From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jan 13 16:28:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6E37B401 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1228743F18 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8C12A89E; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Alan L. Cox" Cc: Matthew Dillon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Virtual memory question In-Reply-To: <3E20B747.1FCA3B36@imimic.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:31 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030114002831.1C8C12A89E@canning.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Alan L. Cox" wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > ... > > How about something like: > > > > getmemfd(). > > > > Roughly speaking, this is shm_open(3), which we currently implement > using files. .. which is expressly what I wanted to avoid. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message