From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 00:19:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890EA16A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:19:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8894243FA3; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:19:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1ASu8T-000DCz-3c; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:19:25 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:12:45 -0800 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:19:24 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: X-Bogosity: No [0.0%] cc: freebsd-amd-64@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm impressed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 08:19:28 -0000 > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:40:45AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Wednesday I received a box with dual AMD-64/Opteron/Hammer, > > I tried the iso-image just to see what happens, and though it booted there > > wasn't enough stuff to do a real install. > > Why not? I've done several real installs using the ISO's. > we must be using different iso's :-) i'll try then another image (maybe 5.2-BETA-amd64-miniinst.iso?) in any case what impressed me was the fact that the cross-make worked so smoothly danny