From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 05:05:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF47C16A4C0 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 05:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.wan.no (exchange.wan.no [80.86.128.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924A643FF7 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 05:05:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F1F3F14@exchange.wanglobal.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: uRPF on FreeBSD Thread-Index: AcOJYIZt6MIy2PuRSRKqUQdBerI/ggCoVIug From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= To: "Haesu" , Subject: RE: uRPF on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 12:06:00 -0000 >=20 > Is there any reverse-path verification feature in FreeBSD kernel? >=20 > reverse-path verification as in uRPF (unicast reverse path=20 > filtering) widely > used for anti-ip-spoofing. >=20 > If it is supported, then does FreeBSD's uPRF implementation=20 > also allow loose > and strict check like on Cisco? =20 >=20 Yes, IPFW2 has this option implemented as option 'verrevpath'. ex. deny not verrevpath man ipfw says: verrevpath For incoming packets, a routing table lookup is done on the packet's source address. If the interface on which the = packet entered the system matches the outgoing interface for the = route, the packet matches. If the interfaces do not match up, the packet does not match. All outgoing packets or packets = with no incoming interface match. The name and functionality of the option is intentionally = similar to the Cisco IOS command: ip verify unicast reverse-path This option can be used to make anti-spoofing rules. -- Sten From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 16:00:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820DC16A4B3 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao04.cox.net (lakemtao04.cox.net [68.1.17.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F4143FD7 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from srenna@vdbmusic.com) Received: from mars ([68.100.200.113]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031006230015.GJXL5790.lakemtao04.cox.net@mars> for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:00:15 -0400 From: "Scott Renna" To: "'FreeBSD ISP List'" Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:00:18 -0400 Message-ID: <001001c38c5d$9d1df820$0201a8c0@mars> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: usb2.0 support in 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:00:16 -0000 Hello, Was wondering if anyone knew if there was USB2.0 support in FreeBSD5.0? Please let me know. Scott renna From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 18:17:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBB716A4BF for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (yazzy.org [217.8.140.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C90343FF9 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@yazzy.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E373980F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 03:17:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.yazzy.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (urukhai.yazzy.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20837-09 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 03:17:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yazzy.solheim (yazzy [192.168.98.11]) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF283980D for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 03:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 02:56:37 +0200 From: Martin Jessa To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031007025637.4d9d874c.freebsd@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20030919003804.GA9135@blazingdot.com> References: <20030919003804.GA9135@blazingdot.com> Organization: WRS ASA X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: New MS email trojan going around - update your scanners X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:17:51 -0000 Unfortunatelly this is old news. It has been around for quite a while. One more crappy windows virus...argh... Stop viruses that corrupt my mp3s! :) On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:38:04 -0700 Marcus Reid wrote: > Hi, > > New MS email trojan: W32/Swen.A@mm > > I've started seeing a higher and higher volume of > infected emails. Virus scanner vendors have updated > signatures today. > > Marcus > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 10:08:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988DE16A4B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marklar.blazingdot.com (marklar.blazingdot.com [207.154.84.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D284243FE3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:08:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@blazingdot.com) Received: (qmail 17119 invoked by uid 503); 7 Oct 2003 17:08:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:08:05 -0700 From: Marcus Reid To: Martin Jessa Message-ID: <20031007170805.GA15664@blazingdot.com> References: <20030919003804.GA9135@blazingdot.com> <20031007025637.4d9d874c.freebsd@yazzy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007025637.4d9d874c.freebsd@yazzy.org> X-Coffee-Level: nearly-fatal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New MS email trojan going around - update your scanners X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:08:06 -0000 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:56:37AM +0200, Martin Jessa wrote: > Unfortunatelly this is old news. It has been around for quite a while. > One more crappy windows virus...argh... > Stop viruses that corrupt my mp3s! > :) Yes, this would be pretty old news by now.. If you look at the date in my original email, I sent it on September 18. Do you have a 20 day mail backlog? Marcus > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:38:04 -0700 > Marcus Reid wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > New MS email trojan: W32/Swen.A@mm > > > > I've started seeing a higher and higher volume of > > infected emails. Virus scanner vendors have updated > > signatures today. > > > > Marcus > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 08:13:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4945816A4B3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3E243FE0 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 20D3930292; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 11:13:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id AC5341D1DC6; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:06:13 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16261.27477.378621.134094@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:06:13 -0400 To: "Scott Renna" In-Reply-To: <001001c38c5d$9d1df820$0201a8c0@mars> References: <001001c38c5d$9d1df820$0201a8c0@mars> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid cc: 'FreeBSD ISP List' Subject: usb2.0 support in 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 15:13:52 -0000 >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Renna writes: Scott> Hello, Was wondering if anyone knew if there was USB2.0 support Scott> in FreeBSD5.0? Adding 'device ehci' to your kernel will enable USB2.0... however, it simply locks up and disables the usb port in question for me. I've posted before about this, but it hasn't been a high priority item. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 16:28:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08D716A4B3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx01.bos.ma.towardex.com (a65-124-16-8.svc.towardex.com [65.124.16.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2BF43FE0 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:28:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from haesu@mx01.bos.ma.towardex.com) Received: by mx01.bos.ma.towardex.com (TowardEX ESMTP 3.0p11_DAKN, from userid 1001) id 150112F953; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:29:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:29:09 -0400 From: Haesu To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031009232909.GA53805@scylla.towardex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: ipfw icmp unreach code response limiting X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:28:51 -0000 Hi, By using the 'unreach ' with ipfw, the system will drop the packet, but at the same time respond to the source with ICMP unreachable message via selected . Is there anyway to "rate-limit" the amount of ICMP unreach messages ipfw generates? For example, on Cisco 'ip icmp rate-limit unreach ' would limit the number of icmp unreachable messages generated from the router to once every . What I am trying to do is, I've setup backscatter traceback technique on bunch of freebsd routers on a network using IBGP distributed blackhole method. For easier backscatter trace-back operation, I need ICMP unreachable messages responding from the router, whenever a packet routes into discard interface. On Cisco, packets routed to Null0 interface is an invalid adjacency (under cef), therefore causes a drop+unreach message. (More info about backscatter technique is at http://www.secsup.org/Tracking/) What I setup on my FreeBSD routers is, I have discard interface (ds0, or rather pseudo-device disc) setup. Any packets routed to ds0 will result in unreachable message by ipfw using following rule: ipfw add 1 unreach filter-prohib all from any to any out via ds0 And this works great, exactly the same behaviour on Cisco&Juniper when a packet is routed to Null0/discard. The only thing is, I'd like to limit the number of unreach filter-prohib messages ipfw generates back to the source to x amount of packets per second. sysctl has net.inet.icmp.icmplim which is exactly what I need, except that ipfw processes the packet _before_ it hits the routing stack, so sysctl value is futile to ipfw's unreach behaviour. Thanks for any comments/ideas :) -hc -- Haesu C. TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Consulting, colocation, web hosting, network design and implementation http://www.towardex.com | haesu@towardex.com Cell: (978)394-2867 | Office: (978)263-3399 Ext. 170 Fax: (978)263-0033 | POC: HAESU-ARIN From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 14:29:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBE716A4D5 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web1.subnetmask.net (web1.subnetmask.net [207.44.145.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B71D543FE0 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:29:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@psyxakias.com) Received: (qmail 16371 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 21:29:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO computer) (212.251.108.81) by web1.subnetmask.net with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 21:29:26 -0000 Message-ID: <001701c38f75$aa4b19e0$dec2fea9@computer> From: "PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD)" To: Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:29:55 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Harddisk Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:29:33 -0000 Hello, We just installed and mounted a 2nd HDD(secondary ide channel) on a = Dedicated Server on FreeBSD 4.8 and look what it gives: ] df=20 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 2015918 52114 1802532 3% / /dev/ad0s1f 22479870 16924774 3756708 82% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 4031950 73418 3635976 2% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc /dev/ad2s1e 76958474 4 70801794 0% /drive2 ] df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 1.9G 51M 1.7G 3% / /dev/ad0s1f 21G 16G 3.6G 82% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 3.8G 72M 3.5G 2% /var procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc /dev/ad2s1e 73G 4.0K 68G 0% /drive2 ] cat /etc/fstab # See the fstab(5) manual page for important information on automatic = mounts # of network filesystems before modifying this file. # # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump = Pass# /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 = 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 = 1 /dev/ad0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 = 2 /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 = 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 = 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 = 0 /dev/ad2s1e /drive2 ufs rw 2 = 2 The problem is that from 73GB (80gb hdd) it only sees free 68GB. How can i check if it has bad sectors? A friend suggested me low-level = format but I never done that before under unix. Also, do i need to be in single-user (I dont have physical access, only = remote root via ssh). Thank you. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 18:57:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A4516A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragorn.summit.net.au (aragorn.summit.net.au [203.221.180.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0680843FDF for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:57:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lachlan@fatpanda.net) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.summit.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 4110E14CD4; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:57:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from felix (dialup-65.164.220.203.acc01-west-rcm.comindico.com.au [203.220.164.65]) by aragorn.summit.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 1089914CCA; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:57:29 +1000 (EST) From: "Lachlan" To: "PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD)" , Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:57:34 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001701c38f75$aa4b19e0$dec2fea9@computer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Harddisk Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:57:39 -0000 On some hdd's there is an option on the jumper settings next to master and slave. That for some reason, limits the size of the hdd. I don't know why this option exists, but it does. Also, you never get 70GB out of a 70GB hdd. Once again, i don't know why. It's just the way it is. Regards, Lachlan -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD) Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 7:30 AM To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Harddisk Problem Hello, We just installed and mounted a 2nd HDD(secondary ide channel) on a Dedicated Server on FreeBSD 4.8 and look what it gives: ] df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 2015918 52114 1802532 3% / /dev/ad0s1f 22479870 16924774 3756708 82% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 4031950 73418 3635976 2% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc /dev/ad2s1e 76958474 4 70801794 0% /drive2 ] df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 1.9G 51M 1.7G 3% / /dev/ad0s1f 21G 16G 3.6G 82% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 3.8G 72M 3.5G 2% /var procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc /dev/ad2s1e 73G 4.0K 68G 0% /drive2 ] cat /etc/fstab # See the fstab(5) manual page for important information on automatic mounts # of network filesystems before modifying this file. # # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/ad2s1e /drive2 ufs rw 2 2 The problem is that from 73GB (80gb hdd) it only sees free 68GB. How can i check if it has bad sectors? A friend suggested me low-level format but I never done that before under unix. Also, do i need to be in single-user (I dont have physical access, only remote root via ssh). Thank you. _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 19:12:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD9716A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (user38.net339.fl.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF2A43FAF for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:12:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9B2CsHl010023 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:12:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9B2Cs9p009996 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:12:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:12:54 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031011021254.GB45699@wjv.com> References: <001701c38f75$aa4b19e0$dec2fea9@computer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: Re: Harddisk Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 02:12:58 -0000 When asked his whereabouts on Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:57 , Lachlan took the fifth, drank it, and then slurred: This really isn't an ISP related issue and more probably it should have been posted to FreeBSD-questions - but: > On some hdd's there is an option on the jumper settings next to > master and slave. That for some reason, limits the size of the > hdd. I don't know why this option exists, but it does. Also, > you never get 70GB out of a 70GB hdd. Once again, i don't know > why. It's just the way it is. He really should try df with the -H option He may find his space is there. Note this system as below - with the first output using -h and the second using -H. Note particularl /dev/ad0s2g. Add the total of used and available and you come up with 28.8G total space with -h but you get 31.1G with the -H. Extroplating that to his larger drive I suspec he will see the correct amount. The -H is 'human readble' and it is a decimal byte count - the way manufacturers show their drives with 1,000,000 bytes equalling 1MB, while the -h used blocks of 1024 and thus will look like there is less space. Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s2a 123M 43M 70M 38% / /dev/ad0s2g 32G 3.8G 25G 13% /usr /dev/ad0s2f 3.9G 2.0K 3.6G 0% /usr2 /dev/ad0s2e 123M 30M 83M 27% /var procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s2a 129M 45M 73M 38% / /dev/ad0s2g 34G 4.1G 27G 13% /usr /dev/ad0s2f 4.2G 2.0K 3.9G 0% /usr2 /dev/ad0s2e 129M 31M 87M 27% /var procfs 4.1K 4.1K 0B 100% /proc > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD) > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 7:30 AM > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Harddisk Problem > > > Hello, > > We just installed and mounted a 2nd HDD(secondary ide channel) on a > Dedicated Server on FreeBSD 4.8 and look what it gives: > > ] df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 2015918 52114 1802532 3% / > /dev/ad0s1f 22479870 16924774 3756708 82% /usr > /dev/ad0s1e 4031950 73418 3635976 2% /var > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc > /dev/ad2s1e 76958474 4 70801794 0% /drive2 > > ] df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 1.9G 51M 1.7G 3% / > /dev/ad0s1f 21G 16G 3.6G 82% /usr > /dev/ad0s1e 3.8G 72M 3.5G 2% /var > procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc > /dev/ad2s1e 73G 4.0K 68G 0% /drive2 > > ] cat /etc/fstab > # See the fstab(5) manual page for important information on automatic mounts > # of network filesystems before modifying this file. > # > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > Pass# > /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 > /dev/ad0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 > /dev/ad2s1e /drive2 ufs rw 2 2 > > The problem is that from 73GB (80gb hdd) it only sees free 68GB. > > How can i check if it has bad sectors? A friend suggested me low-level > format but I never done that before under unix. > > Also, do i need to be in single-user (I dont have physical access, only > remote root via ssh). > > > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 22:50:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35F316A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5CB543FD7 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 60457 invoked by uid 110); 11 Oct 2003 05:51:06 -0000 Received: from ool-18baaf5c.dyn.optonline.net (HELO win2kpc1) (24.186.175.92) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 11 Oct 2003 05:51:06 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-isp@freebsd.org" , "PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD)" Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:50:20 -0400 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2661) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195;4) In-Reply-To: <001701c38f75$aa4b19e0$dec2fea9@computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20031011055022.A5CB543FD7@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Harddisk Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:50:24 -0000 Here is why: manufacturers consider 1GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes, so 80gb drive is really 80,000,000,000 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 = 74.5GB Now, why you get 68 usable space out of 73gb? 8% of usable space is held back by freebsd due to performance issues. You can change this to 0%, but it is not suggested. If you still want to, read man tunefs, option -m -Simon On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:29:55 +0300, PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD) wrote: >Hello, > >We just installed and mounted a 2nd HDD(secondary ide channel) on a Dedicated Server on FreeBSD 4.8 and look what it gives: > >] df >Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >/dev/ad0s1a 2015918 52114 1802532 3% / >/dev/ad0s1f 22479870 16924774 3756708 82% /usr >/dev/ad0s1e 4031950 73418 3635976 2% /var >procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc >/dev/ad2s1e 76958474 4 70801794 0% /drive2 > >] df -h >Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >/dev/ad0s1a 1.9G 51M 1.7G 3% / >/dev/ad0s1f 21G 16G 3.6G 82% /usr >/dev/ad0s1e 3.8G 72M 3.5G 2% /var >procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc >/dev/ad2s1e 73G 4.0K 68G 0% /drive2 > >] cat /etc/fstab ># See the fstab(5) manual page for important information on automatic mounts ># of network filesystems before modifying this file. ># ># Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# >/dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 >/dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 >/dev/ad0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 >/dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 >/dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 >proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 >/dev/ad2s1e /drive2 ufs rw 2 2 > >The problem is that from 73GB (80gb hdd) it only sees free 68GB. > >How can i check if it has bad sectors? A friend suggested me low-level format but I never done that before under unix. > >Also, do i need to be in single-user (I dont have physical access, only remote root via ssh). > > >Thank you. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 00:39:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACF116A4B3 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E65443FAF for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:39:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pilkis@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 20090 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Oct 2003 07:39:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO pilkisnotexp) (62.68.63.42) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 11 Oct 2003 09:39:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #6832473 Message-ID: <0c6001c38fca$758b1200$0464a8c0@spotripoli.local> From: "Putinas" To: "PsYxAkIaS (FreeBSD)" References: <001701c38f75$aa4b19e0$dec2fea9@computer> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:36:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddisk Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:39:14 -0000 cmVhZCBtYW4gbmV3ZnMNCiAgICAgLW0gZnJlZSBzcGFjZSAlDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgVGhlIHBl cmNlbnRhZ2Ugb2Ygc3BhY2UgcmVzZXJ2ZWQgZnJvbSBub3JtYWwgdXNlcnM7IHRoZSBtaW5pbXVt DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgZnJlZSBzcGFjZSB0aHJlc2hvbGQuICBUaGUgZGVmYXVsdCB2YWx1ZSB1 c2VkIGlzIGRlZmluZWQgYnkNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICBNSU5GUkVFIGZyb20gPHVmcy9mZnMvZnMu aD4sIGN1cnJlbnRseSA4JS4gIFNlZSB0dW5lZnMoOCkgZm9yDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgbW9yZSBk ZXRhaWxzIG9uIGhvdyB0byBzZXQgdGhpcyBvcHRpb24uDQoNCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVz c2FnZSAtLS0tLSANCkZyb206ICJQc1l4QWtJYVMgKEZyZWVCU0QpIiA8ZnJlZWJzZEBwc3l4YWtp YXMuY29tPg0KVG86IDxmcmVlYnNkLWlzcEBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgT2N0 b2JlciAxMCwgMjAwMyAyMzoyOSBQTQ0KU3ViamVjdDogSGFyZGRpc2sgUHJvYmxlbQ0KDQoNCkhl bGxvLA0KDQpXZSBqdXN0IGluc3RhbGxlZCBhbmQgbW91bnRlZCBhIDJuZCBIREQoc2Vjb25kYXJ5 IGlkZSBjaGFubmVsKSBvbiBhIERlZGljYXRlZCBTZXJ2ZXIgb24gRnJlZUJTRCA0LjggYW5kIGxv b2sgd2hhdCBpdCBnaXZlczoNCg0KXSBkZiANCkZpbGVzeXN0ZW0gMUstYmxvY2tzICAgVXNlZCAg QXZhaWwgQ2FwYWNpdHkgTW91bnRlZCBvbg0KL2Rldi9hZDBzMWEgIDIwMTU5MTggIDUyMTE0IDE4 MDI1MzIgICAzJSAgLw0KL2Rldi9hZDBzMWYgMjI0Nzk4NzAgMTY5MjQ3NzQgMzc1NjcwOCAgODIl ICAvdXNyDQovZGV2L2FkMHMxZSAgNDAzMTk1MCAgNzM0MTggMzYzNTk3NiAgIDIlICAvdmFyDQpw cm9jZnMgICAgICAgNCAgICA0ICAgIDAgIDEwMCUgIC9wcm9jDQovZGV2L2FkMnMxZSA3Njk1ODQ3 NCAgICA0IDcwODAxNzk0ICAgMCUgIC9kcml2ZTINCg0KXSBkZiAtaA0KRmlsZXN5c3RlbSAgU2l6 ZSAgVXNlZCBBdmFpbCBDYXBhY2l0eSBNb3VudGVkIG9uDQovZGV2L2FkMHMxYSAgMS45RyAgNTFN ICAxLjdHICAgMyUgIC8NCi9kZXYvYWQwczFmICAyMUcgIDE2RyAgMy42RyAgODIlICAvdXNyDQov ZGV2L2FkMHMxZSAgMy44RyAgNzJNICAzLjVHICAgMiUgIC92YXINCnByb2NmcyAgICA0LjBLICA0 LjBLICAgMEIgIDEwMCUgIC9wcm9jDQovZGV2L2FkMnMxZSAgNzNHICA0LjBLICA2OEcgICAwJSAg L2RyaXZlMg0KDQpdIGNhdCAvZXRjL2ZzdGFiDQojIFNlZSB0aGUgZnN0YWIoNSkgbWFudWFsIHBh Z2UgZm9yIGltcG9ydGFudCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBvbiBhdXRvbWF0aWMgbW91bnRzDQojIG9mIG5l dHdvcmsgZmlsZXN5c3RlbXMgYmVmb3JlIG1vZGlmeWluZyB0aGlzIGZpbGUuDQojDQojIERldmlj ZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBNb3VudHBvaW50ICAgICAgRlN0eXBlICBPcHRpb25zICAgICAgICAg RHVtcCAgICBQYXNzIw0KL2Rldi9hZDBzMWIgICAgICAgICAgICAgbm9uZSAgICAgICAgICAgIHN3 YXAgICAgc3cgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDAgICAgICAgMA0KL2Rldi9hZDBzMWEgICAgICAgICAgICAg LyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHVmcyAgICAgcncgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDEgICAgICAgMQ0KL2Rldi9h ZDBzMWYgICAgICAgICAgICAgL3VzciAgICAgICAgICAgIHVmcyAgICAgcncgICAgICAgICAgICAg IDIgICAgICAgMg0KL2Rldi9hZDBzMWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgL3ZhciAgICAgICAgICAgIHVmcyAg ICAgcncgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDIgICAgICAgMg0KL2Rldi9hY2QwYyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgL2Nk cm9tICAgICAgICAgIGNkOTY2MCAgcm8sbm9hdXRvICAgICAgIDAgICAgICAgMA0KcHJvYyAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgL3Byb2MgICAgICAgICAgIHByb2NmcyAgcncgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDAg ICAgICAgMA0KL2Rldi9hZDJzMWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgL2RyaXZlMiAgICAgICAgIHVmcyAgICAg cncgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDIgICAgICAgMg0KDQpUaGUgcHJvYmxlbSBpcyB0aGF0IGZyb20gNzNH QiAoODBnYiBoZGQpIGl0IG9ubHkgc2VlcyBmcmVlIDY4R0IuDQoNCkhvdyBjYW4gaSBjaGVjayBp ZiBpdCBoYXMgYmFkIHNlY3RvcnM/IEEgZnJpZW5kIHN1Z2dlc3RlZCBtZSBsb3ctbGV2ZWwgZm9y bWF0IGJ1dCBJIG5ldmVyIGRvbmUgdGhhdCBiZWZvcmUgdW5kZXIgdW5peC4NCg0KQWxzbywgZG8g aSBuZWVkIHRvIGJlIGluIHNpbmdsZS11c2VyIChJIGRvbnQgaGF2ZSBwaHlzaWNhbCBhY2Nlc3Ms IG9ubHkgcmVtb3RlIHJvb3QgdmlhIHNzaCkuDQoNCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCmZyZWVic2QtaXNwQGZyZWVic2Qu b3JnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGlu Zm8vZnJlZWJzZC1pc3ANClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZW5kIGFueSBtYWlsIHRvICJmcmVlYnNk LWlzcC11bnN1YnNjcmliZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyINCg0K From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 08:08:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30D016A4B3 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nemesis.webmatic.de (nemesis.webmatic.de [212.78.99.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F005F43FAF for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:08:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-isp@chef-ingenieur.de) Received: from gateway.private.lan (Da714.d.pppool.de [80.184.167.20]) by nemesis.webmatic.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFD340EC8 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:08:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chef-ingenieur.de (pc-30.private.lan [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.private.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765E734D79 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:08:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3F881E30.2050503@chef-ingenieur.de> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:13:52 +0200 From: Thomas Krause -CI- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: prog for server software version recording X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:08:14 -0000 Hi, with the growing number of freebsd boxes it becomes harder to keep the overview about the used hardware and installed software (and the versions). Is there a software where I can record the hardware, software and all the changes I've done? The mysql+php combo would be nice. Regards, Thomas. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 22:43:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEEA16A4B3 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantech.net (mail3.atlantech.net [209.183.205.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C526143F93 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:43:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from srenna@vdbmusic.com) Received: from [65.197.254.5] (account srenna@vdbmusic.com) by atlantech.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.3) with HTTP id 59157468; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 01:43:56 -0400 From: To: David Gilbert , "Scott Renna" X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.3 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 01:43:56 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <16261.27477.378621.134094@canoe.dclg.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: 'FreeBSD ISP List' Subject: Re: usb2.0 support in 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 05:43:57 -0000 In trying this and adding the device ehci to my kernel, i go for a build and I'm told ehci is unknown. Anyone had any luck with this before? On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:06:13 -0400 David Gilbert wrote: > >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Renna > writes: > > Scott> Hello, Was wondering if anyone knew if there was > USB2.0 support > Scott> in FreeBSD5.0? > > Adding 'device ehci' to your kernel will enable USB2.0... > however, it > simply locks up and disables the usb port in question for > me. I've > posted before about this, but it hasn't been a high > priority item. > > Dave. > > -- > ============================================================================ > |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two > things can only be | > |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if > and only if they | > |http://daveg.ca | are > precisely opposite. | > =========================================================GLO================