From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 11:05:10 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E90F416A4BF; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8DB1943F75; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 70A042A8D1; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org> 
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:05:10 -0700
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20030825180510.70A042A8D1@canning.wemm.org>
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start. 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:05:11 -0000

Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > What do people think?  Can we loose these type of warnings?  I'm not sure
> > what their need is.  The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for
> <snip>
> 
> I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere?
> Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch?

This might sound silly, but how about hide them (and some of the other
messages) behind the 'sysctl debug.bootverbose' value?

It kinda makes sense for 'boot -v' to put *all* of the boot process into
verbose mode..

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5