From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:10:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082C416A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EC024405A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:10:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 38367 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Dec 2003 18:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.5?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 18:10:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:15:02 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:10:57 -0000 All, 5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA bits to make more room? Scott From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:13:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E74416A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C4243F3F; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:13:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesper@skriver.dk) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8B6C81147A; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:13:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:13:44 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031208181344.GC71561@skriver.dk> References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B88 9CE8 66E9 E631 C9C5 5EB4 22AB F0EC F956 1C31 X-PGP-Public-Key: http://freesbee.wheel.dk/~jesper/gpgkey.pub cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:13:47 -0000 On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:15:02AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > 5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA > bits to make more room? ftp.dk.FreeBSD.org ftp.FreeBSD.org (DK half) both have plenty of space, except on the partitions used for ports, so as long as you're not uploading a new set of packages, I think you can leave 5.2-BETA. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:14:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BEF16A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mail.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00B243FBD; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:14:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from l.ertl@univie.ac.at) Received: from wireless (adslle.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.102.11]) hB8IE17h476702; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:14:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:14:01 +0100 (CET) From: Lukas Ertl To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> Message-ID: <20031208191336.U632@korben.in.tern> References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mailbox 4246; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:14:32 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Scott Long wrote: > Should I remove the 5.2-BETA bits to make more room? Yes, please. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:16:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6B016A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C6F43FA3; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:16:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB8IGDus012334; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:16:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8IGDod012333; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:16:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:16:13 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031208181613.GA12198@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:16:16 -0000 On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:15:02AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > 5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA > bits to make more room? No, I removed the 5.0-release package sets a couple of days ago so there should be plenty of room. I'll remove the 5.2-BETA bits two days after the 5.2-RC1 bits arrive. Thanks for the offer though. :-) -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:39:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2ED16A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tcoip.com.br (erato.tco.net.br [200.220.254.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A110043F3F; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:39:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@tcoip.com.br) Received: from tcoip.com.br ([10.0.2.6]) by mail.tcoip.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB8Idfb14180; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:39:41 -0200 Message-ID: <3FD4C56D.408@tcoip.com.br> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:39:41 -0200 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pt-br, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> In-Reply-To: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:39:48 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > All, >=20 > 5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA > bits to make more room? Personally, I'd prefer it. --=20 Daniel C. Sobral Ger=EAncia de Opera=E7=F5es Divis=E3o de Comunica=E7=E3o de Dados Coordena=E7=E3o de Seguran=E7a VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.br From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:46:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61FE16A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF8643FBF; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:46:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB8IkEus013316; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:46:14 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8IkEvr013315; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:46:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:46:14 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Message-ID: <20031208184614.GB12198@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> <3FD4C56D.408@tcoip.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD4C56D.408@tcoip.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Scott Long cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:46:17 -0000 On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:39:41PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA > >bits to make more room? > > Personally, I'd prefer it. Ok, since we have two yes votes so far... I made the backup copies of the BETA bits on ftp-master and change my vote to "I don't care." :-) -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:53:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5F116A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ldc.ro (ldc-gw.rdsnet.ro [213.157.163.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D78A43FF5 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:53:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from razor@ldc.ro) Received: (qmail 37214 invoked by uid 666); 8 Dec 2003 18:53:29 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:53:28 +0200 From: Alex Popa To: hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Popa , hubs@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:53:33 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". Thank you Alex Popa cvsup.ro.freebsd.org admin ------------+------------------------------------------------------- Alex Popa, | "Computer science is no more about computers than razor@ldc.ro| astronomy is about telescopes" -- E. W. Dijkstra ------------+------------------------------------------------------- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Delivered-To: razor-rofug@ldc.ro Received: (qmail 41365 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 15:12:00 -0000 Received: from daemon.rofug.ro (217.156.25.30) by ns.ldc.ro with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 15:12:00 -0000 Received: from daemon.rofug.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.rofug.ro (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB8E3fNv013419; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:03:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from rofug-bounce@rofug.ro) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list rofug); Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:03:39 +0200 (EET) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by daemon.rofug.ro (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB8E3INv013407 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:03:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 11493 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 14:02:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 14:02:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:03:43 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: rofug@rofug.ro Subject: [rofug] Se mai intampla cuiva ? Message-Id: <20031208160343.0a1acfc9.itetcu@apropo.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 4142 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: rofug-bounce@rofug.ro Errors-to: rofug-bounce@rofug.ro X-original-sender: itetcu@apropo.ro Precedence: bulk Reply-to: rofug@rofug.ro X-list: rofug De vreo 2 ore nu mai pot sa trimit nimic pe listele @freebsd.org. Si zau ca n-am schimbat nimic. Mai are cineva problema asta ? Mesri, IOnut Begin forwarded message: Date: 8 Dec 2003 13:36:35 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON@rdsnet.ro To: itetcu2@xnet.ro Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at rdsnet.ro. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : (freebsd-current@freebsd.org) 216.136.204.125 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 550 Error: Message content rejected --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27772 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 13:36:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 13:36:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:37:13 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, itetcu@apropo.ro Subject: fsck sig 11 (cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo) Message-Id: <20031208153713.07056bf6.itetcu2@xnet.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've sent the mesage on question with no reply so I'm trying my luck here. I am able to reproduce both dump/restore and the fsck errors, even after a fdisk-ing, labeling and newfs-ing (from the sysinstall). The nice thing is that everithing seems to be ok (e.g. on new system install it comes up and run OK) untill the first unclean shutdown, when fsck complaines about the UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY. Hi, FreeBSD it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro 5.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed Nov 19 00:01:27 EET 2003 root@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IT1 i386 I was trying to dump/restore my data from my 40G HDD (ad3) on a bigger 120G HDD (ad0). I've booted from the CD, used sysinstall to devide the disk, installed the minimal distribution, boot up on the new install. Rebooted with the old system (multiuser but in the console and with no activity beside dump/restore, with all /usr/local/etc/rc.d stoped), mounted each new slice and rm -rf * the content. dump/restore ad3s2a to ad0s1a (/) dump/restore ad3s2d to ad0s3d (/tmp) dump/restore ad3s2e to ad0s1e (/var) Untill here everithing OK. # mount /dev/ad0s3f /mnt # mkdir /mnt/home # mount /dev/ad0s3g /mnt/home # cd /mnt # dump 0aLf - / | restore xf - Sometime after 1/3 got dumped I've fpund myself in the debbuger with: /mnt: bad dirino 753722 panic: ufs_dirbad at offset 0: mangled entry I've hit the wrong key so I do not have a core, but I'm confident I can reproduce if needed. Rebooted. After fsck-ing the current disk with good results on the new disk I get the errors, with fsck saying (complete messages at the end): for ad0s3f cannot alloc xxxxxxxxxx bytes for inoinfo and ending with fsck_4.2bsd: bad inode number 376832 to nextinode for ad0s3g cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=47104 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY fsck: /dev/ad0s3g: Segmentation fault ******* Working on device /dev/ad0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=232578 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=232578 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 514017 (250 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 31/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 6 (0x06),(Primary 'big' DOS (>= 32MB)) start 514080, size 41929650 (20473 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 32/ head 0/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 3 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 42443730, size 191992815 (93746 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 4 is: it# bsdlabel -A /dev/ad0s2c # /dev/ad0s3c: type: ESDI disk: ad0s3 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 14593 sectors/unit: 234439535 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] b: 2053552 42443730 swap c: 191992815 42443730 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 524288 44497282 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 e: 524288 45021570 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 f: 52428800 45545858 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 136461887 97974658 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 bsdlabel: partition c doesn't start at 0! bsdlabel: partition c doesn't cover the whole unit! bsdlabel: An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities it# fsck -n ad0s3g ** /dev/ad0s3g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /mnt/home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=47104 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY fsck: /dev/ad0s3g: Segmentation fault it# fsck -n ad0s3f ** /dev/ad0s3f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /mnt ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes cannot alloc 688847944 bytes for inoinfo UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353280 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353281 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353282 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no [..] UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376827 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376828 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376829 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no PARTIALLY ALLOCATED INODE I=376830 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376831 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CLEAR? no fsck_4.2bsd: bad inode number 376832 to nextinode Any help will be greatly appreciated. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user __________________________________________________________ Send 'unsubscribe rofug' to listar@rofug.ro to unsubscribe --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:08:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1937316A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8973643FF2; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:08:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB8J8Pus014075; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:08:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8J8PVA014074; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:08:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:08:25 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Alex Popa , hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20031208190825.GA13991@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:08:29 -0000 On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:53:28PM +0200, Alex Popa wrote: > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if > anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when > sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, > which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail > gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". One of the mail filtering rules was accidentally set a bit too "agressive" early this morning. It was fixed a couple of hours ago. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:13:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F099916A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:13:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from arthur.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB0E43F85 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:13:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simon@arthur.nitro.dk) Received: by arthur.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 3844D117DE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:13:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:13:25 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Alex Popa Message-ID: <20031208191323.GD661@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="maH1Gajj2nflutpK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:13:29 -0000 --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.12.08 20:53:28 +0200, Alex Popa wrote: > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if > anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when > sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, > which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail > gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". There was a problem earlier today, but I just got a mail from David Wolfskill (postmaster@) saying that it should be fixed now. The testmail I just sent came back fine, so I think it's OK again. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/1M1Th9pcDSc1mlERAhWSAJ4wjS8Q64ql3n+tI2GZKkFKNYhGfACginyk n8IR8t80wKFpC3MFJ5pVH30= =EwKo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --maH1Gajj2nflutpK-- From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:32:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFECA16A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0F9543D24 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:32:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 98531 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2003 19:31:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20031209193121.98528.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> References: <20031208111253.I86077@pooker.samsco.home> <3FD4C56D.408@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3FD4C56D.408@tcoip.com.br> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 21:31:21 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Scott Long cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RC1 coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:32:12 -0000 Since disk space is very valuable for me (as of now) I prefer that too. Daniel C. Sobral writes: > Scott Long wrote: > >> All, >> >> 5.2-RC1 will likely be uploaded tonight. Should I remove the 5.2-BETA >> bits to make more room? > > Personally, I'd prefer it. > > -- > Daniel C. Sobral > Gerência de Operações > Divisão de Comunicação de Dados > Coordenação de Segurança > VIVO Centro Oeste Norte > Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 > E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br > Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br > dcs@tcoip.com.br > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hubs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ----------------------- Omer Faruk Sen http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG Software Development Team @ Turkey http://www.Faruk.NET For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc ******************************************************** FreeBSD - because Unix isn't just #include ! From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:41:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4DB16A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB1443D65; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:40:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id UAA23207; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:40:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from uriah.heep.sax.de (localhost.heep.sax.de [127.0.0.1]) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hB8JWUEj011421; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:32:30 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id hB8JWUCp011420; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:32:30 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:32:30 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch To: Alex Popa , hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20031208203230.B8827@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro>; from razor@ldc.ro on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:53:28PM +0200 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: 5E84 F980 C3CA FD4B B584 1070 F48C A81B 69A8 5873 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:41:46 -0000 As Alex Popa wrote: > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking > if anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected > when sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on > apropo.ro, which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, > and his mail gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". IIRC, freebsd.org's MTAs insist on a correctly set up DNS reverse lookup for the MTA delivering to them. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 12:46:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243C716A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4958A43D29; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:45:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1ATSF5-0005Zu-UW; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:44:31 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:44:31 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20031208204431.GF18768@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> <20031208190825.GA13991@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031208190825.GA13991@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: Alex Popa cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:46:24 -0000 --z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:08:25PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:53:28PM +0200, Alex Popa wrote: >=20 > > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if > > anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when > > sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, > > which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail > > gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". >=20 > One of the mail filtering rules was accidentally set a bit too > "agressive" early this morning. It was fixed a couple of hours > ago. BTW one commit message (irc/epic4) wasn't delivered also. -Kirill --z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/1OKvQC1G6a60JuURAgnjAJ9Mn6Rt9WTM+t4JOO7ZutK/MuBMHgCeM8v6 zlhhH2vaZ0gt1uc0fFelg2A= =kpiW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS-- From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 12:59:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82D716A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5E543D13; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:59:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317023D28; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:58:14 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Kirill Ponomarew Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:58:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3FD49F94.28124.5E5F1BCE@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20031208204431.GF18768@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20031208190825.GA13991@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:59:21 -0000 On 8 Dec 2003 at 21:44, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:08:25PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:53:28PM +0200, Alex Popa wrote: > > > > > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if > > > anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when > > > sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, > > > which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail > > > gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". > > > > One of the mail filtering rules was accidentally set a bit too > > "agressive" early this morning. It was fixed a couple of hours > > ago. > > BTW one commit message (irc/epic4) wasn't delivered also. I'd like to keep FreshPorts up to date. Does anyone have the bounced message? If not, I'll do this by hand. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 02:55:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD3C16A4CF for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-out-01.utu.fi (smtp-out-01.utu.fi [130.232.202.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9982143D2F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:55:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) Received: from izar.utu.fi (mailhost.utu.fi [130.232.1.5]) by smtp01.mess.utu.fi (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HPM009WFJFKJC@smtp01.mess.utu.fi> for hubs@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:50:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from ispro.net.tr (perpetual.yok.utu.fi [130.232.138.155]) by izar.utu.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A602CC2B; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:50:08 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:49:02 +0200 From: Evren Yurtesen In-reply-to: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> To: Alex Popa Message-id: <3FD5A89E.4020108@ispro.net.tr> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030808 References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:55:06 -0000 I tried to subscribe myself to one freebsd list and my email got rejected. I dont know why. I only had word subscribe I guess I wasnt supposed to send it to the list though? :) Alex Popa wrote: > Attached is a message from one user here in Romania, who is asking if > anyone else is seeing these problems. His mail gets rejected when > sending from two accounts, one on xnet.ro and another one on apropo.ro, > which is webmail. The contents of the message looks OK, and his mail > gets rejected even if he sends just the word "test". > > Thank you > Alex Popa > cvsup.ro.freebsd.org admin > > ------------+------------------------------------------------------- > Alex Popa, | "Computer science is no more about computers than > razor@ldc.ro| astronomy is about telescopes" -- E. W. Dijkstra > ------------+------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > [rofug] Se mai intampla cuiva ? > From: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu > Date: > Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:03:43 +0200 > To: > rofug@rofug.ro > > > De vreo 2 ore nu mai pot sa trimit nimic pe listele @freebsd.org. Si zau > ca n-am schimbat nimic. > > Mai are cineva problema asta ? > > Mesri, > IOnut > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: 8 Dec 2003 13:36:35 -0000 > From: MAILER-DAEMON@rdsnet.ro > To: itetcu2@xnet.ro > Subject: failure notice > > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at rdsnet.ro. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > : > (freebsd-current@freebsd.org) 216.136.204.125 failed after I sent the message. > Remote host said: 550 Error: Message content rejected > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: > Received: (qmail 27772 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 13:36:26 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) > by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 13:36:26 -0000 > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:37:13 +0200 > From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, itetcu@apropo.ro > Subject: fsck sig 11 (cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo) > Message-Id: <20031208153713.07056bf6.itetcu2@xnet.ro> > X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I've sent the mesage on question with no reply so I'm trying my luck > here. I am able to reproduce both dump/restore and the fsck errors, even > after a fdisk-ing, labeling and newfs-ing (from the sysinstall). > > The nice thing is that everithing seems to be ok (e.g. on new system > install it comes up and run OK) untill the first unclean shutdown, when > fsck complaines about the UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY. > > > > Hi, > > > FreeBSD it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro 5.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD > 5.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed Nov 19 00:01:27 EET 2003 > root@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IT1 i386 > > > I was trying to dump/restore my data from my 40G HDD (ad3) on a bigger > 120G HDD (ad0). > > I've booted from the CD, used sysinstall to devide the disk, installed > the minimal distribution, boot up on the new install. Rebooted with the > old system (multiuser but in the console and with no activity beside > dump/restore, with all /usr/local/etc/rc.d stoped), mounted each new > slice and rm -rf * the content. > > dump/restore ad3s2a to ad0s1a (/) > dump/restore ad3s2d to ad0s3d (/tmp) > dump/restore ad3s2e to ad0s1e (/var) > > Untill here everithing OK. > > # mount /dev/ad0s3f /mnt > # mkdir /mnt/home > # mount /dev/ad0s3g /mnt/home > # cd /mnt > # dump 0aLf - / | restore xf - > > Sometime after 1/3 got dumped I've fpund myself in the debbuger with: > /mnt: bad dirino 753722 > panic: ufs_dirbad at offset 0: mangled entry > > I've hit the wrong key so I do not have a core, but I'm confident I can > reproduce if needed. > > Rebooted. After fsck-ing the current disk with good results on the new > disk I get the errors, with fsck saying (complete messages at the end): > for ad0s3f > cannot alloc xxxxxxxxxx bytes for inoinfo > and ending with > fsck_4.2bsd: bad inode number 376832 to nextinode > > for ad0s3g > cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=47104 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > fsck: /dev/ad0s3g: Segmentation fault > > > ******* Working on device /dev/ad0 ******* > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=232578 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) > > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cylinders=232578 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 63, size 514017 (250 Meg), flag 0 > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 31/ head 254/ sector 63 > The data for partition 2 is: > sysid 6 (0x06),(Primary 'big' DOS (>= 32MB)) > start 514080, size 41929650 (20473 Meg), flag 0 > beg: cyl 32/ head 0/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > The data for partition 3 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 42443730, size 191992815 (93746 Meg), flag 0 > beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > The data for partition 4 is: > > > it# bsdlabel -A /dev/ad0s2c > # /dev/ad0s3c: > type: ESDI > disk: ad0s3 > label: > flags: > bytes/sector: 512 > sectors/track: 63 > tracks/cylinder: 255 > sectors/cylinder: 16065 > cylinders: 14593 > sectors/unit: 234439535 > rpm: 3600 > interleave: 1 > trackskew: 0 > cylinderskew: 0 > headswitch: 0 # milliseconds > track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds > drivedata: 0 > > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > b: 2053552 42443730 swap > c: 191992815 42443730 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > d: 524288 44497282 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 > e: 524288 45021570 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 > f: 52428800 45545858 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > g: 136461887 97974658 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > bsdlabel: partition c doesn't start at 0! > bsdlabel: partition c doesn't cover the whole unit! > bsdlabel: An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities > > > it# fsck -n ad0s3g > ** /dev/ad0s3g (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on /mnt/home > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > cannot alloc 4216257920 bytes for inoinfo > > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=47104 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > fsck: /dev/ad0s3g: Segmentation fault > > > it# fsck -n ad0s3f > ** /dev/ad0s3f (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on /mnt > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > cannot alloc 688847944 bytes for inoinfo > > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353280 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353281 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=353282 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > > [..] > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376827 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376828 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376829 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > PARTIALLY ALLOCATED INODE I=376830 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=376831 > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > CLEAR? no > > fsck_4.2bsd: bad inode number 376832 to nextinode > > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hubs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 10:59:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 0853516A4CF; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:59:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:59:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Evren Yurtesen Message-ID: <20031209185956.GA10414@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20031208185328.GA96184@ldc.ro> <3FD5A89E.4020108@ispro.net.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD5A89E.4020108@ispro.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Alex Popa cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Content filtering gone mad on mx1.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:59:56 -0000 On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:02PM +0200, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > I tried to subscribe myself to one freebsd list and my email got rejected. > I dont know why. > I only had word subscribe > I guess I wasnt supposed to send it to the list though? :) Sending subscribe/unsubscribe messages to the list is really annoying, so if mailman is filtering those for us it's doing us all a big service. Kris From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:36:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB50D16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7DB443D29 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 4173 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Dec 2003 20:35:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.5?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 20:35:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:35:43 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:36:02 -0000 All, The i386 5.2-RC1 bits have been on ftp-master for several days, but I do'not see them on either of the ftp.freebsd.org machines. Is there any reason why they are not getting mirrored out? Scott From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:41:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id DE73716A4CF; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:41:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:41:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031210204111.GA12033@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:41:12 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > The i386 5.2-RC1 bits have been on ftp-master for several days, but I > do'not see them on either of the ftp.freebsd.org machines. Is there any > reason why they are not getting mirrored out? File/directory permissions would be the usual reason. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:45:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77B116A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:45:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C50B43D2C for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:45:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 4873 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Dec 2003 20:45:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.5?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 20:45:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:45:32 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031210204111.GA12033@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20031210134405.M6877@pooker.samsco.home> References: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> <20031210204111.GA12033@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:45:50 -0000 On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > All, > > > > The i386 5.2-RC1 bits have been on ftp-master for several days, but I > > do'not see them on either of the ftp.freebsd.org machines. Is there any > > reason why they are not getting mirrored out? > > File/directory permissions would be the usual reason. > > Kris The only issue that I see is that the ISO images are now owned by group 'archive'. However, they are world readable. DO they have to be in the archive group in order to get mirrored? Why didn't rsync see that the 5.2-BETA bits had been removed? I'll adjust the permissions now and see if that helps. Scott From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:09:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D065B16A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB65D43D2A; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:09:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hBAL9cus021651; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:09:38 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hBAL9cNm021650; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:09:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:09:38 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031210210938.GB20972@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:09:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > The i386 5.2-RC1 bits have been on ftp-master for several days, but I > do'not see them on either of the ftp.freebsd.org machines. Is there any > reason why they are not getting mirrored out? There are TreeComp failed messages in the cvsupd log for beastie so it's having a problem with something - not sure what. The ISC site seems to have the bits now, I'm not sure when it picked them up. ftp-master had its base OS upgraded about 2 days ago but I'm not seeing widespread failures in the logs so I don't *think* that's the problem. But if anyone is seeing issues with ftp-master that started recently let me know please. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:13:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FF016A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:13:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F2F43D13; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hBALDFus021768; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:13:15 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hBALDF3C021767; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:13:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:13:15 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031210211315.GC20972@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> <20031210204111.GA12033@hub.freebsd.org> <20031210134405.M6877@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210134405.M6877@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:13:21 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:45:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > The only issue that I see is that the ISO images are now owned by group > 'archive'. However, they are world readable. DO they have to be in the > archive group in order to get mirrored? Why didn't rsync see that the > 5.2-BETA bits had been removed? The change into group archive happens automagically via a cron job, that's nothing to worry about. The world readable setting would indeed make everything readable regardless. ftp-master.us was able to pick up the 5.2-RC stuff yesterday. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:17:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811516A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0DE43D09; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:16:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesper@skriver.dk) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F30F211498; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:16:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:16:57 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20031210211657.GA32158@skriver.dk> References: <20031210133253.B6877@pooker.samsco.home> <20031210210938.GB20972@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210210938.GB20972@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B88 9CE8 66E9 E631 C9C5 5EB4 22AB F0EC F956 1C31 X-PGP-Public-Key: http://freesbee.wheel.dk/~jesper/gpgkey.pub cc: Scott Long cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why aren't the 5.2-RC1 bits being mirrored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:17:01 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:09:38PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > > The i386 5.2-RC1 bits have been on ftp-master for several days, but I > > do'not see them on either of the ftp.freebsd.org machines. Is there any > > reason why they are not getting mirrored out? > > There are TreeComp failed messages in the cvsupd log for beastie so > it's having a problem with something - not sure what. The ISC site > seems to have the bits now, I'm not sure when it picked them up. beastie ran into the maximum number of files to be deleted in one go, I'm running it manually now without any limitation. > ftp-master had its base OS upgraded about 2 days ago but I'm not > seeing widespread failures in the logs so I don't *think* that's > the problem. But if anyone is seeing issues with ftp-master that > started recently let me know please. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.