From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 00:19:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890EA16A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:19:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8894243FA3; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:19:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1ASu8T-000DCz-3c; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:19:25 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:12:45 -0800 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:19:24 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: X-Bogosity: No [0.0%] cc: freebsd-amd-64@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm impressed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 08:19:28 -0000 > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:40:45AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Wednesday I received a box with dual AMD-64/Opteron/Hammer, > > I tried the iso-image just to see what happens, and though it booted there > > wasn't enough stuff to do a real install. > > Why not? I've done several real installs using the ISO's. > we must be using different iso's :-) i'll try then another image (maybe 5.2-BETA-amd64-miniinst.iso?) in any case what impressed me was the fact that the cross-make worked so smoothly danny From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 00:21:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6087D16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from sierpinski.maddhatt.net (castor.dioscouri.org [66.92.173.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB84743F85 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:21:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from maddhatt@sierpinski.maddhatt.net) Received: by sierpinski.maddhatt.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46050C359; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:04:00 +0000 From: Jared Carr To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031207090359.GA31746@sierpinski.maddhatt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Signal Strength/Connection problems: ath(4) driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 08:21:03 -0000 I am currently using a DWL-AG 520 AR5212 based card. I am connecting to an 802.11b access point that is approx 20 ft away through 2 walls. Whenever I try to bring the card up all that happens is the card sits in scan mode ala... Dec 7 00:21:23 mandelbrot kernel: ieee80211_next_scan: chan 165->1 Dec 7 00:21:23 mandelbrot kernel: ieee80211_newstate: SCAN -> SCAN Eventually it will make a connection but every time the connection is lousy and if I try to send any traffic at all over this connection it will then go back into scan mode immediately, effectively making the wireless link useless. On the other hand this same card with the antenna in the *exactly same* place works without a hitch under windows 2000/xp. I have tried everything I can think of on this and am at a loss as to what else I can possibly try to fix this issue. Any suggestions will be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:00:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BD116A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2730143FDF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:00:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB7909HL010017; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:00:09 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)hB7909YD010016; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:00:09 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])hB78tgDw063304; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 08:55:42 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200312070855.hB78tgDw063304@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Terry Lambert In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Dec 2003 15:54:29 PST." <3FD26C35.BBFB7CBF@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 08:55:42 +0000 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NSS and PAM (was Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:00:14 -0000 Terry Lambert writes: > > On a related note, can I _PLEASE_ have your patches to make dlopen() and > > friends work in the static case? > > Yes, of course. Thank you! Mid-January is fine. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:05:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2DD16A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (sbk-gw.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8281E43FE0; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:05:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB794t9q035468; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:04:55 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from localhost (stranger@localhost)hB794rTP035465; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:04:55 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: sbk-gw.sibnet.ru: stranger owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:04:51 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" X-X-Sender: stranger@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru To: Jun Kuriyama In-Reply-To: <7m8ylp6pn0.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> Message-ID: <20031207150250.L35454@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> References: <7m8ylp6pn0.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_01 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on sbk-gw.sibnet.ru cc: Current cc: pdeuskar@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev/em: Link is not up until 2 seconds after "ifconfig up" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:05:12 -0000 On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > >My experimental 1U box which has em0 and em1 shows following result. >Doing "ifconfig em1 up" after "ifconfig em1 down", link is down 1 or >more seconds. I'm trying to make this box as VRRP router, so 1 >second down during master/backup transition (which uses down, mac >address setting, and up) causes ping-pong transition of master router. > >I think I can work around some timeout tweaks in VRRP daemon side, but >I hope em(4) driver (or hardware problem?) can deal with it. I did >same test with fxp(4) and rl(4), but these interfaces are active after >"ifconfig up" immediately. > > ># ifconfig em1 down; ifconfig em1 up; ifconfig em1; sleep 1; ifconfig em1; sleep 1; ifconfig em1 >em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=3 > inet 192.168.128.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.128.255 > inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe28:4d75%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:30:48:28:4d:75 > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier >em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=3 > inet 192.168.128.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.128.255 > inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe28:4d75%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:30:48:28:4d:75 > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier >em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=3 > inet 192.168.128.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.128.255 > inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe28:4d75%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:30:48:28:4d:75 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > ># pciconf -lv >... >em0@pci2:3:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x10108086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (copper)' > class = network > subclass = ethernet >em1@pci2:3:1: class=0x020000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x10108086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (copper)' > class = network > subclass = ethernet >... > > Did you tried to specify link speed rather than use autosence. Perhaps this delay is due to media sense? Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:13:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774B16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:13:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (herbelot.net1.nerim.net [62.212.117.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C2643FB1 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from diversion.herbelot.nom (diversion.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.6]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB791oWg026719 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:01:50 +0100 (CET) From: Thierry Herbelot To: current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:13:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 X-Warning: Windows can lose your files X-Op-Sys: Le FriBi de la mort qui tue X-Org: TfH&Co X-MailScanner: Found to be clean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312071013.12797.thierry@herbelot.com> Subject: Incompatibility between ACPI and the X-Windows server X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: thierry@herbelot.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:13:19 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to update a notebook, to run 5.2. The beast is an oldish Vaio PC-F707 (Pent-III + Neomagic). When booting with ACPI enabled, X-Windows just stays "frozen" : the screen is blanked, then there is no more progress (and no log in /var/log/XFree.log). When booting without ACPI, X-Windows runs happily. How do I help debugging this problem ? When the screen is frozen, I can't escape to the kernel debugger. TfH PS : the machine also runs flawlessly with a recent 4.9-Stable and the straight X-4.3.0 server. As the machine used to run 4.x, I do not know when the X11 server stopped running alongside with ACPI PS2 : a successful X11 start log (under 5.2, without ACPI) is accessible at http://thierry.herbelot.free.fr/XFree86.0.log PS3 : an ACPI dump is accessible at http://thierry.herbelot.free.fr/foo.asl From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:37:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515CF16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:37:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from web14107.mail.yahoo.com (web14107.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DC3F43F93 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:37:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk) Message-ID: <20031207093728.53982.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.248.174.33] by web14107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:37:28 CET Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:37:28 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Claus=20Guttesen?= To: Dag-Erling "Smørgrav" , Michael Smith In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A word of support for Nate Lawson... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:37:29 -0000 > without working ACPI > support, in two or three years you won't be able to > walk into a store > and buy hardware that FreeBSD will run on. In fact, > I believe that's > already the case for laptops. > Nor Dell PowerEdge 1750, bge doesn't show up. regards Claus Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og virusscan From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:41:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C6316A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2068E43FA3 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:41:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB79f8HL010834; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:41:08 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)hB79f8iL010833; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:41:08 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])hB79drDw063906; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 09:39:53 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200312070939.hB79drDw063906@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Brendon and Wendy In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:12:15 PST." <1070770335.3318.1.camel@bigboot.humphrey.world> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:39:53 +0000 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stupid question for a neophyte: where is ISA_PNP_PROBE defined? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:41:15 -0000 Brendon and Wendy writes: > I've looked every where, and can see it used all over the place, but can > find a definition - I've grepped all of the kernel .c/.h files and no > joy! isa_if.h, which is constructed during the build process. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:45:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D3716A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:45:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.kukulies.org (www.kukulies.org [213.146.112.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CC743FE0 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:45:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: from www.kukulies.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.kukulies.org (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hB79jLee039815 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:45:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by www.kukulies.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id hB79jKds039814 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:45:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:45:20 +0100 (CET) From: "C. Kukulies" Message-Id: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: gimp fails suddenly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:45:26 -0000 I cvsuped and built, installed world and kernel without a hitch also did a port make index, portupgrade -aFrR. But when starting gimp this morning, I get: gimp LibGimp-ERROR **: could not attach to gimp shared memory segment aborting... LibGimp-WARNING **: gimp: wire_read: unexpected EOF gimp: Plug-In crashed: "script-fu" (/usr/X11R6/libexec/gimp/1.2/plug-ins/script-fu) The dying Plug-In may have messed up GIMP's internal state. You may want to save your images and restart GIMP to be on the safe side. ----- Could it be a mmap or vm problem? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:52:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E9716A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D1943FBF; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB79qkRm003182; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB79qk17003181; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:46 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Danny Braniss Message-ID: <20031207095246.GA3149@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Danny Braniss , freebsd-amd-64@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd-64@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm impressed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:52:56 -0000 On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 10:19:24AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:40:45AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > On Wednesday I received a box with dual AMD-64/Opteron/Hammer, > > > I tried the iso-image just to see what happens, and though it booted there > > > wasn't enough stuff to do a real install. > > > > Why not? I've done several real installs using the ISO's. > > > we must be using different iso's :-) > i'll try then another image (maybe 5.2-BETA-amd64-miniinst.iso?) Sounds like you tried the boot-only ISO. That one is to be used like floppies were in the past -- boot it and point the sysinstall at your favorite FTP mirror. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 03:21:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800E16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 03:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42A943FBD for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 03:21:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (FreeBSD 4.9)) id 1ASwye-000P5v-Bw by authid ; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:21:28 +0300 Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:21:28 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: "C. Kukulies" Message-ID: <20031207112128.GB93545@ns2.wananchi.com> References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message,where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.4i (2003-03-19) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gimp fails suddenly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:21:34 -0000 * C. Kukulies [20031207 12:46]: wrote: > I cvsuped and built, installed world and kernel without a hitch > also did a port make index, portupgrade -aFrR. > > But when starting gimp this morning, I get: > > gimp > > LibGimp-ERROR **: could not attach to gimp shared memory segment > > aborting... > > LibGimp-WARNING **: gimp: wire_read: unexpected EOF > gimp: Plug-In crashed: "script-fu" > (/usr/X11R6/libexec/gimp/1.2/plug-ins/script-fu) > > The dying Plug-In may have messed up GIMP's internal state. > You may want to save your images and restart GIMP > to be on the safe side. I see the same problem here , even with jpeg images! Let me know if you get a solution. Thanks -Wash -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 03:36:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5999516A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 03:36:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ultra02.rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (ultra02.rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.9.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532143F93 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 03:36:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from viktor@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de) Received: from ABC216.ram1st.wh.tu-darmstadt.de (ultra19.rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.129.6]) SMTP id hB7BaDT27781 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:36:13 +0100 (MET) Received: by ABC216.ram1st.wh.tu-darmstadt.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:36:07 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:36:07 +0100 From: Viktor Vasilev To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031207113607.GB301@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE i386 Subject: Re: gimp fails suddenly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:36:17 -0000 [the first post didn't make it to current@] On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 10:45:20AM +0100, C. Kukulies wrote: > I cvsuped and built, installed world and kernel without a hitch > also did a port make index, portupgrade -aFrR. > > But when starting gimp this morning, I get: > > gimp > > LibGimp-ERROR **: could not attach to gimp shared memory segment > > aborting... > > LibGimp-WARNING **: gimp: wire_read: unexpected EOF > gimp: Plug-In crashed: "script-fu" > (/usr/X11R6/libexec/gimp/1.2/plug-ins/script-fu) > > The dying Plug-In may have messed up GIMP's internal state. > You may want to save your images and restart GIMP > to be on the safe side. > > ----- > > Could it be a mmap or vm problem? > I saw the same error yesterday on FreeBSD 4.9 Release and found a closed PR about it. The workaround was to start gimp with the --no-shm option. Have a nice day, Viktor -- Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 04:07:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BE416A4CF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 04:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.elcat.kg (imap.elcat.kg [212.42.96.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286A943F75 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 04:07:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from warlock@voip.kg) Received: by mail.elcat.kg (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 0CD9B3CDB8F; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:07:00 +0500 (KGT) Received: from warcomp (warcomp.elcat.kg [212.42.96.26]) by mail.elcat.kg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FF53CD267 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:06:59 +0500 (KGT) From: Roman Streltsov Organization: Elcat To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:06:59 +0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> <20031207113607.GB301@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> In-Reply-To: <20031207113607.GB301@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312071706.59265.warlock@voip.kg> Subject: sendmail coredumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:07:11 -0000 Hello everybody, I CVSuped 1 dec after month pause. In boot phase I have messages pid 325 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 327 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 329 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 331 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 333 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 335 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 pid 337 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 I deny sendmail start in rc.conf sendmail_enable="NONE" and I have option in /etc/make.conf NO_SENDMAIL=yes I don't use sendmail and the trouble is not principial just it isn't nice Any ideas? Roman From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 05:10:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD016A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F84243FE0 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB7DAAXO072924; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:10:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB7DA5QR072923; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:10:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:10:05 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Roman Streltsov Message-ID: <20031207141005.A93967@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> <20031207113607.GB301@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> <200312071706.59265.warlock@voip.kg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200312071706.59265.warlock@voip.kg>; from warlock@voip.kg on Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 05:06:59PM +0500 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.23.0.1; VDF 6.23.0.2 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail coredumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:10:13 -0000 On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 05:06:59PM +0500, Roman Streltsov wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I CVSuped 1 dec after month pause. In boot phase I have messages > > pid 325 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 327 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 329 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 331 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 333 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 335 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > pid 337 (sendmail), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > > > I deny sendmail start in rc.conf > sendmail_enable="NONE" > > and I have option in /etc/make.conf > NO_SENDMAIL=yes > > I don't use sendmail and the trouble is not principial just it isn't nice > > Any ideas? > Your old sendmail binary fails because of the changes in the struct statfs (see 20031112 in src/UPDATING) and because you have NO_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/make.conf it wasn't rebuilt. You see those messages because sendmail probably still gets called by the periodic(8) scripts. From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 05:30:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5A843FA3 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:30:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB7DUDM96713 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 08:30:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 08:30:13 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: ULE and current. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:30:20 -0000 Now that 5.2 has been branched I will soon be making ULE the default scheduler in GENERIC. I'm hoping that before I throw the switch I'll get more feedback from current users. The only big change I have in the pipeline for ULE is improved HTT support. This has all been coded and tested locally. I'm going to commit this after things settle down on HEAD a little more. The plan is to leave ULE as the default until we get to 5.3 at which point we will decide whether or not it is production quality. The most untest workload that I know of is on massive multiuser systems with lots of interactive tasks. If anyone has such a system, I would love to hear of feedback while running ULE. For anyone else, if your workload is either improved or hindered, I'd appreciate a mail with the a description of your workload, your hardware, behavior with ULE, and behavior with 4BSD. Thanks, Jeff From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 06:01:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C99F16A4D1 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 06:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from passion.hsins.com (sw59-121-24.adsl.seed.net.tw [61.59.121.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66DD43F93 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 06:01:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Received: from passion.hsins.com (localhost.hsins.com [127.0.0.1]) hB7E12aM063563; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:01:02 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Received: (from ktsin@localhost) by passion.hsins.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB7E10Yk063562; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:01:00 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:01:00 +0800 From: KT Sin To: Alfred Perlstein Message-ID: <20031207140100.GA63013@passion.hsins.com> References: <20031206134303.GG75620@elvis.mu.org> <20031206134723.GH75620@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031206134723.GH75620@elvis.mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:01:06 -0000 Had this problem before, when the kernel and userland got out of sync. kt On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:47:23AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Ok, nevermind, I don't see how 'lo' got used instead of 'lo0' > but that's what appears to have caused it. > > * Alfred Perlstein [031206 05:43] wrote: > > Sorry if this is a false alarm, but with the "open" firewall > > ruleset in effect: > > > > # ipfw l > > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo > > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > 65000 allow ip from any to any > > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > > > I can't ping my loopback: > > > > # ping localhost > > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes > > ping: sendto: Permission denied > > > > is this known/expected? > > > > > > -- > > - Alfred Perlstein > > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 06:02:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4243D16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 06:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from passion.hsins.com (sw59-121-24.adsl.seed.net.tw [61.59.121.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0CE43F85 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 06:02:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Received: from passion.hsins.com (localhost.hsins.com [127.0.0.1]) hB7E2gaM063570; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:02:42 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Received: (from ktsin@localhost) by passion.hsins.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB7E2bbI063569; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:02:37 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from ktsin@acm.org) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:02:37 +0800 From: KT Sin To: tn Message-ID: <20031207140237.GB63013@passion.hsins.com> References: <3FD2283D.2050306@giallarhorn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD2283D.2050306@giallarhorn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for Atheros 5100X on 5.2 Beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:02:47 -0000 Try adding to your /boot/loader.conf hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1" and reboot. kt On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 02:04:29PM -0500, tn wrote: > The simple question is does the Atheros driver support the AR5001X adapter ? > > I am using a Toshiba A35 S159 Laptop with the built in AR5001X adapter > that supports both 802.11 B and G with the Generic kernel. I haven't > built a custom kernel since i noticed that there were if_ath.ko and > ath_hal.ko modules in the kernel directory. > > I've tried the following after booting: > kldload ath_hal which reports no errors > kldload if_ath which reports the following errors: > ath0: mem 0xe0201000-0xe0210fff irq 22 at device 2.0 > on Pci2 > Pcib1 device ath0 requested decoded memory range 0xe0201000-0xe0210fff > atho: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 3 > device_probe_and_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 > > The module loads as reported by kldstat however the interface does not > show up. > > The settings XP is using are: > IRQ: 22 > Memory Range: E0200000-E020FFFF > Location: PCI bus 2, device 2, function 0 > > The obvious solution at the moment is to modify the driver to use the > same memory range that windows uses. > > Any ideas/suggestions. > > ----------------dmesg---------- > > > Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Tue Nov 25 08:24:08 GMT 2003 > root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a76000. > ACPI APIC Table: > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU 2.30GHz (2298.06-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 > > Features=0xbfebfbff > real memory = 502136832 (478 MB) > avail memory = 478072832 (455 MB) > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled > acpi0: on motherboard > pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 > Using $PIR table, 9 entries at 0xc00fdf30 > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > acpi_cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_cpu1: on acpi0 > acpi_cpu1: Failed to attach throttling P_CNT > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) > agp0: port 0x1800-0x1807 mem > 0xe0000000-0xe007ffff,0xe8000000-0xefffffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 > agp0: detected 32636k stolen memory > agp0: aperture size is 128M > pci0: at device 2.1 (no driver attached) > uhci0: port 0x1820-0x183f > irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0x1840-0x185f > irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub2: Texas Instruments General Purpose USB Hub, class 9/0, rev > 1.10/1.01, addr 2 > uhub2: 2 ports with 0 removable, bus powered > ums0: Logitech USB Receiver, rev 1.10/27.04, addr 3, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 7 buttons and Z dir. > uhci2: port 0x1860-0x187f > irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib1 > rl0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > 0xe0210000-0xe02100ff irq 21 at device 1.0 on pci2 > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:02:3f:93:e5:97 > miibus0: on rl0 > rlphy0: on miibus0 > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > pci2: at device 2.0 (no driver attached) > cbb0: at device 4.0 on pci2 > cardbus0: on cbb0 > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 > cbb0: [MPSAFE] > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1810-0x181f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata0: [MPSAFE] > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > ata1: [MPSAFE] > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 31.6 (no driver attached) > acpi_ec0: port 0x66,0x62 on acpi0 > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned > AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] (Node 0xc447e340), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > acpi_cmbat0: on acpi0 > atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > fdc0: port > 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > npx0: [FAST] > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > orm0: