From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 15:46:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2390516A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.wan.no (exchange.wan.no [80.86.128.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE82643FF5 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:46:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:43:37 +0200 Message-ID: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F1F3F07@exchange.wanglobal.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Queue sizes. Thread-Index: AcOG22MKfVnlp/zORhKYqqg4ssx6zg== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= To: Subject: Queue sizes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:46:43 -0000 Hi! I've experimented with various queue sizes to pipes and i just cant = figure out a generic algorithm from 10mbit through 64kbit (10240, 8192, 4096, 2048, 1024, 512, 256, 128, 64 kbit/s). Does anyone know the most efficient queue size for latency (most = important) vs. bulk (must be _roughly_ same before and after) ?=20 Google doesnt help much (keywords might be wrong?). I would really appreciate if anyone got any tips/clues? -- Sten