From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 30 05:02:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B10537B401 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 05:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAF443FBF for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 05:02:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsglover@zetnet.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18zcSW-0004M0-00 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:02:48 +0100 Received: from zetnet.co.uk (44-022.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.44.22]) h2UD2lid003601 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:02:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3E86DD60.10001@zetnet.co.uk> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:04:48 +0100 From: John Sigsworth Glover User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20030222 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problems building JDK1.3.1p8_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:03:22 -0000 Hi FreeBSD 4.7 Downloaded the updated tar.gz for jdk13 from the ports directory, unpacked and started to run. Following the prompts have downloaded the files from SUN as requested. Make process stops when applying a lot of patches with the following ... ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for jdk-1.3.1p8_1 Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to ../src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/motif /font.properties.ja.bsd.rej >> Patch patch-font.properties.ja.bsd failed to apply cleanly. >> Patch(es) patch-InetAddressImpl.c patch-common::Defs-bsd.gmk applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk13. I can progress no further since I am not sure where to look to resolve this issue. Any suggestions? Regards John S Glover From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 30 23:57:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BC637B401 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBDF43F85 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:57:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2V7vmHt089850; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:57:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h2V7vhEG089849; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:57:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V. To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot , ak03@gte.com Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:57:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Eclipse 2.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:57:51 -0000 On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:58, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > * Alexander Kabaev: > > Eclipse 2.1 has been released. I upgraded the port, get it from > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/eclipse.tar.gz. > > When does it make it up in the FreeBSD ports tree? As soon as the PR is picked up and committed, I guess: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/46568 Just picked it up. Ernst From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 03:49:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2239D37B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 03:49:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from popelschnipser.de (ultrakoreggd.org [217.160.78.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D388B43F85 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 03:49:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de) Received: (qmail 5589 invoked by uid 1048); 31 Mar 2003 11:48:55 -0000 Received: from marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de by p10089345 by uid 1045 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.42. Clear:. Processed in 1.250372 secs); 31 Mar 2003 11:48:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.100.100?) (217.82.125.198) by ultrakoreggd.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 11:48:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:48:51 +0200 From: Marc Recht To: Ernst de Haan , Jean-Baptiste Quenot , ak03@gte.com Message-ID: <28410000.1049111331@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> References: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 2.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:49:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > As soon as the PR is picked up and committed, I guess: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/46568 > > Just picked it up. IMHO it would be nice to follow the BSD JDK's example and rename the directories to bsd (instead of freebsd). Since it builds against the native JDK, it should work also on NetBSD. Just my 0.02 EUR... Regards, Marc mundus es fabula -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD) iD8DBQE+iCsj7YQCetAaG3MRAiGvAJ93g9JmJngFBQBqVBH/995eaeXn0wCeN6+L q7FXx+IjrMvr8EEiDNJPgRg= =AvBR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 03:56:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C7037B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 03:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5EC43F75 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 03:56:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2VBu1Ht091614; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:56:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h2VBu1di091613; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:56:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V. To: Marc Recht , Jean-Baptiste Quenot , ak03@gte.com Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:56:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <28410000.1049111331@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <28410000.1049111331@leeloo.intern.geht.de> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303311356.01263.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 2.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:56:05 -0000 > IMHO it would be nice to follow the BSD JDK's example and rename the > directories to bsd (instead of freebsd). Since it builds against the > native JDK, it should work also on NetBSD. > > Just my 0.02 EUR... I agree that that's probably better. But this would have to be a new PR. I can't commit an ever-changing PR :) Ernst From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 04:07:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D006737B401; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD7443F85; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from znerd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (znerd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h2VC7EUp018008; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from znerd@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from znerd@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h2VC7Em9018004; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) From: Ernst de Haan Message-Id: <200303311207.h2VC7Em9018004@freefall.freebsd.org> To: znerd@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, znerd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: java/44432: Ant-based port installs should use Jikes if available X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:07:16 -0000 Synopsis: Ant-based port installs should use Jikes if available Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-java->znerd Responsible-Changed-By: znerd Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 31 04:07:03 PST 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll handle this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=44432 From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 04:11:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB55E37B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600543FA3 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:11:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2VCBKHt001389 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:11:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h2VCBKAD001388 for java@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:11:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Ernst de Haan To: java@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:11:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303311411.20257.znerd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: [FYI] Apache Ant 1.5.2 in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:11:32 -0000 FYI: The Ant port (devel/jakarta-ant) has been upgraded from 1.5.1 to 1.5.2. Also, the official name of Ant has changed from 'Jakarta Ant' to 'Apache Ant'. The new name will probably soon be reflected by a port name change from 'devel/jakarta-ant' to either 'devel/ant' or 'devel/apache-ant'. Ernst From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 04:16:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9C737B404; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:16:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCA643FB1; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:16:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12) id 18zyDJ-0009bX-00; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:16:33 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:16:33 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Ernst de Haan Message-ID: <20030331121633.GX23467@starjuice.net> References: <200303311411.20257.znerd@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303311411.20257.znerd@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Sheldon Hearn cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FYI] Apache Ant 1.5.2 in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:16:39 -0000 On (2003/03/31 13:11), Ernst de Haan wrote: > FYI: The Ant port (devel/jakarta-ant) has been upgraded from 1.5.1 to 1.5.2. > > Also, the official name of Ant has changed from 'Jakarta Ant' to 'Apache > Ant'. The new name will probably soon be reflected by a port name change > from 'devel/jakarta-ant' to either 'devel/ant' or 'devel/apache-ant'. I'm in favour of ommitting such prefixes, especially given the frequency with which these things change. Ciao, Sheldon. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 04:49:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D0437B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:49:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7E443FDD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:49:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2VCnsHt005726; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:49:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst@zaphod.euronet.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h2VCnq7J005725; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:49:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Ernst de Haan To: Sheldon Hearn Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:49:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200303311411.20257.znerd@FreeBSD.org> <20030331121633.GX23467@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <20030331121633.GX23467@starjuice.net> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303311449.52103.znerd@FreeBSD.org> cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FYI] Apache Ant 1.5.2 in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:49:54 -0000 > > Also, the official name of Ant has changed from 'Jakarta Ant' to > > 'Apache Ant'. The new name will probably soon be reflected by a port > > name change from 'devel/jakarta-ant' to either 'devel/ant' or > > 'devel/apache-ant'. > > I'm in favour of ommitting such prefixes, especially given the frequency > with which these things change. I tend to agree. Then I will set PKGNAMEPREFIX=apache- Ernst From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 07:05:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0F137B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (h132-197-179-27.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466F143FAF for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:05:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h2VF5iAi071735; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:05:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ak03@kanpc.gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by kanpc.gte.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2VF5i7j071734; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:05:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:05:44 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Ernst de Haan Message-Id: <20030331100544.4c41f327.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> References: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Organization: Verizon Data Services X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11claws42 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Eclipse 2.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:05:59 -0000 On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:57:43 +0100 Ernst de Haan wrote: > > As soon as the PR is picked up and committed, I guess: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/46568 > Whatever. This ^^^^ is _not_ my port. -- Alexander Kabaev From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 07:15:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5D037B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BCF43F93 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:15:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12) id 1900zt-000HTG-00; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:14:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:14:53 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Alexander Kabaev Message-ID: <20030331151453.GD23467@starjuice.net> References: <5A31A280-6285-11D7-A9C6-000A278F6414@caraldi.com> <200303310957.43766.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20030331100544.4c41f327.ak03@gte.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030331100544.4c41f327.ak03@gte.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Sheldon Hearn cc: Ernst de Haan cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Eclipse 2.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:15:11 -0000 On (2003/03/31 10:05), Alexander Kabaev wrote: > Ernst de Haan wrote: > > > > As soon as the PR is picked up and committed, I guess: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/46568 > > > > Whatever. This ^^^^ is _not_ my port. And it's _way_ old. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 11:01:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F166437B405 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A8B43FBD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:01:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h2VJ1CUp007053 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:01:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h2VJ1CfO007029 for java@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:01:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:01:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200303311901.h2VJ1CfO007029@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:01:19 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2002/02/25] java/35320 java linux-jdk-1.4 JVM fails when running Tomc 1 problem total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2002/10/11] java/43925 java New port: net/beepcore-java (supersedes p 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 03:26:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6B737B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2C843FA3 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:26:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Imkenberg@t-online.de) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 190JuO-0007g9-04; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:26:28 +0200 Received: from thorsten4 (04076750423-0001@[80.129.187.130]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 190JuK-1Mk5TMC; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:26:24 +0200 Message-ID: <002501c2f841$86e3e480$9001000a@thorsten4> From: Imkenberg@t-online.de (Thorsten Mauch) To: Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:26:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Sender: 04076750423-0001@t-dialin.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 11:26:30 -0000 Hi all I suffer a lot from the absence of native java threads in Linux. My Jboss applicaion runs under linux significant slower then under windows. Nor it scales good. For security reasons I don't want to run my server with windows, so I consider to choose freeBSD. Does anybody have experiance with Jboss and freeBSD ? Does I have to expect compatibily problem ? And how the threading is implemtned in BSD = ? Can I expect the speed and scalability from windows and the securtiy and stablility from UNIX ? If so, whitch port i should use ? Thanx a lot Thorsten From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 05:00:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5A937B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from eowyn.vianetworks.nl (eowyn.vianetworks.nl [212.61.25.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E91543FA3 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:00:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@bowtie.nl) Received: from uucp.iae.nl (uucp.iae.nl [212.61.26.37]) by eowyn.vianetworks.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AD721AA1 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:00:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp.iae.nl (8.9.1/8.9.1) with IAEhv.nl id PAA15816 for java@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:00:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from bowtie.nl (euripides.intra.bowtie.nl [192.168.4.15]) h31Ct5Zd070171; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:55:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@bowtie.nl) Message-ID: <3E898C29.3080501@bowtie.nl> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:55:05 +0200 From: Marc van Kempen Organization: BowTie Technology User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: jni.h and jni_md.h in jdk 1.4.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:00:14 -0000 Hi, jni_md.h gets included in jni.h as follows: #include "jni_md.h" But that file sits in the subdirectory "bsd". This means that while compiling one should specify -I.../include/bsd, but that is a platform specific directory isn't it? So shouldn't that line read: #include "bsd/jni_md.h" ? (I needed that for kde 3.1.1, with this change java gets detected correctly) Regards, Marc. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Marc van Kempen tel. +31 40 2 64 98 60 BowTie Technology fax. +31 40 2 64 98 61 Raiffeisenstraat 7 mailto:marc@bowtie.nl 5611 CH Eindhoven http://www.bowtie.nl ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 05:37:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1098E37B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com (mailout11.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218E143FCB for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:37:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Imkenberg@t-online.de) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 190Lwj-000731-00; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:37:01 +0200 Received: from thorsten4 (04076750423-0001@[80.129.175.147]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 190LwT-19R8kaC; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:36:45 +0200 Message-ID: <005101c2f853$bd04d620$9001000a@thorsten4> From: Imkenberg@t-online.de (Thorsten Mauch) To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:36:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Sender: 04076750423-0001@t-dialin.net Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:37:04 -0000 - I know that the jboss doc is old, but it fit to what i measure, in the current doc I didn't found any statment. - I undertsand that Blackdown have the same thread implementaion. But i can give it try anyway ----- Original Message ----- From: "Achilleus Mantzios" To: "Thorsten Mauch" Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:39 PM Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Thorsten Mauch wrote: > > > In my applciation i use Cocoon/ Jetty or Tomcat and Jboss 2.4.6 or 3.0.4. > > I used win2000 and differnt linux dists, like Debian 3.0 and SuSE 8.0. > > I tried the sun jdk.1.3.1 and 1.4_02. > > But all changes in configuration result only in small differencs. > > I didn't made exact profiling of my applciation. I simply measure the page > > gernaeration time with the cocoon profiling pipeline. > > The result was that windows was about 50% faster then linux. And that in > > case > > of mulible clients i seems that Linux sometimes stucked. > > This observation was suprising for me becuase a differnet cocoon application > > that > > don't uses Jboss perform rather better with linux then windows. > > > > The I found the following statement in the Jboss docs: > > "Be aware however that JBoss performance is very dependant on the underlying > > configuration. > > For example, informal tests show that on the same PC box, it can run twice > > as fast under Windows 2000 / Sun JVM > > than under Linux 2.2 / Sun JVM" > > Just 2 points > > This Jboss documentation is ancient. > Why dont you try blackdown JVM instead of SUN's ??? > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Achilleus Mantzios" > > To: "Thorsten Mauch" > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:43 PM > > Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Thorsten Mauch wrote: > > > > > > There has been an effort called NGPT for linux > > > that tried to implement N:M (#threads:#processes). > > > > > > Anyway now, NGPT is going to be droped in favor > > > of NPTL by RedHat. > > > > > > NPTL is a 1:1 model, and is supposed to kick some butts > > > when it gets intergrated in the new 2.6.* linux kernel. > > > > > > FreeBSD -STABLE works with userland threads. > > > -CURRENT tho (5.*) , is supposed to be kicking as well. > > > > > > I am very interested in your configuration: > > > What windows do you use? > > > What version of Linux, j2sdk??? > > > How many reqs per min?? > > > I am just curious that the Windows mach performed better. > > > > > > (is it jetty threads that cause you the bad performance??) > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > I suffer a lot from the absence of native java threads in Linux. My > > > > Jboss applicaion runs under linux significant slower then under windows. > > > > Nor it scales good. > > > > For security reasons I don't want to run my server with windows, so I > > > > consider to > > > > choose freeBSD. > > > > Does anybody have experiance with Jboss and freeBSD ? Does I have to > > > > expect compatibily problem ? And how the threading is implemtned in BSD > > ? > > > > Can I expect the speed and scalability from windows and the securtiy and > > > > stablility from UNIX ? > > > > If so, whitch port i should use ? > > > > > > > > Thanx a lot > > > > Thorsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ================================================================== > > > Achilleus Mantzios > > > S/W Engineer > > > IT dept > > > Dynacom Tankers Mngmt > > > Nikis 4, Glyfada > > > Athens 16610 > > > Greece > > > tel: +30-210-8981112 > > > fax: +30-210-8981877 > > > email: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com > > > mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr > > > > > > > -- > ================================================================== > Achilleus Mantzios > S/W Engineer > IT dept > Dynacom Tankers Mngmt > Nikis 4, Glyfada > Athens 16610 > Greece > tel: +30-210-8981112 > fax: +30-210-8981877 > email: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com > mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr > From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 06:31:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5FE37B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 06:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.codeheadsystems.com (codeheadsystems.com [68.14.217.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4B43F93 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 06:31:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolpert@codeheadsystems.com) Received: from codeheadsystems.com (www.codeheadsystems.com [127.0.0.1]) h31EVRu5044092; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:31:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wolpert@codeheadsystems.com) Received: from 192.168.1.50 (SquirrelMail authenticated user wolpert) by www.codeheadsystems.com with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:31:28 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <1370.192.168.1.50.1049207488.squirrel@www.codeheadsystems.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:31:28 -0700 (MST) From: "Ned Wolpert" To: In-Reply-To: <002501c2f841$86e3e480$9001000a@thorsten4> References: <002501c2f841$86e3e480$9001000a@thorsten4> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:31:31 -0000 If you want native threads, start looking into using FBSD 5.0 and the native port of Java. I run the jdk1.4.1 on both 4-stable and 5-current, but it is noticably faster on the 5.0 current with the threading model. However, you really want to wait until there is a 5-stable for a production system. (Which is "soon"...) Don't try to benchmark on the current 5.0 system since by default it has debugging built into the kernel which slows it down. (Unless you want to rebuild the system and remove all debugging) BTW, I run a 5-current system at home, no debugging, stable kernel and yes, the native jdk1.4.1 port does kick some ass. I don't have a windows box to compare it too, but it works better then RedHat 8. (Which now I only have on a laptop that my wife uses.) I still want to find a MP AMD system to test, though... that's the real test. > -- Thus, Thorsten Mauch had said: > Hi all > I suffer a lot from the absence of native java threads in Linux. My > Jboss applicaion runs under linux significant slower then under windows. > Nor it scales good. > For security reasons I don't want to run my server with windows, so I > consider to > choose freeBSD. > Does anybody have experiance with Jboss and freeBSD ? Does I have to > expect compatibily problem ? And how the threading is implemtned in BSD > ? Can I expect the speed and scalability from windows and the securtiy > and stablility from UNIX ? > If so, whitch port i should use ? Virtually, Ned Wolpert "An idea is something you have; an ideology is something that has you." --Morris Berman From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 07:23:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D62337B404 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from diomedes.noc.ntua.gr (diomedes.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F9243F3F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:23:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr) Received: from theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.1.1]) by diomedes.noc.ntua.gr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h31FNBd23384; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:23:11 +0300 (EEST) Received: from theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (mantzios@localhost [127.0.0.1]) id h31FNBCF024927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:23:11 +0300 Received: from localhost (mantzios@localhost)id h31FNAMs024923; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:23:10 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr: mantzios owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:23:10 +0300 (EEST) From: Mantzios Achilleus To: wolpert@codeheadsystems.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:23:36 -0000 I think the big battle will be between linux 2.6.x with NPTL, and FreeBSD 5.x with KSE. (Also Jeff Roberson's team has contributed a new 1:1 Threading implementation on FreeBSD) ---------------------------------------------------------------- | go to the source -> http://www.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~mantzios | ---------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 08:37:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BB837B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:37:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgr1.xmission.com (mgr1.xmission.com [198.60.22.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D846343F85 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:37:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from mail by mgr1.xmission.com with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1) id 190Oaw-0005EK-01 for java@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:26:43 -0700 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 190OOA-0008C3-01; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:13:30 -0700 Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h31GDMk70282; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:43:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:43:22 +0930 From: Greg Lewis To: Marc van Kempen Message-ID: <20030402014321.A70241@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <3E898C29.3080501@bowtie.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3E898C29.3080501@bowtie.nl>; from marc@bowtie.nl on Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:55:05PM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=8.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jni.h and jni_md.h in jdk 1.4.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:37:39 -0000 On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:55:05PM +0200, Marc van Kempen wrote: > jni_md.h gets included in jni.h as follows: > > #include "jni_md.h" > > But that file sits in the subdirectory "bsd". This means that while compiling one should specify > -I.../include/bsd, but that is a platform specific directory isn't it? > > So shouldn't that line read: > > #include "bsd/jni_md.h" No. No other JDK 1.4.1 does this, neither do 1.3.1, 1.2.2, etc. What should probably be the case is that the file should be in a subdirectory named freebsd rather than bsd, since I've commonly seen this detected with the lowercase of `uname -s`. This would be in line with 1.3.1. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 10:37:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A695D37B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E8243F3F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 190P7y-00006h-00; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:00:50 -0800 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:00:48 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Thorsten Mauch In-Reply-To: <002501c2f841$86e3e480$9001000a@thorsten4> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:37:33 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Thorsten Mauch wrote: > Hi all > I suffer a lot from the absence of native java threads in Linux. My ... I think it is important to define what "native" is. Sun defines "native" threads as implemented by the OS, rather than in the "green threads" library. In this definition, all the Linux jdk's use native threads. You can run "java -version" to see what you are using. However, Linux threads are implemented as pseudo-processes. This limits scalability somewhat, as threads are supposed to be very light-weight. Context switches take longer, and each thread requires considerable base memory. FreeBSD threads are implemented in-process with the pthread library. These processes are quite lightweight. The jdk1.3.1 and jdk1.4.1 ports now use native FreeBSD threads, rather than green threads. But pthread threads only use a single processor. There is a perception that native OS threads are always faster than green threads or some other internally implemented thread system. That isn't always the case. For intstance, Weblogic built their own JVM (JRockit) and they purposesly implemented their own thread system that does not use OS threads at all. They claim that their JVM is faster for hosting server apps than any other JVM. Tom From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 12:04:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9C837B404 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD46843F85 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:04:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from emerger.yogotech.com (emerger.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA09993; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:04:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by emerger.yogotech.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h31K4V8s026999; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:04:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16009.61647.371831.725618@emerger.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:04:31 -0700 To: Tom Samplonius In-Reply-To: References: <002501c2f841$86e3e480$9001000a@thorsten4> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid cc: Thorsten Mauch cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nate Williams List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 20:04:44 -0000 > There is a perception that native OS threads are always faster than > green threads or some other internally implemented thread system. It turns out that if you're application is CPU and not I/O bound, in most cases 'green threads' or non-kernel threads will almost always faster. (I/O can read/writing logfiles, reading/writing to the console, etc..) In fact, even if you're doing network I/O, Java's internal threading library does a pretty good job of not blocking due to it's use of select/poll. However, if you have to read/write files, then the simple threading model used by FreeBSD (pthreads and/or green-threads) doesn't work well, because it ends up blocking inside the syscall. > That isn't always the case. For intstance, Weblogic built their own > JVM (JRockit) and they purposesly implemented their own thread system > that does not use OS threads at all. They claim that their JVM is > faster for hosting server apps than any other JVM. That's not suprising at all. I wrote a network client/server application in 100% Java that used thousands of threads, and it ran up to 2 orders of magnitude faster using green-threads vs. native (kernel) threads on Solaris. It was a fun problem, and optimizing the solution to work well using both threading models allowed us to find and fix a number of design problems where we made some invalid assumptions about how the thread scheduling would happened. Live-lock, dead-lock, and races are *very* common in many Java programs. The best way to avoid them is to test your app using the different threading models available. Besides, it's good practice for doing SMP work. :) :) Nate From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 16:17:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C41D37B404 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from kathmandu.sun.com (kathmandu.sun.com [192.18.98.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571043F75 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:17:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ranjith.Mandala@Sun.COM) Received: from ha2sca-mail1.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.145.155.62]) by kathmandu.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14421 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:17:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from antmonster (d-usca14-133-206 [129.145.133.206]) ESMTP id h320HRD16888; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:17:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:17:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8293337.1049242647737.JavaMail.Administrator@ha2sca-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> From: Ranjith Mandala To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: postEmail $Id: PostEmail.java,v 1.17 2002/08/30 02:33:02 gmanwani Exp $ X-IM-Review-ID: 183325 cc: Ranjith.Mandala@Sun.COM Subject: Re: (Review ID: 183325) java, javac dumps core when run as non-root user X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:17:30 -0000 Hi, This Bug Report was submitted from http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/ and is being forwarded to you on behalf of f@w.pl. If you would like to respond. Please send an e-mail to the address listed at the end of this report. Regards, RM. ----------------- Original Bug Report------------------- category : hotspot release : 1.4.1 subcategory : runtime_system type : bug synopsis : java, javac dumps core when run as non-root user description : FULL PRODUCT VERSION : java version "1.4.1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (buld 1.4.1-b21) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1-b21, mixed mode) FULL OS VERSION : FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE, i386 EXTRA RELEVANT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION : java built from current ports (under linux compatibility) A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM : When java, javac is run as root, it works, but if run as non-root user, error is printed and core is dumped. Error ID: 4F533F4C494E55580E43505002D7 STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM : - install FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE - install linux-sun-jdk14 from ports - run java as non-root REPRODUCIBILITY : This bug can be reproduced always. workaround : suggested_val : cust_name : Noname cust_email : f@w.pl jdcid : keyword : webbug company : Nocompany hardware : x86 OSversion : Linux bugtraqID : 0 dateCreated : 2003-04-01 17:04:32.7 dateEvaluated : 2003-04-01 17:15:43.758 From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 23:29:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A2637B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D0F43F93 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:29:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 190bB0-0007iY-00; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:52:46 -0800 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:52:44 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Nate Williams In-Reply-To: <16009.61647.371831.725618@emerger.yogotech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Thorsten Mauch cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:29:28 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Nate Williams wrote: ... > However, if you have to read/write files, then the simple threading > model used by FreeBSD (pthreads and/or green-threads) doesn't work well, > because it ends up blocking inside the syscall. ... Well, libpthread appears to be using KSE on 5.0. It will interesting to see if KSE is as light as green-threads are for IO intensive applications, but still be good for CPU intensive programs. KSE has a lot of promise. Tom From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 23:32:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AF337B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:32:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA25D43F3F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:32:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 190bEI-0007kd-00; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:56:10 -0800 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:56:07 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Mantzios Achilleus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:32:54 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mantzios Achilleus wrote: > I think the big battle will be between linux 2.6.x with NPTL, > and FreeBSD 5.x with KSE. (Also Jeff Roberson's team has > contributed a new 1:1 Threading implementation on FreeBSD) ... Why would you want a 1:1 threading implementation? Tom From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 00:05:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF0837B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:05:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from murmeldjur.it.su.se (murmeldjur.it.su.se [130.237.95.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE29743FAF for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:05:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rnyberg@murmeldjur.it.su.se) Received: from murmeldjur.it.su.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murmeldjur.it.su.se (8.12.8/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h3285Dci046347; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:05:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rnyberg@murmeldjur.it.su.se) Received: (from rnyberg@localhost) by murmeldjur.it.su.se (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h32857gN046346; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:05:07 +0200 From: Richard Nyberg To: Tom Samplonius Message-ID: <20030402080507.GB46168@murmeldjur.it.su.se> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Nyberg , Tom Samplonius , Mantzios Achilleus , Imkenberg@t-online.de, freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de cc: Mantzios Achilleus cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:05:16 -0000 On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:56:07PM -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > Why would you want a 1:1 threading implementation? > There was an interesting discussion about this on arch recently. -Richard From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 00:17:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E6B37B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (ulysses.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F5943F3F for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:17:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr) Received: from theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.1.1]) by ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h328H9K37675; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:10 +0300 (EEST) Received: from theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (mantzios@localhost [127.0.0.1]) id h328H9CF028897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:09 +0300 Received: from localhost (mantzios@localhost)id h328H8ds028893; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:08 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr: mantzios owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:07 +0300 (EEST) From: Mantzios Achilleus To: Tom Samplonius In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:17:35 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mantzios Achilleus wrote: > > > I think the big battle will be between linux 2.6.x with NPTL, > > and FreeBSD 5.x with KSE. (Also Jeff Roberson's team has > > contributed a new 1:1 Threading implementation on FreeBSD) > ... > > Why would you want a 1:1 threading implementation? Some folks seem to have done some work on that: http://www-124.ibm.com/pthreads/docs/announcement http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/threads/threads.html http://www.freebsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=8108 > > Tom > ---------------------------------------------------------------- | go to the source -> http://www.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~mantzios | ---------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 00:42:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADFC37B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:42:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from sponsa.its.uu.se (sponsa.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8D43FA3 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:42:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) Received: from sponsa (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C21A9418D; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:40:59 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from sponsa.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by sponsa.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s43583; Wed, 2 Apr 03 10:40:51 +0200 Received: from irfu.se (jazz.irfu.se [130.238.30.195]) by sponsa.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFC64382; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:40:47 +0200 (MSZ) Message-ID: <3E8AA29D.5090204@irfu.se> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:43:09 +0200 From: Yuri Khotyaintsev Organization: Swedish Inst. of Space Physics User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; uk-UA; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: uk-UA, uk, ru, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Samplonius References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de cc: Mantzios Achilleus cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:42:25 -0000 Tom Samplonius wrote: > Why would you want a 1:1 threading implementation? > There is a thread on freebsd-arch on this question started several days ago. One of the main points is that 1:1 can be implemented already for 5.1-RELEASE, but KSE still needs time to mature. -- Dr. Yuri Khotyaintsev Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Division http://www.cluster.irfu.se/yuri From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 01:04:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629DD37B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:04:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF30B43FB1 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:04:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12) id 190eAD-0000FT-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:04:09 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:04:09 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Greg Lewis Message-ID: <20030402090409.GF725@starjuice.net> References: <3E898C29.3080501@bowtie.nl> <20030402014321.A70241@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030402014321.A70241@misty.eyesbeyond.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Sheldon Hearn cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jni.h and jni_md.h in jdk 1.4.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:04:28 -0000 On (2003/04/02 01:43), Greg Lewis wrote: > > So shouldn't that line read: > > > > #include "bsd/jni_md.h" > > No. No other JDK 1.4.1 does this, neither do 1.3.1, 1.2.2, etc. What > should probably be the case is that the file should be in a subdirectory > named freebsd rather than bsd, since I've commonly seen this detected > with the lowercase of `uname -s`. This would be in line with 1.3.1. Would we be shot for a symlink? Ciao, Sheldon. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 13:25:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483BB37B401 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:25:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from iota.root-servers.ch (iota.root-servers.ch [193.41.193.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA82D43F75 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:25:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gaml@buz.ch) Received: (qmail 11357 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 21:25:41 -0000 Received: from dclient80-218-107-72.hispeed.ch (HELO gaxp1800.root.li) (80.218.107.72) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 21:25:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:27:51 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Educational X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <111204538812.20030403232751@buz.ch> To: java@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Tomcat crashes with linux-sun-jdk14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gabriel Ambuehl List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 21:25:44 -0000 Hi, I wanted to test OpenCMS on FreeBSD and thus need to get Tomcat running. Now with linux-sun-jdk13 tomcat itself works but OpenCMS crashes as there isn't all the internalization stuff in there it needs. But with linux-sun-jdk14 I can't get Tomcat 4.1 to work anymore (built from ports). Catalina says: java.util.zip.ZipException: No such file or directory at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:112) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:117) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:55) at org.apache.catalina.loader.StandardClassLoader.addRepositoryInternal(StandardClassLoader.java:1082) at org.apache.catalina.loader.StandardClassLoader.(StandardClassLoader.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.startup.ClassLoaderFactory.createClassLoader(ClassLoaderFactory.java:202) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:140) Bootstrap: Class loader creation threw exception java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: addRepositoryInternal: java.util.zip.ZipException: No such file or directory at org.apache.catalina.loader.StandardClassLoader.addRepositoryInternal(StandardClassLoader.java:1110) at org.apache.catalina.loader.StandardClassLoader.(StandardClassLoader.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.startup.ClassLoaderFactory.createClassLoader(ClassLoaderFactory.java:202) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:140) I'd very much appreciate any pointers how to resolve this problem (same happens with blackdown-14 so that's not it, either). Oh and BTW, the IBM JDK 1.4 is broken, as glibc 2.2 is needed but doesn't get installed.