From owner-freebsd-standards  Sun Oct 20 12:35:46 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BEDEF37B401; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 204AD43E91; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9KJZcpk075783;
	Sun, 20 Oct 2002 13:35:38 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 13:35:26 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20021020.133526.55624580.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: rehsack@liwing.de, standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ISO C99
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021019030759.A85988@FreeBSD.org>
References: <3DB117EF.CD0AEE45@liwing.de>
	<20021019030759.A85988@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-standards.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-standards>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-standards>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

My common sense answer is 'fixes for std=c99 are cool if they don't
break anything (esp with -std=c89) and don't cause bootstrap issues
and conform to style(9).'

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message