From owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 16:06:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9365637B404; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw2a.lmco.com (mailgw2a.lmco.com [192.91.147.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FE943F3F; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:06:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from artem.n.tkachenko@lmco.com) Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com ([129.197.181.54]) by mailgw2a.lmco.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7BN6HL14831; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:06:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40643) id <0HJH00G018X789@lmco.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.70]) by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40643) with ESMTP id <0HJH009N982C4C@lmco.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.75]) by EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:35:00 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:34:59 -0700 From: "Tkachenko, Artem N" To: "Freebsd-Config (E-mail)" , "Freebsd-Questions (E-mail)" Message-id: <573562C6FDA9564A8EEE66D899BC190B02935DA7@EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-Topic: Network interfaces Thread-Index: AcNgWMpb+KsuFNqAQX2LFkP0+cbgbQ== content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2003 22:35:00.0240 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC97E100:01C36058] Subject: Network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-config@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Installation and Configuration List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:06:21 -0000 Hi, I have a Inspiron 5100 and I install FreeBSD 4.8 on it. The computer has an integrated NIC. After installation and typing ifconfig I see the there was no network interfaces detected. Typing /stand/sysinstall and checking the network interfaces configuration I see the fallowing: faith0 sl0 SLIP interface on device /dev/cuaa0 (COM1) ppp0 PPP interface on device /dev/cuaa0 (COM1) Thank you for your time. Sincerely Artem Tkachenko From owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 16:36:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A50B37B404; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta2.adelphia.net (mta2.adelphia.net [64.8.50.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A54343F75; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:36:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([68.169.105.49]) by mta2.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with SMTP id <20030811233606.QFSV597.mta2.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:36:06 -0400 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Tkachenko, Artem N" , "Freebsd-Config (E-mail)" , "Freebsd-Questions (E-mail)" Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:36:05 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <573562C6FDA9564A8EEE66D899BC190B02935DA7@EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-config@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: Installation and Configuration List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:36:07 -0000 Check /var/run/dmesg.boot file and look for boot messages to see if the Nic hardware is found. If so then you have to read the kernel source for the correct kernel option to add to your kernel source and recompile to active the software drivers for you Nic hardware. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tkachenko, Artem N Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:35 PM To: Freebsd-Config (E-mail); Freebsd-Questions (E-mail) Subject: Network interfaces Hi, I have a Inspiron 5100 and I install FreeBSD 4.8 on it. The computer has an integrated NIC. After installation and typing ifconfig I see the there was no network interfaces detected. Typing /stand/sysinstall and checking the network interfaces configuration I see the fallowing: faith0 sl0 SLIP interface on device /dev/cuaa0 (COM1) ppp0 PPP interface on device /dev/cuaa0 (COM1) Thank you for your time. Sincerely Artem Tkachenko _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 13:05:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B3737B401 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web12002.mail.yahoo.com (web12002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C02C43F85 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chicoman341978@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [20.5.221.128] by web12002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:05:56 PDT Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Chico To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <0b5401c35c56$a8f6df40$0f01010a@lambda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Rule Numbering... X-BeenThere: freebsd-config@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Installation and Configuration List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:05:56 -0000 I am wondering what the deal is with the Rule numbering in IPFW? I am switching from IPF to IPFW because it has more functionality, however I am confused with the rule numbering scheme. When I read "how-to's" on the internet people are numbering the firewall rules in there /etc/ipfw.rules file starting with 00300, 00301... and then start going to 00400, 00401, 00402... What the deal with this scheme? Chico __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 23:31:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313F037B401 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAF243FB1 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902D166B04; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7839C788; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:33 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chico Message-ID: <20030813063133.GA52431@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <0b5401c35c56$a8f6df40$0f01010a@lambda> <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rule Numbering... X-BeenThere: freebsd-config@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Installation and Configuration List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:31:35 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:05:56PM -0700, Chico wrote: > I am wondering what the deal is with the Rule > numbering in IPFW? I am switching from IPF to IPFW > because it has more functionality, however I am > confused with the rule numbering scheme. When I read > "how-to's" on the internet people are numbering the > firewall rules in there /etc/ipfw.rules file starting > with 00300, 00301... and then start going to 00400, > 00401, 00402... What the deal with this scheme? Pure arbitrariness. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/OdtFWry0BWjoQKURAqwmAKDaXdi6fudITCsSjrjtwdxow8ecQQCeNe6I tdftLyFbkpjAI/8Sbyh2N8E= =FjnR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From owner-freebsd-config@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 00:26:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FA637B401 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rdsnet.ro (mail.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 726D643FA3 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:26:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itetcu@cameradicommercio.ro) Received: (qmail 4739 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 07:18:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 13 Aug 2003 07:18:04 -0000 Received: by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDE5755; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:18:08 +0300 (EEST) From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Organization: Tecnik'93 S.R.L. To: Chico , freebsd-config@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:18:08 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308131018.08322.itetcu@tecnik93.com> Subject: Re: Rule Numbering... X-BeenThere: freebsd-config@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Installation and Configuration List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:26:24 -0000 On Tuesday 12 August 2003 23:05, Chico wrote: > I am wondering what the deal is with the Rule > numbering in IPFW? I am switching from IPF to IPFW > because it has more functionality, however I am > confused with the rule numbering scheme. When I read > "how-to's" on the internet people are numbering the > firewall rules in there /etc/ipfw.rules file starting > with 00300, 00301... and then start going to 00400, > 00401, 00402... What the deal with this scheme? The rules are check from the lowest to the highest, and the check stops at the first match. I would recommend a 0300, 0310, etc. scheme so that you have pace to add a rule (by hand) if that is necessarily. IOnut