From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 00:54:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4BF16A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 00:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F99744003 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 00:54:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AImKJ-00067g-00 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:57:47 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AImKJ-000672-00 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:57:47 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA98sxg1036337 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:54:59 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hA98sxtk036147 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:54:59 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:54:59 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031109085459.GA31751@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Status of unionfs in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:54:03 -0000 Hi there, Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in (semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject? Probably any information would be appreciated. Thanks so far, ./danfe