella > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world=92s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:44:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349A737B401; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (h-66-166-142-198.SNDACAGL.covad.net [66.166.142.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752EE43E4A; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:44:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsder@mail.allcaps.org) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4858D153BA; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E061153B7; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:44:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Doug Barton Cc: Helge Oldach , Jay Sachs , , , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <20020709134511.I24728-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20020709173249.M68847-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > I am totally disinterested in what happens to the very small percentage of > our users who follow -stable and RELENG_4 religiously. I'm very interested > in what will happen when 4.6.1 is released, and throngs of people upgrade > to it thinking it will "fix" their ssh problems, when in reality it's > creating a whole bunch of new ones. There are actually 2 *separate* problems here. One concerns 4.6.1 and the other concerns stuff after that.. If, as you appear to be suggesting, this change has been propagated to 4.6.1, I would agree with you that it should be backed out. I apologize if I missed that reference in earlier emails. However, that issue should probably be taken up with release engineering, not stable. I certainly do *not* agree that it should never make it into 4.7 (or 4.6-stable or 4.X of any flavor). If this logic is followed to its conclusion, the 4.X series should cease being developed. Until the 5.0 series is ready for release, the 4.x series needs to continue to be developed. FreeBSD needs to make progress and that sometimes causes hiccups. On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Doug Barton also wrote: > The fact that it falls back does not mean that users can get into the box > without intervention. Besides, you're missing the whole point here. Users > should not have to deal with this AT ALL in -stable. If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in *without* change. This fact that this does not occur really is a bug/misfeature of OpenSSH. It really should get reported to them. By fixing this bug/misfeature, *everybody* wins and is happy. On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Doug Barton also wrote: > YOU can have exactly what you want with a simple run-time config option. Yeah ... simple ... once you know that its the problem. And where does it say in the handbook that the default configuration doesn't accept DSA keys? Say what you will, but generating a DSA key on FreeBSD, moving it another FreeBSD box, and still not being able to log in is not POLA. It's a *bug*. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:48:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2800237B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D598B43E42 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:48:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A1nXHd051071; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:49:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6A1nXsS051070; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:49:33 -0700 From: faSty To: Rob Vella Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ifconfig Aliasing Problem - 4.6 Message-ID: <20020710014933.GA51019@i-sphere.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG LOL last week same question i asked and someone told me you must have netmask with ffffff0 something.. let me find my old email. -fasty On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:21:21AM +0000, Rob Vella wrote: > I'm having trouble adding an alias to my Intel Etherexpress Pro (fxp0). > Here is the exact output: > > root$ /sbin/ifconfig fxp0 inet 204.212.36.170 netmask 255.255.255.0 > broadcast 204.212.36.255 alias > ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > root$ > > I've had the same problem on my FreeBSD NAT Router (4.6 as well).. I'm > hoping this is just a release problem. > > If anyone can help me get that aliased and working I would greatly > appreciate it. > > Thanks, > Rob Vella > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 18:50:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A45A37B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E07A43E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:50:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A1q1Hd051137; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:52:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6A1q1sc051136; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:52:01 -0700 From: faSty To: Doug Silver Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ifconfig Aliasing Problem - 4.6 Message-ID: <20020710015201.GB51019@i-sphere.com> References: <20020709184146.Y3580-100000@mail.quantified.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020709184146.Y3580-100000@mail.quantified.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG here is ifconfig fxp0 alias 204.212.36.170 netmask 0xffffffff that what it worked great -fasty On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:55PM -0700, Doug Silver wrote: > Rob - > > I believe the netmask must be 255.255.255.255. > > Could be wrong, though that's what I'm using on my 4.6 box. > > HTH > > -doug > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Rob Vella wrote: > > > I'm having trouble adding an alias to my Intel Etherexpress Pro (fxp0). Here > > is the exact output: > > > > root$ /sbin/ifconfig fxp0 inet 204.212.36.170 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > broadcast 204.212.36.255 alias > > ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > > root$ > > > > I've had the same problem on my FreeBSD NAT Router (4.6 as well).. I'm > > hoping this is just a release problem. > > > > If anyone can help me get that aliased and working I would greatly > > appreciate it. > > > > Thanks, > > Rob Vella > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 19: 0:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F3237B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5289D43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:00:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id A1A2E136B7; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:00:51 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Rob Vella Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ifconfig Aliasing Problem - 4.6 Message-ID: <20020710020051.GA28023@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Rob Vella , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:21:21AM +0000, Rob Vella wrote: > I'm having trouble adding an alias to my Intel Etherexpress Pro (fxp0).= =20 > Here is the exact output: >=20 > root$ /sbin/ifconfig fxp0 inet 204.212.36.170 netmask 255.255.255.0=20 > broadcast 204.212.36.255 alias > ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > root$ >=20 Use the correct netmask; from ifconfig(8): alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. T= his is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wis= hes to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the addr= ess is on the same subnet as the first network address for this interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually 0xffffffff is most appropriate. --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iD8DBQE9K5VTObaG4P6BelARArm7AJ9kcBy+fpg7YL+3E7hav6jOrYkBpACgoR/u OdBKNA9J9RRuQjXqzVMZdxQ= =OT4X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 19: 9: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC6237B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC5E43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A28up9064176; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:08:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709220704.06f0df30@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:08:57 -0400 To: David Greenman-Lawrence From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Cc: Ken Gunderson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020709135159.M28874@nexus.root.com> References: <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:51 PM 7/9/2002 -0700, David Greenman-Lawrence wrote: > The 82557 has a receive side bug that can cause it to stop receiving, but >this isn't caused by it being 'overwhelmed". The problem is supposed to only >occur when using them in 10Mbps mode, although it can happen if the link >changes state as well. The FreeBSD driver has a work-around for this problem >and it the bug shouldn't exist in newer Intel chips in any case. I ran into this _hardware_ bug on a number of motherboards and each one after using the patched driver (commited some time ago) that jlemon did fixed the problem 100% of the time. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 19:24:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4563E37B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4627543E42; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:24:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A2ONp9064260; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:24:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709220904.07342970@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:24:23 -0400 To: Ken Gunderson From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020709144436.B12572@kasilof.boi.hp.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> <20020709102153.A14126@kasilof.boi.hp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709125431.03fade00@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:44 PM 7/9/2002 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: >interestingly enough, a co-worker >informs me these cards are causing a lot fo grief under load in >quite a number of linux boxes deployed in hp datacenters. Hi, LINUX driver != FreeBSD driver. Just because one might have problems doesnt have any bearing on the stability/performance on the other OS. >apparently the cards just become overwhelmed about once or twice >per month and just hang until reset. chip in these cards is the >82557. there were numerous issues with fxp around 4.6rc time, Numerous issues ? Remember also people post to the list when they have problems. No one posts, "Hi, I am using the fxp and dont have any problems. Thanks, bye." The only threads I remember around this were some people with specific problems on specific SMP motherboards. I dont recall any mass problems with the fxp cards... For what its worth, we have deployed some 50 servers on various MB incarnations in the past 4 years ranging from 440BX chipsets to recent 845s and apart from the hardware bug that dg@root.com noted and _one specific_ (VIA 82C598MVP) motherboard which would crash with intel nics in them, we have had excellent results with the fxp driver. YMMV. That being said, if you are just doing experimenting and network performance is not important, 8139 based realtek which you can probably buy at $5 each might be fine... YMMV For production boxes, I would go with Intels. Our news server for example has a good 30Mbit/s of traffic on it 7x24 and has Intel nics in it. The NICs, the OS all perform like champs. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 19:27:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD33037B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FF7C43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:27:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 595 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 02:27:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO satan.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.4) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 02:27:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:27:45 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Clement Laforet Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-Id: <20020710042745.3dbb91df.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:56:49 +0200 Clement Laforet wrote: > Hi guys :) > > I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). Hi, Mike Tancsa sent me a mail and suggested me to do some things. " What does sysctl -a | grep ata and atacontrol list atacontrol cap 0 0 If the last 2 done work, cd /dev ./MAKEDEV ata first." so here my script ouput :) It reminds me another things. The ad2 drive isn't "recognized" by BIOS. This hard drive still correctly works :) And worked since 4.3-RELEASE with the same sysctl parameters ata-1 is dead so, here it is :) Script started on Wed Jul 10 04:10:37 2002 [root@goofy|(500)| root]# #To Be Sure [root@goofy|(501)| root]# cd /dev/ [root@goofy|(502)| dev]# ./MAKEDEV ata [root@goofy|(503)| dev]# sysctl -a | grep ata kern.ipc.max_datalen: 136 hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 hw.ata.wc: 1 hw.ata.tags: 0 hw.ata.atapi_dma: 0 [root@goofy|(504)| dev]# atacontrol list ATA channel 0: Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI rev 4 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: ad2 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 Slave: no device present [root@goofy|(505)| dev]# atacontrol cap 0 0 ATA channel 0, Master, device ad0: ATA/ATAPI revision 4 device model ST313620A firmware revision 3.11 cylinders 16383 heads 16 sectors/track 63 lba supported 26692776 sectors lba48 not supported dma supported overlap not supported Feature Support Enable Value Vendor write cache yes yes read ahead yes yes dma queued no no 0/00 SMART yes no microcode download yes yes security yes no power management yes yes advanced power management no no 0/00 automatic acoustic management no no 0/00 0/00 [root@goofy|(506)| dev]# atacontrol cap 0 2 ATA channel 0, Slave, device Z˙?: ATA/ATAPI revision 0 device model firmware revision żż cylinders 49087 heads 2052 sectors/track 0 lba not supported lba48 not supported dma notsupported overlap not supported Feature Support Enable Value Vendor write cache no no read ahead no no dma queued no no 0/00 SMART no no microcode download no no security no no power management no no advanced power management no no 0/00 automatic acoustic management no no 0/00 0/00 [root@goofy|(507)| dev]# exit Script done on Wed Jul 10 04:12:15 2002 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 19:33:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F0037B401 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13604.mail.yahoo.com (web13604.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26BD543E4A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bzdik@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020710023340.35634.qmail@web13604.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.225.219.108] by web13604.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 19:33:40 PDT Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:33:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Bzdik BSD Subject: RE: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? To: Mike Jakubik , Ken Gunderson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --- Mike Jakubik wrote: > If you are looking for stability, compatibility and speed all in one, > I > would go with a 3com card. My personal favorite is the 3c905c. I have > never > had any problems with this card. However, I have gone thought a > number of > fxp cards and motherboards with onboard chipsets. Some would cause > problems, > some would work ok, you wont know for sure until your try. I stopped buying 3COMs after I was fed up with 3C905B, sometimes they's do things you never thought possible. Never had any trouble with Intels. See, it's all anecdotal and at times very personal :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 20:51:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4A137B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C68143E3B for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:51:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A3p7p9064602; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:51:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709234542.06eb5338@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:51:08 -0400 To: Clement Laforet From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020710042745.3dbb91df.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 04:27 AM 7/10/2002 +0200, Clement Laforet wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:56:49 +0200 >Clement Laforet wrote: >so here my script ouput :) >It reminds me another things. >The ad2 drive isn't "recognized" by BIOS. >This hard drive still correctly works :) Works correctly in what sense ? i.e. you can read and write to it under=20 some OS ? But not on this version of FreeBSD ? >And worked since 4.3-RELEASE with the same sysctl parameters >ata-1 is dead Do you mean ad1 ? If so, If you take ad1 out and adjust ata-0's jumpers so= =20 that its a master with no slave, does it now work ? If not ad1, what do you mean by ata-1 is dead ? Or do you mean ata-1 the=20 controller is actually dead ? If so, get rid of the second drive. >so, here it is :) > >Script started on Wed Jul 10 04:10:37 2002 >[root@goofy|(500)| root]# #To Be Sure >[root@goofy|(501)| root]# cd /dev/ >[root@goofy|(502)| dev]# ./MAKEDEV ata >[root@goofy|(503)| dev]# sysctl -a | grep ata >kern.ipc.max_datalen: 136 >hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 Try sysctl -w hw.ata.ata_dma=3D0 or add hw.ata.ata_dma=3D0 into=20 /boot/loader.conf and reboot. >hw.ata.wc: 1 >hw.ata.tags: 0 >hw.ata.atapi_dma: 0 >[root@goofy|(504)| dev]# atacontrol list >ATA channel 0: > Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI rev 4 > Slave: no device present >ATA channel 1: > Master: ad2 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > Slave: no device present >[root@goofy|(505)| dev]# atacontrol cap 0 0 >ATA channel 0, Master, device ad0: > >ATA/ATAPI revision 4 >device model ST313620A >firmware revision 3.11 >cylinders 16383 >heads 16 >sectors/track 63 >lba supported 26692776 sectors >lba48 not supported >dma supported >overlap not supported > >Feature Support Enable Value Vendor >write cache yes yes >read ahead yes yes >dma queued no no 0/00 >SMART yes no >microcode download yes yes >security yes no >power management yes yes >advanced power management no no 0/00 >automatic acoustic management no no 0/00 0/00 >[root@goofy|(506)| dev]# atacontrol cap 0 2 >ATA channel 0, Slave, device Z=FF?: > >ATA/ATAPI revision 0 >device model >firmware revision =BF=BF >cylinders 49087 >heads 2052 >sectors/track 0 >lba not supported >lba48 not supported >dma notsupported >overlap not supported > >Feature Support Enable Value Vendor >write cache no no >read ahead no no >dma queued no no 0/00 >SMART no no >microcode download no no >security no no >power management no no >advanced power management no no 0/00 >automatic acoustic management no no 0/00 0/00 >[root@goofy|(507)| dev]# exit > >Script done on Wed Jul 10 04:12:15 2002 > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 21:59:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F3437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orwell.lost-angel.com (176.63.252.64.snet.net [64.252.63.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183143E09 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:59:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sammy@lost-angel.com) Received: from orwell.lost-angel.com (localhost.lost-angel.com [127.0.0.1]) by orwell.lost-angel.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A4xRU7002621 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:59:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sammy@lost-angel.com) Received: from localhost (sammy@localhost) by orwell.lost-angel.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g6A4xQng002618 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:59:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: orwell.lost-angel.com: sammy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:59:26 -0400 (EDT) From: sammy!!! To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: CheckMail in OpenSSH 3.0 is depricated ?? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, A feature many of my users has been depricated in OpenSSH 3.0 which is now in FreeBSD STABLE, CheckMail. Does anyone know the reason why this was removed and any SIMPLE work around, for example, was it replaced by another feature? sammy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 22:15:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A08437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trustafari.doofdoof.com (dsl-65-188-195-25.telocity.com [65.188.195.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9B543E54 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:15:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glen@burningman.com) Received: from xdream.doofdoof.com ([172.16.1.1] helo=burningman.com) by trustafari.doofdoof.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17S9oc-0002dx-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:15:02 -0700 Message-ID: <3D2BC2CA.3040706@burningman.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:14:50 -0700 From: Glen Mehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "sammy!!!" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CheckMail in OpenSSH 3.0 is depricated ?? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG UseLogin = yes read the man page-- there's a problem with UsePrivelegeSeparation and UseLogin together. -g sammy!!! wrote: > Hello, > > A feature many of my users has been depricated in OpenSSH 3.0 which is now > in FreeBSD STABLE, CheckMail. > > Does anyone know the reason why this was removed and any SIMPLE work > around, for example, was it replaced by another feature? > > sammy > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Glen Mehn glen at burningman dot com at zerowaitstate dot com at doofdoof dot com "If u ever devour the universe, remember to spit the dragon back out.xx." -swan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 23:30:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F9337B40C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B3F43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A6UMC0029155; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by Master.gorean.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g6A6Ru5n006087; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:27:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: Master.gorean.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:27:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: Erik Trulsson , Eugene Grosbein , Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny In-Reply-To: <20020709164425.J77578-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20020709232647.V5990-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit > ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. I think that you guys are running an old mergemaster on a new -stable system. Can you verify? The -f option to rm prevents error messages from being displayed. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 23:31: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E137B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE75B43E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A6UMC2029155; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by Master.gorean.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g6A6Nhog006081; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:23:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: Master.gorean.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:23:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: Helge Oldach , Jay Sachs , , , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup In-Reply-To: <20020709173249.M68847-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Message-ID: <20020709231825.L5990-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > There are actually 2 *separate* problems here. One concerns 4.6.1 and the > other concerns stuff after that.. The fact that you see them as two seperate problems is part of the problem. :) > I certainly do *not* agree that it should never make it into 4.7 (or > 4.6-stable or 4.X of any flavor). If this logic is followed to its absurd > conclusion, the 4.X series should cease being developed. the distinction that you are failing to make is that there are many different kinds of "changes" to the system. Changes that improve a driver, changes that update systems like sendmail, even when they require some small config changes, are candidates for -stable. Changes like this that have serious potential for causing major problems, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED; are not. > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Doug Barton also wrote: > > > The fact that it falls back does not mean that users can get into the box > > without intervention. Besides, you're missing the whole point here. Users > > should not have to deal with this AT ALL in -stable. > > If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version > 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in > *without* change. This fact that this does not occur really is a > bug/misfeature of OpenSSH. It really should get reported to them. By > fixing this bug/misfeature, *everybody* wins and is happy. IF, at some point in the future, this works properly, then we can consider this. But, IT DOESN'T NOW. We don't do development like this in -stable in any case. We do it in -current. I'm going to drop this subject now, because there really isn't any further point in discussing it in this forum. Doug -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 23:55:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85F437B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f273.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.8.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569A43E52 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:55:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsdsec@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:55:55 -0700 Received: from 212.30.183.3 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 06:55:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.30.183.3] From: "Kirill Magdalinin" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_6 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:55:55 +0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2002 06:55:55.0665 (UTC) FILETIME=[D69D4810:01C227DE] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I cvsup'ed RELENG_4, but haven't built or installed anything. Is it now possible to use cvsup with tag=RELENG_4_6 in order to get that branch or I should delete updated source code? Kirill _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 23:58:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FA737B4CA for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (adsl-64-169-154-205.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [64.169.154.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1448D43E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:58:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: from absinthe2.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A6wXE4061803; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: (from fred@localhost) by absinthe2.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6A6wXvH061802; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:58:33 -0700 From: Fred Condo To: Kirill Magdalinin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_6 Message-ID: <20020710065833.GB61758@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Magdalinin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:55:55AM +0400, Kirill Magdalinin wrote: > Hello, > > I cvsup'ed RELENG_4, but haven't built or installed anything. > Is it now possible to use cvsup with tag=RELENG_4_6 in order to get that > branch or I should delete updated source code? > Changing the tag will make all necessary changes to the sources. No need to manually delete anything. -- Fred Condo - fred@condo.chico.ca.us "It's not Camelot, but it's not Cleveland, either." -- Kevin White, mayor of Boston To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 9 23:59:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56937B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02DE43E31 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:59:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FC45B8B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 657245BAE; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:59:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:59:26 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Kirill Magdalinin Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_6 Message-ID: <20020710085926.A758@droso.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from bsdsec@hotmail.com on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:55:55AM +0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 4.6-STABLE X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:55:55AM +0400, Kirill Magdalinin wrote: > Hello, Hi, >=20 > I cvsup'ed RELENG_4, but haven't built or installed anything. > Is it now possible to use cvsup with tag=3DRELENG_4_6 in order to get tha= t=20 > branch or I should delete updated source code? >=20 You can simply run cvsup again with the new tag, and you'll have the sources for that tag. Cheers, /erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing -- http://droso.org --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9K9tOqy9aWxUlaZARArvSAKD71zJfpp9bZMHzehDW57JAXgWScACg/K6L PtKdiTEWmvmt6nX3f/BpQoA= =YKvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 0:20:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A41D37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (mx2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6872843E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sams [134.2.12.50]) by mx2.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B30106B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:20:22 +0200 (MST) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A7KMeh025771; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:20:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sperber@sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6A7KLqb025768; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:20:21 +0200 (CEST) To: Thomas Seck Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> <20020709204417.GA778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:20:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020709204417.GA778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> (Thomas Seck's message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:44:17 +0200") Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.5 (bok choi, i386-unknown-freebsd4.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Seck writes: Thomas> "[...] Cron also searches /etc/crontab...". Thomas> Thomas> The original poster obviously did not bother to read this document. Thomas> Failing to read documentation and posting false claims on a public Thomas> mailing list is a behaviour that drives me up the wall. That would be me, I guess. I never claimed there's no /etc/crontab file. I claimed there's no root crontab which, as some posters have noted, is something different. On the 4.3 systems I have around here, there's a root crontab starting like this: # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. # (/tmp/adcrcln339/crontab installed on Mon Jun 11 20:53:28 2001) # (Cron version -- $FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab/crontab.c,v 1.12.2.2 2000/12/11 01:03:31 obrien Exp $) It's no big deal. I was just wondering where that came from and why I'm no longer seeing it. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 0:46: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEAD43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:45:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A7iHBu032502; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:44:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3D2BE5D1.4748EDE8@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:44:17 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky , Erik Trulsson , Eugene Grosbein , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny References: <20020709232647.V5990-100000@master.gorean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > > ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit > > ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. > > I think that you guys are running an old mergemaster on a new -stable > system. Can you verify? The -f option to rm prevents error messages from > being displayed. Never mind, I was testing on the wrong system. I'll take care of this. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:26: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6A537B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E9843E5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:25:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7899EEA94; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:25:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2BEF90.1040802@eboa.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:25:52 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: faSty Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> <20020709221853.GA48316@i-sphere.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG faSty wrote: > no no you need clean up in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NISSER (type make clean) > then cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf and config NISSER then cd ../../compile/NISSER > lastly make depend Make absolutely no difference whatsoever. Still get stuck on that linux code. But how the heck it ever managed to build the 4.6 it's running... It also makes me wonder if I should bother to take the 100 mile drive to the ISP in whose rack another box is located. That one didn't come up after the reboot. Ah well, can always make it run the 4.3 kernel like it has done for over a year. Roelof PS final attempt, making clean in /usr/src, ditching /usr/obj and using the config file of yesteryear. The one without BRIDGE option, the one that once made 4.6 successfully -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:26:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC237B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jangada.softinfo.com.br (BA000200.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.164.0.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022C943E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:26:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vitor@softinfo.com.br) Received: from acaraje (acaraje.softinfo.com.br [192.168.10.2]) by jangada.softinfo.com.br (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6A8QB04016506 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:26:12 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from vitor@softinfo.com.br) Message-ID: <009701c227eb$7de606a0$020aa8c0@acaraje> Reply-To: "Vitor de Matos Carvalho" From: "Vitor de Matos Carvalho" To: "FreeBSD-Stable" Subject: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:26:29 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi... I noticed that upgrade of the version of the OpenSSH for 3.4p1 was made one when cvs for RELENG_4 is made. It adds a new user and a new group with the name of sshd. Which would be the funcăo of it? To twirl sshd with the user sshd instead of the user root? Case is because for default it does not come with this alteration? Regards, Vitor de Matos Carvalho System Network Administrator - Softinfo Network FreeBSD - The Power To Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:29: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E655F37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jangada.softinfo.com.br (BA000200.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.164.0.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA47E43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:29:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vitor@softinfo.com.br) Received: from acaraje (acaraje.softinfo.com.br [192.168.10.2]) by jangada.softinfo.com.br (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6A8T204016519 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:29:02 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from vitor@softinfo.com.br) Message-ID: <00a701c227eb$e3733010$020aa8c0@acaraje> Reply-To: "Vitor de Matos Carvalho" From: "Vitor de Matos Carvalho" To: "FreeBSD-Stable" Subject: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:29:20 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi... I noticed that upgrade of the version of the OpenSSH for 3.4p1 was made one when cvs for RELENG_4 is made. It adds a new user and a new group with the name of sshd. Which would be the function of it? To twirl sshd with the user sshd instead of the user root? Case is because for default it does not come with this alteration? Regards, Vitor de Matos Carvalho System Network Administrator - Softinfo Network FreeBSD - The Power To Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:41: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA6F37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sentinel.vg.tzo.com (h179n2fls32o972.telia.com [217.208.226.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C7343E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:41:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Daniel.Eriksson@computer.org) Received: from gadget (gadget [192.168.168.3]) by sentinel.vg.tzo.com (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6A8euQ2003812 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:41:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Daniel.Eriksson@computer.org) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Subject: RE: Upcoming 4.6.1 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:40:58 +0200 Organization: Virtual Gadgets Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com> Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Daniel Eriksson" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as > well, but why > > not Matt's most recent bug fixes? > > Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it > everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO, > 4.6.1 s/b a point patch release. Maybe because they are not bug fixes? If we go through the trouble of releasing a new version of FreeBSD why not include a few close-to-critical bug fixes if they are trivial and known to be correct? I fail to see the logic of releasing an x.x.1 version that still has serious known problems that there are known fixes for. -- Daniel Eriksson Lurker extraordinaire To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:52:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DC237B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from I-Sphere.COM (shell.i-sphere.com [209.249.146.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB3943E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:52:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: from shell.i-sphere.com (fasty@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by I-Sphere.COM (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6A8rfHd056309; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:53:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fasty@shell.i-sphere.com) Received: (from fasty@localhost) by shell.i-sphere.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6A8rfli056308; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:53:41 -0700 From: faSty To: Roelof Osinga Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure Message-ID: <20020710085341.GA56278@i-sphere.com> References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> <20020709221853.GA48316@i-sphere.com> <3D2BEF90.1040802@eboa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3D2BEF90.1040802@eboa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ah you says so. I did it on one of my rack DNS server. I managed get kernel compiled without any error. sorry i tried help you anyway. -fasty On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > faSty wrote: > >no no you need clean up in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NISSER (type make > >clean) > >then cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf and config NISSER then cd > >../../compile/NISSER > >lastly make depend > > Make absolutely no difference whatsoever. Still get stuck on that linux > code. But > how the heck it ever managed to build the 4.6 it's running... > > It also makes me wonder if I should bother to take the 100 mile drive to > the ISP > in whose rack another box is located. That one didn't come up after the > reboot. > > Ah well, can always make it run the 4.3 kernel like it has done for over a > year. > > Roelof > > PS final attempt, making clean in /usr/src, ditching /usr/obj and using the > config file of yesteryear. The one without BRIDGE option, the one that once > made 4.6 successfully > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > eBOAŽ est. 1982 > http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 > mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 1:58:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0734B37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D4F43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:58:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (Sturm@klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6A8wn8A003794 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:58:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:58:49 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Message-ID: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear Sirs. I followed an interesting dispute in this list about setting the kernel option HZ=100 to HZ=10000. No one can say exactly what kind of hardware is 'fast enough' to obtain benefits from setting this granularity option to that high value, so each administrator has to do several efforts to examine whether its hardware is suitable to switch o HZ=10000 or not. We use several SMP systems around here, some have special server mainboards (Slot1 type, TYAN Thunder 2500), some new UP systems with P4/ASUS P4TE main PCB and a low cost SMP system with ASUS CUV4X-D PCB. On all these systems it seems to my subject that performance or 'reaction' time has significantly increased. I did not test the behaviour under extremely heavy load, but within our normal duties and daily work (webserver, MySQL server, NFS server (UPD NFS/3), DHCP boot server, SAMBA server, analytical number crunching with smaller applications in F77 and/or PGI pgf90 under Linuxulator) it is a very convenient experience to see how smooth these machines operate now. We also have a lot of pure diskless clients for X11 terminal services, based on 750 MHz Duron and 64 MB PC133 slow SDRAM, Intel Pro/100+ NICs. They also now have HZ set to 10000 and they also seem to operate faster. Well, this is a subjective impression, not aproved by measurements. -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 2: 4:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE38237B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A94243E5E; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:04:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6A94Pk46533; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:04:26 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:04:25 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: stable@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: VMware2 and CDROM image Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have a patch that allow to use CD-ROM images in VMware2 via vn device: http://sysoev.ru/freebsd/patch.vn_cd.txt Patch was made and tested on FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3. I had used it to install Windows NT 4.0 from CD-ROM image in VMware2. It can be used on FreeBSD 4.x only (because it's using vn device). Russian description is available here: http://sysoev.ru/freebsd/vmware_cd_image.html In English, short: After appling of patch you need rebuild vnconfig and kernel. vnconfig will get new options - '-s cdrom': vnconfig -s cdrom -c vn0c image.iso After configuring vn device you can use it in VMware2 as /dev/vn0c instead of physical CD-ROM device. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 2:15:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ED037B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7743E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:15:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BADEA94; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:15:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2BFB2C.5080908@eboa.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:15:24 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: faSty Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> <20020709221853.GA48316@i-sphere.com> <3D2BEF90.1040802@eboa.com> <20020710085341.GA56278@i-sphere.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG faSty wrote: > ah you says so. I did it on one of my rack DNS server. I managed get > kernel compiled without any error. sorry i tried help you anyway. Oh no, don't be. Any help is always welcome! But I did notice one thing and that is that the good compiles were done just after the 2002.07.05 cvsup. When I tried the bridge option I did another cvsup on the 9th. Since then the compiles failed. Both with and without that option. So there is still hope in that that server - the one that didn't come up - has the July 5th cvsup source. Ah well, got a nice set of wheels :). Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 3:20:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3B037B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23B243E5E; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:20:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 5B71C534B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:20:14 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: Doug Barton , Helge Oldach , Jay Sachs , , Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup References: <20020709173249.M68847-100000@mail.allcaps.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 10 Jul 2002 12:20:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020709173249.M68847-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrew P. Lentvorski" writes: > If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version > 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in > *without* change. This fact that this does not occur really is a > bug/misfeature of OpenSSH. No, it's a bug/misfeature of the protocol OpenSSH implements. OpenSSH can't do anything about it without losing the right to its name. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 3:54:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC1837B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web40308.mail.yahoo.com (web40308.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B61A43E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:54:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nuzrin@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020710105447.84833.qmail@web40308.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.106.140.173] by web40308.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:54:47 PDT Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:54:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Nuzrin Yaapar Reply-To: nuzrin@nuzrin.com Subject: lnc interface dying under heavy I/O when running 4.6-STABLE under VMware 3.1.1 To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Guys, The subject describes it all. I don't know if anyone else is facing this problem, but I can reproduce this problem at will. Under VMware 3.1.1 for Windows, the lnc driver will stop responding after some time. The weirdest part is that it will only manifest itself when doing some heavy network I/O, such as 'make installworld' from NFS mount, or doing netperf. The host OS is WinXP Pro, and the guest OS is the freshly cvsup RELENG_4. Looking at VMware log file, I see a lot these messages: Jul 09 16:42:48: VMX|VLANCE: ethernet0 skipped 1024 time(s) Jul 09 16:42:48: VMX|VLANCE: 254 30 24 23 26 215 11 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 09 16:42:48: VMX|VLANCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 436 Jul 09 16:42:51: VMX|VLANCE: ethernet0 skipped 1280 time(s) Jul 09 16:42:51: VMX|VLANCE: 354 44 37 35 37 313 17 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 09 16:42:51: VMX|VLANCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 436 I've done some investigation, and it seems that after some heavy network activity, the lnc driver will stop calling RX interrupt routine, lnc_rint(). The "fix" is very simple though; in sys/i386/isa/if_lnc.c, delete the call to outw(sc->rdp, RINT | INEA) at the very end of lnc_rint() function. See diff below applied against the latest RELENG_4 code. # diff -ruN sys/i386/isa/if_lnc.c.old sys/i386/isa/if_lnc.c --- sys/i386/isa/if_lnc.c.old Tue Jul 9 21:04:31 2002 +++ sys/i386/isa/if_lnc.c Tue Jul 9 21:04:45 2002 @@ -630,7 +630,6 @@ * here have been dealt with. */ - outw(sc->rdp, RINT | INEA); } Anyone care to describe/explain/enlighten me on what is happening actually? - nuzrin - __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 4:11:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9419B37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morzine.ciger.be (morzine.ciger.be [193.74.104.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6184943E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:11:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from HLH@CIGER.BE) Received: from meribel.cigersoft.be (meribel.cigersoft.be [172.24.2.233]) by morzine.ciger.be (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6ABBUVW071568 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:11:31 +0200 (CEST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Information request about Running SMP kernel with specific mptable Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:11:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <43101D2B73D34E449831D5F1BC57F2C35C9253@meribel.cigersoft.be> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Information request about Running SMP kernel with specific mptable Thread-Index: AcIoAopNtcCyaYFIR7SgGZZxGI4k7w== From: "Henri Hennebert" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Does anyone is running FreeBSD stable in SMP mode on a motherboard _without_ any I/O Ints entry with type ExtINT (mptable output)? I'm suspercting that my kernel freeze at boot come from: APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 0 My PR is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Di386/39234 Another "related" problem is maybe: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/35425 Any information is welcome Henri To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 5:50:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96B37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D996E43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:50:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 992 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 12:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO satan.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.4) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 12:50:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:50:32 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-Id: <20020710145032.71744e07.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709234542.06eb5338@192.168.0.12> References: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709234542.06eb5338@192.168.0.12> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:51:08 -0400 Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Works correctly in what sense ? i.e. you can read and write to it under > some OS ? But not on this version of FreeBSD ? Yes, I tested the drive under FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE and 4.5-STABLE (before new ATA drivers) and 4.6-stable (27th June). No problem. > > >And worked since 4.3-RELEASE with the same sysctl parameters > >ata-1 is dead > > Do you mean ad1 ? If so, If you take ad1 out and adjust ata-0's jumpers so > that its a master with no slave, does it now work ? I put ad2 to ad1, and on heavy load ATA channel 0 failed to. I removed my "strange disk" to and put, added another one. Same symptoms. > If not ad1, what do you mean by ata-1 is dead ? Or do you mean ata-1 the > controller is actually dead ? If so, get rid of the second drive. ATA channel 0 is dying to I think. It's not a big problem for, I'll get rid of ata drive for my box, I just wonder why FreeBSD get frozen on atapi failure :) > > Try sysctl -w hw.ata.ata_dma=0 or add hw.ata.ata_dma=0 into > /boot/loader.conf and reboot. No change. cheers clem ****** UPDATE : of atacontrol cap of ad2 Sorry i mistyped :) [root@goofy|(510)| root]# atacontrol cap 1 0 ATA channel 1, Master, device ad2: ATA/ATAPI revision 5 device model IC35L040AVER07-0 firmware revision ER4OA41A cylinders 16383 heads 16 sectors/track 63 lba supported 80418240 sectors lba48 not supported dma supported overlap not supported Feature Support Enable Value Vendor write cache yes yes read ahead yes yes dma queued yes yes 31/1F SMART yes no microcode download no no security yes no power management yes yes advanced power management yes no 0/00 automatic acoustic management yes no 254/FE 128/80 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 7: 8:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A75537B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.trigger.net (ns.trigger.net [204.50.18.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877C143E3B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:08:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikej@trigger.net) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [204.50.18.204]) by mail.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 91EB430912; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:08:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Stable" Cc: Subject: sshd vs ports sshd Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:08:42 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's built in sshd and the ports version. passwd diffs: 12a13 > sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin 21d21 < sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent IMHO: This is exactly why server software should not be included in the base distribution of FreeBSD. Thanks. --=--==-====-=============-====-==--=-- Mike Jakubik - Technical Manager mikej@trigger.net Trigger Internet Solutions http://www.trigger.net (905) 405-0170 --=--==-====-=============-====-==--=-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 7:33:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD1A37B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (adsl-64-169-154-205.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [64.169.154.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6A843E54; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:33:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: from absinthe2.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6AEX7E4070402; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:33:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: (from fred@localhost) by absinthe2.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6AEX7VC070401; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:33:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:33:06 -0700 From: Fred Condo To: Mike Jakubik Cc: Stable , dinoex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Message-ID: <20020710143306.GC70071@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:42AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's built in sshd > and the ports version. > > passwd diffs: > 12a13 > > sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin > 21d21 > < sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege > separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent > > IMHO: This is exactly why server software should not be included in the base > distribution of FreeBSD. > I strenuously disagree. Should inetd be a port? Sendmail? What about syslogd or named? Although not all should be on by default, they are certainly essential to enough users that they should be part of the default installation. The ports collection, as useful and glorious as it is, is too unstable for software this critical. Bear in mind that the only tag on the ports collection is HEAD; there is no conservative RELENG_4_6 for the ports. The situation with sshd is an anomaly; basing global policy on this experience would be a Bad Thing. -- Fred Condo - fred@condo.chico.ca.us The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well. -- Joe Ancis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 8: 3:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E455B37B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from felix.automagic.org (felix.automagic.org [204.152.186.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A8A243E65 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:03:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jabley@automagic.org) Received: (qmail 42282 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2002 15:03:29 -0000 Received: from localhost.automagic.org (HELO freud) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.automagic.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 15:03:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:03:27 -0400 Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: "Stable" , To: "Mike Jakubik" From: Joe Abley In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <30991E71-9416-11D6-819F-003065CD52E4@automagic.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 10:08 , Mike Jakubik wrote: > There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's built in > sshd > and the ports version. I agree there's a difference, but I don't see any conflict. > passwd diffs: > 12a13 >> sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin > 21d21 > < sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege > separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 8:16:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F401B37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.trigger.net (ns.trigger.net [204.50.18.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627E043E5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:16:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikej@trigger.net) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [204.50.18.204]) by mail.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4267830702; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:16:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Fred Condo" Cc: "Stable" Subject: RE: sshd vs ports sshd Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:16:11 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20020710143306.GC70071@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should be taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically most software that is available and up to date via the ports. This kind of software is very dynamic, and new releases are made very frequently, often fixing crucial security bugs. In my experience, the ports destitutions have always been very reliable, and software from ports is much much (portupgrade vs. build world) easier to maintain and more up to date rather than something that is built in. The combination of the rock solid FreeBSD core + server software via ports to me presents an easy to maintain, stable, and secure system. If FreeBSD provided an option of a true base install, I would be a happy camper :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Condo [mailto:fred@condo.chico.ca.us] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:33 AM > To: Mike Jakubik > Cc: Stable; dinoex@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:42AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's > built in sshd > > and the ports version. > > > > passwd diffs: > > 12a13 > > > sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell > Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin > > 21d21 > > < sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege > > separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent > > > > IMHO: This is exactly why server software should not be > included in the base > > distribution of FreeBSD. > > > > I strenuously disagree. Should inetd be a port? Sendmail? What about > syslogd or named? Although not all should be on by default, they are > certainly essential to enough users that they should be part of the > default installation. > > The ports collection, as useful and glorious as it is, is too unstable > for software this critical. Bear in mind that the only tag on the > ports collection is HEAD; there is no conservative RELENG_4_6 for the > ports. The situation with sshd is an anomaly; basing global policy on > this experience would be a Bad Thing. > > -- > Fred Condo - fred@condo.chico.ca.us > The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well. > -- Joe Ancis > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 8:17:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47C337B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.trigger.net (ns.trigger.net [204.50.18.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD1D43E09; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikej@trigger.net) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [204.50.18.204]) by mail.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EB873091D; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:17:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Joe Abley" Cc: "Stable" , Subject: RE: sshd vs ports sshd Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:17:34 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <30991E71-9416-11D6-819F-003065CD52E4@automagic.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was just concerned with the differences in the users homedir, but everything seems to be working fine. > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Abley [mailto:jabley@automagic.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:03 AM > To: Mike Jakubik > Cc: Stable; dinoex@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd > > > > On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 10:08 , Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's built in > > sshd > > and the ports version. > > I agree there's a difference, but I don't see any conflict. > > > passwd diffs: > > 12a13 > >> sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin > > 21d21 > > < sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege > > separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent > > > > Joe > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 8:27: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2D437B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bobo.thehutt.org (pcp709198pcs.alxndr01.va.comcast.net [68.49.240.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE49243E3B; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:26:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jerry@thehutt.org) Received: from [10.0.3.13] (helo=nomad.thehutt.org) by bobo.thehutt.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17SJP3-0001Jg-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:29:18 -0400 Received: from jerry by nomad.thehutt.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17SJMM-0005rH-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:26:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:26:30 -0400 From: Jerry A! To: Mike Jakubik Cc: Joe Abley , Stable , dinoex@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Message-ID: <20020710152630.GA22486@nomad.thehutt.org> Reply-To: jerry@thehutt.org References: <30991E71-9416-11D6-819F-003065CD52E4@automagic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 11:17:34AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: : I was just concerned with the differences in the users homedir, but : everything seems to be working fine. That't simply b/c ports by default install in ${LOCALBASE} which is usually /usr/local. If you want OpenSSH to track what comes out of openssh.com and not the patched FreeBSD version, then build security/openssh-portable with the OPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE option and set 'NO_OPENSSH= true' in /etc/make.conf. --Jerry Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... ...It's much more important than that! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 9: 8:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38DE37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from citron.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A8EA43E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:07:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eross_a@chasma.net) Received: (qmail 65655 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2002 16:07:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eross) (10.0.0.199) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 16:07:44 -0000 Message-ID: <00f901c2282c$5682a5f0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> From: "Andrew Eross" To: Subject: buildworld fail Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:10:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there all, While doing buildworld on my 4.3-RELEASE box (upgrading to 4.6-STABLE) I get this: cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/ miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/ perl5 -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/globa ls.c cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/ miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/ perl5 -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/perli o.c cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/ miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/ perl5 -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -L/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/m iniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o perl.o gv.o toke.o perly.o op.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o hv.o av.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doop.o doio.o regexec.o taint.o universal.o globals.o perlio.o -lm -lcrypt -lutil /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lcrypt *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src. Any hints about what I'm missing? Thanks, Andrew Eross To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 9:12:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69B937B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8F343E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-195-14-221-117.netcologne.de [195.14.221.117]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6AGCkUt001769 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:12:46 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 1081 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jul 2002 16:08:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:08:32 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20020710160832.GA996@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> <20020709204417.GA778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] (sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de): > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Seck writes: > > Thomas> "[...] Cron also searches /etc/crontab...". > Thomas> > Thomas> The original poster obviously did not bother to read this document. > Thomas> Failing to read documentation and posting false claims on a public > Thomas> mailing list is a behaviour that drives me up the wall. > > That would be me, I guess. I never claimed there's no /etc/crontab > file. I claimed there's no root crontab which, as some posters have > noted, is something different. Uh, oh. My mind thought of "the posting I originally replied to". What my hands made of it is what was finally sent out. Sorry. > On the 4.3 systems I have around here, there's a root crontab starting > like this: > # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. > # (/tmp/adcrcln339/crontab installed on Mon Jun 11 20:53:28 2001) > # (Cron version -- $FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab/crontab.c,v 1.12.2.2 2000/12/11 01:03:31 obrien Exp $) > > It's no big deal. I was just wondering where that came from and why > I'm no longer seeing it. I get your meaning. According to cvs, the behaviour of 'crontab -u root' was changed in version 1.12.2.3 of crontab.c, committed 2001/05/03 to RELENG_4. -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list - and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 9:21:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BC337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.org.ru (sweet.etrust.ru [194.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FBC43E58 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:21:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A036E4D; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:38 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:38 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Andrew Eross Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld fail Message-ID: <20020710162138.GA18542@freebsd.org.ru> References: <00f901c2282c$5682a5f0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00f901c2282c$5682a5f0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:41PM -0400, Andrew Eross wrote: > Hi there all, >=20 > While doing buildworld on my 4.3-RELEASE box (upgrading to 4.6-STABLE) I = get > this: >=20 > cc -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/= perl/ > miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr= ib/ > perl5 -D__FBSDID=3D__RCSID -c > /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/gl= oba > ls.c > cc -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/= perl/ > miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr= ib/ > perl5 -D__FBSDID=3D__RCSID -c > /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contrib/perl5/pe= rli > o.c > cc -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -I/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/= perl/ > miniperl -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr= ib/ > perl5 -D__FBSDID=3D__RCSID -L/usr/obj/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/p= erl/m > iniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o perl.o gv.o toke.o > perly.o op.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o hv.o av.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o p= p.o > scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doop.o doio.o regexec.o taint.o universal.o > globals.o perlio.o -lm -lcrypt -lutil > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lcrypt > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src. > *** Error code 1 Looks like you haven't /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2 Try to do: # cd /usr/src/lib/libcrypt && make depend all && make install clean # ldconfig -m /usr/lib verify that you have it: # ldconfig -elf -r | grep lcrypt and then try to rebuild the world. --=20 Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEW / \ --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBPSxfEo/Va73vhFLNAQFjRwP/Sa/UPv/redP8Mok0hrMretCXFB3eq1AV mbFcQdqnZSPVSTIdGJU0vvTi5feCAHmAUamV6s0A/zt1C4ceudoCBa72LNXvqaWe Jn6+G0hWpI6nqwIr5QG/K++PcKOze4EhV6l1zyBaGzhm8D6ikZznpTt65/tnPqEP kk4dMt6w5XY= =8bmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 9:28: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wopr.webexc.com (wopr.webexc.com [66.162.122.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D0943E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:28:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@webexc.com) Received: from spock.webexc.com (unknown [209.212.209.89]) by wopr.webexc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84245D1 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:27:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by spock.webexc.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C4988404; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:33:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spock.webexc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB263B9; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:33:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 14:33:53 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Barton X-X-Sender: mbarton@spock.webexc.com To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: <20020708143317.O2573-100000@spock.webexc.com> Organization: Webexcellence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and > /usr/share/examples/drivers > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. I did a fresh install of 4.6-RELEASE from CD-ROM the other day and my /usr/share/examples/cvsup was also empty. - -- Matt Barton Webexcellence PH: 317.423.3548 x22 TF: 800.808.6332 x22 FX: 317.423.8735 matt@webexc.com www.webexc.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9Kekk67cWHlKNnWkRAqaHAKDqJN33/Iri5Dps5k7JDWznO8ij/wCgpenB pkT+wMH4Rv/9vl5hYsqaKbM= =yFPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10: 1:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5475837B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host4.the-web-host.com (host4.the-web-host.com [209.239.49.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7383E43E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:01:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Received: from 216.64.128.42 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host4.the-web-host.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6AH1BE16963; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:01:11 -0400 To: Matthew Dillon From: Bill Jones Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Reply-To: bjones@polestar.org Cc: Clement Laforet , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:54:03 -0700 X-Sender: bjones@polestar.org X-Originating-Host: 216.64.128.42 [216.64.128.42]; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:01:11 GMT X-Mailer: WebMail Check v2.3.21 (2000-7-19) X-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; T312461), JavaScript: On Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can comfortably say that this is the single reason why I am still running RELENG_4_5 and have not upgraded to RELENG_4 or even RELENG_4_6. Several months have passed now since the ATA upgrade, and these issues were reported from the first day it was committed. I am disappointed to see not only that it made it into a release version, but that measures STILL aren't being taken to correct it. I also find it disppointing that we're discussing whether or not this will be fixed in version 4.6.1. I don't think we have a choice, unless we're not going to claim stability anymore. Large IDE drives are cheap and commonplace. If we're so willing to make FreeBSD work on laptops, then we should at least give a concerned nod to the most common disk system in average installation. dillon@backplane.com wrote: There still appear to be serious issues with ATA, mostly with CDROM drives. Soren is currently on vacation for 2 weeks (this from an email he sent to the list on 22 June), so we all need to have a little patience. He should be getting back pretty soon now. > -Matt Matthew Dillon :Hi guys :) : :I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). :And I noticed few hours ago, a little difference with the ata drivers. :I know they have changed but there is something which "disturbs" me. :Here a piece of log I have when "ATA failled". I don't know why. Disks seems to be ok, maybe the heat ;) :so... : :Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done :Jul 4 09:00:50 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy last message repeated 2 times :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ata0-master: timeout waiting for command=ef s=00 e=00 :Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode :Jul 4 09:01:20 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting : :After this, the system was still up, even if I was unable to access ad0 and ad2, processes "simply became dead". :(system an 'sensible data' are on SCSI disks) :Without happiness, I deal with this ;) :This was before I upgrade ;) : :I thought (bad ?) that upgrading to newer version of ata driver, allows me to reset ata buses, and repair this "on the fly". :I was wrong ! :Now my FreeBSD system freezes. :The last console info is (like): :ad2: read command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting :ata-1 resetting :*FREEZE* :and then hard reboot :Nothing in syslog :) : :And now the question :o) :Before considering what that happened (four times in 8hours today), I would like to know how I can trace this (kernel options, soft, daemon). :Or maybe I've done a bad things ;) : :here's my uname -a : :FreeBSD goofy.cultdeadsheep.org 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 4 10:05:12 CEST 2002 root@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOOFY i386 : :here's my ata (standard) kernel conf : : :device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 :device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 :device ata :device atadisk # ATA disk drives :device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives :#device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives :#device atapist # ATAPI tape drives To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10:13:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C9137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D9D43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:13:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6AHDMmW013193; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:13:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710130743.03de01a8@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:17:13 -0400 To: bjones@polestar.org, Matthew Dillon From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:54 AM 10/07/2002 -0700, Bill Jones wrote: >I also find it disppointing that we're discussing whether or not >this will be fixed in version 4.6.1. I don't think we have a choice, >unless we're not going to claim stability anymore. If the commits/changes _didnt_ get put in you would see a string of emails, "I also find it disappointing that we're discussing whether or not a whole slew of modern commonly available and used ATA controllers will not be supported in version 4.6.1." >Large IDE drives are cheap and commonplace. Yes, and Soren's work allows us to use large IDE drives and modern ATA controllers. >If we're so willing >to make FreeBSD work on laptops, then we should at least give a concerned >nod to the most common disk system in average installation. Most common what ? Legacy system ? Most common out there today ? Most common platform someone installs FreeBSD on for the first time ? The ata drivers are most certainly broken for some people. Prior to big changes Soren made, the ata drivers were most certainly broken for some people. Remember when the big round of commits went in last time (wd to ad), it broke support for certain old CMD based controllers. FWIW, I have FreeBSD running happily on an old PII-333 laptop just fine with its old hardware. Also, have you actually tried with your hardware / setup ? ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10:20:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB7137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F8043E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:20:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-213-168-118-180.netcologne.de [213.168.118.180]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6AHKJUt016562 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:20:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 1157 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jul 2002 16:58:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:58:57 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-ID: <20020710165857.GB996@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020710015649.0592a44a.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Clement Laforet (sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org): > Hi guys :) > > I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). > And I noticed few hours ago, a little difference with the ata drivers. > I know they have changed but there is something which "disturbs" me. > Here a piece of log I have when "ATA failled". I don't know why. Disks seems to be ok, maybe the heat ;) > so... > > Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Jul 4 09:00:40 goofy /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done > Jul 4 09:00:50 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy last message repeated 2 times > Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ata0-master: timeout waiting for command=ef s=00 e=00 > Jul 4 09:01:10 goofy /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode > Jul 4 09:01:20 goofy /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting (Not quite) the same here (Intel PIIX3, HX chipset with a 4 GB Fujitsu on ad0 and a 19 GB Maxtor on ad2). The driver does not fall back from UDMA 2 to PIO 4. In my opinion, this is a problem with the new ATA driver. I plan to do some testing with an older FreeBSD version to be sure that this is not a controller issue. > After this, the system was still up, even if I was unable to access > ad0 and ad2, processes "simply became dead". (system an 'sensible > data' are on SCSI disks) Without happiness, I deal with this ;) This > was before I upgrade ;) > > I thought (bad ?) that upgrading to newer version of ata driver, > allows me to reset ata buses, and repair this "on the fly". I was > wrong ! Now my FreeBSD system freezes. The last console info is > (like): ad2: read command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata-1 > resetting *FREEZE* and then hard reboot Nothing in syslog :) Fortunately, the system always recovers here. I can trigger the timeouts easily when I do a dump of a filesystem on ad0 to ad2. They rarely occur during normal operation though. -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list only and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10:26: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186EF37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.skif.net (lasvegas.skif.net [195.58.224.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D460243E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@dru.dn.ua) Received: from dru.dn.ua (dru.skif.net [195.58.224.122]) by relay2.skif.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6AHPoQ9099110 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:25:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from admin@localhost) by dru.dn.ua (8.12.4/8.12.4) id g6AHPh5H097209; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:25:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from admin) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:25:43 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-ID: <20020710172542.GC96308@dru.dn.ua> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710130743.03de01a8@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710130743.03de01a8@marble.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:17:13PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Yes, and Soren's work allows us to use large IDE drives and modern ATA > controllers. It's a good. But who know: When Soren will fixed BUG with violation irq15 when secondary IDE is disabled in BIOS setup and in kernel config??? -- Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10:38:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0014837B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBD743E5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:38:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:38:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root, 'statf s' is culprit Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:38:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know several other people have run into the problem where the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the linux_statfs in compat/linux. 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) 48927 java RET statfs RESTART I don't see a NAMEI call before it, I was kind of expecting to given the code. I can't figure out what filesystem it might be doing this on. $ ldd /tmp/jre/j2re1.4.0_01/bin/java /tmp/jre/j2re1.4.0_01/bin/java: libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x28066000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x2807d000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28081000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2804d000) I'm running linux_base-7.1. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to debug this? This is on 4.6-STABLE. Is anyone aware of a workaround for this issue? I'd like to be able to run the jre as non-root. --don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 10:56:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C5637B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5380243E64 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:54:48 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3535D03; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT) To: Paulo Fragoso Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko , Gavin Atkinson , Michiel Boland , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:14:00 -0300." <20020619150606.J97503-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:14 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:14:00 -0300 (BRT) > From: Paulo Fragoso > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > > You also should update your MAKEDEV script with mergemaster. > > And to sh MAKEDEV all again. Device minor/major numbers was changed with > > ata(4) MFC. > > After we redid all following this steps: > > make buildworld > make installworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL6 > make installkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL6 > mergemaster -a > cd /dev && sh MAKEDEV all > > and restoring some files from backup (group, rc.firewall, etc), all > is working fine. I keep posting this because people keep building new systems in a dangerous way. Doing the installworld before building and booting the new kernel is very risky. It will almost always make no difference, but, on the rare occasions when it does, it will leave you with a VERY sick system and the only way out maybe to re-install FreeBSD from scratch. While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) make buildworld make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) fsck -p mount -a -t ufs cd /usr/src make installworld mergemaster -i (-a is a bit inadequate unless you go back and clean up the mess it often leaves before going to multi-user mode.) exit (to multi-user mode) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 11: 2:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EA037B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host4.the-web-host.com (host4.the-web-host.com [209.239.49.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B5943E42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Received: from 216.64.128.42 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host4.the-web-host.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6AI2bE26581; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:02:37 -0400 To: Mike Tancsa From: Bill Jones Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Reply-To: bjones@polestar.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:50:46 -0700 X-Sender: bjones@polestar.org X-Originating-Host: 216.64.128.42 [216.64.128.42]; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:02:37 GMT X-Mailer: WebMail Check v2.3.21 (2000-7-19) X-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; T312461), JavaScript: On Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike@sentex.net wrote: >>If we're so willing >>to make FreeBSD work on laptops, then we should at least give a concerned >>nod to the most common disk system in average installation. > >Most common what ? Legacy system ? Most common out there today ? Most >common platform someone installs FreeBSD on for the first time ? The ata >drivers are most certainly broken for some people. Prior to big changes >Soren made, the ata drivers were most certainly broken for some >people. Remember when the big round of commits went in last time (wd to >ad), it broke support for certain old CMD based controllers. The obvious answer to me is "Most common platform someone installs FreeBSD on for the first time." All I am simply trying to say is that version 4.6.1 will be minted to CD and sold through the various outlets that market it. It would behoove the FreeBSD community greatly if this version of FreeBSD works out of the box and without need to immediately CVSup on a majority of systems out there. This means it should install and run without these errors on both a 128meg system with 80+ gig IDE hard drives (pretty common at most retailers) and on an older system with 32meg and 6gig IDE hard drives (a common "older computer"). If FreeBSD errors during installation or in the first few days of operation for a new user, it is likely that person will select another OS rather than searching the mailing list and website for fixes. Working "out of the box" is good for future growth of FreeBSD. Failing "out of the box" will have a negative impact. Personally, I'd prefer growth. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 11: 4:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8830E37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F226C43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:31 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC425D03; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:34 -0700 (PDT) To: Clement Laforet Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:27:45 +0200." <20020710042745.3dbb91df.sheep.killer@cultdeadsheep.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:04:34 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020710180434.5CC425D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:27:45 +0200 > From: Clement Laforet > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:56:49 +0200 > Clement Laforet wrote: > > > Hi guys :) > > > > I "recently" upgraded one of my server from 4.5 (RELENG_4_5) to stable (RELENG_4) on the 4th july (nearly 9am CEST). > > Hi, > > Mike Tancsa sent me a mail and suggested me to do some things. > > " What does > sysctl -a | grep ata > and > atacontrol list > atacontrol cap 0 0 > > If the last 2 done work, > cd /dev > ./MAKEDEV ata > first." > > so here my script ouput :) > It reminds me another things. > The ad2 drive isn't "recognized" by BIOS. > This hard drive still correctly works :) > And worked since 4.3-RELEASE with the same sysctl parameters > ata-1 is dead > > so, here it is :) > > Script started on Wed Jul 10 04:10:37 2002 > [root@goofy|(500)| root]# #To Be Sure > [root@goofy|(501)| root]# cd /dev/ > [root@goofy|(502)| dev]# ./MAKEDEV ata > [root@goofy|(503)| dev]# sysctl -a | grep ata > kern.ipc.max_datalen: 136 > hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 > hw.ata.wc: 1 > hw.ata.tags: 0 > hw.ata.atapi_dma: 0 Try 'hw.ata.atapi_dma="1"'. This needs to be entered at the initial boot prompt or put into /boot/loader.conf. DMA on ATAPI devices defaults to 0 because DMA was broken in some older ATAPI devices. Now it seems that some ATAPI devices have a problem NOT running DMA. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 11:15:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E2C37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13A943E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A032178D; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:15:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 69D593D07; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:15:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:15:09 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a dual cpu box with 2GB RAM dedicated to running Postgres. Last week, I upgraded FreeBSD from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1. When I went to restart postgres, it complained that it could not allocate the shared memory segment. I'm running Postgres 7.2.1. For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000 with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is obviously impacting performance... The kern.ipc.* settings have not changed. In my /etc/sysctl.conf file, I set kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456 kern.ipc.shmall=65535 kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 With FreeBSD 4.6, I even upped the shmmax to 1073741824 to no avail. I also set this in the kernel (so as to eliminate any issues with setting it at boot time). However, it does produce a most peculiar error message when running postgres: -- cut here -- IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=665346048, 03600) failed: Cannot allocate memory This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce the request size (currently 665346048 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 80000) and/or its max_connections parameter (currently 48). -- cut here -- Now, by my arithmetic, 665346048 is certainly less than 1073741824 by quite a bit. I did not recompile postgres after the FreeBSD upgrade. Has something changed from 4.4-STABLE that would cause such a failure? The funny thing is that it worked just fine with FBSD 4.4 and the lower setting of shmmax (even with 100000 shared_buffers), so something is making postgres try to allocate a larger hunk of memory. I just don't know what. Any advice would be appreciated. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 11:41:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC32A37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.quantified.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB0643E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:41:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.quantified.com [63.212.171.5]) by mail.quantified.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6AIfblg010160; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Silver X-Sender: dsilver@danzig.sd.quantified.net To: Vivek Khera Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.quantified.com) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For what it's worth, when I upgraded to 4.6, I came across this same problem and I think asked the same question. Anyway, recompiling the kernel with the following worked (note the "#PG" are specific numbers that I put in for Postgres): # Added for Postgres operation options SHMMAXPGS=4096 #PG options SHMSEG=256 #PG options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options SEMMNI=256 #PG options SEMMNS=512 #PG options SEMMNU=256 #PG options SEMMAP=256 #PG YMMV ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Doug Silver Network Manager Urchin Software Corp. http://www.urchin.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > I have a dual cpu box with 2GB RAM dedicated to running Postgres. > Last week, I upgraded FreeBSD from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1. When > I went to restart postgres, it complained that it could not allocate > the shared memory segment. I'm running Postgres 7.2.1. > > For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000 > with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is > obviously impacting performance... > > The kern.ipc.* settings have not changed. In my /etc/sysctl.conf > file, I set > > kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456 > kern.ipc.shmall=65535 > kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 > > With FreeBSD 4.6, I even upped the shmmax to 1073741824 to no avail. > I also set this in the kernel (so as to eliminate any issues with > setting it at boot time). > > However, it does produce a most peculiar error message when running > postgres: > > -- cut here -- > IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=665346048, 03600) failed: Cannot allocate memory > > This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared > memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. > To reduce the request size (currently 665346048 bytes), reduce > PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 80000) and/or > its max_connections parameter (currently 48). > -- cut here -- > > > Now, by my arithmetic, 665346048 is certainly less than 1073741824 by > quite a bit. > > I did not recompile postgres after the FreeBSD upgrade. > > Has something changed from 4.4-STABLE that would cause such a failure? > > The funny thing is that it worked just fine with FBSD 4.4 and the > lower setting of shmmax (even with 100000 shared_buffers), so > something is making postgres try to allocate a larger hunk of memory. > I just don't know what. > > Any advice would be appreciated. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 11:56:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B875037B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACE143E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6AIuFmW021064; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:56:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710145342.057b4e90@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:00:07 -0400 To: bjones@polestar.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:50 AM 10/07/2002 -0700, Bill Jones wrote: >The obvious answer to me is "Most common platform someone installs >FreeBSD on for the first time." ... Then its good that Soren committed his changes. The misplaced splx() patch corrected the problem for some but not all which is in the .1 release. You mentioned that you are holding back updating because of this bug. Do you know if it affects you or not ? If it does, how about providing some details so the problem can be fixed. ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 12: 0: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FE837B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mirage.nlink.com.br (mirage.nlink.com.br [200.249.195.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65A0F43E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:59:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulo@nlink.com.br) Received: (qmail 36757 invoked by uid 501); 10 Jul 2002 18:59:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 18:59:55 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:59:55 -0300 (BRT) From: Paulo Fragoso To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko , Gavin Atkinson , Michiel Boland , Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-Reply-To: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: <20020710154619.M93085-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > make buildworld > make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name > REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) > fsck -p > mount -a -t ufs > cd /usr/src > make installworld > mergemaster -i (-a is a bit inadequate unless you go back and clean up > the mess it often leaves before going to multi-user > mode.) > exit (to multi-user mode) We have a doubt, if we have kern.securelevel=-1 and we are doing a security upgrade (for example: that server is using 4.6-RELEASE and its tag is tag=RELENG_4_6), are there any reason to switch to single-user mode? We are upgrading remotely some servers without switch to sigle-user, but in all cases are security upgrade only and all works fine. Thanks, Paulo. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- __O _-\<,_ Why drive when you can bike? (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 13: 0:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA94137B41F for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.ksc.th.com (mail3.ksc.th.com [203.155.0.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BCB43E6D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:58:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easytoberich01@yahoo.com) Received: from ksc.th.com ([203.156.15.36]) by mail3.ksc.th.com (8.12.1/8.12.0) with SMTP id g6AJjxIC022592 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:58:37 +0700 Message-Id: <200207101958.g6AJjxIC022592@mail3.ksc.th.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:00:42 To: stable@FreeBSD.org From: easytoberich01@yahoo.com (international e-business) Subject: ĘÓËĂŃşźŮéˇŐčľéͧĄŇĂâÍĄŇĘ㚥ŇĂŕťĹŐčšáťĹ§ŞŐÇÔľ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG !!!!! Part-Time Job!! ĘÓËĂŃşšŃĄŕĂŐš šŃĄČÖĄÉŇ áĹĐźŮéˇÓ§ŇšťĂĐ¨Ó ¤ŘłľéͧĄŇçҚẺšŐéşéҧäËÁ…?? -§Ňš parttime ˇÓ§ŇšˇŐčşéŇšä´é śéҤسăŞé Internet ŕťçš -ˇÓ§ŇšŕžŐ§ÇŃšĹĐ 2-3 ŞÁ. -ĂŇÂä´é 5,000 – 15,000 şŇˇ śéҤسŕťçš¤šËšÖ觡ŐčˇÓ§ŇšťĂШÓËĂ×ÍÂѧäÁčÁէҚˇÓ šŃĄČÖĄÉҡŐčĄÓĹѧČÖĄÉŇÍÂŮč źŮéÇčҧ§Ňš ËĂ×ÍźŮéˇŐčÂѧžÍÁŐŕÇĹŇÇčҧ¨ŇĄ§ŇšťĂĐ¨Ó ÁդسĘÁşŃľÔŕş×éͧľéš´Ń§šŐé 1. ÁŐˇŃČš¤ľÔˇŐč´Ő 2. žĂéÍÁˇŐč¨ĐŕĂŐšĂŮé ŕš×čͧ¨ŇĄŕťçšĂĐşşăËÁč¨Ö§ľéͧăËéÁŐĄŇĂÍşĂÁăËéľŇÁ¤ÇŇÁŕËÁŇĐĘÁ 3. ľéͧĄŇáŐč¨ĐˇÓ§ŇšÍÂčҧ¨ĂÔ§¨Ń§ ÍÂŇĄˇŐč¨ĐŕťĹŐ蚰ҚСҧĄŇĂŕ§Ôš˘Í§ľšŕͧ áĹĐÍÂŇĄÁŐĂŇÂä´é¨ŇĄĄŇáӧҚľĂ§šŐé¨ĂÔ§ć ˇŘĄÍÂčҧŕťçšäťä´é ăš http://www.geocities.com/getchances2000/ ÍÂčŇ !…………….. ŕťçšá¤čŕžŐ§¤šˇŐčšŃč§ĂÍâÍĄŇĘ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 13: 5:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2091F37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A448943E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6AJmjk66108; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:48:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:48:45 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: Vivek Khera Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > I have a dual cpu box with 2GB RAM dedicated to running Postgres. > Last week, I upgraded FreeBSD from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1. When > I went to restart postgres, it complained that it could not allocate > the shared memory segment. I'm running Postgres 7.2.1. > > For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000 > with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is > obviously impacting performance... > > The kern.ipc.* settings have not changed. In my /etc/sysctl.conf > file, I set > > kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456 > kern.ipc.shmall=65535 > kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 I do not know why your settings worked in 4.4-STABLE but 4.6-RELEASE behaves correctly. If you use standard 8K tuple then shared_buffers=100000 means 100,000*8192=819,200,000 bytes. You set kern.ipc.shmall=65535, so whole shared memory can be no more then 65535*4096=268,431,360 bytes. When you set shared_buffers=32000 then you ask for 262,144,000 bytes and it's worked. > With FreeBSD 4.6, I even upped the shmmax to 1073741824 to no avail. > I also set this in the kernel (so as to eliminate any issues with > setting it at boot time). > > However, it does produce a most peculiar error message when running > postgres: > > -- cut here -- > IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=665346048, 03600) failed: Cannot allocate memory > > This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared > memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. > To reduce the request size (currently 665346048 bytes), reduce > PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 80000) and/or > its max_connections parameter (currently 48). > -- cut here -- > > > Now, by my arithmetic, 665346048 is certainly less than 1073741824 by > quite a bit. Did you up shmmax or shmall ? You need also increase shmall to 262144. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 13: 7: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from citron.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A1FA43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:06:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eross_a@chasma.net) Received: (qmail 660 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2002 20:06:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eross) (10.0.0.199) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 20:06:51 -0000 Message-ID: <01a801c2284d$bdef61d0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> From: "Andrew Eross" To: Subject: Installworld Failed Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:09:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I was wondering if anyone could give me a hint as to why installworld died out on me .. I'm upgrading my 4.3-RELEASE system to 4.6-STABLE ... this is what I'm getting... vm/vmzone.h -> vm/vm_zone.ph vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph Thanks, Andrew Eross PS thanks to Sergey Osokin for the buildworld help earlier .. worked out just fine... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 13:16:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CBC37B406 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEDBA43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:16:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 6132 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2002 20:16:39 -0000 Received: from p50910374.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.3.116) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 20:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1656 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 19:40:52 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 19:40:52 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6AJepo01652 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020710214051.Q1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020619150606.J97503-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56:14AM -0700 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > [ ... upgrading from source ... ] > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) Should this read "sh usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh -p" for the case where your in $PATH mergemaster(8) is just old enough to not know the -p switch or where it lacks needed preparation steps for the buildworld run to come? > make buildworld > make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name > [ ... sequence as known from UPDATING ... ] virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14: 2:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from natto.numachi.com (natto.numachi.com [198.175.254.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA06943E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:02:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: (qmail 11626 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jul 2002 21:02:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:02:15 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: making a 4.6 release under 4.5? Message-ID: <20020710170215.T259@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have to apologize of this isn't the best-targetted mailing list for my questions. But first, the setup: I have a 4.5-RELEASE box. On this box, I'm trying to build a 4.6-STABLE release via 'make release'. I set up my environment thusly: CHROOTDIR=/usr/build/release CVSROOT=/home/ncvs RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 WORLD_FLAGS='-j10' KERNEL_FLAGS='-j10' NOPORTS=YES NOPORTREADMES=YES BUILDNAME=4.5-STABLE (Even as I type this, I see I've mis-set BUILDNAME, but I think that only affects the version name in the kernel.) I think it started to die in here: cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/a2pl; make _EXTRADEPEND echo a2p: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/s2pl ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/find2pl ===> gnu/usr.sbin 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/release. 2183.50 real 1855.67 user 894.73 sys A full typescript of my last effort is here; if anyone is patent: http://www.numachi.com/~reichert/misc/typescript.make_release.1026333708 Questions: - Is this the best place to discuss issues about making a release based on -STABLE? - Was my assumption correct, that RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 is the correct value? - Have I in fact done anything wrong, or amm I stumbling on an undocumented gotcha? If there's some documentation I seem to have glossed over, please point that out to me. Thanks for any advice you may have... -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14: 5:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C1B37B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B198643E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:05:47 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root, 's tatf s' is culprit Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:05:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Don Bowman wrote: > I know several other people have run into the problem where > the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. > Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, > which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on > the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the > linux_statfs in compat/linux. > > 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) > 48927 java RET statfs RESTART OK, after having found out that 'ktrace' isn't appropriate for linux executables (use truss or linux_kdump), I found that the culprit is actually: linux_sched_getscheduler(0xcb18) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' when root, this is permitted. When non-root, this is not-permitted. Suggestions? Is this a problem with the linux emulation? Or is there a permissions difference between linux & freebsd here? --don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:13: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C198337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDDF43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:13:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83B32178D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id A34113D07; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Newsgroups: ml.freebsd.stable References: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Trace: lorax.kciLink.com 1026334519 53221 216.194.193.106 (10 Jul 2002 20:55:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: daemon@kciLink.com X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020517 (@kci) X-Razor-id: 5e73b3e054ffddfdb65ea6a06b2c0088625956a7 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "CS" == Cy Schubert <- CITS Open Systems Group > writes: CS> AFAIAC, the ATA bug fix is one of the issues. The others are OpenSSH, CS> Apache, and the resolver bug. IMO, if we had just one issue to CS> resolve, a patch release would be unwarranted. The bug in sed that causes many ports to fail would be nice to get fixed, considering that people like to use ports on -RELEASE systems... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:23:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3438137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B243E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:23:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (firewall-user@dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68]) by mizar.origin-it.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo27jun02) with ESMTP id g6ALNKlg024879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:23:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/hmo28jun02) with ESMTP id g6ALNJS7087880; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:23:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo01jul02) id XAA04329; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:23:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200207102123.XAA04329@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd In-Reply-To: from Mike Jakubik at "Jul 10, 2002 11:16:11 am" To: mikej@trigger.net (Mike Jakubik) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:23:16 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: fred@condo.chico.ca.us, stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Jakubik: >In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should be >taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically >most software that is available and up to date via the ports. No, it shouldn't. I want a full-function system with a decent MTA, a decent secure login facility, a decent time synchronization facility, a decent nameserver, and so on. I *don't* want a base system that isn't good for anything but eating CPU. This is not a question of getting the base system "pure" and to adhere minimalization efforts with a slightly religious attitude, but to have a base system that people can do something useful with. (Yes, I have several servers that don't have a single port installed because the base system just provides all I need.) Note that I don't care too much about *which* basic server software is included in the base system, however I admit that I have chosen FreeBSD for the reason that it has all the well-known stuff of sendmail, ssh, xntp and bind on board. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:34:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4530D37B408 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADA143E58 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020710213426.QAGV29588.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6ALYPeU050506; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6ALYPBT050505; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200207102134.g6ALYPBT050505@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Vivek Khera Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: References: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com> Comments: In-reply-to Vivek Khera message dated "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:13:04 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1704490256P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:25 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-1704490256P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>> "CS" == Cy Schubert <- CITS Open Systems Group bc.ca>> writes: > > CS> AFAIAC, the ATA bug fix is one of the issues. The others are OpenSSH, > CS> Apache, and the resolver bug. IMO, if we had just one issue to > CS> resolve, a patch release would be unwarranted. > > The bug in sed that causes many ports to fail would be nice to get > fixed, considering that people like to use ports on -RELEASE > systems... If you mean the bug with sed -i, note that this occurred (and was fixed) after 4.6-RELEASE. (sed -i is not even a candidate for 4.6.1...that's a new feature, not a critical bugfix.) Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1704490256P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9LKhh2MoxcVugUsMRAhAeAJ4suhD4EistE7sp2nYmnNvt04fa2QCfUORZ G2Ir9Fo29zqQpLJYya04YUY= =rfoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1704490256P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:40:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B9937B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C121B43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:40:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8473EA94 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:40:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2CA9D2.70704@eboa.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:40:34 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Joke, right? [was Re: 4.6 kernel build failure] References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020709201432.GA65724@peitho.fxp.org> <3D2B5D4A.9090808@eboa.com> <20020709221853.GA48316@i-sphere.com> <3D2BEF90.1040802@eboa.com> <20020710085341.GA56278@i-sphere.com> <3D2BFB2C.5080908@eboa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Roelof Osinga wrote: > faSty wrote: > > ... > But I did notice one thing and that is that the good compiles were done just > after the 2002.07.05 cvsup. When I tried the bridge option I did another > cvsup on the 9th. Since then the compiles failed. Both with and without that > option. > ... Hi All, First and foremost thanks to all who lend a helping hand. Allways very much appreciated. And of course the FreeBSD team! I guess I found out what lay at the heart of my trouble. After returning to the office from my leisurely drive, which btw had the exact same problem, and having enjoyed a good meal and stuff, I toyed around a bit. Since it was very weird that everybody but me reported successes... First I went to to the /usr/src/sys/modules/linux dir to test a make. That worked. OK, one down, one to go. Sure I could now probably build the d'd thing, but... I had this webpage on screen showing both procedures to build a kernel. The traditional way which I use and the "new" way, which I've only used once if at that. So... picked a box other than the one above and made buildkernel the new-fangled way. Guess what? Yep: donar:/usr/src# make buildkernel KERNCONF=NISSER ... -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for NISSER completed on Wed Jul 10 23:09:12 CEST 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------- So there you have it. A bug, send-pr performed. Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:48: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F34F37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A280843E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [198.31.224.225] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17SPJA-0001x7-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:47:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:49:38 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: Installworld Failed Message-Id: <20020710164938.31659ce3.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <01a801c2284d$bdef61d0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> References: <01a801c2284d$bdef61d0$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:09:48 -0400 "Andrew Eross" wrote: > Hi there, > > I was wondering if anyone could give me a hint as to why installworld died > out on me .. I'm upgrading my 4.3-RELEASE system to 4.6-STABLE ... this is > what I'm getting... > > vm/vmzone.h -> vm/vm_zone.ph > vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph > Andrew, Have you installed the openssl port with the overwrite base option, then deinstalled it before the installworld ? I ran into a similar problem and had to reinstall the openssl and openssh-portable (both with overwrite base) ports before the installworld would complete. IIRC the openssh-portable deinstall did not stop the installworld till the man pages index rebuild (slogin.gz?) This was all done on a test-bed machine (P-60), and was quite a time consuming process at that MHz ;-) Am interested in any feed back on this, and can provide more details if necessary. Regards, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 14:56:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5002437B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from citron.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B94DA43E5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eross@prospeed.net) Received: (qmail 2165 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2002 21:56:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eross) (10.0.0.199) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 21:56:42 -0000 Message-ID: <023701c2285d$16c62870$c700000a@corp.chasmainc.com> From: "Andrew Eross" To: Subject: Re: Installworld Failed Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:59:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Stephen, As it turns out the problem was indeed related to openssl .. but specifically the problem was a hanging symlink located in /usr/include for a file that normally would be in /usr/include/openssl .. I had previously removed that installation of openssl and so the symlink was invalid but still there .. I heard that h2ph runs into trouble if you have any hanging symlinks and so I just removed the link and all was well Thanks for the advice though, Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Hilton" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:49 PM Subject: Re: Installworld Failed > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:09:48 -0400 > "Andrew Eross" wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I was wondering if anyone could give me a hint as to why installworld died > > out on me .. I'm upgrading my 4.3-RELEASE system to 4.6-STABLE ... this is > > what I'm getting... > > > > vm/vmzone.h -> vm/vm_zone.ph > > vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph > > > > Andrew, > > Have you installed the openssl port with the overwrite base option, > then deinstalled it before the installworld ? > > I ran into a similar problem and had to reinstall the openssl > and openssh-portable (both with overwrite base) ports before > the installworld would complete. IIRC the openssh-portable > deinstall did not stop the installworld till the man pages > index rebuild (slogin.gz?) > > This was all done on a test-bed machine (P-60), and was quite > a time consuming process at that MHz ;-) > > Am interested in any feed back on this, and can provide more > details if necessary. > > Regards, > > Stephen Hilton > nospam@hiltonbsd.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15: 0:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1537B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.atl.registeredsite.com (mail3.atl.registeredsite.com [64.224.219.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD76A43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:00:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from webmaster@forsetti.com) Received: from vega.dns-host.com (vega.dns-host.com [209.235.102.38]) by mail3.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6AM0dmZ029969; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:00:39 -0400 Received: from forsetti.com (208.10.252.64.snet.net [64.252.10.208]) by vega.dns-host.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6AM0aV02421; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:00:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D2CAE81.6010706@forsetti.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:00:33 -0400 From: Matt Smith Reply-To: webmaster@forsetti.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helge Oldach Cc: Mike Jakubik , fred@condo.chico.ca.us, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd References: <200207102123.XAA04329@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Perhaps there are better ways, but here is a "simple" solution to the issue of "apps in the base system" vs. "apps from ports": Install these apps (ssh, sendmail, etc) in the base system as packages. In other words, a basic install would still install these components, but they would be installed in /usr/local/, and would be registered with the pkg db, so they can easily be removed, maintained, upgraded, etc. Also, this may allow for 2 new installation options: "Functional Base" and "Minimal Base", with the only difference being the inclusion of a default set of packages in the "Functional Base". Just my $0.02, -Matt Helge Oldach wrote: > Mike Jakubik: > >>In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should be >>taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically >>most software that is available and up to date via the ports. > > > No, it shouldn't. I want a full-function system with a decent MTA, a > decent secure login facility, a decent time synchronization facility, a > decent nameserver, and so on. I *don't* want a base system that isn't > good for anything but eating CPU. > > This is not a question of getting the base system "pure" and to adhere > minimalization efforts with a slightly religious attitude, but to have > a base system that people can do something useful with. (Yes, I have > several servers that don't have a single port installed because the base > system just provides all I need.) > > Note that I don't care too much about *which* basic server software is > included in the base system, however I admit that I have chosen FreeBSD > for the reason that it has all the well-known stuff of sendmail, ssh, > xntp and bind on board. > > Helge > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:17:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5E937B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A3F43E58 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:16:13 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97EB5D03; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200." <20020710214051.Q1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:40 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020710221740.E97EB5D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 > From: Gerhard Sittig > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > [ ... upgrading from source ... ] > > > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > > Should this read "sh usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh -p" for > the case where your in $PATH mergemaster(8) is just old enough to > not know the -p switch or where it lacks needed preparation steps > for the buildworld run to come? Actually, I believe that it should. Thanks for pointing this out. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:17:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE9637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mserver2.gmu.edu (mail02.gmu.edu [129.174.0.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C99043E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:17:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sbernard@gmu.edu) Received: from CERBERUS ([129.174.39.210]) by mserver2.gmu.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GZ20LF00.POI for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:17:39 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Bernard" To: Subject: RE: sshd vs ports sshd Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:17:30 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <3D2CAE81.6010706@forsetti.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And presumably you could edit a simple config file to customize a local distribution so that it conforms to what you might feel represents a "functional" or "minimal" base for your environment. Sounds reasonable. Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Matt Smith Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:01 PM To: Helge Oldach Cc: Mike Jakubik; fred@condo.chico.ca.us; stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Perhaps there are better ways, but here is a "simple" solution to the issue of "apps in the base system" vs. "apps from ports": Install these apps (ssh, sendmail, etc) in the base system as packages. In other words, a basic install would still install these components, but they would be installed in /usr/local/, and would be registered with the pkg db, so they can easily be removed, maintained, upgraded, etc. Also, this may allow for 2 new installation options: "Functional Base" and "Minimal Base", with the only difference being the inclusion of a default set of packages in the "Functional Base". Just my $0.02, -Matt Helge Oldach wrote: > Mike Jakubik: > >>In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should be >>taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically >>most software that is available and up to date via the ports. > > > No, it shouldn't. I want a full-function system with a decent MTA, a > decent secure login facility, a decent time synchronization facility, a > decent nameserver, and so on. I *don't* want a base system that isn't > good for anything but eating CPU. > > This is not a question of getting the base system "pure" and to adhere > minimalization efforts with a slightly religious attitude, but to have > a base system that people can do something useful with. (Yes, I have > several servers that don't have a single port installed because the base > system just provides all I need.) > > Note that I don't care too much about *which* basic server software is > included in the base system, however I admit that I have chosen FreeBSD > for the reason that it has all the well-known stuff of sendmail, ssh, > xntp and bind on board. > > Helge > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:28:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC19937B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail9.atl.registeredsite.com (mail9.atl.registeredsite.com [64.224.219.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2658843E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:28:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from webmaster@forsetti.com) Received: from cygnus.dns-host.com (cygnus.dns-host.com [209.235.102.27]) by mail9.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6AMSC3k023904; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:28:12 -0400 Received: from forsetti.com (208.10.252.64.snet.net [64.252.10.208]) by cygnus.dns-host.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6AMSAV12965; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:28:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D2CB4F8.5010000@forsetti.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:28:08 -0400 From: Matt Smith Reply-To: webmaster@forsetti.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sbernard@gmu.edu Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Agreed -- however, I think "minimal" should be standardized as the smallest possible system that allows you to install packages. And Perhaps functional was the wrong term -- maybe "Standard" would be better. This would be the "minimal" system plus those packages that comprise what we currently call "Base". To create your own "functional" system, it should also be possible to simply select the "minimal" system and choose the packages that you desire, either via the install "gui" or via a config file. I think this would cover all the bases. -Matt Steve Bernard wrote: > And presumably you could edit a simple config file to customize a local > distribution so that it conforms to what you might feel represents a > "functional" or "minimal" base for your environment. Sounds reasonable. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Matt Smith > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:01 PM > To: Helge Oldach > Cc: Mike Jakubik; fred@condo.chico.ca.us; stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd > > > Perhaps there are better ways, but here is a "simple" solution to the > issue of "apps in the base system" vs. "apps from ports": > > Install these apps (ssh, sendmail, etc) in the base system as packages. > In other words, a basic install would still install these components, > but they would be installed in /usr/local/, and would be registered with > the pkg db, so they can easily be removed, maintained, upgraded, etc. > > Also, this may allow for 2 new installation options: "Functional Base" > and "Minimal Base", with the only difference being the inclusion of a > default set of packages in the "Functional Base". > > Just my $0.02, > -Matt > > Helge Oldach wrote: > >>Mike Jakubik: >> >> >>>In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should >> > be > >>>taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically >>>most software that is available and up to date via the ports. >> >> >>No, it shouldn't. I want a full-function system with a decent MTA, a >>decent secure login facility, a decent time synchronization facility, a >>decent nameserver, and so on. I *don't* want a base system that isn't >>good for anything but eating CPU. >> >>This is not a question of getting the base system "pure" and to adhere >>minimalization efforts with a slightly religious attitude, but to have >>a base system that people can do something useful with. (Yes, I have >>several servers that don't have a single port installed because the base >>system just provides all I need.) >> >>Note that I don't care too much about *which* basic server software is >>included in the base system, however I admit that I have chosen FreeBSD >>for the reason that it has all the well-known stuff of sendmail, ssh, >>xntp and bind on board. >> >>Helge >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >> > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:29:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5414137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222DA43E4A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:29:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zeerob@rogers.com) Received: from rogers.com ([24.42.106.88]) by fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with ESMTP id <20020710222919.JLCR4853.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@rogers.com> for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:29:19 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2CB3C4.9080503@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:23:00 -0400 From: zeerob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.42.106.88] using ID at Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:29:19 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe zeerob@rogers.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:45: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B237B401; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrburns.nildram.co.uk (mrburns.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF30A43E54; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:45:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from muttley@gotadsl.co.uk) Received: from VicNBob (muttley.gotadsl.co.uk [213.208.123.26]) by mrburns.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2A91E1B4A; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:44:54 +0100 (BST) From: Matthew Whelan To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" , Doug Barton Cc: Helge Oldach , Jay Sachs , stanb@awod.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, des@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:44:59 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <20020709231825.L5990-100000@master.gorean.org> Message-Id: <085ZD83DCOI01WSJ4ZGFURN87PJ.3d2cb8eb@VicNBob> Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: Opera 6.0 build 1010 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 10/07/2002 07:23:43, Doug Barton wrote: >the distinction that you are failing to make is that there are many >different kinds of "changes" to the system. Changes that improve a driver, >changes that update systems like sendmail, even when they require some >small config changes, are candidates for -stable. Changes like this that >have serious potential for causing major problems, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN >DEMONSTRATED; are not. Most people seem to feel that if you were adding ssh a-fresh now, you'd add it with 2,1 not 1,2. UPDATING clearly flags the change. You only get bitten if you remote upgrade without first understanding the significance of the changes from your current version of the O/S. Why do we even have an UPDATING if you're going to preclude making changes that bite people who are unaware of the details it lays out? And yes I understand people installing releases might not read UPDATING, but they really should be reading the release notes, which have also been updated. The number of people asking for help on this issue on -stable has been relatively low, and some of them were in the window between the initial commit and the current version of the UPDATING text so were bitten by a lack of documentation that has since been rectified. How much are you going to hold back developement on the chance that people doing stupid things get hurt? Are you going to remove fdisk because it has the potential to trash a hard disc? Matthew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 15:49:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A70737B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cairu.terra.com.br (cairu.terra.com.br [200.176.3.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F151943E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vlgfreaza@terra.com.br) Received: from smtp2-bra.terra.com.br (smtp2-bra.terra.com.br [200.176.3.33]) by cairu.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431D0474D7 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:49:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pilaia (unknown [200.151.207.116]) (authenticated user vlgfreaza) by smtp2-bra.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA31F885C8 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:49:42 -0300 (EST) Message-ID: <009601c227ff$614bda60$74cf97c8@pilaia> From: "terra" To: Subject: FreeBSD Release Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:48:49 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It would like you make some commentaries with regard to date of launching of the versions of the FreeBSD. Because to define a date for the launching of a new version? It will be that when a date is marked to be made the launching of the new version the things does not finish leaving with haste, is not created expectation on it and thus a certain collection? Certain you that nobody earns to develop the code of the FreeBSD, and yes for the simple ones and good will. Back in the Home Page (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.6R/schedule.html) it is describing the steps of the launching of the 4.6-release version. It will be that with only 2 RELEASE CANDIDATES (with interval of only 1 day of one cadidate for the other) it is the sufficient to determine itself if the version already is ready to be launched? For bigger number of people who make done cvspup RELENG_4 daily and either make world, and for better developers that we have in we team it of the FreeBSD, I find that in 1 month and some days it is not time enough to become test and if to determine the launching of a new version already is ready. In my opniăo the 4.6-release version was prematurely launched, because you find "bug" in the hour to even give boot with cd-01 to be able to make the installation and relatively serious other bug related to IDE DEVICE ATA If she was made more tests in this version before the launching, these two probelemas would not have been before detected and thus to have been corrected before being launched? In these, were one of the main reasons to be announced the launching of version 4.6.1, because with relation to the OpenSSH the current version (2.9.9) was not vulnerable. It does not need to have haste to liberate a new version, and yes after all the tests possible and imaginable to have been done. This is my commentary. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 16:15:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B537B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8C543E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from Yggdrasil (adsl-68-20-35-15.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.35.15]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6ANFb35017689; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:15:37 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David Syphers Reply-To: dsyphers@uchicago.edu To: "terra" , Subject: Re: FreeBSD Release Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:15:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <009601c227ff$614bda60$74cf97c8@pilaia> In-Reply-To: <009601c227ff$614bda60$74cf97c8@pilaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207101815.37593.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 10 July 2002 05:48 am, terra wrote: > Back in the Home Page > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.6R/schedule.html) it is describing the > steps of the launching of the 4.6-release version. It will be that with only > 2 RELEASE CANDIDATES (with interval of only 1 day of one cadidate for the > other) it is the sufficient to determine itself if the version already is > ready to be launched? Please read the page you cite more carefully. I see the first release candidate coming out on 15 May 2002 and RC-4 coming out on 6 June 2002. If you are going to rant, please rant about reality. > I find that in 1 month and some days it > is not time enough to become test and if to determine the launching of a new > version already is ready. Do you propose that the -stable branch should be frozen most of the time? You can't put out three or four releases a year and test each one for three months. > In my opniăo the 4.6-release version was > prematurely launched, because you find "bug" in the hour to even give boot > with cd-01 to be able to make the installation and relatively serious other > bug related to IDE DEVICE ATA If she was made more tests in this version > before the launching, these two probelemas would not have been before > detected and thus to have been corrected before being launched? The ATA code in question had been in -stable since March. Bugs were known. It was decided to release anyway because Sřren could not reproduce some of the problems in his lab, and thus it seemed likely to take a long time to fix. The problem is there are people waiting for each release. 4.6-R _was_ delayed for a few weeks over the original date. It can't be delayed indefinitely because people want to sell the CDs. I agree it's frustrating when the "latest release" has several bugs, but that isn't always controllable. I think the release team does a pretty good job in balancing different interests. -David -- Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand... Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 16:22:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E48B43E42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:22:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from Yggdrasil (adsl-68-20-35-15.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.35.15]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6ANMQ35021363; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:22:26 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David Syphers Reply-To: dsyphers@uchicago.edu To: webmaster@forsetti.com, Helge Oldach Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:22:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: Mike Jakubik , fred@condo.chico.ca.us, stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200207102123.XAA04329@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> <3D2CAE81.6010706@forsetti.com> In-Reply-To: <3D2CAE81.6010706@forsetti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207101822.26550.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 10 July 2002 05:00 pm, Matt Smith wrote: > Perhaps there are better ways, but here is a "simple" solution to the > issue of "apps in the base system" vs. "apps from ports": > > Install these apps (ssh, sendmail, etc) in the base system as packages. > In other words, a basic install would still install these components, > but they would be installed in /usr/local/, and would be registered with > the pkg db, so they can easily be removed, maintained, upgraded, etc. > > Also, this may allow for 2 new installation options: "Functional Base" > and "Minimal Base", with the only difference being the inclusion of a > default set of packages in the "Functional Base". I think the difficulty with this is that some of the programs are tied into the base system. If upgrading Sendmail or gcc really was as easy as installing the port, I think Gregory Shapiro and David O'Brien would have a lot more free time :) So it's a nice concept, but not possible to implement right now (or it would have been done already). But this is my own rather limited understanding of the situation... -David -- Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand... Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 16:31:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EF937B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mrburns.nildram.co.uk (mrburns.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C670B43E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:31:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from muttley@gotadsl.co.uk) Received: from VicNBob (muttley.gotadsl.co.uk [213.208.123.26]) by mrburns.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id B12111E1C99; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:31:11 +0100 (BST) From: Matthew Whelan To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Brian Reichert Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:31:12 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <20020710170215.T259@numachi.com> Message-Id: Subject: Re: making a 4.6 release under 4.5? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Opera 6.0 build 1010 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 10/07/2002 22:02:15, Brian Reichert wrote: >I have to apologize of this isn't the best-targetted mailing list >for my questions. > >But first, the setup: > >I have a 4.5-RELEASE box. On this box, I'm trying to build a >4.6-STABLE release via 'make release'. > >I set up my environment thusly: > > CHROOTDIR=/usr/build/release > CVSROOT=/home/ncvs > RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 > WORLD_FLAGS='-j10' > KERNEL_FLAGS='-j10' > NOPORTS=YES > NOPORTREADMES=YES > BUILDNAME=4.5-STABLE > >(Even as I type this, I see I've mis-set BUILDNAME, but I think >that only affects the version name in the kernel.) > >I think it started to die in here: > > cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/a2pl; make _EXTRADEPEND > echo a2p: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/s2pl > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/x2p/find2pl > ===> gnu/usr.sbin > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 I think you've missed the real culprit, which appears to be: perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -c @/libkern/iconv_converter_if.m Can't open perl script "@/kern/makeobjops.pl": No such file or directory *** Error code 2 Perhaps someone else knows what to do about that as I don't I'm afraid. It's pretty hard to garner any further context with such massively parallel make though. Have you tried either lowering your -j value or using the -P make option? > > Stop in /usr/src/release. > 2183.50 real 1855.67 user 894.73 sys > >A full typescript of my last effort is here; if anyone is patent: > > http://www.numachi.com/~reichert/misc/typescript.make_release.1026333708 > >Questions: > >- Is this the best place to discuss issues about making a release > based on -STABLE? Can't think of a better one... >- Was my assumption correct, that RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 is the correct > value? That's the correct value if you wish to build a snapshot of -STABLE. If you want the latest snapshot of the 4.6 critical-fix-only branch, you want RELENG_4_6 >- Have I in fact done anything wrong, or amm I stumbling on an > undocumented gotcha? > >If there's some documentation I seem to have glossed over, please >point that out to me. > >Thanks for any advice you may have... > >-- >Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert >37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 >Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 16:39:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74D437B405 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tsvnet.ozdaq.com.au (tsvnet.ozdaq.com.au [203.220.27.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C12143E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from allan@ozdaq.com.au) Received: from TSV (tsv.ozdaq.com.au [203.220.27.227]) by tsvnet.ozdaq.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g6ANbxg4043844 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:59 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from allan@ozdaq.com.au) From: "Allan McDonald" To: Subject: RE: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:24:50 +1000 Message-ID: <0F08B228C722D311B5FC00A0C9FB2C7322B4D9@casserver.ozdaq.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Allan McDonald" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Hi, since I have upgraded a box from 4.3 to 4.6 and since then can't ssh into it. ssh out from it is fine. sshd is running. It appears that PAM is now installed, but that could my misinterpretation I have tried to see how to uninstall pam, but couldn't find it easily. Errors on console when trying to log into the box are as follows. date time mail login no modules loaded for 'login' service date time mail login pam_open_session: Permission denied date time mail sshd[143]: no modules loaded for sshd service date time mail sshd[143]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]: Permission denied where mail happens to be name of computer. I have tried booting with the old kernel, restoring from backup the etc directory heirachy. apologies if this should be directed to another mailling list. Regards, Allan McDonald IT Manager Ozdaq Securities Pty Ltd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 16:41:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF737B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (mail5.atl.registeredsite.com [64.224.219.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CBA43E58 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:41:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from webmaster@forsetti.com) Received: from vega.dns-host.com (vega.dns-host.com [209.235.102.38]) by mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6ANfIgr025258 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:41:18 -0400 Received: from forsetti.com (208.10.252.64.snet.net [64.252.10.208]) by vega.dns-host.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6ANfHV20358 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D2CC61B.5020506@forsetti.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:41:15 -0400 From: Matt Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd References: <200207102123.XAA04329@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> <3D2CAE81.6010706@forsetti.com> <200207101822.26550.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Upgrading gcc or Sendmail WOULD be as easy as upgrading the port/package, IFF it were originally installed as a port/package. I understand that they are included in the base system today, but as far as being "tied into", it is "easy" (sort of, perhaps "possible" is better) to add the appropriate entries to make.conf (such as NO_BIND=true, NO_OPENSSH=true), and delete the coinciding binaries by hand. This still leaves a fully functional system, and I can add the approprate BIND and OpenSSH via ports/packages. Then, I can manage these apps simply by using my standard ports/packages management utilities. However, it would be far easier (than using make.conf and deleting binaries by hand) if the default BIND and OpenSSH were installed as ports/packages, such that they could be removed / maintained / upgraded using the port/package management utilities. -Matt David Syphers wrote: > On Wednesday 10 July 2002 05:00 pm, Matt Smith wrote: > >>Perhaps there are better ways, but here is a "simple" solution to the >>issue of "apps in the base system" vs. "apps from ports": >> >>Install these apps (ssh, sendmail, etc) in the base system as packages. >> In other words, a basic install would still install these components, >>but they would be installed in /usr/local/, and would be registered with >>the pkg db, so they can easily be removed, maintained, upgraded, etc. >> >>Also, this may allow for 2 new installation options: "Functional Base" >>and "Minimal Base", with the only difference being the inclusion of a >>default set of packages in the "Functional Base". > > > I think the difficulty with this is that some of the programs are tied into > the base system. If upgrading Sendmail or gcc really was as easy as > installing the port, I think Gregory Shapiro and David O'Brien would have a > lot more free time :) > > So it's a nice concept, but not possible to implement right now (or it would > have been done already). But this is my own rather limited understanding of > the situation... > > -David > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 17: 3:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A74B37B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wald.ucdavis.edu (wald.ucdavis.edu [169.237.237.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37B143E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from larry@wald.ucdavis.edu) Received: from localhost (larry@localhost) by wald.ucdavis.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA22734 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Larry Tai Reply-To: Larry Tai To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: How to find out the default FD_SETSIZE in Freebsd-4.5 stable? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Is there any way to find out what the default FD_SETSIZE under Freebsd-4.5-stable is? And is this a kernel parameter that can be increased without penalty of performance degradation elsewhere? My Apache-2.0.39_3 hangs periodically with these messages in the error log: ---- "Wed Jul 10 00:54:46 2002] [warn] (61)Connection refused: connect to listener" ... ... [Wed Jul 10 11:12:57 2002] [warn] new file descriptor 1222 is too large; you probably need to rebuild Apache with a larger FD_SETSIZE (currently 1024) ---- After some google searches, I came across a few references of FD_SETSIZE being too small in some older versions of FBSD and Apache. In this case, I know for sure that Apache seems to want more than what it was built with. It seems that I need to rebuild Apache-2.0.39_3 from port with extra CFLAGS defined, specifically "-DFD_SETSZIE=8192". I tried putting it in the different configure files and make files but the definitions seemed to always get lost or ignored everytime I do a make. Could it be that the "make" process generates a new configure file every time? I'm not sure which file(s) I should change and the exact syntax of the line. Most of the feedbacks from google mentioned that the lines with either CFLAGS and EXTRA_CFLAGS in the configure file should be changed as in: CFLAGS=-DFD_SETSIZE=8192 The problem is that there aren't any lines that conveniently look like "CFLAGS=" defines that I can change in the configure file from the port. I've also tried putting the string as an ENV variable and that didn't help either. A log of the make process did not show the extra CFLAGS was used at all. I have posted the question to the Apache httpd list but I haven't received any responses yet. Any help you can give me to recompile Apache with the new FD_SETSIZE value would be greatly appreciated. I'm running FreeBSD 4.5-stable and I'm only supporting five virtual hosts. Is a default FD_SETSIZE of 1024 too low? In general, if one needs to customize the compilation process of a particular port, what is the best way to insert extra compiler/loader flags without losing them in the "make" process? Thanks in advance. --------- US-Mail: Larry Tai Department of Statistics 368 Kerr Hall University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 E-Mail: larry@wald.ucdavis.edu or lptai@ucdavis.edu Tel: (530)-752-6085 FAX: (530)-752-7099 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 17:14:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DB137B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from natto.numachi.com (natto.numachi.com [198.175.254.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 632B643E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:14:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: (qmail 13102 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 00:14:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:14:30 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: Matthew Whelan Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Brian Reichert Subject: Re: making a 4.6 release under 4.5? Message-ID: <20020710201430.X259@numachi.com> References: <20020710170215.T259@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from muttley@gotadsl.co.uk on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:31:12AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:31:12AM +0100, Matthew Whelan wrote: > I think you've missed the real culprit, which appears to be: > > perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -c @/libkern/iconv_converter_if.m > Can't open perl script "@/kern/makeobjops.pl": No such file or directory > *** Error code 2 > > Perhaps someone else knows what to do about that as I don't I'm afraid. > > It's pretty hard to garner any further context with such massively parallel > make though. Have you tried either lowering your -j value or using the -P > make option? Well, I'll try it without -j at all, just a straight make, just to verify I can plow forward. I was getting cocky, messing with building 4.5-R under 4.5-R... But, thanks for your suggestions; lemme see what else I can scare up... > >- Was my assumption correct, that RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 is the correct > > value? > > That's the correct value if you wish to build a snapshot of -STABLE. If you > want the latest snapshot of the 4.6 critical-fix-only branch, you want > RELENG_4_6 Interesting. Other than helplessly trolling the mail archives, is there a 'these are relevent tags' document somewhere I could use for research? -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 17:21:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9A337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AEE43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:21:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.158]) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6B0LkIW078961 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6B0LkPm078958; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:46 -0400 (EDT) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG References: <20020710221740.E97EB5D03@ptavv.es.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Jul 2002 20:21:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20020710221740.E97EB5D03@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: <44it3n8679.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Kevin Oberman" writes: > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 > > From: Gerhard Sittig > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > > [ ... upgrading from source ... ] > > > > > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > > > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > > > > Should this read "sh usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh -p" for > > the case where your in $PATH mergemaster(8) is just old enough to > > not know the -p switch or where it lacks needed preparation steps > > for the buildworld run to come? > > Actually, I believe that it should. Thanks for pointing this out. > > > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 17:24:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799C437B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE80C43E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:24:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.158]) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6B0OLIW078972 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:24:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6B0OKgY078969; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:24:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making a 4.6 release under 4.5? References: <20020710170215.T259@numachi.com> <20020710201430.X259@numachi.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Jul 2002 20:24:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20020710201430.X259@numachi.com> Message-ID: <44eleb862z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > That's the correct value if you wish to build a snapshot of -STABLE. If you > > want the latest snapshot of the 4.6 critical-fix-only branch, you want > > RELENG_4_6 > > Interesting. Other than helplessly trolling the mail archives, is > there a 'these are relevent tags' document somewhere I could use > for research? Yes. It's an appendix to the FreeBSD handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 18:21:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACE337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (zola.noos.net [212.198.2.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F5643E58 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 40832957 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2002 01:21:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.76 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jul 2002 01:21:27 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (e2epfxapzitoueop@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6B1KCTf083194; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:21:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6B0qEVW082831; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:52:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:52:14 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Marc Olzheim Cc: stable@freebsd.org, marcolz@stack.nl Subject: Re: /bin/sh, $MAIL and login.conf Message-ID: <20020711005214.GD82744@gits.dyndns.org> References: <20020705132210.A20062@ilse.nl> <20020708203130.GA6805@gits.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708203130.GA6805@gits.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG message resent due to mta misconfigation. On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:31:30PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > I was wondering why /etc/login.conf makes the login shell for root check > > for mail in /var/mail/root. Most systems I use have /var/mail > > nfs-mounted from a central mailserver. > > an alternative would be to access /var/mail nfs-mounted as > /var/spool/mail and to make some mods in /etc/login.conf such as : > > default:\ > ... > :setenv=MAIL=/var/spool/mail/$,BLOCKSIZE=K,FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES:\ > ... > > root:\ > ... > :setenv=MAIL=/var/mail/$,BLOCKSIZE=K,FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES:\ > ... > > > When there are networking problems and thus all operations on /var/mail > > keep 'hanging', I would like to be able to login as root on console and > > fix it. With the default login.conf, this is not possible though, since > > one of the first things /bin/sh does, is check $MAIL for new mail. > > > > So I have three questions: > > > > 2) Is there (going to be) an 'unsetenv' possibility in > > login.conf, so that I can still use 'default' for all classes > > and just unsetenv MAIL for sysadmins and root ? > > yes ;) > > root:\ > :ignorenologin:\ > :setenv=BLOCKSIZE=K,FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES:\ > :tc=default: Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 19: 2:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DCE37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com (angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com [216.223.196.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAFC43E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:02:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@fasttrackmonkey.com) Received: (qmail 11698 invoked by uid 85); 11 Jul 2002 02:02:09 -0000 Received: from spork@fasttrackmonkey.com by angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com by uid 1001 with qmail-scanner-1.10 (sophie: 2.9/3.56. . Clear:0. Processed in 0.066911 secs); 11 Jul 2002 02:02:09 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: spork@fasttrackmonkey.com via angryfist.fasttrackmonkey.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.10 (Clear:0. Processed in 0.066911 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com) (64.47.30.2) by 0 with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 02:02:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:02:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Cc: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Tancsa wrote: > ... Then its good that Soren committed his changes. The misplaced > splx() patch corrected the problem for some but not all which is in the > .1 release. > You mentioned that you are holding back updating because of this bug. Do > you know if it affects you or not ? If it does, how about providing some > details so the problem can be fixed. I'm not the original poster, but I've done the following so far: -open a PR - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=40003 -post a number of messages to this list and -hackers - -http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-stable&m=102608981406043&w=2 -http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-hackers&m=102616421405034&w=2 -http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-stable&m=102531336610390&w=2 This for me is a case of "worked fine in 4.4, panics on boot w/4.6 and yesterday's -stable". In other words, hardware that used to work doesn't now. As a user, I'm not sure what else to do to help the problem along. I've got a box exhibiting the panic on fallback to PIO, and it does this reliably on every boot. I've sent in all the information I have and politely asked if any additional info is needed. So there you go, let me know if there's any more info needed. Is Soren back yet? Does anyone else have their hands in this driver or is it a one-man project? Charles > ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 19:37:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7196E37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bp6.adlistings.com (dealhunting.com [65.194.234.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E475343E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from boone@bp6.adlistings.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by bp6.adlistings.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6B2bdk65338 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:37:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boone) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:37:39 -0500 (CDT) From: User Boone Message-Id: <200207110237.g6B2bdk65338@bp6.adlistings.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've noticed a problem on two totally different machines with RAID1 ATA volumes after the patch in -STABLE. What I'm seeing is errors from the second drive in the set, consisting of ad6 timeouts on READ and WRITE, followed by a controller reset. The errors are very infrequent and occasional, and have sometimes been followed by a kernel panic, though 99% of the time they just log the error and go on. I swapped out the second drive, and still had the problem. I switched the drives around, and the problem stayed with the second controller. This is on two systems. One is an SMP system with a Promise Fasttrak TX2 100 controller (its a dual P-III 1GHz box), the other is a different motherboard, P3-700, and I'm using a CMD 646 chipset and was just letting the ATA driver make a mirror (i.e. the motherboard BIOS has no idea the drives are mirrored). I'm not using tagged queueing, and the only significant commonality with the boxes is the presence of a RAID1 array. Has anyone else seen this happening? On a side note, I broke the mirrors on both boxes and made the drives standalone. I then mounted the second drive on both and moved my relatively active mysql database to the second controller (the second system is set up as a MySQL replica of the first). I've not seen one error since I got rid of the RAID1 arrays. The drives on one system are IBM DTLA 15GB drives, and the other system is running Maxtor 60GB D740X U133 drives with the fluid bearings. Hope these observations are of some assistance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 19:39:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E17537B405 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail7.nc.rr.com (mail7.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C0643E64 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:39:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from i8k.babbleon.org ([66.57.86.84]) by mail7.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:39:32 -0400 Received: by i8k.babbleon.org (Postfix, from userid 111) id 1F72EBA05; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:39:25 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Brian T.Schellenberger To: bjones@polestar.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:39:24 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020711023925.1F72EBA05@i8k.babbleon.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 10 July 2002 01:50 pm, Bill Jones wrote: | mike@sentex.net wrote: | >>If we're so willing | >>to make FreeBSD work on laptops, then we should at least give a | | concerned | | >>nod to the most common disk system in average installation. | > | >Most common what ? Legacy system ? Most common out there today | | ? Most | | >common platform someone installs FreeBSD on for the first time | | ? The ata | | >drivers are most certainly broken for some people. Prior to big | | changes | | >Soren made, the ata drivers were most certainly broken for some | >people. Remember when the big round of commits went in last time | | (wd to | | >ad), it broke support for certain old CMD based controllers. | | The obvious answer to me is "Most common platform someone installs | FreeBSD on for the first time." But the new drivers probably support more first-time installs than the old one does. I know that it corrected multiple problems for me. I *am* running on a laptop, though. OTOH, that's sure getting to be more common rather than less over time. The *problem* is that it also broke some old hardware that previously worked. If you agree that the most important is what will work for most *new* installs, I believe that you are probably arguing the wrong side of the issue, or at the very least it's not clear what the right side of the issue would be. If you want to argue that the commit was a bad idea, then you'd have a much stronger case by arguing that FreeBSD shouldn't break what previously worked so that people aren't afraid to upgrade. | All I am simply trying to say is that version 4.6.1 will be minted | to CD and sold through the various outlets that market it. It would | behoove the FreeBSD community greatly if this version of FreeBSD | works out of the box and without need to immediately CVSup on a majority | of systems out there. This means it should install and run without | these errors on both a 128meg system with 80+ gig IDE hard drives | (pretty common at most retailers) and on an older system with 32meg | and 6gig IDE hard drives (a common "older computer"). | | If FreeBSD errors during installation or in the first few days of | operation for a new user, it is likely that person will select another | OS rather than searching the mailing list and website for fixes. | | | Working "out of the box" is good for future growth of FreeBSD. Failing | "out of the box" will have a negative impact. Personally, I'd prefer | growth. | | | | | | | | | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org | with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . . bts@babbleon.org (personal) http://www.babbleon.org http://www.eff.org http://www.programming-freedom.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 19:42:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B712A37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bp6.adlistings.com (dealhunting.com [65.194.234.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACF143E67 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:42:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from boone@bp6.adlistings.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by bp6.adlistings.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6B2g9165409 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:42:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boone) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:42:09 -0500 (CDT) From: User Boone Message-Id: <200207110242.g6B2g9165409@bp6.adlistings.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG One other note to my email a few minutes ago, I never got these errors under 4.5-RELEASE. Only after I upgraded did I start getting these errors. I also had no problems under 4.5-STABLE as of mid-April 2002. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 19:44:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AB937B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orngca-mls03.socal.rr.com (orngca-mls03.socal.rr.com [66.75.160.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF81B43E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wx@wxcs.com) Received: from latitude (bak-66-27-234-189.bak.rr.com [66.27.234.189]) by orngca-mls03.socal.rr.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6B2ifL01474 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rob Vella" To: Subject: Perl Compilation Problem on 4.6-STABLE? Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:44:34 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm not sure if I should be posting here.. but I've only had this problem until I upgraded to 4.6... Here's the error: op/defins............Can't load '../lib/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for module File::Glob: ../lib/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so: Undefined symbol "PL_stack_max" at ../lib/XSLoader.pm line 75. at ../lib/File/Glob.pm line 101 Compilation failed in require at op/defins.t line 95. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at op/defins.t line 95. FAILED at test 1 If this is related to 4.6, please let me know. Rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 20:10:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3F637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gbronline.com (mail.gbronline.com [12.145.226.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7342743E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco [12.145.236.230] by mail.gbronline.com (SMTPD32-7.10) id A6AF65DA0040; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:08:31 -0500 Message-ID: <00d801c22888$6a34be60$e6ec910c@fbccarthage.com> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: Subject: Ye Olde "Show Stopper" Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:09:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG To Ye Lord of -STABLE: I failed 3 times to make buildkernel after cvsuping RELENG_4, July 9th at 0000 CDT US. Turns out, I'd never built -STABLE on this particular host which was still running 4.5 patched (it's way back on the backline, doing only internal stuff....) Anyway, after a bit of reading I found I was bitten by ye olde "miibus_if.h" thing --- ref the following [incredibly useless in plaintext] URI.... : http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=9bthhl%2 4bk0%241%0FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dkernel%2Bcompil e%2Bfails%2Bmiibus%2Bgroup%253Amailing.freebsd.stable%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie %3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8 I uncommented the line in kern.conf (*blush*) and went back to "make buildworld." The question is, was I right? Or, could I have just called 'make buildkernel' again and continued from there? Which make is gonna "make" miibus_if.h? Thank you very much, Kevin Kinsey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 20:22: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A729737B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gbronline.com (mail.gbronline.com [12.145.226.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A8F43E65 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:21:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco [12.145.236.230] by mail.gbronline.com (SMTPD32-7.10) id A97647F40062; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <014301c2288a$12542ee0$e6ec910c@fbccarthage.com> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." , References: <00d801c22888$6a34be60$e6ec910c@fbccarthage.com> Subject: Re: Ye Olde "Show Stopper" Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:21:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG & that's "Lords" ... egads, howe much mye speling and typeing lacketh accurasy!! Faugh!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:09 PM Subject: Ye Olde "Show Stopper" > To Ye Lord of -STABLE: > > I failed 3 times to make buildkernel after > cvsuping RELENG_4, July 9th at 0000 > CDT US. > > Turns out, I'd never built -STABLE on this > particular host which was still running > 4.5 patched (it's way back on the backline, > doing only internal stuff....) > > Anyway, after a bit of reading I found I was > bitten by ye olde "miibus_if.h" thing > --- ref the following [incredibly useless > in plaintext] URI.... > : > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=9bthhl%2 > 4bk0%241%0FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dkernel%2Bcompil > e%2Bfails%2Bmiibus%2Bgroup%253Amailing.freebsd.stable%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie > %3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8 > > I uncommented the line in kern.conf (*blush*) > and went back to "make buildworld." > > The question is, was I right? Or, could > I have just called 'make buildkernel' again > and continued from there? Which make > is gonna "make" miibus_if.h? > > Thank you very much, > > Kevin Kinsey > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 20:33:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0BB37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from quack.kfu.com (adsl-67-113-12-90.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.113.12.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A227B43E52 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:33:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from icarus.kfu.com (icarus.kfu.com [IPv6:3ffe:1200:301b:2:230:abff:fe06:62e5]) by quack.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6B3XoVg010386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:33:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by icarus.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6B3XjnA000633 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:33:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Message-ID: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:33:44 -0700 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606 X-Accept-Language: en, en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a PIIX4 USB controller). The latest outrage is that I am doing some work on a USB audio device driver to clean it up a bit. It works *perfectly* plugged into the Vaio, but when it's plugged into the Asus machine, I get a trap panic the instant I try and play anything. I can't diagnose the trap because the dump doesn't happen, for unknown reasons. I'm almost at the point of going out and getting a PCI USB controller card for the damn thing. Is it just me? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 21:19: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAF837B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate2-b.volkswagen.de (gate2-b.volkswagen.de [193.23.96.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76FB43E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:19:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Yuan.Feng@vfj.vgj.co.jp) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by gate2-b.volkswagen.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id GAA11416 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:19:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from Volkswagen by relay2.volkswagen.de, id smtpdAAAR3d2__; Thu Jul 11 06:19:04 2002 Received: from devwagwodx0052.wob.vw.de ([10.208.137.187]) by devwagwodx0053.wob.vw.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 34VBCG8L; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:19:07 +0200 Received: from devwagwodx0018.wob.vw.de ([10.208.137.159]) by devwagwodx0052.wob.vw.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 3TAKJ116; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:19:08 +0200 Received: by JPVFJ0TKS00004 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:35:02 +0900 Message-ID: From: "Yuan, Feng" To: FreeBSD stable mailing Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:34:59 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 21:34:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ED037B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A20B43E8A for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:34:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: from pc016247.reshall.uidaho.edu (HELO johncoop.borgsdemons.com) (john?m?cooper@129.101.136.30 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 04:34:11 -0000 Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? From: John Merryweather Cooper Reply-To: john_m_cooper@yahoo.com To: Nick Sayer Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 10 Jul 2002 21:34:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1026362098.33520.18.camel@johncoop.borgsdemons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 20:33, Nick Sayer wrote: > I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based > around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with > USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio > laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a > PIIX4 USB controller). > > The latest outrage is that I am doing some work on a USB audio device > driver to clean it up a bit. It works *perfectly* plugged into the Vaio, > but when it's plugged into the Asus machine, I get a trap panic the > instant I try and play anything. I can't diagnose the trap because the > dump doesn't happen, for unknown reasons. > > I'm almost at the point of going out and getting a PCI USB controller > card for the damn thing. > > Is it just me? > Well, my DFI AK74-EC works fine with USB devices (ZIP drive and a camera) and has the KT133A chipset. The only limitation I have experienced is camera (and not motherboard) related--my Fuji FinePix 4900Z is recognized only at a ugen and not as a umass. I'm still scratching my head on that one. But the USB works fine otherwise. -- _ | |V| / ' || MacroHard -- \ \_| | | \_, || the perfection of form over | ----------------------------------|| substance, marketing over | Web: http://www.borgsdemons.com || performance, and greed over | AIM: johnmcooper || design . . . | =====================================================================/ Public Key: http://www.borgsdemons.com/Personal/pgpkey.asc | =====================================================================\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 21:50:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B0337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hindenburg.eboai.org (hindenburg.eboai.org [206.183.134.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDEB43E3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:50:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chip@chocobo.cx) Received: by hindenburg.eboai.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBD2F5E2D9; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:50:22 -0400 From: Chip Marshall To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? Message-ID: <20020711045022.GB63637@chocobo.cx> Reply-To: chip@chocobo.cx Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-URL: http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ X-OS: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 up 11 days, 11:55 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On July 10, 2002, Nick Sayer sent me the following: > I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based=20 > around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with=20 > USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio= =20 > laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a=20 > PIIX4 USB controller). I had problems with my Gigabyte GA-7VTXE (also KT133A based) where USB devices during boot would be detected fine, and one device after boot would work, but after that, nothing. I turned on USB debugging, and it appeared that the USB code was getting "stuck" somehow during the attachement of the device. I posted to the list a while ago about it, but didn't get any response. --=20 Chip Marshall http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r++ y? --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9LQ6O8vyTVl6qbdQRAqh4AKDgo6klnXay7EWu2rDGWFYlGkTSkgCgwoOL IAr5SENq/yHs5ajyCrsaHPQ= =xeYE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 21:53:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C6F37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC9743E42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:53:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA24903; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:53:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3D2D0F51.5080608@owt.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:53:37 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ye Olde "Show Stopper" References: <00d801c22888$6a34be60$e6ec910c@fbccarthage.com> <014301c2288a$12542ee0$e6ec910c@fbccarthage.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > & that's "Lords" ... egads, howe much > mye speling and typeing lacketh accurasy!! > Faugh!! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:09 PM > Subject: Ye Olde "Show Stopper" > > > >>To Ye Lord of -STABLE: >> >>I failed 3 times to make buildkernel after >>cvsuping RELENG_4, July 9th at 0000 >>CDT US. >> >>Turns out, I'd never built -STABLE on this >>particular host which was still running >>4.5 patched (it's way back on the backline, >>doing only internal stuff....) >> >>Anyway, after a bit of reading I found I was >>bitten by ye olde "miibus_if.h" thing >>--- ref the following [incredibly useless >>in plaintext] URI.... >>: >> >> > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=9bthhl%2 > > 4bk0%241%0FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dkernel%2Bcompil > > e%2Bfails%2Bmiibus%2Bgroup%253Amailing.freebsd.stable%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie > >>%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8 >> >>I uncommented the line in kern.conf (*blush*) >>and went back to "make buildworld." >> >>The question is, was I right? Or, could >>I have just called 'make buildkernel' again >>and continued from there? Which make >>is gonna "make" miibus_if.h? The miibus is a kernel thing and you only needed to buildkernel again. Kent >> >>Thank you very much, >> >>Kevin Kinsey >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >> >> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > . > > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 22:37:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9C537B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.wuppy.net.ru (ns.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6576843E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romanp@unshadow.net) Received: from room101.wuppy.net.ru (room101.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.131]) by ns.wuppy.net.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482721DD6; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:31 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:31 +0400 (MSD) From: "Roman V. Palagin" To: John Polstra Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS errors at high hz values with TCP mounts In-Reply-To: <200207072044.g67KiBn5001861@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: <20020711093340.G1703-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Jul 7, at 1:44pm -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > I see this problem with HZ=1000, overflow doesn't occured in this > > situation... May be problem lies somewhere else? > > Are you sure? I changed the type of sb_timeo to int and the problem > disappeared on my system. You are right - this is just a coincidence: changes to HZ and Solaris NFS server TCP/IP tuning... The problem realy lies in Solaris changes... - Roman --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 22:45:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C395337B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F91E43E5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:45:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from sdn-ar-008dcwashp272.dialsprint.net ([63.178.90.202] helo=moo.holy.cow) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17SWkr-0007Kt-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:44:42 -0700 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EAC6250BEA; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:47:21 -0400 From: parv To: Roelof Osinga Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure Message-ID: <20020711054721.GA6899@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Roelof Osinga , stable@freebsd.org References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG in message <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com>, wrote Roelof Osinga thusly... > > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- > -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall -Wredundant-decls > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -c linux_sysent.c > In file included from linux_sysent.c:14: > linux_proto.h:57: syntax error before `linux_time_t' > linux_proto.h:57: `linux_time_t' undeclared here (not in a function) hi roelof, i just couldn't take your suffering anymore & was mightly hoping that you just might search google out of sheer desparation. i also had the problem; followed the UPDATING comment about it which didn't work, so i sent it to the -stable list in jan 2002. here is another thing to try... http://spitfire.velocet.net/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2002-January/025084.html -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 22:48:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8840D37B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A7743E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:48:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from james.pole@paradise.net.nz) Received: from saturn (203-79-99-241.tnt13.paradise.net.nz [203.79.99.241]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB35D1692; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:48:52 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Pole Organization: None To: chip@chocobo.cx Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:48:51 +1200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <20020711045022.GB63637@chocobo.cx> In-Reply-To: <20020711045022.GB63637@chocobo.cx> Cc: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200207111748.51387.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday 11 July 2002 16:50, Chip Marshall wrote: > I had problems with my Gigabyte GA-7VTXE (also KT133A based) where USB > devices during boot would be detected fine, and one device after boot > would work, but after that, nothing. Isn't that motherboard KT266A-based? I have the exact same motherboard=20 (GA-7VTXE) -- and it has a KT266A chipset, not a KT133A. Even Giagbyte's=20 website seems to agree with me=20 (http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/products/7vtxe.htm). - James --=20 James Pole Favourite Quote: "Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a = Web=20 page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when yo= u=20 had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer,= =20 another word processor, or another network." -- Tim Berners-Lee in Technology Review, July 1996 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 23:14:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FA637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD8943E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:14:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.int (mail@pooh.int [10.0.1.2]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6B6EYIr006295 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:14:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kirk by pooh.int with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SXDm-0003dV-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:14:34 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> From: Kirk Strauser Date: 11 Jul 2002 01:14:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> Message-ID: <87ptxuu6yd.fsf@pooh.int> Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2002-07-11T03:33:44Z, Nick Sayer writes: > I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based > around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with USB > devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio > laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a > PIIX4 USB controller). I don't know what to say. My wife uses an A7V (KT133, 83C572 USB controller) under FreeBSD and Linux. We use USB mice, keyboard, scanners, and printers regularly without any problems. I may be extremely lucky, but that wouldn't fit with my other life experiences. :) -- Kirk Strauser The Strauser Group - http://www.strausergroup.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 1: 1:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3418E37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carmel.diva.nl (carmel.diva.nl [213.136.18.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1409343E58 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:01:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from boland@carmel.diva.nl) Received: from localhost (boland@localhost) by carmel.diva.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6B81cv19201; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:01:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from boland@carmel.diva.nl) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:01:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Michiel Boland To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710145342.057b4e90@marble.sentex.ca> Message-ID: <20020711095747.B19121-100000@carmel.diva.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 10:50 AM 10/07/2002 -0700, Bill Jones wrote: > >The obvious answer to me is "Most common platform someone installs > >FreeBSD on for the first time." > > ... Then its good that Soren committed his changes. The misplaced splx() > patch corrected the problem for some but not all which is in the .1 release. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the splx patch does anything to help people with broken CD-ROM drives. Cheers Michiel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 1:21:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3831537B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (mx1.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8D543E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sams [134.2.12.50]) by mx1.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EBD4AF; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:49:06 +0200 (MST) Received: from sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6B7n6eh027820; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:49:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sperber@sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by sams.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6B7n1og027817; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:49:01 +0200 (CEST) To: Thomas Seck Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No root crontab in 4.6-RELEASE? References: <20020708152752.X84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2AE910.BF80794A@mitre.org> <20020709161746.GA444@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <200207091651.g69Gp3Lg052679@apollo.backplane.com> <20020709204417.GA778@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20020710160832.GA996@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:49:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020710160832.GA996@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> (Thomas Seck's message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:08:32 +0200") Message-ID: Lines: 40 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.5 (bok choi, i386-unknown-freebsd4.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Seck writes: Thomas> * Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] (sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de): >> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Seck writes: >> Thomas> "[...] Cron also searches /etc/crontab...". Thomas> Thomas> The original poster obviously did not bother to read this document. Thomas> Failing to read documentation and posting false claims on a public Thomas> mailing list is a behaviour that drives me up the wall. >> >> That would be me, I guess. I never claimed there's no /etc/crontab >> file. I claimed there's no root crontab which, as some posters have >> noted, is something different. Thomas> Uh, oh. My mind thought of "the posting I originally replied to". Thomas> What my hands made of it is what was finally sent out. Sorry. No problem! >> On the 4.3 systems I have around here, there's a root crontab starting >> like this: >> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. >> # (/tmp/adcrcln339/crontab installed on Mon Jun 11 20:53:28 2001) >> # (Cron version -- $FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab/crontab.c,v 1.12.2.2 2000/12/11 01:03:31 obrien Exp $) >> >> It's no big deal. I was just wondering where that came from and why >> I'm no longer seeing it. Thomas> I get your meaning. According to cvs, the behaviour of 'crontab -u root' Thomas> was changed in version 1.12.2.3 of crontab.c, committed 2001/05/03 to Thomas> RELENG_4. ... and here, finally, is the answer to my question. I never thought of looking at the history of crontab.c. Many thanks! -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 1:45:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A742D37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD8943E42; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6B8j6k86377; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:45:06 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:45:06 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: Murray Stokely Subject: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think 4.6.1 should contain following kernel fixes: 1. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100548+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20020630.freebsd-stable 2. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1982827+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020630.cvs-all 3. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1209006+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020707.cvs-all 4. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=351587+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020630.cvs-all Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 1:49:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6F37B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDFF43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:49:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g6B8n6u08579; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:49:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:49:05 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020711084905.GB4745@sunbay.com> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com.lucky.freebsd.vendors> <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:18:13PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! >=20 [...] > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drive= rs > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. >=20 I'm working on this, and already have patches for 5.0-CURRENT under the test. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9LUaBUkv4P6juNwoRAgoqAJ9Yp1f2Iwbve8AZ+5G1iG4kiOmOYgCfTneH 5RbjaeQzZVyBzIV+fQoM11U= =EFOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 1:50:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9907B37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (h-66-166-142-198.SNDACAGL.covad.net [66.166.142.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2468643E09; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsder@mail.allcaps.org) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 355C8153B7; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8B715277; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:50:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Fred Condo Cc: Mike Jakubik , Stable , Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd In-Reply-To: <20020710143306.GC70071@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> Message-ID: <20020711012016.X71272-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Fred Condo wrote: > I strenuously disagree. Should inetd be a port? Sendmail? What about > syslogd or named? Although not all should be on by default, they are > certainly essential to enough users that they should be part of the > default installation. Well, since you brought it up, the idea should certainly be open to discussion ;) I can make the case for removing any subsystem which is primarily maintained by someone other than the FreeBSD team from the "base" system (ie. buildworld/installworld). This would include named/bind (which most people don't use), sendmail (lots of people use other mailers), OpenSSH (security fixes propagate more often than OS releases), Perl (way too big and unstable), etc. The latest OpenSSH fire drill certainly helps make the point. If OpenSSH wasn't a part of the base buildworld, the dev team wouldn't have to worry about it right now. It would be completely a ports issue. Please note that you can make packages part of a default install even if it's not going to be part of the main buildworld. See the rather long flamefest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdiscussion about removing Perl from the base distribution. Very few people would argue that Perl shouldn't be part of a "default" install. However, keeping it as part of a buildworld/installworld base just becomes very unwieldy. The compromise is to install it by default as a package. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 2:19: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D99B37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raven.ravenbrook.com (raven.ravenbrook.com [193.82.131.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F193D43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (thrush.ravenbrook.com [193.112.141.249]) by raven.ravenbrook.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6B9Ii853968 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:18:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thrush.ravenbrook.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6B9IhZA060850 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:18:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nb@thrush.ravenbrook.com) From: Nick Barnes To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd In-Reply-To: Message from Helge Oldach of "Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:23:16 +0200." <200207102123.XAA04329@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:18:43 +0100 Message-ID: <60849.1026379123@thrush.ravenbrook.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2002-07-10 21:23:16+0000, Helge Oldach writes: > Mike Jakubik: > >In no way am I saying that curtail services like syslogd or inetd should be > >taken out. But things like openssh, sendmail, certain libs, and basically > >most software that is available and up to date via the ports. > > No, it shouldn't. I want a full-function system with a decent MTA, a > decent secure login facility, a decent time synchronization facility, a > decent nameserver, and so on. I *don't* want a base system that isn't > good for anything but eating CPU. > > [...] It seems to me that everyone would appreciate a system delivered as a number of packages of some sort. Then if you wanted a system like the current release, you would install 'base', 'base-openssh', 'base-sendmail', 'base-bind' etc. The default install option in sysinstall would do all this, and so would "make installworld". If you want a more current SSH (say) you use a custom install option in sysinstall, or options to "make installworld" (e.g. in make.conf), or you _uninstall_ 'base-openssh', then you install the 'openssh-4.5q' package (or whatever). In fact, 'base' itself could potentially be rather tiny (does it need to include gcc, or perl)? I seem to recall, from the last time we went around this subject on -stable, that there is at least one project working on making this happen (possibly called "libh"). If you want this enough to gripe about it on -stable, maybe you want it enough to find out what the project is and help out. Nick Barnes Ravenbrook Limited To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 2:37:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE9137B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A4043E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:37:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6B9aM25088168; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6B9a8Fd088167; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:08 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:08 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Paulo Fragoso Cc: Kevin Oberman , Gavin Atkinson , Michiel Boland , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020711093608.GD45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> <20020710154619.M93085-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020710154619.M93085-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Paulo Fragoso! On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:59:55PM -0300, you wrote: > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > > make buildworld > > make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name > > REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) > > fsck -p > > mount -a -t ufs > > cd /usr/src > > make installworld > > mergemaster -i (-a is a bit inadequate unless you go back and clean up > > the mess it often leaves before going to multi-user > > mode.) > > exit (to multi-user mode) > We have a doubt, if we have kern.securelevel=-1 and we are doing a > security upgrade (for example: that server is using 4.6-RELEASE and its > tag is tag=RELENG_4_6), are there any reason to switch to single-user > mode? > > We are upgrading remotely some servers without switch to sigle-user, but > in all cases are security upgrade only and all works fine. We are using 1 server for serial console server, and upgrade our systems from single mode over serial console remotely. -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 2:51: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F0437B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [67.36.71.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B23F43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:51:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 2280 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 09:51:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:51:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Vince Vielhaber To: Vivek Khera Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > -- cut here -- > IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=665346048, 03600) failed: Cannot allocate memory > > This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared > memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. > To reduce the request size (currently 665346048 bytes), reduce > PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 80000) and/or > its max_connections parameter (currently 48). > -- cut here -- > > > Now, by my arithmetic, 665346048 is certainly less than 1073741824 by > quite a bit. > > I did not recompile postgres after the FreeBSD upgrade. > > Has something changed from 4.4-STABLE that would cause such a failure? > > The funny thing is that it worked just fine with FBSD 4.4 and the > lower setting of shmmax (even with 100000 shared_buffers), so > something is making postgres try to allocate a larger hunk of memory. > I just don't know what. > > Any advice would be appreciated. Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3: 4:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C349D37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D3F43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6BA4Jk89268; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:04:20 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:04:19 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html > > Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. > There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3: 5:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E5237B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875D243E31; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:05:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17SapO-000OyE-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:05:38 +0100 To: kgunders@hpb50341.boi.hp.com, mike@sentex.net Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709220904.07342970@192.168.0.12> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:05:38 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Thanks, bye." The only threads I remember around this were some people with > specific problems on specific SMP motherboards. I dont recall any mass > problems with the fxp cards... For what its worth, we have deployed some 50 The SMP problems also turned out to be nothing to do with the fxp cards and everything to do with shared interrupts. But cards which generate a lot of interrpts show this up well, hence it first showed up on FXP and has been misrememberd by people as the "fxp problem". just make sure you arent sharing interrupts on an SMP box and you will do fine. -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3:29:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55E637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [67.36.71.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2736C43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 2475 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 10:29:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:29:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Vince Vielhaber To: Igor Sysoev Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html > > > > Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. > > There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. > > SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax. The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3:31:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F5D37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825D743E58; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:31:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g6BAUjx38001; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:30:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:30:45 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: David Miller Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? Message-ID: <20020711103045.GC4745@sunbay.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:11:26PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > Hi all; >=20 > Is /usr/bin/w -n not supposed to show IP addresses anymore? >=20 This is because new sshd(8) did not import the relevant fix from previous hacked OpenSSH version. Old version had this in sshlogin.c: : revision 1.3 : date: 2001/05/15 01:50:40; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 : branches: 1.3.2; : If a host would exceed 16 characters in the utmp entry, record only : it's IP address/base host instead. :=20 : Submitted by: brian Index: sshlogin.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/crypto/openssh/sshlogin.c,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sshlogin.c 4 May 2001 04:14:23 -0000 1.2 +++ sshlogin.c 15 May 2001 01:50:40 -0000 1.3 @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ record_login(pid_t pid, const char *ttyn strncpy(u.ut_line, ttyname + 5, sizeof(u.ut_line)); u.ut_time =3D time(NULL); strncpy(u.ut_name, user, sizeof(u.ut_name)); - strncpy(u.ut_host, host, sizeof(u.ut_host)); + realhostname_sa(u.ut_host, sizeof(u.ut_host), addr, addr->sa_len); =20 login(&u); lastlog =3D _PATH_LASTLOG; This fix was lost with the latest import (the relevant code is now in loginrec.c). Index: loginrec.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/crypto/openssh/loginrec.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.2.1 diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1.2.1 loginrec.c --- loginrec.c 3 Jul 2002 22:11:42 -0000 1.1.1.1.2.1 +++ loginrec.c 11 Jul 2002 10:27:54 -0000 @@ -654,7 +654,8 @@ construct_utmp(struct logininfo *li, /* Use strncpy because we don't necessarily want null termination */ strncpy(ut->ut_name, li->username, MIN_SIZEOF(ut->ut_name, li->username)); # ifdef HAVE_HOST_IN_UTMP - strncpy(ut->ut_host, li->hostname, MIN_SIZEOF(ut->ut_host, li->hostname)); + realhostname_sa(ut->ut_host, sizeof(ut->ut_host), &li->hostaddr.sa, + li->hostaddr.sa.sa_len); # endif # ifdef HAVE_ADDR_IN_UTMP /* this is just a 32-bit IP address */ Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9LV5VUkv4P6juNwoRAgPjAKCEVnZmE1rHG0IPPhtHSat8DoTcZACeIuwZ yJVUHRB+lM5D0NyEybMErw8= =uVc8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3:36:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8583437B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197A043E31; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C12F7534A; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:34 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: David Miller , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? References: <20020711103045.GC4745@sunbay.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Jul 2002 12:36:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020711103045.GC4745@sunbay.com> Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ruslan Ermilov writes: > This is because new sshd(8) did not import the relevant fix > from previous hacked OpenSSH version. [...] Committed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3:42:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4948E37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85943E4A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:42:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6BAgbk90919; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:42:37 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:42:37 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html > > > > > > Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. > > > There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. > > > > SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax. > > The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. Sorry, I'd meant "SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmall". Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 3:46:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE3137B406 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [67.36.71.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECC3F43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 2601 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 10:46:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:46:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Vince Vielhaber To: Igor Sysoev Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: > > > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html > > > > > > > > Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. > > > > There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. > > > > > > SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax. > > > > The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. > > Sorry, I'd meant "SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmall". Ok, but the kernel config has SHMALL as well. Is one (or more) of the kernel options unused? Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 4: 1:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C0037B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A4343E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:01:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from henry@techiebod.com) Received: from no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk ([62.49.229.110] helo=gw1.techiebod.com) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 17Sbh8-0001yy-0U; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:01:10 +0100 Received: from gw1-int.techiebod.com (bigbox.techiebod.com [192.168.2.1]) by gw1.techiebod.com (zmail) with ESMTP id 69C451A684; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:59:36 +0100 (BST) Received: by gw1-int.techiebod.com (zmail, from userid 1000) id 64E1719318; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:01:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw1-int.techiebod.com (zmail) with ESMTP id 5FE8F36402; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:01:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:01:08 +0100 (BST) From: Henry Whincup To: "stable@freebsd.org" Cc: sos@freebsd.dk Subject: Panics under heavy disk load Message-ID: <20020711114302.U15074-200000@gw1-int.techiebod.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; boundary="0-1067937348-1026385038=:15074" Content-ID: <20020711115815.D15074@gw1-int.techiebod.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-1067937348-1026385038=:15074 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-ID: <20020711115815.G15074@gw1-int.techiebod.com> Using FreeBSD4-Stable as of Jul 9th (this happened before this date, but I updated my source in case the recent changes fixed it -- see below for file version of the ata driver). I have had a few panics of the sort below. These only seem to occour under disk load. Information follows: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x28 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0153aad stack pointer = 0x10:0xc03cde74 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc03cde84 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = Idle interrupt mask = bio trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x30 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02ea360 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc03cdc94 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc03cdc9c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = Idle interrupt mask = bio trap number = 12 panic: page fault After getting a core dump I get: (kgdb) where #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc01e7fc3 in boot (howto=260) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc01e83e8 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc03c4bac, howto=-1069791537) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc0356b22 in trap_fatal (frame=0xc03cdc54, eva=48) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc03567f5 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc03cdc54, usermode=0, eva=48) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc03563b3 in trap (frame={tf_fs = 16, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = 16, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1057240576, tf_ebp = -1069753188, tf_isp = -1069753216, tf_ebx = -1069549476, tf_edx = 6869056, tf_ecx = -944769920, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1070685344, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66050, tf_esp = -1057240576, tf_ss = -1057240576}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc02ea360 in acquire_lock (lk=0xc03ff85c) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:266 #7 0xc02ee460 in softdep_update_inodeblock (ip=0xc0fbca00, bp=0xc2c3a5d4, waitfor=0) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:3813 #8 0xc02e9495 in ffs_update (vp=0xc7aff480, waitfor=0) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:106 #9 0xc02f17c6 in ffs_sync (mp=0xc0e6c600, waitfor=2, cred=0xc0a7e880, p=0xc044a8e0) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1025 #10 0xc02178a7 in sync (p=0xc044a8e0, uap=0x0) at ../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:576 #11 0xc01e7d5e in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:235 #12 0xc01e83e8 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc03c4bac, howto=-1069791537) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #13 0xc0356b22 in trap_fatal (frame=0xc03cde34, eva=40) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:974 #14 0xc03567f5 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc03cde34, usermode=0, eva=40) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:867 #15 0xc03563b3 in trap (frame={tf_fs = 16, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = 16, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1054678528, tf_ebp = -1069752700, tf_isp = -1069752736, tf_ebx = -1058833408, tf_edx = 245, tf_ecx = 4, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072350547, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66182, tf_esp = -1058833408, tf_ss = 6869056}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:466 #16 0xc0153aad in ata_wait (atadev=0xc122e200, mask=88 'X') at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:965 #17 0xc015b3f4 in ad_transfer (request=0xc100f9c0) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:547 #18 0xc0153118 in ata_start (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:688 #19 0xc01539f2 in ata_reinit (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:931 #20 0xc015b564 in ad_transfer (request=0xc100f9c0) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:580 #21 0xc0153118 in ata_start (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:688 #22 0xc01539f2 in ata_reinit (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:931 #23 0xc015b564 in ad_transfer (request=0xc100f9c0) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:580 #24 0xc0153118 in ata_start (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:688 #25 0xc01539f2 in ata_reinit (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:931 #26 0xc015b564 in ad_transfer (request=0xc100f9c0) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:580 #27 0xc0153118 in ata_start (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:688 #28 0xc01539f2 in ata_reinit (ch=0xc0e37c00) at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:931 #29 0xc015bf62 in ad_timeout (request=0xc100f9c0) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:896 #30 0xc01ede59 in softclock () at ../../kern/kern_timeout.c:131 Thus following the advice on onlamp.com (thanks Michael Lucas!) I looked at the function preceeding the first trap call and get: (kgdb) up 16 #16 0xc0153aad in ata_wait (atadev=0xc122e200, mask=88 'X') at ../../dev/ata/ata-all.c:965 965 atadev->channel->status = ATA_INB(atadev->channel->r_io, ATA_STA TUS); (kgdb) p atadev->channel->r_io $1 = (struct resource *) 0x0 I guess this is what is causing the panic but don't know where to go from here. Additional info: I am running the GENERIC kernel with the vinum module loaded Output of a verbose boot attached pciconf -lv: chip0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x12508086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82439HX System Controller (TXC)' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI isab0@pci0:7:0: class=0x060100 card=0x00000000 chip=0x70008086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371SB PIIX3 PCI-to-ISA Bridge (Triton II)' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci0@pci0:7:1: class=0x010180 card=0x00000000 chip=0x70108086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82371SB PIIX3 IDE Interface (Triton II)' class = mass storage subclass = ATA atapci1@pci0:9:0: class=0x018000 card=0x00051103 chip=0x00041103 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'HighPoint Technologies Inc.' device = 'HPT366/8/70 UDMA66/100 EIDE Controller' class = mass storage xl0@pci0:11:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x905010b7 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3COM Corp, Networking Division' device = '3C905-TX Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100' class = network subclass = ethernet none0@pci0:12:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x0519102b rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Matrox Graphics Inc' device = 'MGA-2064W Storm (Millennium board)' class = display subclass = VGA Versions of the ata files (output from fgrep -h FreeBSD: /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/*): * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c,v 1.50.2.37 2002/06/19 08:30:48 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.h,v 1.26.2.11 2002/03/18 08:37:33 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-card.c,v 1.4.2.1 2002/03/18 08:37:33 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c,v 1.60.2.23 2002/05/30 11:42:13 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.h,v 1.22.2.7 2002/03/18 08:37:33 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c,v 1.35.2.25 2002/04/18 19:14:04 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-isa.c,v 1.4.2.1 2002/03/18 08:37:33 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.c,v 1.32.2.8 2002/04/29 18:21:18 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.c,v 1.3.2.17 2002/04/18 19:14:07 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.h,v 1.2.2.8 2002/04/11 09:31:57 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c,v 1.46.2.13 2002/03/26 09:36:43 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.h,v 1.22.2.9 2002/03/18 08:37:34 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c,v 1.48.2.16 2002/03/27 19:48:37 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.h,v 1.15.2.9 2002/03/18 08:37:34 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-fd.c,v 1.44.2.8 2002/03/26 09:36:43 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-fd.h,v 1.10.2.4 2002/03/18 08:37:34 sos Exp $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-tape.c,v 1.36.2.11 2002/03/26 09:36:43 sos Ex p $ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-tape.h,v 1.11.2.5 2002/03/18 08:37:34 sos Exp $ Any help would be appreciated. Henry --0-1067937348-1026385038=:15074 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii; name="dmesg.boot" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20020711115718.C15074@gw1-int.techiebod.com> Content-Description: dmesg.boot Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.boot" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMDIgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4N CkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk3OSwgMTk4MCwgMTk4MywgMTk4NiwgMTk4OCwg MTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MiwgMTk5MywgMTk5NA0KCVRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9m IHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVz ZXJ2ZWQuDQpGcmVlQlNEIDQuNi1TVEFCTEUgIzA6IFdlZCBKdWwgMTAgMDc6 NDc6NTcgQlNUIDIwMDINCiAgICByb290QGd3MS1pbnQudGVjaGllYm9kLmNv bTovdXNyL1NvdXJjZS9GQlNELXN0YWJsZS9zeXMvY29tcGlsZS9HRU5FUklD DQpDYWxpYnJhdGluZyBjbG9jayhzKSAuLi4gVFNDIGNsb2NrOiAxMzMyNzQy MjUgSHosIGk4MjU0IGNsb2NrOiAxMTkzMjI3IEh6DQpDTEtfVVNFX0k4MjU0 X0NBTElCUkFUSU9OIG5vdCBzcGVjaWZpZWQgLSB1c2luZyBkZWZhdWx0IGZy ZXF1ZW5jeQ0KVGltZWNvdW50ZXIgImk4MjU0IiAgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDExOTMx ODIgSHoNCkNMS19VU0VfVFNDX0NBTElCUkFUSU9OIG5vdCBzcGVjaWZpZWQg LSB1c2luZyBvbGQgY2FsaWJyYXRpb24gbWV0aG9kDQpDUFU6IFBlbnRpdW0v UDU0QyAoMTMzLjI3LU1IeiA1ODYtY2xhc3MgQ1BVKQ0KICBPcmlnaW4gPSAi R2VudWluZUludGVsIiAgSWQgPSAweDUyYyAgU3RlcHBpbmcgPSAxMg0KICBG ZWF0dXJlcz0weDFiZjxGUFUsVk1FLERFLFBTRSxUU0MsTVNSLE1DRSxDWDg+ DQpyZWFsIG1lbW9yeSAgPSAxMDA2NjMyOTYgKDk4MzA0SyBieXRlcykNClBo eXNpY2FsIG1lbW9yeSBjaHVuayhzKToNCjB4MDAwMDEwMDAgLSAweDAwMDlm ZmZmLCA2NTEyNjQgYnl0ZXMgKDE1OSBwYWdlcykNCjB4MDA0ZjcwMDAgLSAw eDA1ZmY3ZmZmLCA5NTQyNDUxMiBieXRlcyAoMjMyOTcgcGFnZXMpDQphdmFp bCBtZW1vcnkgPSA5Mjk2NjkxMiAoOTA3ODhLIGJ5dGVzKQ0KYmlvczMyOiBG b3VuZCBCSU9TMzIgU2VydmljZSBEaXJlY3RvcnkgaGVhZGVyIGF0IDB4YzAw ZjdkNjANCmJpb3MzMjogRW50cnkgPSAweGY3N2IwIChjMDBmNzdiMCkgIFJl diA9IDAgIExlbiA9IDENCnBjaWJpb3M6IFBDSSBCSU9TIGVudHJ5IGF0IDB4 NzdlMA0KcG5wYmlvczogRm91bmQgUG5QIEJJT1MgZGF0YSBhdCAweGMwMGZi ZDIwDQpwbnBiaW9zOiBFbnRyeSA9IGYwMDAwOmJkNTAgIFJldiA9IDEuMA0K cG5wYmlvczogT0VNIElEIGNkMDQxDQpPdGhlciBCSU9TIHNpZ25hdHVyZXMg Zm91bmQ6DQpBQ1BJOiAwMDAwMDAwMA0KUHJlbG9hZGVkIGVsZiBrZXJuZWwg Imtlcm5lbCIgYXQgMHhjMDRkMDAwMC4NCkludGVsIFBlbnRpdW0gZGV0ZWN0 ZWQsIGluc3RhbGxpbmcgd29ya2Fyb3VuZCBmb3IgRjAwRiBidWcNCm1kMDog TWFsbG9jIGRpc2sNCkNyZWF0aW5nIERJU0sgbWQwDQpNYXRoIGVtdWxhdG9y IHByZXNlbnQNCnBjaV9vcGVuKDEpOgltb2RlIDEgYWRkciBwb3J0ICgweDBj ZjgpIGlzIDB4ODAwMDAwNWMNCnBjaV9vcGVuKDFhKToJbW9kZTFyZXM9MHg4 MDAwMDAwMCAoMHg4MDAwMDAwMCkNCnBjaV9jZmdjaGVjazoJZGV2aWNlIDAg W2NsYXNzPTA2MDAwMF0gW2hkcj0wMF0gaXMgdGhlcmUgKGlkPTEyNTA4MDg2 KQ0KbnB4MDogPG1hdGggcHJvY2Vzc29yPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZA0KbnB4 MDogSU5UIDE2IGludGVyZmFjZQ0KaTU4Nl9iemVybygpIGJhbmR3aWR0aCA9 IDEwNDAzNjYyMCBieXRlcy9zZWMNCmJ6ZXJvKCkgYmFuZHdpZHRoID0gNzUx ODc5Njk5IGJ5dGVzL3NlYw0KcGNpYjA6IDxIb3N0IHRvIFBDSSBicmlkZ2U+ IG9uIG1vdGhlcmJvYXJkDQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDgwODYsIGRldj0w eDEyNTAsIHJldmlkPTB4MDMNCgljbGFzcz0wNi0wMC0wMCwgaGRydHlwZT0w eDAwLCBtZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVz PTANCmZvdW5kLT4JdmVuZG9yPTB4ODA4NiwgZGV2PTB4NzAwMCwgcmV2aWQ9 MHgwMQ0KCWNsYXNzPTA2LTAxLTAwLCBoZHJ0eXBlPTB4MDAsIG1mZGV2PTEN CglzdWJvcmRpbmF0ZWJ1cz0wIAlzZWNvbmRhcnlidXM9MA0KZm91bmQtPgl2 ZW5kb3I9MHg4MDg2LCBkZXY9MHg3MDEwLCByZXZpZD0weDAwDQoJY2xhc3M9 MDEtMDEtODAsIGhkcnR5cGU9MHgwMCwgbWZkZXY9MA0KCXN1Ym9yZGluYXRl YnVzPTAgCXNlY29uZGFyeWJ1cz0wDQoJbWFwWzIwXTogdHlwZSAxLCByYW5n ZSAzMiwgYmFzZSAwMDAwZTgwMCwgc2l6ZSAgNA0KZm91bmQtPgl2ZW5kb3I9 MHgxMTAzLCBkZXY9MHgwMDA0LCByZXZpZD0weDAzDQoJY2xhc3M9MDEtODAt MDAsIGhkcnR5cGU9MHgwMCwgbWZkZXY9MA0KCXN1Ym9yZGluYXRlYnVzPTAg CXNlY29uZGFyeWJ1cz0wDQoJaW50cGluPWEsIGlycT0xMg0KCW1hcFsxMF06 IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIsIGJhc2UgMDAwMGUwMDAsIHNpemUgIDMNCglt YXBbMTRdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMyLCBiYXNlIDAwMDBkODAwLCBzaXpl ICAyDQoJbWFwWzE4XTogdHlwZSAxLCByYW5nZSAzMiwgYmFzZSAwMDAwZDQw MCwgc2l6ZSAgMw0KCW1hcFsxY106IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIsIGJhc2Ug MDAwMGQwMDAsIHNpemUgIDINCgltYXBbMjBdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMy LCBiYXNlIDAwMDBjODAwLCBzaXplICA4DQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDEw YjcsIGRldj0weDkwNTAsIHJldmlkPTB4MDANCgljbGFzcz0wMi0wMC0wMCwg aGRydHlwZT0weDAwLCBtZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vj b25kYXJ5YnVzPTANCglpbnRwaW49YSwgaXJxPTEwDQoJbWFwWzEwXTogdHlw ZSAxLCByYW5nZSAzMiwgYmFzZSAwMDAwYzQwMCwgc2l6ZSAgNg0KZm91bmQt Pgl2ZW5kb3I9MHgxMDJiLCBkZXY9MHgwNTE5LCByZXZpZD0weDAxDQoJY2xh c3M9MDMtMDAtMDAsIGhkcnR5cGU9MHgwMCwgbWZkZXY9MA0KCXN1Ym9yZGlu YXRlYnVzPTAgCXNlY29uZGFyeWJ1cz0wDQoJaW50cGluPWEsIGlycT0xMQ0K CW1hcFsxMF06IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIsIGJhc2UgZmEwMDAwMDAsIHNp emUgMTQNCgltYXBbMTRdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMyLCBiYXNlIGZiMDAw MDAwLCBzaXplIDIzDQpwY2kwOiA8UENJIGJ1cz4gb24gcGNpYjANCmlzYWIw OiA8SW50ZWwgODIzNzFTQiBQQ0kgdG8gSVNBIGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNl IDcuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQoJSS9PIFJlY292ZXJ5IFRpbWluZzogOC1iaXQgOCBj bG9ja3MsIDE2LWJpdCA0IGNsb2Nrcw0KCUV4dGVuZGVkIEJJT1M6IGRpc2Fi bGVkDQoJTG93ZXIgQklPUzogZW5hYmxlZA0KCUNvcHJvY2Vzc29yIElSUTEz OiBlbmFibGVkDQoJTW91c2UgSVJRMTI6IGRpc2FibGVkDQoJSW50ZXJydXB0 IFJvdXRpbmc6IEE6IElSUTExLCBCOiBJUlExMCwgQzogZGlzYWJsZWQsIEQ6 IElSUTEyDQoJCU1CMDogSVJRMTUsIE1CMTogDQppc2EwOiA8SVNBIGJ1cz4g b24gaXNhYjANCmF0YXBjaTA6IDxJbnRlbCBQSUlYMyBBVEEgY29udHJvbGxl cj4gcG9ydCAweGU4MDAtMHhlODBmIGF0IGRldmljZSA3LjEgb24gcGNpMA0K YXRhMDogaW9iYXNlPTB4MDFmMCBhbHRpb2Jhc2U9MHgwM2Y2IGJtYWRkcj0w eGU4MDANCmF0YTA6IG1hc2s9MDMgb3N0YXQwPTUwIG9zdGF0Mj01MA0KYXRh MC1zbGF2ZTogQVRBUEkgMDAgMDANCmF0YTAtbWFzdGVyOiBBVEFQSSAwMCAw MA0KYXRhMDogbWFzaz0wMyBzdGF0MD01MCBzdGF0MT01MA0KYXRhMC1tYXN0 ZXI6IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRhMC1zbGF2ZTogQVRBIDAxIGE1DQphdGEwOiBk ZXZpY2VzPTAzDQphdGEwOiBhdCAweDFmMCBpcnEgMTQgb24gYXRhcGNpMA0K YXRhMTogaW9iYXNlPTB4MDE3MCBhbHRpb2Jhc2U9MHgwMzc2IGJtYWRkcj0w eGU4MDgNCmF0YTE6IG1hc2s9MDMgb3N0YXQwPTUwIG9zdGF0Mj0wMA0KYXRh MS1tYXN0ZXI6IEFUQVBJIDAwIDAwDQphdGExLXNsYXZlOiBBVEFQSSAwMCAw MA0KYXRhMTogbWFzaz0wMyBzdGF0MD01MCBzdGF0MT0wMA0KYXRhMS1tYXN0 ZXI6IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRhMTogZGV2aWNlcz0wMQ0KYXRhMTogYXQgMHgx NzAgaXJxIDE1IG9uIGF0YXBjaTANCmF0YXBjaTE6IDxIaWdoUG9pbnQgSFBU MzcwIEFUQTEwMCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBwb3J0IDB4YzgwMC0weGM4ZmYsMHhk MDAwLTB4ZDAwMywweGQ0MDAtMHhkNDA3LDB4ZDgwMC0weGQ4MDMsMHhlMDAw LTB4ZTAwNyBpcnEgMTIgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDkuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQphdGEtOiBh dGEyIGV4aXN0cywgdXNpbmcgbmV4dCBhdmFpbGFibGUgdW5pdCBudW1iZXIN CmF0YTI6IGlvYmFzZT0weGUwMDAgYWx0aW9iYXNlPTB4ZDgwMiBibWFkZHI9 MHhjODAwDQphdGEyOiBtYXNrPTAzIG9zdGF0MD0yMCBvc3RhdDI9NTANCmF0 YTItbWFzdGVyOiBBVEFQSSAyMCAyMA0KYXRhMi1zbGF2ZTogQVRBUEkgMDAg MDANCmF0YTI6IG1hc2s9MDMgc3RhdDA9MjAgc3RhdDE9NTANCmF0YTItbWFz dGVyOiBBVEEgYTUgMjUNCmF0YTItc2xhdmU6IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRhMjog ZGV2aWNlcz0wMg0KYXRhMjogYXQgMHhlMDAwIG9uIGF0YXBjaTENCmF0YTM6 IGlvYmFzZT0weGQ0MDAgYWx0aW9iYXNlPTB4ZDAwMiBibWFkZHI9MHhjODA4 DQphdGEzOiBtYXNrPTAzIG9zdGF0MD01MCBvc3RhdDI9MDANCmF0YTMtbWFz dGVyOiBBVEFQSSAwMCAwMA0KYXRhMy1zbGF2ZTogQVRBUEkgMDAgMDANCmF0 YTM6IG1hc2s9MDMgc3RhdDA9NTAgc3RhdDE9MDANCmF0YTMtbWFzdGVyOiBB VEEgMDEgYTUNCmF0YTM6IGRldmljZXM9MDENCmF0YTM6IGF0IDB4ZDQwMCBv biBhdGFwY2kxDQoJdXNpbmcgc2hhcmVkIGlycTEyLg0KeGwwOiA8M0NvbSAz YzkwNS1UWCBGYXN0IEV0aGVybGluayBYTD4gcG9ydCAweGM0MDAtMHhjNDNm IGlycSAxMCBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMTEuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQp4bDA6IEV0aGVybmV0 IGFkZHJlc3M6IDAwOjYwOjk3OjM2OjVhOjA4DQp4bDA6IG1lZGlhIG9wdGlv bnMgd29yZDogZTA0MA0KeGwwOiBmb3VuZCBNSUkvQVVUTw0KbWlpYnVzMDog PE1JSSBidXM+IG9uIHhsMA0KbnNwaHkwOiA8RFA4Mzg0MCAxMC8xMDAgbWVk aWEgaW50ZXJmYWNlPiBvbiBtaWlidXMwDQpuc3BoeTA6ICAxMGJhc2VULCAx MGJhc2VULUZEWCwgMTAwYmFzZVRYLCAxMDBiYXNlVFgtRkRYLCBhdXRvDQpi cGY6IHhsMCBhdHRhY2hlZA0KcGNpMDogPE1hdHJveCBNR0EgTWlsbGVubml1 bSAyMDY0VyBncmFwaGljcyBhY2NlbGVyYXRvcj4gKHZlbmRvcj0weDEwMmIs IGRldj0weDA1MTkpIGF0IDEyLjAgaXJxIDExDQpleF9pc2FfaWRlbnRpZnko KQ0KYXRhLTogYXRhMCBleGlzdHMsIHVzaW5nIG5leHQgYXZhaWxhYmxlIHVu aXQgbnVtYmVyDQphdGEtOiBhdGExIGV4aXN0cywgdXNpbmcgbmV4dCBhdmFp bGFibGUgdW5pdCBudW1iZXINClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMjAzDQpU cnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDI0Mw0KVHJ5aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBhdCAy ODMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMmMzDQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0 IGF0IDMwMw0KVHJ5aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBhdCAzNDMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFk X1BvcnQgYXQgMzgzDQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDNjMw0KaXNhX3By b2JlX2NoaWxkcmVuOiBkaXNhYmxpbmcgUG5QIGRldmljZXMNCmlzYV9wcm9i ZV9jaGlsZHJlbjogcHJvYmluZyBub24tUG5QIGRldmljZXMNCm9ybTA6IDxP cHRpb24gUk9Ncz4gYXQgaW9tZW0gMHhjMDAwMC0weGM3ZmZmLDB4YzgwMDAt MHhjYjdmZiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmZGMwOiA8TkVDIDcyMDY1QiBvciBjbG9uZT4g YXQgcG9ydCAweDNmMC0weDNmNSwweDNmNyBpcnEgNiBkcnEgMiBvbiBpc2Ew DQphdGE0IGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MWYwIGlycSAxNCBv biBpc2EwDQphdGE1IGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MTcwIGly cSAxNSBvbiBpc2EwDQphZHYwIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBvbiBpc2EwDQpi dDA6IEZhaWxlZCBTdGF0dXMgUmVnIFRlc3QgLSBmZg0KYnRfaXNhX3Byb2Jl OiBQcm9iZSBmYWlsZWQgYXQgMHgzMzANCmJ0MDogRmFpbGVkIFN0YXR1cyBS ZWcgVGVzdCAtIGZmDQpidF9pc2FfcHJvYmU6IFByb2JlIGZhaWxlZCBhdCAw eDMzNA0KYnQwOiBGYWlsZWQgU3RhdHVzIFJlZyBUZXN0IC0gZmYNCmJ0X2lz YV9wcm9iZTogUHJvYmUgZmFpbGVkIGF0IDB4MjMwDQpidDA6IEZhaWxlZCBT dGF0dXMgUmVnIFRlc3QgLSBmZg0KYnRfaXNhX3Byb2JlOiBQcm9iZSBmYWls ZWQgYXQgMHgyMzQNCmJ0MDogRmFpbGVkIFN0YXR1cyBSZWcgVGVzdCAtIGZm DQpidF9pc2FfcHJvYmU6IFByb2JlIGZhaWxlZCBhdCAweDEzMA0KYnQwOiBG YWlsZWQgU3RhdHVzIFJlZyBUZXN0IC0gZmYNCmJ0X2lzYV9wcm9iZTogUHJv YmUgZmFpbGVkIGF0IDB4MTM0DQpidDAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBv cnQgMHgxMzQtMHgxMzcgb24gaXNhMA0KYWhhMDogc3RhdHVzIHJlZyB0ZXN0 IGZhaWxlZCBmZg0KYWhhMDogc3RhdHVzIHJlZyB0ZXN0IGZhaWxlZCBmZg0K YWhhMDogc3RhdHVzIHJlZyB0ZXN0IGZhaWxlZCBmZg0KYWhhMDogc3RhdHVz IHJlZyB0ZXN0IGZhaWxlZCBmZg0KYWhhMDogc3RhdHVzIHJlZyB0ZXN0IGZh aWxlZCBmZg0KYWhhMDogc3RhdHVzIHJlZyB0ZXN0IGZhaWxlZCBmZg0KYWhh MCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDEzNC0weDEzNyBvbiBpc2Ew DQphaWMwIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MTQwLTB4MTVmIG9u IGlzYTANCmF0a2JkYzA6IDxLZXlib2FyZCBjb250cm9sbGVyIChpODA0Mik+ IGF0IHBvcnQgMHg2MCwweDY0IG9uIGlzYTANCmF0a2JkMDogPEFUIEtleWJv YXJkPiBmbGFncyAweDEgaXJxIDEgb24gYXRrYmRjMA0KYXRrYmQ6IHRoZSBj dXJyZW50IGtiZCBjb250cm9sbGVyIGNvbW1hbmQgYnl0ZSAwMDY3DQphdGti ZDoga2V5Ym9hcmQgSUQgMHg0MWFiICgyKQ0Ka2JkMCBhdCBhdGtiZDANCmti ZDA6IGF0a2JkMCwgQVQgMTAxLzEwMiAoMiksIGNvbmZpZzoweDEsIGZsYWdz OjB4M2QwMDAwDQpwc20wOiBjdXJyZW50IGNvbW1hbmQgYnl0ZTowMDY3DQpw c20wOiBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcmVzZXQgdGhlIGF1eCBkZXZpY2UuDQp2Z2EwOiA8 R2VuZXJpYyBJU0EgVkdBPiBhdCBwb3J0IDB4M2MwLTB4M2RmIGlvbWVtIDB4 YTAwMDAtMHhiZmZmZiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmYjA6IHZnYTAsIHZnYSwgdHlwZTpW R0EgKDUpLCBmbGFnczoweDcwMDdmDQpmYjA6IHBvcnQ6MHgzYzAtMHgzZGYs IGNydGM6MHgzZDQsIG1lbToweGEwMDAwIDB4MjAwMDANCmZiMDogaW5pdCBt b2RlOjI0LCBiaW9zIG1vZGU6MywgY3VycmVudCBtb2RlOjI0DQpmYjA6IHdp bmRvdzoweGMwMGI4MDAwIHNpemU6MzJrIGdyYW46MzJrLCBidWY6MCBzaXpl OjMyaw0KVkdBIHBhcmFtZXRlcnMgdXBvbiBwb3dlci11cA0KNTAgMTggMTAg MDAgMDAgMDAgMDMgMDAgMDIgNjcgNjAgNGYgNTAgODMgNTUgODEgDQpiZiAx ZiAwMCA0ZiAwZSAwZiAwMCAwMCAwNyA4MCA5YyA4ZSA4ZiAyOCAxZiA5NiAN CmI5IGEzIGZmIDAwIDAxIDAyIDAzIDA0IDA1IDE0IDA3IDM4IDM5IDNhIDNi IDNjIA0KM2QgM2UgM2YgMGMgMDAgMGYgMDggMDAgMDAgMDAgMDAgMDAgMTAg MGUgMDAgZmYgDQpWR0EgcGFyYW1ldGVycyBpbiBCSU9TIGZvciBtb2RlIDI0 DQo1MCAxOCAxMCAwMCAxMCAwMCAwMyAwMCAwMiA2NyA2MCA0ZiA1MCA4MyA1 NSA4MSANCmJmIDFmIDAwIDRmIDBkIDBlIDAwIDAwIDAwIDAwIDljIDhlIDhm IDI4IDFmIDk2IA0KYjkgYTMgZmYgMDAgMDEgMDIgMDMgMDQgMDUgMTQgMDcg MzggMzkgM2EgM2IgM2MgDQozZCAzZSAzZiAwYyAwMCAwZiAwOCAwMCAwMCAw MCAwMCAwMCAxMCAwZSAwMCBmZiANCkVHQS9WR0EgcGFyYW1ldGVycyB0byBi ZSB1c2VkIGZvciBtb2RlIDI0DQo1MCAxOCAxMCAwMCAxMCAwMCAwMyAwMCAw MiA2NyA2MCA0ZiA1MCA4MyA1NSA4MSANCmJmIDFmIDAwIDRmIDBkIDBlIDAw IDAwIDAwIDAwIDljIDhlIDhmIDI4IDFmIDk2IA0KYjkgYTMgZmYgMDAgMDEg MDIgMDMgMDQgMDUgMTQgMDcgMzggMzkgM2EgM2IgM2MgDQozZCAzZSAzZiAw YyAwMCAwZiAwOCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAxMCAwZSAwMCBmZiANCnNjMDog PFN5c3RlbSBjb25zb2xlPiBhdCBmbGFncyAweDEwMCBvbiBpc2EwDQpzYzA6 IFZHQSA8MTYgdmlydHVhbCBjb25zb2xlcywgZmxhZ3M9MHgzMDA+DQpzYzA6 IGZiMCwga2JkMCwgdGVybWluYWwgZW11bGF0b3I6IHNjIChzeXNjb25zIHRl cm1pbmFsKQ0KcGNpYzAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzZTAg aW9tZW0gMHhkMDAwMCBvbiBpc2EwDQpwY2ljMTogbm90IHByb2JlZCAoZGlz YWJsZWQpDQpzaW8wOiBpcnEgbWFwczogMHgxIDB4MTEgMHgxIDB4MQ0Kc2lv MCBhdCBwb3J0IDB4M2Y4LTB4M2ZmIGlycSA0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAgb24gaXNh MA0Kc2lvMDogdHlwZSAxNjU1MEENCnNpbzE6IGlycSBtYXBzOiAweDEgMHg5 IDB4MSAweDENCnNpbzEgYXQgcG9ydCAweDJmOC0weDJmZiBpcnEgMyBvbiBp c2EwDQpzaW8xOiB0eXBlIDE2NTUwQQ0Kc2lvMjogbm90IHByb2JlZCAoZGlz YWJsZWQpDQpzaW8zOiBub3QgcHJvYmVkIChkaXNhYmxlZCkNCnBwYzA6IHBh cmFsbGVsIHBvcnQgZm91bmQgYXQgMHgzNzgNCnBwYzA6IHVzaW5nIGV4dGVu ZGVkIEkvTyBwb3J0IHJhbmdlDQpwcGMwOiBTUFANCnBwYzA6IDxQYXJhbGxl bCBwb3J0PiBhdCBwb3J0IDB4Mzc4LTB4MzdmIGlycSA3IG9uIGlzYTANCnBw YzA6IEdlbmVyaWMgY2hpcHNldCAoTklCQkxFLW9ubHkpIGluIENPTVBBVElC TEUgbW9kZQ0KcGxpcDA6IDxQTElQIG5ldHdvcmsgaW50ZXJmYWNlPiBvbiBw cGJ1czANCmJwZjogbHAwIGF0dGFjaGVkDQpscHQwOiA8UHJpbnRlcj4gb24g cHBidXMwDQpscHQwOiBJbnRlcnJ1cHQtZHJpdmVuIHBvcnQNCnBwaTA6IDxQ YXJhbGxlbCBJL08+IG9uIHBwYnVzMA0KZWQwIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBh dCBwb3J0IDB4MjgwLTB4MjlmIGlvbWVtIDB4ZDgwMDAgaXJxIDEwIG9uIGlz YTANCmZlMCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDMwMC0weDMxZiBv biBpc2EwDQppZTAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzMDAgaW9t ZW0gMHhkMDAwMCBpcnEgMTAgb24gaXNhMA0KbG5jMCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcHJv YmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDI4MCBpcnEgMTAgZHJxIDAgb24gaXNhMA0KY3MwIGZh aWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MzAwLTB4MzFmIG9uIGlzYTANCnNu MCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDMwMC0weDMwZiBpcnEgMTAg b24gaXNhMA0KaXNhX3Byb2JlX2NoaWxkcmVuOiBwcm9iaW5nIFBuUCBkZXZp Y2VzDQpCSU9TIEdlb21ldHJpZXM6DQogMDowMzNhMWYzZiAwLi44MjY9ODI3 IGN5bGluZGVycywgMC4uMzE9MzIgaGVhZHMsIDEuLjYzPTYzIHNlY3RvcnMN CiAxOjAyNmIzZjNmIDAuLjYxOT02MjAgY3lsaW5kZXJzLCAwLi42Mz02NCBo ZWFkcywgMS4uNjM9NjMgc2VjdG9ycw0KIDI6MDNmZWZlM2YgMC4uMTAyMj0x MDIzIGN5bGluZGVycywgMC4uMjU0PTI1NSBoZWFkcywgMS4uNjM9NjMgc2Vj dG9ycw0KIDM6MDNmZmZlM2YgMC4uMTAyMz0xMDI0IGN5bGluZGVycywgMC4u MjU0PTI1NSBoZWFkcywgMS4uNjM9NjMgc2VjdG9ycw0KIDQ6MDNmZmZlM2Yg MC4uMTAyMz0xMDI0IGN5bGluZGVycywgMC4uMjU0PTI1NSBoZWFkcywgMS4u NjM9NjMgc2VjdG9ycw0KIDAgYWNjb3VudGVkIGZvcg0KRGV2aWNlIGNvbmZp Z3VyYXRpb24gZmluaXNoZWQuDQpicGY6IHBwcDAgYXR0YWNoZWQNCm5ldyBt YXNrczogYmlvIDY4ZDA0MCwgdHR5IDYzMDA5YSwgbmV0IDY3MDQ5YQ0KYnBm OiBzbDAgYXR0YWNoZWQNCmJwZjogZmFpdGgwIGF0dGFjaGVkDQpicGY6IGxv MCBhdHRhY2hlZA0KYWQwOiBzdWNjZXNzIHNldHRpbmcgV0RNQTIgb24gSW50 ZWwgY2hpcA0KQ3JlYXRpbmcgRElTSyBhZDANCmFyOiBGcmVlQlNEIGNoZWNr MSBmYWlsZWQNCmFkMDogPFNUNTg1MEEvODAwNzQ2PiBBVEEtMCBkaXNrIGF0 IGF0YTAtbWFzdGVyDQphZDA6IDgxNU1CICgxNjY5MjQ4IHNlY3RvcnMpLCAx NjU2IEMsIDE2IEgsIDYzIFMsIDUxMiBCDQphZDA6IDEgc2Vjcy9pbnQsIDEg ZGVwdGggcXVldWUsIFdETUEyDQphZDA6IHBpb21vZGU9NCBkbWFtb2RlPTIg dWRtYW1vZGU9LTEgY2JsaWQ9MA0KYWQxOiBzdWNjZXNzIHNldHRpbmcgV0RN QTIgb24gSW50ZWwgY2hpcA0KQ3JlYXRpbmcgRElTSyBhZDENCmFyOiBGcmVl QlNEIGNoZWNrMSBmYWlsZWQNCmFkMTogPFFVQU5UVU0gRklSRUJBTEwxMjgw QS9BNjMuMEUwMD4gQVRBLTAgZGlzayBhdCBhdGEwLXNsYXZlDQphZDE6IDEy MjJNQiAoMjUwMzg3MiBzZWN0b3JzKSwgMjQ4NCBDLCAxNiBILCA2MyBTLCA1 MTIgQg0KYWQxOiAxIHNlY3MvaW50LCAxIGRlcHRoIHF1ZXVlLCBXRE1BMg0K YWQxOiBwaW9tb2RlPTQgZG1hbW9kZT0yIHVkbWFtb2RlPS0xIGNibGlkPTAN CmFkMjogc3VjY2VzcyBzZXR0aW5nIFdETUEyIG9uIEludGVsIGNoaXANCkNy ZWF0aW5nIERJU0sgYWQyDQphcjogRnJlZUJTRCBjaGVjazEgZmFpbGVkDQph ZDI6IDxJQk0tRFRMQS0zMDcwNDUvVFg2T0E2MEE+IEFUQS01IGRpc2sgYXQg YXRhMS1tYXN0ZXINCmFkMjogNDM5NzlNQiAoOTAwNjk4NDAgc2VjdG9ycyks IDg5MzU1IEMsIDE2IEgsIDYzIFMsIDUxMiBCDQphZDI6IDE2IHNlY3MvaW50 LCAzMiBkZXB0aCBxdWV1ZSwgdGFnZ2VkIFdETUEyDQphZDI6IHBpb21vZGU9 NCBkbWFtb2RlPTIgdWRtYW1vZGU9NSBjYmxpZD0xDQphZDU6IHN1Y2Nlc3Mg c2V0dGluZyBVRE1BNSBvbiBIaWdoUG9pbnQgY2hpcA0KQ3JlYXRpbmcgRElT SyBhZDUNCmFyOiBIaWdoUG9pbnQgY2hlY2sxIGZhaWxlZA0KYWQ1OiA8SUJN LURUTEEtMzA3MDQ1L1RYNk9BNkFBPiBBVEEtNSBkaXNrIGF0IGF0YTItc2xh dmUNCmFkNTogNDM5NzlNQiAoOTAwNjk4NDAgc2VjdG9ycyksIDg5MzU1IEMs IDE2IEgsIDYzIFMsIDUxMiBCDQphZDU6IDE2IHNlY3MvaW50LCAzMiBkZXB0 aCBxdWV1ZSwgdGFnZ2VkIFVETUExMDANCmFkNTogcGlvbW9kZT00IGRtYW1v ZGU9MiB1ZG1hbW9kZT01IGNibGlkPTENCmFkNjogc3VjY2VzcyBzZXR0aW5n IFVETUE1IG9uIEhpZ2hQb2ludCBjaGlwDQpDcmVhdGluZyBESVNLIGFkNg0K YXI6IEhpZ2hQb2ludCBjaGVjazEgZmFpbGVkDQphZDY6IDxJQk0tRFRMQS0z MDcwNDUvVFg2T0E2MEE+IEFUQS01IGRpc2sgYXQgYXRhMy1tYXN0ZXINCmFk NjogNDM5NzlNQiAoOTAwNjk4NDAgc2VjdG9ycyksIDg5MzU1IEMsIDE2IEgs IDYzIFMsIDUxMiBCDQphZDY6IDE2IHNlY3MvaW50LCAzMiBkZXB0aCBxdWV1 ZSwgdGFnZ2VkIFVETUExMDANCmFkNjogcGlvbW9kZT00IGRtYW1vZGU9MiB1 ZG1hbW9kZT01IGNibGlkPTENCk1vdW50aW5nIHJvb3QgZnJvbSB1ZnM6L2Rl di9hZDBzMWENCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAx NjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KV0FSTklORzogLyB3YXMgbm90 IHByb3Blcmx5IGRpc21vdW50ZWQNCnN0YXJ0X2luaXQ6IHRyeWluZyAvc2Jp bi9pbml0DQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2 OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0 YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQw czE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUg MTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5k ID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4 YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBP Sw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcs IHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2 MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0 eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2Njkx ODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2 NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBz dGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFk MHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXpl IDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVu ZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAw eGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDog T0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3 LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQg NjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTog dHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5 MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAx NjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwg c3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQph ZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6 ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBl bmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUg MHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6 IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0 Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0 IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6 IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2 OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0g MTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUs IHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUgOiBPSw0K YWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNp emUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2Mywg ZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBl IDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2NjkxODUg OiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDE2Njky NDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFy dCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sNCmFkMHMx OiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAxNjY5MjQ3LCBzaXplIDE2 NjkxODUgOiBPSw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9 IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1 LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMTY2OTI0Nywgc2l6ZSAxNjY5MTg1IDogT0sN CmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBz aXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMs IGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlw ZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3 IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAw NDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3Rh cnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFz MTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAy NTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQg PSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhh NSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9L DQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwg c2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYz LCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5 cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQw NyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUw MDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0 YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQx czE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUg MjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5k ID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4 YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBP Sw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0Njks IHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2 MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0 eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0 MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1 MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBz dGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFk MXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXpl IDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVu ZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAw eGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDog T0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5 LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQg NjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTog dHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAw NDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAy NTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwg c3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6IE9LDQph ZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6 ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBl bmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6IHR5cGUg MHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUwMDQwNyA6 IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2 OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sNCmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0 IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBzaXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQxczE6 IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDI1MDA0NjksIHNpemUgMjUw MDQwNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0g OTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhh NSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDog T0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4 OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFy dCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQy czE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXpl IDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBl bmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlw ZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAz MjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkw MDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUs IHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9L DQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODks IHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQg NjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMx OiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5 MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5k ID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUg MHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3 IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2 MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBz dGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0K YWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBz aXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYz LCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTog dHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAw NjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9 IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4 YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6 IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAz ODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3Rh cnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFk MnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6 ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2Mywg ZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5 cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYw MzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5 MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1 LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBP Sw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5 LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0 IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDJz MTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUg OTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVu ZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkMnMxOiB0eXBl IDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMy NyA6IE9LDQphZDJzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAw NjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwg c3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sN CmFkNXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwg c2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDVzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2 MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQ1czE6 IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkw MDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkNXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQg PSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDVzMTogdHlwZSAw eGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcg OiBPSw0KYWQ1czE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYw Mzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkNXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0 YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQph ZDZzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNp emUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQ2czE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMs IGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCmFkNnMxOiB0 eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2 MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDZzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0g OTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KYWQ2czE6IHR5cGUgMHhh NSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDog T0sNCmFkNnMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSA5MDA2MDM4 OSwgc2l6ZSA5MDA2MDMyNyA6IE9LDQphZDZzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFy dCA2MywgZW5kID0gOTAwNjAzODksIHNpemUgOTAwNjAzMjcgOiBPSw0KbWQw OiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0K bWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdp Yw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBt YWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBu byBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxl OiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRh YmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9u IHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0 aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFy dGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkg cGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1h cnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHBy aW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlk IHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZh bGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBp bnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQw OiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0K bWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdp Yw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBt YWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBu byBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxl OiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRh YmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9u IHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0 aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFy dGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkg cGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1h cnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHBy aW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlk IHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZh bGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBp bnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0KbWQw OiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdpYw0K bWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdp Yw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBt YWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBu byBtYWdpYw0KbWQwOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxl OiBubyBtYWdpYw0KYWQwczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMsIGVuZCA9 IDE2NjkyNDcsIHNpemUgMTY2OTE4NSA6IE9LDQphZDFzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1 LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0gMjUwMDQ2OSwgc2l6ZSAyNTAwNDA3IDogT0sN CmFkMXMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAyNTAwNDY5LCBz aXplIDI1MDA0MDcgOiBPSw0KYWQyczE6IHR5cGUgMHhhNSwgc3RhcnQgNjMs IGVuZCA9IDkwMDYwMzg5LCBzaXplIDkwMDYwMzI3IDogT0sNCg== --0-1067937348-1026385038=:15074-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 4:31:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CBD37B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D43A43E58 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:31:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6BBVJk92597; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:31:19 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:31:19 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html > > > > > > > > > > Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. > > > > > There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. > > > > > > > > SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax. > > > > > > The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. > > > > Sorry, I'd meant "SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmall". > > Ok, but the kernel config has SHMALL as well. Is one (or more) > of the kernel options unused? The most priority has setting of kern.ipc.shmall. Next is 'options SHMALL' and next is 'options SHMMAXPGS'. If you do not define SHMALL then it will be equal to SHMMAXPGS. And as far as I know you need to set kern.ipc.shmall before any use of shared memory. You can not change it after use. The best place for kern.ipc.shmall setting is /etc/sysctl.conf. Setting in /boot/loader.conf is helpless. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:13:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFC137B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from search.sparks.net (d-207-5-180-136.gwi.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FFC43E52; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:13:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmiller@sparks.net) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id B6072D984; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:49:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA26D983; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:49:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/w -n changes? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > This is because new sshd(8) did not import the relevant fix > > from previous hacked OpenSSH version. [...] > > Committed. Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind there for a bit:) --- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:15:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4618437B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunsen.solidcore.dk (bunsen.solidcore.dk [217.116.225.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603C43E58 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from laursen@netgroup.dk) Received: from area51 (gw.oxygen.net [217.116.225.2]) (AUTH: LOGIN laursen@solidcore.dk) by bunsen.solidcore.dk with esmtp; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:15:32 +0200 Message-ID: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> Reply-To: "Lasse Laursen" From: "Lasse Laursen" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Software raid 1 on root partition? Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:14:44 +0200 Organization: NetGroup A/S MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm currently in the process of upgrading our Linux servers to FreeBSD. The Linux servers uses software raid 1 on the boot/root partitions - is there a way to do the same under FreeBSD 4.6? Yours -- Lasse Laursen - Systems Developer NetGroup A/S, St. Kongensgade 40H, DK-1264 Křbenhavn K, Denmark Phone: +45 3370 1526 - Fax: +45 3313 0066 - Web: www.netgroup.dk - We don't surf the net, we make the waves. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:15:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E137B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunsen.solidcore.dk (bunsen.solidcore.dk [217.116.225.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A5443E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from laursen@netgroup.dk) Received: from area51 (gw.oxygen.net [217.116.225.2]) (AUTH: LOGIN laursen@solidcore.dk) by bunsen.solidcore.dk with esmtp; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:15:32 +0200 Message-ID: <25f301c228d4$a33d8150$1a01000a@area51> Reply-To: "Lasse Laursen" From: "Lasse Laursen" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Max. memory amount Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:14:42 +0200 Organization: NetGroup A/S MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, We run a MySQL server on a FreeBSD 4.5 system. There is about 1.5 GByte ram in the machine and we would ofcause like to use as much as possible for the MySQL server. When doing a top we get: Mem: 644M Active, 508M Inact, 236M Wired, 38M Cache, 163M Buf, 81M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 326M Used, 1722M Free, 15% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 99425 mysql 2 0 426M 95344K poll 43.6H 6.20% 6.20% mysqld 44735 root 28 0 1912K 900K RUN 0:00 25.00% 1.22% top 129 root 2 0 2144K 856K select 0:58 0.00% 0.00% sshd The MySQL server seems only to use about 500MByte ram? Is there a max. limit that a process is allowed to use? In the LINT file I saw the following: # Certain applications can grow to be larger than the 128M limit # that FreeBSD initially imposes. Below are some options to # allow that limit to grow to 256MB, and can be increased further # with changing the parameters. MAXDSIZ is the maximum that the # limit can be set to, and the DFLDSIZ is the default value for # the limit. MAXSSIZ is the maximum that the stack limit can be # set to. You might want to set the default lower than the max, # and explicitly set the maximum with a shell command for processes # that regularly exceed the limit like INND. # options MAXDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" options DFLDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" Can we get the MySQL database to use more/all the memory by tweaking on these parameters? Yours -- Lasse Laursen - Systems Developer NetGroup A/S, St. Kongensgade 40H, DK-1264 Křbenhavn K, Denmark Phone: +45 3370 1526 - Fax: +45 3313 0066 - Web: www.netgroup.dk - We don't surf the net, we make the waves. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:28:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1037B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts7.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D77F43E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:28:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freymann@scaryg.shacknet.nu) Received: from scaryg.shacknet.nu ([64.231.132.25]) by tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20020711122756.IQKI18351.tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@scaryg.shacknet.nu>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:27:56 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=scaryg.shacknet.nu) by scaryg.shacknet.nu with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17Scya-0006S5-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:23:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:23:16 -0400 From: ScaryG To: "Allan McDonald" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Message-Id: <20020711082316.51bd2ac5.freymann@scaryg.shacknet.nu> In-Reply-To: <0F08B228C722D311B5FC00A0C9FB2C7322B4D9@casserver.ozdaq.com.au> References: <0F08B228C722D311B5FC00A0C9FB2C7322B4D9@casserver.ozdaq.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:24:50 +1000 "Allan McDonald" wrote: > since I have upgraded a box from 4.3 to 4.6 and since then can't ssh > into it. > It appears that PAM is now installed, but that could my > misinterpretation I have tried to see how to uninstall pam, but couldn't > find it easily. Sounds like you didn't read /usr/src/UPDATING. I'm not sure when PAM became a part of the base system, but I do recall tons of problems with early 4.x releases when people forgot this: 20010112: Important new FreeBSD-version stuff: PAM support has been worked in, partially from the "Unix" OpenSSH version. This requires adding the following in pam.conf: sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so sshd auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass sshd auth required pam_permit.so My suggestion is to check that your copy of /etc/pam.conf contains those lines. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Scary Gerry -- Senior Systems Manager freymann@scaryg.shacknet.nu -For web-hosting, DNS Services or PHP & MySql programming see www.interpool.ca -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:33:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06E637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09A043E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:33:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from pulcherrima (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BCXfC20965 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:33:41 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:33:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE. Having three-line C++ programs like the following #include #include int main() { } issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM], especially on -STABLE. I'd did a bit of investigation, and the source of this problem seems to be revision 1.6.2.2 of contrib/gcc/cccp.c. Either this should be reverted, or /usr/include/stddef.h and stdlib.h fixed. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 5:49:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C51537B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serv1.ilse.net (serv1.ilse.nl [62.69.160.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802EA43E4A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:49:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcolz@ilse.nl) Received: (from marcolz@localhost) by serv1.ilse.net (8.11.6/8.10.2) id g6BCnBh08532; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:49:11 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:49:11 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@freebsd.org, marcolz@stack.nl Subject: Re: /bin/sh, $MAIL and login.conf Message-ID: <20020711124911.GA8085@ilse.nl> References: <20020705132210.A20062@ilse.nl> <20020708203130.GA6805@gits.dyndns.org> <20020711005214.GD82744@gits.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711005214.GD82744@gits.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD serv1.ilse.net 3.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.ilse.nl/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:31:30PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > 2) Is there (going to be) an 'unsetenv' possibility in > > login.conf, so that I can still use 'default' for all classes > > and just unsetenv MAIL for sysadmins and root ? > > yes ;) > > root:\ > :ignorenologin:\ > :setenv=BLOCKSIZE=K,FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES:\ > :tc=default: > > Cyrille. Ah, of course. ;-) I somehow thought the 'setenv=' part to be accumulative... Thanks a lot ! Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 6:31:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EA437B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.icarz.com (ns1.icarz.com [207.99.22.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA3343E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:31:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenm@icarz.com) Received: from newken (dhcp104.icarz.com [207.99.22.104]) by hercules.icarz.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g6BDVJG13690; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <054301c228df$3b8846c0$681663cf@icarz.com> From: "Ken Menzel" To: "Lasse Laursen" , References: <25f301c228d4$a33d8150$1a01000a@area51> Subject: Re: Max. memory amount Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:31:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Lasse, This question is probably more appropriate for freebsd-questions or the mysql mailing list. Yes, you will want to increase MAXDSIZ and probably DFLDSIZ ex: create a custom kernel (if you have not done so already (see docs)) add this line: options MAXDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" change it to: options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" set KERNCONF to be your new kernel cd /usr/src;make kernel;shutdown -r NOW and voila! You can now have processes up to 1G. do NOT go above 2047 (1.999999G) or mysql will crash on start, this is a bug in FreeBSD introduced last october when these parameters where made changeable at boot time. BTW you should also be able to change these with the boot loader if you so desire. Best of luck, Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lasse Laursen" To: Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:14 AM Subject: Max. memory amount > Hi, > > We run a MySQL server on a FreeBSD 4.5 system. There is about 1.5 GByte ram > in the machine and we would ofcause like to use as much as possible for the > MySQL server. When doing a top we get: > > > Mem: 644M Active, 508M Inact, 236M Wired, 38M Cache, 163M Buf, 81M Free > Swap: 2048M Total, 326M Used, 1722M Free, 15% Inuse > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 99425 mysql 2 0 426M 95344K poll 43.6H 6.20% 6.20% mysqld > 44735 root 28 0 1912K 900K RUN 0:00 25.00% 1.22% top > 129 root 2 0 2144K 856K select 0:58 0.00% 0.00% sshd > > > The MySQL server seems only to use about 500MByte ram? Is there a max. limit > that a process is allowed to use? > > In the LINT file I saw the following: > > > # Certain applications can grow to be larger than the 128M limit > # that FreeBSD initially imposes. Below are some options to > # allow that limit to grow to 256MB, and can be increased further > # with changing the parameters. MAXDSIZ is the maximum that the > # limit can be set to, and the DFLDSIZ is the default value for > # the limit. MAXSSIZ is the maximum that the stack limit can be > # set to. You might want to set the default lower than the max, > # and explicitly set the maximum with a shell command for processes > # that regularly exceed the limit like INND. > # > options MAXDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" > options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" > options DFLDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" > > > Can we get the MySQL database to use more/all the memory by tweaking on > these parameters? > > > Yours > -- > Lasse Laursen - Systems Developer > NetGroup A/S, St. Kongensgade 40H, DK-1264 Křbenhavn K, Denmark > Phone: +45 3370 1526 - Fax: +45 3313 0066 - Web: www.netgroup.dk > > - We don't surf the net, we make the waves. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 6:41:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B37F37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB02843E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6BDf4wu082824 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:41:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g6BDf3JQ082821 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:41:04 +0300 (EEST) X-Authentication-Warning: atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua: dmitry owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:41:03 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE In-Reply-To: <20020710172542.GC96308@dru.dn.ua.lucky.freebsd.stable> Message-ID: <20020711163544.W66436-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > But who know: When Soren will fixed BUG with violation irq15 when > secondary IDE is disabled in BIOS setup and in kernel config??? In my case, the attachment of disabled ATA channel by the new driver seems to be harmless: ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ed1: port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 15 at device 10.0 on pci0 Ethernet card seems to be happy with the IRQ line, the only thing that one notices is "mux" instead of "ed1" on systat's vmstat screen. Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 6:46:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A651B37B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.icarz.com (ns1.icarz.com [207.99.22.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ECD43E70 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:46:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenm@icarz.com) Received: from newken (dhcp104.icarz.com [207.99.22.104]) by hercules.icarz.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g6BDDjG12364 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:13:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> From: "Ken Menzel" To: References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> Subject: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:13:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, If it's possible this makes a difference can we get a note about HZ added to the tuning(7) man page? Thanks Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hartmann, O." To: Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:58 AM Subject: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 > Dear Sirs. > > I followed an interesting dispute in this list about setting > the kernel option HZ=100 to HZ=10000. > > No one can say exactly what kind of hardware is 'fast enough' to > obtain benefits from setting this granularity option to that high value, > so each administrator has to do several efforts to examine whether > its hardware is suitable to switch o HZ=10000 or not. > > We use several SMP systems around here, some have special server > mainboards (Slot1 type, TYAN Thunder 2500), some new UP systems > with P4/ASUS P4TE main PCB and a low cost SMP system with > ASUS CUV4X-D PCB. On all these systems it seems to my subject > that performance or 'reaction' time has significantly increased. > > I did not test the behaviour under extremely heavy load, but > within our normal duties and daily work (webserver, MySQL server, > NFS server (UPD NFS/3), DHCP boot server, SAMBA server, analytical > number crunching with smaller applications in F77 and/or PGI pgf90 > under Linuxulator) it is a very convenient experience to see > how smooth these machines operate now. > > We also have a lot of pure diskless clients for X11 terminal services, > based on 750 MHz Duron and 64 MB PC133 slow SDRAM, Intel Pro/100+ > NICs. They also now have HZ set to 10000 and they also seem to operate > faster. > > Well, this is a subjective impression, not aproved by measurements. > > -- > MfG > O. Hartmann > > ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz > Becherweg 21 > 55099 Mainz > > Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) > Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) > FAX: +496131/3923532 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 6:50: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1937B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (adsl-64-169-154-205.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [64.169.154.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CA143E54; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: from absinthe2.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6BDnwE4075014; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: (from fred@localhost) by absinthe2.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6BDnw4j075013; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:49:57 -0700 From: Fred Condo To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: Mike Jakubik , Stable , dinoex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd vs ports sshd Message-ID: <20020711134957.GC72613@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> References: <20020710143306.GC70071@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> <20020711012016.X71272-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711012016.X71272-100000@mail.allcaps.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:50:32AM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Fred Condo wrote: > > > I strenuously disagree. Should inetd be a port? Sendmail? What about > > syslogd or named? Although not all should be on by default, they are > > certainly essential to enough users that they should be part of the > > default installation. > > Well, since you brought it up, the idea should certainly be open to > discussion ;) Yes, but perhaps no more on -stable. There is no way the arguably reasonable changes you propose below will go into stable, so this discussion is veering off-topic, and I would hate to be the guy responsible for reducing s/n here. > > I can make the case for removing any subsystem which is primarily > maintained by someone other than the FreeBSD team from the "base" system > (ie. buildworld/installworld). This would include named/bind (which most > people don't use), sendmail (lots of people use other mailers), OpenSSH > (security fixes propagate more often than OS releases), Perl (way too big > and unstable), etc. > > The latest OpenSSH fire drill certainly helps make the point. If OpenSSH > wasn't a part of the base buildworld, the dev team wouldn't have to worry > about it right now. It would be completely a ports issue. > > Please note that you can make packages part of a default install even if > it's not going to be part of the main buildworld. See the rather long > flamefest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdiscussion about removing Perl from the base > distribution. Very few people would argue that Perl shouldn't be part of > a "default" install. However, keeping it as part of a > buildworld/installworld base just becomes very unwieldy. The compromise > is to install it by default as a package. Yes, let us not start a "discussion" like the one about Perl here. This discussion should move to another list. I don't think this change should (or will) happen on RELENG_4, so it is moot to post here about it, and I will post no more in this thread forever :) -- Fred Condo - fred@condo.chico.ca.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7: 4: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B7737B409 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (vic-dial-196-31-177-29.mweb.co.za [196.31.177.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8655B43E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikedube64@hotmail.com) From: "MIKENA DDUBELA" To: Subject: IN NEED OF HELP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:47:32 +0200 Reply-To: "MIKENA DDUBELA" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020711140344.8655B43E52@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FAX: 27-731485293. ATTN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR/C. E. O. TEL:27-825087950. DEAR SIR/MADAM, BUSINESS TRANSACTION. MY NAME IS MIKENA DUBELA THE SON OF DR MOSES DUBE, ONE OF THE GREAT FARMERS IN ZIMBABWE. MY FATHER HAPPENS TO BE ONE OF THE OPPONENTS OF THE PRESIDENT OF ZIMBABWE [ROBERT MUGABE] IN HIS POLITICAL AMBITIONS TO REMAIN IN POWER FOREVER, BECAUSE OF THIS, MY FATHER'S FARM WAS BURNT DOWN AND THE WHOLE ASSETS WAS LOOTED WHILE MY FATHER LOST HIS LIFE. WHEN WE DISCOVERED THAT OUR LIVES WAS NO LONGER SAFE IN ZIMBABWE, MY MOTHER AND I DECIDED TO FLEE TO SOUTH AFRICA WITH THE MONEY MY FATHER HID AWAY IN MY MOTHER'S HOUSE. THIS MONEY, WHICH IS OUR ONLY HOPE OF SURVIVING IS US$16.5M [SIXTEEN MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ]. THIS MONEY IS NOW DEPOSITED IN A FINANCE & SECURITY COMPANY AS A BOX OF VALUABLE CONTAINING JEWELERIES, TO AVOID SABOTAGE. NOW, MY REFUGEE STATUS IN SOUTH AFRICA DOES NOT ALLOW ME TO HAVE A BANK ACCOUNT OR EMBARK ON ANY INVESTMENT AND AGAIN, THE CLOSENESS OF ZIMBABWE TO SOUTH AFRICA DOES NOT MAKE US FEEL VERY SAFE. I WANT YOUR HELP TO ASSIST ME MOVE THIS MONEY OUT OF SOUTH AFRICA TO YOUR FOREIGN ACCOUNTSO THAT I WILL COME OVER THERE TO YOUR COUNTRYTO INVEST THE MONEY. I, SURELY WILL REWARD YOUR EFFORT WITH 25% OF THE TOTAL AMOUNTWHILE 5% WILL COVER THE EXPENSES THAT MAY ARISE IN THE PROCESS OF THE TRANSFER OF THE MONEY. THOUGH, THERE IS NO RISK IN THIS BUSINESS BUT MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T DISCUSS THIS TRANSACTION WITH ANYONE. BEST REGARDS, MIKENA DUBELA. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7: 6:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F09B37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zpfe.com (dev06.eqp.zpfe.com [209.46.51.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B8E643E6D for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stevep-hv@zpfe.com) Received: (qmail 237 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 14:06:39 -0000 Received: from dev13.eqp.zpfe.com (HELO PUFFY.zpfe.com) (209.46.51.29) by dev06.eqp.zpfe.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 14:06:39 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:06:37 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Steve Peterson Subject: 4.6 & IP aliases / ifconfig Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just upgraded my server box from 4.4 to 4.6 via source, and my aliased IP addresses didn't come up on system boot. rc.conf said: ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240" It's alias0 that isn't working. Tried to add it from the command line and got: [root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240 alias ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists [root@magpie ~]# Getting rid of the netmask spec lets the alias be added: [root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 alias [root@magpie ~]# And removing the netmask spec in rc.conf makes it work at next boot time. Ideas on why I can't have a /28 alias? S To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:10:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C9637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [216.254.40.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1CA343E54 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:10:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: (qmail 79460 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 14:10:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:15 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Lasse Laursen Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> Reply-To: jim@nasby.net Mail-Followup-To: "Jim C. Nasby" , Lasse Laursen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51>; from laursen@netgroup.dk on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:14:44PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE-p1 i386 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some point. You can come close to this approach with manual methods, though. See the bootstrapping article for more info. Vinum wishlist: http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/wishlist.html Article about bootstrapping vinum: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/vinum/ On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:14:44PM +0200, Lasse Laursen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently in the process of upgrading our Linux servers to FreeBSD. The > Linux servers uses software raid 1 on the boot/root partitions - is there a > way to do the same under FreeBSD 4.6? > > > Yours > -- > Lasse Laursen - Systems Developer > NetGroup A/S, St. Kongensgade 40H, DK-1264 Křbenhavn K, Denmark > Phone: +45 3370 1526 - Fax: +45 3313 0066 - Web: www.netgroup.dk > > - We don't surf the net, we make the waves. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim@nasby.net Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:16:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB52337B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bobo.thehutt.org (pcp709198pcs.alxndr01.va.comcast.net [68.49.240.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F18B43E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:16:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jerry@thehutt.org) Received: from [10.0.3.13] (helo=nomad.thehutt.org) by bobo.thehutt.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17SemO-0001mM-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:18:49 -0400 Received: from jerry by nomad.thehutt.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17Sejg-0000Hi-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:16:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:15:59 -0400 From: Jerry A! To: Steve Peterson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6 & IP aliases / ifconfig Message-ID: <20020711141559.GA1066@nomad.thehutt.org> Reply-To: jerry@thehutt.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:06:37AM -0500, Steve Peterson wrote: : Just upgraded my server box from 4.4 to 4.6 via source, and my aliased IP : addresses didn't come up on system boot. : : rc.conf said: : : ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" : ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240" : : And removing the netmask spec in rc.conf makes it work at next boot time. : : Ideas on why I can't have a /28 alias? man ifconfig(8) or check out this list's archives, please. --Jerry Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... ...It's much more important than that! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:18:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566DF37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from norton.palomine.net (dsl254-102-179.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.102.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BCA243E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:18:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjohnson@palomine.net) Received: (qmail 40508 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jul 2002 14:18:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:18:38 -0400 From: Chris Johnson To: Steve Peterson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6 & IP aliases / ifconfig Message-ID: <20020711141838.GA40467@palomine.net> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:06:37AM -0500, Steve Peterson wrote: > Just upgraded my server box from 4.4 to=20 > 4.6 via source, and my aliased IP=20 > addresses didn't come up on system boot. Check the list archives and the ifconfig man page. Chris Johnson --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9LZO8PC78Lz4X/PARAjYWAKCMud5uflesEZpcbXwtqhfPlS7LLACZAfGV QWiHzbZZnzqRSsmUQvXt1BM= =5e+H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:21:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8110137B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA043E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@cloud9.net) Received: from earl-grey.cloud9.net (earl-grey.cloud9.net [168.100.1.1]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F7628D7D for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Hennessy To: Subject: Re: Cistron 1.6.6 freeze-ups (fwd) Message-ID: <20020711101547.A89350-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all. I'm using FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE, and I was wondering if any of the following message makes sense. Basically, I'm running Cistron RADIUS 1.6.6 among other things on my FreeBSD box and as of late have run into a problem where the authentication process seems to die for no apparent reason. This has been happening every few hours for a few days now and I was wondering if there was any advice on how to further troubleshoot/resolve the problem. The only way to bring the process back to life is to kill radiusd off and restart it fresh. They seem to think that it's a UDP problem in FreeBSD but have no other ideas. Any comments or ideas would be appreciated. -- Mark P. Hennessy mark@cloud9.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:55:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Emile van Bergen Reply-To: cistron-radius@lists.cistron.nl To: "cistron-radius@lists.cistron.nl" Subject: Re: Cistron 1.6.6 freeze-ups On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Mark Hennessy wrote: > > > Still nothing from ktrace.out (strace doesn't compile, so I use the > > > included FreeBSD ktrace) > > > > What does ps show as the syscall the processes are sleeping on (look at > > the 'wchan' column)? What's the process state? Are they STOPed, for > > whatever reason, eg. because of a failed trace attempt (state T)? > > > UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND > 0 25033 1 0 2 0 1904 1052 sbwait Is ?? 0:10.64 /usr/local/sbin/radiusd > 0 25034 25033 0 2 0 1776 996 select S ?? 0:00.68 /usr/local/sbin/radiusd Hmm, it's in sbwait, which seems to be a kernel routine that is called when recvfrom() blocks. But if the server would block there, it would become runnable again as soon as something comes in (which does happen, see below), and that doesn't happen. I don't know if it's related, but there is a bug in NetBSD (you use FreeBSD, I know) that had something to do with the kernel looping in sbwait, look at http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/495/2000/5/50/3799097/ > The server hasn't been bound to any specific outside interface at the > commandline. > > netstat -a | head -2 ; netstat -a | grep rad > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > udp4 0 0 *.radacct *.* > udp4 14238 0 *.radius *.* ^^^^^ This is an interesting number. Apparently the kernel receives the packets allright, but doesn't pass them on to Cistron for whatever reason. It looks like you have a FreeBSD bug...? Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | e-advies@evbergen.xs4all.nl tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.radius.cistron.nl/list/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:30:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945A537B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EB543E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6BEUYmW014265; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:30:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020711102924.036b6230@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:34:31 -0400 To: Mark Hennessy , From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Cistron 1.6.6 freeze-ups (fwd) In-Reply-To: <20020711101547.A89350-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:21 AM 11/07/2002 -0400, Mark Hennessy wrote: >Hi all. I'm using FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE, and I was wondering if any of the >following message makes sense. >This is an interesting number. Apparently the kernel receives the >packets allright, but doesn't pass them on to Cistron for whatever >reason. > >It looks like you have a FreeBSD bug...? There are a good number of people who run Cistron RADIUS on FreeBSD. Rather than tracing obscure (possibly nonexistent) kernel bugs, I would look first for the more common problems. Typically, on machines with more than one interface (logical or physical) source addresses come into play. Start up radiusd and force the bind address to be the one you expect (also do the port as this can be a problem as well since there are 2 'standards') e.g. if you use RADIUS on port 1645 (instead of 1812) and config the clients to expect it on 192.168.1.43, start up radiusd as so. radiusd -i 192.168.1.43 -p 1645 If you still see problems, add the -x and run it in debug mode and see if there are any messages. ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:41:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CCB37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sage-one.net (adsl-65-71-135-137.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.71.135.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263DE43E54 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:41:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jackstone@sage-one.net) Received: from sagea (sagea [192.168.0.3]) by sage-one.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6BEfH573150; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:41:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jackstone@sage-one.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020711094127.02e79b20@mail.sage-one.net> X-Sender: jackstone@mail.sage-one.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:41:27 -0500 To: Steve Peterson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jack L. Stone" Subject: Re: 4.6 & IP aliases / ifconfig In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:06 AM 7.11.2002 -0500, Steve Peterson wrote: >Just upgraded my server box from 4.4 to 4.6 via source, and my aliased IP >addresses didn't come up on system boot. > >rc.conf said: > >ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" >ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240" > >It's alias0 that isn't working. Tried to add it from the command line and got: > >[root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240 alias >ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists >[root@magpie ~]# > >Getting rid of the netmask spec lets the alias be added: > >[root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 alias >[root@magpie ~]# > >And removing the netmask spec in rc.conf makes it work at next boot time. > >Ideas on why I can't have a /28 alias? > By now you should be aware this subject is answered many times. On "28", your netmask should be 255.255.255.255 (better yet, 0xffffffff) not the "240". Try that and your troubles should go away. In rc.conf ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.255" ... or: ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 0xffffffff" Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net jackstone@sage-one.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:54:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046B837B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tunisiamail.com (200-163-220-204-gnace7002.dsl.telebrasilia.net.br [200.163.220.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0492943E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:53:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Main_office6434e27@tunisiamail.com) Received: from unknown (HELO a231242.upc-a.zhello.nl) (24.112.150.80) by mta21.bigpong.com with esmtp; 12 Jul 0102 00:54:08 -1000 Received: from 207.204.222.220 ([207.204.222.220]) by hd.ressort.net with esmtp; 11 Jul 0102 14:49:01 +0600 Received: from unknown (174.164.66.130) by hd.ressort.net with esmtp; Thu, 11 Jul 0102 20:43:54 -0400 Received: from 149.128.198.241 ([149.128.198.241]) by hd.ressort.net with esmtp; 11 Jul 0102 16:38:47 +0700 Received: from unknown (57.66.165.123) by rly-xw01.otpalo.com with local; 11 Jul 0102 23:33:40 -0900 Reply-To: "Please Read" Message-ID: <005a01d56b3a$6324e7a0$0ad05ba6@mxeipy> From: "Please Read" To: Subject: Know the different HGH products Date: Thu, 11 Jul 0102 07:31:41 +0700 MiME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C3_13D87C5B.E6261E16" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ------=_NextPart_000_00C3_13D87C5B.E6261E16 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 VGhyZWUgZGlmZmVyZW50IEhHSCBwcm9kdWN0cyBhcmU/DQoNCjxodG1sPg0K DQo8aGVhZD4NCg0KPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBj b250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9d2luZG93cy0xMjUyIj4NCg0K PG1ldGEgbmFtZT0iR0VORVJBVE9SIiBjb250ZW50PSJNaWNyb3NvZnQgRnJv bnRQYWdlIDQuMCI+DQoNCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IlByb2dJZCIgY29udGVudD0i RnJvbnRQYWdlLkVkaXRvci5Eb2N1bWVudCI+DQoNCjx0aXRsZT5UaGVyZSBh cmUgdGhyZWUgZGlmZmVyZW50IHR5cGVzIG9mIEhHSCBwcm9kdWN0czwvdGl0 bGU+DQoNCjwvaGVhZD4NCg0KPGJvZHkgYmFja2dyb3VuZD0iY2xvdWRzLmpw ZyI+DQoNCjxwPjxmb250IHNpemU9IjQiPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjODAwMDAw Ij48Yj5UaGVyZSBhcmUgdGhyZWUgZGlmZmVyZW50IHR5cGVzIG9mDQoNCkhH SCBwcm9kdWN0cy48L2I+PC9mb250Pjxicj4NCg0KVGhlIGNvbmZ1c2lvbiBp cyB0aGF0IGFsbCB0aHJlZSBhcmU8YnI+DQoNCmFkdmVydGlzZWQgYXMgaWYg dGhleSB3ZXJlIHRoZSBzYW1lLjwvZm9udD48YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4N Cg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 IDx1PlRoZSB0aHJlZSB0eXBlcyBhcmU6PC91Pjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJy Pg0KDQo8Yj4xKTwvYj4gLS0tIDxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMEZGIj48Yj5I b21lb3BhdGhpYyBIR0g8L2I+PC9mb250Pjxicj4NCg0KPGI+Mik8L2I+IC0t LSA8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBGRiI+PGI+UHJlLWN1cnNvciBIR0g8L2I+ PC9mb250Pjxicj4NCg0KPGI+Myk8L2I+IC0tLSA8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAw MDBGRiI+PGI+UmVhbCBvciBzeW50aGV0aWMgSEdIPC9iPjwvZm9udD4NCg0K KGRlbGl2ZXJlZCBieSBpbmplY3Rpb248YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBvciwgYnkgYW4gb3JhbCBz cHJheSBtZXRob2QpLjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQpEbyB5b3Uga25v dyBkaWZmZXJlbmNlcz88YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KQ2FsbCB1cyBh bmQgd2UnbGwgZXhwbGFpbiB0aGVtIHRvIHlvdS48YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxi cj4NCg0KT3VyIHRvbGwgZnJlZSBudW1iZXIgaXMgPGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMw MDAwODAiPjxiPjEtODg4LTYyMS03MzAwPC9iPjwvZm9udD48YnI+DQoNCkFu IEhHSCBzdGFmZiBtZW1iZXIgaXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlPGJyPg0KDQo5IHRvIDUg UGFjaWZpYyBUaW1lLjxicj4NCg0KSWYgYWZ0ZXIgaG91cnMsIHBsZWFzZSBs ZWF2ZSB5b3UgbmFtZTxicj4NCg0KYW5kIGRheSBhbmQgZXZlbmluZyBwaG9u ZSBudW1iZXJzLjxicj4NCg0KV2Ugd2lsbCBjYWxsIHlvdSBiYWNrIGluIGEg bm8gcHJlc3N1cmUsPGJyPg0KDQplZHVjYXRpb25hbCBtYW5uZXIuPGJyPg0K DQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG92ZXJzZWFzIGNhbGwgeW91ciBsb25nIGRpc3RhbmNl PGJyPg0KDQpvcGVyYXRvciBhbmQgYXNrIHRvIGJlIGNvbm5lY3RlZCB0byBv dXI8YnI+DQoNCnBob25lIG51bWJlci4mbmJzcDsgV2Ugd2lsbCBjYWxsIHlv dSBiYWNrIHNvPGJyPg0KDQp3ZSBjYW4gcGF5IGZvciB0aGUgbG9uZyBkaXN0 YW5jZSBjaGFyZ2VzLjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQo8Zm9udCBjb2xv cj0iI0ZGMDAwMCI+Rm9yIG1vcmUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gb24gSEdIIHJlYWQg b24uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi48L2ZvbnQ+PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCkhB VkUgWU9VIEhFQVJEIE9GPGJyPg0KDQpIVU1BTiBHUk9XVEggSE9STU9ORSAo SEdIKT8/Pzxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsgUmVsZWFzZWQgYnkgeW91ciBvd24gcGl0dWl0YXJ5IGdsYW5k LCBIR0ggc3RhcnRzDQoNCmRlY2xpbmluZzxicj4NCg0KaW4geW91ciAyMHMs IGV2ZW4gbW9yZSBpbiB5b3VyIDMwcyBhbmQgNDBzLCBldmVudHVhbGx5IHJl c3VsdGluZzxicj4NCg0KaW4gdGhlIHNocmlua2FnZSBvZiBtYWpvciBvcmdh bnMgLS0gcGx1cywgYWxsPGJyPg0KDQpvdGhlciBzeW1wdG9tcyByZWxhdGVk IHRvIG9sZCBhZ2UuPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4N Cg0KSU4gVEhPVVNBTkRTIE9GIENMSU5JQ0FMIFNUVURJRVMsPGJyPg0KDQpI R0ggSEFTIEJFRU4gU0hPV04gVE8gQUNDT01QTElTSCBUSEUgRk9MTE9XSU5H Ojxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQoqIFJlZHVjZSBCb2R5IEZhdCBhbmQg QnVpbGQgTGVhbiBNdXNjbGU8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBXSVRIT1VU IEVYRVJDSVNFITxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQoqIEVuaGFuY2UgU2V4 dWFsIFBlcmZvcm1hbmNlPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiogUmVtb3Zl IFdyaW5rbGVzIGFuZCBDZWxsdWxpdGU8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0K KiBMb3dlciBCbG9vZCBQcmVzc3VyZSBhbmQgSW1wcm92ZSBDaG9sZXN0ZXJv bCBQcm9maWxlPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiogSW1wcm92ZSBTbGVl cCwgVmlzaW9uIGFuZCBNZW1vcnk8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KKiBS ZXN0b3JlIEhhaXIgQ29sb3IgYW5kIEdyb3d0aDxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJy Pg0KDQoqIFN0cmVuZ3RoZW4gdGhlIEltbXVuZSBTeXN0ZW08YnI+DQoNCiZu YnNwOzxicj4NCg0KKiBJbmNyZWFzZSBFbmVyZ3kgYW5kIENhcmRpYWMgT3V0 cHV0PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiogVHVybiBiYWNrIHlvdXIgYm9k eSdzIEJpb2xvZ2ljYWwgVGltZSBDbG9jayAxMCAtIDIwIHllYXJzPGJyPg0K DQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiogTGl2ZSBMb25nZXIgQU5EIFN0cm9uZ2VyPGJy Pg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCkFsbCBuYXR1cmFsIGFuZCBvcmdhbmljIHBs YW50IGJhc2VkPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIj MDAwMEZGIj48Yj5GRUVMIDEwIFlFQVJTIFlPVU5HRVIgV0lUSCBPUkFMIFNQ UkFZIEhHSC48YnI+DQoNCkdVQVJBTlRFRUQ8L2I+PC9mb250Pjxicj4NCg0K Jm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgV2UgYXJlIHRoZSBt YW51ZmFjdHVyZXIgYW5kIHdlIHNlbGwgZGlyZWN0bHkgdG8gRG9jdG9ycyw8 YnI+DQoNCkNoaXJvcHJhY3RvcnMsIGFuZCBjb25zdW1lcnMgd29ybGQgd2lk ZSB0aGUgaGlnaGVzdCBncmFkZTxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7SEdIIE9yYWwgU3By YXkgYXZhaWxhYmxlLiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgV2l0aCBpbnRlcm5ldCBtYXJrZXRpbmcs IHdlIGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIHNhdmUNCg0KYWR2ZXJ0aXNpbmc8YnI+DQoNCmNv c3QgYW5kIHBhc3MgdGhvc2Ugc2F2aW5ncyBhbG9uZyB0byB5b3UuPGJyPg0K DQpCdXQgeW91IG11c3QgYWN0IG5vdy4mbmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxi cj4NCg0KVG8gcmVjZWl2ZSBtb3JlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGNhbGwmbmJzcDsg dXMgbm93Ljxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsgVE9MTCBGUkVFIDxiPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMDgwIj4xLTg4 OC02MjEtNzMwMDwvZm9udD48L2I+PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCldl IG11c3Qgc3BlYWsgdG8geW91IGluIHBlcnNvbiB0byBxdWFsaWZ5IHlvdXIg dXNhZ2UuPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyBBbGwgb2YgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgd2lsbCBiZSBhZGRyZXNz ZWQgYW5kIGFuc3dlcmVkIGluDQoNCmEgZnJpZW5kbHksPGJyPg0KDQpubyBw cmVzc3VyZSBtYW5uZXIuJm5ic3A7IE91ciBtYWluIHB1cnBvc2UgaXMgdG8g cHJvdmlkZSB5b3Ugd2l0aDxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gc28g eW91IGNhbiBtYWtlIGFuIGVkdWNhdGVkIGRlY2lzaW9uLjxicj4NCg0KJm5i c3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgRm9yIG1vcmUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY2FsbDxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgPGI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwODAiPjEtODg4 LTYyMS03MzAwPC9mb250PjwvYj48YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KJm5i c3A7SWYgeW91IGFyZSBvbiBsaW5lIHdyaXRlIGRvd24gb3VyPGJyPg0KDQpw aG9uZSBudW1iZXIgYW5kIGNhbGwgdXMgd2hlbiB5b3UgY2FuLjxicj4NCg0K Jm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQpTb29uLCB5b3UgYW5kIHlvdXIgbG92ZWQgb25lcyB3 aWxsIGJlIHZlcnkgZ2xhZCB5b3UgZGlkLjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0K DQpSZWFkIHdoYXQgcGVvcGxlIGFyZSBzYXlpbmc6PGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8 YnI+DQoNCiZxdW90O1RoZSBlZmZlY3RzIG9mIDYgbW9udGhzIG9mIEdIIG9u PGJyPg0KDQpsZWFuIGJvZHkgbWFzcyBhbmQgZmF0IHdlcmUgZXF1aXZhbGVu dDxicj4NCg0KaW4gbWFnbml0dWRlIHRvIHRoZSBjaGFuZ2VzIGluY3VycmVk PGJyPg0KDQpkdXJpbmcgMTAtMjAgeWVhcnMgb2YgYWdpbmcuJnF1b3Q7PGJy Pg0KDQpEci4gRGFuaWVsIFJ1ZG1hbiwgTUQsPGJyPg0KDQpOZXcgRW5nbGFu ZCBKb3VybmFsIG9mIE1lZGljaW5lLjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQom cXVvdDtXaXRoaW4gZm91ciBtb250aHMsIG15IGJvZHkgZmF0IGRlY3JlYXNl ZDxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7Zm9ybSAzMCUgZG93biB0byAyMSUhIEkgbm90aWNl ZCBteSBza2luPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDtpcyBtb3JlIHN1cHBsZSBhbmQgbXkg b3ZlcmFsbCBtZW50YWw8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwO291dGxvb2sgaW1wcm92ZWQg c2lnbmlmaWNhbnRseS4mcXVvdDs8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwO0QuVy4sIE5ldyBK ZXJzZXk8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KJnF1b3Q7V2UgaGF2ZSBiZWVu IG9uIHRoZSBzcHJheSBmb3IganVzdCAzIHdlZWtzPGJyPg0KDQpub3csIGFu ZCBiZXNpZGVzIHRoZSB0cmVtZW5kb3VzIGVuZXJneSB3ZTxicj4NCg0KYm90 aCBmZWVsLCBteSBodXNiYW5kcyBhbGxlcmdpZXMgYW5kIHNwZWxsczxicj4N Cg0Kb2YgZGVwcmVzc2lvbiBoYXZlIGxpZnRlZC4gSSBhbSBoZWFsaW5nPGJy Pg0KDQpleHRyZW1lbHkgZmFzdCBhZnRlciBhbiBhY2NpZGVudCBhbmQgaGF2 ZTxicj4NCg0KbG9zdCA3IGxicy4gd2l0aG91dCB0cnlpbmchJnF1b3Q7PGJy Pg0KDQpDLkIuLCBGbGFnc3RhZmYuIEFaPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoN ClRoYW5rcyBmb3IgcmVhZGluZyBvdXIgbGV0dGVyLDxicj4NCg0KVGhlIEhH SCBTdGFmZjxicj4NCg0KVVNBIERpdmlzaW9uPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+ DQoNClBTOiZuYnNwOyBUaGUgSEdIIFN0YWZmIGd1YXJhbnRlZXMgdGhlPGJy Pg0KDQpoaWdoZXN0IHF1YWxpdHkgYW5kIGxvd2VzdCBwcmljZS48YnI+DQoN CiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7V2UgbWFudWZhY3R1cmUgYW5kIHNoaXAg ZGlyZWN0bHkgdG8geW91ciBkb29yLjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQpD YWxsIHVzIG5vdyA8Yj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDA4MCI+MS04ODgtNjIx LTczMDA8L2ZvbnQ+PC9iPjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7PGJyPg0KDQo9PT09PT09 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IEVuZCBvZiBtZXNzYWdlID09PT09PT09Jm5ic3A7PGJy Pg0KDQombmJzcDs8YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBUaGUgZm9sbG93aW5n IHN0YXRlbWVudCBpcyBwcm92aWRlZCB0byBiZTxicj4NCg0KaW4gY29tcGxp YW5jZSB3aXRoIGNvbW1lcmNpYWwgZW1haWwgbGF3cy48YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNw Ozxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IElmIHlvdSBkbyBub3Qgd2lzaCB0byBy ZWNlaXZlIGZ1cnRoZXI8YnI+DQoNCm1haWxpbmdzLCBwbGVhc2UgY2xpY2sg cmVwbHkgdG86ICB0aGVfaGdoX2NsaW5pY0BidGFtYWlsLm5ldC5jbiAgYW5k IHR5cGUgcmVtb3ZlIGluIHRoZSBzdWJqZWN0IGJveC48YnI+DQoNClRoZW4g Y2xpY2sgc2VuZC48YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOzxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 IFRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpcyBpbiBmdWxsIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aDxicj4N Cg0KVS5TLiBGZWRlcmFsIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBmb3IgY29tbWVyY2lhbDxi cj4NCg0KZW1haWwgdW5kZXIgYmlsbCBTLjE2MTggVGl0bGUgbGxsLCBTZWN0 aW9uIDMwMSw8YnI+DQoNClBhcmFncmFwaCAoYSkoMikoQykgcGFzc2VkIGJ5 IHRoZSAxMDV0aCBVLlMuPGJyPg0KDQpDb25ncmVzcyBhbmQgaXMgbm90IGNv bnNpZGVyZWQgU1BBTTxicj4NCg0Kc2luY2UgaXQgaW5jbHVkZXMgYSByZW1v dmUgbWVjaGFuaXNtLio8YnI+DQoNClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpcyBub3QgaW50 ZW5kZWQgZm9yIHJlc2lkZW50cyBpbiB0aGU8YnI+DQoNCnN0YXRlcyBvZiBD QSwgTkMsIE5WLCBSSSwgVE4sIFZBICZhbXA7IFdBLjxicj4NCg0KU2NyZWVu aW5nIG9mIGFkZHJlc3NlcyBoYXMgYmVlbiBkb25lIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0PGJy Pg0KDQpvZiBvdXIgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGFiaWxpdHkuPGJyPg0KDQombmJzcDs8 YnI+DQoNCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBDYWxsIHVzDQoN Cm5vdyA8Yj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDA4MCI+MS04ODgtNjIxLTczMDA8 L2ZvbnQ+PC9iPiBmb3IgeW91cjxicj4NCg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7IGZyZWUNCg0KSEdIIGNvbnN1bHRhdGlvbi48L3A+DQoNCjxw Pjxicj4NCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91PC9wPg0KDQo8L2JvZHk+DQoNCjwvaHRtbD4N Cg0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0K IA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0K IA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0K IA0KDQotLQ0KDQo1NzgxUGNFSjctMTI3WUJRRTM3NDlSVmprMy03MjVsMjg= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 7:55:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18D037B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web11607.mail.yahoo.com (web11607.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E93B43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:55:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from holtor@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020711145531.43568.qmail@web11607.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.191.164.44] by web11607.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:55:31 PDT Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:55:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Holt Grendal Subject: OpenSSH error To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have seen atleast one post about this error but dont remember seeing the solution if there is one. The error is: Jul 11 10:52:50 damon sshd[84639]: getting vmemoryuse resource limit: Invalid argument It shows up whenever any user successfully logs on. Any ideas on how to fix this? I just rebuilt world July 9th at 20:33 Holt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 8: 9:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5939637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD18943E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536D42178D; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 033543D07; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15661.40858.819829.49331@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:09:14 -0400 To: Curt Sampson Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: References: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "CS" == Curt Sampson writes: >> For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000 >> with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is >> obviously impacting performance... CS> Yes, I'm sure your performance improved. By going from 780 MB to CS> 25 MB of shared memory, you just increased the amount of data the CS> OS can buffer from about 1.1 GB to 1.8 GB. You've just increased CS> your cache size by about 60%. Actually performance went down. Way down. I disagree with your argument that increasing the cache will help, since the cache is not needed if you don't pushd out your SHM pages in the first place and need to reload them quickly. What it turned out to be was that SHMMAX was larger than my SHMALL. Why the kernel let me build it that way without warnings is a hole in the config system, but not fatal. Bumping up SHMALL fixed my issue, and now my performance is back to normal. Perhaps Postgres could identify the smaller of SHMMAX and SHMALL when reporting the failure to get the memory, and indicate which one is too small. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 8:39:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B62B37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA4A43E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:39:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC0C217B3; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:39:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 1D10E3D07; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:39:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15661.42668.997886.567797@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:39:24 -0400 To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: References: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "VV" == Vince Vielhaber writes: VV> Have you looked at the FreeBSD section here: VV> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?kernel-resources.html VV> Most notably, I had to increase SHMMAXPGS on one of my FreeBSD machines. VV> There doesn't appear to be a sysctl variable for it. Thanks for the tip. Turns out my SHMALL was less than SHMMAX. Seems silly that the kernel lets you build it that way, but it does. Upping SHMALL to be commensurate with SHMMAX fixed my problem. I assume I did it manually via sysctl before (was nearly a year ago since this machine was rebooted, so I never noticed it wasn't set in sysctl.conf or the kernel). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 8:57:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074337B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (254.adsl0.ryv.worldonline.dk [213.237.10.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC543E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 861B3A96D; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:57:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:57:01 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: Rob Vella Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl Compilation Problem on 4.6-STABLE? Message-ID: <20020711155701.GV46386@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , Rob Vella , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:44:34PM -0700, Rob Vella wrote: > I'm not sure if I should be posting here.. but I've only had this problem > until I upgraded to 4.6... Here's the error: > > op/defins............Can't load '../lib/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so' for module > File::Glob: ../lib/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so: Undefined symbol "PL_stack_max" > at ../lib/XSLoader.pm line 75. > at ../lib/File/Glob.pm line 101 > Compilation failed in require at op/defins.t line 95. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at op/defins.t line 95. > FAILED at test 1 > > If this is related to 4.6, please let me know. Are we talking about base system perl, or perl port here? =Anton. -- | Anton Berezin | FreeBSD: The power to serve | | catpipe Systems ApS _ _ |_ | http://www.FreeBSD.org | | tobez@catpipe.net (_(_|| | tobez@FreeBSD.org | | +45 7021 0050 | Private: tobez@tobez.org | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9: 0:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0037B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C1843E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:00:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BFxM851692; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:59:27 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:59:22 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Paulo Fragoso Cc: Kevin Oberman , Alexandr Kovalenko , Gavin Atkinson , Michiel Boland , Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-Reply-To: <20020710154619.M93085-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> Message-ID: <20020711195426.N40021-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Paulo Fragoso wrote: [snip] PF> We have a doubt, if we have kern.securelevel=-1 and we are doing a PF> security upgrade (for example: that server is using 4.6-RELEASE and its PF> tag is tag=RELENG_4_6), are there any reason to switch to single-user PF> mode? PF> PF> We are upgrading remotely some servers without switch to sigle-user, but PF> in all cases are security upgrade only and all works fine. YMMV ;-) In maybe most cases it would work, but in others don't. I remembered at least two situations where single-user was really necessary (elf branding changes between 4.0 and 4.1, and some other, don't quite remember, where kernel and userland become incompatible). As someone already mentioned, serial console would be of great help for remote upgrades. And for remote troubleshooting, too. ;-) I would also recommend you getting "server-like" MBs with ability to redirect BIOS output to serial port -- but it's kind of being "perfect in everything" ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9:10:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9E37B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85BB43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BG9xs51886; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:09:59 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:09:59 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE In-Reply-To: <20020711163544.W66436-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: <20020711200923.V40021-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: DP> > But who know: When Soren will fixed BUG with violation irq15 when DP> > secondary IDE is disabled in BIOS setup and in kernel config??? DP> DP> In my case, the attachment of disabled ATA channel by the new driver DP> seems to be harmless: ... unless you are on SMP system... DP> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 DP> ed1: port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 15 at device DP> 10.0 on pci0 DP> DP> Ethernet card seems to be happy with the IRQ line, the only thing that one DP> notices is "mux" instead of "ed1" on systat's vmstat screen. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9:35:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5403C37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D8D43E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 11 Jul 2002 17:35:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:35:50 +0100 From: David Malone To: Larry Tai Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How to find out the default FD_SETSIZE in Freebsd-4.5 stable? Message-ID: <20020711163550.GA52376@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:05:59PM -0700, Larry Tai wrote: > Is there any way to find out what the default FD_SETSIZE under > Freebsd-4.5-stable is? And is this a kernel parameter that can be > increased without penalty of performance degradation elsewhere? It isn't a kernel parameter - it is actually a compile time parameter. Have a look at the man page for select - it describes how to bump the value at compile time. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9:40:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1C37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31B4143E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 11 Jul 2002 17:40:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:40:36 +0100 From: David Malone To: Ken Menzel Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Message-ID: <20020711164036.GB52376@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:13:41AM -0400, Ken Menzel wrote: > If it's possible this makes a difference can we get a note about HZ > added to the tuning(7) man page? Increasing HZ may have a deterimental effect on the performance of some workloads (I'd guess CPU intensive ones would suffer, though I haven't check if there is a measurable effect on modern hardware). If we had some objective measurements then it might be possible to write a section on tuning HZ. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9:51: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3E137B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (www2.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6CD43E42; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:50:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6BGhbNX001236; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:43:37 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Message-ID: <3D2DB5B9.1228220C@grosbein.pp.ru> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:43:37 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [ru] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: system immutable files make mergemaster look funny References: <20020709232647.V5990-100000@master.gorean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > > ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit > > ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine. > > I think that you guys are running an old mergemaster on a new -stable > system. Can you verify? The -f option to rm prevents error messages from > being displayed. Perhaps, you are right - I might run mergemaster after buildworld but before installworld. Now it's all right. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 9:57:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F099937B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from natto.numachi.com (natto.numachi.com [198.175.254.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58CF943E7B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:57:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: (qmail 3688 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 16:57:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:57:01 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making a 4.6 release under 4.5? Message-ID: <20020711125701.D259@numachi.com> References: <20020710170215.T259@numachi.com> <20020710201430.X259@numachi.com> <44eleb862z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <44eleb862z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>; from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.no-ip.com on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:24:20PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:24:20PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Interesting. Other than helplessly trolling the mail archives, is > > there a 'these are relevent tags' document somewhere I could use > > for research? > > Yes. It's an appendix to the FreeBSD handbook. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html Woo-hoo! Thanks. I missed that utterly. Doesn't help in my auxiliary quest of tying RELEASETAG with BUILDNAME for a 'make release', though. :/ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 10:17:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5562437B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CE143E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:17:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g6BHGoH00731; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:16:50 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Kevin Oberman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020711101650.B29387@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Kevin Oberman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020619150606.J97503-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56:14AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I keep posting this because people keep building new systems in a > dangerous way. > > Doing the installworld before building and booting the new kernel is > very risky. It will almost always make no difference, but, on the > rare occasions when it does, it will leave you with a VERY sick > system and the only way out maybe to re-install FreeBSD from scratch. > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > make buildworld > make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name > REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) > fsck -p > mount -a -t ufs > cd /usr/src > make installworld > mergemaster -i (-a is a bit inadequate unless you go back and clean up > the mess it often leaves before going to multi-user > mode.) > exit (to multi-user mode) Shouldn't "make installkernel" come after "make kernel..."? Let's all give homage to the handbook :) Best Regards, -jj -- Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew flowcharts; look how much good it did them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 10:22:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA8937B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TMA-1.brad-x.com (static-b2-191.highspeed.eol.ca [64.56.236.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B9143E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brad@brad-x.com) Received: from Olduvai.netpro.centennialcollege.ca (unknown [199.212.61.131]) by TMA-1.brad-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D580622104A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:22:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:19:17 -0400 From: Brad To: "Shannon -jj Behrens" Message-Id: <20020711131917.2d164dab.brad@brad-x.com> In-Reply-To: <20020711101650.B29387@alicia.nttmcl.com> References: <20020619150606.J97503-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> <20020711101650.B29387@alicia.nttmcl.com> Organization: brad-x.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:16:50 -0700 "Shannon -jj Behrens" wrote: [ ... ] > > Shouldn't "make installkernel" come after "make kernel..."? > > Let's all give homage to the handbook :) > > > Best Regards, > -jj > /usr/src/Makefile has this to say: # buildkernel - Rebuild the kernel and the kernel-modules. # installkernel - Install the kernel and the kernel-modules. # reinstallkernel - Reinstall the kernel and the kernel-modules. # kernel - buildkernel + installkernel. Cheers -- // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 10:22:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7ED37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326743E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:22:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BHLsQ53008; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:21:54 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:21:54 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Shannon -jj Behrens Cc: Kevin Oberman , Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-Reply-To: <20020711101650.B29387@alicia.nttmcl.com> Message-ID: <20020711212119.R40021-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: SjB> > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: SjB> > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) SjB> > make buildworld SjB> > make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name SjB> > REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) SjB> > fsck -p SjB> > mount -a -t ufs SjB> > cd /usr/src SjB> > make installworld SjB> > mergemaster -i (-a is a bit inadequate unless you go back and clean up SjB> > the mess it often leaves before going to multi-user SjB> > mode.) SjB> > exit (to multi-user mode) SjB> SjB> Shouldn't "make installkernel" come after "make kernel..."? Nope. kernel target is "buildkernel then installkernel" Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 10:45:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B771B37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host4.the-web-host.com (host4.the-web-host.com [209.239.49.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6F843E58 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Received: from 216.64.128.42 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host4.the-web-host.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6BHjj908134; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:45:45 -0400 To: "Brian T.Schellenberger" From: Bill Jones Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Reply-To: bjones@polestar.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:37:25 -0700 X-Sender: bjones@polestar.org X-Originating-Host: 216.64.128.42 [216.64.128.42]; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:45:44 GMT X-Mailer: WebMail Check v2.3.21 (2000-7-19) X-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; T312461), JavaScript: On Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG An interesting point. Perhaps my perspective has been coming across as arguing the wrong side. I agree that new installs are the most important. Changes which enable FreeBSD to work on what sort of systems people are purchasing at Dell, Best Buy, Circuit City and other retailers should matter greatly. Secondary, but still important, is making sure the changes break the least amount of legacy hardware as possible. I'd consider 5-6 years a good rule of thumb. If the hardware has gone unsupported for 5 years, then if it's not a huge installed base, losing support for it in BSD will have minimal impact. There have been problems with 4.6-RELEASE with new installs -- CD- ROM problems come to mind immediately. These are related to the ata commits. I would like to see 4.6.1 remedy this situation before our reputation as simple-to-install, always-works OS begins to falter. Admittedly, I can't argue as strongly for my case and the fact that I haven't upgraded. After all, I'm already running FreeBSD. :) I'll hop off the soapbox now. bts@babbleon.org wrote: But the new drivers probably support more first-time installs than the old one does. I know that it corrected multiple problems for me. I *am* running on a laptop, though. OTOH, that's sure getting to be more common rather than less over time. The *problem* is that it also broke some old hardware that previously worked. If you agree that the most important is what will work for most *new* installs, I believe that you are probably arguing the wrong side of the issue, or at the very least it's not clear what the right side of the issue would be. If you want to argue that the commit was a bad idea, then you'd have a much stronger case by arguing that FreeBSD shouldn't break what previously worked so that people aren't afraid to upgrade. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11: 3:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418D37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC043E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:03:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6BI3nGR000739; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:03:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6BI3mJK000738; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:03:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:03:43 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Bill Jones Cc: "Brian T.Schellenberger" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-ID: <20020711180343.GC638@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Jones , "Brian T.Schellenberger" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Bill Jones : > There have been problems with 4.6-RELEASE with new installs -- CD- > ROM problems come to mind immediately. These are related to the > ata commits. I would like to see 4.6.1 remedy this situation before > our reputation as simple-to-install, always-works OS begins to falter. FreeBSD has a reputation of being easy to install? ... Well, I guess that's true if you're not using sysinstall. ``What do you mean `I have to choose /exit/ to proceed to the next step of the installation'?'' :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11: 9:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913DA37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.nl (smtp2.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B7343E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (i1583.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.214.54]) by smtp2.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 339262053A; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:09:06 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:09:02 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: jim@nasby.net Cc: laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-Id: <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:15 -0500 "Jim C. Nasby" wrote: JCN> No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is JCN> on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some Er - have you seen man atacontrol in RELENG_4 lately ? I will quote the most pertinent extract: Allthough the ATA driver allows for creating an ATA RAID on disks on any controller, there are restrictions. It is only pos­ sible to boot on an array if its either located on a "real" ATA RAID controller like the Promise or Highpoint controllers, or if the RAID declared is of RAID1 or SPAN type, in case of a SPAN the partition to boot must reside on the first disk in the SPAN So the answer is - yes you can. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11:17:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1067C37B401 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E106B43E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 23255 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2002 18:17:19 -0000 Received: from p509101c8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.1.200) by mail.gmx.net (mp015-rz3) with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 18:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 16551 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 17:52:09 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 17:52:09 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6BHq9D16547 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:52:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:52:09 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020711195209.S1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020710214051.Q1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> <20020710221740.E97EB5D03@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020710221740.E97EB5D03@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:17:40PM -0700 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 15:17 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 > > From: Gerhard Sittig > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > > [ ... upgrading from source ... ] > > > > > > While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > > > mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > > > > Should this read "sh usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh -p" for > > the case where your in $PATH mergemaster(8) is just old enough to > > not know the -p switch or where it lacks needed preparation steps > > for the buildworld run to come? > > Actually, I believe that it should. Thanks for pointing this out. I just checked rev "$FreeBSD: src/UPDATING,v 1.73.2.72 2002/07/05 12:48:52 des Exp $" of the UPDATING file (i.e. the one in the -STABLE tree). While the 20020415 and 20020404 entries talk about "using the new version of mergemaster" and especially the latter mentions the -p option, the "COMMON ITEMS" section only has the (non special) mergemaster invocation after the installworld run. How about the following addition? (I didn't think too long about the 3.x -> 4.x cross update since I'm not too familiar with it while I did a 4.0 -> 4.6 update just last week:) Index: UPDATING =================================================================== RCS file: /CVSREPO/FreeBSD/src/UPDATING,v retrieving revision 1.73.2.72 diff -u -r1.73.2.72 UPDATING --- UPDATING 2002/07/05 12:48:52 1.73.2.72 +++ UPDATING 2002/07/11 17:01:01 @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ To update from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current 4.x-STABLE ---------- + sh usr.sbin/mergemaster/mergemaster.sh -p [3] make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE @@ -466,6 +467,12 @@ [2] If you do not run mergemaster, you will likely hit a number of show stopper problems. The biggest one is that your /etc/pam.conf won't let you log in using ssh. + [3] Sometimes building or installing the new source tree + has prerequisites an older system doesn't satisfy. This + is what the "pre buildworld mode" of mergemaster was + introduced for. Make sure to either install the new + version of mergemaster before buildworld or run mergemaster + from its source directory where the new version is available. What follows are older entries for those people upgrading from earlier versions of -stable/-current. virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11:17:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845C837B405 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E86043E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:17:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 23289 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2002 18:17:20 -0000 Received: from p509101c8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.1.200) by mail.gmx.net (mp015-rz3) with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 18:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16562 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 17:52:14 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 17:52:14 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6BHqEf16558 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:52:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:52:14 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020711195214.T1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51>; from laursen@netgroup.dk on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:14:44PM +0200 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 14:14 +0200, Lasse Laursen wrote: > > I'm currently in the process of upgrading our Linux servers to FreeBSD. The > Linux servers uses software raid 1 on the boot/root partitions - is there a > way to do the same under FreeBSD 4.6? The trick is to load a kernel with software RAID support even before you have a root filesystem with your kernel and modules on it. :) This is not different between Linux and FreeBSD. Putting everything you need to boot into a ramdisk and loading it with your favourite boot manager is the solution. (I'm not sure but maybe the newly created livecd port is of help, too. Or you have a look at how installation media are done.) virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11:30:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3899E37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (camus.noos.net [212.198.2.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321B643E54 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:30:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 40095248 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2002 18:30:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.70 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jul 2002 18:30:51 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (wijao3ccl6q6fe2d@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6BIUoTL021225; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:30:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6BIUowI021220; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:30:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:30:49 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Marc Olzheim Cc: stable@freebsd.org, marcolz@stack.nl Subject: Re: /bin/sh, $MAIL and login.conf Message-ID: <20020711183049.GE12246@gits.dyndns.org> References: <20020705132210.A20062@ilse.nl> <20020708203130.GA6805@gits.dyndns.org> <20020711005214.GD82744@gits.dyndns.org> <20020711124911.GA8085@ilse.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711124911.GA8085@ilse.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:49:11PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:31:30PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > 2) Is there (going to be) an 'unsetenv' possibility in > > > login.conf, so that I can still use 'default' for all classes > > > and just unsetenv MAIL for sysadmins and root ? > > > > yes ;) > > > > root:\ > > :ignorenologin:\ > > :setenv=BLOCKSIZE=K,FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES:\ > > :tc=default: > > > > Cyrille. > > Ah, of course. ;-) I somehow thought the 'setenv=' part to be > accumulative... they are not cumulative, in the present sample, the root's setenv override the default's setenv. it doesn't complement the later. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 11:56: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7437B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E500A43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:55:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BItrN54798; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:55:53 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:55:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: noc@rinet.ru Subject: 4.6-STABLE panics wirh MROUTING Message-ID: <20020711224825.Q40021-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello there colleagues. After upgrading one of our gateways I'd encountered reproducible kernel panics in multicast-related situations. processes involved are mrouted (from base system) and ospfd from zebra-0.92a_1 FreeBSD gw-f.rinet.ru 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #2: Wed Jul 10 15:05:26 MSD 2002 root@gw-f.rinet.ru:/var/obj/lh/src/sys/gwfn i386 I suspect options MROUTING being "The Evil" [tm], but had no time to check it thoroughly (it's production gateway, you know, so now I'd simply stick it out with about 40 statics both there and on border Cisco ;-) kernel config file follows (it's 4-ethernet router + COM multiport console server) Any thoughts? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident GWF maxusers 0 #makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options INET #InterNETworking options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options NFS_NOSERVER #Completely disable server code options PROCFS #Process filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options NO_F00F_HACK # we are not on buggy Pentium options CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION options CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION options MROUTING # Multicast routing options IPFIREWALL #firewall options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about # dropped packets #options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support #options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity options DUMMYNET #dummynet shaper options HZ=1000 options NMBCLUSTERS=16384 device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver #pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 options COM_MULTIPORT #code for some cards with shared IRQs # 4-port AST device sio2 at isa? port 0x2a0 flags 0x501 device sio3 at isa? port 0x2a8 flags 0x501 device sio4 at isa? port 0x2b0 flags 0x501 device sio5 at isa? port 0x2b8 flags 0x501 irq 7 # 8-port Omega device sio6 at isa? port 0x100 flags 0x605 irq 12 device sio7 at isa? port 0x108 flags 0x605 device sio8 at isa? port 0x110 flags 0x605 device sio9 at isa? port 0x118 flags 0x605 device sio10 at isa? port 0x120 flags 0x605 device sio11 at isa? port 0x128 flags 0x605 device sio12 at isa? port 0x130 flags 0x605 device sio13 at isa? port 0x138 flags 0x605 # PCI Ethernet NICs. #device ed # NE1000/2000 and compatibles #device ed0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 device miibus device rl # NE1000/2000 and compatibles device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 12:30:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A7237B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248FE43E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:30:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6BJUYLA096975; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:30:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6BJUX5m096974; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:30:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:30:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Ken Menzel" , "Hartmann, O." Cc: Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :Hi, :If it's possible this makes a difference can we get a note about HZ :added to the tuning(7) man page? : :Thanks Ken I could put a general admonition in tuning(7) about Hz, but the performance effects are going to be highly dependant on the situation. Generally speaking aggregate performance will not improve if you increase Hz, but I can see how perceived performance might improve in certain specific situations such as having a lot of X clients talking to the server at the same time. The issue with X clients is that a single interactive operation done on the client may result in dozens of interactive packet ops occuring between client and server, many of which cannot be pipelined. In this situation the priority scheduling mechanism tends to break down because the server processes are utilizing a huge amount of cpu but are still classified as being interactive due to short term I/O waits. Several clients may monopolize the server in this fashion and cause obvious lag for the remaining clients. For example, if a couple of clients run 'xengine' the other clients could suffer greatly. An increased switching rate (increasing HZ) may be useful in the above situation. Still, I would not recommend increasing Hz above 500 (2ms). 10000 (100uS) is just plain insane. I think it is high time that we changed the system default on 'fast' machines (anything over 300 MHz) from 100 to 250. 100 is archaic. We will not see detrimental cache side effects until we get above 1000 or so (my guess) so I think '250' as a default instead of 100 is a good idea. But for most people it just doesn't matter. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 13: 2:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4147237B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clever.eusc.inter.net (clever.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF1E43E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from tc01-n70-121.de.inter.net ([213.73.70.121] helo=there) by clever.eusc.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17Sk90-0001FQ-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:02:30 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthias Schuendehuette Reply-To: msch@snafu.de Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: Gerhard Sittig Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:02:29 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Excuse me if I step in here... Gerhard Sittig wrote: > The trick is to load a kernel with software RAID support even > before you have a root filesystem with your kernel and modules > on it. :) This is not different between Linux and FreeBSD. > Putting everything you need to boot into a ramdisk and loading > it with your favourite boot manager is the solution. Ahm... where's the beef? I.e. where does this RAM-Disk Image come from? It's safe to *read* from one of the two disks, but what I don't understand is: Asume there are 4 disks: disk #1+#3 are RAID1 for -STABLE, disk #2+#4 are for -current. I want to boot -stable, so I try to load the RAM-Disk Image from disk #1 - but it's crashed. How do I know what disk to use next? Please answer per Mail too, I'm reading this list via docs.freebsd.org -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) Powered by FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 13:25:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0B37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from empty1.ekahuna.com (empty1.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973C543E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:25:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pjklist@ekahuna.com) Received: from pc-02 (pc02.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.197]) by empty1.ekahuna.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:25:45 -0700 From: "Philip J. Koenig" Organization: The Electric Kahuna Organization To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:25:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: intel etherexpress pro and fxp status?? Reply-To: pjklist@ekahuna.com In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Message-ID: <20020711202545466.AAA969@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:05:38 +0100 > From: Pete French > > > Thanks, bye." The only threads I remember around this were some people with > > specific problems on specific SMP motherboards. I dont recall any mass > > problems with the fxp cards... For what its worth, we have deployed some 50 > > The SMP problems also turned out to be nothing to do with the fxp cards > and everything to do with shared interrupts. But cards which generate a lot > of interrpts show this up well, hence it first showed up on FXP and has > been misrememberd by people as the "fxp problem". > > just make sure you arent sharing interrupts on an SMP box and you > will do fine. > > - -pcf. Holger Kipp sent me a message back on June 21 that says his problems with freezing/IRQ issues on an SMP box that uses a Symbios SCSI controller were solved with a patch/workaround from Gerard Roudier who said he was planning to commit a polished version as soon as he got some time. (Not sure if it's there yet, and I'm not very good at looking at CVS repositories, but a box here updated on 7/7 still shows old date stamps on the sym drivers, and the last apparent change to the module in question (sym_hipd.c) was around 4/26, based on the the FreeBSD CVS webpage.) Phil -- Philip J. Koenig pjklist@ekahuna.com Electric Kahuna Systems -- Computers & Communications for the New Millenium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 13:40:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210D837B405 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B32543E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:40:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-213-168-111-113.netcologne.de [213.168.111.113]) by smtp.netcologne.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6BKehUt007528 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:40:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 1568 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jul 2002 20:34:35 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:34:34 +0200 From: Thomas Seck To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE Message-ID: <20020711203434.GA1348@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020710145342.057b4e90@marble.sentex.ca> <20020711095747.B19121-100000@carmel.diva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711095747.B19121-100000@carmel.diva.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Michiel Boland (boland@carmel.diva.nl): > Please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the splx patch does > anything to help people with broken CD-ROM drives. You are right. It fixes a coding mistake which panicked boxes using TQ. All other issues are still present. -- Thomas Seck This message was sent to a mailinglist I am subscribed to. Please send your replies to the list only and do *not* CC me. Thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 13:47:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC9F37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36D243E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6BKllLA097459; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6BKllXX097458; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207112047.g6BKllXX097458@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Ken Menzel" Cc: "Hartmann, O." , Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> <064901c22919$9738d2c0$681663cf@icarz.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, the main thing you need to figure out is whether your problem is due to cpu monopolization or disk monopolization. 'I/O' load itself can effect the scheduler, but is unlikely to overload the machine. Disk loads are far more likely to overload the physical hard drives. For example, if you have a user logged into a shell whos 30MB mailbox is on the same hard drive as, say, a heavily loaded MySQL database which is saturating the drive, simply reading the mailbox sequentially could take 10 seconds when it would only take 1 second on an idle drive. So the first thing you need to do is determine your drive loads and map out where the different applications/users are going. 'systat -vm 1' helps a lot there because it tells you the hard drive % utilization. The thing about Databases and Web serving is that they can generate a lot of seeking on a drive which can easily saturate the drive (100% utilization). If you determine that drive load is your problem then the logical solution is to add more drives or distribute the partitions differently or add memory (increased caching == reduced disk I/O) or add more hard drives. If you determine that cpu monopolization is the problem and drive load is not the problem then you can try things like raising HZ, renicing processes a little (I recommend no more then +/- 8), reducing the parallelism on some of the server processes, upgrading the cpus, and so forth. There are lots of potential solutions. -Matt :Hi Matt, : Regarding your comment about highly IO intensive programs; many of :us run SQL databases (highly intensive IO). I have noticed a tendency :for a single process to monopolize the CPU with MySQL, to the :exclusion of other users. I do understand the detrimental effects of :state changes on a CPU, so I can relate to not setting this value too :high. I wonder if we might see an effect with this as well? : :I don't remember seeing this discussed here. I do not mean to bring :up a topic that has been discussed before, either here or another :list. However, the effect on IO for a server with several hundred :simultaneous connections could be noticeable. I am not sure a simple :benchmark would should any advantage, although I am planning to play :with the value and run some benchmarks. If I come up with meaningful :numbers I will post them. : :The main thing I was wondering is what effects I might watch for, and :any hints as to what I should not waste my time on. In our :environment we run FreeBSD,Apache,PHP, MySQL for about a thousand :users. It is an interactive database application so this may have :similarities to the X situation you described. I am always looking to :boost performance (can't wait to see 5.0! ). I am just not sure what :kind of an effect I might see. But I will play around as soon as I :return from vacation (unless someone else gets to it first! :). All :the security problems lately have really kept me busy. : :Thanks for the input, :Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 13:55:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5304237B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (d108.dhcp212-198-26.noos.fr [212.198.26.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF5C43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:55:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from herbelot.com (tulipe.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.5]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21693; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:54:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Message-ID: <3D2DF09C.B553DE07@herbelot.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:54:52 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > > An increased switching rate (increasing HZ) may be useful in the above > situation. Still, I would not recommend increasing Hz above 500 (2ms). > 10000 (100uS) is just plain insane. > from actual experience, any p-III with a clock rate above 500MHz (that is, any recent CPU) can sustain Hz=5000, which I used to run trafific-shaped packet blasters (admittedly a narrow focus ...) with very good results (better than special-purpose test boxes). As is said in the dummynet man page, FreeBSD can be a very good traffic shaper, if the userland scheduling rate is high enough (will it be the same with threads in -current, with KSE ?). many of my machines run with GENERIC and kern.hz=1000 in /boot/loader.conf (I still have to look if NTIMECOUNTER is upped in the same porportion : USTL !) TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 14:12:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F1D37B4A2 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zpfe.com (dev06.eqp.zpfe.com [209.46.51.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F185B43E54 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stevep-hv@zpfe.com) Received: (qmail 3929 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 21:12:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO PUFFY.zpfe.com) (65.203.84.227) by dev06.eqp.zpfe.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 21:12:09 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711161023.03cd74b8@wheresmymailserver.com> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:11:36 -0500 To: "Jack L. Stone" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Steve Peterson Subject: Re: 4.6 & IP aliases / ifconfig In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020711094127.02e79b20@mail.sage-one.net> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020711085737.01e32ff0@magpie.zpfe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, there it is. Hard to believe I missed that one. Thanks for the pointers to the docs, everyone. S At 09:41 AM 7/11/2002 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote: >At 09:06 AM 7.11.2002 -0500, Steve Peterson wrote: > >Just upgraded my server box from 4.4 to 4.6 via source, and my aliased IP > >addresses didn't come up on system boot. > > > >rc.conf said: > > > >ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" > >ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240" > > > >It's alias0 that isn't working. Tried to add it from the command line and >got: > > > >[root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.240 alias > >ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > >[root@magpie ~]# > > > >Getting rid of the netmask spec lets the alias be added: > > > >[root@magpie ~]# ifconfig dc0 209.46.51.28 alias > >[root@magpie ~]# > > > >And removing the netmask spec in rc.conf makes it work at next boot time. > > > >Ideas on why I can't have a /28 alias? > > >By now you should be aware this subject is answered many times. On "28", >your netmask should be 255.255.255.255 (better yet, 0xffffffff) not the >"240". Try that and your troubles should go away. > >In rc.conf >ifconfig_dc0="inet 209.46.51.22 netmask 255.255.255.240" >ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 255.255.255.255" >... or: >ifconfig_dc0_alias0="inet 209.46.51.28 netmask 0xffffffff" > >Best regards, >Jack L. Stone, >Administrator > >SageOne Net >http://www.sage-one.net >jackstone@sage-one.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 15: 7:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62DE37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846D943E5E; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g6BM7mN16323; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:07:48 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root Message-ID: <20020711150748.B14694@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20020711214742.C259A37B406@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20020711214742.C259A37B406@hub.freebsd.org>; from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:47:42PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I know several other people have run into the problem where > > the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. > > Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, > > which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on > > the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the > > linux_statfs in compat/linux. > > > > 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) > > 48927 java RET statfs RESTART > > OK, after having found out that 'ktrace' isn't appropriate > for linux executables (use truss or linux_kdump), I found that > the culprit is actually: > > linux_sched_getscheduler(0xcb18) ERR#1 'Operation not > permitted' > > when root, this is permitted. When non-root, this is not-permitted. > > Suggestions? Is this a problem with the linux emulation? Or is > there a permissions difference between linux & freebsd here? I'm having the same problem. It looks like this has been discussed on -STABLE, -JAVA, -HACKERS, and -QUESTIONS, but to no avail: I'm sorry for the redundant cross-post, but this looks like a hard one to solve. -jj -- Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew flowcharts; look how much good it did them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 15:50:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3AE37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns0.seaman.net (ns0.seaman.net [168.215.64.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182C843E42; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dick@seaman.org) Received: from tbird.internal.seaman.net (tbird [192.168.10.12]) by ns0.seaman.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6BMnxRR000902; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:49:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dick@seaman.org) Received: (from dick@localhost) by tbird.internal.seaman.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6BMnws31116; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:49:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:49:58 -0500 From: "Richard Seaman, Jr." To: Shannon -jj Behrens Cc: Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root Message-ID: <20020711174958.E32743@seaman.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." , Shannon -jj Behrens , Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020711214742.C259A37B406@hub.freebsd.org> <20020711150748.B14694@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020711150748.B14694@alicia.nttmcl.com>; from jj@nttmcl.com on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:07:48PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:07:48PM -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > > > I know several other people have run into the problem where > > > the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. > > > Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, > > > which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on > > > the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the > > > linux_statfs in compat/linux. > > > > > > 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) > > > 48927 java RET statfs RESTART > > > > OK, after having found out that 'ktrace' isn't appropriate > > for linux executables (use truss or linux_kdump), I found that > > the culprit is actually: > > > > linux_sched_getscheduler(0xcb18) ERR#1 'Operation not > > permitted' > > > > when root, this is permitted. When non-root, this is not-permitted. > > > > Suggestions? Is this a problem with the linux emulation? Or is > > there a permissions difference between linux & freebsd here? > > I'm having the same problem. It looks like this has been discussed on -STABLE, > -JAVA, -HACKERS, and -QUESTIONS, but to no avail: > > > > I'm sorry for the redundant cross-post, but this looks like a hard one to > solve. Not hard at all. The perms in sched_getscheduler in -stable are silly. (also sched_getparam). Just try changing it to something like the patch below (note that I don't have a stable system at the moment, so I don't guarantee it works, nor that it even compiles -- take it as a guide only). --- p1003_1b.c.orig Thu Jul 11 17:29:55 2002 +++ p1003_1b.c Thu Jul 11 17:40:51 2002 @@ -211,14 +211,24 @@ int sched_getscheduler(struct proc *p, struct sched_getscheduler_args *uap) { - int e; - (void) (0 - || (e = p31b_proc(p, uap->pid, &p)) - || (e = ksched_getscheduler(&p->p_retval[0], ksched, p)) - ); + int e = 0; + struct proc *targetp; - return e; + if (uap->pid == 0) { + targetp = p; + } else { + targetp = pfind(uap->pid); + if (targetp == NULL) { + e = ESRCH; + } + } + + if (e == 0) + e = ksched_getscheduler(&p->p_retval[0], ksched, targetp); + + return (e); } + int sched_yield(struct proc *p, struct sched_yield_args *uap) { -- Richard Seaman, Jr. email: dick@seaman.org 5182 N. Maple Lane phone: 262-367-5450 Nashotah WI 53058 fax: 262-367-5852 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 16:25:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5F537B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD6343E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:25:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6BNPkGR001551; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:25:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6BNPema001549; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:25:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:25:40 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Thierry Herbelot Cc: Matthew Dillon , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Message-ID: <20020711232540.GA1437@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thierry Herbelot , Matthew Dillon , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> <3D2DF09C.B553DE07@herbelot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2DF09C.B553DE07@herbelot.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Thierry Herbelot : > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > An increased switching rate (increasing HZ) may be useful in the above > > situation. Still, I would not recommend increasing Hz above 500 (2ms). > > 10000 (100uS) is just plain insane. > > > > from actual experience, any p-III with a clock rate above 500MHz (that > is, any recent CPU) can sustain Hz=5000, which I used to run > trafific-shaped packet blasters (admittedly a narrow focus ...) with > very good results (better than special-purpose test boxes). > > As is said in the dummynet man page, FreeBSD can be a very good traffic > shaper, if the userland scheduling rate is high enough (will it be the > same with threads in -current, with KSE ?). Sure modern processors can handle 5000 Hz at the expense of a few CPU cycles, but do you actually find that dummynet isn't accurate enough at 1000 Hz? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 17: 9:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7476637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from quack.kfu.com (adsl-67-113-12-90.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.113.12.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327843E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:09:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [IPv6:3ffe:1200:301b:1:2d0:b7ff:fe3f:bdd0]) by quack.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6C09YKi032819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:09:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by morpheus.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6C09TYO000427; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:09:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Message-ID: <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:09:29 -0700 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606 X-Accept-Language: en, en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Sayer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to some of the folks who replied and a couple of USB advice sites, I decided to try a BIOS upgrade. Version 1009 (was 1001C) no longer has the problem, so those of you with older Asus mobos, go get yourself a DOS floppy and get to it! Now if only my USB legacy keyboard support would work for the FreeBSD loader... :-) Nick Sayer wrote: > I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based > around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with > USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio > laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a > PIIX4 USB controller). > > The latest outrage is that I am doing some work on a USB audio device > driver to clean it up a bit. It works *perfectly* plugged into the Vaio, > but when it's plugged into the Asus machine, I get a trap panic the > instant I try and play anything. I can't diagnose the trap because the > dump doesn't happen, for unknown reasons. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 18: 6:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D67537B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2268343E4A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:06:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6C16fZL072052; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:36:42 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020711195214.T1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711195214.T1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 12 Jul 2002 10:36:40 +0930 Message-Id: <1026436002.17955.5.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 03:22, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > The trick is to load a kernel with software RAID support even > before you have a root filesystem with your kernel and modules > on it. :) This is not different between Linux and FreeBSD. > Putting everything you need to boot into a ramdisk and loading > it with your favourite boot manager is the solution. (I'm not > sure but maybe the newly created livecd port is of help, too. > Or you have a look at how installation media are done.) Actually.. The tough bit would be getting the BIOS to boot off the other disk if your first root disk is dead.. I believe if you could do that the loader would only need minimal changes to handle booting off the other disk. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 18:21: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CDD37B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns5.sony.co.jp (NS5.Sony.CO.JP [146.215.0.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5995843E09; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:21:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mistral@imasy.or.jp) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (mail2.sony.co.jp [43.0.1.202]) by ns5.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g6C1L3A41786; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g6C1L2x02314; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp ([43.17.41.105]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id g6C1L2l02310; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.5/8.12.5/mistral) with ESMTP id g6C1L1an006169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from mistral@imasy.or.jp) Received: (from sarumaru@localhost) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6C1L1Ql006168; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sarumaru) From: mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko SARUMARU) To: stable@FreeBSD.org Cc: des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pam_ssh is broken? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:53:18 +0900". <020709115318.M0100426@mistral.imasy.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22PL5] 2001-02/07(Wed) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:21:00 +0900 Message-ID: <020712102100.M0106150@mistral.imasy.or.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > After OpenSSH and PAM updates, I was locked out from the system > by pam_ssh. login and xdm will dump core when I enter user name > and pass phrase. > > /kernel: pid 287 (xdm), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) > /kernel: pid 277 (login), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) The patch in GNATS fixed this problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=40463 Thanks, -- Yoshihiko SARUMARU mail: mistral@imasy.or.jp web: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~mistral/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 18:43:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D418F37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (claudel.noos.net [212.198.2.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A3343E5E for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:43:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 27669209 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 2002 01:43:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.83 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Jul 2002 01:43:22 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (90h3kfhwfhiqcgj8@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6C1hMTL027111; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:43:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6C1hLDm027110; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:43:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:43:21 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Moritz Willers Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what changed in /bin/sh with [n]>&- ? Message-ID: <20020712014321.GP21234@gits.dyndns.org> References: <5AE7E15E-8ECD-11D6-A3F7-00039305A292@wit.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5AE7E15E-8ECD-11D6-A3F7-00039305A292@wit.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:39:29PM +0100, Moritz Willers wrote: > after the update > > # uname -r > 4.6-RELEASE-p1 > # /bin/sh -c 'echo "ha" >&-' > ha > # > > according to the manpage and my knowledge this should not produce any > output: > > [n]>&- close stdout (or file descriptor n) > > is this an intentional change or a unwanted feature? IMHO, it's not a feature :) I'll take a look at this... but, for instance, fill a PR (man send-pr), thanks. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 19: 9: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC9C37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carme.recalldesign.com (carme.recalldesign.com [203.15.93.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709CA43E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:08:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Received: from io.internal.recalldesign.com (mail.internal.recalldesign.com [203.15.93.150]) by carme.recalldesign.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6C28tAw049032 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Received: from vee.net (polarlander.internal.recalldesign.com [203.15.93.252]) by io.internal.recalldesign.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6C28jD73080 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:38:55 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Message-ID: <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:38:45 +0930 From: Michael Gratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020711 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en-gb, en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nick Sayer wrote: > > Now if only my USB legacy keyboard support would work for the FreeBSD > loader... :-) > Yeah, does anyone know what is up with that? It's a pain to have to find and switch to a PS/2 keyboard just to boot to single user mode, play with boot params, or to use an alternate kernel. I've looked around for some solutions before, but never come up with anything useful. /mike -- Mike Gratton , Leader in leachate production and transmission since 1976. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 19:24:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F367A37B40A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB643E42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:24:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davep.NOSPAM@meduseld.net) Received: from baloo.meduseld.net ([66.30.120.53]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020712022448.FGSM24728.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@baloo.meduseld.net>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 02:24:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baloo.meduseld.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6C2OlF03824; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:24:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from davep.NOSPAM@meduseld.net) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:24:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20020711.222446.730551969.davep@meduseld.net> To: mike@vee.net Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky From: "David A. Panariti" In-Reply-To: <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> X-Attribution: davep X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.8 (Honest Recruiter) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Check your BIOS. Mine (Award on an old Soyo 6BA+IV) has an option to enable support for USB keyboards. Works great with BootMagic and the FreeBSD bootldr. Good luck, davep >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Gratton writes: Michael> Nick Sayer wrote: >> >> Now if only my USB legacy keyboard support would work for the >> FreeBSD loader... :-) >> Michael> Yeah, does anyone know what is up with that? It's a pain Michael> to have to find and switch to a PS/2 keyboard just to boot Michael> to single user mode, play with boot params, or to use an Michael> alternate kernel. Michael> I've looked around for some solutions before, but never Michael> come up with anything useful. Michael> /mike Michael> -- Mike Gratton , Michael> Leader in leachate production and transmission since 1976. Michael> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with Michael> "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 20:23:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C752937B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (bran.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9FF43E65 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:23:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd@visi.com) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D00E5208 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:23:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6C3NJ063502 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:23:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:23:19 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr To: stable at FreeBSD Subject: Sorry for off-topic, but I can't mail to freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20020711222319.A63473@sheol.localdomain> Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Again, sorry for this post. I can't very well post to freebsd-questions@ to ask why, on some fine day, I lost my ability to post to freebsd-questions@! I used to, but now I can't. I'm subscribed to exactly one mailing list, freebsd-announce@, yet have no trouble posting here, nor freebsd-hackers@, nor freebsd-security@. I catch up with threads not explicitly sent to me through Usenet; but I'm usually very careful about mailing to the list, as opposed to posting to the group. My spam filters aren't suspect; the morning periodic mail would tell me so. Was I bad, and therefore blacklisted? Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 20:44:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B415D37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (bran.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5D243E6A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:44:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd@visi.com) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB6E4FE6; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:44:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6C3iDS63523; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:44:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:44:13 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200207120344.g6C3iDS63523@sheol.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com Organization: if (!FIFO) if (!LIFO) break; References: <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf_icarz.com@ns.sol.net> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974_apollo.backplane.com@ns.sol.net> In-Reply-To: <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974_apollo.backplane.com@ns.sol.net> From: hawkeyd@visi.com (D J Hawkey Jr) Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 X-Original-Newsgroups: sol.lists.freebsd.stable To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974_apollo.backplane.com@ns.sol.net>, dillon@apollo.backplane.com writes: > >: >:Hi, >:If it's possible this makes a difference can we get a note about HZ >:added to the tuning(7) man page? >: >:Thanks Ken > > I could put a general admonition in tuning(7) about Hz, but the > performance effects are going to be highly dependant on the situation. > > Generally speaking aggregate performance will not improve if you increase > Hz, but I can see how perceived performance might improve in > certain specific situations such as having a lot of X clients talking > to the server at the same time. > > The issue with X clients is that a single interactive operation done on > the client may result in dozens of interactive packet ops occuring > between client and server, many of which cannot be pipelined... > > [ SNIP] > > But for most people it just doesn't matter. In your estimation, would it affect the case of several chained pipes, [doing|waiting on] disk I/O? Or, say, a complex SQL query? Sorry for my naivete, but would increasing the HZ have the effect of making the rest of my activities "snappier" in the above situation? Or is this still too vague? The machines are 700Mhz Celerons and "better", mostly IDE, BTW. > -Matt Thanks, Dave -- Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 21:17:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6179037B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E6F343E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 8770 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 2002 04:17:15 -0000 Received: from p5091045d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.4.93) by mail.gmx.net (mp015-rz3) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2002 04:17:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 18639 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 21:23:39 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 21:23:39 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6BLNVC18626 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:23:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:23:31 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020711232331.U1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from msch@snafu.de on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:02:29PM +0200 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 22:02 +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > Gerhard Sittig wrote: > > The trick is to load a kernel with software RAID support even > > before you have a root filesystem with your kernel and modules > > on it. :) This is not different between Linux and FreeBSD. > > Putting everything you need to boot into a ramdisk and loading > > it with your favourite boot manager is the solution. > > Ahm... where's the beef? I.e. where does this RAM-Disk Image come from? Counter Question: Where does the Linux boot RAM disk come from? I understood the original question to be "I already do boot Linux with a software RAID root fs -- can it be done with FreeBSD, too?". That's when I asked "how is this different?" The admin needs to have some media with a kernel and software RAID drivers for Linux, too, to access the root fs and boot strap into a running system (usually a RAM disk). This image can be built by the admin or he can have it built by the vendor. I don't care about it, it's no different in FreeBSD in any case. And I don't care which boot loader is used and how it accesses the RAM disk image. FreeBSD still has the exact same requirements. Neither system can magically overcome objective constraints. :] > It's safe to *read* from one of the two disks, but what I don't > understand is: > > Asume there are 4 disks: disk #1+#3 are RAID1 for -STABLE, disk #2+#4 > are for -current. I want to boot -stable, so I try to load the RAM-Disk > Image from disk #1 - but it's crashed. How do I know what disk to use > next? How does the boot manager used for Linux know? I don't see the differnce. :) Experience tells me that LILO maps file data blocks to BIOS addresses at "install time" and thus doesn't need to interpret file systems and can boot from any disk the system knows about which runs at install time. While the FreeBSD boot loader knows about ufs (and cd9660?) and reads the file at run time by interpreting the file system. But that's just an implementation detail and doesn't change the situation should the disk with the boot image be b0rken or unavailable. It's as simple as this: Locate the RAM disk image wherever you want to and use a boot manager of your choice. All that's required is that a kernel comes up which can handle software RAID to access the root fs. BTW was there a reason for my pointing to the installation media and the livecd port. You can boot a kernel by any means / from any location and still get your root fs and everything mounted thereunder from the RAID volumes. You just have to get software RAID support before accessing the root fs -- by statically compiling it into the kernel or by loading modules from a RAM disk or whatever you come up with. Otherwise -- if you cannot boot the above mentioned software RAID enabled kernel without accessing the root fs -- you are stuck with hardware RAID. But this is totally different from the OS POV since hardware managed RAID volumes look and feel like "just another simple harddisk". And in all the thread's length I still question the benefit of running your root fs in software RAID. Since /tmp and /var and /usr (and /home) usually all are separate partitions of their own I don't see how the root fs could be often modified or heavily stressed. So a solid backup should suffice and can easily save you from all the hassle outlined above. If one still does require RAID on the (mostly read only) root fs one should switch to hardware RAID and get transparent support. Remember: It is the _non_ transparent RAID support which makes you duplicate parts of your root fs on a media outside of your root fs and keep this copy updated every time you change your kernel or modules. It's not the system's fault. And it is not at all different between the Linux and the FreeBSD setup. Nor would it be different with any other system. Using "one half of a RAID1 set" as a "degraded but still safe to read only disk" is just a hack and works equally well or bad in any setup. virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 21:39: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CCC37B411 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gbronline.com (mail.gbronline.com [12.145.226.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4413843E65 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:39:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco [12.145.236.185] by mail.gbronline.com (SMTPD32-7.10) id ACF6497E003A; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:37:10 -0500 Message-ID: <005101c2295d$f9e49640$b9ec910c@fbccarthage.com> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: , Subject: Re: Sorry for off-topic, but I can't mail to freebsd-questions Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:38:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004C_01C22934.0C9AB960" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C22934.0C9AB960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Was I bad, and therefore blacklisted? > > Dave > > Wouldn't think so...nature of rejection? > What's the message say? > > KDK > Also, your post on "OT - FreeBSD's periodic(8) vs. OpenBSD's came = through on ??'s list about 2.5 hours ago..... KDK ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C22934.0C9AB960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>=20 >
> > Was I bad, and therefore blacklisted?
> >=20 Dave
>
> Wouldn't think so...nature of rejection?
> = What's the=20 message say?
>
> KDK
>

Also, your post on "OT - = FreeBSD's periodic(8) vs. OpenBSD's  came through
on ??'s list = about=20 2.5
hours ago.....

KDK
------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C22934.0C9AB960-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 21:47:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F3337B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gbronline.com (mail.gbronline.com [12.145.226.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3022F43E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:47:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco [12.145.236.185] by mail.gbronline.com (SMTPD32-7.10) id A176732C0064; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:48:06 -0500 Message-ID: <000a01c22957$1c8a1460$b9ec910c@fbccarthage.com> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: , "stable at FreeBSD" References: <20020711222319.A63473@sheol.localdomain> Subject: Re: Sorry for off-topic, but I can't mail to freebsd-questions Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:49:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Was I bad, and therefore blacklisted? > Dave Wouldn't think so...nature of rejection? What's the message say? KDK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 21:57: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0659A37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (d108.dhcp212-198-26.noos.fr [212.198.26.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC24843E09 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:56:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from herbelot.com (tulipe.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.5]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA22479; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:56:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Message-ID: <3D2E618F.DFA1AC18@herbelot.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:56:47 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schultz Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> <3D2DF09C.B553DE07@herbelot.com> <20020711232540.GA1437@HAL9000.wox.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Schultz wrote: > > Sure modern processors can handle 5000 Hz at the expense of a few > CPU cycles, but do you actually find that dummynet isn't accurate > enough at 1000 Hz? for most applications, dummynet is perfect with its 1ms granularity there are other applications (typically packet blasters) which can use a better time accuracy (this is even better when the internal clocked is slaved to GPS with NTP : you can then have near perfect network transaction replay) TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 22:17:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A380137B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2483043E4A for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:17:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org) Received: from mousie.catspoiler.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6C5Hdwr012869; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:17:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org) Message-Id: <200207120517.g6C5Hdwr012869@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:17:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky To: davep@meduseld.net Cc: mike@vee.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020711.222446.730551969.davep@meduseld.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11 Jul, David A. Panariti wrote: > > Check your BIOS. > Mine (Award on an old Soyo 6BA+IV) has an option to enable support for > USB keyboards. > Works great with BootMagic and the FreeBSD bootldr. My GigaByte GA-7DX+ also has this option and the loader sees my USB keyboard when I have this option enabled. The problem is that the keyboard probe code in the kernel (at least in -current) is also fooled into thinking a PS/2 keyboard is present, which it decides it likes better than the USB keyboard. Some time later it must figure out that the PS/2 keyboard isn't there after all, at least according to kbdcontrol, but it isn't smart enough to switch to the USB device. This is especially inconvenient when my NIC card also isn't found and I'm left with a running system that isn't accepting input from anywhere. At that point the only way I can recover is to hit the reset switch. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 23:16:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171E137B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (bran.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F6143E65 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:16:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd@visi.com) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by bran.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1F05290; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:16:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6C6GIl63954; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:16:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:16:18 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sorry for off-topic, but I can't mail to freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20020712011618.A63927@sheol.localdomain> Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com References: <005101c2295d$f9e49640$b9ec910c@fbccarthage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <005101c2295d$f9e49640$b9ec910c@fbccarthage.com>; from kdk@daleco.biz on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:38:24PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Jul 11, at 11:38 PM, Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > > > > > > > > Was I bad, and therefore blacklisted? > > > Dave > > > > Wouldn't think so...nature of rejection? > > What's the message say? Nothing comes back to me whatsoever. > > KDK > > > > Also, your post on "OT - FreeBSD's periodic(8) vs. OpenBSD's came through > on ??'s list about 2.5 > hours ago..... Really?! Hmph. Still doesn't show up in Usenet (sol.lists.freebsd.questions, of sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI, if it matters). > KDK But thanks for the reply. "Never mind", I guess. Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 23:32: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B660137B400; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cse.cs.huji.ac.il (cse.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3481443E65; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:32:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cse.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 17StyE-0007ie-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:32:02 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Prafulla S. Deuskar" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: em driver - Intel(R) PRO/1000 gigabit In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:57:58 -0700 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:31:53 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (sorry for the cross posting) after some more - and long - testing this is what i have: if the card is 'virgin' - no pxe, flash memory 'empty', all seems ok, dhclient works ok. if i enable PXE, running it as diskless is fine (i don't need dhclient). but if i boot of the disk and use dhclient, then it does not work - arp requests are sent and replies come back, but never make it. if i just ifconfig em0 ip.addr then all is ok. using an older if_em ver 1.1.10, dhclient works fine. btw, after the card has been pxe enabled, disabling the flash memory does not help, i can't get it back to work as it did in 'virgin' mode. one more thing, one 'virgin' card is causing panic with bad ram. hope this helps, danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 23:33:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2E737B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.nl (smtp3.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A7E43E64 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:33:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (i1192.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.212.173]) by smtp3.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 938181B515; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:33:11 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:32:56 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: "Kevin Oberman" Cc: paulo@nlink.com.br, never@nevermind.kiev.ua, gavin@ury.york.ac.uk, boland@alexander.diva.nl, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-Id: <20020712083256.20eacedc.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> References: <20020619150606.J97503-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> <20020710175614.7F3535D03@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:14 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: KO> While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: KO> mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) Isn't this better after the buildworld and kernel runs on the basis that if they fail you are not going to complete an install and so may not want the mergemaster -p changes - I've never seen anything in mergemaster -p that could be considered harmful but I like the easy back out after the smoke test reboot (OK I know it's not just a smoke test). KO> make buildworld KO> make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name KO> REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) KO> fsck -p KO> mount -a -t ufs Can it safely go here (this is where I usually do it). -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 23:35:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE9337B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (h-66-166-142-198.SNDACAGL.covad.net [66.166.142.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE9143E67 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsder@mail.allcaps.org) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 90817153B7; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8492A15277; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:35:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? In-Reply-To: <20020711232331.U1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Message-ID: <20020711230521.E73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > And in all the thread's length I still question the benefit of > running your root fs in software RAID. Since /tmp and /var and > /usr (and /home) usually all are separate partitions of their > own I don't see how the root fs could be often modified or > heavily stressed. Ummmm, I might want to do that so that the failure of the *single* disk which holds the root filesystem doesn't take out my entire system? The poster asked about RAID 1 which is mirroring only. He didn't care so much about performance, but he did want reliability. In a truly hot-swappable RAID 1 configuration, the system should *never* have to reboot after its initial startup due to a drive failure. Simply shut down the offending disk, swap it out, restart the new disk and rebuild the RAID 1 mirror. No system downtime required. If the drive fails during a reboot for system maintenance, manual intervention (pointing at the other drive, swapping the drives around, etc) is not an unreasonable expectation to get the system restarted. Then you replace the defective drive and rebuild the mirror. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 23:53:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B99E37B40F for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (h-66-166-142-198.SNDACAGL.covad.net [66.166.142.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55E343E5E for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:53:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsder@mail.allcaps.org) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7E719153B7; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731C815277; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:53:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Gerhard Sittig Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? In-Reply-To: <20020711232331.U1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Message-ID: <20020711233706.G73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > And in all the thread's length I still question the benefit of > running your root fs in software RAID. Well, you can take a complete backup of the system simply by removing one of each pair of the RAID 1 drives if the root fs is also RAID 1. Given how cheap hard drives have gotten and how expensive high capacity backup systems are nowadays, removing one half of a RAID 1 array and replacing it with new drives is a really fast, cost-effective backup method. You can often buy a hard drive for not much more than a high-capacity (> 20GB) tape cartridge. And you can buy 50-100 drives for the price of a high-capacity automated tape drive. Several small engineering companies I know use this method. It generally is superior to tape backups until the company can actually afford an automated tape handling system. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 0:50:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EE737B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net (smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net [154.33.69.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371DE43E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bland@mail.ru) Received: from [154.33.69.38] (helo=mail3.jp.viruscheck.net) by smtp1.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 17SvAN-0000lh-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:48:39 +0900 Received: from [218.47.36.57] (helo=noc.orchid) by mail3.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #2) id 17SvBR-0000VF-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:49:45 +0900 Received: from mail.ru (horse.orchid [89.60.10.11]) by noc.orchid (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6C7ne425083; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:49:44 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3D2E8A14.7040004@mail.ru> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:49:40 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Gratton Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030403060703050003020904" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030403060703050003020904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael, Your problem is in buggy usb keyboard legacy emulator. FreeBSD bootstrap uses old days hardware method to open A20 line. This seems to lockup a number of usb keyboards. Take a look at the patches I have created some time ago to resolve this problem. So, at least they works for me. - cd /usr/src/sys/boot/i386, apply patches attached - rebuild bootstrap code - install it (don't forget to update rebuilded bootsector as well. actualy lockup source resides inside it) Since this patches affects bootsector and /boot/loader it's very good idea to backup both There is another method to fix this problem. It seems like all modern pc's has A20 gate open by default. So, if this true in your case you may just comment out A20 open code in boot1.s Cheers, Alexander. Michael Gratton wrote: > > > Nick Sayer wrote: > >> >> Now if only my USB legacy keyboard support would work for the FreeBSD >> loader... :-) >> > > Yeah, does anyone know what is up with that? It's a pain to have to > find and switch to a PS/2 keyboard just to boot to single user mode, > play with boot params, or to use an alternate kernel. > > I've looked around for some solutions before, but never come up with > anything useful. > > /mike > --------------030403060703050003020904 Content-Type: text/plain; name="boot1.s.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="boot1.s.diff" *** boot2/boot1.s.orig Sat Oct 20 13:28:58 2001 --- boot2/boot1.s Sat Oct 20 16:07:00 2001 *************** *** 195,218 **** xorb %al,%al # Zero assumed bss from rep # the end of boot2.bin stosb # up to 0x10000 - callw seta20 # Enable A20 jmp start+MEM_JMP-MEM_ORG # Start BTX - # - # Enable A20 so we can access memory above 1 meg. - # - seta20: cli # Disable interrupts - seta20.1: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.1 # Yes - movb $0xd1,%al # Command: Write - outb %al,$0x64 # output port - seta20.2: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.2 # Yes - movb $0xdf,%al # Enable - outb %al,$0x60 # A20 - sti # Enable interrupts - retw # To caller # # Trampoline used to call read from within boot1. # --- 195,201 ---- --------------030403060703050003020904 Content-Type: text/plain; name="btx.s.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="btx.s.diff" *** btx/btx/btx.s.orig Sun Oct 28 18:19:03 2001 --- btx/btx/btx.s Mon Oct 29 00:05:34 2001 *************** *** 195,200 **** --- 195,201 ---- # # Bring up the system. # + callw seta20 # Turn A20 on mov $0x2820,%bx # Set protected mode callw setpic # IRQ offsets lidt idtdesc # Set IDT *************** *** 294,299 **** --- 295,321 ---- exit.3: jz exit.3 # No movw $0x1234, BDA_BOOT # Do a warm boot ljmp $0xffff,$0x0 # reboot the machine + # + # Enable A20 so we can access memory above 1 meg. + # + seta20: lidt ivtdesc # Restore IVT + stc # Have we? + mov $0x2401,%ax # BIOS: enable A20 gate + int $0x15 # on later PS/2s + jnc return # If enabled + cli # Disable interrupts + seta20.1: inb $0x64,%al # Get status + testb $0x2,%al # Busy? + jnz seta20.1 # Yes + movb $0xd1,%al # Command: Write + outb %al,$0x64 # output port + seta20.2: inb $0x64,%al # Get status + testb $0x2,%al # Busy? + jnz seta20.2 # Yes + movb $0xdf,%al # Enable + outb %al,$0x60 # A20 + sti # Enable interrupts + return: retw # To caller # # Set IRQ offsets by reprogramming 8259A PICs. # --------------030403060703050003020904 Content-Type: text/plain; name="pxeldr.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="pxeldr.diff" *** pxeldr/pxeldr.s.orig Mon Oct 29 00:19:34 2001 --- pxeldr/pxeldr.s Mon Oct 29 00:20:02 2001 *************** *** 120,129 **** keyb: ') # - # Turn on the A20 address line - # - callw seta20 # Turn A20 on - # # Relocate the loader and BTX using a very lazy protected mode # movw $relocate_msg, %si # Display the --- 120,125 ---- *************** *** 218,240 **** movb $0xe,%ah # BIOS: put_char int $0x10 # call BIOS, print char in %al jmp putstr # keep looping - - # - # Enable A20 - # - seta20: cli # Disable interrupts - seta20.1: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.1 # Yes - movb $0xd1,%al # Command: Write - outb %al,$0x64 # output port - seta20.2: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.2 # Yes - movb $0xdf,%al # Enable - outb %al,$0x60 # A20 - sti # Enable interrupts - retw # To caller # # BTX client to start btxldr --- 214,219 ---- --------------030403060703050003020904 Content-Type: text/plain; name="cdldr.s.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cdldr.s.diff" *** cdldr/cdldr.s.orig Mon Oct 29 00:17:07 2001 --- cdldr/cdldr.s Mon Oct 29 00:17:44 2001 *************** *** 99,108 **** orb $KARGS_FLAGS_CD, 0x8(%bx) # kargs->bootflags |= # KARGS_FLAGS_CD # - # Turn on the A20 address line - # - callw seta20 # Turn A20 on - # # Relocate the loader and BTX using a very lazy protected mode # movw $relocate_msg, %si # Display the --- 99,104 ---- *************** *** 197,219 **** movb $0xe,%ah # BIOS: put_char int $0x10 # call BIOS, print char in %al jmp putstr # keep looping - - # - # Enable A20 - # - seta20: cli # Disable interrupts - seta20.1: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.1 # Yes - movb $0xd1,%al # Command: Write - outb %al,$0x64 # output port - seta20.2: inb $0x64,%al # Get status - testb $0x2,%al # Busy? - jnz seta20.2 # Yes - movb $0xdf,%al # Enable - outb %al,$0x60 # A20 - sti # Enable interrupts - retw # To caller # # BTX client to start btxldr --- 193,198 ---- --------------030403060703050003020904-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 1: 6:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAA737B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp0.nada.kth.se (smtp0.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6CD43E54 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from d98-est@nada.kth.se) Received: from nada.kth.se (c213-89-184-158.cm-upc.chello.se [213.89.184.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp0.nada.kth.se (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6C86oYL008971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:06:51 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3D2E8E1B.3020608@nada.kth.se> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:06:51 +0200 From: Erik Stackenland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ko, ko-kp, ko-kr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: subscribe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 3:16:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B5B37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.icarz.com (ns1.icarz.com [207.99.22.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279DA43E5E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 03:16:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenm@icarz.com) Received: from newken (dhcp104.icarz.com [207.99.22.104]) by hercules.icarz.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g6BKT0G18234; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <064901c22919$9738d2c0$681663cf@icarz.com> From: "Ken Menzel" To: "Matthew Dillon" , "Hartmann, O." Cc: References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:29:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Matt, Regarding your comment about highly IO intensive programs; many of us run SQL databases (highly intensive IO). I have noticed a tendency for a single process to monopolize the CPU with MySQL, to the exclusion of other users. I do understand the detrimental effects of state changes on a CPU, so I can relate to not setting this value too high. I wonder if we might see an effect with this as well? I don't remember seeing this discussed here. I do not mean to bring up a topic that has been discussed before, either here or another list. However, the effect on IO for a server with several hundred simultaneous connections could be noticeable. I am not sure a simple benchmark would should any advantage, although I am planning to play with the value and run some benchmarks. If I come up with meaningful numbers I will post them. The main thing I was wondering is what effects I might watch for, and any hints as to what I should not waste my time on. In our environment we run FreeBSD,Apache,PHP, MySQL for about a thousand users. It is an interactive database application so this may have similarities to the X situation you described. I am always looking to boost performance (can't wait to see 5.0! ). I am just not sure what kind of an effect I might see. But I will play around as soon as I return from vacation (unless someone else gets to it first! :). All the security problems lately have really kept me busy. Thanks for the input, Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Dillon" To: "Ken Menzel" ; "Hartmann, O." Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:30 PM Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 > > : > :Hi, > :If it's possible this makes a difference can we get a note about HZ > :added to the tuning(7) man page? > : > :Thanks Ken > > I could put a general admonition in tuning(7) about Hz, but the > performance effects are going to be highly dependant on the situation. > > Generally speaking aggregate performance will not improve if you increase > Hz, but I can see how perceived performance might improve in > certain specific situations such as having a lot of X clients talking > to the server at the same time. > > The issue with X clients is that a single interactive operation done on > the client may result in dozens of interactive packet ops occuring > between client and server, many of which cannot be pipelined. In this > situation the priority scheduling mechanism tends to break down because > the server processes are utilizing a huge amount of cpu but are still > classified as being interactive due to short term I/O waits. Several > clients may monopolize the server in this fashion and cause obvious > lag for the remaining clients. For example, if a couple of clients > run 'xengine' the other clients could suffer greatly. > > An increased switching rate (increasing HZ) may be useful in the above > situation. Still, I would not recommend increasing Hz above 500 (2ms). > 10000 (100uS) is just plain insane. > > I think it is high time that we changed the system default on 'fast' > machines (anything over 300 MHz) from 100 to 250. 100 is archaic. > We will not see detrimental cache side effects until we get above 1000 > or so (my guess) so I think '250' as a default instead of 100 is a > good idea. > > But for most people it just doesn't matter. > > -Matt > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 6:49:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CB837B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rumori.com (client62-2-193-38.hispeed.ch [62.2.193.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E004F43E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:49:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from willers@wit.ch) Received: from localhost (willers@localhost) by rumori.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CDn5I51859; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:49:05 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from willers@wit.ch) X-Authentication-Warning: rumori.com: willers owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:49:05 +0200 (MEST) From: Moritz Willers X-X-Sender: willers@rumori.com To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what changed in /bin/sh with [n]>&- ? In-Reply-To: <20020712014321.GP21234@gits.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20020712154751.E68971-100000@rumori.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG already done and fixed! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=40334 thanks - Moritz On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:39:29PM +0100, Moritz Willers wrote: > > after the update > > > > # uname -r > > 4.6-RELEASE-p1 > > # /bin/sh -c 'echo "ha" >&-' > > ha > > # > > > > according to the manpage and my knowledge this should not produce any > > output: > > > > [n]>&- close stdout (or file descriptor n) > > > > is this an intentional change or a unwanted feature? > > IMHO, it's not a feature :) > I'll take a look at this... > but, for instance, fill a PR (man send-pr), thanks. > > Cyrille. > -- > Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 6:57:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AE637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from quack.kfu.com (adsl-67-113-12-90.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.113.12.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F43F43E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [IPv6:3ffe:1200:301b:1:2d0:b7ff:fe3f:bdd0]) by quack.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CDvgKi045639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:57:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by morpheus.kfu.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CDvbXc000407; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:57:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Message-ID: <3D2EE050.2010009@quack.kfu.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:57:36 -0700 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606 X-Accept-Language: en, en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Nedotsukov Cc: Michael Gratton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> <3D2E8A14.7040004@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Michael, > Your problem is in buggy usb keyboard legacy emulator. FreeBSD > bootstrap uses old days hardware method to open A20 line. This seems to > lockup a number of usb keyboards. Take a look at the patches I have > created some time ago to resolve this problem. So, at least they works > for me. This didn't work for me. I get the same behavior -- legacy support works for DOS boot floppies, and it works for the kernel, once it's booted up, but the loader is still deaf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 7:18:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3F337B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [64.81.113.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1880143E6E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@meoqu.gank.org) Received: from owen1492.it.oot (nat72962.owentools.com [206.50.138.221]) by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP id 981595378; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:18:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? From: Craig Boston To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020711233706.G73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> References: <20020711233706.G73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Jul 2002 09:18:15 -0500 Message-Id: <1026483501.2941.4.camel@owen1492.it.oot> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 01:53, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Several small engineering companies I know use this method. It generally > is superior to tape backups until the company can actually afford an > automated tape handling system. Until somebody accidentally rm -rf /important_data or otherwise trashes the file system. Then you have two copies of useless junk =) Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 7:18:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782337B406; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CF143E3B; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ant@overclockers.at) Received: from Deadcell.ant ([212.17.108.240]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with ESMTP id <20020712141825.CPOE1248.viefep12-int.chello.at@Deadcell.ant>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:18:25 +0200 Received: from Deadcell.ant (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Deadcell.ant (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CEIQ5Q000566; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:18:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ant@Deadcell.ant) Received: (from ant@localhost) by Deadcell.ant (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g6CEILEp000565; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:18:21 +0200 From: Andreas Ntaflos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: autoconf/aclocal woes at building lyx-1.1.6 Message-ID: <20020712141821.GB372@Deadcell.ant> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello list(s), (I am crossposting because I am not sure if this is -stable related or just the usual "building error" stuff that happes from time to time.) So I am trying to build and install lyx-1.1.6 on a machine running 4.6-STABLE as of Jul 08 and it works just fine building tex and latex and all the dependent stuff, but at some point when it comes to building lyx itself, it stops with one or two errors like this: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot' WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in' WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged. WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template without WARNING: `acconfig.h': WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_MAIN], 1, WARNING: [Define if a function `main' is needed.]) WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the WARNING: documentation. aclocal.m4:3191: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _m4_divert_diversion autoconf/functions.m4:1053: AM_FUNC_OBSTACK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:3191: the top level autoheader: autom4te failed with exit status: 1 at /usr/local/bin/autoheader line 163 gmake[1]: *** [stamp-h.in] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/lyx/work/lyx-1.1.6/src' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 (Don't think the WARNING:s have anything to do with the error tough) I don't know exactly what this is related to. I've tried building it on another machine with 4.6-STABLE (as of Jul 01 I think) and it bails with the same error. What's wrong here? I am not really familiar with that m4 language but didn't find anything obviously wrong in the files mentioned in the above error. autoheader is a perl script and does not show anything strange either. I am sure I am missing something here. Any ideas? TIA regards -- Andreas "ant" Ntaflos ant@overclockers.at Vienna, AUSTRIA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 7:20:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7321237B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [64.81.113.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16ED43E64 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:20:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@meoqu.gank.org) Received: from owen1492.it.oot (nat72962.owentools.com [206.50.138.221]) by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP id DD71F5378; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? From: Craig Boston To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020711233706.G73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> References: <20020711233706.G73169-100000@mail.allcaps.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Jul 2002 09:20:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1026483620.2941.7.camel@owen1492.it.oot> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 01:53, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Several small engineering companies I know use this method. It generally > is superior to tape backups until the company can actually afford an > automated tape handling system. Oh, wait, you're talking about using SEVERAL hard drives and swapping them out. Blah, sorry, need coffee... Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 7:40:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12D937B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hindenburg.eboai.org (hindenburg.eboai.org [206.183.134.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7EB43E64 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 07:40:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chip@chocobo.cx) Received: by hindenburg.eboai.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DBE605E2E9; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40:05 -0400 From: Chip Marshall To: James Pole Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me? Message-ID: <20020712144005.GA27549@chocobo.cx> Reply-To: chip@chocobo.cx Mail-Followup-To: James Pole , stable@freebsd.org References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <20020711045022.GB63637@chocobo.cx> <200207111748.51387.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207111748.51387.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-URL: http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ X-OS: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 up 12 days, 21:40 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On July 11, 2002, James Pole sent me the following: > On Thursday 11 July 2002 16:50, Chip Marshall wrote: > > I had problems with my Gigabyte GA-7VTXE (also KT133A based) where USB > > devices during boot would be detected fine, and one device after boot > > would work, but after that, nothing. >=20 > Isn't that motherboard KT266A-based? I have the exact same motherboard=20 > (GA-7VTXE) -- and it has a KT266A chipset, not a KT133A. Even Giagbyte's= =20 > website seems to agree with me=20 > (http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/products/7vtxe.htm). Whoops! My mistake, you are correct, sir. --=20 Chip Marshall http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ R@ tv@ b++@ DI++++ D+(-) G++ e>++ h>++ r++ y? --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9LupF8vyTVl6qbdQRAs9JAJ9egLPPi0PJGTMg+U0y/hhycDYsYwCgh/zd QRaizZf0SPZMKfTsHZO0/Lw= =zgvg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:16:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B1737B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail533.nifty.com (mail533.nifty.com [202.248.37.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266E43E65 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:16:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bland@mail.ru) Received: from mail.ru by mail533.nifty.com (8.12.4/3.7W-02/25/02) with ESMTP id g6CF9TbJ004527; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:09:29 +0900 Message-ID: <3D2EF129.3080304@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:09:29 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Sayer Cc: Michael Gratton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> <3D2E8A14.7040004@mail.ru> <3D2EE050.2010009@quack.kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nick, Nick Sayer wrote: > > Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > >> Michael, >> Your problem is in buggy usb keyboard legacy emulator. FreeBSD >> bootstrap uses old days hardware method to open A20 line. This seems >> to lockup a number of usb keyboards. Take a look at the patches I >> have created some time ago to resolve this problem. So, at least they >> works for me. > > > This didn't work for me. I get the same behavior -- legacy support > works for DOS boot floppies, and it works for the kernel, once it's > booted up, but the loader is still deaf. So. If you shure you rebuilt the code, installed it (check the date of /boot files) and finaly installed new bootstrap with disklabel(8) (it's not enough to have a copy of files in /boot) then your system seems do not support open a20 gate function for the BIOS int 0x15 interface. Code just falls back to original hardware sequence. Sorry. I may suggest you to add one more method to open a20 gate via port 0x92 (ibm's pc features) or try to apply boot1.s.diff only and as I said in the previous post if you are lucky (your pc have a20 open by default) get the keyboard working. -- Alexander To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:18:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B00937B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E6943E65 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:18:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g6CFHue69118; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:17:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:17:56 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020712151756.GA67588@sunbay.com> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com.lucky.freebsd.vendors> <20020708150706.Q83398-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20020711084905.GB4745@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711084905.GB4745@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:49:05AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:18:13PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > >=20 > > Hello! > >=20 > > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > > > currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the > > > RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point > > > release will include Soren's one-line ATA patch that fixes some of the > > > reported ATA problems, along with security-related updates for SSH, > > > BIND, ktrace, and possibly sendmail. 4.6.1 is currently scheduled for > > > July 17. If you have any questions or comments about this point > > > release, please let us (re@) know. Thanks! > >=20 > [...] > > 2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/dri= vers > > are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and > > 4.6-RELEASE-p1. > >=20 > I'm working on this, and already have patches for 5.0-CURRENT under the > test. >=20 A fix has just been committed: $FreeBSD: src/share/mk/bsd.obj.mk,v 1.47 2002/07/12 15:09:35 ru Exp $ $FreeBSD: src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk,v 1.44 2002/07/12 15:09:35 ru Exp $ MFC is scheduled on Monday. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9LvMjUkv4P6juNwoRAto6AJ4pDq6qKjDvPga2xwkoGW8VsT8PSgCgigmT 2qomk2MQ8ZqDq7UYSqjtgBk= =gqL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:31:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6864137B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cc-gw.1anetworks.net (cc-gw.1anetworks.net [193.243.179.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82DA643E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:31:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@ukip.com) Received: from BRI (bri.1anetworks.net [212.36.98.200] (may be forged)) by parma.1anetworks.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA28567 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:31:12 +0100 (BST) From: "Bri" To: Subject: anyone read this Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:28:00 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm I think these results have to be in accurate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:37:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895CB37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mserver2.gmu.edu (mail02.gmu.edu [129.174.0.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B578143E4A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sbernard@gmu.edu) Received: from CERBERUS ([129.174.39.210]) by mserver2.gmu.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GZ57EN00.8LC for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:37:35 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Bernard" To: Subject: RE: anyone read this Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:37:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ??? ... Is that why Hotmail started with FreeBSD, tried to switch to W2k and failed miserably, and quickly went back to FreeBSD? ;) Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Bri Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:28 AM To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: anyone read this http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm I think these results have to be in accurate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:42:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F415237B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559BB43E65 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:42:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6CFgAmW017608; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:42:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020712114413.05528658@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:45:26 -0400 To: "Bri" , From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: anyone read this In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If I recall correctly, there were a number of Apples to Oranges issues as well as incorrect tuning issues to consider. There was a LENGTHY thread on this before. I suggest going back into the archives if you want to re-live the 'experience' ---Mike At 04:28 PM 12/07/2002 +0100, Bri wrote: >http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm > >I think these results have to be in accurate. > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 8:52:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019F737B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D0543E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:52:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:52:10 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17T2hW-0007TQ-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:51:22 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:51:22 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Don Bowman Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root, 's tatf s' is culprit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Don Bowman wrote: > Don Bowman wrote: > > > I know several other people have run into the problem where > > the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. > > Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, > > which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on > > the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the > > linux_statfs in compat/linux. > > > > 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) > > 48927 java RET statfs RESTART > > OK, after having found out that 'ktrace' isn't appropriate > for linux executables (use truss or linux_kdump), I found that > the culprit is actually: > > linux_sched_getscheduler(0xcb18) ERR#1 'Operation not > permitted' > > when root, this is permitted. When non-root, this is not-permitted. > > Suggestions? Is this a problem with the linux emulation? Or is > there a permissions difference between linux & freebsd here? It's a bug in -stable's permissions checking - it's somewhat over-zealous. The fix is reasonably trivial (I think pointers to this have appeared on -java a number of times). -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Whenever I see a dog salivate I get an insatiable urge to ring a bell. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9: 0:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B4637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D377243E6D for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470422178D for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:00:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 916163D07; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:00:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15662.64776.246577.917551@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:00:08 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: dscheck warning messages (with Dell PERC3 controller) X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a dual CPU Dell box on which I run Postgres. The other night, the nightly mail included a bunch of warnings liks this: > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051990 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051992 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051970 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051970 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051990 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051989 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051988 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051987 > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051986 The device reports itself at boot as aac0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff irq 2 at device 2.1 on pci1 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 54MB cache memory, no battery support aac0: Kernel 2.1-3, Build 2951, S/N 3801d0 The system is newly upgraded from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1 (a week prior to this message showing up). The machine was originally installed with a 4.4-RELEASE. Can anyone explain what the above errors might indicate, or if there is something I can/should do about it? I have not seen these messages since that one day they appeared. Thanks. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9: 4:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C463037B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aurora.siteplus.com (aurora.siteplus.com [66.129.2.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276F443E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:04:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@jwweeks.com) Received: from veager.jwweeks.com (pcp01076331pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net [68.59.219.194]) by aurora.siteplus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6CG4abc010982 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:04:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@jwweeks.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:04:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ssh keys not accepted Message-ID: <20020712115217.W413-100000@veager.jwweeks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For some strange reason, keys from this host are not accepted by any of my other machines. However, I can push id_dsa.pub into authorized_keys2 on this machine and login from any other host. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE (EXXIM_SMP) #0: Wed Jul 3 07:07:21 EDT 2002. I have generated and regenerated id_dsa pairs to no avail. Is there something about this build date that I have missed on the mailing list? Any ideas? Thanks, -- Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9: 5:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0E237B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278F43E31; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CG4u8R079865; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:04:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CG4i01079864; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:04:44 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:04:43 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Murray Stokely Cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" , Murray Stokely , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020712160443.GK45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru> <20020708075902.G20410@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020708075902.G20410@freebsdmall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Murray Stokely! On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:59:02AM -0700, you wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:30:08PM +0400, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > I think 4.6.1 _must_ include all dangerous/security fixes still 4.6. > > BTW what about of new tag in CVS, like RELENG_4_6_1 or something else? > > We will follow the existing tag nomenclature. A RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE > tag will be created on the RELENG_4_6 branch. And what will be security branch for 4.6.1-RELEASE? Or will 4.6-RELEASE-pX became 4.6.1-RELEASE-pX ? -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:10:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D625E37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frl.nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00843E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:08:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof.nisser.com [10.0.0.2]) by frl.nisser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA49EA94; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:45:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D2EF999.2020701@eboa.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:45:29 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: parv Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 kernel build failure References: <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com> <20020711054721.GA6899@moo.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG parv wrote: > in message <3D2B3D2C.5040004@eboa.com>, > wrote Roelof Osinga thusly... > ... > > hi roelof, i just couldn't take your suffering anymore & was mightly > hoping that you just might search google out of sheer desparation. > > i also had the problem; followed the UPDATING comment about it which > didn't work, so i sent it to the -stable list in jan 2002. here is > another thing to try... > > http://spitfire.velocet.net/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2002-January/025084.html Hi Parv, Thanks, but... Google? Nah, I wasn't *that* desperate ;). Anyway, as you might have seen I solved it by doing the kernel build using the new way. Don't know why that worked, don't care either, but it did. NB That was all I did. Same source. Same compiler. Different result. Roelof -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAŽ est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:12:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144E337B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6381B43E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:07:26 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF925D03; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:08:49 -0700 (PDT) To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: paulo@nlink.com.br, never@nevermind.kiev.ua, gavin@ury.york.ac.uk, boland@alexander.diva.nl, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:32:56 +0200." <20020712083256.20eacedc.steve@sohara.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:08:49 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020712160849.CFF925D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:32:56 +0200 > From: Steve O'Hara-Smith > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:56:14 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > KO> While there are a few niggles, the proper sequence is: > KO> mergemaster -p (This is NEW!) > > Isn't this better after the buildworld and kernel runs on the basis > that if they fail you are not going to complete an install and so may not > want the mergemaster -p changes - I've never seen anything in mergemaster -p > that could be considered harmful but I like the easy back out after the > smoke test reboot (OK I know it's not just a smoke test). > > KO> make buildworld > KO> make kernel KERNCONF=your_kernel_conf_name > KO> REBOOT into single-user mode! (This does not mean drop to single user.) > KO> fsck -p > KO> mount -a -t ufs > > Can it safely go here (this is where I usually do it). Doing a mergemaster -p here simply is the same as not running it at all. From the mergemaster man page: -p Pre-buildworld mode. Compares only files known to be essen- tial to the success of {build|install}world, including /etc/make.conf. So it is clearly intended to be run BEFORE buildworld. It was added to work around the requirement that new accounts be added to the system for sendmail before sendmail was built when 8.12 was added. If you had not kept stable (the new accounts had been added to the sources some time earlier), the attempt to install the new sendmail would fail. the '-p' option was added to allow the system to build and only does a comparison on master.passwd and groups. These are files that you typically don't want to simply install the new version and additions to them should never cause a problem to a running system. (I'm a bit uncomfortable about deletions, though.) You always want to run the version of mergemaster in the new system (/usr/src/usr.sbin) so that you will run a version that has any special stuff added/removed from the pre-buildworld to avoid problems. (This was pointed out by a couple of others shortly after I posted my list of upgrade steps.) R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:15:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADF737B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0929343E64 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CGFY8R080151; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CGFVFf080147; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:31 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:31 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Brett Glass Cc: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache2 Makefile ports/www/apache2/files patch-modules:ht (fwd) Message-ID: <20020712161531.GM45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <200207091352.g69Dq0fP014792@cwsys.cwsent.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020709113649.033263a0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020709113649.033263a0@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Brett Glass! On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:39:09AM -0600, you wrote: > Thank you for pointing this out! It may indeed be what's wedging > Apache 2.x. > > I may still downgrade to 1.3.26, though. The process size is > smaller, and the only truly major difference between 1.3.x and > 2.x is the new threading model, which FreeBSD can't use because > pthreads are still a kludge. As far as I see the most useful thing in apache2 is multiple handlers, which was not possible in 1.x. -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:20:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E1837B401; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D788443E81; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:20:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CGK68R080246; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:20:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CGK4Rr080245; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:20:04 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:20:04 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Igor Sysoev Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware2 and CDROM image Message-ID: <20020712162004.GN45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Igor Sysoev! On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:04:25PM +0400, you wrote: > I have a patch that allow to use CD-ROM images in VMware2 via vn device: > http://sysoev.ru/freebsd/patch.vn_cd.txt > > Patch was made and tested on FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3. > I had used it to install Windows NT 4.0 from CD-ROM image in VMware2. > It can be used on FreeBSD 4.x only (because it's using vn device). > > Russian description is available here: > http://sysoev.ru/freebsd/vmware_cd_image.html > > In English, short: > After appling of patch you need rebuild vnconfig and kernel. > vnconfig will get new options - '-s cdrom': > > vnconfig -s cdrom -c vn0c image.iso > > After configuring vn device you can use it in VMware2 as /dev/vn0c > instead of physical CD-ROM device. Hm, thank you, will test it this weekend. -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:21:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A192637B405; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4923C43E4A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:21:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE232178D; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id BB25A3D07; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15663.525.443256.273913@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:21:33 -0400 To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <200207102134.g6ALYPBT050505@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com> <200207102134.g6ALYPBT050505@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "BAM" == Bruce A Mah writes: >> The bug in sed that causes many ports to fail would be nice to get >> fixed, considering that people like to use ports on -RELEASE >> systems... BAM> If you mean the bug with sed -i, note that this occurred (and was fixed) BAM> after 4.6-RELEASE. (sed -i is not even a candidate for 4.6.1...that's a BAM> new feature, not a critical bugfix.) I refer to that in this thread: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=431565+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20020630.freebsd-stable I guess it doesn't seem to affect 4.6-RELEASE-p1. Thanks for the clarification. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:41:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CD937B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EBE43E6E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CGfOP89388; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:41:24 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:41:24 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mike Tancsa Cc: noc@rinet.ru, Subject: Re: 4.6-STABLE panics wirh MROUTING In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020711154823.0379dd28@marble.sentex.ca> Message-ID: <20020712203045.O75573-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: MT> Can you build a debug kernel and then capture a crash dump when the machine MT> panics ? Then load the files in gdb and show where it crashed. Post that MT> to the list and I am sure someone might see something at issue. Just did it. Here is the offending data (panic reproduced exactly by just running mrouted) Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x40 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc019508e stack pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcab48 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcabe8 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 418 (mrouted) interrupt mask = net trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 11 2 1 1 done Uptime: 8m18s dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 262272 dump ata0: resetting devices .. ata0: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=00 ad0: ATAPI 00 00 ata0-slave: ATAPI 00 00 ata0: mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=00 ad0: ATA 01 a5 ata0: devices=01 ad0: success setting PIO4 on generic chip done 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 --- #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc01445ba in boot (howto=256) at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc01449f0 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc0212f4c, howto=-1071568273) at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc01e9fdf in trap_fatal (frame=0xc9fcab08, eva=64) at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc01e9ca1 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc9fcab08, usermode=0, eva=64) at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc01e987f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1072168944, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = 16, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1066864128, tf_ebp = -906187800, tf_isp = -906187980, tf_ebx = 0, tf_edx = -1066863904, tf_ecx = -1015757268, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072082802, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, tf_esp = -1015757312, tf_ss = 0}) at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, flags=0, imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 #7 0xc018ba0e in transmit_event (pipe=0xc3651f00) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:425 #8 0xc018bcc3 in ready_event (q=0xc36ef680) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:577 #9 0xc018cab4 in dummynet_io (m=0xc068f200, pipe_nr=1000, dir=1, fwa=0xc9fcad00) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:1175 #10 0xc01958b8 in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0xc0602f00, ro=0xc0234598, ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- flags=0, imo=0xc9fcad60) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:851 #11 0xc018892c in igmp_sendpkt (inm=0xc36f1840, type=22, addr=0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:482 #12 0xc0188695 in igmp_joingroup (inm=0xc36f1840) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:354 #13 0xc0189b07 in in_addmulti (ap=0xc9fcae44, ifp=0xc35c4e00) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/in.c:863 #14 0xc019692a in ip_setmoptions (sopt=0xc9fcaf10, imop=0xc99acf3c) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1744 #15 0xc0196239 in ip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1233 #16 0xc0197277 in rip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:382 #17 0xc0164385 in sosetopt (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1125 #18 0xc0167613 in setsockopt (p=0xc84a4560, uap=0xc9fcaf80) at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1113 #19 0xc01ea252 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = 1052784323, tf_esi = 67109088, tf_ebp = -1077939076, tf_isp = -906186796, tf_ebx = 1052784323, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 6, tf_eax = 105, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671830616, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 643, tf_esp = -1077939136, tf_ss = 47}) at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #20 0xc01de445 in Xint0x80_syscall () #21 0x804e978 in ?? () #22 0x804e3c5 in ?? () #23 0x804b129 in ?? () #24 0x8048fc3 in ?? () #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, flags=0, imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); (kgdb) l 184 (void)ipsec_setsocket(m, NULL); 185 #endif 186 if (args.rule != NULL) { /* dummynet already saw us */ 187 ip = mtod(m, struct ip *); 188 hlen = IP_VHL_HL(ip->ip_vhl) << 2 ; 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); 190 goto sendit; 191 } 192 193 if (opt) { (kgdb) p *ro $2 = {ro_rt = 0x0, ro_dst = {sa_len = 16 '\020', sa_family = 2 '\002', sa_data = "\000\000ŕ\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}} so, ro->rt is NULL, and it's producing panic. MT> MT> ---Mike MT> MT> At 10:55 PM 11/07/2002 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: MT> >Hello there colleagues. MT> > MT> >After upgrading one of our gateways I'd encountered reproducible MT> >kernel panics in multicast-related situations. processes involved are MT> >mrouted (from base system) and ospfd from zebra-0.92a_1 MT> > MT> >FreeBSD gw-f.rinet.ru 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #2: Wed Jul 10 MT> >15:05:26 MSD 2002 root@gw-f.rinet.ru:/var/obj/lh/src/sys/gwfn i386 MT> > MT> >I suspect options MROUTING being "The Evil" [tm], but had no time to check MT> >it thoroughly (it's production gateway, you know, so now I'd simply stick MT> >it out with about 40 statics both there and on border Cisco ;-) MT> > MT> >kernel config file follows (it's 4-ethernet router + COM multiport console MT> >server) MT> > MT> >Any thoughts? MT> > MT> >Sincerely, MT> >D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ MT> >*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ MT> > MT> > MT> > MT> >machine i386 MT> >cpu I686_CPU MT> >ident GWF MT> >maxusers 0 MT> > MT> >#makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug MT> >symbols MT> > MT> >options INET #InterNETworking MT> >options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem MT> >options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep MT> >this!] MT> >options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support MT> >options NFS_NOSERVER #Completely disable server code MT> >options PROCFS #Process filesystem MT> >options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP MT> >THIS!] MT> >options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support MT> >options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory MT> >options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues MT> >options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores MT> >options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time MT> >extensions MT> >options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING MT> >options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies MT> >options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev MT> >options NO_F00F_HACK # we are not on buggy Pentium MT> > MT> >options CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION MT> >options CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION MT> > MT> >options MROUTING # Multicast routing MT> >options IPFIREWALL #firewall MT> >options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about MT> > # dropped packets MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity MT> >options DUMMYNET #dummynet shaper MT> >options HZ=1000 MT> > MT> >options NMBCLUSTERS=16384 MT> > MT> >device isa MT> >device pci MT> > MT> ># Floppy drives MT> >device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 MT> >device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 MT> > MT> ># ATA and ATAPI devices MT> >device ata MT> >device atadisk # ATA disk drives MT> >options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering MT> > MT> ># atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse MT> >device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD MT> >device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 MT> > MT> >device vga0 at isa? MT> > MT> ># splash screen/screen saver MT> >#pseudo-device splash MT> > MT> ># syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console MT> >device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 MT> > MT> ># Floating point support - do not disable. MT> >device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 MT> > MT> ># Serial (COM) ports MT> >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 MT> >device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 MT> > MT> >options COM_MULTIPORT #code for some cards with shared MT> >IRQs MT> > MT> ># 4-port AST MT> >device sio2 at isa? port 0x2a0 flags 0x501 MT> >device sio3 at isa? port 0x2a8 flags 0x501 MT> >device sio4 at isa? port 0x2b0 flags 0x501 MT> >device sio5 at isa? port 0x2b8 flags 0x501 irq 7 MT> > MT> ># 8-port Omega MT> >device sio6 at isa? port 0x100 flags 0x605 irq 12 MT> >device sio7 at isa? port 0x108 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio8 at isa? port 0x110 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio9 at isa? port 0x118 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio10 at isa? port 0x120 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio11 at isa? port 0x128 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio12 at isa? port 0x130 flags 0x605 MT> >device sio13 at isa? port 0x138 flags 0x605 MT> > MT> ># PCI Ethernet NICs. MT> >#device ed # NE1000/2000 and compatibles MT> >#device ed0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 MT> > MT> >device miibus MT> >device rl # NE1000/2000 and compatibles MT> >device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, MT> >82558) MT> > MT> > MT> ># Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. MT> >pseudo-device loop # Network loopback MT> >pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support MT> >pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) MT> >pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter MT> > MT> > MT> > MT> > MT> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org MT> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message MT> Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:44:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76D637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (office.netstyle.com.ua [213.186.199.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4704A43E67 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:44:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: from mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CGiK8R080554; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:44:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@mile.nevermind.kiev.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by mile.nevermind.kiev.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CGiDBg080553; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:44:13 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:44:13 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: "Jim C. Nasby" Cc: Lasse Laursen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020712164413.GO45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Jim C. Nasby! On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:10:15AM -0500, you wrote: > No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is > on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some > point. I don't think so, it seems that grog@FreeBSD.org forgot about vinum and don't want to fix even known bugs (you can look at cvs logs via cvsweb.freebsd.org). Sources haven't been updated for over 2 years (those that are newer are only cosmetic changes). Also, Greg don't accept any PRs on vinum, rejecting it with reason 'pilot error' or 'read here'. I hate vinum but I should use it (I have only IDE HDDs and no RAID, and I should run disk-time-consuming cvsupd). For now I'm testing in lab RAIDframe (http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/rf/) which is port from NetBSD's system software RAID. It looks much more stable than vinum, have very good fool-proof features (unlike vinum). Reasonable error and diagnostic messages, very simple configuration. With vinum I've already had 3 unrecoverable crashes (on mirroring, which is supposed to be 'safe-me' solution), and 5 kernel panics (yes, Greg, I have vinum compiled as kernel module, not compiled in). With RAIDframe I haven't experienced ANY problem at all for more than 2 month of extensive testing in lab. And yes, you can boot from RAIDframe device. I hope that GEOM will be avaliable in 5.0. > You can come close to this approach with manual methods, though. > See the bootstrapping article for more info. > > Vinum wishlist: > http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/wishlist.html > > Article about bootstrapping vinum: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/vinum/ > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:14:44PM +0200, Lasse Laursen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently in the process of upgrading our Linux servers to FreeBSD. The > > Linux servers uses software raid 1 on the boot/root partitions - is there a > > way to do the same under FreeBSD 4.6? -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:53: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1236D37B401; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886BC43E4A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:53:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.cc) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0231D4A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CGr3rQ087692; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6CGqwS9087691; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:52:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:52:58 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Alexandr Kovalenko Cc: Murray Stokely , "Sergey A. Osokin" , Murray Stokely , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020712165258.GB87571@madman.nectar.cc> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru> <20020708075902.G20410@freebsdmall.com> <20020712160443.GK45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020712160443.GK45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:04:43PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:59:02AM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > > We will follow the existing tag nomenclature. A RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE > > tag will be created on the RELENG_4_6 branch. > > And what will be security branch for 4.6.1-RELEASE? Or will > 4.6-RELEASE-pX became 4.6.1-RELEASE-pX ? 4.6-RELEASE RELENG_4_6_0_RELEASE 4.6-RELEASE-pX RELENG_4_6 4.6.1-RELEASE RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE 4.6.1-RELEASE-pY RELENG_4_6 If you are following the security branch, you need do nothing special... it will become 4.6.1-RELEASE and then 4.6.1-RELEASE-p1 and so on. Just be sure to read src/UPDATING, as always, for important information. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 9:58:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64BB37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6612E43E65 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0020A217B6 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id CA6FE3D07; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) Newsgroups: ml.freebsd.stable References: X-Trace: lorax.kciLink.com 1026491506 97520 216.194.193.106 (12 Jul 2002 16:31:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: daemon@kciLink.com X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020517 (@kci) X-Razor-id: 6324e15a4748f711ab1ecf8635a1a6eaf719f7c4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "IS" == Igor Sysoev writes: >> The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. IS> Sorry, I'd meant "SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmall". Actually, SHMMAXPGS * 4096 == kern.ipc.shmmax so if you set SHMMAXPGS to some value, you need to multiply that by 4096 to set shmmax. I think the kernel should warn you if you set SHMMAX > SHMALL. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 10:12:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF2437B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.nl (smtp3.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B0843E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (p3573.vwr.wanadoo.nl [212.129.225.253]) by smtp3.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 4405D1B4EE; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:12:12 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:12:08 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: "Kevin Oberman" Cc: paulo@nlink.com.br, never@nevermind.kiev.ua, gavin@ury.york.ac.uk, boland@alexander.diva.nl, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-Id: <20020712191208.558abccb.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020712160849.CFF925D03@ptavv.es.net> References: <20020712083256.20eacedc.steve@sohara.org> <20020712160849.CFF925D03@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:08:49 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: KO> Doing a mergemaster -p here simply is the same as not running it at KO> all. From the mergemaster man page: The one and only time I have seen it do anything was after buildworld and before installworld - I read UPDATING and not the man page :) KO> -p Pre-buildworld mode. Compares only files known to be essen- KO> tial to the success of {build|install}world, including KO> /etc/make.conf. KO> KO> So it is clearly intended to be run BEFORE buildworld. I have to agree that this seems pretty clear - so now I am inclined to ask if there is any reason why this phase cannot be placed after buildworld - I can't see anything in mergemaster itself that assumes the world has not yet been huilt. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 11: 7:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF09837B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.inode.at (goliath.inode.at [195.58.161.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D3943E70 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbretter@inode.at) Received: from line-c-205.adsl-dynamic.inode.at ([62.99.151.205] helo=inode.at) by smtp.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17T4or-0006ox-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:07:05 +0200 Message-ID: <3D2F1A53.1080600@inode.at> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:05:07 +0200 From: Michael Bretterklieber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de-at, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sony FX601 freezing (with pcm compiled in) References: <3D20988B.5040406@inode.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Upgrading to FreeBSD 5.0-current solved this problem, bye, Michael Bretterklieber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE on a Sony VAIO FX601 Notebook. > This notebook has a VIAKT133 Chipset, the soundchip is also a via82c686 > one. > > Every time I compile the pcm-driver into the kernel, the kernel hangs on > startup after the parallel-port-probing and before the > ata-device-attachement. If I remove the pcm-driver from the kernel > everything works ok. > > I also tried to load the sound-driver as klm, but the module then > doesen't find the soundcard, but the kernel finds the sound-card if the > pcm-driver is staticaly compiled in. > > I will try to debug this, but I don't know how can I debug this, because > the kernel doesen't panic, it simply hangs. > I compled DDB into the kernel and I can also go into the debugger at > boot time by hidding CTRL-ALT-ESC, but I don't know what how I should > start to debug, > > bye, -- -- -------------------------------------- E-mail: Michael.Bretterklieber@jawa.at ---------------------------- JAWA Management Software GmbH Liebenauer Hauptstr. 200 A-8041 GRAZ Tel: ++43-(0)316-403274-12 Fax: ++43-(0)316-403274-10 GSM: ++43-(0)676-93 96 698 homepage: http://www.jawa.at --------- privat ----------- E-mail: mbretter@inode.at homepage: http://www.inode.at/mbretter -------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 11:27:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6490537B401; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (adsl-64-169-154-205.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [64.169.154.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18BE43E42; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:26:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: from absinthe2.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6CIQsE4080426; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:26:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@absinthe2.dyndns.org) Received: (from fred@localhost) by absinthe2.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6CIQjIe080425; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:26:45 -0700 From: Fred Condo To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko , Murray Stokely , "Sergey A. Osokin" , Murray Stokely , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020712182645.GB80296@absinthe.condo.chico.ca.us> References: <20020707015520.E11035@freebsdmall.com> <20020708091849.GC9340@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20020708093008.GC61953@freebsd.org.ru> <20020708075902.G20410@freebsdmall.com> <20020712160443.GK45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20020712165258.GB87571@madman.nectar.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020712165258.GB87571@madman.nectar.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:52:58AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:04:43PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:59:02AM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > > > We will follow the existing tag nomenclature. A RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE > > > tag will be created on the RELENG_4_6 branch. > > > > And what will be security branch for 4.6.1-RELEASE? Or will > > 4.6-RELEASE-pX became 4.6.1-RELEASE-pX ? > > 4.6-RELEASE RELENG_4_6_0_RELEASE > 4.6-RELEASE-pX RELENG_4_6 Sorry to pick nits, but the line above may confuse some readers. I conclude from the comments below and the nature of CVS branches that, for a system tracking RELENG_4_6, the output of uname -r immediately after the tags for 4.6.1 are laid down will be 4.6.1-RELEASE, and that any security patches on the branch thereafter will result in output of the form 4.6.1-RELEASE-pY. I'm certain this is what you meant, of course. Part of the problem is that the question was ill-posed, in that it assumed that labels such as 4.6-RELEASE are examples of branches, when the term 'branch' properly refers only to CVS branch tags such as RELENG_4_6. > 4.6.1-RELEASE RELENG_4_6_1_RELEASE > 4.6.1-RELEASE-pY RELENG_4_6 > > If you are following the security branch, you need do nothing > special... it will become 4.6.1-RELEASE and then 4.6.1-RELEASE-p1 and > so on. > > Just be sure to read src/UPDATING, as always, for important > information. > -- Fred Condo - fred@condo.chico.ca.us To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. -- Cardinal Bellarmine at Galileo's trial To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 11:44:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E9837B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic.adaptec.com [208.236.45.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC7143E6A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:44:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Scott_Long@adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6CIiEr08675; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.0.52]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10698; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com (btcexc01 [10.100.0.23]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21308; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: by btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:12 -0600 Message-ID: <2C7CBDC6EA58D6119E4A00065B3A24CB046410@btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com> From: "Long, Scott" To: "'Vivek Khera'" , stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: dscheck warning messages (with Dell PERC3 controller) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I have a dual CPU Dell box on which I run Postgres. The other night, > the nightly mail included a bunch of warnings liks this: > > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051990 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051992 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051970 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051970 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051990 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051989 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051988 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051987 > > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051986 > > The device reports itself at boot as > > aac0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff irq 2 at > device 2.1 on pci1 > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 54MB cache memory, no battery support > aac0: Kernel 2.1-3, Build 2951, S/N 3801d0 > > The system is newly upgraded from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1 (a week > prior to this message showing up). The machine was originally > installed with a 4.4-RELEASE. > > Can anyone explain what the above errors might indicate, or if there > is something I can/should do about it? I have not seen these messages > since that one day they appeared. > > Thanks. > Very bizarre. I doubt that this is being *caused* by the controller. Out of curiosity, what is the size of the array and each partition? Did anything strange happen with the array size or the disklabel when you performed the upgrade? Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 11:48: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F3537B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E60343E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP id GQF37091; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:46:23 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417005D03; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: paulo@nlink.com.br, never@nevermind.kiev.ua, gavin@ury.york.ac.uk, boland@alexander.diva.nl, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:12:08 +0200." <20020712191208.558abccb.steve@sohara.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:47:54 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020712184754.417005D03@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:12:08 +0200 > From: Steve O'Hara-Smith > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:08:49 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > KO> Doing a mergemaster -p here simply is the same as not running it at > KO> all. From the mergemaster man page: > > The one and only time I have seen it do anything was after buildworld > and before installworld - I read UPDATING and not the man page :) > > KO> -p Pre-buildworld mode. Compares only files known to be essen- > KO> tial to the success of {build|install}world, including > KO> /etc/make.conf. > KO> > KO> So it is clearly intended to be run BEFORE buildworld. > > I have to agree that this seems pretty clear - so now I am inclined > to ask if there is any reason why this phase cannot be placed after > buildworld - I can't see anything in mergemaster itself that assumes the > world has not yet been huilt. I shouldn't speak for the Doug Barton's intent, but it appears that he designed -p as a catch-all of merges that must be done at any time before the normal post-install mergemaster run. In the case that created this option, running it before installworld would do the trick nicely. I suspect he simply wanted to generalize it in case something needed to be done even before buildworld would work. (It seems possible that this might be the case when the upgrade to 5.0 comes down the pike.) So, the reality is that -p is ALMOST never required. I have never used it. But it is needed for systems that are not kept pretty stable to handle the new sendmail and may be needed again, some day, even before building world. So it's probably wisest to try it before building world and deciding if you want to install any of the changes it tries before building/installing world. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 11:50: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B8737B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCBC43E42 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g6CInjc12440; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:49:45 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Jan Grant , Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root, 's tatf s' is culprit Message-ID: <20020712114945.D9516@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Jan Grant , Don Bowman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 04:51:22PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > I know several other people have run into the problem where > > > the (Linux) JDK or JRE 1.4 will only run as root. > > > Tracing this with 'ktrace', the issue is a statfs call, > > > which returns 'RESTART'. I don't see that errno listed on > > > the man page for statfs, I guess it must come from the > > > linux_statfs in compat/linux. > > > > > > 48927 java CALL statfs(0xbf1f) > > > 48927 java RET statfs RESTART > > > > OK, after having found out that 'ktrace' isn't appropriate > > for linux executables (use truss or linux_kdump), I found that > > the culprit is actually: > > > > linux_sched_getscheduler(0xcb18) ERR#1 'Operation not > > permitted' > > > > when root, this is permitted. When non-root, this is not-permitted. > > > > Suggestions? Is this a problem with the linux emulation? Or is > > there a permissions difference between linux & freebsd here? > > It's a bug in -stable's permissions checking - it's somewhat > over-zealous. The fix is reasonably trivial (I think pointers to this > have appeared on -java a number of times). Based on looking at the archives, this seems to be a commonly encountered problem. Should I submit a PR so that this can be fixed in STABLE, or are there objections to this fix? Thanks, -jj -- Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew flowcharts; look how much good it did them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 12:10:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037B137B407 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from angelic.cynic.net (P061198253113.ppp.prin.ne.jp [61.198.253.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8A343E42 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjs@cynic.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angelic.cynic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5BB8707; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:25:40 +0900 (JST) From: Curt Sampson To: Vivek Khera Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: <15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > I have a dual cpu box with 2GB RAM dedicated to running Postgres. > Last week, I upgraded FreeBSD from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1. When > I went to restart postgres, it complained that it could not allocate > the shared memory segment. I'm running Postgres 7.2.1. This came up on the list a few days ago. FreeBSD 4.6 apparently has some sort of system limit on how much shared memory it will allocate, probably to keep those using shared memory from eating up too much of the available VM. This is not a problem because you want to allocate a fairly small amount of shared memory. > For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000 > with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is > obviously impacting performance... Yes, I'm sure your performance improved. By going from 780 MB to 25 MB of shared memory, you just increased the amount of data the OS can buffer from about 1.1 GB to 1.8 GB. You've just increased your cache size by about 60%. See previous discussions on this (postgresql-general) list over the past couple of weeks for details. (Is this in the FAQ yet?) cjs -- Curt Sampson +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 12:10:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2637B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D6A43E6A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6CJApLA058605; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6CJApAc058604; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:10:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207121910.g6CJApAc058604@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Steve Bernard" Cc: Subject: Re: RE: anyone read this References: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's an old article, and also very wrong. There was a lot of hash over it at the time and the Authors got a mouthful. They republished after tuning FreeBSD: http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1147/sam0108q/0108q.htm In which Linux and FreeBSD wound up with very similar results. However, the authors are obviously not very sophisticated, which should be obvious when you read the excuses they make in the republished article. For example, they recommend using 'async' file mounts which nobody in their right mind should ever do (on Linux OR FreeBSD). They also applied the many tuning suggestions blindly, without any real understanding of what they did, then complained about it (are these guys Linuxheads or something? They seem to think that the best OS to release is one that is pre-tuned to return the best microbenchmark results), and they complain that FreeBSD refuses to allocate infinite resources to the network by default (well, Duh! Real life is not a bowl of mailbox files!). Sigh. One of these days I will get annoyed enough to actually load Linux onto one of my test boxes and play turnabout. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 12:26:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576C837B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87B043E65 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3662178D; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 695C23D07; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:26:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15663.11598.873182.823906@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:26:06 -0400 To: "Long, Scott" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: dscheck warning messages (with Dell PERC3 controller) In-Reply-To: <2C7CBDC6EA58D6119E4A00065B3A24CB046410@btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com> References: <2C7CBDC6EA58D6119E4A00065B3A24CB046410@btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "SL" == Scott Long writes: >> I have a dual CPU Dell box on which I run Postgres. The other night, >> the nightly mail included a bunch of warnings liks this: >> >> > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051990 >> > dscheck(#aacd/0x20006): negative b_blkno -2119051992 SL> Very bizarre. I doubt that this is being *caused* by the controller. SL> Out of curiosity, what is the size of the array and each partition? SL> Did anything strange happen with the array size or the disklabel when SL> you performed the upgrade? [d01]% df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/aacd0s1a 64479 28856 30465 49% / /dev/aacd0s1g 137834676 15459464 111348438 12% /u/d01 /dev/aacd0s1e 503791 192481 271007 42% /usr /dev/aacd0s1f 1031919 8284 941082 1% /var mfs:23 32206 4 29626 0% /tmp procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc For the size, this is what I have: aacd0: on aac0 aacd0: 138850MB (284365824 sectors) It is 5 identical 18Gb disks, mounted with softupdates enabled on all but / partition. # disklabel aacd0 # /dev/aacd0: type: ESDI disk: amnesiac label: fictitious flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 17700 sectors/unit: 284365824 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 284365824 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 17700*) The reboots during upgrade reported no errors on the console, but I don't see any BIOS messages since that's about 35 miles away on the video screen. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 12:46:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D4237B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [217.73.193.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC2E43E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:46:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.stack.net [217.73.193.40]) by park.rambler.ru (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6CJkck48870; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:46:39 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:46:38 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: Vivek Khera Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>> "IS" == Igor Sysoev writes: > > >> The kernel config has SHMMAX and SHMMAXPGS. > > IS> Sorry, I'd meant "SHMMAXPGS is sysctl kern.ipc.shmall". > > Actually, SHMMAXPGS * 4096 == kern.ipc.shmmax > > so if you set SHMMAXPGS to some value, you need to multiply that by > 4096 to set shmmax. > > I think the kernel should warn you if you set SHMMAX > SHMALL. Although kernel build can warn about it I do not believe that sysctl mechanics allows warnings. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 12:53: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0049C37B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [216.194.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E543E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:53:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [216.194.193.106]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66392178D for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:52:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by onceler.kciLink.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 8009B3D07; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:52:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15663.13211.6205.877676@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:52:59 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [GENERAL] was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.04 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "IS" == Igor Sysoev writes: >> I think the kernel should warn you if you set SHMMAX > SHMALL. IS> Although kernel build can warn about it IS> I do not believe that sysctl mechanics allows warnings. I figured as much. But the kernel build doesn't currently issue any such warnings under 4.6-RELEASE-p1. The following doesn't complain during config: # shared memory needs. options SYSVSHM options SHMALL=65536 options SHMMAXPGS=262144 which is what tripped me up. Making SHMALL=SHTMMAXPGS in the config above got the desired results. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 13: 1:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA3637B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E258143E4A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CK1PK92776; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:01:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:01:25 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mike Tancsa , Cc: noc@rinet.ru, Subject: Re: 4.6-STABLE panics wirh MROUTING In-Reply-To: <20020712203045.O75573-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20020712235613.G75573-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: DM> DM> MT> Can you build a debug kernel and then capture a crash dump when the machine DM> MT> panics ? Then load the files in gdb and show where it crashed. Post that DM> MT> to the list and I am sure someone might see something at issue. DM> DM> Just did it. Here is the offending data (panic reproduced exactly by DM> just running mrouted) Well, some hours of digging, rebuilding kernels and stohastic reboots "under my fingers"... now i'm almost certainly sources this error as a result of Luigi's commit at 09.07.2002. All crashdump tracebacks have a step thru dummynet, and test machine with the same kernel, but without active ipfw pipe rules does NOT crash. Now i'm rebuilding kernel from RELENG_4_6. Will keep you informed. DM> DM> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode DM> fault virtual address = 0x40 DM> fault code = supervisor read, page not present DM> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc019508e DM> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcab48 DM> frame pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcabe8 DM> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b DM> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 DM> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 DM> current process = 418 (mrouted) DM> interrupt mask = net DM> trap number = 12 DM> panic: page fault DM> DM> syncing disks... 11 2 1 1 DM> done DM> Uptime: 8m18s DM> DM> dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 262272 DM> dump ata0: resetting devices .. ata0: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=00 DM> ad0: ATAPI 00 00 DM> ata0-slave: ATAPI 00 00 DM> ata0: mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=00 DM> ad0: ATA 01 a5 DM> ata0: devices=01 DM> ad0: success setting PIO4 on generic chip DM> done DM> 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 DM> 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 DM> 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 DM> --- DM> #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 DM> 487 if (dumping++) { DM> (kgdb) bt DM> #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 DM> #1 0xc01445ba in boot (howto=256) at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 DM> #2 0xc01449f0 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc0212f4c, howto=-1071568273) DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 DM> #3 0xc01e9fdf in trap_fatal (frame=0xc9fcab08, eva=64) DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 DM> #4 0xc01e9ca1 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc9fcab08, usermode=0, eva=64) DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 DM> #5 0xc01e987f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1072168944, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = DM> 16, DM> tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1066864128, tf_ebp = -906187800, DM> tf_isp = -906187980, tf_ebx = 0, tf_edx = -1066863904, DM> tf_ecx = -1015757268, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, DM> tf_eip = -1072082802, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, DM> tf_esp = -1015757312, tf_ss = 0}) at DM> /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 DM> #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, DM> flags=0, DM> imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 DM> #7 0xc018ba0e in transmit_event (pipe=0xc3651f00) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:425 DM> #8 0xc018bcc3 in ready_event (q=0xc36ef680) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:577 DM> #9 0xc018cab4 in dummynet_io (m=0xc068f200, pipe_nr=1000, dir=1, DM> fwa=0xc9fcad00) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:1175 DM> #10 0xc01958b8 in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0xc0602f00, ro=0xc0234598, DM> ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- DM> flags=0, imo=0xc9fcad60) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:851 DM> #11 0xc018892c in igmp_sendpkt (inm=0xc36f1840, type=22, addr=0) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:482 DM> #12 0xc0188695 in igmp_joingroup (inm=0xc36f1840) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:354 DM> #13 0xc0189b07 in in_addmulti (ap=0xc9fcae44, ifp=0xc35c4e00) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/in.c:863 DM> #14 0xc019692a in ip_setmoptions (sopt=0xc9fcaf10, imop=0xc99acf3c) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1744 DM> #15 0xc0196239 in ip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1233 DM> #16 0xc0197277 in rip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:382 DM> #17 0xc0164385 in sosetopt (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1125 DM> #18 0xc0167613 in setsockopt (p=0xc84a4560, uap=0xc9fcaf80) DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1113 DM> #19 0xc01ea252 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, DM> tf_edi = 1052784323, tf_esi = 67109088, tf_ebp = -1077939076, DM> tf_isp = -906186796, tf_ebx = 1052784323, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 6, DM> tf_eax = 105, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671830616, DM> tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 643, tf_esp = -1077939136, tf_ss = 47}) DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175 DM> ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- DM> #20 0xc01de445 in Xint0x80_syscall () DM> #21 0x804e978 in ?? () DM> #22 0x804e3c5 in ?? () DM> #23 0x804b129 in ?? () DM> #24 0x8048fc3 in ?? () DM> DM> DM> DM> #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, DM> flags=0, DM> imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 DM> 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); DM> (kgdb) l DM> 184 (void)ipsec_setsocket(m, NULL); DM> 185 #endif DM> 186 if (args.rule != NULL) { /* dummynet already saw us */ DM> 187 ip = mtod(m, struct ip *); DM> 188 hlen = IP_VHL_HL(ip->ip_vhl) << 2 ; DM> 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); DM> 190 goto sendit; DM> 191 } DM> 192 DM> 193 if (opt) { DM> DM> (kgdb) p *ro DM> $2 = {ro_rt = 0x0, ro_dst = {sa_len = 16 '\020', sa_family = 2 '\002', DM> sa_data = "\000\000ŕ\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}} DM> DM> so, ro->rt is NULL, and it's producing panic. DM> DM> MT> DM> MT> ---Mike DM> MT> DM> MT> At 10:55 PM 11/07/2002 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> MT> >Hello there colleagues. DM> MT> > DM> MT> >After upgrading one of our gateways I'd encountered reproducible DM> MT> >kernel panics in multicast-related situations. processes involved are DM> MT> >mrouted (from base system) and ospfd from zebra-0.92a_1 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >FreeBSD gw-f.rinet.ru 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #2: Wed Jul 10 DM> MT> >15:05:26 MSD 2002 root@gw-f.rinet.ru:/var/obj/lh/src/sys/gwfn i386 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >I suspect options MROUTING being "The Evil" [tm], but had no time to check DM> MT> >it thoroughly (it's production gateway, you know, so now I'd simply stick DM> MT> >it out with about 40 statics both there and on border Cisco ;-) DM> MT> > DM> MT> >kernel config file follows (it's 4-ethernet router + COM multiport console DM> MT> >server) DM> MT> > DM> MT> >Any thoughts? DM> MT> > DM> MT> >Sincerely, DM> MT> >D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] DM> MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> MT> >*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** DM> MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> >machine i386 DM> MT> >cpu I686_CPU DM> MT> >ident GWF DM> MT> >maxusers 0 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >#makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug DM> MT> >symbols DM> MT> > DM> MT> >options INET #InterNETworking DM> MT> >options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem DM> MT> >options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep DM> MT> >this!] DM> MT> >options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support DM> MT> >options NFS_NOSERVER #Completely disable server code DM> MT> >options PROCFS #Process filesystem DM> MT> >options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP DM> MT> >THIS!] DM> MT> >options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support DM> MT> >options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory DM> MT> >options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues DM> MT> >options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores DM> MT> >options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time DM> MT> >extensions DM> MT> >options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING DM> MT> >options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies DM> MT> >options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev DM> MT> >options NO_F00F_HACK # we are not on buggy Pentium DM> MT> > DM> MT> >options CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION DM> MT> >options CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION DM> MT> > DM> MT> >options MROUTING # Multicast routing DM> MT> >options IPFIREWALL #firewall DM> MT> >options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about DM> MT> > # dropped packets DM> MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support DM> MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity DM> MT> >options DUMMYNET #dummynet shaper DM> MT> >options HZ=1000 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >options NMBCLUSTERS=16384 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >device isa DM> MT> >device pci DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># Floppy drives DM> MT> >device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 DM> MT> >device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># ATA and ATAPI devices DM> MT> >device ata DM> MT> >device atadisk # ATA disk drives DM> MT> >options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse DM> MT> >device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD DM> MT> >device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >device vga0 at isa? DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># splash screen/screen saver DM> MT> >#pseudo-device splash DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console DM> MT> >device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># Floating point support - do not disable. DM> MT> >device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># Serial (COM) ports DM> MT> >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 DM> MT> >device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >options COM_MULTIPORT #code for some cards with shared DM> MT> >IRQs DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># 4-port AST DM> MT> >device sio2 at isa? port 0x2a0 flags 0x501 DM> MT> >device sio3 at isa? port 0x2a8 flags 0x501 DM> MT> >device sio4 at isa? port 0x2b0 flags 0x501 DM> MT> >device sio5 at isa? port 0x2b8 flags 0x501 irq 7 DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># 8-port Omega DM> MT> >device sio6 at isa? port 0x100 flags 0x605 irq 12 DM> MT> >device sio7 at isa? port 0x108 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio8 at isa? port 0x110 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio9 at isa? port 0x118 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio10 at isa? port 0x120 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio11 at isa? port 0x128 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio12 at isa? port 0x130 flags 0x605 DM> MT> >device sio13 at isa? port 0x138 flags 0x605 DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># PCI Ethernet NICs. DM> MT> >#device ed # NE1000/2000 and compatibles DM> MT> >#device ed0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 DM> MT> > DM> MT> >device miibus DM> MT> >device rl # NE1000/2000 and compatibles DM> MT> >device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, DM> MT> >82558) DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> ># Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. DM> MT> >pseudo-device loop # Network loopback DM> MT> >pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support DM> MT> >pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) DM> MT> >pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> > DM> MT> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org DM> MT> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message DM> MT> DM> DM> Sincerely, DM> D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 13:16:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F97837B405 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A51A643E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:16:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 12234 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 2002 20:16:43 -0000 Received: from p50910545.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.5.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp016-rz3) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2002 20:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 33259 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 19:09:05 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2002 19:09:05 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6CJ94L33255 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:09:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:09:04 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020712210904.W1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020712083256.20eacedc.steve@sohara.org> <20020712160849.CFF925D03@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020712160849.CFF925D03@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:08:49AM -0700 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:08 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > You always want to run the version of mergemaster in the new system > (/usr/src/usr.sbin) so that you will run a version that has any > special stuff added/removed from the pre-buildworld to avoid > problems. (This was pointed out by a couple of others shortly after I > posted my list of upgrade steps.) Which reminds me: I had expected some commentary on my patch to UPDATING. Either it simply was drowned in the list traffic or it was too simple / way off to be considered for inclusion. In the latter case I would have liked some kind of rejection. :) Here are some parameters again for those who would like to have another look at it: Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:52:09 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE -> 4.5-RELENG Message-ID: <20020711195209.S1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Is the -stable list inappropriate for this kind of change suggestion? But I thought a PR to be inappropriate and overdone ... virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 14:25:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDE437B401; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EBF4407A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:01:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17T7Vm-0006om-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:59:34 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17T7Vl-0007aH-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:59:33 -0600 Message-ID: <3D2F4338.1000508@xmission.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:59:36 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions , freebsd-stable Subject: Problems with php4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060302050801000908050801" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060302050801000908050801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just did a cvsup for the ports and tried to make php4. It crashes on zm_startup_imap during the install, I've attached the output, if anyone has any ideas, on what happened and how to fix it, that'd be great. -- -Jason Porter "Real programmers are secure enough to write readable code, which they then self-righteously refuse to explain." --------------060302050801000908050801 Content-Type: text/plain; name="php4.make" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="php4.make" Script started on Fri Jul 12 14:55:14 2002 LIGHTGUARD# make install ===> Building for php4-4.2.1 Making all in Zend Making all in main Making all in ext Making all in zlib Making all in bcmath Making all in libbcmath Making all in src Making all in bz2 Making all in ctype Making all in domxml Making all in ftp Making all in gd Making all in gettext Making all in iconv Making all in imap Making all in mcal Making all in mcrypt Making all in mysql Making all in openssl Making all in pcre Making all in pcrelib Making all in pdf Making all in posix Making all in pspell Making all in readline Making all in session Making all in snmp Making all in sockets Making all in standard Making all in xml Making all in xslt Making all in sapi Making all in cgi Making all in TSRM Making all in . /bin/sh /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/libtool --silent --mode=link cc -I. -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/ -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/main -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1 -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/Zend -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype -I/usr/local/include/gd -I/usr/local/include/c-client -I/usr/local/include/mcal -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include/pspell -I/usr/local/include/ucd-snmp -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/TSRM -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/local/include -o php -export-dynamic stub.lo libphp4.la ./.libs/libphp4.a(php_imap.o): In function `zm_startup_imap': php_imap.o(.text+0x373): undefined reference to `ssl_onceonlyinit' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. LIGHTGUARD# exit exit Script done on Fri Jul 12 14:55:21 2002 --------------060302050801000908050801-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:42:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC7C37B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9259444419; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:21:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com) Received: from ntlworld.com ([213.104.146.54]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020712211934.COHW16050.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@ntlworld.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:19:34 +0100 Message-ID: <3D2F4743.4010403@ntlworld.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:16:51 +0100 From: Antony T Curtis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020611 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux JRE 1.4 under linux compatibility only runs as root References: <20020711214742.C259A37B406@hub.freebsd.org> <20020711150748.B14694@alicia.nttmcl.com> <20020711174958.E32743@seaman.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I gave this a go patching both sched_getscheduler and sched_getparam on -STABLE... The result: jdk1.4 works well on non-root account (tested running Java2D demo and SwingSet2) Thanks! Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:07:48PM -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > > Not hard at all. The perms in sched_getscheduler in -stable are silly. > (also sched_getparam). Just try changing it to something like the patch > below (note that I don't have a stable system at the moment, so I don't > guarantee it works, nor that it even compiles -- take it as a guide only). -- Antony T Curtis BSc Unix Analyst Programmer http://homepage.ntlworld.com/antony.t.curtis/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:43:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E9A37B40C for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flake.decibel.org (flake.decibel.org [216.254.40.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6135442CE for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:13:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from decibel@decibel.org) Received: (qmail 30210 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Jul 2002 21:07:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:06:59 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020712160659.F51502@flake.decibel.org> Reply-To: jim@nasby.net Mail-Followup-To: "Jim C. Nasby" , Steve O'Hara-Smith , laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org>; from steve@sohara.org on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE-p1 i386 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:15 -0500 > "Jim C. Nasby" wrote: > > JCN> No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is > JCN> on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some > > Er - have you seen man atacontrol in RELENG_4 lately ? I will > quote the most pertinent extract: > > Allthough the ATA driver allows for creating an ATA RAID on > disks on any controller, there are restrictions. It is only pos­ > sible to boot on an array if its either located on a "real" ATA > RAID controller like the Promise or Highpoint controllers, or if > the RAID declared is of RAID1 or SPAN type, in case of a SPAN > the partition to boot must reside on the first disk in the SPAN > > So the answer is - yes you can. This is new then, if it actually supports vinum. What is a SPAN? -- Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim@nasby.net Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:44:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B0F37B42B; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr3.xmission.com (mgr3.xmission.com [198.60.22.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A9B443A5; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr3.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17T7mq-00003S-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:17:12 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17T7mp-0001CK-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:17:11 -0600 Message-ID: <3D2F475B.3060700@xmission.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:17:15 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-question@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: dirk@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with php4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000708070409000302050803" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000708070409000302050803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just did a cvsup for the ports and tried to make php4. It crashes on zm_startup_imap during the install, I've attached the output, if anyone has any ideas, on what happened and how to fix it, that'd be great. -- -Jason Porter "Real programmers are secure enough to write readable code, which they then self-righteously refuse to explain." --------------000708070409000302050803 Content-Type: text/plain; name="php4.make" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="php4.make" Script started on Fri Jul 12 14:55:14 2002 LIGHTGUARD# make install ===> Building for php4-4.2.1 Making all in Zend Making all in main Making all in ext Making all in zlib Making all in bcmath Making all in libbcmath Making all in src Making all in bz2 Making all in ctype Making all in domxml Making all in ftp Making all in gd Making all in gettext Making all in iconv Making all in imap Making all in mcal Making all in mcrypt Making all in mysql Making all in openssl Making all in pcre Making all in pcrelib Making all in pdf Making all in posix Making all in pspell Making all in readline Making all in session Making all in snmp Making all in sockets Making all in standard Making all in xml Making all in xslt Making all in sapi Making all in cgi Making all in TSRM Making all in . /bin/sh /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/libtool --silent --mode=link cc -I. -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/ -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/main -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1 -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/Zend -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype -I/usr/local/include/gd -I/usr/local/include/c-client -I/usr/local/include/mcal -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include/pspell -I/usr/local/include/ucd-snmp -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/TSRM -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/local/include -o php -export-dynamic stub.lo libphp4.la ./.libs/libphp4.a(php_imap.o): In function `zm_startup_imap': php_imap.o(.text+0x373): undefined reference to `ssl_onceonlyinit' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. LIGHTGUARD# exit exit Script done on Fri Jul 12 14:55:21 2002 --------------000708070409000302050803-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:45:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262AA37B4B5; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr1.xmission.com (mgr1.xmission.com [198.60.22.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F327E44923; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:14:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17T8KT-0001nN-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:51:57 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17T8KT-0005EE-00; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:51:57 -0600 Message-ID: <3D2F4F81.3000104@xmission.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:52:01 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Sorry for the double post, the list was kinda slow Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry for the double post, the list was kinda slow, they're both the same messages, so you can disregard one of them. -- -Jason Porter "Real programmers are secure enough to write readable code, which they then self-righteously refuse to explain." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:46:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCD337B4B2 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BA86449F8 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:39:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 12 Jul 2002 23:38:56 +0100 (BST) To: Michiel Boland Cc: Mike Tancsa , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@freebsd.dk Subject: Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:01:37 +0200." <20020711095747.B19121-100000@carmel.diva.nl> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:38:51 +0100 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200207122338.aa27236@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020711095747.B19121-100000@carmel.diva.nl>, Michiel Boland writes : >Please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the splx patch does >anything to help people with broken CD-ROM drives. Try the following. It fixes CD-ROM drives in VMWare for me, so there is a good chance it may help with real CD-ROM drives too. Sorry, I meant to try to track this down ages ago as it sounded (and was) really easy to find, but I rarely use CD-ROM drives in VMWare so I never got around to it. It's just a simple race where if the completion interrupt comes in between the splx() and the tsleep(), the tsleep will sit in "atprq" forever. Moving the splx() to after the tsleep ensures that this can't happen. Ian Index: atapi-all.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/iedowse/CVS/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c,v retrieving revision 1.46.2.13 diff -u -r1.46.2.13 atapi-all.c --- atapi-all.c 26 Mar 2002 09:36:43 -0000 1.46.2.13 +++ atapi-all.c 12 Jul 2002 22:35:17 -0000 @@ -206,15 +206,17 @@ TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&atadev->channel->atapi_queue, request, chain); else TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&atadev->channel->atapi_queue, request, chain); - splx(s); ata_start(atadev->channel); /* if callback used, then just return, gets called from interrupt context */ - if (callback) + if (callback) { + splx(s); return 0; + } /* wait for request to complete */ tsleep((caddr_t)request, PRIBIO, "atprq", 0); + splx(s); error = request->error; if (error) bcopy(&request->sense, atadev->result, sizeof(struct atapi_reqsense)); To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 15:51:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFBB37B40A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.rinet.ru (relay.rinet.ru [195.54.192.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE03743E31; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by relay.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CMT1R03829; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:29:01 +0400 (MSD) X-Envelope-To: luigi@freebsd.org Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6CMN5G95319; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:23:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:23:05 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mike Tancsa , Cc: noc@rinet.ru, Subject: Re: 4.6-STABLE panics wirh MROUTING In-Reply-To: <20020712235613.G75573-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20020713021854.Y75573-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> Well, some hours of digging, rebuilding kernels and stohastic reboots DM> "under my fingers"... DM> DM> now i'm almost certainly sources this error as a result of Luigi's commit DM> at 09.07.2002. All crashdump tracebacks have a step thru dummynet, and DM> test machine with the same kernel, but without active ipfw pipe rules DM> does NOT crash. DM> DM> Now i'm rebuilding kernel from RELENG_4_6. Will keep you informed. As expected, RELENG_4_6 is running solid. Test box compiled with this kernel config crashes as soon I'd configure just one ipfw pipe rule and start mrouted. Just filed a PR, but it seems mx1.freebsd.org experiencing problems, at least from our AS (Operation timed out with mx1.freebsd.org.) By the way, why freebsd.org has only one MX? DM> DM> DM> DM> DM> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode DM> DM> fault virtual address = 0x40 DM> DM> fault code = supervisor read, page not present DM> DM> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc019508e DM> DM> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcab48 DM> DM> frame pointer = 0x10:0xc9fcabe8 DM> DM> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b DM> DM> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 DM> DM> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 DM> DM> current process = 418 (mrouted) DM> DM> interrupt mask = net DM> DM> trap number = 12 DM> DM> panic: page fault DM> DM> DM> DM> syncing disks... 11 2 1 1 DM> DM> done DM> DM> Uptime: 8m18s DM> DM> DM> DM> dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 262272 DM> DM> dump ata0: resetting devices .. ata0: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=00 DM> DM> ad0: ATAPI 00 00 DM> DM> ata0-slave: ATAPI 00 00 DM> DM> ata0: mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=00 DM> DM> ad0: ATA 01 a5 DM> DM> ata0: devices=01 DM> DM> ad0: success setting PIO4 on generic chip DM> DM> done DM> DM> 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 DM> DM> 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 DM> DM> 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 DM> DM> --- DM> DM> #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 DM> DM> 487 if (dumping++) { DM> DM> (kgdb) bt DM> DM> #0 dumpsys () at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 DM> DM> #1 0xc01445ba in boot (howto=256) at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 DM> DM> #2 0xc01449f0 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc0212f4c, howto=-1071568273) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 DM> DM> #3 0xc01e9fdf in trap_fatal (frame=0xc9fcab08, eva=64) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 DM> DM> #4 0xc01e9ca1 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc9fcab08, usermode=0, eva=64) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 DM> DM> #5 0xc01e987f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1072168944, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = DM> DM> 16, DM> DM> tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1066864128, tf_ebp = -906187800, DM> DM> tf_isp = -906187980, tf_ebx = 0, tf_edx = -1066863904, DM> DM> tf_ecx = -1015757268, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, DM> DM> tf_eip = -1072082802, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, DM> DM> tf_esp = -1015757312, tf_ss = 0}) at DM> DM> /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 DM> DM> #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, DM> DM> flags=0, DM> DM> imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 DM> DM> #7 0xc018ba0e in transmit_event (pipe=0xc3651f00) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:425 DM> DM> #8 0xc018bcc3 in ready_event (q=0xc36ef680) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:577 DM> DM> #9 0xc018cab4 in dummynet_io (m=0xc068f200, pipe_nr=1000, dir=1, DM> DM> fwa=0xc9fcad00) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c:1175 DM> DM> #10 0xc01958b8 in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0xc0602f00, ro=0xc0234598, DM> DM> ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- DM> DM> flags=0, imo=0xc9fcad60) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:851 DM> DM> #11 0xc018892c in igmp_sendpkt (inm=0xc36f1840, type=22, addr=0) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:482 DM> DM> #12 0xc0188695 in igmp_joingroup (inm=0xc36f1840) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c:354 DM> DM> #13 0xc0189b07 in in_addmulti (ap=0xc9fcae44, ifp=0xc35c4e00) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/in.c:863 DM> DM> #14 0xc019692a in ip_setmoptions (sopt=0xc9fcaf10, imop=0xc99acf3c) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1744 DM> DM> #15 0xc0196239 in ip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:1233 DM> DM> #16 0xc0197277 in rip_ctloutput (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c:382 DM> DM> #17 0xc0164385 in sosetopt (so=0xc88d5b80, sopt=0xc9fcaf10) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1125 DM> DM> #18 0xc0167613 in setsockopt (p=0xc84a4560, uap=0xc9fcaf80) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1113 DM> DM> #19 0xc01ea252 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, DM> DM> tf_edi = 1052784323, tf_esi = 67109088, tf_ebp = -1077939076, DM> DM> tf_isp = -906186796, tf_ebx = 1052784323, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 6, DM> DM> tf_eax = 105, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671830616, DM> DM> tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 643, tf_esp = -1077939136, tf_ss = 47}) DM> DM> at /lh/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175 DM> DM> ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- DM> DM> #20 0xc01de445 in Xint0x80_syscall () DM> DM> #21 0x804e978 in ?? () DM> DM> #22 0x804e3c5 in ?? () DM> DM> #23 0x804b129 in ?? () DM> DM> #24 0x8048fc3 in ?? () DM> DM> DM> DM> DM> DM> DM> DM> #6 0xc019508e in ip_output (m0=0xc068f200, opt=0x0, ro=0xc374c62c, DM> DM> flags=0, DM> DM> imo=0x0) at /lh/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:189 DM> DM> 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); DM> DM> (kgdb) l DM> DM> 184 (void)ipsec_setsocket(m, NULL); DM> DM> 185 #endif DM> DM> 186 if (args.rule != NULL) { /* dummynet already saw us */ DM> DM> 187 ip = mtod(m, struct ip *); DM> DM> 188 hlen = IP_VHL_HL(ip->ip_vhl) << 2 ; DM> DM> 189 ia = ifatoia(ro->ro_rt->rt_ifa); DM> DM> 190 goto sendit; DM> DM> 191 } DM> DM> 192 DM> DM> 193 if (opt) { DM> DM> DM> DM> (kgdb) p *ro DM> DM> $2 = {ro_rt = 0x0, ro_dst = {sa_len = 16 '\020', sa_family = 2 '\002', DM> DM> sa_data = "\000\000ŕ\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}} DM> DM> DM> DM> so, ro->rt is NULL, and it's producing panic. DM> DM> DM> DM> MT> DM> DM> MT> ---Mike DM> DM> MT> DM> DM> MT> At 10:55 PM 11/07/2002 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> DM> MT> >Hello there colleagues. DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >After upgrading one of our gateways I'd encountered reproducible DM> DM> MT> >kernel panics in multicast-related situations. processes involved are DM> DM> MT> >mrouted (from base system) and ospfd from zebra-0.92a_1 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >FreeBSD gw-f.rinet.ru 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #2: Wed Jul 10 DM> DM> MT> >15:05:26 MSD 2002 root@gw-f.rinet.ru:/var/obj/lh/src/sys/gwfn i386 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >I suspect options MROUTING being "The Evil" [tm], but had no time to check DM> DM> MT> >it thoroughly (it's production gateway, you know, so now I'd simply stick DM> DM> MT> >it out with about 40 statics both there and on border Cisco ;-) DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >kernel config file follows (it's 4-ethernet router + COM multiport console DM> DM> MT> >server) DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >Any thoughts? DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >Sincerely, DM> DM> MT> >D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] DM> DM> MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> DM> MT> >*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** DM> DM> MT> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >machine i386 DM> DM> MT> >cpu I686_CPU DM> DM> MT> >ident GWF DM> DM> MT> >maxusers 0 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >#makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug DM> DM> MT> >symbols DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >options INET #InterNETworking DM> DM> MT> >options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem DM> DM> MT> >options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep DM> DM> MT> >this!] DM> DM> MT> >options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support DM> DM> MT> >options NFS_NOSERVER #Completely disable server code DM> DM> MT> >options PROCFS #Process filesystem DM> DM> MT> >options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP DM> DM> MT> >THIS!] DM> DM> MT> >options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support DM> DM> MT> >options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory DM> DM> MT> >options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues DM> DM> MT> >options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores DM> DM> MT> >options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time DM> DM> MT> >extensions DM> DM> MT> >options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING DM> DM> MT> >options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies DM> DM> MT> >options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev DM> DM> MT> >options NO_F00F_HACK # we are not on buggy Pentium DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >options CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION DM> DM> MT> >options CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >options MROUTING # Multicast routing DM> DM> MT> >options IPFIREWALL #firewall DM> DM> MT> >options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about DM> DM> MT> > # dropped packets DM> DM> MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support DM> DM> MT> >#options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity DM> DM> MT> >options DUMMYNET #dummynet shaper DM> DM> MT> >options HZ=1000 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >options NMBCLUSTERS=16384 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >device isa DM> DM> MT> >device pci DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># Floppy drives DM> DM> MT> >device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 DM> DM> MT> >device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># ATA and ATAPI devices DM> DM> MT> >device ata DM> DM> MT> >device atadisk # ATA disk drives DM> DM> MT> >options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse DM> DM> MT> >device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD DM> DM> MT> >device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >device vga0 at isa? DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># splash screen/screen saver DM> DM> MT> >#pseudo-device splash DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console DM> DM> MT> >device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># Floating point support - do not disable. DM> DM> MT> >device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># Serial (COM) ports DM> DM> MT> >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 DM> DM> MT> >device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >options COM_MULTIPORT #code for some cards with shared DM> DM> MT> >IRQs DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># 4-port AST DM> DM> MT> >device sio2 at isa? port 0x2a0 flags 0x501 DM> DM> MT> >device sio3 at isa? port 0x2a8 flags 0x501 DM> DM> MT> >device sio4 at isa? port 0x2b0 flags 0x501 DM> DM> MT> >device sio5 at isa? port 0x2b8 flags 0x501 irq 7 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># 8-port Omega DM> DM> MT> >device sio6 at isa? port 0x100 flags 0x605 irq 12 DM> DM> MT> >device sio7 at isa? port 0x108 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio8 at isa? port 0x110 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio9 at isa? port 0x118 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio10 at isa? port 0x120 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio11 at isa? port 0x128 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio12 at isa? port 0x130 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> >device sio13 at isa? port 0x138 flags 0x605 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># PCI Ethernet NICs. DM> DM> MT> >#device ed # NE1000/2000 and compatibles DM> DM> MT> >#device ed0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >device miibus DM> DM> MT> >device rl # NE1000/2000 and compatibles DM> DM> MT> >device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, DM> DM> MT> >82558) DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> ># Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. DM> DM> MT> >pseudo-device loop # Network loopback DM> DM> MT> >pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support DM> DM> MT> >pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) DM> DM> MT> >pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> > DM> DM> MT> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org DM> DM> MT> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message DM> DM> MT> DM> DM> DM> DM> Sincerely, DM> DM> D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] DM> DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> DM> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** DM> DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> DM> DM> DM> Sincerely, DM> D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** DM> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DM> Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 16: 4:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858B237B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.lilikoi.com (lilikoi.com [67.113.114.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B742F43E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:04:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rhughes@lilikoi.com) Received: from richard.lilikoi.com ([137.110.28.160]) by smtp.lilikoi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6CN4o403416 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:04:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rhughes@lilikoi.com) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20020712160137.048a5ec0@smtp.lilikoi.com> X-Sender: rhughes@smtp.lilikoi.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:01:44 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org From: "Richard J. Hughes" Subject: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dr. Richard J. Hughes Tel: +1 (619) 405-4247 Lilikoi Software, Inc. Fax: +1 (858) 487-0451 rhughes@lilikoi.com For communication on the World Wide Web ... Ceilidh! http://www.lilikoi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 16:15:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B4D37B405 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:15:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aurora.siteplus.com (aurora.siteplus.com [66.129.2.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED50643E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@jwweeks.com) Received: from veager.jwweeks.com (pcp01076331pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net [68.59.219.194]) by aurora.siteplus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6CNF9bc021544; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@jwweeks.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: Shannon -jj Behrens Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh keys not accepted In-Reply-To: <20020712115220.E9516@alicia.nttmcl.com> Message-ID: <20020712190555.B1010-100000@veager.jwweeks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: are you sure you're not getting caught up by the recent > change the in the ssh defaults? I.e., try ssh -1 to try version 1 of the ssh > protocol. Shannon, thanks for the reply. I suppose I should have noted that all of my machines are running version2. I guess I will keep looking Thanks again, -- Jim > > For some strange reason, keys from this host are not accepted by any of my > > other machines. However, I can push id_dsa.pub into authorized_keys2 on > > this machine and login from any other host. > > > > FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE (EXXIM_SMP) #0: Wed Jul 3 07:07:21 EDT 2002. > > > > I have generated and regenerated id_dsa pairs to no avail. Is there > > something about this build date that I have missed on the mailing list? > > Any ideas? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 16:25:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CD337B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seven.Alameda.net (seven.Alameda.net [64.81.63.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9D443E6A; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:25:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulf@Alameda.net) Received: by seven.Alameda.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B4283A203; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:25:02 -0700 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: Jason Porter Cc: freebsd-questions , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Problems with php4 Message-ID: <20020712162501.B37513@seven.alameda.net> Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net References: <3D2F4338.1000508@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D2F4338.1000508@xmission.com>; from leporter@xmission.com on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:59:36PM -0600 Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Recompile your cclient with SSL enabled. On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:59:36PM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > I just did a cvsup for the ports and tried to make php4. It crashes on > zm_startup_imap during the install, I've attached the output, if anyone > has any ideas, on what happened and how to fix it, that'd be great. > > -- > -Jason Porter > > "Real programmers are secure enough to write > readable code, which they then self-righteously > refuse to explain." > > Script started on Fri Jul 12 14:55:14 2002 > LIGHTGUARD# make install > > ===> Building for php4-4.2.1 > Making all in Zend > Making all in main > Making all in ext > Making all in zlib > Making all in bcmath > Making all in libbcmath > Making all in src > Making all in bz2 > Making all in ctype > Making all in domxml > Making all in ftp > Making all in gd > Making all in gettext > Making all in iconv > Making all in imap > Making all in mcal > Making all in mcrypt > Making all in mysql > Making all in openssl > Making all in pcre > Making all in pcrelib > Making all in pdf > Making all in posix > Making all in pspell > Making all in readline > Making all in session > Making all in snmp > Making all in sockets > Making all in standard > Making all in xml > Making all in xslt > Making all in sapi > Making all in cgi > Making all in TSRM > Making all in . > /bin/sh /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/libtool --silent --mode=link cc -I. -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/ -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/main -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1 -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/Zend -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype -I/usr/local/include/gd -I/usr/local/include/c-client -I/usr/local/include/mcal -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include/pspell -I/usr/local/include/ucd-snmp -I/usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1/TSRM -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/local/include -o php -export-dynamic stub.lo libphp4.la > ./.libs/libphp4.a(php_imap.o): In function `zm_startup_imap': > php_imap.o(.text+0x373): undefined reference to `ssl_onceonlyinit' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.2.1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. > LIGHTGUARD# exit > > exit > > Script done on Fri Jul 12 14:55:21 2002 -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204 You can find my resume at: http://seven.Alameda.net/~ulf/resume.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 17: 1:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1504F37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com [80.4.78.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEB343E72 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:01:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from ntlworld.com (alpha.private.lan [192.168.0.2]) by pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6D01BgA031805 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:01:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Message-ID: <3D2F6DC6.A5392FF7@ntlworld.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:01:10 +0100 From: ian j hart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: ATA tags and stuff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can reproduce the "tags problem", RELENG_4 built today. Also noticed some weird secondary IDE stuff. Are there any ATA patches I don't know about? Is it worth trying CURRENT? Will do anything (legal) to help solve the problem. I've borrowed the box for the weekend, so fire away. Three IBM-DTLA-307075 rescued from backup duties plus one new IC35L080AVVA07-0. [shown with tags off here] ad0: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 73308MB [148945/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100 ad2: 73308MB [148945/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA100 ad3: 73308MB [148945/16/63] at ata1-slave UDMA100 First tried a LEX BN630LT M/B. Installed 4.6-RELEASE, upgraded to STABLE. Set up vinum RAID10 volume. While formating I had systat -vmstat running. Noticed that while the "load" appeared the same on all four disks, ad0 and ad1 were at ~5% busy, ad2 and ad3 were at ~50% busy. I posted somthing similar before (20010807). I've swapped the cables around, same result. Tried different cables, same result. All cables are spec length, don't have any shorter. This is a new board - could be a design fault. So I tried a recent gigabyte board, same result. Set tags on. As soon as I load the vinum volume I get [snip time /kernel] ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: timeout waiting for cmd=00 s=d0 e=04 ad2: flush queue failed ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad3: invalidating queued requests done ad2: no request for tag=0 ad2: invalidating queued requests So far only ad2 and ad3 fail. A thought occurs. There could be a master/slave problem with the firmware in the DTLA drives, which is fixed in the IC35. I'll swap the IDE cables on the M/B and see what happens. Maybe I'd better sleep first, I'm rambling. BTW, this is NOT a vinum problem. I get the same problem on normal volumes (but only on ad2 ad3). This is just a *neat* way of loading the drives. -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 17:14: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAE637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384E843E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:13:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D0Dt4T094137 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:13:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:13:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions > on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE. > > Having three-line C++ programs like the following > #include > #include > int main() { } > issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM], > especially on -STABLE. Should it not at least gripe that there's no return statement in a non-void function? -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 17:31:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A84B37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fafoe.dyndns.org (chello212186121237.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.121.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC743E64 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:31:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.dyndns.org) Received: by frog.fafoe (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 35C79272; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:34:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:34:56 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE Message-ID: <20020713003456.GB238@frog.fafoe> References: <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:13:50PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions > > on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE. > > > > Having three-line C++ programs like the following > > #include > > #include > > int main() { } > > issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM], > > especially on -STABLE. > > Should it not at least gripe that there's no return statement in a > non-void function? Both C++ and C99 treat main() specially: leaving the function's scope without an explicit "return"-statement means that 0 is returned to the implementation. Stefan Farfeleder To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 18:20:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894137B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEDF43E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6D1KILA064692; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6D1KHoq064689; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207130120.g6D1KHoq064689@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Ken Menzel" Cc: "Hartmann, O." , Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> <064901c22919$9738d2c0$681663cf@icarz.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Hi Matt, : Regarding your comment about highly IO intensive programs; many of :us run SQL databases (highly intensive IO). I have noticed a tendency :for a single process to monopolize the CPU with MySQL, to the :exclusion of other users. I do understand the detrimental effects of :state changes on a CPU, so I can relate to not setting this value too :high. I wonder if we might see an effect with this as well? : :I don't remember seeing this discussed here. I do not mean to bring :up a topic that has been discussed before, either here or another :list. However, the effect on IO for a server with several hundred :simultaneous connections could be noticeable. I am not sure a simple :benchmark would should any advantage, although I am planning to play :... : :The main thing I was wondering is what effects I might watch for, and :any hints as to what I should not waste my time on. In our :environment we run FreeBSD,Apache,PHP, MySQL for about a thousand :users. It is an interactive database application so this may have :... :Thanks for the input, :Ken Well, this is a bit too vague for me to give a specific answer. In general terms if you are running a mix of services the two big issues are going to be (1) memory, and (2) multiple disks. You can observe disk loads using 'systat -vm 1', and you can observe memory from the same command. Disk loads are in the lower left corner (look at the percentage load, not the transfer rates), and VM is displayed on the right, where programs 'eat' free memory and pages are shift downward, from active to inactive to cache to free. But for VM the the 'react'ivation rate on the right can be an indicator that the system is starting to overload. Reactivation rates beyond a few hundred pages per second would be an indication that more investigation is required. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 19:15:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10ED37B405 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (lafontaine.noos.net [212.198.2.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE6643E5E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 15145507 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jul 2002 02:15:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.72 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jul 2002 02:15:09 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (2llhm5hff08xu8k3@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D2F8dT004461; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:15:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6D2F8AX004460; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:15:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:15:07 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: stan Cc: freebsd stable , gnome Subject: Re: Gnome/Sawfish problems after portupgrade Message-ID: <20020713021507.GF2527@gits.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Cyrille Lefevre , stan , freebsd stable , gnome References: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:29AM -0400, stan wrote: > After last weekends cvsup & portupgrade I am unable to run Sawfish as the > window manager fro Gnome on both machnes I track STABLE on > > Basicly Gnome starts up (after a _very long_ time) and there is no window ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I've this problem too. it seems to be `esd' startup which sleep for a while but don't know why. > manager runing. PS : still no gnome packages in the latest -stable build of packages on ftp.FreeBSD.org as well as the 1500+ missing ports ! CC : -gnome Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 19:21:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7DF37B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (claudel.noos.net [212.198.2.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BD543E4A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:21:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 28236470 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jul 2002 02:21:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.83 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jul 2002 02:21:07 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (lziwbcq1cx18u87i@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D2L6dT004476; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:21:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6D2L5I3004475; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:21:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:21:05 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: David Syphers Cc: Doug Barton , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020713022104.GG2527@gits.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Cyrille Lefevre , David Syphers , Doug Barton , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List References: <20020708154230.J84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <200207081835.02452.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207081835.02452.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 06:35:02PM -0500, David Syphers wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2002 05:43 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > > > > > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > > > > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > > > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > > > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > > > previously. I get "permission refused" > > > > You probably got bit by the protocol change bug. > > I know you disagree with the change, but it's not a bug. It was intentional, > and it's mentioned in UPDATING. Feel free to call it a bad idea... why ssh don't fallback to protocol v1 when a v2 negotiation fail ? in other words, that's what I could guess when I see `Protocol 2,1' which is try v2, and if it fail, try v2. if I wanted v2 only, I would have to say `Protocol 2', point. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 19:33:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B1437B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web11605.mail.yahoo.com (web11605.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 113BE43E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from holtor@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020713023341.71837.qmail@web11605.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.191.164.44] by web11605.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:33:41 PDT Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Holt Grendal Subject: Unloading Kernel Modules To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, My kernal has these modules loaded: > kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 3 0xc0100000 1bb548 kernel 2 1 0xc5b8d000 14000 linux.ko 7 1 0xc7bee000 3000 vn.ko I am unsure how they got there.. Is it safe to Unload them or will this Crash the system? tia holt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 19:48: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7C37B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (verlaine.noos.net [212.198.2.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21D743E6D for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 31778895 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jul 2002 02:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.73 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jul 2002 02:47:55 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (872er3hyguem06iz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6D2lsdT004531; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:47:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6D2lsjF004530; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:47:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:47:54 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Jay Sachs Cc: Doug Barton , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup Message-ID: <20020713024753.GH2527@gits.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Cyrille Lefevre , Jay Sachs , Doug Barton , stan , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , des@FreeBSD.org References: <20020708152519.O84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <3D2A2A60.4090807@eziba.com> <3D2B18C9.B266193A@FreeBSD.org> <3D2B270B.2050201@eziba.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2B270B.2050201@eziba.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:10:19PM -0400, Jay Sachs wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > Jay Sachs wrote: > > > There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, > > So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you > > think it's a good idea or not, it's already catching people by surprise, > > and locking them out of their systems. The change should be reverted. > > It just seems that changes are being made in response to vocal users who > read neither UPDATING nor the headsup to the -stable list. > Unfortunately, when changes feel "right" to people, it's typical > to remain silent; hence I voiced my preference, being a -stable tracker > but non-committer. the problem here isn't the Protocol switch which is valiable. it is the OpenSSH bug which fail to fallback from v2 to v1 when not available. so, Doug is right and I'm w/ him when he though that shouldn't happen until this `feature' isn't fixed and arguing than UPDATING is the solution is too simple. this commit break some installation in a way it shouldn't. point. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 20:25:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6B37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB66643E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:25:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 9E91381066; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:55:46 +0930 (CST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:55:46 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: jim@nasby.net, laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday, 11 July 2002 at 20:09:02 +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:15 -0500 > "Jim C. Nasby" wrote: > > JCN> No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is > JCN> on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some > > Er - have you seen man atacontrol in RELENG_4 lately ? I will > quote the most pertinent extract: > > Allthough the ATA driver allows for creating an ATA RAID on > disks on any controller, there are restrictions. It is only pos­ > sible to boot on an array if its either located on a "real" ATA > RAID controller like the Promise or Highpoint controllers, or if > the RAID declared is of RAID1 or SPAN type, in case of a SPAN > the partition to boot must reside on the first disk in the SPAN > > So the answer is - yes you can. The question was about software RAID. That's currently still not possible. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 20:34:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7033337B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA34D43E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:34:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 1D8AC81066; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:04:43 +0930 (CST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:04:43 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Alexandr Kovalenko Cc: "Jim C. Nasby" , Lasse Laursen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020713033443.GE61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020712164413.GO45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020712164413.GO45527@nevermind.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 12 July 2002 at 19:44:13 +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > Hello, Jim C. Nasby! > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:10:15AM -0500, you wrote: > >> No, there is no support for software raid on the root partition. This is >> on the vinum wishlist, though, so hopefully it will happen at some >> point. > I don't think so, it seems that grog@FreeBSD.org forgot about vinum and > don't want to fix even known bugs (you can look at cvs logs via > cvsweb.freebsd.org). There's a difference between "forgetting" and "not having time". Remember also that this is a volunteer project, and that other people are also capable of fixing bugs. > Sources haven't been updated for over 2 years (those that are newer > are only cosmetic changes). No, that's not correct. Bugs get fixed. > Also, Greg don't accept any PRs on vinum, rejecting it with reason > 'pilot error' or 'read here'. No, I only reject pilot errors and RTFMs with this kind of message. I've taken a look at the Vinum archives, and the only hint I have had of messages from you was about 3 weeks ago, where you got upset about a harmless message at boot time. There was also an anonymous PR (37231) relating to mirroring on vn devices. To this I replied: Greg Lehey, 20 April 2002 Please use real user names when submitting problem reports. This is pilot error. You have created a vn device with exactly 16 MB. You then try to create subdisks of exactly 16 MB on each. Vinum uses the first 265 sectors for configuration information, so there's not enough space left for 16 MB subdisks. For once, the error message is accurate. Your claim that this works when using regular disks is incorrect. PR closed. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37231 for the full PR. Do you have an issue with this? If you have other issues, please let me know. > With vinum I've already had 3 unrecoverable crashes (on mirroring, > which is supposed to be 'safe-me' solution), and 5 kernel panics > (yes, Greg, I have vinum compiled as kernel module, not compiled > in). But you don't appear to have reported them. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 20:52:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5AE37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-80.oz.net [216.39.147.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C06D643E3B for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:52:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 21208 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 03:52:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2002 03:52:05 -0000 Subject: Re: Gnome/Sawfish problems after portupgrade From: Joe Kelsey To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: stan , freebsd stable , gnome In-Reply-To: <20020713021507.GF2527@gits.dyndns.org> References: <20020707152829.GA22987@teddy.fas.com> <20020713021507.GF2527@gits.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 12 Jul 2002 20:52:05 -0700 Message-Id: <1026532325.8748.95.camel@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 19:15, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:29AM -0400, stan wrote: > > After last weekends cvsup & portupgrade I am unable to run Sawfish as the > > window manager fro Gnome on both machnes I track STABLE on > > > > Basicly Gnome starts up (after a _very long_ time) and there is no window > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > I've this problem too. it seems to be `esd' startup which sleep for > a while but don't know why. In my experience, it really was Sawfish that was hanging. The problem (in may case) was that Swafish would hang for minutes, but would eventually continue. I'll bet you are running an X Font Server. I was running xfs-tt. As soon as I switched to gnome2, the problems I had with fonts escalated enormously. I finally switched from xfs-tt to straight X with no font server. Now, startup is a breeze. xfs-tt has other problmes, including horribly mangling the font names so that no application is able to use them. Also, the font server protocol is just too darn slow and unreliable, especially if you are trying to serve a lot of fonts. Try removing your font server and see if it improves. /Joe > > manager runing. > > PS : still no gnome packages in the latest -stable build of packages > on ftp.FreeBSD.org as well as the 1500+ missing ports ! > CC : -gnome > > Cyrille. > -- > Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 22:28:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88B137B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lambertfam.org (www.lambertfam.org [216.223.196.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317CC43E58 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:28:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lambert@lambertfam.org) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.inch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D31350D6 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:26:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from laptop.lambertfam.org (unknown [10.1.0.2]) by mail.lambertfam.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A7E350D5 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by laptop.lambertfam.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C705E28B09; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:28:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:28:22 -0400 From: Scott Lambert To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: cvsup, buildworld this weekend, now cant ssh to machiens that I could :-( Message-ID: <20020713052822.GC857@laptop.lambertfam.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List References: <20020708154230.J84324-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> <200207081835.02452.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> <20020713022104.GG2527@gits.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020713022104.GG2527@gits.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:21:05AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 06:35:02PM -0500, David Syphers wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2002 05:43 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, stan wrote: > > > > > > > I have a laptop that I move from work to home. > > > > > > > > I cvsuped and id a make world on it ths weekend. I of course also ran > > > > mergemaster. I noticed that mergemesate wanted to update some ssh and sshd > > > > config files, so I let it. Now I can't ssh to macines at work that I could > > > > previously. I get "permission refused" > > > > > > You probably got bit by the protocol change bug. > > > > I know you disagree with the change, but it's not a bug. It was intentional, > > and it's mentioned in UPDATING. Feel free to call it a bad idea... > > why ssh don't fallback to protocol v1 when a v2 negotiation fail ? > in other words, that's what I could guess when I see `Protocol 2,1' > which is try v2, and if it fail, try v2. if I wanted v2 only, I > would have to say `Protocol 2', point. It does fall back. But it will try v2 first and since both client and server speak v2, it's just too bad that your automated scripts only have the v1 keys that have been working for 4 years that everyone has forgotten about. It can't change protocols just because of an authentication error. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 22:51:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FDA37B400; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.nl (smtp1.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED443EB7; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:51:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (i1248.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.212.229]) by smtp1.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id EE9C45B0EA; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 07:51:14 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 07:51:09 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: jim@nasby.net, laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-Id: <20020713075109.06ecf02f.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> <20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:55:46 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: G> The question was about software RAID. That's currently still not G> possible. OK now I'm confused - if you set up a RAID1 array with atacontrol on a standard (non RAID) controller what's doing the RAID if it isn't the ata driver software ? -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 22:55:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B42937B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.nl (smtp1.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23A143E4A for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:55:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (p0912.vwa.wanadoo.nl [194.134.198.144]) by smtp1.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 441425B200; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 07:55:06 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 07:55:01 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: jim@nasby.net Cc: laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-Id: <20020713075501.4aa45eb4.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020712160659.F51502@flake.decibel.org> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> <20020712160659.F51502@flake.decibel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:06:59 -0500 "Jim C. Nasby" wrote: JCN> This is new then, if it actually supports vinum. What is a SPAN? I don't think it has anything to do with vinum. I'm still trying to work out what a SPAN (JBOD) is (does the JBOD help ?). I /think/ it is concatenated drives. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 23:21:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633137B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from graveyard.inhuman.org (ip68-100-76-222.nv.nv.cox.net [68.100.76.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8D543E31 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:21:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugly@inhuman.org) Received: from whorism (unknown [192.168.1.4]) by graveyard.inhuman.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0AFFB for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:23:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:21:52 -0400 From: Andrew Martin To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: /dev/dsp reports "device busy" but nothing using it Message-Id: <20020713022152.22036620.ugly@inhuman.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I was playing audio with mplayer and when it finished, mplayer closed as usual, however when trying to play something else I now receive "device busy" messages about /dev/dsp. I do _NOT_ have esd or any other sound daemon running (checked ps ax), nor do I have any other app that plays audio running. In addition, grep'ing fstat for the inode of /dev/dsp gives no results. I get the error with any app, including just cat'ing files to /dev/dsp. I don't see how /dev/dsp could possibly be still in use. uname -a output: FreeBSD whorism 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 10 20:07:35 EDT 2002 -Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 23:40:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8751637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from graveyard.inhuman.org (ip68-100-76-222.nv.nv.cox.net [68.100.76.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB9943E5E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:40:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugly@inhuman.org) Received: from whorism (unknown [192.168.1.4]) by graveyard.inhuman.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E31FB for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:42:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:40:31 -0400 From: Andrew Martin To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: /dev/dsp reports "device busy" but nothing using it Message-Id: <20020713024031.156bd1c4.ugly@inhuman.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I should add: I have pcm compiled into the kernel: pcm0: port 0x14e0-0x14ff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 And this is a fairly recent source tree - from just about a week ago I believe. -Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 23:42:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF4637B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacific.home.vee.net (pacific.home.vee.net [203.18.245.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6520543E6E for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:42:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Received: from vee.net (mjg@wintermute.home.vee.net [203.18.245.2]) by pacific.home.vee.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6DGLWHo045231; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:21:32 GMT (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Message-ID: <3D2FCABA.9010804@vee.net> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:07:46 +0930 From: Mike Gratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020628 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Nedotsukov Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> <3D2E8A14.7040004@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-61.7 required=9.0 tests=DOUBLE_CAPSWORD,USER_IN_WHITELIST,AWL version=2.30 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Take a look at the patches I have > created some time ago to resolve this problem. So, at least they works > for me. Thanks, I'll give it a try sometime in the next few days.. It's interesting, however, that the MBR bootloader(?) - as opposed to the bootstrap loader - works fine. And I assume that it accesses the keyboard in a similar fashion. I can select the drive I want to boot from via the MBR bootloader, and I can use the USB keyboard after the machine has booted, but I can't use it in the bootstrap loader. Very odd. /mike -- Mike Gratton , "Every motive escalate." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 12 23:51:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8452D37B400 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazare.cin.ufpe.br (nazare.cin.ufpe.br [150.161.2.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BAE43E70 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:51:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rss@cin.ufpe.br) Received: (from root@localhost) by nazare.cin.ufpe.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6D6pCP58715; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:51:12 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from rss@nazare.cin.ufpe.br) Received: from buique.cin.ufpe.br (buique [172.17.33.108]) by nazare.cin.ufpe.br (8.11.6/8.11.6av) with ESMTP id g6D6p6U58707; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:51:06 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from rss@nazare.cin.ufpe.br) Received: from rss (helo=localhost) by buique.cin.ufpe.br with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17TGkE-0003b8-00; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:51:06 -0300 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 03:51:05 -0300 (BRT) From: Rossam Souza Silva To: Andrew Martin Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/dsp reports "device busy" but nothing using it In-Reply-To: <20020713024031.156bd1c4.ugly@inhuman.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Are you running KDE with its sound server on? Please, be more verbose. Rossam. On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Andrew Martin wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:40:31 -0400 > From: Andrew Martin > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: /dev/dsp reports "device busy" but nothing using it > > Hello, > > I should add: > > I have pcm compiled into the kernel: > > pcm0: port 0x14e0-0x14ff irq 10 at device 13.0 on > pci0 > > And this is a fairly recent source tree - from just about a week ago I > believe. > > -Andrew > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 0: 8:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F290C37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD0D43E58 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:08:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6D78DY97866; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:08:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6D78BG35594; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:08:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 01:07:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020713.010753.51683482.imp@bsdimp.com> To: e0026813@stud3.tuwien.ac.at Cc: behanna@zbzoom.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GCC/header-related regressions on -STABLE From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020713003456.GB238@frog.fafoe> References: <20020712201311.T39095-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> <20020713003456.GB238@frog.fafoe> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020713003456.GB238@frog.fafoe> Stefan Farfeleder writes: : On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:13:50PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: : > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: : > : > > standards/40084 and standards/40402 constitute significant regressions : > > on -STABLE, which definitely should be fixed for 4.6.1-RELEASE. Chances are good that 4.6.1-RELEASE won't fix something so trivial. I have excellent patches to the PCCARD system that fix real problems for people that won't be included. Chances are good that 4.7-RELEASE will fix them, however, (both the pccard issue and the compiler issues). : > > Having three-line C++ programs like the following : > > #include : > > #include : > > int main() { } : > > issue three(!) warnings with g++ -pedantic is A Very Bad Thing[TM], : > > especially on -STABLE. : > : > Should it not at least gripe that there's no return statement in a : > non-void function? : : Both C++ and C99 treat main() specially: leaving the function's scope : without an explicit "return"-statement means that 0 is returned to the : implementation. True, but in C90 (and definitely in K&R) int main() { } was more or less the same as: int main() { return (rand()); } since whatever was in the magic register that returned the value for the function was what got returned :-). There's a lot of SYS V code that had return (0); added to the end of most of the main functions because of this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 0:15:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4554237B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89A43E3B for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:15:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from Yggdrasil (adsl-68-20-38-148.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.38.148]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6D7FY35021137; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:15:35 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David Syphers Reply-To: dsyphers@uchicago.edu To: Andrew Martin Subject: Re: /dev/dsp reports "device busy" but nothing using it Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:15:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <20020713022152.22036620.ugly@inhuman.org> In-Reply-To: <20020713022152.22036620.ugly@inhuman.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200207130215.34890.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday 13 July 2002 01:21 am, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I was playing audio with mplayer and when it finished, mplayer closed as > usual, however when trying to play something else I now receive "device > busy" messages about /dev/dsp. I do _NOT_ have esd or any other sound > daemon running (checked ps ax), nor do I have any other app that plays > audio running. In addition, grep'ing fstat for the inode of /dev/dsp > gives no results. I get the error with any app, including just cat'ing > files to /dev/dsp. I don't see how /dev/dsp could possibly be still in > use. I just got this a little while ago on my system, too. A workaround is to use a different device, e.g. give mplayer an "-ao oss:/dev/dsp0.1" option. Obviously this is not an answer to your question, but it is an effective workaround. Also, this question is more appropriate for questions@ than stable@. -David -- Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand... Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 0:19:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253EB37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3943E4A for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6D7JsLA076880; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.5/8.12.4/Submit) id g6D7JsDS076879; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200207130719.g6D7JsDS076879@apollo.backplane.com> To: hawkeyd@visi.com (D J Hawkey Jr) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 References: <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf_icarz.com@ns.sol.net> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974_apollo.backplane.com@ns.sol.net> <200207120344.g6C3iDS63523@sheol.localdomain> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :In your estimation, would it affect the case of several chained pipes, :[doing|waiting on] disk I/O? Or, say, a complex SQL query? : :Sorry for my naivete, but would increasing the HZ have the effect of making :the rest of my activities "snappier" in the above situation? Or is this :still too vague? : :The machines are 700Mhz Celerons and "better", mostly IDE, BTW. : :Thanks, :Dave Anything that blocks on lots of little I/O's, which a complex SQL query will do, can monopolize the system's resources. But if the data is well cached a complex sql query will simply be cpu bound and the scheduler will take care of it. In anycase, you just have to play with HZ to find out whether it has any effect. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 2:34: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CC337B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail533.nifty.com (mail533.nifty.com [202.248.37.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EDC43E4A for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:33:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bland@mail.ru) Received: from mail.ru by mail533.nifty.com (8.12.4/3.7W-02/25/02) with ESMTP id g6D9VabJ021294; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:31:37 +0900 Message-ID: <3D2FF378.5040500@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:31:36 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Gratton Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bootstrap loader + USB keyboard no-worky [was: Do VIA 83C572 USB controllers suck or is it just me?] References: <3D2CFC98.8010803@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E1E39.4070601@quack.kfu.com> <3D2E3A2D.50303@vee.net> <3D2E8A14.7040004@mail.ru> <3D2FCABA.9010804@vee.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike, Mike Gratton wrote: > It's interesting, however, that the MBR bootloader(?) - as opposed to > the bootstrap loader - works fine. And I assume that it accesses the > keyboard in a similar fashion. That's correct. boot0 uses same BIOS calls. The difference is it's very small program which runs in real cpu mode and do not need a20 line open, boot2 runs in protected mode and needs it but the method used to do this is not always correct. -- Alexander To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 2:53:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6577537B406 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.kornet.net (relay3.kornet.net [211.48.62.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A20643E58 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:52:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from newstore.co.kr@kornet.net) Received: from bckim2 (211.55.55.79) by relay3.kornet.net; 13 Jul 2002 18:52:40 +0900 Message-ID: <3d2ff8683d7339f3@relay3.kornet.net> (added by relay3.kornet.net) From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?sK28usjG?= To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?W7GksO1dw9bDt7TcILzux8649CDA2rW/sbjD4CC81rfnvMcsILi4ubC787D6IMfUsrIuLi4=?= Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:44:42 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0187_01C0F44A.93A42C00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0187_01C0F44A.93A42C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 w9a9xcDHILzux8649CEhISC4uLmwu/PAzCC4uLXpvu4gteW4s7TPtNkhQTpob3ZlciB7dGV4 dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmU7IGNvbG9yOiNkYzYwOWU7fUE6aG92ZXIge2NvbG9yOiByZWQ7 IHRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lO31BOmFjdGl2ZSB7IHRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25l O31hOmxpbmsge3RleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lOyBjb2xvcjpibGFjazt9YTp2aXNpdGVk IHt0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246bm9uZTsgY29sb3I6YmxhY2s7fWE6YWN0aXZlIHt0ZXh0LWRl Y29yYXRpb246bm9uZTsgfWE6aG92ZXIge3RleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lOyBjb2xvcjpi bHVlfXRkIHtmb250LWZhbWlseToisby4siI7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTo5cHQ7IGxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0 OjE2cHQ7fSNzaGFkb3cge3dpZHRoOiAxMDAlOyBoZWlnaHQ6IDU7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogOXB0 OyBjb2xvcjojZmZmZmZmOzsgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZDtGaWx0ZXI6IHNoYWRvdyhjb2xv cj0jc2lsdmVyICxkaXJlY3Rpb249MTM1KX1BOmxpbmsge1RFWFQtREVDT1JBVElPTjogbm9u ZX1BOnZpc2l0ZWQge1RFWFQtREVDT1JBVElPTjogbm9uZX1BOmhvdmVyIHtDT0xPUjogcmVk OyBURVhULURFQ09SQVRJT046IHVuZGVybGluZX1QIHtGT05ULVNJWkU6IDlwdDsgRk9OVC1G QU1JTFk6ILW4v/J9QlIge0ZPTlQtU0laRTogOXB0OyBGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogtbi/8n1CT0RZ IHtGT05ULVNJWkU6IDlwdDsgRk9OVC1GQU1JTFk6ILW4v/J9VEQge0ZPTlQtU0laRTogOXB0 OyBGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogtbi/8n1JTlBVVCB7Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZ OiC1uL/yfUZPUk0ge0ZPTlQtU0laRTogOXB0OyBGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogtbi/8n1URVhUQVJF QSB7Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiC1uL/yfU9QVElPTiB7Rk9OVC1TSVpF OiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiC1uL/yfQ0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkNCrTrx9G5zrG5 ILjWxry5zLXwvu4gseK8+rTru/MgyMS6uMDbLiC4uLmwu/PAzCC/qbevutDAxyC8urD4wLsg tbW/zbXluK6w2r3AtM+02S4gDQoJCQkJsKGw3SA1NTAsMDAwv/ghICjHwbfOOjg4MCwwMDC/ +CkgICAgILG4wNTA2r+hIMfRx8+/qSAgwKXIo726xsO68SA1MDBNv6Egv6wgMTG4uL/4wLi3 ziC068b4IMfSwM4hIA0KCQkJIAkJCQkgCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQ0KCSAgICq87sfOuPQgsbjD 4MC7IMD8ua7AuLfOx8+0wiDApb+hwMzA/L3Ds6ogwM7FzbPdvNLHwcauv/6+7iC75773wNq/ obDUILvnvvfAxyAJCQkJCQmx4si4uKYgwaaw+CDH1bTPtNkuDQoJICAgKrvnvvfA5b+hvK0g v+6/tcfPtMIgu/PHsLXpwLsgvO7Hzrj0LCCw+LW/sbi4xSwgsOa4xSCx4rTJwLsgwMy/68fP v6kgxse4xbimIMfSIAkJCQkJvPYgwNa9wLTPtNkuDQoJICAgKrTZvufH0SC788ewwLsgsK7D 4SC56citwaG9xMDHILTrx/wgvO7Hzrj0IL/uv7XA2r+hsNQgwcG9wLTPtNkuDQoJICAgKsSr teWw4cGmIChQYXlnYXRlLCBUZWxlYykgvcO9usXbwMcgv6y1vyDA2773wLoguau34bfOIMfY teW4s7TPtNkuDQoJICAgKrzSvbq89sGksPogtfDA2sDOILqvsObAzCC/68DMx8+x4iC2p7mu v6Egs6q4uMDHIMavyK21yCC87sfOuPTAuyC/7r+1x9IgvPYgCQkJCQkJwNa9wLTPtNkuDQoJ ICAgKrTcvPggvO7Hzrj0wMwgvsa00SDIqMbkwMzB9rChILDhx9W1yCC87sfOuPS3zrW1IMDM v+vH0iC89iDA1r3AtM+02S4NCgkgICAqyLi/+LG4uMW9wyDG98DOxq7A+7izLMb3wM7GrrfO wMcgsbi4xbChtMnHz7+pIMH2vNPA+8DOIMi4v/ixuLjFuKYgwPux2CAJCQkJCQkJwK/AzsfV tM+02S4NCgkgICAqsKOw4cfRILD8uK7A2iC48LXlv80gvay/7iC80r26vPbBpMC4t84gwM7F zbPdv6EgtOvH0SDB9r3EwMwgus7Bt8fRIAkJCQkJCQkJu+e+98DautC16b+hsNQgscfH2LXl uLO0z7TZLg0KCSAgICq43sDOv6EgwMy6pcauw6LAuyC257/2ILnmua7A2r+hsNQgu/UgvNK9 xCC2x7TCIMDMuqXGriDH4LvnuKYgsPjB9sfSILz2IMDWtMIgCQkJCQkJseK0ycDMIMDWvcC0 z7TZLg0KCSAgICrApcijvbrGw8C7IMfUsrIgvcXDu8fPvcO46SBLT1NPIElEQ7+hvK0gMbPi sKMgwKXIo726xsMgvK268b26uKYgMTG4uL/4v6EgCQkJCQkJx9LAzsfYILXluLO0z7TZLg0K CSAgICq87sfOuPTAuyDD1rDtsd7HwbfOsde3pShwaHA0LCBEL0IpyK0gx8+/qSCx1yDDs7iu vNO1tbChIL72w7sgCQkJCQkJCQkJuvy4qLTPtNkuDQoJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJDQoJ CQkgDQoNCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkgIMPWsdkguLi5sLvzwLi3ziDBpsDbtcggu+fAzMauDQoJCQkJ CQkJCQkJICAgICogwNfFqbTaICAgKMHWKbTrt86x27fOufogDQogICAgICogu+fB+LC2t6+4 ri287sfOuPQgICAgKMHWKcb6tvPEtw0KICAgICAqIMO7udnB9sD8ua687sfOuPQgICAgKMHW KcDMsdu+xsDMDQoJCQkJCQkJCQkJICAgICogv6G+7sTBLLHoxKGzw8DlsO0gICAgICAowdYp MjG8vLHiwK/F6w0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCSAgICAqILPXxq6/9sWpIMD8ua4gvO7Hzrj0ICAgICjB 1im1pcDMxbiz18auDQogICAgICogtNnAzL7uuK4gICAgKMHWKcCns/O02cDMvu64rg0KCQkJ CQkJCQkJCSAgICAqIL3FvLHH0SC76rzSxse4xSAgICAgILvqvNK/zSC757b3tekNCgkJCQkJ CQkJCQkgICAgKiCxzSCx3SC80yAgICjB1imx3bmuu+cNCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkgICAgKiDAxyC3 +SAgICAgICjB1im02bnMvboNCiAgICAgKiC9xbnfICAgICAguPC0+L20we4NCiAgICAgKiDE q7jetvMgICAgKMHWKcCvtM/Et7XwwfbF0A0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCSAgICAqILvnwMzFrCC8pSAg IMTat7q9usavxscNCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkgICAgKiC+1rDfxse4xSzBpLq4ICAgKMHWKbW1sde/ ocDMteXDvMDODQoNCiAgIC4uLiC/3CAgILTZvPYuDQoNCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJICAgwPzI rbn4yKMov6y29MOzKSA6ICC8usfUILnXIGVtYWlsIDogILmuwMezqiC787TjwLsgv/jHz73D tMIgutDAuiC/rLb0w7O/zSC8usfUwLsgs7Kw3LP1wLi9w7jpIMH3waIgv6y29MC7ILXluK6w 2r3AtM+02S4gDQq4uLmwu/Mgx8G3zrHXt6W75773us4gICC047TnwNo6ILCtvLrIxiAgILmu wMc6ICjT2ykgMDItNDA0LTYyODYgICAJCQkJCQkNCgkJCQkJIMfjtvS++MDMIMiruri43sDP wLsgurizu7Xlt8Egwcu82yDH1bTPtNkuILD4sLO1yCCw1L3Dxse17r+hvK0gvPbB/cfRsM3A zL/AtM8guLjAzyCxzcfPv6Gw1CDHyr/kvvi0wgkJCQkgCSC43sDPwM8gsOa/7Cwgvsa3ocDH ILz2vcWwxbrOufbGsMC7ILStt6/B1r3DuOkgtPUgwMy78yC537zbtcfB9iC+yrW1t88gu+jB psfPv6kgteW4rrDavcC0z7TZLgkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJIAkJCQkJIAkJCQkJIAkJ CQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJCSAJCQkJCQkJCQkJCQkJDQoNCiAtLS0tLT4JCQkJCQkJCQkNCg== ------=_NextPart_000_0187_01C0F44A.93A42C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCEtLSBzYXZlZCBmcm9tIHVybD0oMDAyMilodHRwOi8vaW50ZXJuZXQuZS1tYWlsIC0tPg0K PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9u YWwvL0VOIj4NCg0KPE1FVEEgSFRUUC1FUVVJVj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBDT05URU5UPSJ0 ZXh0L2h0bWw7Y2hhcnNldD1fYXV0b2RldGVjdF9rciI+DQo8aHRtbD4NCjxoZWFkPg0KPHRp dGxlPsPWvcXAxyC87sfOuPQhISEguLi5sLvzwMwguLi16b7uILXluLO0z7TZITwvdGl0bGU+ DQo8bWV0YSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PSJDb250ZW50LVR5cGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9InRleHQvaHRtbDsg Y2hhcnNldD1ldWMta3IiPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPHN0eWxlIHR5cGU9InRleHQvY3NzIj4NCg0K QTpob3ZlciB7dGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmU7IGNvbG9yOiNkYzYwOWU7fQ0KQTpob3Zl ciB7Y29sb3I6IHJlZDsgdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmU7fQ0KQTphY3RpdmUgeyB0ZXh0 LWRlY29yYXRpb246bm9uZTt9DQphOmxpbmsge3RleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lOyBjb2xv cjpibGFjazt9DQphOnZpc2l0ZWQge3RleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lOyBjb2xvcjpibGFj azt9DQphOmFjdGl2ZSB7dGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmU7IH0NCmE6aG92ZXIge3RleHQt ZGVjb3JhdGlvbjpub25lOyBjb2xvcjpibHVlfQ0KdGQge2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiKxvLiyIjsg Zm9udC1zaXplOjlwdDsgbGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6MTZwdDt9DQojc2hhZG93IHt3aWR0aDogMTAw JTsgaGVpZ2h0OiA1OyBmb250LXNpemU6IDlwdDsgY29sb3I6I2ZmZmZmZjs7IGZvbnQtd2Vp Z2h0OmJvbGQ7DQpGaWx0ZXI6IHNoYWRvdyhjb2xvcj0jc2lsdmVyICxkaXJlY3Rpb249MTM1 KX0NCjwvc3R5bGU+DQo8TUVUQSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSBjb250ZW50PSJ0 ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9a3NfY181NjAxLTE5ODciPg0KPFNUWUxFPg0KQTpsaW5rIHtU RVhULURFQ09SQVRJT046IG5vbmV9DQpBOnZpc2l0ZWQge1RFWFQtREVDT1JBVElPTjogbm9u ZX0NCkE6aG92ZXIge0NPTE9SOiByZWQ7IFRFWFQtREVDT1JBVElPTjogdW5kZXJsaW5lfQ0K UCB7Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiC1uL/yfQ0KQlIge0ZPTlQtU0laRTog OXB0OyBGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogtbi/8n0NCkJPRFkge0ZPTlQtU0laRTogOXB0OyBGT05ULUZB TUlMWTogtbi/8n0NClREIHtGT05ULVNJWkU6IDlwdDsgRk9OVC1GQU1JTFk6ILW4v/J9DQpJ TlBVVCB7Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiC1uL/yfQ0KRk9STSB7Rk9OVC1T SVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiC1uL/yfQ0KVEVYVEFSRUEge0ZPTlQtU0laRTogOXB0 OyBGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogtbi/8n0NCk9QVElPTiB7Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiA5cHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFN SUxZOiC1uL/yfQ0KPC9TVFlMRT4NCjxib2R5IGxlZnRtYXJnaW49MCB0b3BtYXJnaW49MCBi YWNrZ3JvdW5kPWh0dHA6Ly9uczEua29zby5uZXQvfmtzaC9ib2R5YmcuZ2lmPg0KPGJyPjx0 YWJsZSBjZWxscGFkZGluZz0wIGNlbGxzcGFjaW5nPTAgIGJvcmRlcj0wICB3aWR0aD01Nzkg YWxpZ249Y2VudGVyPg0KCQk8dHI+PHRkIGFsaWduPWxlZnQgdmFsaWduPWJvdHRvbT48aW1n IHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL25zMS5rb3NvLm5ldC9+a3NoL3RvcGxvZ28uZ2lmIiBib3JkZXI9IjAi PjwvdGQ+PC90cj4NCgkJPHRyPg0KCQk8dGQgYWxpZ249Y2VudGVyPg0KCQkJPHRhYmxlIGNl bGxwYWRkaW5nPTAgY2VsbHNwYWNpbmc9MCBib3JkZXI9MCBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kPSdodHRwOi8v bnMxLmtvc28ubmV0L35rc2gvYmcuZ2lmJyB3aWR0aD01Nzk+DQoJCQkJPHRyPjx0ZCBjb2xz cGFuPSIyIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vbWFubXVsc2FuZy5jby5rciIgdGFyZ2V0PSJrb3Nv Ij48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL25zMS5rb3NvLm5ldC9+a3NoL21haW5faW1nLmdpZiIgYm9y ZGVyPSIwIj48L2E+PC90ZD48L3RyPg0KCQkJCTx0cj48dGQgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciIgd2lk dGg9IjU3OSIgY29sc3Bhbj0iMiI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3czMy5jb20iIHRhcmdldD1u ZXc+PHA+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IkJsdWUiPrTrx9G5zrG5ILjWxry5zLXwvu4gseK8+rTru/Mg yMS6uMDbLiC4uLmwu/PAzCC/qbevutDAxyC8urD4wLsgtbW/zbXluK6w2r3AtM+02S48L2I+ PC9mb250PiA8YnI+DQoJCQkJPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3Nob3Aua29zby5uZXQiIHRhcmdl dD1uZXc+sKGw3Txmb250IGNvbG9yPSJSZWQiPiA8Yj41NTAsMDAwv/ghICjHwbfOOjg4MCww MDC/+Ck8L2I+PC9mb250PiAmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgsbjA1MDav6Egx9HHz7+pICZu YnNwO8ClyKO9usbDuvEgPGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IlJlZCI+NTAwTb+hIDxiPr+sIDExuLi/+Dwv Yj48L2ZvbnQ+wLi3ziC068b4IMfSwM4hPC9hPjwvdGQ+PC90cj4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IDwvcD4gDQoJCQkgICA8dHI+DQoJCQkJIDx0ZCBoZWlnaHQ9MCBiZ2NvbG9yPWJsYWNrIGNv bHNwYW49Mj48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL25zMS5rb3NvLm5ldC9+a3NoL3RpdGxlMS5naWYi IGJvcmRlcj0iMCI+PC90ZD4NCgkJCQk8L3RyPg0KCQkJCTx0cj4NCgkJCQkJPHRkIGNvbHNw YW49Mj48YnI+DQoJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Krzux8649CCxuMPgwLsgwPy5rsC4t87H z7TCIMClv6HAzMD8vcOzqiDAzsXNs9280sfBxq6//r7uILvnvvfA2r+hsNQgu+e+98DHIAkJ CQkJCbHiyLi4piDBprD4IMfVtM+02S48YnI+DQoJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7KrvnvvfA 5b+hvK0gv+6/tcfPtMIgu/PHsLXpwLsgvO7Hzrj0LCCw+LW/sbi4xSwgsOa4xSCx4rTJwLsg wMy/68fPv6kgxse4xbimIMfSIAkJCQkJvPYgwNa9wLTPtNkuPGJyPg0KCSZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyq02b7nx9Egu/PHsMC7ILCuw+EguenIrcGhvcTAxyC068f8ILzux8649CC/7r+1 wNq/obDUIMHBvcC0z7TZLjxicj4NCgkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsqxKu15bDhwaYgKFBh eWdhdGUsIFRlbGVjKSC9w726xdvAxyC/rLW/IMDbvvfAuiC5q7fht84gx9i15biztM+02S48 YnI+DQoJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7KrzSvbq89sGksPogtfDA2sDOILqvsObAzCC/68DM x8+x4iC2p7muv6Egs6q4uMDHIMavyK21yCC87sfOuPTAuyC/7r+1x9IgvPYgCQkJCQkJwNa9 wLTPtNkuPGJyPg0KCSZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyq03Lz4ILzux8649MDMIL7GtNEgyKjG 5MDMwfawoSCw4cfVtcggvO7Hzrj0t861tSDAzL/rx9IgvPYgwNa9wLTPtNkuPGJyPg0KCSZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyrIuL/4sbi4xb3DIMb3wM7GrsD7uLMsxvfAzsaut87AxyCxuLjF sKG0ycfPv6kgwfa808D7wM4gyLi/+LG4uMW4piDA+7HYIAkJCQkJCQnAr8DOx9W0z7TZLjxi cj4NCgkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsqsKOw4cfRILD8uK7A2iC48LXlv80gvay/7iC80r26 vPbBpMC4t84gwM7FzbPdv6EgtOvH0SDB9r3EwMwgus7Bt8fRIAkJCQkJCQkJu+e+98DautC1 6b+hsNQgscfH2LXluLO0z7TZLjxicj4NCgkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsquN7Azr+hIMDM uqXGrsOiwLsgtue/9iC55rmuwNq/obDUILv1ILzSvcQgtse0wiDAzLqlxq4gx+C757imILD4 wfbH0iC89iDA1rTCIAkJCQkJCbHitMnAzCDA1r3AtM+02S48YnI+DQoJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7KsClyKO9usbDwLsgx9SysiC9xcO7x8+9w7jpIEtPU08gSURDv6G8rSAxs+KwoyDA pcijvbrGwyC8rbrxvbq4piAxMbi4v/i/oSAJCQkJCQnH0sDOx9ggteW4s7TPtNkuPGJyPg0K CSZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyq87sfOuPTAuyDD1rDtsd7HwbfOsde3pShwaHA0LCBEL0Ip yK0gx8+/qSCx1yDDs7iuvNO1tbChIL72w7sgCQkJCQkJCQkJuvy4qLTPtNkuPGJyPg0KCQkJ CQkJCQk8L3RkPg0KCQkJCQkJCTwvdHI+DQoJCTx0cj48dGQgY29sc3Bhbj0yIHZhbGlnbj10 b3A+PHRhYmxlIHdpZHRoPTEwMCU+PHRyPjx0ZCB3aWR0aD0xMCBoZWlnaHQ9MT48L3RkPjx0 ZD48aHIgY29sb3I9bmF2eT48L3RkPjx0ZCB3aWR0aD0xMD48L3RkPjwvdHI+PC90YWJsZT48 L3RyPg0KCQk8dHI+PHRkIGNvbHNwYW49MiBhbGlnbj0iY2VudGVyIj48YnI+PGltZyBzcmM9 Imh0dHA6Ly9uczEua29zby5uZXQvfmtzaC90aXRsZTIuZ2lmIiBib3JkZXI9IjAiPjwvdGQ+ PC90cj4NCgkJPHRyPjx0ZCBhbGlnbj1jZW50ZXI+PGEgaHJlZj1odHRwOi8vbWFubXVsc2Fu Zy5jby5rciB0YXJnZXQ9Ymxhbms+PGltZyBzcmM9aHR0cDovL25zMS5rb3NvLm5ldC9+a3No L2tzaGdpZi5naWYgYm9yZGVyPSIwIj48L2E+PC90ZD48dGQgd2lkdGg9MzMwPg0KCSAgPGJy Pjxicj48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL2tvc28ubmV0L25lby9pZGMvaW1nL2tzMDItcG9pbnQu Z2lmIiB3aWR0aD0iMTEiIGhlaWdodD0iMTEiPiANCgkJCQkJCQkJCQk8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1i bHVlIGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0iMiI+ICZuYnNwOzxzdHJvbmc+w9ax2SC4uLmwu/PAuLfOIMGmwNu1 yCC758DMxq48L3N0cm9uZz48YnI+PC9mb250Pg0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCSZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9aHR0cDovL2lua2RhcS5jby5rci8gdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsi PiogwNfFqbTaJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9cmVkPijB1im067fOsdu3 zrn6PC9mb250PjwvYT4gPGJyPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8YSBocmVmPWh0dHA6Ly9wb2xhY2FtLm5ldCB0YXJnZXQ9Il9i bGFuayI+KiC758H4sLa3r7iuLbzux8649CZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxmb250 IGNvbG9yPXJlZD4owdYpxvq288S3PC9mb250PjwvYT48YnI+DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9aHR0cDovL2VhZ2xl ZXllamVhbnMuY29tLyB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiDDu7nZwfbA/LmuvO7Hzrj0Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9cmVkPijB1inAzLHbvsbAzDwvZm9udD48 L2E+PGJyPg0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCSZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9aHR0 cDovL2FpcmNvbjI1LmNvbSB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiC/ob7uxMEssejEobPDwOWw7SAm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1yZWQ+KMHWKTIxvLyx 4sCvxes8L2ZvbnQ+PC9hPjxicj4NCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDs8YSBocmVmPWh0dHA6Ly9jb21zaG9wcGluZy5jby5rciB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiCz 18auv/bFqSDA/LmuILzux8649CZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxmb250IGNvbG9y PXJlZD4owdYptaXAzMW4s9fGrjwvZm9udD48L2E+PGJyPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9 aHR0cDovL291aW5vbi5jby5rciB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiC02cDMvu64riAmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1yZWQ+KMHWKcCns/O02cDMvu64rjwvZm9udD48L2E+ PGJyPg0KCQkJCQkJCQkJCSZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9aHR0cDov L3NhbnNvc2hvcC5jby5rciB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiC9xbyxx9Egu+q80sbHuMUgJm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9cmVkPrvqvNK/zSC757b3 tek8L2ZvbnQ+PC9hPjxicj4NCgkJCQkJCQkJCQkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8 YSBocmVmPWh0dHA6Ly9nb2xkZ2F0ZS5jby5rciB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiCxzSCx3SC8 0yZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxmb250IGNvbG9yPXJlZD4owdYpsd25rrvnPC9mb250Pjwv YT48YnI+DQoJCQkJCQkJCQkJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGEgaHJlZj1odHRw Oi8vZGFtaXNzLmNvLmtyIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4qIMDHILf5Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9cmVkPijB1im02bnMvbo8L2ZvbnQ+ PC9hPjxicj4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8YSBocmVmPWh0dHA6Ly9tb2Rlcm5zaG9lcy5jby5rciB0 YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+KiC9xQ0Kud8mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDs8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1yZWQ+uPC0+L20we48L2ZvbnQ+PC9hPjxicj4NCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDs8YSBocmVmPWh0dHA6Ly91bmljYW0uY28ua3IgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPiogxKu43rbz ICZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxmb250IGNvbG9yPXJlZD4owdYpwK+0z8S3tfDB9sXQPC9m b250PjwvYT48YnI+DQoJCQkJCQkJCQkJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGEgaHJl Zj1odHRwOi8vY3ljbGVtYXJ0LmNvLmtyIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4qILvnwMzFrCC8pSZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxmb250IGNvbG9yPXJlZD7E2re6vbrGr8bHPC9mb250PjwvYT48 YnI+DQoJCQkJCQkJCQkJJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGEgaHJlZj1odHRwOi8v bGdwZXQuY28ua3IgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPiogvtaw38bHuMUswaS6uCZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOzxmb250IGNvbG9yPXJlZD4owdYptbWx17+hwMy15cO8wM48L2ZvbnQ+PC9hPjxi cj48YnI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Li4uIL/cJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7tNm89i48 YnI+PGJyPgkNCgkJCQkJCQkJPC90ZD48L3RyPg0KCQkJCQk8dHI+PHRkIGNvbHNwYW49Mj4N Cjx0YWJsZSB3aWR0aD0iNTc5IiBib3JkZXI9IjAiIGNlbGxzcGFjaW5nPSIwIiBjZWxscGFk ZGluZz0iMCIgc3R5bGU9J2JvcmRlcjoxcHggc29saWQ7IGJvcmRlci1jb2xvcj0jMDAwMDAw Jz4NCjxGT1JNIG5hbWU9Zm9ybTEgYWN0aW9uPWh0dHA6Ly9ob3N0MjFjLm5ldC9vcmRlcl9r c2gvc3BhbS5waHAgdGFyZ2V0PWtvc28+DQo8aW5wdXQgdHlwZT1oaWRkZW4gbmFtZT1zcGFt YWlsIHZhbHVlPSdmcmVlYnNkLXN0YWJsZUBGcmVlQlNELm9yZyc+DQo8dHI+DQogPHRkIGJn Y29sb3I9InBpbmsiPg0KIDx0YWJsZSBib3JkZXI9MCB3aWR0aD0xMDAlPg0KIDx0cj48dGQg YWxpZ249cmlnaHQ+PHN0cm9uZz7A/MitufjIoyi/rLb0w7MpIDogPC9zdHJvbmc+PC90ZD48 dGQ+PGlucHV0IHR5cGU9dGV4dCBuYW1lPXVzZXJ0ZWwgc2l6ZT0yMD48L3RkPjx0ZCByb3dz cGFuPTI+PGlucHV0IHR5cGU9c3VibWl0IHZhbHVlPbOyseKx4j48L3RkPjwvdHI+DQogPHRy Pjx0ZCBhbGlnbj1yaWdodD48c3Ryb25nPry6x9QgudcgZW1haWwgOiA8L3N0cm9uZz48L3Rk Pjx0ZD48aW5wdXQgdHlwZT10ZXh0IG5hbWU9dXNlcm1haWwgc2l6ZT0yMCB2YWx1ZT0nZnJl ZWJzZC1zdGFibGVARnJlZUJTRC5vcmcnPjwvdGQ+PC90cj4NCiA8dHI+PHRkIGFsaWduPWNl bnRlciBjb2xzcGFuPSIzIj48Yj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1ibGFja29yYW5nZT65rsDHs6ogu/O0 48C7IL/4x8+9w7TCILrQwLogIL+stvTDs7/NILy6x9TAuyCzsrDcs/XAuL3DuOkgIMH3waIg v6y29MC7ILXluK6w2r3AtM+02S48L2ZvbnQ+PC9iPg0KIDxicj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iQmx1 ZSI+PGI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3czMy5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0ia29zcCI+uLi5sLvzIMfB t86x17elu+e+97rOPC9hPiA8L2ZvbnQ+ICAmbmJzcDsgPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmluZm9A aW5zc29mdC5jby5rciI+ILTjtOfA2jogsK28usjGPC9hPiAmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs8Zm9udCBj b2xvcj0iQmx1ZSI+ua7AxzogKNPbKSAwMi00MDQtNjI4NjwvYj48L2ZvbnQ+PC90ZD48L3Ry Pg0KIDwvdGFibGU+DQogDQogPC90ZD4NCjwvdHI+DQo8L2Zvcm0+DQo8L3RhYmxlPjwvdGQ+ PC90cj4JPHRyPg0KCQkJCQk8VEQgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciIgYmFja2dyb3VuZD0naHR0cDov L25zMS5rb3NvLm5ldC9+a3NoL2NvcHliZy5naWYnIGNvbHNwYW49Mj48YnI+DQoJCQkJCSZu YnNwO8fjtvS++MDMIMiruri43sDPwLsgurizu7Xlt8Egwcu82yDH1bTPtNkuILD4sLO1yCCw 1L3Dxse17r+hvK0gvPbB/cfRsM3AzL/AtM8guLjAzyCxzcfPv6Gw1CDHyr/kvvi0wg0KCQkJ CSAgCSZuYnNwO7jewM/AzyCw5r/sLCC+xrehwMcgvPa9xbDFus659sawwLsgtK23r8HWvcO4 6SC09SDAzLvzILnfvNu1x8H2IL7KtbW3zyC76MGmx8+/qSC15biusNq9wLTPtNkuDQoJCQkJ CTxGT1JNIG5hbWU9Zm9ybTEgYWN0aW9uPWh0dHA6Ly9lZHVrb3NvLmNvbS9kZW55bWFpbC9k ZW55X21haWxfd2ViLnBodG1sIHRhcmdldD1rb3NvPg0KCQkJCQk8aW5wdXQgdHlwZT1oaWRk ZW4gbmFtZT1sb2duYW1lIHZhbHVlPSdrb3NvXzIwMDFfOTkwMCc+DQoJCQkJCTxpbnB1dCB0 eXBlPWhpZGRlbiBuYW1lPWRlbnltYWlsIHZhbHVlPSdmcmVlYnNkLXN0YWJsZUBGcmVlQlNE Lm9yZyc+DQoJCQkJCSA8QSBvbmNsaWNrPSJ3aW5kb3cub3BlbignJywnxNq80rPdJywncmVz aXphYmxlPW5vLGxvY2F0aW9uYmFyPW5vLG1lbnViYXI9bm8sc3RhdHVzYmFyPW5vLHNjcm9s bGJhcnM9bm8sdG9vbGJhcj1ubyx3aWR0aD01MCxoZWlnaHQ9NTAnKSIgaHJlZj0iIyI+DQoJ CQkJCSAgPGlucHV0IHR5cGU9aW1hZ2Ugc3JjPSJodHRwOi8vbnMxLmtvc28ubmV0L35rc2gv ZGVueW1haWwyMDAxLmdpZiIgYWx0PSJkZW55bWFpbCIgYm9yZGVyPTA+DQoJCQkJCSA8L0E+ PC9GT1JNPg0KCQkJCQk8Rk9STSBhY3Rpb249aHR0cDovL2VkdWtvc28uY29tL2RlbnltYWls L2RlbnlfbWFpbF93ZWIucGh0bWwgdGFyZ2V0PWtvc28+DQoJCQkJCTxpbnB1dCB0eXBlPXRl eHQgbmFtZT1kZW55bWFpbCB2YWx1ZT0nJz4NCgkJCQkJPGlucHV0IHR5cGU9aGlkZGVuIG5h bWU9bG9nbmFtZSB2YWx1ZT1rb3NvXzIwMDFfOTkwMD4gDQoJCQkJCTxBICBvbmNsaWNrPSJ3 aW5kb3cub3BlbignJywnxNq80rPdJywncmVzaXphYmxlPW5vLGxvY2F0aW9uYmFyPW5vLG1l bnViYXI9bm8sc3RhdHVzYmFyPW5vLHNjcm9sbGJhcnM9bm8sdG9vbGJhcj1ubyx3aWR0aD01 LGhlaWdodD01JykiIGhyZWY9IiMiPjxJTlBVVCB0eXBlPXN1Ym1pdCB2YWx1ZT3D37ChsMW6 zrjewM/A27y6IG5hbWU9c3VibWl0PjwvYT48L0ZPUk0+PC90ZD48L1RSPg0KCQkJPCEtLS0t LS0tLQk8dHI+DQoJCQkJCTx0ZCBhbGlnbj1jZW50ZXI+PEEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnNhbGVA a29zby5uZXQiPjxpbWcgc3JjPSJodHRwOi8vaGR3ZWJtYXN0ZXIuY28ua3Iva2ltYmMvYWEu Z2lmIiBib3JkZXI9MD48YnI+PGJyPjwvdGQ+PC90cj4gICAtLS0tLT4NCgkJCTx0cj48dGQg Y29sc3Bhbj0yIGhlaWdodD0xIGJnY29sb3I9IzAwMDAwMD48L3RkPjwvdHI+DQoJCQk8dHI+ PHRkIGNvbHNwYW49MiBoZWlnaHQ9MTAgYmFja2dyb3VuZD1odHRwOi8vbnMxLmtvc28ubmV0 L35rc2gvYm90dG9tYmcuZ2lmPg0KCQkJPHRyPjx0ZCBjb2xzcGFuPTIgaGVpZ2h0PTEgYmdj b2xvcj0jMDAwMDAwPjwvdGQ+PC90cj48L3RhYmxlPjxicj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4= ------=_NextPart_000_0187_01C0F44A.93A42C00-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 4:30:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524DF37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pkl.net (spoon.pkl.net [212.111.57.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9001543E64 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:30:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@pkl.net) Received: (from rik@localhost) by pkl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA10570 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:30:29 +0100 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:30:29 +0100 From: rik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Netgear MA301 Wireless PCI woes Message-ID: <20020713113029.GA7414@spoon.pkl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, After reading the wi man page, and seeing a message from someone else on the -mobile list saying it worked with 4-STABLE, I bought a Netgear MA301 and an MA401 to go with it. It doesn't appear to be recognized in the slightest. The kernel doesn't even recognize it as being present in the machine. I just (12:12 UTC+1) cvsuped from cvsup.uk, and built a fresh GENERIC, to see if that detects the card. No luck. Dmesg is included below. The unknown card with vendor id 0x1274, device 0x5880 is my sound card. It gets kldloaded later. Just to confirm, I'm using 4.6-STABLE ---8<--- dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #1: Sat Jul 13 12:21:20 BST 2002 root@bailey.scitech:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(TM)Processor (1410.21-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183f9ff AMD Features=0xc0440000<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> real memory = 536788992 (524208K bytes) config> q avail memory = 517300224 (505176K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc04df000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc04df09c. Preloaded elf module "agp.ko" at 0xc04df0ec. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00f13a0 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pci0: at 13.0 irq 11 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xb800-0xb87f mem 0xe9800000-0xe980007f irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:ce:18:e0 miibus0: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x5880) at 16.0 irq 5 isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xb000-0xb00f irq 0 at device 17.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xa800-0xa81f irq 5 at device 17.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ums0: Microsoft Microsoft IntelliMouse\M-. Explorer, rev 1.10/1.14, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 5 buttons and Z dir. uhci1: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 5 at device 17.3 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 5 at device 17.4 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered orm0: Acquire Solution


Dear Friend,

Everyday more and more exciting and important information is being communicated via E-mail. In the future, we would like to communicate with you via E-mail, and send you exciting and "Up to Date" information on current subject matter, free e-commerce newsletters, case studiests, and services that Internet users like yourself would have interest in. We are presently seeking your permission for the privilege to serve you efficiently and electronically via E-Mail.

Thank you!

If you do not wish to have us contact you via e-mail, please click the "Unsubscribe" link within the message below and your name will be deleted from our email mailing lists.


Sincerely,

Acquire Solution


Unsubscribe

--OMPH.56528947.1026594224028-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 14:24:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ADD37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 14:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flounder.jimking.net (flounder.jimking.net [209.205.176.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F8F43E31 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 14:24:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Received: from marble.jimking.net (wiz [64.132.9.70]) by flounder.jimking.net (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6DLOB9j033980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL); Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:24:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Received: from jimking.net (slate.jimking.net [192.168.1.99]) by marble.jimking.net (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6DLO4ks024269; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:24:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Message-ID: <3D309A74.2040107@jimking.net> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:24:04 -0500 From: Jim King User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Trusty Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: usb cf reader support? References: <3D3098BC.5080700@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Trusty wrote: > I give. Is there any support for compact flash card readers under > freebsd? I've been looking for a day and a half and still haven't > found anything definitive. > > -A blind idiot- Search the archives. My SanDisk SDDR-31 works great. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 16: 2:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CED337B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.soultwins.com (mail.soultwins.com [66.221.101.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E02443E5E for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:02:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yann@yann.us) Received: (qmail 26348 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 23:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yann) (63.103.152.39) by mail.soultwins.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2002 23:02:11 -0000 From: "Yann Sommer" To: Subject: umount of a removed procfs? Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: <000501c22ac0$d847b260$5801a8c0@yann> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Heya, After creating a jail, mounting it's /proc, and renaming it's directory structure in the host environment as follows: # mkdir -p /jails/a/proc # mount_procfs proc /jails/a/proc # mv /jails/a /jails/b ...the following happens: # mount |tail -n 1 procfs on /jails/a/proc (procfs, local) # umount -f /jails/a/proc umount: unmount of /jails/a/proc failed: No such file or directory # mkdir -p /jails/a/proc # umount -f /jails/a/proc umount: unmount of /jails/a/proc failed: Invalid argument # mount|tail -n 1 procfs on /jails/a/proc (procfs, local) There are currently only two ways known to me to remove the (now invalidly) mounted procfs, either by renaming the new structure to it's original, or by rebooting. Usually when using mv, a check is conducted for mount-points: # mv proc pro mv: cannot rename a mount point Apparently, this check does not traverse subdirectories, allowing the above bug(?) to occur. -yann yann@yann.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 16:12: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2137B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (thule.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.117.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C143E6E for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dvastine@vastine.net) Received: from Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (thule@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6DNC4Cd041828 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:12:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dvastine@vastine.net) Received: from localhost (dvastine@localhost) by Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g6DNC4Xs041825 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:12:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: Thule.ne.client2.attbi.com: dvastine owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:12:04 -0400 (EDT) From: David Vastine X-X-Sender: dvastine@thule.ne.client2.attbi.com To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Ruby fails to install Message-ID: <20020713190948.E36522-100000@thule.ne.client2.attbi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey all, Asked on ports but didn't get a reply.. This is on 4.6-Stable. Ruby is not installing for me I get the following error: installing digest/sha1 installing digest/sha2 sample/irb.rb -> /usr/local/bin/irb chmod 0755 /usr/local/bin/irb /usr/ports/lang/ruby/work/ruby-1.6.7/libi386-freebsd4-ruby.a -> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-freebsd4/libi386-freebsd4-ruby.a chmod 0644 /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-freebsd4/libi386-freebsd4-ruby.a rbconfig.rb -> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-freebsd4/rbconfig.rb chmod 0644 /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-freebsd4/rbconfig.rb ===> Generating temporary packing list strip /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/libexec/elf/strip: /usr/local/bin/ruby: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby. *** Error code 1 Anybody have any pointers? TIA David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 17:42:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E2337B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5387E43E4A for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:42:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 36A0281290; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:12:47 +0930 (CST) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:12:47 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: Josh Paetzel , jim@nasby.net, laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-ID: <20020714004247.GB16279@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> <20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020713075109.06ecf02f.steve@sohara.org> <20020713100218.B284@twincat.vladsempire.net> <20020713222745.00281f72.steve@sohara.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020713222745.00281f72.steve@sohara.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday, 13 July 2002 at 22:27:45 +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:02:18 +0000 > Josh Paetzel wrote: > > JP> atacontrol. You can't use atacontrol to make a standard non-raid > JP> IDE controller do raid. > > So what is this bit of the atacontrol man page about then ? > > Allthough the ATA driver allows for creating an ATA RAID on > disks on any controller, there are restrictions. It is only pos­ > sible to boot on an array if its either located on a "real" ATA > > It seems to be about RAID on standard non-raid controllers to my > poor eye. It does not mention that they will not work, only that there > are boot restrictions. I've been reading the atacontrol man page. It's not very clear, but you could be right. If so, it's a well-kept secret. There also appears to be no way to recover such a RAID 1 partition. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 22:15:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64A337B400; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.nl (smtp3.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223B143E88; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:15:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (i2227.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.216.188]) by smtp3.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E4DD01B4A9; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 07:15:29 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 07:15:24 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: friar_josh@webwarrior.net, jim@nasby.net, laursen@netgroup.dk, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Software raid 1 on root partition? Message-Id: <20020714071524.1587f419.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020714004247.GB16279@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51> <20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org> <20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org> <20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020713075109.06ecf02f.steve@sohara.org> <20020713100218.B284@twincat.vladsempire.net> <20020713222745.00281f72.steve@sohara.org> <20020714004247.GB16279@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:12:47 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: G> On Saturday, 13 July 2002 at 22:27:45 +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: G> > It seems to be about RAID on standard non-raid controllers to my G> > poor eye. It does not mention that they will not work, only that there G> > are boot restrictions. G> G> I've been reading the atacontrol man page. It's not very clear, but G> you could be right. If so, it's a well-kept secret. There also G> appears to be no way to recover such a RAID 1 partition. I've found confirmation - There was a thread in -stable around the 18th of June (subject the new ATA driver vs. vinum) in which Bob Wilcox and Remo Lacho both mentioned running RAID arrays on non RAID controllers using the support in the ATA driver. Having RAID1 without recovery seems less than ideal though. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 22:28:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C40637B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39D43E64 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:28:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tortise@paradise.net.nz) Received: from P1200n (203-79-82-163.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.163]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F24AD27CB for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:28:10 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <1bc401c22af7$2286e630$0900a8c0@P1200n> From: "Tortise@Paradise" To: References: <25f401c228d4$a3482fb0$1a01000a@area51><20020711091015.B51520@flake.decibel.org><20020711200902.3653b534.steve@sohara.org><20020713032546.GD61459@wantadilla.lemis.com><20020713075109.06ecf02f.steve@sohara.org><20020713100218.B284@twincat.vladsempire.net><20020713222745.00281f72.steve@sohara.org><20020714004247.GB16279@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020714071524.1587f419.steve@sohara.org> Subject: Releases means? Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:27:24 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I've been trying to sort out which update to download. I seek a stable version of FreeBSD. Am I correct that of the Current and Stable paths there are releases for each? ie that there are "Current Releases" and "Stable Releases"? I have downloaded releng_4_6 in the expectation it is the Stable Release. Clarity would be appreciated. With thanks in advance. David Hingston _________________________________________________________________________ tortoise@paradise.net.nz http://hingston.yi.org/ http://pcmc.yi.org/ If you seek a digitally signed response please advise. If you received a warning on reading this e-mail, please go to http://www.baycorpid.com/settings/email.asp?CA=healthcert to update your settings To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 22:33:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3AF37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED4E43E4A for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:33:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6E5XC8o000364; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:33:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:32:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020713.233223.24946241.imp@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd-stable@rikrose.net Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netgear MA301 Wireless PCI woes From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020713113029.GA7414@spoon.pkl.net> References: <20020713113029.GA7414@spoon.pkl.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020713113029.GA7414@spoon.pkl.net> rik writes: : After reading the wi man page, and seeing a message from someone else on : the -mobile list saying it worked with 4-STABLE, I bought a Netgear : MA301 and an MA401 to go with it. It doesn't appear to be recognized in : the slightest. The kernel doesn't even recognize it as being present in : the machine. Are you sure that your mobo supports the PCI card you've plugged into it? I have a passive backplane that doesn't work for 3/4 of the pci <-> cardbus bridge cards. If you aren't even seeing the card with pciconf, this may be your lot as well. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 22:59:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4283C37B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B39B43E64 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:59:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6E5Y38o000367; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:34:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:33:14 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020713.233314.19788190.imp@bsdimp.com> To: fbsdstable@rikrose.net Cc: freebsd-stable@rikrose.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netgear MA301 Wireless PCI woes From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020713125216.GA16372@spoon.pkl.net> References: <20020713113029.GA7414@spoon.pkl.net> <20020713125216.GA16372@spoon.pkl.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020713125216.GA16372@spoon.pkl.net> rik writes: : Well, I found out what the problem is. The face plate is far enough away : from where it should be that the card wasn't physically plugged in. : Seems my kernel and the generic kernels both work... That would also cause it not to show up :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 13 23: 0:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D407737B400 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a2.scoop.co.nz (aurora.scoop.co.nz [203.96.152.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38143E8A for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:00:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@scoop.co.nz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a2.scoop.co.nz (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6E60Va2089858; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:00:31 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from andrew@scoop.co.nz) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:00:31 +1200 (NZST) From: Andrew McNaughton To: "Tortise@Paradise" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Releases means? In-Reply-To: <1bc401c22af7$2286e630$0900a8c0@P1200n> Message-ID: <20020714175501.P89663-100000@a2.scoop.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Tortise@Paradise wrote: > Hi > I've been trying to sort out which update to download. I seek a stable > version of FreeBSD. Am I correct that of the Current and Stable paths there > are releases for each? ie that there are "Current Releases" and "Stable > Releases"? I have downloaded releng_4_6 in the expectation it is the > Stable Release. Clarity would be appreciated. > With thanks in advance. > David Hingston There is a current branch, and a stable branch, but those are not 'releases'. They're both moving targets which vary rapidly. every so often the stable branch is used to construct a new release. releng_4_6 gives you the latest (at present) stable release plus the critical fixes only. Andrew McNaughton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message