From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 27 04:29:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD52037B401 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B55043FB1 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:29:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 52970 invoked by uid 0); 27 Apr 2003 11:28:59 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2003 11:28:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3R6CH2q008748; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:12:17 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:12:17 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20030424172440.GB14946@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20030427141157.C1267-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x86-64 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:29:03 -0000 On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:42:38AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:50:07AM -0700, Andrew Kinney wrote: > > > > On 24 Apr 2003, at 9:56, Anthony Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > > this doesn't look very pOwErFuL. :( > > > > > > > > > > > CPU: AMD ClawHammer(tm) (3.14-MHz Hammer-class CPU) > > > > > > > > > > -Anthony. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the low budget "crawlhammer" version. Someone's reading > > > > the CPUID wrong! ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > No, somebody not allowed by an NDA to display the actual cpu clock > > > frequency. > > > > And I would have thought it would have been obvious.. :-/ > > I would have thought so too... :-/ > Maybe have it display: 3.1415926535897 MHz? just 22/7 Mhz would have sufficed. :) Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+