From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 00:10:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D5E37B404 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be (adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1661943F3F for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rimshot@pandora.be) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FEE637E8B; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:10:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from positron.hjc.be (D5762020.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.32.32]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E843537E42; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:10:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from positron.hjc.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by positron.hjc.be (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h6R7AnN3003355; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:10:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (rimshot@localhost)h6R7Amjc018783; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:10:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: positron.hjc.be: rimshot owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:10:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Wouter Clarie X-X-Sender: rimshot@positron.hjc.be To: Jim Durham In-Reply-To: <200307262229.48486.durham@jcdurham.com> Message-ID: References: <200307251349.38413.durham@jcdurham.com> <20030726074239.GB61353@comp.chem.msu.su> <200307262229.48486.durham@jcdurham.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD and Address Redirection X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:10:54 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Jim Durham wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2003 04:07 am, Wouter Clarie wrote: > > > VNC works through NAT just fine. Never had any problems with that. > > Yes, I do that all the time, but in this case, the VNC *server* was the > one behind the NAT, instead of the client, which is the usual case. Yes, that's what I meant. It should work, since it does here. VNC Server on the internal network, accessed from outside. //Wouter From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 23:54:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9076137B401 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.silverwraith.com (66-214-182-79.la-cbi.charterpipeline.net [66.214.182.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B2E43FB1 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:54:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avleen@silverwraith.com) Received: from avleen by mail.silverwraith.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19h1tM-000LAm-V6; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:53:56 -0700 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:53:56 -0700 From: Avleen Vig To: Danny Braniss Message-ID: <20030728065356.GK40189@silverwraith.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Avleen Vig cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recent mplayer port spinning? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:54:03 -0000 On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 10:23:07AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > the problem exits in 4.8-stable too. Are you using any extra CFLAGS? IIRC, using either -ffast-math or -funroll-loops causing things to break. I can't remeber which, or if it's always true, but try disabling any optimizations you might have used one at a time and try again. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 04:43:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF87E37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raven.plab.ku.dk (raven.plab.ku.dk [130.225.107.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D743FA3 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:43:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dk@raven.plab.ku.dk) Received: from raven.plab.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raven.plab.ku.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6SBhgBx012930; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:43:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dk@raven.plab.ku.dk) Received: (from dk@localhost) by raven.plab.ku.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6SBhepi012927; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:43:40 +0200 (CEST) Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Keywords: 2001334874 X-Comment-To: Kenneth Culver Sender: dk@raven.plab.ku.dk To: Kenneth Culver References: <20030725164649.GF297@numachi.com> <20030725124919.R24957@alpha.yumyumyum.org> From: Dmitry Karasik In-Reply-To: Kenneth Culver's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:50:41 -0400 (EDT)" Date: 28 Jul 2003 13:43:40 +0200 Message-ID: <84he56c1w3.fsf@raven.plab.ku.dk> Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recent mplayer port spinnin X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:43:46 -0000 Hi Kenneth! On 25 Jul 03 at 18:50, "Kenneth" (Kenneth Culver) wrote: Kenneth> Maybe try it with FreeBSD-STABLE, or even FreeBSD 4.8? I've found Kenneth> that occasionally, ports will work on later versions of FreeBSD Kenneth> when they won't work on earlier ones. It's the same on 4.8 . Not that the issue bothers me, but merely not to help spread false hopes ( and I believe it is mplayer's problem ). -- Sincerely, Dmitry --- www.karasik.eu.org --- Life ain't fair, but the root password helps. - BOFH From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 04:59:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F102A37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shabanov.park.rambler.ru (shabanov.rambler.stack.net [81.19.65.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE48943FA3 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:59:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vs@shabanov.park.rambler.ru) Received: from shabanov.park.rambler.ru (localhost.park.rambler.ru [127.0.0.1])h6SC0NUp069073 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:23 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from vs@shabanov.park.rambler.ru) Received: (from vs@localhost) by shabanov.park.rambler.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h6SC0MeL069072 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:22 +0400 (MSD) From: Vlad Shabanov Organization: Rambler Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:00:22 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 To: hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307281600.22788.vs@rambler-co.ru> Subject: new search tool for FreeBSD community X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:59:19 -0000 Dear Sir(s), Rambler (www.rambler.ru) developed new search tool working with FreeBSD project mail archives. You can try it at http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ Index contains messages from all mail archives including cvs commits, bug reports, etc. We plan to update database daily. Any comments, suggestions, bug-reports welcome. Best regards, Vladislav Shabanov, Rambler e-mail: vs@rambler-co.ru From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 06:56:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAC137B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.yumyumyum.org (dsl092-171-091.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.171.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA89243F3F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:56:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from culverk@yumyumyum.org) Received: by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B58443B6; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09793B4; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Culver To: Dmitry Karasik In-Reply-To: <84he56c1w3.fsf@raven.plab.ku.dk> Message-ID: <20030728095510.V45461@alpha.yumyumyum.org> References: <20030725164649.GF297@numachi.com> <20030725124919.R24957@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <84he56c1w3.fsf@raven.plab.ku.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recent mplayer port spinnin X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:56:52 -0000 > Kenneth> Maybe try it with FreeBSD-STABLE, or even FreeBSD 4.8? I've found > Kenneth> that occasionally, ports will work on later versions of FreeBSD > Kenneth> when they won't work on earlier ones. > > It's the same on 4.8 . Not that the issue bothers me, but merely not to > help spread false hopes ( and I believe it is mplayer's problem ). > Alright, I'm not sure how to help then, I have no -STABLE machines, mplayer works fine on my -CURRENT machines though. Ken From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:04:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BDF37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lips.thebarn.com (lips.borg.umn.edu [160.94.232.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378D343F85 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:04:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cattelan@thebarn.com) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (c-24-118-121-167.mn.client2.attbi.com [24.118.121.167]) by lips.thebarn.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h6SH3jE6090515; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:03:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cattelan@thebarn.com) From: Russell Cattelan To: Daniel Lang In-Reply-To: <20030726121240.GA5511@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <1059156388.34654.94.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com> <20030726090636.GK22295@spc.org> <20030726121240.GA5511@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1059411822.92723.145.camel@lupo.thebarn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 28 Jul 2003 12:03:43 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Russell Cattelan Subject: Re: Console serial speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:04:04 -0000 On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:12, Daniel Lang wrote: > Hi, > > Bruce M Simpson wrote on Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 10:06:36AM +0100: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > How does one set the serial speed of the console. > > > > Does specifying BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED=57600 not work? > > No, I've experienced the same problem years ago. > The funny thing is, that it worked on some machines, > while it didn't on others. > > I worked around the problem by putting > machdep.conspeed=38400 > in /etc/sysctl.conf, so the speed is reset to the right > speed, once the system is up. > > Of course this doesn't work for boot2, loader or the kernel > itself. These three components seem to set their console speed > in some cases arbitrarly. Yes this seems to be the case. No matter how hard I try to convince sio.c to default to 57600 (I even went as far at setting static volatile speed_t comdefaultrate = CONSPEED; to 57600) so there would be no confusion. I still end up with random console speed each time. The boot loader did pick up the speed from /etc/make.conf and does come up every time at 57600. > > In my kernel I have the CONSPEED and the BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED > in make.conf set accordingly. > > Anyway its not a big problem for me now any more, so I never > filed a PR. > > Best regards, > Daniel -- Russell Cattelan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:42:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9737B401; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.webcraft99.com (blis.bernama.com.my [202.188.124.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD78143F93; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:42:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from afu-subscribed-list@aeefyu.net) Received: from localhost (beta.webcraft99.com [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.webcraft99.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679A719306; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:18:44 +0800 (MYT) Received: from mailhub.webcraft99.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beta.webcraft99.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51365-01; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:18:40 +0800 (MYT) Received: from aeefyu.net (unknown [202.157.203.86]) by mailhub.webcraft99.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECAB19305; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:18:22 +0800 (MYT) Message-ID: <3F254CCB.8030403@aeefyu.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:18:19 +0800 From: Aeefyu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030721 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhub.webcraft99.com cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: BCM4401 Support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:42:07 -0000 With reference to: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-hackers&m=105593188923273&w=2 i.e. Broadcom 440x NIC support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x (as found on latest Dell's Notebooks - mine is a 8500) Would anyone be so kind to enlighten me on the the current status? Last I heard of developments being made was end of June. Anyone please? I am willing to be a tester, if one is required. Cheers -- Feisal Webcraft Solutions - http://www.webcraftsolutions.com -------------------------------------- Chicken Little was right. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:55:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A6337B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-out8.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out8.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2190D43F3F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:55:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from buffy.brucec.backnet ([82.41.200.71]) by smtp-out8.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:55:26 +0100 Received: from buffy.brucec.backnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.brucec.backnet (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6SHtQUK008684 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:55:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bruce@buffy.brucec.backnet) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by buffy.brucec.backnet (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6SHtQqG008683 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:55:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:55:26 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030728175526.GA8495@buffy.brucec.backnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2003 17:55:26.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D12C150:01C35531] Subject: BCM4401 driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:55:29 -0000 I realise that there's a 'beta' FreeBSD driver out for this card, and I've been attempting to learn the kernel interfaces such as bus_dma and mbuf handling to debug it, but without much success. On my Dell, it seems to mostly work if I set the number of RX descriptors very low, around 5, but at the default of 200 the network stalls with invalid packets. Running a tcpdump on the interface shows that, with 5 descriptors, there's an occasional bad packet, but it doesn't stop any network access working. With 200, I get loads of bad packets, where tcpdump shows the mac addresses (the ethernet header I guess) quite a few bytes into the packet. I recently ran the system with the driver preloaded, and after a while it locked the system up, spamming me with 'bcm0: discarding frame w/o ethernet header (len 4294967296 pktlen 4294967296)'. It looks as though there's either a problem with where the chip is putting the data, or something's wrong with the mbuf handling, but which only gets triggered after a while. Does anyone know enough about network drivers to know what the problem might be? It would be great to have this card supported, and it seems that the driver is very near to being working, it just needs a bit more debugging work done on it. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 11:01:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E5B37B404 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web14906.mail.yahoo.com (web14906.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CEA943F85 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030728180143.12743.qmail@web14906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.43.240] by web14906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:43 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: vpo in ECP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:01:48 -0000 Hello, Sorry hackers, I have posted this to questions@freebsd, but got no answer... I did set my mainboard BIOS to use ECP transfer mode (dma 3 & irq 7). I edited my kernel to: device ppc0 at isa? flags 0x8 irq 7 (is there a way to declare the dma I want to use? config complains if I add dma xyz) and when I boot I get: Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 flags 0x8 on isa0 Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP-only) in ECP mode Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppi0: on ppbus0 Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: imm0: NIBBLE mode unavailable! and my zip-100 drive does not get recognized. Is it possible to use vpo in ECP mode?? EPP and compatible modes are just too damn slow. thanks, Paulo Roberto __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 11:08:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB40937B401; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A652243F3F; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:08:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h6SI2ApM012060; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:02:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) h6SI869u016035; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:08:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Aeefyu In-Reply-To: <3F254CCB.8030403@aeefyu.net> References: <3F254CCB.8030403@aeefyu.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sqDdoH1/bECnmpNEDn09" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1059415694.710.31.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 28 Jul 2003 14:08:14 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4401 Support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:08:48 -0000 --=-sqDdoH1/bECnmpNEDn09 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:18, Aeefyu wrote: > With reference to: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dfreebsd-hackers&m=3D105593188923273&w= =3D2 >=20 > i.e. Broadcom 440x NIC support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x (as found on=20 > latest Dell's Notebooks - mine is a 8500) >=20 > Would anyone be so kind to enlighten me on the the current status? > Last I heard of developments being made was end of June. >=20 > Anyone please? >=20 > I am willing to be a tester, if one is required. This was forwarded to me from Greg Lehey. The dcm driver works okay for me, but I had to hack it for some new bus dma changes. I have noticed a few issues of slowness with it when using it in a more "normal" sense (i.e. using it to read mail, ssh to machines, etc.). >> Duncan Barclay has a beta driver for the Broadcomm card. See >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2003-July/001109.html >> for more details. Also, I've been given a pointer to a Linux page, >> http://cabibbo.physics.wm.edu/~bryan/computer/inspiron5100.html, which >> I haven't read yet. Joe >=20 > Cheers --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-sqDdoH1/bECnmpNEDn09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/JWaOb2iPiv4Uz4cRArtOAJ9XdlGb+kQ88Ne6yhG8WK1+GNvF+ACfQciD lRAj0lbeaawlugeYSIPpnq8= =2tBI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sqDdoH1/bECnmpNEDn09-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 14:04:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E5937B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5143F3F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:04:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) Received: from jimslaptop.pitt.nepinc.com (jimslaptop.pitt.nepinc.com [192.100.100.107]) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h6SL4Ju05733; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:04:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) From: Jim Durham Organization: JC Durham Consulting To: Wouter Clarie Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:04:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200307251349.38413.durham@jcdurham.com> <200307272237.14432.durham@jcdurham.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307281704.16378.durham@jcdurham.com> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD and Address Redirection X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: durham@jcdurham.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:04:20 -0000 On Monday 28 July 2003 06:26 am, you wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Jim Durham wrote: > > On Sunday 27 July 2003 03:10 am, Wouter Clarie wrote: > > > Yes, that's what I meant. It should work, since it does here. > > > VNC Server on the internal network, accessed from outside. > > > > Interesting. Is your setup using redirect_address in a natd.conf > > file? > > No. > > > What version of FreeBSD are you running? > > I was afraid you were going to ask this question ;) I'm not using > FreeBSD but OpenBSD. I wasn't actually telling you that natd in > FreeBSD will be able to do it (which it really should), but that it > is perfectly possible to run a VNC Server behind NAT, without an > application proxy. OpenBSD pf proves that. I wonder if the OpenBSD natd is the same code? I don't have any Open BSD machines but it might be interesting to look. > OK.... well, we have tried same-ports, use_sockets, ..everything we can think of and it does not work with VNC....but there's more.... If we substitute a FreeBSD box with vncserver for the windows box, then I actually can see the beginning of a screen forming, about 10 scan lines. Eventually, the connection times out, but when it does it delivers another 10 scan lines of so of screen. That kind of behavior would suggest to me that the first bufferof the screen stuff is sent out, but no ack comes back and, when the connection finally times out, you get another packet bufferas it dumps the connection. By the way, SSH runs fine to that inside machine from the 'net. -Jim From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:22:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F50537B401 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmlb.org (pc2-cmbg4-6-cust36.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.96.76.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5511E43F75 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:22:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmlb@dmlb.org) Received: from orac.my.domain ([192.168.200.75] helo=orac) by dmlb.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19hIGR-0000Pa-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: <002e01c35567$43ce4590$4bc8a8c0@orac> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: "Bruce Cran" , References: <20030728175526.GA8495@buffy.brucec.backnet> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:20:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: BCM4401 driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:22:54 -0000 Hello Bruce, From: "Bruce Cran" > I realise that there's a 'beta' FreeBSD driver out for this card, and I've > been attempting to learn the kernel interfaces such as bus_dma and mbuf > handling to debug it, but without much success. On my Dell, it seems to > mostly work if I set the number of RX descriptors very low, around 5, but at > the default of 200 the network stalls with invalid packets. Running a > tcpdump on the interface shows that, with 5 descriptors, there's an occasional > bad packet, but it doesn't stop any network access working. With 200, I get > loads of bad packets, where tcpdump shows the mac addresses (the ethernet > header I guess) quite a few bytes > into the packet. I recently ran the system with the driver preloaded, and > after a while it locked the system up, spamming me with 'bcm0: discarding frame > w/o ethernet header (len 4294967296 pktlen 4294967296)'. It looks as though > there's either a problem with where the chip is putting the data, or > something's wrong with the mbuf handling, but which only gets triggered after > a while. Does anyone know enough about > network drivers to know what the problem might be? > It would be great to have this card supported, and it seems that the driver > is very near to being working, it just needs a bit more debugging work > done on it. Firstly, an apology. I released the beta driver at the end of june just before I went on holiday. Since I got back I've been maxed out at $REALJOB and been too tired in the evenings to do any hacking on the driver - because of the stuff (chip layout) I'm doing at work, the last thing I want to do is sit in front of another monitor! This situation will continue for another week or two. Your report above tallies with my experiences and those of others on a few platforms. Although you have spotted a few more bits and pieces. I hadn't noticed the misaligned MAC addresses on bad packets. I think that the driver might be programming the chip very slightly incorrectly. Either there is a requirement for the chip to see some sort of alignment on the RX buffers or I've got something wrong in handling the extra header that the chip prepends to the packets, or I've simply got mbuf alignment requirements wrong. Sometimes, I see symptoms of kernel memory being trashed - odd sig 11's etc. It is possible that the chip is spamming memory where it shouldn't. FYI, I used two Linux drivers for reference. One from Broadcom (called bcm4400) and one from Redhat, (called b44 I think). I haven't managed to get any docs from Broadcom, so have had to work blind, and may well have something wrong. Thanks for the feedback and once again apologies for being tardy in tracking this bug down. Duncan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:20:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C205737B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6BE43FA3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:20:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0dr.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.1.187] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19hOmC-0002uE-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:20:04 -0700 Message-ID: <3F261FE6.D137B326@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:19:02 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell Cattelan References: <1059156388.34654.94.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com> <20030726090636.GK22295@spc.org> <1059411822.92723.145.camel@lupo.thebarn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a420d454776054c67aa74d158b67881f4c666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Russell Cattelan Subject: Re: Console serial speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:20:08 -0000 Russell Cattelan wrote: > On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:12, Daniel Lang wrote: > > Bruce M Simpson wrote on Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 10:06:36AM +0100: > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > > How does one set the serial speed of the console. > > > > > > Does specifying BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED=57600 not work? > > > > No, I've experienced the same problem years ago. > > The funny thing is, that it worked on some machines, > > while it didn't on others. > > > > I worked around the problem by putting > > machdep.conspeed=38400 > > in /etc/sysctl.conf, so the speed is reset to the right > > speed, once the system is up. > > > > Of course this doesn't work for boot2, loader or the kernel > > itself. These three components seem to set their console speed > > in some cases arbitrarly. > Yes this seems to be the case. > No matter how hard I try to convince sio.c to default to 57600 > (I even went as far at setting > static volatile speed_t comdefaultrate = CONSPEED; > to 57600) > so there would be no confusion. > I still end up with random console speed each time. > > The boot loader did pick up the speed from /etc/make.conf and > does come up every time at 57600. You also need to modify the /etc/ttys entry to specify std.57600 (see the examples for /dev/ttyd[0-3]) and to set: options CONSPEED=57600 in your config file. -- Terry From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:44:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A190A37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C55B43FA3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0dr.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.1.187] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19hP9e-0004ea-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:44:19 -0700 Message-ID: <3F262594.21DCB20A@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:43:16 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paulo Roberto References: <20030728180143.12743.qmail@web14906.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4c2695b12257a9896312f32afeb8ec9ab387f7b89c61deb1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vpo in ECP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:44:20 -0000 Paulo Roberto wrote: > Sorry hackers, I have posted this to questions@freebsd, but got no > answer... > > I did set my mainboard BIOS to use ECP transfer mode (dma 3 & irq 7). I > edited my kernel to: > > device ppc0 at isa? flags 0x8 irq 7 > > (is there a way to declare the dma I want to use? config complains if I > add dma xyz) > and when I boot I get: Not sure if it's actually meaningful for the driver, but the config file syntax is: device ppc0 at isa? flags 0x8 irq 7 drq 3 > Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: at port > 0x378-0x37f irq 7 flags 0x8 on isa0 > Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP-only) in ECP > mode > Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold > Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: ppi0: on ppbus0 > Jul 1 10:36:42 delta /kernel: imm0: NIBBLE mode unavailable! > > and my zip-100 drive does not get recognized. Is it possible to use vpo > in ECP mode?? EPP and compatible modes are just too damn slow. "man ppc". The answer is "it depends on your chipset"; clearly, it's not had anyone write explicit support for it yet. The manual page goes into some good detail on how to fix this; specifically, you should look at the "Adding support to a new chipset" section. See also "man vpo"; it discusses how to force specific modes for your given chipset. Probably, you should add specific support for your chipset instead, so that other people who end up with the same chipset don't end up having to repeat your problems. -- Terry From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:52:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7F837B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0C543F75; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:52:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0dr.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.1.187] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19hPHD-0005R0-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:52:08 -0700 Message-ID: <3F262766.4DE637F4@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:51:02 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <3F254CCB.8030403@aeefyu.net> <1059415694.710.31.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4824a24ac298a2cc2736aa44eeb21143c3ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Aeefyu cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4401 Support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:52:21 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:18, Aeefyu wrote: > > i.e. Broadcom 440x NIC support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x (as found on > > latest Dell's Notebooks - mine is a 8500) > > > > Would anyone be so kind to enlighten me on the the current status? > > Last I heard of developments being made was end of June. > > This was forwarded to me from Greg Lehey. The dcm driver works okay for > me, but I had to hack it for some new bus dma changes. I have noticed a > few issues of slowness with it when using it in a more "normal" sense > (i.e. using it to read mail, ssh to machines, etc.). Most likely, the interactive performance is a result of the RX packet coelescing, with a timer set to too long an interval. In general, it's probably an easy adjustment to make. I notice that he also says he didn't know what to add into some of the timer and media routines, so that could be part of the issue as well (e.g. if it's getting wedged and having to unwedge itself). BTW: As a rule of thumb, if you don't know what to put in a timer or media routine, put a printf() there. It will likely annoy someone into fixing it. 8-). -- Terry From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 01:48:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EAA37B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmlb.org (pc2-cmbg4-6-cust36.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.96.76.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D7C43F75; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:48:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmlb@dmlb.org) Received: from pc2-cmbg4-6-cust36.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.96.76.36] helo=DJK1Comp) by dmlb.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19hQ8w-0000uL-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:47:39 +0100 Message-ID: <002601c355ae$100a3240$a7ac77c1@DJK1Comp> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: "Terry Lambert" , "Joe Marcus Clarke" References: <3F254CCB.8030403@aeefyu.net> <1059415694.710.31.camel@gyros> <3F262766.4DE637F4@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:47:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300 cc: Aeefyu cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4401 Support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:48:04 -0000 Hello Terry, From: "Terry Lambert" > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:18, Aeefyu wrote: > > > i.e. Broadcom 440x NIC support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x (as found on > > > latest Dell's Notebooks - mine is a 8500) > > > > > > Would anyone be so kind to enlighten me on the the current status? > > > Last I heard of developments being made was end of June. > > > > This was forwarded to me from Greg Lehey. The dcm driver works okay for > > me, but I had to hack it for some new bus dma changes. I have noticed a > > few issues of slowness with it when using it in a more "normal" sense > > (i.e. using it to read mail, ssh to machines, etc.). > > > Most likely, the interactive performance is a result of the RX > packet coelescing, with a timer set to too long an interval. In > general, it's probably an easy adjustment to make. It shouldn't be as I set the RX coalescing timer at the same settings as the Linux drivers - and it is set to 1 packet. > I notice that he also says he didn't know what to add into some > of the timer and media routines, so that could be part of the > issue as well (e.g. if it's getting wedged and having to unwedge > itself). Nope - no wedging is going on. It's packet aligment issues - either I'm programming the RX DMA pointers wrong or not adjusting them correctly on receipt. TX is absolutly fine, it can easily max out a 100MB/s link with hardly any CPU load. > BTW: As a rule of thumb, if you don't know what to put in a timer > or media routine, put a printf() there. It will likely annoy > someone into fixing it. 8-). Ta - will do when the RX issues are fixed. > -- Terry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:19:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D6E37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.icomag.de (ns.icomag.de [195.227.115.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A83A43F3F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bgd@icomag.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icomag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8443B2301D for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:19:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.icomag.de (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 4B9292301F; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icomag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A78D2301D for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:19:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Bogdan TARU X-X-Sender: To: Message-ID: <20030729171356.M2453-100000@fw.office.icom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 Subject: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:19:15 -0000 Hi everyone, I have sort of a newbie question, but that I cannot explain myself. I get some large files in 'ls -al', but when I 'measure' them with 'du', the size is much small. Example: (17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] ls -alsh my_file 19120 -rw-r--r-- 1 root bgd 763M Jul 29 16:56 my_file (17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] du -sh my_file 19M my_file So the 'ls -alsh' shows a file in size of 763M, but 19M of sectors are really 'occupied'. Can someone explain, please? Thanks, bogdan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:24:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5737B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from revolt.poohsticks.org (revolt.poohsticks.org [63.227.60.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B7743FDF for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew@revolt.poohsticks.org) Received: from revolt.poohsticks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by revolt.poohsticks.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h6TFO3J06998; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:24:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from drew@revolt.poohsticks.org) Message-Id: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> To: Bogdan TARU In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:19:07 +0200." <20030729171356.M2453-100000@fw.office.icom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6995.1059492242.1@revolt.poohsticks.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:24:03 -0600 From: Drew Eckhardt cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:24:06 -0000 In message <20030729171356.M2453-100000@fw.office.icom>, bgd@icomag.de writes: >(17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] ls -alsh my_file >19120 -rw-r--r-- 1 root bgd 763M Jul 29 16:56 my_file >(17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] du -sh my_file > 19M my_file > > So the 'ls -alsh' shows a file in size of 763M, but 19M of sectors are >really 'occupied'. Can someone explain, please? unix files can be sparse. -- Home Page For those who do, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:27:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA4137B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.icomag.de (ns.icomag.de [195.227.115.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A124B43F75 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bgd@icomag.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icomag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDB32301D; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.icomag.de (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 66CE22301F; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icomag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FFE2301D; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Bogdan TARU X-X-Sender: To: Drew Eckhardt In-Reply-To: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> Message-ID: <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:27:18 -0000 Hi Drew, I have tried to create some files of myself, with 'spaces' in them (holes?), but they don't act like this. So could you please explain what 'sparse' means, and the 'trick' to create them? Thanks, bogdan On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Drew Eckhardt wrote: > In message <20030729171356.M2453-100000@fw.office.icom>, bgd@icomag.de writes: > >(17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] ls -alsh my_file > >19120 -rw-r--r-- 1 root bgd 763M Jul 29 16:56 my_file > >(17:13) bgd@(bgd)[~/temp] du -sh my_file > > 19M my_file > > > > So the 'ls -alsh' shows a file in size of 763M, but 19M of sectors are > >really 'occupied'. Can someone explain, please? > > unix files can be sparse. > > -- > Home Page > For those who do, no explanation is necessary. > For those who don't, no explanation is possible. > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:53:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605637B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ussenterprise.ufp.org (ussenterprise.ufp.org [208.185.30.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4343FAF for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org) Received: from ussenterprise.ufp.org (bicknell@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ussenterprise.ufp.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TFrt8i089475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bicknell@localhost) by ussenterprise.ufp.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TFrt3T089474 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:53:55 -0400 From: Leo Bicknell To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030729155355.GA89416@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> Organization: United Federation of Planets X-PGP-Key: http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:53:57 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message written on Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:27:14PM +0200, Bogdan TARU = wrote: > I have tried to create some files of myself, with 'spaces' in them > (holes?), but they don't act like this. So could you please explain what > 'sparse' means, and the 'trick' to create them? % cat sparse.c #include #include #include #include int main(void) { int fd; fd =3D open("sparse-file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT); lseek(fd, 1024*1024*1024, SEEK_SET); write(fd, "0123456789", 10); close(fd); } % cc -o sparse sparse.c % ./sparse % ls -lag sparse-file -r-xr----- 1 bicknell bicknell 1073741834 Jul 29 11:52 sparse-file* % du -k sparse-file 48 sparse-file --=20 Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/JpiTNh6mMG5yMTYRAhpsAJ425kMhVTb6tonzZteuQxjJcqKdhgCeKQUc 6oKFtptaWQABsU92FH5KVBk= =ng0F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:00:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3411037B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webserver.get-linux.org (adsl-64-161-78-226.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.161.78.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 585F943FB1 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@webserver.get-linux.org) Received: (qmail 4766 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2003 16:00:48 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:00:48 -0700 From: Joshua Oreman To: Bogdan TARU Message-ID: <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:00:26 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:27:14PM +0200 or thereabouts, Bogdan TARU wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > I have tried to create some files of myself, with 'spaces' in them > (holes?), but they don't act like this. So could you please explain what > 'sparse' means, and the 'trick' to create them? Basically, seek into the file and write a zero byte. The file will logically be as long as the offset you seeked to, but physically only the zero byte you wrote is stored on the disk. Everything else is "empty", so it's just "assumed" to be zero bytes when read. You have two main ways to create sparse files: 1) To "sparsify" a file: Install port sysutils/fileutils and use $ gcp --sparse=always oldfile sparsefile 2) To make a sparse file of X length (mainly just for "fun" purposes), use the C program below. Usually programs will manage their own sparse files; it's something hard to do at the shell. Use these commands to create that C program I mentioned: cat > sparse.c << "EOF" #include #include #include #include #include #include #define KB *1024 #define MB *1024 *1024 int main (int argc, char **argv) { int offset = 10 MB, fd; char ch, file[1024]; while ((ch = getopt (argc, argv, "s:")) != EOF) { if (ch == 's') { offset = atoi (optarg) KB; } } argc -= optind; argv += optind; if (argc) { strcpy (file, argv[0]); } else { strcpy (file, "sparse.out"); } /* Open the file */ if ((fd = open (file, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666)) == -1) { perror ("open"); exit (1); } /* Seek `offset' bytes into it */ lseek (fd, offset, SEEK_SET); /* Write a zero */ write (fd, "\0", 1); /* Close the file */ close (fd); return 0; } EOF gcc -o sparse sparse.c ./sparse -s Replace with something like 10000 for an (about) 10 MB file, and with the name of the sparse file to make (it will be overwritten if it already exists). Example: $ ./sparse -s 10000 sparsefile $ ls -alsh sparsefile 4.0k -rw-r--r-- 1 oremanj users 9.8M Jul 29 08:55 sparsefile ^^^^ physical size ^^^^ logical size $ -- Josh > > Thanks, > bogdan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:02:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BB937B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CDD43F75 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:02:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from buffy.brucec.backnet ([82.41.200.71]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:02:16 +0100 Received: from buffy.brucec.backnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.brucec.backnet (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TG2G1s004013; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:02:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bruce@buffy.brucec.backnet) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by buffy.brucec.backnet (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TG2Gv4004012; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:02:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:02:15 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Bogdan TARU Message-ID: <20030729160215.GA3822@buffy.brucec.backnet> References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729172615.N13255-100000@fw.office.icom> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2003 16:02:16.0802 (UTC) FILETIME=[C851D420:01C355EA] cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:02:20 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:27:14PM +0200, Bogdan TARU wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > I have tried to create some files of myself, with 'spaces' in them > (holes?), but they don't act like this. So could you please explain what > 'sparse' means, and the 'trick' to create them? > Try using the 'truncate' utility: truncate -s 102400G onehundred_terabytes This will create a file which looks like it's 100TB though 'ls', but which only uses 64KB in the directory usage via 'du'. Generally, creating a file, seeking past the end of the file then writing something, will create a 'sparse' file. This, when read, will appear to contain zeros for all entries past the previous end of file, to the entry which was written to. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:08:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE4E37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34CF43FAF for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h6TG8Tv06052; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:08:29 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:08:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: Joshua Oreman In-Reply-To: <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> Message-ID: <20030729180633.U32605@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file size different from ls to du X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:08:36 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote: JO>Usually programs will manage their own sparse files; it's something hard JO>to do at the shell. When I need a file for TCP performance tests I usually do dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1k count=1 seek=99999 harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:09:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA1037B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loops.nilpotent.org (loops.nilpotent.org [12.17.163.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78B1043F85 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fn@hungry.com) Received: (qmail 51419 invoked by uid 200); 29 Jul 2003 16:09:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:09:17 -0700 From: Faried Nawaz To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030729160917.GA51401@nilpotent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: Integral Domains Subject: patch to add make -U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:09:22 -0000 While working around a port issue (ports/55013), I discovered that make couldn't unset variables using make -U. I've written a small patch that adds -U functionality, but I haven't tested it extensively. http://web.nilpotent.org/tmp/make.diff.bz2 (~ 3KB unpacked) against yesterday's -CURRENT code. A simple Makefile I used to test it: -- cut here -- FOO = bar .ifdef FOO SAY = y .else SAY = n .endif all: echo $(SAY) -- cut here -- Try "make -U FOO". Faried. -- The Great GNU has arrived, infidels, behold his wrath ! "If a MOO runs on a port no one accesses, does it run?" From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 17:41:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4909537B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au [128.250.20.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85BC43F3F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:41:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au) Received: from elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au (elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au [128.250.18.41])h6U0fGfE002944 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:41:16 +1000 (EST) From: JacobRhoden Organization: University of Melbourne To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:41:16 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: usb (ucom) driver code comments..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:41:19 -0000 Hey, I am trying to get a device working which uses ucom, and the ucom code has no comments whatsoever, I am able to work bits out, I was wondering if there was any sort of documentation whatsoever on this area? Thanks, Jacob ____________________ http://rhoden.id.au/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 22:14:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C699037B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFF243F3F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:14:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6U5EP4D007975; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:14:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:14:25 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Joshua Oreman In-Reply-To: <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> Message-ID: <20030730090934.L90518@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: sparse files from shell [Re: file size different from ls to du] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:14:33 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote: [snip] JO> Usually programs will manage their own sparse files; it's something hard JO> to do at the shell. dd is your friend. These commands make sparse file of some ks physical and 1g logical: VNFILE=/tmp/sparsefile VNSZ=$((1024*1024)) dd if=/dev/zero of=${VNFILE} bs=1k count=1 seek=$((${VNSZ} - 1)) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 22:54:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB85F37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-135.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F8343F93 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8146366BE5; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40EB85F9; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20030730055443.GA77278@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200307291524.h6TFO3J06998@revolt.poohsticks.org> <20030729160048.GA4647@webserver> <20030730090934.L90518@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030730090934.L90518@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Joshua Oreman Subject: Re: sparse files from shell [Re: file size different from ls to du] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:54:45 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:14:25AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote: >=20 > [snip] >=20 > JO> Usually programs will manage their own sparse files; it's something h= ard > JO> to do at the shell. >=20 > dd is your friend. See also truncate(1) Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/J12jWry0BWjoQKURAraFAJ0ZWSZvBmOuexbuzxUDogDMJjxc1ACdFT6z ASPFgIZW2dwAj2KevagG4Sk= =dWyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 23:11:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144C037B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E6C43F3F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6U6B5FL014560; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:11:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:10:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030730.001013.53573754.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> References: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb (ucom) driver code comments..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:11:14 -0000 In message: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> JacobRhoden writes: : I am trying to get a device working which uses ucom, and the ucom code has no : comments whatsoever, I am able to work bits out, I was wondering if there was : any sort of documentation whatsoever on this area? Use the source luke. However, you'll need to look closely at sys/kern/tty* as well. Looking at something like umodem that implements a ucom plug in might be useful too. You might check out the handbook too, but I think that the usb docs there don't specifically cover usb. Warner From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:14:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04CC37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f97.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0DB43F85 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sajjadw21@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:14:24 -0700 Received: from 202.176.253.196 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:14:24 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.176.253.196] X-Originating-Email: [sajjadw21@hotmail.com] From: "mouhammad sajjad" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:14:24 +0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2003 08:14:24.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[9651A760:01C35672] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: root pwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:14:25 -0000 hi how i can hack root password in freeBSD???? _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with [1]the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* References 1. http://g.msn.com/8HMDEN/2731??PS= From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:47:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9995537B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-135.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C159943F75 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:47:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5AE66D6A; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F11CA33; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:47:25 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: mouhammad sajjad Message-ID: <20030730084725.GA78278@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: root pwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:47:27 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:14:24AM +0000, mouhammad sajjad wrote: >=20 > hi >=20 > how i can hack root password in freeBSD???? Download the following file: ftp://2130706433/pub/FreeBSD-hacks/root-hack.tar.gz (full instructions are included) The site is pretty busy, so if you can't get through at first then just keep trying! kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/J4YdWry0BWjoQKURAiQBAJ93HNVOvYvvNRodaypnzJ5HiD1FYgCeIkmQ u3FscJk62SfyqJuE6ouzMr0= =oD18 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:40:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E959037B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dust.freshx.de (freshx.de [80.190.100.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2604F43F93; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:40:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kai.mosebach@freshx.de) Received: from alpha (p508B1B74.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.27.116]) by dust.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A120415E0C9; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:40:37 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kai Mosebach" To: , Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:40:58 +0200 Message-ID: <049c01c356b9$5b34a0a0$0100a8c0@alpha> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:40:48 -0000 Hi, Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. Any ideas ? Cheers Kai c++ -D_THREAD_SAFE -DFREEBSD_DEBUG -DPTHREADS -DFREEBSD_THREADS -DREL30 \ -DFREEBSD -DI386 -DSAG -I/usr/local/sapdb/depend/incl -I/projects/sapdb/\ FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl -I/projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB -DSYSV\ -D_SVID -I/usr/include/ncurses -w -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DSAPDB_\ FAST -D_REENTRANT -O3 -march=pentium -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/usr/sapdb/DevTo\ ols.74/incl -D_THREAD_SAFE -DFREEBSD_DEBUG -DPTHREADS -DFREEBSD_THREADS \ -c vkb641.cpp In file included from /projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/Loggin\ g/Log_Transaction.hpp:69, from vkb641.cpp:50: /projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/DataAccess/Data_SplitSpace.h\ pp: In member function `void Data_SplitSpace::Deassign(bool) [with T = Log_UndoPage]': /projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/DataAccess/Data_ChainSplitSp\ aceBackwardRead.hpp:168: instantiated from `void Data_ChainSplitSpaceB\ ackwardRead::Iterator::Invalidate(bool) [with PAGE = Log_UndoPage]\ ' /projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/Logging/Log_UndoFile.hpp:304\ : instantiated from here /projects/sapdb/FreeBSD/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/DataAccess/Data_SplitSpace.h\ pp:319: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:57:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E457537B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mortar.sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DD843F85; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by mortar.sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 25D8830A51; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:57:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.velocet.net (Postfix, from userid 101) id DB0DC46BB; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:57:15 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16168.8987.847775.169328@canoe.velocet.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:57:15 -0400 To: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Upgrade to 5.1 fixes wi0 accesspoint mode fubar. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:57:21 -0000 For various reasons, I upgraded my firewall from 4.8-STABLE to 5.1-CURRENT. Recently, I complained that the wireless clients of the wi0 PCI card running in hostap mode would loose sync. It was repeatable that they clients would loose sync when the server was serving more interrupts. One of the most obvious expamples was playing xmms on the server would cause disassociations of the clients. Upgrading the server to 5.1-CURRENT seems to have fixed the problem. Just a report. 4.8-STABLE is still broken... but it's less convenient for me to attempt any tests now. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independant Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:26:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4338C37B41A; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-135.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D78743FA3; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:26:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DAD66CFA; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FA8DAB8; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:26:57 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kai Mosebach Message-ID: <20030730202657.GA81668@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <049c01c356b9$5b34a0a0$0100a8c0@alpha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <049c01c356b9$5b34a0a0$0100a8c0@alpha> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:26:59 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. >=20 > On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. >=20 > Any ideas ? Do you have stale C++ headers in /usr/include? Kris --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KCoRWry0BWjoQKURAiUGAKDN6MFf+OI9x+g2zOyj/vd4RQwRfQCcDGL3 JRpvE1oLAmcM0iU0N70g/pA= =fx1g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:29:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8606D37B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dust.freshx.de (freshx.de [80.190.100.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECB43F85; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:29:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kai.mosebach@freshx.de) Received: from alpha (p508B1B74.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.27.116]) by dust.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3187015E208; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:29:36 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kai Mosebach" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <04a501c356d9$59120130$0100a8c0@alpha> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20030730202657.GA81668@rot13.obsecurity.org> Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: AW: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:29:49 -0000 > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. > > > > On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. > > > > Any ideas ? > > Do you have stale C++ headers in /usr/include? I did a "rm -rf /usr/include" before "make installworld" ... so i dont think so From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:37:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD6937B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-135.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E8C43FA3; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065DB66BE5; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D385FAB8; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:37:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kai Mosebach Message-ID: <20030730203724.GA81738@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030730202657.GA81668@rot13.obsecurity.org> <04a501c356d9$59120130$0100a8c0@alpha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04a501c356d9$59120130$0100a8c0@alpha> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:37:28 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. > > > > > > On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. > > > > > > Any ideas ? > >=20 > > Do you have stale C++ headers in /usr/include? >=20 > I did a "rm -rf /usr/include" before "make installworld" ...=20 > so i dont think so sapdb does not seem to be in ports, so I can't verify this. Anyway, please follow the directions given to you by gcc in reporting the bug. Kris --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KCyEWry0BWjoQKURAg02AKDTVCgYtpg4IFb651snNy8WWGqq5QCg8bOT mAovBRW/db/h8qKvXWlvChw= =s18Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:21:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE15337B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F34A43F75; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:21:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h6ULKo0U036652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:20:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h6ULKo6V036647; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:20:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:20:49 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: make -U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:21:04 -0000 --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, I've accidentally dropped an email about `make -U'. I think that it's not needed, since the functionality can easily be achieved by running "make FOO=3D", i.e., assigning an empty value. Remember that command line variables take precedence over globals, so the following makefile, FOO+=3D bar all: @echo ${FOO} when run as ``make FOO=3Dfoo'', will print just ``foo''. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KDaxUkv4P6juNwoRAmsmAJ9JifxAKvVurSVNWxzBMkBKjz7DSgCfXVHo y6jrvr/xAu5Dvl3VAx0UBxY= =bmO1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:23:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 5CC3037B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:23:20 -0500 From: Juli Mallett To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20030730162320.A66578@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:20:49AM +0300 X-Title: Code Maven X-Towel: Yes X-Negacore: Yes X-Authentication-Warning: localhost: juli pwned teh intarweb cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make -U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:23:20 -0000 * Ruslan Ermilov [ Date: 2003-07-30 ] [ w.r.t. make -U ] > Sorry, I've accidentally dropped an email about `make -U'. > > I think that it's not needed, since the functionality can > easily be achieved by running "make FOO=", i.e., assigning > an empty value. Remember that command line variables take > precedence over globals, so the following makefile, > > FOO+= bar > > all: > @echo ${FOO} > > when run as ``make FOO=foo'', will print just ``foo''. Does that work for the .if defined() case, too? Makefiles can grow to be more complex than just that sort of stuff, after all :) Thanx, juli. (who admits she missed the rest of the conversation) -- juli mallett. email: jmallett@freebsd.org; efnet: juli; aim: bsdflata; i have lost my way home early - i don't care cause i won't stay there. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:27:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BD037B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43D943F75; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:27:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h6ULRi0U037405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:27:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h6ULRiCP037400; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:27:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:27:44 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Juli Mallett Message-ID: <20030730212744.GJ33188@sunbay.com> References: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com> <20030730162320.A66578@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030730162320.A66578@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:27:59 -0000 --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:23:20PM -0500, Juli Mallett wrote: > * Ruslan Ermilov [ Date: 2003-07-30 ] > [ w.r.t. make -U ] > > Sorry, I've accidentally dropped an email about `make -U'. > >=20 > > I think that it's not needed, since the functionality can > > easily be achieved by running "make FOO=3D", i.e., assigning > > an empty value. Remember that command line variables take > > precedence over globals, so the following makefile, > >=20 > > FOO+=3D bar > >=20 > > all: > > @echo ${FOO} > >=20 > > when run as ``make FOO=3Dfoo'', will print just ``foo''. >=20 > Does that work for the .if defined() case, too? Makefiles can grow > to be more complex than just that sort of stuff, after all :) >=20 Not sure what do you mean. The "make -U FOO" was support to undefine the FOO variable, as it the ``.undef FOO'' was called at the end of makefile. Of course, setting FOO=3D on a command line still gets you a "defined" variable, but =2Eif defined(FOO) && !empty(FOO) should do the trick. Try this out with "make FOO=3D": FOO=3D bar all: =2Eif defined(FOO) && !empty(FOO) @echo FOO is set =2Eendif Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KDhQUkv4P6juNwoRAssuAKCJhO7zOgldMvcfLNOZY8/j7FpaIQCdEmD6 HhMwY+Hmb9np9MfNzwI6u3c= =YQZr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:37:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 70F1537B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:37:05 -0500 From: Juli Mallett To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20030730163705.A68092@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030730212049.GI33188@sunbay.com> <20030730162320.A66578@FreeBSD.org> <20030730212744.GJ33188@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030730212744.GJ33188@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:27:44AM +0300 X-Title: Code Maven X-Towel: Yes X-Negacore: Yes X-Authentication-Warning: localhost: juli pwned teh intarweb cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:37:05 -0000 * Ruslan Ermilov [ Date: 2003-07-30 ] [ w.r.t. Re: make -U ] > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:23:20PM -0500, Juli Mallett wrote: > > * Ruslan Ermilov [ Date: 2003-07-30 ] > > [ w.r.t. make -U ] > > > Sorry, I've accidentally dropped an email about `make -U'. > > > > > > I think that it's not needed, since the functionality can > > > easily be achieved by running "make FOO=", i.e., assigning > > > an empty value. Remember that command line variables take > > > precedence over globals, so the following makefile, > > > > > > FOO+= bar > > > > > > all: > > > @echo ${FOO} > > > > > > when run as ``make FOO=foo'', will print just ``foo''. > > > > Does that work for the .if defined() case, too? Makefiles can grow > > to be more complex than just that sort of stuff, after all :) > > > Not sure what do you mean. The "make -U FOO" was support to > undefine the FOO variable, as it the ``.undef FOO'' was called > at the end of makefile. Of course, setting FOO= on a command > line still gets you a "defined" variable, but > > .if defined(FOO) && !empty(FOO) > > should do the trick. Try this out with "make FOO=": > > FOO= bar > > all: > .if defined(FOO) && !empty(FOO) > @echo FOO is set > .endif Why go thru those contortions? I sometimes use "make FOO=" to define things. -U obviously has a place, if it not existing means I have to have all these contortions to do a fairly obvious thing, yeah? Thanx, juli. -- juli mallett. email: jmallett@freebsd.org; efnet: juli; aim: bsdflata; i have lost my way home early - i don't care cause i won't stay there. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:37:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D253737B420; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw2a.lmco.com (mailgw2a.lmco.com [192.91.147.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8521243F85; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from artem.n.tkachenko@lmco.com) Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com ([129.197.181.54]) by mailgw2a.lmco.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6ULb8L27399; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:37:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40643) id <0HIU00E01XDVCS@lmco.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.70]) by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40643) with ESMTP id <0HIU00N31XDU4Q@lmco.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.75]) by EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:06 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:37:06 -0700 From: "Tkachenko, Artem N" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Freebsd-Config (E-mail)" , "Freebsd-Hackers (E-mail)" Message-id: <573562C6FDA9564A8EEE66D899BC190B02A32AD4@EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-Topic: SNMP Thread-Index: AcNW4reDgJncae4QQtKbGDgmGr4UVg== content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2003 21:37:06.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[B9479660:01C356E2] Subject: SNMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:37:13 -0000 Hi, I am new to SNMP. I was asked to set up SNMP agents and a manager on some of the computers in the lab. Can someone recommend some SNMP programs that I can use or a good link on the Internet? I need it for both FreeBSD and Windows machines. Thank you very much for you time. Best regards Artem From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:59:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB77537B404 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.ambrisko.com (adsl-64-174-51-42.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.174.51.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B427943F85 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@www.ambrisko.com) Received: from www.ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6ULwvO7059076; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@www.ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h6ULwieJ059063; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:58:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200307302158.h6ULwieJ059063@www.ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <1059156388.34654.94.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com> To: Russell Cattelan Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:58:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Console serial speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:59:01 -0000 Russell Cattelan writes: | How does one set the serial speed of the console. | I changed the boot loader speed to 57600 in make.conf | but the kernel seems to chose random speeds each time | it's booted. | Sometimes it's 9600 sometimes it 115200 other times | it's 38400. | | Note this is on 5.x current You might want to check sys/isa/sio.c in function siocngetspeed. I comment out the "return (rclk / (16UL * divisor));" on some of my stable boxes. I've seen a few motherboards that result in a messed up console if I don't do it (ie. wrong speed). Doug A. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:45:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E013B37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F1D43F75 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:45:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5A9338A64; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:45:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:45:05 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: Heiner Subject: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:45:08 -0000 --ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi -hackers, discussing some modifications for the sysutils/linneighborhood port, Heiner Eichmann and me came across the following problem: getfsent(3) will fail, if the name of the file system or the mount point contains whitespaces, be them escaped or not (file system names with spaces occur quite of with smbfs mounts). I searched the mail archives and the PR data base, but apart from this email here http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-questions_2003/msg05947.html this problem seems to be either unknown or rather well-known but accepted. I know there is workaround which is to create symbolic links for the paths that contain spaces, but to my mind this is not a real solution. Before taking any further action: Do file system names and mount points with whitespaces violate the specification of fstab? If so, the least thing I'd suggest is the document this restriction. Or should one extend 'getfsent' such that is able to cope with those whitespaces? I am not sure whether this would have any further implications so I am asking here. Cheers, Simon --ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KEpxCkn+/eutqCoRAlzRAJ46Zh5+XSqNUS993HAJYcE/Cejc7gCgs1c7 DRfhMeCjhXhMfci82l6Rth8= =Fulv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:20:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050CC37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688A843FA3 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:20:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UNKocC014881; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:20:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Not Verified[10.0.0.3]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5,0,3,78) id ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:23:37 +1000 Received: from [10.0.17.42] (mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com [10.0.17.42]) by wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D2D3F0F; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:20:43 +1000 (EST) From: Murray Taylor To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Bytecraft Systems Message-Id: <1059607242.64020.5.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 30 Jul 2003 23:20:43 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Heiner Subject: Re: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:20:56 -0000 >From the man page Each filesystem is described on a separate line; fields on each line are separated by tabs or spaces. Clearly, having a space in a filesystem or mount point will violate this constraint, by causing the trailing part to become the next field. Given that this is such a fundamental level in the scheme of things may I suggest that the fstab and mount points maintain the no spaces rule, and allow the higher filesystem (and particularly windoze noddies using SAMBA file shares) to cope with the spaces in filenames stuff.. 0.02c mjt Yes I have a large SAMBA system for the users and Yes a lot of their directories and filenames are 'space laden' .... On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:45, Simon Barner wrote: > Hi -hackers, > > discussing some modifications for the sysutils/linneighborhood port, > Heiner Eichmann and me came across the following problem: > > getfsent(3) will fail, if the name of the file system or the mount point > contains whitespaces, be them escaped or not (file system names with > spaces occur quite of with smbfs mounts). > > I searched the mail archives and the PR data base, but apart from this > email here > > http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-questions_2003/msg05947.html > > this problem seems to be either unknown or rather well-known but > accepted. > > I know there is workaround which is to create symbolic links for the > paths that contain spaces, but to my mind this is not a real solution. > > Before taking any further action: > > Do file system names and mount points with whitespaces violate the > specification of fstab? If so, the least thing I'd suggest is the document > this restriction. > > Or should one extend 'getfsent' such that is able to cope with those > whitespaces? I am not sure whether this would have any further > implications so I am asking here. > > Cheers, > Simon > > ************************************************************************ > This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. > ************************************************************************ -- Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer --------------------------------- Bytecraft Systems & Entertainment P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 M: +61 417 319 256 E: murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com or visit us on the web http://www.bytecraftsystems.com http://www.bytecraftentertainment.com ************************************************************************ This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. ************************************************************************ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:31:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686837B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plum.cyber.com.au (plum.cyber.com.au [203.7.155.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A0B43F93 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from army@cyber.com.au) Received: from vanilla.office.cyber.com.au (vanilla.office.cyber.com.au [192.168.155.226]) by plum.cyber.com.au (8.8.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA12033; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:31:05 +1000 (EST) Received: by vanilla.office.cyber.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1103) id 168C657BADD; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:31:05 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:31:04 +1000 From: Paul Armstrong To: "Tkachenko, Artem N" Message-ID: <20030730233104.GI14068@vanilla.office.cyber.com.au> References: <573562C6FDA9564A8EEE66D899BC190B02A32AD4@EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <573562C6FDA9564A8EEE66D899BC190B02A32AD4@EMSS01M10.us.lmco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: "Freebsd-Hackers \(E-mail\)" Subject: Re: SNMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:31:10 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:37:06PM -0700, Tkachenko, Artem N wrote: > > I am new to SNMP. I was asked to set up SNMP agents and a manager on some of > the computers in the lab. Can someone recommend some SNMP programs that I can > use or a good link on the Internet? I need it for both FreeBSD and Windows > machines. Thank you very much for you time. Best regards Look in /usr/ports/net/net-snmp http://www.net-snmp.org Also, please don't cross post... Paul From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:31:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CAB37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F6E43F3F for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org (ugly.x.kientzle.com [66.166.149.53]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UNVXsE059446; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3F285560.2090607@acm.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:31:44 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021005 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Murray Taylor References: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1059607242.64020.5.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Heiner Subject: Re: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:31:45 -0000 >>Do file system names and mount points with whitespaces violate the >>specification of fstab? If so, the least thing I'd suggest is the document >>this restriction. >> >>Or should one extend 'getfsent' such that is able to cope with those >>whitespaces? I am not sure whether this would have any further >>implications so I am asking here. Formal standards tend to avoid "system administration" issues such as this. I doubt you would be violating any published standard. I say go for it. If something else breaks because of this change, let's fix that, too. I like the fact that FreeBSD works pretty well with other systems; lets keep pushing that. Tim Kientzle From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:46:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D39537B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E443F3F for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UNjocC015054; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:45:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Not Verified[10.0.0.3]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5,0,3,78) id ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:48:37 +1000 Received: from [10.0.17.42] (mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com [10.0.17.42]) by wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42483F0F; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:45:49 +1000 (EST) From: Murray Taylor To: kientzle@acm.org In-Reply-To: <3F285560.2090607@acm.org> References: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1059607242.64020.5.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> <3F285560.2090607@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Bytecraft Systems Message-Id: <1059608748.64020.10.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 30 Jul 2003 23:45:49 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Heiner cc: Murray Taylor Subject: Re: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:46:04 -0000 Just a thort, not having tried it .. does either of the 'standard' methods of including spaces actually work in fstab ?? I speak of quoting (either single or double) and backslashing the space "/mnt/space/silly long dirname/filename also with spaces" or /mnt/space/silly\ long\ dirname/filename\ also\ with\ spaces mjt On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 23:31, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Do file system names and mount points with whitespaces violate the > >>specification of fstab? If so, the least thing I'd suggest is the document > >>this restriction. > >> > >>Or should one extend 'getfsent' such that is able to cope with those > >>whitespaces? I am not sure whether this would have any further > >>implications so I am asking here. > > Formal standards tend to avoid "system administration" > issues such as this. I doubt you would be violating any > published standard. > > I say go for it. If something else breaks because > of this change, let's fix that, too. I like the fact > that FreeBSD works pretty well with other systems; lets > keep pushing that. > > Tim Kientzle > > > ************************************************************************ > This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. > ************************************************************************ -- Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer --------------------------------- Bytecraft Systems & Entertainment P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 M: +61 417 319 256 E: murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com or visit us on the web http://www.bytecraftsystems.com http://www.bytecraftentertainment.com ************************************************************************ This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. ************************************************************************ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:08:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F6B37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40D43FAF for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:08:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2EA038A67; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:08:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:08:42 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Murray Taylor Message-ID: <20030731000842.GE531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1059607242.64020.5.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> <3F285560.2090607@acm.org> <1059608748.64020.10.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1059608748.64020.10.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Murray Taylor cc: Heiner cc: kientzle@acm.org Subject: Re: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:08:45 -0000 --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Just a thort, not having tried it .. >=20 > does either of the 'standard' methods of including spaces actually work > in fstab ?? >=20 > I speak of quoting (either single or double) and backslashing the space >=20 > "/mnt/space/silly long dirname/filename also with spaces" >=20 > or >=20 > /mnt/space/silly\ long\ dirname/filename\ also\ with\ spaces Sorry, I should have written that I have performed tests: Here is what I did: test\ 1 /mnt/test\ 1 ufs ro 0 0 'test 2' '/mnt/test 2' ufs ro 0 0 "test 3" "/mnt/test 3" ufs ro 0 0 This test program ---> snip <-- #include int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { struct fstab *f; =09 while (0 !=3D (f =3D getfsent ())) { printf ("%s %s %s\n", f->fs_spec, f->fs_file, f->fs_vfstype); } =09 return 0; } ---> snip <-- Gives me the following output: /dev/ad0s2b none swap /dev/ad0s1a / ufs /dev/ad0s2g /usr ufs /dev/ad0s2f /home ufs /dev/ad0s2e /var ufs /dev/vinum/mucke /samba-export ufs /dev/acd0c /mnt/cdrom cd9660 /dev/fd0.1440 /mnt/floppy msdos proc /proc procfs kern /kern kernfs linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs fstab: /etc/fstab:14: Inappropriate file type or format fstab: /etc/fstab:15: Inappropriate file type or format fstab: /etc/fstab:16: Inappropriate file type or format Simon --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KF4KCkn+/eutqCoRApBjAJkB+bIuI2N1yGjr2UNkDBBZCRsVuACgwrd3 0+3hEz+inSvZoaPX2RaMpLU= =JE9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:27:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0D737B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts8.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9097143F93 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:27:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@compar.com) Received: from hermes ([65.95.177.176]) by tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with SMTP id <20030731002722.FOTN4447.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@hermes>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:27:22 -0400 Message-ID: <002201c356fa$4a66a700$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matthew Emmerton" To: "Murray Taylor" , References: <20030730224505.GD531@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1059607242.64020.5.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> <3F285560.2090607@acm.org> <1059608748.64020.10.camel@mjtdev1.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:25:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Heiner cc: Murray Taylor Subject: Re: getfsent(3) and spaces in fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:27:25 -0000 No, none of these methods will work. This very discussion came up in -questions a few months ago (or maybe it was late last year). The conclusion was that unless someone rewrites the /etc/fstab parsing routines in libc to support quoted and/or escaped spaces, we'll never be able to mount filesystems that have spaces in their names. -- Matt Emmerton > Just a thort, not having tried it .. > > does either of the 'standard' methods of including spaces actually work > in fstab ?? > > I speak of quoting (either single or double) and backslashing the space > > "/mnt/space/silly long dirname/filename also with spaces" > > or > > /mnt/space/silly\ long\ dirname/filename\ also\ with\ spaces > > > mjt > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 23:31, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > >>Do file system names and mount points with whitespaces violate the > > >>specification of fstab? If so, the least thing I'd suggest is the document > > >>this restriction. > > >> > > >>Or should one extend 'getfsent' such that is able to cope with those > > >>whitespaces? I am not sure whether this would have any further > > >>implications so I am asking here. > > > > Formal standards tend to avoid "system administration" > > issues such as this. I doubt you would be violating any > > published standard. > > > > I say go for it. If something else breaks because > > of this change, let's fix that, too. I like the fact > > that FreeBSD works pretty well with other systems; lets > > keep pushing that. > > > > Tim Kientzle > > > > > > ************************************************************************ > > This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. > > ************************************************************************ > -- > Murray Taylor > Special Projects Engineer > --------------------------------- > Bytecraft Systems & Entertainment > P: +61 3 8710 2555 > F: +61 3 8710 2599 > D: +61 3 9238 4275 > M: +61 417 319 256 > E: murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com > or visit us on the web > http://www.bytecraftsystems.com > http://www.bytecraftentertainment.com > > > > ************************************************************************ > This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. > ************************************************************************ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 21:41:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D194C37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from natto.numachi.com (natto.numachi.com [198.175.254.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0693F43FB1 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:41:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: (qmail 11336 invoked by uid 1001); 31 Jul 2003 04:41:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:41:22 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030731044122.GE9252@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: cell phone syncing under freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:41:24 -0000 This may not be the best list for this question; please redirect me if you have a better suggestion. My question: are there any cell phones for which there exists sync software that works under FreeBSD? I found a Linux page, but haven't had the time (yet) to go sifting though the ports collection: http://tuxmobil.org/phones_linux_misc_brands.html (Still floundering...) Thanks for any advice... -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA BSD admin/developer at large From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:40:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3863737B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net (bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABDD43FBD for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:40:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0sl.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.3.149] helo=mindspring.com) by bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19i82v-0000GW-00; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:40:22 -0700 Message-ID: <3F28C7AD.4E1942CA@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:39:25 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> <20030730.001013.53573754.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4098888a8d10a37d2bf8cb240ff2b1f04350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au Subject: Re: usb (ucom) driver code comments..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:40:34 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > In message: <200307301041.16162.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au> > JacobRhoden writes: > : I am trying to get a device working which uses ucom, and the ucom code has no > : comments whatsoever, I am able to work bits out, I was wondering if there was > : any sort of documentation whatsoever on this area? > > Use the source luke. However, you'll need to look closely at > sys/kern/tty* as well. Looking at something like umodem that > implements a ucom plug in might be useful too. You might check out > the handbook too, but I think that the usb docs there don't > specifically cover usb. There was also a patch posted to the -current or -hackers mailing list around about the end of May that switched 0 and 1 and made made this wort of thing work for another USB device. -- Terry From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 01:18:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0C037B401; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dust.freshx.de (freshx.de [80.190.100.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9367D43FBD; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:18:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kai.mosebach@freshx.de) Received: from alpha (p508B2376.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.35.118]) by dust.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFE815E2B9; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:17:57 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kai Mosebach" To: , Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:18:14 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c3573c$4ae93e80$0100a8c0@alpha> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: [Bug c++/11735] [3.3 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:18:03 -0000 Here about the latest bug, i was telling about ... Regards Kai -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 01:45 An: sapdb@komadev.de Betreff: [Bug c++/11735] [3.3 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-30 23:44 ------- I can confirm this on 3.3 (20030707). And it does not seg fault in 3.2.3 and the mainline=20 (20030730) but I do not have the time to reduce this so marking as invalid so it can be=20 marked as .... According to Phil's regression hunter this is already fixed in 3.3.1 (20030729). I also cannot reproduce it on 3.3.1 (20030714). So this is fixed for 3.3.1 which should be released in the next two weeks. Since you are already using a prelease I would update your prelease. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 01:30:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1414137B401; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FE443F85; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:30:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0sl.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.3.149] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19i8oz-0005X4-00; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:30:02 -0700 Message-ID: <3F28D351.B812ADEC@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:29:05 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kai Mosebach References: <049c01c356b9$5b34a0a0$0100a8c0@alpha> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4201be0800d0aafde4e36463e1387ee14387f7b89c61deb1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:30:10 -0000 Kai Mosebach wrote: > Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. > > On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. > > Any ideas ? This is pretty ugly, but put a space before the ::'s on that line. -- Terry From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:50:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2820937B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.co.ru (mail1.co.ru [194.85.128.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEB243FA3 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:50:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd1@centrum.cz) Received: from mailhub.co.ru ([194.85.128.15] verified) by mail1.co.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 32378682 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:50:55 +0400 Received: from 195.16.34.55 (n3-55.dialup.co.ru [195.16.34.55]) by mailhub.co.ru (8.12.9/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h6V9oqEv004302 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:50:54 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:50:56 +0400 From: Buckie X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <344955013.20030731135056@centrum.cz> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ultra ATA card doesn't seem to provide Ultra speeds. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Buckie List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:50:59 -0000 Hello hackers! I hope someone can help me with this since you know the internals of FreeBSD much more than me. Hope it doesn't take much time. The sort of problem I'm having is this: after installing a new Ultra ATA card (it's based on Silicon Image 0680 chip by the way) although the disks start to run at UATA6 (133) mode (as seen in dmesg output or atacontrol), I see absolutely no improvement compared to WDMA2 mode they used to run previously. I still can get around 14Mb/s on dd transfers, but there has to be more? My motherboard only supports WDMA2 mode and nothing more and that's why I bought the card. Is there any trick I forgot to apply? The drive is Maxtor 120Gb Diamond Plus 9. Also, file transfers from mounted NTFS seem to be very very slow, much slower than UFS transfers, what gives (when using mkisofs for example for burning CDs)? Hope someone can shed some light on this... Z From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:57:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFF137B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F3E43F93 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:57:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h6V9v1xb025968; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:57:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Soeren Schmidt Message-Id: <200307310957.h6V9v1xb025968@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <344955013.20030731135056@centrum.cz> To: Buckie Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:57:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL98b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ultra ATA card doesn't seem to provide Ultra speeds. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:57:06 -0000 It seems Buckie wrote: > Hello hackers! > > I hope someone can help me with this since you know the internals of > FreeBSD much more than me. Hope it doesn't take much time. > > The sort of problem I'm having is this: after installing a new Ultra > ATA card (it's based on Silicon Image 0680 chip by the way) although > the disks start to run at UATA6 (133) mode (as seen in dmesg output or > atacontrol), I see absolutely no > improvement compared to WDMA2 mode they used to run previously. I > still can get around 14Mb/s on dd transfers, but there has to be > more? My motherboard only supports WDMA2 mode and nothing more and > that's why I bought the card. Is there any trick I forgot to apply? > The drive is Maxtor 120Gb Diamond Plus 9. > Also, file transfers from mounted NTFS seem to be very very slow, much > slower than UFS transfers, what gives (when using mkisofs for example > for burning CDs)? > > Hope someone can shed some light on this... Possibly, but you need to give us info so we can try to diagnose the problem "it doesn't work" it not enough, so please provide at least: FreeBSD version (output of uname -a) Boot log (output of dmesg) -Søren From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 03:05:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBC537B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeus.east.utcluj.ro (zeus.east.utcluj.ro [193.226.7.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1A843FCB for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:05:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@zeus.east.utcluj.ro) Received: from paul (abulafia.east.utcluj.ro [193.226.7.158]) by zeus.east.utcluj.ro (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h6VAPoe29120; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:25:50 +0300 Message-ID: <011001c3574b$3ffaf180$9e07e2c1@paul> From: "Paul JURCO" To: "Buckie" References: <344955013.20030731135056@centrum.cz> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:05:14 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultra ATA card doesn't seem to provide Ultra speeds. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:05:47 -0000 for me works just fine: atapci0: port 0xf400-0xf40f,0xf000-0xf003,0xe800-0xe807,0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe007 mem 0xfedff800-0xfedff8ff irq 11 at device 17.0 on pci0 with: ad0: 19073MB [38752/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 on: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE CPU: Pentium/P55C (166.19-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8003bf real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127156224 (124176K bytes) Programming 16 pins in IOAPIC #0 EISA INTCONTROL = 00001e00 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec00000 now my networks speed is 4-5 mb/sec (old speed it was 700-800 kb/sec) paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Buckie" To: Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:50 PM Subject: Ultra ATA card doesn't seem to provide Ultra speeds. > Hello hackers! > > I hope someone can help me with this since you know the internals of > FreeBSD much more than me. Hope it doesn't take much time. > > The sort of problem I'm having is this: after installing a new Ultra > ATA card (it's based on Silicon Image 0680 chip by the way) although > the disks start to run at UATA6 (133) mode (as seen in dmesg output or > atacontrol), I see absolutely no > improvement compared to WDMA2 mode they used to run previously. I > still can get around 14Mb/s on dd transfers, but there has to be > more? My motherboard only supports WDMA2 mode and nothing more and > that's why I bought the card. Is there any trick I forgot to apply? > The drive is Maxtor 120Gb Diamond Plus 9. > Also, file transfers from mounted NTFS seem to be very very slow, much > slower than UFS transfers, what gives (when using mkisofs for example > for burning CDs)? > > Hope someone can shed some light on this... > > > Z > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 03:54:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F167437B401 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.co.ru (mail1.co.ru [194.85.128.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA6343FBD for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:54:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd1@centrum.cz) Received: from mailhub.co.ru ([194.85.128.15] verified) by mail1.co.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 32393188; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:54:38 +0400 Received: from 195.16.34.34 (n3-34.dialup.co.ru [195.16.34.34]) by mailhub.co.ru (8.12.9/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h6VAsUEv011817; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:54:34 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:54:32 +0400 From: Buckie X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1757258773.20030731145432@centrum.cz> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200307310957.h6V9v1xb025968@spider.deepcore.dk> References: <200307310957.h6V9v1xb025968@spider.deepcore.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mailhub.co.ru id h6VAsUEv011817 cc: Soeren Schmidt Subject: Re: Ultra ATA card doesn't seem to provide Ultra speeds. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Buckie List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:54:41 -0000 Hello again. Sorry I just forgot to provide at least a version number. Stupid me. It's FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE and here's a dmesg output. Also, it's not that it 'doesn't work', it works, but I see no difference in speed after changing transfer modes (from WDMA2 to UDMA6) Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #10: Wed Jul 30 12:18:51 MSD 2003 root@Five.365:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KIT Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0465000. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium Pro (200.46-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x619 Stepping =3D 9 Features=3D0xfbff real memory =3D 201326592 (192 MB) avail memory =3D 190713856 (181 MB) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 16 -> irq 12 IOAPIC #0 intpin 17 -> irq 11 IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 10 IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 15 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fdd00 apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 = on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x9000-0x901f irq 15 a= t device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ukbd0: vendor 0x099a USB Multimedia Keyboard, rev 1.10/1.01, addr 2, icla= ss 3/1 ums0: Kensington Kensington USB/PS2 Orbit, rev 1.10/4.00, addr 3, iclass = 3/1 ums0: 2 buttons drm0: <3dfx Voodoo3 3000> port 0x9400-0x94ff mem 0xe2000000-0xe3ffffff,0x= e0000000-0xe1ffffff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 info: [drm] Initialized tdfx 1.0.0 20010216 on minor 0 pcm0: port 0x9800-0x983f irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci= 0 pcm0: ed0: port 0x9c00-0x9c1f irq 15 at de= vice 11.0 on pci0 ed0: address 00:e0:4c:dd:23:1c, type NE2000 (16 bit)=20 atapci1: port 0xb000-0xb00f,0xac00-0xac03,0= xa800-0xa807,0xa400-0xa403,0xa000-0xa007 mem 0xe4000000-0xe40000ff irq 12= at device 12.0 on pci0 ata2: at 0xa000 on atapci1 ata3: at 0xa800 on atapci1 orm0: