From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 03:27:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F065216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fafoe.narf.at (chello212186121237.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.121.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35E044013 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:27:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at (wombat.fafoe.narf.at [192.168.2.102]) by fafoe.narf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905513FAA; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 86FB35E; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:37 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Adam Migus Message-ID: <20030928102735.GI802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <20030925092319.H5418@gamplex.bde.org> <49939.204.254.155.35.1064593320.squirrel@mail.migus.org> <20030927080420.N18558@gamplex.bde.org> <20030927105241.GG802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <3F75DBD1.70600@migus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F75DBD1.70600@migus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sys/conf/DEFAULT[S] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:27:50 -0000 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:49:53PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote: > Actually, while the error is not simply an "off-by-one" error, this > patch is not sufficient to fix the nested case: > > Below is the output of running config (with or without this patch) on my > set of kernels, one of which includes twice on the first line. This > language specification, in fact, fails to handle an include, immediately > followed by anything other than a blank line or comment. Thus the fix > is a little more complicated. I can't reproduce this here. I have no problem with 'include FOO; include BAR' on a single line. Can you make your config files available? Stefan