From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 15:08:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF77816A4CE; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ryu16.org (YahooBB219005044050.bbtec.net [219.5.44.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD46343FBD; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:08:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imura@ryu16.org) Received: from redeye.xt.ryu16.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ryu16.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB4N8pmh088796; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:08:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from imura@redeye.xt.ryu16.org) Received: (from imura@localhost) by redeye.xt.ryu16.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id hB4N8oAd088795; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:08:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from imura) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:08:50 +0900 From: "R. Imura" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031204230850.GC28062%imura@ryu16.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-ja.1 cc: i18n@freebsd.org Subject: Can ports/chinese/big5fs be obsolete after 501109? X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:08:55 -0000 Hi all, Can chinese/big5fs be also obsolete? - R. Imura Index: chinese/big5fs/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/chinese/big5fs/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- chinese/big5fs/Makefile 21 Nov 2003 03:09:40 -0000 1.11 +++ chinese/big5fs/Makefile 4 Dec 2003 22:59:13 -0000 @@ -23,12 +23,14 @@ .include -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 && ${OSVERSION} < 501109 MSDOSFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/fs/msdosfs MSDOSFSKO= msdosfs.ko MSDOSFSKODIR= ${SYSDIR}/modules/msdosfs NTFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/fs/ntfs NTFSPATCH= ntfs_big5.diff.5 +.elif ${OSVERSION} >= 501109 +IGNORE= is obsolete. See mount_msdosfs(8) and mount_ntfs(8) .else MSDOSFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/msdosfs MSDOSFSKO= msdos.ko From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 21:45:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D42D16A4CE; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:45:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ryu16.org (YahooBB219005044050.bbtec.net [219.5.44.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C02843FD7; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imura@ryu16.org) Received: from redeye.xt.ryu16.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ryu16.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB65iumh056523; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:44:56 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from imura@redeye.xt.ryu16.org) Received: (from imura@localhost) by redeye.xt.ryu16.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id hB65it7Y056522; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:44:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from imura) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:44:55 +0900 From: "R. Imura" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031206054455.GA89116%imura@ryu16.org> References: <20031204230850.GC28062%imura@ryu16.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031204230850.GC28062%imura@ryu16.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-ja.1 cc: statue@freebsd.sinica.edu.tw cc: i18n@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can ports/chinese/big5fs be obsolete after 501109? X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 05:45:01 -0000 On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:08:50AM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > Hi all, > > Can chinese/big5fs be also obsolete? I found "FreeBSD Chinese HOWTO" (it's very interesting), and It says we can use big5 file systems without chinese/big5fs in -current. I believe this port can be obsolete. (*) FreeBSD Chinese HOWTO http://freebsd.sinica.edu.tw/zh-tut/index.html I refined a patch. - R. Imura Index: chinese/big5fs/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/chinese/big5fs/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- chinese/big5fs/Makefile 21 Nov 2003 03:09:40 -0000 1.11 +++ chinese/big5fs/Makefile 6 Dec 2003 05:24:49 -0000 @@ -23,12 +23,14 @@ .include -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 && ${OSVERSION} < 501109 MSDOSFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/fs/msdosfs MSDOSFSKO= msdosfs.ko MSDOSFSKODIR= ${SYSDIR}/modules/msdosfs NTFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/fs/ntfs NTFSPATCH= ntfs_big5.diff.5 +.elif ${OSVERSION} >= 501109 +IGNORE= is obsolete. See mount_cd9660(8), mount_msdosfs(8) or mount_ntfs(8) .else MSDOSFSDIR= ${SYSDIR}/msdosfs MSDOSFSKO= msdos.ko From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 21:56:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5DA16A4CE; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from fatpipi.cirx.org (fatpipi.cirx.org [211.23.144.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B8143FE3; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org) Received: from fatpipi.cirx.org (__________@localhost.cirx.org [127.0.0.1]) by fatpipi.cirx.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hB65tttN095308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:55:55 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org) Received: (from vanilla@localhost) by fatpipi.cirx.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hB65ttK7095307; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:55:55 +0800 (CST) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:55:55 +0800 From: "Vanilla I. Shu" To: "R. Imura" Message-ID: <20031206055555.GA95159@fatpipi.cirx.org> References: <20031204230850.GC28062%imura@ryu16.org> <20031206054455.GA89116%imura@ryu16.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031206054455.GA89116%imura@ryu16.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: statue@freebsd.sinica.edu.tw cc: i18n@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can ports/chinese/big5fs be obsolete after 501109? X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 05:56:02 -0000 On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 02:44:55PM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > I found "FreeBSD Chinese HOWTO" (it's very interesting), and > It says we can use big5 file systems without chinese/big5fs in -current. > I believe this port can be obsolete. > (*) FreeBSD Chinese HOWTO > http://freebsd.sinica.edu.tw/zh-tut/index.html > I refined a patch. > - R. Imura okie, I committed your patch. thanks.