From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 08:18:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D4D37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx02.egartech.com (aloha.egartech.com [62.118.81.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0FB443F3F for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:18:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from temik@egartech.com) Received: (qmail 37704 invoked by uid 85); 28 Apr 2003 15:18:37 -0000 Received: from temik@egartech.com by mx02.egartech.com with qmail-scanner-1.03 (. Clean. Processed in 0.323845 secs); 28 Apr 2003 15:18:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO turtle.egar.egartech.com) (192.168.8.4) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 15:18:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:18:30 +0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: <5235EF9BAE6B7F4CB3735789EEF73B29B06A4B@turtle.egar.egartech.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ufs and ext Thread-Index: AcMLjxt47HGL13HSSfCMuN8jrGIHrgCCi71g From: "Artem Tepponen" To: ".VWV." , Subject: RE: ufs and ext X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:18:46 -0000 Hi > > There is one pretty-good almost-filesystem standard which I've used > > successfully, namely "tar". You can write and read a tarball on an > > otherwise-unused partition (ie, raw device, no real filesystem) from > > multiple types of OSes. >=20 > Since the tapes' era, 'tar' is really the only common resource. This brings us to the question 'What is more important: kernel or a = userland?' :-) Artem