From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Mar 24 4:59:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A6137B401 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311B643FB1 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:59:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2OCxZhV005239 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:59:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: moving GEOM around... From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:59:35 +0100 Message-ID: <5238.1048510775@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A number of people have suggested that the directory layout of GEOM sources should be changed. The main complaint seems to be that sys/geom contains both subdirectories (bde) and source files. I personally don't particularly care about that, and as a matter of fact wasn't even aware that was a rule, but if a significant number of people think this is wrong I'm willing to repo-copy things around and fix it, therefore this strawpoll: Option 1: No change Option 2: sys/ geom/ infra/ geom_io.c geom_event.c ... bsd/ geom_bsd.c mbr/ geom_mbr.c sunlabel/ geom_sunlabel.c gbde/ g_bde.c g_bde_crypt.c ... ... Option 3: sys/ geom/ infra/ geom_io.c geom_event.c ... class/ # contains methods implemented in a single # source file geom_bsd.c geom_mbr.c geom_sunlabel.c ... gbde/ # classes implemented in multiple source # files get a subdirectory of their own. Straw votes in private email please... I'll draw whatever concensus opinion I can from the emails I get, and then I'll send the proposal to cvs@ who may at that time shoot it down as unnecessary repo-bloat. Poul-Henning PS: I'm not inclined to entertain a long bikeshed on this issue, on the more general topic of source tree re-layout and the need for a democratic process for determing the location of all future files in our cvs repo. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message